1
|
Bologna E, Licari LC, Franco A, Ditonno F, Manfredi C, De Nunzio C, Perdona S, Brassetti A, Leonardo C, Coogan CL, Cherullo EE, Autorino R. Characteristics, trends, and management of Penile cancer in the United States: A population-based study. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:334.e11-334.e18. [PMID: 38944595 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Penile cancer (PeCa) is a rare disease. HPV infection, smoking, phimosis, and lichen sclerosus represent well-known associated risk factors. OBJECTIVES Primary aim of our study is to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of PeCa and to outline the adopted diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Secondary aim is to investigate risk factors associated with aggressive disease and to identify the complications arising from its surgical treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis using the PearlDiver™ Mariner database, from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2021, identifying all patients diagnosed with PeCa and PeIN, evaluating comorbidities, risk factors, and social and economic conditions. We evaluated the imaging modalities employed for staging as well as the treatment strategies. Finally, we evaluated the most frequent complications associated with inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND). RESULTS During the study period, 17,494 patients were diagnosed with PeCa and 5,965 with penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PeIN). US was the most frequently utilized imaging modality, followed by PET and PET/CT. Use of CT and MRI was around 5%. Surgical treatment was the predominant strategy, utilized in 31.3% of PeCa and 22.9% of PeIN. Wide Local Excision/Glansectomy emerged as the most common surgical procedures. MLR analysis identified smoking as a risk factor for metastatic PeCa (OR; 95% CI = 1.49; 1.379-1.609), HPV infections were associated with a 35% decrease in risk (OR; 95% CI = 0.65; 0.562-0.744) (all P < 0.001). Lichen sclerosus and phimosis were associated with a doubled risk of demolitive surgery. Approximately 40% of patients experienced complications associated with ILND. CONCLUSION Despite advances in PeCa management, there's no significant move toward more conservative treatments. Surgical treatments are still marked by high rates of complications, potentially affect the sexual and psychosocial health of patients. These issues may foster a tendency toward avoidance behaviors, contributing to a delayed clinical presentation and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenio Bologna
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Leslie Claire Licari
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Celeste Manfredi
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Woman, Unit of Urology, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Cosimo De Nunzio
- Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Sisto Perdona
- Uro-Gynecological Department, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Aldo Brassetti
- Department of Urology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Costantino Leonardo
- Department of Urology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pang KH, Yunis M, Haider A, Freeman A, Hadway P, Nigam R, Rees R, Muneer A, Alnajjar HM. Outcomes of Intraoperative Frozen Section Examination of Surgical Resection Margins of the Penis in Penile Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024:102189. [PMID: 39232874 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2024] [Revised: 08/02/2024] [Accepted: 08/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Frozen section examination (FSE) of the tumor resection margins is important during penile-preserving surgery (PPS) in penile cancer. The margin status will impact on how much penile or urethral tissue is excised. We aim to evaluate the outcomes of intraoperative FSE of resection margins in PPS. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who underwent a FSE of resection margins between 2010 and 2022 was conducted. FSEs were compared with the final histopathological analysis and the Diagnostic Testing Accuracy (DTA): sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated. RESULTS Overall, 137 FSE were performed. The median (IQR) age was 65 (53-75) years. 118 (86.1%) patients had negative FSE margins, 16 (11.7%) had positive FSE margins and 3 (2.2%) had equivocal (atypical cells) results. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of penile FSE were 66.7%, 100%, 100%, 93.2% and 94% respectively. 18 patients underwent further resection in the same episode due to a positive or equivocal FSE and 12 (66.7%) achieved negative margins. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and lack of control arm to compare with. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative FSE performed at our center for the assessment of penile SCC margins is 66.7% sensitive and 100% specific. FSE should be considered in PPS, as it's an essential and a reliable diagnostic tool in minimizing over-treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl H Pang
- Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Aiman Haider
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Paul Hadway
- Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Urology, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK
| | - Raj Nigam
- Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Urology, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Rowland Rees
- Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Asif Muneer
- Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Surgical Biotechnology, University College London, London, UK; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hussain M Alnajjar
- Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zekan D, Praetzel R, Luchey A, Hajiran A. Local Therapy and Reconstruction in Penile Cancer: A Review. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2704. [PMID: 39123432 PMCID: PMC11311999 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16152704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2024] [Revised: 07/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Local therapy for penile cancer provides robust survival and can preserve the penis functionally and cosmetically. Interventions must target the appropriate clinical stage. We reviewed studies regarding the primary therapy in penile cancer, from topical therapy to radical penectomy, and reconstructive techniques. Topical therapy (5-FU or Imiquimod) provides a robust oncologic response in patients with Ta or Tis disease. Multiple laser therapies are available for localized patients and those with low-grade T1 disease. There is a non-trivial risk of progression and nodal metastases in poorly selected patients. Wide local excision provides an oncologically sound option in patient with up to T1 disease; less evidence exists for Mohs microsurgery in the setting of penile cancer. Increasingly aggressive approaches include glansectomy and partial/radical penectomy, which provide 5- and 10-year cancer-specific survival rates of over 80%. Meticulous reconstruction is necessary for the durable function of the remaining penis. Preservation of voiding and sexual function occurs via penile skin grafting, glans resurfacing, creation of a functional penile stump, and phalloplasty with a penile implant. Perineal urethrostomy provides an alternative in pathology demanding extensive partial or radical penectomy, and a durable option for seated voiding. Clinical suspicion and timely diagnosis are paramount in terms of management as less-invasive options for earlier-stage disease develop.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Zekan
- School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA; (A.L.); (A.H.)
| | - Rebecca Praetzel
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA 24502, USA;
| | - Adam Luchey
- School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA; (A.L.); (A.H.)
| | - Ali Hajiran
- School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA; (A.L.); (A.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pekov SI, Bormotov DS, Bocharova SI, Sorokin AA, Derkach MM, Popov IA. Mass spectrometry for neurosurgery: Intraoperative support in decision-making. MASS SPECTROMETRY REVIEWS 2024. [PMID: 38571445 DOI: 10.1002/mas.21883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
Ambient ionization mass spectrometry was proved to be a powerful tool for oncological surgery. Still, it remains a translational technique on the way from laboratory to clinic. Brain surgery is the most sensitive to resection accuracy field since the balance between completeness of resection and minimization of nerve fiber damage determines patient outcome and quality of life. In this review, we summarize efforts made to develop various intraoperative support techniques for oncological neurosurgery and discuss difficulties arising on the way to clinical implementation of mass spectrometry-guided brain surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanislav I Pekov
- Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russian Federation
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russian Federation
- Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk, Russian Federation
| | - Denis S Bormotov
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russian Federation
| | | | - Anatoly A Sorokin
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russian Federation
| | - Maria M Derkach
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russian Federation
| | - Igor A Popov
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russian Federation
- Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk, Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pecoraro A, Elst L, Roussel E, Miletić M, Vanthoor J, De Ridder D, Van Rompuy AS, De Cuyper E, Dumez H, De Meerleer G, de Wever L, Goffin K, Van Poppel H, Joniau S, Albersen M. Impact of the Standardization of Penile Cancer Care on the Quality of Care, Outcomes, and Academic-driven Centralization in a Single eUROGEN Referral Center. Eur Urol Focus 2024; 10:57-65. [PMID: 37537111 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Penile cancer (PeCa) represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge given the low patient volume, which may result in inadequate physician expertise and poor guideline adherence. Since 2015, we have developed a specific care pathway for PeCa in our tertiary referral center. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of a dedicated PeCa care pathway on patient management, the adequacy of pathological reporting, and oncological outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We retrospectively queried our institutional registry (S-66482) to identify patients who were surgically treated for PeCa between January 1989 and April 2022. The patient numbers were evaluated within a broader national context. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We compared patient, surgery, tumor, and pathological data before and after 2015. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare local and regional recurrence rates and cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 313 patients were included, of whom 204 (65.1%) were surgically treated after 2015. The median number of patients treated yearly was significantly higher after 2015 (26 vs 5; p < 0.01). Patients treated after 2015 more frequently had no palpable lymph nodes at diagnosis, despite similar primary tumor stage. After adoption of the PeCa care pathway, organ-sparing surgery (OSS) was more commonly performed (79.9% vs 57.8%; p < 0.01) despite local staging being similar and without observing a significant increase in positive margins. Surgical staging in patients with European Association of Urology intermediate- or high-risk tumors was conducted more frequently after 2015 (90% vs 41%; p < 0.01). Pathology reporting was standardized, and there was more frequent reporting of p16 staining status (81.4% vs 8.3%; p < 0.01), lymphovascular invasion (93.8% vs 44.3%; p < 0.01), and perineural invasion (92.4% vs 44.3%; p < 0.01) following implementation. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of a standardized care pathway for PeCa resulted in higher rates of OSS and pathological nodal staging and more complete pathology reports. Considering that these changes were associated with an increase in the number of patients treated, academic-driven centralization may play a role in optimizing the management of these patients. PATIENT SUMMARY We evaluated the impact of a care pathway for patients with penile cancer on patient management, the completeness of pathology reporting, and cancer control. We found that implementation of this pathway was associated with an increase in the number of patients treated, higher rates of organ-sparing surgery and lymph node staging, and more complete pathology reports. Centralization of care may play a role in optimizing the management of penile cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Pecoraro
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Laura Elst
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eduard Roussel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marija Miletić
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Clinical Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Sisters of Mercy University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Joren Vanthoor
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk De Ridder
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Quality Improvement, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Eline De Cuyper
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Herlinde Dumez
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert De Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Liesbeth de Wever
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karolien Goffin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maarten Albersen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cilio S, Tufano A, Pezone G, Alvino P, Spena G, Pandolfo SD, Del Prete P, Amato C, Damiano R, Salonia A, Autorino R, Izzo A, Passaro F, Perdonà S. Sexual Outcomes after Conservative Management for Patients with Localized Penile Cancer. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:10501-10508. [PMID: 38132399 PMCID: PMC10742874 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30120765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Men with localized invasive penile cancer (PC) can be treated with organ-sparing treatments with different functional and aesthetical outcomes. Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate sexual outcomes in patients with PC confined to the glans that underwent wide local excision (WLE) vs. glansectomy with urethral glanduloplasty. METHODS Complete data from 60 patients with PC were analyzed at our institution from 2017 to 2022. Patients were asked for personal habits and clinical features. PC was assessed with a clinical visit and imaging techniques. At the outpatient follow-up visit or phone call, all patients compiled the Changes in Sexual Function Questionnaire (CSFQ) and the International Index of Erectile Function in its short 5-item form (IIEF-5). Erectile function (EF) impairment was categorized using Cappelleri's criteria. RESULTS Overall, 34 patients with PC confined to the glans (c ≤ T2N0) were included. Of those, 12 underwent WLE and 22 underwent glansectomy with urethral glanduloplasty. Using multivariable logistic regression, glansectomy (OR: 3.49) and diabetes (OR: 2.33) were associated with erectile disfunction (IEEF < 22). Meanwhile, using multivariable linear regression analysis, younger patients (Coeff: -2.41) and those that underwent glansectomy (Coeff: -7.5) had a higher risk of sexual function impairment, according to the CSFQ. CONCLUSIONS Patients with PC ≤ T2N0 that underwent WLE have better outcomes in terms of sexual functioning than the patients who underwent glansectomy and uretheral gladuloplasty. Further research is needed to clarify the outcomes of penile-sparing surgery, to inform patients in pre-surgical counseling more comprehensively, and to meet their post-operative expectations more effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Cilio
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Tufano
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, “Sapienza” Rome University, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Pezone
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Alvino
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluca Spena
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Paola Del Prete
- Scientific Directorate, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS “G. Pascale”, Via M. Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Claudio Amato
- Dipartimento di Chimica e Tecnologia del Farmaco, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Rocco Damiano
- Urology Unit, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Alessandro Izzo
- Uro-Gynecological Department, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS “G. Pascale”, Via M. Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Passaro
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Uro-Gynecological Department, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS “G. Pascale”, Via M. Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Puliyath N, Venugopalan AV, Das Kv S, Parol S. The thermal effect of lasers in urology: a review article. Lasers Med Sci 2023; 39:6. [PMID: 38093121 DOI: 10.1007/s10103-023-03948-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Lasers as a technology have a leading role in the modern urological treatment armamentarium. In this article, the application of lasers in different areas of urology is described. The major uses are in urolithiasis, benign prostatic enlargement (BPE), and management of many urological malignancies and other benign pathologies. Lasers have become an established treatment modality in urolithiasis, an acceptable alternative with the least side effect profile in BPE patients, and a novel and promising therapy in many other fields of Urology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nisanth Puliyath
- Department of Urology & Renal Transplant Surgery, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, India.
