Vaccine-associated hypersensitivity

Development of mRNA nano-vaccines for COVID-19 prevention and its biochemical interactions with various disease conditions and age groups

This review has focused on the development of mRNA nano-vaccine and the biochemical interactions of anti-COVID-19 mRNA vaccines with various disease conditions and age groups. It studied five major groups of individuals with different disease conditions and ages, including allergic background, infarction background, adolescent, and adult (youngsters), pregnant women, and elderly. All five groups had been reported to have background-related adverse effects. Allergic background individuals were observed to have higher chances of experiencing allergic reactions and even anaphylaxis. Individuals with an infarction background had a higher risk of vaccine-induced diseases, e.g. pneumonitis and interstitial lung diseases. Pregnant women were seen to suffer from obstetric and gynecological adverse effects after receiving vaccinations. However, interestingly, the elderly individuals (> 65 years old) had experienced milder and less frequent adverse effects compared to the adolescent (<19 and >9 years old) and young adulthood (19-39 years old), or middle adulthood (40-59 years old) age groups, while middle to late adolescent (14-17 years old) was the riskiest age group to vaccine-induced cardiovascular manifestations.

No Yellow Fever Vaccine Reactions in IgE-Mediated Egg Allergic Patients

INTRODUCTION

Egg allergy usually manifests during the initial 2 years of life, a period in which most vaccinations are administered. This often leads to delays in the application of some vaccines in patients with egg allergies, exposing them to a risk of contracting preventable infections. The aim of the study was to describe the frequency of reactions after applying the yellow fever vaccine (YFV) within a population with egg allergy.

METHODS

This was a cohort study with retrospective, multicenter data (2014-2023). Patient records diagnosed with egg allergy were gathered from their initial egg-related reactions until their YFV administration. Information was also collected about hypersensitivity tests conducted for egg and YFV such as the skin prick test (SPT) and intradermal test (IDT).

RESULTS

Among the 171 records analyzed, 23.9% of patients had a history of egg anaphylaxis. Out of these, 5 patients had a positive SPT and 21 IDT with the YFV. All patients tolerated the application of YFV without developing hypersensitivity reactions, regardless of the results of the YFV tests, the severity of egg reactions, the number of egg reactions, or the time since the last egg reaction. Out of the total patient cohort, 46.1% (79 individuals) encountered delays in receiving the YFV, and in this subset, 14% faced delays lasting longer than 12 months.

CONCLUSION

The risk of allergic reactions with the YFV remains low. YFV tests generate delays in the vaccine application without providing high diagnostic accuracy. YFV should not be deferred even in patients with a history of severe egg reactions.

An Unexpected Post-Egg-Free Influenza Vaccine Granulomatous Reaction

ABSTRACT

A 53-year-old woman presented with a pruritic plaque on the left upper arm that appeared following an egg-free flu vaccine due to a history of reaction to the standard vaccine. The affected area enlarged over a several month period immediately following vaccine administration. Physical examination revealed an 8 × 4 cm coalescent pink plaque on the left upper arm. A shave biopsy of the lesion showed dermal "naked" granulomas, or granulomas with sparse lymphocytic infiltrate at the margins, as typically seen in sarcoidosis. No foreign material was seen in the granulomatous reaction, including with polarization. Special stains, including acid fast bacilli, Grocott methenamine silver, periodic acid-Schiff, and Gram, were negative for organisms. The diagnosis of granulomatous dermatitis was made. Subsequent imaging demonstrated no findings suggestive of sarcoidosis. While vaccine-associated hypersensitivity reactions occur frequently, these reactions are typically due to individual vaccine components, such as egg protein, and do not normally result in the formulation of granulomas. Vaccination-induced granulomas are more often associated with the use of aluminum as an adjuvant; however, this is not present in the egg-free influenza vaccine. Thus, a granulomatous reaction to the egg-free influenza vaccine is very unusual and, to our knowledge, not previously reported.

Ally, adversary, or arbitrator? The context-dependent role of eosinophils in vaccination for respiratory viruses and subsequent breakthrough infections

Eosinophils are a critical type of immune cell and central players in type 2 immunity. Existing literature suggests that eosinophils also can play a role in host antiviral responses, typically type 1 immune events, against multiple respiratory viruses, both directly through release of antiviral mediators and indirectly through activation of other effector cell types. One way to prime host immune responses toward effective antiviral responses is through vaccination, where typically a type 1-skewed immunity is desirable in the context of intracellular pathogens like respiratory viruses. In the realm of breakthrough respiratory viral infection in vaccinated hosts, an event in which virus can still establish productive infection despite preexisting immunity, eosinophils are most prominently known for their link to vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease upon natural respiratory syncytial virus infection. This was observed in a pediatric cohort during the 1960s following vaccination with formalin-inactivated respiratory syncytial virus. More recent research has unveiled additional roles of the eosinophil in respiratory viral infection and breakthrough infection. The specific contribution of eosinophils to the quality of vaccine responses, vaccine efficacy, and antiviral responses to infection in vaccinated hosts remains largely unexplored, especially regarding their potential roles in protection. On the basis of current findings, we will speculate upon the suggested function of eosinophils and consider the many potential ways by which eosinophils may exert protective and pathological effects in breakthrough infections. We will also discuss how to balance vaccine efficacy with eosinophil-related risks, as well as the use of eosinophils and their products as potential biomarkers of vaccine efficacy or adverse events.

Contact allergy to neomycin in consecutively patch tested Danish eczema patients from 2000 to 2023: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Neomycin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic that may cause contact allergy. It was withdrawn as a medicine for human use in Denmark in October 2009 but is still found in some vaccines.

OBJECTIVES

To identify time trends in contact allergy to neomycin in the period from 2000 to 2023.

METHODS

A cross-section study of patients ≥18 years consecutively patch-tested with neomycin sulfate (20% in pet.) at Gentofte Hospital, Denmark, during the period 2000-2023 was conducted.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of contact allergy to neomycin was 1.4%. The prevalence was significantly lower in the period '2010-2023' (1.2%) than in '2000-2009' (1.8%) (p < 0.005). Contact allergy to neomycin was significantly positively associated with facial dermatitis and age >40 years, and significantly negatively associated with occupational dermatitis and hand dermatitis. No changes in sex, occupational dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, hand dermatitis, leg dermatitis, facial dermatitis, or age > 40/≤40 (the MOAHLFA-index) were identified when comparing neomycin contact allergic-patients in the two periods '2010-2023' and '2001-2009'.

CONCLUSION

Neomycin is a rare cause of contact allergy in Denmark with a significantly lower prevalence following its withdrawal as a medicinal product for human use in Denmark in 2009.

Pharmacovigilance in Vaccines: Importance, Main Aspects, Perspectives, and Challenges-A Narrative Review

Pharmacovigilance plays a central role in safeguarding public health by continuously monitoring the safety of vaccines, being critical in a climate of vaccine hesitancy, where public trust is paramount. Pharmacovigilance strategies employed to gather information on adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) include pre-registration data, media reports, clinical trials, and societal reporting. Early detection of AEFIs during clinical trials is crucial for thorough safety analysis and preventing serious reactions once vaccines are deployed. This review highlights the importance of societal reporting, encompassing contributions from community members, healthcare workers, and pharmaceutical companies. Technological advancements such as quick response (QR) codes can facilitate prompt AEFI reporting. While vaccines are demonstrably safe, the possibility of adverse events necessitates continuous post-marketing surveillance. However, underreporting remains a challenge, underscoring the critical role of public engagement in pharmacovigilance. This narrative review comprehensively examines and synthesizes key aspects of virus vaccine pharmacovigilance, with special considerations for specific population groups. We explore applicable legislation, the spectrum of AEFIs associated with major vaccines, and the unique challenges and perspectives surrounding pharmacovigilance in this domain.

