1
|
Bajowala SS. Sublingual immunotherapy as an option for effective food allergy treatment. JOURNAL OF FOOD ALLERGY 2022; 4:106-111. [PMID: 39021842 PMCID: PMC11250214 DOI: 10.2500/jfa.2022.4.220026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
Food allergy sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has demonstrated efficacy in inducing desensitization with lower rates of systemic adverse effects than oral immunotherapy (OIT). Long-term SLIT has been shown to induce sustained unresponsiveness, and there is evidence that high-dose SLIT protocols can achieve tolerance that approximates that of OIT. However, the cost of allergenic extract may make long-term, high-dose SLIT prohibitive. Consequently, some allergists have used food allergy SLIT as a temporary bridge to OIT. Other allergists have developed SLIT protocols by using suspensions prepared from whole foods instead of commercially available extracts. Because long-term maintenance dosing regimens for food allergy SLIT have not been standardized, studies are needed to determine the minimum effective doses and duration of food allergy SLIT for various foods. Clarity on these questions may open the door to establishing food allergy SLIT as a viable treatment option.
Collapse
|
2
|
Phelps A, Bruton K, Grydziuszko E, Koenig JFE, Jordana M. The Road Toward Transformative Treatments for Food Allergy. FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY 2022; 3:826623. [PMID: 35386642 PMCID: PMC8974751 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2022.826623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
A series of landmark studies have provided conclusive evidence that the early administration of food allergens dramatically prevents the emergence of food allergy. One of the greatest remaining challenges is whether patients with established food allergy can return to health. This challenge is particularly pressing in the case of allergies against peanut, tree nuts, fish, and shellfish which are lifelong in most patients and may elicit severe reactions. The standard of care for food allergy is allergen avoidance and the timely administration of epinephrine upon accidental exposure. Epinephrine, and other therapeutic options like antihistamines provide acute symptom relief but do not target the underlying pathology of the disease. In principle, any transformative treatment for established food allergy would require the restoration of a homeostatic immunological state. This may be attained through either an active, non-harmful immune response (immunological tolerance) or a lack of a harmful immune response (e.g., anergy), such that subsequent exposures to the allergen do not elicit a clinical reaction. Importantly, such a state must persist beyond the course of the treatment and exert its protective effects permanently. In this review, we will discuss the immunological mechanisms that maintain lifelong food allergies and are, consequently, those which must be dismantled or reprogrammed to instate a clinically non-reactive state. Arguably, the restoration of such a state in the context of an established food allergy would require a reprogramming of the immune response against a given food allergen. We will discuss existing and experimental therapeutic strategies to eliminate IgE reactivity and, lastly, will propose outstanding questions to pave the road to the development of novel, transformative therapeutics in food allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allyssa Phelps
- Department of Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre (MIRC), Schroeder Allergy and Immunology Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu Q, Wang X, Liao YP, Chang CH, Li J, Xia T, Nel AE. Use of a Liver-targeting Nanoparticle Platform to Intervene in Peanut-induced anaphylaxis through delivery of an Ara h2 T-cell Epitope. NANO TODAY 2022; 42:101370. [PMID: 36969911 PMCID: PMC10038170 DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
To address the urgent need for safe food allergen immunotherapy, we have developed a liver-targeting nanoparticle platform, capable of intervening in allergic inflammation, mast cell release and anaphylaxis through the generation of regulatory T-cells (Treg). In this communication, we demonstrate the use of a poly (lactide-co-glycolide acid) (PLGA) nanoparticle platform for intervening in peanut anaphylaxis through the encapsulation and delivery of a dominant protein allergen, Ara h 2 and representative T-cell epitopes, to liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs). These cells have the capacity to act as natural tolerogenic antigen-presenting cells (APC), capable of Treg generation by T-cell epitope presentation by histocompatibility (MHC) type II complexes on the LSEC surface. This allowed us to address the hypothesis that the tolerogenic nanoparticles platform could be used as an effective, safe, and scalable intervention for suppressing anaphylaxis to crude peanut allergen extract. Following the analysis of purified Ara h 2 and representative MHC-II epitopes Treg generation in vivo, a study was carried out to compare the best-performing Ara h 2 T-cell epitope with a purified Ara h 2 allergen, a crude peanut protein extract (CPPE) and a control peptide in an oral sensitization model. Prophylactic as well as post-sensitization administration of the dominant encapsulated Ara h 2 T-cell epitope was more effective than the purified Ara h2 in eliminating anaphylactic manifestations, hypothermia, and mast cell protease release in a frequently used peanut anaphylaxis model. This was accompanied by decreased peanut-specific IgE blood levels and increased TGF-β release in the abdominal cavity. The duration of the prophylactic effect was sustained for two months. These results demonstrate that targeted delivery of carefully selected T-cell epitopes to natural tolerogenic liver APC could serve as an effective platform for the treatment of peanut allergen anaphylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Liu
- Center of Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology (UC CEIN), University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Xiang Wang
- Center of Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology (UC CEIN), University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Yu-Pei Liao
- Center of Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology (UC CEIN), University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Chong Hyun Chang
- Center of Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology (UC CEIN), University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Jiulong Li
- Center of Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology (UC CEIN), University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Tian Xia
- Center of Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology (UC CEIN), University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- Division of NanoMedicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Andre E. Nel
- Center of Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology (UC CEIN), University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- Division of NanoMedicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tontini C, Bulfone-Paus S. Novel Approaches in the Inhibition of IgE-Induced Mast Cell Reactivity in Food Allergy. Front Immunol 2021; 12:613461. [PMID: 34456900 PMCID: PMC8387944 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.613461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Allergy is an IgE-dependent type-I hypersensitivity reaction that can lead to life-threatening systemic symptoms such as anaphylaxis. In the pathogenesis of the allergic response, the common upstream event is the binding of allergens to specific IgE, inducing cross-linking of the high-affinity FcεRI on mast cells, triggering cellular degranulation and the release of histamine, proteases, lipids mediators, cytokines and chemokines with inflammatory activity. A number of novel therapeutic options to curb mast cell activation are in the pipeline for the treatment of severe allergies. In addition to anti-IgE therapy and allergen-specific immunotherapy, monoclonal antibodies targeted against several key Th2/alarmin cytokines (i.e. IL-4Rα, IL-33, TSLP), active modification of allergen-specific IgE (i.e. inhibitory compounds, monoclonal antibodies, de-sialylation), engagement of inhibitory receptors on mast cells and allergen-specific adjuvant vaccines, are new promising options to inhibit the uncontrolled release of mast cell mediators upon allergen exposure. In this review, we critically discuss the novel approaches targeting mast cells limiting allergic responses and the immunological mechanisms involved, with special interest on food allergy treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Tontini
- Lydia Becker Institute for Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Silvia Bulfone-Paus
- Lydia Becker Institute for Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tsai M, Mukai K, Chinthrajah RS, Nadeau KC, Galli SJ. Sustained successful peanut oral immunotherapy associated with low basophil activation and peanut-specific IgE. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020; 145:885-896.e6. [PMID: 31805311 PMCID: PMC6957313 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.10.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Revised: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/31/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral immunotherapy (OIT) can successfully desensitize many peanut-allergic subjects, but clinical tolerance diminishes over time on discontinuation, or low-dose maintenance, of peanut. Therefore, to improve the efficacy and sustainability of such therapy, we sought to identify biomarkers and clinical tools that can predict therapeutic outcomes and monitor treatment responses. OBJECTIVE We evaluated whether basophil activation in whole blood, and plasma levels of peanut-specific immunoglobulins, are useful biomarkers for peanut OIT. METHODS We longitudinally measured, before, during, and after OIT, basophil activation in whole blood ex vivo in response to peanut stimulation, and peanut-specific IgE (sIgE) and peanut-specific IgG4 (sIgG4), in a large, single-site, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 peanut OIT study. We compared basophil responsiveness and peanut-specific immunoglobulins between those who were clinically reactive and those who were tolerant to peanut oral challenges. RESULTS Peanut OIT significantly decreased basophil activation, peanut sIgE, Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Ara h 3 IgE levels, and sIgE/total IgE, but increased sIgG4/sIgE. Participants who became reactive to 4 g of peanut 13 weeks off active OIT exhibited higher peanut-induced basophil activation ex vivo and higher peanut sIgE levels and sIgE/total IgE, but lower sIgG4/sIgE. Notably, participants entering the study with low basophil responsiveness were more likely to achieve treatment success. Substantial suppression of basophil activation was required to maintain long-term clinical tolerance after peanut OIT. CONCLUSIONS Assessments of peanut-induced basophil activation and peanut-specific immunoglobulins can help to predict treatment outcomes, and to differentiate transient desensitization versus sustained unresponsiveness after OIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mindy Tsai
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif
| | - Kaori Mukai
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif
| | - R Sharon Chinthrajah
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif
| | - Kari C Nadeau
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif
| | - Stephen J Galli
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Robison RG. Emerging Food Allergy Treatments. Pediatr Ann 2019; 48:e468-e472. [PMID: 31830285 DOI: 10.3928/19382359-20191114-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergy affects up to 8% of the pediatric population and occurs when a person develops antibodies to specific food proteins resulting in immediate reaction upon ingestion of the food in question. Current treatment revolves around strict allergen avoidance and prompt treatment of systemic, anaphylactic reactions with injectable epinephrine. However, despite strict avoidance, unexpected reactions are a significant problem. Therefore, therapeutic options for treatment of food allergy are in high demand. This article focuses on emerging therapies including oral immunotherapy, sublingual immunotherapy, epicutaneous immunotherapy, and possible adjunct therapies for the treatment and desensitization of IgE-mediated food allergy. [Pediatr Ann. 2019;48(12):e468-e472.].
