Early and late outcomes of percutaneous treatment of TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus class C and D aorto-iliac lesions

Medium-Term Outcomes of Treatment with a VIABAHN VBX Covered Stent for Aortoiliac Occlusive Lesions in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment (EVT) for aortoiliac (AI) occlusive lesions is now conducted worldwide, but there are challenges in EVT for complex AI lesions. The VIABAHN VBX (W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) is a next-generation balloon-expandable covered stent designed for use with complex AI lesions. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the medium-term outcomes of VIABAHN VBX for such lesions.

METHODS

Symptomatic patients who underwent EVT with VIABAHN VBX for an AI lesion from 2018 to 2020 at 7 Japanese centers were reviewed retrospectively. The primary endpoints were primary patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR).

RESULTS

A total of 95 EVT procedures with VIABAHN VBX for AI occlusive lesions were performed in 71 patients. The patients had high rates of dyslipidemia (53%) and chronic kidney disease (61%), and 22% had chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). The Transatlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC Ⅱ) class was A in 12 patients (17%), B in 12 (17%), C in 10 (14%), and D in 37 (52%). Severe calcification (360°) of the treated lesion was present in 31 patients (33%). The median procedure time was 84 (49-158) min, with a technical success rate of 100%. The median follow-up period was 36 (32-43) months. The 3-year primary and secondary patency of VIABAHN VBX were 91% and 99%, the 3-year freedom from TLR was 92%, and the 3-year freedom from major adverse limb event (MALE) was 98%. No limbs required major amputation. Lesion severity (TASC Ⅱ C or D) and severe calcification did not affect the primary patency or freedom from TLR.

CONCLUSIONS

Medium-term outcomes after EVT with VIABAHN VBX for AI lesions were acceptable regardless of lesion severity and calcification. These results suggest that VIABAHN VBX may be suitable for AI occlusive lesions with severe anatomical complexity and/or severe calcification.

10년간의 3차 의료기관 경험을 바탕으로 한 대동맥장골동맥 폐색 질환 혈관내 치료의 기술적 고찰: 후향적 연구

Purpose

To examine the technical considerations of endovascular treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) based on a 10-year experience in Songklanagarind Hospital.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 210 patients who underwent endovascular treatment for symptomatic AIOD between January 2010 and December 2020. The patients' clinical and lesion characteristics, including technical considerations of the procedure, were collected, analyzed, and stratified using the Transatlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC).

Results

Most patients (80%) in this study had chronic limb-threatening ischemia lesions, with an occlusion rate of 37%. The technical success rate of TASC C & D was lower than that of TASC A & B, 84.4% vs. 99.2% p ≤ 0.001. A technical success rate of 93.3% (14/15) was found for the femoral and brachial approach, compared with a success rate of 89.0% (57/64) for the unibifemoral approach in TASC C & D, without a statistically significant difference (p = 0.076). However, the puncture site complications in this route were up to 17.6%, which is the highest rate compared with other techniques. These complications could be treated either conservatively or minimally invasively.

Conclusion

In cases of failed femoral access, simultaneous femoral and brachial approaches improved the technical success rate of endovascular recanalization of TASC C & D aortoiliac occlusions.

Efficacy and Safety of Covered Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety outcome of covered stents (CSs), as compared with bare-metal stents (BMSs), for the treatment of patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to August 2023 to identify all studies comparing efficacy and safety outcomes of CSs versus BMSs for treating AIOD. Our outcome was primary patency, secondary patency, technical success, ankle-brachial index (ABI) variation, target lesion revascularization (TLR), limb salvage, complications, and long-term survival. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled as relative risks (RR) or hazard ratio with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous outcomes were pooled as weighted mean differences and 95% CI. Model selection was based on the heterogeneity of the included studies.

RESULTS

There were 10 studies (2 randomized controlled trials, 8 retrospective cohort studies), comprising 1676 sample size. Compared with BMSs, CSs use was associated with better primary patency of patients with a Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC) D lesion (RR, 1.15, 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.27, p=0.007), TLR (RR, 0.39, 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.56, p<0.001), technical success (RR, 1.01, 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.02, p=0.010), and long-term survival (RR, 1.06, 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.11, p=0.020). There is no difference between CSs and BMSs regarding primary patency of all patients, secondary patency, variation in ABI, limb salvage, and complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with BMSs, CSs used in AIOD was associated with more favorable primary patency in patients with TASC D lesions, TLR, technical success rates, and patient long-term survival. These results provide evidence of the advantages of using CSs for AIOD treatment. Future studies focusing on long-term variations in ABI, primary patency of different degrees of calcification, vascular segments, and TASC classification are warranted.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Although several studies evaluated the clinical efficacy of CS in the context of AIOD treatment, the significance and consistency of these findings were not determined to date. We found that CS was used in AIOD associated with better technical success rate, long-term patient survival, lower target lesion revascularization, and higher primary patency of patients with a Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II D lesion when compared with BMSs. Our study provides evidence supporting the superiority of CSs over BMSs in the treatment of AIOD, and furnishing clinicians with guidance for treatment decisions.

Influence of Perioperative Factors on Patency After Endovascular and Hybrid Treatments of TASC II D Aortoiliac Occlusive Lesions

BACKGROUND

Treatment of Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II D aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD D) remains a controversial topic. Although current recommendations support conventional surgical treatment, several recent studies have reported promising results with endovascular and hybrid strategies. The purpose of this work was to describe the outcomes of endovascular and hybrid management of AIOD D and to investigate the influence of perioperative factors on patency.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center study covering the period from 2016 to 2021. The primary end point was primary patency at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included technical success rate, 30-day mortality, early major complication rate, primary assisted and secondary patency at 12 months, and primary patency at 24 months. After descriptive statistical analysis, a survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Eighteen perioperative factors potentially associated with primary patency were studied by univariate and multivariate analysis adjusted by a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

In all, 82 patients (112 limbs) had undergone an attempt at endovascular (n = 55, 67%) or hybrid (n = 27, 33%) treatment for AIOD D over the study period. The technical success rate was 99%. The 30-day mortality rate was 3%. The early major complication rate was 11%. The primary patency rates at 12 and 24 months were 87.9% [80.3; 96.3] and 77% [66.3; 89.3], respectively. The primary assisted and secondary patency rates at 12 months were 92.6% [86.3; 99.2] and 96% [91.4; 100]. Among the perioperative factors studied, the heavily calcified nature of the target lesions was the only variable significantly associated with primary patency loss in the multivariate analysis (P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Although the results of endovascular and hybrid treatment of AOID D are acceptable, future studies should focus on improving patency rates in heavily calcified lesions. Specific tools of endovascular preparation (intravascular lithotripsy, atherectomy) may represent interesting ways of research.