Advancing molecular modeling and reverse vaccinology in broad-spectrum yellow fever virus vaccine development

Yellow fever outbreaks are prevalent, particularly in endemic regions. Given the lack of an established treatment for this disease, significant attention has been directed toward managing this arbovirus. In response, we developed a multiepitope vaccine designed to elicit an immune response, utilizing advanced immunoinformatic and molecular modeling techniques. To achieve this, we predicted B- and T-cell epitopes using the sequences from all structural (E, prM, and C) and nonstructural proteins of 196 YFV strains. Through comprehensive analysis, we identified 10 cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) and 5T-helper (Th) epitopes that exhibited overlap with B-lymphocyte epitopes. These epitopes were further evaluated for their affinity to a wide range of human leukocyte antigen system alleles and were rigorously tested for antigenicity, immunogenicity, allergenicity, toxicity, and conservation. These epitopes were linked to an adjuvant ( β -defensin) and to each other using ligands, resulting in a vaccine sequence with appropriate physicochemical properties. The 3D structure of this sequence was created, improved, and quality checked; then it was anchored to the Toll-like receptor. Molecular Dynamics and Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics simulations were employed to enhance the accuracy of docking calculations, with the QM portion of the simulations carried out utilizing the density functional theory formalism. Moreover, the inoculation model was able to provide an optimal codon sequence that was inserted into the pET-28a( +) vector for in silico cloning and could even stimulate highly relevant humoral and cellular immunological responses. Overall, these results suggest that the designed multi-epitope vaccine can serve as prophylaxis against the yellow fever virus.

Adverse Events Following COVID-19 Vaccination in Adolescents: Insights From Pharmacovigilance Study of VigiBase

BACKGROUND

During coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, several COVID-19 vaccines were licensed with fast-track procedures. Although these vaccines have demonstrated high immunogenicity, there has been concerns on the serious adverse events (AEs) following COVID-19 vaccination among adolescents. We aimed to analyze comparative safety of COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents.

METHODS

In this pharmacovigilance study, we performed a disproportionality analysis using VigiBase, the World Health Organization's global individual case safety report (ICSR) database. To compare serious AEs reported following COVID-19 vaccines vs. all other vaccines in adolescents aged 12-17 years, ICSRs following any vaccines on adolescents aged 12-17 years were included, defining cases as reports with the AEs of interest, with all other AEs as non-cases. The AEs of interest were myocarditis/pericarditis, multisystem inflammatory syndrome/Kawasaki disease (MIS/KD), anaphylaxis, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). We conducted a disproportionality analysis to estimate reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for each AE of interest, adjusted for sex by using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 99,735 AE reports after vaccination in adolescents, 80,018 reports were from COVID-19 vaccinated adolescents (52.9% females; 56.3% America). The AEs of interest were predominantly reported as serious AE (76.1%) with mRNA vaccines (99.4%). Generally, higher reporting odds for the AEs were identified following COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents; myocarditis/pericarditis (2,829 reports for the COVID-19 vaccine vs. 35 for all other vaccines, adjusted ROR [aROR], 19.61; 95% CI, 14.05-27.39), and MIS/KD (104 vs. 6, aROR, 4.33; 95% CI, 1.89-9.88). The reporting odds for anaphylaxis (515 vs. 165, aROR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72-1.02), GBS (94 vs. 40, aROR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.92) and ITP (52 vs. 12, aROR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.59-2.09) were not significantly higher following COVID-19 vaccination.

CONCLUSION

In this study, there were disproportionate reporting of immune-related AEs following COVID-19 vaccination. While awaiting definitive evidence, there is a need to closely monitor for any signs of immune-related AEs following COVID-19 vaccination among adolescents.

Quantitative Investigation on Exposure to Potentially Harmful Excipients by Injection Drug Administration in Children Under 2 Years of Age and Analysis of Association with Adverse Events: A Single-Center, Retrospective Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Potentially harmful excipients (PHEs) for children have been reported and the need for information collection has been advocated. However, studies on the actual occurrence of adverse events are limited. This study investigated the quantitative exposure of PHEs via injection and their association with adverse events in children under 2 years of age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

As a single-center observational study, children aged 0-23 months received injectable drugs from April 1, 2018, to March 31, 2023 were included. Information on PHE exposure and adverse events after administration were extracted from medical records. Sodium benzoate, benzyl alcohol, ethanol, glycerol, lactose, polyethylene glycol paraben, polysorbate, propylene glycol, sorbitol, sucrose, sulfite, and thimerosal were selected as PHEs.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

6265 cases, 333,694 prescriptions, and 368 drugs (264 ingredients) were analyzed. The median age was 0.63 years (interquartile range [IQR] 0.1-1.1). 72,133 prescriptions, 132 drugs and 99 ingredients contained PHE; 2,961 cases exposed to PHE and 1825 cases exceeding permitted daily exposure. The drug with the highest number of exposure cases was hydroxyzine, and the highest number of prescriptions was heparin (both drugs contain benzyl alcohol). In association between adverse events and PHE exposure, higher doses in cases of adverse event occurrence were found in benzyl alcohol, glycerol, polyethylene glycol, and polysorbate exposed cases. Among thimerosal-exposed cases, "developmental delay" was more frequent in exposed cases, but the causal relationship was unknown. Further investigation is needed to clarify the relationship between adverse events and PHE exposure. Additionally, more precise information on PDE for pediatrics including neonates is necessary.

Fighting flu: novel CD8+ T-cell targets are required for future influenza vaccines

Seasonal influenza viruses continue to cause severe medical and financial complications annually. Although there are many licenced influenza vaccines, there are billions of cases of influenza infection every year, resulting in the death of over half a million individuals. Furthermore, these figures can rise in the event of a pandemic, as seen throughout history, like the 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic (50 million deaths) and the 1968 Hong Kong influenza pandemic (~4 million deaths). In this review, we have summarised many of the currently licenced influenza vaccines available across the world and current vaccines in clinical trials. We then briefly discuss the important role of CD8+ T cells during influenza infection and why future influenza vaccines should consider targeting CD8+ T cells. Finally, we assess the current landscape of known immunogenic CD8+ T-cell epitopes and highlight the knowledge gaps required to be filled for the design of rational future influenza vaccines that incorporate CD8+ T cells.

Recent findings on drug hypersensitivity in children

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) in children have a significant impact on clinical practice and public health. Both under-diagnosis (due to under-reporting) and over-diagnosis (due to the overuse of the term "allergy") are potential issues. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the most recent findings of DHR in children/adolescents and gaps regarding epidemiology, antibiotic allergy, antiepileptic hypersensitivity, vaccine allergy, and severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) in this age group.

Lessons learned from COVID-19, H1N1, and routine vaccine pharmacovigilance in the United States: a path to a more robust vaccine safety program

INTRODUCTION

Vaccine pharmacovigilance is an essential component of vaccine safety programs. Vaccine pharmacovigilance refers to detecting uncommon adverse events following immunization (AEFI), determining whether they are due to the vaccine or are only a coincidence, and, for those AEFI considered related to vaccination, characterizing them further. When AEFI are due to vaccination, it is important to characterize the attributable risk and ascertain the biological mechanism causing the adverse reaction to inform efforts to prevent or mitigate the risk. A robust post-authorization safety system is necessary for vaccine decision-making, clinical recommendations, vaccine compensation, and vaccine communication and confidence.

AREAS COVERED

This paper describes the key characteristics of vaccine pharmacovigilance programs, reviews US vaccine pharmacovigilance for routine vaccination programs, COVID-19, and H1N1, and makes recommendations for improving future vaccine safety systems.

EXPERT OPINION

The key characteristics of vaccine pharmacovigilance programs include passive surveillance, active surveillance, clinical investigation and special studies, and causality assessment. Recent examples illustrate the strengths of US pharmacovigilance systems, including systems for passive and active surveillance, as well as areas for improvement, including study of pathogenesis, consistent funding, and leadership. We make recommendations that would, if implemented, further strengthen the vaccine safety system for future routine and pandemic immunizations.

