1
|
Nabid A, Carrier N, Vigneault E, Martin AG, Bahary JP, Van Nguyen T, Vavassis P, Vass S, Brassard MA, Bahoric B, Archambault R, Vincent F, Bettahar R, Duclos M, Wilke D, Souhami L. Testosterone recovery after androgen deprivation therapy in localised prostate cancer: Long-term data from two randomised trials. Radiother Oncol 2024; 195:110256. [PMID: 38552845 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To determine the rate and time of testosterone (T) recovery in patients (pts) with localised prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy plus 0-, 6-, 18- or 36-month of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). MATERIALS AND METHODS In 1230 pts with prostate cancer randomised into two phase III trials, serum T was measured at baseline, then regularly. T recovery rate was compared between normal vs. abnormal baseline T and with ADT duration with Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A multivariable logistic regression model to predict the probability of recovering normal T was performed. RESULTS Overall, 87.4 % (167/191), 75.9 % (293/386), 54.8 % (181/330) and 43.2 % (80/185) of pts, recovered normal T on the 0-, 6-, 18- or 36-month schedule, respectively (p < 0.001). In patients recovering normal T, the median time to T recovery increased with ADT duration ranging from 0.31, 1.64, 3.06 to 5.0 years for the 0-, 6-, 18- or 36-month schedules, respectively (p < 0.001) and was significantly faster for those with a normal T at baseline (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, older age and longer ADT duration are associated with a lower T recovery. CONCLUSIONS Testosterone recovery rate after ADT depends on several factors including hormonal duration, normal baseline T, age and medical comorbidities. A longer ADT duration is the most important variable affecting T recovery. The data from this report might be a valuable tool to help physicians and patients in evaluating risks and benefits of ADT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdenour Nabid
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
| | - Nathalie Carrier
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Eric Vigneault
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Québec, Canada
| | | | | | - Thu Van Nguyen
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Peter Vavassis
- Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Sylvie Vass
- Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Chicoutimi, Canada
| | - Marc-André Brassard
- Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Chicoutimi, Canada
| | | | | | - François Vincent
- Centre Hospitalier Régional de Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada
| | | | - Marie Duclos
- McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada
| | | | - Luis Souhami
- McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hsueh JY, Gallagher L, Koh MJ, Eden S, Shah S, Wells M, Danner M, Zwart A, Ayoob M, Kumar D, Leger P, Dawson NA, Suy S, Rubin R, Collins SP. Impact of neoadjuvant relugolix on patient-reported sexual function and bother. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1377103. [PMID: 38665954 PMCID: PMC11043501 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1377103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Sexual function following local treatment for prostate cancer is an important quality of life concern. Relugolix is a novel oral GnRH receptor antagonist used in combination with radiation therapy in the treatment of unfavorable prostate cancer. It has been shown to achieve rapid and profound testosterone suppression. As a result, these very low testosterone levels may impact both sexual functioning and perceptions. This prospective study sought to assess neoadjuvant relugolix-induced sexual dysfunction prior to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods Between March 2021 and September 2023, 87 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with neoadjuvant relugolix followed by SBRT per an institutional protocol. Sexual function and bother were assessed via the sexual domain of the validated Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC-26) survey. Responses were collected for each patient at pre-treatment baseline and after several months of relugolix. A Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices questionnaire was administered at the same time points to assess erectile aid usage. Results The median age was 72 years and 43% of patients were non-white. The median baseline Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score was 13 and 41.7% of patients utilized sexual aids prior to relugolix. Patients initiated relugolix at a median of 4.5 months (2-14 months) prior to SBRT. 95% and 87% of patients achieved effective castration (≤ 50 ng/dL) and profound castration (< 20 ng/dl) at SBRT initiation, respectively. Ability to have an erection, ability to reach orgasm, quality of erections, frequency of erections, and overall sexual function significantly declined following relugolix. There was a non- significant increase in sexual bother. Discussion In concordance with known side effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), neoadjuvant relugolix was associated with a significant decline in self-reported sexual function. However, patients indicated only a minimal and non-significant increase in bother. Future investigations should compare outcomes while on relugolix directly to GnRH agonist-induced sexual dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Y. Hsueh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Lindsey Gallagher
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Min Ji Koh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Shaine Eden
- Systems Medicine Program, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular & Cellular Biology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sarthak Shah
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Markus Wells
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Malika Danner
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Alan Zwart
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Marilyn Ayoob
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Deepak Kumar
- Biotechnology Research Institute, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Paul Leger
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Nancy A. Dawson
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Simeng Suy
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Rachel Rubin
- Department of Urology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sean P. Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Spratt DE, George DJ, Shore ND, Cookson MS, Saltzstein DR, Tutrone R, Bossi A, Brown BA, Lu S, Fallick M, Hanson S, Tombal BF. Efficacy and Safety of Radiotherapy Plus Relugolix in Men With Localized or Advanced Prostate Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2024:2815669. [PMID: 38451492 PMCID: PMC10921349 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.7279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
Importance Combination androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with radiotherapy is commonly used for patients with localized and advanced prostate cancer. Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of the oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist relugolix with radiotherapy for treating prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter post hoc analysis of patients with localized and advanced prostate cancer receiving radiotherapy in 2 randomized clinical trials (a phase 2 trial of relugolix vs degarelix, and a subset of the phase 3 HERO trial of relugolix vs leuprolide acetate) included men who were receiving radiotherapy and short-term (24 weeks) ADT (n = 103) from 2014 to 2015 and men receiving radiotherapy and longer-term (48 weeks) ADT (n = 157) from 2017 to 2019. The data were analyzed in November 2022. Interventions Patients receiving short-term ADT received relugolix, 120 mg, orally once daily (320-mg loading dose) or degarelix, 80 mg, 4-week depot (240-mg loading dose) for 24 weeks with 12 weeks of follow-up. Patients receiving longer-term ADT received relugolix, 120 mg, orally once daily (360-mg loading dose) or leuprolide acetate injections every 12 weeks for 48 weeks, with up to 90 days of follow-up. Main Outcomes and Measures Castration rate (testosterone level <50 ng/dL [to convert to nmol/L, multiply by 0.0347) at all scheduled visits between weeks 5 and 25 for patients receiving short-term ADT and weeks 5 and 49 for patients receiving longer-term ADT. Results Of 260 patients (38 Asian [14.6%], 23 Black or African American [8.8%], 21 Hispanic [8.1%], and 188 White [72.3%] individuals), 164 (63.1%) received relugolix. Relugolix achieved castration rates of 95% (95% CI, 87.1%-99.0%) and 97% (95% CI, 90.6%-99.0%) among patients receiving short-term and longer-term ADT, respectively. Twelve weeks post-short-term relugolix, 34 (52%) achieved testosterone levels to baseline or more than 280 ng/dL. Ninety days post longer-term ADT, mean (SD) testosterone levels were 310.5 (122.4) (106.7) ng/dL (relugolix; n = 15) vs 53.0 ng/dL (leuprolide acetate; n = 8) among the subset assessed for testosterone recovery. Castration resistance-free survival was not statistically different between the relugolix and leuprolide acetate cohorts (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.35-2.72; P = .62). Adverse events grade 3 or greater for short-term or longer-term relugolix (headache, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation) were uncommon (less than 5%). Conclusions and Relevance The results of these 2 randomized clinical trials suggest that relugolix rapidly achieves sustained castration in patients with localized and advanced prostate cancer receiving radiotherapy. No new safety concerns were identified when relugolix was used with radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel E. Spratt
