Unmet needs, burden of treatment, and patient engagement in multiple sclerosis: A combined perspective from the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group

PERSIMS: Comparing doctors and patients PERSpectives on quality of life In Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Advances in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) therapy have improved prognosis, but significant disability can still occur. Understanding the perspectives of doctors and patients on how MS and its treatment impact quality of life (QoL) is crucial. We aimed to explore the perceptions of MS patients and neurologists on MS symptoms, treatment, and their impact on QoL.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey was conducted, targeting adult patients with MS and physicians experienced in MS care. Patients' quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the MS Quality of Life (MSQOL-54) scale.

RESULTS

252 patients and 53 doctors completed the survey. Relapses in the previous year were associated with lower physical (p = 0.026) and mental (p = 0.022) health scores. Being satisfied with disease-modifying treatment (DMT) and being involved in its choice were also associated with higher physical (both p < 0.001) and mental (p = 0.024 and p = 0.002, respectively) health scores; these scores were not different in patients under moderate versus high-efficacy DMTs (physical p = 0.582 and mental p = 0.180). Patients' and doctors' perspectives differ in what they value for QoL. Patients prioritized mental health (p = 0.024), while doctors focused on the impact of physical aspects on QoL (p = 0.030 and p = 0.004). Patients valued information about social support (p < 0.001) more than doctors and considered fatigue more challenging to discuss (p = 0.039), whereas doctors highlighted sexual dysfunction as difficult to address (p < 0.001). Doctors prioritized workplace adaptations (p = 0.041), while patients preferred faster access to healthcare to improve QoL (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Incorporating patient-reported outcomes in MS care is essential to align treatment plans with patients' priorities and improve their QoL.

Evaluating patient care in multiple sclerosis: Impact of combined digital tools and holistic management strategies

Background

Innovations are essential to meet the needs of people with MS (PwMS), particularly in addressing delays in diagnosis and treatment, and in supporting patient self-management.

Objectives

To evaluate the real-world use and outcomes of digital technologies and holistic management strategies for MS at a UK Centre.

Methods

Digital tools for PwMS included Patients Know Best (a personal health record) and CONNECTPlus® (an educational app). Tools for healthcare professionals included Infoflex (a clinical database with MSProDiscuss for assessing disease progression). A Healthy Lifestyle Clinic was introduced to promote brain health. The impact of these interventions on time-to-diagnosis, time-to-disease-modifying therapy (DMT) initiation, non-elective admissions, and hospital costs was evaluated retrospectively from 2018 to 2023, comparing pre-intervention (2018-2019) with post-intervention (2020-2023) periods, while accounting separately for COVID-19 years (2020-2021).

Results

Trends indicated a higher likelihood of disease progression in patients with delayed MS diagnosis (p < 0.001), and a reduction in time from diagnosis to DMT initiation, from an average of 23.5 to 5.8 months (p = 0.024), post-MS Infoflex disease management database implementation. Non-elective admissions and healthcare costs also decreased compared to neighbouring hospitals.

Conclusions

Digital and holistic interventions were associated with positive trends in MS care delivery. Further research is needed to validate these findings.

Assessing female sexual dysfunction in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

 Multiple sclerosis (MS) affects mainly young people of reproductive age with significant lifelong repercussions, among which sexual dysfunction (SD) is one of the most neglected during routine clinical care.

OBJECTIVE

 To evaluate SD in female patients diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS).

METHODS

 This cross-sectional analytic study was performed at the Santa Casa de São Paulo Hospital, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, São Paulo, Brazil, between November 2020 and March 2022. The sample included 80 female patients diagnosed with RRMS and 106 healthy controls. Questionnaires probing sexual dysfunction (the Multiple Sclerosis Intimacy and Sexuality Questionnaire - MSISQ-19 and the Female Sexual Function Index - FSFI) and depression and anxiety (the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - HADS, the Beck Depression Inventory - BDI; and the Beck Anxiety Inventory - BAI) were applied.

RESULTS

 A high prevalence of SD in both groups (43.4% and 38.8% for the RRMS and control groups, respectively) was identified by the FSFI analysis. A statistically higher prevalence (56.3%) of sexual dysfunction was detected in RRMS patients when using the MSISQ-19 tool to assess sexuality in this population compared with the FSFI scale (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

 A high prevalence of SD was found in both MS patients and healthy controls as measured by the FSFI. However, the specific tool (MSISQ-19) revealed a higher prevalence of SD in MS patients. Thus, the use of MSISQ-19 for the diagnosis and management of SD in this patient group is recommended.

The renewed Development Model for Integrated Care: a systematic review and model update

BACKGROUND

Organising integrated health services beyond domains in interorganizational networks, can be supported by conceptual models to overview the complexity. The Development Model for Integrated Care (DMIC) is a systematically developed generic model that has been applied to innovate and implement integrated care services in a large range of (international) healthcare settings. After a decade, it is important to incorporate new available literature in the model. Therefore, our aim was to update and further develop the DMIC by incorporating the current body of knowledge.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and subsequent stepwise systematic update of the DMIC.

RESULTS

The review of the literature resulted in 179 included studies and eventually 20 new elements for the development model, which could be positioned in the nine clusters. New elements address the importance of the social system and community of the client, proactive care during the life span, digital (care) services and ethical and value driven collaboration in interorganizational networks that cross domains. The added elements for integrated care build further on the nine thematic clusters and the model as a whole, expanded with new accents.

CONCLUSION

The renewed model emphasizes the connectedness of care within a larger eco-system approach and inter-organizational networks. The model captures current knowledge which can be supportive as a generic conceptual model to develop, implement or innovate integrated services towards health value in societies. Further, it can serve for healthcare services research purposes to reflect on an monitor developments in integrated care settings over time on multiple levels.

Healthcare professionals educational resources for multiple sclerosis-related health behaviour management: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Multidisciplinary care is needed to facilitate health behaviour management for multiple sclerosis (MS). This review mapped the educational resources developed for healthcare professionals (HCPs) targeting MS-related health behaviours.

METHODS

A scoping review, guided by the Arksey and O'Malley framework, was conducted. Peer-reviewed and grey literature databases, organisational websites, search engines and YouTube were systematically searched to collate the evidence sources. Findings were narratively synthesised, and outcomes were categorised using the Kirkpatrick model for educational interventions.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine resources (23 training programs, 13 educational materials and three toolkits) were eligible for inclusion. Physical activity (n = 25) was the predominant health behaviour element, followed by psychological well-being (n = 16) and nutrition/diet (n = 13). Only 51% of the resources were specifically designed to target health behaviours, and 31% mentioned their evidence base. More than three-quarters of resources were technology-based and supported self-directed learning. Theories informed five resources, and two included HCPs and people living with MS perspectives in their development. Six programs were evaluated with HCPs, and most outcomes corresponded to levels 1-3 of the Kirkpatrick model (i.e., satisfaction, knowledge/skills and behavioural changes).

CONCLUSION

There is a globally limited availability of evidence-based educational resources for HCPs addressing MS-related health behaviours. Recommendations for HCP education and resource development are outlined herein.

Evaluation of patient-perceived fatigue in multiple sclerosis utilizing the Finnish MS registry

Objectives

To characterize patient-perceived fatigue by using the Finnish Multiple Sclerosis (MS) registry data.

Materials & Methods

Fatigue was assessed with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC), and the Visual Analogue Scale-Fatigue. Disease severity was evaluated with the Expanded Disability Status Scale and symptoms with the Visual Analogue Scales. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) included the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Questionnaire, the Euro Quality of Life - 5 dimensions, the 15 D, and the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale. For the purposes of the study, patients were classified to those without (FSS ≤ 4) and those with (FSS ≥ 5) fatigue. The FSS scores were correlated with the results of other PROs.

Results

Based on the 512 FSS scores, 47% of the patients reported fatigue (FSS ≥ 5). Fatigue was related to higher disability, lower education, and smoking. FSS correlated significantly with other measures of fatigue, cognitive, and mood symptoms, and was associated with lower Quality of Life.

Conclusions

As an invisible and debilitating symptom fatigue should be evaluated systematically. In the screening, it is important to recognize the characteristics of the different scales. Whereas the FSS may serve as an overall screen, the FSMC may help to identify aspects of cognitive and motor fatigue separately.

