Increasing access to integrated ESKD care as part of universal health coverage

Risk factors associated with mortality among patients on maintenance hemodialysis: The Thailand Renal Replacement Therapy registry

INTRODUCTION

End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) has been increasing in prevalence across the world, including Thailand, and patients with ESKD on hemodialysis have a high mortality risk.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed across 855 hemodialysis centers in the Thailand Renal Replacement Therapy registry. The database and mortality data were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 58 952 patients were included. The survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 93.5%, 69.7%, and 41.2%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, factors such as aging, permanent catheter or arteriovenous graft, twice-weekly hemodialysis, low levels of urea reduction ratio, normalized protein catabolic rate, hemoglobin, transferrin saturation, serum albumin, LDL-cholesterol, intact-parathyroid hormone, uric acid, sodium, phosphate, and bicarbonate were significantly related to death.

CONCLUSION

Mortality is high in ESKD patients on hemodialysis. Age, type of vascular access, twice-weekly hemodialysis, inadequate dialysis, low protein intake, anemia, abnormal electrolytes, and bone mineral disorders are associated with all-cause mortality.

Global kidney health priorities-perspectives from the ISN-GKHA

Kidney diseases have become a global epidemic with significant public health impact. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is set to become the fifth largest cause of death by 2040, with major impacts on low-resource countries. This review is based on a recent report of the International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas (ISN-GKHA) which uncovered gaps in key vehicles of kidney care delivery assessed using World Health Organization building blocks for health systems (financing, services delivery, workforce, access to essential medicines, health information systems and leadership/governance). High-income countries had more centres for kidney replacement therapies (KRT), higher KRT access, higher allocation of public funds to KRT, larger workforces, more health information systems, and higher government recognition of CKD and KRT as health priorities than low-income nations. Evidence identified from the current ISN-GKHA initiative should serve as template for generating and advancing policies and partnerships to address the global burden of kidney disease. The results provide opportunities for kidney health policymakers, nephrology leaders and organizations to initiate consultations to identify strategies for improving care delivery and access in equitable, resource-sensitive manners. Policies to increase use of public funding for kidney care, lower the cost of KRT and increase workforces should be a high priority in low-resource nations, while strategies that expand access to kidney care and maintain current status of care should be prioritized in high-income countries. In all countries, the perspectives of people with CKD should be exhaustively explored to identify core kidney care priorities.

Preparing for responsive management versus preparing for renal dialysis in multimorbid older people with advanced chronic kidney disease (Prepare for Kidney Care): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) prevalence is steadily increasing, in part due to increased multimorbidity in our aging global population. When progression to kidney failure cannot be avoided, people need unbiased information to inform decisions about whether to start dialysis, if or when indicated, or continue with holistic person-centred care without dialysis (conservative kidney management). Comparisons suggest that while there may be some survival benefit from dialysis over conservative kidney management, in people aged 80 years and over, or with multiple health problems or frailty, this may be at the expense of quality of life, hospitalisations, symptom burden and preferred place of death. Prepare for Kidney Care aims to compare preparation for a renal dialysis pathway with preparation for a conservative kidney management pathway, in relation to quantity and quality of life in multimorbid, frail, older people with advanced CKD.

METHODS

This is a two-arm, superiority, parallel group, non-blinded, individual-level, multi-centre, pragmatic trial, set in United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS) kidney units. Patients with advanced CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2, not due to acute kidney injury) who are (a) 80 years of age and over regardless of frailty or multimorbidity, or (b) 65-79 years of age if they are frail or multimorbid, are randomised 1:1 to 'prepare for responsive management', a protocolised form of conservative kidney management, or 'prepare for renal dialysis'. An integrated QuinteT Recruitment Intervention is included. The primary outcome is mean total number of quality-adjusted life years during an average follow-up of 3 years. The primary analysis is a modified intention-to-treat including all participants contributing at least one quality of life measurement. Secondary outcomes include survival, patient-reported outcomes, physical functioning, relative/carer reported outcomes and qualitative assessments of treatment arm acceptability. Cost-effectiveness is estimated from (i) NHS and personal social services and (ii) societal perspectives.

DISCUSSION

This randomised study is designed to provide high-quality evidence for frail, multimorbid, older patients with advanced CKD choosing between preparing for dialysis or conservative kidney management, and healthcare professionals and policy makers planning the related services.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN, ISRCTN17133653 ( https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN17133653 ). Registered 31 May 2017.

Improving Efficiency in Healthcare: Lessons from Successful Health Policies in Chile

BACKGROUND

Chile has made significant progress in recent decades in implementing policies to improve the efficiency of its health system with an impact on population health.

AIM

To present five case studies of successful policies whose impact has been documented.

METHODS

Case study report.

RESULTS

First, we present a summary of the evidence supporting the policy that is changing the Chilean care model from a problem-based to a patient-centered care model. Second, we show how tele-nephrology and advanced renal care units have demonstrated significant impact on chronic kidney disease in Chile. This internationally recognized successful Chilean policy is contributing to address one of the conditions that explains the highest financial burden on the health system. Third, we present recent evidence on the effectiveness of teleoncology care in Chile. Fourth, we highlight the most recent system of epidemiological surveillance implemented in Chile, the EPIVIGILA system, which was essential to support decisions throughout the pandemic. Finally, we underline the health benefit plans implemented in recent decades to improve access to services and financial protection.

CONCLUSIONS

Chile has successfully implemented policies in its health system that have an impact on efficiency and population health. These experiences can be replicated in countries facing similar challenges, using the Chilean experience as a benchmark.

Progress of nations in the organisation of, and structures for, kidney care delivery between 2019 and 2023: cross sectional survey in 148 countries

OBJECTIVE

To assess changes in key measures of kidney care using data reported in 2019 and 2023.

DESIGN

Cross sectional survey in 148 countries.

SETTING

Surveys from International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas between 2019 and 2023 that included participants from countries in Africa (n=36), Eastern and Central Europe (n=16), Latin America (n=18), the Middle East (n=11), Newly Independent States and Russia (n=10), North America and the Caribbean (n=8), North and East Asia (n=6), Oceania and South East Asia (n=15), South Asia (n=7), and Western Europe (n=21).

PARTICIPANTS

Countries that participated in both surveys (2019 and 2023).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Comparison of 2019 and 2023 data for availability of kidney replacement treatment services, access, health financing, workforce, registries, and policies for kidney care. Data for countries that participated in both surveys (2019 and 2023) were included in our analysis. Country data were aggregated by International Society of Nephrology regions and World Bank income levels. Proportionate changes in the status of these measures across both periods were reported.

