Modulation of transcriptional sensitivity of mineralocorticoid and estrogen receptors

From Ligands to Behavioral Outcomes: Understanding the Role of Mineralocorticoid Receptors in Brain Function

Stress is a normal response to situational pressures or demands. Exposure to stress activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and leads to the release of corticosteroids, which act in the brain via two distinct receptors: mineralocorticoid receptors (MR) and glucocorticoid receptors (GR). Persistent HPA axis overactivation or dysregulation can disrupt an individual's homeostasis, thereby contributing to an increased risk for mental illness. On the other hand, successful coping with stressful events involves adaptive and cognitive processes in the brain that render individuals more resilient to similar stressors in the future. Here we review the role of the MR in these processes, starting with an overview of the physiological structure, ligand binding, and expression of MR, and further summarizing its role in the brain, its relevance to psychiatric disorders, and related rodent studies. Given the central role of MR in cognitive and emotional functioning, and its importance as a target for promoting resilience, future research should investigate how MR modulation can be used to alleviate disturbances in emotion and behavior, as well as cognitive impairment, in patients with stress-related psychiatric disorders.

Structure-function relationships of the aldosterone receptor

The cellular response to the adrenal steroid aldosterone is mediated by the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-dependent transcription factors. The MR binds more than one physiological ligand with binding at the MR determined by pre-receptor metabolism of glucocorticoid ligands by 11β hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2. The MR has a wide tissue distribution with multiple roles beyond the classical role in electrolyte homeostasis including cardiovascular function, immune cell signaling, neuronal fate and adipocyte differentiation. The MR has three principal functional domains, an N-terminal ligand domain, a central DNA binding domain and a C-terminal, ligand binding domain, with structures having been determined for the latter two domains but not for the whole receptor. MR signal-transduction can be best viewed as a series of interactions which are determined by the conformation conferred on the receptor by ligand binding. This conformation then determines subsequent intra- and inter-molecular interactions. These interactions include chromatin, coregulators and other transcription factors, and additional less well characterized cytoplasmic non-genomic effects via crosstalk with other signaling pathways. This chapter will provide a review of MR structure and function, and an analysis of the critical interactions involved in MR-mediated signal transduction, which contribute to ligand- and tissue-specificity. Understanding the relevant mechanisms for selective MR signaling in terms of these interactions opens the possibility of novel therapeutic approaches for the treatment of MR-mediated diseases.

Antagonistic effects of finerenone and spironolactone on the aldosterone-regulated transcriptome of human kidney cells

Aldosterone, the main mineralocorticoid hormone in humans, plays a pivotal role in the control of water and salt reabsorption via activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR). Alterations in MR signaling pathway lead to renal dysfunction, including chronic kidney disease and renal fibrosis, that can be prevented or treated with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). Here, we used RNA-Sequencing to analyze effects of two MRAs, spironolactone and finerenone, on the aldosterone-induced transcriptome of a human renal cell line stably expressing the MR. Bioinformatics analysis of the data set reveals the identity of hundreds of genes induced or repressed by aldosterone. Their regulation is modulated in a time-dependent manner and, for the induced genes, depends on the aldosterone-driven direct binding of the MR onto its genomic targets that we have previously characterized. Although both MRAs block aldosterone-induced as well as aldosterone-repressed genes qualitatively similarly, finerenone has a quantitatively more efficient antagonism on some aldosterone-induced genes. Our data provide the first complete transcriptome for aldosterone on a human renal cell line and identifies pro-inflammatory markers (IL6, IL11, CCL7, and CXCL8) as aldosterone-repressed genes.

Identification of two independent SUMO-interacting motifs in Fas-associated factor 1 (FAF1): Implications for mineralocorticoid receptor (MR)-mediated transcriptional regulation

