Routine use of a SILASTIC spring-loaded silo for infants with gastroschisis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Different strategies, equivalent treatment approaches in terms of mortality in four university hospitals: a retrospective multicenter study of gastroschisis in Finland

PURPOSE

Optimal treatment of gastroschisis is not determined. The aim of the present study was to investigate treatment methods of gastroschisis in four university hospitals in Finland.

METHODS

The data of neonates with gastroschisis born between 1993 and 2015 were collected. The primary outcomes were short and long-term mortality and the length of stay (LOS). Statistical analyses consisted of uni- and multivariate models.

RESULTS

Total of 154 patients were included (range from 31 to 52 in each hospital). There were no statistically significant differences in mortality or LOS between centers. Significant differences were observed between the hospitals in the duration of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.046), time to full enteral nutrition (p = 0.043), delay until full defect closure (p = 0.003), central line sepsis (p = 0.025), abdominal compartment syndrome (p = 0.018), number of abdominal operations during initial hospitalization (p = 0.000) and follow-up (p = 0.000), and ventral hernia at follow-up (p = 0.000). In a Cox multivariate analysis, the treating hospital was not associated with mortality.

CONCLUSION

There were no differences in short or long-term mortality between four university hospitals in Finland. However, some inter-hospital variation in postoperative outcomes was present.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The medical and surgical management of gastroschisis

Gastroschisis (GS) is a full-thickness abdominal wall defect in which fetal intestine herniates alongside the umbilical cord into the intrauterine cavity, resulting in an intestinal injury of variable severity. An increased prevalence of gastroschisis has been observed across several continents and is a focus of epidemiologic study. Prenatal diagnosis of GS is common and allows for delivery planning and treatment in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) by collaborative interdisciplinary teams (neonatology, neonatal nursing and pediatric surgery). Postnatal treatment focuses on closure of the defect, optimized nutrition, complication avoidance and a timely transition to enteral feeding. Babies born with complex GS are more vulnerable to complications, have longer and more resource intensive hospital stays and benefit from standardized care pathways provided by teams with expertise in managing infants with intestinal failure. This article will review the current state of knowledge related to the medical and surgical management and outcomes of gastroschisis with a special focus on the role of the neonatologist in supporting integrated team-based care.

Gastroschisis: A Successful, Prospectively Evaluated Treatment Model in a Middle-Income Country

BACKGROUND

This research adopted a care protocol from high-income countries in a level II/III hospital in a middle-income country to decrease morbidity and mortality associated with gastroschisis.

METHODS

We established a multidisciplinary protocol to treat patients with gastroschisis prospectively from November 2012 to November 2018. This included prenatal diagnosis, presence of a neonatologist and pediatric surgeon at birth, and either performing primary closure on the patients with an Apgar score of 8/9, mild serositis, and no breathing difficulty or placing a preformed silo, when unable to fulfill these criteria, under sedation and analgesia (no intubation) in the operating room or at the patients' bedside. The subsequent management took place in the neonatal intensive care unit. The data were analyzed through the Mann-Whitney and Student's t-distribution for the two independent samples; the categorical variables were analyzed through a chi-square distribution or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

In total, 55 patients were included in the study: 33 patients (60%) were managed with a preformed silo, whereas 22 patients (40%) underwent primary closure. Prenatal diagnosis (P = 0.02), birth at the main hospital (P = 0.02), and the presence of a pediatric surgeon at birth (P = 0.04) were associated with successful primary closure. The primary closure group had fewer fasting days (P < 0.001) and a shorter neonatal intensive care unit length of stay (P = 0.025). The survival rate was 92.7% (51 patients).

CONCLUSION

The treatment model modified to fit the means of our hospital proved successful.

A Review of History and Challenges of Evidence-Based Pediatric Surgery

PURPOSE

Evidence-based pediatric surgery (EBPS) refers to the use of the best available evidence in making personalized decisions concerning the management of each pediatric surgical patient. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review on past and present evidence-based clinical decision, and challenges in pediatric surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted according to a set of criteria in PubMed for historical and current peer-reviewed studies regarding EBPS.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-five full-text published articles focusing on EPBS findings over the past 25 years were included. The rarity of many congenital anomalies, the inability to establish multicenter collaborations, the failure to perform double-blinded studies in children, the pediatric surgeons' reluctance to perform ethically unacceptable sham operations and their skepticism shown in accepting and implementing the documented results instead of applying their personal clinical practice methods and surgical techniques are among problems that hamper the accomplishment of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

CONCLUSIONS

RCTs remain limited in clinical pediatric surgery practice due to problems in the design and publication of these trials. Moreover, skepticism exists regarding acceptance and implementation of the documented results of RCTs. Notwithstanding, pediatric surgeons must establish evidence-based centers in order to increase the number of well-designed RCTs, properly evaluate clinical research, make effective evidence-based clinical decisions and develop high-quality of pediatric surgeries care in the future.

Sutureless closure for the management of gastroschisis

Gastroschisis is a common congenital anomaly in which the midgut fails to return to the abdominal cavity resulting in exposed intestines, which are not covered by a membrane in a neonate. The incidence of gastroschisis has been increasing worldwide resulting in an evolving medical and surgical management. Gastroschisis can be either simple or complicated. Complicated gastroschisis occurs when gastroschisis is associated with gastrointestinal conditions such as intestinal atresia, volvulus, stenosis or perforation. In this instance, the mortality and morbidity of patients significantly increases. Initial management of gastroschisis requires a multi-modal, interdisciplinary approach in order to successfully care for a neonate. Patients should be managed in a neonatal intensive care unit under the care of intensivists, respiratory therapists and pediatric surgeons. Temperature regulation, hydration and protection of the bowel are of the utmost priorities. Surgical management of gastroschisis focuses on reduction of the bowel and closure of the abdominal wall defect. Initially, the defect was closed primarily with suture, however, more recently, a sutureless closure has become prevalent. This, in conjunction with use of a silo, has led to a shift from the operating room and general anesthesia to the bedside. This article aims to discuss the presentation, diagnosis and management of gastroschisis.

