The effect of Clinical Practice Guidelines on prescribing practice in mental health: A systematic review

Availability and barriers to access post-stroke rehabilitation in Latin America

OBJECTIVES

To describe the availability and barriers to access post-stroke rehabilitation services in Latin America.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a multi-national survey in Latin American countries. The survey consisted of three sections: (1) the national state of post-stroke rehabilitation; (2) the local state of post-stroke rehabilitation; and (3) the coverage and financing of post-stroke services. Stroke leaders from the surveyed countries were involved in developing and disseminating the survey.

RESULTS

261 responses were collected from 17 countries. The mean age of respondents was 42.4 ± 10.1 years, and 139 (54.5 %) of the respondents were male. National clinical guidelines for post-stroke rehabilitation were reported by 67 (25.7 %) of the respondents. However, there were discrepancies between respondents within the same country. Stroke units, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, and neuropsychological therapy services were less common in public than private settings. The main barriers for inpatient and outpatient services included limited rehabilitation facilities, coverage, and rehabilitation personnel. The main source of financing for the inpatient and outpatient services was the national health insurance, followed by out-of-pocket payments. Private and out-of-pocket costs were more frequently reported in outpatient services.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-stroke rehabilitation services in Latin American countries are restricted due to a lack of coverage by the public health system and private insurers, human resources, and financial aid. Public settings offer fewer post-stroke rehabilitation services compared to private settings. Developing consensus guidelines, increasing coverage, and using innovative approaches to deliver post-stroke rehabilitation is paramount to increase access without posing a financial burden.

Response rates to sequential trials of antipsychotic medications according to algorithms or treatment guidelines in psychotic disorders. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is a relative lack of research evaluating the outcomes when treatment guidelines or algorithms for psychotic disorders are followed. This systematic review and meta-analysis determined the response rates to antipsychotic medications at different stages of these algorithms and whether these response rates differ in first episode cohorts.

METHODS

Data sources: A systematic search strategy was conducted across four databases PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO (Ovid) and CINAHL. Studies that had sequential trials of different antipsychotic medications were included. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed using random effects models and sub-group analysis in first episode psychosis studies.

RESULTS

Of the 4078 unique articles screened, fourteen articles, from nine unique studies, were eligible and included 2522 participants. The proportion who experienced a response to any antipsychotic in the first stage of an algorithm was 0.53 (95 % C.I.:0.38,0.68) and this decreased to 0.26 (95 % C.I.:0.15,0.39) in the second stage. When clozapine was used in the third stage, the proportion that achieved a response was 0.43 (95 % C.I. 0.19, 0.69) compared to 0.26 (95 % C.I.:0.05,0.54) if a different antipsychotic was used. Four studies included 907 participants with a first episode of psychosis and the proportions that achieved a response were: 1st stage: 0.63 (95 % C.I.: 0.45, 0.79); 2nd stage: 0.34 (95 % C.I.:0.16,0.55); clozapine 3rd stage: 0.45 (95 % C.I.:0.0,0.97), different antipsychotic 3rd stage: 0.15 (95 % C.I.,0.01,0.37).

DISCUSSION

These findings support the recommendation to have a trial of clozapine after two other antipsychotic medications have been found to be ineffective.

Is anyone truly healthy? Trends in health risk factors prevalence and changes in their associations with all-cause mortality

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to determine trends in the prevalence of individual health risk factors across time and to examine if their associations with mortality have changed over time.

METHODS

Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES III- 1988-1994 and NHANES 1999-2014; age ≥20 years) was used to examine differences in the odds ratio (OR) of 5-year mortality risk associated with various common health risk factors over the two survey periods using weighted logistic regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, obesity category and white ethnicity (n = 28,279).

RESULTS

Over 97% of individuals had at least one of the 19 risk factors examined with no difference in the prevalence over time (P>0.34). The prevalence of lifestyle, social/mental and physical risk factors (2.2 to 19.1%) increased over time (P<0.0002), while the prevalence of having physiological risk factors decreased by ~6.5% (P<0.0001). Having any lifestyle or social/mental risk factor was significantly associated with a higher 5-year OR for mortality risk in 1999-2014, than 1988-94. In particular, having low education or use of mental health medication were not associated with mortality risk in 1988-94 (P>0.1), but were significantly associated with a higher 5-year OR for mortality in 1999-2014 (P<0.0001). Conversely, physiological risk factors were more weakly related with mortality risk in 1988-1994, than 1999-2014. Having any physical risk factor, and poor self-rated health were similarly related with 5-year mortality risk at both timepoints.

