Report of the second Outcome Measures in Myotonic Dystrophy type 1 (OMMYD-2) international workshop San Sebastian, Spain, October 16, 2013

Comprehensive four-year disease progression assessment of myotonic dystrophy type 1

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a heterogeneous neuromuscular disorder characterized by progressive muscle weakness and myotonia. This study investigates the progression of muscular strength and function over a four-year period. Patients with DM1 were examined at baseline and four years later. The following metrics were assessed over time: muscle strength (Medical Research Council-sumscore), hand-grip strength (Martin-Vigorimeter), hand-grip relaxation time (myotonia), and limitations in activities of daily living and (DM1ActivC questionnaire). A total of 648 patients entered the registry. Recruitment and follow-up is ongoing. In our manuscript, we focus on, 187 patients who were followed for 4 years. A significant decline in MRC sum score was observed, with distal muscles showing more deterioration. Hand-grip strength decreased significantly, with notable differences between sex and phenotype classified by disease onset. Surprisingly, an improvement of myotonia was observed. Follow-up analysis revealed a significant interaction between myotonia and grip-strength over time. Thus, the improvement in myotonia is likely explained by decreased in grip strength. Finally, there was a significant reduction in DM1ActivC score, indicating decreased activity and social participation. This study demonstrated variability in disease progression depending on sex, phenotype and disease status. This research demonstrates a nuanced pattern of disease progression, highlighting the need to combine different outcome measures to fully understand the complexity of DM1.

Longitudinal Changes in Neuropsychological Functioning in Japanese Patients with Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1: A Five Year Follow-Up Study

BACKGROUND

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a form of muscular dystrophy that causes various symptoms, including those of the central nervous system. Some studies have reported cognitive decline in patients with DM1, although the available evidence is limited.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe longitudinal differences in neuropsychological function in patients with DM1.

METHODS

A total of 66 Japanese adult patients with DM1 were investigated using a neuropsychological battery to assess several cognitive domains, including memory, processing speed, and executive function. The patients underwent neuropsychological evaluation approximately five years after baseline (Times 1 and 2).

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients underwent a second neuropsychological evaluation. The participants in the Time 2 evaluation were younger than those who did not participate in Time 2. Patients showed a decline in the Mini-Mental State Examination, Trail Making Test (TMT), Block Design, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test at Time 2 (P < 0.05). Age at Time 1 was associated with a decline in TMT-A and TMT-B scores (rho = 0.57 and 0.45, respectively).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest a cognitive decline in patients with DM1 and warrant further investigation into the possible effects of age-related changes.

Masseter muscle volume as a disease marker in adult-onset myotonic dystrophy type 1

The advent of clinical trials in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) necessitates the identification of reliable outcome measures to quantify different disease manifestations using minimal number of assessments. In this study, clinical correlations of mean masseter volume (mMV) were explored to evaluate its potential as a marker of muscle involvement in adult-onset DM1 patients. We utilised data from a preceding study, pertaining to 39 DM1 patients and 20 age-matched control participants. In this study participants had undergone MRI of the brain, completed various clinical outcome measures and had CTG repeats measured by small-pool PCR. Manual segmentation of masseter muscles was performed by a single rater to estimate mMV. The masseter muscle was atrophied in DM1 patients when compared to controls (p<0.001). Significant correlations were found between mMV and estimated progenitor allele length (p = 0.001), modal allele length (p = 0.003), disease duration (p = 0.009) and and the Muscle Impairment Rating Scale (p = 0.008). After correction for lean body mass, mMV was also inversely correlated with self-reported myotonia (p = 0.014). This study demonstrates that changes in mMV are sensitive in reflecting the underlying disease process. Quantitative MRI methods demonstrate that data concerning both central and peripheral disease could be acquired from MR brain imaging studies in DM1 patients.

Impact of a 12-week strength training program on fatigue, daytime sleepiness, and apathy in men with myotonic dystrophy type 1

Background: Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a multisystemic neuromuscular disorder causing a plea of impairments, of which fatigue and apathy are some of the most frequent non-muscular symptoms. No curative treatment exists to date, and patients only have access to limited effective care, which are intended to decrease the burden of specific symptoms in daily life. Objective: This study aimed to assess whether a 12-week strength-training program has an impact on fatigue/daytime sleepiness, apathy, and patient-reported health in men with DM1. Methods: Eleven participants completed the Fatigue and Daytime Sleepiness Scale (FDSS) and the Myotonic Dystrophy Health Index (MDHI) at baseline, at 6 and 12 weeks, and 6 and 9 months. Also, the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) was filled out at baseline, at 12 weeks, and 6 and 9 months. Results: Results show significant effects of the training program both on apathy and fatigue/daytime sleepiness, effects that are respectively greater at three and six months after the end of the program than at its very end. However, no difference was observed regarding the overall disease burden. Conclusion: These findings are promising for patients with DM1 considering that few non-pharmacological treatments are available.

