Melanopsin-driven pupil response in summer and winter in unipolar seasonal affective disorder

The role of retinal irradiance estimates in melanopsin-driven retinal responsivity: a reanalysis of the post-illumination pupil response in seasonal affective disorder

To isolate melanopsin contributions to retinal sensitivity measured by the post-illumination pupil response (PIPR), controlling for individual differences in non-melanopsin contributions including retinal irradiance is required. When methodologies to negate such differences present barriers, statistical controls have included age, baseline diameter, iris pigmentation, and circadian time of testing. Alternatively, the pupil light reflex (PLR) and calculations estimating retinal irradiance both reflect retinal irradiance, while the PLR also reflects downstream pathways. We reanalyzed data from an observational, correlational study comparing the PIPR across seasons in seasonal affective disorder (SAD) and controls. The PIPR was measured in 47 adults in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (25 SAD) over 50 seconds after 1 second of red and blue stimuli of 15.3 log photons/cm2/s. The PLR was within 1 second while PIPR was averaged over 10-40 seconds post-stimulus. Two raters ranked iris pigmentation using a published scale. We evaluated model fit using Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) across different covariate sets. The best-fitting models included either estimated retinal irradiance or PLR, and circadian time of testing. The PLR is collected contemporaneously in PIPR studies and is an individually specific measure of nonspecific effects, while being minimally burdensome. This work extends the prior publication by introducing theoretically grounded covariates that improved analytic model fits based on AIC specific to the present methods and sample. Such quantitative methods could be helpful in studies which must balance participant and researcher burden against tighter methodological controls of individual differences in retinal irradiance.

One seasonal clock fits all?

Adaptation of physiology and behavior to seasonal changes in the environment are for many organisms essential for survival. Most of our knowledge about the underlying mechanisms comes from research on photoperiodic regulation of reproduction in plants, insects and mammals. However, even humans, who mostly live in environments with minimal seasonal influences, show annual rhythms in physiology (e.g., immune activity, brain function), behavior (e.g., sleep-wake cycles) and disease prevalence (e.g., infectious diseases). As seasonal variations in environmental conditions may be drastically altered due to climate change, the understanding of the mechanisms underlying seasonal adaptation of physiology and behavior becomes even more relevant. While many species have developed specific solutions for dedicated tasks of photoperiodic regulation, we find a number of common principles and mechanisms when comparing insect and mammalian systems: (1) the circadian system contributes to photoperiodic regulation; (2) similar signaling molecules (VIP and PDF) are used for transferring information from the circadian system to the neuroendocrine system controlling the photoperiodic response; (3) the hormone melatonin participates in seasonal adaptation in insects as well as mammals; and (4) changes in photoperiod affect neurotransmitter function in both animal groups. The few examples of overlap elaborated in this perspective article, as well as the discussion on relevance for humans, should be seen as encouragement to unravel the machinery of seasonal adaptation in a multitude of organisms.

Altered pupil light and darkness reflex and eye-blink responses in late-life depression

BACKGROUND

Late-life depression (LLD) is a prevalent neuropsychiatric disorder in the older population. While LLD exhibits high mortality rates, depressive symptoms in older adults are often masked by physical health conditions. In younger adults, depression is associated with deficits in pupil light reflex and eye blink rate, suggesting the potential use of these responses as biomarkers for LLD.

METHODS

We conducted a study using video-based eye-tracking to investigate pupil and blink responses in LLD patients (n = 25), older (OLD) healthy controls (n = 29), and younger (YOUNG) healthy controls (n = 25). The aim was to determine whether there were alterations in pupil and blink responses in LLD compared to both OLD and YOUNG groups.

RESULTS

LLD patients displayed significantly higher blink rates and dampened pupil constriction responses compared to OLD and YOUNG controls. While tonic pupil size in YOUNG differed from that of OLD, LLD patients did not exhibit a significant difference compared to OLD and YOUNG controls. GDS-15 scores in older adults correlated with light and darkness reflex response variability and blink rates. PHQ-15 scores showed a correlation with blink rates, while MoCA scores correlated with tonic pupil sizes.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrate that LLD patients display altered pupil and blink behavior compared to OLD and YOUNG controls. These altered responses correlated differently with the severity of depressive, somatic, and cognitive symptoms, indicating their potential as objective biomarkers for LLD.