Collapse
|
7
|
Baker MG, Wang J. Could This Be IT? Epicutaneous, Sublingual, and Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Food Allergies. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2019; 19:53. [PMID: 31768649 DOI: 10.1007/s11882-019-0885-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Over the last decade, there has been a spark in innovation in the development of therapies for food allergy. Herein, we describe the background and recent advances for food-specific immunotherapies including epicutaneous (EPIT), sublingual (SLIT), and subcutaneous (SCIT). RECENT FINDINGS Studies have progressed most quickly for the treatment of peanut allergy. Data from the phase 3 EPIT trial add to the accumulating evidence that this will be a viable therapy for peanut allergy. Studies for SLIT and SCIT remain in earlier phases with promising results. This is an exciting era for the treatment of food allergy. Multiple therapies are under investigation, each with their own potential advantages. Specific strengths and limitations of each of these therapies may provide an opportunity to personalize the choice of therapy for individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Grace Baker
- Division of Pediatric Allergy & Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Elliot and Roslyn Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L Levy Place, Box 1198, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Julie Wang
- Division of Pediatric Allergy & Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Elliot and Roslyn Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L Levy Place, Box 1198, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Samstein M, Ponda P. The Clinical Utility of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2019; 7:2503-2504. [PMID: 36443999 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Revised: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/18/2019] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Samstein
- Division of Allergy Immunology, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY.
| | - Punita Ponda
- Division of Allergy Immunology, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hong J, Xiao X, Gao Q, Li S, Jiang B, Sun X, Ran P, Yang P. Co-delivery of allergen epitope fragments and R848 inhibits food allergy by inducing tolerogenic dendritic cells and regulatory T cells. Int J Nanomedicine 2019; 14:7053-7064. [PMID: 31564865 PMCID: PMC6722440 DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s215415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Food allergy (FA) is a significant public health problem. The therapeutic efficacy for FA is unsatisfactory currently. The breakdown of intestinal immune tolerance is associated with the pathogenesis of FA. Therefore, it is of great significance to develop novel therapeutic methods to restore immune tolerance in treating FA. METHODS We proposed an oral administration strategy to treat FA by co-delivering food allergen epitope fragment (peptide: IK) and adjuvant R848 (TLR7 ligand) in the mPEG-PDLLA nanoparticles (PPLA-IK/R848 NPs). The generation of tolerogenic dendritic cells (DCs) and regulatory T cells (Tregs) induced by PPLA-IK/R848 NPs were evaluated in vitro and in vivo. The therapeutic effects of PPLA-IK/R848 NPs were also assessed in an OVA-induced FA model. RESULTS PPLA-IK/R848 NPs could efficiently deliver IK to DCs to drive DCs into the tolerogenic phenotypes and promote the differentiation of Tregs in vitro and in vivo, significantly inhibited FA responses through the recovery of intestinal immune tolerance. CONCLUSION Oral administration of PPLA-IK/R848 NPs could efficiently deliver IK and R848 to intestinal DCs and stimulate DCs into allergen tolerogenic phenotype. These tolerogenic DCs could promote the differentiation of Tregs, which significantly protected mice from food allergic responses. This study provided an efficient formulation to alleviate FA through the recovery of immune tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyi Hong
- Department of Allergy, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518020, People’s Republic of China
- Research Center of Allergy & Immunology, Department of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518055, People’s Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou510006, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaojun Xiao
- Research Center of Allergy & Immunology, Department of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518055, People’s Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou510006, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qichan Gao
- Research Center of Allergy & Immunology, Department of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518055, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shanshan Li
- Research Center of Allergy & Immunology, Department of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518055, People’s Republic of China
| | - Bei Jiang
- Research Center of Allergy & Immunology, Department of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518055, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xizhuo Sun
- Department of Allergy, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518020, People’s Republic of China
| | - Pixin Ran
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou510006, People’s Republic of China
| | - Pingchang Yang
- Research Center of Allergy & Immunology, Department of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518055, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Burks AW, Sampson HA, Plaut M, Lack G, Akdis CA. Treatment for food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2019; 141:1-9. [PMID: 29307409 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Revised: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 11/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The prevalence of IgE-mediated food allergy is an increasing public health concern effecting millions of persons worldwide. The current standard of treatment is strict avoidance of the offending food or foods, and to date, there are no regulatory approved treatments for food allergy. A significant amount of research has been directed at various forms of food immunotherapy, including oral, sublingual, and epicutaneous delivery routes. Although oral immunotherapy has shown the greatest promise for efficacy in terms of the amount of protein that can be ingested, it has also demonstrated less tolerability and a less favorable safety profile compared with sublingual immunotherapy and epicutaneous immunotherapy, which offers the least protection but has the best safety and tolerability profile. Studies have been conducted with adding adjuvants and anti-IgE to enhance either the efficacy or safety of food immunotherapy. Multiple concepts of food immunotherapy beyond these first-generation treatments are in either animal or early phase 1 studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Wesley Burks
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
| | - Hugh A Sampson
- The Elliot and Roslyn Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Kravis Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Marshall Plaut
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Md
| | - Gideon Lack
- Department of Paediatric Allergy, Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cezmi A Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University of Zurich, Davos, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vickery BP, Ebisawa M, Shreffler WG, Wood RA. Current and Future Treatment of Peanut Allergy. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2019; 7:357-365. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.11.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Revised: 11/08/2018] [Accepted: 11/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
12
|