Endovascular Interventions for Peripheral Artery Disease: A Contemporary Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is an increasingly prevalent but frequently underdiagnosed condition that can be associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. While an initial noninvasive approach is the cornerstone of management, revascularization is often pursued for patients with treatment-refractory claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). In this review, we discuss the current state of endovascular interventions for PAD and explore the many new emerging technologies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The last decade has resulted in numerous advances in PAD interventions including the ongoing evolution of drug-coated devices, novel approaches to complex lesions, and contemporary evidence from large clinical trials for CLTI. Advances in endovascular management have allowed for increasingly complex lesions to be tackled percutaneously. Future directions for the field include the continued evolution in device technology, continued development of state-of-the-art techniques to revascularization of complex lesions, and increased collaboration between a largely multidisciplinary field.

Contemporary Minimally Invasive Surgery for TASC-D Aorto-Iliac Lesions: Analysis of Outcomes and Risk Factors for Primary and Secondary Patency

BACKGROUND

For complex extensive TASC-II D lesions, the standard of care remains conventional surgery. Nevertheless, guidelines tend to broaden endovascular surgery indications in expert centers for patients at high surgical risk with TASC-II D lesions. Due to the increasing use of endovascular surgery in this setting, we planned to evaluate the patency rate of this approach.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study in a tertiary center. All patients treated for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) with classified D lesions according to the TASC-II classification and requiring management of the aortoiliac bifurcation were retrospectively included between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2017. The type of surgical approach was classified as a pure percutaneous approach or hybrid surgery. The main objective was to describe long-term patency results. The secondary objectives were to identify risk factors for loss of patency and long-term complications. The primary outcomes were primary patency, primary-assisted patency, and secondary patency at 5 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-six patients were included. For the overall population, the primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency proportions at 5 years were 71.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 63.2-81%), 82.1% (95% CI 74.9-89.3%), 96.3% (95% CI 92-100%), respectively. For primary patency, there was a significant difference in favor of the covered stent group at 36 months (P < 0.01) and 60 months (P = 0.037). In a multivariate model, only CS and age were associated with a better primary patency (hazard ratio (HR) 0.36, CI 95% [0.15-0.83], P = 0.0193 and an HR 0.07, 95% CI [0.05-0.09], P = 0.005, respectively). The overall rate of perioperative complications was 11%.

CONCLUSIONS

We report that endovascular and hybrid surgery are safe and effective in the management of TASC-D complex aortoiliac lesions in mid to long-term follow-up. Short-term and long-term complications were all considered as minor.

Aortoiliac: Covered, Uncovered, CERAB as It Relates to Peripheral Arterial Disease

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects over 200 million worldwide and is the leading cause of major limb amputation, with individuals suffering from PAD being at three times greater risk of dying compared with matched controls. TASC-II guidelines provide a consensus on the management of PAD based on the collaboration between international vascular specialties. These guidelines previously outlined open surgery as the gold standard for treatment of aortoiliac disease and PAD as it has demonstrated consistent long-term results. However, this approach is also associated with high perioperative mortality, especially when compared with endovascular techniques. With recent developments in endovascular technology, user technique, and experience, this approach has become more widely used as primary intervention for aortoiliac disease. One of these novel techniques includes covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation, which has demonstrated excellent technical success and improved primary and secondary patency rates with follow-up. The aim of this review is to compare the efficacy of these approaches to the treatment of aortoiliac disease and demonstrate the benefits of the shift toward an endovascular-first approach to treatment of this disease, regardless of lesion complexity or severity.

Comparison of BARD®LIFESTREAM™ covered balloon-expandable stent versus GORE® VIABAHN™ covered self-expandable stent in treatment of aortoiliac obstructive disease: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial (NEONATAL trial)

BACKGROUND

Covered stent has become one of the mainstream therapies for aortoiliac obstructive disease (AIOD), with a higher patency rate than bare metal stent. Covered balloon-expandable (CBE) stent can be placed more accurately with higher a radial support force, while covered self-expanding (CSE) stent has greater elasticity and higher trackability. However, there is no level I evidence regarding the comparison safety and efficacy between the CSE stent and CBE stent in AIOD to date. Therefore, this study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of CBE stent (BARD®LIFESTREAM™) and CSE stent (GORE® VIABAHN™) in AIOD.

METHODS

This trial is a prospective, single-center, parallel, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial. A total of 106 patients will be enrolled and these patients will be randomized to either the CBE stent group or the CSE stent group. The primary end point of the study is the occurrence of target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months after the intervention.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, the ballooN sElf cOver steNt AorToiliAc occuLusive (NEONATAL) trial is the first RCT to compare CBE and CSE stent in AIOD patients. The main aim is to compare the TLR of the target lesion between CBE stent and CSE stent at 12 months post-procedure. The results of clinical trials may contribute to establishing a strategic guideline for choosing the optimal type of covered stent in the treatment of AIOD patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trials Registry ChiCTR2100046734. Registered on 27 May 2021.

Management of chronic peripheral artery disease patients with indication for endovascular revascularization

With an increasing global burden of patients with chronic peripheral artery disease (PAD) the safe and effective provision of lower limb revascularisation is a growing medical need. Endovascular procedures for the treatment of PAD have become a crucial cornerstone of modern vascular medicine, and the first line revascularisation approach if technically feasible and taking patient choice into consideration. With the increasing age of patients with PAD and the increasing number of comorbidities open vascular surgery is also often not feasible. We outline a framework of key messages, endorsed by the board of the European Society of Vascular Medicine for pre-, peri- and post procedural management of patients requiring endovascular arterial procedures of the lower limbs. These key messages emphasize the important and increasing role of interventional vascular physicians.

Stent Grafting for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: Review of the VBX FLEX Study

Endovascular treatment has become an accepted method in the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. Bare metal stents have been used in the treatment of aortoiliac disease since the early 1990s. More recently, the use of covered stent grafts in the aortoiliac segment has shown clinical benefit in terms of patency, freedom from reintervention and quality of life. The VBX FLEX study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the Gore VBX stent graft for use in the aortoiliac segment. The early and mid-term data on the Gore VBX stent graft have shown it to be a safe device for use in the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. This review examines the use of stents in aortoiliac occlusive disease with specific focus on the VBX FLEX Study.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Iliac Artery Endovascular Therapy in the Korean Vascular Intervention Society Endovascular Therapy in Lower Limb Artery Diseases (K-VIS ELLA) Registry

Iliac artery endovascular therapy achieved excellent technical success and a favorable 5-year target lesion revascularization (TLR)-free survival rate, and Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) D showed a favorable but lower 5-year TLR-free survival compared with other TASC groups.

