Standards of Genetic Testing in the Diagnosis and Prognostication of Systemic Mastocytosis in 2022: Recommendations of the EU-US Cooperative Group

High-sensitivity KIT D816V variation analysis by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction: The reference laboratory perspective

OBJECTIVE

Systemic mastocytosis is a hematologic malignancy characterized by clonal expansion of neoplastic mast cells. Detection of this variation is critical for screening and diagnosis, with recent guidelines emphasizing the need for high-sensitivity assays that identify variants at a variant allele frequency below 0.05%. Our reference laboratory offers droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) for detection of KIT D816V at a limit of detection of 0.03% variant allele frequency-substantially higher sensitivity than next-generation sequencing (NGS).

METHODS

Because high-sensitivity KIT D816V testing is still not widely available, we present our 3-year experience with KIT D816V ddPCR in a clinical setting. From January 2021 to March 2024, KIT D816V variation was detected in 14.9% (1232/8272) of samples.

RESULTS

Peripheral blood and bone marrow positivity rates were 11.1% and 34.9%, respectively. Among 181 samples tested by both ddPCR and NGS, ddPCR identified 37.6% as positive, while NGS identified only 6.0% as positive. Next-generation sequencing showed 16% sensitivity and 100% specificity for KIT D816V detection compared with ddPCR as the gold standard, which detected the variant in 84% more samples because of its lower limit of detection. A 20-ng/mL serum tryptase threshold to screen for detecting KIT D816V by ddPCR had 73.7% sensitivity and 91.2% specificity, but lowering the serum tryptase threshold to 11.5 ng/mL increased sensitivity to 97.5%, with 70.7% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, ddPCR for detection of KIT D816V dramatically increases sensitivity over NGS tests used for myeloid malignancies, including systemic mastocytosis. Our findings also provide support for the use of a lower serum tryptase threshold (>11.4 ng/mL instead of >20ng/mL) to initiate workup for a mast cell neoplasm.

Mast Cell Disorders and Hymenoptera Venom-Triggered Anaphylaxis: Evaluation and Management

Patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy (HVA), especially those with severe anaphylaxis, frequently have concomitant clonal mast cell disease (MCD) in the form of systemic mastocytosis or monoclonal mast cell activation syndrome. Detection of clonal MCD is important because it will have significant consequences for managing HVA. Therefore, we recommend patients with HVA be systematically screened for clonal MCD. The pretest probability of clonal MCD can be assessed in a stepwise fashion starting with examination of the skin for typical monomorphic maculopapular cutaneous mastocytosis lesions; measurement of the baseline serum tryptase (BST) and tryptase genotyping for patients with BST greater than 11 ng/mL; followed by the Red Española de Mastocitosis score, which is calculated using anaphylaxis clinical features, BST, and the patient's sex. A bone marrow biopsy should be performed in patients with monomorphic maculopapular cutaneous mastocytosis, a Red Española de Mastocitosis score of 2 or greater, or an elevated BST based on tryptase genotype. Patients with HVA and a clonal MCD should be treated with immunotherapy directed against the Hymenoptera venom for which they are sensitized. For this high-risk subgroup of patients with HVA, it is recommended to continue immunotherapy for more than 5 years or indefinitely and to carry at least three epinephrine autoinjectors. Future studies should determine whether KIT D816V-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors are effective at preventing or reducing the severity of Hymenoptera-venom triggered anaphylaxis in patients with clonal MCD.

Can molecular patterns help to classify overlapping entities in myeloid neoplasms?

