1
|
Gabriel P, Pinar U, Lenfant L, Parra J, Vaessen C, Mozer P, Chartier‐Kastler E, Rouprêt M, Seisen T. Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion vs open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. BJU Int 2025; 135:517-527. [PMID: 39433445 PMCID: PMC11842888 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) vs open radical cystectomy (ORC) for bladder cancer (BC). PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a real-life monocentric study including all consecutive patients who underwent RARC with ICUD or ORC for BC at our institution from 2014 to 2023. Uni- and multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to compare perioperative, oncological and stricture outcomes between both groups by calculating odds (ORs) and hazard (HRs) ratios with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively. RESULTS Overall, 316 patients underwent either RARC with ICUD (n = 228 [72.2%]) or ORC (n = 88 [27.8%]). The perioperative benefits of RARC vs ORC included decreased risks of major blood loss (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.23; P < 0.001), perioperative transfusion (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16-0.57; P < 0.001), 90-day major complications (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.29-0.99; P = 0.04), and prolonged initial length of hospital stay (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09-0.35; P < 0.001), as well as more days alive and out of the hospital within 90 days of surgery (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.46-4.6; P < 0.01). In addition, the use of RARC vs ORC was associated with a higher lymph node (LN) count (OR 3.35, 95% CI 1.83-6.30; P < 0.001), while there was no significant difference in recurrence-free (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.49-1.07; P = 0.1), cancer-specific (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.43-1.10; P = 0.1), overall (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.47-1.20; P = 0.3) and uretero-ileal stricture-free (HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.62-2.25; P = 0.6) survival between both groups after a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 42.3 (16.4-73.8) months. CONCLUSION Our real-world study supports the effectiveness of RARC with ICUD vs ORC for BC. We generally observed better perioperative outcomes, as well as similar oncological-except for higher LN count-and uretero-ileal stricture outcomes after RARC with ICUD vs ORC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre‐Etienne Gabriel
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco‐Urology, APHP, Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hôpital, UrologySorbonne UniversityParisFrance
| | - Ugo Pinar
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco‐Urology, APHP, Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hôpital, UrologySorbonne UniversityParisFrance
| | - Louis Lenfant
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco‐Urology, APHP, Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hôpital, UrologySorbonne UniversityParisFrance
| | - Jérôme Parra
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco‐Urology, APHP, Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hôpital, UrologySorbonne UniversityParisFrance
| | - Christophe Vaessen
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco‐Urology, APHP, Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hôpital, UrologySorbonne UniversityParisFrance
| | - Pierre Mozer
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco‐Urology, APHP, Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hôpital, UrologySorbonne UniversityParisFrance
| | - Emmanuel Chartier‐Kastler
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco‐Urology, APHP, Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hôpital, UrologySorbonne UniversityParisFrance
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco‐Urology, APHP, Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hôpital, UrologySorbonne UniversityParisFrance
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco‐Urology, APHP, Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hôpital, UrologySorbonne UniversityParisFrance
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tillu N, Ben-David R, Skokic V, Rich JM, Kolanukuduru KP, Dey L, Rautiola J, Björklund J, Almoflihi M, Eraky A, Miranda G, Cacciamani G, Desai M, Mehrazin R, Sfakianos JP, Wiklund P. Long-term multicentre analysis of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. BJU Int 2025. [PMID: 39980082 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the 12-year survival outcomes of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD), focusing on those upstaged to ≥pT2 or with node-positive disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multicentre, prospectively maintained database (2004-2022) was reviewed to identify patients who had undergone RARC. Univariable and multivariable models were used to assess upstaging (≥pT2, ≥pN1), and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Among 355 patients with NMIBC (295 men, 60 women), 12.68% had pT2, 8.2% had pT3, 4.2% had pT4, 5.4% had pN1, and 2.8% had pN2 disease. Age ≥ 83 years (odds ratio [OR] 19.7), presence of carcinoma in situ (CIS), in combination with Ta/ T1 bladder cancer (OR 2.7), squamous cell carcinoma (OR 6.6), and variant histology (OR 6.2), predicted upstaging. A body mass index ≥28 kg/m2 (OR 0.4) and Tis alone (OR 0.1) reduced upstaging. The OS rate for the entire cohort was 93% at 1 year, 87% at 5 years and 49% at 12 years. The CSS rate was 97% at 1 year, 83% at 5 years and 76% at 12 years. At 12 years, OS was better in the non-upstaged cohort (52%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 37%-74%) vs the upstaged cohort (39%, 95% CI 26%-57%). CSS was higher in the non-upstaged cohort (79%, 95% CI 71%-88%; P < 0.001) vs the upstaged cohort (68%, 95% CI 56%-82%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION This study provides the longest follow-up data on RARC in NMIBC. The presence of CIS, variant histology, and pT1 on transurethral resection of the bladder tumour were predictors of upstaging, which correlated with higher recurrence and worse survival. RARC with ICUD is a minimally invasive option for NMIBC patients who need to undergo early cystectomy, offering comparable long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeraja Tillu
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Reuben Ben-David
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Viktor Skokic
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jordan M Rich
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Linda Dey
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Juhana Rautiola
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan Björklund
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mohammed Almoflihi
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ahmed Eraky
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gus Miranda
- Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Giovanni Cacciamani
- Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Mihir Desai
- Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Reza Mehrazin
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - John P Sfakianos
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Lima RD, de Almeida LS, Filho ELM, Mota JM, Ribeiro-Filho LA, Suartz CV. Robot-Assisted Cystectomy in Patients With Previous Pelvic Irradiation: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2025; 23:102259. [PMID: 39637626 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2024] [Revised: 10/25/2024] [Accepted: 10/26/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
To evaluate the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted cystectomy in previous pelvic irradiation patients. We performed a systematic review with a single-arm meta-analysis, searching the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases through July 2024. Included studies reported perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy in patients with prior pelvic irradiation. Extracted data included operative time, blood loss, complication rates (using the Clavien-Dindo classification), readmission rates, and length of hospital stay. Study quality was assessed and a single-arm meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the data. This systematic review included 150 patients from 4 retrospective studies. The median operative time ranged from 330 to 382 minutes (Overall Mean = 349.50 min; 95% CI, 331-380), and blood loss varied between 264 mL and 495 mL (Overall Mean = 351.50 mL; 95% CI, 264-495). Major complications, defined as Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III, were reported in 20% to 32% of cases, while total early complications within 90 days ranged from 53% to 59% (Overall rate = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.42-0.75). The readmission rate within 90 days varied between 22% and 40% (Overall rate = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.16-0.47). RARC in patients with prior pelvic irradiation resulted in comparable perioperative outcomes to nonirradiated patients. This review highlights the potential safety and efficacy of RARC in this complex patient group. Future studies comparing surgical approaches with detailed reporting on radiation exposure are essential to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Dobrucki de Lima
- Division of Urology, Institute of Cancer of São Paulo, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Lucas Schenk de Almeida
- Division of Urology, Institute of Cancer of São Paulo, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - José Maurício Mota
- Division of Urology, Institute of Cancer of São Paulo, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Caio Vinicius Suartz
- Division of Urology, Institute of Cancer of São Paulo, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Urology Department, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Urology Department, TBRHSC, Northern Ontario School of Medicine University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang Z, Dou X, Zhou W, Liu Q. Robot-assisted, laparoscopic and open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol 2024; 50:683-702. [PMID: 39172861 PMCID: PMC11554271 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2024.0191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC), and open radical cystectomy (ORC) in bladder cancer. METHODS A literature search for network meta-analysis was conducted using international databases up to February 29, 2024. Outcomes of interest included baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes and oncological outcomes. RESULTS Forty articles were finally selected for inclusion in the network meta-analysis. Both LRC and RARC were associated with longer operative time, smaller amount of estimated blood loss, lower transfusion rate, shorter time to regular diet, fewer incidences of complications, and fewer positive surgical margin compared to ORC. LRC had a shorter time to flatus than ORC, while no difference between RARC and ORC was observed. Considering lymph node yield, there were no differences among LRC, RARC and ORC. In addition, there were statistically significant lower transfusion rates (OR=-0.15, 95% CI=-0.47 to 0.17), fewer overall complication rates (OR=-0.39, 95% CI=-0.79 to 0.00), fewer minor complication rates (OR=-0.23, 95% CI=-0.48 to 0.02), fewer major complication rates (OR=-0.23, 95% CI=-0.68 to 0.21), fewer positive surgical margin rates (OR=0.22, 95% CI=-0.27 to 0.68) in RARC group compared with LRC group. CONCLUSION LRC and RARC could be considered as a feasible and safe alternative to ORC for bladder cancer. Notably, compared with LRC, RARC may benefit from significantly lower transfusion rates, fewer complications and lower positive surgical margin rates. These data thus showed that RARC might improve the management of patients with muscle invasive or high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhanpo Yang
- Tianjin First Central HospitalDepartment of UrologyTianjinChinaDepartment of Urology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Xinmeng Dou
- Tianjin First Central HospitalDepartment of UrologyTianjinChinaDepartment of Urology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Wenhui Zhou
- Tianjin First Central HospitalDepartment of UrologyTianjinChinaDepartment of Urology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Qian Liu
- Tianjin First Central HospitalDepartment of UrologyTianjinChinaDepartment of Urology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zennami K, Kusaka M, Tomozawa S, Toda F, Ito K, Kawai A, Nakamura W, Muto Y, Saruta M, Motonaga T, Takahara K, Sumitomo M, Shiroki R. Impact of an enhanced recovery protocol in frail patients after intracorporeal urinary diversion. BJU Int 2024; 134:426-433. [PMID: 38500447 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol enhances bowel recovery and reduces postoperative ileus (POI) in both non-frail and frail patients after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC). PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study included 186 patients (104 with and 82 without ERAS) who underwent iRARC between 2012 and 2023. 'Frail' patients was defined as those with a low Geriatric-8 questionnaire score (≤13). The primary outcomes were postoperative bowel recovery and the incidence of POI. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), 30- and 90-day complications, 90-day readmission rate, and POI predictors. RESULTS The ERAS group exhibited a significantly shorter LOS, early bowel recovery, a lower POI rate, fewer 90-day high-grade complications, and fewer 90-day readmissions than the non-ERAS group in the entire cohort. Non-frail patients in the ERAS group had a lower rate of POI (7.1% vs. 22.1%; P = 0.008), whereas ERAS did not reduce POI in frail patients (44.1% vs. 36.6%; P = 0.50). In the multivariate analysis, ERAS was associated with a reduced risk of POI in both the entire cohort (odds ratio [OR] 0.39, P = 0.01) and in non-frail patients (OR 0.24, P = 0.01), whereas ERAS was not likely to reduce POI (OR 1.14, P = 0.70) in frail patients. Prehabilitation was identified as a favourable predictor of POI. CONCLUSIONS The ERAS protocol did not reduce POI in frail patients after iRARC, although it enhanced bowel recovery and reduced POI in non-frail patients. Prehabilitation for frail patients might reduce POI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Zennami
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Mamoru Kusaka
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University Okazaki Medical Center, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Shuhei Tomozawa
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Fumi Toda
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine I, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Kazuki Ito
- Department of Rehabilitation, Fujita Health University Okazaki Medical Center, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Akihiro Kawai
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Wataru Nakamura
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Yoshinari Muto
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Masanobu Saruta
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Tomonari Motonaga
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Takahara
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Makoto Sumitomo