CONCLUSION

Health risk factors have both increased and decreased in prevalence over time, along with changes in the association between many of the risk factors and mortality risk. Taken together, these changes complicate interpretation of temporal trends and warrant cautious interpretation of population health patterns based on surveillance data.

Trends and correlates of concurrent opioid and benzodiazepine and/or gabapentinoid use among Ontario nursing home residents

BACKGROUND

A concern with long-term opioid use is the increased risk arising when opioids are used concurrently with drugs that can potentiate their associated adverse effects. The drugs most often encountered are benzodiazepines (BZDs) and gabapentinoids. Our study objectives were to examine trends in the concurrent use of opioids and BZDs, or gabapentinoids, in a Canadian nursing home population over an 11-year period, and current resident-level correlates of this concurrent use.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based, repeated cross-sectional study among Ontario nursing home residents (>65 years) dispensed opioids between April 2009 and February 2020. For the last study year, we examined cross-sectional associations between resident characteristics and concurrent use of opioids with BZDs or gabapentinoids. Linked data on nursing home residents from clinical and health administrative databases was used. The yearly proportions of residents who were dispensed an opioid concurrently with a BZD or gabapentinoid were plotted with percent change derived from log-binomial regression models. Separate modified Poisson regression models estimated resident-level correlates of concurrent use of opioids with BZDs or gabapentinoids.

RESULTS

Over the study period, among residents dispensed an opioid there was a 53.2% relative decrease (30.7% to 14.4%) in concurrent BZD and a 505.4% relative increase (4.4% to 26.6%) in concurrent gabapentinoid use. In adjusted models, increasing age and worsening cognition were inversely associated with the concurrent use of both classes, but most other significantly related covariates were unique to each drug class (e.g., sex and anxiety disorders for BZD, pain severity and presence of pain-related conditions for gabapentinoids).

CONCLUSIONS

Co-administration of BZDs or gabapentinoids in Ontario nursing home residents dispensed opioids remains common, but the pattern of co-use has changed over time. Observed covariates of concurrent use in 2019/20 suggest distinct but overlapping resident populations requiring consideration of the relative risks versus benefits of this co-use and monitoring for potential harm.

A scoping review of theories used to investigate clinician adherence to clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

Routine utilization of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is an effective strategy to optimize patient care and reduce practice variation. Healthcare professionals' failure to adhere to CPGs introduces risks to both patients and the sustainability of healthcare systems. The integration of theory to investigate adherence provides greater insight into the often complex reasons for suboptimal behaviors.

AIM

To determine the coverage of literature surrounding the use of theory in studies of CPG adherence, report the key findings and identify the knowledge gaps.

METHOD

In April 2021, three bibliographic databases were searched for studies published since January 2010, adopting theory to investigate health professionals' adherence to CPGs. Two reviewers independently screened the articles for eligibility and charted the data. A narrative approach to synthesis was employed.

RESULTS

The review includes 12 articles. Studies were limited to primarily investigations of physicians, quantitative designs, single disease states and few countries. The use of behavioral theories facilitated pooling of data of barriers and facilitators of adherence. The domains and constructs of a number of the reported theories are captured within the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF); the most common barriers aligned with the TDF domain of environmental context and resources, fewer studies reported facilitators.

CONCLUSION

There is emerging use of behavioral theories investigating physicians' adherence to CPGs. Although limited in number, these studies present specific insight into common barriers and facilitators, thus providing valuable evidence for refining existing and future implementation strategies. Similar investigations of other health professionals are warranted.

Strategies to prevent long-term opioid use following trauma: a Canadian practice survey

PURPOSE

To evaluate how Canadian clinicians involved in trauma patient care and prescribing opioids perceive the use and effectiveness of strategies to prevent long-term opioid therapy following trauma. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of these strategies were also assessed.

METHODS

We conducted a web-based cross-sectional survey. Potential participants were identified by trauma program managers and directors of the targeted departments in three Canadian provinces. We designed our questionnaire using standard health survey research methods. The questionnaire was administered between April 2021 and November 2021.

