1
|
O'Reilly LM, Schwartz K, Brown SA, Dir A, Gillenwater L, Adams Z, Zapolski T, Hulvershorn LA, Aalsma M. Attitudes toward and training in medications for opioid use disorders: a descriptive analysis among employees in the youth legal system and community mental health centers. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2024; 19:32. [PMID: 38907286 PMCID: PMC11193280 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-024-00614-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research demonstrates gaps in medications for opioid use disorder uptake (MOUDs; methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone) especially among adolescents. These gaps may be partly attributable to attitudes about and training in MOUDs among youth-serving professionals. We extended prior research by conducting descriptive analyses of attitudes regarding effectiveness and acceptability of MOUDs, as well as training in MOUDs, among youth legal system (YLS) employees and community mental health center (CMHC) personnel who interface professionally with youth. METHODS Using survey data from participants (n = 181) recruited from eight Midwest counties, we examined: (1) differences in MOUD attitudes/training by MOUD type and (2) by respondent demographics, and (3) prediction of MOUD attitudes/training by participant-reported initiatives to implement evidence-based practices (EBPs), workplace culture around EBPs, and workplace stress. Attitudes and training were measured in reference to five MOUD types (methadone, oral buprenorphine, injectable buprenorphine, oral naltrexone, injectable naltrexone) on three subscales (effectiveness, acceptability, training). RESULTS Wilcoxon signed-rank tests demonstrated that most outcomes differed significantly by MOUD type (differences observed among 22 of 30 tests). Kruskal-Wallis tests suggested MOUD differences based on demographics. For methadone, CMHC providers endorsed greater perceived effectiveness than YLS providers and age explained significant differences in perceived effectiveness. For buprenorphine, CHMC providers viewed oral or injectable buprenorphine as more effective than YLS employees, respondents from more rural counties viewed oral buprenorphine as more effective than those from less rural counties, and age explained differences in perceived effectiveness. For naltrexone, perceived gender differed by gender. Hierarchical ordinal logistic regression analysis did not find an association between personal initiatives to implement EBPs, workplace culture supporting EBPs, or workplace stress and effectiveness or acceptability of MOUDs. However, personal initiatives to implement EBPs was associated with training in each MOUD. CONCLUSIONS These results highlight a few key findings: effectiveness/acceptability of and training in MOUDs largely differ by MOUD type; setting, rurality, age, gender, and education explain group differences in perceived effectiveness of and training in MOUDs; and implementing EBPs is associated with training in MOUDs. Future research would benefit from examining what predicts change in MOUD attitudes longitudinally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren M O'Reilly
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Katherine Schwartz
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Steven A Brown
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, 401 W. 10th St, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Allyson Dir
- Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Logan Gillenwater
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Zachary Adams
- Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Tamika Zapolski
- Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Leslie A Hulvershorn
- Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Matthew Aalsma
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shakya P, Jangra J, Rao R, Mishra AK, Bhad R. Assessment of treatment retention rates and predictors of retention on opioid agonist treatment among adolescents. Drug Alcohol Rev 2024. [PMID: 38884374 DOI: 10.1111/dar.13890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is an effective treatment for opioid dependence syndrome in adults. However, studies on effectiveness of OAT in adolescents are limited; existing studies show varying retention rates. The present study aimed to assess OAT retention rates in adolescent patients with opioid dependence syndrome registered in a community drug treatment clinic in Delhi, India, and to analyse factors associated with retention at 1 year. METHODS Retrospective cohort study. All adolescents (n = 130) aged 10-19 years, started on OAT from January 2020 to July 2022 were included. Baseline and follow-up data was extracted from online record system maintained at the clinic. OAT retention rates at different timepoints were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to discern factors associated with one-year retention. RESULTS The participants' mean age was 16.9 (SD 1.4) years. Mean age of starting opioids was 14.9 (SD 2.2) years; 29.5% (n = 38) injected opioids. The 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month retention rate on OAT was 64.4%, 45.6%, 38.7% and 29% respectively. The retention rates with buprenorphine and methadone were comparable. Multivariate logistic regression showed retention for less than 12 months to be significantly associated with younger age of starting heroin, involvement in illegal activities, absenteeism from school and substance use in family. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The 12-month retention rates on OAT in adolescents is comparable to retention rates in adults. Various factors associated with early age of onset of opioid use are also associated with lower retention rates on OAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pooja Shakya
- Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Science, New Delhi, India
| | - Jaswant Jangra
- National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ravindra Rao
- National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ashwani Kumar Mishra
- National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Roshan Bhad
- National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lynch SE, Mulford CF, Wiley TRA, Blanco C. Fentanyl-Related Substance Use Patterns, Morbidity, and Mortality Among Adolescents and Young Adults: Implications for Behavioral Health Services Research. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2024:S0890-8567(24)00260-0. [PMID: 38797280 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2024.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
This commentary discusses best practices for responding to fentanyl-related overdose deaths in adolescents and young adults, and it outlines the current state of knowledge about them. Various types of approaches to fentanyl-related overdoses in this age group may need to be developed based on the different risk factors that are emerging from the existing data. We describe the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) behavioral health services research priorities connected with fentanyl-related overdoses in youth. We highlight a key target for intervention and discuss research opportunities related to early intervention with youth with identifiable risk factors. NIDA's research agenda is a means of assisting communities that experience fentanyl-related overdoses by providing scientific information that can be translated into clear recommendations for public action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean E Lynch
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, North Bethesda, Maryland.