Abdominal Wall Defects

The 2 most common congenital abdominal wall defects are gastroschisis and omphalocele. Both are usually diagnosed prenatally with fetal ultrasonography, and affected patients are treated at a center with access to high-risk obstetric services, neonatology, and pediatric surgery. The main distinguishing features between the 2 are that gastroschisis has no sac and the defect is to the right of the umbilicus, whereas an omphalocele typically has a sac and the defect is at the umbilicus. In addition, patients with an omphalocele have a high prevalence of associated anomalies, whereas those with gastroschisis have a higher likelihood of abnormalities related to the gastrointestinal tract, with the most common being intestinal atresia. As such, the prognosis in patients with omphalocele is primarily affected by the severity and number of other anomalies and the prognosis for gastroschisis is correlated with the amount and function of the bowel. Because of these distinctions, these defects have different management strategies and outcomes. The goal of surgical treatment for both conditions consists of reduction of the abdominal viscera and closure of the abdominal wall defect; primary closure or a variety of staged approaches can be used without injury to the intra-abdominal contents through direct injury or increased intra-abdominal pressure, or abdominal compartment syndrome. Overall, the long-term outcome is generally good. The ability to stratify patients, particularly those with gastroschisis, based on risk factors for higher morbidity would potentially improve counseling and outcomes.

Management of Gastroschisis: Results From the NETS2G Study, a Joint British, Irish, and Canadian Prospective Cohort Study of 1268 Infants

OBJECTIVE

In infants with gastroschisis, outcomes were compared between those where operative reduction and fascial closure were attempted ≤24 hours of age (PC), and those who underwent planned closure of their defect >24 hours of age following reduction with a pre-formed silo (SR).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Inadequate evidence exists to determine how best to treat infants with gastroschisis.

METHODS

A secondary analysis was conducted of data collected 2006-2008 using the British Association of Pediatric Surgeons Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System, and 2005-2016 using the Canadian Pediatric Surgery Network.28-day outcomes were compared between infants undergoing PC and SR. Primary outcome was number of gastrointestinal complications. Interactions were investigated between infant characteristics and treatment to determine whether intervention effect varied in sub-groups of infants.

RESULTS

Data from 341 British and Irish infants (27%) and 927 Canadian infants (73%) were used. 671 infants (42%) underwent PC and 597 (37%) underwent SR. The effect of SR on outcome varied according to the presence/absence of intestinal perforation, intestinal matting and intestinal necrosis. In infants without these features, SR was associated with fewer gastrointestinal complications [aIRR 0.25 (95% CI 0.09-0.67, P = 0.006)], more operations [aIRR 1.40 (95% CI 1.22-1.60, P < 0.001)], more days PN [aIRR 1.08 (95% CI 1.03-1.13, P < 0.001)], and a higher infection risk [aOR 2.06 (95% CI 1.10-3.87, P = 0.025)]. In infants with these features, SR was associated with a greater number of operations [aIRR 1.30 (95% CI 1.17-1.45, P < 0.001)], and more days PN [aIRR 1.06 (95% CI 1.02-1.10, P = 0.003)].

CONCLUSIONS

In infants without intestinal perforation, matting, or necrosis, the benefits of SR outweigh its drawbacks. In infants with these features, the opposite is true. Treatment choice should be based upon these features.

Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) measured tissue oxygenation in neonates with gastroschisis: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Management of gastroschisis involves either primary or staged closure. Bowel ischemia and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) are possible complications that can be related to a method of treatment. NIRS monitoring has never been applied in this group of patients and may allow for earlier detection of complications.

OBJECTIVE

To assess near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) monitoring in neonates with gastroschisis for detecting changes in tissue oxygenation (rSO₂) related to bowel reductions or height of bowel in the silo and for detecting tissue ischemia.

METHODS

Patients with gastroschisis and controls underwent continuous multi-channel assessment of oxygenation of the brain (CrSO₂), kidney (RrSO₂) and bowel (GrSO₂) in a prospective pilot study.

RESULTS

Fifteen neonates were treated with primary closure (n = 3) or staged closure (n = 12); two had confirmed bowel ischemia, none developed ACS.There was no significant correlation between height of the bowel and GrSO₂ at apex (p = .72) or base (p = .54) within the silo. During staged reductions there was a clinically non-significant change in RrSO₂ (Δ-2.5%, p = .04), but no significant changes in CrSO₂ (p = .11), and GrSO₂ of apex (p = .97) and base (p = .31). Patients with confirmed ischemia had GrSO₂ that were lower than controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Measuring GrSO₂ through a silo is feasible. Staged reduction seems safe based on NIRS measurements, with minimal effect of hydrostatic pressure on bowel oxygenation. NIRS was able to detect subtle changes in intra-abdominal renal perfusion during reduction and could differentiate healthy and ischemic bowel.

Gastroschisis: A State-of-the-Art Review

Gastroschisis, the most common type of abdominal wall defect, has seen a steady increase in its prevalence over the past several decades. It is identified, both prenatally and postnatally, by the location of the defect, most often to the right of a normally-inserted umbilical cord. It disproportionately affects young mothers, and appears to be associated with environmental factors. However, the contribution of genetic factors to the overall risk remains unknown. While approximately 10% of infants with gastroschisis have intestinal atresia, extraintestinal anomalies are rare. Prenatal ultrasound scans are useful for early diagnosis and identification of features that predict a high likelihood of associated bowel atresia. The timing and mode of delivery for mothers with fetuses with gastroschisis have been somewhat controversial, but there is no convincing evidence to support routine preterm delivery or elective cesarean section in the absence of obstetric indications. Postnatal surgical management is dictated by the condition of the bowel and the abdominal domain. The surgical options include either primary reduction and closure or staged reduction with placement of a silo followed by delayed closure. The overall prognosis for infants with gastroschisis, in terms of both survival as well as long-term outcomes, is excellent. However, the management and outcomes of a subset of infants with complex gastroschisis, especially those who develop short bowel syndrome (SBS), remains challenging. Future research should be directed towards identification of epidemiological factors contributing to its rising incidence, improvement in the management of SBS, and obstetric/fetal interventions to minimize intestinal damage.

Variation in hospital costs for gastroschisis closure techniques

BACKGROUND

In newborns with gastroschisis, both primary repair and delayed fascial closure with initial silo placement are considered safe with similar outcomes although cost differences have not been explored.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of newborns admitted with gastroschisis at a single center from 2011 to 2016. Demographic, clinical, and cost data during the initial hospitalization were collected. Differences between procedure costs and clinical endpoints were analyzed using multivariable linear regression adjusting for prematurity, complicated gastroschisis, and performance of additional operations.

RESULTS

80 patients with gastroschisis met inclusion criteria. Rates of primary fascial, primary umbilical cord closure, and delayed closure were 14%, 65%, and 21%, respectively. Delayed closure was associated with an increase in total hospital costs by 57% compared to primary repair (p < 0.001). In addition, delayed closure was associated with increased total and NICU LOS (p < 0.05), parenteral nutrition duration (p = 0.02), ventilator days (p < 0.001), time to goal enteral feeds (p = 0.01), and all cost sub-categories except ward room costs (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Delayed fascial closure was associated with significantly greater hospital costs during the index admission.

