1
|
Dempsey PJ, Farrelly C, Cronin CG, Fenlon HM. Preoperative imaging of colorectal liver metastases: what the radiologist and the multidisciplinary team need to know. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:1602-1618. [PMID: 39078288 PMCID: PMC11417391 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
The management of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has transformed over the past 2 decades. Advances in surgical techniques, systemic therapies, and local treatments have resulted in a paradigm shift. Disease that would once have been considered terminal is now frequently treated aggressively with both a disease-free and overall survival benefit. In line with the expanding range of treatment options, there has been an increase in the volume and complexity of imaging required in the management of these patients to ensure optimal patient selection and outcome. The radiologist plays a pivotal role in interpreting these studies, conveying the relevant information and informing the discussion at multidisciplinary team meetings. The purpose of this review is to provide an update for radiologists on the current surgical management of patients with CRLM highlighting specific imaging information that is required by the multidisciplinary team when assessing resectability and/or the need for additional liver-directed therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip J Dempsey
- Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin D07, Ireland
| | - Cormac Farrelly
- Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin D07, Ireland
| | - Carmel G Cronin
- Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin D07, Ireland
| | - Helen M Fenlon
- Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin D07, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim GY, Gibbs P. Cancer Stage vs Mortality End Points in Randomized Clinical Trials of Cancer Screening. JAMA 2024:2823659. [PMID: 39264621 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.16359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Y Kim
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Personalised Oncology Division, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Personalised Oncology Division, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nakatsumi H, Komatsu Y, Harada K, Kawamoto Y, Yuki S, Sawada K, Ishiguro A, Sogabe S, Ando T, Sasaki Y, Yoshikawa A, Nakamura M, Dazai M, Tateyama M, Muto O, Kotaka M, Sagawa T, Muranaka T, Hatanaka K, Takagi R, Sakata Y. A multicenter, prospective, phase II trial of second-line aflibercept plus FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to an anti-EGFR antibody: HGCSG1801. Int J Cancer 2024. [PMID: 39143041 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.35116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024]
Abstract
Aflibercept (AFL) plus FOLFIRI prolongs overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, there is limited evidence on the efficacy and safety of AFL plus FOLFIRI previously treated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents. Therefore, we conducted a prospective open-label phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of AFL plus FOLFIRI in Japanese patients with mCRC failing a prior oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy plus an anti-EGFR agent. AFL (4 mg/kg iv) followed by FOLFIRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m2, leucovorin 200 mg/m2 iv, bolus 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] 400 mg/m2, and infusional 5-FU 2400 mg/m2/46 h) was given every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicities. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. Forty three patients were enrolled between November 2019 and October 2022. The primary endpoint was met: 6-month PFS rate was 58.8% (90% confidence interval [CI], 45.7%-72.0%). Median PFS and OS were 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.5-11.0 months) and 18.8 months (95% CI, 12.9-26.6 months), respectively. The overall response rate was 20.9% (95% CI, 10.0-36.0%) and disease control rate was 88.4% (95% CI, 74.9-96.1%). The main grade ≥3 adverse events included hypertension (62.8%), neutropenia (55.8%), leukopenia (25.6%), febrile neutropenia (11.6%), fatigue (9.3%), anorexia (9.3%), proteinuria (9.3%), and diarrhea (7.0%). No deaths and no new safety signals with a causal relation to the study treatment were observed. This study suggests that AFL plus FOLFIRI shows a high response rate and a manageable safety profile in Japanese patients with mCRC who failed prior oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy plus an anti-EGFR agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Nakatsumi
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Medical Center, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoshito Komatsu
- Division of Cancer Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Harada
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Kawamoto
- Division of Cancer Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Yuki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kentaro Sawada
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kushiro Rosai Hospital, Kushiro, Japan
| | - Atsushi Ishiguro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Susumu Sogabe
- Department of Medical Oncology, KKR Sapporo Medical Center, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Ando
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sasaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hakodate Central General Hospital, Hakodate, Japan
| | - Ayumu Yoshikawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japanese Red Cross Kitami Hospital, Kitami, Japan
| | - Michio Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sapporo City General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Dazai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sapporo Medical Center NTT EC, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Miki Tateyama
- Department of Internal Medicine, Tomakomai Nissho Hospital, Tomakomai, Japan
| | - Osamu Muto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Japanese Red Cross Akita Hospital, Akita, Japan
| | | | - Tamotsu Sagawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Tetsuhito Muranaka
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wakkanai City Hospital, Wakkanai, Japan
| | - Kazuteru Hatanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hakodate Municipal Hospital, Hakodate, Japan
| | - Ryo Takagi
- Institute of Health Science Innovation for Medical Care, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Amygdalos I, Truhn D, Vondran FWR. Outcome prediction after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases: out with the old, in with the new? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2024; 13:732-735. [PMID: 39175724 PMCID: PMC11336544 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-24-187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Iakovos Amygdalos
- Department of General, Visceral, Pediatric and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Daniel Truhn
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Florian W. R. Vondran
- Department of General, Visceral, Pediatric and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Narayanan G, Mahendra AM, Gentile NT, Schiro BJ, Gandhi RT, Peña CS, Dijkstra M. Safety and Effectiveness of Irreversible Electroporation in Lymph Node Metastases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2024; 47:1066-1073. [PMID: 38943032 PMCID: PMC11303484 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03795-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Demonstrating the safety and efficacy of percutaneous irreversible electroporation (IRE) for the treatment of lymph node metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS An IRB-approved, single-center retrospective review was performed on patients with lymph node metastases gastrointestinal, and genitourinary primary cancers. Primary objective safety was evaluated by assessing complications graded according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification, and efficacy was determined by tumor response on follow-up imaging and local progression-free survival (LPFS). Secondary outcome measures were technical success (complete ablation with an adequate ablative margin > 5 mm), length of hospital stay and distant progression-free survival (DPFS). RESULTS Nineteen patients underwent percutaneous IRE between June 2018 and February 2023 for lymph node metastases, close to critical structures, such as vasculature, bowel, or nerves. The technical success was achieved in all cases. Complications occurred in four patients (21.1%), including two self-limiting grade 1 hematomas, a grade 1 abdominal pain, and grade 2 nerve pain treated with medication. Seventeen patients were hospitalized overnight, one patient stayed two nights and another patient stayed fourteen nights. Median follow-up was 25.5 months. Median time to local progression was 24.1 months (95% CI: 0-52.8) with 1-, 2-, and 5-year LPFS of 57.9%, 57.9% and 20.7%, respectively. Median time to distant progression was 4.3 months (95% CI: 0.3-8.3) with 1-, 2-, and 5-year DPFS of 31.6%, 13.2% and 13.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION IRE is a safe and effective minimally-invasive treatment for lymph node metastases in locations, where temperature dependent ablation may be contraindicated. Care should be taken when employing IRE near nerves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Govindarajan Narayanan
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ashwin M Mahendra
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Nicole T Gentile
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Brian J Schiro
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ripal T Gandhi
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Constantino S Peña
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Madelon Dijkstra
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu M, Bao Q, Zhao T, Huang L, Zhang D, Wang Y, Yan X, Wang H, Jin K, Liu W, Wang K, Xing B. Pre-hepatectomy dynamic circulating tumor DNA to predict pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy and post-hepatectomy recurrence in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Hepatol Int 2024; 18:1029-1039. [PMID: 38427145 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-023-10628-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the predictive value of pre-hepatectomy dynamic circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) on pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy and recurrence after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). BACKGROUND Pathologic response is a predictor of clinical outcomes for patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM. Postoperative ctDNA has been proven to be sensitive for recurrence detection. However, few studies investigate the impact of pre-hepatectomy ctDNA on pathologic response and recurrence. METHODS Patients with potential resectable CRLM underwent preoperative chemotherapy and hepatectomy between 2018 and 2021 was considered for inclusion. Plasma ctDNA was collected before and after preoperative chemotherapy. Pathologic response was analyzed for all patients after liver resection. Recurrence free survival was compared between patients with different ctDNA status and different pathologic response. The relation between ctDNA and pathologic response was also analyzed. RESULTS A total of 114 patients were included. ctDNA was detectable in 108 of 114 patients (94.7%) before chemotherapy, in 56 of 114 patients (49.1%) after chemotherapy. Patients with ctDNA positive at baseline and negative after chemotherapy had significantly longer RFS (median RFS 17 vs 7 months, p = 0.001) and HRFS (median HRFS unreached vs 8 months, p < 0.001) than those with ctDNA persistently positive after chemotherapy. Two patients (1.6%) had a pathologic complete response and 56 patients (45.2%) had a pathologic major response. Post-chemotherapy ctDNA- was associated with improved major pathologic response (53.4% vs 32.1%, p = 0.011). In the multivariable analysis, ctDNA- after chemotherapy (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.93), major pathologic response (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.19-0.62) and surgery combined with radiofrequency ablation (HR 2.62, 95% CI 1.38-5.00) were independently associated with RFS (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Pre-hepatectomy dynamic monitoring of ctDNA could predict pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy and post-hepatectomy recurrence in CRLM patients. Negative ctDNA after preoperative chemotherapy was associated with better tumor regression grade and recurrence-free survival, which might be used to guide pre-hepatectomy chemotherapy and predict prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Quan Bao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Tingting Zhao
- GloriousMed Clinical Laboratory (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Longfei Huang
- GloriousMed Clinical Laboratory (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Danhua Zhang
- GloriousMed Clinical Laboratory (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanyan Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoluan Yan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongwei Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Kemin Jin
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Kun Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| | - Baocai Xing
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kinos S, Hagman H, Halonen P, Soveri LM, O'Reilly M, Pfeiffer P, Frödin JE, Sorbye H, Heervä E, Liposits G, Kallio R, Ålgars A, Ristamäki R, Salminen T, Bärlund M, Shah CH, McDermott R, Röckert R, Flygare P, Kwakman J, Teske A, Punt C, Glimelius B, Österlund P. Detailed analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer patients who developed cardiotoxicity on another fluoropyrimidine and switched to S-1 treatment (subgroup analysis of the CardioSwitch-study). Acta Oncol 2024; 63:248-258. [PMID: 38698698 PMCID: PMC11332541 DOI: 10.2340/1651-226x.2024.24023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The CardioSwitch-study demonstrated that patients with solid tumors who develop cardiotoxicity on capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment can be safely switched to S-1, an alternative fluoropyrimidine (FP). In light of the European Medicines Agency approval of S-1 in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), this analysis provides more detailed safety and efficacy information, and data regarding metastasectomy and/or local ablative therapy (LAT), on the mCRC patients from the original study. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study was conducted at 12 European centers. The primary endpoint was recurrence of cardiotoxicity after switch. For this analysis, safety data are reported for 78 mCRC patients from the CardioSwitch cohort (N = 200). Detailed efficacy and outcomes data were available for 66 mCRC patients. RESULTS Data for the safety of S-1 in mCRC patients were similar to the original CardioSwitch cohort and that expected for FP-based treatment, with no new concerns. Recurrent cardiotoxicity (all grade 1) with S-1-based treatment occurred in 4/78 (5%) mCRC patients; all were able to complete FP treatment. Median progression-free survival from initiation of S-1-based treatment was 9.0 months and median overall survival 26.7 months. Metastasectomy and/or LAT was performed in 33/66 (50%) patients, and S-1 was successfully used in recommended neoadjuvant/conversion or adjuvant-like combination regimens and schedules as for standard FPs. INTERPRETATION S-1 is a safe and effective FP alternative when mCRC patients are forced to discontinue 5-FU or capecitabine due to cardiotoxicity and can be safely used in the standard recommended regimens, settings, and schedules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sampsa Kinos
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Helga Hagman
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Päivi Halonen
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Leena-Maija Soveri
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mary O'Reilly
- Department of Oncology, St Vincent's University Hospital and University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Per Pfeiffer
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jan-Erik Frödin
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Halfdan Sorbye
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Eetu Heervä
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Gabor Liposits
- Department of Oncology, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Hjørring, Denmark
| | - Raija Kallio
- Department of Oncology, Oulu University and University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Annika Ålgars
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Raija Ristamäki
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Tapio Salminen
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Maarit Bärlund
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Carl-Henrik Shah
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ray McDermott
- Department of Oncology, St Vincent's University Hospital and University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Petra Flygare
- Department of Oncology, Sundsvall Hospital, Sundsvall, Sweden
| | - Johannes Kwakman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Arco Teske
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Punt
- Depatment of Epidemiology, Jules Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherland
| | | | - Pia Österlund
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; rTema Cancer, Department of GI-cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Popescu I, Dudău AM, Dima S, Herlea V, Croitoru VM, Dinu IM, Miron M, Lupescu I, Croitoru-Cazacu IM, Dumitru R, Croitoru AE. Multimodal Treatment of Metastatic Rectal Cancer in a Young Patient: Case Report and Literature Review. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:696. [PMID: 38792879 PMCID: PMC11123219 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60050696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Revised: 04/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
Metastatic colorectal cancer requires a multidisciplinary and individualized approach. Herein, we reported the case of a young woman diagnosed with metastatic rectal cancer who received an individualized multimodal treatment strategy that resulted in a remarkable survival. There were several particular aspects of this case, such as the early onset of the disease, the successful use of conversion therapy, the application of liquid biopsy to guide treatment, and the specific nature of the bone metastasis. To offer more insights for navigating such challenges in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, we have conducted a literature review to find more data related to the particularities of this case. The incidence of early onset colorectal cancer is on the rise. Data suggests that it differs from older-onset colorectal cancer in terms of its pathological, epidemiological, anatomical, metabolic, and biological characteristics. Conversion therapy and surgical intervention provide an opportunity for cure and improve outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to approach each case individually, as every patient with limited liver disease should be considered as a candidate for secondary resection. Moreover, liquid biopsy has an important role in the individualized management of metastatic colorectal cancer patients, as it offers additional information for treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ionuț Popescu
- Faculty of Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University, 040441 Bucharest, Romania; (I.P.); (V.M.C.)
| | - Ana-Maria Dudău
- Faculty of Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University, 040441 Bucharest, Romania; (I.P.); (V.M.C.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania; (I.M.D.); (M.M.); (I.M.C.-C.); (A.E.C.)
| | - Simona Dima
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (S.D.); (V.H.); (I.L.); (R.D.)