Myeloid neoplasms include myeloproliferative and myelodysplastic neoplasms and acute myeloid leukaemia. Historically, these diseases have been diagnosed based on clinicopathological features with sometimes arbitrary thresholds that have persisted even as molecular features were gradually incorporated into their classification. As such, although current diagnostic approaches can classify the majority of myeloid neoplasms accurately using a combination of molecular and clinicopathological features, some areas of overlap persist and occasionally pose diagnostic challenges. These include overlap across BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms; between clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance and myelodysplastic neoplasms; myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms; and, detection of KIT mutations in myeloid neoplasms other than mastocytosis, raising the prospect of systemic mastocytosis. Molecular testing has become state of the art in the diagnostic work-up of myeloid neoplasms, and molecular patterns can inherently help to classify overlapping entities if considered within a framework of haematological presentations. For future development, molecular testing will likely include whole genome and transcriptome sequencing, and primarily molecular classifications of myeloid neoplasms have already been suggested. As such, genetically defined groups should still constitute the basis for our understanding of disease development from early onset to progression, while clinicopathological features could then be used to describe the stage of the disease rather than the specific type of myeloid neoplasm.

Prevalence and incidence of mastocytosis in adults: a Danish nationwide register study

INTRODUCTION

Mastocytosis is a group of rare heterogeneous diseases with a prevalence previously found to be 10-23 per 100,000 persons. More awareness and improvements in the diagnostic methods in later years have led to more patients being diagnosed. Here, we set out to present the prevalence and incidence rate of mastocytosis among the adult Danish population. By merging data from the Danish National Patient Register, the Danish Pathology Register and the Danish Cancer Register we included all adult patients (≥ 18 years) diagnosed with mastocytosis in Denmark prior to 2022. A cohort of 1,594 patients with mastocytosis was identified. The prevalence of mastocytosis was 27.43 per 100,000 persons (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25.95-28.96) as of January 1, 2022, and the 25-year average incidence rate between 1997 and 2021 was 1.21 per 100,000 persons (95%CI: 1.02-1.40) with an increasing incidence rate since 2002. We found a higher prevalence of mastocytosis among adults in the Danish population than previously reported, and an increasing incidence rate during the last 20 years. Increased awareness of the disease and better diagnostic methods most likely contributed to this.

Harmonization of Diagnostic Criteria in Mastocytosis for Use in Clinical Practice: WHO vs ICC vs AIM/ECNM

Mastocytosis is a clonal myeloid disorder defined by an increase and accumulation of mast cells (MCs) in one or multiple organ systems. The complex pathology of mastocytosis results in variable clinical presentations, courses, and outcomes. The World Health Organization (WHO) divides the disease into cutaneous mastocytosis (CM), several forms of systemic mastocytosis (SM), and MC sarcoma. In most patients with SM, a somatic KIT mutation, usually D816V, is identified. Patients diagnosed with CM or nonadvanced SM, including indolent SM, have a near-normal life expectancy, whereas those with advanced SM, including aggressive SM and MC leukemia, have limited life expectancy. Since 2001, a multidisciplinary consensus group consisting of experts from the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis and the American Initiative in Mast Cell Diseases has supported the field by developing diagnostic criteria for mastocytosis. These criteria served as the basis for the WHO classification of mastocytosis over 2 decades. More recently, an International Consensus Classification group proposed slightly modified diagnostic criteria and a slightly revised classification. In this article, these changes are discussed. Furthermore, we propose harmonization among the proposals of the American Initiative in Mast Cell Diseases/European Competence Network on Mastocytosis consensus group, WHO, and the International Consensus Classification Group. Such harmonization will facilitate comparisons of retrospective study results and the conduct of prospective trials.

Case Report: Multidisciplinary management of a patient with indolent systemic mastocytosis and refractory symptoms

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare hematologic condition characterized by the proliferation and accumulation in tissue of clonal mast cells in multiple organ systems. The release of mast cell mediators in the indolent disease type and the predominant mast cell infiltration of tissues in advanced disease contribute to the heterogeneous clinical presentation. The disease driver in >90% of adult cases is an activating KIT mutation, with D816V being the most frequent. Here we describe a case of a young adult male presenting with osteoporosis with associated symptoms of reflux and a history of bee sting anaphylaxis. A multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis and management was required to minimize morbidities and prevent complications. Current best supportive care was inadequate to control the patient's disease, and a selective KIT D816V inhibitor (avapritinib) was initiated. Conventional, and advanced therapies, including those in the treatment pipeline for SM are discussed.