Challenges and Outcome of Management of Gastroschisis at a Tertiary Institution in North-Eastern Nigeria

Introduction: Gastroschisis is a congenital anterior abdominal wall defect characterized by herniation of abdominal contents through a defect usually located to the right side of the umbilical cord. It occurs in about 1 in 2,000-4,000 live births and is slightly commoner in males. Management has remained challenging in the low and middle-income countries (LMICS), with high mortality rates. This study highlights the clinical presentation, treatment, outcomes, and challenges in the management of gastroschisis at a tertiary healthcare center in a resource-limited setting. Methods: This was a retrospective review of the records of all patients with gastroschisis managed over a period of 30 months (January 2016-June 2018). Data on patients' demographics, age, birth weight, clinical presentation, method of gastroschisis reduction and closure, complications, and outcomes were collated. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20. A p-value of >0.05 was considered significant. Results: Twenty-four patients with gastroschisis were managed. Of these, 18 patients had data available for analysis. There were 14 males, with a male-female ratio of 3.5:1. The median age at presentation was 11.0 h (range 1-36 h). Ten patients (55.6%) were delivered in a medical facility. One patient had type II jejunal atresia and transverse colonic atresia as associated anomalies. Improvised silos were applied by the bedside in 15 (83.3%) patients, while two patients (11.1%) had primary closure under general anesthesia. One patient died before definitive treatment could be done. Sterile urobags and female condoms were used for constructing improvised silos in 9 (60%) and 6 (40%) patients, respectively. Eight patients who had initial silo application had complete bowel reduction over a median time of 8.0 days (mean 10.0 ± 6.5 days, range 2-23 days). Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) was not available. The average time to commencement of feeding was 8.0 days ± 6.6 (median 6.0 days, range 2-22 days). Full feeding was achieved in five patients (two patients in the primary closure group and three from the silo group) over a mean time of 16.8 days ± 10.4 (median 14.0 days). Sepsis was the commonest complication. Four patients (22.2%) survived. Conclusion: Management of gastroschisis remains challenging in resource-limited regions.

Developing and implementing an interventional bundle to reduce mortality from gastroschisis in low-resource settings

Background: Gastroschisis is associated with less than 4% mortality in high-income countries and over 90% mortality in many tertiary paediatric surgery centres across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The aim of this trial is to develop, implement and prospectively evaluate an interventional bundle to reduce mortality from gastroschisis in seven tertiary paediatric surgery centres across SSA. Methods: A hybrid type-2 effectiveness-implementation, pre-post study design will be utilised. Using current literature an evidence-based, low-technology interventional bundle has been developed. A systematic review, qualitative study and Delphi process will provide further evidence to optimise the interventional bundle and implementation strategy. The interventional bundle has core components, which will remain consistent across all sites, and adaptable components, which will be determined through in-country co-development meetings. Pre- and post-intervention data will be collected on clinical, service delivery and implementation outcomes for 2-years at each site. The primary clinical outcome will be all-cause, in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes include the occurrence of a major complication, length of hospital stay and time to full enteral feeds. Service delivery outcomes include time to hospital and primary intervention, and adherence to the pre-hospital and in-hospital protocols.  Implementation outcomes are acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, coverage, cost and sustainability. Pre- and post-intervention clinical outcomes will be compared using Chi-squared analysis, unpaired t-test and/or Mann-Whitney U test. Time-series analysis will be undertaken using Statistical Process Control to identify significant trends and shifts in outcome overtime. Multivariate logistic regression analysis will be used to identify clinical and implementation factors affecting outcome with adjustment for confounders. Outcome: This will be the first multi-centre interventional study to our knowledge aimed at reducing mortality from gastroschisis in low-resource settings. If successful, detailed evaluation of both the clinical and implementation components of the study will allow sustainability in the study sites and further scale-up. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03724214.

Improving outcomes for neonates with gastroschisis in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION

There is a significant disparity in outcomes for neonates with gastroschisis in high-income countries (HICs) compared with low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Many LMICs report mortality rates between 75% and 100% compared with <4% in HICs.

AIM

To undertake a systematic review identifying postnatal interventions associated with improved outcomes for gastroschisis in LMICs.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Three search strings will be combined: (1) neonates; (2) gastroschisis and other gastrointestinal congenital anomalies requiring similar surgical care; (3) LMICs. Databases to be searched include MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis Global, and the Cochrane Library. Grey literature will be identified through Open-Grey, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry and ISRCTN registry (Springer Nature). Additional studies will be sought from reference lists of included studies. Study screening, selection, data extraction and assessment of methodological quality will be undertaken by two reviewers independently and team consensus sought on discrepancies. The primary outcome of interest is mortality. Secondary outcomes include complications, requirement for ventilation, parenteral nutrition duration and length of hospital stay. Tertiary outcomes include service delivery and implementation outcomes. The methodology of the studies will be appraised. Descriptive statistics and outcomes will be summarised and discussed.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required since no new data are being collected. Dissemination will be via open access publication in a peer-reviewed medical journal and distribution among global health, global surgery and children's surgical collaborations and international conferences.

CONCLUSION

This study will systematically review literature focused on postnatal interventions to improve outcomes from gastroschisis in LMICs. Findings can be used to help inform quality improvement projects in low-resource settings for patients with gastroschisis. In the first instance, results will be used to inform a Wellcome Trust-funded multicentre clinical interventional study aimed at improving outcomes for gastroschisis across sub-Saharan Africa.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018095349.

The Management of an Ectopic Ovary in an Adolescent Patient with Gastroschisis

BACKGROUND

Gastroschisis is an abdominal wall defect through which the bowel herniates into the amniotic cavity. Surgical correction of gastroschisis is performed during infancy. Gynecologic concerns have not been described in this population as either an associated anomaly or complication of surgical repair.

CASE

A 15-year-old nulliparous female patient presented with abdominal pain with a history of gastroschisis requiring 4 surgeries in infancy. Computed tomography scan showed an ovary located in the right upper quadrant, which was concerning for torsion. She was taken for a laparotomy with right oophorectomy after conservative management had failed.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Long-term gynecologic outcomes of patients with gastroschisis are not well documented. Because gastroschisis patients are known to have abdominal pain later in life, this case shows that the differential diagnosis should include etiologies beyond the gastrointestinal tract.

Closure methods in gastroschisis

The expected outcome of gastroschisis has evolved from an almost certain death of the child prior to the use of parenteral nutrition to almost certain survival. The primary goal of the surgical intervention is return of eviscerated contents into the abdominal cavity. The optimal surgical technique is dependent on the status of the intestine and the accommodation of abdominal domain. In this review, the various surgical techniques for management are discussed as they have evolved. Ironically, a minimalist surgical intervention originally practiced due to the poor expected outcome is now being adopted as a minimalist surgical approach for abdominal wall closure associated with an expected excellent outcome.