- Center of Excellence in Translational Medicine, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Vlad Herlea
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (S.D.); (V.H.); (I.L.); (R.D.)
- Pathology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Vlad M. Croitoru
- Faculty of Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University, 040441 Bucharest, Romania; (I.P.); (V.M.C.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania; (I.M.D.); (M.M.); (I.M.C.-C.); (A.E.C.)
| | - Ioana Mihaela Dinu
- Medical Oncology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania; (I.M.D.); (M.M.); (I.M.C.-C.); (A.E.C.)
| | - Monica Miron
- Medical Oncology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania; (I.M.D.); (M.M.); (I.M.C.-C.); (A.E.C.)
| | - Ioana Lupescu
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (S.D.); (V.H.); (I.L.); (R.D.)
- Radiology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Irina M. Croitoru-Cazacu
- Medical Oncology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania; (I.M.D.); (M.M.); (I.M.C.-C.); (A.E.C.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (S.D.); (V.H.); (I.L.); (R.D.)
| | - Radu Dumitru
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (S.D.); (V.H.); (I.L.); (R.D.)
- Radiology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Adina Emilia Croitoru
- Medical Oncology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania; (I.M.D.); (M.M.); (I.M.C.-C.); (A.E.C.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (S.D.); (V.H.); (I.L.); (R.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Petrella F, Danuzzo F, Sibilia MC, Vaquer S, Longarini R, Guidi A, Raveglia F, Libretti L, Pirondini E, Cara A, Cassina EM, Tuoro A, Cortinovis D. Colorectal Cancer Pulmonary Metastasectomy: When, Why and How. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1408. [PMID: 38611086 PMCID: PMC11010871 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third-most-diagnosed cancer in males and in females, representing 8% of estimated new cases, and the third cause of cancer-related death in both sexes, accounting for 9% of cancer deaths in men and 8% in women. About 20% of patients diagnosed with CRC present metastatic disease. Although lung metachronous or synchronous metastatic spread without other involved sites has been reported in only a small proportion of patients, considering that this tumor is frequently diagnosed, the clinical approach to CRC pulmonary metastases represents a major issue for thoracic surgeons and CRC oncologists. Among patients diagnosed with pulmonary metastases from CRC, about 9-12% are eligible for local treatments with radical intent, including surgical resection, SBRT (stereotactic body radiation therapy) and ablation therapy. Due to the lack of randomized controlled trials among different local strategies, there is no definitive evidence about the optimal approach, although surgical resection is considered the most effective therapeutic option in this clinical scenario. Oncological achievement of primary radical resection, the biology of primary tumor and metastatic sites, disease free interval and or progression free survival are independent prognostic factors which make it possible to define a cohort of patients which might significantly benefit from pulmonary metastasectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Petrella
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (F.D.); (M.C.S.); (S.V.); (L.L.); (E.P.); (A.C.); (E.M.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Federica Danuzzo
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (F.D.); (M.C.S.); (S.V.); (L.L.); (E.P.); (A.C.); (E.M.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Maria Chiara Sibilia
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (F.D.); (M.C.S.); (S.V.); (L.L.); (E.P.); (A.C.); (E.M.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Sara Vaquer
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (F.D.); (M.C.S.); (S.V.); (L.L.); (E.P.); (A.C.); (E.M.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Raffaella Longarini
- Division of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (R.L.); or (D.C.)
| | - Alessandro Guidi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (R.L.); or (D.C.)
| | - Federico Raveglia
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (F.D.); (M.C.S.); (S.V.); (L.L.); (E.P.); (A.C.); (E.M.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Lidia Libretti
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (F.D.); (M.C.S.); (S.V.); (L.L.); (E.P.); (A.C.); (E.M.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Emanuele Pirondini
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (F.D.); (M.C.S.); (S.V.); (L.L.); (E.P.); (A.C.); (E.M.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Andrea Cara
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (F.D.); (M.C.S.); (S.V.); (L.L.); (E.P.); (A.C.); (E.M.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Enrico Mario Cassina
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (F.D.); (M.C.S.); (S.V.); (L.L.); (E.P.); (A.C.); (E.M.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Antonio Tuoro
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (F.D.); (M.C.S.); (S.V.); (L.L.); (E.P.); (A.C.); (E.M.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Diego Cortinovis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (R.L.); or (D.C.)
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aho S, Osterlund E, Ristimäki A, Nieminen L, Sundström J, Mäkinen MJ, Kuopio T, Kytölä S, Ålgars A, Ristamäki R, Heervä E, Kallio R, Halonen P, Soveri LM, Nordin A, Uutela A, Salminen T, Stedt H, Lamminmäki A, Muhonen T, Kononen J, Glimelius B, Isoniemi H, Lehto JT, Lehtomäki K, Osterlund P. Impact of Primary Tumor Location on Demographics, Resectability, Outcomes, and Quality of Life in Finnish Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients (Subgroup Analysis of the RAXO Study). Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1052. [PMID: 38473410 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16051052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
The primary tumor location (PTL) is associated with the phenotype, metastatic sites, mutations, and outcomes of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, but this has mostly been studied according to sidedness (right vs. left sided). We studied right colon vs. left colon vs. rectal PTL in a real-life study population (n = 1080). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed multi-cross-sectionally with QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29, EQ-5D, and 15D. A chi-square, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression were used to compare the groups. The PTL was in the right colon in 310 patients (29%), the left colon in 396 patients (37%), and the rectum in 375 patients (35%). The PTL was associated with distinct differences in metastatic sites during the disease trajectory. The resectability, conversion, and resection rates were lowest in the right colon, followed by the rectum, and were highest in the left colon. Overall survival was shortest for right colon compared with left colon or rectal PTL (median 21 vs. 35 vs. 36 months), with the same trends after metastasectomy or systemic therapy only. PTL also remained statistically significant in a multivariable model. The distribution of symptoms varied according to PTL, especially between the right colon (with general symptoms of metastases) and rectal PTL (with sexual- and bowel-related symptoms). mCRC, according to PTL, behaves differently regarding metastatic sites, resectability of the metastases, outcomes of treatment, and HRQoL.
Collapse
Grants
- 2016, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 Finska Läkaresällskapet
- 2019-2020, 2021, 2022-2023 Finnish Cancer Registry
- 2020-2022 Relanderin säätiö
- 2012, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility Area of Tampere, Helsinki, Turku, Kuopio, Oulu, and Satakunta Hospitals
- Tukisäätiö 2019, 2020, 2023 and OOO-project 2020 Tampere University Hospital
- 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 Helsinki University Hospital
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Aho
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 2, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön katu 23, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- TUNI Palliative Care Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön katu 23, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Palliative Care Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 2, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Emerik Osterlund
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ari Ristimäki
- Department of Pathology, HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 3, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Applied Tumor Genomics Research Program, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Lasse Nieminen
- Department of Pathology, FIMLAB, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 2, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Department of Pathology, University of Tampere, Arvo Ylpön katu 23, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Jari Sundström
- Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Kiinanmyllynkatu 4-8, 20520 Turku, Finland
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Kiinanmyllynkatu 10, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Markus J Mäkinen
- Department of Pathology, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, 90220 Oulu, Finland
- Translational Medicine Research Unit, Department of Pathology, University of Oulu, Pentti Kaiteran katu 1, 90570 Oulu, Finland
- Medical Research Center Oulu, Pentti Kaiteran katu 1, 90570 Oulu, Finland
| | - Teijo Kuopio
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Nova, Hoitajantie 3, 40620 Jyväskylä, Finland
- Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Seminaarinkatu 15, 40014 Jyväskylän yliopisto, Finland
| | - Soili Kytölä
- Department of Genetics, HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 3, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Genetics, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Annika Ålgars
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Hämeentie 11, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Raija Ristamäki
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Hämeentie 11, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Eetu Heervä
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Hämeentie 11, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Raija Kallio
- Department of Oncology, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, 90220 Oulu, Finland
- Department of Oncology, University of Oulu, Pentti Kaiteran katu 1, 90570 Oulu, Finland
| | - Päivi Halonen
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Leena-Maija Soveri
- Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Home Care, Joint Municipal Authority for Health Care and Social Services in Keski-Uusimaa, Sairaalakatu 1, 05850 Hyvinkää, Finland
| | - Arno Nordin
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Aki Uutela
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tapio Salminen
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 2, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön katu 23, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Hanna Stedt
- Department of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1A, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Annamarja Lamminmäki
- Department of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1A, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Timo Muhonen
- Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, South Carelia Central Hospital, Valto Käkelän Katu 1, 53130 Lappeenranta, Finland
| | - Juha Kononen
- Docrates Cancer Centre, Docrates Hospital, Saukonpaadenranta 2, 00180 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Nova, Hoitajankatu 3, 40620 Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Helena Isoniemi
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Juho T Lehto
- TUNI Palliative Care Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön katu 23, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Palliative Care Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 2, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Kaisa Lehtomäki
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 2, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön katu 23, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Pia Osterlund
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 2, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön katu 23, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Eugeniavägen 3, 17176 Solna, Sweden
- Department of Oncology/Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 1, 17177 Solna, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Su CC, Guo SE, Kuo YW. Effects of internet-based digital health interventions on the physical activity and quality of life of colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:168. [PMID: 38374448 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08369-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The recent trend of Internet-based digital health interventions has driven researchers to implement them to promote physical activity (PA) and improve patients' health outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the effects of Internet-based digital health interventions on PA and quality of life (QoL) in colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. METHODS We searched for relevant studies investigating the effects of internet-based digital health interventions published until Dec. 2022 in electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CEPS) according to PRISMA guidelines. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist was used to examine the quality of the included studies. We performed the fixed and random effects model for meta-analysis. RESULTS Among 746 identified studies, eight published between 2018 and 2022 were included. These covered 991 internet-based digital health interventions and 875 controls. After 6 months of internet-based digital health interventions, CRC survivors' performance in PA (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.09-0.38) and QoL (SMD = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.01-0.22) indicators improved significantly. CONCLUSIONS Internet-based digital health improved the PA behaviour and QoL of patients with CRC. Because of differences in intervention outcomes, additional randomized controlled trials are warranted to provide suggestions for clinical practice. Internet-based digital health interventions are promising for promoting PA in CRC survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ching-Ching Su
- Department of Nursing and Graduate Institute of Nursing, College of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology (CGUST), No. 2, Sec. W., Jiapu Rd., Puzi City, Chiayi County, 61363, Taiwan
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 6, West Sec., Jiapu Road, Puzi City, Chiayi County, 61363, Taiwan
| | - Su-Er Guo
- Department of Nursing and Graduate Institute of Nursing, College of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology (CGUST), No. 2, Sec. W., Jiapu Rd., Puzi City, Chiayi County, 61363, Taiwan.
- Chronic Diseases and Health Promotion Research Center, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology (CGUST), No. 2, Sec. W., Jiapu Rd., Puzi City, Chiayi County, 61363, Taiwan.
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 6, West Sec., Jiapu Road, Puzi City, Chiayi County, 61363, Taiwan.
- Department of Safety Health and Environmental Engineering, Ming Chi University of Technology, No. 84 Gungjuan Rd., Taishan Dist., New Taipei City, 24301, Taiwan.
| | - Ya-Wen Kuo
- Department of Nursing and Graduate Institute of Nursing, College of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology (CGUST), No. 2, Sec. W., Jiapu Rd., Puzi City, Chiayi County, 61363, Taiwan.
- Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 6, West Sec., Jiapu Road, Puzi City, Chiayi County, 61363, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hitchcock KE, Miller ED, Shi Q, Dixon JG, Gholami S, White SB, Wu C, Goulet CC, George M, Jee KW, Wright CL, Yaeger R, Shergill A, Hong TS, George TJ, O'Reilly EM, Meyerhardt JA, Romesser PB. Alliance for clinical trials in Oncology (Alliance) trial A022101/NRG-GI009: a pragmatic randomized phase III trial evaluating total ablative therapy for patients with limited metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluating radiation, ablation, and surgery (ERASur). BMC Cancer 2024; 24:201. [PMID: 38350888 PMCID: PMC10863118 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11899-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with liver-confined metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), local therapy of isolated metastases has been associated with long-term progression-free and overall survival (OS). However, for patients with more advanced mCRC, including those with extrahepatic disease, the efficacy of local therapy is less clear although increasingly being used in clinical practice. Prospective studies to clarify the role of metastatic-directed therapies in patients with mCRC are needed. METHODS The Evaluating Radiation, Ablation, and Surgery (ERASur) A022101/NRG-GI009 trial is a randomized, National Cancer Institute-sponsored phase III study evaluating if the addition of metastatic-directed therapy to standard of care systemic therapy improves OS in patients with newly diagnosed limited mCRC. Eligible patients require a pathologic diagnosis of CRC, have BRAF wild-type and microsatellite stable disease, and have 4 or fewer sites of metastatic disease identified on baseline imaging. Liver-only metastatic disease is not permitted. All metastatic lesions must be amenable to total ablative therapy (TAT), which includes surgical resection, microwave ablation, and/or stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) with SABR required for at least one lesion. Patients without overt disease progression after 16-26 weeks of first-line systemic therapy will be randomized 1:1 to continuation of systemic therapy with or without TAT. The trial activated through the Cancer Trials Support Unit on January 10, 2023. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include event-free survival, adverse events profile, and time to local recurrence with exploratory biomarker analyses. This study requires a total of 346 evaluable patients to provide 80% power with a one-sided alpha of 0.05 to detect an improvement in OS from a median of 26 months in the control arm to 37 months in the experimental arm with a hazard ratio of 0.7. The trial uses a group sequential design with two interim analyses for futility. DISCUSSION The ERASur trial employs a pragmatic interventional design to test the efficacy and safety of adding multimodality TAT to standard of care systemic therapy in patients with limited mCRC. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05673148, registered December 21, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Qian Shi
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jesse G Dixon
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Manju George
- COLONTOWN/PALTOWN Development Foundation, Crownsville, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Rona Yaeger
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box #22, 10065, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ardaman Shergill
- Alliance Protocol Operations Office, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box #22, 10065, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Paul B Romesser
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box #22, 10065, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Huang CK, Shih CH, Kao YS. Elderly Rectal Cancer: An Updated Review. Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:181-190. [PMID: 38270849 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01495-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Treatment of rectal cancer patients of advanced age should be modulated by life expectancy and tolerance. Due to the rapid advance of this field, we aim to conduct an updated review of this topic. RECENT FINDINGS The field of elderly rectal cancer has advanced a lot. This review covers all the treatment aspects of elderly rectal cancer, including the prognostic factor, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and palliative treatment. We also provide the future aspect of the management of elderly rectal cancer. The advancement of prognostic factor research, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and palliative treatment has made the care of elderly rectal cancer patients better. The future of these fields should focus on the definition of the elderly and the application of particle therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Kai Huang
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Hsiu Shih
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Taoyuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Shuo Kao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taoyuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, No.1492, Zhongshan Rd., Taoyuan Dist., Taoyuan City, 330, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Osterlund E, Ristimäki A, Mäkinen MJ, Kytölä S, Kononen J, Pfeiffer P, Soveri LM, Keinänen M, Sorbye H, Nunes L, Salminen T, Nieminen L, Uutela A, Halonen P, Ålgars A, Sundström J, Kallio R, Ristamäki R, Lamminmäki A, Stedt H, Heervä E, Kuopio T, Sjöblom T, Isoniemi H, Glimelius B, Osterlund P. Atypical (non-V600E) BRAF mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer in population and real-world cohorts. Int J Cancer 2024; 154:488-503. [PMID: 37724848 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BRAF-V600E mutation (mt) is a strong negative prognostic and predictive biomarker in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Non-V600Emt, designated atypical BRAFmt (aBRAFmt) are rare, and little is known about their frequency, co-mutations and prognostic and predictive role. These were compared between mutational groups of mCRC patients collected from three Nordic population-based or real-world cohorts. Pathology of aBRAFmt was studied. The study included 1449 mCRC patients with 51 (3%) aBRAFmt, 182 (13%) BRAF-V600Emt, 456 (31%) RAS&BRAF wild-type (wt) and 760 (52%) RASmt tumours. aBRAFmt were seen in 2% of real-world and 4% of population-based cohorts. Twenty-six different aBRAFmt were detected, 11 (22%) class 2 (serrated adenocarcinoma in 2/9 tested), 32 (64%) class 3 (serrated in 15/25) and 4 (8%) unclassified. aBRAFmt patients were predominantly male, had more rectal primaries, less peritoneal metastases, deficient mismatch repair in one (2%), and better survival after metastasectomy (89% 5-year overall survival [OS]-rate) compared with BRAF-V600Emt. aBRAFmt and BRAF-V600Emt had poorer performance status and received fewer treatment lines than RAS&BRAFwt and RASmt. OS among aBRAFmt (median 14.4 months) was longer than for BRAF-V600Emt (11.2 months), but shorter than for RAS&BRAFwt (30.5 months) and RASmt (23.4 months). Addition of bevacizumab trended for better OS for the aBRAFmt. Nine patients with aBRAFmt received cetuximab/panitumumab without response. aBRAFmt represents a distinct subgroup differing from other RAS/BRAF groups, with serrated adenocarcinoma in only half. OS for patients with aBRAFmt tumours was slightly better than for BRAF-V600Emt, but worse than for RASmt and RAS&BRAFwt. aBRAFmt should not be a contraindication for metastasectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emerik Osterlund
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ari Ristimäki
- Department of Pathology, HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine, Applied Tumor Genomics Research Program, Research Programs Unit, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Markus J Mäkinen
- Department of Pathology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
- Translational Medicine Research Unit, Department of Pathology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Soili Kytölä
- Department of Genetics, HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Genetics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Juha Kononen
- Departemnt of Oncology, Central hospital of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland
- Docrates hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Per Pfeiffer
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Leena-Maija Soveri
- Home Care, Geriatric Clinic and Palliative Care, Joint Municipal Authority for Health Care and Social Services in Keski-Uusimaa, Hyvinkää, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mauri Keinänen
- Department of Genetics, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland
| | - Halfdan Sorbye
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Luís Nunes
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Tapio Salminen
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
- Department of Oncology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Lasse Nieminen
- Department of Pathology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
- Department of Pathology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Aki Uutela
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Transplant and HPB Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Päivi Halonen
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Annika Ålgars
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- Department of Oncology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Jari Sundström
- Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Raija Kallio
- Department of Oncology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
- Department of Oncology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Raija Ristamäki
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- Department of Oncology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Annamarja Lamminmäki
- Department of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Hanna Stedt
- Department of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Eetu Heervä
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- Department of Oncology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Teijo Kuopio
- Department of Pathology, Central Finland Hospital Nova, Jyväskylä, Finland
- Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Tobias Sjöblom
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Helena Isoniemi
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Pia Osterlund
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
- Department of Oncology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Transplant and HPB Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology/Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hamers PAH, Vink GR, Elferink MAG, Moons LMG, Punt CJA, May AM, Koopman M. Impact of colorectal cancer screening on survival after metachronous metastasis. Eur J Cancer 2024; 196:113429. [PMID: 38006758 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increasing proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases in Europe are detected by screening with faecal immunochemical testing (FIT). Previous studies showed that population screening with FIT leads to a decrease in CRC incidence and to detection at an earlier stage. However, approximately twenty percent of patients with CRC without metastases at initial diagnosis still develop metachronous metastases. We investigated the association between detection mode of the primary tumor and overall survival (OS) after metachronous metastasis in patients with CRC. METHODS Nationwide registry-based data was obtained of 794 patients who developed metachronous metastases after being diagnosed with stage I-III CRC between January and June 2015. With multivariable Cox PH regression modelling, we analyzed the (causal) association between detection mode of the primary tumor (FIT screen-detected versus non-screen-detected) and OS after metachronous metastasis while adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS Median OS and five-year OS after metachronous metastasis were significantly higher for patients with screen-detected (n = 152) vs. non-screen-detected primary tumors (n = 642): 38.3 vs. 19.2 months, and 35.4% vs. 18.8%, respectively, p < 0.0001). After adjustment for potential confounders, the association between detection mode and OS after metachronous metastasis remained significant (HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.56-0.89]). CONCLUSIONS Screen-detection of the primary tumor was independently associated with longer OS after metachronous metastasis. This may support the clinical utility of the population screening program and it shows the prognostic value of detection mode of the primary tumor once metachronous metastasis is diagnosed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia A H Hamers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Geraldine R Vink
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marloes A G Elferink
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M May
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhang XL, Wang HT, Tang Y, Lu Q, Yuan HX, Wang X, Liu LH, Zhu DX, Wang WP. Colorectal liver metastases: Correlations of contrast-enhanced ultrasound features with tumor clinicopathological factors and clinical outcomes following conversion therapy. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2024; 86:339-356. [PMID: 37927253 DOI: 10.3233/ch-231963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the prognostic impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features for initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) in a clinical setting of conversion therapy. METHODS Between March 2015 and November 2020, consecutive patients with CLMs who received conversion treatment were prospectively enrolled. All participants underwent liver CEUS at baseline. The primary endpoint was conversion resection rate (R0 and overall resection). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS 104 participants who completed conversion treatment were included. CEUS enhancement pattern was correlated with index lesion (size and echogenicity), primary (site, differentiation, perineural invasion, and RAS genotype) and serum (CA19-9 level) characteristics (P = <0.001-0.016). CEUS enhancement pattern was significantly associated with R0 resection rate, ORR, PFS, and OS (P = 0.001-0.049), whereas enhancement degree was associated with PFS and OS (P = 0.043 and 0.045). Multivariate analysis showed that heterogeneous enhancement independently predicted R0 and overall resection (P = 0.028 and 0.024) while rim-like enhancement independently predicted ORR and OS (P = 0.009 and 0.026). CONCLUSION CEUS enhancement pattern was significantly associated with tumor characteristics and clinical outcomes following conversion therapy, and thus might be of prognosis impact for initially unresectable CLMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Long Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hang-Tao Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yang Tang
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qing Lu
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hai-Xia Yuan
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xi Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Li-Heng Liu
- Department of Radiology and Multi-Disciplinary Team of Colorectal Cancer, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - De-Xiang Zhu
- Department of General Surgery and Multi-Disciplinary Team of Colorectal Cancer, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen-Ping Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hitchcock KE, Miller ED, Shi Q, Dixon JG, Gholami S, White SB, Wu C, Goulet CC, George M, Jee KW, Wright CL, Yaeger R, Shergill A, Hong TS, George TJ, O'Reilly EM, Meyerhardt JA, Romesser PB. Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (Alliance) trial A022101/NRG-GI009: A pragmatic randomized phase III trial evaluating total ablative therapy for patients with limited metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluating radiation, ablation, and surgery (ERASur). RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3773522. [PMID: 38196590 PMCID: PMC10775493 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3773522/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
Background For patients with liver-confined metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), local therapy of isolated metastases has been associated with long-term progression-free and overall survival (OS). However, for patients with more advanced mCRC, including those with extrahepatic disease, the efficacy of local therapy is less clear although increasingly being used in clinical practice. Prospective studies to clarify the role of metastatic-directed therapies in patients with mCRC are needed. Methods The Evaluating Radiation, Ablation, and Surgery (ERASur) A022101/NRG-GI009 trial is a randomized, National Cancer Institute-sponsored phase III study evaluating if the addition of metastatic-directed therapy to standard of care systemic therapy improves OS in patients with newly diagnosed limited mCRC. Eligible patients require a pathologic diagnosis of CRC, have BRAF wild-type and microsatellite stable disease, and have 4 or fewer sites of metastatic disease identified on baseline imaging. Liver-only metastatic disease is not permitted. All metastatic lesions must be amenable to total ablative therapy (TAT), which includes surgical resection, microwave ablation, and/or stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) with SABR required for at least one lesion. Patients without overt disease progression after 16-26 weeks of first-line systemic therapy will be randomized 1:1 to continuation of systemic therapy with or without TAT. The trial activated through the Cancer Trials Support Unit on January 10, 2023. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include event-free survival, adverse events profile, and time to local recurrence with exploratory biomarker analyses. This study requires a total of 346 evaluable patients to provide 80% power with a one-sided alpha of 0.05 to detect an improvement in OS from a median of 26 months in the control arm to 37 months in the experimental arm with a hazard ratio of 0.7. The trial uses a group sequential design with two interim analyses for futility. Discussion The ERASur trial employs a pragmatic interventional design to test the efficacy and safety of adding multimodality TAT to standard of care systemic therapy in patients with limited mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Qian Shi