Egg allergy and yellow fever vaccination

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate biomarkers capable of safely guiding Yellow fever vaccine (YFV) vaccination among individuals suspicious of hen's egg allergy, and identify factors associated with a higher risk for adverse events after immunization (AEAI).

METHODS

Patients underwent skin prick test (SPT) for standardized allergens: whole egg, egg white, egg yolk; YFV (1:10 dilution; Biomanguinhos-Fiocruz), and intradermal test (IDT; YFV 0.02 mL, 1:100 dilution) and positive and negative controls. Serum levels of specific IgE (sIgE) for a whole egg, egg white, egg yolk, egg albumin, ovomucoid, lysozyme, and conalbumin (ImmunoCap®; ThermoFisher®) were obtained. Patients sensitized to YFV were submitted to YFV desensitization, and those negatives received YFV (0.5mL) and remained under surveillance for at least one hour.

RESULTS

103 patients were enrolled, 95% under 12 years old. 71% (81/103) of patients had reactions: 80% immediate, 11% mixed, and 9% delayed. There was an association between positive skin test results with YFV and the severity of the reaction (OR:7.64; 95%CI:1.61-36.32; p = 0,011). Only the presence of sIgE to ovomucoid was associated with clinical symptoms (p = 0,025). Thirty patients underwent the YFV desensitization protocol.

CONCLUSION

There is a relationship between the positivity of the egg's components and the severity of the clinical reaction. Furthermore, the relationship between the positivity of the tests with the YFV and egg's components may show a tendency to look at ovomucoid and conalbumin, but it is not a certainty. Therefore, further studies are needed to confirm these associations, and for now, the authors still recommend using the vaccine for testing when necessary.

[Association between vaccination and the risk of immunoglobulin A vasculitis in children]

OBJECTIVES

To study the effect of vaccination on the short-term risk of immunoglobulin A vasculitis (IgAV) in children.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the general data and the vaccination history within one year prior to onset in children with IgAV hospitalized in the Children's Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University from November 2021 to January 2023. Vaccine exposure rates in the risk period (3 months prior to IgAV onset) and the control period were compared by autocontrol-case crossover analysis, and the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated. A sensitivity analysis for the one-month and two-month risk periods was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 193 children with IgAV were included, with a median age of 7.0 years. Among the 193 children, 36 (18.7%) received at least one dose of the vaccine within 1 year prior to IgAV onset, and 14 (7.3%) received at least one dose of the vaccine during the 3-month risk period. Compared to the unvaccinated IgAV group, the vaccinated IgAV group had a significantly younger age of onset (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the proportions of children with gastrointestinal involvement, renal involvement, and joint involvement between the two groups (P>0.05). The odds ratio for developing IgAV after receiving any type of vaccine within 3 months prior to IgAV onset was 2.08 (95%CI: 0.82-5.27, P>0.05). Further sensitivity analysis for the 1-month and 2-month risk periods demonstrated that the odds ratios for developing IgAV after receiving any type of vaccine were 2.74 (95%CI: 0.72-10.48, P>0.05) and 2.72 (95%CI: 0.95-7.77, P>0.05), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaccination dose not increase the risk of IgAV, nor does it exacerbate clinical symptoms in children with IgAV.

Effect of Gender and Special Considerations for Women in Mastocytosis and Anaphylaxis

This article reviews the effects of gender on anaphylaxis in general and focuses on mastocytosis-specific issues. Incidence of anaphylaxis is increased in female compared with male patients during the pubertal years through the fifth decade of life, in which these disparities decrease. Estrogen is thought to increase the severity of anaphylaxis through increased endothelial nitric oxide synthase release. Despite this, all-cause fatal anaphylaxis does not appear to show a gender predilection. Systemic mastocytosis incidence is higher in women; however, mortality is increased in men owing to increased molecular and cytogenetic abnormalities.

Acupuncture as a therapeutic intervention for post-COVID-19 vaccination urticaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic persisted for over 3 years since its onset in December 2019, posing an ongoing global threat to human health. In the absence of specific antiviral medications for COVID-19, vaccination has emerged as a popular preventive measure adopted by the general public. However, an undesirable consequence of COVID-19 vaccination has been the frequent incidence of urticaria, a type of adverse skin manifestations. Despite the prevalence of this issue, there is currently a lack of clinical evidence exploring the potential utility of acupuncture as a therapeutic approach to managing urticaria arising after COVID-19 vaccination. To address this knowledge gap, this study aims to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture as a therapeutic intervention for treating urticaria in the general population following COVID-19 vaccination.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The retrieval strategies employed in this study involve obtaining all relevant articles published from December 2019 to October 2023. These articles will be obtained from databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (SinoMed), VIP database and the WanFang database. Subsequently, the collected articles will undergo a thorough screening process based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Additionally, study quality will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk bias assessment tool. To conduct the meta-analysis, we will employ the Review Manager software (RevMan V.5.3). Finally, the study findings will be evaluated for their level of evidence.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

As this is a secondary review of published clinical data, this study does not involve direct contact with human subjects, and therefore, ethical approval and consent are not required. The findings of the study will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal, ensuring that the results undergo rigorous evaluation by experts in the field.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022377343.

Factors associated with intention for revaccination among patients with adverse events following immunization

OBJECTIVES

Individuals and healthcare providers may be uncertain about the safety of revaccination after an adverse event following immunization (AEFI). We identified factors associated with physician recommendation for revaccination and participant intention to be revaccinated among patients with adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) assessed in the Canadian Special Immunization Clinic (SIC) Network from 2013 to 2019.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included patients assessed in the Canadian Special Immunization Clinic Network from 2013 to 2019 for an AEFI who required additional doses of the vaccine temporally associated with their AEFI. Participants underwent standardized assessment and data collection. Physician recommendations regarding revaccination and participant intent for revaccination were recorded. AEFI impact on daily activities and need for medical attention was captured as low, moderate, high impact and serious (e.g., requiring hospitalization). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with physician recommendation and participant intention for revaccination, controlling for province of assessment.

RESULTS

Physician recommendation was significantly associated with the type of AEFI and AEFI impact. Compared to large local reaction, physician recommendation for revaccination was reduced for immediate hypersensitivity (aOR: 0.24 [95% CI: 0.08-0.76]) and new onset autoimmune disease (aOR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.04-0.69). Compared to low impact AEFIs, physician recommendation was reduced for moderate (aOR: 0.22 [95% CI: 0.07-0.65]), high impact (aOR: 0.08 [95% CI: 0.02-0.30]), and serious AEFIs (aOR: 0.11 [95% CI: 0.03-0.37]). Participant intention for revaccination was significantly associated with AEFI impact, with reduced odds for high versus low impact AEFIs (aOR: 0.12 [95% CI: 0.04-0.42]).

CONCLUSION

Physicians appear to use AEFI type and impact to guide recommendations while patients use primarily AEFI impact to form intentions for revaccination. The findings may help inform counselling for patients with AEFIs.

Clinical effects of COVID-19 vaccines on chronic spontaneous urticaria patients: a study on two Turkish centers

Background

The relationship between CSU and vaccines is reported in the literature. The post-vaccine clinical effect of COVİD-19 vaccines on CSU patients is still unclear. we aimed to evaluate clinical effects of COVID-19 Vaccines on CSU patients.

Materials and methods

CSU patients under treatment and follow-up in our outpatient clinic were evaluated retrospectively. To determine disease activity the urticaria activity score over seven days (UAS7) was used. The details of demographic information, CSU treatment, history of COVID-19 infection and exacerbation of urticaria during infection, COVID-19 vaccinations, type of vaccine, side effect reaction time after vaccination, hospital admission requirement were also assessed.