Fas-associated factor 1 (FAF1) was originally isolated as a Fas-associated factor and was subsequently found to interact with numerous other proteins that are involved in various cellular events including Fas-mediated apoptosis, nuclear factor (NF)-κB, Wnt/β-catenin, and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signaling pathways, mineralocorticoid receptor (MR)-mediated transactivation, and ubiquitin-dependent processes. Herein, we defined two small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO)-interacting motifs (SIMs) within FAF1 and demonstrated to be crucial for transcriptional modulation of the MR. Our study demonstrated that the SIMs of FAF1 do not play a significant role in regulating its subcellular localization, Fas-mediated apoptosis, or NF-κB or Wnt/β-catenin pathways. Remarkably, FAF1 interacts with the sumoylated MR and represses aldosterone-activated MR transactivation in a SIM-dependent manner. Moreover, silencing of endogenous FAF1 in cells resulted in an increase in the induction of MR target genes by aldosterone, indicating that FAF1 functions as an MR co-repressor. We further provide evidence to suggest that the mechanisms of FAF1/SIM-mediated MR transrepression involve inhibition of MR N/C interactions and promotion of MR polyubiquitination and degradation. Sumoylation has been linked to impacting of repressive properties on several transcription factors and cofactors. Our findings therefore provide mechanistic insights underlying SUMO-dependent transcriptional repression of the MR.

30 YEARS OF THE MINERALOCORTICOID RECEPTOR: Coregulators as mediators of mineralocorticoid receptor signalling diversity

The cloning of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) 30 years ago was the start of a new era of research into the regulatory processes of MR signalling at target genes in the distal nephron, and subsequently in many other tissues. Nuclear receptor (NR) signalling is modified by interactions with coregulatory proteins that serve to enhance or inhibit the gene transcriptional responses. Over 400 coregulatory proteins have been described for the NR super family, many with functional roles in signalling, cellular function, physiology and pathophysiology. Relatively few coregulators have however been described for the MR although recent studies have demonstrated both ligand and/or tissue selectivity for MR-coregulator interactions. A full understanding of the cell, ligand and promoter-specific requirements for MR-coregulator signalling is an essential first step towards the design of small molecular inhibitors of these protein-protein interactions. Tissue-selective steroidal or non-steroidal modulators of the MR are also a desired therapeutic goal. Selectivity, as for other steroid hormone receptors, will probably depend on differential expression and recruitment of coregulatory proteins.

Role of Nuclear Receptors in Central Nervous System Development and Associated Diseases

The nuclear hormone receptor (NHR) superfamily is composed of a wide range of receptors involved in a myriad of important biological processes, including development, growth, metabolism, and maintenance. Regulation of such wide variety of functions requires a complex system of gene regulation that includes interaction with transcription factors, chromatin-modifying complex, and the proper recognition of ligands. NHRs are able to coordinate the expression of genes in numerous pathways simultaneously. This review focuses on the role of nuclear receptors in the central nervous system and, in particular, their role in regulating the proper development and function of the brain and the eye. In addition, the review highlights the impact of mutations in NHRs on a spectrum of human diseases from autism to retinal degeneration.

Role of mineralocorticoid receptors on the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis in humans

This clinical review will summarize the available data regarding the role of mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs) on the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis control in physiological and pathological conditions and in the memory processes involved in the control and appraisal of a stress event. MRs are predominantly expressed in the limbic structures, with the hippocampus being the main localization, although MRs are also found at the hypothalamic level. It is known that hyppocampal MRs control the proactive feedback involved in the maintenance of the basal HPA activity, mainly at the nadir of the circadian rhythm. In physiological conditions, the administration of pharmacological doses of both MR antagonists and agonists is able to interact with the HPA activity, modifying the quiescent phase-nadir of the circadian rhythm, although some data in the literature do not support these observations. Also, in a physiological condition such as aging, an enhanced HPA axis activity is found in the time window, when MRs are predominantly occupied by cortisol circulating levels, possibly reflecting an MR impairment in this period of life. In pathology, major depression has been correlated to MR qualitative-quantitative alterations which could reflect differences on psychological and physiological responses, possibly predicting psychopathologies. Most of the remarks reported in this review seem to indicate, in agreement with animal data, a role played by MRs in the delicate control of the HPA axis in humans and the possible predisposition to the development of pathologies in case of their alterations.