| | | | | | - Carlos Blanco
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, North Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Turuba R, Katan C, Marchand K, Brasset C, Ewert A, Tallon C, Fairbank J, Mathias S, Barbic S. Weaving community-based participatory research and co-design to improve opioid use treatments and services for youth, caregivers, and service providers. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0297532. [PMID: 38635804 PMCID: PMC11025903 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Integrating the voices of service users and providers in the design and delivery of health services increases the acceptability, relevance, and effectiveness of services. Such efforts are particularly important for youth opioid use treatments and services, which have failed to consider the unique needs of youth and families. Applying community-based participatory research (CBPR) and co-design can facilitate this process by contextualizing service user experiences at individual and community levels and supporting the collaborative design of innovative solutions for improving care. However, few studies demonstrate how to effectively integrate these methods and engage underserved populations in co-design. As such, this manuscript describes how our team wove CBPR and co-design methods to develop solutions for improving youth opioid use treatments and services in Canada. As per CBPR methods, national, provincial, and community partnerships were established to inform and support the project's activities. These partnerships were integral for recruiting service users (i.e., youth and caregivers) and service providers to co-design prototypes and support local testing and implementation. Co-design methods enabled understanding of the needs and experiences of youth, caregivers, and service providers, resulting in meaningful community-specific innovations. We used several engagement methods during the co-design process, including regular working group meetings, small group discussions, individual interviews and consultations, and feedback grids. Challenges involved the time commitment and resources needed for co-design, which were exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic and limited our ability to engage a diverse sample of youth and caregivers in the process. Strengths of the study included youth and caregiver involvement in the co-design process, which centered around their lived experiences; the therapeutic aspect of the process for participants; and the development of innovations that were accepted by design partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne Turuba
- Foundry, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Christina Katan
- Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kirsten Marchand
- Foundry, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Alayna Ewert
- Foundry, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Corinne Tallon
- Foundry, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jill Fairbank
- Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steve Mathias
- Foundry, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Providence Research, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Skye Barbic
- Foundry, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Providence Research, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Welsh JW, Dopp AR, Durham RM, Sitar SI, Passetti LL, Hunter SB, Godley MD, Winters KC. Narrative review: Revised Principles and Practice Recommendations for Adolescent Substance Use Treatment and Policy. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2024:S0890-8567(24)00140-0. [PMID: 38537736 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2024.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In 2014, the U.S. National Institute on Drug Abuse released the "Principles of Adolescent Substance Use Disorder Treatment," summarizing previously established evidence and outlining principles of effective assessment, treatment, and aftercare for substance use disorders (SUD). Winters et al. (2018) updated these principles to be developmentally appropriate for adolescents. This review builds on that formative work and recommends updated adolescent assessment, treatment, and aftercare principles and practices. METHOD The Cochrane, MEDLINE-PubMed, and PsychInfo databases were searched for relevant studies with new data about adolescent substance use services. This article updates the 13 original principles; condenses the 8 original modalities into 5 practices; and highlights implications for public policy approaches, future funding, and research. RESULTS Key recommendations from the principles include integrating care for co-occurring mental health disorders and SUDs, improving service accessibility including through the educational system, maintaining engagement, and addressing tension between agencies when collaborating with other youth service systems. Updates to the treatment practices include adoption of Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT), investment in social programs and family involvement in treatment, expanding access to behavioral therapies and medications, increasing funding to harm reduction services, supporting reimbursement for continuing care services, and increasing investment in research. CONCLUSION These revised principles of adolescent assessment, treatment, and aftercare approaches and practices aim to establish guidance and evidence-based practices for treatment providers, while encouraging necessary support from policymakers and funding agencies to improve the standard of care for adolescent SUD services.