Care of infants with gastroschisis in low-resource settings

There is great global disparity in the outcome of infants born with gastroschisis. Mortality approaches 100% in many low income countries. Barriers to better outcomes include lack of antenatal diagnosis, deficient pre-hospital care, ineffective neonatal resuscitation and venous access, limited intensive care facilities, poor access to the operating theatre and safe neonatal anesthesia, and lack of neonatal parenteral nutrition. However, lessons can be learned from the evolution in management of gastroschisis in high-income countries, generic efforts to improve neonatal survival in low- and middle-income countries as well as specific gastroschisis management initiatives in low-resource settings. Micro and meso-level interventions include educational outreach programs, and pre and in hospital management protocols that focus on resuscitation and include the delay or avoidance of early neonatal anesthesia by using a preformed silo or equivalent. Furthermore, multidisciplinary team training, nurse empowerment, and the intentional involvement of mothers in monitoring and care provision may contribute to improving survival. Macro level interventions include the incorporation of ultrasound into World Health Organisation antenatal care guidelines to improve antenatal detection and the establishment of the infrastructure to enable parenteral nutrition provision for neonates in low- and middle-income countries. On a global level, gastroschisis has been suggested as a bellwether condition for evaluating access to and outcomes of neonatal surgical care provision.

Use of quality improvement (QI) methodology to decrease length of stay (LOS) for newborns with uncomplicated gastroschisis

PURPOSE

Gastroschisis is a congenital defect of the abdominal wall leading to considerable morbidity and long hospitalizations. The purpose of this study was to use quality improvement methodology to standardize care in the management of gastroschisis that may contribute to length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

A gastroschisis quality improvement team established a best-practice protocol in order to decrease LOS in infants with uncomplicated gastroschisis. The specific aim was to decrease median LOS from a baseline of 34days. We used statistical process control charts including rational subgroup analysis to monitor LOS.

RESULTS

From December 2008 to December 2016, 119 patients with uncomplicated gastroschisis were evaluated. Retrospective data were obtained on 25 patients prior to protocol implementation. Ninety-four patients with uncomplicated gastroschisis comprised the prospective process stage. The median LOS for this retrospective cohort was 34days (IQR: 30.5-50.5), while the median LOS for the prospective cohort following implementation of the protocol decreased to 29days (IQR: 23-43).

CONCLUSIONS

With the use of quality improvement methodology, including standardization of care and a change in surgical approach, the median LOS for newborns with uncomplicated gastroschisis at our institution decreased from 34days to 29days.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Omphaloceles in combination with a self-made hemispherical cushion: a report of 12 cases

The aim of this study was to discuss the curative effect of applying "capsule-reserved normal saline bag and self-made hemi-spherical cushion oppression" for treating giant omphaloceles. Twelve patients with giant omphaloceles who were admitted to our hospital between January 2008 and June 2016 were selected for treatment as follows: a capsule-reserved normal saline bag was used to promote the gradual return of the abdominal contents into the abdominal cavity in phase I, and a self-made hemi-spherical cushion was used for compression combined with a local dressing change in phase II to treat the giant omphaloceles without surgical treatment. All 12 patients in this group were cured, and after follow-up visits for >10 months, they had no abdominal infections, wound disruption, intestinal obstruction, or other complications, and their growth was normal. Two patients had abdominal hernias, and they recovered after herniorrhaphies. Giant omphaloceles in newborns were treated in stages, and in phase II, non-surgical treatment was applied, which was easily performed with a smaller wound, low cost, an obvious curative effect, and higher safety and effectiveness.

Enrollment and reporting practices in pediatric general surgical randomized clinical trials: A systematic review and observational analysis

BACKGROUND

Pediatric surgical randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are labor-intensive and costly. This systematic review investigated patient accrual and estimates of study duration in RCTs by interrogating enrollment and registration practices.

METHODS

We performed a peer-review search of multiple databases from 2000 to 2016 evaluating RCTs salient to the field with inclusion mandated that a self-identified pediatric surgeon be listed as an author. Trial registries were also searched. RCTs were appraised, and predictors of success were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression, with success defined as achievement of recruitment objectives.

RESULTS

After screening, 137 RCTs were analyzed. Mean Jadad score was 1.80 (median=2). CONSORT scores ranged between 17% and 97% (median=58%). Sixty-seven studies described sample-size determination, 49 reported projected enrollment, and 26 were successful. Among 26 registered RCTs, 15 disclosed their expected completion date, which was achieved by 8. On average, protocols underwent 3.42 iterations. 9% of trials were terminated before completion, most commonly owing to poor recruitment. Trial registration and urgent cases significantly predicted success on multivariable analysis (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Overall quality of reporting in pediatric surgical trials is poor. Sample-size calculation and patient accrual are frequently poorly performed or underestimated, resulting in trial overrun and/or premature termination. These data may help inform subsequent study design and facilitate successful completion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-Systematic Review and Observational (Case-Control) Analysis.

Sutureless elastic ring silo for the gastroschisis

Background: The definitive surgical management of gastroschisis is the return of the eviscerated abdominal content into the abdomen as soon as possible. Objectives: Assess the efficacy of using a sutureless elastic ring silo (SERS) for the management of gastroschisis. Methods: Neonates with gastroschisis were enrolled at Songklanagarind Hospital between January 2006 and December 2008. A primary repair (PR) was attempted in all cases. If this was not possible due to concerns about abdominal compartment syndrome, a stage abdominal closure with a silo pouch was fashioned: a traditional silo (TS) or SERS. When the bowel was completely reduced, a second-stage closure was performed in the operating room. Data collected included general demographic data, size of defect, associated anomalies, hospital course, mode of gastroschisis closure, duration of parenteral nutrition (PN) and ventilator, first feeding age, complications, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Results: Twenty-nine children with gastroschisis were treated (PR: 9, TS: 9, and SERS: 11). There were no differences (p >0.05) concerning gender, mode of delivery, APGAR scores, gestational age, birth weight, or defect size. A preformed silo was employed in 20 of 29 cases, TS in nine (31%), and SERS in 11 (38%) cases in an average operative time of 80.6 and 40 minutes, respectively, a significantly shorter operative time in the SERS (p =0.007). Overall, there were no differences (p >0.05) concerning duration of ventilator support (10.2 days), duration of PN (21.3 days), first feeding age (15 days), LOS (26.5 days), and complication. Conclusion: The use of a sutureless elastic ring silo with readily available inexpensive materials is simple, safe and efficacious in our setting.

