Efficacy and safety of safinamide as an add-on therapy to L-DOPA for patients with Parkinson's disease: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II/III study

Factors associated with a placebo effect in Parkinson's disease in clinical trials: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Outcomes of clinical trials of treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) may be influenced by placebo effects. The aim of this study was to determine the factors associated with placebo effects in Parkinson's disease (PD) for guidance with design of future clinical trials.

METHODS

Factors associated with placebo effects in PD were examined in a meta-analysis using a random effects model with pooling of placebo effects on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS III) or Movement Disorder Society sponsored revision of UPDRS III (MDS-UPDRS III). The following prespecified variables were included in the analyses: with or without drug at baseline, with or without a placebo run-in phase, with or without motor fluctuation, published year, number of study sites, placebo administration period, age, sex, disease duration, and daily levodopa dose. Publication bias was assessed by visual inspection of funnel plots and adjusted using the trim-and-fill method.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight articles with a total of 4828 subjects satisfied the inclusion criteria. There was a significant placebo effect using UPDRS III or MDS-UPDRS III (SMD = - 0.25; 95% CI - 0.35 to - 0.14; p < 0.001, I2 = 92%). Subgroup and/or multivariate meta-regression analyses revealed that placebo effects were associated with advanced PD (p = 0.04), drug exposure at baseline (p < 0.001), placebo administration period (p < 0.001), and disease duration (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study are important as guidance in design of future clinical trials in which the influence of placebo effects is minimized.

Pharmacotherapy of motor symptoms in early and mid-stage Parkinson's disease: guideline "Parkinson's disease" of the German Society of Neurology

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

There are multiple pharmacological treatment options for motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). These comprise multiple drug classes which are approved for the condition, including levodopa, dopamine agonists, COMT inhibitors, MAO-B inhibitors, NMDA-receptor antagonists, anticholinergics, and others. Some of the drugs are approved for monotherapy and combination therapy while others are only approved as adjunctive therapy to levodopa. Furthermore, treatment for special treatment situations, e.g., rescue medication for off-phases, for tremor, treatment during pregnancy and breast feeding is discussed and recommendations are given with further details.

METHODS

The recommendations were based on systematic literature reviews, drafted by expert teams, consented in online polls followed by online consensus meetings of the whole German Parkinson's Guideline Group, and publicly released in November 2023.

RESULTS

In the new S2k (i.e., consensus-based) guidelines, the pharmacotherapy of the motor symptoms of PD is discussed in five chapters. These comprise "Parkinson medication", "Initial monotherapy", "Early combination therapy", "Fluctuations and dyskinesia", and "Parkinsonian tremor". Furthermore, there is a chapter for special treatment situations, including perioperative management, freezing of gait, and pregnancy and breastfeeding.

CONCLUSION

The recommendations for the pharmacotherapy of motor symptoms of PD have been updated. Newly available drugs have been added, while other drugs (e.g., ergoline dopamine agonists, anticholinergics, budipine) have been removed from the recommendations.

Discovery of novel benzimidazole derivatives as selective and reversible monoamine oxidase B inhibitors for Parkinson's disease treatment

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. The development of novel scaffolds for human monoamine oxidase B (hMAO-B) inhibitors with reversible properties represents an important strategy to improve the efficacy and safety for PD treatment. In the current work, we have devised and assessed two innovative derivative series serving as hMAO-B inhibitors. These series have utilized benzimidazole as a scaffold and strategically incorporated a primary amide group, which is recognized as a pivotal pharmacophore in subsequent activity screening and reversible mode of action. Among these compounds, 16d has emerged as the most potent hMAO-B inhibitor with an IC50 value of 67.3 nM, comparable to safinamide (IC50 = 42.6 nM) in vitro. Besides, 16d demonstrated good selectivity towards hMAO-B isoenzyme with a selectivity index over 387. Importantly, in line with the design purpose, 16d inhibited hMAO-B in a competitive and reversible manner (Ki = 82.50 nM). Moreover, 16d exhibited a good safety profile in both cellular and acute toxicity assays in mice. It also displayed ideal pharmacokinetic properties and blood-brain barrier permeability in vivo, essential prerequisites for central nervous system medicines. In the MPTP-induced PD mouse model, 16d significantly alleviated the motor impairment, especially muscle relaxation and motor coordination. Therefore, 16d, serving as a lead compound, holds instructive significance for subsequent investigations regarding its application in the treatment of PD.

Ecofriendly micellar mediated spectrofluorimetric method for ultrasensitive quantification of the antiparkinsonian drug safinamide in pharmaceutical formulation and spiked human plasma

A novel, highly sensitive and eco-friendly micellar-mediated spectrofluorimetric method was developed and validated for the determination of the novel antiparkinsonian drug safinamide mesylate in the presence of its related precursor impurity, 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde. The proposed approach relies on increasing the inherent fluorescence emission at 296 nm of safinamide, by forming hydrogen bonds between the mentioned drug and sodium dodecyl sulfate in the micellar system using 0.1 N HCl as a solvent, following excitation at 226 nm. A thorough investigation was conducted into the experimental factors affecting spectrofluorimetric behavior of the studied drug. A linearity plot of safinamide over the concentration range of 10.0-1000.0 ng/mL against the relative fluorescence intensities was established. The proposed method demonstrated excellent sensitivity down to the nano-gram level with detection and quantitation limits of 1.91 and 5.79 ng/mL, respectively. The studied drug was effectively determined in Parkimedine® Tablets. Furthermore, the proposed method allows for ultrasensitive quantification of safinamide in spiked human plasma, with satisfactory percentage recovery (98.97-102.28%). Additionally, the greenness assessment using the advanced green certificate classification approach, the complementary green analytical procedure index (Complex-GAPI), and the analytical GREEness metric approach (AGREE), along with the practicality check using the Blue Applicability Grade Index in addition to the all-inclusive overall whiteness evaluation using the RGB-12 model were carried out. The outcomes demonstrated the effectiveness and whiteness of the proposed technique. Clearly, the suggested approach has the advantages of being simple, requiring no pretreatment steps, and relying solely on direct measuring procedures.

Novel and experimental therapeutics for the management of motor and non-motor Parkinsonian symptoms

BACKGROUND  : Both motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) have a substantial detrimental influence on the patient's quality of life. The most effective treatment remains oral levodopa. All currently known treatments just address the symptoms; they do not completely reverse the condition.

METHODOLOGY

In order to find literature on the creation of novel treatment agents and their efficacy for PD patients, we searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and other online libraries.

RESULTS

According to the most recent study on Parkinson's disease (PD), a great deal of work has been done in both the clinical and laboratory domains, and some current scientists have even been successful in developing novel therapies for PD patients.

CONCLUSION

The quality of life for PD patients has increased as a result of recent research, and numerous innovative medications are being developed for PD therapy. In the near future, we will see positive outcomes regarding PD treatment.

Safinamide as adjunctive therapy to levodopa monotherapy for patients with Parkinson's disease with wearing-off: The Japanese observational J-SILVER study

BACKGROUND

Safinamide is an effective adjunctive therapy for wearing-off in Parkinson's disease (PD); however, evidence is lacking in older patients and those in the early stages of wearing-off. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of safinamide as adjunctive therapy in patients with PD treated with levodopa monotherapy in clinical practice.

METHODS

This multicentre, open-label observational study was conducted at five sites in Japan. Patients diagnosed with PD and wearing-off initiated safinamide as adjunctive therapy with levodopa monotherapy. Efficacy endpoints were mean changes in Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part I, III, and IV scores; daily ON-time without dyskinesia using 24-h patient symptom diaries; and 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) scores at 18 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

In total, 24 patients initiated safinamide (66.7% were aged ≥75 years); the mean duration of wearing-off was 1.2 years. MDS-UPDRS Part III total score, Part IV total score, and PDQ-39 summary index decreased significantly from baseline (mean change -7.0 [p = 0.012], -2.4 [p = 0.007] and - 5.3 [p = 0.012], respectively). There was a non-statistically significant increase of 1.55 h in mean daily ON-time without dyskinesia. Numerical Rating Scale total score for pain (p = 0.015), and scores for OFF-period pain (p = 0.012) and nocturnal pain (p = 0.021) subdomains were significantly improved in the subgroup with pain. Most reported adverse events were classified as mild.

CONCLUSION

Safinamide improved motor and non-motor symptoms and quality of life-related measures in older patients with PD in the early stages of wearing-off without new safety concerns.

STUDY REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network in Japan; study ID: UMIN000044341.