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Daniel J. George
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Neal D. Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare USA, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
| | - Michael S. Cookson
- Department of Urology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
| | | | | | - Alberto Bossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Institute, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Sophia Lu
- Myovant Sciences Inc, Brisbane, California
| | | | | | - Bertrand F. Tombal
- Institut de Recherche Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hu S, Chang CP, Snyder J, Deshmukh V, Newman M, Date A, Galvao C, Haaland B, Porucznik CA, Gren LH, Sanchez A, Lloyd S, O’Neil B, Hashibe M. Mental health outcomes in a population-based cohort of patients with prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:445-454. [PMID: 37867158 PMCID: PMC10919332 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have evaluated mental health disorders comprehensively among patients with prostate cancer on long-term follow-up. The primary aim of our study was to assess the incidence of mental health disorders among patients with prostate cancer compared with a general population cohort. A secondary aim was to investigate potential risk factors for mental health disorders among patients with prostate cancer. METHODS Cohorts of 18 134 patients with prostate adenocarcinomas diagnosed between 2004 and 2017 and 73470 men without cancer matched on age, birth state, and follow-up time were identified. Mental health diagnoses were identified from electronic health records and statewide health-care facilities data. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS The hazard ratios for mood disorders, including depression, among prostate cancer survivors increased for all follow-up periods compared with the general population. The hazard ratios for any mental illness increased with Hispanic, Black, or multiple races; people who were underweight or obese; those with advanced prostate cancer; and those undergoing their first course cancer treatment. We also observed statistically significantly increased hazard ratios for mental health disorders among patients with lower socioeconomic status (P < .0001) and increasing duration of androgen-deprivation therapy (P = .0348). Prostate cancer survivors had a 61% increased hazard ratio for death with a depression diagnosis. CONCLUSION Prostate cancer diagnosis was associated with a higher risk of mental health disorders compared with the general population, which was observed as long as 10-16 years after cancer diagnosis. Providing long-term mental health support may be beneficial to increasing life expectancy for patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siqi Hu
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Chun-Pin Chang
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - John Snyder
- Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Vikrant Deshmukh
- University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Michael Newman
- University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ankita Date
- Pedigree and Population Resource, Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Carlos Galvao
- Pedigree and Population Resource, Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Benjamin Haaland
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Christina A Porucznik
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Lisa H Gren
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Alejandro Sanchez
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Brock O’Neil
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Mia Hashibe
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Castro-Larefors S, Marti-Laosa MM, Lopez-Honrubia V, Rey-Lopez I, Ruiz-Herrero B, Murria-Perez Y, Andres I, Jimenez-Garcia IE, Berenguer R, Aguayo-Martos M, Sánchez-Prieto R, Rovirosa A, Jimenez-Jimenez E, Arenas M, Sabater S. Longer time to testosterone recovery impacts favorably on outcomes for prostate cancer following androgen deprivation and radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2024:10.1007/s00066-024-02208-8. [PMID: 38416163 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02208-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of sustained hypogonadism after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) associated with radiotherapy in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS). METHODS A retrospective cohort analysis of 213 consecutive PCa patients referred for radiotherapy plus ADT was carried out. Follow-up times including time to testosterone recovery (TTR) and bRFS were calculated from the end of ADT. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses predicting bRFS were used. The optimal cutoffs for TTR and duration of ADT were determined using the maximally selected rank statistics (MSRS). RESULTS After a median follow-up of 104 months, 18 patients relapsed among those who had recovered testosterone levels and 9 among those who did not. Median ADT duration was 36 months. The optimal cutoff for TTR was determined using MSRS. TTR >48 months was significantly associated with better bRFS (logrank, p < 0.0027). Five-year bRFS was 100% for >48 months vs. 85% for <48 months. TTR was the only significant variable for bRFS in multivariate Cox analysis. CONCLUSION Our data show an association between longer TTR and bRFS values among PCa patients treated with ADT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Castro-Larefors
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA), C/ Hnos Falcó 37, 02006, Albacete, Spain
| | - Maria Magdalena Marti-Laosa
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA), C/ Hnos Falcó 37, 02006, Albacete, Spain
| | - Veronica Lopez-Honrubia
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA), C/ Hnos Falcó 37, 02006, Albacete, Spain
| | - Irene Rey-Lopez
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA), C/ Hnos Falcó 37, 02006, Albacete, Spain
| | - Beatriz Ruiz-Herrero
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA), C/ Hnos Falcó 37, 02006, Albacete, Spain
| | - Yasmina Murria-Perez
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA), C/ Hnos Falcó 37, 02006, Albacete, Spain
| | - Ignacio Andres
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA), C/ Hnos Falcó 37, 02006, Albacete, Spain
| | - Isabel Elvira Jimenez-Garcia
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA), C/ Hnos Falcó 37, 02006, Albacete, Spain
| | - Roberto Berenguer
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA), C/ Hnos Falcó 37, 02006, Albacete, Spain
| | - Manuel Aguayo-Martos
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA), C/ Hnos Falcó 37, 02006, Albacete, Spain
| | - Ricardo Sánchez-Prieto
- Laboratorio de Oncología. Unidad de Medicina Molecular, Centro Regional de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Unidad Asociada de Biomedicina UCLM, Unidad asociada al CSIC, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain
- Departamento de Ciencias Médicas, Facultad de Medicina de Albacete, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain
| | - Angeles Rovirosa
- Gynecological Cancer Unit, Radiation Oncology Department, ICMHO, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Sebastià Sabater
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA), C/ Hnos Falcó 37, 02006, Albacete, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
