In vivo evaluation of (+)-MR200 as a new selective sigma ligand modulating MOP, DOP and KOP supraspinal analgesia

The proof of concept of 2-{3-[N-(1-benzylpiperidin-4-yl)propyl]amino}-6-[N-methyl-N-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)amino]-4-phenylpyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile for the therapy of neuropathic pain

In the search for new small molecules for the therapy of neuropathic pain, we found that 2-{3-[N-(1-benzylpiperidin-4-yl)propyl]amino}-6-[N-methyl-N-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)amino]-4-phenylpyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile (12) induced a robust antiallodynic effect in capsaicin-induced mechanical allodynia, a behavioural model of central sensitization, through σ1R antagonism. Furthermore, administration of compound 12 to neuropathic animals, fully reversed mechanical allodynia, increasing its mechanical threshold to levels that were not significantly different from those found in paclitaxel-vehicle treated mice or from basal levels before neuropathy was induced. Ligand 12 is thus a promising hit-compound for the therapy of neuropathic pain.

Fentanyl Structure as a Scaffold for Opioid/Non-Opioid Multitarget Analgesics

One of the strategies in the search for safe and effective analgesic drugs is the design of multitarget analgesics. Such compounds are intended to have high affinity and activity at more than one molecular target involved in pain modulation. In the present contribution we summarize the attempts in which fentanyl or its substructures were used as a μ-opioid receptor pharmacophoric fragment and a scaffold to which fragments related to non-opioid receptors were attached. The non-opioid ‘second’ targets included proteins as diverse as imidazoline I₂ binding sites, CB₁ cannabinoid receptor, NK₁ tachykinin receptor, D₂ dopamine receptor, cyclooxygenases, fatty acid amide hydrolase and monoacylglycerol lipase and σ₁ receptor. Reviewing the individual attempts, we outline the chemistry, the obtained pharmacological properties and structure-activity relationships. Finally, we discuss the possible directions for future work.

Studies on the affinity of 6-[(n-(cyclo)aminoalkyl)oxy]-4H-chromen-4-ones for sigma 1/2 receptors

Sigma (σ) receptors represent attractive targets for the development of potential agents for the treatment of several disorders, including Alzheimer's disease and neuropathic pain. In the search for multitarget small molecules (MSMs) against such disorders, we have re-discovered chromenones as new affine σ₁/σ₂ ligands. 6-(4-(Piperidin-1-yl)butoxy)-4H-chromen-4-one (7), a previously identified MSM with potent dual-target activities against acetylcholinesterase and monoamine oxidase B, also exhibited σ₁/σ₂ affinity. 6-(3-(Azepan-1-yl)propoxy)-4H-chromen-4-one (20) showed a K _i value for σ₁ of 27.2 nM (selectivity (σ₁/σ₂) = 28), combining the desired σ₁ receptor affinity with a dual inhibitory capacity against both acetyl- and butyrylcholinesterase. 6-((5-Morpholinopentyl)oxy)-4H-chromen-4-one (12) was almost equipotent to S1RA, an established σ₁ receptor antagonist.

Interaction of new sigma ligands with biomembrane models evaluated by differential scanning calorimetry and Langmuir-Blodgett studies

The compound (+)-MR200 [(+)-methyl (1R,2S)-2-{[4-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-hydroxypiperidin-1-yl]methyl}-1-phenylcyclopropanecarboxylate] is a selective sigma 1 (σ₁) antagonist with antinociceptive effect, able to increase selective opioid receptor agonist-mediated analgesia. The parent compound (-)-MRV3 [(-)-methyl (1S,2R)-2-[(4-hydroxy-4-phenylpiperidin-1-yl)-methyl]-1-phenylcyclopropanecarboxylate], a σ₁ antagonist with an improved σ₁/σ₂ selectivity respect to (+)-MR200, play a role in both central sensitization and pain hypersensitivity, suggesting a potential use of σ₁ antagonists for the treatment of persistent pain conditions. With the intention to assessing the membrane absorption of compounds and their ability to cross it, the interaction of (+)-MR200 and (-)-MRV3 with dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine phospholipids (DMPC), used as biomembrane models was studied by Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Langmuir-Blodgett (LB).

Exploiting the Power of Stereochemistry in Drug Action: 3-[(2S,6S,11S)-8-Hydroxy-6,11-dimethyl-1,4,5,6-tetrahydro-2,6-methano-3-benzazocin-3(2H)-yl]-N-phenylpropanamide as Potent Sigma-1 Receptor Antagonist

(+)-(2S,6S,11S)- and (-)-(2R,6R,11R)-Benzomorphan derivatives have a different binding affinity for sigma-1 (σ1R) and opioid receptors, respectively. In this study, we describe the synthesis of the (+)-enantiomer [(+)-LP1] of the benzomorphan MOR agonist/DOR antagonist LP1 [(-)-LP1]. The binding affinity of both (+)-LP1 and (-)-LP1 for σ1R and sigma-2 receptor (σ2R) was tested. Moreover, (+)-LP1 opioid receptor binding affinity was also investigated. Finally, (+)-LP1 was tested in a mouse model of inflammatory pain. Our results showed a nanomolar σ1R and binding affinity for (+)-LP1. Both (+)-LP1 and (-)-LP1 elicited a significant analgesic effect in a formalin test. Differently from (-)-LP1, the analgesic effect of (+)-LP1 was not reversed by naloxone, suggesting a σ1R antagonist profile. Furthermore, σ1R agonist PRE-084 was able to unmask the σ1R antagonistic component of the benzomorphan compound. (+)-LP1 could constitute an useful lead compound to develop new analgesics based on mechanisms of action alternative to opioid receptor activation.