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Koper A, Wileński S, Śledzińska P, Bebyn M, Koper K. Prognostic factors in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with Trifluridine/Tipiracil. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:10867-10877. [PMID: 37318592 PMCID: PMC10423107 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04909-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The systemic treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are unsatisfactory, and the disease recurs despite the use of numerous medications and their combinations. Trifluridine/Tipiracil is a relatively new drug used in refractory mCRC. Little is known about its real-world effectiveness and prognostic and predictive factors. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a prognostic model for refractory mCRC treated with Trifluridine/Tipiracil. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated the data from 163 patients who had received Trifluridine/Tipiracil as a third or fourth line of treatment for refractory mCRC. RESULTS After starting Trifluridine/Tipiracil, 21.5% of patients survived one year, and the median overall survival after Trifluridine/Tipiracil initiation was 251 days (SD: 17.855; 95%CI: 216-286). Median progression-free survival after Trifluridine/Tipiracil initiation was 56 days (SD: 4.826; 95%CI 47-65). Moreover, the median overall survival from diagnosis was 1333 days (SD: 82.84; 95%CI: 1170-1495). In forward stepwise multivariate Cox regression analysis, initial radical treatment (HR = 0.552, 95% CI 0.372-0.819, p < 0.003), the number of cycles of first-line chemotherapy (HR = 0.978, 95% CI 0.961-0.995, p < 0.011), the number of cycles of second-line chemotherapy (HR = 0.955, 95% CI 0.931-0.98, p < 0.011), BRAF mutation (HR = 3.016, 95% CI = 1.207-7.537, p = 0.018), and hypertension (HR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.44-0.931, p = 0.02) were all associated with survival after Trifluridine/Tipiracil initiation. Our model and model-based nomogram displayed an AUC of 0.623 for one-year survival estimation in the testing cohort. The C-index for the prediction nomogram was 0.632. CONCLUSION We have developed a prognostic model for refractory mCRC treated with Trifluridine/Tipiracil based on five variables. Moreover, we reported a nomogram which could be used by oncologists in clinic visits on a daily basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnieszka Koper
- Department of Oncology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland
- Department of Oncology, Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Centre, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Sławomir Wileński
- Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland
- Central Cytostatic Drug Department, Hospital Pharmacy, The F. Lukaszczyk Oncology Centre, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Paulina Śledzińska
- 10th Military Research Hospital and Polyclinic, 85-681 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Marek Bebyn
- 10th Military Research Hospital and Polyclinic, 85-681 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Koper
- Department of Oncology, Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Centre, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
- Department of Clinical Oncology, and Nursing, Department of Oncological Surgery, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Amygdalos I, Hitpass L, Schmidt F, Josephs G, Bednarsch J, Berres ML, Lüdde T, Olde Damink SWM, Ulmer TF, Neumann UP, Bruners P, Lang SA. Survival after combined resection and ablation is not inferior to that after resection alone, in patients with four or more colorectal liver metastases. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:343. [PMID: 37642753 PMCID: PMC10465667 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03082-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are the predominant factor limiting survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Multimodal treatment strategies are frequently necessary to achieve total tumor elimination. This study examines the efficacy of liver resection combined with local ablative therapy in comparison to liver resection only, in the treatment of patients with ≥ 4 CRLM. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Germany. Patients with ≥ 4 CRLM in preoperative imaging, who underwent curative resection between 2010-2021, were included. Recurrent resections and deaths in the early postoperative phase were excluded. Ablation modalities included radiofrequency or microwave ablation, and irreversible electroporation. Differences in overall- (OS) and recurrence-free-survival (RFS) between patients undergoing combined resection-ablation vs. resection only, were examined. RESULTS Of 178 included patients, 46 (27%) underwent combined resection-ablation and 132 (73%) resection only. Apart from increased rates of adjuvant chemotherapy in the first group (44% vs. 25%, p = 0.014), there were no differences in perioperative systemic therapy. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test analyses showed no statistically significant differences in median OS (36 months for both, p = 0.638) or RFS (9 months for combined resection-ablation vs. 8 months, p = 0.921). Cox regression analysis showed a hazard ratio of 0.891 (p = 0.642) for OS and 0.981 (p = 0.924) for RFS, for patients undergoing resection only. CONCLUSION For patients with ≥ 4 CRLM, combined resection-ablation is a viable option in terms of OS and RFS. Therefore, combined resection-ablation should be considered for complete tumor clearance, in patients with multifocal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iakovos Amygdalos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Bonn, Germany.
| | - Lea Hitpass
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Bonn, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Felix Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Gerrit Josephs
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Jan Bednarsch
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Bonn, Germany
| | - Marie-Luise Berres
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Bonn, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Tom Lüdde
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Bonn, Germany
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Steven W M Olde Damink
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Tom Florian Ulmer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Bonn, Germany
| | - Ulf P Neumann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Bonn, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Philipp Bruners
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Bonn, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Sven Arke Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Huemer F, Dunkl C, Rinnerthaler G, Schlick K, Heregger R, Emmanuel K, Neureiter D, Klieser E, Deutschmann M, Roeder F, Greil R, Weiss L. Management of metastatic colorectal cancer in patients ≥70 years - a single center experience. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1222951. [PMID: 37560467 PMCID: PMC10407548 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1222951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Age-standardized mortality rates for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are highest among elderly patients. In current clinical guidelines, treatment recommendations for this patient population are based on a limited number of clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this monocentric, retrospective analysis we characterized patients aged ≥70 years undergoing systemic therapy for mCRC and overall survival (OS) was investigated. RESULTS We included 117 unselected, consecutive mCRC patients aged ≥70 years undergoing systemic therapy for mCRC between February 2009 and July 2022. Median OS was 25.6 months (95% CI: 21.8-29.4). The median age was 78 years (range: 70-90) and 21%, 48%, 26% and 5% had an ECOG performance score of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The median number of systemic therapy lines was 2 (range: 1-5). The choice of first-line chemotherapy backbone (doublet/triplet versus mono) did not impact OS (HR: 0.83, p=0.50) or the probability of receiving subsequent therapy (p=0.697). Metastasectomy and/or local ablative treatment in the liver, lung, peritoneum and/or other organs were applied in 26 patients (22%) with curative intent. First-line anti-EGFR-based therapy showed a trend towards longer OS compared to anti-VEGF-based therapy or chemotherapy alone in left-sided mCRC (anti-EGFR: 39.3 months versus anti-VEGF: 27.3 months versus chemotherapy alone: 13.8 months, p=0.105). In multivariable analysis, metastasectomy and/or local ablative treatment with curative intent (yes versus no, HR: 0.22, p<0.001), the ECOG performance score (2 versus 0, HR: 3.07, p=0.007; 3 versus 0, HR: 3.66, p=0.053) and the presence of liver metastases (yes versus no, HR: 1.79, p=0.049) were independently associated with OS. CONCLUSIONS Our findings corroborate front-line monochemotherapy in combination with targeted therapy as the treatment of choice for elderly mCRC patients with palliative treatment intent. Metastasectomy and/or local ablative treatment with curative intent are feasible and may improve OS in selected elderly mCRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Huemer
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Celine Dunkl
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Gabriel Rinnerthaler
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Konstantin Schlick
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Ronald Heregger
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Klaus Emmanuel
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Daniel Neureiter
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Eckhard Klieser
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Michael Deutschmann
- Department of Radiology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Falk Roeder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Richard Greil
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Tumor Registry of the Province of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Lukas Weiss
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Tumor Registry of the Province of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Uutela A, Nordin A, Osterlund E, Halonen P, Kallio R, Soveri LM, Salminen T, Ålgars A, Ristimäki A, Ovissi A, Lamminmäki A, Muhonen T, Kononen J, Ristamäki R, Heervä E, Stedt H, Lehtomäki K, Kytölä S, Sundström J, Mäkinen MJ, Nieminen L, Kuopio T, Keinänen M, Osterlund P, Isoniemi H. Resectability and resection rates of colorectal liver metastases according to RAS and BRAF mutational status: prospective study. Br J Surg 2023; 110:931-935. [PMID: 36511370 PMCID: PMC10361677 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Aki Uutela
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Abdominal Centre, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Transplant and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Arno Nordin
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Abdominal Centre, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Emerik Osterlund
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Abdominal Centre, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Päivi Halonen
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Centre and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Raija Kallio
- Department of Oncology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Leena-Maija Soveri
- Home Care Geriatric Clinic and Palliative Care, Joint Municipal Authority for Health Care and Social Services in Keski-Uusimaa, Hyvinkää, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tapio Salminen
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Annika Ålgars
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Ari Ristimäki
- Department of Pathology, HUS Diagnostic Centre and Applied Tumour Genomics, Research Programmes Unit, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ali Ovissi
- Department of Radiology, HUS Medical Imaging Centre, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Annamarja Lamminmäki
- Department of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Timo Muhonen
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, South Carelia Central Hospital, Lappeenranta, Finland
| | - Juha Kononen
- Department of Oncology, Central Finland Hospital Nova, Jyväskylä, Finland
- Docrates Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Raija Ristamäki
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Eetu Heervä
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Hanna Stedt
- Department of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Kaisa Lehtomäki
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Soili Kytölä
- Department of Genetics, HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Centre, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jari Sundström
- Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Markus J Mäkinen
- Department of Pathology, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Lasse Nieminen
- Department of Pathology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Teijo Kuopio
- Department of Pathology, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Mauri Keinänen
- Department of Genetics, FIMLAB laboratories, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Pia Osterlund
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Centre and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
- Department of Oncology/Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska Sjukhuset, Cancer Centre of Excellence, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Helena Isoniemi
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Abdominal Centre, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Marmorino F, Faggioni L, Rossini D, Gabelloni M, Goddi A, Ferrer L, Conca V, Vargas J, Biagiarelli F, Daniel F, Carullo M, Vetere G, Granetto C, Boccaccio C, Cioni D, Antonuzzo L, Bergamo F, Pietrantonio F, Cremolini C, Neri E. The prognostic value of radiomic features in liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer patients from the TRIBE2 study. Future Oncol 2023; 19:1601-1611. [PMID: 37577810 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims: Evaluating the prognostic role of radiomic features in liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line therapy at baseline and best response among patients undergoing resection. Patients & methods: Among patients enrolled in TRIBE2 (NCT02339116), the association of clinical and radiomic data, extracted by SOPHiA-DDM™ with progression-free and overall survival (OS) in the overall population and with disease-free survival/postresection OS in those undergoing resection was investigated. Results: Among 98 patients, radiomic parameters improved the prediction accuracy of our model for OS (area under the curve: 0.83; sensitivity: 0.85; specificity: 0.73; accuracy: 0.78), but not progression-free survival. Of 46 resected patients, small-distance high gray-level emphasis was associated with shorter disease-free survival and high gray-level zone emphasis/higher kurtosis with shorter postresection OS. Conclusion: Radiomic features should be implemented as tools of outcome prediction for liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Marmorino
- Unit of Oncology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy & Department of Translational Research & New Technologies in Medicine & Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Faggioni
- Academic Radiology, Department of Translational Research & New Technologies in Medicine & Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Daniele Rossini
- Unit of Oncology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy & Department of Translational Research & New Technologies in Medicine & Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Michela Gabelloni
- Academic Radiology, Department of Translational Research & New Technologies in Medicine & Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Antonio Goddi
- Academic Radiology, Department of Translational Research & New Technologies in Medicine & Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Loïc Ferrer
- SOPHiA GENETICS, Multimodal Research team, Cité de la Photonique, 11 avenue de Canteranne, 33600, PESSAC, France
| | - Veronica Conca
- Unit of Oncology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy & Department of Translational Research & New Technologies in Medicine & Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Jennifer Vargas
- SOPHiA GENETICS, Multimodal Research team, Cité de la Photonique, 11 avenue de Canteranne, 33600, PESSAC, France
| | | | - Francesca Daniel
- Oncology Unit 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Martina Carullo