Dantzer JA, Wood RA. Next-Generation Approaches for the Treatment of Food Allergy. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2019; 19:5. [PMID: 30689123 DOI: 10.1007/s11882-019-0839-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW IgE-mediated food allergies are an increasing health concern, and current management includes food avoidance and use of emergency medications. Effective treatment of food allergy is highly desirable. Next generation approaches for the treatment of food allergy aim to improve both safety and efficacy, potentially including long-term tolerance. RECENT FINDINGS Oral immunotherapy (OIT) and epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) will likely be integrated into clinical practice as part of food allergy management in the near future. Newer approaches, such as sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), modified proteins, lysosomal-associated membrane protein DNA (LAMP DNA) vaccines, and the use of immunomodulatory agents, are early in development and depending on results, could also become important treatment options. This is a review of novel approaches to the treatment of food allergy that are currently under investigation, including the use of SLIT, modified proteins, probiotics, Chinese herbal supplements, biologic therapies, and DNA vaccines, as well as a summary of the current status of OIT and EPIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Dantzer
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, John Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., CMSC 1102, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Robert A Wood
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, John Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., CMSC 1102, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Psychosocial Mediators of Change and Patient Selection Factors in Oral Immunotherapy Trials. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2018; 55:217-236. [PMID: 30284193 DOI: 10.1007/s12016-018-8700-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is influenced by physiological, psychological, and environmental variables and can be best understood by considering the interactions of factors that cut across multiple levels. One of the most important issues relating to treatment in food allergy is to identify, describe, and define predictors that may contribute to modify HRQL outcomes. The research presented demonstrates that measures of HRQL are able to distinguish key features of known groups (e.g. relating to reaction severity, treatment, allergen type/number, expectation of outcome) and delineate impact on hitherto unknown groups (e.g. relating to personality types and coping styles). This heterogeneity may explain why HRQL or other patient-related outcomes may differ in individuals during, or following any treatment or intervention. Patient-reported outcomes are relatively poorly defined to date. Since HRQL has only been studied in relatively few oral immunotherapy trials to date, primarily looking at caregiver HRQL, it is unclear which factors, measures, or subscales are most predictive of short- and/or long-term treatment outcomes for which type of patient, and which time points for measurement are most informative. A standardised protocol that incorporates HRQL and other relevant patient-related outcome measures and agreed definitions of outcomes would allow for the comparison of efficacy of food allergy treatments between centres, trials, or countries. Further evidence-based research aimed at exploring the effects of interventions on outcomes in food allergy is needed, including the influence of patient and parent factors on protocol design. To this end, it is vital that patient-related outcomes such as improved HRQL are seen as a primary outcome and are measured at multiple intervals during the trial duration and beyond. The creative use of methods and designs (both qualitative and quantitative) to better understand the role of HRQL in immunotherapy treatment trials will enable improved modelling of the costs, risks, and benefits of any treatment. Systematic analysis and modelling of antecedent factors, mediators, and outcomes will be important to boost intervention effects and to maximise the overall benefits of treatment.
Collapse
|
14
|
Oral and Sublingual Immunotherapy for Treatment of IgE-Mediated Food Allergy. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2018; 55:139-152. [PMID: 29656306 DOI: 10.1007/s12016-018-8677-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Development of active therapies for IgE-mediated food allergy is a critical action step toward alleviating the adverse medical, psychosocial, and economic burdens on affected patients and families. Significant progress has been observed specifically in the application of single-allergen oral and sublingual immunotherapy for treatment of IgE-mediated food allergy, with emphasis on milk, egg, and peanut as the primary allergens. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) has demonstrated efficacy in promoting immunomodulatory effects that lead to the clinical outcome of desensitization, defined as reduced reactivity while on active OIT, in the majority of treated individuals; however, achievement of sustained unresponsiveness following cessation of therapy has been observed in a smaller subset of treated subjects. The potential therapeutic benefits of OIT must be carefully considered in light of the significant potential for adverse events ranging from self-limited or easily treated oropharyngeal, respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms, to persistent abdominal complaints that lead to cessation of therapy in an estimated 10-15% of treated individuals. To date, the majority of studies have focused on single-allergen OIT approaches; however, multi-allergen OIT has shown promise in initial trials and is the subject of ongoing investigation to address the complex needs of multi-food allergic individuals. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been utilized for the treatment of food allergy and pollen-food allergy syndrome, demonstrating moderate efficacy, a favorable safety profile and variable tolerability, with oropharyngeal symptoms most commonly observed. Although studies directly comparing OIT and SLIT are limited, in general, the favorable safety profile associated with SLIT comes at the expense of reduced efficacy, while the more robust clinical effects observed with OIT come at the risk of potentially intolerable, treatment-limiting side effects. Future investigation to address specific knowledge gaps including optimal dose, duration, age of initiation, maintenance schedule, mechanisms, predictors of risk and therapeutic response will be important to maximize efficacy, minimize risk and develop personalized, effective approaches to targeting food allergy.
Collapse
|
15
|
The Use of Biomarkers to Predict Aero-Allergen and Food Immunotherapy Responses. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2018; 55:190-204. [PMID: 29455358 DOI: 10.1007/s12016-018-8678-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of allergic conditions has continued to rise over the past several decades, with a growing body of research dedicated toward the treatment of such conditions. By driving a complex range of changes in the underlying immune response, immunotherapy is the only therapy that modulates the immune system with long-term effects and is presently utilized for the treatment of several atopic conditions. Recent efforts have focused on identifying biomarkers associated with these changes that may be of use in predicting patients with the highest likelihood of positive clinical outcomes during allergen immunotherapy (AIT), providing guidance regarding AIT discontinuation, and predicting symptomatic relapse and the need for booster AIT after therapy. The identification of such biomarkers in food allergy has the additional benefit of replacing oral food challenges, which are presently the gold standard for diagnosing food allergies. While several markers have shown early promise, research has yet to identify a marker that can invariably predict clinical response to AIT. Skin prick testing (SPT) and specific IgE have commonly been used as inclusion criteria for the initiation of AIT and prediction of reactions during subsequent allergen challenge; however, existing data suggests that changes in these markers are not always associated with clinical improvement and can be widely variable, reducing their utility in predicting clinical response. Similar findings have been described for the use of allergen-specific functional IgG4 antibodies, basophil activation and histamine release, and type 2 innate lymphoid cells. There appears to be a promising association between changes in the expression of dendritic cell-associated markers, as well as the use of DNA promoter region methylation patterns in the prediction of allergy status following therapy. The cellular and molecular changes brought about by immunotherapy are still under investigation, but major strides in our understanding are being made.