Detection of KIT Mutations in Systemic Mastocytosis: How, When, and Why

More than 90% of patients affected by mastocytosis are characterized by a somatic point mutation of KIT, which induces ligand-independent activation of the receptor and downstream signal triggering, ultimately leading to mast cell accumulation and survival. The most frequent mutation is KIT p.D816V, but other rarer mutations can also be found. These mutations often have a very low variant allele frequency (VAF), well below the sensitivity of common next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods used in routine diagnostic panels. Highly sensitive methods are developing for detecting mutations. This review summarizes the current indications on the recommended methods and on how to manage and interpret molecular data for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with mastocytosis.

Autoantibodies to type I interferons in patients with systemic mastocytosis

Background

Autoantibodies to type I interferons have been identified in association with a variety of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Type I interferons have demonstrated inhibitory effects on mast cell proliferation and degranulation. Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a disease characterized by increased mast cell burden and mediator release. Whether autoantibodies to type I interferon are present in the sera of patients with SM, and if so, whether they correlate with characteristics of disease, is unknown.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine whether autoantibodies to type I interferons are observed in the sera of patients with SM, and if so, whether they correlate with biomarkers of disease severity.

Methods

We analyzed sera from 89 patients with SM for concentrations of autoantibodies to type I interferon by using a multiplex particle-based assay and signal neutralization capacity by using a STAT1 activity assay and then compared these measurements with those in a database of information on 1284 healthy controls.

Results

Our cohort was predominantly female (57.3%), with a median age of 56 years. Of the cohort members, 13 produced autoantibodies to IFN-β, 3 to IFN-ω, and 0 to IFN-α. None of the 13 sera demonstrated signal neutralization. Neither autoantibody concentration nor signaling inhibition measurements correlated with tryptase concentrations or D816V allele burden.

Conclusion

Although a small subpopulation of patients with SM have autoantibodies to type I interferons, there was no correlation between autoantibody production and signaling inhibition. These data are consistent with the conclusion that autoantibodies to type I interferon do not play a significant role in the pathogenesis or severity of SM.

Serum chemistry profiling and prognostication in systemic mastocytosis: a registry-based study of the ECNM and GREM

ABSTRACT

Certain laboratory abnormalities correlate with subvariants of systemic mastocytosis (SM) and are often prognostically relevant. To assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of individual serum chemistry parameters in SM, 2607 patients enrolled within the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis and 575 patients enrolled within the German Registry on Eosinophils and Mast Cells were analyzed. For screening and diagnosis of SM, tryptase was identified as the most specific serum parameter. For differentiation between indolent and advanced SM (AdvSM), the following serum parameters were most relevant: tryptase, alkaline phosphatase, β2-microglobulin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), albumin, vitamin B12, and C-reactive protein (P < .001). With regard to subvariants of AdvSM, an elevated LDH of ≥260 U/L was associated with multilineage expansion (leukocytosis, r = 0.37, P < .001; monocytosis, r = 0.26, P < .001) and the presence of an associated myeloid neoplasm (P < .001), whereas tryptase levels were highest in mast cell leukemia (MCL) vs non-MCL (308μg/L vs 146μg/L, P = .003). Based on multivariable analysis, the hazard-risk weighted assignment of 1 point to LDH (hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-4.0; P = .018) and 1.5 points each to β2-microglobulin (HR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4-5.4; P = .004) and albumin (HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.7-6.5; P = .001) delineated a highly predictive 3-tier risk classification system (0 points, 8.1 years vs 1 point, 2.5 years; ≥1.5 points, 1.7 years; P < .001). Moreover, serum chemistry parameters enabled further stratification of patients classified as having an International Prognostic Scoring System for Mastocytosis-AdvSM1/2 risk score (P = .027). In conclusion, serum chemistry profiling is a crucial tool in the clinical practice supporting diagnosis and prognostication of SM and its subvariants.

