MRI-based (MAST) score accurately identifies patients with NASH and significant fibrosis

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in adults

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the umbrella term that comprises metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver, or isolated hepatic steatosis, through to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis, the progressive necroinflammatory disease form that can progress to fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. MASLD is estimated to affect more than one-third of adults worldwide. MASLD is closely associated with insulin resistance, obesity, gut microbial dysbiosis and genetic risk factors. The obesity epidemic and the growing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus greatly contribute to the increasing burden of MASLD. The treatment and prevention of major metabolic comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity will probably slow the growth of MASLD. In 2023, the field decided on a new nomenclature and agreed on a set of research and action priorities, and in 2024, the US FDA approved the first drug, resmetirom, for the treatment of non-cirrhotic metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis with moderate to advanced fibrosis. Reliable, validated biomarkers that can replace histology for patient selection and primary end points in MASH trials will greatly accelerate the drug development process. Additionally, noninvasive tests that can reliably determine treatment response or predict response to therapy are warranted. Sustained efforts are required to combat the burden of MASLD by tackling metabolic risk factors, improving risk stratification and linkage to care, and increasing access to therapeutic agents and non-pharmaceutical interventions.

Head-to-Head Comparison Between Phosphatidylethanol Versus Indirect Alcohol Biomarkers for Diagnosis of MetALD Versus MASLD: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

The current subclassification of steatotic liver disease (SLD) relies on validated questionnaires, such as Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and Lifetime Drinking History (LDH), which, while useful, are impractical and lack precision for their use in routine clinical practice. Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a quantitative, objective alcohol biomarker with high sensitivity and specificity.

AIMS

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of PEth for differentiating metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-associated liver disease (MetALD) from metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in a large, population-based, prospective, multiethnic cohort of individuals with overweight or obesity.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional analysis of a prospective study including 374 adults with overweight or obesity residing in Southern California who had SLD as defined by MRI-PDFF ≥ 5%. The clinical research visit included medical history, biochemical and PEth testing, standardised validated questionnaires (including AUDIT and LDH), physical examination, and advanced imaging using MRI-PDFF and MRE.

RESULTS

Among 374 adults with SLD, the prevalence of MASLD, MetALD, and ALD was 90.1%, 6.4%, and 3.5%, respectively. PEth had a robust diagnostic accuracy in the detection of MetALD (AUROC 0.81, 95%CI 0.73-0.89) and the Youden cut-off was 25 ng/mL. In head-to-head comparative efficacy analysis, PEth was both statistically and clinically superior to all previously used indirect alcohol biomarkers for diagnosing MetALD, including aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio, mean corpuscular volume, gamma glutamyltransferase, and ALD/NAFLD index (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PEth outperforms previously used non-invasive tests in differentiating MetALD from MASLD and has the potential to change clinical practice by enhancing the subclassification of SLD.

T1/T2 mapping as a non-invasive method for evaluating liver fibrosis based on correlation of biomarkers: a preclinical study

BACKGROUND

Given the inherent limitations of invasive biopsy and the insufficient accuracy of liver-related serum biomarkers, there is an urgent need for the development of reliable, non-invasive imaging techniques for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis. This study aims to investigate the correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T1/T2 mapping sequences and biomarkers of collagen deposition and ongoing systemic inflammation, and to evaluate the potential of T1/T2 mapping as a non-invasive method for the accurate diagnosis of liver fibrosis.

METHODS

A mouse model of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced liver fibrosis was established and T1/T2 mapping were performed at different weeks of treatment. The histopathological analysis, collagen quantification, and inflammatory factors measurements (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α) were conducted to correlate MRI parameters with collagen deposition and inflammation. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 22.0, Chicago, IL, USA) and Origin 2018 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).

RESULTS

The principal findings indicated that T1 and T2 values exhibited a progressive increase with the severity of fibrosis, demonstrating a positive correlation with collagen deposition and inflammatory factors, especially the hydroxyproline content (r = 0.880, P < 0.001). The HYP content exhibited a progressive increase with advancing fibrosis stages (ρ = 0.914, P < 0.001). Similarly, T1 values increased significantly across fibrosis stage(ρ = 0.854, P < 0.001). Statistical comparison of these coefficients revealed no significant difference (Z = 1.031, P = 0.303). ROC curve analysis showed that T1 mapping was more accurate than T2 mapping in detecting collagen deposition and inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlighted the potential of T1/T2 mapping as non-invasive and quantitative biomarkers for diagnosing and staging liver fibrosis, providing new insights into the onset and progression of liver fibrosis.

Delicate and thin fibrous septa indicate a regression tendency in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis patients with advanced fibrosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH)-related fibrosis is reversible. However, the dynamic morphology change in fibrosis regression remains unclear. We aim to explore the morphological characteristics of fibrosis regression in advanced MASH patients.

METHODS

Clinical and histological data of 79 biopsy-proved MASH patients with advanced fibrosis (F3-F4) were reviewed. The second harmonic generation/two-photon excitation fluorescence (SHG/TPEF) image technology was used to quantitatively identify the R (regressive) septa from P (progressive) septa and PS (perisinusoidal) fibrosis. Non-invasive tests were used to compare the fibrosis level with and without R septa groups. Transcriptomics was used to explore hub genes and the underlying mechanism of the formation of R septa.

RESULTS

The R septa were different from the P septa and PS fibrosis in detail collagen quantitation identified by SHG/TPEF technology. The R septa were found in MASH fibrosis-regressed patients, which met the definition of the "Beijing classification". Therefore, patients were divided into two groups according to septa morphology: with R septa (n = 10, 12.7%), and without R septa (n = 69, 87.3%). Patients with R septa had lower values in most non-invasive tests, especially for liver stiffness assessed by TE (12.3 vs. 19.4 kPa, p = 0.010) and FAST (FibroScan®-AST) score (0.43 vs. 0.70, p = 0.003). Transcriptomics analysis showed that the expressions of five hub fibrogenic genes, including Col3A1, BGN, Col4A1, THBS2, and Col4A2 in the R septa group, were significantly lower.

CONCLUSIONS

The R septa can be differentiated from the P septa and PS fibrosis by quantitative assessment of SHG/TPEF, and it represents a tendency of fibrosis regression in MASH patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03386890, 29/12/2017.

MOVING DIAGNOSIS OF LIVER FIBROSIS INTO THE COMMUNITY

Chronic liver diseases (CLD) are a leading cause of death worldwide, with alcohol consumption and metabolic risk factors as the two reasons accounting for the majority of cases of CLD in many developed countries. Currently there is a lack of specific strategies for early diagnosis of CLD and consequently most cases are diagnosed in advanced stages of the disease, which is associated with negative consequences for disease management and prognosis. Screening for CLD is based on either detection of chronic viral hepatitis B and C, or detection of liver fibrosis in patients with steatotic liver disease related to alcohol or metabolic dysfunction. There are non-invasive tools available for detection of liver fibrosis, including serological and imaging-based tests. Clinical practice guidelines recommend screening for liver fibrosis using algorithms that combine different non-invasive tests, with widely available but low accuracy tests such as FIB-4 for a first screening step in primary care setting, and other tests with less availability but higher accuracy, such as Transient Elastography or Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test as a second step. There are different pathways for early detection of patients with CLD from primary to specialized care, where primary care providers are key for early detection, management and referral of patients. In addition, intervention on metabolic risk factors and alcohol consumption should be carried out in collaboration between specialized therapy and primary care. This review describes liver fibrosis from the community perspective, highlighting gaps in knowledge on how to define the optimal combination of tests, target population, the ideal pathway of care for CLD, and how to increase implementation of programs for early diagnosis of liver diseases in clinical practice.