Results

Total of 190 patients with a mean age of The mean age of patients was 41,7±14,0 years (range = 18–72) were enrooled. The patient sample consisted of 50 males and 140 females (male/female ratio 1:2.8). 181 (CoronaVac 77, Pfizer-BioNTech 104) patients were vaccinated. Urticarial exacerbation was occurred in 25 patients. The median UAS value was 5 before vaccination, it was 12 in patients with post-vaccine urticaria. Two patients had angioedema and one patient had anaphylaxis after vaccinated with Pfizer-BioNTech.

Conclusion

COVID-19 vaccination in the CSU can be considered safe. Cases with urticarial exacerbation appear to be transient and can be managed by antihistamine and/or systemic steroid therapies. More extensive studies are needed for the relationship with CSU and post-coronavirus vaccination anaphylaxy.

Q fever immunology: the quest for a safe and effective vaccine

Q fever is an infectious zoonotic disease, caused by the Gram-negative bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Transmission occurs from livestock to humans through inhalation of a survival form of the bacterium, the Small Cell Variant, often via handling of animal parturition products. Q fever manifests as an acute self-limiting febrile illness or as a chronic disease with complications such as vasculitis and endocarditis. The current preventative human Q fever vaccine Q-VAX poses limitations on its worldwide implementation due to reactogenic responses in pre-sensitized individuals. Many strategies have been undertaken to develop a universal Q fever vaccine but with little success to date. The mechanisms of the underlying reactogenic responses remain only partially understood and are important factors in the development of a safe Q fever vaccine. This review provides an overview of previous and current experimental vaccines developed for use against Q fever and proposes approaches to develop a vaccine that establishes immunological memory while eliminating harmful reactogenic responses.

Recent Advances of Emerging Spleen-Targeting Nanovaccines for Immunotherapy

Vaccines provide a powerful tool to modulate the immune system for human disease prevention and treatment. Classical vaccines mainly initiate immune responses in the lymph nodes (LNs) after subcutaneous injection. However, some vaccines suffer from inefficient delivery of antigens to LNs, undesired inflammation, and slow immune induction when encountering the rapid proliferation of tumors. Alternatively, the spleen, as the largest secondary lymphoid organ with a high density of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and lymphocytes, acts as an emerging target organ for vaccinations in the body. Upon intravenous administration, the rationally designed spleen-targeting nanovaccines can be internalized by the APCs in the spleen to induce selective antigen presentation to T and B cells in their specific sub-regions, thereby rapidly boosting durable cellular and humoral immunity. Herein, the recent advances of spleen-targeting nanovaccines for immunotherapy based on the anatomical architectures and functional zones of the spleen, as well as their limitations and perspectives for clinical applications are systematically summarized. The aim is to emphasize the design of innovative nanovaccines for enhanced immunotherapy of intractable diseases in the future.

Evaluation of Children with Cow's Milk Allergy Who Received Measles or Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccines Containing Alpha-Lactalbumin

Objective: Cases of cow's milk allergy (CMA) who reacted to measles or measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccines containing alpha-lactalbumin have been reported. The purpose of this study was to assess patients with CMA who received measles or MMR vaccines containing alpha-lactalbumin, as well as the characteristics of those who developed reactions to these vaccines. Study Design: Patients followed up in the allergy clinic for CMA and who received measles or MMR vaccines containing alpha-lactalbumin at 9 or 12 months of age were included in the study, and their characteristics were analyzed retrospectively from the hospital registry system. Results: Forty-nine patients were included in the study. Six patients received the measles vaccine, whereas 43 patients received the MMR vaccine containing alpha-lactalbumin. Vaccine skin tests were performed on these 6 patients. One patient had a positive intradermal test, so an alternative vaccine not containing alpha-lactalbumin was administered. The other 5 patients were vaccinated, and no reaction was observed. Anaphylaxis was observed in 3 of 43 patients who received the MMR vaccine containing alpha-lactalbumin. In all of these patients, the first reaction to dairy products was anaphylaxis. In 2 of those patients, cow's milk-specific IgE (spIgE) levels were >100 kU/L, and alpha-lactalbumin-spIgE levels were also high at 97 and 90 kU/L. The third patient's cow's milk-spIgE level was 15.9 kU/L, whereas the alpha-lactalbumin-spIgE level was 0.04 kU/L. Conclusion: Especially in patients with an initial reaction of anaphylaxis to dairy products and high cow's milk-spIgE levels, the risk of reaction is high with the MMR vaccine.

Anaphylactic shock induced by polyethylene glycol after bowel preparation for the colorectal cancer surgery: A case report

BACKGROUND

Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is widely used as an additive because of its hydrophilic and chemically inert properties. However, there are been increasing reports of PEG allergies, including anaphylaxis, although they are still rare. This case report aims to raise awareness, that the commonly used bowel cleansing agent containing PEG can cause serious allergic reactions.

CASE SUMMARY

Prior to surgery for sigmoid colon cancer, a 63-year-old man was prescribed a bowel cleansing agent containing PEG. Within 30 min of ingestion, he developed symptoms of anaphylactic shock and did not respond to initial intramuscular epinephrine injection. Under diagnosis of anaphylaxis to PEG, he was stabilized with fluid hydration and continuous norepinephrine infusion.

CONCLUSION

While allergic reactions to PEG are rare, they can be life-threatening. Therefore, it is crucial for clinicians to be aware of this possibility and to diagnose and resuscitate patients immediately.

Administration of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine to subjects with various allergic backgrounds

Background

The mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine was introduced to the general public in December 2020. Shortly thereafter, safety concerns were raised due to the reporting of allergic reactions. Allergy-related disorders were suspected to be significant risk factors and the excipient polyethylene glycol was suggested to be a robust allergen.

Methods

This is a retrospective study analysis. Subjects with putative risk factors for severe allergic reactions to the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine were referred for vaccination under observation at the Unit of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Data was collected for each subject, including demographic details, medical history and previous reactions to any allergen. When appropriate, skin tests were done prior to vaccination.

Results

A total of 346 subjects received 623 vaccine doses under observation. The study included patients with various allergy-related disorders (n=290) and those with allergy to a previous COVID-19 vaccine dose (n=56). Both groups showed female predominance (78% and 88%, p=NS). Patients without reactions to previous doses reported more drug allergy (80% vs. 39%, p<0.001) and previous anaphylaxis (64% vs. 14%, p<0.001). There was no difference in sensitivity to other allergens, including polyethylene glycol. Under observation, mild allergic reactions were noted in 13 individuals characterized by female gender (100%), a history of anaphylaxis (69%) and drug allergy (62%). In 7 subjects, allergy was treated with antihistamines while others recovered spontaneously.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that vaccination under specialist-supervision is a powerful tool for reducing over-diagnosis of systemic reactions and for rapid and reliable collection of vaccine safety data.

An updated review on oral protein-based antigen vaccines efficiency and delivery approaches: a special attention to infectious diseases

Various infectious agents affect human health via the oral entrance. The majority of pathogens lack approved vaccines. Oral vaccination is a convenient, safe and cost-effective approach with the potential of provoking mucosal and systemic immunity and maintaining individual satisfaction. However, vaccines should overcome the intricate environment of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Oral protein-based antigen vaccines (OPAVs) are easier to administer than injectable vaccines and do not require trained healthcare professionals. Additionally, the risk of needle-related injuries, pain, and discomfort is eliminated. However, OPAVs stability at environmental and GIT conditions should be considered to enhance their stability and facilitate their transport and storage. These vaccines elicit the local immunity, protecting GIT, genital tract and respiratory epithelial surfaces, where numerous pathogens penetrate the body. OPAVs can also be manipulated (such as using specific incorporated ligand and receptors) to elicit targeted immune response. However, low bioavailability of OPAVs necessitates development of proper protein carriers and formulations to enhance their stability and efficacy. There are several strategies to improve their efficacy or protective effects, such as incorporation of adjuvants, enzyme inhibitors, mucoadhesive or penetrating devices and permeation enhancers. Hence, efficient delivery of OPAVs into GIT require proper delivery systems mainly including smart target systems, probiotics, muco-adhesive carriers, lipid- and plant-based delivery systems and nano- and microparticles.