Exploring access to community neurorehabilitation for people with progressive neurological conditions: a qualitative study

PURPOSE

Community neurorehabilitation enables people with progressive neurological conditions (PNCs) to manage their symptoms to live an active, fulfilling life; however, it is not accessible to all. This study explored the factors influencing access to community neurorehabilitation in Northern Ireland from the perspective of people with PNCs and their carers.

METHODS

Eleven people living with a PNC and three carers took part in virtual focus groups. Data was thematically analysed using the framework method.

RESULTS

Access to neurorehabilitation was described as a staged journey, driven by people with PNCs, and impacted by interactions with others. Four themes were identified: the person in the driving seat, describing the value of person-centred care and the need for proactivity; the traffic lights, depicting the role and influence of health care professionals (HCPs); the need for direction; and roadworks and roadblocks, identifying additional barriers to access. In addition, six fundamentals of good access were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

This study adds depth to our understanding of the complexity, and the roles and needs of people with PNCs and HCPs, in accessing community neurorehabilitation. Further research is needed to determine how best to empower people to access rehabilitation.

A qualitative study on the experiences of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant for Multiple Sclerosis

AIM

Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is an effective treatment for people with highly-active relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), who are not adequately responding to disease-modifying therapies. To date, research has predominantly focused on disease-specific outcome measures. There is a lack of research exploring patient experiences of this complex treatment. The study aims to explore the experience of considering and receiving HSCT treatment for MS.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted online with 12 adults with MS who had undergone HSCT treatment. Interview topics covered the experience of deciding on the treatment, the HSCT process itself, and the patient-reported outcomes following HSCT. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis approach was employed.

RESULTS

Three main themes were identified: (1) Balancing hope and fear explores the decision-making experience when considering HSCT as a treatment; (2) Distinct emotional experience, highlights the unique challenges faced on all stages of the treatment journey; and (3) Adjusting to outcomes, explores how participants make sense of the aftermath of the treatment, including managing the ongoing uncertainty of MS and complications arising from HSCT.

DISCUSSION

HSCT is a complex treatment, both physically and psychologically for pwMS. A comprehensive and holistic care pathway is required to support people with MS at all stages of the treatment process, to ensure patient-centred planning and care.

Patient and Physician Perspectives of Treatment Burden in Multiple Sclerosis

The number of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) has greatly increased in recent decades, leading to higher treatment complexity. DMTs can differ in mode and frequency of administration, benefit-risk profile, and associated costs. Patients with MS contend not only with the burden of their chronic disease but also with the treatment burden of their MS therapy. Adhering to dosing schedules and infusion appointments can be difficult for busy, working-age patients or those with limited access to transportation. Patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) may have differing priorities, concerns, and preferences when selecting treatment, potentially affecting treatment satisfaction and, importantly, adherence. Additionally, patients face direct and indirect costs related to treatment. These factors can all contribute to a high treatment burden on patients, impacting their quality of life and potentially leading to worse patient outcomes. HCPs, patients, and caregivers must work together to alleviate treatment burden through effective communication, shared decision-making, appreciating each other's perspectives, and additional HCP support. Consideration of treatment burden into clinical guidelines is also warranted. In this review, we examine key factors impacting treatment burden for patients with MS, with a focus on the patient perspective as provided by our patient authors, and provide strategies to minimize treatment burden.

Subcutaneous ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis: Results of the Phase 1b OCARINA I study

OBJECTIVE

Subcutaneous ocrelizumab is being developed to provide treatment flexibility and additional choice to patients with multiple sclerosis. OCARINA I (NCT03972306) is an open-label, multicenter, Phase 1b, dose-finding study to investigate the pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of subcutaneous ocrelizumab and to select a dose for the Phase 3 OCARINA II study (NCT05232825).

METHODS

Patients with relapsing or primary progressive multiple sclerosis (aged 18-65 years; Expanded Disability Status Scale score 0.0-6.5) were enrolled into two groups: previously treated with intravenous ocrelizumab (Group A) or naïve to ocrelizumab (Group B). Patients received single ascending doses of subcutaneous ocrelizumab up to 1200 mg. Following dose escalation, new patients in Group A were randomized (1:1) to receive a single 600 mg intravenous ocrelizumab dose or the candidate subcutaneous dose, which was predicted to result in similar exposure as the 600 mg intravenous dose while being safe and well tolerated. The area under the concentration-time curve for both formulations was used to select the subcutaneous ocrelizumab dose. Patients in all cohorts could enter a dose-continuation phase.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight and 47 patients were enrolled into Group A and B, respectively; most patients were female (72.7%/63.0%), and mean age at baseline was 45.7 and 39.7 years, respectively. Subcutaneous ocrelizumab was well tolerated across all doses tested. The 920 mg subcutaneous ocrelizumab dose was selected for the OCARINA II study based on pharmacokinetic and safety data.

INTERPRETATION

Subcutaneous ocrelizumab may provide patients with multiple sclerosis with an additional treatment option.

Beyond lines of treatment: embracing early high-efficacy disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis management

Recent advances in multiple sclerosis (MS) management have shifted perspectives on treatment strategies, advocating for the early initiation of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (heDMTs). This perspective review discusses the rationale, benefits, and challenges associated with early heDMT initiation, reflecting on the obsolescence of the traditional "first-line" and "second-line" treatment classifications. The article emerges from the last update of the consensus document of the Spanish Society of Neurology on the treatment of MS. During its development, there was a recognized need to further discuss the concept of treatment lines and the early use of heDMTs. Evidence from randomized controlled trials and real-world studies suggests that early heDMT initiation leads to improved clinical outcomes, including reduced relapse rates, slowed disease progression, and decreased radiological activity, especially in younger patients or those in early disease stages. Despite the historical belief that heDMTs involve more risks and adverse events compared to moderate-efficacy DMTs (meDMTs), some studies have reported comparable safety profiles between early heDMTs and meDMTs, though long-term safety data are still lacking. The review also addresses the need for a personalized approach based on patient characteristics, prognostic factors, and preferences, explores the importance of therapeutic inertia, and highlights the evolving landscape of international and national guidelines that increasingly advocate for early intensive treatment approaches. The article also addresses the challenges of ensuring access to these therapies and the importance of further research to establish long-term safety and effectiveness of DMTs in MS.

MyMS: An Interface for Patient-Reported Outcomes for Finnish Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Patient-generated data are a cornerstone of individualized multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment. MyMS, an interface for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) was developed by the Finnish MS Register to enable systematic collection of PROs.

METHODS

MyMS collects data on demographics, lifestyle factors, disease-related factors, and validated questionnaires, including the Quality of Life Questionnaire (15D), the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), and the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). At the end of 2020, the patient-reported Expanded Disability Status Scale (PREDSS), the EuroQOL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC), and the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Questionnaire (MSNQ) were added.

RESULTS

As of January 1, 2023, 1201 individuals with MS (79% female) have added data to MyMS. Of the validated PRO measures (PROMs), the 15D, MSIS-29, and FSS are the most used. The mean PREDSS score is 3.0 and median disease duration is 6.4 years. According to the existing PROMs, patients report mildly compromised quality of life and problems with fatigue and cognition.

CONCLUSIONS

The patient interface of the Finnish MS Register consists of data from 17 of 21 counties with well-being services. The interface is used by 10% of Finnish individuals with MS. The addition of the PREDSS, EQ-5D, FSMC, and MSNQ to the interface has increased health care professional and patient interest in the use of PROMs. We suggest that PROs should be integrated into electronic health records to improve shared decision-making and diminish documentation burden.

Barriers to the health and well-being of women with multiple sclerosis in Southwestern Ontario, Canada

PURPOSE

This study explores the lived experiences of women living with multiple sclerosis (MS) and identifies barriers to their optimal health and well-being.

METHODOLOGY

Using van Manen's interpretative phenomenologic analysis, the researchers conducted semistructured interviews with 23 women diagnosed with MS in Southwestern Ontario, Canada. Data were analyzed using NVivo 12 software, and themes were validated through member checking.

RESULTS

The study revealed a key theme of "obstacles for women with MS" and subthemes related to barriers to physical, mental, and social well-being. Participants reported experiencing feelings of health despite their MS diagnosis but identified various constraints on their optimal health and well-being, including challenges with employment, financial support, and housing security.