| | - A V Venugopalan
- Department of Urology & Renal Transplant Surgery, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, India
| | - Shanmugha Das Kv
- Department of Urology & Renal Transplant Surgery, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, India
| | - Subeesh Parol
- Department of Urology & Renal Transplant Surgery, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Switlyk MD, Hopland A, Reitan E, Sivanesan S, Brennhovd B, Axcrona U, Hole KH. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Penile Cancer: A Pictorial Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5324. [PMID: 38001583 PMCID: PMC10670261 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in assessing penile cancer is not well defined. However, this modality may be successfully applied for preoperative staging and patient selection; postoperative local and regional surveillance; and assessments of treatment response after oncological therapies. Previous studies have been mostly limited to a few small series evaluating the accuracy of MRI for the preoperative staging of penile cancer. This review discusses the principles of non-erectile mpMRI, including functional techniques and their applications in evaluating the male genital region, along with clinical protocols and technical considerations. The latest clinical classifications and guidelines are reviewed, focusing on imaging recommendations and discussing potential gaps and disadvantages. The development of functional MRI techniques and the extraction of quantitative parameters from these sequences enables the noninvasive assessment of phenotypic and genotypic tumor characteristics. The applications of advanced techniques in penile MRI are yet to be defined. There is a need for prospective trials and feasible multicenter trials due to the rarity of the disease, highlighting the importance of minimum technical requirements for MRI protocols, particularly image resolution, and finally determining the role of mpMRI in the assessment of penile cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta D. Switlyk
- Department of Radiology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 Oslo, Norway; (E.R.); (K.H.H.)
| | - Andreas Hopland
- Department of Urology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 Oslo, Norway; (A.H.); (S.S.); (B.B.)
| | - Edmund Reitan
- Department of Radiology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 Oslo, Norway; (E.R.); (K.H.H.)
| | - Shivanthe Sivanesan
- Department of Urology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 Oslo, Norway; (A.H.); (S.S.); (B.B.)
- Institute of Clinical Medicine (KlinMED), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Brennhovd
- Department of Urology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 Oslo, Norway; (A.H.); (S.S.); (B.B.)
| | - Ulrika Axcrona
- Department of Pathology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Knut H. Hole
- Department of Radiology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 Oslo, Norway; (E.R.); (K.H.H.)
- Institute of Clinical Medicine (KlinMED), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gulino G, Distante A, Akhundov A, Bassi PF. Male infertility and urological tumors: Pathogenesis and therapeutical implications. Urologia 2023; 90:622-630. [PMID: 37491831 PMCID: PMC10623618 DOI: 10.1177/03915603221146147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
Most genitourinary tract cancers have a negative impact on male fertility. Although testicular cancers have the worst impact, other tumors such as prostate, bladder, and penis are diagnosed early and treated in relatively younger patients in which couple fertility can be an important concern. The purpose of this review is to highlight both the pathogenetic mechanisms of damage to male fertility in the context of the main urological cancers and the methods of preserving male fertility in an oncological setting, in light of the most recent scientific evidence. A systematic review of available literature was carried out on the main scientific search engines, such as PubMed, Clinicaltrials.Gov, and Google scholar. Three hundred twenty-five relevant articles on this subject were identified, 98 of which were selected being the most relevant to the purpose of this review. There is a strong evidence in literature that all of the genitourinary oncological therapies have a deep negative impact on male fertility: orchiectomy, partial orchiectomy, retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RPLND), radical cystectomy, prostatectomy, penectomy, as well as radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hormonal androgen suppression. Preservation of fertility is possible and includes cryopreservation, hormonal manipulation with GnRH analogs before chemotherapy, androgen replacement. Germ cell auto transplantation is an intriguing strategy with future perspectives. Careful evaluation of male fertility must be a key point before treating genitourinary tumors, taking into account patients' age and couples' perspectives. Informed consent should provide adequate information to the patient about the current state of his fertility and about the balance between risks and benefits in oncological terms. Standard approaches to genitourinary tumors should include a multidisciplinary team with urologists, oncologists, radiotherapists, psycho-sexologists, andrologists, gynecologists, and reproductive endocrinologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Gulino
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - A Distante
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - A Akhundov
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - PF Bassi
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Croghan SM, Cullen IM, Raheem O. Functional outcomes and health-related quality of life following penile cancer surgery: a comprehensive review. Sex Med Rev 2023; 11:441-459. [PMID: 37204120 DOI: 10.1093/sxmrev/qead021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Organ-sparing surgery (OSS) in penile cancer management aspires to maintain organ form and function and preserve health-related quality of life (HRQoL), yet there is a lack of integrated evidence exploring these outcomes. OBJECTIVES The aim sought to review HRQoL, functional, aesthetic, and psychological outcomes following OSS or radical penectomy for penile cancer. METHODS A systematic review of MEDLINE and Cochrane databases included studies reporting on function (sexual, urinary or sensory), genital appearance or HRQoL/psychological well-being following surgical treatment of primary penile cancer. English-language reports (2000-2022), incorporating patient-reported or objective clinical outcome measures, were eligible. Studies of nonsurgical treatment strategies and those in the context of metastatic disease were excluded. Data were compiled and analyzed. RESULTS Twenty-six studies were included. Sexual function was the most studied outcome (754 pooled respondents; 19 studies), most frequently with the original 15-item and abridged 5-item International Index of Erectile Function. Preservation of erectile function following OSS is generally described, with some reduction in overall sexual satisfaction cited. Heterogeneous assessment of voiding function with little preoperative evaluation render interstudy comparison difficult. Most patients appear able to void from a standing position following OSS, with spraying the most common symptom. Maintenance of some sensory function is described with both split-thickness skin grafting and urethral glanduloplasty following radical glansectomy. Limited studies suggest reasonable patient satisfaction with genital cosmesis post-OSS. A negative impact on HRQoL is described in most studies following penile cancer surgery, variably correlated with aggressiveness of penile surgery and addition of lymphadenectomy. Anxiety, depression, and reduced self-esteem have been reported in penile cancer survivors. Relationship well-being varies, with some survivors reporting this to be unchanged. CONCLUSION OSS can preserve elements of sexual, urinary, and sensory function, supporting advantages over radical penectomy for eligible patients. However, a comprehensive understanding remains limited due to small, heterogeneous patient cohorts, challenges in obtaining premorbid data, and variability in outcome measures. Standardization of patient-reported outcomes following OSS is desirable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie M Croghan
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin D02 YN77, Ireland
- Department of Urology, Blackrock Clinic, Dublin A94 E4X7, Ireland
| | - Ivor M Cullen
- Department of Urology, Blackrock Clinic, Dublin A94 E4X7, Ireland
- Department of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin D09V2N0, Ireland
| | - Omer Raheem
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lubner MG, Marko J, Hu R, Kawashima A, Potretzke TA, Frazier AA, Whiting R, Udager AM. Malignant Neoplasms of the Penis with Radiologic and Pathologic Correlation. Radiographics 2023; 43:e230025. [PMID: 37471245 DOI: 10.1148/rg.230025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
Penile malignancy is the third most common male-specific genitourinary malignancy, with squamous cell carcinoma representing the most common histologic type. Squamous cell carcinoma is an epithelial malignancy, frequently developing from the mucosal surfaces of the foreskin, glans, and coronal sulcus and manifesting as a distal infiltrative or ulcerated mass. This typically occurs in men from the 6th to 8th decades of life, and risk factors include human papillomavirus, phimosis, presence of foreskin and poor hygiene, chronic inflammatory conditions such as lichen sclerosus, trauma, and smoking. Primary urethral malignancies including urothelial carcinoma and adenocarcinoma can occur but may lack this distal predilection. Sarcoma, melanoma, leukemia or lymphoma, and metastatic disease are less common sources of penile malignancy. Because of the sensitive nature of penile malignancies, there may be delays in seeking care and in subsequent diagnosis. Recently, the staging guidelines for penile cancer have been updated concurrently with a shift toward more penile-preserving therapies, which have led to a larger role of imaging in diagnosis, staging, and treatment planning for penile malignancies. A variety of imaging modalities may play a role in the identification and staging of penile malignancy, including an increased use of MRI for local staging of tumors, CT and PET/CT for identification of nodal and distant disease, and US for image-guided biopsy. The authors discuss an imaging approach to a spectrum of penile malignancies, with an emphasis on radiologic and pathologic correlation and how knowledge of normal tissue types and anatomic structures can aid in the diagnosis and staging of these tumors. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan G Lubner
- From the Department of Radiology (M.G.L.) and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (R.H.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Sciences Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792; American College of Radiology Institute for Radiologic Pathology, Silver Spring, Md (M.G.L., J.M., A.A.F.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Ariz (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (T.A.P.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.A.F.); Department of Radiology, Moncrief Army Health Clinic, Fort Jackson, Columbia, SC (R.W.); and Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.M.U.)
