Robotic Level III Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombectomy: Initial Series

Robotic surgical techniques and methods for treating renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus

Renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus (RCC-IVCTT) has a high mortality rate, and surgery is the only promising treatment. Open surgery has been the gold standard treatment for several decades. However, with the development of minimally invasive surgical technologies, the advantages of robotic surgery have gradually emerged. The classic Mayo Clinic Classification system has certain limitations in guiding robotic surgery. Therefore, a new classification system that is compatible with robotic surgery is urgently needed. Advancements in robotic surgery must be systematically summarized and evaluated. Since Abaza's initial report on robotic surgery, the exploration of robotic radical nephrectomy (RRN) with IVC thrombectomy has resulted in numerous related techniques and approaches, including surgical positions and approaches, control of blood vessels, assisted exposure, step-by-step strategy, and preoperative and intraoperative auxiliary technology and equipment. Our team proposed a new tumor thrombus classification system termed the "301 Classification" based on RRN with venous thrombectomy, which matches each level of tumor thrombus with a distinct robotic surgical strategy. With advances in technology and accumulated experience, RRN with IVC thrombectomy holds promise as the preferred surgical option for RCC-IVCTT. Although "301 Classification" can provide objective advantages in robotic surgery, more cases are needed to be optimized for guiding surgery accurately. The overview provided in this paper aims to serve as a reference and inspiration for future research and clinical practice regarding RCC-IVCTT.

Rapidly Progressing Renal Cell Carcinoma With Unexpected Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombus

Introduction

We report here a case of RCC without preoperative tumor thrombus that had progressed to RCC with IVC tumor thrombus.

Case Presentation

A 75-year-old man was referred to our hospital. Contrast-enhanced CT showed a 50-mm mass in the right kidney with an indistinct border, contrast in the early phase and washout in the late phase. RARN was attempted for RCC. Intraoperatively, a tumor thrombus was unexpectedly observed. We converted to open surgery, and the right kidney and tumor thrombus were removed. Postoperative lymphorrhea was observed, but the patient recovered without any problems. Lung and bone metastases subsequently appeared, and the patient died 2 months later.

Conclusions

Surgeons should keep in mind that a tumor thrombus can grow rapidly before performing surgery for renal cell carcinoma.

Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Renal Cell Carcinoma with Intravenous Tumor Thrombus: A Systematic Review of Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Approaches

INTRODUCTION

Locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with intravenous tumor thrombus (IVTT) represents 4-10% of renal tumors. This review assesses the safety and outcomes of minimally invasive techniques, specifically laparoscopic (LAP) and robotic-assisted (RA) methods, for treating RCC with IVTT.

METHODS

A literature search across several databases identified 54 studies (42 case series, 12 cohort studies) for analysis. Perioperative outcomes, including operative time, blood loss, transfusion rates, length of stay, and complications, were compared based on IVTT levels.

RESULTS

LAP and RA techniques were feasible for low-level IVTT, showing similar perioperative results. RA outperformed LAP in high-level IVTT with shorter operative times and lower blood loss and transfusion rates, despite managing more complex cases. RA maintained stable cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and metastasis rates, whereas LAP exhibited higher rates in high-level cases. Both techniques had low local recurrence rates.

CONCLUSION

RA may be a superior option for RCC with IVTT, especially in high-level cases, but the data come mainly from specialized centers, signaling a need for multicenter validation and standardized criteria. Long-term outcomes require further study to assess RA's non-inferiority to LAP.

A Case Series of Six Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma With Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombus Who Underwent Robotic-Assisted Radical Nephrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus occurs in 4%-10% of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cases. Robotic-assisted radical nephrectomy (RARN) with IVC tumor thrombectomy offers a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed six cases of RARN for RCC with IVC thrombus at two institutions between April 2022 and August 2024. For left-sided RCC, the left renal vein was transected using a vascular stapler before IVC thrombectomy, ensuring adequate access for thrombus removal.

RESULTS

Four patients had right-sided RCC, and two had left-sided RCC. The median operative time was 256 min, with a median blood loss of 175 mL. No conversions to open surgery, positive surgical margins, or major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3) were reported. No blood transfusions were required.

CONCLUSION

RARN with IVC thrombectomy resulted in minimal blood loss and no serious complications. Our findings suggest that it is a feasible and safe procedure, even when performed with technical modifications for left-sided RCC.

French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2024-2026: Management of kidney cancer

OBJECTIVE

To update the French recommendations for the management of kidney cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted for the period from 2014 to 2024. The most relevant articles concerning the diagnosis, classification, surgical treatment, medical treatment, and follow-up of kidney cancer were selected and incorporated into the recommendations. The recommendations have been updated specifying the level of evidence (strong or weak).

RESULTS

Kidney cancer following prolonged occupational exposure to trichloroethylene should be considered an occupational disease. The reference examination for the diagnosis and staging of kidney cancer is the contrast-enhanced thoraco-abdominal CT scan. PET scans are not indicated in the staging of kidney cancer. Percutaneous biopsy is recommended in situations where its results will influence therapeutic decisions. It should be used to reduce the number of surgeries for benign tumors, particularly avoiding unnecessary radical nephrectomies. Kidney tumors should be classified according to the pTNM 2017 classification, the WHO 2022 classification, and the ISUP nucleolar grade. Metastatic kidney cancers should be classified according to IMDC criteria. Surveillance of tumors smaller than 2cm should be prioritized and can be offered regardless of patient age. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is the reference surgical treatment for T1 tumors. Ablative therapies and surveillance are options for elderly patients with comorbidities for tumors larger than 2cm. Stereotactic radiotherapy is an option to discuss for treating localized kidney tumors in patients not eligible for other treatments. Radical nephrectomy is the first-line treatment for locally advanced localized cancers. Pembrolizumab is recommended for patients at high risk of recurrence after surgery for localized kidney cancer. In metastatic patients, cytoreductive nephrectomy can be immediate in cases of good prognosis, delayed in cases of intermediate or poor prognosis for patients stabilized by medical treatment, or as "consolidation" in patients with complete or major partial response at metastatic sites after systemic treatment. Surgical or local treatment of metastases can be proposed for single lesions or oligometastases. Recommended first-line drugs for metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma are combinations of axitinib/pembrolizumab, nivolumab/ipilimumab, nivolumab/cabozantinib, and lenvatinib/pembrolizumab. Patients with non-clear cell metastatic kidney cancer should be presented to the CARARE Network and prioritized for inclusion in clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

These updated recommendations are a reference that will enable French and French-speaking practitioners to optimize their management of kidney cancer.

