Venous excess ultrasonography (VExUS) captures dynamic changes in volume status surrounding hemodialysis: A multicenter prospective observational study

Background

The evaluation of volume status is essential to clinical decision-making, yet multiple studies have shown that physical exam does not reliably estimate a patient's intravascular volume. Venous excess ultrasound score (VExUS) is an emerging volume assessment tool that utilizes inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and pulse-wave Doppler waveforms of the portal, hepatic and renal veins to evaluate venous congestion. A point-of-care ultrasound exam initially developed by Beaubein-Souligny et al., VExUS represents a reproducible, non-invasive and accurate means of assessing intravascular congestion. VExUS has recently been validated against RHC-the gold-standard of hemodynamic evaluation for volume assessment. While VExUS scores were shown to correlate with elevated cardiac filling pressures (i.e., right atrial pressure (RAP) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP)) at a static point in time, the ability of VExUS to capture dynamic changes in volume status has yet to be elucidated. We hypothesized that paired VExUS examinations performed before and after hemodialysis (HD) would reflect changes in venous congestion in a diverse patient population.

Methods

Inpatients with end-stage renal disease undergoing intermittent HD were evaluated with transabdominal VExUS and lung ultrasonography before and following HD. Paired t-tests were conducted to assess differences between pre-HD and post-HD VExUS scores, B-line scores and dyspnea scores.

Results

Fifty-six patients were screened for inclusion in this study. Ten were excluded due to insufficient image quality or incomplete exams, and forty-six patients (ninety-two paired ultrasound exams) were included in the final analysis. Paired t-test analysis of pre-HD and post-HD VExUS scores revealed a mean VExUS grade change of 0.82 (p<0.001) on a VExUS scale ranging from 0 to 4. The mean difference in B-line score following HD was 0.8 (p=0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in subjective dyspnea score (p=0.41).

Conclusions

Large-volume fluid removal with HD was represented by changes in VExUS score, highlighting the utility of the VExUS exam to capture dynamic shifts in intravascular volume status. Future studies should evaluate change in VExUS grade with intravenous fluid or diuretic administration, with the ultimate goal of evaluating the capacity of a standardized bedside ultrasound protocol to guide inpatient volume optimization.

A Comprehensive COVID-19 Daily News and Medical Literature Briefing to Inform Health Care and Policy in New Mexico: Implementation Study

BACKGROUND

On March 11, 2020, the New Mexico Governor declared a public health emergency in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The New Mexico medical advisory team contacted University of New Mexico (UNM) faculty to form a team to consolidate growing information on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its disease to facilitate New Mexico's pandemic management. Thus, faculty, physicians, staff, graduate students, and medical students created the "UNM Global Health COVID-19 Intelligence Briefing."

OBJECTIVE

In this paper, we sought to (1) share how to create an informative briefing to guide public policy and medical practice and manage information overload with rapidly evolving scientific evidence; (2) determine the qualitative usefulness of the briefing to its readers; and (3) determine the qualitative effect this project has had on virtual medical education.

METHODS

Microsoft Teams was used for manual and automated capture of COVID-19 articles and composition of briefings. Multilevel triaging saved impactful articles to be reviewed, and priority was placed on randomized controlled studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, practice guidelines, and information on health care and policy response to COVID-19. The finalized briefing was disseminated by email, a listserv, and posted on the UNM digital repository. A survey was sent to readers to determine briefing usefulness and whether it led to policy or medical practice changes. Medical students, unable to partake in direct patient care, proposed to the School of Medicine that involvement in the briefing should count as course credit, which was approved. The maintenance of medical student involvement in the briefings as well as this publication was led by medical students.

RESULTS

An average of 456 articles were assessed daily. The briefings reached approximately 1000 people by email and listserv directly, with an unknown amount of forwarding. Digital repository tracking showed 5047 downloads across 116 countries as of July 5, 2020. The survey found 108 (95%) of 114 participants gained relevant knowledge, 90 (79%) believed it decreased misinformation, 27 (24%) used the briefing as their primary source of information, and 90 (79%) forwarded it to colleagues. Specific and impactful public policy decisions were informed based on the briefing. Medical students reported that the project allowed them to improve on their scientific literature assessment, stay current on the pandemic, and serve their community.

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID-19 briefings succeeded in informing and guiding New Mexico policy and clinical practice. The project received positive feedback from the community and was shown to decrease information burden and misinformation. The virtual platforms allowed for the continuation of medical education. Variability in subject matter expertise was addressed with training, standardized article selection criteria, and collaborative editing led by faculty.