Background and Objectives

Limited data are available regarding long-term clinical outcomes of iliac artery endovascular therapy (EVT) in real-world practice. This study investigated long-term outcomes according to Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) classifications.

Methods

We analyzed data from 1,705 limbs of 1,364 patients from the retrospective cohort of the multicenter Korean Vascular Intervention Society Endovascular Therapy in Lower Limb Artery Disease registry. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR)-free survival.

Results

TASC A, B, C, and D lesions were present in 19.4%, 26.2%, 28.7%, and 25.7% of the treated limbs, respectively. The technical success rate was 96.2% and did not differ between TASC lesion types. Complications occurred in 6.8% of cases and more occurred in TASC D (11.8%). Iliac artery EVT showed a 5-year TLR-free survival of 89.2%. The TASC D group had the lowest TLR-free rate of 79.3%. TASC D (hazard ratio [HR], 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12–2.73; p=0.014), plain old balloon angioplasty (HR, 4.25; 95% CI, 2.03–8.88; p<0.001), current smoker (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.26–2.83; p=0.002), previous bypass surgery (HR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.28–7.19; p=0.011), combined femoropopliteal treatment (HR, 4.89; 95% CI, 3.19–7.50; p<0.001), combined below the knee treatment (HR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.25–3.89; p=0.007), and complications (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.07–3.24; p=0.028) were predictors for TLR.

Conclusions

Iliac artery EVT achieved excellent technical success and 5-year TLR-free survival. TASC D showed a favorable but lower 5-year TLR-free survival rate and higher complication rate compared with other TASC groups.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02748226

Covered Stents vs. Angioplasty for Common Iliac Artery In Stent Restenosis: A Retrospective Comparison

OBJECTIVE

The optimal endovascular treatment for common iliac artery in stent re-stenosis has yet to be assessed. Treatment options include, among others, angioplasty alone and repeated stenting with covered stents.

METHODS

This study retrospectively compared patency and target lesion revascularisation of these treatments. All patients who underwent endovascular treatment of common iliac artery in stent re-stenosis between 2007 and 2017 were included retrospectively. The primary end point was freedom from re-stenosis. Secondary endpoints were target lesion revascularisation rate (TLR) and freedom from occlusion during follow up.

RESULTS

Seventy-four interventions were included, consisting of 37 angioplasties and 37 covered stent placements in 57 patients. Freedom from re-stenosis at four years was 72.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 51.8% - 88.7%) in the covered stent group vs. 43.5% (95% CI 25.9% - 59.8%) in the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) group (p = .003). The target lesion revascularisation (TLR) rate was 16.4% (95% CI 7.1% - 35.6%) and 43.6% (95% CI 28.0% - 63.2%) respectively (p = .020). There was no difference in freedom from occlusion; this was 90.8% (95% CI 73.9% - 97.0%) in the covered stent group and 79.1% (95% CI 58.4% - 90.3%) in the PTA group (p = .49). The difference in freedom from re-stenosis and TLR remained significant after sensitivity and multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSION

Covered stents offer better outcomes for common iliac artery in stent re-stenosis than angioplasty alone.

The effect of the stented iliac lesions TASC-II C, D on the femoropopliteal bypass patency: Propensity score-matched observational study

INTRODUCTION

Concurrent stenting of complex iliac lesions during infrainguinal bypasses can increase the complexity of a case and impact outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to evaluate the effect of inflow stenting of TASC-II C, D iliac lesions on femoropopliteal bypass patency.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study of patients who underwent femoropopliteal bypass with TASC-II C, D iliac artery stenting (hybrid group) or without inflow lesions (non-hybrid group) was conducted. After propensity score matching, 120 patients were included in the non-hybrid group and 60 patients in the hybrid one. The median follow-up was 432 (193; 1313) days in the hybrid group and 472 (196; 1376) days in the non-hybrid group (p = 0.94).

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the groups in 30-day morbidity and serious adverse events. At 3 years, primary and secondary bypass patency for the hybrid group and non-hybrid group were 62.2% versus 59.9% (p = 0.36) and 63.7% versus 64.3% (p = 0.077), respectively. The primary patency of the iliac stents in patients of the hybrid group was 95% at 3 years. The estimated hazard ratio for primary patency for hybrid versus non-hybrid was 0.77, with 90% CI: 0.50-1.21; the noninferiority upper bound being 1.31, which corresponds to a 10% additive noninferiority margin for probabilities. The 3 years of freedom from amputation in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia was 94.1% and 75.0% in the hybrid and non-hybrid groups, respectively (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of the femoropopliteal bypass in hybrid surgery supplemented with stenting of TASC-II C, D iliac lesions was similar to femoropopliteal bypass with intact inflow arteries.

Midterm Outcomes on Primary Endovascular Treatment of 395 Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease Patients: A Single-Center Experience

We report the results of endovascular treatment of Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC) A&B, TASC C, and TASC D aortoiliac lesions in a single vascular center. In this retrospective, observational cohort study, we analyzed 395 patients (mean age 61.2 ± 9.0; 359 men) between January 2015 and December 2017. Technical success was achieved in 96.5%; in-hospital mortality was 1.2% (n = 5). Median follow-up was 36 months (range 24-49 months). After 1 and 5 years, the primary patency rates were 99% and 85% for TASC A&B, 90%, and 78% for TASC C, and 90% and 74% for TASC D. Secondary patency rates were 99% and 90% for TASC A&B, 98% and 65% for TASC C, and 97% and 65% for TASC D. Previous peripheral revascularization (hazard ratio: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.01-3.08, P = .04) was associated with decreased primary patency along with lower age, TASC C, and TASC D class. This analysis reported the acceptable effectiveness and safety of stenting for all types of aortoiliac occlusive disease in a modern setting, with few complications and excellent long-term primary and secondary patency rates.

Korean Multicenter Registry Study of EPIC Stents for the Treatment of Iliac Artery Disease: K-EPIC Registry

Background and Objectives

The EPIC™ stent is a self-expanding, nitinol stent that has been designed to enhance flexibility and provide expansion within vessels. The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of the EPIC™ stent when used to treat iliac artery diseases in a prospective Korean multicenter registry.

Methods

A total of 138 patients with iliac artery diseases who received endovascular treatment with EPIC™ stents at 9 Korean sites were enrolled in a prospective cohort and followed for 1 year. The primary endpoint was the 1-year freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary endpoints were 1-year clinical patency and freedom from major adverse events (MAEs).