Collapse
|
16
|
Orgel K, Burk C, Smeekens J, Suber J, Hardy L, Guo R, Burks AW, Kulis M. Blocking antibodies induced by peanut oral and sublingual immunotherapy suppress basophil activation and are associated with sustained unresponsiveness. Clin Exp Allergy 2018; 49:461-470. [PMID: 30383313 PMCID: PMC6438743 DOI: 10.1111/cea.13305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2018] [Revised: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral and sublingual immunotherapies for peanut allergy have demonstrated efficacy in small clinical trials; however, mechanisms and biomarkers correlating with clinical outcomes remain elusive. Previous studies have demonstrated a role for IgG in post-OIT plasma in the suppression of IgE-mediated mast cell reactions. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to characterize the role that peanut oral and sublingual immunotherapy-induced plasma factors play in the inhibition of ex vivo basophil activation and whether inhibitory activity is associated with clinical outcomes. METHODS Plasma samples from subjects on placebo, peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT) or peanut sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), and IgG-depleted plasma or the IgG fraction were incubated with sensitized basophils, and the inhibition of basophil activation following stimulation with peanut extract was measured. Basophil inhibition results were compared between the two routes of immunotherapy, time on treatment and clinical outcomes. RESULTS Plasma from subjects after 12 months of active peanut OIT, but not placebo, inhibits basophil activation ex vivo. Depletion of IgG abrogated the blocking effect of OIT plasma, while the IgG fraction substantially blocked basophil activation. Basophils are inhibited to a similar extent by undiluted OIT and SLIT plasma; however, diluted OIT plasma from the time of desensitization challenge inhibited basophils more than diluted SLIT plasma from time of desensitization challenge. Plasma from subjects who experienced sustained unresponsiveness following OIT inhibited basophils to a greater extent than plasma from subjects who were desensitized, but this was not true for SLIT. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Peanut immunotherapy induces IgG-dependent functional changes in plasma that are associated with OIT but not SLIT clinical outcomes. Understanding the mechanisms of peanut OIT and SLIT may help derive informative biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Orgel
- Department of Pediatrics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,UNC Food Allergy Initiative, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Caitlin Burk
- Department of Pediatrics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,UNC Food Allergy Initiative, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Johanna Smeekens
- Department of Pediatrics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,UNC Food Allergy Initiative, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jada Suber
- Department of Pediatrics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,UNC Food Allergy Initiative, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Lakeya Hardy
- Department of Pediatrics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,UNC Food Allergy Initiative, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Rishu Guo
- Department of Pediatrics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,UNC Food Allergy Initiative, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - A Wesley Burks
- Department of Pediatrics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,UNC Food Allergy Initiative, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Michael Kulis
- Department of Pediatrics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,UNC Food Allergy Initiative, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhang W, Sindher SB, Sampath V, Nadeau K. Comparison of sublingual immunotherapy and oral immunotherapy in peanut allergy. ALLERGO JOURNAL 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s15007-018-1688-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
18
|
Zhang W, Sindher SB, Sampath V, Nadeau K. Comparison of sublingual immunotherapy and oral immunotherapy in peanut allergy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 27:153-161. [PMID: 31440440 DOI: 10.1007/s40629-018-0067-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The prevalence of food allergy has been increasing over the past few decades at an alarming rate with peanut allergy affecting about 2% of children. Both oral immunotherapy (OIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) have shown promise as a treatment option for peanut allergy. Immunotherapy induces desensitization and reduces the risk of reaction during accidental ingestion and may also enable those who are successfully desensitized to include the food allergen in their diet. OIT has been very well studied and has been found to be more efficacious that SLIT with an acceptable safety profile. However, SLIT is associated with fewer side effects. Studies indicate that a combination of SLIT and OIT may together induce a significant increase in challenge thresholds with fewer adverse events. More head-to-head clinical trials that direct compare OIT and SLIT as well as SLIT and OIT combination studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenming Zhang
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
| | - Sayantani B Sindher
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
| | - Vanitha Sampath
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
| | - Kari Nadeau
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.,Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fauquert JL, Michaud E, Pereira B, Bernard L, Gourdon-Dubois N, Rouzaire PO, Rochette E, Merlin E, Evrard B. Peanut gastrointestinal delivery oral immunotherapy in adolescents: Results of the build-up phase of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PITA study). Clin Exp Allergy 2018; 48:862-874. [PMID: 29665158 DOI: 10.1111/cea.13148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Revised: 04/06/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral immunotherapy to peanut is effective in desensitizing patients but has significant side effects including anaphylaxis and gastrointestinal symptoms. In most protocols, peanut is administered in a vehicle food. OBJECTIVE In an exclusively adolescent population, we tested a new approach using sealed capsules of peanut (gastrointestinal delivery oral immunotherapy or GIDOIT) to bypass the upper gastrointestinal tract. The primary aim was to assess the efficacy of the oral build-up phase of GIDOIT and the secondary aim to analyse its safety. METHODS Adolescents with a history of a clinical allergic reaction after peanut ingestion were included in a 2-armed, parallel-design, individually randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial after a positive double-blind placebo-controlled oral food challenge (DBPCFC1). A central randomization centre used computer-generated tables to allocate treatments. Peanut (or placebo) capsules were ingested daily over a period of 24 weeks with increments every 2 weeks from 2 to 400 mg of peanut protein (pp). Primary outcome was tolerance of 400 mg of pp at DBPCFC2. RESULTS Thirty patients were included between September 2013 and May 2014. At DBPCFC2, unresponsiveness to 400 mg of pp was achieved in 17/21 peanut group patients (2 withdrawn patients) and 1/9 in the placebo group (Intention-to-treat analysis, P < .001, absolute difference = 0.7, 95%IC 0.43 0.96). Oropharyngeal symptoms were equally frequent in both groups. No dysphagia or other signs of eosinophilic oesophagitis occurred. Digestive adverse events (AE) were more frequent in the treated group (P = .02), but mild and without compliance issues. Only one severe advent event led to withdrawal in a patient who ingested twice the investigated treatment. Peanut-specific humoral immune responses were modulated. CONCLUSION The GIDOIT protocol demonstrated clinical and immunological efficacy and had an acceptable level of safety with weak oropharyngeal symptoms, no dysphagia, mild digestive events and few severe systemic AE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J-L Fauquert
- Unité d'allergologie de l'enfant, CHU Estaing, Pole pédiatrique, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,INSERM CIC 1405, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - E Michaud
- Unité d'allergologie de l'enfant, CHU Estaing, Pole pédiatrique, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,INSERM CIC 1405, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - B Pereira
- Unité de Biostatistiques, Direction de la Recherche Clinique et Innovation (DRCI), CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - L Bernard
- Département de Pharmacie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - N Gourdon-Dubois
- Unité d'allergologie de l'enfant, CHU Estaing, Pole pédiatrique, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,INSERM CIC 1405, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - P-O Rouzaire
- Service d'Immunologie, CHU Gabriel-Montpied, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,UFR Pharmacie, ERTICa, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - E Rochette
- INSERM CIC 1405, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - E Merlin
- Unité d'allergologie de l'enfant, CHU Estaing, Pole pédiatrique, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,INSERM CIC 1405, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,UFR Médecine, UMR1019 UNH, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - B Evrard
- Service d'Immunologie, CHU Gabriel-Montpied, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,UFR Pharmacie, ERTICa, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sicherer SH, Sampson HA. Food allergy: A review and update on epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and management. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2017; 141:41-58. [PMID: 29157945 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 890] [Impact Index Per Article: 127.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2017] [Revised: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 11/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This review provides general information to serve as a primer for those embarking on understanding food allergy and also details advances and updates in epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment that have occurred over the 4 years since our last comprehensive review. Although firm prevalence data are lacking, there is a strong impression that food allergy has increased, and rates as high as approximately 10% have been documented. Genetic, epigenetic, and environmental risk factors are being elucidated increasingly, creating potential for improved prevention and treatment strategies targeted to those at risk. Insights on pathophysiology reveal a complex interplay of the epithelial barrier, mucosal and systemic immune response, route of exposure, and microbiome among other influences resulting in allergy or tolerance. The diagnosis of food allergy is largely reliant on medical history, tests for sensitization, and oral food challenges, but emerging use of component-resolved diagnostics is improving diagnostic accuracy. Additional novel diagnostics, such as basophil activation tests, determination of epitope binding, DNA methylation signatures, and bioinformatics approaches, will further change the landscape. A number of prevention strategies are under investigation, but early introduction of peanut has been advised as a public health measure based on existing data. Management remains largely based on allergen avoidance, but a panoply of promising treatment strategies are in phase 2 and 3 studies, providing immense hope that better treatment will be imminently and widely available, whereas numerous additional promising treatments are in the preclinical and clinical pipeline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott H Sicherer
- Elliot and Roslyn Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Kravis Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
| | - Hugh A Sampson
- Elliot and Roslyn Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Kravis Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hamad A, Burks WA. Emerging Approaches to Food Desensitization in Children. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2017; 17:32. [PMID: 28429307 DOI: 10.1007/s11882-017-0700-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to highlight the recent advances in food desensitization in children with food allergy. RECENT FINDINGS Recent advancements in epicutaneous, sublingual, and oral immunotherapy for food allergy in the future may offer children with food allergy and their families a viable option to reduce risk or severity of anaphylaxis with phase III trials ongoing for two of these treatment modalities. Food allergy prevalence in children is estimated to be up to 8%. These children are at risk of significant allergic reactions and anaphylaxis. Food avoidance and use of antihistamines or epinephrine has been the standard of care for these patients. This approach also has a significant socioeconomic effects on patients and their families. Recent advancements in understanding food allergy have allowed for exploring new methods of treatment. There is an increasing interest in oral immunotherapy, epicutaneous immunotherapy, or sublingual immunotherapy for food allergy. There have been also innovative approaches to immunotherapy by modification of food allergens (to make them less allergenic while maintain their immunogenicity) or adding adjunctive treatments (probiotics, anti-IgE, etc.) to increase efficacy or safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Hamad
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, 27517, USA.