RESULTS

Data for 148 countries that participated in both surveys were available for analysis. The proportions of countries that provided public funding (free at point of delivery) increased from 27% in 2019 to 28% in 2023 for haemodialysis, 23% to 28% for peritoneal dialysis, and 31% to 36% for kidney transplantation services. Centres for these treatments increased from 4.4 per million population (pmp) to 4.8 pmp (P<0.001) for haemodialysis, 1.4 pmp to 1.6 pmp for peritoneal dialysis, and 0.43 pmp to 0.46 pmp for kidney transplantation services. Overall, access to haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis improved, however, access to kidney transplantation decreased from 30 pmp to 29 pmp. The global median prevalence of nephrologists increased from 9.5 pmp to 12.4 pmp (P<0.001). Changes in the availability of kidney registries and in national policies and strategies for kidney care were variable across regions and country income levels. The reporting of specific barriers to optimal kidney care by countries increased from 55% to 59% for geographical factors, 58% to 68% (P=0.043) for availability of nephrologists, and 46% to 52% for political factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Important changes in key areas of kidney care delivery were noted across both periods globally. These changes effected the availability of, and access to, kidney transplantation services. Countries and regions need to enact enabling strategies for preserving access to kidney care services, particularly kidney transplantation.

A systematic review and quality assessment of economic evaluations of kidney replacement therapies in end-stage kidney disease

End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is fatal without treatment by kidney replacement therapies (KRTs). However, access to these treatment modalities can be problematic given the high costs. This systematic review (SR) aims to provide an updated economic evaluation of pairwise comparisons of KRTs and the implications for the proportion of patients with access to the KRT modalities, i.e., kidney transplantation (KT), hemodialysis (HD), and peritoneal dialysis (PD). This SR was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020. We searched studies in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) registry, from inception to March 2023. Thirteen studies were included with pairwise comparisons among three KRTs, with varying proportions of patients for each modality. Seven studies were from high-income countries, including five from Europe. Summary findings are presented on a cost-effectiveness plane and incremental net benefit (INB). KT was the most cost-effective intervention across the pairwise comparisons. KT and PD were both more cost-effective alternatives to HD. HD was more costly and less effective than PD in all studies except one. Concurrent efforts to increase both KT and PD represented the best scenario to improve treatment options for ESKD patients.

Global access and quality of conservative kidney management

BACKGROUND

Conservative kidney management (CKM) describes supportive care for people living with kidney failure who choose not to receive or are unable to access kidney replacement therapy (KRT). This study captured the global availability of CKM services and funding.

METHODS

Data came from the International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health survey conducted between June and September 2022. Availability of CKM, infrastructure, guidelines, medications and training were evaluated.

RESULTS

CKM was available in some form in 61% of the 165 responding countries. CKM chosen through shared decision-making was available in 53%. Choice-restricted CKM-for those unable to access KRT-was available in 39%. Infrastructure to provide CKM chosen through shared decision-making was associated with national income level, reported as being "generally available" in most healthcare settings for 71% of high-income countries, 50% of upper-middle-income countries, 33% of lower-middle-income countries and 42% of low-income countries. For choice-restricted CKM, these figures were 29%, 50%, 67% and 58%, respectively. Essential medications for pain and palliative care were available in just over half of the countries, highly dependent upon income setting. Training for caregivers in symptom management in CKM was available in approximately a third of countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Most countries report some capacity for CKM. However, there is considerable variability in terms of how CKM is defined, as well as what and how much care is provided. Poor access to CKM perpetuates unmet palliative care needs, and must be addressed, particularly in low-resource settings where death from untreated kidney failure is common.

A global overview of health system financing and available infrastructure and oversight for kidney care

BACKGROUND

Governance, health financing, and service delivery are critical elements of health systems for provision of robust and sustainable chronic disease care. We leveraged the third iteration of the International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas (ISN-GKHA) to evaluate oversight and financing for kidney care worldwide.

METHODS

A survey was administered to stakeholders from countries affiliated with the ISN from July to September 2022. We evaluated funding models utilized for reimbursement of medications, services for the management of chronic kidney disease, and provision of kidney replacement therapy (KRT). We also assessed oversight structures for the delivery of kidney care.

RESULTS

Overall, 167 of the 192 countries and territories contacted responded to the survey, representing 97.4% of the global population. High-income countries tended to use public funding to reimburse all categories of kidney care in comparison with low-income countries (LICs) and lower-middle income countries (LMICs). In countries where public funding for KRT was available, 78% provided universal health coverage. The proportion of countries that used public funding to fully reimburse care varied for non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (27%), dialysis for acute kidney injury (either hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) (44%), chronic hemodialysis (45%), chronic peritoneal dialysis (42%), and kidney transplant medications (36%). Oversight for kidney care was provided at a national level in 63% of countries, and at a state/provincial level in 28% of countries.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated significant gaps in universal care coverage, and in oversight and financing structures for kidney care, particularly in in LICs and LMICs.

Advanced Care Planning in Chronic Kidney Disease: Qualitative Impact of the MY WAY Intervention

CONTEXT

Despite recommendations for shared decision-making and advanced care planning (ACP) for people with chronic kidney disease (CKD), such conversations are infrequent. The MY WAY educational and patient coaching intervention aimed to promote high-quality ACP.

OBJECTIVES

This qualitative substudy sought to gain participant feedback on the MY WAY ACP coaching intervention, and how it impacted their wishes, perceptions of kidney care, and factors that helped them reflect on ACP.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants from the intervention arm of the MY WAY study about their prior experience with ACPs in the context of CKD, impressions of the MY WAY intervention, and outcomes of the MY WAY intervention. We conducted a qualitative thematic analysis of transcribed interviews.

RESULTS

Among 15 intervention participants, the following major themes emerged: 1) Patients with CKD approach ACP with varied experiences; 2) Patients felt the MY WAY coaching intervention supported ACP by reinforcing values; and 3) Patients found the coaching intervention focused on end of life, but not necessarily on decision making regarding CKD.

CONCLUSION

Participants perceived the coaching intervention to have high utility in facilitating ACP, but had a limited impact on CKD-specific decision-making. These findings suggest that the coach plays a crucial role in comfort with ACP conversations and that ACP readiness and engagement may not correlate with treatment preferences or understanding of CKD treatment decisions.

Cost-benefit analysis of haemodialysis in patients with end-stage kidney disease in Abuja, Nigeria

BACKGROUND

Significant gaps in scholarship on the cost-benefit analysis of haemodialysis exist in low-middle-income countries, including Nigeria. The study, therefore, assessed the cost-benefit of haemodialysis compared with comprehensive conservative care (CCC) to determine if haemodialysis is socially worthwhile and justifies public funding in Nigeria.

METHODS

The study setting is Abuja, Nigeria. The study used a mixed-method design involving primary data collection and analysis of secondary data from previous studies. We adopted an ingredient-based costing approach. The mean costs and benefits of haemodialysis were derived from previous studies. The mean costs and benefits of CCC were obtained from a primary cross-sectional survey. We estimated the benefit-cost ratios (BCR) and net benefits to determine the social value of the two interventions.

RESULTS

The net benefit of haemodialysis (2,251.30) was positive, while that of CCC was negative (-1,197.19). The benefit-cost ratio of haemodialysis was 1.09, while that of CCC was 0.66. The probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses results demonstrate that haemodialysis was more cost-beneficial than CCC, and the BCRs of haemodialysis remained above one in most scenarios, unlike CCC's BCR.