Collapse
|
6
|
Fishman M, Wenzel K, Gauthier P, Borodovsky J, Murray O, Subramaniam G, Levy S, Fredyma E, McLeman B, Marsch LA. Engagement, initiation, and retention in medication treatment for opioid use disorder among young adults: A narrative review of challenges and opportunities. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE AND ADDICTION TREATMENT 2024:209352. [PMID: 38494051 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) is a catastrophic public health problem for young adults (YAs) and their families. While medication for OUD (MOUD) is safe, effective, and recognized as the standard of care, its' uptake and success have been limited in YAs compared to older adults. METHODS This narrative review summarizes the existing literature and highlights select studies regarding barriers to YA MOUD, potential explanations for those barriers, and strategies to overcome them. RESULTS Barriers are prominent along the entire cascade of care, including: treatment engagement and entry, MOUD initiation, and MOUD retention. Hypothesized explanations for barriers include: developmental vulnerability, inadequate treatment system capacity, stigma against MOUD, among others. Interventions to address barriers include: promotion of family involvement, increasing provider capacity, integration of MOUD into primary care, assertive outreach, and others. CONCLUSIONS Integrating an adapted version of family coaching from the Community Reinforcement Approach and Family Training (CRAFT) and other models into YA MOUD treatment serves as an example of an emerging novel practice that holds promise for broadening the funnel of engagement in treatment and initiation of MOUD, and enhancing treatment outcomes. This and other developmentally-informed approaches should be evaluated as part of a high-priority clinical and research agenda for improving OUD treatment for YAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Fishman
- Maryland Treatment Centers, 3800 Frederick Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21229, USA; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Dept of Psychiatry, 3800 Frederick Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21229, USA.
| | - Kevin Wenzel
- Maryland Treatment Centers, 3800 Frederick Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21229, USA
| | - Phoebe Gauthier
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, 46 Centerra Parkway, Suite 315, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA
| | - Jacob Borodovsky
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, 46 Centerra Parkway, Suite 315, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA
| | - Owen Murray
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, 46 Centerra Parkway, Suite 315, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA
| | - Geetha Subramaniam
- Center for Clinical Trials Network, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Ave, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Sharon Levy
- Boston Children's Hospital, Division of Addiction Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Emma Fredyma
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, 46 Centerra Parkway, Suite 315, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA
| | - Bethany McLeman
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, 46 Centerra Parkway, Suite 315, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA
| | - Lisa A Marsch
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, 46 Centerra Parkway, Suite 315, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yadav AS, Kumar A, Singh S, Singh T. Navigating Adherence: Unraveling Factors Shaping Opioid Substitution Therapy Compliance. Cureus 2024; 16:e51577. [PMID: 38313900 PMCID: PMC10836039 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective In drug-deaddiction programs, dropout is a major problem in any drug de-addiction program, as dependence is a chronic illness known to relapse frequently. Understanding factors that predict dropout can help design targeted interventions to promote follow-up. This study aimed to assess the various sociodemographic characteristics of opioid-dependent subjects on buprenorphine maintenance treatment and dropping out at or before the three-month follow-up period. Method In this study, the sociodemographic characteristics and quality of life (QOL) of 34 opioid-dependent subjects (males, 32, 94%; females, 2, 6%) on the day of their enrolment in an opioid substitution therapy (OST) center were assessed, and a comparison of sociodemographic and drug use pattern was made between those who followed up and those who dropped out by the end of three months. Results Statistical analysis of the various sociodemographic characteristics using appropriate tests yielded that predictors of good follow-up are younger age (F = 4.57907, P = 0.04008), better education (F = 5.07221, P = 0.031305), and being part of a nuclear family. Longer follow-up was associated with shorter opioid intake duration (F = 8.58908, P = 0.006195). Better social relationships, as evidenced by the social relationship domain score of QOL, predicted longer follow-up (F = 8.58908, P = 0.006195). Other characteristics analyzed did not yield significant associations. Conclusions The study unveils the complexity of opioid addiction recovery, revealing the interplay of age, education, family, addiction duration, and support, shaping one's resilience in recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anupam S Yadav
- Department of Psychiatry, Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial (GSVM) Medical College, Kanpur, IND
| | - Ashutosh Kumar
- Department of Psychiatry, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, IND