Understanding gastroschisis and its clinical management: where are we?

Gastroschisis is the commonest developmental defect of the anterior abdominal wall in both developed and developing countries. The past 30 years have seen transformational improvements in outcome due to advances in neonatal intensive care and enhanced integration between the disciplines of maternal fetal medicine, neonatology and pediatric surgery. A review of gastroschisis, which emphasizes its epidemiology, multidisciplinary care strategies and contemporary outcomes is timely. Areas covered: This review discusses the current state of knowledge related to prevalence and causation, and postulated embryopathologic mechanisms contributing to the development of gastroschisis. Using relevant, current literature with an emphasis on high level evidence where it exists, we review modern techniques of prenatal diagnosis, pre and postnatal risk stratification, preferred timing and method of delivery, options for abdominal wall closure, nutritional management, and short and long term clinical and neurodevelopmental follow-up. Expert commentary: This section explores controversies in contemporary management which contribute to practice and cost variation and discusses the benefits of novel nutritional therapies and care standardization that target unnecessary practice variation and improve overall cost-effectiveness of gastroschisis care. The commentary concludes with a review of fertile areas of gastroschisis research, which represent opportunities for knowledge synthesis and further outcome improvement.

Variability in outcomes after gastroschisis closure across U.S. children's hospitals

BACKGROUND

In patients undergoing gastroschisis closure, the effects of timing of closure and patient and hospital-level characteristics on length of stay (LOS) and time to enteral autonomy are unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

Using the Pediatric Health Information System, we compared neonates who underwent early (within 1day of birth) versus delayed (>1day after birth) gastroschisis closure from 2005 to 2013. We evaluated the relationship between time to closure and both LOS and days on total parenteral nutrition (TPN).

RESULTS

Of 4459 neonates with gastroschisis, 43.9% underwent early closure and 56.1% underwent delayed closure. Delayed closure, complicated gastroschisis, government insurance, lower birth weight, older age at closure, and complex chronic conditions were associated with longer LOS and days on TPN (all p<0.05). There was significant inter-hospital variability in both outcomes, after adjusting for patient- and hospital-level characteristics, including hospitals' gastroschisis and neonatal volumes, median age at closure, and percentages of complicated and delayed gastroschisis patients, (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Delayed gastroschisis closure is associated with longer LOS and duration of TPN, even after excluding complicated cases. Furthermore, after controlling for hospital volume, rate of complicated gastroschisis, and timing of closure, the persistent inter-hospital variability suggests that practice variability is partially responsible for these differences.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Does timing of gastroschisis repair matter? A comparison using the ACS NSQIP pediatric database

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on optimal timing of gastroschisis repair. The 2012-2014 ACS NSQIP Pediatric Participant Use Data File was used to compare outcomes of primary versus staged gastroschisis repair.

METHODS

Cases were divided into primary repair (0-1day) and staged repair (4-14days). Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared for primary versus staged closure using Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous variables. Length of stay was compared after controlling for prematurity.

RESULTS

There were 627 subjects included, with 364 neonates in the primary group and 263 in the staged group. The primary group demonstrated shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) (5.1days; p<0.001) and had less surgical site infections (OR=0.27; p=0.003), but had longer ventilator days (1.9days; p<0.001). Neonates in the primary repair group were less likely to be discharged home versus transferred to another hospital (OR=0.24; p=0.006) and more likely to require nutritional support at discharge (OR=1.74; p=0.034). No significant differences were identified for mortality, readmissions, postoperative LOS, sepsis or other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Staged repair of gastroschisis has longer LOS attributed to preoperative timing, but less ventilator days. Outcomes for these closure techniques are equivocal and support surgeons performing the closure technique they are most experienced with.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III (Treatment: retrospective comparative study).

A novel approach in the treatment of neonatal gastroschisis: a review of the literature and a single-center experience

Gastroschisis is a congenital abdominal wall defect and its management remains an issue. We performed a review of the literature to summarize its evaluation, management and outcome and we describe a new type of surgical reduction performed in our center without anesthesia (GA), immediately after birth, in the delivery room. Between January 2002 and March 2013, we enrolled all live born infants with gastroschisis referred to the third-level Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology "San Camillo" of Rome. Two groups of infants were identified: group 1 in which gastroschis reduction was performed by the traditional technique and group 2 in which reduction was immediately performed after birth in the delivery room without GA. Twelve infants were enrolled in group 1, and seven infants in group 2. Statistical significance was observed between the groups regarding the hospital stay, for the duration of parenteral nutrition and full oral feeds (p = .004). Survival was similar between two groups. The reduction without GA performed immediately after birth in a delivery room encourages the relationship between the mother and her child and appears to be a safe and feasible technique in a selected group of patients with simple gastroschisis defect; for this reason, it could represent a valid alternative to traditional approach.

Variability of outcome reporting in Hirschsprung's Disease and gastroschisis: a systematic review

Heterogeneity in outcome reporting limits identification of gold-standard treatments for Hirschsprung’s Disease(HD) and gastroschisis. This review aimed to identify which outcomes are currently investigated in HD and gastroschisis research so as to counter this heterogeneity through informing development of a core outcome set(COS). Two systematic reviews were conducted. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they compared surgical interventions for primary treatment of HD in review one, and gastroschisis in review two. Studies available only as abstracts were excluded from analysis of reporting transparency. Thirty-five HD studies were eligible for inclusion in the review, and 74 unique outcomes were investigated. The most commonly investigated was faecal incontinence (32 studies, 91%). Seven of the 28 assessed studies (25%) met all criteria for transparent outcome reporting. Thirty gastroschisis studies were eligible for inclusion in the review, and 62 unique outcomes were investigated. The most commonly investigated was length of stay (24 studies, 80%). None of the assessed studies met all criteria for transparent outcome reporting. This review demonstrates that heterogeneity in outcome reporting and a significant risk of reporting bias exist in HD and gastroschisis research. Development of a COS could counter these problems, and the outcome lists developed from this review could be used in that process.

Management of Patients with Gastroschisis Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Concurrent Respiratory Failure

Treatment of gastroschisis often requires multiple surgical procedures to re-establish abdominal domain, reduce abdominal contents, and eventually close the abdominal wall. In patients who have concomitant respiratory failure requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), this process becomes further complicated. This situation is rare and only five such cases have been reported in the ECMO registry database. Management of three of the five patients along with results and implications for future care of similar patients is discussed here. Two patients had respiratory failure due to meconium aspiration syndrome and one patient had persistent acidosis as well as worsening pulmonary hypertension leading to the decision of ECMO. The abdominal contents were placed in a spring-loaded silastic silo while on ECMO and primary closure was performed three to six days after the decannulation. All three patients survived and are developmentally appropriate. We recommend avoiding aggressively reducing the abdominal contents and using a silo to conservatively reducing the gastroschisis while the patient is on ECMO therapy. Keeping the intra-abdominal pressure below 20 mm Hg can possibly reduce ECMO days and ventilator time and has been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality. Patients with gastroschisis and respiratory failure requiring ECMO can have good outcomes despite the complexity of required care.