Results

The mean age of the study subjects was 66.8±8.5 years and most subjects were male (86.2%). The most frequent lesion type was Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus B (43.5%) and the majority (56.5%) of the target lesions were located in the common iliac artery. Procedural success was obtained in 99.3% of patients. The freedom from TLR and the clinical patency at 1-year follow-up were 94.9% and 92.3%, respectively. The 1-year rate of MAEs was 5.1%. Combined coronary artery disease (hazard ratio [HR], 5.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13–30.89; p=0.035) and smaller stent diameter (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17–0.88; p=0.023) were identified as independent risk factors of TLR after EPIC™ stent implantation.

Conclusions

The EPIC™ stents demonstrated excellent immediate and 1-year efficacy and safety outcomes in iliac artery lesions in this multicenter, prospective, registry-based study.

Endovascular Revascularization for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

말초동맥질환은 하지혈관을 흔히 침범하는 폐쇄성 질환이다. 대동맥-장골동맥 부위에서 이를 치료하기 위한 재개통술은 전통적으로 수술적인 접근을 통한 우회술을 근간으로 하였으며, 최근에는 국소적이고 단순한 병변들을 위주로 혈관 내 접근법을 통한 치료법이 우선 권고되고 있다. 혈관 내 접근법은 그 최소침습적인 특성으로 인하여 수술의 위험성이 높은 환자에 대해서 활용하는 것이 일반적이었으나, 근래의 다양한 기법 및 기구의 발전으로 보다 다양한 질병 상태를 가진 환자에서 활용되어 수술적인 치료에 근접하는 결과가 보고되고 있다. 이 종설에서는 말초동맥 질환에 대한 진단 및 대동맥-장골동맥 부위의 혈관 내 재개통술에 활용되는 기법 및 기구들에 대해 살펴보고 그 역할에 대해 살펴보고자 한다.

Hybrid covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation (CERAB) procedure is preferable to aortobifemoral bypass for limb-threatening aortoiliac occlusive disease during the COVID-19 crisis

The COVID-19 pandemic is disrupting the provision of acute vascular surgery across the globe. Limited evidence of the impact of nosocomial infection on patient outcomes as well as concerns about critical care capacity will likely have an impact on surgical decision-making. Endovascular therapy offers a way by which perioperative risk can be reduced for vascular patients while also reducing the impact of acute surgery on intensive care unit capacity. This case report describes the management of a patient with complex aortoiliac occlusive disease by a hybrid endovascular approach in light of these constraints, with a successful outcome.

Endovascular management of aorto-iliac occlusive disease (Leriche syndrome)

BACKGROUND

Bypass grafting is the standard of care for chronic aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD, aka Leriche Syndrome) but is associated with mortality rates of up to 25% if surgical re-intervention is necessary. Despite a recent shift towards an endovascular-first strategy for TransAtlantic InterSociety Consensus II ("TASC II") C and D lesions, reports from Leriche Syndrome are still limited.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

15 high-risk patients (11 male, 4 female), mean age of 60.6 years, with chronic aorto-iliac occlusive disease were retrospectively reviewed. Retrograde approaches via the bilateral femoral arteries for aortic occlusion less than 4 cm in length and/or antegrade fashion from the brachial artery for juxtarenal type lesions were made. For the latter, thrombolysis prior to angioplasty was also performed. Intraluminal or if necessary, subintimal angioplasty was performed with deployment of either bare metal stents or stentgrafts in a kissing-stent fashion.

RESULTS

A total of 28 iliac arteries and 14 occluded abdominal aorta were treated with 100% technical success, of which 25% success were achieved by using subintimal technique. Two minor complications occurred, including vascular rupture and distal emboli in one patient apiece, which were successfully managed via endovascular fashion. There were no complications of renal artery emboli. Primary and secondary patency rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 92.3% and 100%; 83.9% and 100%; and 83.9% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular therapy for chronic aorto-iliac occlusion has a high technical success rate, with good short- and mid-term primary and secondary patency rates and may provide a valid alternative to surgery for high-risk patients.

Iliac Artery Intervention

Endovascular revascularization for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) is now considered first-line therapy for patients with claudication and critical limb ischemia and in asymptomatic patients in whom large-bore access is required (eg, mechanical circulatory support or transcatheter aortic valve replacement). The authors review the data supporting endovascular therapy for AIOD, indications and contraindications for AIOD revascularization, as well as the procedural techniques required to safely perform endovascular therapy in this vascular bed. They review prevention and management of the major complications that can occur during these procedures. Finally, they discuss postprocedural management to maintain patency and optimize patient outcomes.

Feasibility of ischemic leg ulcer healing using percutaneous techniques: a real-life study

Background

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is established as the first-line vascular procedure in patients with lower extremity artery disease.

Purpose

We aimed to evaluate the technical and clinical effectiveness of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the management of ischemic foot ulcers.

Material and Methods

All consecutive patients presenting with a foot ulcer at the outpatient vascular surgery clinic of our hospital between June 2009 and June 2015 were evaluated using foot pulse assessment, ankle-brachial index, and duplex scanning. If non-invasive parameters suggested lower extremity artery disease, CT angiography and/or digital subtraction angiography were performed and a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was carried out when feasible during the same session. All patients were followed until healing, amputation, death, or for at least two years. Short- and long-term clinical success was evaluated based on ulcer size and appearance. Patients with worsening ulcers after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty underwent bypass grafting or amputation.

Results

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was performed in 161 patients (100%) with stenoses > 50%, including cases lesions > 10 cm and/or multiple/calcified lesions, 144 of which completed the study. In 88 (61.2%) patients, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was performed in the suprapopliteal axis exclusively, in 10 (6.8%) patients in the infrapopliteal axis only, and in 46 (31.9%) in both levels. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was technically successful in 141 (98%) patients. After 3.1 years, the rate of healing was 68%, limb salvage 88%, overall survival 69.5%, and amputation-free survival 64%.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for ischemic foot ulceration treatment is in the majority of patients feasible, effective, and safe with high rates of healing and limb salvage.

Native Microchannel Recanalization with Orbital Atherectomy as a Viable Alternative to Failed Standard Recanalization of TASC II D Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment of Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II D aortoiliac lesions is now an accepted form of revascularization. We sought to demonstrate that native microchannel recanalization and orbital atherectomy is a successful recanalization method of TASC II D aortoiliac lesions refractory to standard recanalization techniques.