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Shiroki
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yokoyama M, Chen W, Waseda Y, Fujiwara M, Kato D, Shirakawa T, Shimizu Y, Nenohi T, Matsumoto Y, Okumura T, Urushibara M, Ai M, Fushimi K, Fukagai T, Eto M, Fujii Y, Ishizaka K. Comparisons of in-hospital fee and surgical outcomes between robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open radical cystectomy: a Japanese nationwide study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2024; 54:822-826. [PMID: 38553780 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyae039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate in-hospital fees and surgical outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and open radical cystectomy (ORC) using a Japanese nationwide database. METHODS All data were obtained from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database between April 2020 and March 2022. Basic characteristics and perioperative indicators, including in-hospital fees, were compared among the RARC, LRC and ORC groups. Propensity score-matched comparisons were performed to assess the differences between RARC and ORC. RESULTS During the study period, 2931, 1311 and 2435 cases of RARC, LRC and ORC were identified, respectively. The RARC group had the lowest in-hospital fee (median: 2.38 million yen), the shortest hospital stay (26 days) and the lowest blood transfusion rate (29.5%), as well as the lowest complication rate (20.9%), despite having the longest anesthesia time (569 min) among the three groups (all P < 0.01). The outcomes of LRC were comparable with those of RARC, and the differences in these indicators between the RARC and ORC groups were greater than those between the RARC and LRC groups. In propensity score-matched comparisons between the RARC and ORC groups, the differences in the indicators remained significant (all P < 0.01), with an ~50 000 yen difference in in-hospital fees. CONCLUSIONS RARC and LRC were considered to be more cost-effective surgeries than ORC due to their superior surgical outcomes and comparable surgical fees in Japan. The widespread adoption of RARC and LRC is expected to bring economic benefits to Japanese society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minato Yokoyama
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki City
- Department of Insured Medical Care Management, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo
| | - Yuma Waseda
- Department of Insured Medical Care Management, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo
| | | | - Daisuke Kato
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki City
| | - Takeshi Shirakawa
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki City
| | - Yohei Shimizu
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki City
| | - Tsunehiro Nenohi
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki City
| | - Yuki Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki City
| | - Taisuke Okumura
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki City
| | - Masayasu Urushibara
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki City
| | - Masumi Ai
- Department of Insured Medical Care Management, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo
| | - Kiyohide Fushimi
- Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo
| | - Takashi Fukagai
- Department of Urology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo
| | - Masatoshi Eto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Fujii
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo
| | - Kazuhiro Ishizaka
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki City
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cella L, Basile G, Moretto S, Paciotti M, Hurle R, Lughezzani G, Avolio PP, Piccolini A, Mancon S, Lazzeri M, Gallioli A, Berquin C, Diana P, Mertens LS, Baboudjian M, Buffi NM, Contieri R, Uleri A. Robotic assisted vs open radical cystectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:277. [PMID: 38961035 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02026-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
Several randomized control trials (RCTs) have been published comparing open (ORC) with robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). However, uncertainty persists regarding this issue, as evidences and recommendations on RARC are still lacking. In this systematic review and metaanalysis, we summarized evidence in this context. A literature search was conducted according to PRISMA criteria, using PubMed/Medline, Web Of Science and Embase, up to March 2024. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected. The primary endpoint was to investigate health-related quality of life (QoL) both at 3 and 6 months after surgery. Secondary endpoints include pathological and perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications and oncological outcomes. Furthermore, we conducted a cost evaluation based on the available evidence. Eight RCTs were included, encompassing 1024 patients (515 RARC versus 509 ORC). QoL appeared similar among the two groups both after 3 and 6 months. No significant differences in overall and major complications at 30 days (p = 0.11 and p > 0.9, respectively) and 90 days (p = 0.28 and p = 0.57, respectively) were observed, as well as in oncological, pathological and perioperative outcomes, excepting from operative time, which was longer in RARC (MD 92.34 min, 95% CI 83.83-100.84, p < 0.001) and transfusion rate, which was lower in RARC (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.30-0.61, p < 0.001). Both ORC and RARC are viable options for bladder cancer, having comparable complication rates and oncological outcomes. RARC provides transfusion rate advantages, however, it has longer operative time and higher costs. QoL outcomes appear similar between the two groups, both after 3 and 6 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ludovica Cella
- Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Basile
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Moretto
- Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Marco Paciotti
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Lughezzani
- Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Pier Paolo Avolio
- Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Piccolini
- Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Mancon
- Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Massimo Lazzeri
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Camille Berquin
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pietro Diana
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Baboudjian
- Department of Urology, North Academic Hospital, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - Nicolò Maria Buffi
- Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Contieri
- Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Uleri
- Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yasuda Y, Numao N, Fujiwara R, Takemura K, Yoneoka Y, Oguchi T, Yamamoto S, Yonese J. Surgical outcomes and predictive value for major complications of robot-assisted radical cystectomy of real-world data in a single institution in Japan. Int J Urol 2024; 31:724-729. [PMID: 38477173 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to describe the surgical outcome of robot-assisted radical cystectomy and predictive factors for major complications in real-world clinical practice at a single institution in Japan. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 208 consecutive patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy at our institution between 2019 and 2023. Patient and disease characteristics, intraoperative details, and perioperative outcomes were reviewed. Postoperative complications were defined as minor complications (Clavien-Dindo grades 1-2) or major complications (grades 3-5). Predictors of complications were examined using multivariable logistic analysis. RESULTS Overall, 147 men and 61 women, median age 70 years (interquartile range, 62-77), were included in this study. Median operative time and estimated blood loss were 8.4 h and 185 mL, respectively; 11 patients (5%) received intraoperative blood transfusions. For urinary diversions, ileal conduit, neobladder, and cutaneous ureterostomy were performed in 153 (74%), 49 (24%), and 6 (3%) patients, respectively. Urinary diversions were primarily performed with extracorporeal urinary diversion. In total, 140 complications occurred in 111 patients (53%) within 30 days. Of these patients, 31 major complications occurred in 28 patients, and one perioperative death (0.5%) with a postoperative cardiovascular event. Multivariable analysis showed only prolonged operative time (odds ratio: 4.34, 95% confidence interval: 1.82-10.35, p < 0.01) was the independent risk factor for major complications. CONCLUSIONS This study reports surgical outcomes at our single institution. Prolonged operative time was a significant prognostic factor for major complications. As far as we know, this study reports the largest number of robot-assisted radical cystectomy cases at a single center in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yosuke Yasuda
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Noboru Numao
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryo Fujiwara
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kosuke Takemura
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Yoneoka
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Oguchi
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinya Yamamoto
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junji Yonese
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tomos G, Saussine C, Gaillard V, Lang H, Tricard T. [Short-term functional outcomes of laparoscopic robotic-assisted cystectomy (RAC) with ileal conduit urinary diversion (ICUD) for lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD): A single-center retrospective study]. THE FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2024; 34:102639. [PMID: 38636808 DOI: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the short-term functional outcomes and morbidity of robotic-assisted cystectomy (RAC) and intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD). METHODS All consecutive patients who underwent RAC+ICUD for LUTD in a tertiary hospital center, between July 2018 and May 2021 were retrospectively included. Medical records were systematically reviewed and patient, perioperative and postoperative data were collected. A good short-term functional outcome was defined by the combination of a satisfying urostomy equipment (absence of urine leakage and easy appliance of the urostomy bag), the absence of pelvicaliceal system dilatation on sonography, and the absence of renal function decrease at the 2months post-operative consultation. Intraoperative parameters and post-operative complications were collected to assess morbidity. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were included. Eight (22.8%) patients needed intraoperative conversion to laparotomy. Twenty-five patients (92,5%) met criteria for a good functional outcome 2months post-operatively. The median operative time was 346min (86.5-407.5). The median blood loss was 100mL (100-290) and 5 patients (18.5%) required blood transfusion. The median times to return of bowel function was 3 days (2-4) and the median length of hospital stay was 10 days (10-18). Peri-operative complications were reported in 16 patients (59.2%): 6 (22.2%) minor complications Clavien ≤ II and 10 (37%) major complications Clavien ≥ III. There was no significative decrease of the renal function (mean preoperative creatininemia of 61.2μmol/L (50.5-74.5) vs 64.5μmol/L (47-85.25) postoperatively) CONCLUSION: RAC+ICUD in LUTD can provide good short-term functional outcomes while limiting blood transfusion, time to return of bowel function and the length of hospital stay. These results should be confirmed by larger prospective study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Tomos
- Département d'urologie, Nouvel Hôpital civil, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
| | - Christian Saussine
- Département d'urologie, Nouvel Hôpital civil, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Victor Gaillard
- Département d'urologie, Nouvel Hôpital civil, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Hervé Lang
- Département d'urologie, Nouvel Hôpital civil, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Thibault Tricard
- Département d'urologie, Nouvel Hôpital civil, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Flammia RS, Licari LC, Bologna E, Mastroianni R, Proietti F, Tuderti G, Anceschi U, Brassetti A, Franco A, De Nunzio C, Autorino R, Leonardo C, Simone G. Comparative Outcomes of Open Radical Cystectomy vs. Robot-Assisted Approaches with Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion: A Meta-Analysis and Network Meta-Analysis of Perioperative and Quality of Life Outcomes. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2421. [PMID: 38673693 PMCID: PMC11051502 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: To conduct a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs that compare outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intra- or extracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD or ECUD) and the standard open approach (oRC). Methods: A systematic review identified RCTs including patients aged >18 years with non-metastatic bladder cancer treated with RARC (ICUD or ECUD) vs. oRC and reporting peri- and post-operative outcomes and quality of life (QoL) assessment. Standard and network metanalyses were performed. Results: Data from 1024 patients included in eight RCTs were analyzed. The standard meta-analysis found that RARC had longer OT, lower EBL, and a lower transfusion rate compared to oRC (all p < 0.001). No significant differences in terms of LOS between the ICUD vs. ECUD vs. ORC were recorded. RARC patients demonstrated better scores in fatigue, insomnia, pain, physical functioning, and role functioning-according to QoL assessment-compared to ORC at early follow-up, despite no difference at baselines. Finally, at network metanalysis, ICUD (OR = 0.74, p < 0.001) but not ECUD (OR = 0.92, p < 0.08) yielded a lower rate of high-grade 90-day complications compared to ORC despite longer OT (MD = 89.56, p = 0.0351). Conclusions: RARC represents a safe and feasible option to reduce perioperative bleeding with no definitive impact on LOS compared to ORC. Interestingly, ICUD may reduce the burden of 90-day complications to a greater extent than ECUD. Nonetheless, surgeons should be aware of the extended OT and steep learning curve of ICUD. Finally, RARC may provide some short-term benefits in terms of QoL, but more research is needed to determine its long-term effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocco Simone Flammia
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (L.C.L.)
- Department of Urology, “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Leslie Claire Licari
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (L.C.L.)
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (R.A.)
| | - Eugenio Bologna
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (L.C.L.)
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (R.A.)
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Flavia Proietti
- Department of Urology, “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Aldo Brassetti
- Department of Urology, “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (R.A.)