The Effects of Safinamide in Chinese and Non-Chinese Patients with Parkinson's Disease

INTRODUCTION

Ethnicity differences are an important determinant in the clinical manifestation of Parkinson's disease (PD), but they are not yet widely recognized, particularly regarding the response to dopaminergic medications. The aim of this paper is to analyze the efficacy and safety of safinamide in Chinese patients with PD in the pivotal studies SETTLE and XINDI compared to the non-Chinese population of the SETTLE trial.

METHODS

SETTLE (NCT00627640) and XINDI (NCT03881371) were phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials. Patients received safinamide or placebo as add-on to levodopa. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the mean total daily OFF time. Secondary efficacy endpoints included total daily ON time, ON time with no/non-troublesome dyskinesia, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 items. Safety was evaluated through the frequency of adverse events. Data from 440 non-Chinese and 109 Chinese patients in the SETTLE study, and 305 Chinese patients in the XINDI trial were considered for this post hoc analysis.

RESULTS

Significant positive results were seen in favor of safinamide in all populations for the primary and secondary endpoints, with no differences in terms of magnitude. No "treatment by ethnicity" interaction was detected for any parameters, confirming the homogeneity of treatment effects between different populations. The safety and tolerability of safinamide in Chinese patients were similar to those in the other ethnic groups, without unexpected adverse reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Safinamide was shown to improve PD symptoms and quality of life in different ethnic populations, without any treatment by race interaction. Further studies are warranted to investigate potential differences in a real-life situation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

SETTLE (NCT00627640) and XINDI (NCT03881371).

Medical, surgical, and physical treatments for Parkinson's disease

Although dopamine replacement therapy remains a core component of Parkinson's disease treatment, the onset of motor fluctuations and dyskinetic movements might require a range of medical and surgical approaches from a multidisciplinary team, and important new approaches in the delivery of dopamine replacement are becoming available. The more challenging, wide range of non-motor symptoms can also have a major impact on the quality of life of a patient with Parkinson's disease, and requires careful multidisciplinary management using evidence-based knowledge, as well as appropriately tailored strategies according to the individual patient's needs. Disease-modifying therapies are urgently needed to prevent the development of the most disabling refractory symptoms, including gait and balance difficulties, cognitive impairment and dementia, and speech and swallowing impairments. In the third paper in this Series, we present the latest evidence supporting the optimal treatment of Parkinson's disease, and describe an expert approach to many aspects of treatment choice where an evidence base is insufficient.

Levodopa use in Australia: an analysis of Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme 10% data

Background

Levodopa remains the mainstay of treatment of Parkinson's disease, however, over time motor fluctuations and levodopa-induced dyskinesia develop, requiring add-on therapies to control emerging symptoms. To date, however, there is no clear consensus in Australia, or elsewhere, at which dose of levodopa that add-on therapies should be considered.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to examine the treatment patterns of patients with Parkinson's disease in Australia, with particular focus on levodopa doses at the time of first add-on.

Methods

This was a retrospective, observational, non-interventional study of patients with Parkinson's disease within the Australian Department of Human Services Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) 10% sample. Data on all reimbursed prescriptions (both general and concession), prescriber type and item code were extracted for patients who were dispensed at least three PBS reimbursed prescriptions for levodopa in the previous 12 months prescription from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2021.

Results

154 850 unique patients were included, of whom 42 330 (27%) commenced add-on therapy during the period. In the 12 months prior to add-on therapy, levodopa doses ranged from 100 mg/day to 1000 mg/day. The majority of patients were prescribed add-on therapy by a neurologist and approximately 40% of patients were prescribed levodopa doses of 600 mg/day or more prior to the first add-on therapy being initiated.

Conclusions

A large proportion of patients in Australia are managed with levodopa monotherapy doses that are considered high and many of these patients may benefit from the addition of add-on therapy to their regimen.

Trends and hotspots in non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease: a 10-year bibliometric analysis

Non-motor symptoms are prevalent among individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) and seriously affect patient quality of life, even more so than motor symptoms. In the past decade, an increasing number of studies have investigated non-motor symptoms in PD. The present study aimed to comprehensively analyze the global literature, trends, and hotspots of research investigating non-motor symptoms in PD through bibliometric methods. Studies addressing non-motor symptoms in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC), published between January 2013 and December 2022, were retrieved. Bibliometric methods, including the R package "Bibliometrix," VOS viewer, and CiteSpace software, were used to investigate and visualize parameters, including yearly publications, country/region, institution, and authors, to collate and quantify information. Analysis of keywords and co-cited references explored trends and hotspots. There was a significant increase in the number of publications addressing the non-motor symptoms of PD, with a total of 3,521 articles retrieved. The United States was ranked first in terms of publications (n = 763) and citations (n = 11,269), maintaining its leadership position among all countries. King's College London (United Kingdom) was the most active institution among all publications (n = 133) and K Ray Chaudhuri was the author with the most publications (n = 131). Parkinsonism & Related Disorders published the most articles, while Movement Disorders was the most cited journal. Reference explosions have shown that early diagnosis, biomarkers, novel magnetic resonance imaging techniques, and deep brain stimulation have become research "hotspots" in recent years. Keyword clustering revealed that alpha-synuclein is the largest cluster for PD. The keyword heatmap revealed that non-motor symptoms appeared most frequently (n = 1,104), followed by quality of life (n = 502), dementia (n = 403), and depression (n = 397). Results of the present study provide an objective, comprehensive, and systematic analysis of these publications, and identifies trends and "hot" developments in this field of research. This work will inform investigators worldwide to help them conduct further research and develop new therapies.

Safinamide for pain management in patients with Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

Pain is often neglected in Parkinson's disease (PD), although it impacts most PD patients. While the mechanism of pain in PD is still being studied, various pharmacological, interventional, and alternative treatment options have been offered for pain relief. Safinamide, a recently approved drug for PD, has shown promising results in improving pain in patients with PD. Several clinical studies report changes in pain scores in PD patients treated with safinamide, but these have not been systematically summarized. Therefore, our main goal was to perform a systematic review and statistical analysis of relevant studies.

METHODS

A systematic search of studies was conducted using four databases: Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Scopus. The nine included randomized controlled trials did not provide sufficient data for a meta-analysis; therefore, we conducted a qualitative systematic review.

RESULTS

Our results suggest that safinamide at a daily dose of 100mg is more effective for treating PD pain than that of 50mg. Moreover, the reduction in fluctuation-related pain and pain from edema was more consistent when treated with safinamide compared to other PD pain types. We also attempted to suggest a mechanism of action for safinamide on pain processing in the brain, which should be explored in more detail in future studies.

CONCLUSION

Clinical evidence suggests that safinamide may be particularly beneficial for PD patients experiencing fluctuation-related pain and pain from edema, as these subtypes of pain showed greater improvement compared to other types of pain. Based on the findings of the included studies, safinamide appears to relieve the overall pain burden. However, the lack of sufficient data for conducting a meta-analysis highlights the need for future studies to report mean pain scores and their standard deviations.

The effects of safinamide according to gender in Chinese parkinsonian patients

The incidence and prevalence of Parkinson's disease (PD) is expected to raise dramatically over the next decades. Gender-related differences are not yet widely recognized, particularly regarding the response to dopaminergic medications. To analyse gender differences in the clinical effects of safinamide, compared to placebo, in Chinese PD patients of the pivotal XINDI trial. The XINDI study was a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Patients were followed for 16 weeks receiving safinamide or placebo as add-on to levodopa. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the mean total daily OFF time. Secondary efficacy endpoints included total daily ON time, ON time with no/non-troublesome dyskinesia, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 items. A post-hoc analysis was performed to describe the efficacy of safinamide in both genders on motor symptoms, motor fluctuations and quality of life. 128 (42%) out of 305 patients enrolled were women and 177 (58%) men. Our additional analyses of the XINDI study have shown that safinamide, compared to placebo, was associated with improvements in motor symptoms, motor fluctuations and quality of life in both genders, with some differences in the response that did not reach statistical significance, possibly due to sample size limitation and post-hoc design of the study. The changes from baseline at week 16 were > 50% higher in the females compared to males for the total daily OFF time (- 1.149 h vs - 0.764 h in males), the total daily ON time (1.283 h vs 0.441 h in males), the UPDRS total score (- 8.300 points vs - 5.253 points in males) and the UPDRS part II score (- 2.574 points vs - 1.016 points in males). The changes from baseline at week 16 were higher in the females compared to males in the "ADL" domain (- 6.965 points vs - 5.772 points in males), the "Emotional well-being" domain (- 6.243 points vs - 4.203 in males), the "Stigma" domain (- 6.185 points vs - 4.913 points in males) and the "Bodily discomfort" domain (- 5.196 points vs 1.099 points in males), while were higher in males in the "Mobility" score (- 6.523 points vs - 4.961 points in females) and the "Communication" score (- 3.863 points vs - 1.564 points in females). Safinamide was shown to improve PD symptoms and quality of life in both male and female Chinese patients. Possible differences in the response between genders need to be further studied in larger and different ethnic populations.