| | - Jamie Marko
- From the Department of Radiology (M.G.L.) and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (R.H.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Sciences Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792; American College of Radiology Institute for Radiologic Pathology, Silver Spring, Md (M.G.L., J.M., A.A.F.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Ariz (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (T.A.P.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.A.F.); Department of Radiology, Moncrief Army Health Clinic, Fort Jackson, Columbia, SC (R.W.); and Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.M.U.)
| | - Rong Hu
- From the Department of Radiology (M.G.L.) and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (R.H.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Sciences Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792; American College of Radiology Institute for Radiologic Pathology, Silver Spring, Md (M.G.L., J.M., A.A.F.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Ariz (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (T.A.P.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.A.F.); Department of Radiology, Moncrief Army Health Clinic, Fort Jackson, Columbia, SC (R.W.); and Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.M.U.)
| | - Akira Kawashima
- From the Department of Radiology (M.G.L.) and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (R.H.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Sciences Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792; American College of Radiology Institute for Radiologic Pathology, Silver Spring, Md (M.G.L., J.M., A.A.F.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Ariz (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (T.A.P.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.A.F.); Department of Radiology, Moncrief Army Health Clinic, Fort Jackson, Columbia, SC (R.W.); and Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.M.U.)
| | - Theodora A Potretzke
- From the Department of Radiology (M.G.L.) and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (R.H.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Sciences Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792; American College of Radiology Institute for Radiologic Pathology, Silver Spring, Md (M.G.L., J.M., A.A.F.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Ariz (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (T.A.P.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.A.F.); Department of Radiology, Moncrief Army Health Clinic, Fort Jackson, Columbia, SC (R.W.); and Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.M.U.)
| | - Aletta Ann Frazier
- From the Department of Radiology (M.G.L.) and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (R.H.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Sciences Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792; American College of Radiology Institute for Radiologic Pathology, Silver Spring, Md (M.G.L., J.M., A.A.F.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Ariz (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (T.A.P.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.A.F.); Department of Radiology, Moncrief Army Health Clinic, Fort Jackson, Columbia, SC (R.W.); and Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.M.U.)
| | - Ryan Whiting
- From the Department of Radiology (M.G.L.) and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (R.H.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Sciences Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792; American College of Radiology Institute for Radiologic Pathology, Silver Spring, Md (M.G.L., J.M., A.A.F.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Ariz (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (T.A.P.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.A.F.); Department of Radiology, Moncrief Army Health Clinic, Fort Jackson, Columbia, SC (R.W.); and Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.M.U.)
| | - Aaron M Udager
- From the Department of Radiology (M.G.L.) and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (R.H.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Sciences Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792; American College of Radiology Institute for Radiologic Pathology, Silver Spring, Md (M.G.L., J.M., A.A.F.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Ariz (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (T.A.P.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.A.F.); Department of Radiology, Moncrief Army Health Clinic, Fort Jackson, Columbia, SC (R.W.); and Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.M.U.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Scornajenghi CM, Asero V, Bologna E, Basile G, De Angelis M, Moschini M, Del Giudice F. Organ-sparing treatment for T1 and T2 penile cancer: an updated literature review. Curr Opin Urol 2023; Publish Ahead of Print:00042307-990000000-00098. [PMID: 37377374 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Penile cancer (PeCa) is an orphan disease due to its rare incidence in high-income countries. Traditional surgical options for clinical T1-2 disease, including partial and total penectomy, can dramatically affect patient's quality of life and mental health status. In selected patients, organ-sparing surgery (OSS) has the potential to remove the primary tumor with comparable oncologic outcomes while maintaining penile length, sexual and urinary function. In this review, we aim to discuss the indications, advantages, and outcomes of various OSSs currently available for men diagnosed with PeCa seeking an organ-preserving option. RECENT FINDINGS Patient survival largely depends on spotting and treating lymph node metastasis at an early stage. The required surgical and radiotherapy skill sets cannot be expected to be available in all centers. Consequently, patients should be referred to high-volume centers to receive the best available treatments for PeCa. SUMMARY OSS should be used for small and localized PeCa (T1-T2) as an alternative to partial penectomy to preserve patient's quality of life while maintaining sexual and urinary function and penile aesthetics. Overall, there are different techniques that can be used with different response and recurrence rates. In case of tumor recurrence, partial penectomy or radical penectomy is feasible, without impacting overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Maria Scornajenghi
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome
| | - Vincenzo Asero
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome
| | - Eugenio Bologna
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome
| | - Giuseppe Basile
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario De Angelis
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
White J, Mason R, Lawen T, Spooner J, Faria KVM, Rahman F, Ramasamy R. Therapeutic Approaches to Penile Cancer: Standards of Care and Recent Developments. Res Rep Urol 2023; 15:165-174. [PMID: 37288454 PMCID: PMC10243351 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s387228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Penile cancer is a rare malignancy, most commonly diagnosed in older men, associated with poor outcomes, dramatic decline in quality of life and sexual function. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common histopathology of penile cancer, accounting for 95% of all cases. Localized, early-stage penile cancer can be effectively managed through penile-sparing techniques in many cases, though advanced stages of penile cancer carry a poor prognosis. Current innovative treatments are exploring the role of targeted therapy, HPV-directed therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive T-cell therapies in treatment and prevention of relapse of penile cancer. Clinical trials are investigating the potential of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced penile cancer. This review examines the current management of penile cancer and highlights future directions in research and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua White
- Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ross Mason
- Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Tarek Lawen
- Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Jesse Spooner
- Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Kauy V M Faria
- Department of Urology, Institute of Cancer of São Paulo, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Farah Rahman
- Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ranjith Ramasamy
- Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
European Association of Urology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Collaborative Guideline on Penile Cancer: 2023 Update. Eur Urol 2023; 83:548-560. [PMID: 36906413 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Penile cancer is a rare disease but has a significant impact on quality of life. Its incidence is increasing, so it is important to include new and relevant evidence in clinical practice guidelines. OBJECTIVE To provide a collaborative guideline that offers worldwide physician and patient guidance for the management of penile cancer. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Comprehensive literature searches were performed for each section topic. In addition, three systematic reviews were conducted. Levels of evidence were assessed, and a strength rating for each recommendation was assigned according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Penile cancer is a rare disease but its global incidence is increasing. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the main risk factor for penile cancer and pathology should include an assessment of HPV status. The main aim of primary tumour treatment is complete tumour eradication, which has to be balanced against optimal organ preservation without compromising oncological control. Early detection and treatment of lymph node (LN) metastasis is the main determinant of survival. Surgical LN staging with sentinel node biopsy is recommended for patients with a high-risk (≥pT1b) tumour with cN0 status. While (inguinal) LN dissection remains the standard for node-positive disease, multimodal treatment is needed in patients with advanced disease. Owing to a lack of controlled trials and large series, the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation are low in comparison to those for more common diseases. CONCLUSIONS This collaborative penile cancer guideline provides updated information on the diagnosis and treatment of penile cancer for use in clinical practice. Organ-preserving surgery should be offered for treatment of the primary tumour when feasible. Adequate and timely LN management remains a challenge, especially in advanced disease stages. Referral to centres of expertise is recommended. PATIENT SUMMARY Penile cancer is a rare disease that significantly impacts quality of life. While the disease can be cured in most cases without lymph node involvement, management of advanced disease remains challenging. Many unmet needs and unanswered questions remain, underlining the importance of research collaborations and centralisation of penile cancer services.
Collapse
|
15
|
Imam N, Burjonrappa S. Nephron sparing surgery outcomes in Wilms' tumor: is it ready for primetime? Pediatr Surg Int 2022; 39:5. [PMID: 36441254 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-022-05299-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radical nephrectomy is the gold standard in Wilms tumor (WT) treatment and is combined with adjuvant treatment in early stage disease or performed after neo adjuvant therapy in advanced disease. With the development of novel adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapeutic strategies, there is increasing interest in organ preserving procedures in several adult malignancies. Potential long-term complications of living with a single kidney include hyperfiltration syndrome, hypertension, and fluid retention. If NSS (Nephron Sparing Surgery) were to be adopted for the treatment of WT it would be necessary to preserve the gains in Overall Survival (OS) seen with current treatment protocols. With this in mind we undertook a study of outcomes of NSS performed in the USA using a large population-based registry. METHODS We retrospectively queried the SEER Research Plus 18-registries Database 2010-2018 for patients 18 years old or younger with Wilms tumor as determined by ICD-O-3 code 8960. Clinical and demographic data was extracted, and statistical analysis was performed in GraphPad PRISM 9 with bivariate analysis and log-rank analysis to determine survival. RESULTS 1087 patients with Wilms tumor were identified. 73 (6.72%) underwent nephron-sparing surgery. The final cohort consisted of 45 patients (64%) who underwent unilateral NSS and 25 patients (36%) who underwent bilateral NSS. Three were excluded from analysis due to non-renal origin of tumor. Mean age was 3.214 years (std dev 3.807). Demographics were similar between the groups, apart from younger age associated with bilateral tumor (p = 0.0441). No differences were found between radiation use (p = 0.4280), chemotherapy use (p = 0.5479), tumor size (p = 0.2186), positive regional lymph nodes (p = 0.707). Log-rank analysis demonstrated that cancer-specific survival was not significantly different between unilateral and bilateral NSS or radical nephrectomy (p = 0.4539). CONCLUSION NSS may preserve renal function long-term, an important consideration in the pediatric population. Prospective study is necessary to select the appropriate patient subsets who may benefit from NSS in WT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nareena Imam
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Rutgers, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 504 Medical Education Building, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA
| | - Sathyaprasad Burjonrappa
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Rutgers, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 504 Medical Education Building, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Staniorski C, Grajales V, Pekala KR, Zhu X, Morrill C, Toussi A, Rusilko PJ. Buried Penis Reconstruction in the Management of Localized Penile Cancer. Urology 2022; 170:221-225. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
17
|