The role of noninvasive biomarkers for monitoring cell injury in advanced liver fibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Accurate and reliable diagnosis and monitoring of hepatic fibrosis is increasingly important given the variable natural history in chronic liver disease (CLD) and expanding antifibrotic therapeutic options targeting reversibility of early-stage cirrhosis. This highlights the need to develop more refined and effective noninvasive techniques for the dynamic assessment of fibrogenesis and fibrolysis.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a literature review on PubMed, from 1 December 1970, to 1 November 2024, to evaluate and compare available blood-based and imaging-based noninvasive tools for hepatic fibrosis diagnosis and monitoring. Simple scores such as FIB-4 and NAFLD fibrosis score are suitable for excluding significant or advanced fibrosis, while tertiary centers should adopt complex scores and liver stiffness measurement as part of a secondary diagnostic and more comprehensive evaluation. Moreover, the advent of multiomics for high-resolution molecular profiling, and integration of artificial intelligence for noninvasive diagnostics holds promise for revolutionizing fibrosis monitoring and treatment through novel biomarker discovery and predictive omics-based algorithms.

EXPERT OPINION

The increased shift toward noninvasive diagnostics for liver fibrosis needs to align with personalized medicine, enabling more effective, tailored management strategies for patients with liver disease in the future.

Head-to-head comparison among FAST, MAST, and multiparametric MRI-based new score in diagnosing at-risk MASH

OBJECTIVES

New scores were developed to identify at-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) using multiparametric MRI (mpMRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on 176 patients with suspected or diagnosed metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) paired with an MR scan, vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), and liver biopsy. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), proton density fat fraction (PDFF), and mpMRI-based corrected T1 (cT1) were combined to develop a one-step strategy, named MPcT (MRE + PDFF + cT1, combined score), and a two-step strategy-MRE-based LSM followed by PDFF with cT1 (M-PcT, paired score) for diagnosing at-risk MASH. Each model was categorized using rule-in and rule-out criteria (three categorized analyses). To avoid overfitting, the diagnostic accuracies were evaluated based on 5-fold cross-validation.

RESULTS

PDFF + cT1 (PcT) had the highest diagnostic performance for severe activity (hepatic inflammation plus ballooning grade ≥ 3) and for NAS ≥ 4 (active MASH). Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) of M-PcT (0.832) for detecting at-risk MASH were significantly higher than those of Fibroscan-AST (FAST) (0.744, p = 0.017), MRI-AST (MAST) (0.710, p = 0.002), and MPcT (0.695, p < 0.001) in three categorized analysis. Following the rule-in criteria, positive predictive values of M-PcT (84.5%) were higher than those of FAST (73.5%), MAST (70.0%), and MPcT (66.7%). Following the rule-out criteria, negative predictive values of M-PcT (88.7%) were higher than those of FAST (84.0%), MAST (73.9%), and MPcT (84.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The two-step strategy, M-PcT (paired score), showed the reliability of rule-in/-out for at-risk MASH, with better predictive performance compared with FAST and MAST (combined score).

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number, UMIN000012757).

KEY POINTS

Question There is no mpMRI-based method for detecting as-risk MASH (NAFLD activity score ≥ 4 with fibrosis stage ≥ 2) like FAST and MAST scores. Findings MRE-based LSMs followed by PDFF with cT1 (M-PcT) were more useful in detecting at-risk MASH than the combined score (FAST and MAST). Clinical relevance By combining MRE and PDFF with cT1, it becomes possible to evaluate the pathology of MASH without the need for a liver biopsy, assisting in prognosis prediction and decision-making for treatment options.

Association between triglyceride glucose-body mass index and the staging of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to thoroughly investigate the clinical value of triglyceride glucose-body mass index (TyG-BMI) in patients diagnosed with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Specifically, we aimed to determine its association with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and the progression of liver fibrosis.

METHODS

The study included 393 patients diagnosed with NAFLD after liver biopsy. The patients were divided into two distinct cohorts: a training cohort (N = 320) and a validation cohort (N = 73). The training cohort was further divided into four groups based on TyG-BMI quartiles. The clinical characteristics of the patients in each group were compared in detail, and the association between TyG-BMI and NASH, NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) ≥ 4, at-risk NASH, significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis was analyzed using multiple models. Additionally, we generated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to evaluate the predictive ability of TyG-BMI for NASH and fibrosis staging in patients with NAFLD.

RESULTS

Patients with higher TyG-BMI values had a significantly higher prevalence of NASH, NAS ≥ 4, at-risk NASH, significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis (all p < .05). TyG-BMI was an independent predictor of these diseases in both unadjusted and adjusted models (all p < .05). ROC curve analysis further revealed the excellent performance of TyG-BMI in predicting NASH, NAS ≥ 4, at-risk NASH, significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis. The validation cohort yielded analogous results. Furthermore, we constructed three multivariate models of TyG-BMI in conjunction with elastography metrics, which demonstrated elevated diagnostic AUC values of 0.782, 0.792, 0.794, 0.785, 0.834, and 0.845, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms a significant association between insulin resistance and NAFLD, including at-risk NASH and fibrosis staging, as assessed using the TyG-BMI index. TyG-BMI and its associated multivariate models can be valuable noninvasive indicators for NAFLD diagnosis, risk stratification, and disease course monitoring.

FibroScan-AST score for diagnosing fibrotic MASH: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Following the approval of the first agent for the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), identification of patients with fibrotic MASH (MASH with NAS ≥ 4 and fibrosis stage ≥ 2) is crucial. We assessed the performance of FibroScan-aspartate aminotransferase (AST) score (FAST) for ruling in/out fibrotic MASH.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and gray literature sources up to January 11, 2024. Studies were eligible if they assessed the accuracy of FAST score for the detection of fibrotic MASH using biopsy as the reference standard at previously reported thresholds (FAST ≥ 0.67 for ruling-in and ≤ 0.35 for ruling-out fibrotic MASH). We calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates for FAST thresholds alongside 95% confidence intervals following bivariate random- effects models. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework.

RESULTS

We included 16 studies with 8838 participants. A FAST score ≥ 0.67 yielded a pooled specificity of 0.87 (0.82-0.90) while a FAST score ≤ 0.35 yielded a summary sensitivity of 0.88 (0.83-0.91). At a prevalence of 30%, the positive predictive value for ruling-in fibrotic MASH was 60% while the negative predictive value for ruling-out the target condition was 91%. AST levels, cirrhosis prevalence, and number of pathologists reviewing biopsies were sources of heterogeneity among studies. The certainty of evidence was low to very low.

CONCLUSIONS

FAST score can be used as a triage test for ruling out fibrotic MASH. Nevertheless, its low positive predictive value necessitates sequential testing for ruling-in fibrotic MASH.

Expert Panel Recommendations: Practical Clinical Applications for Initiating and Monitoring Resmetirom in Patients With MASH/NASH and Moderate to Noncirrhotic Advanced Fibrosis

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease affects 1 in 4 people in the United States and western Europe, with an important proportion developing metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), the progressive subtype of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Cirrhosis caused by MASH is a leading indication for liver transplantation and the most common cause of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hitherto, there have been no specific pharmacotherapies for MASH. The recent conditional approval by the Food and Drug Administration of resmetirom for the treatment of moderate or advanced MASH presents a much-anticipated therapeutic option for patients with noncirrhotic advanced MASH. Specifically, the intended population for resmetirom are patients with MASH and fibrosis stages 2 or 3. The approval of resmetirom also presents important challenges, including how to noninvasively identify patients with fibrosis stages 2-3, and how to exclude patients with more advanced disease who should not be treated until further data emerge on the use of resmetirom in this population. Herein we consider the available literature with regard to identifying the intended population for treatment with resmetirom and in proposing criteria for stopping treatment.