- Department of Urology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy;
| | - Cosimo De Nunzio
- Department of Urology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy;
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (R.A.)
| | - Costantino Leonardo
- Department of Urology, “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Simhal RK, Simon DP, Wang KR, Shah YB, Havranek B, Mark JR, Chandrasekar T, Shah MS, Lallas CD. Perioperative and Complication Related Outcomes for Robotic-Assisted vs Open Radical Cystectomy: A Comparative National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Analysis. J Endourol 2024; 38:331-339. [PMID: 38269428 DOI: 10.1089/end.2023.0279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Radical cystectomy (RC) is standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, but it comes with significant perioperative risk, with half of the patients experiencing major postoperative complications. Robot-assisted radical cystectomies (RARCs) have aimed to decrease patient morbidity and been increasingly adopted in North America. Currently, both open radical cystectomies (ORCs) and RARCs are frequently performed. The aim of this study is to contribute to the existing literature using newly available data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP), representing one of the most recent, largest multi-institutional studies, while uniquely accounting for a variety of factors, including type of urinary diversion, cancer staging, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: RC procedures performed between 2019 and 2021 were identified in NSQIP and the corresponding cystectomy-targeted database. Cases in the ORC group were planned open procedures, and cases in the RARC group were robot assisted, including unplanned conversion to open cases for intention to treat. Chi-square and t-tests were performed to compare baseline demographics and operative parameters. Multivariate analysis was performed for outcomes, including major complications, minor complications, and 30-day mortality rates, while adjusting for baseline differences significant on univariate analysis. Results: Five thousand three hundred forty-three RC cases were identified. Of these, 70% underwent planned ORC, while 30% received RARC. RARC was associated with longer operative times and shorter hospital length of stay compared with ORC. On multivariate analysis, there was no difference between the cohorts in 30-day rates of major complications, hospital readmissions, need for reoperation, or mortality. ORC was, however, associated with higher rates of minor complications, bleeding, superficial surgical site infections, and anastomotic leak. Conclusions: In the NSQIP database, ORC is associated with higher rates of 30-day minor complications, most notably bleeding, compared with RARC. However, there is no difference in regard to perioperative major morbidity or mortality rates. This study is unique in the size of the cohorts compared, timeliness of data (2019-2021), applicability to a variety of different practice settings across the country, and ability to control for factors, such as type of urinary diversion and pathological bladder cancer staging, as well as use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) specific to Thomas Jefferson University.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishabh K Simhal
- Department of Urology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Daniel P Simon
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Urology, Intermountain Health Care, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kerith R Wang
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yash B Shah
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Brandon Havranek
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - James R Mark
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Mihir S Shah
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Costas D Lallas
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fu S, Shi H, Fan Z, Li J, Luan T, Dong H, Wang J, Chen S, Zhang J, Wang J, Ding M, Wang H. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of its differential effect on effectiveness and safety. Int J Surg 2024; 110:01279778-990000000-00948. [PMID: 38260944 PMCID: PMC11020008 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC) is increasingly being used in recent years. Whether iRARC offers advantages over open radical cystectomy (ORC) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the difference of perioperative outcomes, oncological outcomes and complications between iRARC and ORC. METHODS The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and CNKI databases were searched in July 2023 according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) statement. Studies were identified to be eligible if they compared perioperative outcomes, oncological outcomes and complications in patients who underwent iRARC with ORC. RESULTS Twenty-two studies involving 7,020 patients were included. Compared to ORC, iRARC was superior for estimated blood loss [EBL WMD: -555.52; 95% CI, -681.64 to -429.39; P<0.001], blood transfusion rate [OR: 0.16; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.28; P<0.001], length of hospital stay [LOS WMD: -2.05; 95% CI, -2.93 to -1.17; P<0.001], Clavien-Dindo grades ≥III complication rate [30d: OR: 0.57; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.75; P<0.001; 90d: OR: 0.71; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.84; P<0.001], and positive surgical margin [PSM OR: 0.65; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.85; P=0.002]. However, iRARC had a longer operative time [OT WMD: 68.54; 95%CI 47.41 to 89.67; P<0.001] and a higher rate of ureteroenteric stricture [ UES OR: 1.56; 95% CI 1.16 to 2.11; P=0.003]. Time to flatus, time to bowel, time to regular diet, readmission rate, Clavien-Dindo grades CONCLUSION Robot-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion appears to be superior to open radical cystectomy in terms of effectiveness and safety. However, attention should be paid to the occurrence of ureteroenteric stricture during follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shi Fu
- Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - HongJin Shi
- Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Zhinan Fan
- Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
- Department of Urology, Meishan People's Hospital, Meishan, China
| | - Jinze Li
- Department of Urology/Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ting Luan
- Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Haonan Dong
- Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Jincheng Wang
- Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Shuwen Chen
- Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Jinsong Zhang
- Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Jiansong Wang
- Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Mingxia Ding
- Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Haifeng Wang
- Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Katsimperis S, Tzelves L, Tandogdu Z, Ta A, Geraghty R, Bellos T, Manolitsis I, Pyrgidis N, Schulz GB, Sridhar A, Shaw G, Kelly J, Skolarikos A. Complications After Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with a Meta-regression Analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:920-929. [PMID: 37246124 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Radical cystectomy is considered a procedure of high complexity with a relative high complication rate. OBJECTIVE To systematically summarize the literature regarding the complications of radical cystectomy and the factors that contribute to them. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on complications related to radical cystectomy. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 3766 studies were screened, and 44 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Complications following radical cystectomy are quite common. The most common complications were gastrointestinal complications (20%), infectious complications (17%), and ileus (14%). The majority of complications occurring were Clavien I-II (45%). Specific measurable patient factors are related to certain complications and can be used to stratify risk and assist in preoperative counseling, while proper design of high-quality RCTs may better reflect real-life complication rates. CONCLUSIONS In our study, RCTs with a low risk of bias had higher complication rates than studies with a high risk of bias, underlining the need for further improvement on complication reporting in order to refine surgical outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY Radical cystectomy is usually followed by high complication rates, which affect patients and are, in turn, strongly associated with patients' preoperative health status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lazaros Tzelves
- University College of London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Zafer Tandogdu
- University College of London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Anthony Ta
- University College of London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Robert Geraghty
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England
| | | | | | - Nikolaos Pyrgidis
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Ashwin Sridhar
- University College of London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gregory Shaw
- University College of London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - John Kelly
- University College of London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Khetrapal P, Wong JKL, Tan WP, Rupasinghe T, Tan WS, Williams SB, Boorjian SA, Wijburg C, Parekh DJ, Wiklund P, Vasdev N, Khan MS, Guru KA, Catto JWF, Kelly JD. Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perioperative, Oncological, and Quality of Life Outcomes Using Randomized Controlled Trials. Eur Urol 2023; 84:393-405. [PMID: 37169638 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Revised: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Differences in recovery, oncological, and quality of life (QoL) outcomes between open radical cystectomy (ORC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) for patients with bladder cancer are unclear. OBJECTIVE This review aims to compare these outcomes within randomized trials of ORC and RARC in this context. The primary outcome was the rate of 90-d perioperative events. The secondary outcomes included operative, pathological, survival, and health-related QoL (HRQoL) measures. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Systematic literature searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov were performed up to May 31, 2022. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Eight trials, reporting 1024 participants, were included. RARC was associated with a shorter hospital length of stay (LOS; mean difference [MD] 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03-0.39, p = 0.02) than and similar complication rates to ORC. ORC was associated with higher thromboembolic events (odds ratio [OR] 1.84, 95% CI 1.02-3.31, p = 0.04). ORC was associated with more blood loss (MD 322 ml, 95% CI 193-450, p < 0.001) and transfusions (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.65-3.36, p < 0.001), but shorter operative time (MD 76 min, 95% CI 39-112, p < 0.001) than RARC. No differences in lymph node yield (MD 1.07, 95% CI -1.73 to 3.86, p = 0.5) or positive surgical margin rates (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.54-1.67, p = 0.9) were present. RARC was associated with better physical functioning or well-being (standardized MD 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.65, p < 0.001) and role functioning (MD 8.8, 95% CI 2.4-15.1, p = 0.007), but no improvement in overall HRQoL. No differences in progression-free survival or overall survival were seen. Limitations may include a lack of generalization given trial patients. CONCLUSIONS RARC offers various perioperative benefits over ORC. It may be more suitable in patients wishing to avoid blood transfusion, those wanting a shorter LOS, or those at a high risk of thromboembolic events. PATIENT SUMMARY This study compares robot-assisted keyhole surgery with open surgery for bladder cancer. The robot-assisted approach offered less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and fewer blood clots. No other differences were seen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pramit Khetrapal
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
| | - Joanna Kae Ling Wong
- Department of Anaesthetics, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Wei Phin Tan
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thiara Rupasinghe
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Wei Shen Tan
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stephen B Williams
- Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | | | - Carl Wijburg
- Department of Urology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Dipen J Parekh
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute at the Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nikhil Vasdev
- Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Stevenage, UK; School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK
| | | | - Khurshid A Guru
- Department of Urology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - James W F Catto
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - John D Kelly
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Courboin E, Mathieu R, Panetta V, Mjaess G, Diamand R, Verhoest G, Roumiguié M, Bajeot AS, Soria F, Lonati C, Simeone C, Simone G, Anceschi U, Umari P, Sridhar A, Kelly J, Mertens LS, Sanchez-Salas R, Colomer A, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A, Krajewski W, Quackels T, Peltier A, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Teoh JYC, Pradere B, Moschini M, Roumeguère T, Albisinni S. Comparing Robotic-Assisted to Open Radical Cystectomy in the Management of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Propensity Score Matched-Pair Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4732. [PMID: 37835425 PMCID: PMC10571883 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) requiring radical surgery, limited data are available comparing robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC) to open radical cystectomy (ORC). The objective of this study was to compare the two surgical techniques. METHODS A multicentric cohort of 593 patients with NMIBC undergoing iRARC or ORC between 2015 and 2020 was prospectively gathered. Perioperative and pathologic outcomes were compared. RESULTS A total of 143 patients operated on via iRARC were matched to 143 ORC patients. Operative time was longer in the iRARC group (p = 0.034). Blood loss was higher in the ORC group (p < 0.001), with a consequent increased post-operative transfusion rate in the ORC group (p = 0.003). Length of stay was longer in the ORC group (p = 0.007). Post-operative complications did not differ significantly (all p > 0.05). DFS at 60 months was 55.9% in ORC and 75.2% in iRARC with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.033) found in the univariate analysis. CONCLUSION We found that iRARC for patients with NMIBC is safe, associated with a lower blood loss, a lower transfusion rate and a shorter hospital stay compared to ORC. Complication rates were similar. No significant differences in survival analyses emerged across the two techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etienne Courboin
- Department of Urology, University Clinics of Brussels, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium; (G.M.); (T.Q.); (T.R.); (S.A.)
- Department of Urology, CHU Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France; (R.M.); (G.V.)
| | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, CHU Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France; (R.M.); (G.V.)
| | - Valentina Panetta
- L’altrastatistica S.R.L., Consultancy & Training, Biostatistics Office, 00100 Rome, Italy;
| | - Georges Mjaess
- Department of Urology, University Clinics of Brussels, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium; (G.M.); (T.Q.); (T.R.); (S.A.)
| | - Romain Diamand
- Department of Urology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium; (R.D.); (A.P.)
| | - Gregory Verhoest
- Department of Urology, CHU Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France; (R.M.); (G.V.)
| | - Mathieu Roumiguié
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Paul-Sabatier University, 31000 Toulouse, France; (M.R.); (A.S.B.)
| | - Anne Sophie Bajeot
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Paul-Sabatier University, 31000 Toulouse, France; (M.R.); (A.S.B.)
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, 10024 Turin, Italy;
| | - Chiara Lonati
- Department of Urology, Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (C.L.); (C.S.)
| | - Claudio Simeone
- Department of Urology, Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (C.L.); (C.S.)
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00100 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (U.A.)
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00100 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (U.A.)
| | - Paolo Umari
- Departement of Urology, Ospedale Maggiore della Caritá di Novara, Universitá del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novarra, Italy;
| | - Ashwin Sridhar
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (A.S.); (J.K.)
| | - John Kelly
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (A.S.); (J.K.)
| | - Laura S. Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Rafael Sanchez-Salas
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 70123 Paris, France; (R.S.-S.); (A.C.)
| | - Anna Colomer
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 70123 Paris, France; (R.S.-S.); (A.C.)
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37100 Verona, Italy; (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37100 Verona, Italy; (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland;
| | - Thierry Quackels
- Department of Urology, University Clinics of Brussels, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium; (G.M.); (T.Q.); (T.R.); (S.A.)
| | - Alexandre Peltier
- Department of Urology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium; (R.D.); (A.P.)
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; (F.M.); (A.B.); (M.M.)
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; (F.M.); (A.B.); (M.M.)
| | - Jeremy Y. C. Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China;
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria;
- Department of Urology, Hopital La Croix du Sud, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - Marco Moschini
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; (F.M.); (A.B.); (M.M.)
| | - Thierry Roumeguère
- Department of Urology, University Clinics of Brussels, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium; (G.M.); (T.Q.); (T.R.); (S.A.)
- Department of Urology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium; (R.D.); (A.P.)
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Department of Urology, University Clinics of Brussels, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium; (G.M.); (T.Q.); (T.R.); (S.A.)