Supraspinal and Peripheral, but Not Intrathecal, σ1R Blockade by S1RA Enhances Morphine Antinociception

Sigma-1 receptor (σ₁R) antagonism increases the effects of morphine on acute nociceptive pain. S1RA (E-52862) is a selective σ₁R antagonist widely used to study the role of σ₁Rs. S1RA alone exerted antinociceptive effect in the formalin test in rats and increased noradrenaline levels in the spinal cord, thus accounting for its antinociceptive effect. Conversely, while systemic S1RA failed to elicit antinociceptive effect by itself in the tail-flick test in mice, it did potentiate the antinociceptive effect of opioids in this acute pain model. The present study aimed to investigate the site of action and the involvement of spinal noradrenaline on the potentiation of opioid antinociception by S1RA on acute thermal nociception using the tail-flick test in rats. Local administration was performed after intrathecal catheterization or intracerebroventricular and rostroventral medullar (RVM) cannulae implantation. Noradrenaline levels in the spinal cord were evaluated using the concentric microdialysis technique in awake, freely-moving rats. Systemic or supraspinal administration of S1RA alone, while having no effect on antinociception, enhanced the effect of morphine in rats. However, spinal S1RA administration did not potentiate the antinociceptive effect of morphine. Additionally, the peripherally restricted opioid agonist loperamide was devoid of antinociceptive effect but produced antinociception when combined with S1RA. Neurochemical studies revealed that noradrenaline levels in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord were not increased at doses exerting potentiation of the antinociceptive effect of the opioid. In conclusion, the site of action of σ₁R for opioid modulation on acute thermal nociception is located at the peripheral and supraspinal levels, and the opioid-potentiating effect is independent of the spinal noradrenaline increase produced by S1RA.

Benzomorphan skeleton, a versatile scaffold for different targets: A comprehensive review

Despite the fact that the benzomorphan skeleton has mainly been employed in medicinal chemistry for the development of opioid analgesics, it is a versatile structure. Its stereochemistry, as well as opportune modifications at the phenolic hydroxyl group and at the basic nitrogen, play a pivotal role addressing the benzomorphan-based compounds to a specific target. In this review, we describe the structure activity-relationships (SARs) of benzomorphan-based compounds acting at sigma 1 receptor (σ1R), sigma 2 receptor (σ2R), voltage-dependent sodium channel, N-Methyl-d-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor-channel complex and other targets. Collectively, the SARs data have highlighted that the benzomorphan nucleus could be regarded as a useful template for the synthesis of drug candidates for different targets.

Modality-specific peripheral antinociceptive effects of μ-opioid agonists on heat and mechanical stimuli: Contribution of sigma-1 receptors

Morphine induces peripherally μ-opioid-mediated antinociception to heat but not to mechanical stimulation. Peripheral sigma-1 receptors tonically inhibit μ-opioid antinociception to mechanical stimuli, but it is unknown whether they modulate μ-opioid heat antinociception. We hypothesized that sigma-1 receptors might play a role in the modality-specific peripheral antinociceptive effects of morphine and other clinically relevant μ-opioid agonists. Mechanical nociception was assessed in mice with the paw pressure test (450 g), and heat nociception with the unilateral hot plate (55 °C) test. Local peripheral (intraplantar) administration of morphine, buprenorphine or oxycodone did not induce antinociception to mechanical stimulation but had dose-dependent antinociceptive effects on heat stimuli. Local sigma-1 antagonism unmasked peripheral antinociception by μ-opioid agonists to mechanical stimuli, but did not modify their effects on heat stimulation. TRPV1+ and IB4+ cells are segregated populations of small neurons in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and the density of sigma-1 receptors was higher in IB4+ cells than in the rest of small nociceptive neurons. The in vivo ablation of TRPV1-expressing neurons with resiniferatoxin did not alter IB4+ neurons in the DRG, mechanical nociception, or the effects of sigma-1 antagonism on local morphine antinociception in this type of stimulus. However, it impaired the responses to heat stimuli and the effect of local morphine on heat nociception. In conclusion, peripheral opioid antinociception to mechanical stimuli is limited by sigma-1 tonic inhibitory actions, whereas peripheral opioid antinociception to heat stimuli (produced in TRPV1-expressing neurons) is not. Therefore, sigma-1 receptors contribute to the modality-specific peripheral effects of opioid analgesics.

Novel Sigma-1 receptor antagonists: from opioids to small molecules: what is new?

Sigma-1 (σ1) receptor has been identified as a chaperone protein that interacts with other proteins, such as N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and opioid receptors, modulating their activity. σ1 receptor antagonists have been developed to obtain useful compounds for the treatment of psychoses, pain, drug abuse and cancer. Some interesting compounds such as E-5842 (5) and MS-377 (24), haloperidol and piperazine derivatives, respectively, were endowed with high affinity for σ1 receptors (Ki σ1 = 4 and 73 nM; Ki σ2 = 220 and 6900, respectively). They were developed for the treatment of psychotic disorders and 5 also underwent Phase II clinical trials suggesting interesting potential therapeutic applications. Here, σ1 receptor antagonists have been grouped based on chemical structure and reviewed according to structure-activity relationship and potential therapeutic role.

(+)-Methyl (1R,2S)-2-{[4-(4-Chlorophenyl)-4-hydroxypiperidin-1-yl]methyl}-1-phenylcyclopropanecarboxylate [(+)-MR200] Derivatives as Potent and Selective Sigma Receptor Ligands: Stereochemistry and Pharmacological Properties

Methoxycarbonyl-1-phenyl-2-cyclopropylmethyl based derivatives cis-(+)-1a [cis-(+)-MR200], cis-(-)-1a [cis-(-)-MR201], and trans-(±)-1a [trans-(±)-MR204], have been identified as new potent sigma (σ) receptor ligands. In the present paper, novel enantiomerically pure analogues were synthesized and optimized for their σ receptor affinity and selectivity. Docking studies rationalized the results obtained in the radioligand binding assay. Absolute stereochemistry was unequivocally established by X-ray analysis of precursor trans-(+)-5a as camphorsulfonyl derivative 9. The most promising compound, trans-(+)-1d, showed remarkable selectivity over a panel of more than 15 receptors as well as good chemical and enzymatic stability in human plasma. An in vivo evaluation evidenced that trans-(+)-1d, in contrast to trans-(-)-1d, cis-(+)-1d, or cis-(-)-1d, which behave as σ₁ antagonists, exhibited a σ₁ agonist profile. These data clearly demonstrated that compound trans-(+)-1d, due to its σ₁ agonist activity and favorable receptor selectivity and stability, provided an useful tool for the study of σ₁ receptors.