CONCLUSION

The benefit of haemodialysis outweighs its cost, making it cost-beneficial to society and justifying public funding. However, the National Health Insurance Authority requires additional studies, such as budget impact analysis, to establish the affordability of full coverage of haemodialysis.

[Characteristics and needs of patients requiring nephrology care: A review of the literature]

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a public health problem. However, the management of patients with CKD is confined to the diagnosis of the disease and its conventional treatment by dialysis or renal transplantation. The aim of this article is to describe the specific characteristics of patients suffering from kidney disease and to determine their needs according to the stage of their renal disease.

A Multinational, Multicenter Study Mapping Models of Kidney Supportive Care Practice

Introduction

Kidney supportive care (KSC) integrates kidney and palliative care to improve quality of life for people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Despite increasing interest and global advocacy to integrate KSC into kidney care, evidence to guide optimal care delivery is limited.

Methods

This observational cross-sectional study used an online survey to describe current KSC models in Australia, Aotearoa-New Zealand, and the UK.

Results

Between April and December 2022, 114 nephrology units responded (response rate 67%), with 66% having a dedicated KSC service (UK, 74%; Australia, 58%; and New Zealand, 67%). Many different health care professionals worked in KSC services with diversity in clinical resources and activities between units and across countries. Overall, funding for KSC services was low, with a median full time equivalent (FTE) per unit (standardized per 100 people receiving hemodialysis [HD]) of 0.51 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.17-1.05) and 4 units provided a service without allocated funding. The scope of KSC service was wide-ranging and prioritized activities included symptom management, psychological support, complex future treatment planning and discussion, and care coordination. There were no significant differences between countries in terms of location of care provision, frequency of review, referral patterns or discharge rates; however, there was variation described within countries.

Conclusion

Models of KSC vary markedly across kidney units and between countries. Despite this variation, there was consistency in terms of clinical priorities which were person-centered and focused on physical and psychosocial well-being. Further research is required to evaluate the effectiveness of KSC provision, alongside improved funding methods to ensure sustainable and equitable KSC delivery.

A Comparison between the Effectiveness of computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Training and transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Dialysis Patients' Executive Functions

Purpose

Executive function impairments are among the most common dialysis side effects. The present study aims to compare the efficiency of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) with computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Training (cCRT) on dialysis patients' executive functions.

Research method

The present study, a quasi-experimental effort, adopted a pre-test/post-test method that included a control (sham) group.

Design

The study sample consisted of 30 participants, selected through the convenience sampling method, and categorized into three groups of cCRT, tDCS, and sham participants. The cCRT participants were asked to complete 8 tasks in Captain's Log MindPower Builder software. The tDCS participants were treated with a 0.06 mA/cm2 current with the anodal electrode on F3 and the cathodal electrode on Fp2. For the sham participants, the electrodes were put on the same regions but there was no current stimulation. The treatment lasted for 10 sessions carried out every other day.

Results

The results of MANCOVA showed no significant difference between the sham group and the cCRT group in any of the executive function items. . However, between the sham group and the tDCS group was detected a significant difference in spatial working memory (p \< 0.05) and a marginally significant in cognitive flexibility (p = 0.091). No significant difference was reported between cCRT and tDCS groups in any item.

Conclusion

According to the findings of the study, given the efficacy of tDCS on spatial working memory and cognitive flexibility for dialysis patients, it can be used to improve these skills.

Evaluation of the implementation of a "Pediatric Feasibility Assessment for Transplantation" tool in children and adolescents at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation remains the treatment of choice for children with kidney failure (KF). In South Africa, kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is restricted to children eligible for transplantation. This study reports on the implementation of the Paediatric Feasibility Assessment for Transplantation (pFAT) tool, a psychosocial risk score developed in South Africa to support transparent transplant eligibility assessment in a low-resource setting.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective descriptive analysis of children assessed for KRT using pFAT tool from 2015 to 2021.

RESULTS

Using the pFAT form, 88 children (median [range] age 12.0 [1.1 to 19.0] years) were assessed for KRT. Thirty (34.1%) children were not listed for KRT, scoring poorly in all domains, and were referred for supportive palliative care. Fourteen of these 30 children (46.7%) died, with a median survival of 6 months without dialysis. Nine children were reassessed and two were subsequently listed. Residing >300 km from the hospital (p = .009) and having adherence concerns (p = .003) were independently associated with nonlisting. Of the 58 (65.9%) children listed for KRT, 40 (69.0%) were transplanted. One-year patient and graft survival were 97.2% and 88.6%, respectively. Only one of the four grafts lost at 1-year posttransplant was attributed to psychosocial issues.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term outcomes among children listed using the pFAT form are good. Among those nonlisted, the pFAT highlights specific psychosocial/socioeconomic barriers, over which most children themselves have no power to change, which should be systemically addressed to permit eligibility of more children and save lives.

The Ottawa Statement implementation guidance document for cluster randomized trials in the hemodialysis setting

Research teams are increasingly interested in using cluster randomized trial (CRT) designs to generate practice-guiding evidence for in-center maintenance hemodialysis. However, CRTs raise complex ethical issues. The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials, published in 2012, provides 15 recommendations to address ethical issues arising within 7 domains: justifying the CRT design, research ethics committee review, identifying research participants, obtaining informed consent, gatekeepers, assessing benefits and harms, and protecting vulnerable participants. But applying the Ottawa Statement recommendations to CRTs in the hemodialysis setting is complicated by the unique features of the setting and population. Here, with the help of content experts and patient partners, we co-developed this implementation guidance document to provide research teams, research ethics committees, and other stakeholders with detailed guidance on how to apply the Ottawa Statement recommendations to CRTs in the hemodialysis setting, the result of a 4-year research project. Thus, our work demonstrates how the voices of patients, caregivers, and all stakeholders may be included in the development of research ethics guidance.

Capacity for the management of kidney failure in the International Society of Nephrology Newly Independent States and Russia region: report from the 2023 ISN Global Kidney Health Atlas (ISN-GKHA)

The International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas (ISN-GKHA) was established to aid understanding of the status and capacity of countries to provide optimal kidney care worldwide. This report presents the current characteristics of kidney care in the ISN Newly Independent States (NIS) and Russia region. Although the median prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) was higher (11.4%) than the global median (9.5%), the median CKD-related death rate (1.4%) and prevalence of treated kidney failure (KF) in the region (411 per million population [pmp]) were lower than they are globally (2.5% and 822.8 pmp, respectively). Capacity to provide an adequate frequency of hemodialysis (HD) and kidney transplantation services is present in all the countries (100%). In spite of significant economic advancement, the region has critical shortages of nephrologists, dietitians, transplant coordinators, social workers, palliative care physicians, and kidney supportive care nurses. Home HD remains unavailable in any country in the region. Although national registries for dialysis and kidney transplantation are available in most of the countries across the ISN NIS and Russia region, few registries exist for nondialysis CKD and acute kidney injury. Although a national strategy for improving care for CKD patients is presented in more than half of the countries, no country in the region had a CKD-specific policy. Strategies that incorporate workforce training, planning, and development for all KF caregivers could help ensure sustainable kidney care delivery in the ISN NIS and Russia region.