Identification of location and kinetically defined mechanism of cofactors and reporter genes in the cascade of steroid-regulated transactivation

A currently obscure area of steroid hormone action is where the component factors, including receptor and reporter gene, act. The DNA binding of factors can be precisely defined, but the location and timing of factor binding and action are usually not equivalent. These questions are addressed for several factors (e.g. glucocorticoid receptor (GR), reporter, TIF2, NCoR, NELF-A, sSMRT, and STAMP) using our recently developed competition assay. This assay reveals both the kinetically defined mechanism of factor action and where the above factors act relative to both each other and the equilibrium equivalent to the rate-limiting step, which we call the concentration limiting step (CLS). The utility of this competition assay would be greatly increased if the position of the CLS is invariant and if the factor acting at the CLS is known. Here we report that the exogenous GREtkLUC reporter acts at the CLS as an accelerator for gene induction by GRs in U2OS cells. This mechanism of reporter function at the CLS persists with different reporters, factors, receptors, and cell types. We, therefore, propose that the reporter gene always acts at the CLS during gene induction and constitutes a landmark around which one can order the actions of all other factors. Current data suggest that how and where GR and the short form of SMRT act is also constant. These results validate a novel and rational methodology for identifying distally acting factors that would be attractive targets for pharmaceutical intervention in the treatment of diseases involving GR-regulated genes.

The hypersensitive glucocorticoid response specifically regulates period 1 and expression of circadian genes

Glucocorticoids regulate gene expression by binding and activating the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). While ligand affinity determines the global sensitivity of the response, additional proteins act on the genome to tune sensitivity of some genes. However, the genomic extent and specificity of dose-specific glucocorticoid responses are unknown. We show that dose-specific glucocorticoid responses are extraordinarily specific at the genomic scale, able to distinctly express a single gene, the circadian rhythm gene for Period 1 (PER1), at concentrations consistent with the nighttime nadir of human cortisol. We mapped the PER1 response to a single GR binding site. The specific GR binding sequence did not impact sensitivity, and we instead attributed the response to a combination of additional transcription factors and chromatin accessibility acting in the same locus. The PER1 hypersensitive response element is conserved in the mouse, where we found similar upregulation of Per1 in pituitary cells. Targeted and transient overexpression of PER1 led to regulation of additional circadian rhythm genes hours later, suggesting that hypersensitive expression of PER1 impacts circadian gene expression. These findings show that hypersensitive GR binding occurs throughout the genome, drives targeted gene expression, and may be important to endocrine mediation of peripheral circadian rhythms.

Interactions of the mineralocorticoid receptor--within and without

The mineralocortoid receptor (MR) regulates salt homeostasis in the kidneys and plays a range of other roles in the heart, vasculature, brain and adipose tissue. It interacts with both mineralocorticoids and glucocorticoids to mediate transcription of target genes. The ability of the MR to exert tissue- and ligand-specific effects relies on its interactions with a range of binding partners, including the chaperone proteins, coregulators, other transcription factors, DNA and modifying proteins. Interactions within the domains of the MR also modulate the overall transcriptional complex. This review will discuss the current understanding of interactions involving the MR and highlight their relevance to ligand- or tissue-specificity as well as their suitability as therapeutic targets.

Deducing the temporal order of cofactor function in ligand-regulated gene transcription: theory and experimental verification

Cofactors are intimately involved in steroid-regulated gene expression. Two critical questions are (1) the steps at which cofactors exert their biological activities and (2) the nature of that activity. Here we show that a new mathematical theory of steroid hormone action can be used to deduce the kinetic properties and reaction sequence position for the functioning of any two cofactors relative to a concentration limiting step (CLS) and to each other. The predictions of the theory, which can be applied using graphical methods similar to those of enzyme kinetics, are validated by obtaining internally consistent data for pair-wise analyses of three cofactors (TIF2, sSMRT, and NCoR) in U2OS cells. The analysis of TIF2 and sSMRT actions on GR-induction of an endogenous gene gave results identical to those with an exogenous reporter. Thus new tools to determine previously unobtainable information about the nature and position of cofactor action in any process displaying first-order Hill plot kinetics are now available.

Cooperative activation of cyclin D1 and progesterone receptor gene expression by the SRC-3 coactivator and SMRT corepressor

