Limited echocardiography-guided therapy in subacute shock is associated with change in management and improved outcomes

Tele-education in point-of-care ultrasound training

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, ultrasound skills have been taught through a one-on-one approach, where instructors physically guide learners' hands at the bedside or in the workshop. However, this method is frequently challenged by scheduling and cost limitations. Our objective was to create a tele-education model for point-of-care ultrasound training and evaluate its effectiveness and its impact on learners' perceived workload compared to conventional education and self-directed learning methods.

METHODS

We conducted a 3-arm randomized trial, comparing tele-education (TE), conventional education (CE) and self-directed learning (SL) methods. All subjects underwent online didactic lectures prior to a hands-on ultrasound workshop. The TE group utilized an ultrasound machine equipped with a speakerphone, a webcam for direct visualization of learner's hand maneuvers, and an analog-to-video converter for the real-time streaming of ultrasound images. This configuration enabled remote instructors to provide immediate verbal feedback to learners. In contrast, the CE group received in-person coaching, while the SL group had no instructors present. Following the coaching session, subjects completed a scenario-based skill test and a survey on the National Aeronautics and Space Administration task load index (NASA-TLX) to measure their ultrasound competency and perceived workload, respectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven ultrasound novices were randomly allocated into 3 groups. The median skill test score of TE, CE, and SL was 22 [interquartile range (IQR): 18-28], 24 [IQR: 21-31], and 16 [IQR: 15-18], respectively (p < 0.01). Pairwise comparisons of median test scores of 3 groups demonstrated a statistical significance in comparisons of TE vs. SL (22 vs. 16, p = 0.01) and CE vs. SL (24 vs. 16, p < 0.01), but not in TE vs. CE (22 vs. 24, p = 0.56). There was no statistical significance observed in the median NASA-TLX scores among the 3 groups; 54 [IQR:47-61] in TE, 57 [IQR:22-64] in CE, and 66 [IQR: 66-72] in SL (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our tele-education model was more effective than self-directed learning. There was no statistically significant difference in effectiveness between the tele-education and the conventional education groups. Importantly, tele-education did not impose a significantly higher workload on learners compared to conventional education or self-directed learning. Tele-education has a substantial potential as an alternative to conventional ultrasound training.

The association between integrating echocardiography use in the management of septic shock patients and outcomes in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Septic shock in critically ill patients can increases morbidity and mortality. We aimed to study the effect on outcomes when integrating point of care (POC) echocardiography in the management of septic shock patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) who are being treated according to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines.

METHODS

An electronic search of MEDLINE through PubMed, clinical trials.gov and google scholar was conducted for the period from January 1990-January 2024 to identify studies of septic shock adult and pediatric patients in the ICU managed according to SSC guidelines with or without POC echocardiography. Three reviewers extracted data independent of each other. Cochrane collaboration tool was used for bias assessment. Random effect meta-analysis used to pool data.

RESULTS

A total of 1701 articles identified. Seven studies included in the final report with a total of 3885 patients. POC echocardiography guided septic shock management was associated with lower in-hospital and 28-day mortality (sOR = 0.82 [95%CI: 0.71-0.95], p = 0.01), more frequent initiation of inotropic support (sOR = 2.42 [95%CI 1.92-3.03], p < 0.0001) and shorter time to achieve lactate clearance (SMD = - 0.87 h [95%CI - 1.23 h to - 0.51 h], p < 0.0001). Summary estimates did not achieve significance for effect of POC echocardiography on 24-h fluid intake (SMD = - 2.11 ml [95%CI - 5.93 ml to 1.72 ml], p = 0.28) on mechanical ventilation-free days (SMD = 0.03 days [95%CI - 0.04 to 0.10], p = 0.94). Shock reversal time analysis was less meaningful due to the small number of studies reporting outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

POC echocardiography guided management in septic shock patients in the ICU can lead to a decrease in mortality, increase in initiation of inotropic support, and a decrease in lactate clearance time. Larger cohort studies and data collection and analysis are needed for further understanding and optimizing standardization of protocols for POC echocardiography use in septic shock patients in the ICU.

Agreement of point of care ultrasound and final clinical diagnosis in patients with acute heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, and shock: POCUS not missing the target

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an important tool for clinical diagnosis and decision-making in critical and non-critical scenarios. Dyspnea, chest pain, and shock are conditions susceptible to evaluation with ultrasound considering diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact already proven. There is scarce evidence in diagnosis agreement using ultrasound as an extension of physical examination. We aimed to evaluate ED patients in whom POCUS was performed, to analyze agreement between clinical initial diagnosis using ultrasound images and final diagnosis. Furthermore, we analyze failed diagnosis, inconclusive POCUS exams, and discuss details. A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted on adults who visited the emergency department with any of these three chief complaints: dyspnea, chest pain, and shock. All were evaluated with ultrasound at admission. Agreement between initial diagnosis using POCUS and final definite diagnosis was calculated. Failed diagnosis and inconclusive exams were analyzed. A total of 209 patients were analyzed. Populations: mostly males, mean age 64 years old, hypertensive. Agreement on patients with dyspnea and suspicion of acute decompensated heart failure was 0.98; agreement on chest pain suspicion of non-ST acute coronary syndrome was 0.96; agreement on type of shock was 0.90. Among the population, 12 patients had an inconclusive POCUS exam, and 16 patients had a failed diagnosis. The use of POCUS in the emergency department shows almost perfect agreement when compared with the final diagnosis in individuals experiencing acutely decompensated heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, and shock. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this tool on mortality and prognosis when there are diagnostic errors.

Sonographic findings using the SAFE-A protocol in pre- and post-hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Accurate assessment of relative intravascular volume is one of the cornerstones for the proper management of hospitalized patients requiring hemodialysis. Currently, the use of dynamic parameters such as bedside ultrasonography is recommended to support the assessment of the intravascular volume profile. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate findings of sonographic assessment of intravascular volume estimate (SAFE-A) protocol among hemodialysis inpatients with end-stage renal disease, before and after the hemodialysis sessions, and correlate these findings with the net ultrafiltrate (UFNET).

RESULTS

A positive correlation was found between the negative variation of 1 point in the score of the SAFE-A protocol with the withdrawal of 426.73 mL of net ultrafiltrate.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a strong correlation between the score of the SAFE-A protocol and the net ultrafiltrate. Therefore, this study concludes that the application of the SAFE-A protocol in dialysis patients demonstrates a correlation between the suggested score and volume status, consistent with findings from the original study conducted in a distinct population.

The 2023 WSES guidelines on the management of trauma in elderly and frail patients

BACKGROUND

The trauma mortality rate is higher in the elderly compared with younger patients. Ageing is associated with physiological changes in multiple systems and correlated with frailty. Frailty is a risk factor for mortality in elderly trauma patients. We aim to provide evidence-based guidelines for the management of geriatric trauma patients to improve it and reduce futile procedures.

METHODS

Six working groups of expert acute care and trauma surgeons reviewed extensively the literature according to the topic and the PICO question assigned. Statements and recommendations were assessed according to the GRADE methodology and approved by a consensus of experts in the field at the 10th international congress of the WSES in 2023.

RESULTS

The management of elderly trauma patients requires knowledge of ageing physiology, a focused triage, including drug history, frailty assessment, nutritional status, and early activation of trauma protocol to improve outcomes. Acute trauma pain in the elderly has to be managed in a multimodal analgesic approach, to avoid side effects of opioid use. Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended in penetrating (abdominal, thoracic) trauma, in severely burned and in open fractures elderly patients to decrease septic complications. Antibiotics are not recommended in blunt trauma in the absence of signs of sepsis and septic shock. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with LMWH or UFH should be administrated as soon as possible in high and moderate-risk elderly trauma patients according to the renal function, weight of the patient and bleeding risk. A palliative care team should be involved as soon as possible to discuss the end of life in a multidisciplinary approach considering the patient's directives, family feelings and representatives' desires, and all decisions should be shared.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of elderly trauma patients requires knowledge of ageing physiology, a focused triage based on assessing frailty and early activation of trauma protocol to improve outcomes. Geriatric Intensive Care Units are needed to care for elderly and frail trauma patients in a multidisciplinary approach to decrease mortality and improve outcomes.