- Unit of Oncology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy & Department of Translational Research & New Technologies in Medicine & Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Vetere
- Unit of Oncology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy & Department of Translational Research & New Technologies in Medicine & Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Cristina Granetto
- SC Oncologia AO S. Croce & Carle, University Teaching Hospital, Via A. Carle 25, 12100, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Chiara Boccaccio
- Unit of Oncology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy & Department of Translational Research & New Technologies in Medicine & Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Dania Cioni
- Academic Radiology, Department of Translational Research & New Technologies in Medicine & Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Antonuzzo
- Clinical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Department of Experimental & Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, 50139, Firenze, Italy
| | - Francesca Bergamo
- Oncology Unit 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Filippo Pietrantonio
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian 1, 20133, Milano, Italy
| | - Chiara Cremolini
- Unit of Oncology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy & Department of Translational Research & New Technologies in Medicine & Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Emanuele Neri
- Academic Radiology, Department of Translational Research & New Technologies in Medicine & Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tolonen A, Kerminen H, Lehtomäki K, Huhtala H, Bärlund M, Österlund P, Arponen O. Association between Computed Tomography-Determined Loss of Muscle Mass and Impaired Three-Month Survival in Frail Older Adults with Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3398. [PMID: 37444508 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
As patients with solid (non-hematological) cancers and a life expectancy of <3 months rarely benefit from oncological treatment, we examined whether the CT-determined loss of muscle mass is associated with an impaired 3-month overall survival (OS) in frail ≥75-year-old patients with cancer. Frailty was assessed with G8-screening and comprehensive geriatric assessment in older adults at risk of frailty. The L3-level skeletal (SMI) and psoas (PMI) muscle indexes were determined from routine CT scans. Established and optimized SMI and PMI cut-offs were used. In the non-curative treatment group (n = 58), 3-month OS rates for normal and low SMI were 95% and 64% (HR 9.28; 95% CI 1.2-71) and for PMI 88%, and 60%, respectively (HR 4.10; 1.3-13). A Cox multivariable 3-month OS model showed an HR of 10.7 (1.0-110) for low SMI, 2.34 (0.6-9.8) for ECOG performance status 3-4, 2.11 (0.5-8.6) for clinical frailty scale 5-9, and 0.57 (0.1-2.8) for males. The 24-month OS rates in the curative intent group (n = 21) were 91% and 38% for the normal and low SMI groups, respectively. In conclusion, CT-determined low muscle mass is independently associated with an impaired 3-month OS and, alongside geriatric assessment, could aid in oncological versus best supportive care decision-making in frail patients with non-curable cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antti Tolonen
- Department of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Kuntokatu 2, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön Katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Hanna Kerminen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön Katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Centre of Geriatrics, Tampere University Hospital, Kuntokatu 2, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Gerontology Research Center (GEREC), Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön Katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Kaisa Lehtomäki
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön Katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Teiskontie 35, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Heini Huhtala
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Kalevantie 5, 33014 Tampere, Finland
| | - Maarit Bärlund
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön Katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Teiskontie 35, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Pia Österlund
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön Katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Teiskontie 35, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Tema Cancer, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Eugeniavägen 3, 17176 Solna, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 1, 17177 Solna, Sweden
| | - Otso Arponen
- Department of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Kuntokatu 2, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön Katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Vulasala SSR, Sutphin PD, Kethu S, Onteddu NK, Kalva SP. Interventional radiological therapies in colorectal hepatic metastases. Front Oncol 2023; 13:963966. [PMID: 37324012 PMCID: PMC10266282 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.963966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal malignancy is the third most common cancer and one of the prevalent causes of death globally. Around 20-25% of patients present with metastases at the time of diagnosis, and 50-60% of patients develop metastases in due course of the disease. Liver, followed by lung and lymph nodes, are the most common sites of colorectal cancer metastases. In such patients, the 5-year survival rate is approximately 19.2%. Although surgical resection is the primary mode of managing colorectal cancer metastases, only 10-25% of patients are competent for curative therapy. Hepatic insufficiency may be the aftermath of extensive surgical hepatectomy. Hence formal assessment of future liver remnant volume (FLR) is imperative prior to surgery to prevent hepatic failure. The evolution of minimally invasive interventional radiological techniques has enhanced the treatment algorithm of patients with colorectal cancer metastases. Studies have demonstrated that these techniques may address the limitations of curative resection, such as insufficient FLR, bi-lobar disease, and patients at higher risk for surgery. This review focuses on curative and palliative role through procedures including portal vein embolization, radioembolization, and ablation. Alongside, we deliberate various studies on conventional chemoembolization and chemoembolization with irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads. The radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres has evolved as salvage therapy in surgically unresectable and chemo-resistant metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sai Swarupa R. Vulasala
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Patrick D. Sutphin
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Samira Kethu
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United States
| | - Nirmal K. Onteddu
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Flowers Hospital, Dothan, AL, United States
| | - Sanjeeva P. Kalva
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
He M, Jia Z, Hu L, Wu H. Development and validation of a nomogram to predict which patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases would benefit from primary tumor resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:144. [PMID: 37237238 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04426-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of primary tumor resection (PTR) in the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) patients has become increasingly controversial. Our goal is to establish a nomogram to screen for the candidates that would benefit from PTR in CRLM patients. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was searched for 8366 patients with colorectal liver cancer metastases (CRLM) from 2010 to 2015. Overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier curve. After propensity score matching (PSM), predictors were analyzed by logistic regression analysis, and a nomogram was created to predict for survival benefit of PTR using R software. RESULTS After PSM, there were 814 patients in both PTR group and non-PTR group, respectively. The median OS time in the PTR group was 26 months (95%CI = 23.33 ~ 28.67) and the median OS time in the non-PTR group was 15 months (95%CI = 13.36 ~ 16.64). The Cox regression analysis found that PTR was an independent predictive factor (HR = 0.46, 0.41 ~ 0.52) for OS. Additionally, logistic regression was used to study the factors impacting PTR benefit, and the results showed that CEA (P = 0.016), chemotherapy (P < 0.001), N stage (P < 0.001), histological grade (P < 0.001), and lung metastasis (P = 0.001) are independent predictive factors affecting the therapeutic outcome of PTR in patients with CRLM. The developed nomogram displayed good discriminative ability in predicting the beneficial probability of PTR surgery, with the area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.801 in training set and 0.739 in validation set respectively. CONCLUSION We developed a nomogram that predicts the survival benefits of PTR in CRLM patients with relatively high accuracy, and quantifies the predictive factors for PTR-related benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingming He
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, 230022, China
| | - Zhenya Jia
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Lei Hu
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, China.
| | - Huo Wu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, 230022, China.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lehtomäki K, Soveri LM, Osterlund E, Lamminmäki A, Uutela A, Heervä E, Halonen P, Stedt H, Aho S, Muhonen T, Ålgars A, Salminen T, Kallio R, Nordin A, Aroviita L, Nyandoto P, Kononen J, Glimelius B, Ristamäki R, Isoniemi H, Osterlund P. Resectability, Resections, Survival Outcomes, and Quality of Life in Older Adult Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (the RAXO-Study). J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12103541. [PMID: 37240646 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Older adults are underrepresented in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) studies and thus may not receive optimal treatment, especially not metastasectomies. The prospective Finnish real-life RAXO-study included 1086 any organ mCRC patients. We assessed repeated centralized resectability, overall survival (OS), and quality of life (QoL) using 15D and EORTC QLQ-C30/CR29. Older adults (>75 years; n = 181, 17%) had worse ECOG performance status than adults (<75 years, n = 905, 83%), and their metastases were less likely upfront resectable. The local hospitals underestimated resectability in 48% of older adults and in 34% of adults compared with the centralized multidisciplinary team (MDT) evaluation (p < 0.001). The older adults compared with adults were less likely to undergo curative-intent R0/1-resection (19% vs. 32%), but when resection was achieved, OS was not significantly different (HR 1.54 [CI 95% 0.9-2.6]; 5-year OS-rate 58% vs. 67%). 'Systemic therapy only' patients had no age-related survival differences. QoL was similar in older adults and adults during curative treatment phase (15D 0.882-0.959/0.872-0.907 [scale 0-1]; GHS 62-94/68-79 [scale 0-100], respectively). Complete curative-intent resection of mCRC leads to excellent survival and QoL even in older adults. Older adults with mCRC should be actively evaluated by a specialized MDT and offered surgical or local ablative treatment whenever possible.
Collapse
Grants
- 2016, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 Finska Läkaresällskapet
- 2019-2020, 2021, 2022-23 Finnish Cancer Foundation
- 2023 Swedish Cancer Society
- 2022-2023 Radium Hemmets Research Funds
- 2020-2022 Relander's Foundation
- 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021,2022, 2023 Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility Area of Tampere, Helsinki and Turku
- Tukisäätiö 2019, 2020; OOO 2020 Tampere University Hospital
- 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 Helsinki University Hospital
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaisa Lehtomäki
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön Katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Teiskontie 35, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Leena-Maija Soveri
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Clinicum, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
- Home Care, Joint Municipal Authority for Health Care and Social Services in Keski-Uusimaa, 05850 Hyvinkää, Finland
| | - Emerik Osterlund
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Annamarja Lamminmäki
- Department of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1A, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Aki Uutela
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Surgery, Clinicum, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eetu Heervä
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Hämeentie 11, 20520 Turku, Finland
- Department of Oncology, University of Turku, Kiinanmyllynkatu 10, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Päivi Halonen
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Clinicum, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hanna Stedt
- Department of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1A, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Sonja Aho
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön Katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Teiskontie 35, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Timo Muhonen
- Department of Oncology, South Carelia Central Hospital, Valto Käkelän Katu 1, 53130 Lappeenranta, Finland
| | - Annika Ålgars
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Hämeentie 11, 20520 Turku, Finland
- Department of Oncology, University of Turku, Kiinanmyllynkatu 10, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Tapio Salminen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön Katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Teiskontie 35, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Raija Kallio
- Department of Oncology, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, 90220 Oulu, Finland
| | - Arno Nordin
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Surgery, Clinicum, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Laura Aroviita
- Department of Oncology, Kanta-Häme Central Hospital, Ahvenistontie 20, 13530 Hämeenlinna, Finland
| | - Paul Nyandoto
- Department of Oncology, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Keskussairaalankatu 7, 15850 Lahti, Finland
| | - Juha Kononen
- Docrates Cancer Centre, Docrates Hospital, Saukonpaadenranta 2, 00180 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Central Finland Central Hospital, Keskussairaalantie 19, 40620 Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Raija Ristamäki
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Hämeentie 11, 20520 Turku, Finland
- Department of Oncology, University of Turku, Kiinanmyllynkatu 10, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Helena Isoniemi
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Surgery, Clinicum, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Pia Osterlund
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön Katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Teiskontie 35, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Clinicum, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Tema Cancer, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Eugeniavägen 3, 17176 Solna, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 1, 17177 Solna, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Safety and effectiveness of aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI in Korean patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received oxaliplatin-containing regimen. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:1131-1143. [PMID: 35344080 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-03946-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of aflibercept in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in Korean patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who progressed with oxaliplatin-containing regimen. METHODS This was a prospective observational study conducted at 22 sites across Korea between February 2018 and September 2019. Patients aged > 19 years with a diagnosis of mCRC who were prescribed aflibercept plus FOLFIRI, after progression with an oxaliplatin-containing regimen were included. Disease assessment was performed every 6 weeks. RESULTS A total of 185 patients were included (males, 58.9%; right-sided tumors, 23.8%; and ECOG performance factor ≥ 1, 68.6%). A total of 514 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 134 patients, of which 206 (49.2%; 95% CI 42.0%, 56.4%) events were considered as adverse drug reactions (ADRs), 172 unexpected AEs (49.7%; 95% CI 42.5%, 56.9%), and 53 serious AEs (22.2%; 95% CI16.2%, 28.2%). The most common serious ADR was pneumonia (n = 2, 1.6%). The most common all grade hematological AE and non-hematological AE were neutropenia (21.6%) and nausea (16.2%), respectively. Over a median follow-up of 5.6 months, a total of five grade 5 (1.0%) AEs were reported. Median OS was 9.4 months, and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.3 months. The overall response rate was 14.6%. Right-sided tumor location and prior bevacizumab treatment were independent factors of poor PFS in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI was effective and showed an acceptable safety profile in Korean patients with mCRC in daily clinical practice.