CONCLUSION

The findings highlight the need for healthcare professionals to advocate for equitable treatments, medication, and accessibility supports for women with MS, as well as for policies that address disability income support and affordable housing. Further research is recommended to explore power imbalances experienced by women with MS in precarious employment situations or living with episodic disabilities.

Shared decision-making in underserved populations with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The concept of shared decision-making (SDM) is valuable to ensure patients receive individualized care. SDM occurs when healthcare providers engage patients in making personal healthcare decisions that could contribute to better long-term outcomes. With the ever-increasing landscape of treatment options available, SDM can be challenging but valuable for patients. Patients from underserved populations are potentially less likely to engage in SDM, impacting their long-term care. This systematic literature review aimed to explore SDM in these patient populations.

METHODS

Relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed using key search terms, without any restriction on publication date. All searches and data retrieval were conducted between May 25, 2022, and August 17, 2022, and abstracts were reviewed by two independent reviewers. A thematic analysis was used to present the data.

RESULTS

All search terms yielded 418 articles; 89 were included (33 involving patients with multiple sclerosis [MS]). Reported mean percentage of patients with MS (including from underserved populations) who preferred SDM was 52 % (range: 37.5-71.5; n = 4). Differences in racial/ethnic assimilation of information communicated by clinicians were reported, impacted by the lower literacy level and certain cultural health beliefs in groups of underserved populations. Primary care clinicians play a key role in providing information to patients in underserved populations.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a clear benefit for SDM for patients with MS, and without it, patients report dissatisfaction, decisional regret, and lack of confidence in the medical system. However, there are several challenges, including the need for further examination of social determinants of health, for underserved patient populations which still need to be addressed.

A systematic review to explore patients' MS knowledge and MS risk knowledge

Living with a chronic illness poses particular challenges, including maintaining current disease knowledge to optimise self-management and interaction with health professionals. People with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) are increasingly encouraged to participate in shared decision making. Making informed decisions is likely to rely on adequate knowledge about the condition and its associated risks. The aim of this systematic review is to explore patients' existing MS knowledge and MS risk knowledge, and how these relate to demographic and disease variables. A literature search was conducted using PsycINFO, PubMed and Cochrane Library. Eligible studies were published peer-reviewed reporting quantitative measures of MS knowledge and MS risk knowledge in adult MS patients. Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria comprising a total sample of 4,420 patients. A narrative synthesis was undertaken because studies employed various measures. Suboptimal levels of MS knowledge and MS risk knowledge were generally identified across studies. Greater self-reported adherence and a willingness to take medication were related to higher MS knowledge, while educational level was a significant predictor of both MS knowledge and MS risk knowledge. Associations with other demographic and disease-related variables were mixed for both knowledge domains. Direct comparison of results across studies were limited by methodological, sampling and contextual heterogeneity. The review's findings and implications for future research and clinical practice are considered from this perspective.

Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis: Past, Present, and Future

Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS) is common and can have negative effects on quality of life. The clinical presentation can be more subtle and insidious. Thus, cognitive impairment is often underrecognized by both persons with MS (PwMS) and clinicians, leading to underestimation disability due to MS. Recent evidence supports that relapses affect cognition in a similar pattern to other physical relapse symptoms and may be the only symptom of a relapse. Regular screening using validated tests for PwMS will improve the care provided and quality of life of PwMS.

Cognitive impairment and its impact on employment: A qualitative interview-based study involving healthcare professionals and people living with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment can considerably impact the work life of people who have multiple sclerosis (MS). Cognitive symptoms are associated with an increased likelihood of unemployment, changes in employment and decreased working hours. This qualitative interview-based study aims to gather real-word experiences and perspectives from both people living with MS and healthcare professionals, to explore how cognitive symptoms are experienced in the workplace, how their impact is addressed, and what can be done to support people in managing and minimizing this impact on employment.

METHODS

Semi-structured, one-to-one interviews were conducted with people living with MS who experience cognitive symptoms, and with healthcare professionals working in MS care. Participants were recruited from a healthcare market research agency based in the United States. The data obtained from the interviews were subsequently analysed using a Grounded Theory method, in order to identify the core themes that form the basis of this paper.

RESULTS

A total of 20 participants (n = 10 people living with MS; n = 10 healthcare professionals) from the United States were interviewed. Overall, 9 themes were identified from the raw data, which were grouped into three core themes describing the perspectives and experiences reported by both people living with MS and healthcare professionals: (1) The implications of cognitive symptoms on work; (2) Challenges in addressing cognitive impairment and its impact on work in MS care; (3) Strategies and support for managing the impact of cognitive symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The real-world insights of PwMS and HCPs gained from this qualitative study show that a multi-faceted approach to addressing cognitive impairment and its impact on the employment of PwMS is required. Workplace adjustments can range from self-implemented changes to changes put in place by employers to accommodate the various ways in which cognitive symptoms may impact a person's work. This study provides valuable information on how people living with MS can be affected by cognitive symptoms in the context of their employment; furthermore, that preparing early when possible and maintaining a proactive approach to managing their impacts on work are important for maintaining a good quality of life.

Identifying definite patterns of unmet needs in patients with multiple sclerosis using unsupervised machine learning

INTRODUCTION

People with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) exhibit a spectrum of needs that extend beyond solely disease-related determinants. Investigating unmet needs from the patient perspective may address daily difficulties and optimize care. Our aim was to identify patterns of unmet needs among PwMS and their determinants.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional multicentre study. Data were collected through an anonymous, self-administered online form. To cluster PwMS according to their main unmet needs, we performed agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to visualize cluster distribution. Pairwise comparisons were used to evaluate demographics and clinical distribution among clusters.

RESULTS

Out of 1764 mailed questionnaires, we received 690 responses. Access to primary care was the main contributor to the overall unmet need burden. Four patterns were identified: cluster C1, 'information-seekers with few unmet needs'; cluster C2, 'high unmet needs'; cluster C3, 'socially and assistance-dependent'; cluster C4, 'self-sufficient with few unmet needs'. PCA identified two main components in determining the patterns: the 'public sphere' (access to information and care) and the 'private sphere' (need for assistance and social life). Older age, lower education, longer disease duration and higher disability characterized clusters with more unmet needs in the private sphere. However, demographic and clinical factors failed in explaining the four identified patterns.

CONCLUSION

Our study identified four unmet need patterns among PwMS, emphasizing the importance of personalized care. While clinical and demographic factors provide some insight, additional variables warrant further investigation to fully understand unmet needs in PwMS.

Analysis and mapping the research landscape on patient-centred care in the context of chronic disease management

RATIONALE

Patient-centred care has emerged as a transformative approach in managing chronic diseases, aiming to actively involve patients in their healthcare decisions.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to analyse and map the research landscape on patient-centred care in the context of chronic disease management.

METHODS

This study used Scopus to retrieve the relevant articles. The analysis focused on the growth pattern, highly cited articles, randomised clinical trials, patients and providers perspectives, facilitators and barriers, frequent author keywords, emerging topics, and prolific countries and journals in the field.

RESULTS

In total, 926 research articles met the inclusion criteria. There was a notable increase in the number of publications over time. Cancer had the highest number of articles (n = 379, 40.9%), followed by diabetes mellitus, and mental health and psychiatric conditions. Studies on patient-centred care in diabetic patients received the highest number of citations. The results identified 52 randomised controlled trials that covered four major themes: patient-centred care for diabetes management, shared decision-making in mental health and primary care, shared decision-making in cancer care, and economic evaluation and cost-effectiveness. The study identified 51 studies that examined the impact of tools such as computer-based systems, decision aids, smartphone apps, and online tools to improve patient-centred outcomes. A map of author keywords showed that renal dialysis, HIV, and atrial fibrillation were the most recent topics in the field. Researchers from the United States contributed to more than half of the retrieved publications. The top active journals included "Patient Education and Counselling" and "Health Expectations".

CONCLUSION

This study provides valuable insights into the research landscape of patient-centred care within the context of chronic diseases. The current study provided a comprehensive overview of the research landscape on patient-centred care, which can empower patients by raising their awareness about clinical experiences and outcomes.