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00100 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sathianathen NJ, Pan HY, Furrer M, Thomas B, Dundee P, Corcoran N, Weight CJ, Konety B, Nair R, Lawrentschuk N. Comparison of Robotic vs Open Cystectomy: A Systematic Review. Bladder Cancer 2023; 9:253-269. [PMID: 38993188 PMCID: PMC11181804 DOI: 10.3233/blc-220065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of a robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) compared to an open approach is still under debate. Initial data on RARC were from trials where urinary diversion was performed by an extracorporeal approach, which does not represent a completely minimally invasive procedure. There are now updated data for RARC with intracorporeal urinary diversion that add to the evidence profile of RARC. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of RARC compared with open radical cystectomy (ORC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Multiple databases were searched up to May 2022. We included randomised trials in which patients underwent RARC and ORC. Oncological and safety outcomes were assessed. RESULTS Seven trials of 907 participants were included. There were no differences seen in primary outcomes: disease progression [RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.23], major complications [RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.24] and quality of life [SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.38]. RARC resulted in a decreased risk of perioperative blood transfusion [RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.76], wound complications [RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.55] and reduced length of hospital stay [MD -0.62 days, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.13]. However, there was an increased risk of developing a ureteric stricture [RR 4.21, 95% CI 1.07 to 16.53] in the RARC group and a prolonged operative time [MD 70.4 minutes, 95% CI 34.1 to 106.7]. The approach for urinary diversion did not impact outcomes. CONCLUSION RARC is an oncologically safe procedure compared to ORC and provides the benefits of a minimally invasive approach. There was an increased risk of developing a ureteric stricture in patients undergoing RARC that warrants further investigation. There was no difference in oncological outcomes between approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niranjan J. Sathianathen
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Henry Y.C. Pan
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Marc Furrer
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Urology, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Benjamin Thomas
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Philip Dundee
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Niall Corcoran
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Urology, Western Health, Footscray, VIC, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | - Rajesh Nair
- Department of Urology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Liu H, Zhou Z, Yao H, Mao Q, Chu Y, Cui Y, Wu J. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy vs open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg Oncol 2023; 21:240. [PMID: 37542288 PMCID: PMC10403906 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03132-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Even though there isn't enough clinical evidence to demonstrate that robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is preferable to open radical cystectomy (ORC), RARC has become a widely used alternative. We performed the present study of RARC vs ORC with a focus on oncologic, pathological, perioperative, and complication-related outcomes and health-related quality of life (QOL). METHODS We conducted a literature review up to August 2022. The search included PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane controlled trials register databases. We classified the studies according to version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). The data was assessed by Review Manager 5.4.0. RESULTS 8 RCTs comparing 1024 patients were analyzed in our study. RARC was related to lower estimated blood loss (weighted mean difference (WMD): -328.2; 95% CI -463.49--192.92; p < 0.00001), lower blood transfusion rates (OR: 0.45; 95% CI 0.32 - 0.65; p < 0.0001) but longer operation time (WMD: 84.21; 95% CI 46.20 -121.72; p < 0.0001). And we found no significant difference in terms of positive surgical margins (P = 0.97), lymph node yield (P = 0.30) and length of stay (P = 0.99). Moreover, no significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of survival outcomes, pathological outcomes, postoperative complication outcomes and health-related QOL. CONCLUSION Based on the present evidence, we demonstrated that RARC and ORC have similar cancer control results. RARC is related to less blood loss and lower transfusion rate. We found no difference in postoperative complications and health-related QOL between robotic and open approaches. RARC procedures could be used as an alternate treatment for bladder cancer patients. Additional RCTs with long-term follow-up are needed to validate this observation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongquan Liu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, NO. 20 East Yuhuangding Road, Yantai, 264000, Shandong, China
| | - Zhongbao Zhou
- Department of Urology, Fengtai District, Beijing TianTan Hospital, Capital Medical University. No, 119 South 4Th Ring West Road, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Huibao Yao
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, NO. 20 East Yuhuangding Road, Yantai, 264000, Shandong, China
| | - Qiancheng Mao
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, NO. 20 East Yuhuangding Road, Yantai, 264000, Shandong, China
| | - Yongli Chu
- Department of Scientific Research, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, NO. 20 East Yuhuangding Road, Yantai, 264000, Shandong, China
| | - Yuanshan Cui
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, NO. 20 East Yuhuangding Road, Yantai, 264000, Shandong, China.
| | - Jitao Wu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, NO. 20 East Yuhuangding Road, Yantai, 264000, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ray CH, Davaro F, Hamilton ZA, Raza J. Perioperative outcomes of open versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy in octogenarians: a population based analysis. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:1629-1635. [PMID: 36933124 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01568-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
Octogenarians undergoing cystectomy experience higher morbidity and mortality compared to younger patients. Though the non-inferiority of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) compared to open radical cystectomy (ORC) has been established in a generalized population, the benefits of the robotic approach have not been well studied in an aged population. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for all patients who underwent cystectomy for bladder cancer from 2010 to 2016. Of these, 2527 were performed in patients age 80 or older; 1988 and 539 underwent ORC and RARC, respectively. On Cox regression analysis, RARC was associated with significantly reduced odds for both 30- and 90-day mortality (HR 0.404, p = 0.004; HR 0.694, p = 0.031, respectively), though the association with overall mortality was not significant (HR 0.877, p = 0.061). The robotic group had a significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) compared to open surgery (10.3 days ORC vs. 9.3 days RARC, p = 0.028). The proportion of cases performed robotically increased over the study period from 12.2% in 2010 to 28.4% in 2016 (p = 0.009, R2 = 0.774). The study is limited by a retrospective design and a section bias, which was not completely control for in the analysis. In conclusion, RARC provides improved perioperative outcomes in aged patients compared to ORC and a trend toward greater utilization of this technique was observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connor H Ray
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Facundo Davaro
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Institute and Research Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Johar Raza
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Achermann C, Sauer A, Cattaneo M, Walz J, Wyler SF, Kwiatkowski M, Prause LW. Retrospective Evaluation of a Single Surgeon's Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion via Ileal Conduit. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3799. [PMID: 37568615 PMCID: PMC10416818 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC) is increasingly being performed instead of open surgery. A criticism of this technique is the long learning curve, but limited data are available on this topic. At our center, the transition from open radical cystectomy (ORC) to iRARC began in May 2017. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the initial 53 cases of robot-assisted cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion via ileal conduit, which were performed by one single surgeon. The patients were divided into four consecutive groups according to the surgeon's increasing experience, and perioperative parameters were analyzed as a surrogate for the learning curve. Over the course of the learning curve, a decline in median operation time from 415 to 361 min (p = 0.02), blood loss from 400 to 200 mL (p = 0.01), and minor complications from 71% to 15% (p = 0.02) was observed. No significant difference in overall and major complications, length of hospital stay, and total lymph node yield was shown. During the initial period of the learning curve, only the less complex cases were operated on using robotic surgery, while the more challenging ones were handled through open surgery. After experience with 28 cases, no more cystectomies were performed through open surgery. This led to an increase in operation time and length of hospital stay, as well as a higher incidence of both minor and overall complications among cases 28-40. After 40 cases, a significant decrease in these parameters was observed again. Our analysis demonstrated that operation time, blood loss, and minor complications decrease with increasing surgical experience in iRARC, while suggesting that technically challenging cases should be operated on after experience with 40 robotic cystectomies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christof Achermann
- Department of Urology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, 5001 Aarau, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Basel, University of Basel, 4001 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Sauer
- Department of Urology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, 5001 Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Marco Cattaneo
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, 4001 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Center, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - Stephen F. Wyler
- Department of Urology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, 5001 Aarau, Switzerland
- Medical Faculty, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Maciej Kwiatkowski
- Department of Urology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, 5001 Aarau, Switzerland
- Medical Faculty, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, Academic Hospital Braunschweig, 38126 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Lukas W. Prause
- Department of Urology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, 5001 Aarau, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dai S, Liu C, Jiang Z, Teng X, Yan S, Xia D, Tuo Z, Wang X, Wang Q, Bi L. Three-port approach vs conventional laparoscopic radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder: a single-center retrospective study. World J Surg Oncol 2023; 21:160. [PMID: 37231430 PMCID: PMC10210304 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03031-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent three-port laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) with orthotopic neobladder (ONB) and traditional five-port method. METHODS From January 2017 to November 2020, 100 patients underwent LRC + ONB at a third-level grade A hospital. RESULTS Our study included 55 patients who underwent three-port LRC and 45 patients who underwent the five-port method. There were no significant differences in perioperative data such as operation time (253.00 ± 43.89 vs. 259.07 ± 52.31 min, P = 0.530), estimated blood loss (EBL)(97.64 ± 59.44 vs. 106.67 ± 55.35 min, P = 0.438), day to flatus (2.25 ± 1.49 vs. 2.76 ± 1.77 days, P = 0.128), day to regular diet (7.07 ± 2.99 vs. 7.96 ± 3.32 days, P = 0.165), day to pelvic drain removal (9.58 ± 3.25 vs. 10.53 ± 3.80 days, P = 0.180), and hospital stay after operation (11.62 ± 3.72 vs. 11.84 ± 4.37 days, P = 0.780) between the two groups. The only significant difference was in the treatment cost (P = 0.035). Similarly, postoperative complications, quality of life, and tumor outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The three-port method is safe and feasible for patients suitable for traditional five-port LRC with an orthotopic neobladder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuxin Dai
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230032, China
| | - Chang Liu
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230032, China
| | - Zhiwei Jiang
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230032, China
| | - Xiangyu Teng
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230032, China
| | - Songbai Yan
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230032, China
| | - Dian Xia
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230032, China
| | - Zhouting Tuo
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230032, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230032, China
| | - Qi Wang
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230032, China.
| | - Liangkuan Bi
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230032, China.
- Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Han JH, Ku JH. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Where we are in 2023. Investig Clin Urol 2023; 64:107-117. [PMID: 36882169 PMCID: PMC9995950 DOI: 10.4111/icu.20220384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Open radical cystectomy (ORC) is associated with high rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality, owing to its extensive surgical nature and the high frequency of multiple co-morbidities among patients. As an alternative, robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has been increasingly adopted worldwide, being a reliable treatment option that utilizes minimally invasive surgery. Seventeen years have passed since the advent of the RARC, and comprehensive long-term follow-up data are now becoming available. The present review focuses on the current knowledge of RARC in 2023, and analyzes various aspects, including oncological outcomes, peri/post-operative complications, post-operative quality of life (QoL) change, and cost-effectiveness. Oncologically, RARC showed comparable oncological outcomes to ORC. With regard to complications, RARC was associated with lower estimated blood loss, lower intraoperative transfusion rates, shorter length of stay, lower risk of Clavien-Dindo grade III-V complications, and lower 90-day rehospitalization rates than ORC. In particular, RARC with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) performed by high-volume centers significantly reduced the risk of post-operative major complications. In terms of post-operative QoL, RARC with extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD) showed comparable results to ORC, while RARC with ICUD was superior in some respects. As the RARC implementation rate increases and the learning curve is overcome, more prospective studies and randomized controlled trials with large-scale patients are expected to be conducted in the future. Accordingly, sub-group analysis in various groups such as ECUD, ICUD, continent and non-continent urinary diversion, etc. is considered to be possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jang Hee Han
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Fontanet S, Basile G, Baboudjian M, Gallioli A, Huguet J, Territo A, Parada R, Gavrilov P, Aumatell J, Sanz I, Bravo-Balado A, Verri P, Uleri A, Gaya JM, Palou J, Breda A. Robot-assisted vs. open radical cystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Actas Urol Esp 2023:S2173-5786(23)00005-7. [PMID: 36737037 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been launched in the last decade to examine the surgical safety and oncological efficacy of robot-assisted (RARC) vs open radical cystectomy (ORC) for patients with bladder cancer. The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to compare the perioperative and oncological outcomes of RARC vs ORC. METHODS A literature search was conducted through July 2022 using PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. The outcomes were intraoperative, postoperative, and oncological outcomes of RARC vs ORC. RESULTS A total of eight RCTs comprising 1,024 patients met our inclusion criteria. RARC was associated with longer operative time (mean 92.34 min, 95% CI 83.83-100.84, p < 0.001) and lower blood transfusion rate (Odds ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% CI 0.30-0.61, p < 0.001). No differences emerged in terms of 90-day overall (p = 0.28) and major (p = 0.57) complications, length of stay (p = 0.18), bowel recovery (p = 0.67), health-related quality of life (p = 0.86), disease recurrence (p = 0.77) and progression (p = 0.49) between the two approaches. The main limitation is represented by the low number of patients included in half of RCTs included. CONCLUSIONS This study supports that RARC is not inferior to ORC in terms of surgical safety and oncological outcomes. The benefit of RARC in terms of lower blood transfusion rate need to be balanced with the cost related to the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Fontanet
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - G Basile
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Spain
| | - M Baboudjian
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Urology, APHM, North Academic Hospital, Marseille, France; Department of Urology, APHM, La Conception Hospital, Marseille, France; Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - A Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Huguet
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Territo
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R Parada
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Gavrilov
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Aumatell
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Sanz
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Bravo-Balado
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Verri
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Uleri
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J M Gaya
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zahid A, Ayyan M, Farooq M, Cheema HA, Shahid A, Naeem F, Ilyas MA, Sohail S. Robotic surgery in comparison to the open and laparoscopic approaches in the field of urology: a systematic review. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:11-29. [PMID: 35526260 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01416-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
To establish the feasibility of robotic surgical procedures in urology in terms of the applications, merits, and demerits as well as the postoperative and oncological outcomes while comparing it with the conventional approaches. A systematic search of electronic databases was performed to identify Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort studies on Robot-Assisted urological surgical procedures in comparison with the conventional methods. The quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the revised Cochrane "Risk of Bias" tool. A qualitative narrative synthesis of the data extracted from the studies was performed and presented in tabulated form. After screening, 39 studies were included in our review (7 Randomized Controlled Trials and 32 Cohort studies). Robot-Assisted Prostatectomy appears to be associated with lower estimated blood loss and shorter length of hospital stay. For Robot-Assisted Cystectomy, the results suggest longer operative time and fewer complications. Robot-Assisted Radical Nephrectomy was found to be associated with fewer perioperative complications and longer mean operative time while Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy was associated with less positive surgical margins and reduced need for postoperative analgesia. The mean operative time was longer while the length of stay was shorter for the robotic approach in inguinal lymphadenectomy and ureteral reimplantation. The feasibility of Robot-Assisted surgery varied for different outcome measures as well as for different procedures. Some common advantages were a shorter length of stay, lesser blood loss, and fewer complications while the drawbacks included longer operative time.Study protocol PROSPERO database (Registration Number: CRD42021256623).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afra Zahid
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Ayyan
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
| | - Minaam Farooq
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Huzaifa Ahmad Cheema
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Abia Shahid
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Faiza Naeem
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
| | | | - Shehreen Sohail
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Central Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Grobet-Jeandin E, Pinar U, Parra J, Rouprêt M, Seisen T. Health-related quality of life after curative treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2023; 20:279-293. [PMID: 36653671 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00693-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is an aggressive disease for which the gold-standard treatment is radical cystectomy (RC) in combination with cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Bladder-sparing strategies such as trimodal therapy (TMT) have also emerged to improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients. However, an improved understanding of the effect of all these treatment modalities on HRQoL is essential to provide personalized patient care. Different combinations of generic, cancer-specific and bladder cancer-specific questionnaires can be used as instruments for HRQoL evaluation in patients with MIBC before and after curative treatments, which can largely affect multiple domains of HRQoL including general health as well as physical, functional, social and emotional well-being. However, diagnosis of MIBC per se is also likely to affect HRQoL, and the perspective of cure after RC or TMT could induce a return to baseline HRQoL values for most of these domains. A considerable amount of data on HRQoL after RC is available, but conflicting results have been reported regarding the effect of urinary diversion (ileal conduit or orthotopic neobladder) and surgical approach (open or robotic surgery) on patient quality of life. Data on HRQoL after TMT are scarce, and additional comparative studies including patients receiving RC (especially using ileal orthotopic neobladder) are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Grobet-Jeandin
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Urology, Paris, France. .,Division of Urology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Ugo Pinar
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Urology, Paris, France
| | - Jérôme Parra
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Urology, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Urology, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Urology, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Maibom SL, Joensen UN, Aasvang EK, Rohrsted M, Thind PO, Bagi P, Kistorp T, Poulsen AM, Salling LN, Kehlet H, Brasso K, Røder MA. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal ileal conduit diversion versus open radical cystectomy with ileal conduit for bladder cancer in an ERAS setup (BORARC): protocol for a single-centre, double-blinded, randomised feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:7. [PMID: 36639814 PMCID: PMC9838067 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01229-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical cystectomy (RC) with urinary diversion is the recommended treatment for selected cases of non-metastatic high-risk non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. It remains unknown whether robot-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy (RARC) offers any advantage in terms of safety compared to open cystectomy (ORC) in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) setup. Blinded randomised controlled trials (RCTs) between RARC versus ORC have never been conducted in cystectomy patients. We will investigate the feasibility of conducting a double-blinded RCT comparing ORC with RARC with intra-corporal ileal conduit (iRARC) in an ERAS setup. METHODS This is a single-centre, double-blinded, randomised (1:1) clinical feasibility study for patients with non-metastatic high-risk non-muscle-invasive or muscle-invasive bladder cancer scheduled for cystectomy. All participants are recruited from Rigshospitalet, Denmark. The planned sample size is 50 participants to investigate whether blinding of the surgical technique is feasible. Participants and postoperative caring physicians and nurses are blinded using a pre-study designed abdominal dressing and blinding of the patient's electronic health record. Study endpoints are assessed 90 days postoperatively. The primary aim is to study the frequency and pattern of unplanned unblinding after surgery and the number of participants who cannot guess the surgical technique at the day of discharge. Eleven secondary endpoints are assessed: length of stay, days alive and out of hospital, in-hospital complication rate, 30-day complication rate, 90-day complication rate, readmission rate, quality of life, blood loss, pain, rate of moderate/severe post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) complications, and delirium. Participants are managed in an ERAS setup in both arms of the trial. DISCUSSION We report on the design and objectives of a novel experimental feasibility study investigating whether blinding of the surgical technique in cystectomy patients is possible. This information is essential for the design of future blinded trials comparing ORC to RARC. There is a continued need to compare RARC and ORC in terms of both efficacy, safety, and oncological outcomes. Estimated end of study is March 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03977831. Registered on the 6th of June 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Liff Maibom
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XUrological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ulla Nordström Joensen
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XUrological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Eske Kvanner Aasvang
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Malene Rohrsted
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XUrological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Ole Thind
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XUrological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Per Bagi
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XUrological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Kistorp
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alicia Martin Poulsen
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XUrological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lisbeth Nerstrøm Salling
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XUrological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henrik Kehlet
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XSection of Surgical Pathophysiology, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Klaus Brasso
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XUrological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Andreas Røder
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XUrological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fontanet S, Basile G, Baboudjian M, Gallioli A, Huguet J, Territo A, Parada R, Gavrilov P, Aumatell J, Sanz I, Bravo-Balado A, Verri P, Uleri A, Gaya J, Palou J, Breda A. Cistectomía radical asistida por robot vs. cistectomía radical abierta: revisión sistemática de ensayos controlados aleatorizados. Actas Urol Esp 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
27
|
Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Cystectomy—A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Eur Urol Focus 2022:S2405-4569(22)00285-1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
28
|
Hoeh B, Flammia RS, Hohenhorst L, Sorce G, Chierigo F, Panunzio A, Tian Z, Saad F, Gallucci M, Briganti A, Terrone C, Shariat SF, Graefen M, Tilki D, Antonelli A, Kluth LA, Becker A, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Outcomes of robotic-assisted versus open radical cystectomy in a large-scale, contemporary cohort of bladder cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:830-837. [PMID: 35661361 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES To test for differences in perioperative outcomes and total hospital costs (THC) in nonmetastatic bladder cancer patients undergoing open (ORC) versus robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). METHODS We relied on the National Inpatient Sample database (2016-2019). Statistics consisted of trend analyses, multivariable logistic, Poisson, and linear regression models. RESULTS Of 5280 patients, 1876 (36%) versus 3200 (60%) underwent RARC versus ORC. RARC increased from 32% to 41% (estimated annual percentage change [EAPC]: + 8.6%; p = 0.02). Rates of transfusion (8% vs. 16%), intraoperative (2% vs. 3%), wound (6% vs. 10%), and pulmonary (6% vs. 10%) complications were lower in RARC patients (all p < 0.05). Moreover, median length of stay (LOS) was shorter in RARC (6 vs. 7days; p < 0.001). Conversely, median THC (31,486 vs. 27,162$; p < 0.001) were higher in RARC. Multivariable logistic regression-derived odds ratios addressing transfusion (0.49), intraoperative (0.53), wound (0.68), and pulmonary (0.71) complications favored RARC (all p < 0.01). In multivariable Poisson and linear regression models, RARC was associated with shorter LOS (Rate ratio:0.86; p < 0.001), yet higher THC (Coef.:5,859$; p < 0.001). RARC in-hospital mortality was lower (1% vs. 2%; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS RARC complications, LOS, and mortality appear more favorable than ORC, but result in higher THC. The favorable RARC profile contributes to its increasing popularity throughout the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Hoeh
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Rocco S Flammia
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.,Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Lukas Hohenhorst
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.,Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gabriele Sorce
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.,Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Chierigo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.,Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Andrea Panunzio
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.,Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Andreas Becker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
The Effects of Surgical Approaches and Enhanced Recovery Protocols on the Cost Effectiveness of Radical Cystectomy. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12091433. [PMID: 36143218 PMCID: PMC9502617 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Enhanced recovery protocols and robotic approaches to radical cystectomy are known to reduce perioperative complications; however, the most cost-effective strategy is unknown. We aim to assess the cost effectiveness of radical cystectomy with different surgical techniques and perioperative treatment protocols. We performed a meta-analysis of studies comparing open radical cystectomy (ORC), robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) using extracorporeal (ECUD) or intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. Operative time, transfusion, complication, Ileus, length of stay and re-admission rates were extracted. US costs for surgery, treatment, hospitalization and complications were obtained from the literature. Israeli costs were obtained from hospital administrative data. Two cost effectiveness models (US and Israel) were developed. The two most cost-effective strategies in both models were ORC with ERAS and RARC with ICUD and ERAS. RARC with ERAS produced the two most effective strategies with ICUD being dominant over ECUD. All strategies implementing the ERAS protocol were more effective than their parallel non-ERAS strategies. RARC with ICUD and ERAS is cost effective compared to ORC. ERAS protocol improves treatment effectiveness and lowers overall costs. ICUD was shown to be more effective and less costly in comparison to ECUD.