Surgical and Oncological Outcomes of Level III-IV Versus Level I-II Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: A Decennial Experience of a High-Volume European Referral Center

BACKGROUND

In patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) the role of the extent of tumor thrombus into the inferior vena cava (IVC) has never been addressed from a surgical and oncologic standpoint. This study aims to evaluate differences between level III-IV versus level I-II patients concerning peri- and postoperative morbidity, additional treatments and long-term oncological outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Overall, 40 patients with RCC underwent radical nephrectomy (RN) with IVC thrombectomy at a single European institution between 2010 and 2023. Complications were reported according to the European Union (EAU) guidelines recommendations. Spider chart served as graphical depiction of surgical and oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 22 (55%) and 18 (45%) patients harbored level III-IV and I-II IVC thrombus. Level III-IV patients experienced significantly higher rates of intraoperative transfusions (68 vs 39%), but not significantly higher rates of intraoperative complications (32% vs 28%). Level III-IV patients had significantly higher rates of postoperative transfusions (82% vs 33%) and Clavien Dindo ≥3 complications (41% vs 15%). In level III-IV versus level I-II patients, median follow up was 482 and 1070 days, the rate of distant recurrence was 59% and 50%, the rate of systemic progression was 27% and 13%, and the rate of additional treatment/s was 64% and 61%, respectively (all p values > 0.05). Overall survival was 36% in level III-IV patients and 67% in level I-II (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that patients with level III-IV RCC who are candidates for IVC thrombectomy should be counselled about the higher likelihood of postoperative severe adverse events and worse overall survival relative to level I-II counterparts.

Surgical Strategies and Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Vena Cava Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to describe robot-assisted vena cava reconstruction by summarising surgical strategies and perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on all robotic surgeries involving dissection and repair of the inferior vena cava (IVC) at our institution. Patient characteristics, operative reports, and follow-up visits were analysed.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients underwent robot assisted surgery of the vena cava from 2016 to 2023. The median postoperative hospital stay of all patients was 7 days, and the median estimated blood loss (EBL) was 550 mL. The median IVC clamping time was 23 min, and IVC wall invasion was pathologically identified in five cases. No patients had liver or kidney dysfunction at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our initial experiences demonstrate that it is safe and feasible for experienced surgeons to perform robot-assisted vena cava reconstruction in highly selected patients.

Robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy using the novel surgical robot platform, hinotori: Initial experience with two cases

Introduction

A newly developed surgical robot system, hinotori, with various unique advantages has been in clinical use in Japan; however, there have not been any studies of robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy using hinotori.

Case presentation

We describe two male patients aged 67 and 76 years old with right renal cell carcinoma and a level II and I inferior vena cava tumor thrombus, respectively, undergoing robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy using hinotori. Both operations were successfully completed with a purely robotic procedure without any major perioperative complications, resulting in the following findings: time using robotic system, 158 and 156 min; total operative time, 228 and 214 min; estimated blood loss, 535 and 200 mL, respectively.

Conclusion

Based on our first experience, robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy using hinotori may be an effective treatment for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus ≤level II.

A Narrative Review on Robotic Surgery as Treatment for Renal Cell Carcinoma with Inferior Vena Cava Thrombus

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a common diagnosis, of which a notable portion of patients present with an extension into the venous circulation causing an inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus. Venous extension has significant implications for staging and subsequent treatment planning, with recommendations for more aggressive surgical removal, although associated surgical morbidity and mortality is relatively increased. The methods for surgical removal of RCC with IVC thrombus remain complex, particularly surrounding the use of robot-assisted surgery. Robot assistance for radical nephrectomy in this context is recently emerging. Thrombus level has important implications for surgical technique and prognosis. Other preoperative considerations may include location, laterality, size, and wall invasion. The urology literature on treatment of such tumors is largely limited to case series and institutional studies that describe the feasibility of various surgical options for these complex tumors. Further understanding of the outcomes and patient-specific risk factors would shed increased light on the optimal treatment for such cases. This narrative review provides a thorough overview on the previously reported use of robot-assisted nephrectomy in RCC with IVC thrombus to inform further studies which may optimize outcomes and guide shared decision-making.

Robot-assisted radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy: a case report

Background

Recently, robot-assisted surgery has been widely used to treat several urological cancers. Robot-assisted radical nephrectomy (RARN) was approved by the health insurance system in April 2022; however, RARN with inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy (IVCTT) is still challenging. Also, its safety and feasibility have not yet been established owing to lack of literature, especially in Japan.

Case Description

We performed RARN with IVCTT in four patients between April 2022 and March 2023 at Fujita Health University Hospital. To reduce the risk of tumor embolism and major hemorrhage, an "IVC-first, kidney-last" robotic technique was developed. The safety and feasibility of RARN with IVCTT were evaluated by assessing the perioperative outcomes. Three women and one man were enrolled in this study. The median age was 72 years, and the tumor was on the right side in all cases. According to the Mayo Clinic thrombus classification, two patients were classified as level I, and the others were classified as level II. The two patients at level I did not undergo presurgical treatments, whereas the others at level II underwent presurgical treatments, which were combinations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune-checkpoint inhibitors. The median operation and console times were 341 and 247 min, respectively. The median bleeding volume was 577 mL, and no complications beyond grade III of the Clavien-Dindo classification were observed. The median length of postoperative hospital stay was 10 days.

Conclusions

Although the sample size was relatively small, we demonstrated the safety and feasibility of RARN with IVCTT in the Japanese population.

Experiences of robot assisted thrombectomy with 2-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

No consensus has been reached on operative procedures since a limited case series of robot-assisted inferior vena cava thrombectomy (RA-IVCT) and robot-assisted radical nephrectomy (RA-RN) have been described.

METHODS

The clinical data of 21 patients who underwent RA-IVCT and RA-RN were retrieved from the database. Preoperative preparation was used for assessment of the tumour. Surgical procedures were recorded, and operative skills were summarised.

RESULTS

The median IVC clamping time was 23 min, and IVC wall invasion was pathologically found in 2 cases. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 8.4 days and most patients recovered to full ambulation and oral feeding on the fourth day. None of the patients had liver or kidney dysfunction at the last follow-up (median, 24 months).

CONCLUSION

RA-IVCT presents technical challenges to surgeons. IVC control is an important part of the surgical process and different sides require different techniques.

Robot-assisted Surgery in the Field of Urology: The Most Pioneering Approaches 2015-2023

Robot-assisted surgery has emerged as a transformative technology, revolutionizing surgical approaches and techniques that decades ago could barely be imagined. The field of urology has taken charge in pioneering a new era of minimally invasive surgery with the ascent of robotic systems which offer enhanced visualization, precision, dexterity, and enabling surgeons to perform intricate maneuvers with improved accuracy. This has led to improved surgical outcomes, including reduced blood loss, lower complication rates, and faster patient recovery. The aim of our review is to present an evidence-based critical analysis on the most pioneering robotic urologic approaches described over the last eight years (2015-2023).

Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally-invasive surgery for renal cell carcinoma with venous tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative trials

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to conduct a pooled analysis to compare the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally-invasive radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombus (MI-RNTT) with open radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombus (O-RNTT).

METHODS

This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library database) were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published in English up to December 2022. The primary outcomes were perioperative results, complications, and oncologic outcomes. Review Manager 5.4 was used for this analysis.

RESULTS

In total, eight retrospective trials with a total of 563 patients were included. Compared to O-RNTT, MI-RNTT had shorter hospitalization time [weighted mean difference (WMD) -3.58 days, 95% CI: -4.56 to -2.59; P <0.00001), lower volumes of blood loss (WMD -663.32 ml, 95% CI: -822.22 to -504.42; P <0.00001), fewer transfusion rates (OR 0.18, 95% CI: 0.09-0.35; P <0.00001), fewer overall complications (OR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.22-0.49; P <0.00001), and fewer major complications s (OR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.24-1.00; P =0.05). However, operative time, intraoperative complications, mortality rate (intraoperative, within 30 days, and total mortality), overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and cancer-specific survival did not significantly differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

MI-RNTT possesses more benefits than O-RNTT in terms of length of hospital stay, blood loss, and complications and provides comparable mortality rates and oncologic outcomes. However, more comprehensive and rigorous research is warranted to further validate the outcomes, which should include a larger sample size and comprehensive data from high-volume medical centers.

Cephalic inferior vena cava non-clamping technique versus standard procedure for robot-assisted laparoscopic level II-III thrombectomy: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Renal tumour can invade the venous system and ~4-10% patients with renal tumour had venous thrombus. Although the feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic inferior vena cava thrombectomy (RAL-IVCT) in patients with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus has been validated, the wide application is still a challenge due to the complexity of IVC control. The objective was to describe our novel cephalic IVC non-clamping technique and to compare the outcomes versus standard RAL-IVCT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective single-centre cohort containing 30 patients with level II-III IVC thrombus was established since August 2020. Fifteen patients underwent cephalic IVC non-clamping approach and 15 patients received standard RAL-IVCT. The authors decided the surgical technique according to the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart and IVC.

RESULTS

The non-clamping group had less operative time (median 148 versus 185 min, P =0.04), and lower Clavien-grade II complication rate (26.7% versus 80.0%, P =0.003). The median intraoperative blood loss were 400 ml [interquartile range (IQR) 275-615 mL] and 800 ml (IQR 350-1300 ml), respectively ( P =0.05). The most common complication in standard RAL-IVCT group was liver dysfunction. No gas embolism, hypercapnia or tumour thrombus dislodgment occurred in non-clamping group. After a median follow-up of 17.0 months (IQR 13.5-18.5 months) and 15.5 months (IQR 13.0-17.0 months), two patients (16.7%) in the non-clamping group and 3 patients (20.0%) in the standard RAL-IVCT group died (hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.10-3.54, P =0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

The cephalic IVC non-clamping technique can be performed safely with acceptable surgical outcomes and short-term oncologic outcomes in patients with level II-III IVC thrombus. Compared with standard procedure, it had less operative time and lower complication rate.

Renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus: A review of relevant anatomy and surgical techniques for the general urologist

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is estimated to account for 4.1% of all new cancer diagnoses and 2.4% of all cancer deaths in 2020 according to the National Cancer Institute SEER database. This will likely total 73,000 new cases and 15,000 deaths. RCC is one of the most lethal of the common cancers urologists will encounter with a 5-year relative survival of 75.2%. Renal cell carcinoma is one of a small subset of malignancies that are associated with tumor thrombus formation, which is tumor extension into a blood vessel. An estimated 4% to 10% of patients with RCC will have some degree of tumor thrombus extending into the renal vein or inferior vena cava at the time of diagnosis. Tumor thrombi change the staging of RCC and therefore are an important part of initial patient workup. It is known that such tumors are more aggressive with higher Fuhrman grades, N+ or M+ at time of surgery and have higher probability of recurrence with lower cancer-specific survival. Aggressive surgical intervention with radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy can be performed with survival benefits. Classifying the level of the tumor thrombus becomes vitally important in surgical planning as it will dictate the surgical approach. Level 0 thrombi may be amenable to simple renal vein ligation while level 4 can require thoracotomy and possible open-heart surgery with coordination of many surgical teams. Here we will review the anatomy associated with each level of tumor thrombus and attempt to construct an outline for surgical techniques that may be used. We aim to give a concise overview so that general urologists may use it to understand these potentially complicated cases.

Comparative analysis of surgical and oncologic outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy with venous thrombectomy: a propensity-matched cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To provide insight into the surgical and oncological outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy with venous thrombectomy (RALRN-VT, LRN-VT, ORN-VT) in patients with renal tumor and venous thrombus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A propensity-matched retrospective cohort study containing 324 patients with renal tumor and venous thrombus from January 2014 to August 2021 was analyzed. We compared surgical outcomes and we used the Kalan-Meier method to assess the overall survival (OS), tumor-specific survival (TSS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). The Pearson chi-square test and Fisher exact test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, Cox proportional hazards regression model and log-rank test were used.

RESULTS

After matching, baseline characteristics were comparable in the RALRN-VT, LRN-VT and ORN-VT group. The RALRN-VT group had the least operative time (median 134 min vs 289 min vs 330 min, P < 0.001), the least blood loss (median 250 ml vs 500 ml vs 1000 ml, P < 0.001) and the fewest packed red blood cells transfusion (median 400 ml vs 800 ml vs 1200 ml, P < 0.001). The ORN-VT group had the highest complication rate (18.2 vs 22.7 vs 43.2%, P = 0.005), the highest Clavien grade (P = 0.001) and the longest postoperative hospital stay (median 7d vs 8d vs 10d, P < 0.001). No significant difference in OS, TSS and MFS between the minimally invasive procedures (MIP, including RALRN-VT and LRN-VT) group and ORN-VT group was found. The hazard ratio of LRFS for the MIP group was 0.20 (95% CI 0.06-0.70, P = 0.01) compared with ORN-VT group.

CONCLUSIONS

RALRN-VT can result in the best surgical outcomes compared with LRN-VT and ORN-VT. The MIP group had a better LRFS compared with ORN-VT group.

Review of Robotic-Assisted Radical Nephrectomy with Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy in Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent advances in minimally invasive technology have compelled surgeons to perform nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy using robotic assistance. Here, we aim to review the data comparing open versus robot-assisted nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy, as well as review operative robotic techniques for nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the last decade, there have been increasing reports of successful robotic-assisted IVC thrombectomy among skilled robotic surgeons, with case series detailing operative technique, as well as operative and oncologic outcomes for levels I-IV caval thrombus. While there is immense promise in the future of robotic-assisted IVC thrombectomy, further studies with direct comparison to open surgical intervention will be needed to ensure the oncologic principles and outcomes are non-inferior.