Patient-Centered Core Impact Sets: What They are and Why We Need Them

A quote attributed to Mark Twain states, “What gets us into trouble is not what we don’t know. It’s what we know for sure that just ain’t so.” The growing focus on patient centricity has revealed a misalignment between what patients report as important to them about their disease and/or treatment, and the data collected in research and care. Decisions across healthcare are made using an evidence base most stakeholders acknowledge is inadequate. Patients might report that what is important to them are everyday life impacts, concepts that can be very different from the more typical clinical outcomes we often track. In this paper, we encourage expanding current thinking to all “impacts,” not only health outcomes, but also the other equally (and sometimes more important) concerns patients report as important to them. We propose that a patient-centered core impact set be developed for each disease or condition of interest, and/or subpopulation of patients. A patient-centered core impact set begins with gathering from patients and caregivers an inventory of all impacts disease and treatments have on a patient’s (and carers’ and families’) life. Then, through a formal prioritization process, a core set of impacts is derived, inclusive of but extending beyond relevant health outcomes. We offer several recommendations on how to move the goal of a patient-centered core impact set forward through collaboration, leadership, and establishment of a patient-centered core impact set development blueprint with supporting tools.

Clinical Outcome Evaluations and CBT Response Prediction in Myotonic Dystrophy

BACKGROUND

The European OPTIMISTIC clinical trial has demonstrated a significant, yet heterogenous effect of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for Myotonic Dystrophy type 1 (DM1) patients. One of its remaining aims was the assessment of efficacy and adequacy of clinical outcome measures, including the relatively novel primary trial outcome, the DM1-Activ-c questionnaire.

OBJECTIVES

Assessment of the relationship between the Rasch-built DM1-Activ-c questionnaire and 26 commonly used clinical outcome measurements. Identification of variables associated with CBT response in DM1 patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the to date largest clinical trial in DM1 (OPTIMISTIC), comprising of 255 genetically confirmed DM1 patients randomized to either standard care or CBT with optionally graded exercise therapy. Correlations of 27 different outcome measures were calculated at baseline (cross-sectional) and of their respective intervention induced changes (longitudinal). Bootstrap enhanced Elastic-Net (BeEN) regression was validated and implemented to select variables associated with CBT response.

RESULTS

In cross-sectional data, DM1-Activ-c correlated significantly with the majority of other outcome measures, including Six Minute Walk Test and Myotonic Dystrophy Health Index. Fewer and weaker significant longitudinal correlations were observed. Nine variables potentially associated with CBT response were identified, including measures of disease severity, executive cognitive functioning and perceived social support.

CONCLUSIONS

The DM1-Activ-c questionnaire appears to be a well suited cross-sectional instrument to assess a variety of clinically relevant dimensions in DM1. Yet, apathy and experienced social support measures were less well captured. CBT response was heterogenous, requiring careful selection of outcome measures for different disease aspects.

Cerebral involvement and related aspects in myotonic dystrophy type 2

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is an autosomal dominant multisystemic disorder caused by CCTG repeats expansion in the first intron of the CNBP gene. In this review we focus on the brain involvement in DM2, including its pathogenic mechanisms, microstructural, macrostructural and functional brain changes, as well as the effects of all these impairments on patients' everyday life. We also try to understand how brain abnormalities in DM2 should be adequately measured and potentially treated. The most important pathogenetic mechanisms in DM2 are RNA gain-of-function and repeat-associated non-ATG (RAN) translation. One of the main neuroimaging findings in DM2 is the presence of diffuse periventricular white matter hyperintensity lesions (WMHLs). Brain atrophy has been described in DM2 patients, but it is not clear if it is mostly caused by a decrease of the white or gray matter volume. The most commonly reported specific cognitive symptoms in DM2 are dysexecutive syndrome, visuospatial and memory impairments. Fatigue, sleep-related disorders and pain are also frequent in DM2. The majority of key symptoms and signs in DM2 has a great influence on patients' daily lives, their psychological status, economic situation and quality of life.

Assessment of muscular strength and functional capacity in the juvenile and adult myotonic dystrophy type 1 population: a 3-year follow-up study

INTRODUCTION

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a progressive, multisystemic, and autosomal dominant disease. Muscle wasting and weakness have been associated with impaired functional capacity and restricted social participation in affected individuals. The disease's presentation is very heterogenous and its progression is still under-documented.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to document the progression of muscular strength and functional capacity in the DM1 population over a 3-year period.

METHODS

Twenty-three individuals with juvenile or adult phenotypes of DM1 were recruited to complete clinical assessments in 2016 and 2019. Maximal isometric muscle strength (MIMS) was evaluated with quantified muscle testing and functional capacity was evaluated with the Mini-BESTest, the 10-m walk test at comfortable and maximal speeds, the Timed Up and Go and the 6-min walk test. Participants also completed three questionnaires: DM1-Activ, Upper Extremity Functional Index and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). Subgroup analyses were evaluated for sex, phenotype, and type of physical activity practiced during the 3-year period.