Collapse
|
28
|
Evdokimova S, Kornietskaya A, Bolotina L, Sidorov D, Kaprin A. Postoperative Chemotherapy After Surgical Resection of Metachronous Metastases of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. World J Oncol 2023; 14:26-31. [PMID: 36895991 PMCID: PMC9990738 DOI: 10.14740/wjon1568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Currently, 6 months of perioperative or adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) is a standard treatment option after radical surgical removal of metachronous metastases in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Data show that ACT improves relapse-free survival in such patients, although no difference in overall survival rate was observed. We perform a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical resection of metachronous metastases in CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sevindzh Evdokimova
- P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute - Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow125284, Russia
| | - Anna Kornietskaya
- Department of Chemotherapy, P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute - Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Larisa Bolotina
- Department of Chemotherapy, P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute - Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Dmitriy Sidorov
- Abdominal Oncology, City Clinical Oncological Hospital No. 1, Moscow 105005, Russia
| | - Andrey Kaprin
- P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute - Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow125284, Russia.,Urology Department, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow117198, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cervantes A, Adam R, Roselló S, Arnold D, Normanno N, Taïeb J, Seligmann J, De Baere T, Osterlund P, Yoshino T, Martinelli E. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:10-32. [PMID: 36307056 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 446] [Impact Index Per Article: 446.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A Cervantes
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Adam
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université Paris-Saclay, ER "Chronothérapie, Cancers, Transplantation", Villejuif, France
| | - S Roselló
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - D Arnold
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Asklepios Tumourzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - N Normanno
- Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumouri, 'Fondazione G. Pascale'-IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - J Taïeb
- Department of Gastroenterology and GI Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP Paris Centre, Paris, France; Paris Cancer Institute SIRIC CARPEM, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - J Seligmann
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - T De Baere
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; University of Paris-Saclay, UFR Médecine Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Centre d'Investigation Clinique BIOTHERIS, INSERM CIC1428, Villejuif, France
| | - P Osterlund
- Tampere University Hospitals and University, Tampere, Finland; Tema Cancer/GI-oncology, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden
| | - T Yoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - E Martinelli
- Department of Precision Medicine, Oncology Unit, Università della Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Meyer YM, Olthof PB, Grünhagen DJ, Swijnenburg RJ, Elferink MAG, Verhoef C. Interregional practice variations in the use of local therapy for synchronous colorectal liver metastases in the Netherlands. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:1651-1658. [PMID: 35501243 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the Dutch regional practice variation in treatment of synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) over time and assess their impact on patients survival. METHODS Two cohorts of patients with synchronous CRLM were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). All patients diagnosed between 2014 and 2018 were selected to analyze interregional practice variations in local therapy (LT) with multivariable logistic regression. Overall survival (OS) was assessed for patients diagnosed from 2008 to 2013 using Kaplan Meier method and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS The proportion of patients who underwent LT increased from 15.5% to 21.9%. Interregional use of LT varied from 19.1% to 25.0%. Multivariable logistic regression showed significant differences between regions in the use of LT (p = 0.001) in 2014-2018. There was no association between OS and region of diagnosis for patients who underwent LT after correction for confounders.The use of LT for CRLM increased from 15.5% in 2008-2013 to 21.9% in 2014-2018. Three-year OS increased from 16% to 19% respectively. CONCLUSION Interregional practice variations have decreased. The remaining differences are not associated with OS. The use of local therapy and 3-year overall survival have increased over time. Local practice should be monitored to prevent undesirable variation in outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannick M Meyer
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pim B Olthof
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marloes A G Elferink
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
How Can the EU Beating Cancer Plan Help in Tackling Lung Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Breast Cancer and Melanoma? Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10091618. [PMID: 36141230 PMCID: PMC9498919 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10091618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer is the second leading cause of mortality in EU countries, and the needs to tackle cancer are obvious. New scientific understanding, techniques and methodologies are opening up horizons for significant improvements in diagnosis and care. However, take-up is uneven, research needs and potential outstrip currently available resources, manifestly beneficial practices—such as population-level screening for lung cancer—are still not generalised, and the quality of life of patients and survivors is only beginning to be given attention it merits. This paper, mainly based on a series of multistakeholder expert workshops organised by the European Alliance for Personalised Medicine (EAPM), looks at some of those specifics in the interest of planning a way forward. Part of this exercise also involves taking account of the specific nature of Europe and its constituent countries, where the complexities of planning a way forward are redoubled by the wide variations in national and regional approaches to cancer, local epidemiology and the wide disparities in health systems. Despite all the differences between cancers and national and regional resources and approaches to cancer care, there is a common objective in pursuing broader and more equal access to the best available care for all European citizens.
Collapse
|
32
|
Wang PP, Lin C, Wang J, Margonis GA, Wu B. BRAF Mutations in Colorectal Liver Metastases: Prognostic Implications and Potential Therapeutic Strategies. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174067. [PMID: 36077604 PMCID: PMC9454989 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In this literature review, we investigated the relationship between BRAF mutation and prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases. We also investigated factors affecting the prognosis of patients with BRAF mutations and summarized the latest research on targeted therapies. Abstract Surgery combined with chemotherapy and precision medicine is the only potential treatment for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). The use of modern molecular biotechnology to identify suitable biomarkers is of great significance for predicting prognosis and formulating individualized treatment plans for these patients. BRAF mutations, particularly V600E, are widely believed to be associated with poor prognosis in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). However, it is unclear which specific factors affect the prognosis of CRLM patients with BRAF mutations. It is also unknown whether patients with resectable CRLM and BRAF mutations should undergo surgical treatment since there is an increased recurrence rate after surgery in these patients. In this review, we combined the molecular mechanism and clinical characteristics of BRAF mutations to explore the prognostic significance and potential targeted therapy strategies for patients with BRAF-mutated CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei-Pei Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230001, China
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Chen Lin
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Jane Wang
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | | | - Bin Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Real-World Evaluation of Quality of Life, Effectiveness, and Safety of Aflibercept Plus FOLFIRI in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Prospective QoLiTrap Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143522. [PMID: 35884583 PMCID: PMC9324206 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Aflibercept plus FOLFIRI prolongs overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after the failure of oxaliplatin-containing therapy. QoLiTrap prospectively evaluated the quality of life (QoL) and effectiveness of this regimen in daily clinical practice, according to RAS status, sex, and prior targeted therapy, especially epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFR-I). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients whose EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS) improved or reduced by <5% from baseline during the first 12 weeks of therapy. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. One thousand two hundred and seventy-seven patients were treated with aflibercept plus FOLFIRI and 872 were evaluable for QoL. GHS improved or decreased by <5% in 40.3% of cases. The ORR was 20.8%, the median PFS was 7.8 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 7.3−8.3), and the median OS was 14.4 months (95% CI, 13.1−18.1). After prior EGFR-I, the ORR was 23.7%, median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI, 6.5−12.9), and median OS was 17.4 months (95% CI, 10.5−33.7). The safety profile was consistent with previously reported data. Aflibercept plus FOLFIRI given in daily practice maintained QoL in mCRC patients, was associated with a high objective tumor response, and retained its activity regardless of sex, RAS status, and prior EGFR-I therapy.
Collapse
|
34
|
Koh CE. Resecting the primary in unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer: Should we or shouldn't we? Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:809-810. [PMID: 35892253 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Cherry E Koh
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,RPA Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Talebi A, Shahidsales S, Aliakbarian M, Pezeshki Rad M, Kerachian MA. Oncogenic fusion transcript analysis identified ADAP1-NOC4L, potentially associated with metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Med 2022; 12:525-540. [PMID: 35702822 PMCID: PMC9844608 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Fusion transcripts are transcriptome-mediated alterations involved in tumorigenesis and are considered as diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic biomarkers. In metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC), fusion transcripts are rarely reported. The main challenge is to identify driver chimeras with a significant role in cancer progression. METHODS In the present study, 86 RNA sequencing data samples were analyzed to discover driver fusion transcripts. Functional assays included clonogenic cell survival, wound-healing, and transwell cell invasion. Quantitative expression analysis of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), apoptotic regulators, and metastatic markers were examined for the candidate fusion genes. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed using patient overall survival (OS). RESULTS A variety of driver fusions were identified. Fourteen fusion genes (51% of mCRC), each at least found in two mCRC samples, were determined as oncogenic fusion transcripts by in silico analysis of their functions. Among them, two recurrent chimeric transcripts confirmed by Sanger sequencing were selected. Positive expression of ADAP1-NOC4L was significantly associated with an increased risk of poor OS in mCRC patients. In vitro transforming potential for the chimera, resulting from the fusion of ADAP1 and NOC4L was assessed. Overexpression of this fusion gene increased cell proliferation and enhanced migration and invasion of CRC cells. In addition, it significantly upregulated EMT and anti-apoptotic markers. CONCLUSIONS ADAP1-NOC4L transcript chimera, a driver chimera identified in this study, provides new insight into the underlying mechanisms involved in the development and spread of mCRC. It suggests the potential of RNA-based alterations as novel targets for personalized medicine in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amin Talebi
- Medical Genetics Research CenterMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran,Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical GeneticsMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
| | | | - Mohsen Aliakbarian
- Faculty of Medicine, Surgical Oncology Research CenterMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
| | - Masoud Pezeshki Rad
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of RadiologyMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
| | - Mohammad Amin Kerachian
- Medical Genetics Research CenterMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran,Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical GeneticsMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran,Cancer Genetics Research UnitReza Radiotherapy and Oncology CenterMashhadIran
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Resectability, conversion, metastasectomy and outcome according to RAS and BRAF status for metastatic colorectal cancer in the prospective RAXO study. Br J Cancer 2022; 127:686-694. [PMID: 35610367 PMCID: PMC9381729 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01858-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Outcomes after metastasectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) vary with RAS and BRAF mutational status, but their effects on resectability and conversion rates have not been extensively studied. Methods This substudy of the prospective RAXO trial included 906 patients recruited between 2011 and 2018. We evaluated repeated centralised resectability assessment, conversion/resection rates and overall survival (OS), according to RAS and BRAF status. Results Patients included 289 with RAS and BRAF wild-type (RAS and BRAFwt), 529 with RAS mutated (RASmt) and 88 with BRAF mutated (BRAFmt) mCRC. Metastatic prevalence varied between the RAS and BRAFwt/RASmt/BRAFmt groups, for liver (78%/74%/61%), lung (24%/35%/28%) and peritoneal (15%/15%/32%) metastases, respectively. Upfront resectability (32%/29%/15%), conversion (16%/13%/7%) and resection/local ablative therapy (LAT) rates (45%/37%/17%) varied for RASa and BRAFwt/RASmt/BRAFmt, respectively. Median OS for patients treated with resection/LAT (n = 342) was 83/69/30 months, with 5-year OS-rates of 67%/60%/24%, while systemic therapy-only patients (n = 564) had OS of 29/21/15 months with 5-year OS-rates of 11%/6%/2% in RAS and BRAFwt/RASmt/BRAFmt, respectively. Resection/LAT was associated with improved OS in all subgroups. Conclusions There were significant differences in resectability, conversion and resection/LAT rates according to RAS and BRAF status. OS was also significantly longer for RAS and BRAFwt versus either mutant. Patients only receiving systemic therapy had poorer long-term survival, with variation according to molecular status. Clinical trial registration NCT01531621/EudraCT2011-003158-24
Collapse
|
37
|
Hitchcock KE, Romesser PB, Miller ED. Local Therapies in Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2022; 36:553-567. [PMID: 35562258 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Curative intent surgical resection of colorectal metastases to the liver and lungs in eligible patients results in improved disease control and prolonged overall survival with the potential for cure in a subset of patients. Additional ablative and local therapies for use in the liver, lungs, and other body sites have been developed with emerging data on the utility and toxicity of these treatments. Future studies should focus on identification of appropriate candidates for treatment and determining the optimal modality and timing of treatment accounting for both patient and disease factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn E Hitchcock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida Health, Davis Cancer Pavilion, 1535 Gale Lemerand Drive, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Paul B Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box #22, New York, NY 10065, USA; Early Drug Development Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric D Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, 460 West 10th Avenue, Room A209, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Williams NR, Patrick H, Fiorentino F, Allen A, Sharma M, Milošević M, Macbeth F, Treasure T. Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC) randomised controlled trial: a systematic review of published responses. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2022; 62:6567629. [PMID: 35415756 PMCID: PMC9257793 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this review was to assess the nature and tone of the published responses to the Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC) randomized controlled trial. METHODS Published articles that cited the PulMiCC trial were identified from Clarivate Web of Science (©. Duplicates and self-citations were excluded and relevant text extracted. Four independent researchers rated the extracts independently using agreed scales for the representativeness of trial data and the textual tone. The ratings were aggregated and summarized. Two PulMiCC authors carried out a thematic analysis of the extracts. RESULTS Sixty-four citations were identified and relevant text was extracted and examined. The consensus rating for data inclusion was a median of 0.25 out of 6 (range 0 to 5.25, IQR 0-1.5) and for textual tone the median rating was 1.87 out of 6 (range 0 to 5.75, IQR 1-3.5). The majority of citations did not provide adequate representation of the PulMiCC data and the overall the textual tone was dismissive. Although some were supportive, many discounted the findings because the trial closed early and was underpowered to show non-inferiority. Two misinterpreted the authors' conclusions but there was acceptance that five-year survival was much higher than widely assumed. CONCLUSIONS Published comments reveal a widespread reluctance to consider seriously the results of a carefully conducted randomized trial. This may be because the results challenge accepted practice because of 'motivated reasoning'. But there is a widespread misunderstanding of the fact that though PulMiCC with 93 patients was underpowered to test non-inferiority, it still provides reliable evidence to undermine the widespread belief in a major survival benefit from metastasectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norman R Williams
- Surgical and Interventional Trials Unit, University College London, UK
| | | | - Francesca Fiorentino
- Nightingale-Saunders Clinical Trials & Epidemiology Unit, King's Clinical Trials Unit, Kings College London, UK
| | | | - Manuj Sharma
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College, London, UK
| | - Mišel Milošević
- Thoracic Surgery Clinic, Institute for Lung Diseases of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | | | - Tom Treasure
- Clinical Operational Research Unit, University College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Health-Related Quality of Life in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Curative Resection and/or Local Ablative Therapy or Systemic Therapy in the Finnish RAXO-Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071713. [PMID: 35406485 PMCID: PMC8996978 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Metastasectomy and/or local ablative therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients often provide long-term survival. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data in curatively treated mCRC are limited. In the RAXO-study that evaluated repeated resectability, a multi-cross-sectional HRQoL substudy with 15D, EQ-5D-3L, QLQ-C30, and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires was conducted. Mean values of patients in different treatment groups were compared with age- and gender-standardized general Finnish populations. The questionnaire completion rate was 444/477 patients (93%, 1751 questionnaires). Mean HRQoL was 0.89−0.91 with the 15D, 0.85−0.87 with the EQ-5D, 68−80 with the EQ-5D-VAS, and 68−79 for global health status during curative treatment phases, with improvements in the remission phase (disease-free >18 months). In the remission phase, mean EQ-5D and 15D scores were similar to the general population. HRQoL remained stable during first- to later-line treatments, when the aim was no longer cure, and declined notably when tumour-controlling therapy was no longer meaningful. The symptom burden affecting mCRC survivors’ well-being included insomnia, impotence, urinary frequency, and fatigue. Symptom burden was lower after treatment and slightly higher, though stable, through all phases of systemic therapy. HRQoL was high in curative treatment phases, further emphasizing the strategy of metastasectomy in mCRC when clinically meaningful.