King MT, Orio PF, D'Amico AV. Can Extreme Dose Escalation With External Beam Radiation Therapy and Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost Obviate the Need for Long-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Patients With High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:402-403. [PMID: 38220257 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Martin T King
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Peter F Orio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anthony V D'Amico
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Preston MA, Hong A, Dufour R, Marden JR, Kirson NY, Gatoulis SC, Kongara S, Gandhi R, Morgans AK. Implications of Delayed Testosterone Recovery in Patients with Prostate Cancer. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 60:32-35. [PMID: 38298745 PMCID: PMC10825231 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
To assess the clinical impact of delayed testosterone recovery (TR) following the discontinuation of medical androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), a retrospective, longitudinal analysis was conducted in adult males with prostate cancer using the Optum® de-identified Electronic Health Record data set and Optum® Enriched Oncology Data (2010-2021). Of 3875 patients who initiated and discontinued ADT, 1553 received one or more testosterone-level tests within the 12 mo following discontinuation and were included in this study. These 1553 patients were categorized into two cohorts: 25% as TR (testosterone levels >280 ng/dl at any test within 12 mo following ADT discontinuation) and 75% as non-TR. At baseline, non-TR patients were older, had lower testosterone levels, and were more likely to have diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension, but less likely to have sexual dysfunction. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, the TR cohort had a lower risk of new-onset diabetes (hazard ratio [HR] 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-0.79), trended toward a lower risk of new-onset depression (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.33-1.02), and had a higher likelihood of seeking treatment for sexual dysfunction (HR 1.33; 95% CI 0.99-1.78) versus the non-TR cohort. These findings support monitoring testosterone levels after ADT discontinuation to manage potential long-term comorbidities in patients with prostate cancer. Patient summary This real-world analysis of males with prostate cancer who were treated with medical androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) found that most patients did not have their testosterone level checked in the 12 mo after stopping ADT. Of those who did, 75% did not achieve normal testosterone levels (>280 ng/dl), and these patients were more likely to experience new-onset diabetes than those who achieved normal testosterone levels. These results suggest that to ensure effective clinical decision-making, physicians should check patients' testosterone levels after stopping ADT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Raj Gandhi
- Myovant Sciences, Inc., Brisbane, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tutrone R, Saad F, George DJ, Tombal B, Bailen JL, Cookson MS, Saltzstein DR, Hanson S, Brown B, Lu S, Fallick M, Shore ND. Testosterone Recovery for Relugolix Versus Leuprolide in Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Results from the Phase 3 HERO Study. Eur Urol Oncol 2023:S2588-9311(23)00290-0. [PMID: 38143206 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the HERO study, relugolix demonstrated sustained testosterone suppression superior to that of leuprolide acetate (97% vs 89%; difference 7.9% [95% confidence interval, 4.1-12%; p < 0.001]). OBJECTIVE To analyze testosterone recovery in a prespecified subset of men from the HERO study not indicated to continue androgen deprivation therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Men (N = 934) were randomized (2:1) to receive relugolix 120 mg orally daily or leuprolide acetate injections every 12 wk for 48 wk. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Testosterone recovery was assessed in 184 men who completed 48 wk of treatment. During the 90-d recovery period, assessments included time to testosterone recovery (>280 ng/dl; ≥80% of baseline testosterone), serum levels of prostate-specific antigen and pituitary hormones, and adverse events. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The cumulative incidence rate of testosterone recovery to >280 ng/dl at 90 d following drug discontinuation was significantly higher in the relugolix cohort (n = 137) than in the leuprolide acetate cohort (n = 47; 54% vs 3.2%; nominal p = 0.002). The median time to testosterone recovery was faster following relugolix treatment than with leuprolide acetate treatment (86.0 d vs 112.0 d). Compared with leuprolide acetate, more men treated with relugolix achieved ≥80% of baseline testosterone levels (39% vs 2.1%). Men ≤65 yr and those with baseline testosterone greater than the median had a higher incident rate of testosterone recovery. Adverse events were generally similar between treatment groups. One limitation is the short testosterone recovery follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS Oral relugolix had faster and more complete recovery of testosterone to normal levels after treatment discontinuation than leuprolide acetate in a subset of men from the HERO study. The clinical implications of a faster testosterone recovery with relugolix may be significant for men being treated with androgen deprivation therapy and influence treatment decisions. PATIENT SUMMARY The male hormone testosterone is reduced during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Reduced testosterone levels cause side effects, impacting patient quality of life. When treatment is stopped, the side effects lessen over time as the levels of testosterone come back to pretreatment range (testosterone recovery). In this study, we found that the time to testosterone recovery was faster with relugolix than with leuprolide acetate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fred Saad
- University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Daniel J George
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Bertrand Tombal
- Institut de Recherche Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Michael S Cookson
- Department of Urology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | | | | | - Sophia Lu
- Myovant Sciences, Inc., Brisbane, CA, USA
| | | | - Neal D Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare USA, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Roy S, Kishan AU, Morgan SC, Martinka L, Spratt DE, Sun Y, Malone J, Grimes S, Citrin DE, Malone S. Association of PSA kinetics after testosterone recovery with subsequent recurrence: secondary analysis of a phase III randomized controlled trial. World J Urol 2023; 41:3905-3911. [PMID: 37792009 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04635-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE After cessation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), testosterone gradually recovers to supracastrate levels (> 50 ng/dL). After this, rises in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) are often seen. However, it remains unknown whether early PSA kinetics after testosterone recovery are associated with subsequent biochemical recurrence (BCR). METHODS We performed a secondary analysis of a phase III randomized controlled trial in which newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer patients were randomly allocated to ADT for 6 months starting 4 months prior to or simultaneously with prostate RT. We calculated the PSA doubling time (PSADT) based on PSA values up to 18 months after supracastrate testosterone recovery. Competing risk regression was used to evaluate the association of PSADT with relative incidence of BCR, considering deaths as competing events. RESULTS Overall, 313 patients were eligible. Median PSADT was 8 months. Cumulative incidence of BCR at 10 years from supracastrate testosterone recovery was 19% and 11% in patients with PSADT < 8 months and ≥ 8 months (p = 0.03). Compared to patients with PSADT of < 4 months, patients with higher PSADT (sHR for PSADT 4 to < 8 months: 0.36 [95% CI 0.16-0.82]; 8 to < 12 months: 0.26 [0.08-0.91]; ≥ 12 months: 0.20 [0.07-0.56]) had lower risk of relative incidence of BCR. CONCLUSIONS Early PSA kinetics, within 18 months of recovery of testosterone to a supracastrate level, can predict for subsequent BCR. Taking account of early changes in PSA after testosterone recovery may allow for recognition of potential failures earlier in the disease course and thereby permit superior personalization of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soumyajit Roy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, 500 S Paulina St, Atrium Bldg, A-013, Chicago, IL, 60605, USA.