RESULTS

For the whole group, there was a significant decline in the scores of the Mini-BESTest and the LEFS. Also, MIMS significantly declined for prehension, lateral pinch as well as for hip abductors, knee extensors and ankle dorsiflexors muscle groups. Subgroups analyses revealed that men lost more MIMS than women, and that adult phenotype lost more MIMS than juvenile phenotype.

CONCLUSION

Quantified muscle testing is a better indicator of disease progression over a 3-year period than functional tests. Phenotype and sex are important factors that influence the progression of DM1.

Responsiveness of Daytime Sleepiness and Fatigue Scales in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1

Daytime sleepiness and fatigue are prominent symptoms of myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) that can be amenable to treatment in the context of randomized controlled trials. No study has yet documented whether self-reported measures of daytime sleepiness and fatigue can detect change over time and the meaning of this change. The aim was to explore indicators of responsiveness to change and interpretability for the Daytime Sleepiness Scale and the Fatigue Severity Scale in 115 DM1 prospectively followed patients. Results suggest that these two self-reported questionnaires are sufficiently sensitive to detect changes beyond expected measurement error over time in this population.

Predictors of participation restriction over a 9-year period in adults with myotonic dystrophy type 1

PURPOSE

For slowly progressive neuromuscular disease, prognostic approach and long-term monitoring of participation is a crucial part of rehabilitation services. To improve the prognostic approach, professionals must identify individuals at risk of having higher participation restriction. This study aimed to identify personal and environmental predictors of participation restriction over nine years in adults with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1).

METHODS

A secondary analysis of a longitudinal design comparing baseline with a follow-up nine years later was used with a multidimensional assessment of participation and personal and environmental factors. Based on theoretical models, multiple linear regressions were used.

RESULTS

One hundred and fourteen adults with DM1 were included in the study (63.2% women; 78.9% adult onset; mean (SD) age of 43.5 (10.4) years). When age, sex, phenotype, and education were controlled for, participation restriction was predicted by a longer time to stand and walk, lower grip strength, higher body mass index, absence of perceived impact of myotonia in daily living, use of adapted transportation from community services, and perception of obstacle in physical environment (p < 0.001, adjusted R² = 0.50).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of predictors of participation restriction can be advantageously modified by rehabilitation and environmental changes, such as politics targeting community services provision or physical environment and services accessibility.Implications for rehabilitationPredictors could better inform rehabilitation professional to recognize individuals at risk of higher participation restriction over time and to target specific interventions based on a prognostic approach.Rehabilitation professionals could inform the people living with myotonic dystrophy type 1 and their relatives of the multifactorial nature of occurrence of participation restriction to diminish the "fatality" associated with a genetic progressive disorder.Predictors allow professionals to assess and intervene in the management of specific factors depending on the rehabilitation goal.Identifying individual with myotonic dystrophy with higher risk of participation restriction could help implement a long-term community based rehabilitation intervention plan targeting both personal and environmental factors.

Responsiveness of outcome measures in myotonic dystrophy type 1

OBJECTIVE

As myotonic dystrophy type 1(DM1) evolves slowly and interventional trials often have a short duration, responsive outcomes in DM1 are needed. The objective of this study was to determine the responsiveness of muscle strength, balance, and functional mobility measurements after a 1-year follow-up period in individuals with DM1.

METHODS

Sixty-three adults with noncongenital DM1 completed the following assessments at baseline and at 1-year follow-up: Handheld dynamometry (lower limbs), stationary dynamometry (lower limbs), step test, timed-up-and-go test (TUG), modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance (mCTSIB), feet-together stance, tandem stance, one-leg stance, 10-meter walk test, and sit-to-stand test.

RESULTS

Change was captured by stationary dynamometry (proximal flexor and extensor muscles), handheld dynamometry (proximal flexor and distal extensor muscles), TUG, and mCTSIB (P ≤ 0.04). Ceiling or floor effects were shown for most static balance tests.

INTERPRETATION

Overall, adequate responsiveness was shown for both muscle strength dynamometers, TUG and mCTSIB. These outcomes are therefore likely candidate endpoints for clinical trials lasting 1 year. Most static balance tests are not responsive and not recommended in a heterogeneous DM1 population.

Validity of the Mini-BESTest in adults with myotonic dystrophy type 1

INTRODUCTION

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a multisystemic neuromuscular disease that causes balance problems. The objective of this study was to assess the construct validity of the Mini-BESTest among adults with DM1.

METHODS

Fifty-nine individuals with late-onset or adult phenotypes of DM1 were recruited. Participants performed the Mini-BESTest, 10-Meter Walk Test (10mWT), 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), and Timed Up & Go (TUG) and were questioned on their tendency to lose balance and whether they fell in the past month.