Patel A, Naghavi AO, Johnstone PA, Spiess PE, Grass GD. Updates in the use of radiotherapy in the management of primary and locally-advanced penile cancer. Asian J Urol 2022; 9:389-406. [PMID: 36381600 PMCID: PMC9643293 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Penile cancer is a rare malignancy in most developed countries, but may represent a significant oncologic challenge in certain African, Asian, and South American regions. Various treatment approaches have been described in penile cancer, including radiotherapy. This review aimed to provide a synopsis of radiotherapy use in penile cancer management and the associated toxicities. In addition, we aimed to discuss palliative radiation for metastases to the penis and provide a brief overview of how tumor biology may assist with treatment decision-making. Methods Peer-reviewed manuscripts related to the treatment of penile cancer with radiotherapy were evaluated by a PubMed search (1960–2021) in order to assess its role in the definitive and adjuvant settings. Selected manuscripts were also evaluated for descriptions of radiation-related toxicity. Results Though surgical resection of the primary is an excellent option for tumor control, select patients may be treated with organ-sparing radiotherapy by either external beam radiation or brachytherapy. Data from randomized controlled trials comparing radiotherapy and surgery are lacking, and thus management is frequently determined by institutional practice patterns and available expertise. Similarly, this lack of clinical trial data leads to divergence in opinion regarding lymph node management. This is further complicated in that many cited studies evaluating lymph node radiotherapy used non-modern radiotherapy delivery techniques. Groin toxicity from either surgery or radiotherapy remains a challenging problem and further risk assessment is needed to guide intensification with multi-modal therapy. Intrinsic differences in tumor biology, based on human papillomavirus infection, may help aid future prognostic and predictive models in patient risk stratification or treatment approach. Conclusion Penile cancer is a rare disease with limited clinical trial data driving the majority of treatment decisions. As a result, the goal of management is to effectively treat the disease while balancing the importance of quality of life through integrated multidisciplinary discussions. More international collaborations and interrogations of penile cancer biology are needed to better understand this disease and improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
18
|
Deng X, Liu Y, Zhan X, Chen T, Jiang M, Jiang X, Chen L, Fu B. Trends in Incidence, Mortality, and Survival of Penile Cancer in the United States: A Population-Based Study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:891623. [PMID: 35785206 PMCID: PMC9248743 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.891623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate the trends in incidence and mortality, and explore any change in survival of penile cancer in the United States. Methods We obtained data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000-2018) utilizing the SEER Stat software. The joinpoint regression was used to analyze the secular trend of incidence and incidence-based mortality (IBM) stratified by age, race, and summary stage. The 5-year relative survival rate was also calculated. Result The age-adjusted rates of penile cancer patients were 0.38 (0.37-0.39) and 0.21 (0.2-0.21) for overall incidence and IBM, respectively. The 5-year relative survival rates were 67.7%, 66.99%, and 65.67% for the calendar periods of 2000-2004, 2005-2009, and 2010-2014, respectively. No significant changes in incidence by era were observed from 2000 to 2018 [annual percentage change (APC) = 0.5%, p = 0.064]. The IBM rate of penile cancer showed an initial significant increase from 2000 to 2002 (APC = 78.6%, 95% CI, -1.7-224.6) followed by a deceleration rate of 4.6% (95% CI, 3.9-5.3) during 2002 to 2018. No significant improvement in 5-year relative survival was observed. The trends by age, race, and summary stage in incidence and IBM were significantly different. Conclusion This study, using population-level data from the SEER database, showed an increasing trend in IBM and no significant improvement in the 5-year relative survival rate. Meanwhile, the incidence of penile cancer exhibited a relatively stable trend during the study period. These results might be due to the lack of significant progress in the treatment and management of penile cancer patients in the United States in recent decades. More efforts, like increasing awareness among the general population and doctors, and centralized management, might be needed in the future to improve the survival of this rare disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinxi Deng
- Department of Urology, Jiu Jiang No.1 People’s Hospital, Jiujiang, China
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Xiangpeng Zhan
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Tao Chen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Ming Jiang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Xinhao Jiang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Luyao Chen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Bin Fu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sakalis VI, Campi R, Barreto L, Garcia-Perdomo HA, Greco I, Zapala Ł, Kailavasan M, Antunes-Lopes T, Marcus JD, Manzie K, Osborne J, Ayres B, Moonen LM, Necchi A, Crook J, Oliveira P, Pagliaro LC, Protzel C, Parnham AS, Albersen M, Pettaway CA, Spiess PE, Tagawa ST, Rumble RB, Brouwer OR. What Is the Most Effective Management of the Primary Tumor in Men with Invasive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Available Treatment Options and Their Outcomes. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 40:58-94. [PMID: 35540709 PMCID: PMC9079254 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Context The primary lesion in penile cancer is managed by surgery or radiation. Surgical options include penile-sparing surgery, amputative surgery, laser excision, and Moh’s micrographic surgery. Radiation is applied as external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy. The treatment aims to completely remove the primary lesion and preserve a sufficient functional penile stump. Objective To assess whether the 5-yr recurrence-free rate and other outcomes, such as sexual function, quality of life, urination, and penile preserving length, vary between various treatment options. Evidence acquisition The EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Cochrane HTA, DARE, HEED), Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for publications from 1990 through May 2021. Randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized comparative studies (NRCSs), and case series (CSs) were included. Evidence synthesis The systematic review included 88 studies, involving 9578 men from 16 NRCSs and 72 CSs. The cumulative mean 5-yr recurrence-free rates were 82.0% for penile-sparing surgery, 83.9% for amputative surgery, 78.6% for brachytherapy, 55.2% for EBRT, 69.4% for lasers, and 88.2% for Moh’s micrographic surgery, as reported from CSs, and 76.7% for penile-sparing surgery and 93.3% for amputative surgery, as reported from NRCSs. Penile surgery affects sexual function, but amputative surgery causes more appearance concerns. After brachytherapy, 25% of patients reported sexual dysfunction. Both penile-sparing surgery and amputative surgery affect all aspects of psychosocial well-being. Conclusions Despite the poor quality of evidence, data suggest that penile-sparing surgery is not inferior to amputative surgery in terms of recurrence rates in selected patients. Based on the available information, however, broadly applicable recommendations cannot be made; appropriate patient selection accounts for the relative success of all the available methods. Patient summary We reviewed the evidence of various techniques to treat penile tumor and assessed their effectiveness in oncologic control and their functional outcomes. Penile-sparing as well as amputative surgery is an effective treatment option, but amputative surgery has a negative impact on sexual function. Penile-sparing surgery and radiotherapy are associated with a higher risk of local recurrence, but preserve sexual function and quality of life better. Laser and Moh’s micrographic surgery could be used for smaller lesions.
Collapse
|
20
|
Yamaguchi T, Sugiyama Y, Tanaka T, Kimura T, Yumura Y, Nakano M, Sugiyama T, Miura N, Goya M, Yamamoto A, Takahashi S, Miura Y, Tsuzuki T, Masumori N, Nishiyama H, Yao M, Koie T, Miyake H, Saika T, Saito S, Akimoto T, Tamada T, Ando Y, Takahashi S, Suzuki T, Hinotsu S, Kamba T. Summary of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Penile Cancer 2021 by the Japanese Urological Association. Int J Urol 2022; 29:780-792. [DOI: 10.1111/iju.14924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Yamaguchi
- Department of Urology Faculty of Life Sciences Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan
| | - Yutaka Sugiyama
- Department of Urology Faculty of Life Sciences Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan
| | - Toshiaki Tanaka
- Department of Urology Sapporo Medical University Sapporo Japan
| | - Tomokazu Kimura
- Department of Urology Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba Tsukuba Japan
| | - Yasushi Yumura
- Reproduction Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan
| | - Masahiro Nakano
- Department of Endourology Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center Gifu Japan
| | - Takayuki Sugiyama
- Department of Urology Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Hamamatsu Japan
| | - Noriyoshi Miura
- Department of Urology Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine Toon Japan
| | - Masato Goya
- Department of Urology Chubu Tokushukai Hospital Kitanakagusuku Japan
| | - Akira Yamamoto
- Department of Radiology Kawasaki Medical School Kurashiki Japan
| | - Satoru Takahashi
- Imaging Research Center Takatsuki General Hospital Takatsuki Japan
| | - Yuji Miura
- Department of Clinical Oncology Toranomon Hospital Tokyo Japan
| | - Toyonori Tsuzuki
- Department of Surgical Pathology Aichi Medical University Hospital Nagakute Japan
| | - Naoya Masumori
- Department of Urology Sapporo Medical University Sapporo Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Nishiyama
- Department of Urology Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba Tsukuba Japan
| | - Masahiro Yao
- Department of Urology Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan
| | - Takuya Koie
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine Gifu University Gifu Japan
| | - Hideaki Miyake
- Department of Urology Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Hamamatsu Japan
| | - Takashi Saika
- Department of Urology Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine Toon Japan
| | - Seiichi Saito
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine University of the Ryukyus Nishihara Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology National Cancer Center Hospital East Kashiwa Japan
| | - Tsutomu Tamada
- Department of Radiology Kawasaki Medical School Kurashiki Japan
| | - Yuichi Ando
- Department of Chemotherapy Nagoya University Hospital Nagoya Japan
| | - Satoru Takahashi
- Department of Urology Nihon University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
| | | | - Shiro Hinotsu
- Department of Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology Sapporo Medical University Sapporo Japan
| | - Tomomi Kamba
- Department of Urology Faculty of Life Sciences Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Inverted urethral flap reconstruction after partial penectomy: Long-term oncological and functional outcomes. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:169.e13-169.e20. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
22
|
Pang KH, Alnajjar HM, Muneer A. Advances in penile-sparing surgical approaches. Asian J Urol 2022; 9:359-373. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
23
|
Falcone M, Preto M, Blecher G, Timpano M, Peretti F, Ferro I, Mangione C, Gontero P. The outcomes of glansectomy and split thickness skin graft reconstruction for invasive penile cancer confined to glans. Urology 2022; 165:250-255. [PMID: 35038491 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report surgical, functional and patient reported outcomes(PROs) of glansectomy(GS) and split-thickness skin graft(STSG) reconstruction in case of locally invasive penile cancer(PC) MATERIALS AND METHODS: : A retrospective analysis from May 2015 to August 2019 was conducted. Inclusion criteria were age<80, a "de novo" malignancy, clinically confined PC (≤T2) with histological confirmation. Complications, recurrence-free(RFS), cancer-free(CFS) and overall survival(OS) were described. Functional outcomes and PRO's were explored using validated questionnaires and "ad hoc" created questionnaire respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis, t-Student and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to estimate survival and postsurgical functional changes respectively. RESULTS 34 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 12(IQR:12-41) months. Positive surgical margins were detected in 2.9% of cases, requiring salvage surgery.Postoperative complications occurred in 29.4%, most commonly being a graft partial loss(17.6%), meatal stenosis(5.8%) or genital wound infection(5.8%). Disease recurrence occurred in 17.6% of cases with a median elapsed time of 16 months(12-41). 12-month RFS was 88.2%, whilst CSS and OS were 91 % at the same time point. Glans sensation was preserved in 91.2% of cases. 88.2% of patients reported to be fully satisfied with the postoperative aesthetic appearance of the penis, 91.2% of patients would recommend the same procedure to someone else. Limitations include retrospective design and the lack of a control group CONCLUSIONS: : GS with STSG minimizes the impact on urinary and sexual functions without jeopardizing oncological control in locally advanced PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Falcone
- Urology Clinic - A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza" - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Italy; Neurourology Clinic - A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza" - Unità Spinale Unipolare, Italy
| | - Mirko Preto
- Urology Clinic - A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza" - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Italy.
| | - Gideon Blecher
- Adjunct Lecturer, Department of Surgery. Monash University. Melbourne (Australia) Wellington Rd, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia; Urology Consultant. Department of Urology, The Alfred Hospital. Melbourne, (Australia) 55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Massimiliano Timpano
- Urology Clinic - A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza" - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Italy
| | - Federica Peretti
- Urology Clinic - A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza" - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Italy
| | - Ilaria Ferro
- Urology Clinic - A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza" - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Italy
| | - Carlotta Mangione
- Urology Clinic - A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza" - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Urology Clinic - A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza" - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Update on penile sparing surgery for penile cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2022; 32:1-7. [PMID: 34750321 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Penile sparing surgery (PSS) is considered the standard of care in penile cancer where appropriate, as preservation of the penis may enable the patient to maintain urinary and sexual function. This review will focus on the latest developments over the past two years. RECENT FINDINGS In this review, we discuss the latest findings in oncological outcomes in PSS, specifically glansectomy. We also introduce technology that may be useful in improving the precision of surgical resection margins in PSS. Finally, we consider the value of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and consider how research in this area can be improved. SUMMARY A recent study has found a correlation between local recurrences (LR) and worse overall and cancer-specific survival in glansectomy, which challenges the belief that LR do not confer worse oncological outcomes. Despite numerous studies evaluating PROMs in penile cancer/PSS, few of these studies provide quality evidence of the 'supportive care needs'. A shift in research is required to identify those men at most risk of distress and to identify ways to support men diagnosed with penile cancer.