Mortality and disability-adjusted life years in North Africa and Middle East attributed to kidney dysfunction: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

Background

The study aimed to estimate the attributable burden to kidney dysfunction as a metabolic risk factor in the North Africa and Middle East (NAME) region and its 21 countries in 1990-2019.

Methods

The data used in this study were obtained from the Global Burden of Diseases (GBD) 2019 study, which provided estimated measures of deaths, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), and other epidemiological indicators of burden. To provide a better insight into the differences in the level of social, cultural, and economic factors, the Socio-Demographic Index (SDI) was used.

Results

In the NAME region in 2019, the number of deaths attributed to kidney dysfunction was 296 632 (95% uncertainty interval: 249 965-343 962), which was about 2.5 times higher than in the year 1990. Afghanistan, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia had the highest, and Kuwait, Turkey, and Iran (Islamic Republic of) had the lowest age-standardized rate of DALYs attributed to kidney dysfunction in the region in 2019. Kidney dysfunction was accounted as a risk factor for ischemic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, stroke, and peripheral artery disease with 150 471, 111 812, 34 068, and 281 attributable deaths, respectively, in 2019 in the region. In 2019, both low-SDI and high-SDI countries in the region experienced higher burdens associated with kidney dysfunction compared to other countries.

Conclusions

Kidney dysfunction increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases burden and accounted for more deaths attributable to cardiovascular diseases than chronic kidney disease in the region in 2019. Hence, policymakers in the NAME region should prioritize kidney disease prevention and control, recognizing that neglecting its impact on other diseases is a key limitation in its management.

Conservative kidney management and kidney supportive care: core components of integrated care for people with kidney failure

Integrated kidney care requires synergistic linkage between preventative care for people at risk for chronic kidney disease and health services providing care for people with kidney disease, ensuring holistic and coordinated care as people transition between acute and chronic kidney disease and the 3 modalities of kidney failure management: conservative kidney management, transplantation, and dialysis. People with kidney failure have many supportive care needs throughout their illness, regardless of treatment modality. Kidney supportive care is therefore a vital part of this integrated framework, but is nonexistent, poorly developed, and/or poorly integrated with kidney care in many settings, especially in low- and middle-income countries. To address this, the International Society of Nephrology has (i) coordinated the development of consensus definitions of conservative kidney management and kidney supportive care to promote international understanding and awareness of these active treatments; and (ii) identified key considerations for the development and expansion of conservative kidney management and kidney supportive care programs, especially in low resource settings, where access to kidney replacement therapy is restricted or not available. This article presents the definitions for conservative kidney management and kidney supportive care; describes their core components with some illustrative examples to highlight key points; and describes some of the additional considerations for delivering conservative kidney management and kidney supportive care in low resource settings.

Pathways Project Pragmatic Lessons Learned: Integrating Supportive Care Best Practices into Real-World Kidney Care

Key Points

A multisite quality improvement project using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement learning collaborative structure helped kidney care teams identify seriously ill patients and implement supportive care best practices. Helpful approaches included needs assessment, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement tools, peer exchange, clinician role modeling, data feedback, and technical assistance. Dialysis center teams tailored implementation of best practices into routine dialysis workflows with nephrologist prerogative to delegate goals of care conversations to nurse practitioners and social workers.

Background

Despite two decades of national and international guidelines urging greater availability of kidney supportive care (KSC), uptake in the United States has been slow. We conducted a multisite quality improvement project with ten US dialysis centers to foster implementation of three KSC best practices. This article shares pragmatic lessons learned by the project organizers.

Methods

The project team engaged in reflection to distill key lessons about what did or did not work in implementing KSC.

Results

The seven key lessons are (1 ) systematically assess KSC needs; (2 ) prioritize both the initial practices to be implemented and the patients who have the most urgent needs; (3 ) use a multifaceted approach to bolster communication skills, including in-person role modeling and mentoring; (4 ) empower nurse practitioners and social workers to conduct advance care planning through teamwork and warm handoffs; (5 ) provide tailored technical assistance to help sites improve documentation and electronic health record processes for storing advance care planning information; (6 ) coach dialysis centers in how to use required Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement processes to improve KSC; and (7 ) implement systematic approaches to support patients who choose active medical management without dialysis.

Conclusions

Treatment of patients with kidney disease is provided in a complex system, especially when considered across the continuum, from CKD to kidney failure on dialysis, and at the end of life. Even among enthusiastic early adopters of KSC, 18 months was insufficient time to implement the three prioritized KSC best practices. Concentrating on a few key practices helped teams focus and see progress in targeted areas. However, effect for patients was attenuated because federal policy and financial incentives are not aligned with KSC best practices and goals.

Clinical Trial registry name and registration number

Pathways Project: KSC, NCT04125537 .

Comprehensive conservative care: what doctors say, what patients hear

The demographic evolution of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) has led to the advent of an alternative treatment option to kidney replacement therapy in the past couple of decades. The KDIGO controversies on Kidney Supportive Care called this approach "comprehensive conservative care" (CCC) and defined it as planned holistic patient-centered care for patients with CKD stage 5 that does not include dialysis. Although the benefit of this treatment option is now well-recognized, especially for the elderly, and comorbid and frail patients, its development remains limited in practice. While shared decision-making and advance care planning represent the cornerstones of the CCC approach, one of the main barriers in its development is the perfectible communication between nephrologists and patients, but also between all healthcare professionals involved in the care of advanced CKD patients. As a result, a significant gap has opened up between what doctors say and what patients hear. Indeed, although CCC is reported by nephrologists to be widely available in their facilities, few of their patients say that they have actually heard of it. The objectives of this review are to explore discrepancies between what doctors say and what patients hear, to identify the factors underlying this gap, and to formulate practical proposals for narrowing this gap in practice.

Sustainable Development Goals: Challenges and the Role of the International Society of Nephrology in Improving Global Kidney Health

The United Nations 2030 agenda for sustainable development includes 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) that represent a universal call to end poverty and protect the planet, and are intended to guide government and private sector policies for international cooperation and optimal mobilization of resources. At the core of their achievement is reducing mortality by improving the global burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. CKD is the only NCD with a consistently rising age-adjusted mortality rate and is rising steadily up the list of the causes of lives lost globally. Kidney disease is strongly affected by social determinants of health, with a strong interplay between CKD incidence and progression and other NCDs and SDGs. Tackling the shared CKD and NCD risk factors will help with progress toward the SDGs and vice versa . Challenges to global kidney health include both preexisting socioeconomic factors and natural and human-induced disasters, many of which are intended to be addressed through actions proposed in the sustainable development agenda. Opportunities to address these challenges include public health policies focused on integrated kidney care, kidney disease surveillance, building strategic partnerships, building workforce capacity, harnessing technology and virtual platforms, advocacy/public awareness campaigns, translational and implementation research, and environmentally sustainable kidney care.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence on inflammation in depressive illness and symptoms in chronic and end-stage kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Depression affects approximately 27% of adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney failure (ESKF). Depression in this population is associated with impaired quality of life and increased mortality. The extent of inflammation and the impact on depression in CKD/ESKF is yet to be established. Through a systematic literature review and meta-analysis, we aim to understand the relationship between depression and inflammation in CKD/ESKF patients.