Proceedings of the 5th Meeting of Translational Hepatology, organized by the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver (AEEH)

This is the summary report of the 5th Translational Hepatology Meeting, endorsed by the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver (AEEH) and held in Seville, Spain, in October 2023. The meeting aimed to provide an update on the latest advances in the field of basic and translational hepatology, covering different molecular, cellular, and pathophysiological aspects of the most relevant clinical challenges in liver pathologies. This includes the identification of novel biomarkers and diagnostic tools, the understanding of the relevance of immune response and inflammation in liver diseases, the characterization of current medical approaches to reverse liver diseases, the incorporation of novel molecular insights through omics techniques, or the characterization of the impact of toxic and metabolic insults, as well as other organ crosstalk, in liver pathophysiology.

Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Fatty Liver Disease (Version 2024)

With the rising epidemic of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes mellitus in China, metabolic dysfunction-associated non-alcoholic fatty liver disease has become the most prevalent chronic liver disease. This condition frequently occurs in Chinese patients with alcoholic liver disease and chronic hepatitis B. To address the impending public health crisis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and its underlying metabolic issues, the Chinese Society of Hepatology and the Chinese Medical Association convened a panel of clinical experts to revise and update the "Guideline of prevention and treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (2018, China)". The new edition, titled "Guideline for the prevention and treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (Version 2024)", offers comprehensive recommendations on key clinical issues, including screening and monitoring, diagnosis and evaluation, treatment, and follow-up for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease is now the preferred English term and is used interchangeably with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Additionally, the guideline emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration among hepatologists and other specialists to manage cardiometabolic disorders and liver disease effectively.

Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis through Noninvasive Tests in Steatotic Liver Disease

Liver fibrosis, a critical predictor of the prognosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), is traditionally diagnosed via biopsy. Nevertheless, non-invasive alternatives, such as serum biomarkers, vibration-controlled transient elastography, and magnetic resonance elastography, have become prominent because of the limitations of biopsies. Serum biomarkers, such as fibrosis-4 index and NFS Score, are also used widely, offering reliable diagnostic performance for advanced fibrosis. Vibration-controlled transient elastography and shear wave elastography provide further non-invasive evaluations with high diagnostic accuracy, particularly for advanced fibrosis, but the results may be affected by factors such as obesity. Magnetic resonance elastography, with superior diagnostic accuracy and operator independence, is a promising method, but its high cost and limited availability restrict its widespread use. Emerging algorithms, such as NIS4, FAST, or MAST score, have strong potential in identifying high-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis patients. The integration of multiple non-invasive methods can optimize diagnostic accuracy, reducing the need for invasive biopsies while identifying patients at risk of liver-related complications. Further research is needed to refine these diagnostic tools and improve accessibility.

Modernizing metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease diagnostics: the progressive shift from liver biopsy to noninvasive techniques

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a growing public health concern worldwide. Liver biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing and staging MASLD, but it is invasive and carries associated risks. In recent years, there has been significant progress in developing noninvasive techniques for evaluation. This review article discusses briefly current available noninvasive assessments and the various liver biopsy techniques available for MASLD, including invasive techniques such as transjugular and transcutaneous needle biopsy, intraoperative/laparoscopic biopsy, and the evolving role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy. In addition to discussing the various biopsy techniques, we review the current state of knowledge on the histopathologic evaluation of MASLD, including the various scoring systems used to grade and stage the disease. We also explore current and alternative modalities for histopathologic evaluation, such as whole slide imaging and the utility of immunohistochemistry. Overall, this review article provides a comprehensive overview of the progress in liver biopsy techniques for MASLD and compares invasive and noninvasive modalities. However, beyond clinical trials, the practical application of liver biopsy may be limited, as ongoing advancements in noninvasive fibrosis assessments are expected to more effectively identify candidates for MASLD treatment in real-world settings.

Regression of hepatic fibrosis after pharmacological therapy for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

The global incidence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is escalating considerably. NAFLD covers a range of liver conditions from simple steatosis to the more severe form known as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, which involves chronic liver inflammation and the transformation of hepatic stellate cells into myofibroblasts that generate excess extracellular matrix, leading to fibrosis. Hepatocyte ballooning is a key catalyst for fibrosis progression, potentially advancing to cirrhosis and its decompensated state. Fibrosis is a critical prognostic factor for outcomes in patients with NAFLD; therefore, those with substantial fibrosis require timely intervention. Although liver biopsy is the most reliable method for fibrosis detection, it is associated with certain risks and limitations, particularly in routine screening. Consequently, various noninvasive diagnostic techniques have been introduced. This review examines the increasing prevalence of NAFLD, evaluates the noninvasive diagnostic techniques for fibrosis, and assesses their efficacy in staging the disease. In addition, it critically appraises current and emerging antifibrotic therapies, focusing on their mechanisms, efficacy, and potential in reversing fibrosis. This review underscores the urgent need for effective therapeutic strategies, given the dire consequences of advanced fibrosis.

Understanding Why Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis Lags Behind Hepatitis C in Therapeutic Development and Treatment Advances

Therapeutic development for metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) trails behind the success seen in hepatitis C virus (HCV) management. HCV, characterized by a viral etiology, benefits from direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) targeting viral proteins, achieving cure rates exceeding 90%. In contrast, MASH involves complex metabolic, genetic, and environmental factors, presenting challenges for drug development. Non-invasive diagnostics like ultrasound, FibroScan, and serum biomarkers, while increasingly used, lack the diagnostic accuracy of liver biopsy, the current gold standard. This review evaluates therapies for MASH, including resmetirom (Rezdiffra) and combinations like pioglitazone and vitamin E, which show potential but offer modest improvements due to MASH’s heterogeneity. The limited efficacy of these treatments highlights the need for multi-targeted strategies addressing metabolic and fibrotic components. Drawing parallels to HCV’s success, this review emphasizes advancing diagnostics and therapies for MASH. Developing effective, patient-specific therapies is crucial to closing the gap between MASH and better-managed liver diseases, optimizing care for this growing health challenge.

Disparities in screening and risk stratification for hispanic adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

BACKGROUND AIMS

Cut-points for non-invasive tests (NITs) for risk stratification in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) were derived from predominantly non-Hispanic populations. It is unknown if these cut-points perform adequately in Hispanic individuals. We assessed the performance characteristics of current NIT cut-points among Hispanic patients and determined whether they could be further optimized.

APPROACH RESULTS

We prospectively enrolled 244 adults with biopsy-proven MASLD. Participants underwent a research visit with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and vibration controlled transient elastography (VCTE). Histology and imaging assessments were conducted centrally. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by area under the receiver-operating curve (AUROC) and optimal cut-points were identified by Youden J analysis. The mean (±SD) age and body mass index were 52.6 (±13) and 31.6 (±4.6) kg/m2. Overall, 40% had diabetes, 31% (N=75) were Hispanic. 40% of Hispanic and 28.4% of non-Hispanic patients had significant fibrosis. To detect significant fibrosis, MRE and VCTE exhibited significantly lower accuracy in Hispanic versus non-Hispanic participants (AUROC: MRE, 0.87 vs. 0.98, p=0.01; VCTE, 0.78 vs. 0.92, p=0.02). Clinical care algorithms yielded high false-negative rates among Hispanic participants (14% with low-risk FIB-4 and 21% with low-risk VCTE had advanced fibrosis on biopsy). Cut-points of 2.73 kPa for MRE and 6.9 kPa for VCTE were optimal to detect significant fibrosis in Hispanic individuals. Findings were validated in a Latin American cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower NIT cut-points may be needed to optimize surveillance for significant fibrosis due to MASLD in Hispanic populations commensurate with their higher burden and severity of disease.