Fixed drug eruption after pentavalent diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, inactivated poliovirus and Haemophilus influenzae type b combined vaccine in an infant

In Turkey, diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated poliovirus and Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTaP-IPV-Hib) vaccine has been administered to all children in the second, fourth, sixth and 18th months within the scope of the national vaccination programme. Here we present a rare case of fixed drug eruption (FDE) that occurred as a result of the administration of a pentavalent DTaP-IPV-Hib combined vaccine in a 4-month-old girl. There was no history of taking any other medication before or when the lesion appeared. The lesion responded well to 1 week of topical methylprednisolone aceponate cream application and regressed within 1 week, leaving mild hyperpigmentation. Few cases of FDE have been reported occurring after administration of various vaccines and it is extremely rare in children. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of FDE developing in an infant after the combined pentavalent DTaP-IPV-Hib vaccine.

Frequency of allergic reactions in egg allergic patients after receiving the yellow fever vaccine

BACKGROUND

Immunization with live attenuated viral yellow fever vaccine (YFV) grants effective immunity in most cases, and is recommended and prioritized for residents and travelers of endemic countries. YFV is seldom administered to egg-allergic patients (EAP) since it is cultivated in embryonated chicken eggs and may contain residual egg proteins, being a problem for egg-allergic residents and travelers of endemic countries.

OBJECTIVE

Describe the frequency of allergic reactions after YFV administration in confirmed EAP from an allergy outpatient center in Bogotá, Colombia.

METHODS

An observational, retrospective, cross-sectional, and descriptive study was conducted from January 2017 to December 2019. EAP whose allergy was confirmed with a positive Skin Prick Test (SPT) and/or egg protein-specific IgE levels who hadn't received the YFV were included. Every patient had an SPT, severe EAP, and an additional Intradermal Test (IDT) done with the vaccine. If the vaccine SPT and IDT were negative, the YFV was administered as a single dose; if either were positive, the YFV was administered in graded doses. Statistical analysis was done in Stata16MP.

RESULTS

Seventy one patients were included, 24 (33.8%) of those had a history of egg anaphylaxis. All patients had negative YFV SPTs, and two of the five YVF IDTs were positive. Two patients, with previous egg-anaphylaxis, presented allergic reactions to the vaccine.

CONCLUSIONS

YFV did not trigger allergic reactions in EAP without history of egg-anaphylaxis. With further research, safe single-dose vaccination to this population could be considered; however, patients with previous egg-anaphylaxis should be evaluated by an allergist before vaccination.

The Matrix-M™ adjuvant: A critical component of vaccines for the 21st century

Matrix-M™ adjuvant is a key component of several novel vaccine candidates. The Matrix-M adjuvant consists of two distinct fractions of saponins purified from the Quillaja saponaria Molina tree, combined with cholesterol and phospholipids to form 40-nm open cage-like nanoparticles, achieving potent adjuvanticity with a favorable safety profile. Matrix-M induces early activation of innate immune cells at the injection site and in the draining lymph nodes. This translates into improved magnitude and quality of the antibody response to the antigen, broadened epitope recognition, and the induction of a Th1-dominant immune response. Matrix-M-adjuvanted vaccines have a favorable safety profile and are well tolerated in clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the latest findings on the mechanisms of action, efficacy, and safety of Matrix-M adjuvant and other saponin-based adjuvants, with a focus on the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) subunit vaccine candidate NVX-CoV2373 developed to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

The Prevalence of Immediate Hypersensitivity Reactions to the BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: Data from the Vaccination Campaign in a Large Academic Hospital

The anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination has probably been the most effective tool for preventing the infection and negative outcomes of the COVID-19 disease, and therefore for interrupting the pandemic state. The first licensed SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was BNT162b2, an mRNA vaccine that has been widely used since the earliest stages of the global vaccination campaign. Since the beginning of the vaccination campaign, some cases of suspected allergic reactions to BNT162b2 have been described. Epidemiological data, however, have provided reassuring results of an extremely low prevalence of these hypersensitivity reactions to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. In this article, we describe the results of a survey carried out through the use of a questionnaire, administered to all the health personnel of our university hospital after the first two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine, which investigated the development of adverse reactions after a vaccination. We analyzed the responses of 3112 subjects subjected to the first dose of the vaccine; among these, 1.8% developed symptoms compatible with allergic reactions and 0.9% with clinical manifestations of possible anaphylaxis. Only 10.3% of the subjects who had allergic reactions after the first injection experienced similar reactions after the second dose and none of them experienced anaphylaxis. In conclusion, the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is rarely associated with severe allergic reactions and the second dose of vaccine is safe for this group of patients.

Nucleic acid-based vaccine platforms against the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19)

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has infected 673,010,496 patients and caused the death of 6,854,959 cases globally until today. Enormous efforts have been made to develop fundamentally different COVID-19 vaccine platforms. Nucleic acid-based vaccines consisting of mRNA and DNA vaccines (third-generation vaccines) have been promising in terms of rapid and convenient production and efficient provocation of immune responses against the COVID-19. Several DNA-based (ZyCoV-D, INO-4800, AG0302-COVID19, and GX-19N) and mRNA-based (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and ARCoV) approved vaccine platforms have been utilized for the COVID-19 prevention. mRNA vaccines are at the forefront of all platforms for COVID-19 prevention. However, these vaccines have lower stability, while DNA vaccines are needed with higher doses to stimulate the immune responses. Intracellular delivery of nucleic acid-based vaccines and their adverse events needs further research. Considering re-emergence of the COVID-19 variants of concern, vaccine reassessment and the development of polyvalent vaccines, or pan-coronavirus strategies, is essential for effective infection prevention.

Real-life safety profile of mRNA vaccines for COVID-19: an analysis of VAERS database

Introduction

Since the first COVID-19 messenger RNA vaccines became available globally for emergency or conditional use, post-marketing surveillance activities have been implemented for the monitoring of any adverse events that might arise in daily clinical practice and were not detected earlier during clinical trials.

Methods

Safety data concerning the BNT162b2 and the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines were collected from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for the period from December 2020 to October 15, 2021. In addition to a descriptive analysis of individuals who experienced an adverse event after vaccination, a case-non-case analysis was performed by using the Reporting Odds Ratio with 95% confidence interval as statistical parameter for detecting differences in reporting rates between the two mRNA vaccines.

Results

At the cut-off date, a total of 758,040 reports were submitted to VAERS, of which 439,401 were related to the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine and 318,639 to the Moderna vaccine (mRNA-1273). Most common adverse events following immunization for both mRNA vaccines were headache, fatigue, pyrexia, dizziness, nausea, pain, chills, and pain in extremity. A disproportionality was found for BNT162b2 as compared with mRNA-1273 for some events of special interest, such as myocarditis [ROR 2.00; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.93 to 2.06], Bell’s palsy (1.34; 1.29 to 1.39), and anaphylactic shock (3.23; 2.96 to 3.53).

Conclusion

Even if some rare adverse events were identified, our survey of post-marketing surveillance has provided further evidence of the favourable safety profile of mRNA vaccines.