Role of σ1 Receptors in Learning and Memory and Alzheimer's Disease-Type Dementia

The present chapter will review the role of σ1 receptor in learning and memory and neuroprotection , against Alzheimer's type dementia. σ1 Receptor agonists have been tested in a variety of pharmacological and pathological models of learning impairments in rodents these last past 20 years. Their anti-amnesic effects have been explained by the wide-range modulatory role of σ1 receptors on Ca2+ mobilizations, neurotransmitter responses, and particularly glutamate and acetylcholine systems, and neurotrophic factors. Recent observations from genetic and pharmacological studies have shown that σ1 receptor can also be targeted in neurodegenerative diseases, and particularly Alzheimer's disease . Several compounds, acting partly through the σ1 receptor, have showed effective neuroprotection in transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer's disease . We will review the data and discuss the possible mechanisms of action, particularly focusing on oxidative stress and mitochondrial integrity, trophic factors and a novel hypothesis suggesting a functional interaction between the σ1 receptor and α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Finally, we will discuss the pharmacological peculiarities of non-selective σ1 receptor ligands, now developed as neuroprotectants in Alzheimer's disease , and positive modulators, recently described and that showed efficacy against learning and memory deficits.

Pharmacological Modulation of the Sigma 1 Receptor and the Treatment of Pain

There is a critical need for new analgesics acting through new mechanisms of action, which could increase the efficacy with respect to existing therapies and reduce their unwanted effects. Current preclinical evidence supports the modulatory role of sigma-1 receptors (σ1R) in nociception, mainly based on the pain-attenuated phenotype of σ1R knockout mice and on the antinociceptive effect exerted by σ1R antagonists on pains of different etiologies. σ1R is highly expressed in different pain areas of the CNS and the periphery (particularly dorsal root ganglia), and interacts and modulates the functionality of different receptors and ion channels . The antagonism of σ1R leads to decreased amplification of pain signaling within the spinal cord (central sensitization), but recent data also support a role at the periphery. σ1R antagonists have consistently demonstrated efficacy in neuropathic pain , but also in other types of pain including inflammatory, orofacial, visceral, and post-operative pain. Apart from acting alone, when combined with opioids, σ1R antagonists enhance opioid analgesia but not opioid-induced unwanted effects. Interestingly, unlike opioids, σ1R antagonists do not modify normal sensory mechanical and thermal sensitivity thresholds but they exert antihypersensitive effects in sensitizing conditions, enabling the reversal of nociceptive thresholds back to normal values. Accordingly, σ1R antagonists are not strictly analgesics; they are antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic drugs acting when the system is sensitized following prolonged noxious stimulation or persistent abnormal afferent input (e.g., secondary to nerve injury). These are distinctive features allowing σ1R antagonists to exert a modulatory effect specifically in pathophysiological conditions such as chronic pain .

Sigma-1 Receptor and Pain

There is a critical need for new analgesics acting through new mechanisms of action, which could increase the efficacy respect to existing therapies and/or reduce their unwanted effects. Current preclinical evidence supports the modulatory role of the sigma-1 receptor (σ1R) in nociception, mainly based on the pain-attenuated phenotype of σ1R knockout mice and on the antinociceptive effect exerted by σ1R antagonists on pain of different etiology, very consistently in neuropathic pain, but also in nociceptive, inflammatory, and visceral pain. σ1R is highly expressed in different pain areas of the CNS and the periphery, particularly dorsal root ganglia (DRG), and interacts and modulates the functionality of different receptors and ion channels. Accordingly, antinociceptive effects of σ1R antagonists both acting alone and in combination with other analgesics have been reported at both central and peripheral sites. At the central level, behavioral, electrophysiological, neurochemical, and molecular findings support a role for σ1R antagonists in inhibiting augmented excitability secondary to sustained afferent input. Moreover, the involvement of σ1R in mechanisms regulating pain at the periphery has been recently confirmed. Unlike opioids, σ1R antagonists do not modify normal sensory mechanical and thermal sensitivity thresholds but they exert antihypersensitivity effects (antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic) in sensitizing conditions, enabling the reversal of nociceptive thresholds back to normal values. These are distinctive features allowing σ1R antagonists to exert a modulatory effect specifically in pathophysiological conditions such as chronic pain.

Sigma-1 Receptor Antagonists: A New Class of Neuromodulatory Analgesics

The sigma-1 receptor is a unique ligand-operated chaperone present in key areas for pain control, in both the peripheral and central nervous system. Sigma-1 receptors interact with a variety of protein targets to modify their function. These targets include several G-protein-coupled receptors such as the μ-opioid receptor, and ion channels such as the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR). Sigma-1 antagonists modify the chaperoning activity of sigma-1 receptor by increasing opioid signaling and decreasing NMDAR responses, consequently enhancing opioid antinociception and decreasing the sensory hypersensitivity that characterizes pathological pain conditions. However, the participation in pain relief of other protein partners of sigma-1 receptors in addition to opioid receptors and NMDARs cannot be ruled out. The enhanced opioid antinociception by sigma-1 antagonism is not accompanied by an increase in opioid side effects , including tolerance, dependence or constipation, so the use of sigma-1 antagonists may increase the therapeutic index of opioids. Furthermore, sigma-1 antagonists (in the absence of opioids) have been shown to exert antinociceptive effects in preclinical models of neuropathic pain induced by nerve trauma or chemical injury (the antineoplastic paclitaxel), and more recently in inflammatory and ischemic pain. Although most studies attributed the analgesic properties of sigma-1 antagonists to their central actions, it is now known that peripheral sigma-1 receptors also participate in their effects. Overwhelming preclinical evidence of the role of sigma-1 receptors in pain has led to the development of the first selective sigma-1 antagonist with an intended indication for pain treatment, which is currently in Phase II clinical trials.