Early use of high-efficacy therapies in multiple sclerosis in the United States: benefits, barriers, and strategies for encouraging adoption

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by progressive neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration from disease onset that, if left untreated, can result in the accumulation of irreversible neurological disability. Early intervention with high-efficacy therapies (HETs) is increasingly recognized as the best strategy to delay or mitigate disease progression from the earliest stages of the disease and to prevent long-term neurodegeneration. Although there is growing clinical and real-world evidence supporting early HET intervention, foregoing this strategy in favor of a traditional escalation approach prioritizing lower-efficacy disease-modifying therapies remains a common approach in clinical practice. This review explores potential health care professional- and patient-related barriers to the early use of HETs in patients with MS in the United States. Barriers can include regulatory and reimbursement restrictions; knowledge gaps and long-term safety concerns among health care professionals; and various individual, cultural, and societal factors affecting patients. Potential strategies for overcoming these barriers and encouraging early HET use are proposed.

The Clinical Nurse Practitioner's Essential Role in Early Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Sclerosis in Europe: A Consensus Report

Timely diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) is a challenge due to factors such as prompt identification of symptoms and consequent delays in hospital visits and treatment initiation. In part to address this challenge, an expert scientific advisory panel of clinical nurse practitioners (CNPs) from different European nations was convened by Viatris on October 25, 2022, in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. This meeting was an interactive discussion to understand the role of clinical nurse practitioners in MS management. The objectives were to (1) understand the current delays in MS diagnosis from the perspective of expert CNPs; (2) determine the role of the CNP in MS management; and (3) identify the opportunities to improve accessibility, foster collaboration among stakeholders, and promote initiatives to educate people with MS. The recommendations of the panel underline the multidimensional role of CNPs in the management of MS at all stages. Health care stakeholders need to work together to achieve better access to treatment regimens and facilitate outcomes in the management of MS through shared decision-making and follow-ups. Further exploration of the role of CNPs in the management of MS, as well as recommendations for early diagnosis, will help both general practitioners and specialists better manage MS care.

The Association of Anxiety and Depression with the Quality of Life of People with Multiple Sclerosis

The quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis is not only influenced by factors that lead to neurological disability or factors from the spectrum of a person’s demographic characteristics, but also by various mental and psychological factors that lead to altered states of these people. The aim of the research was to determine the correlation of anxiety and depression with the quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis. The sample consisted of 100 participants with multiple sclerosis (40% male, average age 47.8). The instruments used in the research included: The Beck Depression Inventory, The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Instrument. 75% of our participants showed significant symptoms of state anxiety, and 71% of them showed significant symptoms of trait anxiety. At the same time 59% had minimal depression and 7% had severe depression. A negative correlation was found between state anxiety and physical health (r = -0.609, p < 0.01), trait anxiety and physical health (r = -0.757, p < 0.01), state anxiety and the mental health (r = - 0.639; p < 0.01), trait anxiety and mental health (r = -0.819, p < 0.01), as well as depression and physical health (r = - 0.670, p <0.01) and depression and mental health (r = - 0.750, p <0.01). Depression and anxiety correlate negatively with quality of life and require psychosocial and social support planning programs in rehabilitation of people with multiple sclerosis.

Identification and management of subclinical disease activity in early multiple sclerosis: a review

IMPORTANCE

Early treatment initiation in multiple sclerosis (MS) is crucial in preventing irreversible neurological damage and disability progression. The current assessment of disease activity relies on relapse rates and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesion activity, but inclusion of other early, often "hidden," indicators of disease activity may describe a more comprehensive picture of MS.

OBSERVATIONS

Early indicators of MS disease activity other than relapses and MRI activity, such as cognitive impairment, brain atrophy, and fatigue, are not typically captured by routine disease monitoring. Furthermore, silent progression (neurological decline not clearly captured by standard methods) may occur undetected by relapse and MRI lesion activity monitoring. Consequently, patients considered to have no disease activity actually may have worsening disease, suggesting a need to revise MS management strategies with respect to timely initiation and escalation of disease-modifying therapy (DMT). Traditionally, first-line MS treatment starts with low- or moderate-efficacy therapies, before escalating to high-efficacy therapies (HETs) after evidence of breakthrough disease activity. However, multiple observational studies have shown that early initiation of HETs can prevent or reduce disability progression. Ongoing randomized clinical trials are comparing escalation and early HET approaches.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

There is an urgent need to reassess how MS disease activity and worsening are measured. A greater awareness of "hidden" indicators, potentially combined with biomarkers to reveal silent disease activity and neurodegeneration underlying MS, would provide a more complete picture of MS and allow for timely therapeutic intervention with HET or switching DMTs to address suboptimal treatment responses.

Experiences of people with multiple sclerosis and clinicians in using cognitive behavioural therapies for hidden symptoms: a systematic review and meta-aggregation

PURPOSE

Cognitive behavioural therapies (CBTs) are a standard of care for treatment of many 'hidden symptoms' in people with MS (PwMS), such as stress, depression, and fatigue. However, these interventions can vary widely in formatting and may not be tailored for PwMS. To optimize CBTs for MS, understanding the experiences of PwMS and clinicians is essential. This systematic review and meta-aggregation synthesizes existing qualitative data on stakeholder perspectives of CBTs for PwMS.

METHODS

Systematic searches across five major electronic databases were conducted. Studies reporting qualitative data were identified. Two reviewers performed screening, quality assessment, data extraction, and certainty of evidence assessments. Meta-aggregation was performed as per the Joanna Briggs Institute approach, entailing qualitative data extraction, developing categories, and synthesizing overall findings.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were included in this review, comprising data from 653 PwMS and 47 clinicians. In the meta-aggregation, 122 qualitative results were extracted and grouped into nine categories. Categories were then combined into six synthesized findings: (1) setting the context-life with MS, (2) reasons for participating in CBTs, (3) acceptability of and experiences with participating in CBTs, (4) perceived benefits of CBTs, (5) perceived challenges with CBTs, and (6) suggestions to improve CBTs for PwMS.

CONCLUSIONS

A range of benefits including psychological, social, and lifestyle improvements were reported, but varied based on the design of the CBT intervention. Future CBT interventions should be tailored to participant needs, delivered in group settings, offer online options, and be delivered by a trained facilitator familiar with MS. Further exploration of the ideal CBT design for PwMS, as well as engagement with caregivers and clinicians treating MS, is warranted.

Priority setting: women's health topics in multiple sclerosis

Background

A scoping review found that most studies on women's health in multiple sclerosis (MS) focused on pregnancy, fetal/neonatal outcomes and sexual dysfunction. Few studies addressed menopause, contraception, gynecologic cancers/cancer screening. However, the perceived relative importance of these knowledge gaps to people living with MS and other partners is unknown. We engaged a range of partners, including people living with MS, health care providers, researchers, and patient advocacy groups, to set priorities for future research in women's health in MS.

Methods

We employed a three-step global engagement process. First, we identified which broad research topics relevant to women's health in MS were of highest priority using two surveys. Second, we developed specific research questions within these topics using focus groups. Finally, we prioritized the research questions with a third survey.

Results

Overall, 5,266 individuals responded to the initial surveys [n = 1,430 global survey, mean (SD) age 50.0 (12.6), all continents; n = 3,836 North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis survey, mean (SD) age 64.8 (9.6), United States]. Menopause, sexual dysfunction, pregnancy, gynecologic cancer/cancer screening, hormones and parenthood were identified as the most important topics. Focus groups generated 80 potential research questions related to these topics. In the final survey 712 individuals prioritized these questions. The highest priority questions in each research topic were: (i) How do perimenopause and menopause affect disease activity, course, response to disease-modifying treatment and quality of life in MS; (ii) What are the most effective strategies for managing issues around sexual intimacy, including related to low sexual desire, changes in physical function, and MS symptoms; (iii) Are there long-term effects of disease-modifying therapies on the children of persons with MS; (iv) What are the short and long-term effects of disease-modifying drugs on gynecologic cancer risk, particularly for high efficacy disease-modifying drugs and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; (v) Are there hormone related treatments that can stabilize fluctuations in MS symptoms; and (vi) How does MS fatigue impact parenting strategies.

Conclusion

Priorities for research relating to women's health issues for persons with MS have been delineated using a collaborative process with key partners. Alignment of future research with these priorities should be monitored.