RESULTS

Scores on the Mini-BESTest were significantly different between phenotypes and CTG repeat numbers (P < .02). Significant correlations were found with the 10mWT, 6MWT, and the TUG (r = 0.77-0.84; P < .001). A cutoff score of 21.5 was found to identify fallers with 90% posttest accuracy.

DISCUSSION

The Mini-BESTest demonstrates evidence of construct validity when assessing balance in the DM1 population.

Validation of Motor Outcome Measures in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2

Introduction: Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) lacks disease-specific, validated, motor outcome measures (OMs), and patients' reported outcomes (PROs). This represents a limit for the monitoring of disease progression and treatment response. Our aim was to identify the most appropriate OMs to be translated in clinical practice and clinical trials on DM2. This study has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov NCT03603171 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03603171). Methods: Sixty-six patients with genetically confirmed DM2 underwent a baseline and a follow-up visit after 1 year. The tested OMs included: hand opening time, pressure pain threshold (PPT), manual muscle testing (MMT), hand held dynamometry (HHD), scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA), quantitative motor function test (QMFT), gait stairs Gowers chair (GSGC), 30-s sit to stand test, functional index 2 (FI-2) and 6MWT. The PROs included DM1-Active-C, Rasch-built Pompe-specific activity scale (R-Pact), fatigue and daytime sleepiness (FDSS), brief pain inventory short form (BPI-sf), myotonia behavior scale (MBS), and the McGill pain questionnaire. Results: All patients completed the MBS and the results correlated well with the hand-opening time. The PPT showed a low reliability, no correlation with pain questionnaires, and did not differentiate patients with or without myalgia. Both muscle strength assessments, MMT and HHD, showed good construct validity. The QMFT showed an acceptable ceiling effect (14.5%), good convergent and differential validity and performed overall better than GSGC. The SARA score showed high flooring effect and is not useful in DM2. 6MWT proved a valid outcome measure in DM2. The 30-s sit to stand is a feasible test with good convergent validity, showing a flooring effect of 20% as it cannot be used in more severely affected patients. The FI-2 is time-consuming and has a high ceiling effect. At the 1-year visit the only assessments able to detect a worsening of DM2 were HHD, QMFT, and 6MWT, which are the most sensitive to change, and therefore clinically meaningful OMs in DM2. Conclusion: The clinical meaningful motor outcome measures that best depict the multifaceted phenotype of DM2 and its slow progression are MBS, MMT, or HHD (depending on the clinical setting), QMFT, and the 6MWT.

Brain Structural Features of Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 and their Relationship with CTG Repeats

Background

Few adequately-powered studies have systematically evaluated brain morphology in adult-onset myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1).

Objective

The goal of the present study was to determine structural brain differences between individuals with and without adult-onset DM1 in a multi-site, case-controlled cohort. We also explored correlations between brain structure and CTG repeat length.

Methods

Neuroimaging data was acquired in 58 unaffected individuals (29 women) and 79 individuals with DM1 (50 women). CTG repeat length, expressed as estimated progenitor allele length (ePAL), was determined by small pool PCR. Statistical models were adjusted for age, sex, site, and intracranial volume (ICV).

Results

ICV was reduced in DM1 subjects compared with controls. Accounting for the difference in ICV, the DM1 group exhibited smaller volume in frontal grey and white matter, parietal grey matter as well as smaller volume of the corpus callosum, thalamus, putamen, and accumbens. In contrast, volumes of the hippocampus and amygdala were significantly larger in DM1. Greater ePAL was associated with lower volumes of the putamen, occipital grey matter, and thalamus. A positive ePAL association was observed for amygdala volume and cerebellar white matter.

Conclusions

Smaller ICV may be a marker of aberrant neurodevelopment in adult-onset DM1. Volumetric analysis revealed morphological differences, some associated with CTG repeat length, in structures with plausible links to key DM1 symptoms including cognitive deficits and excessive daytime somnolence. These data offer further insights into the basis of CNS disease in DM1, and highlight avenues for further work to identify therapeutic targets and imaging biomarkers.

Analysis of the functional capacity outcome measures for myotonic dystrophy

Objectives

Defining clinically relevant outcome measures for myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) that can be valid and feasible for different phenotypes has proven problematic. The Outcome Measures for Myotonic Dystrophy (OMMYD) group proposed a battery of functional outcomes: 6‐minute walk test, 30 seconds sit and stand test, timed 10 m walk test, timed 10 m walk/run test, and nine‐hole peg test. This, however, required a large‐scale investigation,

Methods

A cohort of 213 patients enrolled in the natural history study, PhenoDM1, was analyzed in cross‐sectional analysis and subsequently 98 patients were followed for longitudinal analysis. We aimed to assess: (1) feasibility and best practice; (2) intra‐session reliability; (3) validity; and (4) behavior over time, of these tests.