Venous excess ultrasonography (VExUS) captures dynamic changes in volume status surrounding hemodialysis: A multicenter prospective observational study

Background

The evaluation of volume status is essential to clinical decision-making, yet multiple studies have shown that physical exam does not reliably estimate a patient's intravascular volume. Venous excess ultrasound score (VExUS) is an emerging volume assessment tool that utilizes inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and pulse-wave Doppler waveforms of the portal, hepatic and renal veins to evaluate venous congestion. A point-of-care ultrasound exam initially developed by Beaubein-Souligny et al., VExUS represents a reproducible, non-invasive and accurate means of assessing intravascular congestion. VExUS has recently been validated against RHC-the gold-standard of hemodynamic evaluation for volume assessment. While VExUS scores were shown to correlate with elevated cardiac filling pressures (i.e., right atrial pressure (RAP) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP)) at a static point in time, the ability of VExUS to capture dynamic changes in volume status has yet to be elucidated. We hypothesized that paired VExUS examinations performed before and after hemodialysis (HD) would reflect changes in venous congestion in a diverse patient population.

Methods

Inpatients with end-stage renal disease undergoing intermittent HD were evaluated with transabdominal VExUS and lung ultrasonography before and following HD. Paired t-tests were conducted to assess differences between pre-HD and post-HD VExUS scores, B-line scores and dyspnea scores.

Results

Fifty-six patients were screened for inclusion in this study. Ten were excluded due to insufficient image quality or incomplete exams, and forty-six patients (ninety-two paired ultrasound exams) were included in the final analysis. Paired t-test analysis of pre-HD and post-HD VExUS scores revealed a mean VExUS grade change of 0.82 (p<0.001) on a VExUS scale ranging from 0 to 4. The mean difference in B-line score following HD was 0.8 (p=0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in subjective dyspnea score (p=0.41).

Conclusions

Large-volume fluid removal with HD was represented by changes in VExUS score, highlighting the utility of the VExUS exam to capture dynamic shifts in intravascular volume status. Future studies should evaluate change in VExUS grade with intravenous fluid or diuretic administration, with the ultimate goal of evaluating the capacity of a standardized bedside ultrasound protocol to guide inpatient volume optimization.

Inferior vena cava ultrasound and other techniques for assessment of intravascular and extravascular volume: an update

Goals of volume management are to accurately assess intravascular and extravascular volume and predict response to volume administration, vasopressor support or volume removal. Data are reviewed that support the following: (i) Dynamic parameters reliably guide volume administration and may improve clinical outcomes compared with static parameters, but some are invasive or only validated with mechanical ventilation without spontaneous breathing. (ii) Ultrasound visualization of inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter variations with respiration reliably assesses intravascular volume and predicts volume responsiveness. (iii) Although physiology of IVC respiratory variations differs with mechanical ventilation and spontaneous breathing, the IVC collapsibility index (CI) and distensibility index are interconvertible. (iv) Prediction of volume responsiveness by IVC CI is comparable for mechanical ventilation and spontaneous breathing patients. (v) Respiratory variations of subclavian/proximal axillary and internal jugular veins by ultrasound are alternative sites, with comparable reliability. (vi) Data support clinical applicability of IVC CI to predict hypotension with anesthesia, guide ultrafiltration goals, predict dry weight, predict intra-dialytic hypotension and assess acute decompensated heart failure. (vii) IVC ultrasound may complement ultrasound of heart and lungs, and abdominal organs for venous congestion, for assessing and managing volume overload and deresuscitation, renal failure and shock. (viii) IVC ultrasound has limitations including inadequate visualization. Ultrasound data should always be interpreted in clinical context. Additional studies are required to further assess and validate the role of bedside ultrasonography in clinical care.

Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound by Intensive Care Unit Triage Teams in Evaluating Unstable Patients Outside Intensive Care Units

Introduction Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become an integral asset in intensive care units (ICUs). However, there is limited literature on the value of POCUS in evaluating deteriorating patients outside the ICU. In this study, we sought to investigate the use and impact of POCUS by ICU triage teams in hospitals outside of the ICU setting. Methods ICU triage fellows were provided a portable ultrasound to use as part of their evaluations during consultations and hospital code activations. Fellows were asked to fill out a survey on how ultrasound was used and its impact on patient management. Free-text data such as reason for ultrasound use, views obtained, clinical impressions before and after ultrasound, and clinical actions were recorded. These data were transcribed and categorized electronically. Results A total of 51 total resuscitations were documented. The most common reason for ICU triage team evaluation was hypotension (53%, N=27). The most common clinical focus for ultrasound use was cardiac assessment (53%, N=27), followed by volume status assessment (35%, N=18). The most common ultrasound views per encounter obtained were parasternal long (82%, N=42), followed by apical four-chamber view (76%, N=39) and subcostal view (75%, N=38). Out of 38 encounters with clinical impressions documented, 79% (N=30) of pre-ultrasound clinical impressions were confirmed by ultrasound use. Of total encounters, 35% (N=18) had a significant clinical action taken based on ultrasound findings (fluid resuscitation, vasopressor initiation, etc.). Conclusions Ultrasound is a valuable tool for patient evaluation in non-ICU wards, especially in confirming clinical impressions and guiding therapeutic actions. Some limitations of this study include reporting bias and incomplete capture of ultrasound use in non-ICU wards.

Association of the Range of Outpatient Services Provided by Primary Care Physicians with Subsequent Health Care Costs and Utilization

BACKGROUND

Broader primary care practice range of services (ROS), defined as the diversity of professional services delivered, is associated with lower utilization. ROS provided by individual primary care physicians (PCPs) varies considerably with unclear implications for patients.

OBJECTIVES

Create a PCP-ROS measure covering six categories of outpatient services, including expanded codes for mental health counseling services and point of care ultrasound (POCUS) technology in physician offices. Determine whether PCP-ROS is associated with total Medicare expenditures, inpatient admissions, acute hospital utilization (AHU), and emergency department (ED) visits. Examine physician and practice characteristics associated with PCP-ROS.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

4,569,711 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries and 27,008 PCPs observed during the evaluation of the Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC +) initiative.

MEASUREMENTS

PCP-ROS, hospitalizations, AHU (includes observation stays as well as inpatient admissions), ED visits, and total Medicare expenditures.

RESULTS

Physicians varied substantially in the range of services provided. Broader PCP-ROS was significantly, independently associated with 1 - 3% lower Medicare expenditures (p ≤ 0.01), inpatient admissions (p ≤ 0.027), AHU (p ≤ 0.025), and ED visit rates (p ≤ 0.000). PCP-ROS score was associated with improved patient outcomes, independent of physician provision of procedures (such as laceration repair or skin excisions). Physicians in practice sites affiliated with a hospital or health system had narrower PCP-ROS than independent physicians by 0.3 to 0.4 (p < 0.001). Internal medicine specialty was associated with narrower PCP-ROS than family medicine by 0.3 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients cared for by primary care physicians who provide a broader range of services subsequently experience lower acute care utilization and expenditures than do those cared for by physicians with narrower ROS. Practice leaders and professional associations should consider how best to ensure that primary care physicians efficiently and effectively provide the office-based professional services most needed by their patients.

Point of Care Ultrasonographic Life Support in Emergency (PULSE)-a quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND

Many physicians use point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) in their clinical practice to improve their diagnostic capabilities, accuracy, and timeliness. Over the last two decades, the use of PoCUS in the emergency room has dramatically increased. This study aimed to determine emergency physicians' retention of knowledge and skills after a brief training workshop on a focused ultrasound-guided approach to a patient presenting with undifferentiated shock, shortness of breath, and cardiac arrest in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital. The secondary aim was to deliver the PoCUS-guided algorithmic approach to manage a patient presenting with undifferentiated shock, respiratory distress, and cardiac arrest in the emergency department.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental study was conducted with a single-day Point of Care Ultrasonographic Life Support in Emergency (PULSE) training workshop in October 2021 at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. A total of 32 participants attended the course, including twenty-one junior residents (PGY 1 and 2) and medical officers with experience of fewer than two years working in different emergency departments of urban tertiary care hospitals across Karachi, Pakistan. Pre- and post-assessment tools comprised a written examination, evaluating participants' knowledge and skills in ultrasound image acquisition and interpretation. Cronbach's alpha was used to calculate the validity of the tool. Results obtained before and after the training session were compared by the McNemar's test. A p value of ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement in response to each question pre to post-test after completion of the course (Table 1). The significant change can be seen in questions 7, 8, 13, and 15, with a percentage change of 33.3, 80.9, 42.9, and 47.7. There was a significant improvement in the understanding and knowledge of participants after the training. The scores in the post-test were high compared to the pre-test in each category, i.e., respiratory distress (p < 0.017), cardiac arrest (p < 0.041), basic ultrasound knowledge (p < 0.001), and undifferentiated shock (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

All participants showed improvement in their knowledge and confidence regarding using PoCUS in life-threatening conditions. Through this study, we have also developed an algorithmic approach to managing undifferentiated shock, respiratory failure, and cardiac arrest. Future studies must assess the effectiveness and feasibility of incorporating these algorithms into clinical practice.