Gastroschisis: Bellwether for neonatal surgery capacity in low resource settings?

INTRODUCTION

Economic disadvantage may adversely influence the outcomes of infants with gastroschisis (GS). Gastroschisis International (GiT) is a network of seven paediatric surgical centres, spanning two continents, evaluating GS treatment and outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A 2-year retrospective review of GS infants at GiT centres. Primary outcome was mortality. Sites were classified into high, middle and low income country (HIC, MIC, and LIC). MIC and LIC were sometimes combined for analysis (LMIC). Disability adjusted life years (DALYs) were calculated and centres with the highest mortality underwent a needs assessment.

RESULTS

Mortality was higher in the LICs and LMICs: 100% in Uganda and Cote d'Ivoire, 75% in Nigeria and 60% in Malawi. 29% and 0% mortality was reported in South Africa and the UK, respectively. Septicaemia was the commonest cause of death. Averted and non-avertable DALYs were nil in Uganda and Cote d'Ivoire (no survivors). In the UK (100% survival) averted DALYs (met need) was highest, representing death and disability prevented by surgical intervention. Performance improvement measures were agreed: a prospectively maintained GS register; clarification of the key team members of a GS team and management pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose the use of GS as a bellwether condition for assessing institutional capacity to deliver newborn surgical care. Early access to care, efficient multidisciplinary team working, appropriate resuscitation, avoidance of abdominal compartment syndrome, stabilization prior to formal closure and proactive nutritional interventions may reduce GS-associated burden of disease in low resource settings.

Outcome reporting in randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of gastroschisis treatment: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Core outcome sets (COS) facilitate clinical research by providing an agreed set of outcomes to be measured when evaluating treatment efficacy. Gastroschisis is increasing in frequency and evidence-based treatments are lacking. We aimed to identify initial candidate outcomes for a gastroschisis COS from existing literature.

METHODS

Using a sensitive search strategy we identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews (SRs) of treatment interventions for gastroschisis. Outcomes were extracted and assigned to the core areas, 'Pathophysiological Manifestations', 'Life Impact', 'Resource Use', 'Adverse Events' and 'Mortality'.

RESULTS

A total of 50 outcomes were identified. RCTs reported 6-9 outcomes each; SRs reported 9-25. The most frequently reported outcomes were 'Length of hospital stay' (reported in 8 studies), 'Duration of ventilation' and 'Time to full enteral feeds' (7 studies). Outcomes identified could be assigned to all five core areas.

CONCLUSIONS

There is wide heterogeneity in outcomes reported in studies evaluating treatment interventions for gastroschisis. It is unclear which outcomes are of highest importance across stakeholder groups. Developing a COS to standardize outcome measurement and reporting for gastroschisis is warranted.

Management of gastroschisis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The diagnosis and treatment of gastroschisis spans the perinatal disciplines of maternal fetal medicine, neonatology, and pediatric surgery. Since gastroschisis is one of the commonest and costliest structural birth defects treated in neonatal ICUs, a comprehensive review of its epidemiology, prenatal diagnosis, postnatal treatment, and short and long-term outcomes is both timely and relevant.

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence of gastroschisis has increased dramatically over the past 20 years, leading to a renewed interest in causation. The widespread availability of maternal screening and ultrasound results in very high rates of prenatal diagnosis, which enables evaluation of the optimal timing and mode of delivery. The preferred method of surgical closure continues to be an issue of debate among pediatric surgeons, whereas postsurgical treatment seeks to expedite the initiation and progression of enteral feeding and minimize complications. A small subset of babies with complex gastroschisis leading to intestinal failure benefit from the knowledge and expertise of dedicated interdisciplinary teams, which seek to bring novel therapies and improved clinical outcomes.

SUMMARY

The opportunities to increase the knowledge of causation, and identify best practices leading to improved outcomes, drive the ongoing need for collaborative clinical research in gastroschisis.

The role of preformed silos in the management of infants with gastroschisis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The pre-formed silo (PFS) is increasingly used in the management of gastroschisis, but its benefits remain unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature comparing use of a PFS with alternate treatment strategies.

METHODS

Studies comparing the use of a PFS with alternate strategies were identified and data extracted. The primary outcome measure was length of time on a ventilator. Mean difference (MD) between continuous variables and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Risk difference and 95% CI were determined for dichotomous data.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies, including one randomised controlled trial, were included. Treatment strategy and outcome measures reported varied widely. Meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in days of ventilation, but a longer duration of parenteral nutrition (PN) requirement [MD 6.4 days (1.3, 11.5); p = 0.01] in infants who received a PFS. Subgroup analysis of studies reporting routine use of a PFS for all infants demonstrated a significantly shorter duration of ventilation with a PFS [MD 2.2 days (0.5, 3.9); p = 0.01] but no difference in duration of PN requirement. Other outcomes were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

The quality of evidence comparing PFS with alternate treatment strategies for gastroschisis is poor. Only routine use of PFS is associated with fewer days on a ventilator compared with other strategies. No strong evidence to support a preference for any strategy was demonstrated. Prospective studies are required to investigate the optimum management of gastroschisis. Standardised outcome measures for this population should be established to allow comparison of studies.

Challenges of improving the evidence base in smaller surgical specialties, as highlighted by a systematic review of gastroschisis management

Objective

To identify methods of improving the evidence base in smaller surgical specialties, using a systematic review of gastroschisis management as an example.

Background

Operative primary fascial closure (OPFC), and silo placement with staged reduction and delayed closure (SR) are the most commonly used methods of gastroschisis closure. Relative merits of each are unclear.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed comparing outcomes following OPFC and SR in infants with simple gastroschisis. Primary outcomes of interest were mortality, length of hospitalization and time to full enteral feeding.

Results

751 unique articles were identified. Eight met the inclusion criteria. None were randomized controlled trials. 488 infants underwent OPFC and 316 underwent SR. Multiple studies were excluded because they included heterogeneous populations and mixed intervention groups. Length of stay was significantly longer in the SR group (mean difference 8.97 days, 95% CI 2.14–15.80 days), as was number of post-operative days to complete enteral feeding (mean difference 7.19 days, 95%CI 2.01–12.36 days). Mortality was not statistically significantly different, although the odds of death were raised in the SR group (OR 1.96, 95%CI 0.71–5.35).