Tumor necrosis factor α promotes clonal dominance of KIT D816V+ cells in mastocytosis: role of survivin and impact on prognosis

ABSTRACT

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is defined by the expansion and accumulation of neoplastic mast cells (MCs) in the bone marrow (BM) and extracutaneous organs. Most patients harbor a somatic KIT D816V mutation, which leads to growth factor-independent KIT activation and accumulation of MC. Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF) is a proapoptotic and inflammatory cytokine that has been implicated in the clonal selection of neoplastic cells. We found that KIT D816V increases the expression and secretion of TNF. TNF expression in neoplastic MCs is reduced by KIT-targeting drugs. Similarly, knockdown of KIT or targeting the downstream signaling cascade of MAPK and NF-κB signaling reduced TNF expression levels. TNF reduces colony formation in human BM cells, whereas KIT D816V+ cells are less susceptible to the cytokine, potentially contributing to clonal selection. In line, knockout of TNF in neoplastic MC prolonged survival and reduced myelosuppression in a murine xenotransplantation model. Mechanistic studies revealed that the relative resistance of KIT D816V+ cells to TNF is mediated by the apoptosis-regulator BIRC5 (survivin). Expression of BIRC5 in neoplastic MC was confirmed by immunohistochemistry of samples from patients with SM. TNF serum levels are significantly elevated in patients with SM and high TNF levels were identified as a biomarker associated with inferior survival. We here characterized TNF as a KIT D816V-dependent cytokine that promotes clonal dominance. We propose TNF and apoptosis-associated proteins as potential therapeutic targets in SM.

A clinical, morphological and molecular study of 70 patients with gastrointestinal involvement in systemic mastocytosis

In 70 patients with KIT D816V positive systemic mastocytosis (SM) including 36 patients with advanced SM (AdvSM), we correlated the extent of reported mucosal mast cell ([m]MC) infiltration of the upper and/or lower gastrointestinal tract (UGIT, n = 63; LGIT, n = 64; both, n = 57) with symptoms and markers of MC burden/subtype. GI symptoms were reported by all patients (mean 2.1 number of symptoms). A strong mMC infiltration was identified in 24 patients (UGIT, 17/63, 27%; LGIT, 19/64, 30%). Concurrent involvement of UGIT and LGIT (n = 12) correlated with female gender (75%) and a higher symptom burden (mean 2.7) but not with MC burden or subtype. Significant differences between non-AdvSM and AdvSM were reported regarding food intolerance (54% vs. 17%), cramping (54% vs. 22%) and weight loss (0% vs. 64%). KIT D816V was identified in 54/56 (96%) available biopsies. In 46 patients, digital PCR revealed a correlation with low albumin levels (r =  - 0.270, P = 0.069) and the KIT D816V VAF in peripheral blood (r = 0.317, P = 0.036) but not with the extent of mMC infiltration or markers of MC burden/subtype. Although MC mediator triggered GI symptoms have a substantial impact on the quality of life, correlation to objective disease parameters is lacking thus making its systematic assessment challenging.

Systemic mastocytosis: 2023 update on diagnosis and management in adults

INTRODUCTION

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a complex and heterogeneous disease, characterized by the clonal accumulation of mast cells in one or more organs. In 2022 both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) modified the diagnostic and classification criteria of SM. Moreover, the identification of new clinical and molecular variables has improved prognostic tools and led to increasingly individualized therapeutic strategies.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to present the updates introduced by the International Consensus Classification in diagnostic criteria of SM. In addition, we report the latest data available from the most important clinical trials in patients both with non-advanced and advanced disease, including elenestinib and bezuclastinib.