Insights for Healthcare Providers on Shared Decision-Making in Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review

Shared decision-making (SDM) between the patient and their healthcare provider (HCP) in developing treatment plans is increasingly recognized as central to improving treatment adherence and, ultimately, patient outcomes. In multiple sclerosis (MS), SDM is particularly crucial for optimizing treatment in a landscape that has grown more complex with the availability of newer, high-efficacy MS therapies. However, little direct evidence on the effectiveness of SDM is available to guide practice. Multiple factors, including patient age, ethnic background, perceptions, invisible MS symptoms, and psychological comorbidities can influence a patient's willingness and ability to participate in SDM. HCPs need to appreciate these factors and ask the right questions to break down obstacles to SDM. The HCP has a responsibility to help patients feel adequately informed and comfortable in having an active role in their care. This review identifies potential barriers to SDM and provides a strategy for HCPs to overcome these obstacles through patient (and caregiver) discussions to ensure optimal patient satisfaction with treatment and thus the best possible outcomes for their patients.

No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) as a Clinical Assessment Tool for Multiple Sclerosis: Clinician and Patient Perspectives [Narrative Review]

The emergence of high-efficacy therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS), which target inflammation more effectively than traditional disease-modifying therapies, has led to a shift in MS management towards achieving the outcome assessment known as no evidence of disease activity (NEDA). The most common NEDA definition, termed NEDA-3, is a composite of three related measures of disease activity: no clinical relapses, no disability progression, and no radiological activity. NEDA has been frequently used as a composite endpoint in clinical trials, but there is growing interest in its use as an assessment tool to help patients and healthcare professionals navigate treatment decisions in the clinic. Raising awareness about NEDA may therefore help patients and clinicians make more informed decisions around MS management and improve overall MS care. This review aims to explore the potential utility of NEDA as a clinical decision-making tool and treatment target by summarizing the literature on its current use in the context of the expanding treatment landscape. We identify current challenges to the use of NEDA in clinical practice and detail the proposed amendments, such as the inclusion of alternative outcomes and biomarkers, to broaden the clinical information captured by NEDA. These themes are further illustrated with the real-life perspectives and experiences of our two patient authors with MS. This review is intended to be an educational resource to support discussions between clinicians and patients on this evolving approach to MS-specialized care.

Multiple sclerosis and the incidence of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A number of studies have suggested that multiple sclerosis (MS) can be associated with serious vascular complications, for which pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is a potentially lethal complication. The purpose of this study is to establish a current literature-based estimate of the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and PTE in patients with MS (pwMS) due to the lack of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on this topic. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, studies were assessed regarding the association between MS and the incidence of VTE. The studies were identified through a systematic search of major electronic databases spanning the period from 1950 to February 2022. A random-effects analysis was conducted to calculate the pooled effect size (ES) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using STATA software. Nine out of 4605 studies were included in the meta-analysis, with an overall sample size of 158,546 individuals. Meta-analysis revealed that the pooled incidence of VTE was 1.8% (95% CI 1.4-2.3) among pwMS. Also, there was an incidence of 0.9% (95% CI 0.4-1.4) and 1.5% (95% CI 1-2.2) for PTE and DVT, respectively in pwMS. Analysis showed MS would be significantly associated with a twofold increased risk of VTE [risk ratios (RR) = 2.12 (95% CI 1.53-2.93)]. Although MS is not typically considered a major risk factor for VTE, the meta-analysis of cohort studies shows that MS has a relative association with an increased incidence of VTE. Future research should focus on the investigation of the effects of MS and its treatments on VTE risk, and also a full range of confounding adjustments will be needed.

What Is the True Impact of Cognitive Impairment for People Living with Multiple Sclerosis? A Commentary of Symposium Discussions at the 2020 European Charcot Foundation

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, neurodegenerative, inflammatory condition usually associated with physical disability. Clinical care has been skewed toward the physical manifestations of the disease, yet a range of silent symptoms occurs including the cognitive aspects of MS. In a 2018 meeting of MS in the 21st Century (MS21), an international steering committee comprising both specialists and patient experts recognised that the 'invisible symptoms' of MS pose a significant challenge to patient engagement. These findings prompted the European Charcot Foundation (ECF) MS21 symposium (2020), where a panel consisting of two leading MS clinicians and an MS patient expert (who were all members of the MS21 steering group) gathered to discuss the impact of cognitive impairment on the everyday lives of people with MS.The perspectives and experiences of the panellists are summarised in this paper. The key points raised were that (1) the cognitive manifestations of MS are under-recognised and have consequently been undermanaged from a clinical perspective and (2) cognitive impairment due to MS has a significant impact upon daily living and patient quality of life. During discussions about how these challenges can be addressed, the panel advocated for an improvement in education about cognitive symptoms for people living with MS and healthcare professionals (HCPs) to raise awareness about this aspect of MS. Furthermore, the panel emphasised the importance of open and proactive communication between HCPs and their patients with MS about cognitive symptoms to reduce the stigma attached to these symptoms. In the opinion of the panel, future clinical trials which include cognitive outcomes as key endpoints are needed. Reflecting this point, cognitive impairment in MS care also needs to be treated as an important disease symptom, as is done with physical symptoms of the disease. Implementing early and routine cognition screening and promoting measures for protecting cognition to people living with MS, such as cognitive rehabilitation and a 'brain-healthy' lifestyle, are actions which can drive forward the recognition of cognitive impairment as a care priority.If prioritised as highly as physical disability in both the MS care and clinical drug development setting, and proactively discussed in conversations between HCPs and patients with MS, the 'invisibility' of cognitive impairment in MS can be lifted and a better quality of life can be promoted for people living with MS.

Treatment of older patients with multiple sclerosis: Results of an International Delphi Survey

Background

People over age 50-55 have historically been excluded from randomized clinical trials for multiple sclerosis (MS). However, more than half of those living with an MS diagnosis are over 55.

Objective

Explore the unique considerations of treating older people with MS (PwMS) using an iterative and structured Delphi-based assessment to gather expert opinions.

Methods

Eight MS neurologists with an interest in older PwMS developed a 2-round survey. Survey respondents were qualified neurologists with ≥3 years' experience, personally responsible for treatment decisions, and treating ≥20 patients per month, of whom ≥10% were ≥50 years old. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement on questions with categorical responses or as a mean score ≥4 on questions with numerical responses.

Results

In Survey 1, 224 neurologists responded; 180 of these completed Survey 2. Limited consensus was reached with varying levels of agreement on several topics including identification and assessment of older patients; factors relating to treatment decisions including immunosenescence and comorbidities; considerations for high-efficacy treatments; de-escalation or discontinuation of treatment; effects of COVID-19; and unmet needs for treating this population.

Conclusion

The results of this Delphi process highlight the need for targeted studies to create guidance for the care of older PwMS.

Shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis physical symptomatic care: a systematic review

Background

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory, demyelinating, and neurodegenerative disease affecting young adults. People with MS are highly interested in engaging in physical symptom management and decision-making but are often not actively engaged in symptom management discussions. Research examining the benefit of shared decision-making in the management of physical MS symptoms is sparse.

Objectives

This study aimed to identify and synthesize the evidence on the use of shared decision-making in physical MS symptom management.

Design

This study is a systematic review of published evidence on the use of shared decision-making in physical MS symptom management.

Data sources and methods

MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched in April 2021, June 2022, and April 2, 2023, for primary, peer-reviewed studies of shared decision-making in the management of MS physical symptoms. Citations were screened, data extracted, and study quality assessed according to Cochrane guidelines for systematic reviews, including risk of bias assessment. Statistical synthesis of the included study results was not appropriate; results were summarized in a nonstatistical manner using the vote-counting method to estimate beneficial versus harmful effects.

Results

Of 679 citations, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Six studies addressed shared decision-making in the management of pain, spasms, neurogenic bladder, fatigue, gait disorder, and/or balance issues, and nine studies addressed physical symptoms in general. One study was a randomized controlled trial; most studies were observational studies. All study results and study author conclusions indicated that shared decision-making is important to the effective management of physical MS symptoms. No study results suggested that shared decision-making was harmful or delayed the management of physical MS symptoms.

Conclusion

Reported results consistently indicate that shared decision-making is important in effective MS symptomatic care. Further rigorous randomized controlled trials are warranted to investigate the effectiveness of shared decision-making associated with MS physical symptomatic care.