Collapse
|
25
|
Fernandez N, Medina M, Wessells H, Perez J. Geometrical Model of Free Skin Graft for the Optimization of Glans Reconstruction after Partial Penectomy. Rev Urol 2021. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction and Objective The management of penile carcinoma is very disabling and mutilating, bur early treatment can be curative. Our group systematically performs oncological management with immediate penile reconstruction and preservation of the organ (partial penectomy, resurfacing, or glansectomy) when feasible. Due to the low incidence of penile carcinoma, it is difficult to achieve experience in penile reconstruction using free grafts in a standardized and reproducible way. Therefore, we herein present the results of the use of an inanimate model to identify the most efficient geometric way to procure and apply a free skin graft to reconstruct the penis.
Methods A preclinical inanimate model of the penis was developed to simulate the surgical reconstruction using a free skin graft. Six different geometric skin-graft models were created and tested. For each of them, we measured graft's surface area as well as the discarded surface after placing the graft on the penis for reconstruction. We also measured the amount of suture lines required for reconstruction. All of these measurements in the six different models were compared.
Results Based on the six models, we identified that the longitude of the graft must measure the same as the maximum perimeter of the glans in order to have a square that enables the complete coverage of the penile defect. The total graft area for the first 4 models was of 40 cm2; for models 5 and 6, it was of 60 cm2. The average discarded area of the graft was of 18.135 cm2 (range: 12 cm2 to 30 cm2). Models 4 years 6 were the ones with the least discarded tissue: 12 cm2. The average amount of suture lines to secure the different model grafts was 7.3 (range: 5 to 12). The models that required the least amount of suture lines were number 1 and 4, with a total of 5 suture lines.
Conclusions The double trapezoid is the most efficient model to reconstruct the glans after organ-sparing oncological management. Our results contribute to establish a more standardized and predictable technique to reconstruct the penis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Fernandez
- Department of Urology, University of Washington. Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Monica Medina
- Division of Urology, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Hunter Wessells
- Department of Urology, University of Washington. Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Jaime Perez
- Division of Urology, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Evaluation and Management of Genitourinary Emergencies in Patients with Cancer. Emerg Med Int 2021; 2021:4511968. [PMID: 34367695 PMCID: PMC8337163 DOI: 10.1155/2021/4511968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Genitourinary emergencies in cancer patients are common. Most cancer treatments are administered in the outpatient setting, and patients with complications often visit the emergency department. However, there is no recent emergency medicine literature review focusing on genitourinary emergencies in the oncologic population. Objective of the review. To increase awareness of common genitourinary emergencies in patients with cancer and enable the prompt recognition and appropriate management of these conditions. Discussion. Genitourinary emergencies in patients with cancer require a multidisciplinary approach to treatment. The most common genitourinary emergencies in patients with cancer are related to infection, obstructive uropathy, hemorrhagic cystitis, and complications associated with urinary diversions. The treatment approach in patients with infections, including viral infections, is similar to those without cancer. Understanding the changes in the anatomy of patients with urinary diversions or fistulas can help with the management of genitourinary emergencies. Conclusions Familiarization with the uniqueness of genitourinary emergencies in patients with cancer is important for emergency physicians.
Collapse
|
27
|
Miyamoto H. Intraoperative pathology consultation during urological surgery: Impact on final margin status and pitfalls of frozen section diagnosis. Pathol Int 2021; 71:567-580. [PMID: 34154033 DOI: 10.1111/pin.13132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Despite recent improvements in diagnostic and surgical techniques in urological oncology, positive resection margin remains a significant concern for surgeons. Meanwhile, intraoperative pathology consultation with frozen section assessment (FSA), particularly for histological diagnosis of the lesions incidentally found or enlarged or sentinel lymph nodes, generally provides critical information which enables immediate decision making for optimal patient care. The intraoperative evaluation of surgical margins is also often requested, although there are some differences in its application between institutions and surgeons. Importantly, it remains to be determined whether intraoperative FSA indeed contributes to reducing the risk of final positive margins and thereby improving long-term patient outcomes. This review summarizes available data indicating the potential impact of FSA at the surgical margins during urological surgeries, including radical or partial cystectomy, partial nephrectomy, radical prostatectomy, penectomy, and orchiectomy. The accuracy and pitfalls of the intraoperative consultation/FSA diagnosis are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Miyamoto
- Departments of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine and Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Anderson S, Breen KJ, Davis NF, Deady S, Sweeney P. Penile cancer in Ireland - A national review. Surgeon 2021; 20:187-193. [PMID: 34034967 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Penile cancer is a rare malignancy, with a reported incidence of 1.5/100,000 males in the Republic of Ireland in 2015. The aim of this study was to perform the first national review and to evaluate clinicopathological factors affecting survival. SUBJECTS AND METHODS All cases of penile cancer in Ireland between 1995 and 2010 were identified through the National Cancer Registry Ireland (NCRI) and analysed to identify factors affecting survival. RESULTS 360 cases of penile cancer were identified, with a mean age at diagnosis of 65.5 years and 88% (n = 315) of cases occurred in those over 50. 91% (n = 328) of cases were squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). The majority of patients were treated surgically (n = 289), with 57% (n = 206) and 24% (n = 87) undergoing partial penectomy and total penectomy respectively. Only 18% (n = 65) received radiotherapy, and 8% (n = 27) received chemotherapy. Mean overall survival (OS) was 113 months, and five year disease specific survival (DSS) was 70% (95%CI: 59.1-77.8%). Age at diagnosis, nodal status and presence of metastatic disease were independent prognostic markers on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION This study represents the first national review of penile cancer in Ireland. The annual incidence and survival rates are comparable to European figures, though superior DSS has previously been reported from our institution, highlighting the role for centralisation of care in Ireland. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2b.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Anderson
- Department of Urology, Mercy University Hospital, Co. Cork, Ireland.
| | - K J Breen
- Department of Urology, Mercy University Hospital, Co. Cork, Ireland
| | - N F Davis
- Department of Urology, Mercy University Hospital, Co. Cork, Ireland
| | - S Deady
- National Cancer Registry of Ireland, Ireland
| | - P Sweeney
- Department of Urology, Mercy University Hospital, Co. Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Preto M, Falcone M, Blecher G, Capece M, Cocci A, Timpano M, Gontero P. Functional and Patient Reported Outcomes Following Total Glans Resurfacing. J Sex Med 2021; 18:1099-1103. [PMID: 37057466 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whilst there is a trend away from aggressive nonorgan sparing surgical treatments for malignant penile disease, a variety of penile preservation options exist but functional outcomes and patient reported outcomes (PROs) in this area are poorly reported to date. AIM The aim of this study is to report functional outcomes and PROs of total glans resurfacing (TGR) in a consecutive series of patients with lichen sclerosis (LS) or localized penile cancer (PC). METHODS From 2004 to 2018 a consecutive series of patients underwent TGR for the management of LS or localized PC in a tertiary referral network. Patient clinical records and operative notes were retrospectively reviewed. Statistical analysis was conducted with Stata 12. OUTCOMES Urinary and sexual outcomes were recorded utilizing both the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) validated questionnaires while PROs were extrapolated from a 5-item "ad hoc" telephone questionnaire administered at 1 year post procedure. RESULTS 37 consecutive patients were enrolled. Histology results demonstrated LS in 16 patients, with the remaining 21 having a diagnosis of PC. The most common reasons for patient presentation were local pain (32.4%), pruritus (37.8%) and bleeding (29.7%). Median follow-up was 22 (IQR 13-77) months. Median age was 62 (IQR 55-68). Neither of the questionnaires assessing urinary and sexual function showed any significant deterioration after surgery. Glans sensitivity was fully maintained in 89.2% of cases. 94.5% of patients reported to be fully satisfied with the aesthetic appearance of the penis and would consider undergoing the same procedure again if necessary. 91.9% of patients would recommend the same procedure to someone else. An overall improvement of the quality of life was reported by 86.4% of patients. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS TGR should be considered a treatment of choice for selected cases of benign or malignant penile lesions STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Our study has some limitations, the first being its retrospective nature. Furthermore, despite being one of the largest series to date, follow-up duration is somewhat limited and a control group is lacking. CONCLUSION TGR represents an excellent surgical option ensuring satisfactory voiding and sexual function, as well as cosmesis for selected cases of penile lesions. M. Preto, M. Falcone, G. Blecher, et al. Functional and Patient Reported Outcomes Following Total Glans Resurfacing. J Sex Med 2021;18:1099-1103.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirko Preto
- Urology Clinic - A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza" - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Italy.
| | - Marco Falcone
- Urology Clinic - A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza" - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Italy; Neurourology Clinic - A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza" - Unità Spinale Unipolare, Italy
| | - Gideon Blecher
- Adjunct Lecturer, Department of Surgery. Monash University. Melbourne (Australia) Wellington Rd, Clayton VIC, Australia; Urology Consultant. Department of Urology, The Alfred Hospital. Melbourne, Melbourne VIC, Australia
| | - Marco Capece
- Urology department, Federico II Hospital, University of Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Cocci
- Urology department, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Timpano
- Urology Clinic - A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza" - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Urology Clinic - A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza" - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Compérat E, Moguelet P, Renard-Penna R, Pradere B. [Penile carcinoma: Practical issues, from the biopsy to surgery]. Ann Pathol 2021; 42:5-14. [PMID: 33820662 DOI: 10.1016/j.annpat.2021.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
The management of a penile carcinoma is complex, a collaboration between radiologist, pathologist and urologist is necessary to obtain a correct staging. In this review we try to demonstrate step by step how to achieve a complete pathology report, how to manage the patient (imaging, biopsy, fresh frozen section and surgery).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Compérat
- Service d'anatomie et cytologie pathologiques, Sorbonne université, hôpital Tenon, Paris, France.