Efficacy and Safety of MAO-B Inhibitors Safinamide and Zonisamide in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In Parkinson's disease, safinamide and zonisamide are novel monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors with a dual mechanism of action involving the inhibition of sodium and calcium channels and the subsequent release of glutamate. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the efficacy and safety of both drugs compared with placebo on motor symptoms, cognitive function, and quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, Scopus, PsycINFO, and trials registries up to March 2023 for randomized controlled trials of adults with Parkinson's disease administered either safinamide or zonisamide and published in English. We excluded single-arm trials or if neither the efficacy nor safety outcomes of interest were reported. Primary outcomes were the change from baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale section III (UPDRS-III) and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included a change from baseline in OFF-time, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 to evaluate quality of life, and Mini-Mental State Examination for cognitive function assessment. The meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4.1. Random-effect models were used to calculate the pooled mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses by medication, doses, Parkinson's disease stage, and risk of bias were conducted. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane's risk of bias tool. Sensitivity analysis was conducted, and publication bias were evaluated. This meta-analysis was not externally funded, and the protocol is available on the Open Science Framework Registration ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AMNP5 ).

RESULTS

Of 3570 screened citations, 16 trials met inclusion criteria (4314 patients with Parkinson's disease). Ten safinamide trials were conducted in several countries. Six zonisamide trials were included, five of which were conducted in Japan and one in India. UPDRS Part III scores were significantly lower with both monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors than with placebo (MD = -  2.18; 95% CI -  2.88 to -  1.49; I 2 =63%; n = 14 studies). A subgroup analysis showed a significant improvement in UPDRS-III in safinamide (MD = -  2.10; 95% CI -  3.09 to -  1.11; I2 = 71%; n = 8 studies) and zonisamide (MD = -  2.31; 95% CI -  3.35 to -  1.27; I2 = 52%; n = 6 studies) compared with placebo. Monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors significantly decreased OFF-time compared with placebo. No significant differences in cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination), whereas an improvement in quality of life (Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 scores) was observed. There was no significant difference in incidence rates of serious adverse events among all examined doses of zonisamide and safinamide compared with placebo. Two trials were reported as a high risk of bias and sensitivity analyses confirmed the primary analysis results.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence suggests that novel monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors not only improve motor symptoms but also enhance patients' quality of life. The meta-analysis showed that both medications have a similar safety profile to placebo with regard to serious adverse events. The overall findings emphasize the effectiveness of safinamide and zonisamide in the treatment of Parkinson's disease as adjunct therapy. Further long-term studies examining the impact of these medications on motor and non-motor symptoms are necessary.

Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Single and Multiple Oral Doses of Safinamide in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

This randomized, parallel-group study evaluated the plasma pharmacokinetic profile of safinamide in 24 healthy Chinese men and women, randomly assigned to receive 50 or 100 mg of safinamide as a single dose, followed, after a 7-day washout, by multiple doses once daily for 7 days. Plasma safinamide was determined up to 96 h after the first single dose (day 1) and the last multiple dose (day 14), and up to 24 h after the first multiple dose (day 8). Following single- and multiple-dose administration, peak concentrations were achieved at a median time of 1.5-2 h. Plasma exposure increased in a dose-proportional manner. After single dose, mean half-life was 23-24 h. Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero extrapolated to infinity was only slightly higher than AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration, corresponding for the 2 parameters, respectively, to 12,380 and 11,560 ng • h/mL for the 50 mg and to 22,030 and 20,790 ng • h/mL for the 100-mg dose. AUC in the dosing interval at steady state was 13,150 and 23,100 ng • h/mL for 50 and 100 mg of safinamide. Steady state was reached in 6 days, accumulation was approximately twofold, and the pharmacokinetics were time independent. The plasma safinamide pharmacokinetic profile observed in this study is in line with the published results in both Chinese and non-Asian populations.

Monoamine oxidase B inhibitors based on natural privileged scaffolds: A review of systematically structural modification

Monoamine oxidase is a flavin enzyme that catalyzes the oxidation of monoamine neurotransmitters in the brain. Various toxic by-products, aldehydes and hydrogen peroxide produced during the catalytic process, can cause oxidative stress and neuronal cell death. Overexpression of MAO-B and insufficient dopamine concentration are recognized as pathological factors in neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) including Parkinson's disease (PD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Therefore, the inhibition of MAO-B is an attractive target for the treatment of NDs. Despite significant efforts, few selective and reversible MAO-B inhibitors have been clinically approved. Natural products have emerged as valuable sources of lead compounds in drug discovery. Compounds such as chromone, coumarin, chalcone, caffeine, and aurone, present in natural structures, are considered as privileged scaffolds in the synthesis of MAO-B inhibitors. In this review, we summarized the structure-activity relationship (SAR) of MAO-B inhibitors based on the naturally privileged scaffolds over the past 20 years. Additionally, we proposed a balanced discussion on the advantages and limitations of natural scaffold-based MAO-B inhibitors with providing a future perspective in drug development.

Comparative efficacy and safety of adjunctive drugs to levodopa for fluctuating Parkinson's disease - network meta-analysis

It remains unclear which adjunctive drug for Parkinson's disease (PD) in combination with levodopa is more effective, tolerable, and safe. We aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety among anti-PD drugs from several classes in patients with fluctuating PD who received levodopa through network meta-analysis (NMA). Twelve anti-PD drugs belonging to 4 different drug classes (dopamine agonists, monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors, catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors, and an adenosine A2A receptor antagonist) were selected. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing placebo with anti-PD drug or among anti-PD drugs in patients with PD who experienced motor fluctuations or wearing-off and received levodopa. We included 54 RCTs in the analysis. The NMA was performed under a frequentist framework using a random-effects model. The efficacy outcome was change in daily off-time, and the tolerability outcome was discontinuation due to all causes. Safety outcomes included discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and the incidence of AEs, dyskinesia, hallucination, and orthostatic hypotension. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) in the NMA, ropinirole transdermal patch (SUCRA, 0.861) ranked the highest in efficacy, followed by pramipexole (0.762), ropinirole extended release (ER) (0.750), and safinamide (0.691). In terms of tolerability, ropinirole (0.954) ranked the highest, followed by pramipexole (0.857), safinamide (0.717), and ropinirole ER (0.708). Each anti-PD drug had different SUCRA ranking profiles for the safety outcomes. These findings suggest that ropinirole, pramipexole, and safinamide are well-balanced anti-PD drugs that satisfy both efficacy and tolerability outcomes.

Impact of Safinamide on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease

Introduction

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic and progressive neurodegenerative condition due to the degeneration of nigral dopaminergic cells. Both motor and non-motor symptoms (NMS) of PD produce a marked impairment in PD patients' quality of life (QoL), but contrary to motor features, NMS do not improve with dopamine replacement. Novel therapeutic interventions for PD have successfully controlled most motor manifestations of PD, but the management of NMS is still challenging. Since NMS have a negative impact on the QoL of PD patients, researchers are currently looking for drugs that can modulate the activity of neurotransmitter systems other than dopamine in the hope that can alleviate NMS in PD. Among the recently approved drugs for patients experiencing fluctuations in motor symptoms, safinamide stands out as an effective add-on therapy to levodopa. Safinamide is a monoamine oxidase type-B inhibitor (MAOB-I), with proven efficacy in reducing motor fluctuations. Its distinctive mechanism of action impacts dopaminergic pathways via MAOB inhibition and glutamatergic pathways by blocking sodium and calcium channels. Findings from Phase III clinical trials, meta-analysis, post-hoc analysis, and real-life experiences indicate that safinamide benefits motor symptoms such as tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, and gait. Additionally, it shows promise for improving NMS like fatigue, pain, mood, and sleep disturbances in patients with PD.

Areas Covered

In this article, the authors explore the impact of safinamide on patient-reported outcomes in PD. A thorough search was conducted on PubMed focusing on studies published between 2018 and 2023 in English. The inclusion criteria encompassed clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and reviews. The search strategy revolved around the implementation of MeSH terms related to safinamide and its impact on the quality of life in PD.

Conclusion

Our data strongly support the improving effect on QoL, reducing the disabling NMS reported in patients with PD.