Circadian photoentrainment varies by season and depressed state: associations between light sensitivity and sleep and circadian timing

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Altered light sensitivity may be an underlying vulnerability for disrupted circadian photoentrainment. The photic information necessary for circadian photoentrainment is sent to the circadian clock from melanopsin-containing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs). The current study tested whether the responsivity of ipRGCs measured using the post-illumination pupil response (PIPR) was associated with circadian phase, sleep timing, and circadian alignment, and if these relationships varied by season or depression severity.

METHODS

Adult participants (N = 323, agem = 40.5, agesd = 13.5) with varying depression severity were recruited during the summer (n = 154) and winter (n = 169) months. Light sensitivity was measured using the PIPR. Circadian phase was assessed using Dim Light Melatonin Onset (DLMO) on Friday evenings. Midsleep was measured using actigraphy. Circadian alignment was calculated as the DLMO-midsleep phase angle. Multilevel regression models covaried for age, gender, and time since wake of PIPR assessment.

RESULTS

Greater light sensitivity was associated with later circadian phase in summer but not in winter (β = 0.23; p = 0.03). Greater light sensitivity was associated with shorter DLMO-midsleep phase angles (β = 0.20; p = 0.03) in minimal depression but not in moderate depression (SIGHSAD < 6.6; Johnson-Neyman region of significance).

CONCLUSIONS

Light sensitivity measured by the PIPR was associated with circadian phase during the summer but not in winter, suggesting ipRGC functioning in humans may affect circadian entrainment when external zeitgebers are robust. Light sensitivity was associated with circadian alignment only in participants with minimal depression, suggesting circadian photoentrainment, a possible driver of mood, may be decreased in depression year-round, similar to decreased photoentrainment in winter.

Illuminating the way: the role of bright light therapy in the treatment of depression

INTRODUCTION

Despite the growing number of different therapeutic options, treatment of depression is still a challenge. A broader perspective reveals the benefits of bright light therapy (BLT). It stimulates intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells, which induces a complex cascade of events, including alterations in melatonergic, neurotrophic, GABAergic, glutamatergic, noradrenergic, serotonergic systems, and HPA axis, suggesting that BLT effects expand beyond the circadian pacemaker.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors present and discuss recent data of BLT in major depressive disorder, non-seasonal depression, bipolar depression or depressive phase of bipolar disorder, and seasonal affective disorder, as well as in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The authors further highlight BLT effects in various depressive disorders compared to placebo and report data from several studies suggesting a response to BLT in TRD. Also, the authors report data showing that BLT can be used both as a monotherapy or in combination with other pharmacological treatments.

EXPERT OPINION

BLT is an easy-to-use and low-budget therapy with good tolerability. Future studies should focus on clinical and biological predictors of response to BLT, on defining specific populations which may benefit from BLT and establishing treatment protocols regarding timing, frequency, and duration of BLT.

Chronic restraint stress-induced depression-like behavior is mediated by upregulation of melanopsin expression in C57BL/6 mice retina

BACKGROUND

Depression is associated with circadian disturbances in which melanopsin was a key mechanism. Further studies have demonstrated that melanopsin gene variations are associated with some depressive disorders and aberrant light can impair mood through melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells (mRGCs). The goal of this study was to explore the direct relationship between depression and melanopsin.

METHODS

Adult C57BL/6 male mice were physically restrained for 16 h in a 50-ml polypropylene centrifuge tube and all behavioral tests were performed after CRS treatment. Western blot analysis and immunofluorescence were used to detect melanopsin expression in the retina of C57BL/6 mice. And we observed the change of the electrophysiological function and release of glutamate of mRGCs.

RESULTS

The melanopsin expression upregulate in mRGCs of chronic restraint stress (CRS)-treating mice which exhibit depression-like behavior. The frequency of blue light-induced action potentials and light-induced glutamate release mediated by melanopsin also increase significantly. This change of melanopsin is mediated by the CRS-induced glucocorticoid.

CONCLUSIONS

CRS may induce the depression-like behavior in mice via glucocorticoid-melanopsin pathway. Our findings provide a novel mechanistic link between CRS-induced depression and melanopsin in mice.