METHODS

Four consecutive patients from 2016 to 2018 with symptomatic TASC II D aortoiliac occlusive disease prohibitive for open bypass and failed traditional prodding guidewire or device recanalization technique were identified and underwent advanced native microchannel selection and subsequent orbital atherectomy (Cardiovascular Systems, Inc, St Paul, MN). Native microchannels of the calcified lesions were probed and traversed with a 0.014″ wire. The atherectomy crown was tracked over the wire, and orbital atherectomy was initiated with a 1.25 mm crown starting at the lowest revolution and continued until the microchannel is sufficiently large to track a 1.2 mm-balloon for angioplasty. Serial microchannel angioplasty with exchange for stiffer and/or larger profile wires and balloons was achieved until a covered stent could be safely deployed across the target lesion. The kissing stent technique was then used to recreate the aortic bifurcation. A ViperSlide lubricant solution was used in all cases per indication for use. Patients were all heparinized to maintain an activated clotting time of 250. Lesion characteristics, survival, limb salvage, patency, and change in clinical symptoms were also analyzed.

RESULTS

All 4 patients underwent successful native microchannel recanalization and orbital atherectomy of the common iliac artery (CIA). There were no intraoperative ruptures, embolizations, or dissections. All 4 patients presented with unilateral CIA occlusion with contralateral CIA stenosis. The average occlusion lesion length of the CIA was 6.0 cm. The average contralateral stenosis length was 2.3 cm. The kissing stent technique was used in all patients for reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation. At 30 days, all patients had improvement in pain and primary patency of 100%. Long-term follow-up at 21.6 months noted continued improvement in symptoms and primary patency of 75%. The fourth patient died at 4 months from lung cancer with occluded iliac stents by imaging at that time.

CONCLUSIONS

Native microchannel recanalization with subsequent orbital atherectomy is an option in high-risk patients with TASC II D aortoiliac disease who have failed traditional recanalization techniques. Further work in proper patient selection and safe utilization of atherectomy devices in the CIA is needed.

Update on covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation

Objective

The covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation (CERAB) technique was introduced in 2009 in order to provide an anatomically and physiologically optimal endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation.

Method

In the current review, all available evidence on this technique was summarized.

Results

In vitro studies have shown a more favorable geometry of CERAB compared to kissing stents, leading to better local flow conditions. The results of CERAB are at least as good as those achieved with kissing stents in a more complex group of treated patients. The mid-term patency rates approach those of surgical reconstruction. Initial data show that the technique can also be used in combination with chimney grafts in order to preserve side branches.

Conclusion

CERAB has proven to be the most optimal endovascular treatment option for aorto-iliac occlusive disease with regard to geometry and flow and is related to promising clinical outcomes. Prospective and comparative trials are necessary to elucidate the most optimal treatment algorithm for patients with aorto-iliac occlusive disease.

Endovascular Approach Versus Aortobifemoral Bypass Grafting: Outcomes in Extensive Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

Objective:

Compare technical, clinical, and economic outcomes between endovascular and open approaches in patients with type D aortoiliac occlusive disease according to the TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus.

Methods:

Patients undergoing revascularization for type D aortoiliac lesions, either endovascular or open surgery approach, from 2 Portuguese institutions between January 2011 and October 2017 were included. The surgical technique was left to the surgeon discretion. Patients with common femoral artery affection, both obstructive and aneurysmatic, were excluded.

Results:

Twenty-seven patients underwent aortobifemoral bypass and 32 patients were submitted to endovascular repair. The patients undergoing endovascular procedure were more likely to present with chronic heart failure ( P = .001) and chronic kidney disease ( P = .022) and less likely to have a history of smoking ( P = .05). The mean follow-up period was 67.84 (95% confidence interval = 61.85-73.83) months. The open surgery approach resulted in a higher technical success ( P = .001); however, limb salvage and patency rates were not different between groups. Endovascular approach was associated with a shorter length-of-stay, both inpatient (6 vs 9 days; P = .041) and patients admitted in the intensive care unit (0 vs 3.81 days; P = .001) as well as lower hospital expenses (US$9281 vs US$23 038; P = .001) with a similar procedure cost (US$2316 vs US$1173; P = .6). No differences were found in the postsurgical quality of life.

Conclusion:

Endovascular approach is, at least, clinically equivalent to open surgery approach and is more cost-efficient. The “endovascular-first” approach should be considered for type D occlusive aortoiliac lesions.

Independent predictors of loss of primary patency at 1 year after aortoiliac stent implantation

To identify the risk factors for restenosis at 1 year after aortoiliac stenting for symptomatic peripheral artery disease in real-world practice. We performed subgroup analysis of a large-scale prospective multicenter registry study enrolling Japanese patients with peripheral arterial disease who underwent aortoiliac endovascular therapy from April 2014 to April 2016. The subgroup comprised 880 patients (1108 limbs) who received iliac stenting. The Rutherford class was 2, 3, and 4 in 42%, 51%, and 7% of the patients, respectively. TASC II class D disease was noted in 18% of the patients and 35% had chronic total occlusion. Mean total stent length was 82.1 ± 48.5 mm and minimum stent diameter was 9.0 ± 1.3 mm. Balloon-expandable stents were used in 8% of the limbs. Concomitant femoropopliteal lesions were present in 36% of the limbs with aortoiliac lesions. In the overall patient population, the risk of restenosis at 1 year after stenting was 11.4%. Femoropopliteal lesions and the minimum stent diameter were identified as independent risk factors for restenosis at 1 year. When the study population was stratified according to these two risk factors, the restenosis rate at 1 year was 27.1% in the patients with a minimum stent diameter < 8 mm and femoropopliteal lesions, whereas it was only 5.3% in those with a minimum stent diameter ≥ 10 mm and no femoropopliteal lesions. Femoropopliteal lesions and a smaller stent diameter were independent risk factors for restenosis at 1 year after aortoiliac stenting.

Endovascular treatment of different types of iliac occlusions-Results from an observational study

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of endovascular therapy on the treatment of different types of iliac occlusions.

Materials and methods

A bi-center prospective, non-randomized study was conducted on 100 patients (mean age 59.14 ± 8.53; 64 men) who underwent endovascular treatment of iliac occlusive disease between January 2013 and November 2017. We evaluated baseline data, procedure, and follow-up results for the entire group, and according to Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC II) classification. The majority of patients (60%) were treated for severe claudication; 56 (56%) patients had TASC B occlusions, 28 patients TASC C, and 16 patients TASC D.

Results

The mean length of the occluded segments was 61.41 ± 35.15 mm. Procedural complications developed in 6 patients (6%). Mean ankle-brachial pressure index increased from 0.40 ± 0.12 preoperatively to 0.82 ± 0.16 postoperatively. The mean follow-up was 33.18 ± 15.03 months. After 1 and 5 years, the primary patency rates were 98% and 75.1%, and the secondary patency rate was 97% respectively. Regarding occlusion complexity there were no statistical significant differences in primary patency rates (TASC B vs. C vs. D: p = 0.19). There were no statistically significant differences in primary patency rates between patients in different clinical stages, as well as between the type of stents, and location of the occlusion.