Levodopa Prescription Patterns in Patients with Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Japanese Database Analysis

Prescription doses of levodopa in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) are generally lower in Japan than in the United States or Europe, although Japanese guidelines for the management of PD recommend increasing the dosage as the disease progresses. However, data regarding levodopa prescription practices in patients with advanced PD in the clinical setting are limited. This retrospective observational study analyzed patterns of drug use for patients with advanced PD in Japan using claims data from hospitalized patients in the Medical Data Vision Co. database. Eligible patients had at least two PD-associated claims in two different quarters between April 1, 2008, and November 30, 2018, and a 10-item activities of daily living score <60 upon hospital discharge (as a proxy for advanced PD). The primary endpoint was the prescribed dosage of levodopa at the index hospitalization. Dosages of other PD drugs (medications with an on-label indication for PD) and non-PD drugs were also assessed. Overall, 4029 patients met the inclusion criteria (mean age, 76.9 years; 83.3% aged ≥70 years). At the index date, 74.0% were receiving levodopa. Patients received a median of one PD drug in addition to levodopa, and 27.4% and 20.2% received one or two concomitant PD drugs, respectively. Patients received a median of two non-PD drugs. The median levodopa dosage and total levodopa equivalent dosage (LED) at the index hospitalization were 418.2 and 634.8 mg/day (adjusted for body weight, 9.0 and 13.7 mg/kg/day), respectively. The median levodopa and total LED dosage in each 6-month increment during the 5 years before and after the index date ranged between 263.9 and 330.2 mg/day (5.0 and 6.5 mg/kg/day) and 402.0 and 504.9 mg/day (8.3 and 10.1 mg/kg/day), respectively. This study suggests that many Japanese patients with advanced PD could receive more intensive treatment with higher doses of levodopa.

Establishment of a sensitive UPLC-MS/MS method to quantify safinamide in rat plasma

A fast, simple, and sensitive ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method was established for the quantification of safinamide in rat plasma. Plasma samples were treated with acetonitrile for protein precipitation, and diazepam was used as an internal standard (IS). The analytes were separated on an Acquity UPLC C18 (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.7 μm) chromatographic column with gradient elution using a mobile phase (0.1% formic acid-acetonitrile). Then, the eluates were detected by electrospray ionization (ESI) in positive ion mode. The analytes were quantified by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) using the transition m/z 303.3→215.0 of safinamide and m/z 285.0→154.0 of IS. Safinamide had good linearity in the concentration range of 1.0-2000 ng/mL, and the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was 1.0 ng/mL. The intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy of safinamide were less than 7.63%, while the average recovery rate was 92.98%-100.29%. The method was validated to be stable and had low noise, short chromatographic run time, wide linear range, small sample volumes, low sample injection volumes, and high sensitivity. Therefore, it can be used in pharmacokinetics and preclinical and clinical studies.

A Systematic Review of Pharmacological Interventions for Apathy in Aging Neurocognitive Disorders

OBJECTIVE

Apathy, a frequent neuropsychiatric symptom in aging neurocognitive disorders, has been associated with cognitive decline and functional disability. Therefore, timely provision of pharmacological interventions for apathy is greatly needed.

DESIGN

A systematical literature review of existing studies was conducted up to 30 May 2023 in several databases (PubMed, PsychInfo, Cochrane, Google Scholar, etc.) that included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses assessing pharmacological treatments for apathy in aging neurocognitive disorders. The quality of the studies was appraised.

RESULTS

In patients with Alzheimer's Disease (AD), donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, methylphenidate, and gingko biloba were proven efficacious for apathy, while rivastigmine, cognitive enhancer IRL752 and piribedil were found to be beneficial in patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) and agomelatine in patients with Frontotemporal Dementia (FD). The extensive proportion of RCTs in which apathy was used as a secondary outcome measure, along with the considerable methodological heterogeneity, did not allow the evaluation of group effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacological interventions for apathy in aging neurocognitive disorders are complex and under-investigated. The continuation of systematic research efforts and the provision of individualized treatment for patients suffering from these disorders is vital.

Clinical benefit of MAO-B and COMT inhibition in Parkinson's disease: practical considerations

Inhibitors of monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) are major strategies to reduce levodopa degradation and thus to increase and prolong its effect in striatal dopaminergic neurotransmission in Parkinson's disease patients. While selegiline/rasagiline and tolcapone/entacapone have been available on the market for more than one decade, safinamide and opicapone have been approved in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Meanwhile, comprehensive data from several post-authorization studies have described the use and specific characteristics of the individual substances in clinical practice under real-life conditions. Here, we summarize current knowledge on both medication classes, with a focus on the added clinical value in Parkinson's disease. Furthermore, we outline practical considerations in the treatment of motor fluctuations and provide an outlook on ongoing studies with MAO-B and COMT inhibitors.

The effects of safinamide on dysphagia in Parkinson's disease

Dysphagia is a potentially fatal symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD) and is characterized by frequent silent aspiration, a risk factor for aspiration pneumonia. The transdermal dopamine agonist rotigotine alleviates dysphagia in patients with PD and is more effective than oral levodopa, suggesting the importance of continuous dopaminergic stimulation (CDS) in swallowing. Safinamide is a monoamine oxidase B (MAOB) inhibitor that facilitates CDS. In this retrospective open-label evaluator-blinded research, swallowing functions in nine patients with PD were examined using a video fluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) before and after treatment with 50 mg of oral safinamide. The VFSS results showed that safinamide significantly improved some swallowing measures during oral and pharyngeal phases, including oral transit time and pharyngeal transit time, without worsening of any measures. Notably, improvements in lip closure, an oral phase component, seemed to be most attributable to improvements in oral phase scores. In conclusion, a medicine for CDS may effectively improve swallowing functions in patients with PD. This is the first study to show that the MAOB inhibitor safinamide partly but significantly improves swallowing function in patients with PD.

Comparative efficacy and safety of monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors plus channel blockers and monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors as adjuvant therapy to levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors plus channel blockers (MAO-BIs plus) are a new class of antiparkinsonian drug with additional mechanisms of action for their property as ion channel blockers. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of MAO-BIs plus and conventional MAO-BIs, as well as their corresponding doses, as adjuvant therapy to levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHOD

Randomized controlled trials enrolling PD patients treated with selegiline, rasagiline, safinamide or zonisamide as adjuvant therapy to levodopa were identified. Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Thirty-one randomized controlled trials comprising 7142 PD patients were included. Compared with levodopa monotherapy, the combination therapy of MAO-BIs and levodopa was significantly more effective, with a mean difference of 2.74 (1.26-4.18) on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III score change for selegiline, 2.67 (1.45-3.87) for safinamide, 2.2 (0.98-3.64) for zonisamide and 2.04 (1.24-2.87) for rasagiline. No significant difference was detected amongst MAO-BIs. The surface under the cumulative ranking results showed that safinamide 100 mg and rasagiline 1 mg ranked first in improving UPDRS III and UPDRS II, respectively. Zonisamide 100 mg ranked first in reducing OFF time. For safety outcomes, rasagiline was associated with a higher incidence of adverse events than placebo and safinamide. MAO-BIs plus had a higher probability of being safer agents compared to conventional MAO-BIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors plus, conventional MAO-BIs and the corresponding doses are similar in efficacy in PD treatment. MAO-BIs plus might be safer than conventional MAO-BIs. Head-to-head comparisons are needed for further investigation.

Sustained response in early responders to safinamide in patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations: A post hoc analysis of the SETTLE study

Safinamide is a selective, reversible, monoamine oxidase B inhibitor for the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and motor fluctuations. This was a post hoc analysis of the SETTLE study, in which patients with PD and motor fluctuations were randomly assigned to 24-week treatment with safinamide (50 mg/day for 2 weeks, increased to 100 mg/day if tolerated) or placebo. In the present analysis, responders were defined according to their treatment responses at Week 2 and Week 24 based on changes in ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia from baseline with cutoffs of 1 hour. It was found that 81% (103/127) of the responders at Week 2 maintained the response through Week 24 in the safinamide group. Other outcomes did not necessarily coincide with the ON-time response; however, “Early” responders who showed a treatment response at both Week 2 and Week 24 had substantial improvements from baseline in OFF-time, UPDRS Part II and III scores, and PDQ-39 summary index scores through Week 24. The safinamide group had a higher proportion of early responders than the placebo group (39% vs 20%, p &lt; 0.0001). At baseline, early responders in the safinamide group had significantly higher UPDRS Part II and III scores, shorter ON-time, and longer OFF-time than the other responder populations. In conclusion, the results of the present post hoc analysis suggest that patients with a short ON-time, severe motor symptoms, and highly compromised activities of daily living can benefit from safinamide early in treatment and over the long term.