Monitoring Macro- and Microcirculation in the Critically Ill: A Narrative Review

Circulatory shock is a common and important diagnosis in the critical care environment. Hemodynamic monitoring is quintessential in the management of shock. The currently used hemodynamic monitoring devices not only measure cardiac output but also provide data related to the prediction of fluid responsiveness, extravascular lung water, and also pulmonary vascular permeability. Additionally, these devices are minimally invasive and associated with fewer complications. The area of hemodynamic monitoring is progressively evolving with a trend toward the use of minimally invasive devices in this area. The critical care physician should be well-versed with current hemodynamic monitoring limitations and stay updated with the upcoming advances in this field so that optimal therapy can be delivered to patients in circulatory shock.

Fluids and Early Vasopressors in the Management of Septic Shock: Do We Have the Right Answers Yet?

Septic shock is a common condition associated with hypotension and organ dysfunction. It is associated with high mortality rates of up to 60% despite the best recommended resuscitation strategies in international guidelines. Patients with septic shock generally have a Mean Arterial Pressure below 65 mmHg and hypotension is the most important determinant of mortality among this group of patients. The extent and duration of hypotension are important. The two initial options that we have are 1) administration of intravenous (IV) fluids and 2) vasopressors, The current recommendation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines to administer 30 ml/kg fluid cannot be applied to all patients. Complications of fluid over-resuscitation further delay organ recovery, prolong ICU and hospital length of stay, and increase mortality. The only reason for administering intravenous fluids in a patient with circulatory shock is to increase the mean systemic filling pressure in a patient who is volume-responsive, such that cardiac output also increases. The use of vasopressors seems to be a more appropriate strategy, the very early administration of vasopressors, preferably during the first hour after diagnosis of septic shock, may have a multimodal action and potential advantages, leading to lower morbidity and mortality in the management of septic patients. Vasopressor therapy should be initiated as soon as possible in patients with septic shock.

Fluid resuscitation in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis: A multidisciplinary perspective

Fluid resuscitation is typically needed in patients with cirrhosis, sepsis and hypotension. However, the complex circulatory changes associated with cirrhosis and the hyperdynamic state, characterised by increased splanchnic blood volume and relative central hypovolemia, complicate fluid administration and monitoring of fluid status. Patients with advanced cirrhosis require larger volumes of fluids to expand central blood volume and improve sepsis-induced organ hypoperfusion than patients without cirrhosis, which comes at the cost of a further increase in non-central blood volume. Monitoring tools and volume targets still need to be defined but echocardiography is promising for bedside assessment of fluid status and responsiveness. Large volumes of saline should be avoided in patients with cirrhosis. Experimental data suggest that independent of volume expansion, albumin is superior to crystalloids at controlling systemic inflammation and preventing acute kidney injury. However, while it is generally accepted that albumin plus antibiotics is superior to antibiotics alone in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, evidence is lacking in patients with infections other than spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Patients with advanced cirrhosis, sepsis and hypotension are less likely to be fluid responsive than those without cirrhosis and early initiation of vasopressors is recommended. While norepinephrine is the first-line option, the role of terlipressin needs to be clarified in this context.

Point-of-care echocardiography and thoracic ultrasound in the management of critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection: Experience in three regional UK intensive care units

INTRODUCTION

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has an established role in the management of the critically ill. Information and experience of its use in those with COVID-19 disease is still evolving. We undertook a review of cardiac and thoracic ultrasound examinations in patients with COVID-19 on the intensive care unit (ICU). Our aim was to report key findings and their impact on patient management.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of critically ill patients with COVID-19 was undertaken in three adult ICUs, who received point-of-care cardiac and/or thoracic ultrasound during the 2019-2020 COVID-19 pandemic. We recorded baseline demographic data, principal findings, change in clinical management and outcome data.

RESULTS

A total of 55 transthoracic echocardiographic examinations scans were performed on 35 patients. 35/55 (64%) echocardiograms identified an abnormality, most commonly a dilated or impaired right ventricle (RV) and 39/55 (70%) scans resulted in a change in management. Nine patients (26%) were found to have pulmonary arterial thrombosis on CTPA or post-mortem. More than 50% of these patients showed evidence of right ventricular dilatation or impairment. Of the patients who were known to have pulmonary arterial thrombosis and died, 83% had evidence of right ventricular dilatation or impairment. 32 thoracic ultrasound scans were performed on 23 patients. Lung sliding and pleural thickening were present bilaterally in all studies. Multiple B-lines were present in all studies, and sub-pleural consolidation was present bilaterally in 72%.

CONCLUSION

POCUS is able to provide useful and clinically relevant information in those critically ill with COVID-19 infection, resulting in change in management in a high proportion of patients. Common findings in this group are RV dysfunction, multiple B-lines and sub-pleural consolidation.

Reducing Systemic Risks in a Traumatic Panfacial Injury Patient

Panfacial trauma refers to injuries caused by high-energy mechanisms to two or more regions of the craniofacial skeleton, including the frontal bone, the midface, and the occlusal unit. As with any trauma, Advanced Trauma Life Support protocols should be followed in unstable patients. For the patient with panfacial traumatic injury, advanced perioperative care or critical care is frequently required. This article describes surgical critical care for panfacial injuries, a component of the acute-care surgery model, to reduce systemic risks, improve the patient's condition, and enable a successful surgical outcome.

POCUS and Fluid Responsiveness on Venoarterial ECMO

VA ECMO allows organ perfusion and oxygenation while awaiting myocardial recovery, cardiac transplantation, or long-term mechanical circulatory support. Diagnosis of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is a daily challenge for the clinician managing patients on venoarterial ECMO. Lung ultrasound (US) can be a valuable tool as the initial imaging modality for the diagnosis of pneumonia. Point-of-care US (POCUS) is broadly used in patients with ARDS. POCUS is recommended to be performed regularly in COVID-19 patients for respiratory failure management. In this review, we summarized the US characteristics of COVID-19 patients, mainly focusing on lung US and echocardiography. Point-of-care lung US (LUS) was demonstrated to be an effective tool in case of acute respiratory failure for ICU patients, community-acquired pneumonia, and ventilator-associated pneumonia. This review describes the usefulness of LUS in the early detection of HAP in cardiac critically ill patients under VA ECMO as well as assess its sonographic features.

Point-of-care ultrasound use in emergencies: what every anaesthetist should know

Point-of-care ultrasound has been embraced by anaesthetists as an invaluable tool for rapid diagnosis of haemodynamic instability, to ensure procedural safety and monitor response to treatments. Increasingly available, affordable and portable, with emerging evidence of improved patient outcomes, point-of-care ultrasound has become a valuable tool in the emergency setting. This state-of-the-art review describes the feasibility of point-of-care ultrasound practice, training and maintenance of competence. It also describes the many uses of point-of-care ultrasound for the anaesthetist and describes the most salient point-of-care ultrasound views for anaesthetic emergencies including: undifferentiated shock; hypoxemia; and trauma. Procedural safety is also discussed in addition to relevant important governance aspects. Cardiac function should be assessed using the parasternal long axis, parasternal short basal/mid-papillary/apical, apical four chamber and subcostal four chamber views, and should include a visual estimation of global left ventricular ejection fraction. Other cardiovascular conditions that can be identified using point-of-care ultrasound include: pericardial effusion; cardiac tamponade; and pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary emergency conditions that can be diagnosed using point-of-care ultrasound include pneumothorax; pleural effusion; and interstitial syndrome. The extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma examination may of value in patients who are hypotensive in order to identify intra-abdominal haemorrhage, pneumothoraces and haemothoraces.