Dealing with malignancy involving the inferior vena cava in the 21st century

INTRODUCTION

Malignancies involving the inferior vena cava (IVC) have historically been considered not amendable to surgery. More recently, involvement of the IVC by neoplastic processes in the kidney, liver or in the retroperitoneum can be managed successfully.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

In this systematic review we summarize the current evidence regarding the surgical management of the IVC in cases of involvement in neoplastic processes. Current literature was searched, and studies selected on the base of the PRISMA guidelines. Evidence was synthesized in narrative form due to heterogeneity of studies.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Renal cell carcinoma accounts for the greatest proportion of studied patients and can be managed with partial or complete vascular exclusion of the IVC, thrombectomy and direct closure or patch repair with good oncological prognosis. Hepatic malignancies or metastases may involve the IVC, and the joint expertise of hepatobiliary and vascular surgeons has developed various strategies, according to the location of tumor and the need to perform a complete vascular exclusion above the hepatic veins. In retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, the IVC can be excised en-block to guarantee better oncological margins. Also, in retroperitoneal sarcomas not arising from the IVC a vascular substitution may be required to improve the overall survival by clearing all the neoplastic cells in the retroperitoneum. Leiomyoma can have a challenging presentation with involvement of the IVC requiring either thrombectomy, partial or complete substitution, with good oncological outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary approach with specialist expertise is required when dealing with IVC involvement in surgical oncology. Multiple techniques and strategies are required to deliver the most efficient care and achieve the best possible overall survival. The main aim of these procedures must be the complete clearance of all neoplastic cells and achievement of a safe margin according to the perioperative treatment strategy.

A Decade of Robotic-Assisted Radical Nephrectomy with Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes

PURPOSE

Open radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy (O-CT) is standard management for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus. First reported a decade ago, robotic-assisted radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy (R-CT) is a minimally invasive option for this disease. We aimed to perform a systematic review to assess the safety and feasibility of R-CT in terms of perioperative outcomes and compare the outcomes between R-CT and O-CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PubMed®, Scopus®, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of ScienceTM databases were searched using the free-text and MeSH terms "renal cell carcinoma," "inferior vena cava," "thrombosis" or "thrombus," "robot" and "thrombectomy." Studies reporting perioperative outcomes of R-CT and studies comparing R-CT with O-CT were included. The review was done in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.

RESULTS

The search retrieved 28 articles describing R-CT, including 7 comparative studies. This systematic review included 1,375 patients, out of which 329 patients were in single-arm studies and 1,046 patients were in comparative studies. Of the 329 patients who underwent R-CT, 14.7% were level I, 60.9% level II, 20.4% level III and 2.5% level IV thrombus. Operative time ranged from 150 to 530 minutes; blood transfusion was administered in 38.2% (126). The overall complication rate was 30.3% (99). R-CT, in comparison to O-CT, was associated with a lower blood transfusion rate (18.4% vs 64.3%, p=0.002) and a lower complication rate (14.5% vs 36.7%, p=0.005). Major complication and 30-day mortality rates were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

R-CT has acceptable perioperative outcomes in carefully selected patients. Compared with O-CT, R-CT is associated with a lower blood transfusion rate and fewer overall complications. In experienced hands with carefully selected patients, R-CT is feasible and safe, with acceptable outcomes; however, selection bias limits definitive inference of these results, and optimal patient selection criteria remain to be described.

Radical Nephrectomy in Renal Cell Carcinoma with Venous Tumoral Thrombus: Long-term Outcomes and Overall Survival

Objective To describe the five-year overall survival (OS) and perioperative morbidity of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with venous tumor thrombus (VTT) treated through radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy.

Materials and Methods We evaluated a cohort of 530 patients with a diagnosis of RCC from January 2009 to December 2019, and found VTT in 42 of them; these 42 patients composed the study sample. The patients were stratified according to the Neves Thrombus Classification (NTC). The baseline and perioperative characteristics, as well as the follow-up, were described. The Kaplan-Meier curve and its respective Cox regression were applied to present the 5-year OS and the OS stratified by the NTC.

Results The average age of the sample was of 63.19 ± 10.7 years, and there were no differences regarding gender. In total, VTT was present in 7.9% of the patients. According to the NTC, 30.9% of the cases corresponded to level I, 21.4%, to level II, 26.1%, to level III, and 21.4%, to level IV. The 5-year OS was of 88%. For level-I and level-II patients, the 5-year OS was of 100%, and of only 38% among level-IV patients. Complications, mostly minor, occurred in 57% of the cases.

Conclusions Radical nephrectomy with thrombectomy is a morbid procedure; however, most complications are minor, and the five-year mortality is null for patients in NTC levels I and II, and low for levels III and IV, and it may be even lower in level-III patients when standardizing transesophageal echocardiogram intraoperatively and routinary extracorporeal bypass. Thus, we recommend considering this surgery as the first-line management in patients with RCC and VTT.

Vascular Implications of COVID-19: Role of Radiological Imaging, Artificial Intelligence, and Tissue Characterization: A Special Report

The SARS-CoV-2 virus has caused a pandemic, infecting nearly 80 million people worldwide, with mortality exceeding six million. The average survival span is just 14 days from the time the symptoms become aggressive. The present study delineates the deep-driven vascular damage in the pulmonary, renal, coronary, and carotid vessels due to SARS-CoV-2. This special report addresses an important gap in the literature in understanding (i) the pathophysiology of vascular damage and the role of medical imaging in the visualization of the damage caused by SARS-CoV-2, and (ii) further understanding the severity of COVID-19 using artificial intelligence (AI)-based tissue characterization (TC). PRISMA was used to select 296 studies for AI-based TC. Radiological imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and ultrasound were selected for imaging of the vasculature infected by COVID-19. Four kinds of hypotheses are presented for showing the vascular damage in radiological images due to COVID-19. Three kinds of AI models, namely, machine learning, deep learning, and transfer learning, are used for TC. Further, the study presents recommendations for improving AI-based architectures for vascular studies. We conclude that the process of vascular damage due to COVID-19 has similarities across vessel types, even though it results in multi-organ dysfunction. Although the mortality rate is ~2% of those infected, the long-term effect of COVID-19 needs monitoring to avoid deaths. AI seems to be penetrating the health care industry at warp speed, and we expect to see an emerging role in patient care, reduce the mortality and morbidity rate.

Robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy: Initial experience in Japan

Introduction

Open surgical approach remains the standard treatment for renal cell carcinoma with an inferior vena cava tumor thrombus. In recent years, however, robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy have emerged as minimally invasive alternatives to conventional open surgery.