Results

OMMYD outcomes proved feasible as 96% of the participants completed at least one trial for all tests and more than half (n = 113) performed all three trials of each test. Body mass index and disease severity associate with functional capacity. There was a significant difference between the first and second trials of each test. There was a moderate to strong correlation between these functional outcomes and muscle strength, disease severity and patient‐reported outcomes. All outcomes after 1 year detected a change in functional capacity except the nine‐hole peg test.

Conclusions

These tests can be used as a battery of outcomes or independently based on the shown overlapping psychometric features and strong cross‐correlations. Due to the large and heterogeneous sample of this study, these results can serve as reference values for future studies.

Affective symptoms and apathy in myotonic dystrophy type 1 a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To gain insight into the prevalence of apathy, depression and anxiety symptoms in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) patients on the basis of a systematic review with a meta-analysis.

METHODS

One author systematically searched and selected studies from Embase, Medline, PsychInfo and Web of Science (index periods up to August 2018). Data extraction and bias assessment were performed independently by two authors. We calculated (1) a weighted pooled prevalence and (2) weighted pooled standardized mean difference (Hedges' g) from studies comparing DM1 patients to healthy and/or neuromuscular disease controls separately for symptoms of depression, anxiety and apathy.

RESULTS

The pooled prevalences of depression (26 studies, n = 1267 DM1 patients), anxiety (19 studies, n = 896) and apathy (5 studies, n = 428), were 18% (95%CI: 12-25), 16 (95%CI: 13-18) and 55% (95%CI: 50-60), respectively. Effect sizes (Hedges' g) for depression, anxiety and apathy in DM1 patients compared to healthy controls were 1.04 (95%-CI: 0.71 to 1.37), 0.87 (95%-CI: 0.51 to 1.24) and 1.13 (95%-CI:0.54-1.71). Effect sizes for symptoms of depression, anxiety and apathy were 0.29 (95% CI: -0.12 to 0.70), 0.45 (95%-CI: -0.31 to 1.22) and 1.12 (95%-CI: 0.32-1.93) for DM1 patients versus neuromuscular disease controls. In most analyses, statistical heterogeneity was high.

CONCLUSIONS

Estimated pooled prevalences of clinically significant levels of symptoms of depression, anxiety and apathy in DM1 are 19, 17 and 55% respectively. Symptoms of depression and anxiety in DM1 may reflect reactive adjustment to progressive impairment and restricted participation similar to other chronic neuromuscular disease. The literature on the prevalence and severity of apathy, although a clinically relevant and characteristic symptom of DM1, is relatively scarce.

Tracking the brain in myotonic dystrophies: A 5-year longitudinal follow-up study

Objectives

The aim of this study was to examine the natural history of brain involvement in adult-onset myotonic dystrophies type 1 and 2 (DM1, DM2).

Methods

We conducted a longitudinal observational study to examine functional and structural cerebral changes in myotonic dystrophies. We enrolled 16 adult-onset DM1 patients, 16 DM2 patients, and 17 controls. At baseline and after 5.5 ± 0.4 years participants underwent neurological, neuropsychological, and 3T-brain MRI examinations using identical study protocols that included voxel-based morphometry and diffusion tensor imaging. Data were analyzed by (i) group comparisons between patients and controls at baseline and follow-up, and (ii) group comparisons using difference maps (baseline–follow-up in each participant) to focus on disease-related effects over time.

Results

We found minor neuropsychological deficits with mild progression in DM1 more than DM2. Daytime sleepiness was restricted to DM1, whereas fatigue was present in both disease entities and stable over time. Comparing results of cross-sectional neuroimaging analyses at baseline and follow-up revealed an unchanged pattern of pronounced white matter alterations in DM1. There was mild additional gray matter reduction in DM1 at follow-up. In DM2, white matter reduction was of lesser extent, but there were some additional alterations at follow-up. Gray matter seemed unaffected in DM2. Intriguingly, longitudinal analyses using difference maps and comparing them between patients and controls did not reveal any significant differences of cerebral changes over time between patients and controls.

Conclusion

The lack of significant disease-related progression of gray and white matter involvement over a period of five years in our cohort of DM1 and DM2 patients suggests either a rather slowly progressive process or even a stable course of cerebral changes in middle-aged adult-onset patients. Being the first longitudinal neuroimaging trial in DM1 and DM2, this study provides useful additional information regarding the natural history of brain involvement.