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Scott C Morgan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Levi Martinka
- Rush Medical College, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UH-Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Yilun Sun
- Department of Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Julia Malone
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Scott Grimes
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Deborah E Citrin
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Shawn Malone
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gallagher L, Xiao J, Hsueh J, Shah S, Danner M, Zwart A, Ayoob M, Yung T, Simpson T, Fallick M, Kumar D, Leger P, Dawson NA, Suy S, Collins SP. Early biochemical outcomes following neoadjuvant/adjuvant relugolix with stereotactic body radiation therapy for intermediate to high risk prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1289249. [PMID: 37916156 PMCID: PMC10616590 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1289249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Injectable GnRH receptor agonists have been shown to improve cancer control when combined with radiotherapy. Prostate SBRT offers an abbreviated treatment course with comparable efficacy to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Relugolix is a new oral GnRH receptor antagonist which achieves rapid, sustained testosterone suppression. This prospective study sought to evaluate early testosterone suppression and PSA response following relugolix and SBRT for intermediate to high prostate cancer. Methods Relugolix was initiated at least 2 months prior to SBRT. Interventions to improve adherence were not utilized. PSA and total testosterone levels were obtained prior to and 1-4 months post SBRT. Profound castration was defined as serum testosterone ≤ 20 ng/dL. Early PSA nadir was defined as the lowest PSA value within 4 months of completion of SBRT. Per prior trials, we examined the percentage of patients who achieved PSA level of ≤ 0.5 ng/mL and ≤ 0.2 ng/mL during the first 4 months post SBRT. Results Between July 2021 and January 2023, 52 men were treated at Georgetown with relugolix (4-6 months) and SBRT (36.25-40 Gy in 5 fractions) per an institutional protocol (IRB 12-1775). Median age was 71 years. 26.9% of patients were African American and 28.8% were obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). The median pretreatment PSA was 9.1 ng/ml. 67% of patients were ≥ Grade Group 3. 44 patients were intermediate- and 8 were high-risk. Patients initiated relugolix at a median of 3.6 months prior to SBRT with a median duration of 6.2 total months. 92.3% of patients achieved profound castration during relugolix treatment. Poor drug adherence was observed in 2 patients. A third patient chose to discontinue relugolix due to side effects. By post-SBRT month 4, 87.2% and 74.4% of patients achieved PSA levels ≤ 0.5 ng/ml and ≤ 0.2 ng/ml, respectively. Discussion Relugolix combined with SBRT allows for high rates of profound castration with low early PSA nadirs. We observed a 96% testosterone suppresion rate without the utilization of scheduled cues/reminders. This finding supports the notion that patients with localized prostate cancer can consistently and successfully follow an oral ADT protocol without daily reminders. Given relugolix's potential benefits over injectable GnRH receptor agonists, its usage may be preferred in specific patient populations (fear of needles, prior cardiovascular events). Future studies should focus on boundaries to adherence in specific underserved populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Gallagher
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Jerry Xiao
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Jessica Hsueh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sarthak Shah
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Malika Danner
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Alan Zwart
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Marilyn Ayoob
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Thomas Yung
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Tiffany Simpson
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Mark Fallick
- Medical Science Department, Myovant Sciences, Inc, United States
| | - Deepak Kumar
- Biotechnology Research Institute, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Paul Leger
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Nancy A. Dawson
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Simeng Suy
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sean P. Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Arafa AT, Blader LR, Ramakrishna K, Engle J, Ryan CJ, Zorko NA, Jha G, Antonarakis ES. Clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone with or without ongoing androgen deprivation therapy: A retrospective case-control study. Prostate 2023; 83:1279-1284. [PMID: 37337669 PMCID: PMC10914526 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Abiraterone and concurrent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) are used in the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Recently, it has been suggested that the use of abiraterone alone (without ADT) may have comparable efficacy to abiraterone with ongoing ADT. Here, we sought to assess the impact of ADT cessation in patients beginning abiraterone for castration-resistant prostate cancer. METHODS We identified 39 patients at our institution who received abiraterone alone (with discontinuation of ADT) between 2011 and 2022. We then procured a comparable group of 39 patients (matched by age, Gleason score, and prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level) who received abiraterone with ongoing ADT during the same period. We assessed and compared clinical outcomes in the two groups (abiraterone-alone vs. abiraterone-ADT) with respect to PSA response rates, PSA progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results were adjusted using Cox proportional-hazards multivariable models. RESULTS The median PSA before treatment initiation was 12.7 (range: 0.2-199) ng/mL in the abiraterone-alone group and 15.5 (range: 0.6-212) ng/mL in the abiraterone-ADT group. Use of abiraterone alone adequately suppressed testosterone levels in 35/37 (94.6%) patients. Patients receiving abiraterone alone had a median PSA reduction of 80.2% versus 79.5% in patients receiving abiraterone plus ADT. The median PSA progression-free survival in patients receiving abiraterone alone was 27.4 versus 25.8 months in patients receiving abiraterone plus ADT (hazard ratio [HR] 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-1.71; p = 0.82). In addition, abiraterone alone was associated with an overall survival of 3.6 versus 3.1 years in patients receiving abiraterone plus ADT (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.50-1.62; p = 0.72). There were no differences in PFS or OS between groups after performing Cox multivariable regression analyses. CONCLUSION Use of abiraterone alone was associated with comparable clinical outcomes to patients who received abiraterone together with ADT. Further prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the impact of abiraterone alone on treatment outcomes and cost savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali T. Arafa
- University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Leah R. Blader
- University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | - Jeff Engle
- University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Charles J. Ryan
- University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN
- Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, CA
| | | | - Gautam Jha