METHODS

We searched nine electronic databases for published studies until January 2022. Titles and abstracts were screened against inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction and study quality assessment was carried out independently by two reviewers. A meta-analysis was carried out where appropriate; otherwise a narrative review of studies was completed.

RESULTS

Sixty studies met our inclusion criteria and entered the review (9481 patients included in meta-analysis). Meta-analysis of cross-sectional associations revealed significantly higher levels of pro-inflammatory biomarkers; C-reactive protein; Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha in patients with depressive symptoms (DS) compared to patients without DS. Significantly lower levels of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 were found in patients with DS compared to patients without DS. Considerable heterogeneity was detected in the analysis for most inflammatory markers.

CONCLUSION

We found evidence for an association of higher levels of pro-inflammatory and lower anti-inflammatory cytokines and DS in patients with CKD/ESKF. Clinical trials are needed to investigate whether anti-inflammatory therapies will be effective in the prevention and treatment of DS in these patients with multiple comorbidities.

[REIN and international collaboration]

On the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the REIN (French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network), a summary work on the contributions of the national French ESKD register was carried out. On the issue of its international role, the following key messages were retained. Right from its inception, the REIN registry has been integrated into the family of European registries under the direction of the European society ERA and its registry based at the Academic Medical Centre of Amsterdam. In this context, the registry has been a part of numerous international publications and projects financed by the European Commission. The expertise of the Agency of Biomedicine and REIN on the registries has been sought on several occasions in the context of setting up registries of replacement therapies. Several foreign students outside the European Union have also been able to come and work in the REIN national coordination.

Financial toxicity experienced by rural Australian families with chronic kidney disease

AIM

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its treatment places a financial burden on healthcare systems and households worldwide, yet little is known of its financial impact, on those who reside in rural settings. We aimed to quantify the financial impacts and out-of-pocket expenditure experienced by adult rural patients with CKD in Australia.

METHODS

A web based structured survey was completed between November 2020 and January 2021. English speaking participants over 18 years of age, diagnosed with CKD stages 3-5, those receiving dialysis or with a kidney transplant, who lived in a rural location in Australia.

RESULTS

In total 77 (69% completion rate) participated. The mean out of pocket expenses were 5056 AUD annually (excluding private health insurance costs), 78% of households experienced financial hardship with 54% classified as experiencing financial catastrophe (out-of-pocket expenditure greater than 10% of household income). Mean distances to access health services for all rural and remote classifications was greater than 50 kilometres for specialist nephrology services and greater than 300 kilometres for transplanting centres. Relocation for a period greater than 3 months to access care was experienced by 24% of participants.

CONCLUSION

Rural households experience considerable financial hardship due to out-of-pocket costs in accessing treatment for CKD and other health-related care, raising concerns about equity in Australia, a high-income country with universal healthcare.

Kidney Clinicians' Perceptions of Challenges and Aspirations to Improve End-Of-Life Care Provision

Introduction

End-of-life care is an essential part of integrated kidney care. However, renal clinicians' experiences of care provision and perceptions of end-of-life care needs are limited. This study explored renal clinicians' experiences of providing end-of-life care and developed recommendations to improve experiences.

Methods

An exploratory qualitative study using semistructured focus groups and 1 interview was undertaken at 5 kidney services in Victoria, Australia. The transcripts were analyzed thematically.

Results

Between February and December 2017, 54 renal clinicians (21 doctors and 33 nurses) participated in the study. Clinicians reported multiple challenges of end-of-life care experiences resulting in compromised treatment planning and decision making and highlighted priorities to guide better care experiences. Challenges of providing end-of-life care were underpinned by mismatches in illness and treatment expectations, limited engagement in advance care planning, medical complexity, and differences between clinicians and patients in what constituted quality of life. These challenges were associated with compromised end-of-life care planning, which resulted in care experiences that were rushed with a prolonged treatment focus, risking limited preparation for death and moral distress. Clinicians aspired for positive end-of-life care experiences, including patient control and consensus in decision making, and a coordinated and collaborative approach across healthcare providers.

Conclusions

Renal clinicians highlighted multiple factors and circumstances which resulted in experiences of compromised end-of-life care for patients with kidney disease. To improve care experiences, clinician-directed priorities included more training and support to facilitate systematic and earlier discussions about illness expectations and end-of-life care planning and greater communication and collaboration across healthcare providers is required.

Understanding Similarities and Differences in CKD and Dialysis Care in Children and Adults

In lower-income settings there is often a dearth of resources and nephrologists, especially pediatric nephrologists, and individual physicians often find themselves caring for patients with chronic kidney diseases and end-stage kidney failure across the age spectrum. The management of such patients in high-income settings is relatively protocolized and permits high-volume services to run efficiently. The basic principles of managing chronic kidney disease and providing dialysis are similar for adults and children, however, given the differences in body size, causes of kidney failure, nutrition, and growth between children and adults with kidney diseases, nephrologists must understand the relevance of these differences, and have an approach to providing quality and safe dialysis to each group. Prevention, early diagnosis, and early intervention with simple therapeutic and lifestyle interventions are achievable goals to manage symptoms, complications, and reduce progression, or avoid kidney failure in children and adults. These strategies currently are easier to implement in higher-resource settings with robust health systems. In many low-resource settings, kidney diseases are only first diagnosed at end stage, and resources to pay out of pocket for appropriate care are lacking. Many barriers therefore exist in these settings, where specialist nephrology personnel may be least accessible. To improve management of patients at all ages, we highlight differences and similarities, and provide practical guidance on the management of children and adults with chronic kidney disease and kidney failure. It is important that children are managed with a view to optimizing growth and well-being and maximizing future options (eg, maintaining vein health and optimizing cardiovascular risk), and that adults are managed with attention paid to quality of life and optimization of physical health.