Although the ability of coactivators to enhance the expression of estrogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha) target genes is well established, the role of corepressors in regulating 17beta-estradiol (E2)-induced gene expression is poorly understood. Previous studies revealed that the silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptor (SMRT) corepressor is required for full ERalpha transcriptional activity in MCF-7 breast cancer cells, and we report herein the E2-dependent recruitment of SMRT to the regulatory regions of the progesterone receptor (PR) and cyclin D1 genes. Individual depletion of SMRT or steroid receptor coactivator (SRC)-3 modestly decreased E2-induced PR and cyclin D1 expression; however, simultaneous depletion revealed a cooperative effect of this coactivator and corepressor on the expression of these genes. SMRT and SRC-3 bind directly in an ERalpha-independent manner, and this interaction promotes E2-dependent SRC-3 binding to ERalpha measured by co-IP and SRC-3 recruitment to the cyclin D1 gene as measured by chromatin IP assays. Moreover, SMRT stimulates the intrinsic transcriptional activity of all of the SRC family (p160) coactivators. Our data link the SMRT corepressor directly with SRC family coactivators in positive regulation of ERalpha-dependent gene expression and, taken with the positive correlation found for SMRT and SRC-3 in human breast tumors, suggest that SMRT can promote ERalpha- and SRC-3-dependent gene expression in breast cancer.

A dual estrogen receptor TR-FRET assay for simultaneous measurement of steroid site binding and coactivator recruitment

The human estrogen receptors (hER) are members of the nuclear hormone receptor (NHR) superfamily and represent important drug targets for the pharmaceutical industry. Initially, ligand binding assays were used to identify novel ligands using receptors purified from native tissues. With the advent of molecular cloning techniques, cell-based transactivation assays have been the gold standard for many years of drug discovery. With the elucidation of the structural mechanisms underlying the activation of NHRs, cell-free assays with purified receptors have become important tools to directly assess different binding sites (e.g., the hormone binding site or the cofactor binding site). The available cell-free assays have so far facilitated the study of one binding site at a time. With the introduction of Terbium (Tb(3+))-based time-resolved fluorescence energy transfer (TR-FRET), it has become possible to measure 2 different interactions within 1 test tube in parallel. The authors have applied this technology to develop a dual readout system for the simultaneous monitoring of steroid hormone site binding and cofactor peptide recruitment. They took advantage of a commercially available fluorescent tracer as an indicator for classical steroid site binding and designed a novel peptide derived from the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1a (PGC1a) as an indicator for functional agonistic behavior of a test compound. The established assay is able to differentiate between agonists, antagonists, partial agonists, and compounds binding to the cofactor recruitment site. The IC(50) values obtained for a number of reference compounds in the multiplexed assay are in concordance with published data. The simple 1-step mix-and-measure protocol gives excellent quality and robustness and can be miniaturized to 5-microL volume.

Modulation of glucocorticoid receptor induction properties by cofactors in peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Glucocorticoids are widely used for their anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties. Changing concentrations of transcriptional cofactors or chemicals in transiently transfected tissue culture cells modify several properties of glucocorticoid receptor-regulated gene expression including total activity (A(max)), agonist steroid potency (EC(50)), and the percentage of full agonist activity for antisteroids (percent partial agonist activity). However, no reports exist for endogenous genes in primary human cells. Here we document that reduced concentrations of TIF2, a p160 coactivator, in peripheral blood mononuclear cells modulate these parameters for endogenous genes in a gene-selective manner, thus establishing the physiological relevance of this behavior.

Ligand-selective transactivation and transrepression via the glucocorticoid receptor: role of cofactor interaction

The mechanisms that determine ligand-selective transcriptional responses by the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) are not fully understood. Using a wide panel of GR ligands, we investigated the relationships between the potency and maximal response for transactivation via a glucocorticoid response element (GRE) and transrepression via both nuclear factor small ka, CyrillicB (NFsmall ka, CyrillicB) and activator protein-1 (AP-1) sites, relative binding affinity for the GR, as well as interaction with both coactivators and corepressors. The results showed ligand-selective differences in potency and efficacy for each promoter, as well as for a particular ligand between the three promoters. Ligand potency correlated with relative affinity for the GR for agonists and partial agonists in transactivation but not for transrepression. Maximal response was unrelated to relative affinity of ligand for GR for both transactivation and transrepression. A good and significant correlation between full length coactivator binding in two-hybrid assays and efficacy as well as potency of different receptor-steroid complexes for both transactivation and transrepression supports a major role for coactivator recruitment in determination of ligand-selective transcriptional activity. Furthermore, ligand-selective GR binding to GRIP-1, as determined by both two-hybrid and DNA pull down assays, correlated positively with ligand-selective efficacy for transactivation of both a synthetic GRE reporter with expressed GR as well as of an endogenous gene via endogenous GR. The receptor interacting domain of the corepressor SMRT exhibited strong interaction with both agonists and partial agonists, similar to the results for coactivators, suggesting a possible role for SMRT in activation of transcription. However, there was no correlation between ligand affinity for the GR and cofactor interaction. These results provide strong quantitative biochemical support for a model in which GR-mediated ligand-selective differential interaction with GRIP-1, SRC-1A, NCoR and SMRT is a major determinant of ligand-selective and promoter-specific differences in potency and efficacy, for both transactivation and transrepression.