POCUS in dyspnea, nontraumatic hypotension, and shock; a systematic review of existing evidence

BACKGROUND

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been adopted as a powerful tool in acute medicine. This systematic review aims to critically appraise the existing literature on point-of-care ultrasound in respiratory or circulatory deterioration.

METHODS

Original studies on POCUS and dyspnea, nontraumatic hypotension, and shock from March 2002 until March 2022 were assessed in the PubMed and Embase Databases. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies using an established checklist.

RESULTS

We included 89 articles in this review. Point-of-care ultrasound in the initial workup increases the diagnostic accuracy in patients with dyspnea, nontraumatic hypotension and shock in the ED, ICU and medical ward setting. No improvement is found in patients with severe sepsis in the ICU setting. POCUS is capable of narrowing the differential diagnoses and is faster, and more feasible in the acute setting than other diagnostics available. Results on outcome measures are heterogenous. The quality of the included studies is considered low most of the times, mainly because of performance and selection bias and absence of a gold standard as the reference test.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that POCUS contributes to a higher diagnostic accuracy in dyspnea, nontraumatic hypotension, and shock. It aides in narrowing the differential diagnoses and shortening the time to correct diagnosis and effective treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRY

INPLASY; Registration number: INPLASY202220020; URL: https://inplasy.com/.

Artificial intelligence (AI) versus expert: A comparison of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT-VTI) assessment between ICU doctors and an AI tool

PURPOSE

The application of point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) in medical education is a relatively new course. There are still great differences in the existence, quantity, provision, and depth of bedside ultrasound education. The left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT-VTI) has been successfully used in several studies as a parameter for hemodynamic management of critically ill patients, especially in the evaluation of fluid responsiveness. While LVOT-VTI has been broadly used, valuable applications using artificial intelligence (AI) in PoCUS is still limited. We aimed to identify the degree of correlation between auto LVOT-VTI and the manual LVOT-VTI acquired by PoCUS trained ICU doctors.

METHODS

Among the 58 ICU doctors who attended PoCUS training from 1 September 2019 to 30 November 2020, 46 ICU doctors who trained for more than 3 months were enrolled. At the end of PoCUS training, each of the enrolled ICU doctors acquired echocardiography parameters of a new ICU patient in 2 h after new patient was admitted. One of the two bedside expert sonographers would take standard echocardiogram of new ICU patients within 24 h. For ICU doctors, manual LVOT-VTI was obtained for reference and auto LVOT-VTI was calculated instantly by using an AI software tool. Based on the image quality of the auto LVOT-VTI, ICU patients was separated into ideal group (n = 31) and average group (n = 15).

RESULTS

Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDd, p = 0.1028), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, p = 0.3251), left atrial dimension (LA-d, p = 0.0962), left ventricular E/A ratio (p = 0.160), left ventricular wall motion (p = 0.317) and pericardial effusion (p = 1) had no significant difference between trained ICU doctors and expert sonographer. ICU patients in average group had greater sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (7.33 ± 1.58 vs. 4.09 ± 0.57, p = 0.022) and lactic acid (3.67 ± 0.86 mmol/L vs. 1.46 ± 0.12 mmol/L, p = 0.0009) with greater value of LVEDd (51.93 ± 1.07 vs. 47.57 ± 0.89, p = 0.0053), LA-d (39.06 ± 1.47 vs. 35.22 ± 0.98, p = 0.0334) and percentage of decreased wall motion (p = 0.0166) than ideal group. There were no significant differences of δLVOT-VTI (|manual LVOT-VTI - auto LVOT-VTI|/manual VTI*100%) between the two groups (8.8% ± 1.3% vs. 10% ± 2%, p = 0.6517). Statistically, significant correlations between manual LVOT-VTI and auto LVOT-VTI were present in the ideal group (R2  = 0.815, p = 0.00) and average group (R2  = 0.741, p = 0.00).

CONCLUSIONS

ICU doctors could achieve the satisfied level of expertise as expert sonographers after 3 months of PoCUS training. Nearly two thirds of the enrolled ICU doctors could obtain the ideal view and one third of them could acquire the average view. ICU patients with higher SOFA scores and lactic acid were less likely to acquire the ideal view. Manual and auto LVOT-VTI had statistically significant agreement in both ideal and average groups. Auto LVOT-VTI in ideal view was more relevant with the manual LVOT-VTI than the average view. AI might provide real-time guidance among novice operators who lack expertise to acquire the ideal standard view.

Effect of goal-directed fluid therapy on renal function in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To evaluate whether goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) reduces the risk of renal injury in critical illness.

Methods

MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and CBM was searched from inception to 13 March 2022, for studies comparing the effect of GDFT with usual care on renal function in critically ill patients. GDFT was defined as a protocolized intervention based on hemodynamic and/or oxygen delivery parameters. A fixed or random effects model was applied to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR) based on heterogeneity through the included studies.

Results

A total of 28 studies with 9,019 patients were included. The pooled data showed that compared with usual care, GDFT reduced the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in critical illness (OR 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47 to 0.80, p< 0.001). Sensitivity analysis with only low risk of bias studies showed the same result. Subgroup analyses found that GDFT was associated with a lower AKI incidence in both postoperative and medical patients. The reduction was significant in GDFT aimed at dynamic indicators. However, no significant difference was found between groups in RRT support (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.05, p= 0.17). GDFT tended to increase fluid administration within the first 6 h, decrease fluid administration after 24 h, and was associated with more vasopressor requirements.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggests that GDFT aimed at dynamic indicators may be an effective way to prevent AKI in critical illness. This may indicate a benefit from early adequate fluid resuscitation and the combined effect of vasopressors.

A Systemic Review on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Patients With Undifferentiated Shock in the Emergency Department

Early identification of the shock type and correct diagnosis is associated with better outcomes. Previous studies have suggested that point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) increases the diagnostic accuracy of patients in undifferentiated shock. However, a complete overview of the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS and the related treatment changes when compared to standard care is still limited. Our objective was to compare POCUS against standard practice regarding the diagnostic accuracy and specific therapeutic management changes (fluid volume administration and vasopressor use) in patients with undifferentiated shock in the emergency department (ED). We conducted a systematic review in concordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. A systematic search was performed using Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, and clinicaltrials.gov. Two physicians independently selected the articles and assessed the quality of the studies independently with the Quadas-2 tool. All included studies used POCUS in adult patients in undifferentiated shock and described diagnostic accuracy or specific therapeutic management changes (fluid volume administration or vasopressor use) and compared this to standard care. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes were the amount of fluid administered and vasopressor use in the ED. Only articles published after 1996 were included. There were 10,805 articles found of which 6 articles were included. Four out of six studies reported diagnostic accuracy, three reported on fluid administration and vasopressors. We found that the diagnostic accuracy improved through the use of POCUS when compared to the standard care group, increasing overall diagnostic accuracy from 45-60% to 80-89% when combined with clinical information. There was no significant difference in fluid administration or vasopressor use between the groups. In our systematic review, we found that the use of POCUS in patients that presented with undifferentiated shock in the ED improved the diagnostic accuracy of the shock type and final diagnosis. POCUS resulted in no changes in fluid administration or vasopressor use when compared to standard care. However, the results should be interpreted within the limitations of some of the studies that were included in the review.

Critical care ultrasound training: a survey exploring the "education gap" between potential and reality in Canada

Background

Critical care ultrasound (CCUS) is now a core competency for Canadian critical care medicine (CCM) physicians, but little is known about what education is delivered, how competence is assessed, and what challenges exist. We evaluated the Canadian CCUS education landscape and compared it against published recommendations.

Methods

A 23-item survey was developed and incorporated a literature review, national recommendations, and expert input. It was sent in the spring of 2019 to all 13 Canadian Adult CCM training programs via their respective program directors. Three months were allowed for data collection and descriptive statistics were compiled.