Home dialysis: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

Home dialysis modalities (home hemodialysis [HD] and peritoneal dialysis [PD]) are associated with greater patient autonomy and treatment satisfaction compared with in-center modalities, yet the level of home-dialysis use worldwide is low. Reasons for limited utilization are context-dependent, informed by local resources, dialysis costs, access to healthcare, health system policies, provider bias or preferences, cultural beliefs, individual lifestyle concerns, potential care-partner time, and financial burdens. In May 2021, KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) convened a controversies conference on home dialysis, focusing on how modality choice and distribution are determined and strategies to expand home-dialysis use. Participants recognized that expanding use of home dialysis within a given health system requires alignment of policy, fiscal resources, organizational structure, provider incentives, and accountability. Clinical outcomes across all dialysis modalities are largely similar, but for specific clinical measures, one modality may have advantages over another. Therefore, choice among available modalities is preference-sensitive, with consideration of quality of life, life goals, clinical characteristics, family or care-partner support, and living environment. Ideally, individuals, their care-partners, and their healthcare teams will employ shared decision-making in assessing initial and subsequent kidney failure treatment options. To meet this goal, iterative, high-quality education and support for healthcare professionals, patients, and care-partners are priorities. Everyone who faces dialysis should have access to home therapy. Facilitating universal access to home dialysis and expanding utilization requires alignment of policy considerations and resources at the dialysis-center level, with clear leadership from informed and motivated clinical teams.

Significado de la hemodiálisis para la persona con enfermedad renal crónica

Introducción: La Enfermedad Renal se considera un problema de salud pública asociado a los estilos de vida de la población. El progreso de la enfermedad a estadio terminal requiere tratamiento de hemodiálisis, condición de salud que genera cambios a nivel social, económico, emocional y físico. Objetivo: Describir los significados que asigna la persona con enfermedad renal crónica al tratamiento de hemodiálisis. Material y Método: Investigación cualitativa, con enfoque en la teoría fundamentada. Al estudio se vincularon 18 personas mayores de 18 años de edad y en tratamiento de hemodiálisis. La recolección de la información se hizo a través de entrevistas en profundidad hasta conseguir la saturación teórica. El análisis de los datos se llevó a cabo en el programa ATLAS.ti9. Resultados: Se hallaron cuatro categorías: perdiendo la función renal, modificando los estilos de vida, cambiando la forma de vivir con la hemodiálisis y viviendo con hemodiálisis, estas categorías, simbolizan los significados al tratamiento de hemodiálisis. Conclusión: El tratamiento con hemodiálisis cambia el pronóstico de la enfermedad renal crónica, disminuyendo la morbilidad y la mortalidad. La persona durante el tratamiento debe adaptarse y enfrentar cambios físicos, fisiológicos, emocionales, sociales y familiares

Conservative Kidney Management: When, Why, and For Whom?

Deciding between dialysis and conservative kidney management (CKM) in an elderly or seriously ill person with kidney failure is complex and requires shared decision making. Patients and families look to their nephrologist to provide an individualized recommendation that aligns with patient-centered goals. For a balanced and considered decision to be made, dialysis should not be the default and nephrologists need to be familiar with relevant prognostic information including survival, symptom burden, functional trajectory, and quality of life with dialysis and with CKM. CKM is a holistic, proactive, and multidisciplinary treatment for kidney failure. For some elderly comorbid patients, CKM improves symptom burden and aligns with quality-of-life goals, with modest or no loss of longevity. CKM can be provided by a nephrologist alone but ideally is managed through partnership with a dedicated supportive or palliative care service embedded within the nephrology practice. Treatment decisions are best discussed early in the disease trajectory and occur over many consultations, and nephrologists should be upskilled in communication to better support patients and families in these important conversations. Nephrologists should remain actively involved in their patients' care through to end-of-life care.

How Do Kidney Disease Clinicians View Kidney Supportive Care and Palliative Care? A Qualitative Study

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Kidney supportive care (KSC) is a developing area in medicine that integrates the expertise of kidney and palliative care practitioners to improve symptoms and quality of life for people with advanced kidney disease. The intersection of the practical aspects of KSC (including care activities and clinical referrals) with palliative and end-of-life care (EOLC) are largely unknown. The aim of this study was to explore kidney disease clinicians' experiences of KSC, palliative care, and EOLC.

STUDY DESIGN

An exploratory qualitative study using semistructured focus groups.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Kidney disease clinicians (18 physicians, 3 trainees, and 33 kidney disease nurses) from 5 public hospitals were recruited across Victoria, Australia.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Thematic analysis of focus group transcripts.

RESULTS

The 2 overarching themes highlighted by clinicians were their perception that their health care systems insufficiently addressed the needs of people with advanced kidney disease, as well as their aspirations to develop KSC services to improve health care experiences. Three subthemes were identified related to limitations in health care systems: (1) variation in the clinical scope of KSC, (2) limited integration of palliative care, and (3) experiences of challenging and compromised provision of EOLC. The second theme described aspirations for future KSC services to be more inclusive, seamless, and collaborative across health care providers with capacity to respond to meet changing palliative care needs.

LIMITATIONS

Findings may not be transferable to contexts outside of Victoria, Australia; data were collected in 2017-2018 and may not reflect current or future experiences.

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney clinicians described systemic challenges and compromises in care experiences and the need for development of KSC services. They expressed that this development would require a consistent and systematic approach that integrates palliative care and embeds KSC as part of kidney health service delivery.

Mortality and Quality of Life with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Five-Year Cohort Study with a Sample Initially Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis

The quality of life, morbidity and mortality of people receiving renal replacement therapy is affected both by the renal disease itself and its treatment. The therapy that best improves renal function and quality of life is transplantation. Objectives: To study the quality of life, morbidity and mortality of people receiving renal replacement therapy over a five-year period. Design: A longitudinal multicentre study of a cohort of people with chronic kidney disease. Methods: Patients from the Girona health area receiving peritoneal dialysis were studied, gathering data on sociodemographic and clinical variables through an ad hoc questionnaire, quality of life using the SF-36 questionnaire, and social support with the MOS scale. Results: Mortality was 47.2%. Physical functioning was the variable that worsened most in comparison with the first measurement (p = 0.035). Those receiving peritoneal dialysis (p = 0.068) and transplant recipients (p = 0.083) had a better general health perception. The social functioning of transplant recipients improved (p = 0.008). Conclusions: People with chronic kidney disease had a high level of mortality. The dimension of physical functioning worsens over the years. Haemodialysis is the therapy that most negatively effects general health perception. Kidney transplantation has a positive effect on the dimensions of energy/vitality, social functioning and general health perception.

The hidden financial catastrophe of chronic kidney disease under universal coverage and Thai "Peritoneal Dialysis First Policy"

Objective

Universal health coverage can decrease the magnitude of the individual patient's financial burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD), but the residual financial hardship from the patients' perspective has not been well-studied in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aimed to evaluate the residual financial burden in patients with CKD stage 3 to dialysis in the "PD First Policy" under Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS) in Thailand.

Methods

This multicenter nationwide cross-sectional study in Thailand enrolled 1,224 patients with pre-dialysis CKD, hemodialysis (HD), and peritoneal dialysis (PD) covered by UCS and other health schemes for employees and civil servants. We interviewed patients to estimate the proportion with catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and medical impoverishment. The risk factors associated with CHE were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression.