Canonical transient receptor potential channels expression is elevated in a porcine model of metabolic syndrome

Plasma epinephrine and heart rate are elevated in metabolic syndrome, suggesting enhanced catecholamine secretion from the adrenal medulla. Canonical transient receptor potential (TRPC) channels are implicated in mediating hormone-induced Ca(2+) influx and catecholamine secretion in adrenomedullary chromaffin cells. We studied the pattern of TRPC expression in the pig adrenal medulla and investigated whether adrenal TRPC expression is altered in prediabetic metabolic syndrome Ossabaw miniature pigs. We used a combination of molecular biological, biochemical, and fluorescence imaging techniques. We determined the sequence of pig TRPC1 and TRPC3-7 channels. We found that the pig adrenal medulla expressed predominantly TRPC1, TRPC5, and TRPC6 transcripts. The expression level of these TRPCs was significantly elevated in the adrenal medulla from pigs with metabolic syndrome. Interestingly, aldosterone, which is endogenously secreted in the adjacent adrenal cortex, increased TRPC1, TRPC5, and TRPC6 expression in adrenal chromaffin cells isolated from metabolic syndrome but not control pigs. Spironolactone, a blocker of mineralocorticoid receptors, inhibited the aldosterone effect. Dexamethasone also increased TRPC5 expression in metabolic syndrome chromaffin cells. The amplitude of hormone-induced divalent cation influx correlated with the level of TRPC expression in adrenal chromaffin cells. Orai1/Stim1 protein expression was not significantly altered in the metabolic syndrome adrenal medulla when compared with the control. We propose that in metabolic syndrome, abnormally elevated adrenal TRPC expression may underlie increased plasma epinephrine and heart rate. The excess of plasma catecholamines and increased heart rate are risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Thus, TRPCs are potential therapeutic targets in the fight against cardiovascular disease.

What goes on behind closed doors: physiological versus pharmacological steroid hormone actions

Steroid-hormone-activated receptor proteins are among the best-understood class of factors for altering gene transcription in cells. Steroid receptors are of major importance in maintaining normal human physiology by responding to circulating concentrations of steroid in the nM range. Nonetheless, most studies of steroid receptor action have been conducted using the supra-physiological conditions of saturating concentrations (> or =100 nM) of potent synthetic steroid agonists. Here we summarize the recent developments arising from experiments using two clinically relevant conditions: subsaturating concentrations of agonist (to mimic the circulating concentrations in mammals) and saturating concentrations of antagonists (which are employed in endocrine therapies to block the actions of endogenous steroids). These studies have revealed new facets of steroid hormone action that could not be uncovered by conventional experiments with saturating concentrations of agonist steroids, such as a plethora of factors/conditions for the differential control of gene expression by physiological levels of steroid, a rational approach for examining the gene-specific variations in partial agonist activity of antisteroids, and a dissociation of steroid potency and efficacy that implies the existence of separate, and possibly novel, mechanistic steps and cofactors.

Differential modulation of glucocorticoid and progesterone receptor transactivation

The determinants of the different biological activities of progesterone receptors (PRs) vs. glucocorticoid receptors (GRs), which bind to the same DNA sequences, remain poorly understood. The mechanisms by which differential expression of a common target gene can be achieved by PR and GR include unequal agonist steroid concentrations for half maximal induction (EC50) and dissimilar amounts of residual partial agonist activity for antisteroids in addition to the more common changes in total gene induction, or Vmax. Several factors are known to alter some or all of these three parameters for GR-regulated gene induction and some (i.e., the corepressors NCoR and SMRT) modulate the EC50 and partial agonist activity for GR and PR induction of the same gene in opposite directions. The current study demonstrates that other factors known to modulate GR properties (GME, GMEB-2, Ubc9, and STAMP) can also differentially interact with PRs or alter several of the above induction parameters under otherwise identical conditions. These results support the hypothesis that the modulation of EC50, partial agonist activity, and Vmax by a given factor is not limited to one receptor in a specific cell line. Furthermore, the number of factors that unequally modulate PR and GR induction parameters is now greatly expanded, thereby increasing the possible mechanisms for differential gene regulation by PRs vs. GRs.