Validation of the Nine Hole Peg Test as a measure of dexterity in myotonic dystrophy type 1

We aimed to validate the Nine Hole Peg Test as a measure of dexterity in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). Fifty patients with adult-onset, genetically confirmed DM1 were evaluated by Nine Hole Peg Test and re-evaluated at one week. Myotonia was not a limiting factor. The first test was compared with that performed by normal subjects (n = 28). Contextually, patients underwent handgrip and three-finger pinch assessments by handheld dynamometer. The Nine Hole Peg Test showed high intra-rater and inter-rater reliability in DM1 [ICC 0.86/0.83 for dominant and 0.90/0.88 for non-dominant hand, respectively]. Inverse correlation with handgrip and pinch strength values (r = -0.4; p < 0.01) and direct correlation with Muscular Impairment Rating Scale (r = 0.4; p < 0.01) were found for both DH and NDH. The test was able to differentiate severe DM1 patients, stratified by extent of muscle impairment, from mildly affected and normal controls, with a sensitivity of 97% and 95% for dominant hand and non-dominant hand, respectively (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, we showed that the Nine Hole Peg Test is a reliable, valid and sensitive test of dexterity in DM1, and that it can be considered as a candidate outcome measure to monitor natural history of disease and, possibly, therapeutic response in clinical trials.

Outcome Measures for Central Nervous System Evaluation in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 May Be Confounded by Deficits in Motor Function or Insight

Background: Central nervous system involvement in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is associated with cognitive deficits, impaired social performance and excessive somnolence, which greatly impact quality of life. With the advent of clinical trials in DM1, there is a pressing need to identify outcome measures for quantification of central symptoms that are feasible and valid. In this context, we sought to evaluate neuropsychological and self-reported measures currently recommended by expert consensus, with particular reference to their specificity for central nervous system involvement in a moderate-sized DM1 cohort.

Methods: Forty-five adults with DM1 and 20 controls completed neuropsychology assessments and symptom questionnaires. Those without contraindication also underwent MRI brain, from which global gray matter volume and white matter lesion volume were quantified. CTG repeat was measured by small pool PCR, and was screened for the presence of variant repeat sequences.

Results: The neuropsychology test battery was well tolerated and detected impairment across various domains in the DM1 group vs. controls. Large effect sizes in the Stroop and Trail Making Tests were however attenuated by correction for basic speed, which could be influenced by dysarthria and upper limb weakness, respectively. Low mood was strongly associated with increased self-reporting of central symptoms, including cognitive impairment. Conversely, self-reported cognitive impairment did not generally predict poorer performance in neuropsychology assessments, and there was a trend toward greater self-reporting of low mood and cognitive problems in those with milder white matter change on MRI. Global gray matter volume correlated with performance in several neuropsychology assessments in a multivariate model with age and sex, while white matter lesion volume was associated with executive dysfunction reported by a proxy. Screening for variant repeats was positive in three individuals, who reported mild muscle symptoms.

Conclusions: Identification of outcome measures with good specificity for brain involvement in DM1 is challenging, since complex cognitive assessments may be compromised by peripheral muscle weakness and self-reported questionnaires may be influenced by mood and insight. This highlights the need for further large, longitudinal studies to identify and validate objective measures, which may include imaging biomarkers and cognitive measures not influenced by motor speed.

Neuropsychological and Psychological Functioning Aspects in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 Patients in Italy

Introduction: Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 (DM1) is an autosomal dominant genetic illness, characterized by a progressive loss of strength. Important deficits in cognitive functioning and a significant prevalence of psychiatric disorders have been previously reported.

Methods:A neuropsychological and psychological assessment was carried out in 31 DM1 patients (61% males) in order to measure the cognitive functioning and explore their personality profiles. The MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), ENB-2 Battery assessing memory (short term, long term and working memory), integration capacities, visual-spatial ability, attention (selective, divided, shifting/switching) executive functions, praxis, discrimination and logic capabilities and psychopathology Symptom Check List 90-R (SCL-90-R) were administered. The neuropsychological and psychological evaluation of DM1 patients was carried out taking into consideration the clinical parameters (CTG repeat, age at onset, disease duration, Muscular Impairment Rate Scale (MIRS), Medical Research Council Scale (MRC) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scales (EPS)).

Results: Regarding psychopathology 19.4% of patients scored a moderate or high level of symptoms intensity index (GSI), 12.9% reported a high number of symptoms (PST) and 16.1% reported a high intensity level of the perceived symptoms (PSDI). Fatigue and daytime sleepiness resulted as being associated with higher levels of psychoticism (PSY). Only 1 patient reported a severe impairment in the spatial and temporal orientation, memory, language, praxis, attention and calculation. Longer disease duration was also associated with cognitive impairment evaluated through ENB-2 (p < 0.05).

Discussions and Conclusions:There are indications of the utility of neuropsychological and psychological screening and support for these patients and their families due to the link between disease duration and cognitive performances. A proposal of a clinical protocol, with an illustration of a clinical case report of a family is presented.

Eight years after an international workshop on myotonic dystrophy patient registries: case study of a global collaboration for a rare disease

BACKGROUND

Myotonic Dystrophy is the most common form of muscular dystrophy in adults, affecting an estimated 10 per 100,000 people. It is a multisystemic disorder affecting multiple generations with increasing severity. There are currently no licenced therapies to reverse, slow down or cure its symptoms. In 2009 TREAT-NMD (a global alliance with the mission of improving trial readiness for neuromuscular diseases) and the Marigold Foundation held a workshop of key opinion leaders to agree a minimal dataset for patient registries in myotonic dystrophy. Eight years after this workshop, we surveyed 22 registries collecting information on myotonic dystrophy patients to assess the proliferation and utility the dataset agreed in 2009. These registries represent over 10,000 myotonic dystrophy patients worldwide (Europe, North America, Asia and Oceania).