Collapse
|
30
|
Skolarikos A. Re: Effect of Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion vs Open Radical Cystectomy on 90-Day Morbidity and Mortality Among Patients with Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Eur Urol 2022; 82:441-442. [PMID: 35933244 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Skolarikos
- School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Second Department of Urology, Sismanogleio Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Popescu ER, Geantă M, Brand A. Mapping of clinical research on artificial intelligence in the treatment of cancer and the challenges and opportunities underpinning its integration in the European Union health sector. Eur J Public Health 2022; 32:443-449. [PMID: 35238918 PMCID: PMC9159319 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although current efforts are made to diminish the incidence and burden of disease, cancer is still widely identified late at stage. This study aims to conduct a systematic review mapping the existent and emerging clinical research on artificial intelligence (AI) in the treatment of cancer and to underpin its integration challenges and opportunities in the European Union (EU) health sector. METHODS A systematic literature review (SLR) evaluating global clinical trials (CTs; published between 2010 and 2020 or forthcoming) was concluded. Additionally, a horizon scanning (HS) exercise focusing on emerging trends (published between 2017 and 2020) was conducted. RESULTS Forty-four CTs were identified and analyzed. Selected CTs were divided into three research areas: (i) potential of AI combined with imaging techniques, (ii) AI's applicability in robotic surgery interventions and (iii) AI's potential in clinical decision making. Twenty-one studies presented an interventional nature, nine papers were observational and 14 articles did not explicitly mention the type of study performed. The papers presented an increased heterogeneity in sample size, type of tumour, type of study and reporting of results. In addition, a shift in research is observed and only a small fraction of studies were completed in the EU. These findings could be further linked to the current socio-economic, political, scientific, technological and environmental state of the EU in regard to AI innovation. CONCLUSION To overcome the challenges threatening the EU's integration of such technology in the healthcare field, new strategies taking into account the EU's socio-economic and political environment are deemed necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marius Geantă
- Center for Innovation in Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
- KOL Medical Media, Bucharest, Romania
- United Nations University—Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Angela Brand
- United Nations University—Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Public Health Genomics, Manipal School of Life Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
- Dr. TMA Pai Endowment Chair in Public Health Genomics, Manipal School of Life Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wijburg CJ, Hannink G, Michels CT, Weijerman PC, Issa R, Tay A, Decaestecker K, Wiklund P, Hosseini A, Sridhar A, Kelly J, d'Hondt F, Mottrie A, Klaver S, Edeling S, Dell'Oglio P, Montorsi F, Rovers MM, Witjes JA. Learning Curve Analysis for Intracorporeal Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 39:55-61. [PMID: 35528784 PMCID: PMC9068730 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The utilisation of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal reconstruction (iRARC) has increased in recent years. Little is known about the length of the learning curve (LC) for this procedure. Objective To study the length of the LC for iRARC in terms of 90-d major complications (MC90; Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3), 90-d overall complications (OC90, Clavien-Dindo grades 1–5), operating time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), and length of hospital stay (LOS). Design, setting, and participants This was a retrospective analysis of all consecutive iRARC cases from nine European high-volume hospitals with ≥100 cases. All patients had bladder cancer for which iRARC was performed, with an ileal conduit or neobladder as the urinary diversion. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Outcome parameters used as a proxy for LC length were the number of consecutive cases needed to reach a plateau level in two-piece mixed-effects models for MC90, OC90, OT, EBL, and LOS. Results and limitations A total of 2186 patients undergoing iRARC between 2003 and 2018were included. The plateau levels for MC90 and OC90 were reached after 137 cases (95% confidence interval [CI] 80–193) and 97 cases (95% CI 41–154), respectively. The mean MC90 rate at the plateau was 14% (95% CI 7–21%). The plateau level was reached after 75 cases (95% CI 65–86) for OT, 88 cases (95% CI 70–106) for EBL, and 198 cases (95% CI 130–266) for LOS. A major limitation of the study is the difference in the balance of urinary diversion types between centres. Conclusions This multicentre retrospective analysis for the iRARC LC among nine European centres showed that 137 consecutive cases were needed to reach a stable MC90 rate. Patient summary We carried out a multicentre analysis of the surgical learning curve for robot-assisted removal of the bladder and bladder reconstruction in patients with bladder cancer. We found that 137 consecutive cases were needed to reach a stable rate of serious complications.
Collapse
|
33
|
Mortezavi A, Crippa A, Kotopouli MI, Akre O, Wiklund P, Hosseini A. Association of Open vs Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Mortality and Perioperative Outcomes Among Patients With Bladder Cancer in Sweden. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e228959. [PMID: 35482309 PMCID: PMC9051984 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Mortality rates resulting from bladder cancer have remained unchanged for more than 30 years. The surgical community has put hope in robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) in an effort to improve surgical outcomes and bladder cancer survival without strong supporting evidence. OBJECTIVE To evaluate perioperative, safety, and survival outcome differences between RARC with ICUD and open radical cystectomy (ORC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This nationwide population-based cohort study used data from the Swedish National Register of Urinary Bladder Cancer and population-based Cause of Death Register, which includes clinical information on tumor characteristics, treatment, and survival and covers approximately 97% of patients with urinary bladder cancer in Sweden. All patients who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in any hospital between January 2011 and December 2018 were included. Follow-up data were collected until December 2019. Data analysis was conducted from June to December 2020. EXPOSURES RARC or ORC. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcomes were all-cause and cancer-specific mortality between RARC and ORC, compared using propensity score matching. Secondary outcomes were differences in perioperative outcomes after the different surgical approaches. RESULTS Throughout the observation period, 889 patients underwent RARC and 2280 patients underwent ORC at 24 Swedish hospitals. The median (IQR) age was 71 (66-76) years and 2386 patients (75.3%) were men. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 47 (28-71) months, the 5-year cancer-specific mortality rates were 30.2% (variance, 1.59) for ORC and 27.6% (variance, 3.12) for RARC, and the overall survival rates were 57.7% (variance, 2.46) for ORC and 61.4% (variance, 5.11) for RARC. In the propensity score-matched analysis, RARC was associated with a lower all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.89; P = .004). Compared with ORC, RARC was associated with a lower estimated blood loss (median [IQR] 150 [100-300] mL vs 700 [400-1300] mL; P < .001), intraoperative transfusion rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.05; 95% CI, 0.03-0.08; P < .001), and shorter length of stay (median [IQR], 9 [6-13] days vs 13 [10-17] days; P < .001), and with a higher lymph node yield (median [IQR], 20 [15-27] lymph nodes vs 14 [8-24] lymph nodes; P < .001) and 90-day rehospitalization rate (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.02-1.60; P = .03). The RARC group, compared with the ORC group had lower risk of Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher complications (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.87; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that compared with ORC, RARC with ICUD was associated with a lower overall mortality rate, fewer high-grade complications, and more favorable perioperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashkan Mortezavi
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alessio Crippa
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria Ioanna Kotopouli
- Division of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden
| | - Olof Akre
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Surgery, Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Surgery, Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Abolfazl Hosseini
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Surgery, Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Influence of steep Trendelenburg position on postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg 2021; 16:1233-1247. [PMID: 34972981 PMCID: PMC9606098 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01361-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Intraoperative physiologic changes related to the steep Trendelenburg position have been investigated with the widespread adoption of robot-assisted pelvic surgery (RAPS). However, the impact of the steep Trendelenburg position on postoperative complications remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare RAPS to laparoscopic/open pelvic surgery with regards to the rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE), cardiac, and cerebrovascular complications. Meta-regression was performed to evaluate the influence of confounding risk factors. Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 47 non-randomized controlled studies (NRSs), with a total of 380,125 patients, were included. Although RAPS was associated with a decreased risk of VTE and cardiac complications compared to laparoscopic/open pelvic surgery in NRSs [risk ratio (RR), 0.59; 95% CI 0.51–0.72, p < 0.001 and RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.58–1.50, p = 0.78, respectively], these differences were not confirmed in RCTs (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.52–1.62, p = 0.77 and RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.58–1.50, p = 0.78, respectively). In subgroup analyses of laparoscopic surgery, there was no significant difference in the risk of VTE and cardiac complications in both RCTs and NRSs. In the meta-regression, none of the risk factors were found to be associated with heterogeneity. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in cerebrovascular complications between RAPS and laparoscopic/open pelvic surgery. Our meta-analysis suggests that the steep Trendelenburg position does not seem to affect postoperative complications and, therefore, can be considered safe with regard to the risk of VTE, cardiac, and cerebrovascular complications. However, proper individualized preventive measures should still be implemented during all surgeries including RAPS to warrant patient safety.
Collapse
|
35
|
Tuo Z, Zhang Y, Wang J, Zhou H, Lu Y, Wang X, Yang C, Yu D, Bi L. Three-port approach vs standard laparoscopic radical cystectomy with an ileal conduit: a single-centre retrospective study. BMC Urol 2021; 21:159. [PMID: 34781963 PMCID: PMC8591944 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-021-00920-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the three-port approach and conventional five-port laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) with an ileal conduit. METHODS Eighty-four patients, who were diagnosed with high-risk non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma and underwent LRC with an ileal conduit between January 2018 and April 2020, were retrospectively evaluated. Thirty and fifty-four patients respectively underwent the three-port approach and five-port LRC. Clinical characteristics, pathological data, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up data were analysed. RESULTS There were no differences in perioperatively surgical outcome, including pathology type, prostate adenocarcinoma incidence, tumour staging, and postoperative creatinine levels between the two groups. The operative time (271.3 ± 24.03 vs. 279.57 ± 48.47 min, P = 0.299), estimated blood loss (65 vs. 90 mL, P = 0.352), time to passage of flatus (8 vs. 10 days, P = 0.084), and duration of hospitalisation post-surgery (11 vs. 12 days, P = 0.922) were no clear difference between both groups. Compared with the five-port group, the three-port LRC group was related to lower inpatient costs (12 453 vs. 14 134 $, P = 0.021). Our follow-up results indicated that the rate of postoperative complications, 90-day mortality, and the oncological outcome did not show meaningful differences between these two groups. CONCLUSIONS Three-port LRC with an ileal conduit is technically safe and feasible for the treatment of bladder cancer. On comparing the three-port LRC with the five-port LRC, our technique does not increase the rate of short-term and long-term complications and tumour recurrence, but the treatment costs of the former were reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhouting Tuo
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230032, China
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230032, China
| | - Jinyou Wang
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230032, China
| | - Huan Zhou
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230032, China
| | - Youlu Lu
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230032, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230032, China
| | - Chao Yang
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230032, China
| | - Dexin Yu
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230032, China
| | - Liangkuan Bi
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Maibom SL, Røder MA, Aasvang EK, Rohrsted M, Thind PO, Bagi P, Kistorp T, Poulsen AM, Salling LN, Kehlet H, Brasso K, Joensen UN. Open vs robot-assisted radical cystectomy (BORARC): a double-blinded, randomised feasibility study. BJU Int 2021; 130:102-113. [PMID: 34657367 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine surgical outcomes and feasibility of blinding patients and care providers to the surgical technique of radical cystectomy (RC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Single-centre, parallel-group, double-blinded, randomised feasibility study of open RC (ORC) vs robot-assisted RC with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC) in an 'Enhanced Recovery After Surgery' setup. A total of 50 patients aged ≥18 years with bladder cancer planned for RC with an ileal conduit were included. Patients with previous major abdominal/pelvic surgery, pelvic radiation or anaesthesiological contraindications were excluded. Primary outcomes were proportion of unblinded patients and success of blinding using Bang's Blinding Index. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), complication rates, blood loss, pain, and opioid consumption. RESULTS A total of 26% of the patients were unblinded before discharge. We demonstrated that patients and doctors remained blinded for the allocated treatment, but nurses did not. Blood loss was greater in the ORC group as was operative time in the iRARC group. We found no difference in complication rate, LOS, or use of analgesics. CONCLUSIONS The present study demonstrates that blinding of surgical technique in RC is possible. The results of secondary outcomes are consistent with the findings of previous unblinded randomised controlled trials. Our study highlights that it is possible to perform a blinded phase III study to explore the optimal surgical technique in RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia L Maibom
- Urological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin A Røder
- Urological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Eske K Aasvang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Malene Rohrsted
- Department of Urology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter O Thind
- Department of Urology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Per Bagi
- Department of Urology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Kistorp
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alicia M Poulsen
- Department of Urology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lisbeth N Salling
- Department of Urology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henrik Kehlet
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Section for Surgical Pathophysiology, The Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Klaus Brasso
- Urological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ulla N Joensen