Conclusion

In our study, endovascular treatment for iliac artery occlusions proved to be a safe and efficient approach with excellent primary and secondary patency rates regardless of the complexity of occlusions defined by TASC II classification. This study is aligned with the notion that in well selected patients, endovascular therapy can be the treatment of choice even in complex iliac lesions if performed by experienced endovascular interventionists in high volume centers.

Outcomes From the Multicenter Italian Registry on Primary Endovascular Treatment of Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

Purpose: To report the results of endovascular treatment of iliac and complex aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) in a multicenter Italian registry. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, multicenter, observational cohort study analyzed 713 patients (mean age 68±10 years; 539 men) with isolated iliac and complex aortoiliac lesions treated with primary stenting between January 2015 and December 2017. Indications for treatment were claudication in 406 (57%) patients and critical limb ischemia in 307 (43%). According to the TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC) classification, the lesions were categorized as type A (104, 15%), type B (171, 24%), type C (170, 24%), and type D (268, 37%). Early (<30 days) endpoints included mortality, thrombosis, and major complications. Late major outcomes were primary and secondary patency and freedom from reintervention as estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis; estimates are given with the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Associations between baseline variables and primary patency were sought with multivariate analysis; the results are presented as the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI. Results: Technical success was achieved in 708 (99%) lesions; in-hospital mortality was 0.6% (n=4). The median follow-up was 11 months (range 0-42). The estimated primary patency rate was 96% (95% CI 94% to 97%) at 1 year and 94% (95% CI 91% to 96%) at 2 years. The estimated secondary patency was 99% (95% CI 97% to 99%) at 1 year and 98% (95% CI 95% to 99%) at 2 years. The estimated freedom from reintervention was 98% (95% CI 96% to 99%) at 1 year and 97% (95% CI 94% to 98.5%) at 2 years. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the application of a covered stent was associated with an increased need for reintervention (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.74, p=0.005). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was associated with decreased primary patency (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.25 to 10.8, p=0.018). Conclusion: Endovascular intervention with primary stent placement for aortoiliac occlusive disease achieved satisfactory 2-year patency regardless of the complexity of the lesion. Almost all TASC lesions should be considered for primary endovascular intervention if suitable.

[Aortic bifurcation reconstruction : Endovascular repair and alternatives]

CLINICAL ISSUE

Aortic bifurcation disease is a manifestation of arteriosclerosis in about 95% of cases. Stenotic disease of the aortic bifurcation is a special form of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). Men older than 60 years are particularly affected.

STANDARD TREATMENT

The potential of endovascular therapy has continued to increase. Hereby, the increased availability of hybrid operating suites which allow for a combined use of endovascular techniques and open surgery plays an important role.

DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP

For the decision on the type of therapy and the sizing of the prosthesis, thin-slice CT angiography (CTA) of the abdominal aorta and the iliac arteries including multiplanar reconstructions in the sagittal and coronal planes is sufficient. The inguinal arteries have to be included in the CTA volume.

PERFORMANCE

Compared to open surgery, endovascular therapy of aortic bifurcation disease has the advantage of reduced invasiveness.

ACHIEVEMENTS

Treatment of aortic bifurcation disease continues to change. In daily practice, the standard treatment of complex aortic bifurcation disease is still open surgery. However, an increasing number of studies indicate that endovascular therapy and open surgery should be considered equivalent, complementary methods.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Good quality preinterventional CTA is important for intervention planning. If you want to offer endovascular therapy as a radiologist, knowledge of interventional skills and close cooperation with clinical colleagues, particularly the vascular surgeon, is mandatory.

The Influence of Inflammation on Fibrinogen Turnover and Redistribution of the Hemostatic Balance to a Prothrombotic State in High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity-Dual Poor Responder (HTPR-DPR) Patients

Knowledge about the influence of inflammation on platelet function and relocation of hemostatic balance to hypercoagulable state is still unclear. We compared two groups of patients who suffer from acute vs. chronic inflammatory process and additionally present high on-treatment platelet reactivity-dual platelet resistance. We did not found any differences in platelet aggregation between both investigated groups, but patients who suffer from chronic inflammation presented stronger relocation of the hemostatic balance to the hypercoagulability. A high concentration of prothrombin fragment F1+2 together with higher activity of von Willebrand factor in critical limb ischemia shows more exaggerated fibrinogen turnover although the blood concentration of this factor was in normal range. We concluded that high on-treatment platelet reactivity-dual platelet resistance and intensified inflammation are linked with elevated platelet and fibrinogen turnover to counteract proper hemostatic balance in favor of a prothrombotic state.

Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

GUIDELINE SUMMARY

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is associated with mortality, amputation, and impaired quality of life. These Global Vascular Guidelines (GVG) are focused on definition, evaluation, and management of CLTI with the goals of improving evidence-based care and highlighting critical research needs. The term CLTI is preferred over critical limb ischemia, as the latter implies threshold values of impaired perfusion rather than a continuum. CLTI is a clinical syndrome defined by the presence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in combination with rest pain, gangrene, or a lower limb ulceration >2 weeks duration. Venous, traumatic, embolic, and nonatherosclerotic etiologies are excluded. All patients with suspected CLTI should be referred urgently to a vascular specialist. Accurately staging the severity of limb threat is fundamental, and the Society for Vascular Surgery Threatened Limb Classification system, based on grading of Wounds, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) is endorsed. Objective hemodynamic testing, including toe pressures as the preferred measure, is required to assess CLTI. Evidence-based revascularization (EBR) hinges on three independent axes: Patient risk, Limb severity, and ANatomic complexity (PLAN). Average-risk and high-risk patients are defined by estimated procedural and 2-year all-cause mortality. The GVG proposes a new Global Anatomic Staging System (GLASS), which involves defining a preferred target artery path (TAP) and then estimating limb-based patency (LBP), resulting in three stages of complexity for intervention. The optimal revascularization strategy is also influenced by the availability of autogenous vein for open bypass surgery. Recommendations for EBR are based on best available data, pending level 1 evidence from ongoing trials. Vein bypass may be preferred for average-risk patients with advanced limb threat and high complexity disease, while those with less complex anatomy, intermediate severity limb threat, or high patient risk may be favored for endovascular intervention. All patients with CLTI should be afforded best medical therapy including the use of antithrombotic, lipid-lowering, antihypertensive, and glycemic control agents, as well as counseling on smoking cessation, diet, exercise, and preventive foot care. Following EBR, long-term limb surveillance is advised. The effectiveness of nonrevascularization therapies (eg, spinal stimulation, pneumatic compression, prostanoids, and hyperbaric oxygen) has not been established. Regenerative medicine approaches (eg, cell, gene therapies) for CLTI should be restricted to rigorously conducted randomizsed clinical trials. The GVG promotes standardization of study designs and end points for clinical trials in CLTI. The importance of multidisciplinary teams and centers of excellence for amputation prevention is stressed as a key health system initiative.

Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is associated with mortality, amputation, and impaired quality of life. These Global Vascular Guidelines (GVG) are focused on definition, evaluation, and management of CLTI with the goals of improving evidence-based care and highlighting critical research needs. The term CLTI is preferred over critical limb ischemia, as the latter implies threshold values of impaired perfusion rather than a continuum. CLTI is a clinical syndrome defined by the presence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in combination with rest pain, gangrene, or a lower limb ulceration >2 weeks duration. Venous, traumatic, embolic, and nonatherosclerotic etiologies are excluded. All patients with suspected CLTI should be referred urgently to a vascular specialist. Accurately staging the severity of limb threat is fundamental, and the Society for Vascular Surgery Threatened Limb Classification system, based on grading of Wounds, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) is endorsed. Objective hemodynamic testing, including toe pressures as the preferred measure, is required to assess CLTI. Evidence-based revascularization (EBR) hinges on three independent axes: Patient risk, Limb severity, and ANatomic complexity (PLAN). Average-risk and high-risk patients are defined by estimated procedural and 2-year all-cause mortality. The GVG proposes a new Global Anatomic Staging System (GLASS), which involves defining a preferred target artery path (TAP) and then estimating limb-based patency (LBP), resulting in three stages of complexity for intervention. The optimal revascularization strategy is also influenced by the availability of autogenous vein for open bypass surgery. Recommendations for EBR are based on best available data, pending level 1 evidence from ongoing trials. Vein bypass may be preferred for average-risk patients with advanced limb threat and high complexity disease, while those with less complex anatomy, intermediate severity limb threat, or high patient risk may be favored for endovascular intervention. All patients with CLTI should be afforded best medical therapy including the use of antithrombotic, lipid-lowering, antihypertensive, and glycemic control agents, as well as counseling on smoking cessation, diet, exercise, and preventive foot care. Following EBR, long-term limb surveillance is advised. The effectiveness of nonrevascularization therapies (eg, spinal stimulation, pneumatic compression, prostanoids, and hyperbaric oxygen) has not been established. Regenerative medicine approaches (eg, cell, gene therapies) for CLTI should be restricted to rigorously conducted randomizsed clinical trials. The GVG promotes standardization of study designs and end points for clinical trials in CLTI. The importance of multidisciplinary teams and centers of excellence for amputation prevention is stressed as a key health system initiative.

Acute and Midterm Outcomes of Antegrade vs Retrograde Crossing Strategies for Endovascular Treatment of Iliac Artery Chronic Total Occlusions

Purpose: To examine whether an antegrade or retrograde crossing strategy for treatment of iliac artery chronic total occlusions (CTOs) is associated with differences in procedural or midterm outcomes. Materials and Methods: A dual-center retrospective cohort study was conducted in 168 patients (mean age 66.4±10.6 years; 116 men) treated for CTOs in 110 common iliac arteries (CIA), 52 external iliac arteries (EIA), and 26 combined CIA/EIAs. Logistic regression models were developed to determine the association between crossing strategy and procedural complications, 1- and 3-year target lesion revascularization (TLR), and major adverse limb events (MALE). Results are presented as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: An initial antegrade strategy was more common for EIA CTOs (p<0.005), and an initial retrograde strategy was more often used in CIA (p<0.005) and combined CIA/EIA (p<0.005) CTOs. Crossover to an alternate approach was required in 27.6% of initial antegrade attempts and 9.6% of initial retrograde attempts. EIA CTOs were the most likely lesions to be treated successfully with the initial attempt (either strategy). In all, 123 (65.4%) lesions were successfully crossed with a final retrograde approach and 65 with a final antegrade approach. Overall target lesion success was high for both groups (95.1% vs 93.2%, p=0.456). Lesions treated with a final retrograde approach were shorter (75.3±34.9 vs 87.6±31.3 mm, p=0.005) and were more likely to be treated with a reentry device (34.2% vs 9.2%, p<0.001) and with balloon-expandable stents (39.2% vs 17.7%, p=0.005). The final antegrade approach was associated with a lower risk of target lesion complications (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.81, p=0.034). The two crossing approaches were associated with similar estimates of 1- and 3-year TLR and MALE. Conclusion: A final antegrade approach was associated with lower rates for complications but the 2 approaches were similar in terms of lesion success, TLR, and MALE. The EIA CTOs were more likely to be treated with an antegrade approach and more likely to be crossed successfully with the initial approach irrespective of the crossing direction.

Comparison of results between kissing stent and aortic bifurcated bypass in aortoiliac occlusive disease

OBJECTIVE

Kissing stent (KS) technique has been used as an alternative to aortic bifurcated bypass surgery (ABBS) for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). We aimed to compare the results of ABBS and KS in AIOD.

METHODS

Medical records of patients treated with ABBS and KS between March 2011 and December 2016 in a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The patients' characteristics and clinical outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent ABBS had a more common history of smoking (P = 0.04) and lower body mass index (P = 0.02). A significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of the TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II classification (P < 0.01). A significant difference was observed between the two groups of improvement in postoperative mean ankle-brachial indexes (ABI) (ABBS: 0.57 ± 0.24 vs KS: 0.41 ± 0.18, P = 0.01). A significant difference was observed between the combined treatments of the two groups (P < 0.01). Primary patency rates of the ABBS and KS groups at 1, 2, and 3 years were 90.1% and 100%, 82.6% and 90.6%, and 82.6% and 90.6%, respectively (P = 0.637). Primary assisted patency rates of the ABBS and KS groups at 1, 2, and 3 years were 90.1% and 100%, 82.6% and 95.7%, and 82.6% and 95.7%, respectively (P = 0.110). Secondary patency rates of the ABBS and KS groups at 1, 2, and 3 years were 93.8% and 100%, 93.8% and 95.7%, and 93.8% and 95.7%, respectively (P = 0.512).

CONCLUSION

ABBS in AIOD remains an important revascularization option whenever endovascular treatment is not feasible.