RESULTS

The registries use a variety of data collection methods (e.g. online patient surveys or clinician led) and have a variety of budgets (from being run by volunteers to annual budgets over €200,000). All registries collect at least some of the originally agreed data items, and a number of additional items have been suggested in particular items on cognitive impact.

CONCLUSIONS

The community should consider how to maximise this collective resource in future therapeutic programmes.

Cognitive behavioural therapy with optional graded exercise therapy in patients with severe fatigue with myotonic dystrophy type 1: a multicentre, single-blind, randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 is the most common form of muscular dystrophy in adults and leads to severe fatigue, substantial physical functional impairment, and restricted social participation. In this study, we aimed to determine whether cognitive behavioural therapy optionally combined with graded exercise compared with standard care alone improved the health status of patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1.

METHODS

We did a multicentre, single-blind, randomised trial, at four neuromuscular referral centres with experience in treating patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 located in Paris (France), Munich (Germany), Nijmegen (Netherlands), and Newcastle (UK). Eligible participants were patients aged 18 years and older with a confirmed genetic diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy type 1, who were severely fatigued (ie, a score of ≥35 on the checklist-individual strength, subscale fatigue). We randomly assigned participants (1:1) to either cognitive behavioural therapy plus standard care and optional graded exercise or standard care alone. Randomisation was done via a central web-based system, stratified by study site. Cognitive behavioural therapy focused on addressing reduced patient initiative, increasing physical activity, optimising social interaction, regulating sleep-wake patterns, coping with pain, and addressing beliefs about fatigue and myotonic dystrophy type 1. Cognitive behavioural therapy was delivered over a 10-month period in 10-14 sessions. A graded exercise module could be added to cognitive behavioural therapy in Nijmegen and Newcastle. The primary outcome was the 10-month change from baseline in scores on the DM1-Activ-c scale, a measure of capacity for activity and social participation (score range 0-100). Statistical analysis of the primary outcome included all participants for whom data were available, using mixed-effects linear regression models with baseline scores as a covariate. Safety data were presented as descriptives. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02118779.

FINDINGS

Between April 2, 2014, and May 29, 2015, we randomly assigned 255 patients to treatment: 128 to cognitive behavioural therapy plus standard care and 127 to standard care alone. 33 (26%) of 128 assigned to cognitive behavioural therapy also received the graded exercise module. Follow-up continued until Oct 17, 2016. The DM1-Activ-c score increased from a mean (SD) of 61·22 (17·35) points at baseline to 63·92 (17·41) at month 10 in the cognitive behavioural therapy group (adjusted mean difference 1·53, 95% CI -0·14 to 3·20), and decreased from 63·00 (17·35) to 60·79 (18·49) in the standard care group (-2·02, -4·02 to -0·01), with a mean difference between groups of 3·27 points (95% CI 0·93 to 5·62, p=0·007). 244 adverse events occurred in 65 (51%) patients in the cognitive behavioural therapy group and 155 in 63 (50%) patients in the standard care alone group, the most common of which were falls (155 events in 40 [31%] patients in the cognitive behavioural therapy group and 71 in 33 [26%] patients in the standard care alone group). 24 serious adverse events were recorded in 19 (15%) patients in the cognitive behavioural therapy group and 23 in 15 (12%) patients in the standard care alone group, the most common of which were gastrointestinal and cardiac.

INTERPRETATION

Cognitive behavioural therapy increased the capacity for activity and social participation in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 at 10 months. With no curative treatment and few symptomatic treatments, cognitive behavioural therapy could be considered for use in severely fatigued patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1.

FUNDING

The European Union Seventh Framework Programme.

Cognitive impairment and quality of life in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1

INTRODUCTION

This study sought to clarify whether specific cognitive abilities are impaired in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) as well as to investigate the relationships among quality of life (QoL), cognitive function, and psychological factors.

METHODS

Sixty patients with DM1 were evaluated on cognitive functioning (abstract reasoning, attention/working memory, executive function, processing speed, and visuoconstructive ability), apathy, depression, excessive daytime sleepiness, fatigue, and QoL. QoL was assessed by 2 domains of the Muscular Dystrophy Quality of Life Scale (Psychosocial Relationships and Physical Functioning and Health).

RESULTS

More than half of the patients exhibited cognitive impairment in attention/working memory, executive function, processing speed, and visuoconstructive ability. The Psychosocial Relationships factor was associated with processing speed, attention/working memory, and apathy, whereas depression and fatigue were associated with 2 QoL domains.