Sleep and circadian rhythm profiles in seasonal depression

Sleep and circadian rhythm disruptions are symptoms of, and hypothesized underlying mechanisms in, seasonal depression. Discrepant observational findings and mixed responses to sleep/circadian-based treatments suggest heterogenous sleep and circadian disruptions in seasonal depression, despite these disruptions historically conceptualized as delayed circadian phase and hypersomnia. This study used a data-driven cluster analysis to characterize sleep/circadian profiles in seasonal depression to identify treatment targets for future interventions. Biobehavioral measures of sleep and circadian rhythms were assessed during the winter in individuals with Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD), subsyndromal-SAD (S-SAD), or nonseasonal, never depressed controls (total sample N = 103). The following variables were used in the cluster analysis: circadian phase (from dim light melatonin onset), midsleep timing, total sleep time, sleep efficiency, regularity of midsleep timing, and nap duration (all from wrist actigraphy). Sleep and circadian variables were compared across clusters and controls. Despite limited sleep/circadian differences between diagnostic groups, there were two reliable (Jaccard Coefficients >0.75) sleep/circadian profiles in SAD/S-SAD individuals: a 'Disrupted sleep' cluster, characterized by irregular and fragmented sleep and an 'Advanced' cluster, characterized by early sleep and circadian timing and longer total sleep times (>7.5 h). Clusters did not differ by depression severity. Midsleep correlated with DLMO (r = 0.56), irregularity (r = 0.3), and total sleep time (r = -0.27). Sleep and circadian disruptions in seasonal depression are not uniformly characterized by hypersomnia and circadian phase delay. Presence of distinct sleep and circadian subgroups in seasonal depression may predict successful treatment response. Prospective assessment and tailoring of individual sleep and circadian disruptions may reduce treatment failures.

Sleep and circadian differences between light and heavy adult alcohol drinkers

Background

Numerous studies have reported that eveningness is associated with increased alcohol consumption. However, biological markers of circadian timing, such as dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) and circadian photoreceptor responsivity (post‐illumination pupil response, PIPR), have rarely been assessed in the context of habitual alcohol consumption. This study aimed to examine sleep, circadian timing, and photoreceptor responsivity in adult alcohol drinkers.

Methods

Participants (21 to 45 years) included 28 light and 50 heavy drinkers. The 8‐day study consisted of a week of adlib sleep monitored with wrist actigraphy, followed by a 9‐h laboratory session with a photoreceptor responsivity and circadian phase assessment.

Results

The heavy drinkers obtained on average 28 more minutes of sleep (p = 0.002) and reported more eveningness than the light drinkers (p = 0.029). There was a trend for a shorter DLMO‐midsleep interval (p = 0.059) in the heavy drinkers, reflecting a tendency for them to sleep at an earlier circadian phase. The PIPR in the heavy drinkers was significantly smaller than in the light drinkers (p = 0.032), suggesting reduced circadian photoreceptor responsivity in the heavy drinkers. A larger PIPR was significantly associated with a later DLMO in the light drinkers (r = 0.44, p = 0.019), but this relationship was absent in the heavy drinkers (r = −0.01, p = 0.94).

Conclusions

These results are consistent with earlier reports of more eveningness and a shorter DLMO‐midsleep interval being associated with heavier alcohol drinking. The novel finding of reduced circadian photoreceptor responsivity in heavy drinkers is consistent with prior rodent studies. Future studies should explore the impact of habitual alcohol consumption on other measures of circadian photoreceptor responsivity.

Elucidating treatment targets and mediators within a confirmatory efficacy trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy vs. light therapy for winter depression

BACKGROUND

This study is a confirmatory efficacy trial of two treatments for winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD): SAD-tailored group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT-SAD) and light therapy (LT). In our previous efficacy trial, post-treatment outcomes for CBT-SAD and LT were very similar, but CBT-SAD was associated with fewer depression recurrences two winters later than LT (27.3% in CBT-SAD vs. 45.6% in LT). CBT-SAD engaged and altered a specific mechanism of action, seasonal beliefs, which mediated CBT-SAD's acute antidepressant effects and CBT-SAD's enduring benefit over LT. Seasonal beliefs are theoretically distinct from LT's assumed target and mechanism: correction of circadian phase. This study applies the experimental therapeutics approach to determine how each treatment works when it is effective and to identify the best candidates for each. Biomarkers of LT's target and effect include circadian phase angle difference and the post-illumination pupil response. Biomarkers of CBT-SAD's target and effect include decreased pupillary and sustained frontal gamma-band EEG responses to seasonal words, which are hypothesized as biomarkers of seasonal beliefs, reflecting less engagement with seasonal stimuli following CBT-SAD. In addition to determining change mechanisms, this study tests the efficacy of a "switch" decision rule upon recurrence to inform clinical decision-making in practice.