| | - Philippe Moguelet
- Service d'anatomie et cytologie pathologiques, Sorbonne université, hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Raphaele Renard-Penna
- Service de radiologie hôpitaux Tenon et Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, GRC-UPMC n°5 Oncotype-URO, Sorbonne universités, Paris, France
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of urology, comprehensive cancer center, medical university of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ranjan SK, Ghorai RP, Kumar S, Usha P, Panwar VK, Kundal A. Modified "parachute technique" of partial penectomy: A penile preservation surgery for carcinoma penis. J Family Med Prim Care 2021; 10:1054-1056. [PMID: 34041123 PMCID: PMC8138405 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1784_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 10/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Carcinoma penis is a rare malignancy which mostly occurs after the sixth decade of life. It is managed surgically and partial penectomy is the most common procedure done in carcinoma involving the distal penis. Partial penectomy provides the opportunity of preservation of sexual function and enables the patient to micturate in standing position. The conventional technique of neourethra creation in partial penectomy is slitting the urethra dorsally. We propose an alternative approach to neourethra formation. Technique involves ventral slitting of the urethra followed by suturing which begins at the ventral aspect and continued in a parachute fashion toward the dorsal end. This new technique will help primary physicians and surgeons in providing better surgical results in caring for patients with carcinoma penis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satish K Ranjan
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Rudra P Ghorai
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Sunil Kumar
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Preeti Usha
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Vikas K Panwar
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Ashikesh Kundal
- Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Oncologic outcomes and subsequent treatment following organ sparing surgery for penile carcinoma: The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:302.e19-302.e27. [PMID: 33612354 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the oncologic outcomes of organ sparing surgery (OSS) for penile cancer and to determine the management of and risk factors for local recurrence at a tertiary referral center in the United States. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients undergoing OSS from 1996 to 2018 at The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center were identified using a prospective database. Organ sparing procedures included: wide local excision (WLE; including circumcision and glans resurfacing), partial or total glansectomy, laser therapy, or OSS combined with laser ablation (i.e., laser combination). Clinical and pathologic data were collected for descriptive analysis. Recurrences (local and regional) were identified, and the association between overall and local recurrences was determined using Cox proportional hazards regression. Overall and recurrence free survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS A total of 129 patients undergoing OSS were identified with a median follow up interval of 28.0 months. The most common OSS was laser combination (38.8%), and 65.1% of patients presented with pTis or ≤pT1a disease. Twenty (15.5%) recurrences were identified, of which 17 (13.2%) were local and 3 (2.3%) were regional. There were no distant recurrences as the initial site of recurrence. The median time to local recurrence was 20.9 months, and 88.2% were identified within 5 years of surgery. Most (76.5%) local recurrences were successfully treated with further penile preservation without a detrimental impact on overall survival. Patients with pathologic Ta or T1a disease treated with laser or laser combination surgery were more likely to present with local recurrence. CONCLUSION OSS using a variety of techniques to achieve negative surgical margins provides long-term effective local control for localized penile cancer. Most local recurrences can be successfully treated with further penile preserving strategies and long follow-up is essential. Laser therapy or laser combination with OSS should be used with caution in patients with invasive penile cancer.
Collapse
|
33
|
Emmanuel A, Watkin N. Update on organ preserving surgical strategies for penile cancer. Urol Oncol 2021; 40:179-183. [PMID: 33610446 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2020] [Revised: 12/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
With the passage of time, there has been a major paradigm shift in the surgical management of penile cancer from radical to organ preserving penile surgical techniques, with closer surgical margins which offer good oncological, cosmetic and functional outcomes with improved physical and psychosexual well-being. This article aims to provide an update of the current organ preserving surgical strategies for penile cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Emmanuel
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| | - Nick Watkin
- Penile Cancer Centre, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Croghan SM, Compton N, Daniels AE, Fitzgibbon L, Daly PJ, Cullen IM. Phallus Preservation in Penile Cancer Surgery: Patient-reported Aesthetic & Functional Outcomes. Urology 2021; 152:60-66. [PMID: 33600836 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Revised: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic penile reconstruction using standardized questionnaires. Whilst organ-preserving penile cancer surgery has evolved, aiming to preserve genital function, reduce psychological morbidity of radical penectomy, and maximise patient quality of life, few studies have evaluated patients' final perceptions. METHODS Following ethical approval, patients post partial/radical glansectomy with reconstruction 2016-2019, under a single surgeon, were identified. Patients were posted a modified Index of Male Genital Image, the IIEF-5, a customised questionnaire exploring outcomes of urinary and sensory function and the EORTC QLQ-C30 to complete and return. Questionnaires were nonidentifiable, however study ID linked responses to the procedure performed. RESULTS A total of 130 questionnaires were received from 35 patients post penile reconstruction, giving a response rate of 71.4% (35/49). Mean time from surgery was 22 months (4-51), and mean age 61 years (31-79). The majority (82.4%, n = 28) were satisfied or felt neutral about the appearance of their genitalia. High satisfaction with postprocedure urinary function was reported; 85.3% (29/34) could void from a standing position and 79.4% (27/34) reported little or no spraying of urine. Nineteen patients (55.89%) were sexually active, with mean IIEF-5 scores of 14.9 (5-25) (partial glansectomy) and 15.8 (5-25) (radical glansectomy). Mean QoL over past week on 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 scale was 5.88 (3-7). CONCLUSION We report good aesthetic and functional outcomes in a unique study exploring penile cancer surgery patient-reported outcome measures. These results strongly support phallus-preserving phallic-preserving strategies as the standard of care in eligible patients undergoing penile cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie M Croghan
- Department of Urological Surgery & Andrology, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland.
| | - Niall Compton
- Department of Urological Surgery & Andrology, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland
| | - Anne E Daniels
- Department of Urological Surgery & Andrology, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland
| | - Linda Fitzgibbon
- Department of Urological Surgery & Andrology, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland
| | - Pádraig J Daly
- Department of Urological Surgery & Andrology, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland
| | - Ivor M Cullen
- Department of Urological Surgery & Andrology, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Medeiros-Fonseca B, Cubilla A, Brito H, Martins T, Medeiros R, Oliveira P, Gil da Costa RM. Experimental Models for Studying HPV-Positive and HPV-Negative Penile Cancer: New Tools for An Old Disease. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13030460. [PMID: 33530343 PMCID: PMC7865362 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13030460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Penile cancer is an uncommon and understudied malignancy that is most commonly diagnosed in developing countries. Therapeutic advances have been slow, in part due to the lack of in vitro and in vivo models for testing new drugs before performing clinical trials. Recently, this difficulty has been partly overcome and multiple new pre-clinical models were reported. These important developments will help develop new therapies for penile cancer patients. The present review summarizes and discusses the available data concerning the pre-clinical models of penile cancer and their uses. Comparisons are drawn between different models, allowing researchers to choose the most adequate setting for their experiments. The remaining gaps in this array of penile cancer models are also discussed, in particular the lack of models for studying metastatic disease and cell lines representing tumors associated with human papillomavirus. Abstract Penile cancer is an uncommon malignancy that occurs most frequently in developing countries. Two pathways for penile carcinogenesis are currently recognized: one driven by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and another HPV-independent route, associated with chronic inflammation. Progress on the clinical management of this disease has been slow, partly due to the lack of preclinical models for translational research. However, exciting recent developments are changing this landscape, with new in vitro and in vivo models becoming available. These include mouse models for HPV+ and HPV− penile cancer and multiple cell lines representing HPV− lesions. The present review addresses these new advances, summarizing available models, comparing their characteristics and potential uses and discussing areas that require further improvement. Recent breakthroughs achieved using these models are also discussed, particularly those developments pertaining to HPV-driven cancer. Two key aspects that still require improvement are the establishment of cell lines that can represent HPV+ penile carcinomas and the development of mouse models to study metastatic disease. Overall, the growing array of in vitro and in vivo models for penile cancer provides new and useful tools for researchers in the field and is expected to accelerate pre-clinical research on this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatriz Medeiros-Fonseca
- Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, UTAD, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal; (B.M.-F.); (T.M.); (P.O.)
| | - Antonio Cubilla
- Instituto de Patología e Investigación and Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Asunción, Paraguay;
| | - Haissa Brito
- Maranhão Tumour and DNA Biobank (BTMA), Post-graduate Programme in Adult Health (PPGSAD), Federal University of Maranhão (UFMA), São Luís 65080-805, Brazil;
| | - Tânia Martins
- Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, UTAD, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal; (B.M.-F.); (T.M.); (P.O.)
- Veterinary Sciences Department, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, UTAD, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
| | - Rui Medeiros
- Molecular Oncology and Viral Pathology Group, CI-IPOP, IPO-Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal;
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
- Virology Service, IPO-Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
- Biomedicine Research Center (CEBIMED), Faculty of Health Sciences, Fernando Pessoa University, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal
| | - Paula Oliveira
- Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, UTAD, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal; (B.M.-F.); (T.M.); (P.O.)
- Veterinary Sciences Department, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, UTAD, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
| | - Rui M. Gil da Costa
- Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, UTAD, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal; (B.M.-F.); (T.M.); (P.O.)