Case presentation

Here, we describe a 76-year-old female patient with right renal cell carcinoma with a level I inferior vena cava thrombus undergoing robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy, which was successfully completed with a purely robotic procedure, resulting in the following outcomes: console time,167 min; total operative time, 211 min; and estimated blood loss, 150 mL. To our knowledge, this is the first case managed by robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy in Japan.

Conclusion

Based on our experience, it might be worthwhile to consider purely robotic surgery for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma with an inferior vena cava thrombus.

Step-by-step and orderly lowering of the height of inferior vena cava tumor thrombus is the key to robot-assisted thrombectomy for Mayo III/IV tumor thrombus

Background

The surgical management of Mayo III/IV tumor thrombi is difficult and risky, and robotic surgery is even more difficult. The purpose of this study was to introduce the step-by-step and orderly lowering of the height of inferior vena cava tumor thrombus, which was the core technique of robot operation for Mayo III/IV tumor thrombus.

Method

A total of 18 patients were included in this study. The average tumor thrombus height was 2.4 cm above the level of the second porta hepatis (SPH), and 9 patients were prepared for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) before surgery. During the operation, the height of the tumor thrombus was lowered orderly for 2-3 times, and the blood flow blocking method was changed sequentially. The CPB was required when tumor thrombus in the atrium; After the height of the thrombus was lowered to the atrium entrance, CPB was stopped and the blood flow was blocked in the upper- and retro-hepatic inferior vena cava (IVC); After the tumor thrombus continued to descend to the lower part of the SPH, liver blood flow could be restored, and then, the blood flow was simply blocked in the retro-hepatic IVC to complete the removal of the thrombus and the repair or resection of the IVC. Finally, the diseased kidney and renal vein were removed.

Results

All operations were successfully completed, and 2 cases were transferred to laparotomy. Seven cases received CPB, while the other 11 did not. 15 patients underwent two times of the lowering of the tumor thrombus, 2 patients underwent one time and 1 patient underwent three times. The mean liver/IVC dissociation and vascular suspension time was 22.0 min. All patients had less than Clavien-Dindo grade III complications, no serious complications occurred during operation, and no patient died within 90 days.

Conclusions

The step-by-step and orderly decline of tumor thrombus height is the key to the success of robot Mayo III / IV tumor thrombus surgery. This method can shorten FPH and CPB time and improve the success rate of surgery.

Surgical treatment of renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus

PURPOSE

The present report discusses the indications of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in open nephrectomy and surgical outcomes of conventional and minimally invasive surgical techniques for treating advanced renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus.

METHODS

The present study involved a comprehensive retrieval of pertinent literature from the most recent two decades.

RESULTS

Comparisons between radical nephrectomy procedures in terms of open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgeries revealed that open surgery had more blood loss, a longer operation time and higher mortality rates than laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgeries. Furthermore, surgery with CPB was associated with more blood loss than non-CPB surgery. Rates of early and late deaths were much higher in patients with CPB than in those without CPB.

CONCLUSIONS

Different surgical techniques had different indications in terms of levels of inferior vena cava tumor thrombus. The laparoscopic, robotic-assisted, open surgical techniques and CPB with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest were indicated for Levels I, II, III and III-IV inferior vena cava tumor thrombus, respectively. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgeries cause less trauma than open surgery but require more complicated equipments to support the procedure. CPB should be avoided in radical nephrectomy whenever possible. The increased application of laparoscopic and robotic techniques in the future is anticipated.

Robotic Assisted Caval Replacement for Recurrent Renal Cell Carcinoma Invading the wall of the IVC

OBJECTIVE

To describe a case of robotic inferior vena cava resection for an advanced case of renal cell carcinoma with accompanying robotic caval replacement using a synthetic graft.

METHODS

In this report and accompanying video we describe a case of complete caval reconstruction with 3 year follow up. A 49-year-old male who at the age of 40 (9 years ago) had undergone right open partial nephrectomy for a pT1b 4.6 cm Fuhrman Grade 2 clear cell RCC with negative margins was found to have a recurrent mass at 6 years of follow up with suspicion of invasion into duodenum and IVC. For his recurrence, he underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic right radical nephrectomy and IVC resection followed by a placement of a 18mm GORE-TEX® graft anastomosed to the caudal and cephalad edges of the resected cava.

RESULTS

The surgery was successfully completed using robotic assistance with a total operative time of 6 hours and 40 minutes and 900cc blood loss. The patient experienced no intraoperative or perioperative complications and was discharged home on postoperative day #2. At 3 year of follow up there is no evidence of local recurrence. The radiology reports repeatedly commented on vascular structures "within normal limits". The patient had experienced no graft issues at a present follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

This case provides a description of the surgery with video demonstration of technique as well as provides a few technical suggestions that may be useful for those who attempt similar surgery in the future.

Case reports of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy: A retrospective analysis

Renal cell carcinoma is one common type of urologic cancers. It has tendencies to invade into the inferior vena cava (IVC) and usually requires an open surgery procedure. High rates of operative complications and mortality are usually associated with an open surgery procedure. The recently emerged robot-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (RAL-RN) and IVC tumor thrombectomy have shown to reduce operative related complications in patients with renal cell carcinoma.This case series study aimed to summarize technical utilization, perioperative outcomes, and efficacies of RAL-RN and IVC tumor thrombectomy in our hospital. A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data from 20 patients who underwent RAL-RN and IVC tumor thrombectomy from January 2017 to December 2019 in our department.Patients had a median age of 59 years (interquartile range [IQR], 46-68). Four patients had renal neoplasm on left side and 16 on right side. Nineteen patients underwent RAL-RN (level 0: n = 2) or RAL-RN with IVC thrombectomy (n = 17) (level I: n = 3; level II: n = 12; and level III: n = 3) and 1 patient was converted into an open surgery. The median operative time was 328 minutes (IQR, 221-453). The estimated median blood loss was 500 mL (IQR, 200-1200). The median size of removed renal carcinoma was 67 cm2 (IQR, 40-91); the length of IVC tumor thrombus was 5 cm (IQR, 3-7). The postsurgery hospital length of stay was 6 days (IQR, 5-7). The complications included intestinal obstruction (n = 1), lymphatic fistula (n = 1), heart failure (n = 1), and low hemoglobin level (n = 1). The outcomes for patients after 16 months (IQR, 11-21) follow-up were tumor-free (n = 10), tumor progression (n = 4), loss of contact (n = 1), and death (n = 5).We concluded that RAL-RN and IVC thrombectomy renders good safety profiles including minimal invasiveness, low estimated median blood loss, short hospitalization, low morbidity, and quick renal function recovery. The long-term efficacy needs a further investigation.