Results

Eleven of 13 (85%) programs responded, of which only 7/11 (64%) followed national recommendations. Curricula differed, as did how education was delivered: 8/11 (72%) used hands-on training; 7/11 (64%) used educational rounds; 5/11 (45%) used image interpretation sessions, and 5/11 (45%) used scan-based feedback. All 11 employed academic half-days, but only 7/11 (64%) used experience gained during clinical service. Only 2/11 (18%) delivered multiday courses, and 2/11 (18%) had mandatory ultrasound rotations. Most programs had only 1 or 2 local CCUS expert-champions, and only 4/11 (36%) assessed learner competency. Common barriers included educators receiving insufficient time and/or support.

Conclusions

Our national survey is the first in Canada to explore CCUS education in critical care. It suggests that while CCUS education is rapidly developing, gaps persist. These include variation in curriculum and delivery, insufficient access to experts, and support for educators.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13089-021-00249-z.

Critical care ultrasound in geriatric trauma resuscitation leads to decreased fluid administration and ventilator days

BACKGROUND

Geriatric trauma populations respond differently than younger trauma populations. Critical care ultrasound (CCUS) can guide resuscitation, and it has been shown to decrease intravenous fluid (IVF), lower time until operation, and lower mortality in trauma. Critical care ultrasound-guided resuscitation has not yet been studied in geriatric trauma. We hypothesized that incorporation of CCUS would decrease amount of IVF administered, decrease time to initiation of vasopressors, and decrease end organ dysfunction.

METHODS

A PRE-CCUS geriatric trauma group between January 2015 and October 2016 was resuscitated per standard practice. A POST-CCUS group between January 2017 and December 2018 was resuscitated based on CCUS performed by trained intensivist upon admission to the intensive care unit and 6 hours after initial ultrasound. The PRE-CCUS and POST-CCUS groups underwent propensity score matching, yielding 60 enrollees in each arm. Retrospective review was conducted for demographics, clinical outcomes, and primary endpoints, including amount of IVF in the first 48 hours, duration to initiation of vasopressor use, and end organ dysfunction. Wilcoxon two-sample, χ2 tests, and κ statistics were performed to check associations between groups.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference between PRE-CCUS and POST-CCUS demographics and Injury Severity Scores. Intravenous fluid within 48 hours decreased from median [interquartile range] of 4941 mL [4019 mL] in the PRE-CCUS to 2633 mL [3671 mL] in the POST-CCUS (p = 0.0003). There was no significant difference between the two groups in time to initiation of vasopressors, vasopressor duration, lactate clearance, intensive care unit length of stay, or hospital length of stay. There was a significant decrease in ventilator days, with 26.7% PRE-CCUS with ventilation longer than 2 days, and only 6.7% POST-CCUS requiring ventilation longer than 2 days (p = 0.0033).

CONCLUSION

Critical care ultrasound can be a useful addition to geriatric resuscitation. The POST-CCUS received less IV fluid and had decreased ventilator days. While mortality, lactate clearance, complications, and hospital stay were not statistically different, there was a perception that CCUS was a useful adjunct for assessing volume status and cardiac function.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, level II.

Integrated Multiorgan Bedside Ultrasound for the Diagnosis and Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock

Despite decades of research, the mortality rate of sepsis and septic shock remains unacceptably high. Delays in diagnosis, identification of an infectious source, and the challenge of providing patient-tailored resuscitation measures routinely result in suboptimal patient outcomes. Bedside ultrasound improves a clinician's ability to both diagnose and manage the patient with sepsis. Indeed, multiple point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) protocols have been developed to evaluate and treat various subsets of critically ill patients. These protocols mostly target patients with undifferentiated shock and have been shown to improve clinical outcomes. Other studies have shown that POCUS can improve a clinician's ability to identify a source of infection. Once a diagnosis of septic shock has been made, serial POCUS exams can be used to continuously guide resuscitative efforts. In this review, we advocate that the patient with suspected sepsis or septic shock undergo a comprehensive POCUS exam in which sonographic information across organ systems is synthesized and used in conjunction with traditional data gleaned from the patient's history, physical exam, and laboratory studies. This harmonization of information will hasten an accurate diagnosis and assist with hemodynamic management.

The Use of POCUS to Manage ICU Patients With COVID-19

Since the advent of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, clinicians have had to modify how they provide high-value care while mitigating the risk of viral spread. Routine imaging studies have been discouraged due to elevated transmission risk. Patients who have been diagnosed with COVID-19 often have a protracted hospital course with progression of disease. Given the need for close follow-up of patients, we recommend the use of ultrasonography, particularly point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), to manage patients with COVID-19 through their entire ICU course. POCUS will allow a clinician to evaluate and monitor cardiac and pulmonary function, as well as evaluate for thromboembolic disease, place an endotracheal tube, confirm central venous catheter placement, and rule out a pneumothorax. If a patient improves sufficiently to perform weaning trials, POCUS can also help evaluate readiness for ventilator liberation.

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for hospitalists and general internists

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is currently implemented in various medical fields by clinicians for the bedside examination of patients. Evidence supports the fact that adding an ultrasound technology in daily practice (hand-held ultrasound device), called by some 'stethoscope of the future', improves patient care and allows an earlier diagnosis in a hospital setting. In this article, we reviewed the historical evolution of the use of ultrasound in medicine and the possibilities of using POCUS for hospitalists and general internists based on the existing scientific literature.

Milestone Approach to Designing a Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum for Transition-to-Residency Programs in the United States

Phenomenon: Point-of-care ultrasound is fast becoming standard clinical bedside practice for diverse specialties. Medical schools are responding by adding ultrasound education, though the majority use it to supplement the learning of basic sciences. Point-of-care ultrasound practice-based clinical skills education is rare. There also is a lack of standardization across curricula, leading to much variability in the ultrasound skills that medical students from different schools bring to residency. To best inform a point-of-care ultrasound curriculum for our Transition-to Residency program, we investigated literature on 1) how medical students are being prepared for use of point-of-care ultrasound in clinical practice, 2) what skills are being taught, 3) what point-of-care ultrasound skills residency programs expect from incoming residents. Approach: We reviewed literature to identify curricula in U.S. medical schools that teach the concepts, knowledge, and skills related to point-of-care ultrasound. We also mapped point-of-care ultrasound expectations set forth by the Entrustable Professional Activities for undergraduate medical education to the specialty-specific milestones identified by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Additionally, we reviewed specialty-specific professional organizations for position statements and guidelines describing the point-of-care ultrasound skills expected for practicing physicians in their respective specialties. The goal was to identify any needs and gaps in education regarding point-of-care ultrasound across the undergraduate to graduate medical education continuum to practice. Findings: We found seven published point-of-care ultrasound curricula for medical students. There was wide variability in these curricula regarding what point-of-care ultrasound content is being taught, as well as when and how this skill is taught. No Entrustable Professional Activity listed point-of-care ultrasound as a skill requirement for graduating medical students. For graduate medical education, there was wide variability across specialties in residency milestones related to point-of-care ultrasound; some (e.g., emergency medicine) listed extensive milestones while others (e.g., internal medicine) listed none. However, we found that many specialty-specific professional organizations do list detailed point-of-care ultrasound expectations for their practicing physicians. Insights: As point-of-care ultrasound is fast becoming common practice across many specialties, standardization of education and related competencies-similar to other clinical skills training-is necessary across medical schools. Mapping point-of-care ultrasound expectations to current teaching across the continuum from undergraduate to graduate medical education may allow schools to tailor point-of-care ultrasound training for Transition-to-Residency programs. We provide a sample pilot point-of-care ultrasound curriculum that we designed for our Transition-to-Residency course.

The Conundrum of Volume Status Assessment: Revisiting Current and Future Tools Available for Physicians at the Bedside

Assessment of patients’ volume status at the bedside is a very important clinical skill that physicians need in many clinical scenarios. Hypovolemia with hypotension and tissue under-perfusion are usually more alarming to physicians, but hypervolemia is also associated with poor outcomes, making euvolemia a crucial goal in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the assessment of volume status can be challenging, especially in the absence of a gold standard test that is reliable and easily accessible to assist with clinical decision-making. Physicians need to have a broad knowledge of the individual non-invasive clinical tools available for them at the bedside to evaluate volume status. In this review, we will discuss the strengths and limitations of the traditional tools, which include careful history taking, physical examination, and basic laboratory tests, and also include the relatively new tool of point-of-care ultrasound.