Antinociception by Sigma-1 Receptor Antagonists: Central and Peripheral Effects

There is plenty of evidence supporting the modulatory role of sigma-1 receptors (σ1Rs) in nociception, mainly based on the pain-attenuated phenotype of σ1R knockout mice and on the antinociceptive effect exerted by σ1R antagonists, particularly in nonacute sensitizing conditions involving sustained afferent drive, activity-dependent plasticity/sensitization, and ultimately pain hypersensitivity, as it is the case in chronic pains of different etiology. Antinociceptive effects of σ1R antagonists both when acting alone and in combination with opioids (to enhance opioid analgesia) have been reported at both central and peripheral sites. At the central level, findings at the behavioral (animal pain models), electrophysiological (spinal wind-up recordings), neurochemical (spinal release of neurotransmitters) and molecular (NMDAR function) level supports a role for σ1R antagonists in inhibiting augmented excitability secondary to sustained afferent input. Attenuation of activity-induced plastic changes (central sensitization) following tissue injury/inflammation or nerve damage could thus underlie the central inhibitory effect of σ1R antagonists. Moreover, recent pieces of information confirm the involvement of σ1R in mechanisms regulating pain at the periphery, where σ1Rs are highly expressed, particularly in dorsal root ganglia. Indeed, local peripheral administration of σ1R antagonists reduces inflammatory hyperalgesia. Potentiation of opioid analgesia is also supported, particularly at supraspinal sites and at the periphery, where locally administered σ1R antagonists unmask opioid analgesia. Altogether, whereas σ1R activation is coupled to pain facilitation and inhibition of opioid antinociception, σ1R antagonism inhibits pain hypersensitivity and "releases the brake" enabling opioids to exert enhanced antinociceptive effects, both at the central nervous system and at the periphery.

Novel Potent N-Methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) Receptor Antagonists or σ1 Receptor Ligands Based on Properly Substituted 1,4-Dioxane Ring

Two series of 1,4-dioxanes (4-11 and 12-19) were rationally designed and prepared to interact either with the phencyclidine (PCP) binding site of the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor or with σ1 receptors, respectively. The biological profiles of the novel compounds were assessed using radioligand binding assays, and the compounds with the highest affinities were investigated for their functional activity. The results were in line with the available pharmacophore models and highlighted that the 1,4-dioxane scaffold is compatible with potent antagonist activity at NMDA receptor or high affinity for σ1 receptors. The primary amines 6b and 7 bearing a cyclohexyl and a phenyl ring or two phenyl rings in position 6, respectively, were the most potent noncompetitive antagonists at the NMDA receptor with IC50 values similar to those of the dissociative anesthetic (S)-(+)-ketamine. The 5,5-diphenyl substitution associated with a benzylaminomethyl moiety in position 2, as in 18, favored the interaction with σ1 receptors.

Possible involvement of the Sigma-1 receptor chaperone in chemotherapeutic-induced neuropathic pain

Previous studies have shown that ligands of the sigma-1 receptor chaperone (Sig-1R) regulate pain-related behaviors. Clinical use of chemotherapeutics is often compromised due to their adverse side effects, particularly those related to neuropathy. Previous studies have shown that repeated administration of oxaliplatin and paclitaxel produces neuropathy in rodents. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to clarify the involvement of the Sig-1R in chemotherapeutic-induced neuropathy by examining the effects of oxaliplatin and paclitaxel on the Sig-1R levels in the spinal cord, and by examining the effects of Sig-1R agonist and antagonist on oxaliplatin- and paclitaxel-induced neuropathy in rats. Chemotherapeutic-induced neuropathic pain was accompanied by a significant reduction of the Sig-1R level in the spinal cord. Furthermore, the administration of paclitaxel to CHO cells that stably overexpressed Sig-1Rs induced the clustering of Sig-1Rs. We also found that the Sig-1R agonist SA4503 potently inhibited the neuropathy induced by oxaliplatin- and paclitaxel, whereas this action was abolished by the Sig-1R antagonist NE-100. These results suggest that the reduction of Sig-1R activity is involved in chemotherapeutic-induced neuropathy, and the Sig-1R agonist SA4503 could serve as a potential candidate for the treatment of chemotherapeutic-induced neuropathy.

Investigational sigma-1 receptor antagonists for the treatment of pain

INTRODUCTION

The sigma-1 receptor (σ1R) is a ligand-regulated molecular chaperone that interacts with other proteins, including NMDA and opioid receptors, to modulate their activity. Convergent evidence indicates that σ1R antagonists exert inhibitory effects (and agonists stimulatory effects) on pain by stepping down the intracellular signaling cascades involved in transduction of noxious stimuli and plastic changes (i.e., sensitization phenomena) associated with chronic pain states.

AREAS COVERED

This review addresses three primary domains. The first focuses on mechanisms underlying the antinociceptive effects of σ1R antagonists. The second addresses evidence gained using pharmacological tools and experimental drugs in the discovery phase and clinical development. Finally, the article outlines the potential benefits of σ1R antagonists, alone or in combination, in the context of available pain therapeutics.

EXPERT OPINION

There is a critical need for new analgesics based on new mechanisms of action. Target identification requires convincing evidence relating targets to function. In turn, target validation requires confirmation of therapeutic benefits, ideally in humans. Current preclinical evidence provides strong rationale for σ1R antagonists in pain. The outcome of clinical studies with the most advanced investigational σ1R antagonist, S1RA (E-52862), will be of great interest to ascertain the potential of this new therapeutic approach to pain management.