| | - Wesley A Burks
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Oral immunotherapy for food allergy: A Spanish guideline. Egg and milk immunotherapy Spanish guide (ITEMS GUIDE). Part 2: Maintenance phase of cow milk (CM) and egg oral immunotherapy (OIT), special treatment dosing schedules. Models of dosing schedules of OIT with CM and EGG. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2017; 45:508-518. [PMID: 28676231 DOI: 10.1016/j.aller.2017.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2017] [Accepted: 05/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cow's milk and egg are the most frequent causes of food allergy in the first years of life. Treatments such as oral immunotherapy (OIT) have been investigated as an alternative to avoidance diets. No clinical practice guides on the management of OIT with milk and egg are currently available. OBJECTIVES To develop a clinical guide on OIT based on the available scientific evidence and the opinions of experts. METHODS A review was made of studies published in the period between 1984 and June 2016, Doctoral Theses published in Spain, and summaries of communications at congresses (SEAIC, SEICAP, EAACI, AAAAI), with evaluation of the opinion consensus established by a group of experts pertaining to the scientific societies SEICAP and SEAIC. RESULTS Recommendations have been established regarding the indications, requirements and practical aspects of the different phases of OIT, as well as special protocols for patients at high risk of suffering adverse reactions. CONCLUSIONS A clinical practice guide is presented for the management of OIT with milk and egg, based on the opinion consensus of Spanish experts.
Collapse
|
23
|
Moingeon P, Mascarell L. Differences and similarities between sublingual immunotherapy of allergy and oral tolerance. Semin Immunol 2017; 30:52-60. [PMID: 28760498 DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2017.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2017] [Accepted: 07/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy is the only treatment altering the natural course of IgE-mediated allergies. Whereas the subcutaneous route for immunotherapy (SCIT) has been historically considered as a reference, we discuss herein the relative advantages of the sublingual and oral routes as alternatives to SCIT in order to elicit allergen-specific tolerance. The buccal and gut immune systems are similarly organized to favor immune tolerance to antigens/allergens, due to the presence of tolerogenic dendritic cells and macrophages promoting the differentiation of CD4+ regulatory T cells. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is now established as a valid treatment option, with clinical efficacy demonstrated in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (to either grass, tree, weed pollens or mite allergens) and encouraging results obtained in the management of mild/moderate allergic asthma. While still exploratory, oral immunotherapy (OIT) has shown promising results in the desensitization of patients with food allergies. We review at both biological and clinical levels the perspectives currently pursued for those two mucosal routes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Moingeon
- Research Department, Stallergenes Greer, 6 rue Alexis de Tocqueville, 92160 Antony, France.
| | - Laurent Mascarell
- Research Department, Stallergenes Greer, 6 rue Alexis de Tocqueville, 92160 Antony, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
|
25
|
Berglund JP, Szczepanski N, Penumarti A, Beavers A, Kesselring J, Orgel K, Burnett B, Burks AW, Kulis M. Preparation and Analysis of Peanut Flour Used in Oral Immunotherapy Clinical Trials. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2017; 5:1098-1104. [PMID: 28132800 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.11.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2016] [Revised: 11/06/2016] [Accepted: 11/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is an investigational therapeutic approach for the treatment of food allergies. Characterization of the drug product used in oral immunotherapy trials for peanut allergy has not been reported. OBJECTIVE To quantify relative amounts of the major peanut allergens and microbial load present in peanut flour used in OIT trials and assess whether these parameters change over a 12-month period. We also anticipate that this report will serve as a guide for investigators seeking to conduct OIT trials under Food and Drug Administration-approved Investigational New Drug applications. METHODS Densitometric scanning of Ara h 1 and Ara h 2 resolved on SDS-PAGE gels was used to assess allergen content in peanut flour extracts. Microbial testing was conducted on peanut flour under US Pharmacopeia guidelines for the presence of Escherichia coli, salmonella, yeast, mold, and total aerobic bacteria. In addition, aflatoxin was quantified in peanut flour. Reported results were obtained from 4 unique lots of peanut flour. RESULTS Relative amounts of the major peanut allergens were similar between different lots of peanut flour and remained stable over a 12-month period. E coli and salmonella were absent from all lots of flour. Yeast, mold, total aerobic bacteria, and aflatoxin were within established US Pharmacopeia guidelines on all lots tested and remained within the criteria over a 12-month period. CONCLUSIONS Peanut flour used as a drug product contains the major peanut allergens and has low levels of potentially harmful microbes. Both these parameters remain stable over a 12-month period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelena P Berglund
- Duke Translational Medicine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Nicole Szczepanski
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Anusha Penumarti
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Ayeshia Beavers
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Janelle Kesselring
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kelly Orgel
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Bruce Burnett
- Duke Translational Medicine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - A Wesley Burks
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Michael Kulis
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jones SM, Sicherer SH, Burks AW, Leung DYM, Lindblad RW, Dawson P, Henning AK, Berin MC, Chiang D, Vickery BP, Pesek RD, Cho CB, Davidson WF, Plaut M, Sampson HA, Wood RA. Epicutaneous immunotherapy for the treatment of peanut allergy in children and young adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016; 139:1242-1252.e9. [PMID: 28091362 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 227] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2016] [Revised: 07/18/2016] [Accepted: 08/16/2016] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peanut allergy is common, life-threatening, and without therapeutic options. We evaluated peanut epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) by using Viaskin Peanut for peanut allergy treatment. OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate the clinical, safety, and immunologic effects of EPIT for the treatment of peanut allergy. METHODS In this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 74 participants with peanut allergy (ages 4-25 years) were treated with placebo (n = 25), Viaskin Peanut 100 μg (VP100; n = 24) or Viaskin Peanut 250 μg (VP250; n = 25; DBV Technologies, Montrouge, France). The primary outcome was treatment success after 52 weeks, which was defined as passing a 5044-mg protein oral food challenge or achieving a 10-fold or greater increase in successfully consumed dose from baseline to week 52. Adverse reactions and mechanistic changes were assessed. RESULTS At week 52, treatment success was achieved in 3 (12%) placebo-treated participants, 11 (46%) VP100 participants, and 12 (48%) VP250 participants (P = .005 and P = .003, respectively, compared with placebo; VP100 vs VP250, P = .48). Median change in successfully consumed doses were 0, 43, and 130 mg of protein in the placebo, VP100, and VP250 groups, respectively (placebo vs VP100, P = .014; placebo vs VP250, P = .003). Treatment success was higher among younger children (P = .03; age, 4-11 vs >11 years). Overall, 14.4% of placebo doses and 79.8% of VP100 and VP250 doses resulted in reactions, predominantly local patch-site and mild reactions (P = .003). Increases in peanut-specific IgG4 levels and IgG4/IgE ratios were observed in peanut EPIT-treated participants, along with trends toward reduced basophil activation and peanut-specific TH2 cytokines. CONCLUSIONS Peanut EPIT administration was safe and associated with a modest treatment response after 52 weeks, with the highest responses among younger children. This, when coupled with a high adherence and retention rate and significant changes in immune pathways, supports further investigation of this novel therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacie M Jones
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, Ark.