Radical nephrectomy and vena caval thrombectomy with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass and hypothermic circulatory arrest: Experience at a large tertiary institution

Objective:

This study aimed to review the experience at a large regional tertiary centre of open radical nephrectomy (RN) with vena caval thrombectomy with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) for the management of renal masses.

Method:

Data on patients with renal masses who had undergone RN and vena caval thrombectomy with CPB and HCA had been prospectively collected at two centres over a 19-year period (2000–2019). Twenty-three consecutive patients were identified and retrospectively analysed for operative and tumour characteristics and for postoperative outcome. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed to compare patient outcomes based on tumour characteristics.

Results:

Median operating time was 358 minutes (interquartile range (IQR)=94 minutes), median bypass time was 117 minutes (IQR=28.5 minutes) and median circulation arrest time was 25 minutes (IQR=18.5 minutes). The median hospital length of stay was 11 days (IQR=5.3 days). Total complication rate was 52% ( n=12), consisting of four minor and eight major complications (Clavien–Dindo score >IIIa), including one intraoperative death. The overall five-year survival rate was 73% (11/15), with a median follow-up time of 53.1 months. Eleven (48%) patients were surgically cured, with a median follow-up time of 60.1 months (IQR=71.8 months). Disease recurrence was seen in eight (35%) patients, of whom four died. Patients who died survived for a median of 46.5 months. Median survival after the diagnosis of metastatic disease was seven months.

Conclusions:

We report the largest Australian cohort of RN with vena caval thrombectomy with CPB and HCA. We demonstrate outcomes comparable to major overseas centres, with an overall five-year survival rate of 73%. This suggests that even patients with extensive venal caval thrombus from renal masses can experience long-term survival benefit from RN and venal caval thrombectomy.

Level of evidence:

Level 3.

Robotic renal surgery for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus

Surgical management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus is inherently complex, posing challenges for even the most experienced urologists. Until the mid-2000s, nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy was exclusively performed using variations of the open technique initially described decades earlier, but since then several institutions have reported their robotic experiences. Robotic IVC thrombectomy was initially reported for level I and II thrombi, and more recently in higher-lever III thrombi. In general, the robotic approach is associated with less blood loss and shorter hospital stays compared to the open approach, low rates of open conversion in reported cases, relatively low rates of high-grade complications, and favorable overall survival on short-term follow-up in limited cohorts. Operative times are longer, costs are significantly higher, and left-sided tumors always require intraoperative repositioning and usually require preoperative embolization. To date, criteria for patient selection or open conversion have not been defined, and long-term oncologic outcomes are lacking. While the early published robotic experience demonstrates feasibility and safety in carefully selected patients, longer-term follow-up remains necessary. Patient selection, indications for open conversion, logistics of conversion particularly in emergent settings, necessity and safety of preoperative embolization, the value proposition, and long-term oncologic outcomes must all be clearly defined before this approach is widely adopted.

Robotic retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal inferior vena cava thrombectomy: right-sided cases with level I-II tumor thrombus

OBJECTIVES

To compare the perioperative hemodynamic consequences and oncology outcomes of robotic retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal inferior vena cava(IVC) thrombectomy(IVCT) for right renal cell carcinoma(RCC) with IVC tumor thrombus(IVCTT) that located below the first porta hepatis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2018 and June 2019, 35 patients of right RCC with IVCTT that located below the first porta hepatis underwent robotic retroperitoneal IVCT(16 patients) or transperitoneal IVCT(19 patients). We have described the procedures of transperitoneal IVCT earlier. The main procedure of robotic retroperitoneal IVCT include circumferential dissection of the IVC, sequentially clamping subhepatic IVC, the left renal vein and the caudal IVC with vessel loops, IVCT, IVC repair, radical nephrectomy(RN). The following parameters were compared between the two groups: baselines characteristic, perioperative consequences and hemodynamic changes.

RESULTS

Retroperitoneal and transperitoneal cohorts were comparable in terms of IVC thrombus length(3.2 vs 4.0 cm), IVC block time (18 vs 16 min, p=0.64), postoperative hospital stay (6 vs 6 days, p= 0.67), postoperative complications (0 vs 0), and recurrence or metastasis rate(0 vs 0) for patients with similar baseline characteristic. The retroperitoneal cohort tended to less blood loss (160 vs 240ml,p=0.024), shorter operative time(130 vs 145min,p=0.003), lower central venous pressure(p＜0.05) and smaller diameter of IVC (p＜0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic retroperitoneal RN and IVCT is feasible for patients of right RCC with IVCTT located below the first porta hepatis and is superior to transperitoneal IVCT in terms of bleeding control and operation time for skilled surgeons.

Current Trends in Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma with Venous Thrombus Extension

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the evidence regarding the current trends in surgical management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombosis. Recent published series have shown the role of minimally invasive surgery in IVC thrombectomy. This review article evaluates the present RCC with venous extent literature to assess the role of open and minimally invasive surgery in this scenario.

RECENT FINDINGS

Robotic urological surgery has shown to have known benefits in radical prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy, and pyeloplasty. Recent published series showed feasibility of robotic IVC thrombectomy even for level IV cases. With growing number of robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgeries worldwide, there is a current tendency to treat this complex and challenging pathology with a minimally invasive approach, without compromising oncological outcomes.

Robotic renal and adrenal oncologic surgery: A contemporary review

Robot-assisted surgery has evolved over time. Radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy is feasible and safe for level I, II and III thrombus in high volume centers. Though it is feasible for level IV thrombus, this procedure needs a multi-departmental co-operation. However, the safety of robot-assisted procedures in this subset is still unknown. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy has been universally approved and found oncologically safe. Robotic adrenalectomy has been increasingly utilized for select cases, especially in bilateral tumors and for retroperitoneal adrenalectomy.

Minimally invasive radical nephrectomy: a contemporary review

Minimally invasive renal surgery has revolutionized the surgical management of renal cancer since the initial report of laparoscopic nephrectomy in 1991. Laparoscopic nephrectomy became the mainstay of management in surgically resectable renal masses since the 1990s. The growing body of literature supporting nephron-sparing surgery over the last two decades has meant that minimally invasive radical nephrectomy (MI-RN) is now the preferred treatment for renal tumors not amenable to partial nephrectomy. While there is a well-described experience with complex radical nephrectomy using standard laparoscopy, robot-assisted surgery has shortened the learning curve and facilitated greater uptake of minimally invasive surgery in difficult surgical scenarios traditionally performed open surgically. Increased experience and expertise with robot-assisted renal surgery has led to expansion of the indications for MI-RN to include larger masses, locally advanced renal masses invading adjacent tissues or regional hilar/retroperitoneal lymph nodes, cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic disease, and concurrent venous tumor thrombectomy for renal vein or inferior vena cava (IVC) involvement. In this article, we review the various surgical techniques and adjunctive procedures associated with MI-RN.