- Maranhão Tumour and DNA Biobank (BTMA), Post-graduate Programme in Adult Health (PPGSAD), Federal University of Maranhão (UFMA), São Luís 65080-805, Brazil;
- Molecular Oncology and Viral Pathology Group, CI-IPOP, IPO-Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal;
- Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy (LEPABE), Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +55-9132728000
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Coba G, Patel T. Penile Cancer: Managing Sexual Dysfunction and Improving Quality of Life After Therapy. Curr Urol Rep 2021; 22:8. [PMID: 33420966 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-020-01022-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review the most current literature on how the treatment for penile cancer can affect quality of life and to discuss current treatment options to overcome sexual dysfunction and ultimately improve patient wellbeing. RECENT FINDINGS Multiple medical and surgical therapies exist to address the high incidence of sexual dysfunction following penile cancer treatment. Advancements and refinements in the neophalloplasty, penile prosthesis, and penile lengthening procedures have opened the door to improved long-term outcomes. Additionally, studies continue to highlight the severe psychological toll that penile cancer treatment can have on patients. We explore the potential options for addressing the inherent psychologic effects of these treatments and highlight the need for further research in this domain. Although rare, it is important for all urologists to be familiar with the treatments and post-treatment sequelae of penile cancer. Penile cancer is associated with dramatic decline in quality of life and sexual function. Multiple medical and surgical therapies exist that addresses these concerns. Additionally, urologists must also be mindful of the psychologic component regarding surgical disfigurement and the decline in sexual function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Coba
- University of South Florida-Morsani College of Medicine, 12901 Bruce B Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Trushar Patel
- Department of Urology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 2 Tampa General Circle, STC6, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
May M, Rink M, Merseburger AS, Brookman-May SD. Why is the principle of "as much radicality as needed, as much organ preservation as possible" only insufficiently implemented in daily practice in the surgical treatment of penile cancer patients? Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:1901-1903. [PMID: 33209653 PMCID: PMC7658148 DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-1152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias May
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth-Hospital, Straubing, Germany
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Axel S Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Sabine D Brookman-May
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.,Janssen Research and Development Oncology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Falcone M, Preto M, Oderda M, Timpano M, Russo GI, Capogrosso P, Cocci A, Fode M, Gontero P. Total Glans Resurfacing for the Management of Superficial Penile Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis in a Tertiary Referral Center. Urology 2020; 145:281-286. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
39
|
Kravvas G, Ge L, Ng J, Shim TN, Doiron PR, Watchorn R, Kentley J, Panou E, Dinneen M, Freeman A, Jameson C, Haider A, Francis N, Minhas S, Alnajjar H, Muneer A, Bunker CB. The management of penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PeIN): clinical and histological features and treatment of 345 patients and a review of the literature. J DERMATOL TREAT 2020; 33:1047-1062. [DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1800574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- G. Kravvas
- Department of Dermatology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - L. Ge
- Department of Dermatology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - J. Ng
- Department of Dermatology, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - T. N. Shim
- Department of Dermatology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - P. R. Doiron
- Department of Dermatology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - R. Watchorn
- Department of Dermatology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - J. Kentley
- Department of Dermatology, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - E. Panou
- Department of Dermatology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - M. Dinneen
- Department of Urology, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - A. Freeman
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - C. Jameson
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - A. Haider
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - N. Francis
- Department of Histopathology, Imperial College Hospitals, London, UK
| | - S. Minhas
- Department of Urology, Imperial College Hospitals, London, UK
| | - H. Alnajjar
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - A. Muneer
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - C. B. Bunker
- Department of Dermatology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
- Department of Dermatology, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Beech BB, Chapman DW, Rourke KF. Clinical outcomes of glansectomy with split-thickness skin graft reconstruction for localized penile cancer. Can Urol Assoc J 2020; 14:E482-E486. [PMID: 32432538 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Penectomy as the traditional surgical treatment of penile cancer has substantial adverse functional and psychological impact. Glansectomy with split-thickness skin graft (STSG) reconstruction aims to provide curative resection while maximizing functional outcomes and minimizing psychological harm. We describe our outcomes of glansectomy with STSG reconstruction for penile cancer in a Canadian setting. METHODS We identified patients undergoing glansectomy with STSG genital reconstruction for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis from July 2006 to July 2019 at a single center. Patients undergoing glansectomy for reasons other than penile cancer were excluded. We collected clinical and pathological data, including patient demographics, 90-day complications, positive margin rate, local recurrence rate, disease-specific survival, and functional outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize our cohort and to examine outcomes. RESULTS Twelve men met study criteria with a median age of 62 years. Seven patients had failed prior treatment. The 90-day complication rate (Clavien >2) was 0% and graft take was excellent in all cases. The positive margins rate was 16.7% (n=2). Local recurrence occurred in two patients (16.7%), one of whom underwent a repeat organ-sparing surgery for salvage, while the other underwent radical penectomy for high-risk pathological features. Disease-free survival at a median followup of 14 months was 91.7% (11/12). Standing voiding and erectile function, as well as satisfactory cosmesis, were preserved in all patients. CONCLUSIONS Glansectomy with STSG reconstruction is a safe and effective treatment for men with localized penile cancer with simultaneous preservation of cosmesis, as well as urinary and sexual function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben B Beech
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - David W Chapman
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Keith F Rourke
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Pérez J, Chavarriaga J, Ortiz A, Orrego P, Rueda S, Quiroga W, Fernandez N, Patiño G, Tobar V, Villareal N, Prada J, Barco C, Sarmiento G. Oncological and Functional Outcomes After Organ-Sparing Plastic Reconstructive Surgery for Penile Cancer. Urology 2020; 142:161-165.e1. [PMID: 32380155 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.03.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Revised: 03/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe oncological and functional outcomes in patients treated with reconstructive organ-sparing surgery (OSS) for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Plastic reconstructive OSS of the penis with a split thickness skin graft has been proposed as a treatment option for penile cancer, with the objective being preservation of physiological voiding and sexual function without comprising oncological control. MATERIALS AND METHODS Multicenter study reporting clinicopathological data of 57 patients with malignant lesions of the penis treated with OSS and plastic reconstructive surgery with split thickness skin graft from 2007 to 2019. Health related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed with EuroQoL-5D-3L, urinary symptoms with the International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire for Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, and erectile function with the International Index of erectile function (IIEF)-5. RESULTS Fifty-seven patients underwent OSS reconstructive surgery. Twenty underwent glans resurfacing, 23 partial penectomy, and 14 glansectomy. Median age was 55.1 years (interquartile range [IQR] 29-90), median follow-up 55.7 months (3-149). At the time of data analysis, 6 patients had died of Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) (12.5%) and 10 (17.8%) had progressed. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed a 5-year survival rate of 87.5% and a 5-year progression-free survival of 83%. We assessed HRQoL and functional outcomes in 32 patients. EuroQol 5D-3L showed a mean health status of 82.5%, median Voiding score of the ICIQ-MLTUS was 4 (IQR 1-15), and median IIEF-5 19 (IQR 10.75-25). CONCLUSION OSS of the penis remains a safe and viable option for the treatment of SCC, ensuring a favorable appearance of the penis, preserving urinary and sexual function, with good HRQoL and without comprising oncological safety in selected cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Pérez
- Division of Urology, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia; Department of Urology, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Julián Chavarriaga
- Division of Urology, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
| | - Ana Ortiz
- Division of Urology, Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander Clínica Ardila Lulle (FOSCAL), Universidad Autonoma de Bucaramanga, Colombia
| | - Paola Orrego
- Division of Urology, Hospital Militar Central, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Sandra Rueda
- Division of Urology, Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander Clínica Ardila Lulle (FOSCAL), Universidad Autonoma de Bucaramanga, Colombia
| | - William Quiroga
- Division of Urology, Hospital Militar Central, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Nicolás Fernandez
- Division of Urology, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia; Department of Urology, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Colombia; Division of Urology, Hospital for SickKids, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - German Patiño
- Division of Urology, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Verónica Tobar
- Division of Urology, Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander Clínica Ardila Lulle (FOSCAL), Universidad Autonoma de Bucaramanga, Colombia
| | - Nicolás Villareal
- Division of Urology, Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander Clínica Ardila Lulle (FOSCAL), Universidad Autonoma de Bucaramanga, Colombia
| | - Juan Prada
- Division of Urology, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Catalina Barco
- Department of Urology, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Guillermo Sarmiento
- Division of Urology, Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander Clínica Ardila Lulle (FOSCAL), Universidad Autonoma de Bucaramanga, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bandini M, Albersen M, Chipollini J, Pederzoli F, Zhu Y, Ye DW, Ornellas AA, Watkin N, Ager M, Hakenberg OW, Heidenreich A, Raggi D, Catanzaro M, Haidl F, Mazzone E, Marandino L, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Azizi M, Spiess PE, Necchi A. Optimising the selection of candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy amongst patients with node-positive penile squamous cell carcinoma. BJU Int 2020; 125:867-875. [PMID: 32175663 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify predictors of poor overall survival (OS) amongst patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) with clinical inguinal lymphadenopathy (cN+), in order to define the best candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Using an international, multicentre database of 924 patients with pSCC, we identified 334 men who harboured cN+ with available clinical and follow-up data. Lymph node involvement was defined either by the presence of palpable inguinal node disease or by preoperative computed tomography (CT) assessment. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (18 F-FDG-PET)/CT scan was performed based on clinical judgment of the treating physician. Regression-tree analysis generated a risk stratification tool for prediction of 24-month overall mortality (OM). Kaplan-Meier explored the OS benefit related to the use of NAC according to the regression-tree-stratified subgroups. RESULTS Overall, 120 (35.9%), 152 (45.5%), and 62 (18.6%) patients harboured cN1, cN2, and cN3 disease. 18 F-FDG-PET/CT was performed in 48 (14.4%) patients, and 16 (4.8%) had inguinal and pelvic nodal PET detection. The median OS was 107 months, with a 24-month OS of 66%. At regression-tree analysis (area under the curve = 70%), patients with cN3 and cN2 with PET/CT-detected inguinal and pelvic nodal activity had a higher risk of 24-month OM (>50%). NAC was associated with improved 24-month OS rates (54% vs 33%) only in this subgroup of patients (P = 0.002), which was also confirmed after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio 0.28, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.62; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION Patients with pSCC with cN3 or cN2 and inguinal and pelvic 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan detected disease had higher 24-month OM rates according to our regression-tree model. NAC was associated with improved OS only in these subgroups of patients. Our novel decision model may help to stratify cN+ patients, and identify those who most likely will benefit from NAC prior to radical surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Bandini
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Juan Chipollini
- Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Filippo Pederzoli
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Yao Zhu
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Ding-Wei Ye
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Antonio A Ornellas
- Hospital Mário Kröeff and Brazilian Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Nick Watkin
- NHS Foundation Trust, St. George's University Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Michael Ager
- NHS Foundation Trust, St. George's University Hospitals, London, UK
| | | | | | - Daniele Raggi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Mario Catanzaro
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Elio Mazzone
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Marandino
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mounsif Azizi
- Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is often the treatment of choice for skin cancer removal as it maximizes normal tissue sparing and can be paired with a reconstructive approach that optimizes function and cosmesis. Many tumors on the eyelid, nose, ear, and genitals are particularly well suited for MMS but can be challenging for the dermatologic surgeon. OBJECTIVE To review the complex anatomy, as well as the authors' approach to executing and interpreting Mohs layers, at each of these anatomical sites. METHODS A review of the literature on MMS of the eyelid, nose, ear, and genitals was performed using the PubMed database and relevant search terms. CONCLUSION These sites present potential pitfalls for tumor resection and reconstruction, but with the proper technique, the dermatologic surgeon can minimize tumor recurrence and MMS complications. Warning signs for potentially difficult tumor resection can signify when an interdisciplinary approach is warranted.