| | - Sonali Singh
- Department of Pediatrics, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND
| | - Tejpal Singh
- Department of Medicine, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, IND
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McInerney K, Marchand K, Buckley J, Gao C, Kestler A, Mathias S, Argyle A, Barbic S. Informing youth-centred opioid agonist treatment: Findings from a retrospective chart review of youths' characteristics and patterns of opioid agonist treatment engagement in a novel integrated youth services program. Early Interv Psychiatry 2023; 17:1028-1037. [PMID: 37259685 DOI: 10.1111/eip.13446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
AIM Youth ages 12-24 account for approximately 20% of overdoses and yet are poorly reached by opioid agonist treatment (OAT), the most widely recommended treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). This study contributes to understanding this critical gap by describing youths' patterns of OAT engagement at a novel integrated youth-specific OAT program. METHODS A retrospective chart review was carried out on electronic medical records of n = 23 youth with OUD accessing a community-based integrated youth services (IYS) centre. Data abstraction focused on four domains: sociodemographic, social determinants of health, patterns of OAT engagement, and other services utilized. RESULTS Youths' mean age was 22.6 years (SD = 2.1), with a mean age of first opioid use of 17.4 (SD = 2.7). Youth reported extensive histories of adverse childhood experiences, concurrent mental and physical health complications, and poly-substance use. All youth were offered OAT and 83% initiated treatment with buprenorphine/naloxone, methadone, or slow-release oral morphine. Among those initiating OAT, 42.1% were considered stable on OAT. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first empirical study to describe youths' OAT engagement in an integrated youth-specific OAT program. Our findings demonstrated that a high proportion of youth with OUD initiated OAT in this novel program with varying degrees of OAT stability. These findings can be used to inform the development and implementation of youth-specific and integrated OAT. To account for the novelty of this area of study and small sample sizes, future collaborative efforts across IYS initiatives should be considered, including mixed method approaches to understand outcomes and experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly McInerney
- Foundry North Shore, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kirsten Marchand
- Foundry Central Office, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Chloe Gao
- Foundry Central Office, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Diamond Health Care Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andrew Kestler
- Centre for Health Evaluation Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Diamond Health Care Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Steve Mathias
- Foundry Central Office, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Providence Research, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, The Unviersity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Aubree Argyle
- School of Nursing and Human Physiology, Gonzaga University, Spokane, WA, USA
| | - Skye Barbic
- Foundry Central Office, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schuler MS, Saloner B, Gordon AJ, Dick AW, Stein BD. National Trends in Buprenorphine Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder From 2007 to 2018. Subst Abus 2023; 44:154-163. [PMID: 37278310 PMCID: PMC10654713 DOI: 10.1177/08897077231179576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Buprenorphine is a key medication to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Since its approval in 2002, buprenorphine access has grown markedly, spurred by major federal and state policy changes. This study characterizes buprenorphine treatment episodes during 2007 to 2018 with respect to payer, provider specialty, and patient demographics. METHODS In this observational cohort study, IQVIA Real World pharmacy claims data were used to characterize trends in buprenorphine treatment episodes across four time periods: 2007-2009, 2010-2012, 2013-2015, and 2016-2018. RESULTS In total, we identified more than 4.1 million buprenorphine treatment episodes among 2 540 710 unique individuals. The number of episodes doubled from 652 994 in 2007-2009 to 1 331 980 in 2016-2018. Our findings indicate that the payer landscape changed dramatically, with the most pronounced growth observed for Medicaid (increased from 17% of episodes in 2007-2009 to 37% of episodes in 2016-2018), accompanied by relative declines for both commercial insurance (declined from 35 to 21%) and self-pay (declined from 27 to 11%). Adult primary care providers (PCPs) were the dominant prescribers throughout the study period. The number of episodes among adults older than 55 increased more than 3-fold from 2007-2009 to 2016-2018. In contrast, youth under age 18 experienced an absolute decline in buprenorphine treatment episodes. Buprenorphine episodes increased in length from 2007-2018, particularly among adults over age 45. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate that the U.S. experienced clear growth in buprenorphine treatment-particularly for older adults and Medicaid beneficiaries-reflecting some key health policy and implementation success stories. Yet, since the prevalence of OUD and fatal overdose rate have also approximately doubled during this period, the observed growth in buprenorphine treatment did not demonstrably impact the pronounced treatment gap. To date, only a minority of individuals with OUD currently receive treatment, indicating continued need for systemic efforts to equitably improve treatment uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brendan Saloner