Registration

PROSPERO: CRD42023396270.

The importance of the patient's perspective in decision-making in multiple sclerosis: Results of the OwnMS patient perspectives study

BACKGROUND

Research is needed to identify the unmet disease education and communication needs of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) to support informed decision-making, enable self-management and maintain independence for PwMS for as long as possible.

METHODS

An Expert Steering Group co-developed two studies for PwMS aged 18 years and over: a qualitative, online, patient community activity and a quantitative anonymised online survey. The quantitative survey was conducted in the UK from 12 September 2019 to 18 November 2019 amongst PwMS recruited via the Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Trust newsletter and their closed Facebook group. Questions explored the goals, desires, and knowledge gaps of PwMS. Self-reported data from people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) were collated and reviewed, and discussed by the Steering Group. This paper presents descriptive statistics of the quantitative survey findings.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 117 participants with RRMS. Most respondents (73%) had personal goals related to lifestyle and many (69%) were concerned about maintaining independence. More than half of respondents were worried about planning for the future in relation to income (56%), housing (40%) and most respondents also indicated MS had a negative impact on their lives, including their work life (73%) and social life (69%). Limited occupational support was forthcoming (17% were not provided with any support and only 27% report their work environment being adjusted to suit their needs). The ability to plan for the future and to understand the course of MS were highlighted as key priorities by respondents. A positive trend was observed between those who felt able to plan for the future and their knowledge of MS progression. The proportion of patients who report knowing a 'great deal' about MS prognosis and disability progression was low (16% and 9%, respectively), suggesting an increased role for clinical teams to provide information and education for PwMS. Communication between respondents and their clinical teams highlighted the role of specialist nurses for PwMS to provide holistic, informative support and demonstrated the level of comfort that PwMS have in discussing less clinical topics with these providers.

CONCLUSION

This UK nationwide survey highlighted some of the unmet needs in disease education and communication in a subgroup of UK patients with RRMS, which can impact quality of life. Discussing goals and planning alongside prognosis and disability progression with MS care teams may enable people with RRMS not only to make informed treatment decisions, but also to self-manage and plan for the future, factors which are important to maintain independence.

Impact of a specific consultation for patients with progressive forms of multiple sclerosis on the response to their unmet care needs: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

As their disease evolves, most patients with progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) develop particular healthcare needs that are not always addressed with usual follow-up. To adapt neurological care to these patients, we created a specific consultation for patients with progressive MS in our centre in 2019.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the main unmet care needs of patients with progressive MS in our setting, and to establish the usefulness of the specific consultation to address them.

METHODS

Literature review and interviews with patients and healthcare professionals were conducted to identify the main unmet needs in routine follow-up. Two questionnaires were developed, assessing the importance of the unmet needs identified and the usefulness of the consultation to meet them, for patients under follow-up in the specific consultation and their informal caregivers.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients and nineteen informal caregivers participated. The most important unmet needs were the information about the disease, access to social services and coordination between specialists. A positive correlation was found between the importance of these unmet needs and the responsiveness to each of them in the specific consultation.

CONCLUSIONS

The creation of a specific consultation may improve attention to the healthcare needs of patients with progressive MS.

Psychosocial Difficulties Experienced by MS Patients in their Quality of Life: A Comparative Study of Two Countries

BACKGROUND

MS is deeply impacted by social factors, such as access to health services, support from official and unofficial sources, and social welfare, which are also thought to contribute to the quality of life of MS patients. The purpose of this study is to examine the quality of life and to analyse the psychosocial challenges of MS patients in North Cyprus and Germany.

METHODS

This study was designed with a cross-sectional and comparative research method. The personal information form and the WHO Quality of Life Scale Short Form were used. A total sixty-eight participants joined the study: 35 German patients and 33 Turkish Cypriot patients. Researchers collected the data by face-to-face interviews between December 2021 and March 2022. The majority of MS patients were females average age was 49.48 years old.

RESULTS

In general, the two populations had comparable total sub-dimension scores of quality of life. However, only environment sub-dimension score has significant difference between Germany (x̄ =70.04) and North Cyprus (x̄ =55.87). Perceived opportunities for accessing medication, physiotherapy, and psychological support, as well as the opportunity to receive psychological support after the time of diagnosis were considered greater in the German group compared to the Turkish Cypriot one.

CONCLUSION

Findings from this cross-sectional research demonstrate significant differences in services provided, particularly in the psychosocial domain, between those in Germany and those in Cyprus. Consequently, all parties in both countries (governments, families, health workers, social workers and people with MS) should cooperate to improve social support mechanisms. Moreover, it is needed better access to health services in Northern Cyprus.

Pain and cognitive performance in adults with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Pain and cognitive dysfunction are separately known to be important manifestations of multiple sclerosis (MS). Although pain is a complex subjective phenomenon with affective and cognitive aspects, it is not known if people with MS reporting pain are at greater risk of reduced performance in objective tests of cognition. The presence or direction of any association remains to be clarified, as do the roles of confounders such as fatigue, medication and mood.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of studies examining the relationship between pain and objectively measured cognition in adults with confirmed MS, according to a pre-registered protocol (PROSPERO 42,020,171,469). We carried out searches in MEDLINE, Embase and PsychInfo. Studies of adults with any subtype of MS, with chronic pain and in which cognitive evaluation was conducted by validated instruments were included. We evaluated the role of potential confounders (medication, depression, anxiety, fatigue and sleep) and described findings by eight pre-specified cognitive domains. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

11 studies (n = 3714 participants, range 16 to 1890 per study) were included in the review. Four studies included longitudinal data. Nine studies identified a relationship between pain and objectively measured cognitive performance. In seven of these studies, higher pain scores were associated with poorer cognitive performance. However, no evidence was available for some cognitive domains. Heterogeneous study methodology precluded meta-analysis. Studies infrequently controlled for the specified confounders. Most studies were judged to be at risk of bias.

DISCUSSION

Several studies, but not all, identified a negative relationship between pain severity and objectively measured cognitive performance. Our ability to further characterise this relationship is limited by study design and lack of evidence in many cognitive domains. Future studies should better establish this relationship and delineate the neurological substrate underpinning it.

Evaluating the impact of patient-reported outcome measures on depression and anxiety levels in people with multiple sclerosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease affecting multiple functional aspects of patients' lives. Depression and anxiety are common amongst persons with MS (PwMS). There has been an interest in utilizing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to capture and systematically assess patient's perceptions of their MS experience in addition to other clinical measures, but PROMs are not usually collected in routine clinical practice. Therefore, this study aims to systematically incorporate periodic electronically administered PROMs into the care of PwMS to evaluate its effects on depression and anxiety.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial will be conducted with patients allocated 1:1 to either intervention or conservative treatment groups. Patients in the intervention group will complete PROMs at the start of the study and then every 6 months for 1 year, in addition to having their MS healthcare provider prompted to view their scores. The conservative treatment group will complete PROMs at the start of the study and again after 12 months, and their neurologist will not be able to view their scores. For both groups, pre-determined critical PROM scores will trigger an alert to the patient's MS provider. The difference in change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score between the intervention and conservative treatment groups at 12 months will be the primary outcome, along with difference in Consultation Satisfaction Questionnaire and CollaboRATE scores at 12 months, and proportion and type of healthcare provider intervention/alerts initiated by different PROMs as secondary outcomes.

DISCUSSION

This study will determine the feasibility of utilizing PROMs on an interval basis and its effects on the psychological well-being of PwMS. Findings of this study will provide evidence on use of PROMs in future MS clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered at the National Institutes of Health United States National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04979546 . Registered on July 28, 2021.

Shared decision making in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: A consensus based on Delphi methodology

Shared decision making is a way of incorporating patients' preferences and values into the decisions regarding the treatment and follow-up plan for the condition that affects them. It is currently applied mainly in the context of chronic disorders for which there is no cure available but nevertheless many therapeutic alternatives, such as multiple sclerosis (MS). Current views and opinions on shared decision making for the treatment of MS are discussed in this consensus based on a modified Delphi method that included a group of neurologists from Argentina. A set of statements was defined by the experts and seeks to serve as a guide to apply this concept in clinical practice.