| | - Scott H Sicherer
- Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - A Wesley Burks
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | | | | | - M Cecilia Berin
- Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - David Chiang
- Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Brian P Vickery
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Robbie D Pesek
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, Ark
| | | | - Wendy F Davidson
- National Institutes of Health (National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases), Bethesda, Md
| | - Marshall Plaut
- National Institutes of Health (National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases), Bethesda, Md
| | - Hugh A Sampson
- Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Robert A Wood
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Food allergy has grown in rapidly in prevalence, currently affecting 5% of adults and 8% of children. Management strategy is currently limited to 1) food avoidance and 2) carrying and using rescue intramuscular epinephrine/adrenaline and oral antihistamines in the case of accidental ingestion; there is no FDA approved treatment. Recently, oral, sublingual and epicutaneous immunotherapy have been developed as active treatment of food allergy, though none have completed phase 3 study. Efficacy and safety studies of immunotherapy have been variable, though there is clearly signal that immunotherapy will be a viable option to desensitize patients. The use of bacterial adjuvants, anti-IgE monoclonal antibodies, and Chinese herbal formulations either alone or in addition to immunotherapy may hold promise as future options for active treatment. Active prevention of food allergy through early introduction of potentially offending foods in high-risk infants will be an important means to slow the rising incidence of sensitization.
Collapse
|
28
|
MacGinnitie AJ, Rachid R, Gragg H, Little SV, Lakin P, Cianferoni A, Heimall J, Makhija M, Robison R, Chinthrajah RS, Lee J, Lebovidge J, Dominguez T, Rooney C, Lewis MO, Koss J, Burke-Roberts E, Chin K, Logvinenko T, Pongracic JA, Umetsu DT, Spergel J, Nadeau KC, Schneider LC. Omalizumab facilitates rapid oral desensitization for peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016; 139:873-881.e8. [PMID: 27609658 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 203] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2016] [Revised: 08/03/2016] [Accepted: 08/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peanut oral immunotherapy is a promising approach to peanut allergy, but reactions are frequent, and some patients cannot be desensitized. The anti-IgE medication omalizumab (Xolair; Genentech, South San Francisco, Calif) might allow more rapid peanut updosing and decrease reactions. OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate whether omalizumab facilitated rapid peanut desensitization in highly allergic patients. METHODS Thirty-seven subjects were randomized to omalizumab (n = 29) or placebo (n = 8). After 12 weeks of treatment, subjects underwent a rapid 1-day desensitization of up to 250 mg of peanut protein, followed by weekly increases up to 2000 mg. Omalizumab was then discontinued, and subjects continued on 2000 mg of peanut protein. Subjects underwent an open challenge to 4000 mg of peanut protein 12 weeks after stopping study drug. If tolerated, subjects continued on 4000 mg of peanut protein daily. RESULTS The median peanut dose tolerated on the initial desensitization day was 250 mg for omalizumab-treated subjects versus 22.5 mg for placebo-treated subject. Subsequently, 23 (79%) of 29 subjects randomized to omalizumab tolerated 2000 mg of peanut protein 6 weeks after stopping omalizumab versus 1 (12%) of 8 receiving placebo (P < .01). Twenty-three subjects receiving omalizumab versus 1 subject receiving placebo passed the 4000-mg food challenge. Overall reaction rates were not significantly lower in omalizumab-treated versus placebo-treated subjects (odds ratio, 0.57; P = .15), although omalizumab-treated subjects were exposed to much higher peanut doses. CONCLUSION Omalizumab allows subjects with peanut allergy to be rapidly desensitized over as little as 8 weeks of peanut oral immunotherapy. In the majority of subjects, this desensitization is sustained after omalizumab is discontinued. Additional studies will help clarify which patients would benefit most from this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rima Rachid
- Division of Immunology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Hana Gragg
- Clinical Research Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Sara V Little
- Division of Immunology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Paul Lakin
- Clinical Research Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | | | - Jennifer Heimall
- Division of Allergy, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa
| | - Melanie Makhija
- Allergy Division, the Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Ill
| | - Rachel Robison
- Allergy Division, the Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Ill
| | - R Sharon Chinthrajah
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Lucille Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, Calif
| | - John Lee
- Division of Immunology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | | | - Tina Dominguez
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Lucille Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, Calif
| | - Courtney Rooney
- Division of Allergy, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa
| | - Megan Ott Lewis
- Division of Allergy, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa
| | - Jennifer Koss
- Allergy Division, the Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Ill
| | | | - Kimberly Chin
- Clinical Research Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Tanya Logvinenko
- Clinical Research Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Jacqueline A Pongracic
- Allergy Division, the Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Ill
| | | | - Jonathan Spergel
- Division of Allergy, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa
| | - Kari C Nadeau
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Lucille Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, Calif
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sindher S, Fleischer DM, Spergel JM. Advances in the Treatment of Food Allergy: Sublingual and Epicutaneous Immunotherapy. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2016; 36:39-54. [PMID: 26617226 DOI: 10.1016/j.iac.2015.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Food allergies continue to increase in prevalence. Standard care is a strict elimination diet, but life-threatening reactions still occur. Allergen immunotherapy has the most potential in treating food allergy. Subcutaneous immunotherapy has not been adopted into food allergy therapy. Oral immunotherapy has a high rate of adverse reactions. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) uses the tolerogenic environment of the oral mucosa and epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) uses the immune cells of the epidermis to transport antigens to afferent lymph nodes to activate immune responses. SLIT and EPIT can successfully desensitize patients. More research is needed to define optimal doses and administration protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sayantani Sindher
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at University of Pennsylvania, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4399, USA
| | - David M Fleischer
- Section of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, 13123 East 16th Avenue, B518, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Jonathan M Spergel
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at University of Pennsylvania, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4399, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Jhamnani RD, Frischmeyer-Guerrerio P. Desensitization for Peanut Allergies in Children. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2016; 3:282-291. [PMID: 28042528 PMCID: PMC5193471 DOI: 10.1007/s40521-016-0091-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Immunotherapy for peanut allergy has been an exploding topic of study within the last few years. Sublingual, epicutaneous, and oral immunotherapy are being investigated and show promise in the treatment of peanut allergy. Oral immunotherapy has shown the most clinical benefit; however, sublingual and epicutaneous immunotherapy appear to have the most favorable safety profiles. Most studies to date suggest that only a minority of subjects achieve sustained unresponsiveness to peanut after discontinuation of immunotherapy. Recent efforts have been focused on identifying adjunct therapies, such as omalizumab, that may assist patients in achieving peanut desensitization more quickly and with greater success. Several underlying immunologic mechanisms, including a switch from IgE to IgG4 production and induction of T regulatory cells, have been studied although more research is needed to identify reliable biomarkers. This article will describe the immunotherapy approaches that are being investigated to induce peanut desensitization, and highlight the benefits and risks of these therapies that need to be considered before they are ready for routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rekha D Jhamnani
- National Institutes of Health, 10 Clinical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Comparisons of outcomes with food immunotherapy strategies: efficacy, dosing, adverse effects, and tolerance. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2016; 16:396-403. [DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
32
|
Srivastava KD, Siefert A, Fahmy TM, Caplan MJ, Li XM, Sampson HA. Investigation of peanut oral immunotherapy with CpG/peanut nanoparticles in a murine model of peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016; 138:536-543.e4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.01.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2013] [Revised: 12/14/2015] [Accepted: 01/21/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
33
|
Maina E, Cox E. A double blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial of the efficacy, quality of life and safety of food allergen‐specific sublingual immunotherapy in client owned dogs with adverse food reactions: a small pilot study. Vet Dermatol 2016; 27:361-e91. [DOI: 10.1111/vde.12358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Maina
- Laboratory of Immunology Ghent University of Veterinary Medicine Salisburylaan 133 Merelbeke 9820 Belgium
| | - Eric Cox
- Laboratory of Immunology Ghent University of Veterinary Medicine Salisburylaan 133 Merelbeke 9820 Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wood RA. Food allergen immunotherapy: Current status and prospects for the future. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016; 137:973-982. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2015] [Revised: 01/07/2016] [Accepted: 01/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