- University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Arai M, Kosaka T, Yasumizu Y, Takeda T, Matsumoto K, Oya M. Androgen deprivation therapy duration is significantly associated with Testosterone recovery in Japanese patients with prostate cancer. Int J Urol 2023; 30:235-239. [PMID: 36375076 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Due to the fear generated by COVID-19 in Spring 2020, many patients postponed their scheduled outpatient visits. To differentiate those patients with prostate cancer (PCa) whose androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) injection treatment can be postponed, we investigated the characteristics of testosterone (T) recovery in Japanese patients after they received combined ADT and radiation therapy (RT). METHODS We included 81 patients with PCa treated with ADT and RT at Keio University Hospital from January 2013 to December 2018. T-recovery was defined as the time interval between the last ADT injection and 3-6 months after T-normalization. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time to T-recovery. Cox proportional hazards models identified T-recovery predictors. RESULTS The 50% cumulative incidence of T-recovery was 7.0 months for the 6-short-term group (defined as patients having ≤6 months of ADT therapy) versus 13.0 months for the 6-long-term group (>6 months of therapy) (p < 0.001). The incidence was 7.0 months for the 12 short-term-ADT (ST) group versus 18.0 months for the 12 long-term-ADT (LT) group (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that a shorter duration of ADT was associated with a shorter time to T-recovery (hazard ratio, 0.253; 95% CI, 0.138-0.465; p < 0.001). No other factors were significant predictors of T-recovery. CONCLUSION Androgen deprivation therapy duration is significantly associated with T-recovery in Japanese patients with PCa. If a patient undergoes ADT for more than 6 or 12 months, it is possible to postpone their outpatient visits for 13 and 18 months, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Arai
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeo Kosaka
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yota Yasumizu
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshikazu Takeda
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Mototsugu Oya
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lee TY, Pierrillas PB, Lin YW, de Greef R, Zandvliet AS, Schindler E, Migoya E. Population PK and Semimechanistic PK/PD Modeling and Simulation of Relugolix Effects on Testosterone Suppression in Men with Prostate Cancer. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2023; 113:124-134. [PMID: 36073238 PMCID: PMC10091729 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Relugolix, the first orally active, nonpeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist, is approved in the United States and the European Union for the treatment of adult patients with advanced prostate cancer. The recommended dosing regimen is a 360-mg loading dose followed by a 120-mg daily dose. Relugolix and testosterone concentration data and clinical information from two phase I studies, two phase II studies, and the phase III safety and efficacy study (HERO) were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model and a semimechanistic population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PopPK/PD) model that characterized relugolix exposure and its relationship to testosterone concentrations. Age, body weight, and Black/African American race had at most minimal effects on relugolix exposure or testosterone concentrations with no clinical relevance. Simulations using the PopPK/PD model confirmed the recommended dosing regimen of relugolix, with the median simulated testosterone concentrations predicted to achieve castration levels (< 50 ng/dL) and profound castration levels (< 20 ng/dL) by day 2 and day 9, respectively, and demonstrated that 97.3% and 85.5% of the patients remained at castration levels (< 50 ng/dL) upon temporary interruption of treatment for 7 days and 14 days, respectively. Collectively, simulations based on the PopPK and PopPK/PD models were consistent with actual data from clinical studies, reflecting the high predictiveness of the models and supporting the reliability of model-based simulations. These models can be used to provide guidance regarding dosing recommendations under various circumstances (e.g., temporary interruption of treatment, if needed) for relugolix.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tien-Yi Lee
- Myovant Sciences, Inc., Brisbane, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Emilie Schindler
- Certara, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.,F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR, Loloi J, Deebel NA, Bernstein A, Nackeeran S, Zucker I, Ramasamy R. Persistent Testosterone Suppression After Cessation of Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Cureus 2022; 14:e32699. [PMID: 36686106 PMCID: PMC9848702 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Many men receiving temporary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for localized prostate cancer fail to achieve baseline testosterone levels after cessation. Testosterone recovery in men with localized prostate cancer receiving temporary ADT was assessed. Methods A global federated health research network (TriNetX) was used to identify men diagnosed with prostate cancer undergoing temporary ADT. Two cohorts were identified: men receiving luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) antagonists or LHRH agonists, and men receiving combined ADT (LHRH agonist and antiandrogens). Further stratification was based on a treatment duration of six months (short-term) or 18 months (long-term) to compare testosterone (T) recovery profiles five years after ADT cessation. Results A total of 28,583 men received LHRH agonist or antagonist therapy alone, and 20,188 men received combination ADT. A total of 46.7% of men who received short-term LHRH agonists or antagonists and 40.6% of men who received short-term combined ADT, recovered to mean baseline T levels at five years. Only men who received short-term LHRH agonists/antagonists recovered to eugonadal levels at the five-year follow-up. Around 50% of men who received long-term LHRH agonist/antagonist therapy and 10.7% of men who received combined ADT, recovered to mean baseline T levels at five years. However, neither group recovered to eugonadal T levels. Conclusions At the five-year follow-up after ADT cessation, most patients failed to recover to their mean baseline and eugonadal T levels. Given that testosterone deficiency is associated with metabolically adverse changes in body composition, increased insulin resistance, impaired bone health, and hypogonadal symptoms, serum T levels must be closely monitored in men receiving ADT following treatment cessation.
Collapse
|
15
|
Guin S, Jun T, Patel VG, Ayers KL, Deitz M, Cai Y, Zhou X, Tsao CK, Oh WK, Chen R, Liaw BC. Extraction of Treatment Information From Electronic Health Records and Evaluation of Testosterone Recovery in Patients With Prostate Cancer. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2022; 6:e2200010. [PMID: 35696627 DOI: 10.1200/cci.22.00010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Data quality and standardization remain a challenge when analyzing real-world clinical data. We built a clinical research database, using machine learning and natural learning processing, and investigated factors influencing testosterone recovery (T-recovery) in patients with localized prostate cancer (LPC) after initial androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS Medication and treatment-associated dates missing in structured tables were extracted from patient notes using ConceptMapper, an automated data extraction tool, standardized and curated in Sema4 clinical research database. ADT usage duration was evaluated, and T-recovery in patients with LPC was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. We assessed the prognostic value of post-ADT T-recovery with prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival and failure-free survival. RESULTS In total, 4,125 of 30,832 (13.4%) patients with prostate cancer had medication exclusively from notes with high precision and recall, F1 score ≥ 0.95. Association of dates with medication usage had a F1 score of 0.76. ADT duration estimation had higher accuracy combining information from notes to tables from electronic medical record (70% v 45%). Baseline testosterone was the strongest predictor of T-recovery in these patients. Patients with a baseline testosterone ≥ 300 ng/dL recovered in 9.79 versus 38 months for patients with baseline testosterone < 300 ng/dL (P < .0001). Shorter prostate-specific antigen progression-free interval was observed for patients with T-recovery (≥ 300 ng/dL) at 6 months after ADT cessation compared with patients without T-recovery (< 300 ng/dL; 13.7 v 25.1 months; P = .055). CONCLUSION We augmented structured electronic medical record data with data extracted from notes and improved the accuracy of medication information for patients. ADT exposure and T-recovery in patients with LPC produced results consistent with the literature and clinical experience and illustrates the power of applying machine learning methods to enhance the quality of real-world evidence in answering clinically relevant questions.