Selective sigma-1 receptor antagonists for the treatment of pain

The sigma-1 receptor (σ1R) is located in areas of the CNS key for pain control and belongs to a unique target class with chaperoning functions over different molecular targets involved in transmission and amplification of nociceptive messages. Preclinical evidence supports a role for σ1R antagonists in the treatment of pain states where hypersensitivity develops as hyperalgesia and allodynia, two common symptoms encountered in neuropathic and other chronic pain conditions. Additionally, σ1R antagonists increase opioid analgesia without increasing opioid-related unwanted effects, which point to their potential use as opioid adjuvant therapy. This review summarizes the structure and function of the σ1R as well as the medicinal chemistry and pharmacological studies directed to the identification of σ1R antagonists for the treatment of pain.

The antagonistic effect of the sigma 1 receptor ligand (+)-MR200 on persistent pain induced by inflammation

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN

The sigma 1 (σ1) receptor, which is widely distributed in the CNS in areas that are known to be important for pain control, may play a role in persistent pain characterized by the hypersensitivity of nociceptive transmission. Here, we investigated the effect of σ1 blockade in an inflammatory pain model.

TREATMENT AND METHODS

An intraplantar injection of carrageenan (2 %) was used to induce paw inflammation. The effects of the σ1 antagonist (+)-MR200, given subcutaneously at a dose of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5,1, 1.5, and 2 mg/kg prior to injection of carrageenan, on inflammatory pain and inflammation were assessed. Mechanical allodynia with von Frey filaments, thermal hyperalgesia with the plantar test and edema evaluation with a plethysmometer were measured. Intergroup comparisons were assessed by one- or two-way analysis of variance when appropriate, followed by post-hoc tests (Dunnett's test for one-way or Bonferroni for two-way ANOVA).

RESULTS

(+)-MR200 dose-dependently prevented allodynia and hyperalgesia induced by carrageenan. Furthermore, it reduced paw edema with a significant inhibition percentage of 37.82 % at 3 h after carrageenan treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The blockade of the σ1 receptor with the selective antagonist (+)-MR200 may contribute to the suppression of the typical symptoms of inflammatory pain.

Modulation of peripheral μ-opioid analgesia by σ1 receptors

We evaluated the effects of σ1-receptor inhibition on μ-opioid-induced mechanical antinociception and constipation. σ1-Knockout mice exhibited marked mechanical antinociception in response to several μ-opioid analgesics (fentanyl, oxycodone, morphine, buprenorphine, and tramadol) at systemic (subcutaneous) doses that were inactive in wild-type mice and even unmasked the antinociceptive effects of the peripheral μ-opioid agonist loperamide. Likewise, systemic (subcutaneous) or local (intraplantar) treatment of wild-type mice with the selective σ1 antagonists BD-1063 [1-[2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]-4-methylpiperazine dihydrochloride] or S1RA [4-[2-[[5-methyl-1-(2-naphthalenyl)1H-pyrazol-3-yl]oxy]ethyl] morpholine hydrochloride] potentiated μ-opioid antinociception; these effects were fully reversed by the σ1 agonist PRE-084 [2-(4-morpholinethyl)1-phenylcyclohexanecarboxylate) hydrochloride], showing the selectivity of the pharmacological approach. The μ-opioid antinociception potentiated by σ1 inhibition (by σ1-receptor knockout or σ1-pharmacological antagonism) was more sensitive to the peripherally restricted opioid antagonist naloxone methiodide than opioid antinociception under normal conditions, indicating a key role for peripheral opioid receptors in the enhanced antinociception. Direct interaction between the opioid drugs and σ1 receptor cannot account for our results, since the former lacked affinity for σ1 receptors (labeled with [(3)H](+)-pentazocine). A peripheral role for σ1 receptors was also supported by their higher density (Western blot results) in peripheral nervous tissue (dorsal root ganglia) than in several central areas involved in opioid antinociception (dorsal spinal cord, basolateral amygdala, periaqueductal gray, and rostroventral medulla). In contrast to its effects on nociception, σ1-receptor inhibition did not alter fentanyl- or loperamide-induced constipation, a peripherally mediated nonanalgesic opioid effect. Therefore, σ1-receptor inhibition may be used as a systemic or local adjuvant to enhance peripheral μ-opioid analgesia without affecting opioid-induced constipation.

Sigma 1 receptor: a new therapeutic target for pain

Sigma 1 receptor (σ₁ receptor) is a unique ligand-regulated molecular chaperone located mainly in the endoplasmic reticulum and the plasma membrane. σ₁ receptor is activated under stress or pathological conditions and interacts with several neurotransmitter receptors and ion channels to modulate their function. The effects reported preclinically with σ₁ receptor ligands are consistent with a role for σ₁ receptor in central sensitization and pain hypersensitivity and suggest a potential therapeutic use of σ₁ receptor antagonists for the management of neuropathic pain as monotherapy. Moreover, data support their use in opioid adjuvant therapy: combination of σ₁ receptor antagonists and opioids results in potentiation of opioid analgesia, without significant increases in opioid-related unwanted effects. Results from clinical trials using selective σ₁ receptor antagonists in several pain conditions are eagerly awaited to ascertain the potential of σ₁ receptor modulation in pain therapy.

Sigma-1 receptor antagonism as opioid adjuvant strategy: enhancement of opioid antinociception without increasing adverse effects

While opioids are potent analgesics widely used in the management of pain, a number of well-known adverse effects limit their use. The sigma-1 receptor is a ligand-regulated molecular chaperone involved in pain processing, including modulation of opioid antinociception. However, data supporting the potential use of sigma-1 receptor ligands as suitable opioid adjuvants are based on studies that use non selective ligands. Also, safety issues derived from combination therapy are poorly addressed. In this study we used the new selective sigma-1 receptor antagonist S1RA (E-52862) to characterize the effect of selective sigma-1 receptor blockade on opioid-induced efficacy- and safety-related outcomes in mice. S1RA (40 mg/kg) had no effect in the tail-flick test but did enhance the antinociceptive potency of several opioids by a factor between 2 and 3.3. The potentiating effect of S1RA on morphine antinociception did not occur in sigma-1 receptor knockout mice, which supports the selective involvement of the sigma-1 receptor. Interestingly, S1RA co-administration restored morphine antinociception in tolerant mice and reverted the reward effects of morphine in the conditioned place preference paradigm. In addition, enhancement of antinociception was not accompanied by potentiation of other opioid-induced effects, such as the development of morphine analgesic tolerance, physical dependence, inhibition of gastrointestinal transit, or mydriasis. The use of sigma-1 receptor antagonists as opioid adjuvants could represent a promising pharmacological strategy to enhance opioid potency and, most importantly, to increase the safety margin of opioids. S1RA is currently in phase II clinical trials for the treatment of several pain conditions.