Collapse
|
44
|
Kristinsson S, Johnson M, Ralph D. Review of penile reconstructive techniques. Int J Impot Res 2020; 33:243-250. [PMID: 32152468 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-020-0246-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Revised: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Reconstructive surgery of the penis holds many unique challenges due to the unique physiological properties of the tissues. Much of the effort involved therefore goes to preserving as much of the native tissue as possible whilst novel and creative methods have been adopted to repair defects and in creation of neophallus. A search of the PubMed database was carried out using the following keywords: 'penile trauma', 'penile cancer', 'lichen sclerosus', 'glansectomy', 'glans resurfacing', 'penile-sparing surgery', 'micropenis', 'aphallia', 'female-to-male sex reassignment surgery', 'scrotal flap' and 'genital lymphoedema'. Results for glans resurfacing in treating cancer showed low local recurrence rates at 0-10% whilst 90% of lichen sclerosus patients reported complete resolutions of pain and pruritis. For repairs of penile shaft skin defects the literature supports the use of full-thickness skin graft and pedicled scrotal flaps. The radial artery-based forearm free flap remains the best option for neophallus creation in terms of function, sensation and cosmesis but unfortunately leaves a disfiguring scar and involves multiple stages. Some novel techniques have been developed to circumvent these issues and are discussed. This article presents an update on the important developments in the field of penile reconstructive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sverrir Kristinsson
- St. Peter's Andrology Centre and UCLH, 145 Harley Street, London, W1G 6BJ, UK
| | - Mark Johnson
- St. Peter's Andrology Centre and UCLH, 145 Harley Street, London, W1G 6BJ, UK
| | - David Ralph
- St. Peter's Andrology Centre and UCLH, 145 Harley Street, London, W1G 6BJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ellul T, Grice P, Mainwaring A, Bullock N, Shanahan A, Cave D, Dormer J, Harrison R, Brown G, Younis A, Bose P, Goddard JC, Summerton DJ. Frozen section analysis for organ-conserving surgery in penile cancer: Assessing oncological outcomes and trends of local recurrence. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/2051415820903192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Introduction and objectives: The local recurrence rate of penile cancer following surgical excision is reported in many series to be between 6 and 29%. Intra-operative frozen section (FS) is a useful tool to ensure safe microscopic margins in organ-sparing procedures in penile cancer. In this series, we assessed the rates of positive margins and patterns of local recurrence in a multicentre cohort of patients undergoing penile-preserving surgery assisted by intra-operative FS analysis. Materials and methods: We reviewed all those patients for whom intra-operative FS was employed during penile-preserving surgery in three tertiary referral centres between 2003 and 2016. We assessed whether the use of FS altered the surgical technique and what affect it had on positive margins and recurrence rates. Results: A total of 169 patients were identified. Of these, intra-operative FS examination of the surgical margin was positive in 21 (12%) cases. Final histological examination confirmed cancer-free margins in all but one patient (99.4%). Overall, 9 patients developed local recurrence (5.3%). Conclusions: In this series, intra-operative FS contributed to a very low rate (5.3%) of local recurrence. We noted an extremely low positive margin rate (0.6%) which highlights the benefit of incorporating FS analysis into organ-preserving surgery for penile cancer. Level of evidence: Not applicable for this multicentre audit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Ellul
- Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, UK
| | - P Grice
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK
| | | | - N Bullock
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - A Shanahan
- Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, UK
| | - D Cave
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK
| | - J Dormer
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK
| | - R Harrison
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK
| | - G Brown
- Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, UK
| | | | - P Bose
- Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | - JC Goddard
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Krishna S, Shanbhogue K, Schieda N, Morbeck F, Hadas B, Kulkarni G, McInnes MD, Baroni RH. Role of MRI in Staging of Penile Cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 51:1612-1629. [PMID: 31976600 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2019] [Revised: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Penile cancer is one of the male-specific cancers. Accurate pretreatment staging is crucial due to a plethora of treatment options currently available. The 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer-Tumor Node and Metastasis (AJCC-TNM) revised the staging for penile cancers, with invasion of corpora cavernosa upstaged from T2 to T3 and invasion of urethra downstaged from T3 to being not separately relevant. With this revision, MRI is more relevant in local staging because MRI is accurate in identifying invasion of corpora cavernosa, while the accuracy is lower for detection of urethral involvement. The recent European Urology Association (EAU) guidelines recommend MRI to exclude invasion of the corpora cavernosa, especially if penis preservation is planned. Identification of satellite lesions and measurement of residual-penile-length help in surgical planning. When nonsurgical treatment modalities of the primary tumor are being considered, accurate local staging helps in decision-making regarding upfront inguinal lymph node dissection as against surveillance. MRI helps in detection and extent of inguinal and pelvic lymphadenopathy and is superior to clinical palpation, which continues to be the current approach recommended by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) treatment guidelines. MRI helps the detection of "bulky" lymph nodes that warrant neoadjuvant chemotherapy and potentially identify extranodal extension. However, tumor involvement in small lymph nodes and differentiation of reactive vs. malignant lymphadenopathy in large lymph nodes continue to be challenging and the utilization of alternative contrast agents (superparamagnetic iron oxide), positron emission tomography (PET)-MRI along with texture analysis is promising. In locally recurrent tumors, MRI is invaluable in identification of deep invasion, which forms the basis of treatment. Multiparametric MRI, especially diffusion-weighted-imaging, may allow for quantitative noninvasive assessment of tumor grade and histologic subtyping to avoid biopsy undersampling. Further research is required for incorporation of MRI with deep learning and artificial intelligence algorithms for effective staging in penile cancer. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1612-1629.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satheesh Krishna
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Krishna Shanbhogue
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nicola Schieda
- Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fernando Morbeck
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sao Paulo, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Benhabib Hadas
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Girish Kulkarni
- Departments of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew D McInnes
- Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ronaldo Hueb Baroni
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sao Paulo, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Localized disease: types of reconstruction/plastic surgery techniques after glans resurfacing/glansectomy/partial/total penectomy. Curr Opin Urol 2020; 30:213-217. [PMID: 31895889 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the current literature specific to surgery for localized penile cancer including novel reconstructive techniques.Centralization of penile cancer services in many European countries and in particular the United Kingdom has resulted in an increased proportion of men undergoing organ-sparing surgery (OSS) rather than partial or total penectomy. In this review, we focus on reconstructive techniques following surgery for the primary penile tumour. RECENT FINDINGS The widespread adoption of penile preserving techniques in Europe and North America has shown both oncological safety as well as good cosmetic and functional outcomes. Recent evidence has suggested that narrower surgical margins do not affect overall cancer-specific survival or local recurrence rates. Therefore, excellent cosmetic and functional outcomes can be achieved using techniques such as glans resurfacing using split-thickness skin grafts, dorsal or ventral V-Y skin advancement and urethral centralization after partial penectomy. For patients requiring more radical surgery such as total penectomy, phallic reconstruction is a suitable option using free flaps or pedicled flaps. SUMMARY The use of OSS has transformed the lives of penile cancer patients who can avoid the significant clinical and psychological consequences of more radical surgical treatments. Careful case selection and preoperative counselling is advised prior to reconstructive techniques. Close postoperative clinical surveillance is necessary for early detection of local recurrence.
Collapse
|
48
|
Boguslawska J, Kryst P, Poletajew S, Piekielko-Witkowska A. TGF-β and microRNA Interplay in Genitourinary Cancers. Cells 2019; 8:E1619. [PMID: 31842336 PMCID: PMC6952810 DOI: 10.3390/cells8121619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Revised: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Genitourinary cancers (GCs) include a large group of different types of tumors localizing to the kidney, bladder, prostate, testis, and penis. Despite highly divergent molecular patterns, most GCs share commonly disturbed signaling pathways that involve the activity of TGF-β (transforming growth factor beta). TGF-β is a pleiotropic cytokine that regulates key cancer-related molecular and cellular processes, including proliferation, migration, invasion, apoptosis, and chemoresistance. The understanding of the mechanisms of TGF-β actions in cancer is hindered by the "TGF-β paradox" in which early stages of cancerogenic process are suppressed by TGF-β while advanced stages are stimulated by its activity. A growing body of evidence suggests that these paradoxical TGF-β actions could result from the interplay with microRNAs: Short, non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression by binding to target transcripts and inducing mRNA degradation or inhibition of translation. Here, we discuss the current knowledge of TGF-β signaling in GCs. Importantly, TGF-β signaling and microRNA-mediated regulation of gene expression often act in complicated feedback circuits that involve other crucial regulators of cancer progression (e.g., androgen receptor). Furthermore, recently published in vitro and in vivo studies clearly indicate that the interplay between microRNAs and the TGF-β signaling pathway offers new potential treatment options for GC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Boguslawska
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education; 01-813 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Piotr Kryst
- II Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland; (P.K.); (S.P.)
| | - Slawomir Poletajew
- II Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland; (P.K.); (S.P.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Weibl P, Herwig R. Superficial penile cancer treated with complete excision of the glans epithelium and coverage with a tissue sealant matrix (TachoSil®). Cent European J Urol 2019; 72:204-208. [PMID: 31482031 PMCID: PMC6715082 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2019.1626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2017] [Revised: 01/31/2018] [Accepted: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The aim of our work was to demonstrate the feasibility and clinical outcomes after partial excision of the epithelial and subepithelial layer of the glans with subsequent tissue sealant matrix coverage (TachoSil®). Material and methods We enrolled 11 consecutive patients with superficial penile cancer. Under the microscopic guidance, the tumor in the glans area was excised continuously with a minimal lateral margin of 5 mm. The cosmetic result was accessed using a 5-graded scale ranging from very dissatisfied to very satisfied. Results The median patient's age at the presentation was 46 years (range 38-53). Histopathological examination of the specimen confirmed squamous cell carcinoma and tumor-free surgical margins were obtained in all cases. Overall, the tumors were TaG1 in 3 patients, TaG2 in 1 patient, TisG1 in 2 patients, TisG2 in 2 patient, T1aG1 in 2 patients, and T1aG2 in 1 patient. All patients had clinically negative lymph-node status - cN0 (confirmed by aabdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scan with contrast). During the follow-up of 6 to 36 months (median 18), local recurrence occurred in 1 patient with carcinoma in situ six months after surgery, which was managed by a second glans-preserving surgery without recurrence. The others showed no signs of local recurrence or metastasis during the period of observation. Conclusions These preliminary data suggests that glans-preserving surgical technique using TachoSil® as a defect coverage is technically feasible, functionally safe and cosmetically satisfying. However, well-designed prospective-randomized trial is warranted, to further confirm the clinical utility of our approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Weibl
- Landesklinikum Korneuburg - Teaching Hospital, Department of Urology, Korneuburg, Austria
| | - Ralf Herwig
- Department of Reconstructive Urology, Andrology and Mens's Health, Vienna Urology Foundation, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
|