Immune Response Related to Lymphadenopathy Post COVID-19 Vaccination

Mass vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global health strategy to control the COVID-19 pandemic. With the increasing number of vaccinations, COVID-19 vaccine-associated lymphadenopathy (C19-VAL) has been frequently reported. Current findings emphasize the characteristics of C19-VAL. The mechanism of C19-VAL is complicated to explore. Accumulated reports separately show that C19-VAL incidence is associated with receiver age and gender, reactive change within lymph nodes (LN), etc. We constructed a systematic review to evaluate the associated elements of C19-VAL and provide the mechanism of C19-VAL. Articles were searched from PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE by using the processing of PRISMA. The search terms included combinations of the COVID-19 vaccine, COVID-19 vaccination and lymphadenopathy. Finally, sixty-two articles have been included in this study. Our results show that days post-vaccination and B cell germinal center response are negatively correlated with C19-VAL incidence. The reactive change within LN is highly related to C19-VAL development. The study results suggested that strong vaccine immune response may contribute to the C19-VAL development and perhaps through the B cell germinal center response post vaccination. From the perspective of imaging interpretation, it is important to carefully distinguish reactive lymph nodes from metastatic lymph node enlargement through medical history collection or evaluation, especially in patients with underlying malignancy.

Anaphylactic Reactions to COVID-19 Vaccines: An Updated Assessment Based on Pharmacovigilance Data

This study aimed at producing an updated assessment of the incidence of anaphylaxis associated with COVID-19 vaccines based on pharmacovigilance data. Anaphylactic reaction and anaphylactic shock data post-COVID-19-vaccination reported from week 52, 2020 to week 1 or week 2, 2023 were collected from the VAERS and EudraVigilance databases, respectively, and analyzed comparatively. Incidence rates were calculated using the corresponding administered vaccine doses as denominators for all licensed vaccines and both platform types (mRNA or vectored). The latest data from the present analysis showed lower anaphylaxis incidence associated with COVID-19 vaccination compared to previous estimates from week 52, 2020 to week 39, 2021 (anaphylactic reaction: 8.96 (95% CI 8.80-9.11)/million doses overall (EEA: 14.19 (95% CI 13.92-14.47)/million/US: 3.17 (95% CI 3.03-3.31)/million); anaphylactic shock: 1.46 (95% CI 1.39-1.52)/million doses overall (EEA: 2.47 (95% CI 2.36-2.58)/million/US: 0.33 (95% CI 0.29-0.38)/million)). Incidence rates varied by vaccine and were higher as captured in EudraVigilance compared to the VAERS and for vectored compared to mRNA vaccines. Most reported cases had a favorable outcome. The extremely rare fatalities (overall rates across continents 0.04 (95% CI 0.03-0.06)/million doses for anaphylactic reaction and 0.02 (95% CI 0.01-0.03)/million vaccine doses for anaphylactic shock) were also associated with vector-rather than mRNA-based vaccines. The diminished incidence of anaphylaxis post-vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines offers assurance about their safety, as does the continuous potential adverse events monitoring through specialized pharmacovigilance databases.

Allergic Reactions to Vaccines in Children: From Constituents to Specific Vaccines

Vaccination is an essential public health measure that helps to reduce the burden of infectious diseases in children. Although vaccines have an excellent safety record and the association of severe allergic reactions is rare, public concerns about vaccine safety can lead to incomplete vaccination coverage in children with or without allergies. Therefore, it is important to understand the mechanisms and implications of allergic reactions to vaccines and define strategies to manage them to provide the safest care for vaccine recipients. In this review, we provide an overview on the types of allergic reactions that can occur after vaccination, including those caused by various vaccine constituents. We also discuss the mechanisms underlying these allergic reactions and the recommended diagnosis and management strategies for children with a history of suspected allergic reactions to vaccines. An improved understanding of allergic reactions to vaccines can aid in the enhancement of the safety and effectiveness of vaccination.

Case Report of Serum Sickness-like Reaction following the First Dose of the Chimpanzee Adenovirus-Vectored AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccine, ChAdOx1

Serum sickness-like reaction from serum sickness is critical. Serum sickness-like reaction has comparable symptoms to serum sickness, but their underlying pathophysiology is distinct. This delayed hypersensitivity response was first characterized as a drug-induced reaction and is uncommon in adults; it is more common in children. COVID-19 vaccinations are now being routinely given in the COVID-19 period, and adverse reactions to immunization have been recorded. We present a case of COVID-19 vaccination-induced serum sickness-like reaction which developed after receiving the first dose of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine.

Self-Reported Allergic Adverse Events Following Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (TURKOVAC™) among General and High-Risk Population

TURKOVAC™ is a whole-virion inactivated COVID-19 vaccine which was developed and granted emergency use and conditional marketing authorization in December 2021 in Türkiye. The objective of this study is to assess the distribution and the severity of allergic adverse events following the administration of the vaccine as the primary or the booster dose in 15 provinces in Türkiye. In this cohort study, between February and May 2022, in the selected 15 provinces having an adequate number of health care personnel in the community health centers to conduct the study, 32,300 people having the first, the second, or the booster dose of the vaccine were invited to the survey. A total of 29,584 people voluntarily agreed to participate to the survey and were given a structured questionnaire after a minimum of 10 days following the vaccination. In our study, only 0.5% of the participants (142 persons) reported to experience any allergic reaction, and 12 of them (8.5%) reported to be given medical treatment in a health center. Male predominance (55.6%) was observed among participants reported to experience any allergic reaction. No hospitalization was recorded. Of the participants, 4.4% (1315 people) reported to have a history of allergy. The most reported allergens were drugs. Among the participants without a known history of allergy (n = 28,269), 0.4% of them (110 people) reported to experience an allergic reaction following the vaccination, and 5.4% of the allergic reactions (six people) were reported to be treated in a health center. The percentage of the participants given any medical treatment among the participants without a known history of allergy is 0.02%. No immediate or anaphylactic reaction was reported. Among the participants with a known history of allergy (n = 1315), 32 people (2.4% of them) reported to experience an allergic reaction following the vaccination, and 18.7% of the allergic reactions (six people) were reported to be prescribed a medical treatment. The percentage of the participants given any medical treatment among the participants with a known history of allergy is 0.4%. A known history of allergy increased the risk of having an allergic experience by approximately six times following vaccination. As a whole-virion inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, the TURKOVAC™ vaccine, with a low allergic reaction-related adverse event profile, can be an alternative to other COVID-19 vaccines.

The conundrum of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine-induced anaphylaxis

Novel messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines have proven to be effective tools against coronavirus disease 2019, and they have changed the course of the pandemic. However, early reports of mRNA vaccine-induced anaphylaxis resulted in public alarm, contributing toward vaccine hesitancy. Although initial reports were concerning for an unusually high rate of anaphylaxis to the mRNA vaccines, the true incidence is likely comparable with other vaccines. These reactions occurred predominantly in young to middle-aged females, and many had a history of allergies. Although initially thought to be triggered by polyethylene glycol (PEG), lack of reproducibility of these reactions with subsequent dosing and absent PEG sensitization point away from an IgE-mediated PEG allergy in most. PEG skin testing has poor posttest probability and should be reserved for evaluating non-vaccine-related PEG allergy without influencing decisions for subsequent mRNA vaccination. Immunization stress-related response can closely mimic vaccine-induced anaphylaxis and warrants consideration as a potential etiology. Current evidence suggests that many individuals who developed anaphylaxis to the first dose of an mRNA vaccine can likely receive a subsequent dose after careful evaluation. The need to understand these reactions mechanistically remains critical because the mRNA platform is rapidly finding its way into other vaccinations and therapeutics.

Clinical Phenotypes of Immediate First-Dose Reactions to mRNA COVID-19: A Multicenter Latent Class Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although immediate potentially allergic reactions have been reported after dose 1 of mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, comprehensively defined subtypes have not been clearly distinguished.

OBJECTIVE

To define distinct clinical phenotypes of immediate reactions after dose 1 of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, and to assess the relation of clinical phenotype to mRNA COVID-19 vaccine second dose tolerance.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with 1 or more potentially allergic symptoms or signs within 4 hours of receiving dose 1 of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and assessed by allergy/immunology specialists from 5 U.S. academic medical centers (January-June 2021). We used latent class analysis-an unbiased, machine-learning modeling method-to define novel clinical phenotypes. We assessed demographic, clinical, and reaction characteristics associated with phenotype membership. Using log-binomial regression, we assessed the relation between phenotype membership and second dose tolerance, defined as either no symptoms or mild, self-limited symptoms resolving with antihistamines alone. A sensitivity analysis considered second dose tolerance as objective signs only.