Collapse
|
40
|
Germani MM, Borelli B, Boraschi P, Antoniotti C, Ugolini C, Urbani L, Morelli L, Fontanini G, Masi G, Cremolini C, Moretto R. The management of colorectal liver metastases amenable of surgical resection: How to shape treatment strategies according to clinical, radiological, pathological and molecular features. Cancer Treat Rev 2022; 106:102382. [PMID: 35334281 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients have poor chances of long term survival, being < 15% of them still alive after 5 years from diagnosis. Nonetheless, patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) may be eligible for metastases resection thus being able to achieve long-term disease remission and survival. The likelihood for patients with CRLM of being or becoming eligible for liver metastasectomy is increasing, thanks to the evolution of surgical techniques, the availability of active systemic treatments and the widespread diffusion of experienced multidisciplinary boards to manage these patients. However, disease relapse after liver surgery is common and occurs in two-thirds of resected patients. Therefore, adequate radiological staging and risk stratification is crucial for the optimal selection of patients candidate to surgery in order to maximize the benefit-risk ratio of liver metastasectomy and to individualize the treatment strategy. Based on the multidimensional assessment, three possible approaches are available: upfront liver surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, perioperative chemotherapy preceding and following liver surgery, and an upfront systemic treatment including chemotherapy plus a targeted agent, both chosen according to patients' and tumours' characteristics, then followed by liver surgery if indicated. In this review, we describe the most important factors impacting the therapeutic choices in patients with resectable and potentially resectable CRLM, and we discuss the most promising factors that may reshape the future decision-making process of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Maria Germani
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Beatrice Borelli
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Piero Boraschi
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, and Nuclear Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Carlotta Antoniotti
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Clara Ugolini
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Lucio Urbani
- Unit of General Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Luca Morelli
- General Surgery, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gabriella Fontanini
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gianluca Masi
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Chiara Cremolini
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Moretto
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Banchini F, Luzietti E, Palmieri G, Bonfili D, Romboli A, Conti L, Capelli P. Laparoscopic Resection of Synchronous Liver Metastasis Involving the Left Hepatic Vein and the Common Trunk Bifurcation: A Strategy of Parenchyma-Sparing Resection with Left Sectionectomy and 4a Subsegmentectomy by Arantius Approach. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10030517. [PMID: 35326995 PMCID: PMC8950909 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10030517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
When colorectal cancer presents with liver metastasis, hepatic resection remains the most important factor in prolonging survival, and new paradigms have been proposed to augment resectability. An adequate liver remnant and vascularisation are the only limits in complex liver resection, and parenchyma-sparing surgery is a strategy for minimising the complications, preserving liver function, and allowing patients to undergo further liver resection. The laparoscopic approach represents a new challenge, especially when lesions are located in the superior or posterior part of the liver. We discuss the case of an 81-year-old patient with a single synchronous liver metastasis involving the left hepatic vein and leaning into the middle hepatic vein at the common trunk, where we performed a simultaneous laparoscopic colonic resection with a left sectionectomy extended to segment 4a. The strategic approach to the Arantius ligament by joining the left and middle hepatic vein allowed us to avoid a major liver hepatectomy, preserve the liver parenchyma, reduce complications, enhance patient recovery, and perform the entire procedure by laparoscopy. Our example suggests that the Arantius approach to the left hepatic vein and the common trunk could be a feasible approach to consider in laparoscopic surgery for lesions located in their proximity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Banchini
- Department of General Surgery, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29100 Piacenza, Italy; (E.L.); (G.P.); (A.R.); (L.C.); (P.C.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Enrico Luzietti
- Department of General Surgery, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29100 Piacenza, Italy; (E.L.); (G.P.); (A.R.); (L.C.); (P.C.)
| | - Gerardo Palmieri
- Department of General Surgery, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29100 Piacenza, Italy; (E.L.); (G.P.); (A.R.); (L.C.); (P.C.)
| | - Deborah Bonfili
- Department of General Surgery, Università degli Studi di Parma, 43100 Parma, Italy;
| | - Andrea Romboli
- Department of General Surgery, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29100 Piacenza, Italy; (E.L.); (G.P.); (A.R.); (L.C.); (P.C.)
| | - Luigi Conti
- Department of General Surgery, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29100 Piacenza, Italy; (E.L.); (G.P.); (A.R.); (L.C.); (P.C.)
| | - Patrizio Capelli
- Department of General Surgery, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29100 Piacenza, Italy; (E.L.); (G.P.); (A.R.); (L.C.); (P.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Osterlund E, Ristimäki A, Kytölä S, Kuopio T, Heervä E, Muhonen T, Halonen P, Kallio R, Soveri LM, Sundström J, Keinänen M, Ålgars A, Ristamäki R, Sorbye H, Pfeiffer P, Nunes L, Salminen T, Lamminmäki A, Mäkinen MJ, Sjöblom T, Isoniemi H, Glimelius B, Osterlund P. KRAS-G12C Mutation in One Real-Life and Three Population-Based Nordic Cohorts of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:826073. [PMID: 35251991 PMCID: PMC8889930 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.826073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background KRAS mutations, present in over 40% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), are negative predictive factors for anti-EGFR therapy. Mutations in KRAS-G12C have a cysteine residue for which drugs have been developed. Published data on this specific mutation are conflicting; thus, we studied the frequency and clinical characteristics in a real-world and population-based setting. Methods Patients from three Nordic population-based cohorts and the real-life RAXO-study were combined. RAS and BRAF tests were performed in routine healthcare, except for one cohort. The dataset consisted of 2,559 patients, of which 1,871 could be accurately classified as KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF-V600E. Demographics, treatments, and outcomes were compared using logistic regression. Overall survival (OS) was estimated with Kaplan–Meier, and differences were compared using Cox regression, adjusted for baseline factors. Results The KRAS-G12C frequency was 2%–4% of all tested in the seven cohorts (mean 3%) and 4%–8% of KRAS mutated tumors in the cohorts (mean 7%). Metastasectomies and ablations were performed more often (38% vs. 28%, p = 0.040), and bevacizumab was added more often (any line 74% vs. 59%, p = 0.007) for patients with KRAS-G12C- vs. other KRAS-mutated tumors, whereas chemotherapy was given to similar proportions. OS did not differ according to KRAS mutation, neither overall (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.03; 95% CI 0.74–1.42, reference KRAS-G12C) nor within treatment groups defined as “systemic chemotherapy, alone or with biologics”, “metastasectomy and/or ablations”, or “best supportive care”, RAS and BRAF wild-type tumors (n = 548) differed similarly to KRAS-G12C, as to other KRAS- or NRAS-mutated (n = 66) tumors. Conclusions In these real-life and population-based cohorts, there were no significant differences in patient characteristics and outcomes between patients with KRAS-G12C tumors and those with other KRAS mutations. This contrasts with the results of most previous studies claiming differences in many aspects, often with worse outcomes for those with a KRAS-G12C mutation, although not consistent. When specific drugs are developed, as for this mutation, differences in outcome will hopefully emerge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emerik Osterlund
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ari Ristimäki
- Department of Pathology, HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,Applied Tumor Genomics Research Program, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Soili Kytölä
- Department of Genetics, HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Genetics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Teijo Kuopio
- Department of Pathology, Central Finland Hospital Nova, Jyväskylä, Finland.,Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Eetu Heervä
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.,Department of Oncology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Timo Muhonen
- Department of Oncology, South Carelia Central Hospital, Lappeenranta, Finland.,Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Päivi Halonen
- Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Raija Kallio
- Department of Oncology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.,Department of Oncology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Leena-Maija Soveri
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,Home Care, Geriatric Clinic and Palliative Care, Joint Municipal Authority for Health Care and Social Services in Keski-Uusimaa, Hyvinkää, Finland
| | - Jari Sundström
- Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.,Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Mauri Keinänen
- Department of Genetics, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland
| | - Annika Ålgars
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.,Department of Oncology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Raija Ristamäki
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.,Department of Oncology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Halfdan Sorbye
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Per Pfeiffer
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Luís Nunes
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Tapio Salminen
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.,Department of Oncology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Annamarja Lamminmäki
- Department of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.,Department of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Markus J Mäkinen
- Department of Pathology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.,Department of Pathology, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, University of Oulu, and Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Tobias Sjöblom
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Helena Isoniemi
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Pia Osterlund
- Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.,Department of Oncology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.,Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Oncology/Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Osterlund P, Kinos S, Pfeiffer P, Salminen T, Kwakman J, Frödin JE, Shah C, Sorbye H, Ristamäki R, Halonen P, Soveri L, Heervä E, Ålgars A, Bärlund M, Hagman H, McDermott R, O’Reilly M, Röckert R, Liposits G, Kallio R, Flygare P, Teske A, van Werkhoven E, Punt C, Glimelius B. Continuation of fluoropyrimidine treatment with S-1 after cardiotoxicity on capecitabine- or 5-fluorouracil-based therapy in patients with solid tumours: a multicentre retrospective observational cohort study. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100427. [PMID: 35798468 PMCID: PMC9291631 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
|
44
|
Current Surgical Management Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14041063. [PMID: 35205811 PMCID: PMC8870224 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancer diagnoses in the world. At least half of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer will develop metastatic disease, with most being identified in the liver. Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is potentially curative. Surgical resection of CRLM, however, remains underutilized despite the continued expansion of operative strategies available. This is likely due to differing views on resectability. Resectability is a surgical assessment, and the classification of CRLM as unresectable should only be made by an experienced hepatobiliary surgeon. Obtaining a surgical evaluation at the time of liver metastasis discovery may help mitigate the challenge of assessing resectability and the determination of potential operative time windows within current multimodal management strategies. The aim of this review is to help facilitate discussions surrounding resectability as well as the timing and sequencing of both surgical and non-surgical therapies. Abstract Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer diagnosis in the world, and the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths. Despite significant progress in management strategies for colorectal cancer over the last several decades, metastatic disease remains difficult to treat and is often considered incurable. However, for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), surgical resection offers the best opportunity for survival, can be curative, and remains the gold standard. Unfortunately, surgical treatment options are underutilized. Misperceptions regarding resectable and unresectable CRLM likely play a role in this. The assessment of factors that impact resectability status like medical fitness, technical considerations, and disease biology can be difficult, necessitating careful multidisciplinary input and discussion. The identification of ideal operative time windows that align with the multimodal management of these patients can also be perplexing. For all patients with CRLM it may therefore be advantageous to obtain surgical evaluation at the time of discovering liver metastases to mitigate these challenges and minimize the risk of undertreatment. In this review we summarize current surgical management strategies for CRLM and discuss factors to be considered when determining resectability.
Collapse
|
45
|
Rhaiem R, Rached L, Tashkandi A, Bouché O, Kianmanesh R. Implications of RAS Mutations on Oncological Outcomes of Surgical Resection and Thermal Ablation Techniques in the Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:816. [PMID: 35159083 PMCID: PMC8834154 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related death. More than 50% of patients with CRC will develop liver metastases (CRLM) during their disease. In the era of precision surgery for CRLM, several advances have been made in the multimodal management of this disease. Surgical treatment, combined with a modern chemotherapy regimen and targeted therapies, is the only potential curative treatment. Unfortunately, 70% of patients treated for CRLM experience recurrence. RAS mutations are associated with worse overall and recurrence-free survival. Other mutations such as BRAF, associated RAS /TP53 and APC/PIK3CA mutations are important genetic markers to evaluate tumor biology. Somatic mutations are of paramount interest for tailoring preoperative treatment, defining a surgical resection strategy and the indication for ablation techniques. Herein, the most relevant studies dealing with RAS mutations and the management of CRLM were reviewed. Controversies about the implication of this mutation in surgical and ablative treatments were also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rami Rhaiem
- Faculty of Medecine, University Reims Champagne-Ardenne, 51100 Reims, France; (O.B.); (R.K.)