EXPERT OPINION

Diagnosis and classification of SM has evolved over years. The most recent WHO and ICC classification improved SM diagnostic work-up, providing clinicians with a clear and simplified diagnostic scheme. New approved targeted therapies such as midostaurin and avapritinib modified the treatment paradigm in patients in advanced stage, and next-generation inhibitors actually investigated in clinical trials are expected in the next future.

The diagnostic workup for systemic mastocytosis differs from consensus recommendations: Results of a worldwide survey

Objective

Mastocytosis is a complex disorder affecting various organs. The diagnostic workup can be challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach including the use of uncommon tests. To assess mastocytosis management around the globe, we conducted the first worldwide online survey for physicians.

Methods

A 21-item questionnaire was sent out to the members of the World Allergy Organization (WAO), the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA2LEN), the Urticaria (UCARE) and Angioedema (ACARE) Centers of Reference and Excellence, the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), and the European Mast Cell and Basophil Research Network (EMBRN) in April-June 2021.

Results

Across 628 respondents from 79 countries 87.7% and 9.7% of physicians were allergists/clinical immunologists and/or dermatologists. Participating physicians were from all regions of the world (Europe, EU: 41.6%; North America, NA: 24.8%; Latin America, LA: 14.5%; Asia-Pacific, AP: 12.6%; and Africa/Middle East, AME: 6.5%). Only 2.2% of respondents worked at Specialized Mastocytosis Centers (SMCs) in North America or European Union. Physicians reported caring for 4 patients with mastocytosis per year, with higher numbers in European Union and Asia Pacific (5/year) compared to Latin America (2/year). Dermatologists and physicians who work at SMCs reported higher patient numbers (15/year and 80/year, respectively). Suspicion of mastocytosis in the allergology and dermatology community is commonly driven by anaphylaxis (82.9%), mastocytosis skin lesions (82.1%), or elevated tryptase levels (76.6%). Osteoporosis and gastrointestinal symptoms less often prompted suspicion of mastocytosis (21.4% and 49.9%, respectively). World Health Organisation (WHO)-diagnostic criteria and classification, regardless of the region, are only used by about 50% of physicians, with higher rates for SMCs (83.3%). Serum tryptase, bone marrow biopsy, and KIT D816V mutation analysis are included in the diagnostic workup by 90.9%, 61.5%, and 58.4% of physicians, respectively. The biggest challenges for the management of mastocytosis are the lack of more effective treatment options (51.1%), missing multidisciplinary networks (47.1%), and the lack of experience of specialists from other disciplines (39.0%).

Conclusions

The diagnostic workup for mastocytosis differs from consensus recommendations and varies between regions. This may be improved by establishing active multidisciplinary networks, increasing access to diagnostic procedures, consistently applying WHO criteria, and developing new Mastocytosis Centers of Reference and Excellence.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Non-advanced Systemic Mastocytosis

Systemic mastocytosis is associated with KIT D816V mutation in more than 90% of cases. Patients with non-advanced forms of mastocytosis (indolent systemic mastocytosis, bone marrow mastocytosis, and smoldering systenic mastocytosis) have a low rate of progession to advanced variants and generally have a comparable life expectancy to age-matched general population. Symptomatology in non-advanced mastocytosis is variable and is related to mast cell mediator release. While some patients require no or minimal symptomatic therapy with antimediator drugs, other may suffer from refractory symptoms impacting the quality of life despite being on multiple anti-mediator drugs. KIT tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been approved for advanced SM, and avapritinib has also been recently approved as the first such inhibitor for indolent systemic mastocytosis. Other TKIs are currently in clinical trials for patients with non-advanced SM who have persistent and severe symptoms despite optimized antimediator therapy. This article will review the current state of the science and available clinical data from trials of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-advanced systemic mastocytosis.