Artificial intelligence-based evaluation of prognosis in cirrhosis

Cirrhosis represents a significant global health challenge, characterized by high morbidity and mortality rates that severely impact human health. Timely and precise prognostic assessments of liver cirrhosis are crucial for improving patient outcomes and reducing mortality rates as they enable physicians to identify high-risk patients and implement early interventions. This paper features a thorough literature review on the prognostic assessment of liver cirrhosis, aiming to summarize and delineate the present status and constraints associated with the application of traditional prognostic tools in clinical settings. Among these tools, the Child-Pugh and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoring systems are predominantly utilized. However, their accuracy varies significantly. These systems are generally suitable for broad assessments but lack condition-specific applicability and fail to capture the risks associated with dynamic changes in patient conditions. Future research in this field is poised for deep exploration into the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) with routine clinical and multi-omics data in patients with cirrhosis. The goal is to transition from static, unimodal assessment models to dynamic, multimodal frameworks. Such advancements will not only improve the precision of prognostic tools but also facilitate personalized medicine approaches, potentially revolutionizing clinical outcomes.

Envisioning how to advance the MASH field

Since 1980, the cumulative effort of scientists and health-care stakeholders has advanced the prerequisites to address metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), a prevalent chronic non-communicable liver disease. This effort has led to, among others, the approval of the first drug specific for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH; formerly known as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis). Despite substantial progress, MASLD is still a leading cause of advanced chronic liver disease, including primary liver cancer. This Perspective contextualizes the nomenclature change from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease to MASLD and proposes important considerations to accelerate further progress in the field, optimize patient-centric multidisciplinary care pathways, advance pharmacological, behavioural and diagnostic research, and address health disparities. Key regulatory and other steps necessary to optimize the approval and access to upcoming additional pharmacological therapeutic agents for MASH are also outlined. We conclude by calling for increased education and awareness, enhanced health system preparedness, and concerted action by policy-makers to further the public health and policy agenda to achieve at least parity with other non-communicable diseases and to aid in growing the community of practice to reduce the human and economic burden and end the public health threat of MASLD and MASH by 2030.

Current Progress and Challenges in the Development of Pharmacotherapy for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), a severe form of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), poses a significant threat to global health. Despite extensive research efforts over the past decade, only one drug has received market approval under accelerated pathways. In this review, we summarise the pathogenesis of MASH and present a comprehensive overview of recent advances in phase 2-3 clinical trials targeting MASH. These trials have highlighted considerable challenges, including low response rates to drugs, limitations of current surrogate histological endpoints, and inadequacies in the design of MASH clinical trials, all of which hinder the progress of MASH pharmacotherapy. We also explored the potential of non-invasive tests to enhance clinical trial design. Furthermore, given the strong association between MASLD and cardiometabolic disorders, we advocate for an integrated approach to disease management to improve overall patient outcomes. Continued investigation into the mechanisms and pharmacology of combination therapies may offer valuable insights for developing innovative MASH treatments.

Optimal cut-offs of vibration-controlled transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography in diagnosing advanced liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Opinions differ regarding vibration-controlled transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography (VCTE/MRE) cut-offs for diagnosing advanced fibrosis (AF) in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We investigated the diagnostic performance and optimal cut-off values of VCTE and MRE for diagnosing AF.

METHODS

Literature databases, including Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed, were used to identify relevant studies published up to June 13, 2023. We selected studies evaluating VCTE and MRE regarding the degree of liver fibrosis using liver biopsy as the reference. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristics curves (AUCs) of the pooled data for VCTE and MRE for each fibrosis stage and optimal cut-offs for AF were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 19,199 patients from 63 studies using VCTE showed diagnostic AUC of 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.80-0.86), 0.83 (0.80-0.86), 0.87 (0.84-0.90), and 0.94 (0.91-0.96) for ≥F1, ≥F2, ≥F3, and F4 stages, respectively. Similarly, 1,484 patients from 14 studies using MRE showed diagnostic AUC of 0.89 (0.86-0.92), 0.92 (0.89-0.94), 0.89 (0.86-0.92), and 0.94 (0.91-0.96) for ≥F1, ≥F2, ≥F3, and F4 stages, respectively. The diagnostic AUC for AF using VCTE was highest at 0.90 with a cut-off of 7.1-7.9 kPa, and that of MRE was highest at 0.94 with a cut-off of 3.62-3.8 kPa.

CONCLUSION

VCTE (7.1-7.9 kPa) and MRE (3.62-3.8 kPa) with the suggested cut-offs showed favorable accuracy for diagnosing AF in patients with NAFLD. This result will serve as a basis for clinical guidelines for non-invasive tests and differential diagnosis of AF.

EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), previously termed non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is defined as steatotic liver disease (SLD) in the presence of one or more cardiometabolic risk factor(s) and the absence of harmful alcohol intake. The spectrum of MASLD includes steatosis, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH, previously NASH), fibrosis, cirrhosis and MASH-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This joint EASL-EASD-EASO guideline provides an update on definitions, prevention, screening, diagnosis and treatment for MASLD. Case-finding strategies for MASLD with liver fibrosis, using non-invasive tests, should be applied in individuals with cardiometabolic risk factors, abnormal liver enzymes, and/or radiological signs of hepatic steatosis, particularly in the presence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) or obesity with additional metabolic risk factor(s). A stepwise approach using blood-based scores (such as FIB-4) and, sequentially, imaging techniques (such as transient elastography) is suitable to rule-out/in advanced fibrosis, which is predictive of liver-related outcomes. In adults with MASLD, lifestyle modification - including weight loss, dietary changes, physical exercise and discouraging alcohol consumption - as well as optimal management of comorbidities - including use of incretin-based therapies (e.g. semaglutide, tirzepatide) for T2D or obesity, if indicated - is advised. Bariatric surgery is also an option in individuals with MASLD and obesity. If locally approved and dependent on the label, adults with non-cirrhotic MASH and significant liver fibrosis (stage ≥2) should be considered for a MASH-targeted treatment with resmetirom, which demonstrated histological effectiveness on steatohepatitis and fibrosis with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. No MASH-targeted pharmacotherapy can currently be recommended for the cirrhotic stage. Management of MASH-related cirrhosis includes adaptations of metabolic drugs, nutritional counselling, surveillance for portal hypertension and HCC, as well as liver transplantation in decompensated cirrhosis.

Serum Cytokeratin 18 Fragment Is an Indicator for Treating Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease

Background and Aims

Although numerous noninvasive diagnostic methods have been developed to predict liver fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), they lack markers for predicting lobular inflammation, hepatocellular ballooning, or changes related to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). We examined serum cytokeratin 18 fragment (CK18F) as a noninvasive marker for predicting treatment response and "at-risk MASH" and "MASH resolution" in patients with MASLD.

Methods

One-hundred-and-ten patients with MASLD who underwent repeated biopsy were enrolled (age, 4 [0.5-21] years) in this retrospective study. We investigated associations among serum CK18F levels, liver histology, and blood tests and compared them with changes in serum CK18F levels and liver histology and the resolution of MASH. Additionally, 565 biopsy-proven patients were analyzed for associations among serum CK18F levels, liver histology, and blood tests. Moreover, the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index and CK18F were examined for their usefulness in predicting "at-risk MASH."

Results

CK18F changes were strongly correlated with changes in lobular inflammation, hepatocellular ballooning, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score. Multiple regression analysis showed that contributing to "MASH resolution" was associated with changes in CK18F levels as independent factors. Patients diagnosed with MASLD and an FIB-4 index >2.67, or those with an FIB-4 index ≤2.67 and CK18F > 200 U/L, were at high risk of developing MASH and should be referred to a hepatologist. Conversely, those with an FIB-4 index ≤2.67 and CK18F ≤ 200 U/L were effectively managed through regular follow-up appointments.

Conclusion

CK18F changes are associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score changes and are a promising noninvasive diagnostic marker for "at risk MASH" and "MASH resolution."