DISCUSSION

Our study identified specific cognitive impairments in DM1. Specific cognitive functions and psychological factors may be potential contributors to QoL. Muscle Nerve 57: 742-748, 2018.

French translation and cross-cultural adaptation of The Myotonic Dystrophy Health Index

INTRODUCTION

Validation studies of disease-specific instruments for myotonic dystrophy type-1 (DM1) are required prior to their global use in clinical trials involving different cultures and countries. Here we translate and culturally adapt the Myotonic Dystrophy Health Index (MDHI), a disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure, for a French DM1 population.

METHODS

Using the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Task Force method for translation and adaptation of PRO questionnaires, we created a French translation of the MDHI. We subsequently tested this instrument in a cohort of French-speaking patients with DM1.

RESULTS

The MDHI was forward and back translated and modified by consensus to create the most compatible translation. Cognitive interviews were conducted with 5 patients with DM1 to ensure the usability and understanding of the translation.

DISCUSSION

The French version of the MDHI is an optimal translation of the original instrument that is acceptable to native patients and ready for clinical trial use. Muscle Nerve 57: 686-689, 2018.

Further evidence for the reliability and validity of the Fatigue and Daytime Sleepiness Scale

BACKGROUND

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is an inherited neuromuscular disease causing, among other symptoms, fatigue and excessive daytime sleepiness, which are frequently undifferentiated by patients and/or clinicians. The Fatigue and Daytime Sleepiness Scale (FDSS) has been devised to measure these two overlapping symptoms as a single clinical entity.

OBJECTIVE

To further examine the reliability and the construct validity of the FDSS in patients with DM1.

METHODS

The scale was administered to 48 DM1 patients on two occasions at a 2week-interval. Intra-rater reliability and internal consistency were established by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha, respectively. Construct validity was assessed by using the known-group method. More precisely, the mean FDSS score of patients with and without subjective complaints of fatigue and/or sleepiness was compared.

RESULTS

The FDSS showed good intra-rater reliability (ICC=0.83) and acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha =0.6). Also, the FDSS was able to distinguish between patients who had fatigue and sleepiness complaints from those who did not (mean FDSS score of 10.6 vs 8.0, p=0.01), suggesting good construct validity.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the present study supports the continued use of the FDSS as a reliable and valid instrument to measure fatigue and daytime sleepiness in patients with DM1 for either clinical or research purposes.

Functional impairment in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 can be assessed by an ataxia rating scale (SARA)

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is not characterised by ataxia per se; however, DM1 and ataxia patients show similar disturbances in movement coordination often experiencing walking and balance difficulties, although caused by different underlying pathologies. This study aims to investigate the use of a scale previously described for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA) with the hypothesis that it could have utility in DM1 patients as a measure of disease severity and risk of falling. Data from 54 DM1 patients were pulled from the PHENO-DM1 natural history study for analysis. Mean SARA score in the DM1 population was 5.45 relative to the maximum score of eight. A flooring effect (score 0) was observed in mild cases within the sample. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability was high with intraclass coefficients (ICC) of 0.983 and 1.00, respectively. Internal consistency was acceptable as indicated by a Cronbach's alpha of 0.761. Component analysis revealed two principle components. SARA correlated with: (1) all measures of muscle function tested, including quantitative muscle testing of ankle dorsiflexion (r = -0.584*), the 6 min walk test (r = -0.739*), 10 m walk test (r = 0.741*), and the nine hole peg test (r = 0.602*) and (2) measures of disease severity/burden, such as MIRS (r = 0.718*), MDHI (r = 0.483*), and DM1-Activ (r = -0.749*) (*p < 0.001). The SARA score was predicted by an interaction between modal CTG repeat length and age at sampling (r = 0.678, p = 0.003). A score of eight or above predicted the use of a walking aid with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 85.7%. We suggest that further research is warranted to ascertain whether SARA or components of SARA are useful outcome measures for clinical trials in DM1. As a tool, it can be used for gathering information about disease severity/burden and helping to identify patients in need of a walking aid, and can potentially be applied in both research and healthcare settings.

Patient-Centered Therapy Development for Myotonic Dystrophy: Report of the Myotonic Dystrophy Foundation-Sponsored Workshop

Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is an autosomal dominant, repeat expansion, progressive disorder with no drug therapies. Consequently, to better define a regulatory pathway in anticipation of new treatment strategies under investigation, the Myotonic Dystrophy Foundation convened a workshop entitled "Patient-Centered Therapy Development for Myotonic Dystrophy" in September 2015. Participants included representatives from academia, industry, the patient community, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Presenters described the symptom burden of the disease, and existing data on DM biomarkers, endpoints, natural history, and benefit-risk considerations. FDA participants helped clarify the regulatory requirements for new drug treatment approvals and DM-specific issues such as variability, slow progression, and low prevalence. Workshop attendees gained a better understanding of DM and the current status of existing data and tools to support therapeutic drug research and development.