- Urological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Tamhankar AS, Thurtle D, Hampson A, El‐Taji O, Thurairaja R, Kelly JD, Catto JWF, Lane T, Adshead J, Vasdev N. Radical Cystectomy in England from 2013 to 2019 on 12,644 patients: An analysis of national trends and comparison of surgical approaches using Hospital Episode Statistics data. BJUI COMPASS 2021; 2:338-347. [PMID: 35474875 PMCID: PMC8988840 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.79] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction We evaluate the data of 12,644 Radical Cystectomies in England (Open, Robotic and Laparoscopic) with trends in the adaption of techniques and post-operative complications. Methods This analysis utilised national Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) from NHS England. Results There was a statistically significant increase (P < .001) in the number of Robotic assisted radical cystectomies from 10.8% in 2013-2014 and 39.5% in 2018-2019.The average LOS reduced from 12.3 to 10.8 days for RARC from 2013 to 2019 similarly the LOS reduced from 16.2 to 14.3 for ORC. The rate of sepsis (0-90 days) did rise from 5% to 14.5% between 2013-2014 and 2017-2018 for the entire cohort (P < .001). Acute renal failure (ARF) increased over the years from 9.5% to 17% (P < .001). The rate for fever, UTI, critical care activity and ARF were higher for ORC than RARC (P < .001).The comparison of all episodes within 90 days for conduit versus non-conduit diversions showed significantly higher rates of sepsis, infections, UTI and fever in non-conduit group .Overall complications were significantly higher in non-conduit group throughout the duration except was year 2016-17(P < .001).The robotic approach has increased in last 5 years with nearly 40% of the cystectomies now being robotically in 2018-19 from the initial percentage of 10.8% in 2013-14. Conclusion This evaluation of the HES data from NHS England for 12,644 RC confirms an increase in the adoption of Robotic Cystectomy. Our data confirms the need to develop strategies with enhanced recovery protocols and post-operative close monitoring following Radical Cystectomy in order to reduce post-operative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Thurtle
- Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer CentreLister HospitalStevenageUK
| | - Alexander Hampson
- Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer CentreLister HospitalStevenageUK
| | - Omar El‐Taji
- Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer CentreLister HospitalStevenageUK
| | | | - John D. Kelly
- Division of Surgery and Interventional ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Tim Lane
- Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer CentreLister HospitalStevenageUK
| | - James Adshead
- Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer CentreLister HospitalStevenageUK
| | - Nikhil Vasdev
- Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer CentreLister HospitalStevenageUK
- School of Life and Medical SciencesUniversity of HertfordshireHatfieldUK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hinsenveld FJ, Boormans JL, van der Poel HG, van der Schoot DKE, Vis AN, Aben KKH, Arends TJ, Ausems PJ, Baselmans D, Berger C, Berrens A, Bickerstaffe H, Bos SD, Braam M, Buddingh KT, Claus S, Dekker K, van Doeveren T, Einerhand S, Fossion L, van Gennep EJ, van Ginkel N, Palacios LAG, Hermans T, Hobijn MM, van Huystee SH, Jaspers-Valentijn M, Klaver OS, Koldewijn EL, Korsten L, Lenting A, Lentjes KJ, Luiting HB, van der Meer S, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Noordzij MA, Nooter RI, Notenboom C, Oomen R, van Roermund J, de Rooij J, Roshani H, Schrier BP, van der Slot MA, Somford DM, Stelwagen PJ, Stroux A, van der West A, Wijsman BP, Windt W, van Zanten P, van Beek SC. Intermediate-term survival of robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive and high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer in The Netherlands. Urol Oncol 2021; 40:60.e1-60.e9. [PMID: 34303597 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection is the recommended treatment in non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). In randomised trials, robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) showed non-inferior short-term oncological outcomes compared with open radical cystectomy (ORC). Data on intermediate and long-term oncological outcomes of RARC are limited. OBJECTIVE To assess the intermediate-term overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with MIBC and high-risk non-MIBC (NMIBC) who underwent ORC versus RARC in clinical practice. METHODS AND MATERIALS A nationwide retrospective study in 19 Dutch hospitals including patients with MIBC and high-risk NMIBC treated by ORC (n = 1086) or RARC (n = 386) between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2015. Primary and secondary outcome measures were median OS and RFS, respectively. Survival outcomes were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. A multivariable Cox regression model was developed to adjust for possible confounders and to assess prognostic factors for survival including clinical variables, clinical and pathological disease stage, neoadjuvant therapy and surgical margin status. RESULTS The median follow-up was 5.1 years (95% confidence interval ([95%CI] 5.0-5.2). The median OS after ORC was 5.0 years (95%CI 4.3-5.6) versus 5.8 years after RARC (95%CI 5.1-6.5). The median RFS was 3.8 years (95%CI 3.1-4.5) after ORC versus 5.0 years after RARC (95%CI 3.9-6.0). After multivariable adjustment, the hazard ratio for OS was 1.00 (95%CI 0.84-1.20) and for RFS 1.08 (95%CI 0.91-1.27) of ORC versus RARC. Patients who underwent ORC were older, had higher preoperative serum creatinine levels and more advanced clinical and pathological disease stage. CONCLUSION ORC and RARC resulted in similar intermediate-term OS and RFS in a cohort of almost 1500 MIBC and high-risk NMIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florentien J Hinsenveld
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres location Vrije University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - André N Vis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres location Vrije University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katja K H Aben
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - T J Arends
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - P J Ausems
- Department of Urology, HagaZiekenuis, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - D Baselmans
- Department of Urology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Cpam Berger
- Department of Urology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - A Berrens
- Department of Urology, Franciscus Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Bickerstaffe
- Department of Urology, Bravis Hospital, Bergen op Zoom, Roosendaal, The Netherlands
| | - S D Bos
- Department of Urology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - M Braam
- Department of Urology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - K T Buddingh
- Department of Urology, HagaZiekenuis, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - S Claus
- Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - K Dekker
- Department of Urology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - T van Doeveren
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Smh Einerhand
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lmcl Fossion
- Department of Urology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - E J van Gennep
- Department of Urology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - N van Ginkel
- Department of Urology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | | | - Tjn Hermans
- Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - M M Hobijn
- Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - S H van Huystee
- Department of Urology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - M Jaspers-Valentijn
- Department of Urology, Bravis Hospital, Bergen op Zoom, Roosendaal, The Netherlands
| | - O S Klaver
- Department of Urology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E L Koldewijn
- Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - L Korsten
- Department of Urology, Elisabeth TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherland
| | - A Lenting
- Department of Urology, Franciscus Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K J Lentjes
- Department of Urology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H B Luiting
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S van der Meer
- Department of Urology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - J A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres location Vrije University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M A Noordzij
- Department of Urology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - R I Nooter
- Department of Urology, Franciscus Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caw Notenboom
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rja Oomen
- Department of Urology, Elisabeth TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherland
| | - Jgh van Roermund
- Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J de Rooij
- Department of Urology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - H Roshani
- Department of Urology, HagaZiekenuis, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - B P Schrier
- Department of Urology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - M A van der Slot
- Department of Urology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D M Somford
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - P J Stelwagen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres location Vrije University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ama Stroux
- Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A van der West
- Department of Urology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - B P Wijsman
- Department of Urology, Elisabeth TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherland
| | - Wakm Windt
- Department of Urology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - P van Zanten
- Department of Urology, HagaZiekenuis, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Sytse C van Beek
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Patel NH, Miranda G, Cai J, Desai M, Gill I, Aron M. Robotic Radical Cystectomy Outcomes after Intervention for Prostate Cancer. J Endourol 2021; 35:633-638. [PMID: 33267670 DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction and Objectives: We evaluated patients who underwent treatment for prostate cancer and then subsequent robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). Our objective was to understand clinical, pathologic, and survival outcomes in these patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 333 male patients underwent RARC with standard intracorporeal urinary diversion from 2009 to 2019. We evaluated patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy (RP) and either external beam radiation or brachytherapy (XRT) before RARC. These patients were compared with patients who underwent RARC without any prior intervention for or history of prostate cancer (radical cystectomy [RC]). Results: Patients in the RP and XRT groups were found to be older than the RC group (p = 0.0108) and also have a greater Charlson comorbidity index (p < 0.001). There was no difference in estimated blood loss, operative time, and length of stay across all three groups. The RP group had a higher rate of positive margins 31.58% compared with RC and XRT at 8.22% and 10.00%, respectively (p = 0.0036). There was also a higher rate of extravesical disease on final pathology report for the XRT group at 60.00% compared with 37.5% and 36.85% for RC and RP, respectively (p = 0.0056). Overall survival was lowest in the XRT group compared with RP and RC (p > 0.001) with no difference in recurrence-free survival. Conclusion: Patients in the RP group have higher rates of positive margin, whereas patients in the XRT group have higher rates of extravesical disease and overall survival after undergoing a RARC. Careful counseling and attention to these parameters is required in these patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neel H Patel
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Gus Miranda
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jie Cai
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Mihir Desai
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Inderbill Gill
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Monish Aron
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Zennami K, Sumitomo M, Takahara K, Nukaya T, Takenaka M, Fukaya K, Ichino M, Fukami N, Sasaki H, Kusaka M, Shiroki R. Intra-corporeal robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis comparing perioperative and long-term survival outcomes and recurrence patterns. Int J Clin Oncol 2021; 26:1514-1523. [PMID: 34009486 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01939-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns between robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intra-corporeal urinary diversion (iRARC) and open radical cystectomy (ORC). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 177 bladder cancer patients who received iRARC or ORC at Fujita Health University between 2008 and 2020. Our primary endpoint was long-term oncological outcomes. As a secondary endpoint, we examined perioperative outcomes, complications, and recurrence patterns. These outcome measures were compared between the propensity score (PS)-matched cohorts. RESULTS PS-matched analysis resulted in 60 matched pairs from iRARC and ORC groups. The iRARC cohort was associated with significantly longer operative time (p = 0.02), lower estimated blood loss (p < 0.001), lower blood transfusion rate (p < 0.001), shorter length of hospital stay (p < 0.001), fewer overall complications (p = 0.03), and lower rate of postoperative ileus (p = 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference between iRARC and ORC in 5-year RFS (p = 0.46), CSS (p = 0.63), and OS (p = 0.71). RFS and CSS were also comparable, even in locally advanced (≥ cT3) disease. Multivariate analysis identified lymphovascular invasion as a robust predictor of RFS, CSS, and OS. The number of recurrence was similar between the groups, while extra-pelvic lymph nodes were more frequent in iRARC than that in ORC (22.7% vs. 7.7%). CONCLUSIONS iRARC has favorable perioperative outcomes, fewer complications, and comparable long-term survival outcomes, including locally advanced (≥ cT3) disease, compared to that in ORC. Our results need to be validated in prospective randomized clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Zennami
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
| | - Makoto Sumitomo
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Takahara
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| | - Takuhisa Nukaya
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| | - Masashi Takenaka
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| | - Kosuke Fukaya
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| | - Manabu Ichino
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| | - Naohiko Fukami
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University Okazaki Medical Center, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Hitomi Sasaki
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| | - Mamoru Kusaka
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University Okazaki Medical Center, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Shiroki
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Gul ZG, Katims AB, Winoker JS, Wiklund P, Waingankar N, Mehrazin R. Robotic assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy: a review of what we do and don't know. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:2209-2215. [PMID: 34159104 PMCID: PMC8185680 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.11.32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Radical cystectomy (RC) is the gold standard treatment for muscle-invasive and high-risk, noninvasive bladder cancer. Since 2003, robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has been gaining popularity. Metanalyses show that the primary advantage of RARC is less blood loss and the primary advantage of open radical cystectomy (ORC) is shorter operative times. There do not appear to be significant differences in complications, cancer-related outcomes or survival between the two approaches. Cost analyses comparing RARC and ORC are complicated by the often-ill-defined distinction between the cost to the hospital versus the cost to payors. However, it is likely that for both hospitals and payors, RARC is cost effective at high-volume centers. It is feasible that in the future, increased experience with RARC will lead to improved outcomes and justify the use of RARC over ORC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeynep G Gul
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew B Katims
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jared S Winoker
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nikhil Waingankar
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Reza Mehrazin