RESULTS

Our response rate was 47% (350/744), and 52% (181/350) of participants completed the entire survey. Most respondents (71%, 129/181) worked in teaching hospitals. Multimodal analgesia (93%, 240/257), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (77%, 198/257), and physical stimulation (75%, 193/257) were the strategies perceived to be the most frequently used. Several preventive strategies were perceived to be very effective by over 80% of respondents. Of these, some that were reported as not being frequently used were perceived to be among the most effective ones, including guidelines or protocols, assessing risk factors for opioid misuse, physical health follow-up by a professional, training for clinicians, patient education, and prescription monitoring systems. Staff shortages, time constraints, and organizational practices were identified as the main barriers to the implementation of the highest ranked preventive strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Several strategies to prevent long-term opioid therapy following trauma are perceived as being effective by those prescribing opioids in this population. Some of these strategies appear to be commonly used in everyday practice and others less so. Future research should focus on which preventive strategies should be given higher priority for implementation before assessing their effectiveness.

Trends in Brazilian market of antidepressants: A five-year dataset analysis

Introduction: Depression is an emotional disorder associated with morbidities and disabilities worldwide. The growing use of antidepressants is a concern for health managers because there are still unanswered questions on the effectiveness and safety of these medicines. Drug sales have increased in Brazil in recent years, but investigations on antidepressants sales are not available. We aimed to describe the trends in the antidepressant commerce in Brazil in a five-year period.

Materials and Methods: We performed an ecological study on antidepressant sales in Brazil, from November 2014 to October 2019, using data from IQVIA™, a data provider of pharmaceutical sales. Antidepressants were coded by the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system, and sales were presented in defined daily doses (DDDs) and DDDs per 1,000 inhabitants per day (DIDs). The results were expressed in absolute quantities and growth rates.

Results: The analyzed dataset contained 23 active substances in 780 products. The total sales of antidepressants increased from 23.3 DIDs in November 2014 to 38.3 DIDs in October 2019 (p = 0.002). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the most sold category of drugs (+5.7 million DDDs) in the period. ‘Other’ antidepressants presented the largest growth rate (104.7%). Individually, the most sold active substance was escitalopram (+1.8 million DDDs), and vortioxetine had the largest growth rate (336.2%). Tricyclic sales remained unchanged, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors had low and even decreasing sales (−9.5%).

Discussion: The total sales of antidepressants increased in Brazil from November 2014 to October 2019. The higher sale volumes of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and higher growth rate of ‘other’ antidepressants, with low sale volume of tricyclics and a decrease of monoamine oxidase inhibitors, suggest the replacement of older drugs by newer ones following a global trend. Therapeutic advances and commercial promotion efforts on new products might explain these findings.

Pragmatic Precision Psychiatry-A New Direction for Optimizing Treatment Selection

IMPORTANCE

Clinical trials have identified numerous prescriptive predictors of mental disorder treatment response, ie, predictors of which treatments are best for which patients. However, none of these prescriptive predictors is strong enough alone to guide precision treatment planning. This has prompted growing interest in developing precision treatment rules (PTRs) that combine information across multiple prescriptive predictors, but this work has been much less successful in psychiatry than some other areas of medicine. Study designs and analysis schemes used in research on PTR development in other areas of medicine are reviewed, key challenges for implementing similar studies of mental disorders are highlighted, and recent methodological advances to address these challenges are described here.

OBSERVATIONS

Discovering prescriptive predictors requires large samples. Three approaches have been used in other areas of medicine to do this: conduct very large randomized clinical trials, pool individual-level results across multiple smaller randomized clinical trials, and develop preliminary PTRs in large observational treatment samples that are then tested in smaller randomized clinical trials. The third approach is most feasible for research on mental disorders. This approach requires working with large real-world observational electronic health record databases; carefully selecting samples to emulate trials; extracting information about prescriptive predictors from electronic health records along with other inexpensive data augmentation strategies; estimating preliminary PTRs in the observational data using appropriate methods; implementing pragmatic trials to validate the preliminary PTRs; and iterating between subsequent observational studies and quality improvement pragmatic trials to refine and expand the PTRs. New statistical methods exist to address the methodological challenges of implementing this approach.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Advances in pragmatic precision psychiatry will require moving beyond the current focus on randomized clinical trials and adopting an iterative discovery-confirmation process that integrates observational and experimental studies in real-world clinical populations.