KIT Mutations and Other Genetic Defects in Mastocytosis: Implications for Disease Pathology and Targeted Therapies

A KIT activating mutation (usually KIT D816V) is detected in neoplastic cells in greater than 90% of indolent patients with systemic mastocytosis (SM). In more advanced variants of SM, additional genetic defects can be found in several myeloid malignancy-related genes, which can be detected by applying next-generation sequencing. Currently, the techniques recommended to detect the KIT D816V mutation and quantify the mutational burden in peripheral blood, bone marrow, or other organs/tissues are allele specific-quantitative PCR or droplet digital PCR. These techniques are useful for diagnosis, prognostication, follow-up and monitoring of therapeutic efficacy of cytoreductive agents in patients with SM.

Antibody-Based and Cell Therapies for Advanced Mastocytosis: Established and Novel Concepts

Advanced systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a heterogeneous group of myeloid neoplasms characterized by an uncontrolled expansion of mast cells (MC) in one or more internal organs, SM-induced tissue damage, and poor prognosis. Advanced SM can be categorized into aggressive SM (ASM), MC leukemia (MCL), and SM with an associated hematologic neoplasm (SM-AHN). In a vast majority of all patients, neoplastic cells display a KIT mutation, mostly D816V and rarely other KIT variants. Additional mutations in other target genes, such as SRSF2, ASXL1, or RUNX1, may also be identified, especially when an AHN is present. During the past 10 years, improved treatment approaches have led to a better quality of life and survival in patients with advanced SM. However, despite the availability of novel potent inhibitors of KIT D816V, not all patients enter remission and others relapse, often with a multi-mutated and sometimes KIT D816V-negative disease exhibiting multi-drug resistance. For these patients, (poly)chemotherapy, antibody-based therapies, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may be viable treatment alternatives. In this article, we discuss treatment options for patients with drug-resistant advanced SM, including novel KIT-targeting drugs, antibody-based drugs, and stem cell-eradicating therapies.

The Normal Range of Baseline Tryptase Should Be 1 to 15 ng/mL and Covers Healthy Individuals With HαT

Physiological levels of basal serum tryptase vary among healthy individuals, depending on the numbers of mast cells, basal secretion rate, copy numbers of the TPSAB1 gene encoding alpha tryptase, and renal function. Recently, there has been a growing debate about the normal range of tryptase because individuals with the hereditary alpha tryptasemia (HαT) trait may or may not be symptomatic, and if symptomatic, uncertainty exists as to whether this trait directly causes clinical phenotypes or aggravates certain conditions. In fact, most HαT-positive cases are regarded as asymptomatic concerning mast cell activation. To address this point, experts of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM) and the American Initiative in Mast Cell Diseases met at the 2022 Annual ECNM meeting and discussed the physiological tryptase range. Based on this discussion, our faculty concluded that the normal serum tryptase range should be defined in asymptomatic controls, inclusive of individuals with HαT, and based on 2 SDs covering the 95% confidence interval. By applying this definition in a literature screen, the normal basal tryptase in asymptomatic controls (HαT-positive persons included) ranges between 1 and 15 ng/mL. This definition should avoid overinterpretation, unnecessary referrals, and unnecessary anxiety or anticipatory fear of illness in healthy individuals.

KIT D816V Mast Cells Derived from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Recapitulate Systemic Mastocytosis Transcriptional Profile

Mast cells (MCs) represent a population of hematopoietic cells with a key role in innate and adaptive immunity and are well known for their detrimental role in allergic responses. Yet, MCs occur in low abundance, which hampers their detailed molecular analysis. Here, we capitalized on the potential of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells to give rise to all cells in the body and established a novel and robust protocol for human iPS cell differentiation toward MCs. Relying on a panel of systemic mastocytosis (SM) patient-specific iPS cell lines carrying the KIT D816V mutation, we generated functional MCs that recapitulate SM disease features: increased number of MCs, abnormal maturation kinetics and activated phenotype, CD25 and CD30 surface expression and a transcriptional signature characterized by upregulated expression of innate and inflammatory response genes. Therefore, human iPS cell-derived MCs are a reliable, inexhaustible, and close-to-human tool for disease modeling and pharmacological screening to explore novel MC therapeutics.