Conclusions

Despite showing some benefit of OPFC over SR, our results are tempered by the low quality of the available studies, which were small and variably reported. Coordinating research through a National Paediatric Surgical Trials Unit could alleviate many of these problems. A similar national approach could be used in other smaller surgical specialties.

Surgical Treatment Results In Gastroschisis Based On Preterm Delivery Within The 34th Week Of Gestation By Caesarean Section

was to assess the value of the today’s appropriate approach, preterm delivery in the 34th week of gestation by Caesarean section and subsequent surgical intervention at the perinatal center, in daily practice of pediatric surgery with regard to early postoperative and mid-term outcome.

Over the time period of 9 years, all consecutive cases diagnosed with gastroschisis at the perinatal center, University Hospital of Magdeburg, were born by Caesarean section within the 34th week of gestation followed by surgical intervention. The registered data were compared with those published by other groups.

Overall, there were 19 cases through the investigation period from 01/01/2006 to 12/31/2014. The mean duration of gestation was 237.9 days. The mean birth weight was 2,276 g. In all individuals, a primary closure with no artificial material was achieved. The duration of postoperative artificial respiration was 2.3 days. Oral uptake could be initiated on the 10

The data indicate that in case of gastroschisis, primary closure can be more frequently achieved by section within the 34

Abdominal wall defects

Abdominal wall defects in foetuses include gastroschisis, exomphalos, bladder exstrophy complex, cloacal exstrophy and body stalk syndrome. The defects that occur more commonly are gastroschisis and exomphalos. In this review we assess the current evidence regarding the incidence, perinatal risk factors, antenatal and postnatal management and outcome for both these conditions. A review of the current surgical practices for management of gastroschisis and exomphalos is discussed.

Abdominal wall defects: prenatal diagnosis, newborn management, and long-term outcomes

Omphalocele and gastroschisis represent the most frequent congenital abdominal wall defects a pediatric surgeon is called to treat. There has been an increased reported incidence in the past 10 years mainly due to the diffuse use of prenatal ultrasound. The early detection of these malformations, and related associated anomalies, allows a multidisciplinary counseling and planning of delivery in a center equipped with high-risk pregnancy assistance, pediatric surgery, and neonatology. At present times, closure of defects, even in multiple stages, is always possible as well as management of most of cardiac-, urinary-, and gastrointestinal-associated malformations. The progress, herein discussed, in the care of newborns with abdominal wall defects assures most of them survive and reach adulthood. Some aspects of transition of medical care will also be considered, including fertility and cosmesis.

Gastroschisis-related complications requiring further surgical interventions

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of gastroschisis-related complications (GRCs) after closure of the abdominal wall defect, with a focus on frequency, type and timing of required surgical interventions, and to identify the impact of these on further outcome.

METHODS

All gastroschisis patients treated from 1975 to 2008 in a tertiary-level center were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical procedures for GRCs following abdominal wall closure of simple gastroschisis [SG (intact continuous bowel)] and complex gastroschisis [CG (additional gastrointestinal malformations)] were compared, and outcomes were determined.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight patients were identified with a median follow-up of 15.0 years (range 4-37). Ninety-four (87%) had SG, and 14 (13%) CG. Surgical interventions for GRCs were performed in 28 (26%) patients with 16 requiring multiple operations. Overall, 60 surgical procedures were performed. Bowel obstruction (n = 34) was the most common GRC, followed by anastomotic stricture (n = 8) and ischemic bowel (n = 3). The median interval between gastroschisis closure and secondary surgery for GRCs was 62.5 days (range 1 day-15 years). Surgical interventions were significantly more frequent in CG compared with SG [12/14 (86%) vs. 16/94 (17%); P < 0.0001]. The overall survival rate was 90%. Significantly, more patients required parenteral nutrition for more than 28 days [9/28 (32%) vs. 13/80 (16 %); P = 0.0468], longer median time to achieve full enteral feedings (87 vs. 33 days; P < 0.0001) and longer median hospital stay (117 vs. 54 days; P < 0.0001) compared with those not requiring additional surgery.

CONCLUSION

GRCs requiring surgical interventions were more common in patients with CG, which were associated with delay in achieving full enteral feedings and prolonged hospital stay.

Staged gastroschisis closure using Alexis wound retractor: first experiences

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of an Alexis wound retractor (AWR) device for staged gastroschisis closures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

AWR device was used to cover unreduced viscera of a gastroschisis when primary abdominal wall closure was not convenient. The eviscerated organs were covered with one of the two spring-loaded rings of the AWR inserted underneath the abdominal wall. Gradual reduction was guaranteed through careful traction on the external ring. We retrospectively analyzed the prenatal, post-natal and operative data of the first patients treated with AWR and report their post-operative outcomes.

RESULTS

The AWR device was used for staged closure in eight cases. Complete reduction and fascial closure were performed at a median of 3.5 ± 1.6 days. Ventilatory support was necessary for 4.0 ± 3 days and full parenteral feeds for 7.5 ± 6.1 days after fascial closure. Median full enteral feeding was observed at 18 ± 12.5 days after closure allowing discharge in a median period of 30.5 ± 15.6 days after closure.

CONCLUSION

The AWR device is not only a safe and efficient silo for a progressive reduction of severe gastroschisis, but also an interesting tool for continuous stretching leading to an increase of the peritoneal cavity volume, enhancing the equalizing of the viscero-abdominal disproportion.

Delivery room surgery: an applicable therapeutic strategy for gastroschisis in developing countries

BACKGROUND

The survival rate of infants with gastroschisis has improved significantly. It is over 90% in developed countries, but 50% in developing countries. This study aimed to investigate the factors improving the survival rate of infants with gastroschisis in developing countries.

METHODS

Neonates meeting the inclusion criteria, who presented to our center since the establishment of delivery room surgery, were enrolled into this retrospective study. Data were evaluated specifically to determine the role of delivery room surgery in reducing the mortality and morbidity of infants with gastroschisis and to identify factors optimizing the conditions of outborn infants.

RESULTS

A total of 64 infants were identified. The overall survival rate of the infants was 60.9%. The survival rate of infants in inborns was 76.5%, and the survival rate of infants in outborns was 43.3%. Infants of the outborn group took more time to reach full enteral feeding, and were more likely to require a prolonged stay in hospital when compared with those of the inborn group. Logistic analysis identified that the surgical technique, the presence of sepsis and intestinal necrosis could be expected to influence the outcome of gastroschisis.

CONCLUSIONS

The strategy of delivery of patients in a center prepared to perform delivery room closure of gastroschisis appears to improve the survival of patients with gastroschisis. Further reduction in mortality rates will depend on improved conditions of outborn infants.