Switching from Rasagiline to Safinamide as an Add-On Therapy Regimen in Patients with Levodopa: A Literature Review

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex disease, and the treatment is focused on the patient's clinical symptoms. Levodopa continues to be the most effective drug for symptomatic PD treatment. However, chronic levodopa treatment is associated with the development of motor complications in most patients. Add-on therapeutic drugs, such as dopamine agonists and monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitors, for example, safinamide and rasagiline, may be a desirable addition to continuously increase the levodopa dose for the optimization of motor control in PD. The scientific literature shows that safinamide significantly alleviated motor fluctuations with no increase in troublesome dyskinesia, thanks to its unique double mechanism, providing further benefits to fluctuating PD patients when compared to a placebo or other drugs. Switching from rasagiline to safinamide has been shown to improve the wearing-off phenomena, which is defined as the recurrent, predictable worsening of symptoms of parkinsonism at the end of the levodopa dose until the next dose reaches a clinical effect. In this situation, safinamide may be helpful for reducing the total daily dose of levodopa, improving the OFF time and ON time without troublesome dyskinesias, and being more effective than other MAO-B inhibitors. In this narrative review, we explore the switch from rasagiline to safinamide in patients with motor complications as a feasible and effective alternative to optimize antiparkinsonian treatment.

Recent Advances in Drug Therapy for Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease manifesting with motor and non-motor symptoms. Current treatment mainly relies on medication as a symptomatic therapy modulating neurotransmitters. Dopamine replacement therapy has been established, and levodopa is the gold standard for treatment of PD. However, the emergence of motor complications, such as a wearing-off phenomenon, is a clinical problem. Both primary symptoms and motor complications have been targets for the development of treatments for PD. Recent progression in the management of motor complications is supported by newly developed agents and advances in device and formulation technology to deliver drugs continuously. Elucidation of the pathophysiology of PD and the development of disease-modifying therapy that affects the underlying fundamental pathophysiology of the disease are also progressing. In this review, we introduce current knowledge on developments concerning medications for patients with PD.

Monoamine-oxidase Type B Inhibitors and Cognitive Functions in Parkinson's Disease: Beyond the Primary Mechanism of Action

Symptoms of cognitive impairment are rather common since the early stage of Parkinson's disease (PD); they aggravate with disease progression and may lead to dementia in a significant proportion of cases. Worsening of cognitive symptoms in PD patients depends on the progression of subcortical dopaminergic damage as well as the involvement of other brain neurotransmitter systems in cortical and subcortical regions. Beyond the negative impact on disability and quality of life, the presence and severity of cognitive symptoms may limit adjustments of dopamine replacement therapy along the disease course. This review focuses on the consequences of the administration of monoamine-oxidase type Binhibitors (MAOB-I) on cognition in PD patients. Two drugs (selegiline and rasagiline) are available for the treatment of motor symptoms of PD as monotherapy or in combination with L-DOPA or dopamine agonists in stable and fluctuating patients; a further drug (safinamide) is usable in fluctuating subjects solely. The results of available studies indicate differential effects according to disease stage and drug features. In early, non-fluctuating patients, selegiline and rasagiline ameliorated prefrontal executive functions, similarly to other dopaminergic drugs. Benefit on some executive functions was maintained in more advanced, fluctuating patients, despite the tendency of worsening prefrontal inhibitory control activity. Interestingly, high-dose safinamide improved inhibitory control in fluctuating patients. The benefit of high-dose safinamide on prefrontal inhibitory control mechanisms may stem from its dual mechanism of action, allowing reduction of excessive glutamatergic transmission, in turn secondary to increased cortical dopaminergic input.

[Effect of safinamide on morning-off phenomenon in elderly patients with Parkinson's disease]

AIM

Morning-off is a symptom experienced by patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), which markedly reduces patients' quality of life. The present study evaluated the effect of safinamide on morning-off in elderly PD patients.

METHODS

This observational study included 30 PD patients treated with 50 or 100 mg/day of safinamide in the evening. Using patient-reported outcomes, we evaluated the effect of safinamide on daily/morning ON-time, daily/morning OFF-time, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III score, and non-motor symptoms. Data at baseline (treatment start) and at 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks after baseline were recorded.

RESULTS

The PD patients (75.8±7.5 years old) in this study, who tended to be older than in previous phase 2/3 or 3 studies, may represent real-world Japanese PD patients. Compared with baseline, safinamide significantly increased the daily ON-time at eight weeks and morning ON-time at four weeks. Safinamide significantly reduced the daily OFF-time and morning OFF-time at four weeks. The UPDRS Part III score was significantly reduced by 1 point at 12 weeks. Safinamide showed a tendency to reduce non-motor symptoms, such as anxiety, pain, and depressive feelings. There was no marked difference in these parameters between patients treated with 50 and 100 mg of safinamide.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that safinamide administered in the evening can benefit elderly patients who experience wearing off, especially morning off, and non-motor symptoms.

The Efficacy of Safinamide in the Management of Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease that is challenging to treat due to its progressive nature and its weaning response to therapy. Safinamide, a monoamine oxidase type-B inhibitor (MAOB-I), has shown promise in managing dyskinesias caused by levodopa (L-dopa), carbidopa, and PD features such as pain and depression. This systematic review aimed to evaluate safinamide's efficacy as a monotherapy and an add-on in tackling these issues. We composed this systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Our group searched the following databases: Manchester University Library, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, PubMed, PubMed Central, and MedLine for articles produced in the last ten years using various search terms and criteria, which we outlined in the search strategy and eligibility criteria sections. We excluded 722 out of the initially screened 730 records for multiple reasons, such as titles and abstracts being irrelevant to the topic, articles without free full access, articles originally not in the English language, and articles that did not score 70% or above on their respective quality assessment tools. The studies explored supported safinamide's use in managing motor fluctuations, pain, depression, and improving patients' quality of life.

Collective Expert Perspectives on the Use of Safinamide as Adjunctive Therapy for Parkinson’s Disease: Online-Based Delphi Survey

Background. Safinamide is a selective, reversible monoamine oxidase-B inhibitor with a sodium channel inhibitory effect. Published clinical evidence supports safinamide as an effective therapy for Parkinson’s disease (PD) with wearing-off. However, to date, no consensus recommendations have been available to guide physicians in Asia on the optimal use of safinamide in clinical practice. To summarize opinions on the optimal patient profile and methods of using safinamide in common clinical scenarios, Japanese movement disorder specialists with expertise in PD investigated the perspectives of neurologists and neurosurgeons. Methods. The Delphi panel approach was used to summarize the opinions of panelists. The panel comprised doctors from Japan with extensive clinical practice experience in the use of safinamide (n = 46 at the final round). The consensus was defined as 80% or more agreement between panelists for each scenario at the final round. Results. There was a high level of agreement that patients with the following symptoms are suitable for safinamide treatment such as bradykinesia (100%), rigidity (95.7%), and/or gait disorder (89.1%) based on motor symptoms and PD-related pain (97.8%) and/or depression or apathy (93.5%) based on non-motor symptoms. Morning-off (95.7%), but not dyskinesia (71.7%), also reached consensus. The use of high-dose safinamide (100 mg/day) was recommended when the improvement in PD symptoms is insufficient and increasing the doses of other anti-PD medications is difficult (97.8%) or when the abovementioned non-motor symptoms adversely affect daily life (93.5%). Conclusions. This report provides expert perspectives on the use of safinamide for a wide range of clinical scenarios in Japan.

Newly Approved and Investigational Drugs for Motor Symptom Control in Parkinson's Disease

Motor symptoms are a core feature of Parkinson's disease (PD) and cause a significant burden on patients' quality of life. Oral levodopa is still the most effective treatment, however, the motor benefits are countered by inherent pharmacologic limitations of the drug. Additionally, with disease progression, chronic levodopa leads to the appearance of motor complications including motor fluctuations and dyskinesia. Furthermore, several motor abnormalities of posture, balance, and gait may become less responsive to levodopa. With these unmet needs and our evolving understanding of the neuroanatomic and pathophysiologic underpinnings of PD, several advances have been made in defining new therapies for motor symptoms. These include newer levodopa formulations and drug delivery systems, refinements in adjunctive medications, and non-dopaminergic treatment strategies. Although some are in early stages of development, these novel treatments potentially widen the available options for the management of motor symptoms allowing clinicians to provide an individually tailored care for PD patients. Here, we review the existing and emerging interventions for PD with focus on newly approved and investigational drugs for motor symptoms, motor fluctuations, dyskinesia, and balance and gait dysfunction.