Large-scale cross-sectional online survey on patient-neurologist communication, burden of disease assessment and disease monitoring in people with multiple sclerosis

Background

Management of multiple sclerosis (MS) requires a high level of communication between health care professionals (HCPs) and people with MS (pwMS) including profound investigation and discussion of symptoms to identify therapeutic needs. For treatment decisions, monitoring of disease activity is important, in this respect self-monitoring devices and apps, as well as magnetic resonance imaging are important tools.

Methods

MS Perspectives is a cross-sectional online survey conducted in Germany which was designed to collect data, among others, on the communication between pwMS and HCPs regarding treatment goals, symptom assessment, usage of devices and apps to self-monitor health functions, as well as to identify patients' attitude toward the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Between December 2021 and February 2022, 4,555 pwMS completed the survey.

Results

In total, 63.7% of participants reported that treatment goals have been discussed with their HCPs. Symptoms worsening in the past 12 months independent of relapses was more often reported by pwMS than inquired by HCPs, according to patients' report. Devices or apps for health monitoring were used by less than half of participants. Frequency of MRI controls was much lower in participants with longer compared to shorter disease duration (47.5 vs. 86.3%). The proportion of patients with annual or semiannual scans was highest among pwMS receiving infusion therapy (93.5%), followed by oral medication (82.5%) and injectables (73.4%), and lowest for pwMS without immunotherapy (58.2%).

Conclusion

MS Perspectives identified a rather low patient involvement regarding treatment goals and symptom assessment in clinical practice. Regarding this and our findings for health self-monitoring and MRI usage, strategies for improving patient-HCP communication and disease monitoring may be considered.

Psychometric Properties of LUN-MS: A New Questionnaire to Identify the Unmet Needs of People With Multiple Sclerosis

Background

We developed a 29-item Questionnaire, Long-term Unmet Needs in MS (LUN-MS) to identify the unmet needs of people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS).

Objective

To assess acceptability, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and validity of the LUN-MS.

Methods

Participants completed the LUN-MS and MSIS-29 twice, four weeks apart. Acceptability was assessed by looking at the response rate in each time point. Reliability was calculated by comparing the response during the two time points using Cohen's weighted kappa. Using principal component analysis, the dimensionality of the questionnaire's items was reduced, to five domains and the internal consistency of each domain was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Concurrent validity was tested by comparing the total LUN-MS score against MSIS-29 and EQ-5D-3L using Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient.

Results

Among 88 participants, rate of completion at time points-1 and 2 was 96 and 80% respectively. Test-retest reliability for individual items was between fair to near-perfect (weighted Cohen's kappa 0.39-0.81). The unmet needs could be divided into five internally consistent domains (Cronbach's alpha 0.83-0.74): neuropsychological, ambulation, physical, interpersonal relationship and informational. Concurrent validity with MSIS-29 (r = 0.705, P < .001) and EQ-5D-3L (r = 0.617, P < .001) were good.

Conclusion

LUN-MS is a reliable, valid, and acceptable tool to identify the unmet needs of pwMS.

An evaluation of the role of community care in meeting the needs of people with multiple sclerosis in Ireland

BACKGROUND

People with MS (PwMS) can experience a number of diverse needs which may be met by community-based services such as those delivered by MS Ireland (MSI), where Community Workers (CWs) provide support to PwMS on an individualised basis. However, while such support may be critical in helping PwMS adapt and cope with the challenges of living with MS, there has been little evaluation of the outcomes and impacts of this service to date. This study aimed to explore the perceived effectiveness and impacts of community work from the perspectives of both PwMS and CWs.

METHODS

Using stakeholder engagement and public and patient involvement (PPI), two surveys were developed for (1) CWs, and (2) services users of MSI. A series of open and closed questions centred on the effectiveness of community work in meeting twelve distinct categories of needs taken from an adapted framework of rehabilitation and healthcare needs of PwMS. Both CWs and service users rated the extent to which these various needs were met through community work, as well as describing the mechanisms by which needs were met, and the challenges faced in meeting these needs. Separately, both groups described the perceived impacts of community work using open-text responses.

RESULTS

Fifteen CWs and 367 PwMS, 269 (73%) of whom knew their CW, participated. Both groups rated community work positively in meeting the needs for information, emotional/psychological support and coordination of care, with lower perceived capacity for community work to meet needs for employment accommodations, caregiver support and homecare. Mann Whitney U tests did not find any significant difference between groups in the perceived capacity of community work to meet the various needs examined (p>.05). Core mechanisms by which CWs meet needs are by signposting to relevant services, listening, and facilitating peer support. Difficulty accessing external services was the primary challenge identified in meeting needs. Positive impacts of community work included the role that CWs play in fostering confidence and acceptance of MS, and in helping service users overcome the challenges of MS.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest how CWs can help meet the needs of PwMS, while also highlighting the numerous positive impacts that community work has for this group. While it is clear that a number of unmet needs may remain due to a lack of access to other external services, this study shows how community-based services may play an important role in helping PwMS adapt to living with MS.

Acceptability of wearable devices for measuring mobility remotely: Observations from the Mobilise-D technical validation study

Background

This study aimed to explore the acceptability of a wearable device for remotely measuring mobility in the Mobilise-D technical validation study (TVS), and to explore the acceptability of using digital tools to monitor health.

Methods

Participants (N = 106) in the TVS wore a waist-worn device (McRoberts Dynaport MM + ) for one week. Following this, acceptability of the device was measured using two questionnaires: The Comfort Rating Scale (CRS) and a previously validated questionnaire. A subset of participants (n = 36) also completed semi-structured interviews to further determine device acceptability and to explore their opinions of the use of digital tools to monitor their health. Questionnaire results were analysed descriptively and interviews using a content analysis.

Results

The device was considered both comfortable (median CRS (IQR; min-max) = 0.0 (0.0; 0-20) on a scale from 0-20 where lower scores signify better comfort) and acceptable (5.0 (0.5; 3.0-5.0) on a scale from 1-5 where higher scores signify better acceptability). Interviews showed it was easy to use, did not interfere with daily activities, and was comfortable. The following themes emerged from participants' as being important to digital technology: altered expectations for themselves, the use of technology, trust, and communication with healthcare professionals.

Conclusions

Digital tools may bridge existing communication gaps between patients and clinicians and participants are open to this. This work indicates that waist-worn devices are supported, but further work with patient advisors should be undertaken to understand some of the key issues highlighted. This will form part of the ongoing work of the Mobilise-D consortium.

Neural correlates of digital measures shown by structural MRI: a post-hoc analysis of a smartphone-based remote assessment feasibility study in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

A study was undertaken to evaluate remote monitoring via smartphone sensor-based tests in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). This analysis aimed to explore regional neural correlates of digital measures derived from these tests.

METHODS

In a 24-week, non-randomized, interventional, feasibility study (NCT02952911), sensor-based tests on the Floodlight Proof-of-Concept app were used to assess cognition (smartphone-based electronic Symbol Digit Modalities Test), upper extremity function (Draw a Shape Test, Pinching Test), and gait and balance (Static Balance Test, Two-Minute Walk Test, U-Turn Test). In this post-hoc analysis, digital measures and standard clinical measures (e.g., Nine-Hole Peg Test [9HPT]) were correlated against regional structural magnetic resonance imaging outcomes. Seventy-six PwMS aged 18-55 years with an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 0.0-5.5 were enrolled from two different sites (USA and Spain). Sixty-two PwMS were included in this analysis.

RESULTS

Worse performance on digital and clinical measures was associated with smaller regional brain volumes and larger ventricular volumes. Whereas digital and clinical measures had many neural correlates in common (e.g., putamen, globus pallidus, caudate nucleus, lateral occipital cortex), some were observed only for digital measures. For example, Draw a Shape Test and Pinching Test measures, but not 9HPT score, correlated with volume of the hippocampus (r = 0.37 [drawing accuracy over time on the Draw a Shape Test]/ - 0.45 [touching asynchrony on the Pinching Test]), thalamus (r = 0.38/ - 0.41), and pons (r = 0.35/ - 0.35).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple neural correlates were identified for the digital measures in a cohort of people with early MS. Digital measures showed associations with brain regions that clinical measures were unable to demonstrate, thus providing potential novel information on functional ability compared with standard clinical assessments.