Lower extremity arterial disease in patients with diabetes: a contemporary narrative review

Lower-extremity arterial disease (LEAD) is a major endemic disease with an alarming increased prevalence worldwide. It is a common and severe condition with excess risk of major cardiovascular events and death. It also leads to a high rate of lower-limb adverse events and non-traumatic amputation. The American Diabetes Association recommends a widespread medical history and clinical examination to screen for LEAD. The ankle brachial index (ABI) is the first non-invasive tool recommended to diagnose LEAD although its variable performance in patients with diabetes. The performance of ABI is particularly affected by the presence of peripheral neuropathy, medial arterial calcification, and incompressible arteries. There is no strong evidence today to support an alternative test for LEAD diagnosis in these conditions. The management of LEAD requires a strict control of cardiovascular risk factors including diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidaemia. The benefit of intensive versus standard glucose control on the risk of LEAD has not been clearly established. Antihypertensive, lipid-lowering, and antiplatelet agents are obviously worthfull to reduce major cardiovascular adverse events, but few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the benefits of these treatments in terms of LEAD and its related adverse events. Smoking cessation, physical activity, supervised walking rehabilitation and healthy diet are also crucial in LEAD management. Several advances have been achieved in endovascular and surgical revascularization procedures, with obvious improvement in LEAD management. The revascularization strategy should take into account several factors including anatomical localizations of lesions, medical history of each patients and operator experience. Further studies, especially RCTs, are needed to evaluate the interest of different therapeutic strategies on the occurrence and progression of LEAD and its related adverse events in patients with diabetes.

Contemporary outcomes of thoracofemoral bypass

OBJECTIVE

Thoracofemoral bypass (TFB) is an alternative to aortofemoral bypass (AFB) or extra-anatomic bypass for severe aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). TFB may be particularly useful in select patients with concurrent visceral aortic branch vessel disease, infrarenal aortic occlusions, or after failed AFB. However, there are few contemporary series describing the indications and outcomes for TFB. Therefore, the purpose of this analysis was to review our experience with TFB.

METHODS

All patients undergoing TFB for occlusive disease from 2002 to 2017 were reviewed. All patients underwent left thoracoretroperitoneal exposure of the supraceliac aorta with division of the diaphragmatic crus and supraceliac cross-clamping. An end-to-side aortic anastomosis was created and each graft limb was tunneled in the retroperitoneum to the femoral bifurcation. Adjunctive visceral/infrainguinal revascularization was performed selectively based on symptoms, end-organ function, and/or preoperative imaging. The primary end points were major complications and 30-day mortality. Secondary end points included limb patency, freedom from major adverse limb events, and survival. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to characterize the end points.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients (age 61 ± 9 years; 54% female; 7% in a hypercoaguable state) underwent TFB. The mean preoperative ankle-brachial index was 0.4 bilaterally. Indications included critical limb ischemia (56%), claudication (30%), acute limb ischemia (7%), and combined AIOD and mesenteric ischemia (7%). Seven patients (17%) had previously undergone AFB and 15 (38%) had previously undergone any prior aortic operation. Adjunctive visceral bypass occurred in 8 patients (20%; N = 14 grafts, n = 6 renal, n = 5 superior mesenteric artery, and n = 3 celiac). The postoperative duration of stay was 11 days (interquartile range [IQR], 7-16 days) and the 30-day mortality was 5% (n = 2). Major complications occurred in 34% of patients (N = 14; pulmonary, 15%; cardiac, 12%; bleeding, 7%; accidental splenectomy, 5%; renal, 5%; wound, 2%). The mean postoperative ankle-brachial index was 0.9 bilaterally. At a median follow-up of 7 months (IQR, 1-17 months), 5 patients (12%) underwent some form of reintervention (graft/limb related, n = 4 [n = 2 graft thrombosis, n = 2 graft infection], n = 1 mesenteric bypass revision). The estimated 3-year primary limb patency and freedom from major adverse limb events were 80 ± 10%, and 70 ± 10%, respectively. The estimated 5-year survival was 93 ± 5% (median, 27.3; IQR, 14.5-35.2; 95% confidence interval, 17.9-32.8).

CONCLUSIONS

This experience represents one of the largest and most current series of retroperitoneal TFB. We demonstrate that TFB can be performed with good outcomes for patients with severe AIOD, especially if concomitant visceral/infrainguinal reconstruction is warranted. These results support a continued role for TFB in select patients.

[Hemostatic changes in patients with peripheral artery disease before and after bypass surgery]

AIM

To assess intrinsic coagulation pathway factors activity and hemostatic markers of endothelial dysfunction in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) before and after lower extremity bypass surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

80 patients with PAD Fontaine grade IIB-III were enrolled. 40 patients underwent open aorto-femoral-popliteal repair (group A) and 40 patients - medication (group B). Before and in 3 months after surgery peripheral venous blood samples were collected to assess the activity of factors VIII, IX, XI, von Willebrand factor (VWF), protein C (PrC), and metabolites of nitric oxide II (NO).

RESULTS

Increased preoperative activity of VIII, IX, XI, and VWF factors compared with normal values was observed in group A. After 3 months there was an additional increase of VIII and VWF factors' activity. Activity of IX and XI factors remained increased on background of reduced level of NO metabolites. In group B increased activity of IX, XI, and VWF factors was revealed while levels of NO metabolites and PrC were normal.

CONCLUSION

Thus, PAD is followed by prothrombotic state especially in patients after surgery. Surgical procedures are associated with more severe hypercoagulation.

Endovascular and Hybrid Revascularization for Complicated Aorto-Iliac Occlusive Disease: Short-Term Results in Single Institute Experience

Background

Treatment for extensive aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) includes endovascular interventions, hybrid procedures and surgical reconstruction. This study evaluated the short-term outcomes of endovascular and hybrid procedures in patients with Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC-II) D AIOD lesions.

Materials and Methods

From January 2013 to June 2015, 41 patients with TASC-II D AIOD lesions who underwent revascularization at our institute were retrospectively included. Nineteen underwent endovascular procedures and 22 underwent hybrid procedures with a postoperative surveillance program for at least 1 year. Patient demographics and short-term outcomes were analyzed.

Results

The procedural success rate in all patients was 100%. The accumulative postoperative complication rate was 20.2%, and the major complication was acute kidney injury (14.6%). The time of freedom from target lesion revascularization was 18.9 months. The primary patency rates in the endovascular group were 89.5% and 84.2% at 1 and 2 years, respectively, compared to 95.5% at 1 and 2 years in the hybrid group; however, the difference was not significant (p = 0.234). The secondary patency rates were 94.7% and 93% at 1 and 2 years, respectively, in the endovascular group, and 95.5% and 94% at 1 and 2 years, respectively, in the hybrid group; however, the differences was not significant (p = 0.916).

Conclusions

Our study revealed that endovascular and hybrid procedures are favorable treatment choices for patients with TASC-II D AIOD lesions. In patients with multilevel steno-occlusive lesions, hybrid procedures improved distal runoff flow and reduced the complexity of endovascular procedures.