Effects of MAO-B inhibitors on non-motor symptoms and quality of life in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review

Non-motor symptoms (NMS) are common among patients with Parkinson's disease and reduce patients' quality of life (QOL). However, there remain considerable unmet needs for NMS management. Three monoamine oxidase B inhibitors (MAO-BIs), selegiline, rasagiline, and safinamide, have become commercially available in many countries. Although an increasing number of studies have reported potential beneficial effects of MAO-BIs on QOL and NMS, there has been no consensus. Thus, the primary objective of this study was to provide an up-to-date systematic review of the QOL and NMS outcomes from the available clinical studies of MAO-BIs. We conducted a literature search using the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases in November 2021. We identified 60 publications relevant to this topic. Overall, rasagiline and safinamide had more published evidence on QOL and NMS changes compared with selegiline. This was likely impacted by selegiline being introduced many years prior to the field embarking on the study of NMS. The impact of MAO-BIs on QOL was inconsistent across studies, and this was unlikely to be clinically meaningful. MAO-BIs may potentially improve depression, sleep disturbances, and pain. In contrast, cognitive and olfactory dysfunctions are likely unresponsive to MAO-BIs. Given the paucity of evidence and controlled, long-term studies, the effects of MAO-BIs on fatigue, autonomic dysfunctions, apathy, and ICD remain unclear. The effects of MAO-BIs on static and fluctuating NMS have never been investigated systematically. More high-quality studies will be needed and should enable clinicians to provide personalized medicine based on a non-motor symptom profile.

Opicapone versus placebo in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuation-associated pain: rationale and design of the randomised, double-blind OCEAN (OpiCapone Effect on motor fluctuations and pAiN) trial

Background

Optimisation of dopaminergic therapy may alleviate fluctuation-related pain in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Opicapone (OPC) is a third-generation, once-daily catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor shown to be generally well tolerated and efficacious in reducing OFF-time in two pivotal trials in patients with PD and end-of-dose motor fluctuations. The OpiCapone Effect on motor fluctuations and pAiN (OCEAN) trial aims to investigate the efficacy of OPC 50 mg in PD patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuations and associated pain, when administered as adjunctive therapy to existing treatment with levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCi).

Methods

OCEAN is a Phase IV, international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, interventional trial in PD patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuations and associated pain. It consists of a 1-week screening period, 24-week double-blind treatment period and 2-week follow-up period. Eligible patients will be randomised 1:1 to OPC 50 mg or placebo once daily while continuing current treatment with levodopa/DDCi and other chronic, stable anti-PD and/or analgesic treatments. The primary efficacy endpoint is change from baseline in Domain 3 (fluctuation-related pain) of the King’s Parkinson’s disease Pain Scale (KPPS). The key secondary efficacy endpoint is change from baseline in Domain B (anxiety) of the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Non-Motor rating Scale (MDS-NMS). Additional secondary efficacy assessments include other domains and total scores of the KPPS and MDS-NMS, the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8), the MDS-sponsored Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Parts III and IV, Clinical and Patient’s Global Impressions of Change, and change in functional status via Hauser’s diary. Safety assessments include the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. The study will be conducted in approximately 140 patients from 50 clinical sites in Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom. Recruitment started in February 2021 and the last patient is expected to complete the study by late 2022.

Discussion

The OCEAN trial will help determine whether the use of adjunctive OPC 50 mg treatment can improve fluctuation-associated pain in PD patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuations. The robust design of OCEAN will address the current lack of reliable evidence for dopaminergic-based therapy in the treatment of PD-associated pain.

Trial registration

EudraCT number 2020–001175-32; registered on 2020-08-07.

The Effects of Safinamide Adjunct Therapy on Depression and Apathy in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: Post-hoc Analysis of a Japanese Phase 2/3 Study

Background and Purpose

Neuropsychiatric symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) have been shown to significantly affect quality of life (QOL). We investigated the impact of safinamide on depression and apathy when administered as an adjunct to levodopa in Japanese patients with PD.

Methods

This was a post-hoc analysis of data from a phase 2/3 clinical study of safinamide in Japanese patients with PD experiencing wearing-off (JapicCTI-153056; https://www.clinicaltrials.jp/cti-user/trial/ShowDirect.jsp?japicId=JapicCTI-153056). Patients received placebo, safinamide 50 mg, or safinamide 100 mg as an adjunct therapy. The endpoints for this analysis were changes from baseline to Week 24 in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part I item 3 (depression) and item 4 (apathy) scores and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) “emotional well-being” domain score. Subgroup analyses investigated the relationship between neuropsychologic symptoms and improvements in motor fluctuation and assessed which patient populations might be expected to obtain neuropsychologic benefit from safinamide.

Results

Compared with placebo, safinamide (both doses) significantly improved UPDRS Part I item 3 scores in the overall analysis population, and the 100-mg dose improved UPDRS Part I item 4 scores in the population with apathy at baseline. Changes in the PDQ-39 “emotional well-being” score showed numerical, but not significant, dose-related improvements. Notable reductions in depression were associated with a change in daily ON-time ≥1 h, pain during OFF-time at baseline, and female sex.

Conclusions

The results from this post-hoc analysis of the Japanese phase 2/3 study suggest that safinamide could bring benefits to patients with PD who have mild depression, pain during the OFF phase. In addition, safinamide might provide particular benefits for patients with PD who have mild apathy and female.

The XINDI Study: A Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide as Add-On Therapy to Levodopa in Chinese Patients with Parkinson's Disease with Motor Fluctuations

BACKGROUND

Levodopa remains the gold standard for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, but its long-term use is associated with motor complications whose management is still a significant challenge. Safinamide is a multimodal drug with proven efficacy as an adjunct to levodopa.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of safinamide as an add-on to levodopa in Chinese patients with Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations.

METHODS

The XINDI study was a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, with a 2-week screening period and a 16-week treatment period. The starting dose of safinamide (or placebo) was 50 mg once daily, increased to 100 mg once daily at day 15. Patients aged ≥  18 years, with idiopathic Parkinson's disease of &gt;3 years duration, Hoehn and Yahr stage 1-4, and daily OFF time ≥  1.5 h, were eligible. Patients should follow a stable oral levodopa regimen and may receive concomitant treatment with stable doses of other anti-Parkinson drugs, except monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors. Patients with severe disabling peak-dose or biphasic dyskinesia, unpredictable or widely swinging fluctuations, other forms of parkinsonism, a history of dementia or severe cognitive dysfunction, major psychiatric illnesses, and/or clinically significant medical illnesses were excluded. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline to week 16 in the mean daily OFF time. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, the Numerical Rating Scale, the Clinical Global Impression scale, and the 39-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire scale. The statistical analysis of the efficacy parameters was conducted using an analysis of co-variance, except for the Clinical Global Impression scale scores that were assessed using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Safety was evaluated through the frequency of adverse events and serious adverse events, physical examination, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiograms, and laboratory exams. All safety endpoints were summarized using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

The trial enrolled 307 patients. At week 16, the difference in the change of the mean total daily OFF time between safinamide and placebo groups was 1.10 h (p &lt; 0.0001). This change was significantly greater in the safinamide group starting from week 2, suggesting a rapid onset of drug efficacy. ON time, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impression scale, and the 39-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire showed statistically significant improvements. There were no significant between-group differences for adverse events or serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Safinamide, as add-on therapy to levodopa, significantly reduced motor fluctuations and improved motor symptoms and quality of life of Chinese patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. The improvements observed in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale total and motor scores were also clinically significant. No safety concerns were identified, confirming the good tolerability profile of the drug.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03881371, registered on 19 March, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/NCT03881371 .

Monoamine Oxidase-B Inhibitors for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: Past, Present, and Future

Monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibitors are commonly used for the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). MAO-B inhibitor monotherapy has been shown to be effective and safe for the treatment of early-stage PD, while MAO-B inhibitors as adjuvant drugs have been widely applied for the treatment of the advanced stages of the illness. MAO-B inhibitors can effectively improve patients' motor and non-motor symptoms, reduce "OFF" time, and may potentially prevent/delay disease progression. In this review, we discuss the effects of MAO-B inhibitors on motor and non-motor symptoms in PD patients, their mechanism of action, and the future development of MAO-B inhibitor therapy.

Characteristics of wearing-off and motor symptoms improved by safinamide adjunct therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease: A post hoc analysis of a Japanese phase 2/3 study

INTRODUCTION

Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience various motor and non-motor symptoms. We conducted a post hoc analysis of a Japanese phase 2/3 study of safinamide (50 or 100 mg/day) in patients with Parkinson's disease and wearing-off to evaluate response according to background factors. Safinamide efficacy against major motor symptoms was also assessed.

METHODS

Multiple regression analyses in safinamide-treated patients (50 or 100 mg/day) assessed changes in daily ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia (hereafter referred to as ON-time) according to baseline clinical variables. Subgroup analyses by baseline Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III score were also conducted. We evaluated cardinal motor symptoms using the UPDRS.