Results

Under UCS, the total out-of-pocket expenditure in HD was over two times higher than PD and nearly six times higher than CKD stages 3-4. HD suffered significantly more CHE and medical impoverishment than PD and pre-dialysis CKD [CHE: 8.5, 9.3, 19.5, 50.0% (p < 0.001) and medical impoverishment: 8.0, 3.1, 11.5, 31.6% (p < 0.001) for CKD Stages 3-4, Stage 5, PD, and HD, respectively]. In the poorest quintile of UCS, medical impoverishment was present in all HD and two-thirds of PD patients. Travel cost was the main driver of CHE in HD. In UCS, the adjusted risk of CHE increased in PD and HD (OR: 3.5 and 16.3, respectively) compared to CKD stage 3.

Conclusions

Despite universal coverage, the residual financial burden remained high in patients with kidney failure. CHE was considerably lower in PD than HD, although the rates remained alarmingly high in the poor. The "PD First' program" could serve as a model for other LMICs. However, strategies to minimize financial distress should be further developed, especially for the poor.

Implementation and Effectiveness of a Learning Collaborative to Improve Palliative Care for Seriously Ill Hemodialysis Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Limited implementation of palliative care practices in hemodialysis may contribute to end-of-life care that is intensive and not patient centered. We determined whether a learning collaborative for hemodialysis center providers improved delivery of palliative care best practices.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Ten US hemodialysis centers participated in a pre-post study targeting seriously ill patients between April 2019 and September 2020. Three practices were prioritized: screening for serious illness, goals of care discussions, and use of a palliative dialysis care pathway. The collaborative educational bundle consisted of learning sessions, communication skills training, and implementation support. The primary outcome was change in the probability of complete advance care planning documentation among seriously ill patients. Health care utilization was a secondary outcome, and implementation outcomes of acceptability, adoption, feasibility, and penetration were assessed using mixed methods.

RESULTS

One center dropped out due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Among the remaining nine centers, 20% (273 of 1395) of patients were identified as seriously ill preimplementation, and 16% (203 of 1254) were identified as seriously ill postimplementation. From the preimplementation to postimplementation period, the adjusted probability of complete advance care planning documentation among seriously ill patients increased by 34.5 percentage points (95% confidence interval, 4.4 to 68.5). There was no difference in mortality or in utilization of palliative hemodialysis, hospice referral, or hemodialysis discontinuation. Screening for serious illness was widely adopted, and goals of care discussions were adopted with incomplete integration. There was limited adoption of a palliative dialysis care pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

A learning collaborative for hemodialysis centers spanning the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was associated with adoption of serious illness screening and goals of care discussions as well as improved documentation of advance care planning for seriously ill patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER

Pathways Project: Kidney Supportive Care, NCT04125537.

Challenges to the right to health in sub-Saharan Africa: reflections on inequities in access to dialysis for patients with end-stage kidney failure

Realization of the individual’s right to health in settings such as sub-Saharan Africa, where health care adequate resources are lacking, is challenging. This paper demonstrates this challenge by illustrating the example of dialysis, which is an expensive but life-saving treatment for people with kidney failure. Dialysis resources, if available in sub-Saharan Africa, are generally limited but in high demand, and clinicians at the bedside are faced with deciding who lives and who dies. When resource limitations exist, transparent and objective priority setting regarding access to such expensive care is required to improve equity across all health needs in a population. This process however, which weighs individual and population health needs, denies some the right to health by limiting access to health care.

This paper unpacks what it means to recognize the right to health in sub-Saharan Africa, acknowledging the current resource availability and scarcity, and the larger socio-economic context. We argue, the first order of the right to health, which should always be realized, includes protection of health, i.e. prevention of disease through public health and health-in-all policy approaches. The second order right to health care would include provision of universal health coverage to all, such that risk factors and diseases can be effectively and equitably detected and treated early, to prevent disease progression or development of complications, and ultimately reduce the demand for expensive care. The third order right to health care would include equitable access to expensive care. In this paper, we argue that recognition of the inequities in realization of the right to health between individuals with “expensive” needs versus those with more affordable needs, countries must determine if, how, and when they will begin to provide such expensive care, so as to minimize these inequities as rapidly as possible. Such a process requires good governance, multi-stakeholder engagement, transparency, communication and a commitment to progress. We conclude the paper by emphasizing that striving towards the progressive realization of the right to health for all people living in SSA is key to achieving equity in access to quality health care and equitable opportunities for each individual to maximize their own state of health.

COVID-19 and Kidney Disease: Progress in Health Inequity From Low-Income Settings

The acute coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a significant impact on the incidence and prevalence of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease globally and in low-income settings. Chronic kidney disease increases the risk of developing COVID-19 and COVID-19 causes acute kidney injury directly or indirectly and is associated with high mortality in severe cases. Outcomes of COVID-19-associated kidney disease were not equitable globally owing to a lack of health infrastructure, challenges in diagnostic testing, and management of COVID-19 in low-income settings. COVID-19 also significantly impacted kidney transplant rates and mortality among kidney transplant recipients. Vaccine availability and uptake remains a significant challenge in low- and lower-middle-income countries compared with high-income countries. In this review, we explore the inequities in low- and lower-middle-income countries and highlight the progress made in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of patients with COVID-19 and kidney disease. We recommend further studies into the challenges, lessons learned, and progress made in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of patients with COVID-19-related kidney diseases and suggest ways to improve the care and management of patients with COVID-19 and kidney disease.

Dialysis Decision-Making, Dialysis Experiences, and Illness Perceptions: A Qualitative Study of Pakistani Patients Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis

Rationale & Objective

The incidence and prevalence of patients with kidney failure requiring dialysis are increasing in Pakistan. However, in-depth perspectives on kidney care from Pakistani people requiring maintenance dialysis are lacking.

Study Design

Qualitative interview study.

Setting & Participants

Between September 2020 and January 2021, we interviewed 20 adults receiving maintenance hemodialysis in 2 outpatient dialysis units in Pakistan. We asked open-ended questions to explore their experiences with various aspects of kidney care.

Analytical Approach

We recorded, transcribed, and then, using a phenomenological approach, thematically analyzed interviews.

Results

We observed the following 6 main themes: (1) Patients perceived various supernatural phenomena as causes of their illness and chose traditional medicine for chronic kidney disease (CKD) treatment. (2) Patients expressed dissatisfaction with their physicians' communication. They felt poorly informed and resented their decision to initiate dialysis. (3) Family members tried to dissuade patients away from dialysis but also provided support once dialysis was initiated. (4) Patients and families found it challenging to afford dialysis and transplantation and also to arrange for transportation. (5) Women found it challenging to fulfill their obligations as wives and mothers while receiving maintenance dialysis. (6) Patients seemed reluctant to discuss end-of-life care.

Limitations

We collected data from only 2 hospitals in neighboring cities. Additionally, patients on peritoneal dialysis were not included.