STAMP, a novel predicted factor assisting TIF2 actions in glucocorticoid receptor-mediated induction and repression

The coactivator TIF2 was predicted to interact with an unknown factor to modify both the relative inhibition in glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-mediated gene repression and several parameters of agonists and antisteroids in GR-regulated induction. Here, we describe the isolation and characterization of the predicted factor as a new 1,277-amino-acid endogenous protein (STAMP). STAMP associates with coactivators (TIF2 and SRC-1) and is selective for a subset of the steroid/nuclear receptors including GRs. Transfected STAMP increases the effects of TIF2 in GR-mediated repression and induction. Conversely, the levels of both induction and repression of endogenous genes are reduced when STAMP small interfering RNAs are used to lower the level of endogenous STAMP. Endogenous STAMP colocalizes with GR in intact cells and is recruited to the promoters of endogenous GR-induced and -repressed genes. We suggest that STAMP is an important new, downstream component of GR action in both gene activation and gene repression.

Effects of acetylation, polymerase phosphorylation, and DNA unwinding in glucocorticoid receptor transactivation

Varying the concentration of selected factors alters the induction properties of steroid receptors by changing the position of the dose-response curve (or the value for half-maximal induction=EC(50)) and the amount of partial agonist activity of antisteroids. We now describe a rudimentary mathematical model that predicts a simple Michaelis-Menten curve for the multi-step process of steroid-regulated gene induction. This model suggests that steps far downstream from receptor binding to steroid can influence the EC(50) of agonist-complexes and partial agonist activity of antagonist-complexes. We therefore asked whether inhibitors of three possible downstream steps can reverse the effects of increased concentrations of two factors: glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) and Ubc9. The downstream steps (with inhibitors in parentheses) are protein deacetylation (TSA and VPA), DNA unwinding (CPT), and CTD phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II (DRB and H8). None of the inhibitors mimic or prevent the effects of added GRs. However, inhibitors of DNA unwinding and CTD phosphorylation do reverse the effects of Ubc9 with high GR concentrations. These results support our earlier conclusion that different rate-limiting steps operate at low and high GR concentrations versus high GR with Ubc9. The present data also suggest that downstream steps can modulate the EC(50) of GR-mediated induction, thus both supporting the utility of our mathematical model and widening the field of biochemical processes that can modify the EC(50).

Steroid receptor coregulator diversity: What can it mean for the stressed brain?

Glucocorticoid hormones modulate brain function and as such are crucial for responding and adjusting to physical and psychological stressors. Their effects are mediated via mineralo- and glucocorticoid receptors, which in large measure act as transcription factors to modulate transcription of target genes, in a receptor-, cell-, and state-specific manner. The nature and magnitude of these transcriptional effects depend on the presence and activity of downstream proteins, such as steroid receptor coactivators and corepressors (together: coregulators), many of which are expressed in the brain. We address the role of coregulators for mineralo- and glucocorticoid receptor-mediated modulation of gene transcription. We first address evidence from cell lines for the importance of coregulator stoichiometry for steroid signaling. The in vivo importance of coregulators-when possible specifically for glucocorticoid signaling in the brain-is discussed based on knockout mice, transient knockdown of steroid receptor coactivators, and distribution and regulation of coactivator expression in the brain. We conclude that for a better understanding of modulation of brain function by glucocorticoids, it is necessary to take into account the role of coregulators, and to assess their importance relative to changes in hormone levels and receptor expression.