Noninvasive Tests to Assess Fibrosis and Disease Severity in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease

Risk of disease progression and clinical outcomes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is associated with fibrosis stage and presence of "at-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH)." Although liver biopsy is considered the gold standard to diagnose MASH and stage of fibrosis, biopsy is infrequently performed in clinical practice and has associated sampling error, lack of interrater reliability, and risk for procedural complications. Noninvasive tests (NITs) are routinely used in clinical practice for risk stratification of patients with MASLD. Several NITs are being developed for detecting "at-risk MASH" and cirrhosis. Clinical care guidelines apply NITs to identify patients needing subspecialty referral. With recently approved Food and Drug Administration treatment for MASH and additional emerging pharmacotherapy, NITs will identify patients who will most benefit from treatment, monitor treatment response, and assess risk for long-term clinical outcomes. In this review, we examine the performance of NITs to detect "at-risk MASH," fibrosis stage, response to treatment, and risk of clinical outcomes in MASLD and MASH.

Prospective head-to-head comparison of non-invasive scores for diagnosis of fibrotic MASH in patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Non-invasive scores have been proposed to identify patients with fibrotic, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), who are at the highest risk of progression to complications of cirrhosis and may benefit from pharmacologic treatments. However, data in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are lacking. The aim of this multicenter prospective study was to perform a head-to-head comparison of FAST (FibroScan-aspartate aminotransferase [AST]), MAST (MRI-AST), MEFIB (magnetic resonance elastography [MRE] plus FIB-4), and FNI (fibrotic NASH index) for detecting fibrotic MASH in patients with T2DM.

METHODS

A total of 330 outpatients with T2DM and biopsy-proven metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) from the QUID-NASH study (NCT03634098), who underwent FibroScan, MRI-proton density fat fraction and MRE at the time of liver biopsy were studied. The main outcome was fibrotic MASH, defined as NAS ≥4 (with at least one point for each parameter) and fibrosis stage ≥2 (centrally reviewed).

RESULTS

All data for score comparisons were available for 245 patients (median age 59 years, 65% male, median BMI 31 kg/m2; fibrotic MASH in 39%). FAST and MAST had similar accuracy (AUROCs 0.81 vs. 0.79, p = 0.41) but outperformed FNI (0.74; p = 0.01) and MEFIB (0.68; p <0.0001). When using original cut-offs, MAST outperformed FAST, MEFIB and FNI when comparing the percentage of correctly classified patients, in whom liver biopsy would be avoided (69% vs. 48%, 46%, 39%, respectively; p <0.001). When using cut-offs specific to our population, FAST outperformed FNI and MAST (56% vs. 40%, and 38%, respectively; p <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that FAST, MAST, MEFIB and FNI are accurate non-invasive tools to identify patients with T2DM and fibrotic MASH in secondary/tertiary diabetes clinics. Cut-offs adapted to the T2DM population should be considered.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), identifying those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis and significant fibrosis, who are the most at risk of developing clinical liver-related outcomes and who may benefit from pharmacologic treatments, is an unmet need. In this prospective multicenter study, we compared four non-invasive scores, three based on imaging (MRI or ultrasound technologies) and one on laboratory blood tests, for this purpose, using original and study-specific cut-offs. Our findings show that FAST, MAST, MEFIB and FNI are accurate non-invasive tools to identify patients with T2DM and fibrotic MASH in secondary/tertiary diabetes clinics. Cut-offs adapted to the T2DM population should be considered.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03634098.

Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests to screen for at-risk MASH-An individual participant data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is a need to reduce the screen failure rate (SFR) in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) clinical trials (MASH+F2-3; MASH+F4) and identify people with high-risk MASH (MASH+F2-4) in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate non-invasive tests (NITs) screening approaches for these target conditions.

METHODS

This was an individual participant data meta-analysis for the performance of NITs against liver biopsy for MASH+F2-4, MASH+F2-3 and MASH+F4. Index tests were the FibroScan-AST (FAST) score, liver stiffness measured using vibration-controlled transient elastography (LSM-VCTE), the fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4) and the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS). Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) and thresholds including those that achieved 34% SFR were reported.

RESULTS

We included 2281 unique cases. The prevalence of MASH+F2-4, MASH+F2-3 and MASH+F4 was 31%, 24% and 7%, respectively. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curves for MASH+F2-4 were .78, .75, .68 and .57 for FAST, LSM-VCTE, FIB-4 and NFS. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curves for MASH+F2-3 were .73, .67, .60, .58 for FAST, LSM-VCTE, FIB-4 and NFS. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curves for MASH+F4 were .79, .84, .81, .76 for FAST, LSM-VCTE, FIB-4 and NFS. The sequential combination of FIB-4 and LSM-VCTE for the detection of MASH+F2-3 with threshold of .7 and 3.48, and 5.9 and 20 kPa achieved SFR of 67% and sensitivity of 60%, detecting 15 true positive cases from a theoretical group of 100 participants at the prevalence of 24%.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential combinations of NITs do not compromise diagnostic performance and may reduce resource utilisation through the need of fewer LSM-VCTE examinations.

Performance of MAST, FAST, and MEFIB in predicting metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

To identify individuals with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) or "at-risk" MASH among patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), three noninvasive models are available with satisfactory efficiency, which include magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]- AST (MAST), FibroScan-AST (FAST score), and magnetic resonance elastography [MRE] plus FIB-4 (MEFIB). We aimed to evaluate the most accurate approach for diagnosing MASH or "at-risk" MASH.

METHODS

We included 108 biopsy-proven MASLD patients who underwent simultaneous assessment of MRE, MRI proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), and FibroScan scans. Compared with the histological diagnosis, we analyzed the AUC of each model and assessed the accuracy.

RESULTS

Our study cohort consisted of 64.8% of MASH and 25.9% of "at-risk" MASH. When analyzing the performance of each model for the diagnostic accuracy of MASH, we found that the AUC [95% CI] of MAST was comparable to FAST (0.803 [0.719-0.886] vs 0.799 [0.707-0.891], P = 0.930) and better than MEFIB (0.671 [0.571-0.772], P = 0.005). Similar findings were observed in the "at-risk" MASH patients. The AUCs [95% CI] for MAST, FAST, and MEFIB were 0.810 [0.719-0.900], 0.782 [0.689-0.874], and 0.729 [0.619-0.838], respectively. The models of MAST and FAST had comparable AUCs (P = 0.347), which were statistically significantly higher than that of MEFIB (P = 0.041). Additionally, the cutoffs for diagnosis of MASH were lower than "at-risk" MASH.

CONCLUSION

MAST and FAST performed better than MEFIB in diagnosing "at-risk" MASH and MASH using lower cutoff values. Our findings provided evidence for selecting the most accurate noninvasive model to identify patients with MASH or at-risk MASH.

Comparative efficacy of pharmacologic therapies for MASH in reducing liver fat content: Systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is a leading cause of liver disease. Dynamic changes in MRI proton-density-fat fraction (PDFF) are associated with MASH resolution. We aimed to determine the relative efficacy of therapeutic agents for reducing hepatic fat, assessed by MRI-PDFF.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception until December 26, 2023, for published randomized controlled trials comparing pharmacological interventions in patients with MASH that assessed changes in MRI-PDFF. The primary outcome was the absolute change in MRI-PDFF. The secondary outcome was a ≥30% decline in MRI-PDFF. A surface under-the-curve cumulative ranking probabilities (SUCRA) analysis was performed. Of 1550 records, a total of 39 randomized controlled trials (3311 participants) met the inclusion criteria. For MRI-PDFF decline at 24 weeks, aldafermin (SUCRA: 83.65), pegozafermin (SUCRA: 83.46), and pioglitazone (SUCRA: 71.67) were ranked the most effective interventions. At 24 weeks, efinopegdutide (SUCRA: 67.02), semaglutide + firsocostat (SUCRA: 62.43), and pegbelfermin (SUCRA: 61.68) were ranked the most effective interventions for achieving a ≥30% decline in MRI-PDFF.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides an updated, relative rank-order efficacy of therapies for MASH in reducing hepatic fat. These data may help inform the design and sample size calculation of future clinical trials and assist in the selection of combination therapy.