RESULTS

In the multiple regression analysis, changes in ON-time were related to baseline non-motor symptoms (UPDRS part I score) and ON-time in the 50-mg group, but no relationships with non-motor symptoms were observed in the 100-mg group. Additionally, in the subgroup analysis of patients with more severe motor symptoms (UPDRS part III score > 20), a significant improvement in ON-time was observed only with 100 mg/day (p = 0.01). At both doses, safinamide significantly improved cardinal motor symptom scores (bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, axial symptoms, and gait disturbances).

CONCLUSIONS

The observed response profile to the 50-mg/day dose may be related to baseline non-motor symptoms, but this was not true for the 100-mg/day dose. Both safinamide doses improved major motor symptoms in levodopa-treated patients with PD.

Zonisamide improves wearing off in Parkinson's disease without exacerbating dyskinesia: Post hoc analysis of phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Although phase 2 and 3 clinical trials in Japan showed that zonisamide improved wearing off in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), no studies to date have evaluated whether zonisamide improves wearing off in patients with PD without exacerbating dyskinesia. Therefore, we examined this hypothesis in a post hoc analysis of pooled data from the previous phase 2 and 3 trials.

METHODS

Both trials evaluated zonisamide 25 mg and 50 mg versus placebo during a 12-week treatment period. In our analysis, primary efficacy variables were adjusted mean change in wearing off (evaluated as change in "off" time) and dyskinesia from baseline to 12 weeks. Dyskinesia was evaluated using Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part 4 items 32 (4-32; duration of dyskinesia) and 33 (4-33; disability of dyskinesia) score. Criteria outcomes included rates of patients meeting specific criteria based on off time plus UPDRS part 4-32 or 4-33.

RESULTS

A total of 212 patients were included in this analysis. Zonisamide 50 mg significantly reduced off time and UPDRS part 4-33 score at week 12 versus placebo without increasing UPDRS part 4-32 score. The proportion of patients receiving zonisamide 50 mg who met the criterion "Off time decreased and UPDRS part 4-33 score did not increase" was significantly higher than that of patients receiving placebo.

CONCLUSION

Zonisamide improves wearing off without exacerbating dyskinesia in Japanese patients with PD. Moreover, zonisamide 50 mg may improve dyskinesia. Further studies are needed to prospectively determine the benefits and clinical relevance of zonisamide on dyskinesia.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of safinamide as an add-on treatment to levodopa for parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

While levodopa is still the most effective treatment for Parkinson's disease, concerns about long-term complications such as wearing-off and dyskinesia with levodopa usage remain.

AREAS COVERED

Safinamide is a highly selective and reversible monoamine oxidase B inhibitor introduced in the European Union, Japan, and the United States as an adjunctive agent to levodopa in PD patients with motor fluctuation. This review outlines the pharmacological properties, therapeutic effects, and tolerability of safinamide as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with advanced PD. Efficacy and safety findings from double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical trials for safinamide as an adjunct therapy to levodopa for PD are summarized.

EXPERT OPINION

Safinamide was well tolerated as a treatment for PD, and there was no significant difference in the frequency and severity of adverse events between the safinamide and placebo groups. It was also suggested that safinamide had a beneficial effect on the accompanying non-motor symptoms such as PD-related pain. Safinamide may exhibit neuroprotective effects through antioxidant and anti-glutamate effects, and research on the disease-modifying effect of PD is desired in the future.

Effects of safinamide adjunct therapy on pain in patients with Parkinson's disease: Post hoc analysis of a Japanese phase 2/3 study

INTRODUCTION

The non-dopaminergic and dopaminergic actions of safinamide may alleviate pain in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We investigated the efficacy of safinamide for pain when administered as an adjunct to levodopa in Japanese patients with PD.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of a phase 2/3 clinical study of safinamide in Japanese patients with PD who were experiencing wearing-off. Pain was assessed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II 'sensory symptoms' item 17, on a scale of 0-4, and the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) 'bodily discomfort' domain score. Subgroup analyses, according to baseline symptoms and concomitant medications, were also performed.

RESULTS

Least square (LS) mean changes in the UPDRS item 17 score from baseline to Week 24 in the placebo, safinamide 50-mg and safinamide 100-mg groups during the OFF phase were 0.08, -0.15 (p = 0.0133 vs placebo) and -0.18 (p = 0.0054), respectively, and during the ON phase were 0.04, -0.08 (p = 0.0529) and -0.08 (p = 0.0505), respectively. Changes from baseline to Week 24 in PDQ-39 'bodily discomfort' scores were not significantly different in safinamide groups vs placebo. The presence of moderate-to-severe bradykinesia or early-morning dystonia at baseline resulted in numerically greater effect sizes in UPDRS item 17 scores during the OFF phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Safinamide 50 mg and 100 mg reduced the UPDRS item 17 score in patients with PD, especially during the OFF phase. Patients with moderate-to-severe bradykinesia and early-morning dystonia may benefit from safinamide treatment.

Effects of safinamide on pain in patients with fluctuating Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Non-motor symptoms (NMS) are integral to Parkinson's Disease (PD) and management remains a challenge. Safinamide is a novel molecule in relation to addressing NMS due to its multifocal mechanism of action with both dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic properties.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of safinamide on NMS and its burden in PD patients with motor fluctuations after 6 months of treatment.

METHODS

This observational, multicenter, open-label, pilot study assessed a wide range of NMS using the following rating scales, NMSS (non-motor symptom scale), KPPS (King's PD pain scale), HADS (hospital anxiety and depression scale), PDQ-8 (Parkinson's disease quality of life questionnaire), and PDSS-2 (Parkinson's disease sleep scale), EuroQol-5D 3 level version (EQ-5D-3L), CGI-I (clinical global impression of improvement), and PGI-C (patient global impression of change). Motor examination using UPDRS part III (Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale, motor examination), UPDRS IV (complications of therapy) and Hoehn and Yahr staging were also obtained.

RESULTS

27 patients were included in the analysis and were evaluated at baseline and ≥ 6 months after safinamide treatment. 26 patients had a daily maintenance dose of 100 mg and 1 patient a daily dose of 50 mg. Significant improvements in UPDRS IV, KPPS item 5 (region-specific "off" dystonia), KPPS domain 3 (items 4-6, fluctuation related pain) and KPPS total score were observed after treatment with safinamide, while maintaining stable dopaminergic medication. No statistically significant differences were found in NMSS, HADS, PDSS-2, EQ-5D-3L, and PDQ-8 after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that safinamide may have a beneficial effect on pain, a key unmet need in fluctuating PD patients.

The Current Evidence for the Use of Safinamide for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease

Introduction

Parkinson’s therapeutic interventions are only symptomatic. An optimal treatment should therefore address the largest number of motor and non-motor symptoms, to manage patients at best. Safinamide is one of the most recent approved drugs for fluctuating patients, in add-on to levodopa, that remains the gold standard treatment. It has a unique mechanism of action, both dopaminergic (as MAO-B inhibitor) and glutamatergic (through Na⁺ channel blockade). Results from Phase III trials, post-hoc analyses and real-life experiences suggest a beneficial effect on motor (such as tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity and gait) and non-motor (pain, mood, sleep) symptoms.

Areas Covered

Here, the authors discuss clinical efficacy and safety of safinamide, identifying the patients’ profiles that could benefit most. A search in PubMed was performed in September 2020, with no time limits. Publications’ abstracts were reviewed.

Conclusion

Safinamide is peculiar due to its double mechanism of action. Its benefits in improving motor functions and fluctuations, and some non-motor symptoms, could have a valuable impact on patients’ quality of life (QoL), together with its safety profile.

The role of glutamatergic neurotransmission in the motor and non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease: Clinical cases and a review of the literature

Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system and, as such, many brain regions, including the basal ganglia, are rich in glutamatergic neurons. The importance of the basal ganglia in the control of voluntary movement has long been recognised, with the effect of dysfunction of the region exemplified by the motor symptoms seen in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the basal ganglia and the associated glutamatergic system also play a role in the modulation of emotion, nociception and cognition, dysregulation of which result in some of the non-motor symptoms of PD (depression/anxiety, pain and cognitive deficits). Thus, while the treatment of PD has traditionally been approached from the perspective of dopaminergic replacement, using agents such as levodopa and dopamine receptor agonists, the glutamatergic system offers a novel treatment target for the disease. Safinamide has been approved in over 20 countries globally for fluctuating PD as add-on therapy to levodopa regimens for the management of 'off' episodes. The drug has both dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic pharmacological effects, the latter including inhibition of abnormal glutamate release. The effect of safinamide on the glutamatergic system might present some advantages over dopamine-based therapies for PD by providing efficacy for motor (levodopa-induced dyskinesia) as well as non-motor (anxiety, mood disorders, pain) symptoms. In this article, we discuss the potential role of glutamatergic inhibition on these symptoms, using illustrative real-world examples of patients we have treated with safinamide.