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Maibom SL, Røder MA, Poulsen AM, Thind PO, Salling ML, Salling LN, Kehlet H, Brasso K, Joensen UN. Morbidity and Days Alive and Out of Hospital Within 90 Days Following Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 28:1-8. [PMID: 34337519 PMCID: PMC8317890 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Morbidity after radical cystectomy (RC) is usually quantified in terms of rates of complications, mortality, reoperations, and readmissions, and length of stay (LOS). The overall burden following RC within the first 90 d following RC may be better described using days alive and out of hospital (DAOH), which is a validated, patient-centred proxy for both morbidity and mortality. Objective To report short-term morbidity, LOS, and DAOH within 90 d after RC and risk factors associated with these parameters. Design setting and participants The study included 729 patients undergoing RC for bladder cancer at a single academic centre from 2009 to 2019. Data were retrieved from national electronic medical charts. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Multivariate analysis was used to investigate variables associated with a major complication, LOS >7 d, and DAOH <80 d. Results and limitations The 90-d complication rate was 80%, including major complications in 37% of cases. Median LOS was 7 d (interquartile range (IQR) 6-9) and median DAOH was 80 d (IQR 71-83) days. Body mass index and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) predicted major complications. CCI predicted LOS >7 d and DAOH <80 d. Conclusions RC was associated with significant short-term morbidity and DAOH was a good marker for cumulative morbidity after RC. We propose that DAOH should be a standard supplement for reporting surgical outcomes following RC for bladder cancer, which may facilitate better comparison of outcomes across treating institutions. Patient summary We studied complications after surgical removal of the bladder for bladder cancer. We assessed a novel patient-centred tool that more accurately describes the total burden of complications after surgery than traditional models. We found that patients with a high body mass index and coexisting chronic diseases had a higher risk of a complicated surgical course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia L Maibom
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin A Røder
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alicia M Poulsen
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter O Thind
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marie L Salling
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lisbeth N Salling
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henrik Kehlet
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Section of Surgical Pathophysiology, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Klaus Brasso
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ulla N Joensen
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Maibom SL, Joensen UN, Poulsen AM, Kehlet H, Brasso K, Røder MA. Short-term morbidity and mortality following radical cystectomy: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e043266. [PMID: 33853799 PMCID: PMC8054090 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study short-term (<90 days) morbidity and mortality following radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer and identify modifiable risk factors associated with these. DESIGN Systematic review. METHODS The systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for relevant papers on 11 June 2019 and rerun on 27 May 2020. Studies reporting complications, reoperations, length of stay and mortality within 90 days were included. Studies were reviewed according to criteria from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and the quality of evidence was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS The search retrieved 1957 articles. Sixty-six articles were included. The quality of evidence was poor to good. Most studies were retrospective, and no randomised clinical trials were identified. Of included studies a median of 6 Martin criteria for reporting complications after surgery were fulfilled. The Clavien-Dindo classification for grading complications was most frequently used. The weighted overall complication rate after RC was 34.9% (range 28.8-68.8) for in-house complications, 39.0% (range 27.3-80.0) for 30-day complications and 58.5% (range 36.1-80.5) for 90-day complications. The most common types of complications reported were gastrointestinal (29.0%) and infectious (26.4%). The weighted mortality rate was 2.4% (range 0.9-4.7) for in-house mortality, 2.1% (0.0-3.7) for 30-day mortality and 4.7% (range 0.0-7.0) for 90-day mortality. Age and comorbidity were identified as the best predictors for complications following RC. CONCLUSION Short-term morbidity and mortality are high following RC. Reporting of complications is heterogeneous and the quality of evidence is generally low. There is a continuous need for randomised studies to address any intervention that can reduce morbidity and mortality following RC. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER 104937.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Liff Maibom
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Unit, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ulla Nordström Joensen
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Unit, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alicia Martin Poulsen
- Department of Urology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henrik Kehlet
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Section for Surgical Pathophysiology, The Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Klaus Brasso
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Unit, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Andreas Røder
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Unit, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Pignot G, Treacy P, Walz J. Growing evidence for benefits of minimally invasive radical cystectomy. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 9:2459-2461. [PMID: 33457215 PMCID: PMC7807372 DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Geraldine Pignot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Patrick Treacy
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wijburg CJ, Michels CTJ, Hannink G, Grutters JPC, Rovers MM, Alfred Witjes J. Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer Patients: A Multicentre Comparative Effectiveness Study. Eur Urol 2021; 79:609-618. [PMID: 33446375 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and urinary diversion in patients with bladder cancer is known for its high risk of complications. Although open radical cystectomy (ORC) is regarded as the standard treatment, robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is increasingly used in practice, despite the fact that high-quality evidence comparing the effectiveness of both techniques is lacking. OBJECTIVE To study the effectiveness of RARC compared with that of ORC, in terms of 90 d complications (Clavien-Dindo), health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and clinical outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A prospective comparative effectiveness study was conducted in 19 Dutch centres, expert in either ORC or RARC. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 30, 90, and 365 d. INTERVENTION Standard ORC or RARC with PLND, using a standardised perioperative protocol. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary outcome was any-grade complications after 90 d. Secondary outcomes included HRQOL, complications (minor, major, 30 d, and 365 d), and clinical outcomes. Differences were calculated as risk differences (RDs) between the groups with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for potential baseline differences by means of propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Between March 2016 and November 2018, 348 patients were included (n = 168 for ORC, n = 180 for RARC). At 90 d, any-grade complication rates were 63% for ORC and 56% for RARC (RD -6.4%, 95% CI -17 to 4.5). Major complication rates were 15% for ORC and 16% for RARC (RD 0.9%, 95% CI -7.0 to 8.8). Total minor complication rates were 57% for ORC and 49% for RARC (RD -7.6%, 95% CI -19 to 3.6). Analyses showed no statistically significant differences in HRQOL between ORC and RARC. Some differences were found in the secondary outcomes in favour of either RARC or ORC. The major drawback inherent to the design comprises residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS This multicentre comparative effectiveness study showed no statistically significant differences between ORC and RARC in terms of complications and HRQOL. PATIENT SUMMARY This multicentre study did not show differences in overall complication rates, health-related quality of life, mortality, and clinical and oncological outcomes between open and robot-assisted radical cystectomy in bladder cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl J Wijburg
- Department of Urology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| | - Charlotte T J Michels
- Department of Urology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke P C Grutters
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maroeska M Rovers
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Teoh JC, Yee CH, Chiu PF, Chan VS, Chan ET, Ng CF, Chan EY. Key steps in performing robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion and the evidence that we have so far. UROLOGICAL SCIENCE 2021. [DOI: 10.4103/uros.uros_108_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
47
|
Dong L, Qin Y, Ya L, Liang C, Tinghui H, Pinlin H, Jin Y, Youliang W, Shu C, Tao W. Bayesian network analysis of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e23645. [PMID: 33350743 PMCID: PMC7769378 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000023645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We have performed the direct and network meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted (RARC) versus laparoscopic (LRC) versus open radical cystectomy (ORC) for bladder cancer (BCa). METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase was performed up until Dec 20, 2019. Outcome indexes include oncologic outcomes (the recurrence rate, mortality), pathologic outcomes (lymph node yield (LNY), positive lymph node (PLN), positive surgical margins (PSM)), perioperative outcomes (operating time (OP), estimated blood loss (EBL), blood transfusion rate, the length of hospital stay (LOS) and the time to regular diet) and postoperative 90-day complications. RESULTS We have analyzed 6 RCTs, 23 prospective studies, and 25 retrospective studies (54 articles: 6382 patients). On one hand, the direct meta-analysis shows RARC is better than LRC or ORC. On the other hand, the clinical effects of the recurrence rate, Morbidity, PSM, LNY, PLN, and postoperative 90-day complications of RARC, LRC and ORC are all no statistical significance by network meta-analysis. Moreover, the probability rank shows that the comprehensive rank of RARC is better than LRC or ORC. The clinical effects of OP, EBL, LOS, blood transfusion rate and the time to regular diet are all statistical significance by network meta-analysis. There are ORC > LRC > RARC in the EBL ranking. Patients with RARC exhibited a decrease of LOS compared to those with LRC or ORC. Patients with RARC exhibited a decrease in blood transfusion rate and the time to regular diet compared to those with ORC. Patients with ORC exhibited an increase of OP compared to those with RARC or LRC. The heterogeneity tests of most studies are < 50%. Most studies have no publication bias and the quality of the selected studies is good. CONCLUSION The direct meta-analysis and network meta-analysis suggest that RARC is better than LRC or ORC according to comprehensive analysis. However, we need a large sample size and more high-quality studies to verify and improve in the further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Dong
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan
| | - Yu Qin
- Department of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu
| | - Lu Ya
- Department of Respiratory, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College
| | - Cao Liang
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan
| | - Hu Tinghui
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan
| | - He Pinlin
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University
| | - Yang Jin
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University
| | - Wang Youliang
- Department of Laboratory, Pengzhou People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Cui Shu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan
| | - Wu Tao
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Comparing open-radical cystectomy and robot-assisted radical cystectomy: current status and analysis of the evidence. Curr Opin Urol 2020; 30:400-406. [PMID: 32235281 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Radical cystectomy is the definitive surgical treatment for aggressive bladder cancer. The robotic platform offers a new approach to radical cystectomy, but the benefits are unclear. This review examines the latest evidence, with a particular focus on developments in the last two years. RECENT FINDINGS Prospective evaluations of open (ORC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) are emerging. The radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer trial reported in 2018 and demonstrated oncological noninferiority for both approaches and marginal shorter length of stays with RARC using an extracorporeal reconstruction. The trial confirmed prospective randomized comparisons are possible, and replicates observations from two earlier, smaller randomised controlled trials with longer follow-up. Although there has been significant traction to the intracorporeal approach to RARC, randomized trial evidence is awaited to show any benefit over ORC. SUMMARY New evidence alludes to the noninferiority of the robotic platform in radical cystectomy in comparison to open surgery. There is minimal evidence of a clinically meaningful benefit. Until this is addressed, ORC remains the gold standard for the definitive surgical management of bladder cancer.
Collapse
|
49
|
Liu YH, Dai HT, Liu CM, Zheng J. Comparative analysis of the clinical effect and safety of Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy + Orthotopic Ileal Neobladder and Open Surgery. Pak J Med Sci 2020; 37:59-64. [PMID: 33437251 PMCID: PMC7794141 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.37.1.2273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To explore the clinical effect and safety of laparoscopic radical cystectomy + orthotopic ileal neobladder and open surgery. Methods The study was conducted at Jingzhou First People's Hospital from January 2017 to July 2018. In this study 87 patients undergoing radical cystectomy + orthotopic ileal neobladder were chosen and classified into an observation group (48 cases) and a control group (39 cases) according to the surgical methods. The observation group underwent laparoscopic surgery, while the control group underwent open surgery. Perioperative period and prognostic conditions were compared in both groups. Results The intraoperative bleeding amount obviously decreased. The recovery time of gastroenteric function and postoperative hospitalization time were significantly shortened. Postoperative pain was significantly alleviated. Compared with the control group, the observation group showed significant differences (P<0.05). The time, amount and difference in pelvic lymph node dissection in both groups were not significantly different (P>0.05). The differences in both groups in terms of the daytime/nighttime urinary continence rate, maximum urinary flow rate, internal bladder pressure, maximum bladder pressure during urination, internal urethral pressure, bladder capacity, and residual urine volume six months after the operation were not statistically significant (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications, including urinary fistula, bleeding, urinary tract infection, pulmonary infection, dysuria, lymphatic leakage, ureterostenosis, or relapse (P>0.05). The ileus incidence rate in the observation group was obviously lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic radical cystectomy + orthotopic ileal neobladder has the characteristics of limited trauma, a minimal amount of bleeding and a fast recovery. The functions of orthotopic neobladders are good, and the occurrence rate of postoperative complications is low. In addition, body immunity is protected. Hence, this procedure deserves to be promoted clinically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Hua Liu
- Yuan-hua Liu, Department of Urology, Jingzhou First People's Hospital, Jingzhou,434000, Hubei, P.R. China
| | - Hai-Tao Dai
- Hai-tao Dai, Department of Urology, Jingzhou First People's Hospital, Jingzhou,434000, Hubei, P.R. China
| | - Chang-Mao Liu
- Chang-mao Liu, Department of Urology, Jingzhou First People's Hospital, Jingzhou,434000, Hubei, P.R. China
| | - Jiang Zheng
- Jiang Zheng, Department of Urology, Jingzhou First People's Hospital, Jingzhou,434000, Hubei, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Cai PY, Khan AI, Shoag JE, Scherr DS. Robotic Radical Cystectomy in the Contemporary Management of Bladder Cancer. Urol Clin North Am 2020; 48:45-50. [PMID: 33218593 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2020.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
"The robotic approach for radical cystectomy has become increasingly adopted by the urologic oncology community, as it has been shown to have equivalent oncologic outcomes with shorter hospital stay and fewer perioperative transfusions. Consensus guidelines from expert surgeons have been published to provide guidance on all aspects of how to implement the robotic approach in the urologic oncology clinic."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Y Cai
- Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, Starr 900, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Aleem I Khan
- Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, Starr 900, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Jonathan E Shoag
- Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, Starr 900, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Douglas S Scherr
- Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, Starr 900, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|