Conclusions

Our findings shed light on patients' perspectives on kidney care in Pakistan and call for financially feasible solutions to raise kidney disease awareness and improve patients' experiences with dialysis. Physician training in communication and shared dialysis decision making along with the development of culturally adapted decision aids are needed to improve CKD knowledge and shared decision making. Although financial challenges preclude many from receiving long-term dialysis, cost-effective strategies to improve the availability of other options (eg, supportive kidney care, peritoneal dialysis, and transplantation) are still warranted.

CKD Care Programs and Incident Kidney Failure: A Study of a National Disease Management Program in Taiwan

Rationale & Objective

Taiwan implemented national pay-for-performance programs for chronic kidney disease (CKD) care in 2006 and 2011; however, it is unknown whether this affected trends in maintenance dialysis. This study assessed the temporal trends in the incidence, prevalence, and mortality of individuals treated with maintenance dialysis from 2002-2016 in Taiwan.

Study Design

Follow-up study using Taiwan Renal Disease System Databases.

Setting & Participants

Participants who received dialysis for ≥90 days.

Predictors

Age, sex, and calendar year.

Outcomes

Incidence, prevalence of maintenance dialysis, or death, ascertained using the National Death Registry database.

Analytical Approach

The estimated annual percentage change was assessed by a generalized linear model, and the association of the programs with changes in the incidence of maintenance dialysis was evaluated using an age-period-cohort model.

Results

A total of 144,258 incident cases with a follow-up of 346 million person-years were analyzed during the observed periods. The estimated annual percentage change of the expected crude incidence rate was slightly reduced by 0.41% (95% CI, −1.06 to 0.24) and was more obvious in women and patients aged greater than 70 years; whereas, it was significantly increased in those aged greater than 75 years. After disentangling age and cohort effects, the implementation of the care programs was associated with an overall net drift of −1.09% (95% CI, −1.65 to −0.52) per year and a significant linear reduction in the period rate ratio from 1.06 (95% CI, 1.02-1.09) in the years 2002-2006 to 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98) in 2012-2016, using years 2007-2011 as reference.

Limitations

The findings of the study may have limited inferences to other countries with different health care systems.

Conclusions

The implementation of universal CKD care programs in Taiwan has significantly reduced the long-term trends in the incidence of maintenance dialysis; hence, devoting governmental resources to CKD care and prevention is advocated.

Paediatric nephrology in under-resourced areas

BACKGROUND

Nearly 50% of the world population and 60% of children aged 0 to 14 years live in low- or lower-middle-income countries. Paediatric nephrology (PN) in these countries is not a priority for allocation of limited health resources. This article explores advancements made and persisting limitations in providing optimal PN services to children in such under-resourced areas (URA).

METHODS

Medline, PubMed and Google Scholar online databases were searched for articles pertaining to PN disease epidemiology, outcome, availability of services and infrastructure in URA. The ISN and IPNA offices were contacted for data, and two online questionnaire surveys of IPNA membership performed. Regional IPNA members were contacted for further detailed information.

RESULTS

There is a scarcity of published data from URA; where available, prevalence of PN diseases, managements and outcomes are often reported to be different from high income regions. Deficiencies in human resources, fluoroscopy, nuclear imaging, immunofluorescence, electron microscopy and genetic studies were identified. Several drugs and maintenance kidney replacement therapy are inaccessible to the majority of patients. Despite these issues, regional efforts with support from international bodies have led to significant advances in PN services and infrastructure in many URA.

CONCLUSIONS

Equitable distribution and affordability of PN services remain major challenges in URA. The drive towards acquisition of regional data, advocacy to local government and non-government agencies and partnership with international support bodies needs to be continued. The aim is to optimise and achieve global parity in PN training, investigations and treatments, initially focusing on preventable and reversible conditions.

Addressing the Ethical Challenges of Providing Kidney Failure Care for Children: A Global Stance

Children with kidney failure require kidney replacement therapy (KRT), namely maintenance dialysis and kidney transplant. Adequate kidney failure care consists of KRT or conservative treatment with palliative care. In the context of kidney failure, children depend on parents who are their surrogate decision-makers, and the pediatric nephrology team for taking decisions about KRT or conservative care. In this paper, we discuss the ethical challenges that arise relating to such decision-making, from a global perspective, using the framework of pediatric bioethics. While many ethical dilemmas in the care of children with KRT are universal, the most significant ethical dilemma is the inequitable access to KRT in low & middle income countries (LMICs) where rates of morbidity and mortality depend on the family's ability to pay. Children with kidney failure in LMICs have inadequate access to maintenance dialysis, timely kidney transplant and palliative care compared to their counterparts in high income countries. Using case vignettes, we highlight how these disparities place severe burdens on caregivers, resulting in difficult decision-making, and lead to moral distress among pediatric nephrologists. We conclude with key action points to change this status-quo, the most important being advocacy by the global pediatric nephrology community for better access to affordable kidney failure care for children.

Changing landscape of dialysis withdrawal in patients with kidney failure: Implications for clinical practice

Dialysis withdrawal has become an accepted treatment option for patients with kidney failure and is one of the leading causes of death in patients receiving dialysis in high-income countries. Despite its increasing acceptance, dialysis withdrawal currently lacks a clear, consistent definition. The processes and outcomes of dialysis withdrawal have wide temporal and geographical variability, attributed to dialysis patient selection, influence from cultural, religious and spiritual beliefs, and availability of kidney replacement therapy and conservative kidney management. As a complex, evolving process, dialysis withdrawal poses an enormous challenge for clinicians and healthcare teams with various limitations precluding a peaceful and smooth transition between active dialysis and end-of-life care. In this review, we examine the current definitions of dialysis withdrawal, the temporal and geographical patterns of dialysis withdrawal, international barriers in the decision-making process (including dialysis withdrawal during the COVID-19 pandemic), and gaps in the current dialysis withdrawal recommendations for clinical consideration and future studies.

The Role of Kidney Supportive Care and Active Medical Management Without Dialysis in Supporting Well-Being in Kidney Care

People living with kidney failure often experience a higher symptom burden (including anxiety and depression) and lower quality of life than patients with other serious chronic diseases. The end of life for these patients is characterized by high intensity of treatment (such as intensive care unit stays) and lack of support for family. Kidney supportive care, which emphasizes quality of life, person-centered care, and holistic care for the person and their family, is an approach that improves well-being by aligning care with the patient's preferences and goals. Kidney supportive care encompasses identifying seriously ill patients, eliciting patient values and goals through shared decision making and advance care planning, assessing and managing symptoms, communicating prognosis, offering active medical management without dialysis, and planning and managing care transitions, especially at the end of life. Models, strategies, and tools for incorporating kidney supportive care and active medical management without dialysis into existing workflows are available. However, barriers to implementation in the United States include clinician knowledge gaps, current workflows, and financial incentives, which make it difficult to break from the de facto default practice of starting dialysis for patients with kidney failure regardless of age, frailty, or debilitating condition. Policy changes are needed to fully implement kidney supportive care in the United States.