Growth and developmental outcomes of infants with gastroschisis at one year of age: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to describe the physical growth and developmental outcomes of babies born with gastroschisis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all cases of gastroschisis in Western Australia born between 1997 and 2010.

RESULTS

In the 128 pregnancies with fetal gastroschisis, 117 babies were live born. 112 (95.7%) survived to one year. 19% had z scores of<-1.28 for weight at birth (<10th centiles) compared with 30% at one year. Neurodevelopmental data were available in 88/112 (79%) of survivors (Griffiths scores in 67; reports of ages and stages questionnaire (ASQ) in 21). The mean GQ at 12 months was 99 (SD 9.8). Suboptimal neurodevelopmental outcomes were noted in eight. Complex gastroschisis (present at birth) and acquired gut related complications were associated with adverse long term outcomes. The incidence of acquired gut complications was least (5%) in those who underwent silo reduction as the primary management. However, on univariate and multivariate analysis, the type of primary reduction did not significantly influence the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

A large proportion of infants with gastroschisis exhibit suboptimal weight gain during the first year. The incidence of adverse developmental outcomes appears to be low.

Primary fascial closure versus staged closure with silo in patients with gastroschisis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Gastroschisis is the most common congenital abdominal wall defect. Despite advances in the surgical closure of gastroschisis, consensus is lacking as to which method results in the best patient outcomes. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare short-term outcomes associated with primary fascial closure and staged repair with a silo in patients with gastroschisis.

METHODS

We reviewed Medline citations, as well as the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, between January 1, 1996 and June 1, 2012. Articles were identified using the search term "gastroschisis" and [("treatment outcome" or "prognosis") or randomized controlled trials]. Case reports, reviews, letters, abstracts only, non-English abstracts, and studies that did not address at least one of the outcomes of interest were excluded from the meta-analysis. Two independent reviewers identified relevant articles for final inclusion. A standard data collection form created by the authors was used to extract study information, including study design, patient characteristics, and reported patient outcomes. The data were analyzed using standard meta-analytic techniques.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included in the meta-analysis. In the five studies that selected closure method randomly or as a temporal shift in practice, silo was associated with better outcomes, with a significant reduction in ventilator days (p<0.0001), time to first feed (p=0.04), and infection rates (p=0.03). When all studies were included, primary closure was associated with improved outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Silo closure is associated with better clinical outcomes in the studies with the least selection bias. Larger prospective studies are needed to definitively determine the best closure technique.

Contemporary 2-year outcomes of complex gastroschisis

PURPOSE

Outcomes of gastroschisis are influenced by associated intestinal complications. We present a detailed analysis of complex gastroschisis.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all patients with gastroschisis treated at 2 university neonatal intensive care units between January 1, 2001, and March 31, 2007, was performed.

RESULTS

Of 83 patients, 19 (23%) had complex gastroschisis, including atresias (68%), gangrene (37%), closing gastroschisis (32%), perforation (21%), strictures (21%), and volvulus (11%). Prenatal ultrasound did not predict complications. Fifty-three percent underwent primary closure. Duration of mechanical ventilation and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) was 14.4 ± 1.9 days and 90.7 ± 9.0 days, respectively. Enteral feeds started at 35.9 ± 4.6 days. Hospital stay was 104.4 ± 9.6 days. Patients underwent a median of 3 abdominal procedures (range, 2-5) before discharge. Ninety-five percent survived to discharge; 33% and 67% were discharged on TPN and gastrostomy feeds, respectively. Two-year survival was 89%, with 82% on full oral feeding, 12% on a combination of oral and gastrostomy feeding, and 1 patient (who received a liver/bowel transplant) on a combination of enteral and parenteral nutrition.

CONCLUSIONS

Complex gastroschisis continues to produce significant morbidity. However, most of the patients are TPN free by 2 years of age.

Long-term review of sutureless ward reduction in neonates with gastroschisis in the neonatal unit

BACKGROUND

A sutureless ward reduction (SWR) protocol was implemented in the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary level hospital in 1999. Although the short-term outcomes associated with SWR have been documented, the long-term outcomes are unknown.

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected from the medical records of all neonates with gastroschisis from September 1999 to December 2010. Data on their growth and development and the prevalence of any health problems were collected.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients with gastroschisis were managed over an 11 year period. Forty-four of these patients received SWR, with 2 deaths in the neonatal period. In the 42 survivors, 35 patients were reviewed at a median age of 7 years and 10 months (range, 6-134 months; interquartile range, 37-124 months). One patient experienced failure to thrive and developmental delay, and later died of a medical complication. Thirty-two patients (91.4%) developed an umbilical hernia, only 2 of whom required umbilical herniotomy. Four patients (11.4%) developed small bowel obstruction, all within the first year.

CONCLUSION

Most patients with SWR exhibited normal growth with minimal bowel complications. Despite the high incidence of umbilical hernia, the majority resolved spontaneously and did not require subsequent herniotomy.

Effect of time to surgical evaluation on the outcomes of infants with gastroschisis

PURPOSE

Our goal is to identify the impact of time to surgical intervention on the outcomes of infants with gastroschisis.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, we performed a retrospective review of the medical records of all infants admitted to our institution from 2001 to 2010. Transport, bowel stabilization, and closure times were defined as the time from birth to admission, admission to the first-documented operative intervention, and first operative intervention to abdominal closure, respectively. Outcomes included age at full enteral feeds, total parental nutrition days, ventilator days, and hospital length of stay. Multivariate analysis was used to identify independent predictors of the outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred eighteen infants with gastroschisis were included in our study. Transport and bowel stabilization times were not predictive of any outcome. However, the time to abdominal wall closure and postnatal gastrointestinal complications were independently predictive of age at full enteral feeds, total parenteral nutrition days, and hospital length of stay.

CONCLUSION

Time to surgical evaluation/bowel stabilization was not predictive of any clinically relevant outcomes in infants with gastroschisis. These data demonstrate that potential benefits from prenatal regionalization of infants with gastroschisis are not supported by decreased time to operative intervention.

Advances in surgery for abdominal wall defects: gastroschisis and omphalocele

Abdominal wall defects (AWDs) are a common congenital surgical problem in fetuses and neonates. The incidence of these defects has steadily increased over the past few decades due to rising numbers of gastroschisis. Most of these anomalies are diagnosed prenatally and then managed at a center with available pediatric surgical, neonatology, and high-risk obstetric support. Omphaloceles and gastroschisis are distinct anomalies that have different management and outcomes. There have been a number of recent advances in the care of patients with AWDs, both in the fetus and the newborn, which will be discussed in this article.