The Impact on 30-Day Mortality From a Brief Focused Ultrasound-Guided Management Protocol Immediately Before Emergency Noncardiac Surgery in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether brief ultrasound-guided treatment of hemodynamic shock and respiratory failure immediately before emergency noncardiac surgery reduced 30-day mortality.

DESIGN

Parallel, nonblinded, randomized trial with 1:1 allocation to control and intervention groups.

SETTING

Twenty-eight major hospitals within China.

PARTICIPANTS

Six-hundred sixty patients ≥14 years of age, scheduled for emergency noncardiac surgery with evidence of shock (heart rate >120 beat/min, systolic blood pressure< 90 mmHg or requiring inotrope infusion), or respiratory failure (Pulse Oxygen Saturation <92%, respiratory rate >20 beat/min, or requiring mechanical ventilation).

INTERVENTIONS

A brief (<15 minutes) focused ultrasound of ventricular filling and function, lung, and peritoneal spaces, with predefined treatment recommendation based on the ultrasound was performed before surgery or standard care.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included changes in medical or surgical diagnosis and management due to ultrasound, intensive care unit, and hospital stay and cost, and Short Form-8 quality-of-life scores. Although there were frequent changes in diagnosis (82%) and management (49%) after the ultrasound, mortality at 30 days was not different between groups (50 [15.7%] v 53 [16.3%]; odds ratio 1.05, 0.69-1.6, p = 0.826). There were no differences in the secondary outcomes of the days spent in the hospital (mean 13.8 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.1-15.6 v 14.4 d, 11.8-17.1, p = 0.718) or intensive care unit (mean 9.3 days, 95% CI 7.7-11.0 v 8.7 d, 7.2-10.2, p = 0.562), hospital cost (USD$14.5K, 12.2-16.7 v 13.7, 11.5-15.9, p = 0.611) or Short Form-8 scores at one year (mean 80.9, 95% CI 78.4-83.3 v 79.7, 76.9-82.5, p = 0.54) between participants allocated to the ultrasound and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients with hemodynamic shock or respiratory failure, a focused ultrasound-guided management did not reduce 30-day mortality but led to frequent changes in diagnosis and patient management.

Effect of focused cardiopulmonary ultrasonography on clinical outcome of septic shock: a randomized study

Objective

To investigate the effect of focused ultrasonography on clinical outcomes of septic shock.

Methods

Patients with septic shock were randomized into an integrated cardiopulmonary ultrasonography (ICUS) group and conventional (CON) group. Within 1 hour of admission, the ICUS group underwent ICUS examination for hemodynamic decision-making, while the CON group received standard treatment. The primary endpoint was 28-day mortality after admission. The secondary endpoints were cumulative fluid administration in the first 6, 24, and 72 hours; use of vasoactive drugs; lactate clearance; duration of ventilation; and ICU stay.

Results

Ninety-four qualified patients were enrolled (ICUS group, 49; CON group, 45). ICUS showed no significant effect on 28-day mortality. Within the initial 6 hours, the ICUS group tended to have a higher fluid balance and fluid intake than the CON group. The duration of vasopressor support was shorter in the ICUS group. There were no differences in the cumulative fluid infusion within 24 or 72 hours, lactate clearance, ICU stay, or duration of ventilation.

Conclusions

The initially focused ICUS did not affect the clinical outcomes of septic shock, but it tended to be associated with a higher fluid balance within the initial 6 hours and shorter duration of vasopressor support.

Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index: Clinical Validation and Application for Assessment of Relative Intravascular Volume

Accurate assessment of relative intravascular volume is critical to guide volume management of patients with acute or chronic kidney disorders, particularly those with complex comorbidities requiring hospitalization or intensive care. Inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter variability with respiration measured by ultrasound provides a dynamic noninvasive point-of-care estimate of relative intravascular volume. We present details of image acquisition, interpretation, and clinical scenarios to which IVC ultrasound can be applied. The variation in IVC diameter over the respiratory or ventilatory cycle is greater in patients who are volume responsive than those who are not volume responsive. When 2 recent prospective studies of spontaneously breathing patients (n = 214) are added to a prior meta-analysis of 181 patients, for a total of 7 studies of 395 spontaneously breathing patients, IVC collapsibility index (CI) had a pooled sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 81% for predicting volume responsiveness, which is similar to a pooled sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 82% for 9 studies of 284 mechanically ventilated patients. IVC maximum diameter <2.1 cm, that collapses >50% with or without a sniff is inconsistent with intravascular volume overload and suggests normal right atrial pressure (0-5 mmHg). Inferior vena cava collapsibility (IVC CI) < 20% with no sniff suggests increased right atrial pressure and is inconsistent with overt hypovolemia in spontaneously breathing or ventilated patients. These IVC CI cutoffs do not appear to vary greatly depending on whether patients are breathing spontaneously or are mechanically ventilated. Patients with lower IVC CI are more likely to tolerate ultrafiltration with hemodialysis or improve cardiac output with ultrafiltration. Our goal for IVC CI generally ranges from 20% to 50%, respecting potential biases to interpretation and overriding clinical considerations. IVC ultrasound may be limited by factors that affect IVC diameter or collapsibility, clinical interpretation, or optimal visualization, and must be interpreted in the context of the entire clinical situation.

Perioperative echocardiography-guided hemodynamic therapy in high-risk patients: a practical expert approach of hemodynamically focused echocardiography

The number of high-risk patients undergoing surgery is growing. To maintain adequate hemodynamic functioning as well as oxygen delivery to the vital organs (DO2) amongst this patient population, a rapid assessment of cardiac functioning is essential for the anesthesiologist. Pinpointing any underlying cardiovascular pathophysiology can be decisive to guide interventions in the intraoperative setting. Various techniques are available to monitor the hemodynamic status of the patient, however due to intrinsic limitations, many of these methods may not be able to directly identify the underlying cause of cardiovascular impairment. Hemodynamic focused echocardiography, as a rapid diagnostic method, offers an excellent opportunity to examine signs of filling impairment, cardiac preload, myocardial contractility and the function of the heart valves. We thus propose a 6-step-echocardiographic approach to assess high-risk patients in order to improve and maintain perioperative DO2. The summary of all echocardiographic based findings allows a differentiated assessment of the patient's cardiovascular function and can thus help guide a (patho)physiological-orientated and individualized hemodynamic therapy.

[Perioperative optimization using hemodynamically focused echocardiography in high-risk patients-A practice guide]

BACKGROUND

The number of high-risk patients undergoing surgery is steadily increasing. In order to maintain and, if necessary, optimize perioperative hemodynamics as well as the oxygen supply to the organs (DO₂) in this patient population, a timely assessment of cardiac function and the underlying pathophysiological causes of hemodynamic instability is essential for the anesthesiologist. A variety of hemodynamic monitoring procedures are available for this purpose; however, due to method-immanent limitations they are often not able to directly identify the underlying cause of cardiovascular impairment.

OBJECTIVE

To present a stepwise algorithm for a perioperative echocardiography-based hemodynamic optimization in noncardiac surgery high-risk patients. In this context, echocardiography on demand according to international guidelines can be performed under certain conditions (hemodynamic instability, nonresponse to hemodynamic treatment) as well as in the context of a planned intraoperative procedure, mostly as a transesophageal echocardiography.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Hemodynamically focused echocardiography as a rapidly available bedside method, enables the timely diagnosis and assessment of cardiac filling obstructions, volume status and volume response, right and left heart function, and the function of the heart valves.

CONCLUSION

Integrating all echocardiographic findings in a differentiated assessment of the patient's cardiovascular function enables a (patho)physiologically oriented and individualized hemodynamic treatment.

Point of care ultrasound in the paediatric acute care setting: Getting to the 'heart' of respiratory distress

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a growing interesting tool in the emergency setting. Its usefulness in diagnostic and therapeutic pathway of patients with respiratory distress in addition to clinical evaluation is well established in adult emergency medicine while paediatric specific data, although growing, remain limited. We report a case series of paediatric patients presenting with respiratory distress successfully diagnosed with cardiac dysfunction following POCUS evaluations. Lung POCUS, in combination with cardiac POCUS, is a very useful supplementary diagnostic tool to assess the breathless child and to rapidly identify life-threatening primary etiologies or secondary physiologies. Thus, fast echocardiography is a desirable aid for paediatric emergency physicians and should be supported in all paediatric emergency settings following an adequate training that is mandatory regarding image acquisition and data interpretation.