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Adam J Gordon
- Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care Knowledge and Advocacy (PARCKA) Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, and Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Welsh JW, Sitar SI, Hunter BD, Godley MD, Dennis ML. Substance use severity as a predictor for receiving medication for opioid use disorder among adolescents: An analysis of the 2019 TEDS. Drug Alcohol Depend 2023; 246:109850. [PMID: 36989708 PMCID: PMC10121859 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is vastly underutilized in adolescents. Existing treatment guidelines for OUD largely focus on adults, providing limited guidance for pediatric populations. Limited information is known about use of MOUD in adolescents based on substance use severity. METHODS This secondary data analysis examined how patient-level variables influenced the receipt of MOUD in adolescents aged 12-17 (n = 1866) using the Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) 2019 Discharge data set. A crosstabulation and chi-square statistic evaluated the relationship between a proxy for clinical need based on high-risk opioid use (either reporting daily opioid use within the past 30 days and/or history of injection opioid use) for MOUD in states with and without adolescents receiving MOUD (n = 1071). A two-step logistic regression analysis in states with any adolescents receiving MOUD examined the explanatory power of demographic, treatment intake, and substance use characteristics. RESULTS Completion of 12th grade, a GED, or beyond, decreased the likelihood of receiving MOUD (odds ratio [OR]= 0.38, p = 0.017), as did being female (OR = 0.47, p = .006). None of the remaining clinical criteria were significantly associated with MOUD, although a history of one or more arrests increased the likelihood of MOUD (OR = 6.98, p = 0.06). Only 13% of individuals who met criteria for clinical need received MOUD. CONCLUSIONS Lower education could serve as a proxy for substance use severity. Guidelines and best practices are needed to ensure the proper distribution of MOUD to adolescents based on clinical need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine W Welsh
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1821 Clifton Road, NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
| | - Siara I Sitar
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1821 Clifton Road, NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
| | - Brooke D Hunter
- Chestnut Health Systems, 448 Wylie Drive, Normal, IL 61761, USA
| | - Mark D Godley
- Chestnut Health Systems, 448 Wylie Drive, Normal, IL 61761, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Marchand K, Turuba R, Katan C, Brasset C, Fogarty O, Tallon C, Fairbank J, Mathias S, Barbic S. Becoming our young people’s case managers: caregivers’ experiences, needs, and ideas for improving opioid use treatments for young people using opioids. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2022; 17:34. [PMID: 35525987 PMCID: PMC9077957 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-022-00466-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Evidence continues to show that young people, ages 15-24, remain at significant risk of harms from non-medical opioid use and opioid use disorder (OUD), with experts calling for widespread implementation of developmentally-appropriate interventions. These recommendations include the involvement of caregivers in the prevention, early intervention, and treatment of young people using opioids. However, little research has investigated caregivers’ experiences supporting young people, leaving critical gaps in understanding this role. The aim of this study is to explore caregivers’ experiences accessing opioid use treatments with young people and their needs and ideas for improving such treatments. Methods This study reports qualitative findings from Phase 1 of the Improving Treatment Together project, a multi-phase, multi-site community-based participatory study broadly aimed at co-designing opioid use treatments to improve the experiences and outcomes of young people using non-medical opioids. During Phase 1, a total of 27 caregivers (parents, guardians) participated in full-day workshops that were conducted in three communities in British Columbia, Canada. Following human-centred co-design methods, caregivers engaged in small and large group discussions of their experiences, needs, and ideas for improving opioid use treatments for young people. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed. Results Across communities, caregivers’ main experiences were defined as ‘becoming our young people’s case managers’ and ‘enduring a never-ending rollercoaster’. To improve these experiences, two needs themes were identified – expanding organizational and system-level capacity and wider-spread understanding of opioid use as a health issue. Caregivers brainstormed a total of 378 individual ideas to meet these needs, several of which spanned multiple needs themes. Conclusions Caregivers’ experiences, needs, and ideas reveal critical opportunities for improving the quality of interventions for opioid use among young people. This study represents a substantial contribution to the design and implementation of developmentally-appropriate and family-centred interventions for young people using opioids.