RESULTS

We identified 265 patients with dose-1 immediate reactions with 3 phenotype clusters: (1) Limited or Predominantly Cutaneous, (2) Sensory, and (3) Systemic. A total of 223 patients (84%) received a second dose and 200 (90%) tolerated their second dose. Sensory cluster (all patients had the symptom of numbness or tingling) was associated with a higher likelihood of second dose intolerance, but this finding did not persist when accounting for objective signs.

CONCLUSIONS

Three novel clinical phenotypes of immediate-onset reactions after dose 1 of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were identified using latent class analysis: (1) Limited or Predominantly Cutaneous, (2) Sensory, and (3) Systemic. Whereas these clinical phenotypes may indicate differential mechanistic etiologies or associations with subsequent dose tolerance, most individuals proceeding to their second dose tolerated it.

Skin manifestations following anti-COVID-19 vaccination: A multicentricstudy from Turkey

PURPOSE

After the emergence of the pandemic caused by the COVID-19 virus, vaccination with various vaccines has started to be implemented across the world. To identify dermatological reactions developing after the COVID-19 vaccines administered in Turkey and determine their clinical features and risk factors that may play a role in their development.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included patients aged ≥18 years, who presented to 13 different dermatology clinics in Turkey between July 2021 and September 2021 after developing dermatological reactions following the administration of the COVID-19 vaccine. After providing written consent, the patients were asked to complete a standard survey including questions related to age, gender, occupation, comorbidities, the regular medication used, the onset of cutaneous reactions after vaccination, and localization of reactions. Dermatological reactions were categorized according to whether they developed after the first or second dose of the vaccine or whether they occurred after the inactivated or messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine. The relationship between dermatological reactions and some variables such as gender and comorbidities was also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 269 patients [116 women (43.1%), 153 men (56.9%)] were included in the study. It was observed that the dermatological diseases and reactions that most frequently developed after vaccination were urticaria (25.7%), herpes zoster (24.9%), maculopapular eruption (12.3%), and pityriasis rosea (4.5%). The rate of dermatological reactions was 60.6% after the administration of the mRNA vaccine and 39.4% after that of the inactivated vaccine. There was a statistically significantly higher number of reactions among the patients that received the mRNA vaccine (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The most common reactions in our sample were urticaria, herpes zoster, and maculopapular eruption. Physicians should know the dermatological side effects of COVID-19 vaccines and their clinical features.

Death and Disability Reported with Cases of Vaccine Anaphylaxis Stratified by Administration Setting: An Analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System from 2017 to 2022

The serious nature of post-vaccination anaphylaxis requires healthcare professionals to be adequately trained to respond to these hypersensitivity emergencies. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes reported with cases of vaccine anaphylaxis stratified by administration setting. We queried reports in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database from 2017 to 2022 and identified cases involving anaphylaxis with an onset within one day of vaccine administration. The primary outcome was the combined prevalence of death or disability for each setting while the secondary outcome was the prevalence of hospitalization. Adjusted (age, sex, prior history of allergy, vaccine type) odds ratios (aOR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using logistic regression analysis. A total of 2041 cases of anaphylaxis comprised the primary study cohort with representation in the sample from all 50 US states and the District of Columbia. The mean age was 43.3 ± 17.5 years, and most cases involved women (79.9%). Cases of anaphylaxis were reported after receiving a coronavirus vaccine (85.2%), influenza vaccine (5.9%), tetanus vaccine (2.2%), zoster vaccine (1.6%), measles vaccine (0.7%), and other vaccine (4.5%). Outcomes associated with reports of vaccine anaphylaxis included 35 cases of death and disability and 219 hospitalizations. Compared with all other settings, the aOR of death and disability when anaphylaxis occurred was 1.92 (95% CI, 0.86-4.54) in a medical provider's office, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.26-2.43) in a pharmacy and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.15-3.94) in a public health clinic. Compared with all other settings, the aOR of hospitalization when anaphylaxis occurred was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.71-1.47) in a medical provider's office, 1.06 (95% CI, 0.72-1.54) in a pharmacy, and 1.12 (95% CI, 0.61-1.93) in a public health clinic. An analysis of a national database across six years revealed no significant differences in the odds of death/disability and odds of hospitalization associated with post-vaccination anaphylaxis in the medical office, pharmacy, and public health clinic compared with all other settings. This study expands our understanding of the safety of immunization services and reinforces that all settings must be prepared to respond to such an emergency.

COVID arm as a common cutaneous manifestation after mRNA-1273 vaccination: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

By August 2022, CoronaVirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) had caused 600 million illnesses and 6.5 million fatalities globally. A massive vaccination program is being implemented worldwide to suppress this condition. Several works of literature stated that mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, specifically with the mRNA-1273 vaccine, is followed by clear evidence of the COVID arm effects associated with this vaccine.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the latest evidence of COVID arm as a common effect of mRNA-1273 vaccination with the ultimate goal of improving vaccine counseling to help healthcare professionals and reassure patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed on topics that assess the COVID arm as a cutaneous manifestation following mRNA-1273 vaccination from inception up until July 2022.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies with a total of 1129 participants after the first and second dose of mRNA-1273 vaccination reported that most participants had COVID arm following the first dose administration. The characteristics of the patients were a mean age of 43.8 years old, and females represented ≥ 50% in most studies, with a mean onset of 6.9 days after the first dose administration. Symptoms resolved within seven days following the treatment and were harmless.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that the COVID arm condition is most common following the first mRNA-1273 vaccination in the female and middle-aged group. The correlation between demographic variables and COVID arm risk elucidates that the reaction is a type IV allergic skin reaction.

Dynamics of T follicular helper cells in patients with rheumatic diseases and subsequent antibody responses in a three-dose immunization regimen of CoronaVac

Given increased acceptance of the CoronaVac, there is an unmet need to assess the safety and immunogenic changes of CoronaVac in patients with rheumatic diseases (RD). Here we comprehensively analysed humoral and cellular responses in patient with RD after a three-dose immunization regimen of CoronaVac. RD patients with stable condition and/or low disease activity (n = 40) or healthy controls (n = 40) were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive CoronaVac (Sinovac). The prevalence of anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibodies and neutralizing antibodies was similar between healthy control (HC) and RD patients after the second and the third vaccination. However, the titers of anti-RBD IgG and neutralizing antibodies were significantly lower in RD patients compared to HCs (p < 0.05), which was associated with an impaired T follicular helper (Tfh) cell response. Among RD patients, those who generated an antibody response displayed a significantly higher Tfh cells compared to those who failed after the first and the second vaccination (p < 0.05). Interestingly, subjects with a negative serological response displayed a similar Tfh memory response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-derived peptides as their anti-RBD IgG positive counterpart, and all (4/4) of the non-responders in HCs, and 62.5% (5/8) of the non-responders in patients with RD displayed a positive serological response following the third dose. No serious adverse events were observed. In conclusion, our findings support SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with RD with stable and/or low disease activity. The impaired ability in generating vaccine-specific antibodies in patients with RD was associated with a reduction in Tfh cells induction. The window of vaccination times still needs to be explored in future studies. Clinical trial registration: This trial was registered with ChiCTR2100049138.