- Hepatobiliary, Pancreas, Endocrine and Digestive Surgical Oncology Department, Robert Debré Hospital, CHU de Reims, 51100 Reims, France; (L.R.); (A.T.)
| | - Linda Rached
- Hepatobiliary, Pancreas, Endocrine and Digestive Surgical Oncology Department, Robert Debré Hospital, CHU de Reims, 51100 Reims, France; (L.R.); (A.T.)
| | - Ahmad Tashkandi
- Hepatobiliary, Pancreas, Endocrine and Digestive Surgical Oncology Department, Robert Debré Hospital, CHU de Reims, 51100 Reims, France; (L.R.); (A.T.)
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Faculty of Medecine, University Reims Champagne-Ardenne, 51100 Reims, France; (O.B.); (R.K.)
- Digestive Oncology and Hepatogastroenterology Department, Robert Debré Hospital, CHU de Reims, 51100 Reims, France
| | - Reza Kianmanesh
- Faculty of Medecine, University Reims Champagne-Ardenne, 51100 Reims, France; (O.B.); (R.K.)
- Hepatobiliary, Pancreas, Endocrine and Digestive Surgical Oncology Department, Robert Debré Hospital, CHU de Reims, 51100 Reims, France; (L.R.); (A.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kempf E, Priou S, Lamé G, Daniel C, Bellamine A, Sommacale D, Belkacemi Y, Bey R, Galula G, Taright N, Tannier X, Rance B, Flicoteaux R, Hemery F, Audureau E, Chatellier G, Tournigand C. Impact of two waves of Sars-Cov2 outbreak on the number, clinical presentation, care trajectories and survival of patients newly referred for a colorectal cancer: A French multicentric cohort study from a large group of university hospitals. Int J Cancer 2022; 150:1609-1618. [PMID: 35001364 PMCID: PMC9015603 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The SARS‐Cov2 may have impaired care trajectories, patient overall survival (OS), tumor stage at initial presentation for new colorectal cancer (CRC) cases. This study aimed at assessing those indicators before and after the beginning of the pandemic in France. In this retrospective cohort study, we collected prospectively the clinical data of the 11.4 million of patients referred to the Greater Paris University Hospitals (AP‐HP). We identified new CRC cases between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2020, and compared indicators for 2018‐2019 to 2020. pTNM tumor stage was extracted from postoperative pathology reports for localized colon cancer, and metastatic status was extracted from CT‐scan baseline text reports. Between 2018 and 2020, 3602 and 1083 new colon and rectal cancers were referred to the AP‐HP, respectively. The 1‐year OS rates reached 94%, 93% and 76% for new CRC patients undergoing a resection of the primary tumor, in 2018‐2019, in 2020 without any Sars‐Cov2 infection and in 2020 with a Sars‐Cov2 infection, respectively (HR 3.78, 95% CI 2.1‐7.1). For patients undergoing other kind of anticancer treatment, the percentages are 64%, 66% and 27% (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4‐3.3). Tumor stage at initial presentation, emergency level of primary tumor resection, delays between the first multidisciplinary meeting and the first anticancer treatment did not differ over time. The SARS‐Cov2 pandemic has been associated with less newly diagnosed CRC patients and worse 1‐year OS rates attributable to the infection itself rather than to its impact on hospital care delivery or tumor stage at initial presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Kempf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Henri Mondor and Albert Chenevier Teaching Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France.,Laboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénierie des Connaissances pour la e-Santé, LIMICS, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Paris, France
| | - Sonia Priou
- IT Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Innovation and Data, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Lamé
- Laboratoire Génie Industriel, Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Christel Daniel
- Laboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénierie des Connaissances pour la e-Santé, LIMICS, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Paris, France.,IT Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Innovation and Data, Paris, France
| | - Ali Bellamine
- IT Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Innovation and Data, Paris, France
| | - Daniele Sommacale
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Henri Mondor and Albert Chenevier Teaching Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France
| | - Yazid Belkacemi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henri Mondor and Albert Chenevier Teaching Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France
| | - Romain Bey
- IT Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Innovation and Data, Paris, France
| | - Gilles Galula
- Department of Chronic Diseases and Cancer, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Head Office, Paris, France
| | - Namik Taright
- Department of Medical Information, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Head Office, Paris, France
| | - Xavier Tannier
- Laboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénierie des Connaissances pour la e-Santé, LIMICS, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Paris, France
| | - Bastien Rance
- Department of Medical Informatics, Centre-Université de Paris (APHP-CUP), Université de Paris, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Rémi Flicoteaux
- Department of Medical Information, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Head Office, Paris, France
| | - François Hemery
- Department of Medical Information, Henri Mondor and Albert Chenevier Teaching Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France
| | - Etienne Audureau
- Clinical Research Unit, Henri Mondor and Albert Chenevier Teaching Hospital, Université Paris Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, CEpiA Team, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France
| | - Gilles Chatellier
- Department of Medical Informatics, Centre-Université de Paris (APHP-CUP), Université de Paris, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Tournigand
- Department of Medical Oncology, Henri Mondor and Albert Chenevier Teaching Hospital, Université Paris Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Callesen LB, Takacova T, Hamfjord J, Würschmidt F, Oldhafer KJ, Brüning R, Arnold D, Spindler KLG. Circulating DNA in patients undergoing loco-regional treatment of colorectal cancer metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359221133171. [PMID: 36339929 PMCID: PMC9634210 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221133171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Loco-regional treatment strategies of colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases are evolving, but biological markers that can benefit patients and assist physicians in clinical decisions are lacking. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the current knowledge on circulating DNA and its clinical utility in predicting outcomes in patients undergoing loco-regional treatment of CRC metastases. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted on March 22, 2022. We included studies on patients undergoing loco-regional treatment of CRC metastases reporting the predictive or prognostic value of circulating DNA in the blood. Hazard ratios (HR) were pooled in separate random-effects meta-analyses to investigate if pre- or post-ablation measurements of circulating DNA were associated with survival. The risk of bias was assessed according to the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Results Twenty-eight studies with 2868 patients were included, of which 16 studies were eligible for meta-analyses. As expected in this new research field, a majority of included studies (n = 21/28) had a high risk of bias in at least one domain. Circulating DNA above the cutoff in a plasma sample taken before loco-regional treatment was associated with a short recurrence-free survival [pooled HR = 2.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-5.7, n = 162] and overall survival (pooled HR = 4.7, 95% CI 1.1-20.6, n = 105). Circulating DNA above the cutoff in a plasma sample taken after loco-regional treatment was associated with a short recurrence-free survival (pooled HR = 4.5, 95% CI 3.4-6.1, n = 569) and overall survival (pooled HR = 7.5, 95% CI 2.0-27.3, n = 161). There was limited data on the association between dynamics in circulating DNA and outcome. Conclusions Measurements of circulating DNA can be valuable when selecting and monitoring patients undergoing loco-regional treatment of CRC metastases. Studies designed to investigate the true clinical utility of circulating DNA in the context of various ablation modalities are warranted.The review has been registered at PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022320032).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tana Takacova
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, Hamburg,
Germany
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Care with
Sections Hematology and Rheumatology, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Julian Hamfjord
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University
Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for
Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of
Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Karl J. Oldhafer
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, Hamburg,
Germany
- Department of Surgery, Division of
Hepato-biliary and Pancreatic (HBP) Surgery, AK Barmbek, Hamburg,
Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University
Budapest, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Roland Brüning
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, Hamburg,
Germany
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, AK
Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Arnold
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, Hamburg,
Germany
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Care
with Sections Hematology and Rheumatology, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Karen-Lise G. Spindler
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology,
Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus
University, Aarhus Denmark
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, Hamburg,
Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Alveolar Echinococcosis-A Challenging Task for the Hepatobiliary Surgeon. Pathogens 2021; 11:pathogens11010040. [PMID: 35055988 PMCID: PMC8778716 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11010040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Alveolar echinococcosis (AE) is an ultimately fatal disease, whose only curative treatment is surgery. Due to its late presentation extended liver resections are often necessary. The true benefit of extensive surgery has yet to be established; (2) Methods: We present a single center experience of 33 cases of Echinococcus multilocularis that have been treated at a high-volume hepatobiliary surgery center between 2004 and 2021. (3) Results: Of the 33 patients 24 patients underwent major liver resection (73%). In addition to the liver resection patients frequently underwent complex extrahepatic procedures such as lymphadenectomy (n = 21, 61%), vascular resections and reconstructions (n = 9, 27%) or resections and reconstruction of the extrahepatic bile duct (n = 11, 33%). Seven patients suffered from ≥ grade III complications (21%). Complete resection was achieved in 17 patients. Fourteen patients had R1 resections and two had macroscopic parasitic remnant (R2). Progressive disease was reported in three patients (The two R2 patients and one R1 resected patient). At a median follow-up of 54 months no mortality has occurred in our cohort; (4) Conclusions: Liver resection remains the gold standard for AE. Even in extensive disease the combination of complex resection and perioperative benzimidazoles can achieve favorable long-term outcomes.
Collapse
|
49
|
Eigeliene N, Saarenheimo J, Wichmann V, Österlund P, Jekunen A. Metastatic Rectal Carcinoma with Long-Term Remission due to Modern Multimodality Treatment. Case Rep Oncol 2021; 14:1475-1482. [PMID: 34899239 PMCID: PMC8613627 DOI: 10.1159/000519044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In the era of personalized medicine, systemic treatment with chemotherapy in combination with targeted drugs, tailored according to RAS and BRAF status, has improved the survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but curative resection of metastases provides the only chance of cure. Here, we present a 40-year-old male with rectal adenocarcinoma and multiple bilateral synchronous liver metastases who has achieved long-term remission with multimodal treatment without resection of all metastatic lesions. This case emphasizes the need of repeated multidisciplinary team assessments and change of treatment intent if extraordinary responses are seen. The initial therapy consisted of short-course radiotherapy and surgery of the primary tumor followed by oxaliplatin-based combination chemotherapy and panitumumab with disease control intent. A complete radiologic response in >20 liver metastases in segments II–VIII was obtained. A biopsy-verified relapse of 3 liver metastases occurred at 9 months of treatment pause. Subsequently, major liver resection of 8 lesions was performed (4 with adenocarcinoma and 4 with cicatrix showing the challenge of disappearing lesions), followed by 6 months of adjuvant-like therapy. No relapse in MRI, PET, or CT has been noted since liver resection 6 years ago. Comprehensive genomic profiling of the primary tumor and liver metastases had similar driver mutations representing a low level of gene alteration and low diversity, possibly explaining the exceptional treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalja Eigeliene
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland.,University of Turku, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku, Finland
| | - Jatta Saarenheimo
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland.,Department of Pathology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland
| | - Viktor Wichmann
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland.,University of Turku, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku, Finland
| | - Pia Österlund
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.,Department of Oncology & Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska Comprehensive, Cancer Centre, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Antti Jekunen
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland.,University of Turku, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Treasure T, Farewell V, Macbeth F, Batchelor T, Milosevic M, King J, Zheng Y, Leonard P, Williams NR, Brew-Graves C, Morris E, Fallowfield L. The Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC) burden of care study: Analysis of local treatments for lung metastases and systemic chemotherapy in 220 patients in the PulMiCC cohort. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:2911-2922. [PMID: 34310835 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this work was to examine the burden of further treatments in patients with colorectal cancer following a decision about lung metastasectomy. METHOD Five teams participating in the Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC) study provided details on subsequent local treatments for lung metastases, including the use of chemotherapy. For patients in three groups (no metastasectomy, one metastasectomy or multiple local interventions), baseline factors and selection criteria for additional treatments were examined. RESULTS The five teams recruited 220 patients between October 2010 and January 2017. No lung metastasectomy was performed in 51 patients, 114 patients had one metastasectomy and 55 patients had multiple local interventions. Selection for initial metastasectomy was associated with nonelevated carcinoembryonic antigen, fewer metastases and no prior liver metastasectomy. These patients also had better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores and lung function at baseline. Four sites provided information on chemotherapy in 139 patients: 79 (57%) had one to five courses of chemotherapy, to a total of 179 courses. The patterns of survival after one or multiple metastasectomy interventions showed evidence of guarantee-time bias contributing to an impression of benefit over no metastasectomy. After repeated metastasectomy, a significantly higher risk of death was observed, with no apparent reduction in chemotherapy usage. CONCLUSION Repeated metastasectomy is associated with a higher risk of death without reducing the use of chemotherapy. Continued monitoring without surgery might reassure patients with indolent disease or allow response assessment during systemic treatment. Overall, the carefully collected information from the PulMICC study provides no indication of an important survival benefit from metastasectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Treasure
- Clinical Operational Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Fergus Macbeth
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Tim Batchelor
- Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals, Bristol, UK
| | - Misel Milosevic
- Institute for Lung Diseases of Vojvodina, Thoracic Surgery Clinic, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | | | - Yan Zheng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zheng Zhou University/Henan Cancer Hospital, Zheng Zhou, Henan Province, China
| | - Pauline Leonard
- Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, Romford, UK
| | - Norman R Williams
- Surgical and Interventional Trials Unit (SITU), University College London, London, UK
| | - Chris Brew-Graves
- Division of Medicine, National Cancer Imaging Accelerator (NCIA), University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Lesley Fallowfield
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research and Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), University of Sussex, Falmer, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|