Bedside POCUS during ward emergencies is associated with improved diagnosis and outcome: an observational, prospective, controlled study

Background

Rapid response teams are intended to improve early diagnosis and intervention in ward patients who develop acute respiratory or circulatory failure. A management protocol including the use of a handheld ultrasound device for immediate point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) examination at the bedside may improve team performance. The main objective of the study was to assess the impact of implementing such a POCUS-guided management on the proportion of adequate immediate diagnoses in two groups. Secondary endpoints included time to treatment and patient outcomes.

Methods

A prospective, observational, controlled study was conducted in a single university hospital. Two teams alternated every other day for managing in-hospital ward patients developing acute respiratory and/or circulatory failures. Only one of the team used an ultrasound device (POCUS group).

Results

We included 165 patients (POCUS group 83, control group 82). Proportion of adequate immediate diagnoses was 94% in the POCUS group and 80% in the control group (p = 0.009). Time to first treatment/intervention was shorter in the POCUS group (15 [10–25] min vs. 34 [15–40] min, p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality rates were 17% in the POCUS group and 35% in the control group (p = 0.007), but this difference was not confirmed in the propensity score sample (29% vs. 34%, p = 0.53).

Conclusion

Our study suggests that protocolized use of a handheld POCUS device at the bedside in the ward may improve the proportion of adequate diagnosis, the time to initial treatment and perhaps also survival of ward patients developing acute respiratory or circulatory failure.

Clinical Trial Registration NCT02967809. Registered 18 November 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02967809.

Prehospital Echocardiogram Use in Identifying Massive Pulmonary Embolism in Unidentified Respiratory Failure

Medical transport teams often handle cases of complex, critically ill patients and are in need of rapid, bedside assessments to guide clinical decision making. The use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) as a diagnostic indicator has gained increased acceptance in emergency medicine. Ultrasound devices have become increasingly portable, and numerous studies have demonstrated that use in the prehospital setting is feasible, accurate, and can have a dramatic impact on the care of patients. In this case report, we highlight the use of handheld ultrasound in the identification of right heart dilation in an unstable patient with respiratory failure in a rural emergency department, concerning for massive pulmonary embolism. The patient was given thrombolytic therapy with dramatic clinical improvement, ultimately surviving transport to the intensive care unit at a nearby tertiary care center.

Pragmatic Recommendations for the Management of COVID-19 Patients with Shock in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

As some patients infected with the novel coronavirus progress to critical illness, a subset will eventually develop shock. High-quality data on management of these patients are scarce, and further investigation will provide valuable information in the context of the pandemic. A group of experts identify a set of pragmatic recommendations for the care of patients with SARS-CoV-2 and shock in resource-limited environments. We define shock as life-threatening circulatory failure that results in inadequate tissue perfusion and cellular dysoxia/hypoxia, and suggest that it can be operationalized via clinical observations. We suggest a thorough evaluation for other potential causes of shock and suggest against indiscriminate testing for coinfections. We suggest the use of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) as a simple bedside prognostic score for COVID-19 patients and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to evaluate the etiology of shock. Regarding fluid therapy for the treatment of COVID-19 patients with shock in low-middle-income countries, we favor balanced crystalloids and recommend using a conservative fluid strategy for resuscitation. Where available and not prohibited by cost, we recommend using norepinephrine, given its safety profile. We favor avoiding the routine use of central venous or arterial catheters, where availability and costs are strong considerations. We also recommend using low-dose corticosteroids in patients with refractory shock. In addressing targets of resuscitation, we recommend the use of simple bedside parameters such as capillary refill time and suggest that POCUS be used to assess the need for further fluid resuscitation, if available.

Change in right ventricular systolic function after continuous renal replacement therapy initiation and renal recovery

OBJECTIVE

To describe the associations between right ventricular (RV) function and outcomes of patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study, conducted 2006-2015 at an academic hospital in USA. We included patients with AKI requiring CRRT who had paired echocardiograms within 2 weeks before and after CRRT initiation. We defined improvement in RV systolic function as 2-point improvement on the semiquantitative scale.

RESULTS

The cohort included 201 patients. The mean(±SD) age was 59(±16) years with 83(41%) female. The median time of the pre and post echocardiograms relative to CRRT initiation were - 1 day (IQR-3;0) prior to and 3 days (IQR1;7) after CRRT initiation. Thirty-one (15%) patients showed an improvement in their RV function. Using a multivariable logistic regression model, improvement in RV systolic function was associated with lower odds of major adverse kidney events (composite of mortality, need for dialysis or persistently elevated serum creatinine) at 90 days with odds ratio (OR) of 0.37(95%CI:0.17-0.84, p.016). Positive cumulative fluid balance was associated with lower odds of improvement in RV function (OR 0.95 per 1-l increase, p 0.045).

CONCLUSION

Serial assessment of RV function among patients with AKI requiring CRRT could provide prognostic value.

Changes in cardiac output with hemodialysis relate to net volume balance and to inferior vena cava ultrasound collapsibility in critically ill patients

Cardiac output may increase after volume administration with relative intravascular volume depletion, or after ultrafiltration (UF) with relative intravascular volume overload. Assessing relative intravascular volume using respiratory/ventilatory changes in inferior vena cava (IVC) diameters may guide volume management to optimize cardiac output in critically ill patients requiring hemodialysis (HD) and/or UF.We retrospectively studied 22 critically ill patients having relative intravascular volume assessed by IVC Collapsibility Index (IVC CI) = (IVCmax-IVCmin)/IVCmax*100%, within 24 h of cardiac output measurement, during 37 intermittent and 21 continuous HD encounters. Cardiac output increase >10% was considered significant. Net volume changes between cardiac outputs were estimated from "isonatremic volume equivalent" (0.9% saline) gains and losses.Cardiac output increased >10% in 15 of 42 encounters with IVC CI <20% after net volume removal, and in 1 of 16 encounters with IVC CI ≥20% after net volume administration (p = 0.0136). All intermittent and continuous HD encounters resulted in intradialytic hypotension. Net volume changes between cardiac output measurements were significantly less (median +1.0 mL/kg) with intractable hypotension or vasopressor initiation, and net volume removal was larger (median -22.9 mL/kg) with less severe intradialytic hypotension (p < 0.001). Cardiac output increased >10% more frequently with least severe intradialytic hypotension and decreased with most severe intradialytic hypotension (p = 0.047).In summary, cardiac output may increase with net volume removal by ultrafiltration in some critically ill patients with relative intravascular volume overload assessed by IVC collapsibility. Severe intradialytic hypotension may limit volume removal with ultrafiltration, rather than larger volume removal causing severe intradialytic hypotension.

Évaluation hémodynamique précoce par échocardiographie ciblée des patients en sepsis ou choc septique (Sepsis-3) au service d’urgence

Introduction : L’identification du profil hémodynamique des patients septiques au service d’urgence (SU) pourrait permettre d’adapter individuellement les recommandations de la Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC). L’objectif de cette étude était de décrire le profil hémodynamique précoce par échocardiographie ciblée chez les patients en sepsis et leur impact thérapeutique.

Méthode : Étude prospective monocentrique incluant les patients septiques (score qSOFA [quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment] ≥ 2) sur une période de 30 mois. L’échocardiographie était réalisée par des médecins urgentistes de niveau échographie clinique en médecine d’urgence 1 afin de déterminer le profil hémodynamique (hypovolémie, vasoplégie avec hyperkinésie, insuffisance ventriculaire ou profil « normal ») dès le sepsis identifié au SU. L’impact thérapeutique était défini par le nombre de patients pour lesquels l’échocardiographie modifiait le traitement de la SSC.