A Composite Blood Biomarker Including AKR1B10 and Cytokeratin 18 for Progressive Types of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

BACKGRUOUND

We aimed to evaluate whether composite blood biomarkers including aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B10 (AKR1B10) and cytokeratin 18 (CK-18; a nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [NASH] marker) have clinically applicable performance for the diagnosis of NASH, advanced liver fibrosis, and high-risk NASH (NASH+significant fibrosis).

METHODS

A total of 116 subjects including healthy control subjects and patients with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) were analyzed to assess composite blood-based and imaging-based biomarkers either singly or in combination.

RESULTS

A composite blood biomarker comprised of AKR1B10, CK-18, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) showed excellent performance for the diagnosis of, NASH, advanced fibrosis, and high-risk NASH, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.934 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.888 to 0.981), 0.902 (95% CI, 0.832 to 0.971), and 0.918 (95% CI, 0.862 to 0.974), respectively. However, the performance of this blood composite biomarker was inferior to that various magnetic resonance (MR)-based composite biomarkers, such as proton density fat fraction/MR elastography- liver stiffness measurement (MRE-LSM)/ALT/AST for NASH, MRE-LSM+fibrosis-4 index for advanced fibrosis, and the known MR imaging-AST (MAST) score for high-risk NASH.

CONCLUSION

Our blood composite biomarker can be useful to distinguish progressive forms of NAFLD as an initial noninvasive test when MR-based tools are not available.

Screening for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: Time to discard the emperor's clothes of normal liver enzymes?

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is the most prevalent chronic liver condition worldwide. Current liver enzyme-based screening methods have limitations that may missed diagnoses and treatment delays. Regarding Chen et al, the risk of developing MAFLD remains elevated even when alanine aminotransferase levels fall within the normal range. Therefore, there is an urgent need for advanced diagnostic techniques and updated algorithms to enhance the accuracy of MAFLD diagnosis and enable early intervention. This paper proposes two potential screening methods for identifying individuals who may be at risk of developing MAFLD: Lowering these thresholds and promoting the use of noninvasive liver fibrosis scores.

EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD)

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), previously termed non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is defined as steatotic liver disease (SLD) in the presence of one or more cardiometabolic risk factor(s) and the absence of harmful alcohol intake. The spectrum of MASLD includes steatosis, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH, previously NASH), fibrosis, cirrhosis and MASH-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This joint EASL-EASD-EASO guideline provides an update on definitions, prevention, screening, diagnosis and treatment for MASLD. Case-finding strategies for MASLD with liver fibrosis, using non-invasive tests, should be applied in individuals with cardiometabolic risk factors, abnormal liver enzymes, and/or radiological signs of hepatic steatosis, particularly in the presence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) or obesity with additional metabolic risk factor(s). A stepwise approach using blood-based scores (such as FIB-4) and, sequentially, imaging techniques (such as transient elastography) is suitable to rule-out/in advanced fibrosis, which is predictive of liver-related outcomes. In adults with MASLD, lifestyle modification - including weight loss, dietary changes, physical exercise and discouraging alcohol consumption - as well as optimal management of comorbidities - including use of incretin-based therapies (e.g. semaglutide, tirzepatide) for T2D or obesity, if indicated - is advised. Bariatric surgery is also an option in individuals with MASLD and obesity. If locally approved and dependent on the label, adults with non-cirrhotic MASH and significant liver fibrosis (stage ≥2) should be considered for a MASH-targeted treatment with resmetirom, which demonstrated histological effectiveness on steatohepatitis and fibrosis with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. No MASH-targeted pharmacotherapy can currently be recommended for the cirrhotic stage. Management of MASH-related cirrhosis includes adaptations of metabolic drugs, nutritional counselling, surveillance for portal hypertension and HCC, as well as liver transplantation in decompensated cirrhosis.

A review of MASLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma: progress in pathogenesis, early detection, and therapeutic interventions

The incidence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is continuously rising, evolving into a global health challenge. Concurrently, cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) associated with MASLD are also on the increase. Although traditional risk factors such as age, gender, and metabolic factors play significant roles in the development of HCC, it cannot be overlooked that MASLD, triggered by changes in modern lifestyle and dietary habits, may also exacerbate the risk of HCC, and this phenomenon is common even among non-obese individuals. Regrettably, MASLD often fails to receive timely diagnosis, resulting in a limited number of patients receiving HCC surveillance. Moreover, there is currently a lack of clear definition for the target population for surveillance beyond patients with cirrhosis. Consequently, MASLD-related HCC is often detected at a late stage, precluding the optimal timing for curative treatment. However, our understanding of the pathogenesis and progression of HCC remains limited. Therefore, this paper reviews relevant literature from recent years, delving into multiple dimensions such as pathogenesis, surveillance and diagnosis, prevention, and treatment, aiming to provide new ideas and directions for the prevention and treatment of MASLD-related HCC.

Monitoring disease progression in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease. Its prevalence is increasing with the epidemic of obesity and metabolic syndrome. MASLD progression into metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and advanced fibrosis may lead to decompensated cirrhosis and development of liver-related events, hepatocellular carcinoma and death. Monitoring disease progression is critical in decreasing morbidity, mortality, need for transplant and economic burden. Assessing for treatment response once FDA-approved medications are available is still an unmet clinical need.

AIMS

To explore the most up-to-date literature on testing used for monitoring disease progression and treatment response METHODS: We searched PubMed from inception to 15 August 2023, using the following MeSH terms: 'MASLD', 'Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease', 'MASH', 'metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis', 'Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease', 'NAFLD', 'non-alcoholic steatohepatitis', 'NASH', 'Biomarkers', 'clinical trial'. Articles were also identified through searches of the authors' files. The final reference list was generated based on originality and relevance to this review's broad scope, considering only papers published in English.

RESULTS

We have cited 101 references in this review detailing methods to monitor MASLD disease progression and treatment response.

CONCLUSION

Various biomarkers can be used in different care settings to monitor disease progression. Further research is needed to validate noninvasive tests more effectively.

A prospective study on the prevalence of at-risk MASH in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United States

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on the prevalence and treatment of at-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in the United States.

AIM

To estimate the prevalence of at-risk MASH in a prospectively recruited cohort of adults with T2DM using new nomenclature endorsed by multiple societies.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled adults aged ≥50 with T2DM from primary care and endocrinology clinics in southern California from 2016 to 2023. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) was defined by an magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction ≥5% and at least one metabolic risk factor without any other chronic liver disease or secondary cause for hepatic steatosis.

RESULTS

We included 530 adult patients with T2DM. The mean (±SD) age and body mass index (BMI) were 64.4 (±8.1) years and 31.5 (±6.1) kg/m2, respectively. Among patients with T2DM, the prevalence of MASLD, at-risk MASH and cirrhosis was 69.6%, 13.6% and 6.8%, respectively. Among patients with co-existing T2DM and obesity, the prevalence of MASLD, at-risk MASH and cirrhosis was 77.8%, 15.9% and 9.0%, respectively, and was higher than in participants without obesity (p < 0.0001, 0.0543 and 0.0128, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Among adults aged ≥50 years with T2DM, the prevalence of MASLD, at-risk MASH and cirrhosis is high, posing a significant risk for liver-related morbidity and mortality. Approximately 14% of patients with T2DM may be candidates for pharmacologic therapies specific to MASH-related fibrosis.

Diagnosis and non-invasive assessment of MASLD in type 2 diabetes and obesity

BACKGROUND

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is currently the most common chronic liver disease and an important cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. It is strongly associated with type 2 diabetes and obesity. Because of the huge number of patients at risk of MASLD, it is imperative to use non-invasive tests appropriately.