Surgical Tips for Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to describe the preoperative evaluation, surgical techniques, and postoperative management of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) undergoing radical nephrectomy (RN) and inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombectomy.

RECENT FINDINGS

RN and IVC thrombectomy remains the standard management option in non-metastatic RCC patients with IVC thrombus. A comprehensive preoperative workup, including high-quality imaging, blood works, and appropriate consultations are required for all patients. The aim of the surgery is complete resection of all tumor burden, which requires a skillful surgical team for such a challenging procedure and is inherently associated with a high rate of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Preoperative CT or MRI is essential for surgical planning. The surgical approach is mainly determined by the level of the tumor thrombus. The open approach has been the standard, though minimally invasive and robotic techniques are emerging in selected cases by experienced surgeons.

Complex robotic nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy: an evolving landscape

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Robotic nephrectomy for complex renal masses and in the setting of inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus has been shown to be a well tolerated and reproducible surgical option. Recent developments in such procedures will be discussed as they continue to evolve.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple case series have demonstrated the application of robotic surgery in the management of the most complex renal tumors and for IVC thrombi with acceptable oncologic and perioperative outcomes. Prior to the advent of robotic surgery, massive tumors, contiguous organ invasion, need for lymphadenectomy, and IVC tumor thrombus were thought by many to require open surgery. Since 2011, several studies have reported robotic nephrectomy for complex tumors with recent comparisons of robotic and open approaches finding similar oncologic and survival outcomes but with shorter length of stay (LOS) and less blood loss with robotic surgery.

SUMMARY

Robotic surgery is a feasible and well tolerated alternative to open surgery for the management of complex renal tumors and IVC thrombi. The potential benefits of shorter LOS, less blood loss, and earlier convalescence suggest this approach should continue to be evaluated. Patient selection and surgeon experience are of paramount importance.

Immediate preoperative renal artery embolization in the resection of complex renal tumors (UroCCR-48 Reinbol study)

PURPOSE

We evaluated the feasibility and outcomes of immediate preoperative renal artery embolization (IPRAE) before complex nephrectomy for locally advanced RCC ± inferior vena cava thrombus (IVCT).

METHODS

A comparative retrospective (2007-2017) multicenter study which included 145 patients with locally advanced RCC ± IVCT: 99 radical nephrectomies vs. 46 radical nephrectomies with IPRAE identified in the prospective UroCCR national database (CNIL DR 2013-206; NCT03293563). IPRAE was performed under local anesthesia the day of nephrectomy (< 4 h prior to nephrectomy). The primary endpoint was peroperative blood loss (mL). Secondary outcomes were: tolerance of embolization (pain visual scale), success rate of IPRAE defined by complete devascularization of the kidney, perioperative complications according to Clavien score and postoperative GFR.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of IPRAE and the control groups were similar. Tumor staging was 14% T2b, 41% T3a, 27% T3b, 13% T3c, 6% T4. The success rate of IPRAE was 98%. Median artery embolizated per patient was 2 (Agochukwu and Shuch in World J Urol 32:581-589, 2014; Marshall et al. in J Urol 139:1166-1172, 1988; Yap et al. in BJU Int 110:1283-1288, 2012;Gill et al. in J Urol. 194:929-938, 2015; Wang et al. in Eur Urol 69:1112-1119, 2016). No severe complications occurred after IPRAE. Postembolization syndrome was reported in 7% (Clavien I-II). Mean peroperative blood losses in the IPRAE and control groups were: 726 ± 118 ml and 1083 ± 114 ml (P = 0.03). In a multivariate analysis that included: age, Karnofsky index, IPRAE (yes vs. no), IVCT (yes vs. no), tumor size and synchronous metastasis, no IPRAE and IVCT were significantly associated with increased peroperative bleeding.

CONCLUSION

IPRAE before nephrectomy for locally advanced and/or IVCT tumors was well tolerated, was associated with lower peroperative bleeding and did not increase the incidence or severity of postoperative complications.

A modified sequential vascular control strategy in robot-assisted level III-IV inferior vena cava thrombectomy: initial series mimicking the open 'milking' technique principle

OBJECTIVE

To introduce a modified sequential vascular control strategy, mimicking the open 'milking' technique principle, for the early release of the first porta hepatis (FPH) and to stop cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in level III-IV robot-assisted inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombectomy (RA-IVCTE).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From November 2014 to June 2019, 27 patients with a level III-IV IVC tumour thrombus (IVCTT) underwent RA-IVCTE in our department. The modified sequential control strategy was used in 12 cases. Previously, we released the FPH after the thrombus was resected and the IVC was closed completely, and CPB was stopped at the end of surgery (15 patients). Presently, using our modified strategy, we place another tourniquet inferior to the second porta hepatis (SPH) once the proximal thrombus is removed from the IVC below the SPH. Then, we suture the right atrium and perform early release of the FPH, and stop CPB. Finally, tumour thrombectomy, vascular reconstruction, and radical nephrectomy are performed.

RESULTS

Compared with the previous strategy, the modified steps resulted in a shorter median FPH clamping (19 vs 47 min, P < 0.001) and CPB times (60 vs 87 min, P < 0.05); a lower rate of Grade II-IV perioperative complications (25% vs 60%, P < 0.05); and better postoperative hepatorenal and coagulation function, including better median serum alanine aminotransferase (172.7 vs 465.4 U/L, P < 0.001), aspartate aminotransferase (282.4 vs 759.8 U/L, P < 0.001), creatinine (113.4 vs 295 μmol/L, P < 0.01), blood urea nitrogen (7.3 vs 16.7 mmol/L, P < 0.01), and D-dimer (5.9 vs 20 mg/L, P < 0.001) levels.

CONCLUSION

With the early release of the FPH and stopping CPB, the modified sequential vascular control strategy in level III-IV RA-IVCTE reduced the perioperative risk for selected patients and improved the feasibility and safety of the surgery. We would recommend this approach to other centres that plan to develop robotic surgery for renal cell carcinoma with level III-IV IVCTT in the future.

Initial Series of Robotic Segmental Inferior Vena Cava Resection in Left Renal Cell Carcinoma With Caval Tumor Thrombus

OBJECTIVE

To present our preliminary experience of robotic left radical nephrectomy (LRN) and segmental inferior vena cava (IVC) resection without caval replacement for left renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2017 and 2018, 7 patients underwent segmental IVC resection and LRN robotically. All patients underwent preoperative cavography, demonstrating complete IVC occlusion. Computed tomography-based 3-dimensional reconstruction revealed sufficient collateralization of the IVC and right renal vein (RRV). The cephalic IVC was circumferentially resected and ligated just below the second porta hepatis. The caudal IVC was circumferentially resected above the RRV with preservation of the major collaterals. The RRV was not dissected during the procedure to avoid compromising its neocollaterals. The IVC portion between the RRV and the second porta hepatis was removed en bloc with the tumor thrombus, and the LRN was performed.