Pharmacological treatment algorithms for the acute phase, agitation, and maintenance phase of first-episode schizophrenia: Japanese Society of Clinical Neuropsychopharmacology treatment algorithms

OBJECTIVE

There are only a few treatment algorithms for first-episode schizophrenia. Moreover, all the algorithms apply to acute treatment, but not maintenance treatment. Therefore, we aimed to develop acute and maintenance treatment algorithms for first-episode schizophrenia.

METHODS

The algorithm committee of the Japanese Society of Clinical Neuropsychopharmacology developed pharmacological treatment algorithms for the acute phase, agitation, and maintenance phase of first-episode schizophrenia.

RESULTS

The acute treatment algorithm focuses on drug-naïve patients with first-episode schizophrenia who are not old or very agitated and recommends first-line treatment with aripiprazole, second- or third-line treatment with risperidone/paliperidone or olanzapine, and fourth-line treatment with clozapine. Long-acting injection of the current antipsychotic agent can be used for poor medication adherence or based on patient preference. The agitation treatment algorithm recommends first-line treatment with lorazepam and second- or third-line treatment with quetiapine or levomepromazine and clearly instructs that the medication used for agitation should be reduced and then discontinued after remission of agitation. The maintenance treatment algorithm recommends the gradual reduction of antipsychotics to the minimum effective dose after remission of positive symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

We hope that our unique algorithms will be used broadly and will contribute to minimizing patients' burden related to antipsychotic treatment.

Twenty-Year Trends in the Psychopharmacological Treatment of Outpatients with Borderline Personality Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Naturalistic Study in Spain

OBJECTIVE

Although no psychotropic drugs have been officially approved for the treatment of borderline personality disorder (BPD), medications are routinely prescribed for these patients. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate changes in the pharmacological management of patients with BPD treated in an outpatient specific unit in Spain over the past 20 years, while a secondary aim was to identify the factors associated with the prescription.

METHODS

Observational and cross-sectional study of all patients with a primary diagnosis of BPD (n = 620) consecutively admitted to a BPD outpatient program in Barcelona, Spain, from 2001 through 2020. We examined trends in the prescription of antidepressants, benzodiazepines, mood stabilizers, and antipsychotics. For the analysis, prescription data were grouped into four 5-year periods (2001-2005, 2006-2010, 2011-2015, and 2016-2020). Logistic regression models were performed to identify sociodemographic and clinical variables associated with pharmacological prescription and polypharmacy.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients receiving pharmacotherapy decreased over time. Antidepressant prescription rates remained high and stable over time (74% of patients), while benzodiazepine use decreased significantly during the study period (from 77 to 36%) and second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) use increased from 15 to 32%. Psychiatric comorbidity was the main factor associated with pharmacological treatment (odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.5-4.2) and polypharmacy, although a high percentage of patients without comorbidity were also taking medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the past 20 years, the pharmacological treatment of BPD outpatients has undergone important changes, most notably the decrease in benzodiazepines and increase in SGAs. The findings of this study demonstrate that pharmacotherapy is much more prevalent in patients with BPD than recommended in most clinical guidelines.

[Clozapine in the Treatment of Schizophrenic Psychosis: Patient Characteristics and Antipsychotic Combinations in One Cohort at a Psychiatric Care Hospital]

BACKGROUND

In many studies, clozapine has been reported to have superior effectiveness compared to other antipsychotics. So far there is little systematic data on the practice of clozapine prescription and characteristics of patients treated.

METHOD

Retrospective evaluation of all 392 treatment courses of inpatients with schizophrenic psychoses during one year. Detailed analysis of the patients treated with clozapine including the dosages and additional psychotropic medication.

RESULT

Patients treated with clozapine showed a higher disease severity than patients without clozapine. They received more frequently pharmacological combination therapies, which in some cases significantly contradicted the current guideline recommendations.

CONCLUSION

The results underline the pronounced disease severity of patients receiving clozapine treatment and substantiate evidence from the literature on the limited implementation of guidelines in prescribing practice. The study carried out serves as a pilot survey of a multicenter research project on the practice of prescribing clozapine in psychiatric hospitals in different German regions.

Improvements in the degree of understanding the treatment guidelines for schizophrenia and major depressive disorder in a nationwide dissemination and implementation study

BACKGROUND

To implement clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), it is necessary for psychiatrists to deepen their understanding of the CPGs. The Effectiveness of Guidelines for Dissemination and Education in Psychiatric Treatment (EGUIDE) project is a nationwide dissemination and implementation study of two sets of CPGs for schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (MDD).