Collapse
|
16
|
Ogawa S, Hasegawa A, Makabe S, Onagi A, Matsuoka K, Kayama E, Koguchi T, Hata J, Sato Y, Akaihata H, Kataoka M, Haga N, Kojima Y. Impacts of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy Prior to Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy on Postoperative Hormonal- and Sexual-Related Quality of Life – Assessment by Patient-Reported Questionnaire. Res Rep Urol 2022; 14:39-48. [PMID: 35223660 PMCID: PMC8865904 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s342063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (HT) before radical prostatectomy (RP) is not recommended by current guidelines in terms of oncological outcomes. Despite this, neoadjuvant HT is sometimes conducted before RP for a small proportion of patients in clinical practice. This study evaluated the impacts of neoadjuvant HT on hormonal- and sexual-related quality of life (QOL) among patients who underwent robot-assisted RP (RARP). Materials and Methods Participants comprised 470 patients divided into a non-neoadjuvant HT group (n = 408) and a neoadjuvant HT group (n = 62). Hormonal- and sexual-related QOL were measured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire. Results Hormonal summary scores at 6 and 9 months, function scores before and 3, 6, and 9 months and bother score at 6 months after RARP were significantly lower in the neoadjuvant HT group than in the non-neoadjuvant HT group. Sexual function scores were decreased in the neoadjuvant HT group compared to the non-neoadjuvant HT group before and 6 months after RARP. In the neoadjuvant HT group, sexual function at 3 months after RARP was significantly worse in patients with >5 months of neoadjuvant HT than in patients with ≤5 months of neoadjuvant HT. Conversely, sexual bother at 3 months after RARP was significantly worse in patients with ≤5 months of neoadjuvant HT than in patients with >5 months of neoadjuvant HT. Conclusion Vintage neoadjuvant HT prior to RARP should not be recommended due to not only oncological outcomes, but also the impacts on postoperative hormonal- and sexual-related QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soichiro Ogawa
- Department of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
- Correspondence: Soichiro Ogawa, Department of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, 1, Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan, Tel +81 24 547 1316, Fax +81 24 548 3393, Email
| | - Akihisa Hasegawa
- Department of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Shunta Makabe
- Department of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Akifumi Onagi
- Department of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Kanako Matsuoka
- Department of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Emina Kayama
- Department of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Koguchi
- Department of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Junya Hata
- Department of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Yuichi Sato
- Department of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Hidenori Akaihata
- Department of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Masao Kataoka
- Department of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Nobuhiro Haga
- Department of Urology, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Kojima
- Department of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chedrawe E, Sathe A, White J, Ory J, Ramasamy R. Testosterone Therapy in Advanced Prostate Cancer. ANDROGENS: CLINICAL RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS 2022; 3:180-186. [PMID: 36684061 PMCID: PMC9850445 DOI: 10.1089/andro.2021.0035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Androgen deprivation therapy is a mainstay of advanced prostate cancer (PCa) but the resulting low testosterone levels leave men susceptible to a multitude of adverse effects. These can include vasomotor symptoms, reduced sexual desire and performance, and mood changes. Testosterone therapy (TTh) in advanced PCa has historically been contraindicated since Huggins and Hodges reported that testosterone activates PCa. Although TTh has been demonstrated to be safe in patients who have undergone treatment for localized PCa, there is extremely limited evidence on its safety in advanced PCa. Despite the lack of evidence, some men with advanced PCa still inquire about TTh, and recent publications have described its use. In this article, we review the potential implications of TTh in men with advanced PCa, defined here as biochemical recurrence after localized therapy or metastatic PCa that is either hormone sensitive or castration resistant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Chedrawe
- Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada,Address correspondence to: Emily Chedrawe, MD, Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, 1276 South Park St. Room 293, 5 Victoria, Halifax NS B3H2Y9, Canada,
| | - Aditya Sathe
- Health Science Center College of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Josh White
- Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Jesse Ory
- Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
An Expert Review on the Combination of Relugolix with Definitive Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 113:278-289. [PMID: 34923058 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Revised: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is an integral component in the management of prostate cancer across multiple disease states. Traditionally, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists constituted the backbone of ADT. However, gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor hormone (GnRH) antagonists are also available, which offer faster testosterone suppression and reduced likelihood of ADT-related adverse effects compared to LHRH agonists, including the potential for fewer ADT-associated major cardiac events. Until recently, all forms of LHRH agonists and GnRH antagonist formulations are of parenteral administration. However, recently relugolix gained FDA approval as the first oral GnRH antagonist. Relugolix achieves faster and more complete testosterone suppression compared to an LHRH agonist. This translates to more rapid prostate-specific antigen response compared to LHRH agonists. After discontinuation of relugolix, testosterone recovers faster than after GnRH agonists or injectable GnRH antagonist therapy. Overall, these factors provide opportunities for more precisely defined ADT duration when combined with radiation therapy. The rapid onset and offset testosterone suppression with relugolix, however, may require physicians to rethink the mechanism and goals of ADT when prescribing. As an oral formulation, relugolix enables patients to avoid pain and injection site reactions, limit extra office visits for injections, and achieve a shorter duration of experiencing the side effects of castrate testosterone levels. This convenience and tolerability may enhance physicians' willingness to prescribe ADT and patients' feeling of control over their ADT course, but the potential advantages are accompanied by the risks of patients choosing to discontinue therapy to escape side effects of ADT. This article focuses on different aspects of what is known and unknown regarding the optimal use of ADT and radiation therapy, and how relugolix, due to its properties, fit into our current treatment paradigms for localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
19
|
Matsumoto K, Niwa N, Kosaka T, Takeda T, Yasumizu Y, Tanaka N, Morita S, Mizuno R, Shinojima T, Asanuma H, Oya M. Negative impact of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on detecting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Int J Clin Oncol 2021; 26:1722-1728. [PMID: 34086109 PMCID: PMC8175233 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01942-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Routine use of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) before radical prostatectomy (RP) is not recommended, but it is sometimes performed to reduce the prostate size and tumor volume or to prevent tumor progression during the wait times for surgery in clinical practice. On the other hand, the impact of NHT on the pattern of biochemical recurrence (BCR) is unknown. Methods We retrospectively examined 1749 consecutive patients who underwent RP between 1996 and 2017. Among the patients who met the inclusion criteria, BCR developed in 240 of non-NHT patients and in 120 of NHT patients during the mean follow-up period of 6.9 years. We examined the impact of NHT on the PSA-doubling time (DT) following BCR at different times after RP. Results The median PSA-DTs in non-NHT patients who experienced BCR in the first year after surgery, between 1 and 2 years, between 2 and 3 years, between 3 and 4 years, between 4 and 5 years, and at > 5 years were 5.5, 8.8, 11.3, 17.7, 18.2, and 18.4 months, respectively. On the other hand, those in NHT patients were 1.4, 4.1, 9.1, 13.4, 27.2, and 19.3 months, respectively. The differences of PSA-DTs in the first year after surgery (p < 0.001) and between 1 and 2 years (p = 0.005) were significant between non-NHT and NHT patients. Conclusion Patients who received NHT had a higher risk of a rapid PSA increase when they experienced BCR, especially within 2 years after RP. In order to not miss the optimal timing of salvage treatment for BCR, intensive PSA follow-up is necessary. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10147-021-01942-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuhiro Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
| | - Naoya Niwa