Potentiation of morphine-induced mechanical antinociception by σ₁ receptor inhibition: role of peripheral σ₁ receptors

We studied the modulation of morphine-induced mechanical antinociception and side effects by σ₁ receptor inhibition. Both wild-type (WT) and σ₁ receptor knockout (σ₁-KO) mice showed similar responses to paw pressure (100-600 g). The systemic (subcutaneous) or local (intraplantar) administration of σ₁ antagonists (BD-1063, BD-1047, NE-100 and S1RA) was devoid of antinociceptive effects in WT mice. However, σ₁-KO mice exhibited an enhanced mechanical antinociception in response to systemic morphine (1-16 mg/kg). Similarly, systemic treatment of WT mice with σ₁ antagonists markedly potentiated morphine-induced antinociception, and its effects were reversed by the selective σ₁ agonist PRE-084. Although the local administration of morphine (50-200 μg) was devoid of antinociceptive effects in WT mice, it induced dose-dependent antinociception in σ₁-KO mice. This effect was limited to the injected paw. Enhancement of peripheral morphine antinociception was replicated in WT mice locally co-administered with σ₁ antagonists and the opioid. None of the σ₁ antagonists tested enhanced morphine-antinociception in σ₁-KO mice, confirming a σ₁-mediated action. Morphine-induced side-effects (hyperlocomotion and inhibition of gastrointestinal transit) were unaltered in σ₁-KO mice. These results cannot be explained by a direct interaction of σ₁ ligands with μ-opioid receptors or adaptive changes of μ-receptors in σ₁-KO mice, given that [(3)H]DAMGO binding in forebrain, spinal cord, and hind-paw skin membranes was unaltered in mutant mice, and none of the σ₁ drugs tested bound to μ-opioid receptors. These results show that σ₁ receptor inhibition potentiates morphine-induced mechanical analgesia but not its acute side effects, and that this enhanced analgesia can be induced at peripheral level.

Low doses of dextromethorphan attenuate morphine-induced rewarding via the sigma-1 receptor at ventral tegmental area in rats

Chronic use of morphine causes rewarding and behavioral sensitization, which may lead to the development of psychological craving. In our previous study, we found that a widely used antitussive dextromethorphan (known as a low affinity NMDA receptor antagonist), at doses of 10-20 mg/kg (i.p.), effectively decreased morphine rewarding in rats. In this study, we further investigated the effects and mechanisms of low doses of DM (μg/kg range) on morphine rewarding and behavioral sensitization. A conditioned place preference test was used to determine the rewarding and a locomotor activity test was used to determine the behavioral sensitization induced by the drug(s) in rats. When a low dose of DM (3 or 10 μg/kg, i.p.) was co-administered with morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.), the rewarding effect, but not behavioral sensitization, induced by morphine was inhibited. The inhibiting effect of DM could be blocked by systemically administering a sigma-1 receptor antagonist, BD1047 (3 mg/kg, i.p.). When BD1047 (5 nmole/site) was locally given at the VTA, it also blocked the effects of a low dose of DM in inhibiting morphine rewarding. Our findings suggest that the activation of the sigma-1 receptor at the VTA may be involved in the mechanism of low doses of DM in inhibiting the morphine rewarding effect and the possibility of using extremely low doses of DM in treatment of opioid addiction in clinics.

Novel potent and selective σ ligands: evaluation of their agonist and antagonist properties

Novel enantiomers and diastereoisomers structurally related to σ ligand (+)-MR200 were synthesized to improve σ(1)/σ(2) subtype selectivity. The selective σ(1) ligand (-)-8 showed an antagonist profile determined by phenytoin differential modulation of binding affinity in vitro, confirmed in vivo by an increase of κ opioid analgesia. The σ(2) ligand (-)-9 displayed agonist properties in an in vitro isolated organ bath assay and antiproliferative effects on LNCaP and PC3 prostate cancer cell lines.

Pharmacology and therapeutic potential of sigma(1) receptor ligands

Sigma (σ) receptors, initially described as a subtype of opioid receptors, are now considered unique receptors. Pharmacological studies have distinguished two types of σ receptors, termed σ₁ and σ₂. Of these two subtypes, the σ₁ receptor has been cloned in humans and rodents, and its amino acid sequence shows no homology with other mammalian proteins. Several psychoactive drugs show high to moderate affinity for σ₁ receptors, including the antipsychotic haloperidol, the antidepressant drugs fluvoxamine and sertraline, and the psychostimulants cocaine and methamphetamine; in addition, the anticonvulsant drug phenytoin allosterically modulates σ₁ receptors. Certain neurosteroids are known to interact with σ₁ receptors, and have been proposed to be their endogenous ligands. These receptors are located in the plasma membrane and in subcellular membranes, particularly in the endoplasmic reticulum, where they play a modulatory role in intracellular Ca²⁺ signaling. Sigma₁ receptors also play a modulatory role in the activity of some ion channels and in several neurotransmitter systems, mainly in glutamatergic neurotransmission. In accordance with their widespread modulatory role, σ₁ receptor ligands have been proposed to be useful in several therapeutic fields such as amnesic and cognitive deficits, depression and anxiety, schizophrenia, analgesia, and against some effects of drugs of abuse (such as cocaine and methamphetamine). In this review we provide an overview of the present knowledge of σ₁ receptors, focussing on σ₁ ligand neuropharmacology and the role of σ₁ receptors in behavioral animal studies, which have contributed greatly to the potential therapeutic applications of σ₁ ligands.