AIMS

To provide a narrative review on the performance and limitations of non-invasive tests, with a special emphasis on the impact of diabetes and obesity.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Cochrane databases for articles published from 1990 to August 2023.

RESULTS

Abdominal ultrasonography remains the primary method to diagnose hepatic steatosis, while magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction is currently the gold standard to quantify steatosis. Simple fibrosis scores such as the Fibrosis-4 index are well suited as initial assessment in primary care and non-hepatology settings to rule out advanced fibrosis and future risk of liver-related complications. However, because of its low positive predictive value, an abnormal test should be followed by specific blood (e.g. Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score) or imaging biomarkers (e.g. vibration-controlled transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography) of fibrosis. Some non-invasive tests of fibrosis appear to be less accurate in patients with diabetes. Obesity also affects the performance of abdominal ultrasonography and transient elastography, whereas magnetic resonance imaging may not be feasible in some patients with severe obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

This article highlights issues surrounding the clinical application of non-invasive tests for MASLD in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity.

Cenicriviroc Suppresses and Reverses Steatohepatitis by Regulating Macrophage Infiltration and M2 Polarization in Mice

The inhibition of hepatic macrophage and Kupfer cell recruitment and activation is a potential strategy for treating insulin resistance and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Cenicriviroc (CVC), a dual C-C chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) and CCR5 antagonist, has shown antifibrotic activity in murine models of NASH and has been evaluated in clinical trials on patients with NASH. This study investigated the effects of CVC on macrophage infiltration and polarization in a lipotoxic model of NASH. C57BL/6 mice were fed a high-cholesterol, high-fat (CL) diet or a CL diet containing 0.015% CVC (CL + CVC) for 12 weeks. Macrophage recruitment and activation were assayed by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. CVC supplementation attenuated excessive hepatic lipid accumulation and peroxidation and alleviated glucose intolerance and hyperinsulinemia in the mice that were fed the CL diet. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that compared with the CL group, mice fed the CL + CVC diet had fewer M1-like macrophages, more M2-like macrophages, and fewer T cell counts, indicating that CVC caused an M2-dominant shift of macrophages in the liver. Similarly, CVC decreased lipopolysaccharide-stimulated M1-like macrophage activation, whereas it increased interleukin-4-induced M2-type macrophage polarization in vitro. In addition, CVC attenuated hepatic fibrosis by repressing hepatic stellate cell activation. Lastly, CVC reversed insulin resistance as well as steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis of the liver in mice with pre-existing NASH. In conclusion, CVC prevented and reversed hepatic steatosis, insulin resistance, inflammation, and fibrogenesis in the liver of NASH mice via M2 macrophage polarization.

FibroScan-aspartate transaminase: A superior non-invasive model for diagnosing high-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis

BACKGROUND

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with hepatic histological NAFLD activity score ≥ 4 and fibrosis stage F ≥ 2 is regarded as "at risk" non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Based on an international consensus, NAFLD and NASH were renamed as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), respectively; hence, we introduced the term "high-risk MASH". Diagnostic values of seven non-invasive models, including FibroScan-aspartate transaminase (FAST), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI), etc. for high-risk MASH have rarely been studied and compared in MASLD.

AIM

To assess the clinical value of seven non-invasive models as alternatives to liver biopsy for diagnosing high-risk MASH.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 309 patients diagnosed with NAFLD via liver biopsy at Beijing Ditan Hospital, between January 2012 and December 2020. After screening for MASLD and the exclusion criteria, 279 patients were included and categorized into high-risk and non-high-risk MASH groups. Utilizing threshold values of each model, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV), were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to evaluate their diagnostic efficacy based on the area under the curve (AUROC).

RESULTS

MASLD diagnostic criteria were met by 99.4% patients with NAFLD. The MASLD population was analyzed in two cohorts: Overall population (279 patients) and the subgroup (117 patients) who underwent liver transient elastography (FibroScan). In the overall population, FIB-4 showed better diagnostic efficacy and higher PPV, with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUROC of 26.9%, 95.2%, 73.5%, 72.2%, and 0.75. APRI, Forns index, and aspartate transaminase to alanine transaminase ratio (ARR) showed moderate diagnostic efficacy, whereas S index and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio (GPR) were relatively weaker. In the subgroup, FAST had the highest diagnostic efficacy, its sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUROC were 44.2%, 92.3%, 82.1%, 67.4%, and 0.82. The FIB-4 AUROC was 0.76. S index and GPR exhibited almost no diagnostic value for high-risk MASH.

CONCLUSION

FAST and FIB-4 could replace liver biopsy as more effectively diagnostic methods for high-risk MASH compared to APRI, Forns index, ARR, S index, and GPR; FAST is superior to FIB-4.

New and emerging treatments for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is a leading etiology of chronic liver disease worldwide, with increasing incidence and prevalence in the setting of the obesity epidemic. MASH is also a leading indication for liver transplantation, given its associated risk of progression to end-stage liver disease. A key challenge in managing MASH is the lack of approved pharmacotherapy. In its absence, lifestyle interventions with a focus on healthy nutrition and regular physical activity have been the cornerstone of therapy. Real-world efficacy and sustainability of lifestyle interventions are low, however. Pharmacotherapy development for MASH is emerging with promising data from several agents with different mechanisms of action (MOAs) in phase 3 clinical trials. In this review, we highlight ongoing challenges and potential solutions in drug development for MASH and provide an overview of available data from emerging therapies across multiple MOAs.

This Is What Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Looks Like: Potential of a Multiparametric MRI Protocol

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a prevalent condition with a broad spectrum defined by liver biopsy. This gold standard method evaluates three features: steatosis, activity (ballooning and lobular inflammation), and fibrosis, attributing them to certain grades or stages using a semiquantitative scoring system. However, liver biopsy is subject to numerous restrictions, creating an unmet need for a reliable and reproducible method for MASLD assessment, grading, and staging. Noninvasive imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), offer the potential to assess quantitative liver parameters. This review aims to provide an overview of the available MRI techniques for the three criteria evaluated individually by liver histology. Here, we discuss the possibility of combining multiple MRI parameters to replace liver biopsy with a holistic, multiparametric MRI protocol. In conclusion, the development and implementation of such an approach could significantly improve the diagnosis and management of MASLD, reducing the need for invasive procedures and paving the way for more personalized treatment strategies.

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: A comprehensive updated review of risk factors, symptoms, and treatment

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a subtype of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and a progressive and chronic liver disorder with a significant risk for the development of liver-related morbidity and mortality. The complex and multifaceted pathophysiology of NASH makes its management challenging. Early identification of symptoms and management of patients through lifestyle modification is essential to prevent the development of advanced liver disease. Despite the increasing prevalence of NASH, there is no FDA-approved treatment for this disease. Currently, medications targeting metabolic disease risk factors and some antifibrotic medications are used for NASH patients but are not sufficiently effective. The beneficial effects of different drugs and phytochemicals represent new avenues for the development of safer and more effective treatments for NASH. In this review, different risk factors, clinical symptoms, diagnostic methods of NASH, and current treatment strategies for the management of patients with NASH are reviewed.