Résultats : Quatre-vingt-un patients (44 sepsis, 37 chocs septiques) ont été étudiés (âge moyen : 70 ± 15 ans ; hommes [n = 47, 58 %] ; SOFA = 5,3 ± 2,9 ; lactates = 4,6 ± 4,2 mmol/l ; admission en réanimation [n = 30, 37 %] ; mortalité j28 [n = 28, 35 %]) après un remplissage vasculaire médian de 500 ml (écart interquartile : 250–1 500 ml). Les profils hémodynamiques dominants étaient l’hypovolémie (n = 54, 66 %), parfois associée à une vasoplégie (n = 26, 32 %) et l’insuffisance ventriculaire (n = 21, 26 %). L’impact thérapeutique concernait 21 patients (26 %), dont un arrêt précoce du remplissage vasculaire après un volume de 850 ± 740 ml chez huit patients.

Conclusion : La dysfonction ventriculaire précoce est présente chez plus de 20 % des patients septiques. L’impact pronostique d’une évaluation échocardiographique dès l’identification du sepsis au SU reste à déterminer.

Point-of-care ultrasonography in nephrology: a cross-sectional national survey among Brazilian nephrologists

Introduction:

Point-of-care ultrasonography (US) (POCUS) has been used in several specialties, particularly in medical emergency. Despite the confirmation of its numerous benefits, the use of POCUS is still timid in nephrology. In the present study, we aim to investigate the use of POCUS by Brazilian nephrologists.

Methods:

A survey carried out among the members of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology, through institutional e-mail, using the SurveyMonkey platform. We included 12 self-administered questions, which answers were given anonymously.

Results:

It was evident that the majority (64%) of the participants did not have the opportunity to practice US during their nephrological training in their residency, specialization, or even in internships; those with experience with US use the method mainly for implanting central vascular accesses (68%), performing a renal biopsy (58%) and evaluating renal morphology (50%); and the main barriers for nephrologists who do not yet use US are the high price of US machines (26%) and the lack of time to learn about US (23%). Also, POCUS use for examinations of other organs, such as the lung (31%) and heart (18%), which are fundamental in the cardiovascular and volume assessment of patients with kidney diseases, is even more limited. However, 95% of the participants expressed an interest in learning POCUS for use in their medical practice.

Conclusion:

Most of the Brazilian nephrologists interviewed were not trained in US; however, almost all of the research participants expressed an interest in learning to use POCUS in nephrological practice.

Vasopressor Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit

After fluid administration for vasodilatory shock, vasopressors are commonly infused. Causes of vasodilatory shock include septic shock, post-cardiovascular surgery, post-acute myocardial infarction, postsurgery, other causes of an intense systemic inflammatory response, and drug -associated anaphylaxis. Therapeutic vasopressors are hormones that activate receptors-adrenergic: α1, α2, β1, β2; angiotensin II: AG1, AG2; vasopressin: AVPR1a, AVPR1B, AVPR2; dopamine: DA1, DA2. Vasopressor choice and dose vary widely because of patient and physician practice heterogeneity. Vasopressor adverse effects are excessive vasoconstriction causing organ ischemia/infarction, hyperglycemia, hyperlactatemia, tachycardia, and tachyarrhythmias. To date, no randomized controlled trial (RCT) of vasopressors has shown a decreased 28-day mortality rate. There is a need for evidence regarding alternative vasopressors as first-line vasopressors. We emphasize that vasopressors should be administered simultaneously with fluid replacement to prevent and decrease duration of hypotension in shock with vasodilation. Norepinephrine is the first-choice vasopressor in septic and vasodilatory shock. Interventions that decrease norepinephrine dose (vasopressin, angiotensin II) have not decreased 28-day mortality significantly. In patients not responsive to norepinephrine, vasopressin or epinephrine may be added. Angiotensin II may be useful for rapid resuscitation of profoundly hypotensive patients. Inotropic agent(s) (e.g., dobutamine) may be needed if vasopressors decrease ventricular contractility. Dopamine has fallen to almost no-use recommendation because of adverse effects; angiotensin II is available clinically; there are potent vasopressors with scant literature (e.g., methylene blue); and the novel V1a agonist selepressin missed on its pivotal RCT primary outcome. In pediatric septic shock, vasopressors, epinephrine, and norepinephrine are recommended equally because there is no clear evidence that supports the use of one vasoactive agent. Dopamine is recommended when epinephrine or norepinephrine is not available. New strategies include perhaps patients will be started on several vasopressors with complementary mechanisms of action, patients may be selected for particular vasopressors according to predictive biomarkers, and novel vasopressors may emerge with fewer adverse effects.

A Shifting Paradigm: The Role of Focused Cardiac Ultrasound in Bedside Patient Assessment

Transthoracic echocardiography is the standard of care in anatomic and functional cardiovascular assessment; however, focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) performed with portable ultrasound equipment is increasingly being used as an adjunct to comprehensive history and physical examination. FoCUS assessments, unlike formal echocardiography, are intended to assist physicians in answering explicit clinical questions with a narrow differential diagnosis in real time. Over the past decade, a growing body of literature has repeatedly shown the value that FoCUS adds to clinical evaluation. Specifically, FoCUS improves point-of-care diagnostic accuracy, which in turn modifies treatment plans, decreases time to diagnosis, and reduces resource utilization. Although less robust, there is also evidence showing improvement in clinical outcomes. Based on this evidence, clinicians, training programs, and clinical societies have embraced FoCUS as a tool to complement bedside patient evaluation. Herein, we review the evidence for FoCUS in clinical practice, specifically evaluating the diagnostic accuracy, the impact on clinical decision-making, and the effect on clinical outcomes.

Emergency bedside ultrasound-benefits as well as caution: Part 2: Echocardiography

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Critical care echocardiography (CCE) has become an important component of general critical care ultrasonography, and a current review of its performance is presented.

RECENT FINDINGS

Basic CCE should be performed as a goal-directed examination to better identify specific signs and to answer important clinical questions concerning acute hemodynamic concerns. It has evolved in the ICU and also in the emergency department not only for improved diagnostic capability but also as an effective part of the triage process. It remains an efficacious procedure even in patients with respiratory failure when combined with lung ultrasonography. Numerous acronyms were proposed, but in all cases, CCE responds to the same rules as fundamental echocardiography. Basic CCE requires accessible and comprehensive training for physicians and is mandatory for all intensivists. Development of pocket echo devices may increase the use of basic CCE as has miniaturization of other medical technologies. Performance should be managed by guidelines, and the CCE training program should be standardized worldwide. More trials are welcome to evaluate its impact on patient outcomes.

SUMMARY

Thanks to its ability to quickly obtain a diagnostic orientation at the bedside and to implement targeted therapy, basic CCE over the past decade has become an essential tool for hemodynamic assessment of the cardiopulmonary unstable patient. Its more recent incorporation into the education of trainees in medical school and residencies/fellowships has reinforced its perceived importance in critical care management, despite the relative paucity as yet of rigorous scientific evidence demonstrating positive outcome modification from its use.

Clinical Guidance for Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency and Critical Care Areas after Implementing Insurance Coverage in Korea

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a useful tool that is widely used in the emergency and intensive care areas. In Korea, insurance coverage of ultrasound examination has been gradually expanding in accordance with measures to enhance Korean National Insurance Coverage since 2017 to 2021, and which will continue until 2021. Full coverage of health insurance for POCUS in the emergency and critical care areas was implemented in July 2019. The National Health Insurance Act classified POCUS as a single or multiple-targeted ultrasound examination (STU vs. MTU). STU scans are conducted of one organ at a time, while MTU includes scanning of multiple organs simultaneously to determine each clinical situation. POCUS can be performed even if a diagnostic ultrasound examination is conducted, based on the physician's decision. However, the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service plans to monitor the prescription status of whether the POCUS and diagnostic ultrasound examinations are prescribed simultaneously and repeatedly. Additionally, MTU is allowed only in cases of trauma, cardiac arrest, shock, chest pain, and dyspnea and should be performed by a qualified physician. Although physicians should scan all parts of the chest, heart, and abdomen when they prescribe MTU, they are not required to record all findings in the medical record. Therefore, appropriate prescription, application, and recording of POCUS are needed to enhance the quality of patient care and avoid unnecessary cut of medical budget spending. The present article provides background and clinical guidance for POCUS based on the implementation of full health insurance coverage for POCUS that began in July 2019 in Korea.