Collapse
|
12
|
Risk factors associated with recent opioid-related hospitalizations in children: a nationwide analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 2022; 38:843-851. [PMID: 35239012 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-022-05088-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Identifying at-risk children can provide a crucial opportunity for preventative measures to avoid opioid addiction. This study sought to determine at-risk pediatric patients that were previously hospitalized due to other causes prior to their opioid-related admission. METHODS The Nationwide Readmissions Database (2010-2014) was queried for children 1-18 years old with an opioid-related hospitalization. Previous admissions (up to 1 year prior) and associated diagnoses were compared. Results were weighted for national estimates. RESULTS 51,349 opioid-related hospitalizations were identified with an overall in-hospital mortality of 0.8%. Seventeen percent had a previous admission during the same calendar year of which 44% had > 1 and 11% had ≥ 5 prior admissions. Only 4% of prior admissions occurred at a different hospital. Males and females were equally represented, and 82% were ≥ 13 years old. Only 16% of previously admitted patients underwent a major surgical procedure during a previous hospitalization. The most common concomitant diagnoses for patients with prior hospitalizations were drug abuse (37%), chronic pulmonary disease (18%), and depression (10%). CONCLUSION Opioid-related hospitalizations often occur among children with multiple recent admissions, usually to the same hospital. Most patients do not have a history of cancer or recent surgery to account for their opioid use.
Collapse
|
13
|
Welsh JW, Mataczynski MJ, Passetti LL, Hunter BD, Godley MD. Attitudes and beliefs among Georgia addiction treatment staff about medication for opioid use disorder in adolescents, young adults, and adults: a multi-mixed methods study. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE 2022; 48:347-355. [PMID: 35416739 DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2022.2043335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Background: Adverse consequences, including non-fatal overdose and death, are prevalent in adolescents and young adults with opioid use disorder (OUD). Barriers toward medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) have been identified in adult populations but are poorly understood in youth.Objective: This exploratory multi-mixed methods study examines beliefs and attitudes of addiction treatment program staff about the use of MOUD in youth.Methods: A 40-item survey was distributed electronically to 299 addiction treatment programs in Georgia from May 2020 to January 2021. Participant (N = 215; 74% female) attitudes regarding the use of MOUD in three age groups (adolescents (aged 16-17), young adults (aged 18-25), and adults (aged 26+) on a 6-point Likert scale were compared using paired samples t-tests. A series of one-way ANOVA analyses examined differences in attitudes and beliefs across participant characteristics. Verbatim responses to qualitative survey questions were analyzed using a coding reliability approach to thematic analysis.Results: Participants were less likely to support MOUD in adolescents (M = 3.68, SD 1.5) compared with young (M = 4.38, SD 1.36, t = 8.19, p < .001, d = .51) and older adults (M = 4.64, SD 1.3, t = 9.83, p < .001 d = .74). Participants endorsed higher response rates for the use of both naltrexone and buprenorphine over methadone in young adults. A total of 1,412 text responses were reviewed. Participants highlighted barriers to acceptance and use of MOUD in adolescents including safety concerns and impact on brain development.Conclusions: The results support a comprehensive approach to reducing the barriers to using medications to treat OUDs in adolescent populations. Formal and focused continuing education to correct attitudes and beliefs about MOUD treatment for adolescents is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine W Welsh
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Maggie J Mataczynski
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|