Anaphylaxis: Advances in the Past 10 Years

In the past 10 years, anaphylaxis has grown into its own special area of study within Allergy-Immunology, both at the bench and at the bedside. This review focuses on some of the most clinically relevant advances over the past decade. These include simplified and more inclusive diagnostic criteria for adults and children, uniform definition of biphasic anaphylaxis, and improved systems for objective severity grading. Studies reported in the past decade have led to improved understanding of normal and abnormal regulation of mast cell function, translating into better diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to patients with anaphylaxis. Research has provided improved recognition and treatment of mast cell disorders and has identified a new condition, hereditary α-tryptasemia, that may impact anaphylactic syndromes. We have learned to recognize new causes (α-gal), new pathways (Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor-X2), and many risk factors for severe anaphylaxis. The stability of epinephrine in autoinjectors was reported to be very good for several years after the labeled expiry date, and it can tolerate freezing and thawing. Repeated and prolonged exposure to excessive heat leads to degradation of epinephrine activity. New treatments to prevent severe anaphylaxis have been described, using new ways to block the IgE receptor or modulate intracellular signaling pathways.

Recent Advances in Genomics-Based Approaches for the Development of Intracellular Bacterial Pathogen Vaccines

Infectious diseases continue to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The majority of infectious diseases are caused by intracellular pathogenic bacteria (IPB). Historically, conventional vaccination drives have helped control the pathogenesis of intracellular bacteria and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, saving millions of lives. However, in light of various limitations, many diseases that involve IPB still do not have adequate vaccines. In response to increasing demand for novel vaccine development strategies, a new area of vaccine research emerged following the advent of genomics technology, which changed the paradigm of vaccine development by utilizing the complete genomic data of microorganisms against them. It became possible to identify genes related to disease virulence, genetic patterns linked to disease virulence, as well as the genetic components that supported immunity and favorable vaccine responses. Complete genomic databases, and advancements in transcriptomics, metabolomics, structural genomics, proteomics, immunomics, pan-genomics, synthetic genomics, and population biology have allowed researchers to identify potential vaccine candidates and predict their effects in patients. New vaccines have been created against diseases for which previously there were no vaccines available, and existing vaccines have been improved. This review highlights the key issues and explores the evolution of vaccines. The increasing volume of IPB genomic data, and their application in novel genome-based techniques for vaccine development, were also examined, along with their characteristics, and the opportunities and obstacles involved. Critically, the application of genomics technology has helped researchers rapidly select and evaluate candidate antigens. Novel vaccines capable of addressing the limitations associated with conventional vaccines have been developed and pressing healthcare issues are being addressed.

Adverse Effects of COVID-19 Vaccination: Machine Learning and Statistical Approach to Identify and Classify Incidences of Morbidity and Postvaccination Reactogenicity

Good vaccine safety and reliability are essential for successfully countering infectious disease spread. A small but significant number of adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines have been reported. Here, we aim to identify possible common factors in such adverse reactions to enable strategies that reduce the incidence of such reactions by using patient data to classify and characterise those at risk. We examined patient medical histories and data documenting postvaccination effects and outcomes. The data analyses were conducted using a range of statistical approaches followed by a series of machine learning classification algorithms. In most cases, a group of similar features was significantly associated with poor patient reactions. These included patient prior illnesses, admission to hospitals and SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. The analyses indicated that patient age, gender, taking other medications, type-2 diabetes, hypertension, allergic history and heart disease are the most significant pre-existing factors associated with the risk of poor outcome. In addition, long duration of hospital treatments, dyspnoea, various kinds of pain, headache, cough, asthenia, and physical disability were the most significant clinical predictors. The machine learning classifiers that are trained with medical history were also able to predict patients with complication-free vaccination and have an accuracy score above 90%. Our study identifies profiles of individuals that may need extra monitoring and care (e.g., vaccination at a location with access to comprehensive clinical support) to reduce negative outcomes through classification approaches.

Impact of Sex and Age on mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Side Effects in Japan

mRNA COVID-19 vaccination was initiated worldwide in late 2020, and its efficacy has been well reported. However, studies about vaccine-related side effects are sparse. A total of 262 health care workers who received mRNA COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 were recruited, and their vaccine-related side effects were investigated. Impact of sex and age on the side effects was statistically analyzed. A higher number of vaccine-related side effects among females versus males was identified (median 3 versus 2, P < 0.05, after the first dose, and 5 versus 2.5, P < 0.01, after the second dose). General fatigue, headache, chills, and fever were the culprit adverse symptoms. In multivariate analysis, females had an increasing number of side effects after receiving their first (B = 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2 to 1.2) and second (B = 1.5; 95% CI, 0.7 to 2.2) vaccine doses compared to that of males. In age analysis, the older group (≥60 years old) had a lower number of side effects than the younger group (B = -0.5 with a 95% CI of -1.1 to -0.02 after the first vaccine dose, and B = -2.1 with a 95% CI of -2.9 to -1.2 after the second vaccine dose). Additionally, prolonged time to recovery was found among females (P = 0.003 after the first dose; P = 0.008 after the second dose). Specifically, symptoms of general fatigue, headache, itching, swelling at the injection site, and dizziness were the culprit symptoms affecting recovery time. Several cutaneous and membranous symptoms, including "COVID arm," were identified among females. These results highlight the impact of sex and age on side effects from mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and will aid in creating a safer vaccine. IMPORTANCE We demonstrate sex- and age-related impact on mRNA COVID-19 vaccine-related side effects, with a higher number and frequency of side effects and prolonged time to recovery in females compared to males and negative correlation between age and vaccine-related side effects. Identification of unique age- and sex-specific adverse symptoms will provide the opportunity to better understand the nature of sex- and age-associated immunological differences and develop safer and more efficacious vaccines.

Case series of chronic spontaneous urticaria following COVID-19 vaccines: an unusual skin manifestation

BACKGROUND

Urticaria following the COVID-19 vaccine was rarely reported and had a short self-limited resolution. However, there has been relatively little literature published on CSU induced by COVID-19 vaccines.

PURPOSE

We describe a case series of patients who experienced CSU after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

METHODS

A retrospective case series of 10 patients referred to the Department of Clinical Pharmacology of the University of Monastir (January 2021-January 2022) and included for evaluation of urticaria after COVID-19 vaccination.

RESULTS

The median age was 31 years and patients were mostly female. Atopy was presented in 3 patients and urticaria was accompanied by angioedema in 6 patients. The median time interval between vaccination and the onset of urticaria was 28.5 h. The offended dose was the first one in 8 patients. The resolution of the eruption was observed at least 2 months later, despite the regular use of a full dose of antihistamine in nine patients. Polynuclear leucocytosis was identified in 5 patients. Anti-TPOAb was positive in one patient after receiving the BNT162b2 vaccine. Total serum IgE was elevated in 4 patients. Skin tests for the suspected vaccine as well as the vaccine excipient were negative.

CONCLUSION

We add to the medical literature ten new cases of chronic spontaneous urticarial reactions following COVID-19 vaccines uncontrolled with high-dose first-generation H1 antihistamines.

Post-vaccination incidence and side effects of COVID-19 in a cohort of Brazilian healthcare professionals: an internet-based survey

OBJECTIVE

So far, at least 18 different severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 vaccines have been approved. Until October 2022, 12.8 billion doses had been administered all over the world. Vaccination of high-risk groups and healthcare professionals was initially prioritized. This cross-sectional survey aimed to investigate the occurrence of vaccine side effects, as well as the incidence of COVID-19 among vaccinated healthcare professionals.

METHODS

A survey was structured and shared with healthcare professionals using a digital platform to collect data between May and June 2021.

RESULTS

This study included 6,115 participants. The most prevalent age group was 30-39 years (31.3%), 67.3% were female and 73.2% accounted for physicians, and nearly half worked in frontline care for COVID-19. Approximately, two-thirds of them were vaccinated with CoronaVac, and about 60% reported at least one side effect following the vaccination. Nevertheless, minor reactions were more frequent, such as pain at site of injection, fatigue, and headache. Our data could be used to inform people on the likelihood of side effects of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly CoronaVac, since this is the largest study about vaccine reactions using this vaccine, to our best knowledge.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of side effects in Brazilian healthcare professionals was 60%, and the most common side effects included local swelling/pain, fatigue/tiredness, fever, headache, and limb pain.