Molecular Mechanisms of Neurogenic Inflammation of the Skin

The skin, including the hypodermis, is the largest body organ and is in constant contact with the environment. Neurogenic inflammation is the result of the activity of nerve endings and mediators (neuropeptides secreted by nerve endings in the development of the inflammatory reaction in the skin), as well as interactions with other cells such as keratinocytes, Langerhans cells, endothelial cells and mast cells. The activation of TRPV-ion channels results in an increase in calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P, induces the release of other pro-inflammatory mediators and contributes to the maintenance of cutaneous neurogenic inflammation (CNI) in diseases such as psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, prurigo and rosacea. Immune cells present in the skin (mononuclear cells, dendritic cells and mast cells) also express TRPV1, and their activation directly affects their function. The activation of TRPV1 channels mediates communication between sensory nerve endings and skin immune cells, increasing the release of inflammatory mediators (cytokines and neuropeptides). Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the generation, activation and modulation of neuropeptide and neurotransmitter receptors in cutaneous cells can aid in the development of effective treatments for inflammatory skin disorders.

Allergy: Mechanistic insights into new methods of prevention and therapy

In the past few decades, the prevalence of allergic diseases has increased worldwide. Here, we review the etiology and pathophysiology of allergic diseases, including the role of the epithelial barrier, the immune system, climate change, and pollutants. Our current understanding of the roles of early life and infancy; diverse diet; skin, respiratory, and gut barriers; and microbiome in building immune tolerance to common environmental allergens has led to changes in prevention guidelines. Recent developments on the mechanisms involved in allergic diseases have been translated to effective treatments, particularly in the past 5 years, with additional treatments now in advanced clinical trials.

How to evaluate the patient with a suspected mast cell disorder and how/when to manage symptoms

Mast cell disorders include mastocytosis and mast cell activation syndromes. Mastocytosis is a rare clonal disorder of the mast cell, driven by KIT D816V mutation in most cases. Mastocytosis is diagnosed and classified according to World Health Organization criteria. Mast cell activation syndromes encompass a diverse group of disorders and may have clonal or nonclonal etiologies. Hematologists may be consulted to assist in the diagnostic workup and/or management of mast cell disorders. A consult to the hematologist for mast cell disorders may provoke anxiety due to the rare nature of these diseases and the management of nonhematologic mast cell activation symptoms. This article presents recommendations on how to approach the diagnosis and management of patients referred for common clinical scenarios.

Genomic profiling for clinical decision making in myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia

Myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias derive from the clonal expansion of hematopoietic cells driven by somatic gene mutations. Although assessment of morphology plays a crucial role in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with these malignancies, genomic characterization has become increasingly important for accurate diagnosis, risk assessment, and therapeutic decision making. Conventional cytogenetics, a comprehensive and unbiased method for assessing chromosomal abnormalities, has been the mainstay of genomic testing over the past several decades and remains relevant today. However, more recent advances in sequencing technology have increased our ability to detect somatic mutations through the use of targeted gene panels, whole-exome sequencing, whole-genome sequencing, and whole-transcriptome sequencing or RNA sequencing. In patients with myeloid neoplasms, whole-genome sequencing represents a potential replacement for both conventional cytogenetic and sequencing approaches, providing rapid and accurate comprehensive genomic profiling. DNA sequencing methods are used not only for detecting somatically acquired gene mutations but also for identifying germline gene mutations associated with inherited predisposition to hematologic neoplasms. The 2022 International Consensus Classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias makes extensive use of genomic data. The aim of this report is to help physicians and laboratorians implement genomic testing for diagnosis, risk stratification, and clinical decision making and illustrates the potential of genomic profiling for enabling personalized medicine in patients with hematologic neoplasms.