METHODS

Adults with SAD (target N = 160) will be randomzied to 6-weeks of CBT-SAD or LT in winter 1; followed in winter 2; and, if a depression recurrence occurs, offered cross-over into the alternate treatment (i.e., switch from LT➔CBT-SAD or CBT-SAD➔LT). All subjects will be followed in winter 3. Biomarker assessments occur at pre-, mid-, and post-treatment in winter 1, at winter 2 follow-up (and again at mid-/post-treatment for those crossed-over), and at winter 3 follow-up. Primary efficacy analyses will test superiority of CBT-SAD over LT on depression recurrence status (the primary outcome). Mediation analyses will use parallel process latent growth curve modeling.

DISCUSSION

Consistent with the National Institute of Mental Health's priorities for demonstrating target engagement at the level of Research Domain Criteria-relevant biomarkers, this work aims to confirm the targets and mechanisms of LT and CBT-SAD to maximize the impact of future dissemination efforts.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03691792 . Registered on October 2, 2018.

Neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms of circadian rhythm disruption in bipolar disorder: A critical multi-disciplinary literature review and agenda for future research from the ISBD task force on chronobiology

AIM

Symptoms of bipolar disorder (BD) include changes in mood, activity, energy, sleep, and appetite. Since many of these processes are regulated by circadian function, circadian rhythm disturbance has been examined as a biological feature underlying BD. The International Society for Bipolar Disorders Chronobiology Task Force (CTF) was commissioned to review evidence for neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms pertinent to BD.

METHOD

Drawing upon expertise in animal models, biomarkers, physiology, and behavior, CTF analyzed the relevant cross-disciplinary literature to precisely frame the discussion around circadian rhythm disruption in BD, highlight key findings, and for the first time integrate findings across levels of analysis to develop an internally consistent, coherent theoretical framework.

RESULTS

Evidence from multiple sources implicates the circadian system in mood regulation, with corresponding associations with BD diagnoses and mood-related traits reported across genetic, cellular, physiological, and behavioral domains. However, circadian disruption does not appear to be specific to BD and is present across a variety of high-risk, prodromal, and syndromic psychiatric disorders. Substantial variability and ambiguity among the definitions, concepts and assumptions underlying the research have limited replication and the emergence of consensus findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research in circadian rhythms and its role in BD is warranted. Well-powered studies that carefully define associations between BD-related and chronobiologically-related constructs, and integrate across levels of analysis will be most illuminating.

Publication guidelines and recommendations for pupillary measurement in psychophysiological studies

A variety of psychological and physical phenomena elicit variations in the diameter of pupil of the eye. Changes in pupil size are mediated by the relative activation of the sphincter pupillae muscle (decrease pupil diameter) and the dilator pupillae muscle (increase pupil diameter), innervated by the parasympathetic and sympathetic branches, respectively, of the autonomic nervous system. The current guidelines are intended to inform and guide psychophysiological research involving pupil measurement by (1) summarizing important aspects concerning the physiology of the pupil, (2) providing methodological and data-analytic guidelines and recommendations, and (3) briefly reviewing psychological phenomena that modulate pupillary reactivity. Because of the increased ease and tractability of pupil measurement, the goal of these guidelines is to promote accurate recording, analysis, and reporting of pupillary data in psychophysiological research.

Individual differences and diversity in human physiological responses to light

Exposure to light affects our physiology and behaviour through a pathway connecting the retina to the circadian pacemaker in the hypothalamus - the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Recent research has identified significant individual differences in the non-visual effects of light,mediated by this pathway. Here, we discuss the fundamentals and individual differences in the non-visual effects of light. We propose a set of actions to improve our evidence database to be more diverse: understanding systematic bias in the evidence base, dedicated efforts to recruit more diverse participants, routine deposition and sharing of data, and development of data standards and reporting guidelines.