RESULTS

All cases were successfully performed by robotic surgery without conversion. Median operative time was 420 minutes. Median intensive care unit stay was 3 days. Four grade Ⅱ complications occurred in 2 patients. One patient had mild LEE postoperatively and recovered without special medication. Median preoperative and 3-6 months follow-up serum creatinine was 118.7 μmol/L and 135.2 μmol/L, respectively. No patient needed dialysis postoperatively. One case occurred disease progression. No patient died during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Robotic segmental IVC resection for left RCC with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus is feasible in well-selected cases. Three-dimensional reconstruction and cavography are helpful in the preoperative evaluation of neocollaterals in patients with suprarenal IVC occlusion.

En bloc retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy for renal cell carcinoma with level 0 to II venous tumor thrombus: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

The surgical treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with venous tumor thrombus (VTT) is challenging. In the current study, the authors have reported their surgical outcomes and experience with en bloc retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombectomy for patients with RCC with level 0 to II VTT.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the clinical records of 78 patients who underwent retroperitoneal LRN with IVC thrombectomy from March 2015 to September 2018 was performed. The surgical procedures included establishing the retroperitoneal space, ligating and severing the renal artery, clamping the renal vein and IVC, incising the IVC, and placing the renal and tumor thrombus en bloc into a retrieval bag.

RESULTS

According to the Mayo classification, the tumor thrombus was level 0, I, and II, respectively, in 28 patients, 27 patients, and 23 patients. The median operative time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay were 256 minutes, 400 mL, and 8 days, respectively. A total of 67 patients were not converted to open surgery. No patient died during surgery, and no tumor embolization occurred. Thirteen patients experienced complications. The pathological reports indicated clear cell RCC in 70 patients and other RCC in 8 patients. The median follow-up was 14.5 months, and 61 patients were alive at the time of last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

En bloc retroperitoneal LRN with IVC thrombectomy is a challenging but feasible procedure for experienced surgeons in patients with RCC with level 0 to II VTT.

Comprehensive managements of metastatic renal tumor with Mayo III inferior vena cava tumor thrombus: a case report

Renal tumor with inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus still remains one of the most medical challenges in urological oncology. Despite numerous researches reporting the surgical experiences and survivals of this kind of patients, there is still lacking a standard recommended therapy right now. We reported a case of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with Mayo III IVC tumor thrombus who underwent robotic-assisted complete removal of the intracaval thrombus and radical left nephrectomy followed by renal arterial chemoembolization and pazopanib administration. It provides a new scheme and mode of diagnosis and treatment for this kind of patients. The patient was a 50-year-old man with left low-back pain for 20 days diagnosed with left renal tumor and Mayo III IVC tumor thrombus at the earliest. Initially, the patient underwent the renal arterial chemoembolization and targeted treatment to inhibit tumor's progression. After a two-year therapy period, the size of renal mass and lung nodules decreased than before, as well as the IVC tumor thrombus dropped to level II. Considering the efficacy of previous treatments, we performed robot-assisted IVC thrombectomy and radical left nephrectomy for this patient. The post-operative pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of tumor thrombus as renal clear cell carcinoma. The patients recovered well after surgery and was followed-up for 36 months during the whole treatment course. This case with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and Mayo III IVC tumor thrombus received the interventional therapy, molecular targeted therapy and robot-assisted surgery successively, and acquired satisfying outcome. Patients with mRCC always suffer shorter overall survivals and aggressive progression compared with those localized tumors, therefore it is essential to formulate rational comprehensive treatment and carry out in time following-up.

Cumulative Sum Analysis of the Operator Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Mayo Clinic Level I-IV Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy Associated with Renal Carcinoma: A Study of 120 Cases at a Single Center

Background

This study aimed to use cumulative sum analysis of the operator learning curve for robot-assisted Mayo Clinic level I–IV inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombectomy associated with renal carcinoma, and describes the development of an optimized operative procedure at a single center.

Material/Methods

A retrospective study included 120 patients with Mayo Clinic level I–IV IVC thrombus who underwent robotic surgery between 2013 and 2018. Points in the learning curve were identified using cumulative sum analysis, and their impact was assessed by multiple regression analysis. Perioperative indicators analyzed included operative time, estimated blood loss, early complications, and the 90-day progression rate.

Results

Cumulative sum analysis identified three phases in the learning curve of robot-assisted IVC thrombectomy. The median operative time decreased from 265 min (range, 212–401 min) to 207 min (range, 146–276 min) (p=0.003), the median estimated blood loss decreased from 775 ml (range, 413–1500 ml) to 300 ml (range, 163–813 ml) (p=0.006), and the early complication rate decreased from 52.5% to 15.0% (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that for an initial 40 cases and a further 80 cases, the learning phase, the affected side, the Mayo Clinic level, and the surgical method were independent factors that affected operative time, estimated blood loss, and the rate of early complications.

Conclusions

Experience from an initial 40 cases and a further 80 cases of Mayo Clinic level I–IV IVC thrombectomy associated with renal carcinoma were found to provide acceptable surgical and clinical outcomes.

Survival benefit with extended lymphadenectomy for advanced renal malignancy: A population-based analysis

Objective

We used population-based data to examine the possible benefit of extended lymphadenectomy for patients with renal malignancy in the setting of more advanced disease.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was utilized to identify non-metastatic, T3-T4 renal cancer patients from 2004–2015 treated with removal of ≥1 lymph node at the time of nephrectomy. Non-parametric bivariate statistics were used to assess associations between covariates of interest and extended lymphadenectomy (≥10 lymph nodes removed). Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) benefit was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis.

Results

Of the 4397 patients identified, 816 (18.6%) underwent extended lymphadenectomy. For patients with T3a disease, 5-year CSS and OS benefit with extended lymphadenectomy did not reach statistical significance (CSS: hazard ratio [HR] 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77–1.24; OS: HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.77–1.20). Conversely, for those with T3b-T3c disease, extended lymphadenectomy led to statistically significant improvements in both 5-year CSS and OS compared to non-extended lymphadenectomy (CSS: HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61–0.99; OS: HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58–0.90). Finally, for those with T4 disease, use of extended lymphadenectomy had OS benefit after 5 years (OS: HR 0.51, HR 0.29–0.90, p = 0.02).

Conclusion

Based on population-level data, extended lymphadenectomy was associated with improved survival in select patients with advanced renal malignancy treated with surgical nephrectomy. Understanding the basis of these real-world findings in the face of conflicting randomized trial results will be key, moving forward.