NAFLD in the 21st Century: Current Knowledge Regarding Its Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Therapeutics

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a major public health issue worldwide. It is the most common liver disease in Western countries, andits global prevalence is estimated to be up to 35%. However, its diagnosis may be elusive, because liver biopsy is relatively rarely performed and usually only in advanced stages of the disease. Therefore, several non-invasive scores may be applied to more easily diagnose and monitor NAFLD. In this review, we discuss the various biomarkers and imaging scores that could be useful in diagnosing and managing NAFLD. Despite the fact that general measures, such as abstinence from alcohol and modulation of other cardiovascular disease risk factors, should be applied, the mainstay of prevention and management is weight loss. Bariatric surgery may be suggested as a means to confront NAFLD. In addition, pharmacological treatment with GLP-1 analogues or the GIP agonist tirzepatide may be advisable. In this review, we focus on the utility of GLP-1 analogues and GIP agonists in lowering body weight, their pharmaceutical potential, and their safety profile, as already evidenced inanimal and human studies. We also elaborate on other options, such as the use of vitamin E, probiotics, especially next-generation probiotics, and prebiotics in this context. Finally, we explore future perspectives regarding the administration of GLP-1 analogues, GIP agonists, and probiotics/prebiotics as a means to prevent and combat NAFLD. The newest drugs pegozafermin and resmetiron, which seem to be very promising, arealso discussed.

Risk of liver-related events in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) patients with fibrosis: A comparative analysis of various risk stratification criteria

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

International regulatory agencies recommend testing drug therapy for patients with noncirrhotic high-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) because they are at risk of liver-related events (LRE). We aimed to compare the risk of LRE in patients with MASLD stratified for F2-F4 fibrosis and MASH.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Overall, 1938 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven MASLD were enrolled. High-risk MASH was defined as MASH with F2-F4 fibrosis. LSM was measured by transient elastography. LRE were recorded during follow-up. Cox multivariate models were used to assess the association between high-risk MASH or F2-F4 fibrosis without MASH, of LSM (≥8 or ≥10 Kpa), and of AGILE 3+ with LRE. The diagnostic performance for the prediction of LRE was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves. The observed 5-year actuarial rate of LRE was 0.4%, 0.2%, 5.1%, and 6.6% in patients with F0-F1 fibrosis without MASH, F0-F1 fibrosis with MASH, F2-F4 fibrosis without MASH, and high-risk MASH, respectively. At multivariate Cox regression analysis using F0-F1 fibrosis without MASH as a reference, both F2-F4 fibrosis without MASH [adjusted HR (aHR) 9.96] and high-risk MASH (aHR 10.14) were associated with LRE. In the 1074 patients with available LSM, LSM ≥ 10 kPa (aHR 6.31) or AGILE 3+ > 0.67 (aHR 27.45) independently predicted the development of LRE and had similarly acceptable 5-year area under the receiver operating characteristic to high-risk MASH and F2-F4 fibrosis (0.772, 0.818, 0.739, and 0.780, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of LRE is similar in patients with high-risk MASH and with F2-F4 fibrosis without MASH. The use of LSM ≥ 10 kPa or AGILE 3+ > 0.67 could be an accurate option to identify patients with MASLD worthy to be included in clinical trials.

Non-invasive testing and risk-stratification in patients with MASLD

The development and validation of non-invasive fibrosis tests (NITs) has changed clinical practice in Hepatology over the last 15 years. Metabolic associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), formerly known as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is the most prevalent liver disease in western countries, with up to a third of the unselected adult population affected. In this article, we review the use of NITs in the diagnosis and staging of MASLD. We discuss their use in the diagnosis of steatosis, steatohepatitis and fibrosis and critically evaluate recently published data. These NITs include a variety of approaches, such as serum markers like FIB-4, pro-C3 and ELF, imaging techniques like Fibroscan® and MRE, and combined scores like Agile 3+ and Agile 4, offering a range of options for healthcare providers. Furthermore, these non-invasive tests also serve as valuable prognostic tools, allowing for better risk assessment and improved patient management, particularly in predicting liver-related events and overall mortality.

Non-invasive diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Current status and future perspective

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease throughout the world. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver cirrhosis can result from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the severe stage of NAFLD progression. By some estimates, NAFLD affects almost one-third of the world's population, which is completely new and serious public health issue. Unfortunately, NAFLD is diagnosed by exclusion, and the gold standard for identifying NAFLD/NASH and reliably measuring liver fibrosis remains liver biopsy, which is an invasive, costly, time-consuming procedure and involves variable inter-observer diagnosis. With the progress of omics and imaging techniques, numerous non-invasive serological assays have been generated and developed. On the basis of these developments, non-invasive biomarkers and imaging techniques have been combined to increase diagnostic accuracy. This review provides information for the diagnosis and assessment of NAFLD/NASH in clinical practice going forward and may assist the clinician in making an early and accurate diagnosis and in proposing a cost-effective patient surveillance. We discuss newly identified and validated non-invasive diagnostic methods from biopsy-confirmed NAFLD patient studies and their implementation in clinical practice, encompassing NAFLD/NASH diagnosis and differentiation, fibrosis assessment, and disease progression monitoring. A series of tests, including 20-carboxy arachidonic acid (20-COOH AA) and 13,14-dihydro-15-keto prostaglandin D2 (dhk PGD2), were found to be potentially the most accurate non-invasive tests for diagnosing NAFLD. Additionally, the Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (3D-MRE), combination of the FM-fibro index and Liver stiffness measurement (FM-fibro LSM index) and the machine learning algorithm (MLA) tests are more accurate than other tests in assessing liver fibrosis. However, it is essential to use bigger cohort studies to corroborate a number of non-invasive diagnostic tests with extremely elevated diagnostic values.

Interpretation, Reporting, and Clinical Applications of Liver MR Elastography

Chronic liver disease is highly prevalent and often leads to fibrosis or cirrhosis and complications such as liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. The diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis is crucial to determine management and mitigate complications. Liver biopsy for histologic assessment has limitations such as sampling bias and high interreader variability that reduce precision, which is particularly challenging in longitudinal monitoring. MR elastography (MRE) is considered the most accurate noninvasive technique for diagnosing and staging liver fibrosis. In MRE, low-frequency vibrations are applied to the abdomen, and the propagation of shear waves through the liver is analyzed to measure liver stiffness, a biomarker for the detection and staging of liver fibrosis. As MRE has become more widely used in clinical care and research, different contexts of use have emerged. This review focuses on the latest developments in the use of MRE for the assessment of liver fibrosis; provides guidance for image acquisition and interpretation; summarizes diagnostic performance, along with thresholds for diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis; discusses current and emerging clinical applications; and describes the latest technical developments.

A Novel Score Based on Controlled Attenuation Parameter Accurately Predicts Hepatic Steatosis in Individuals With Metabolic Dysfunction Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Derivation and Independent Validation Study

INTRODUCTION

In metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, the diagnostic efficacy of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) was not very accurate in evaluating liver fat content. The aim of this study was to develop a score, based on CAP and conventional clinical parameters, to improve the diagnostic performance of CAP regarding liver fat content.

METHODS

A total of 373 participants from 2 independent Chinese cohorts were included and divided into derivation (n = 191), internal validation (n = 75), and external validation (n = 107) cohorts. Based on the significant difference index between the 2 groups defined by the magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) in derivation cohort, the optimal model (CAP-BMI-AST score [CBST]) was screened by the number of parameters and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). In the internal and external validation cohorts, the AUROC and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compare the diagnostic performance of CBST with that of CAP.

RESULTS

We constructed the CBST = -14.27962 + 0.05431 × CAP - 0.14266 × body mass index + 0.01715 × aspartate aminotransferase. When MRI-PDFF was ≥20%, ≥10%, and ≥5%, the AUROC for CBST was 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.83), 0.89 (95% CI 0.83-0.94), and 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98), which was higher than that for CAP respectively. In the internal validation cohort, the AUROC for CBST was 0.80 (95% CI 0.70-0.90), 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-1.00), and 0.98 (95% CI 0.94-1.00). The optimal thresholds of CBST were -0.5345, -1.7404, and -1.9959 for detecting MRI-PDFF ≥20%, ≥10%, and ≥5%, respectively.

DISCUSSION

The CBST score can accurately evaluate liver steatosis and is superior to the CAP.