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Takeo Kosaka
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Toshikazu Takeda
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Yota Yasumizu
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Shinya Morita
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Ryuichi Mizuno
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Shinojima
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Asanuma
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Mototsugu Oya
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ali S, Esper P. Brachytherapy: Increased Use in Patients With Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancers. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2021; 25:321-328. [PMID: 34019017 DOI: 10.1188/21.cjon.321-328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brachytherapy is a well-established and effective primary treatment modality for low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancers. Although the benefits of brachytherapy in unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancers have not been as clear, research suggests that brachytherapy boost may improve biochemical progression-free survival in these patients. OBJECTIVES This article aims to discuss evidence for the revival of brachytherapy use in unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancers and specific nursing implications in the management of these patients. METHODS The literature on brachytherapy and its use to treat localized prostate cancers was reviewed. FINDINGS Nurses should be knowledgeable about the indications for brachytherapy, patient eligibility, anticipated side effects, and symptom management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanna Ali
- University of Maryland Medical Center
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
van Son MJ, Peters M, Reddy D, Shah TT, Hosking-Jervis F, Robinson S, Lagendijk JJW, Mangar S, Dudderidge T, McCracken S, Hindley RG, Emara A, Nigam R, Persad R, Virdi J, Lewi H, Moore C, Orczyk C, Emberton M, Arya M, Ahmed HU, van der Voort van Zyp JRN, Winkler M, Falconer A. Conventional radical versus focal treatment for localised prostate cancer: a propensity score weighted comparison of 6-year tumour control. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2021; 24:1120-1128. [PMID: 33934114 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-021-00369-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2020] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For localised prostate cancer, focal therapy offers an organ-sparing alternative to radical treatments (radiotherapy or prostatectomy). Currently, there is no randomised comparative effectiveness data evaluating cancer control of both strategies. METHODS Following the eligibility criteria PSA < 20 ng/mL, Gleason score ≤ 7 and T-stage ≤ T2c, we included 830 radical (440 radiotherapy, 390 prostatectomy) and 530 focal therapy (cryotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound or high-dose-rate brachytherapy) patients treated between 2005 and 2018 from multicentre registries in the Netherlands and the UK. A propensity score weighted (PSW) analysis was performed to compare failure-free survival (FFS), with failure defined as salvage treatment, metastatic disease, systemic treatment (androgen deprivation therapy or chemotherapy), or progression to watchful waiting. The secondary outcome was overall survival (OS). Median (IQR) follow-up in each cohort was 55 (28-83) and 62 (42-83) months, respectively. RESULTS At baseline, radical patients had higher PSA (10.3 versus 7.9) and higher-grade disease (31% ISUP 3 versus 11%) compared to focal patients. After PSW, all covariates were balanced (SMD < 0.1). 6-year weighted FFS was higher after radical therapy (80.3%, 95% CI 73.9-87.3) than after focal therapy (72.8%, 95% CI 66.8-79.8) although not statistically significant (p = 0.1). 6-year weighted OS was significantly lower after radical therapy (93.4%, 95% CI 90.1-95.2 versus 97.5%, 95% CI 94-99.9; p = 0.02). When compared in a three-way analysis, focal and LRP patients had a higher risk of treatment failure than EBRT patients (p < 0.001), but EBRT patients had a higher risk of mortality than focal patients (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS Within the limitations of a cohort-based analysis in which residual confounders are likely to exist, we found no clinically relevant difference in cancer control conferred by focal therapy compared to radical therapy at 6 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke J van Son
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. .,Department of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. .,Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Max Peters
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Deepika Reddy
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Taimur T Shah
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, Sunderland Royal Hospital, City Hospital Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK
| | - Feargus Hosking-Jervis
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Robinson
- Division of Clinical Oncology, Department of Radiotherapy, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College London Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jan J W Lagendijk
- Department of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Stephen Mangar
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Stuart McCracken
- Department of Urology, Sunderland Royal Hospital, City Hospital Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK
| | - Richard G Hindley
- Department of Urology, Hampshire Hospitals & Ain Shams University Hospitals, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Amr Emara
- Department of Urology, Hampshire Hospitals & Ain Shams University Hospitals, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Raj Nigam
- BMI Mount Alvernia Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Raj Persad
- Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Jaspal Virdi
- Department of Urology, Princes Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, UK.,Rivers Hospital, Essex, UK
| | | | - Caroline Moore
- Department of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, and University College Hospital London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Clement Orczyk
- Department of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, and University College Hospital London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Department of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, and University College Hospital London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Manit Arya
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.,Department of Urology, Princes Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, UK.,Rivers Hospital, Essex, UK.,Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Matt Winkler
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Alison Falconer
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Randomized clinical trials assessing novel therapies in men with localized prostate cancer frequently require large patient numbers and more than a decade of follow-up to demonstrate improvements in overall survival. As the landscape of treatment options for prostate cancer is rapidly changing, clinical trials requiring long follow-up threaten to impede treatment improvements and run the risk of results being obsolete by the time that they are reported in publication. To address these issues, there has been tremendous interest in identifying an intermediate clinical endpoint that can be assessed earlier in the disease course to serve as a robust surrogate for overall survival in men with localized prostate cancer. Herein we review the relevant data for surrogate endpoints in localized prostate cancer, highlighting the work performed by the Intermediate Clinical Endpoints in Cancer of the Prostate Working Group identifying metastasis-free survival as a valid surrogate for men treated for localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
23
|
Reckell T, Nguyen K, Phan T, Crook S, Kostelich EJ, Kuang Y. Modeling the synergistic properties of drugs in hormonal treatment for prostate cancer. J Theor Biol 2021; 514:110570. [PMID: 33422609 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers in men, with increasing incidence worldwide. This public health concern has inspired considerable effort to study various aspects of prostate cancer treatment using dynamical models, especially in clinical settings. The standard of care for metastatic prostate cancer is hormonal therapy, which reduces the production of androgen that fuels the growth of prostate tumor cells prior to treatment resistance. Existing population models often use patients' prostate-specific antigen levels as a biomarker for model validation and for finding optimal treatment schedules; however, the synergistic effects of drugs used in hormonal therapy have not been well-examined. This paper describes the first mathematical model that explicitly incorporates the synergistic effects of two drugs used to inhibit androgen production in hormonal therapy. The drugs are cyproterone acetate, representing the drug family of anti-androgens that affect luteinizing hormones, and leuprolide acetate, representing the drug family of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs. By fitting the model to clinical data, we show that the proposed model can capture the dynamics of serum androgen levels during intermittent hormonal therapy better than previously published models. Our results highlight the importance of considering the synergistic effects of drugs in cancer treatment, thus suggesting that the dynamics of the drugs should be taken into account in optimal treatment studies, particularly for adaptive therapy. Otherwise, an unrealistic treatment schedule may be prescribed and render the treatment less effective. Furthermore, the drug dynamics allow our model to explain the delay in the relapse of androgen the moment a patient is taken off treatment, which supports that this delay is due to the residual effects of the drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor Reckell