Novel highly potent and selective sigma 1 receptor antagonists related to spipethiane

Conservative chemical modifications of the core structure of the lead spipethiane (1) afforded novel potent sigma(1) ligands. sigma(1) affinity and sigma(1/)sigma(2) selectivity proved to be favored by the introduction of polar functions (oxygen atom or carbonyl group) in position 3 or 4 (4-6) or by the elongation of the distance between the two hydrophobic portions of the molecule with the simultaneous presence of a carbonyl group in position 4 (8 and 9). The observed cytostatic effect against the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7/ADR, highly expressing sigma(1) receptors, and not against MCF-7, as well as the enhancement of morphine analgesia highlighted the sigma(1) antagonist profile of this series of compounds. In particular, due to its high sigma(1) affinity (pK(i) = 10.28) and sigma(1)/sigma(2) selectivity ratio (29510), compound 9 might be a novel valuable tool for sigma receptor characterization and a suitable template for the rational design of potential therapeutically useful sigma(1) antagonists.

Antagonism by haloperidol and its metabolites of mechanical hypersensitivity induced by intraplantar capsaicin in mice: role of sigma-1 receptors

RATIONALE

We evaluated the effects of haloperidol and its metabolites on capsaicin-induced mechanical hypersensitivity (allodynia) and on nociceptive pain induced by punctate mechanical stimuli in mice.

RESULTS

Subcutaneous administration of haloperidol or its metabolites I or II (reduced haloperidol) dose-dependently reversed capsaicin-induced (1 microg, intraplantar) mechanical hypersensitivity of the hind paw (stimulated with a nonpainful, 0.5-g force, punctate stimulus). The order of potency of these drugs to induce antiallodynic effects was the order of their affinity for brain sigma-1 (sigma(1)) receptor ([(3)H](+)-pentazocine-labeled). Antiallodynic activity of haloperidol and its metabolites was dose-dependently prevented by the selective sigma(1) receptor agonist PRE-084, but not by naloxone. These results suggest the involvement of sigma(1) receptors, but discard any role of the endogenous opioid system, on the antiallodynic effects. Dopamine receptor antagonism also appears unlikely to be involved in these effects, since the D(2)/D(3) receptor antagonist (-)-sulpiride, which had no affinity for sigma(1) receptors, showed no antiallodynic effect. None of these drugs modified hind-paw withdrawal after a painful (4 g force) punctate mechanical stimulus in noncapsaicin-sensitized animals. As expected, the control drug gabapentin showed antiallodynic but not antinociceptive activity, whereas clonidine exhibited both activities and rofecoxib, used as negative control, showed neither.

CONCLUSION

These results show that haloperidol and its metabolites I and II produce antiallodynic but not antinociceptive effects against punctate mechanical stimuli and suggest that their antiallodynic effect may be due to blockade of sigma(1) receptors but not to dopamine receptor antagonism.

Sigma-1 receptors are essential for capsaicin-induced mechanical hypersensitivity: studies with selective sigma-1 ligands and sigma-1 knockout mice

We evaluated the role of sigma(1) receptors on capsaicin-induced mechanical hypersensitivity and on nociceptive pain induced by punctate mechanical stimuli, using wild-type and sigma(1) receptor knockout (sigma(1)-KO) mice and selective sigma(1) receptor-acting drugs. Mutation in sigma(1)-KO mice was confirmed by PCR analysis of genomic DNA and, at the protein level, by [(3)H](+)-pentazocine binding assays. Both wild-type and sigma(1)-KO mice not treated with capsaicin showed similar responses to different intensities of mechanical stimuli (0.05-8 g force), ranging from innocuous to noxious, applied to the hind paw. This indicates that sigma(1) gene inactivation does not modify the perception of punctate mechanical stimuli. The intraplantar (i.pl.) administration of capsaicin induced dose-dependent mechanical allodynia in wild-type mice (markedly reducing both the threshold force necessary to induce paw withdrawal and the latency to paw withdrawal induced by a given force). In contrast, capsaicin was completely unable to induce mechanical hypersensitivity in sigma(1)-KO mice. The high-affinity and selective sigma(1) antagonists BD-1063, BD-1047 and NE-100, administered subcutaneously (s.c.), dose-dependently inhibited mechanical allodynia induced by capsaicin (1 microg,i.pl.), yielding ED(50) (mg/kg) values of 15.80+/-0.93, 29.31+/-1.65 and 40.74+/-7.20, respectively. The effects of the sigma(1) antagonists were reversed by the sigma(1) agonist PRE-084 (32 mg/kg, s.c.). None of the drugs tested modified the responses induced by a painful mechanical punctate stimulus (4 g force) in nonsensitized animals. These results suggest that sigma(1) receptors are essential for capsaicin-induced mechanical hypersensitivity, but are not involved in mechanical nociceptive pain.

A new sigma ligand, (+/-)-PPCC, antagonizes kappa opioid receptor-mediated antinociceptive effect

The compound (1R,2S/1S,2R)-2-[4-hydroxy-4-phenylpiperidin-1-yl)methyl]-1-(4-methylphenyl) cyclopropanecarboxylate [(+/-)-PPCC] is a ligand with high affinity for sigma (sigma) sites of which the selectivity towards several other receptor systems has been demonstrated. Given the existence of a relationship between the sigma system and the kappa opioid (KOP)-mediated analgesia, to characterize the pharmacological properties of (+/-)-PPCC we analyzed its influence on the analgesic effect of the systemic injected kappa agonist (-)-U-50,488H comparing the effects with those shown by (+)-pentazocine and BD1047. The results demonstrate that the systemic administration of (+/-)-PPCC (1 mg/kg s.c.) does not modify basal tail-flick latency. Pre-treatment with (+/-)-PPCC, at the same dose, significantly decreased the antinociceptive effect of (-)-U-50,488H, analogously to the sigma compounds used. This study confirms that (+/-)-PPCC plays the role of sigma agonist in this model and strengthens the hypothesis of the sigma receptor modulatory role on KOP-mediated analgesia.