METHODS

A total of 413 psychiatrists (n = 212 in 2016; n = 201 in 2017) learned the two CPGs in the education program of the EGUIDE project, and clinical knowledge of these CPGs was evaluated at baseline and after the programs. To improve the correct answer rate for clinical knowledge after the programs, we revised the lecture materials associated with items that had a low correct answer rate in 2016 and used the revised lecture materials with the CPGs in 2017. The rates of correct answers after the programs between the 2016 and 2017 groups were compared.

RESULTS

The correct answer rate of one item on the schizophrenia CPG and one item on the MDD CPG tended to be improved (S-D5 and D-C6) and that of one on the MDD CPG was significantly improved (D-D3, P = 0.0008) in the 2017 group compared to those in the 2016 group.

CONCLUSIONS

We reported improvements in clinical knowledge of CPGs after the EGUIDE program in the 2017 group following revision of the lecture materials based on results from the 2016 group. These attempts to improve the degree of understanding of CPGs may facilitate the successful dissemination and implementation of psychiatric guidelines in everyday practice.

Minding metabolism: targeted interventions to improve cardio-metabolic monitoring across early and chronic psychosis

Background

Antipsychotics (APs) increase weight, metabolic syndrome, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Guidelines recommend cardio-metabolic monitoring at initial assessment, at 3 months and then annually in people prescribed APs.

Aim

To determine the rates of cardio-metabolic monitoring in AP treated early and chronic psychosis and to assess the impact of targeted improvement strategies.

Methods

Medical records were reviewed in two cohorts of first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients before and after the implementation of a physical health parameter checklist and electronic laboratory order set. In a separate group of patients with chronic psychotic disorders, adherence to annual monitoring was assessed before and 3 months after an awareness-raising educational intervention.

Results

In FEP, fasting glucose (39% vs 67%, p=0.05), HbA1c (0% vs 24%, p=0.005) and prolactin (18% vs 67%, p=0.001) monitoring improved. There were no significant differences in weight (67% vs 67%, p=1.0), BMI (3% vs 10%, p=0.54), waist circumference (3% vs 0%, p=1.0), fasting lipids (61% vs 76% p=0.22) or ECG monitoring (67% vs 67%, p=1.0). Blood pressure (BP) (88% vs 57%, p=0.04) and heart rate (91% vs 65%, p=0.03) monitoring dis-improved. Diet (0%) and exercise (<15%) assessment was poor. In chronic psychotic disorders, BP monitoring improved (20% vs 41.4%, p=0.05), whereas weight (17.0% vs 34.1%, p=0.12), BMI (9.7% vs 12.1%, p=1.0), fasting glucose (17% vs 24.3%, p=0.58) and fasting lipids remained unchanged (17% vs 24.3%, p=0.58).

Conclusions

Targeted improvement strategies resulted in a significant improvement in a limited number of parameters in early and chronic psychotic disorders. Overall, monitoring remained suboptimal.

Antidepressant prescriptions have not fully reflected evolving evidence from cumulative network meta-analyses and guideline recommendations

OBJECTIVES

This study compares three major elements of evidence-based medicine (EBM) practices, namely evidence synthesis, clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), and real-world prescriptions in the United States, regarding antidepressant treatments of major depression over the past 3 decades.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We conducted network meta-analyses (NMAs) of antidepressants every 5 years up to 2016 based on a comprehensive data set of double-blind randomized controlled trials. We identified CPGs and extracted their recommendations. We surveyed the prescriptions in the United States at 5-year intervals up to 2015.

RESULTS

Most drugs recommended by CPGs presented favorable performance in efficacy and acceptability in NMAs. However, CPG recommendations were often in terms of drug classes rather than individual drugs, whereas NMAs suggested distinctive difference between drugs within the same class. The update intervals of all CPGs were longer than 5 years. All the antidepressants prescribed frequently in the United States were recommended by CPGs. However, changes in prescriptions did not correspond to alterations in CPGs or to apparent changes in the effects indicated by NMAs. Many factors including marketing efforts, regulations, or patient values may have played a role.

CONCLUSION

Enhancements including accelerating CPG updates and monitoring the impact of marketing on prescriptions should be considered in future EBM implementation.