- School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, 901 S. Palm Walk, Tempe, AZ 85287-1804, USA
| | - Kyle Nguyen
- Biomathematics Graduate Program, North Carolina State University, 2700 Katharine Stinson Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA; Center for Research in Scientific Computation, North Carolina State University, 2700 Katharine Stinson Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA
| | - Tin Phan
- School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, 901 S. Palm Walk, Tempe, AZ 85287-1804, USA
| | - Sharon Crook
- School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, 901 S. Palm Walk, Tempe, AZ 85287-1804, USA
| | - Eric J Kostelich
- School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, 901 S. Palm Walk, Tempe, AZ 85287-1804, USA
| | - Yang Kuang
- School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, 901 S. Palm Walk, Tempe, AZ 85287-1804, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kato Y, Shigehara K, Kawaguchi S, Izumi K, Kadono Y, Mizokami A. Recovery of serum testosterone following neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy in Japanese prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose rate brachytherapy. Aging Male 2020; 23:1210-1216. [PMID: 32096413 DOI: 10.1080/13685538.2020.1731450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the time course of total testosterone (TT) recovery after cessation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in Japanese patients treated with brachytherapy. METHODS In total, 125 patients with prostate cancer received 6 months of neoadjuvant ADT (nADT) followed by low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy. TT was measured every 3 months after cessation of nADT, and some predictive factors affecting TT recovery were analyzed. RESULTS The cumulative incidence rates of TT recovery to normal levels (TT ≥ 3.0 ng/mL) after 12 and 24 months cessation were 49.6% and 81.6%, respectively. The median interval to recover to normal TT was 15 months. In multivariate analysis, the use of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist as nADT significantly earlier improved to recovery to normal TT level (p = 0.046). Conversely, higher body mass index (BMI) and hypertension significantly prolonged TT recovery to normal (p = 0.026 and p = 0.026, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Approximately one-fifth of patients still had low TT levels 2 years after the cessation of 6 months nADT before LDR brachytherapy. Use of a GnRH agonist, higher BMI, and hypertension were the predictive factors for slower TT recovery to normal TT levels after the cessation of nADT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Kato
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Kazuyoshi Shigehara
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Shohei Kawaguchi
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Kouji Izumi
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Kadono
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Atsushi Mizokami
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Re: Neal D. Shore, Fred Saad, Michael S. Cookson, et al. Oral Relugolix for Androgen-deprivation Therapy in Advanced Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med 2020;382:2187–96. Eur Urol 2020; 78:e195. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
26
|
Roy S, Grimes S, Eapen L, Spratt DE, Malone J, Craig J, Morgan SC, Malone S. Impact of Sequencing of Androgen Suppression and Radiation Therapy on Testosterone Recovery in Localized Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:1179-1188. [PMID: 32565318 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We performed a secondary analysis of a phase 3 randomized trial to determine the influence of sequencing of radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on posttreatment testosterone recovery and implications of testosterone recovery on subsequent relapse. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with localized prostate cancer with Gleason score ≤7, clinical stage T1b to T3a, and prostate-specific antigen <30 ng/mL were randomized to neoadjuvant and concurrent ADT for 6 months starting 4 months before prostate radiation therapy (NHT arm) or concurrent and adjuvant ADT for 6 months starting simultaneously with radiation therapy (CAHT arm). Full testosterone recovery (FTR) was defined as recovery of testosterone to >10.5 nmol/L in patients with baseline ≥10.5 nmol/L or to baseline level in patients with baseline <10.5 nmol/L. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) since ADT initiation to supracastrate testosterone level (>1.7 nmol/L), and to FTR was compared between the arms using a truncation time point of 36 months. RESULTS The adjusted difference in RMST to supracastrate testosterone between the CAHT and NHT arm was 1.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-2.5; P = .005). No difference was noted in RMST to FTR between the arms (18.7 vs 18.5 months, adjusted difference: 0.5; 95% CI, -1.4 to 2.4; P = .61). There was no evidence of heterogeneity of treatment effect (interaction P = .76) on risk of relapse over subgroups stratified by testosterone recovery to supracastrate level at 15 months after start of ADT. Based on a multistate Markov model, no independent effect of time to FTR on risk of subsequent relapse was observed (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.02; 95% CI, 0.96-1.08). CONCLUSIONS Patients should be counseled that an additional 12 months on average is needed for FTR to occur after treatment with prostate radiation therapy and 6 months of ADT. This is independent of the sequencing of ADT and radiation therapy. Furthermore, recovery of testosterone does not appear to affect the risk of subsequent relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soumyajit Roy
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Scott Grimes
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Libni Eapen
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Julia Malone
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julia Craig
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Scott C Morgan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shawn Malone
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Chen MC, Kilday PS, Elliott PA, Artenstein D, Slezak J, Jacobsen SJ, Chien GW. Neoadjuvant Leuprolide Therapy with Radical Prostatectomy: Long-term Effects on Health-related Quality of Life. Eur Urol Focus 2020; 7:779-787. [PMID: 32165116 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Revised: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant androgen ablation (neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy [NADT]) is used prior to radical prostatectomy, contrary to guidelines, but its long-term effects on quality of life is unknown. OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of NADT on patient's long-term recovery following surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS From March 2011 to August 2013, 5808 men with newly diagnosed prostate were followed up to 24 mo. A cohort of men who received NADT prior to robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP; n=51) was compared 1:3 with a matched group that underwent RALP only (n=153). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Patients were matched on Charlson comorbidities, biopsy Gleason score, and node status on final pathology. The Kruskall-Wallis test was used to compare the groups on their bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal domains of the 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 mo postoperatively. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The urinary irritative, urinary incontinence, and bowel domains were similar in the two groups during the 24 mo (p=0.832, 0.901, and 0.732, respectively). In the hormonal domain, the NADT group did worse (p<0.001). The sexual domain was also worse for the NADT group. However, when accounting for nerve sparing, there was no significant difference in sexual outcomes between the two groups (p=0.069). CONCLUSIONS Patients who received NADT prior to RALP do not have worse sexual function, but have worse hormonal scores for up to 2yr after surgery. PATIENT SUMMARY Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NADT) is administered prior to robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP), contrary to clinical guidelines. NADT may not have worse sexual function outcomes up to 2yr after RALP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Chen
- Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Patrick S Kilday
- Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Peter A Elliott
- Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Artenstein
- Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeff Slezak
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Steven J Jacobsen
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Gary W Chien
- Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|