(+)-Morphine and (-)-morphine stereoselectively attenuate the (-)-morphine-produced tail-flick inhibition via the naloxone-sensitive sigma receptor in the ventral periaqueductal gray of the rat

We have previously demonstrated that (+)-morphine and (-)-morphine pretreated spinally for 45 min stereoselectively attenuates the tail-flick inhibition produced by (-)-morphine given spinally in the mouse. The present study is then undertaken to determine if the same phenomenon observed in the mouse spinal cord can also take place in the ventral periaqueductal gray of the rat. Pretreatment with (+)-morphine for 45 min at 0.3 to 3.3 fmol dose-dependently attenuated the tail-flick inhibition produced by (-)-morphine (9 nmol) given into the ventral periaqueductal gray. Likewise, pretreatment with (-)-morphine for 45 min at a higher dose (3-900 pmol), which given alone did not affect the baseline tail-flick latency, also dose-dependently attenuated the tail-flick inhibition produced by (-)-morphine. Thus, (+)-morphine is approximately 270,000-fold more potent than (-)-morphine in attenuating the (-)-morphine-produced tail-flick inhibition. The attenuation of the (-)-morphine-produced tail-flick inhibition induced by (+)-morphine or (-)-morphine was dose-dependently reversed by (+)-naloxone (27.5 to 110 pmol) pretreatment for 50 min given into the ventral periaqueductal gray. Pretreatment with the sigma receptor antagonist BD1047 (N-[2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]-N-methyl-2-(dimethylamino)ethylamine dihydrobromide) (11-45 nmol) for 45 min given into the ventral periaqueductal gray also reversed dose-dependently the attenuation of the (-)-morphine-produced tail-flick inhibition induced by (+)-morphine or (-)-morphine, indicating that the effects are mediated by the activation of the sigma receptors. Since (+)-morphine, (-)-morphine and (+)-naloxone do not have any affinity for the naloxone-inaccessible sigma receptors, we therefore propose that (+)-morphine and (-)-morphine attenuate the (-)-morphine-produced tail-flick inhibition via the activation of the naloxone-sensitive sigma receptor originally proposed by Tsao and Su [Tsao, L.T., Su, T.P., 1997. Naloxone-sensitive, haloperidol-sensitive, [(3)H](+)-SKF-1047-binding protein partially purified from rat liver and rat brain membranes: an opioid/sigma receptor. Synapse 25, 117-124].

Stereoselective action of (+)-morphine over (-)-morphine in attenuating the (-)-morphine-produced antinociception via the naloxone-sensitive sigma receptor in the mouse

We have previously demonstrated that (+)-morphine and (-)-morphine given spinally stereoselectively attenuate the spinally-administered (-)-morphine-produced tail-flick inhibition in the mouse. The phenomenon has been defined as antianalgesia. Present studies were then undertaken to determine if the systemic administration of (+)-morphine and (-)-morphine also stereoselectively attenuates the systemic (-)-morphine-produced tail-flick inhibition and the effects of (+)-morphine and (-)-morphine are mediated by the naloxone-sensitive sigma receptor activation in male CD-1 mice. Pretreatment with (+)-morphine at a dose of 0.01-10 ng/kg given subcutaneously dose-dependently attenuated the tail-flick inhibition produced by subcutaneously-administered (-)-morphine (5 mg/kg). Pretreatment with (-)-morphine (0.01-1.0 mg/kg) given subcutaneously also attenuates the (-)-morphine-produced tail-flick inhibition. The ED50 values for (+)-morphine and (-)-morphine for inhibiting the (-)-morphine-produced tail-flick inhibition were estimated to be 30.6 pg/kg and 97.5 microg/kg, respectively. The attenuation of the (-)-morphine-produced tail-flick inhibition induced by (+)-morphine or (-)-morphine pretreatment was reversed by the pretreatment with (+)-naloxone or by the sigma receptor antagonist BD1047 (N-[2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]-N-methyl-2-(dimethylamino)ethylamine dihydrobromide) given subcutaneously. Pretreatment with (+)-pentazocine, a selective sigma receptor agonist, (1-10 mg/kg) given subcutaneously also attenuates (-)-morphine-produced tail-flick inhibition, which was restored by (+)-naloxone (4 mg/kg) or BD1047 (10 mg/kg) pretreated subcutaneously. It is concluded that (+)-morphine exhibits extremely high stereoselective action over (-)-morphine given systemically in attenuating the systemic (-)-morphine-produced antinociception and the antianalgesic effect of (+)-morphine and (-)-morphine is mediated by activation of the naloxone-sensitive sigma receptor.

dextro-Morphine attenuates the morphine-produced conditioned place preference via the sigma(1) receptor activation in the rat

An unbiased conditioned place preference paradigm was used to evaluate the effect of dextro-morphine on the morphine-produced reward in male CD rats. Morphine sulfate (1-10 mg/kg) given intraperitoneally dose-dependently produced the conditioned place preference. Pretreatment with dextro-morphine at a dose from 0.1 to 3 microg/kg given subcutaneously dose-dependently attenuated the morphine-produced conditioned place preference. However, dextro-morphine at a higher dose 100 microg/kg did not affect the morphine-produced conditioned place preference. Thus, dextro-morphine pretreatment induces a U-shaped dose-response curve for attenuating the morphine-produced conditioned place preference. The attenuation of the morphine-produced conditioned place preference was reversed by the pretreatment with the sigma(1) receptor antagonist BD1047 (N-[2-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)ethyl]-N-methyl-2-(dimethylamino)ethylamine dihydrobromide. dextro-Morphine or BD1047 given alone did not affect the baseline place conditioning. It is concluded that dextro-morphine attenuated the morphine-produced conditioned place preference via the sigma(1) receptor activation.