Responsiveness to phytoestrogens in primary human osteoblasts is modulated differentially by a "less-calcemic" analog of 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D(3): JK 1624F(2)-2 (JKF)

We have reported previously, that female-derived bone cells responded to 17beta-estradiol (E(2)) and raloxifene (Ral), and male-derived cells responded only to dihydrotestosterone (DHT) when the stimulation of creatine kinase specific activity (CK), which is a marker for hormone responsiveness, was measured. We also found that pre-treatment with the less-calcemic analog of Vitamin D, JK 1624 F(2)-2 (JKF), upregulated the response of CK to E(2) and Ral. In this study, we analyzed the response of human bone cells from pre- and post-menopausal females and males, to phytoestrogens. Bone cells derived from pre-menopausal women showed greater stimulation of CK than cells from post-menopausal women, after treatment with E(2) (30 nM), daidzein (D, 3000 nM), genistein (G, 3000 nM) and Ral (3000 nM); whereas the responses to biochainin A (BA 3000 nM), quecertin (Qu 3000 nM) or the carboxy derivative of G (cG 300 nM) were not age-dependent. Male-derived cells did not respond to phytoestrogens. When cells derived from female bones at both age groups were pre-treated with JKF, by daily addition of 1nM, for 3 days, there was an upregulation of the response to E(2), Ral, G and D but not to BA or Qu. Nuclear binding of (3)[H] E(2) was characteristic of the different phytoestrogens, with increase of the specific binding after pre-treatment with JKF. In contrast, the membranal binding of E(2)-Ov-Eu, which was specific for the estrogenic compounds except Ral, was inhibited by pre-treatment with JKF except for ICI 161480 (ICI). Male bone cells did not bind E(2)-Ov-Eu but bound T-BSA-Eu; this binding was abolished by pre-treatment with JKF. Pre-treatment with JKF increased mRNA for ERalpha and decreased mRNA for ERbeta in bone cells from both age groups of females and from males, all of which expressed both ERs, with a ratio of ERalpha to ERbeta of 121:1 in pre- and 78:1 in post-menopausal and 105:1 in male bone cells. This study raises the possibility of combined Vitamin D analog and phytoestrogen for hormonal replacement therapy to prevent post-menopausal osteoporosis, which is a subject of ongoing research in animal models.

Neuroanatomical distribution and colocalisation of nuclear receptor corepressor (N-CoR) and silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid receptors (SMRT) in rat brain

The two structurally related nuclear receptor corepressor (N-CoR) and silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid receptors (SMRT) proteins have been found to differentially affect the transcriptional activity of numerous nuclear receptors, such as thyroid hormone, retinoic acid and steroid receptors. Because of the numerous effects mediated by nuclear receptors in brain, it is of interest to extend these in vitro data and to explore the cellular distribution of both corepressors in brain tissue. We therefore examined, using in situ hybridisation, whether the relative abundance of these two functionally distinct corepressors differed in rat brain and pituitary. We find that although both N-CoR and SMRT transcripts are ubiquitously expressed in brain, striking differences in their respective levels of expression could be observed in discrete areas of brain stem, thalamus, hypothalamus and hippocampus. Using dual-label immunofluorescence, we examined in selected glucocorticoid sensitive areas involved in the regulation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis activity, the respective protein abundance of N-CoR and SMRT. Protein abundance was largely concurrent with the mRNA expression levels, with SMRT relatively more abundant in hypothalamus and brain stem areas. Colocalisation of N-CoR and SMRT was demonstrated by confocal microscopy in most areas studied. Taken together, these findings are consistent with the idea that the uneven neuroanatomical distribution of N-CoR and SMRT protein may contribute to the site-specific effects exerted by hormones, such as glucocorticoids, in the brain.

Role of activation function domain-1, DNA binding, and coactivator GRIP1 in the expression of partial agonist activity of glucocorticoid receptor-antagonist complexes