Standards of Pathology in the Diagnosis of Systemic Mastocytosis: Recommendations of the EU-US Cooperative Group

Pathology plays a central role in the diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis (SM), its delineation from other neoplasms and reactive conditions, and in monitoring of SM under therapy. The morphologic hallmark of SM is the accumulation of spindle-shaped, hypogranulated mast cells (MCs) in bone marrow (BM) and other extracutaneous tissues. Four of the 5 World Health Organization-defined diagnostic criteria (ie, compact MC aggregates [=major criterion]; atypical MC morphology; activating KIT point mutations; aberrant expression of CD25 and/or CD2 and/or CD30 in MCs [=minor criteria]) can be addressed by the pathologist. The final classification of SM variants as either BM mastocytosis, indolent SM, smoldering SM, aggressive SM (ASM), SM with an associated hematologic neoplasm (SM-AHN), or MC leukemia (MCL) has important prognostic significance and requires the integration of certain morphological, clinical, radiological, and biochemical data, referred to as B- and C-findings. Substantial diagnostic challenges may be posed to the pathologist and clinician especially in the so-called advanced SM variants, that is, ASM, MCL, and SM-AHN. In this article, updated recommendations of the EU-US Cooperative Group regarding standards of pathology in the diagnosis of SM, presented during the year 2020 Working Conference held in September in Vienna, are reported.

Systemic Mastocytosis and Other Entities Involving Mast Cells: A Practical Review and Update

Evidence in the recent literature suggests that the presentation spectrum of mast cell neoplasms is broad. In this article, we elaborate on recent data pertaining to minor diagnostic criteria of systemic mastocytosis (SM), including sensitive testing methods for detection of activating mutations in the KIT gene or its variants, and adjusted serum tryptase levels in cases with hereditary α-tryptasemia. We also summarize entities that require differential diagnosis, such as the recently reclassified SM subtype named bone marrow mastocytosis, mast cell leukemia (an SM subtype that can be acute or chronic); the rare morphological variant of all SM subtypes known as well-differentiated systemic mastocytosis; the extremely rare myelomastocytic leukemia and its differentiating features from mast cell leukemia; and mast cell activation syndrome. In addition, we provide a concise clinical update of the latest adjusted risk stratification model incorporating genomic data to define prognosis in SM and new treatments that were approved for advanced SM (midostaurin, avapritinib).

Comprehensive Analysis of Acquired Genetic Variants and Their Prognostic Impact in Systemic Mastocytosis

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare clonal haematopoietic stem cell disease in which activating KIT mutations (most commonly KIT D816V) are present in virtually every (>90%) adult patient at similar frequencies among non-advanced and advanced forms of SM. The KIT D816V mutation is considered the most common pathogenic driver of SM. Acquisition of this mutation early during haematopoiesis may cause multilineage involvement of haematopoiesis by KIT D816V, which has been associated with higher tumour burden and additional mutations in other genes, leading to an increased rate of transformation to advanced SM. Thus, among other mutations, alterations in around 30 genes that are also frequently mutated in other myeloid neoplasms have been reported in SM cases. From these genes, 12 (i.e., ASXL1, CBL, DNMT3A, EZH2, JAK2, KRAS, NRAS, SF3B1, RUNX1, SF3B1, SRSF2, TET2) have been recurrently reported to be mutated in SM. Because of all the above, assessment of multilineage involvement of haematopoiesis by the KIT D816V mutation, in the setting of multi-mutated haematopoiesis as revealed by a limited panel of genes (i.e., ASXL1, CBL, DNMT3A, EZH2, NRAS, RUNX1 and SRSF2) and associated with a poorer patient outcome, has become of great help to identify SM patients at higher risk of disease progression and/or poor survival who could benefit from closer follow-up and eventually also early cytoreductive treatment.