Overall Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and a Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Safinamide is a novel anti-parkinsonian drug with possible anti-dyskinetic properties. Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex disease. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of safinamide administration compared to placebo in PD patients on multiple outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, LILACS, and trial databases were searched up to 23 December 2020 for randomized controlled studies (RCTs) comparing safinamide to placebo, alone or as add-on therapy in PD. Data were extracted from literature and regulatory agencies. Primary outcomes were ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia, OFF-time, and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) section III (UPDRS-III). Secondary outcomes included any dyskinesia rating scale (DRS), ON-time with troublesome dyskinesia, UPDRS-II, and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 (PDQ-39). In order to estimate mean difference (MD) and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI), generic inverse variance and Mantel-Haenszel methods were used for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Analyses were performed grouping by PD with (PDwMF) or without (PDwoMF) motor fluctuations, safinamide dose, and concomitant dopaminergic treatment. Summary of findings with GRADE were performed.

RESULTS

Six studies with a total of 2792 participants were identified. In PDwMF patients, safinamide 100 mg as add-on to levodopa (L-dopa) significantly increased ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia (MD = 0.95 h; 95% CI from 0.41 to 1.49), reduced OFF-time (MD = - 1.06 h; 95% CI from - 1.60 to - 0.51), and improved UPDRS-III (MD = - 2.77; 95% CI from - 4.27 to - 1.28) with moderate quality of evidence. Similar results were observed for the 50 mg dose. However, the quality of evidence was moderate only for ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia, whereas for OFF-time and UPDRS-III was low. In PDwoMF patients taking a single dopamine agonist, safinamide 100 mg resulted in little to no clinically significant improvement in UPDRS-III (MD = - 1.84; 95% CI from - 3.19 to - 0.49), with moderate quality of evidence. Conversely, in PDwoMF patients, the 200 mg and 50 mg doses showed nonsignificant improvement in UPDRS-III, with very low and moderate quality of evidence, respectively. In PDwMF patients taking safinamide 100 mg or 50 mg, nonsignificant differences were observed for ON-time with troublesome dyskinesia and DRS, with high and low quality of evidence, respectively. In the same patients, UPDRS-II was significantly improved at the 100 mg and 50 mg dose, with high and moderate quality of evidence. In PDwoMF, UPDRS-II showed a little yet significant difference only at 100 mg, with low quality of evidence. PDQ-39 resulted significantly improved only with the 100 mg dose in PDwMF, with low quality of evidence.

CONCLUSION

Overall, safinamide is effective in PDwMF patients taking L-dopa both at 100 and 50 mg daily. Evidence for efficacy in early PD is limited. Further trials are needed to better evaluate the anti-dyskinetic properties of safinamide.

Safinamide Improves Non-Motor Symptoms Burden in Parkinson's Disease: An Open-Label Prospective Study

Some studies observed a benefit of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients after treatment with safinamide in some non-motor symptoms (NMSs). The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of safinamide on NMS burden in PD. SAFINONMOTOR (an open-label study of the effectiveness of safinamide on non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease patients) is a prospective open-label single-arm study conducted in five centers from Spain. The primary efficacy outcome was the change from baseline (V1) to the end of the observational period (6 months) (V4) in the non-motor symptoms scale (NMSS) total score. Between May/2019 and February/2020 50 patients were included (age 68.5 ± 9.12 years; 58% females; 6.4 ± 5.1 years from diagnosis). At 6 months, 44 patients completed the follow-up (88%). The NMSS total score was reduced by 38.5% (from 97.5 ± 43.7 in V1 to 59.9 ± 35.5 in V4; p < 0.0001). By domains, improvement was observed in sleep/fatigue (-35.8%; p = 0.002), mood/apathy (-57.9%; p < 0.0001), attention/memory (-23.9%; p = 0.026), gastrointestinal symptoms (-33%; p = 0.010), urinary symptoms (-28.3%; p = 0.003), and pain/miscellaneous (-43%; p < 0.0001). Quality of life (QoL) also improved with a 29.4% reduction in the PDQ-39SI (from 30.1 ± 17.6 in V1 to 21.2 ± 13.5 in V4; p < 0.0001). A total of 21 adverse events in 16 patients (32%) were reported, 5 of which were severe (not related to safinamide). Dyskinesias and nausea were the most frequent (6%). Safinamide is well tolerated and improves NMS burden and QoL in PD patients with severe or very severe NMS burden at 6 months.

Impact of SAfinamide on Depressive Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease Patients (SADness-PD Study): A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the effects of safinamide on depression, motor symptoms, and the serotonin syndrome related to its co-administration with antidepressants in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients at 1 and 3 months of follow-up compared to baseline.

RESULTS

n = 82 (safinamide 50 mg = 22, 100 mg = 60, with antidepressants = 44). First, we found improvement in depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: -6 ± 5.10 at 1 month and -7.27 ± 5.10 at 3 months, p < 0.0001; Patient Global Impression of Improvement Scale: 60.3% and 69.5% of patients at 1 and 3 months reported some improvement). Second, safinamide improved the daily life activities and motor symptoms/motor complications (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-II): -2.51 ± 6.30 and -2.47 ± 6.11 at 1 and 3 months, p < 0.0001; III: -3.58 ± 8.68 and -4.03 ± 8.95 at 1 and 3 months, p < 0.0001; IV: -0.61 ± 2.61 and -0.8 ± 2.53 at 1 and 3 months, p < 0.0001). Third, 7.31% and 8.53% of patients developed non-severe adverse events related to safinamide at 1 and 3 months. Serotonin syndrome was not observed in the patients treated with antidepressants; some isolated serotonin syndrome symptoms were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Safinamide could be useful for treating depression in PD; it was effective for motor symptoms and motor complications and safe even when co-administered with antidepressants.

Long-term safety and efficacy of safinamide as add-on therapy in levodopa-treated Japanese patients with Parkinson's disease with wearing-off: Results of an open-label study

INTRODUCTION

Safinamide, a selective, reversible monoamine oxidase B inhibitor with a sodium channel inhibitory effect, improves symptoms in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). This study aimed to confirm the long-term safety and efficacy of safinamide in Japanese PD patients with wearing-off.

METHODS

Japanese PD patients aged ≥30 years with wearing-off were eligible. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in the mean daily ON-time without troublesome dyskinesias at 52 weeks of treatment. Other efficacy endpoints included changes from baseline in mean daily OFF-time and unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) and PDQ-39 scores.

RESULTS

In total, 203 patients entered the study, and 142 completed the 52-week treatment. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 78.3% of patients, with nasopharyngitis (20.7%) and dyskinesias (17.7%) as the most common; serious AEs occurred in 17.2%, causing discontinuation in 10.8%. At Week 52, the mean daily ON-time without troublesome dyskinesias increased from baseline by 1.42 h. Change from baseline in mean daily OFF-time was -1.40 h, and that in the UPDRS Part III score in the ON-phase was -6.20.

CONCLUSIONS

As adjunctive treatment with levodopa, safinamide was safe, well tolerated, and effective in improving ON-time and other PD symptoms at 52 weeks.

[Safinamide Mesilate (Equfina® TABLETS 50 mg): preclinical and clinical pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety]

Parkinson's disease is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the degenerative loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. Dopamine deficiency is thought to disrupt motor control of the basal ganglia and cause characteristic motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease such as bradykinesia, akinesia, and tremor. Therefore, dopamine replacement therapy is widely used in the clinical setting. Safinamide is a novel, selective, and reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase B expected to increase dopamine levels in the brain and improve the symptoms of Parkinson's disease. In addition, safinamide shows non-dopaminergic actions such as sodium channel blockade and inhibition of glutamate release. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that safinamide ameliorates "wearing off" symptoms after administration in rat and monkey models with selectively destroyed dopaminergic neurons. In the monkeys, safinamide concurrently inhibited levodopa-induced dyskinesia. These findings suggest that safinamide not only increases the dopaminergic effect of levodopa, but also reduces levodopa-induced adverse events via its non-dopaminergic effects. In clinical trials of patients with Parkinson's disease with the "wearing off" phenomenon, safinamide has been found to prolong the "on time" and improve motor function as assessed by Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III. In Japan, safinamide was approved in September 2019 as a levodopa combination drug for Parkinson's disease with "wearing off" phenomenon. Safinamide is therefore expected to be a new treatment option for patients with Parkinson's disease.