The determinants of the partial agonist activity of most antisteroids complexed with steroid receptors are not well understood. We now examine the role of the N-terminal half of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) including the activation domain (AF-1), the DNA binding site sequence, receptor contact with DNA, and coactivator binding on the expression of partial agonist activity in two cell lines for GRs bound by five antiglucocorticoids: dexamethasone mesylate (Dex-Mes), dexamethasone oxetanone (Dex-Ox), progesterone (Prog), deoxycorticosterone (DOC), and RU486. Using truncated GRs, we find that the N-terminal half of GR and the AF-1 domain are dispensable for the partial agonist activity of antiglucocorticoids. This contrasts with the AF-1 domain being required for the partial agonist activity of antisteroids with most steroid receptors. DNA sequence (MMTV vs a simple GRE enhancer) and cell-specific factors (CV-1 vs Cos-7) exert minor effects on the level of partial agonist activity. Small activity differences for some complexes of GAL4/GR chimeras with GR- vs GAL-responsive reporters suggest a contribution of DNA-induced conformational changes. A role for steroid-regulated coactivator binding to GRs is compatible with the progressively smaller increase in partial agonist activity of Dex-Mes > Prog > RU486 with added GRIP1 in CV-1 cells. This hypothesis is consistent with titration experiments, where low concentrations of GRIP1 more effectively increase the partial agonist activity of Dex-Mes than Prog complexes. Furthermore, ligand-dependent GRIP1 binding to DNA-bound GR complexes decreases in the order of Dex > Dex-Mes > Prog > RU486. Thus, the partial agonist activity of a given GR-steroid complex in CV-1 cells correlates with its cell-free binding of GRIP1. The ability to modify the levels of partial agonist activity through changes in steroid structure, DNA sequence, specific DNA-induced conformational changes, and coactivator binding suggests that useful variations in endocrine therapies may be possible by the judicious selection of these parameters to afford gene and tissue selective results.

Corepressor binding to progesterone and glucocorticoid receptors involves the activation function-1 domain and is inhibited by molybdate

Corepressors are known to interact via their receptor interaction domains (RIDs) with the ligand binding domain in the carboxyl terminal half of steroid/nuclear receptors. We now report that a portion of the activation function-1 domain of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) and progesterone receptors (PRs), which is the major transactivation sequence, is necessary but not sufficient for corepressor [nuclear receptor corepressor (NCoR) and silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor (SMRT)] RID binding to GRs and PRs in both mammalian two-hybrid and coimmunoprecipitation assays. Importantly, these two receptor sequences are functionally interchangeable in the context of GR for transactivation, corepressor binding, and corepressor modulatory activity assays. This suggests that corepressors may act in part by physically blocking portions of receptor activation function-1 domains. However, differences exist in corepressor binding to GRs and PRs. The C-terminal domain of PRs has a higher affinity for corepressor than that of GRs. The ability of some segments of the coactivator TIF2 to competitively inhibit corepressor binding to receptors is different for GRs and PRs. With each receptor, the cell-free binding of corepressors to ligand-free receptor is prevented by sodium molybdate, which is a well-known inhibitor of receptor activation to the DNA-binding state. This suggests that receptor activation precedes binding to corepressors. Collectively, these results indicate that corepressor binding to GRs and PRs involve both N- and C-terminal sequences of activated receptors but differ in ways that may contribute to the unique biological responses of each receptor in intact cells.

Glucocorticoid Receptor Ligand Binding Domain Is Sufficient for the Modulation of Glucocorticoid Induction Properties by Homologous Receptors, Coactivator Transcription Intermediary Factor 2, and Ubc9

Several factors modulate the position of the dose-response curve of steroid receptor-agonist complexes and the partial agonist activity of antagonist complexes, thereby causing differential gene activation by circulating hormones and unequal gene repression during endocrine therapies with antisteroids. We now ask whether the modulatory activity of three factors (homologous receptor, coactivator transcription intermediary factor 2, and Ubc9) requires the same or different domains of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs). In all cases, we find that neither the amino terminal half of the receptor, which contains the activation function-1 activation domain, nor the DNA binding domain is required. This contrasts with the major role of activation function-1 in determining the amount of gene expression and partial agonist activity of antisteroids with most steroid receptors. However, the situation is more complicated with Ubc9, where GR N-terminal sequences prevent the actions of Ubc9, but not added GR or transcription intermediary factor 2, at low GR concentrations. Inhibition is relieved by deletion of these sequences or by replacement with the comparable region of progesterone receptors but not by overexpression of the repressive sequences. These results plus the binding of C-terminal GR sequences to the suppressive N-terminal domain implicate an intramolecular mechanism for the inhibition of Ubc9 actions at low GR concentrations. A shift from noncooperative to cooperative steroid binding at high GR concentrations suggests that conformational changes reposition the inhibitory N-terminal sequence to allow Ubc9 interaction with elements of the ligand binding domain. Collectively, these results indicate a dominant role of GR C-terminal sequences in the modulation of the dose-response curve and partial agonist activity of GR complexes. They also reveal mechanistic differences both among individual modulators and between the ability of the same factors to regulate the total amount of gene expression.