35
|
Song TW. A practical view of immunotherapy for food allergy. KOREAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS 2016; 59:47-53. [PMID: 26958062 PMCID: PMC4781731 DOI: 10.3345/kjp.2016.59.2.47] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2015] [Revised: 10/05/2015] [Accepted: 10/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Food allergy is common and sometimes life threatening for Korean children. The current standard treatment of allergen avoidance and self-injectable epinephrine does not change the natural course of food allergy. Recently, oral, sublingual, and epicutaneous immunotherapies have been studied for their effectiveness against food allergy. While various rates of desensitization (36% to 100%) and tolerance (28% to 75%) have been induced by immunotherapies for food allergy, no single established protocol has been shown to be both effective and safe. In some studies, immunologic changes after immunotherapy for food allergy have been revealed. Adverse reactions to these immunotherapies have usually been localized, but severe systemic reactions have been observed in some cases. Although immunotherapy cannot be recommended for routine practice yet, results from recent studies demonstrate that immunotherapies are promising for the treatment of food allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Won Song
- Department of Pediatrics, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Burk CM, Kulis M, Leung N, Kim EH, Burks AW, Vickery BP. Utility of component analyses in subjects undergoing sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 2016; 46:347-53. [PMID: 26362760 PMCID: PMC4732904 DOI: 10.1111/cea.12635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2015] [Revised: 08/07/2015] [Accepted: 08/24/2015] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with peanut changes clinical and immune responses in most peanut-allergic individuals, but the response is highly variable. OBJECTIVE We sought to examine the component-specific effects of peanut SLIT and determine whether peanut component testing could predict the outcome of a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) after 12 months of peanut SLIT. METHODS We included 33 subjects who underwent peanut SLIT with a DBPCFC of 2500 mg of peanut protein performed after 12 months of therapy. Plasma samples from baseline and after 12 months of peanut SLIT were assayed using ImmunoCAP for IgE and IgG4 against whole peanut, Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3, Ara h 8, and Ara h 9. RESULTS Following 12 months of SLIT, 10 subjects (30%) passed the DBPCFC without symptoms and were considered desensitized. Subjects that failed the DBPCFC tolerated a median of 460 mg peanut protein (range: 10-1710 mg). The desensitized group had significantly lower baseline levels of IgE against peanut (median 40.8 vs. 231 kUA /L, P = 0.0082), Ara h 2 (median 17 vs. 113 kUA /L, P = 0.0082), and Ara h 3 (median 0.3 vs. 8.5 kUA /L, P = 0.0396). ROC curves indicated that baseline IgE against peanut and Ara h 2 were equally effective at discriminating between the two groups (AUC = 0.7957, P = 0.007752 for both). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE In this cohort of subjects undergoing SLIT for peanut allergy, lower baseline levels of IgE against Ara h 2, Ara h 3, and peanut were associated with successful desensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M Burk
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - M Kulis
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - N Leung
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - E H Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - A W Burks
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - B P Vickery
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lanser BJ, Wright BL, Orgel KA, Vickery BP, Fleischer DM. Current Options for the Treatment of Food Allergy. Pediatr Clin North Am 2015; 62:1531-49. [PMID: 26456449 PMCID: PMC4970423 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2015.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Food allergy is increasing in prevalence; as a result, there is intense focus on developing safe and effective therapies. Current methods of specific immunotherapy include oral, sublingual, and epicutaneous, while nonspecific methods that have been investigated include: Chinese herbal medicine, probiotics, and anti-IgE antibodies. Although some studies have demonstrated efficacy in inducing desensitization, questions regarding safety and the potential for achieving immune tolerance remain. Although some of these therapies demonstrate promise, further investigation is required before their incorporation into routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce J. Lanser
- Department of Pediatric, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA and National Jewish Health, 1400 Jackson Street, J322, Denver, CO 80206, USA
| | - Benjamin L. Wright
- Department of Pediatric, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Campus Box #7231, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA and Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Kelly A. Orgel
- Department of Pediatric, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Campus Box #7231, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Brian P. Vickery
- Department of Pediatric, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Campus Box #7231, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - David M. Fleischer
- Department of Pediatric, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA and Children’s Hospital Colorado, 13123 E. 16th Ave, B518, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mondoulet L, Dioszeghy V, Thébault C, Benhamou PH, Dupont C. Epicutaneous immunotherapy for food allergy as a novel pathway for oral tolerance induction. Immunotherapy 2015; 7:1293-305. [PMID: 26584421 DOI: 10.2217/imt.15.86] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Epicutaneous immunotherapy is a developing technique, aiming at desensitizing patients with food allergy with less risks that oral ingestion or injection could generate. Several clinical trials have been performed and are currently running, in milk and peanut allergy, assessing the safety of the technique and its efficacy. Preclinical models indicate a major role in the mechanisms of desensitization, for example, Tregs and epigenetic modifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucie Mondoulet
- DBV Technologies, Green Square, 80/84 rue des Meuniers, Bagneux, France
| | - Vincent Dioszeghy
- DBV Technologies, Green Square, 80/84 rue des Meuniers, Bagneux, France
| | - Claude Thébault
- DBV Technologies, Green Square, 80/84 rue des Meuniers, Bagneux, France
| | | | - Christophe Dupont
- Université Paris Descartes - Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, 149 Rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Food allergy is a worldwide issue, with an estimated prevalence of 2-10%. An effective treatment is not available for people affected and the only management is the avoidance of the allergen. Oral immunotherapy and sublingual immunotherapy have been tested by several authors, in particular for milk, egg and peanuts allergy, with significant results in term of desensitization induction. The achievement of tolerance is by the contrary doubtful, with different results obtained. In this review, we reviewed protocols of oral and sublingual immunotherapy for food allergy published in literature, mainly against milk, egg and peanut. At present, immunotherapy does not represent the gold standard in the treatment of food allergy, even if it can desensitize patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea D Praticò
- Unit of Pediatric Pneumoallergology & Cystic Fibrosis, Department of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Arasi S, Passalacqua G, Caminiti L, Crisafulli G, Fiamingo C, Pajno GB. Efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy in children. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2015; 12:49-56. [PMID: 26496537 DOI: 10.1586/1744666x.2016.1102058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is currently the only available disease-modifying and aetiological treatment of IgE-mediated diseases. Sublingual allergen immunotherapy (SLIT) constitutes the preferred route of administration of AIT for respiratory allergies in Europe. Recently it has also been approved in the US. Further applications are currently under evaluation, such as IgE-mediated food allergy and IgE-mediated atopic dermatitis. The SLIT safety profile is overall favourable, although local adverse events, usually mild, are described. Most of the meta-analyses confirmed the efficacy of SLIT in reducing symptoms and medication intake in children with allergic diseases. AIT, as an immune-modulating treatment, can modify the natural history of the allergic diseases: reduction of the risk of development of asthma and bronchial hyperreactivity in patients with allergic rhinitis, and reduction of the onset of new sensitizations. A great interest is now devoted to the preventive effects of AIT and, consequently, to the optimal time of initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Arasi
- a Department of Pediatrics- Allergy Unit , University of Messina , Messina , Italy
| | - Giovanni Passalacqua
- b Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS San Martino IST , University of Genoa , Genova , Italy
| | - Lucia Caminiti
- a Department of Pediatrics- Allergy Unit , University of Messina , Messina , Italy
| | - Giuseppe Crisafulli
- a Department of Pediatrics- Allergy Unit , University of Messina , Messina , Italy
| | - Chiara Fiamingo
- a Department of Pediatrics- Allergy Unit , University of Messina , Messina , Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
An Examination of Clinical and Immunologic Outcomes in Food Allergen Immunotherapy by Route of Administration. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2015; 15:35. [PMID: 26141581 DOI: 10.1007/s11882-015-0536-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy for the treatment of food allergy has been a subject of intensive study within the last 10 years. After an unsuccessful attempt with subcutaneous immunotherapy for peanut allergy, other routes with varying degrees of safety and efficacy have been tested for peanut, milk, and egg allergies. In this review, we summarize the results to date with oral immunotherapy, sublingual immunotherapy, and epicutaneous immunotherapy for the treatment of food allergy. While results of immunotherapy trials are promising, increases in efficacy are commonly associated with an increased side effect profile. There is a need for additional research beginning at the preclinical level to develop safe and effective treatments for food allergy.