Understanding the Effect of Multiple Sclerosis on General and Dimensions of Mental Health

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the current study is to investigate how general and dimensions of mental health are affected by multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

Factor analysis, generalized linear models, and one-sample t-tests were used to analyze data from 78 people with MS with a mean age of 52.19 (S.D. = 12.94) years old and 25.64% males and 38,516 people without MS with a mean age of 49.10 (S.D. = 18.24) years old and 44.27% males from Understanding Society.

RESULTS

The current study found that there are three underlying factors of the GHQ-12 labeled as GHQ-12A (social dysfunction and anhedonia; 6 items), GHQ-12B (depression and anxiety; 4 items), and GHQ-12C (loss of confidence; 2 items), and the general mental health, GHQ-12A (social dysfunction and anhedonia), and GHQ-12C (loss of confidence) are associated with MS.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective mental health management in MS patients is important given mental health in people with MS is linked to the onset of MS and exacerbating disease progression/relapses.

Shared decision-making in patients with multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic and progressive neurological disorder impacting physical, cognitive, and psychosocial health. The disease course, severity, and presence of symptoms differ within and between persons over time and are unpredictable. Given the preference-sensitive nature of many key decisions to be made, and the increasing numbers of disease-modifying therapies, shared decision-making (SDM) with patients seems to be key in offering optimum care and outcomes for people suffering from MS. In this paper, we describe our perspective on how to achieve SDM in patients with MS, following key SDM-elements from established SDM-frameworks. As for deliberation in the clinical encounter, SDM communication training of professionals and feedback on their current performance are key aspects, as well as encouraging patients to participate. Concerning information for patients, it is important to provide balanced, evidence-based information about the benefits and the harms of different treatment options, including the option of surveillance only. At the same time, attention is needed for the optimal dosage of that information, given the symptoms of cognitive dysfunction and fatigue among MS-patients, and the uncertainties they have to cope with. Finally, for broader communication, a system is required that assures patient preferences are actually implemented by multidisciplinary MS-teams. As SDM is also being implemented in many countries within the context of value-based health care, we consider the systematic use of outcome information, such as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and Patient Decision Aids, as an opportunity to achieve SDM.

The effect of nurse practitioner (NP-led) care on health-related quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis - a randomized trial

Background

Care for People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) is increasingly complex, requiring innovations in care. Canada has high rates of MS; it is challenging for general neurologists to optimally care for PwMS with busy office practices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of add-on Nurse Practitioner (NP)-led care for PwMS on depression and anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS), compared to usual care (community neurologist, family physician).

Methods

PwMS followed by community neurologists were randomized to add-on NP-led or Usual care for 6 months. Primary outcome was the change in HADS at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were HADS (6 months), EQ5D, MSIF, CAREQOL-MS, at 3 and 6 months, and Consultant Satisfaction Survey (6 months).

Results

We recruited 248 participants; 228 completed the trial (NP-led care arm n = 120, Usual care arm n = 108). There were no significant baseline differences between groups. Study subjects were highly educated (71.05%), working full-time (41.23%), living independently (68.86%), with mean age of 47.32 (11.09), mean EDSS 2.53 (SD 2.06), mean duration since MS diagnosis 12.18 years (SD 8.82) and 85% had relapsing remitting MS. Mean change in HADS depression (3 months) was: -0.41 (SD 2.81) NP-led care group vs 1.11 (2.98) Usual care group p = 0.001, sustained at 6 months; for anxiety, − 0.32 (2.73) NP-led care group vs 0.42 (2.82) Usual care group, p = 0.059. Other secondary outcomes were not significantly different. There was no difference in satisfaction of care in the NP-led care arm (63.83 (5.63)) vs Usual care (62.82 (5.45)), p = 0.194).

Conclusion

Add-on NP-led care improved depression compared to usual neurologist care and 3 and 6 months in PwMS, and there was no difference in satisfaction with care. Further research is needed to explore how NPs could enrich care provided for PwMS in healthcare settings.

Trial registration

Retrospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04388592, 14/05/2020).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-022-02809-9.

A Targeted Literature Search and Phenomenological Review of Perspectives of People with Multiple Sclerosis and Healthcare Professionals of the Immunology of Disease-Modifying Therapies

Introduction

The mechanisms of action of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) are complex and involve an interplay of immune system components. People with MS (PwMS) may lack a clear understanding of the immunological pathways involved in MS and its treatment; effective communication between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwMS is needed to facilitate shared decision-making when discussing the disease and selecting DMTs and is particularly important in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era.

Methods

In this patient-authored two-part review, we performed a targeted literature search to assess the need for better communication between HCPs and PwMS regarding treatment selection, and also conducted a qualitative survey of four patient and care-partner authors to obtain insights regarding their understanding of and preferences for the treatment and management of MS.

Results

Following a search of the Embase and MEDLINE databases using Ovid in June 2020, an analysis of 40 journal articles and conference abstracts relating to patient empowerment and decision-making in DMT selection for MS showed a preference for safety and efficacy of treatments, followed by autonomy and convenience of administration. A need for better communication between HCPs and PwMS during treatment selection to improve patient satisfaction was also identified. The open survey responses from the patient authors revealed a need for greater involvement in decision-making processes and desire for improved communication and information tools.

Conclusions

This targeted literature search and phenomenological review confirms PwMS preferences for empowered decision-making in disease management and treatment selection, to optimize independence, safety, and efficacy. It also identifies an unmet need for improved communication and information tools that convey MS information in a relatable manner. Furthermore, this review seeks to address this unmet need by providing plain language figures and descriptions of MS immune mechanisms that can be used to facilitate discussions between HCPs and PwMS.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40120-022-00349-5.

In multiple sclerosis (MS), there are different cells in the immune system that contribute to the disease. The main cells in the immune system are T and B cells. People with MS (PwMS) might not be familiar with details about the immune system, and healthcare professionals might not always communicate details about how treatments work clearly to PwMS when choosing treatments with them. It is important for PwMS to have all the information they need to help make decisions about treatments. This information needs to be given in a way they can understand. This is especially important during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In this paper, we first looked at what research has already been published about what is most important to PwMS when making treatment decisions. The existing research says that safety and effectiveness are the most important things and that PwMS prefer treatments that they can take themselves. PwMS also need better communication and information from doctors to make decisions and to help explain how MS treatments work in the body. Next, we gave a survey to the patients who are authors of this paper to ask about what is important to them when making treatment decisions. Their answers were very similar to the existing research. Overall, PwMS need better communication from healthcare professionals about the immune system. This paper also includes plain language descriptions and figures to help healthcare professionals explain and discuss the importance of the immune system in MS with PwMS.

Early vs. late treatment initiation in multiple sclerosis and its impact on cost of illness: A register-based prospective cohort study in Sweden

Background

Early treatment with disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) has been associated with lower disability progression; the aim was to explore its association with cost of illness (COI) in MS.

Methods

All people with relapsing-remitting MS in the Swedish MS register, aged 20–57 years and receiving their first MS DMT in 2006–2009, were followed in nationwide registers for 8 years. Healthcare costs (in- and outpatient healthcare, DMTs and other prescribed drugs), and productivity losses (sickness absence and disability pension) of individuals receiving therapy in ≤6 months after diagnosis (early treatment group) were compared to those receiving therapy >6 months (late treatment group). Using Poisson regressions, the mean COI per patient per year, and per group, was estimated, adjusted for disability progression.

Results

The early treatment group comprised 74% of the 1562 individuals included in the study. The early treatment group had lower productivity losses over time. Both groups had similar healthcare costs, which first increased and then decreased over time.

Conclusions

Early DMT in MS could result in lower productivity losses possibly through maintained work capacity. COI serves as an objective measure showing the advantage of early vs. late treatment initiation in MS.

The Development and Psychometric Validation of the Brief Disability-Related Stress Scale in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis

Disability-related stress is the unique stressful experiences and challenges people with disabilities encounter. The goal of the study was to develop and validate the Brief Disability-Related Stress Scale ( BDRSS) in a sample of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Findings demonstrated that the BDRSS is unidimensional and has good psychometric properties (internal consistency reliability coefficient [Cronbach’s α = .86]). The BDRSS was also found to correlate with the Perceived Stress Scale–10 ( PSS-10; r = .69). Results of this study suggested the potential clinical utility of incorporating the BDRSS in rehabilitation, mental health, and neuropsychology settings to assess stressors experienced by people with MS.