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
There is a growing evidence that allergen immunotherapy (AIT) can provide significant and long-lasting clinical benefit for a number of allergic individuals. However, it is less clear if AIT results in clinical tolerance, which is characterized by a persistent state of clinical non-reactivity to allergens after therapy is finished. Addressing this knowledge gap is particularly relevant for patients undergoing AIT for food allergies, as anything less than complete tolerance could have potentially devastating consequences. An increasing number of studies, in particular those involving oral immunotherapy, are attempting to assess tolerance induction following AIT. Clinical tolerance does appear to be achievable in a subset of patients undergoing AIT, but whether this is equivalent to the type of tolerance observed in nonallergic individuals remains unknown. Developing established criteria for assessing tolerance induction, as well as the use of consistent terminology when describing clinical tolerance, will be important for determining the disease-modifying potential of AIT.
Collapse
|
43
|
Nowak-Węgrzyn A, Albin S. Oral immunotherapy for food allergy: mechanisms and role in management. Clin Exp Allergy 2015; 45:368-83. [PMID: 25077670 DOI: 10.1111/cea.12382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
With the emergence of food allergy as an important public health problem, it has become clear that there is an unmet need in regard to treatment. In particular, IgE-mediated food allergy that is associated with risk of fatal anaphylaxis has been the subject of multiple studies in the past decade. The growing body of evidence derived from multiple centres and various study designs indicates that for IgE-mediated food allergy, immunomodulation through food immunotherapy is possible; however, the extent of protection afforded by such treatment is highly variable. At this time, the capacity for food immunotherapy to restore permanent tolerance to food has not been demonstrated conclusively. This review will discuss these topics as they apply to the most important studies of food oral immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Nowak-Węgrzyn
- Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Kravis Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Deol S, Bird JA. Current opinion and review on peanut oral immunotherapy. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2015; 10:3017-21. [PMID: 25483680 DOI: 10.4161/hv.32190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
In the last decade, peanut oral immunotherapy research has shown promise as an alternative treatment to avoidance in peanut-allergic patients. Research has not only focused on desensitization, but also on immunologic changes and sustained-tolerance. This article reviews the current literature and the historical background of oral immunotherapy as well as immune mechanisms in oral immunotherapy and other therapies being explored in food allergic individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Deol
- a Division of Allergy & Immunology; Department of Internal Medicine ; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center ; Dallas , TX USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Izadi N, Luu M, Ong PY, Tam JS. The Role of Skin Barrier in the Pathogenesis of Food Allergy. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2015; 2:382-402. [PMID: 27417371 PMCID: PMC4928763 DOI: 10.3390/children2030382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2015] [Revised: 08/25/2015] [Accepted: 08/25/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Food allergy is a serious public health problem with an increasing prevalence. Current management is limited to food avoidance and emergency treatment. Research into the pathogenesis of food allergy has helped to shape our understanding of how patients become sensitized to an allergen. Classically, food sensitization was thought to occur through the gastrointestinal tract, but alternative routes of sensitization are being explored, specifically through the skin. Damaged skin barrier may play a crucial role in the development of food sensitization. Better understanding of how patients initially become sensitized may help lead to the development of a safe and effective treatment for food allergies or better prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neema Izadi
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.
| | - Minnelly Luu
- Department of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California.
| | - Peck Y Ong
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California.
| | - Jonathan S Tam
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kobernick AK, Chambliss J, Burks AW. Pharmacologic options for the treatment and management of food allergy. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2015; 8:623-33. [PMID: 26289224 DOI: 10.1586/17512433.2015.1074038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Food allergy affects approximately 5% of adults and 8% of children in developed countries, and there is currently no cure. Current pharmacologic management is limited to using intramuscular epinephrine or oral antihistamines in response to food allergen exposure. Recent trials have examined the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous, oral, sublingual, and epicutaneous immunotherapy, with varying levels of efficacy and safety demonstrated. Bacterial adjuvants, use of anti-IgE monoclonal antibodies, and Chinese herbal formulations represent exciting potential for development of future pharmacotherapeutic agents. Ultimately, immunotherapy may be a viable option for patients with food allergy, although efficacy and safety are likely to be less than ideal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron K Kobernick
- a 1 Department of Allergy and Immunology, 260 MacNider Building, CB# 7220, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7220, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Chhiba KD, Singh AM, Bryce PJ. New developments in immunotherapies for food allergy. Immunotherapy 2015; 7:913-22. [DOI: 10.2217/imt.15.55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Food allergy affects around 10% of the population. As the prevalence of food allergy continues to increase, disproportionately in children, new therapies for food allergy are being investigated. While there are no approved treatments for food allergy, immunotherapy facilitates significant desensitization and protection from accidental exposure. Nevertheless, current immunotherapies do not entirely nor permanently eliminate sensitivity to the food allergen. Since the rates of sustained unresponsiveness are significantly lower than desensitization, future therapies that enhance the rates of long-term tolerance in patients will catalyze progress in this field over the next 5–10 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishan Dilip Chhiba
- Division of Allergy-Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Anne Marie Singh
- Division of Allergy-Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Paul J Bryce
- Division of Allergy-Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
|
49
|
A review of biomarkers for predicting clinical reactivity to foods with a focus on specific immunoglobulin E antibodies. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2015; 15:250-8. [DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
50
|
Kulis M, Wright BL, Jones SM, Burks AW. Diagnosis, management, and investigational therapies for food allergies. Gastroenterology 2015; 148:1132-42. [PMID: 25633563 PMCID: PMC4793977 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.01.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2014] [Revised: 01/15/2015] [Accepted: 01/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Food allergies have increased in prevalence over the past 20 years, now becoming an important public health concern. Although there are no therapies currently available for routine clinical care, recent reports have indicated that immunotherapies targeting the mucosal immune system may be effective. Oral immunotherapy is conducted by administering small, increasing amounts of food allergen; it has shown promise for desensitizing individuals with peanut, egg, or milk allergies. Sublingual immunotherapy also desensitizes allergic patients to foods-2 major studies have examined the effects of sublingual immunotherapy in subjects with peanut allergies. We review the complex nature of IgE-mediated food allergies and the therapies being evaluated in clinical trials. We focus on the diagnosis and management of food allergies and investigational therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Kulis
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Benjamin L. Wright
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Stacie M. Jones
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - A. Wesley Burks
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|