Pharmacological characterization of the interaction between the dual phosphodiesterase (PDE) 3/4 inhibitor RPL554 and glycopyrronium on human isolated bronchi and small airways

The need for inhaled phosphodiesterase inhibitors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

INTRODUCTION

The therapeutic implications of phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors have attracted interest because PDEs are regarded as an intracellular target to be exploited for therapeutic advancements in the treatment of COPD. At present, the only approved approach for the treatment of COPD with PDE inhibitors is the use of an oral PDE4 inhibitor. However, this treatment is not widely employed, primarily due to the narrow therapeutic index associated with oral PDE4 inhibitors, which significantly limits the tolerable dose. The inhalation route represents a viable alternative to the oral route for improving the therapeutic index of PDE4 inhibitors.

AREAS COVERED

The development of inhaled PDE4 inhibitors, with a focus on tanimilast and ensifentrine, the latter of which is a dual PDE3/PDE4 inhibitor.

EXPERT OPINION

The inhalation route offers several advantages regarding the delivery of PDE inhibitors for the management of COPD. Tanimilast and ensifentrine have been shown to improve lung function, reduce exacerbations and enhance quality of life in COPD patients. However, it has not yet been determined which type of COPD patient might benefit more from inhaled PDE4 inhibitors, and it remains unclear whether concomitant inhibition of PDE3 and PDE4 confers a significant benefit compared to blocking PDE4 alone in COPD.

Drug-Drug Interactions and Synergy: From Pharmacological Models to Clinical Application

This review explores the concept of synergy in pharmacology, emphasizing its importance in optimizing treatment outcomes through the combination of drugs with different mechanisms of action. Synergy, defined as an effect greater than the expected additive effect elicited by individual agents according to specific predictive models, offers a promising approach to enhance therapeutic efficacy while minimizing adverse events. The historical evolution of synergy research, from ancient civilizations to modern pharmacology, highlights the ongoing quest to understand and harness synergistic interactions. Key concepts, such as concentration-response curves, additive effects, and predictive models, are discussed in detail, emphasizing the need for accurate assessment methods throughout translational drug development. Although various mathematical models exist for synergy analysis, selecting the appropriate model and software tools remains a challenge, necessitating careful consideration of experimental design and data interpretation. Furthermore, this review addresses practical considerations in synergy assessment, including preclinical and clinical approaches, mechanism of action, and statistical analysis. Optimizing synergy requires attention to concentration/dose ratios, target site localization, and timing of drug administration, ensuring that the benefits of combination therapy detected bench-side are translatable into clinical practice. Overall, the review advocates for a systematic approach to synergy assessment, incorporating robust statistical analysis, effective and simplified predictive models, and collaborative efforts across pivotal sectors, such as academic institutions, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory agencies. By overcoming critical challenges and maximizing therapeutic potential, effective synergy assessment in drug development holds promise for advancing patient care. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Combining drugs with different mechanisms of action for synergistic interactions optimizes treatment efficacy and safety. Accurate interpretation of synergy requires the identification of the expected additive effect. Despite innovative models to predict the additive effect, consensus in drug-drug interactions research is lacking, hindering the bench-to-bedside development of combination therapies. Collaboration among science, industry, and regulation is crucial for advancing combination therapy development, ensuring rigorous application of predictive models in clinical settings.

Ensifentrine: First Approval

Ensifentrine, an inhaled, selective phosphodiesterase (PDE) 3 and PDE4 inhibitor, is being developed by Verona Pharma plc for the treatment of respiratory diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In June 2024, ensifentrine (OHTUVAYRE™) inhalation suspension was approved for the maintenance treatment of COPD in adult patients in the USA. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of ensifentrine leading to this first approval for the maintenance treatment of COPD.

The novel inhaled dual PDE3 and PDE4 inhibitor ensifentrine for the treatment of COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol on trough FEV1 and exacerbation according to PRISMA statement

The investigation of ensifentrine, an inhaled dual phosphodiesterase (PDE)3 and PDE4 inhibitor, for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) maintenance therapy presents a significant clinical interest. Despite promising results from recent Phase III trials, a comprehensive synthesis of its therapeutic efficacy in COPD is lacking. This protocol outlines the first registered systematic review and meta-analysis in PROSPERO to assess the impact of ensifentrine on trough forced expiratory volume in the 1st second (FEV1) and acute exacerbations of COPD. By conducting a rigorous literature search and employing solid methodologies, this endeavour aims to provide robust evidence on the real efficacy of ensifentrine. Anticipated outcomes include a significant improvement in trough FEV1 and a reduction in AECOPD risk among ensifentrine-treated patients compared to controls, corroborating its bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory properties. The meta-analysis expects to reveal consistent results across different trials, enhancing confidence in the findings. Additionally, subgroup analyses may unveil factors influencing the efficacy of ensifentrine, guiding optimal therapeutic strategies. Overall, this protocol holds the potential to inform clinical practice and regulatory decisions, positioning ensifentrine as a valuable addition to COPD management.

Use of human airway smooth muscle in vitro and ex vivo to investigate drugs for the treatment of chronic obstructive respiratory disorders

Isolated airway smooth muscle has been extensively investigated since 1840 to understand the pharmacology of airway diseases. There has often been poor predictability from murine experiments to drugs evaluated in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the use of isolated human airways represents a sensible strategy to optimise the development of innovative molecules for the treatment of respiratory diseases. This review aims to provide updated evidence on the current uses of isolated human airways in validated in vitro methods to investigate drugs in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive respiratory disorders. This review also provides historical notes on the pioneering pharmacological research on isolated human airway tissues, the key differences between human and animal airways, as well as the pivotal differences between human medium bronchi and small airways. Experiments carried out with isolated human bronchial tissues in vitro and ex vivo replicate many of the main anatomical, pathophysiological, mechanical and immunological characteristics of patients with asthma or COPD. In vitro models of asthma and COPD using isolated human airways can provide information that is directly translatable into humans with obstructive lung diseases. Regardless of the technique used to investigate drugs for the treatment of chronic obstructive respiratory disorders (i.e., isolated organ bath systems, videomicroscopy and wire myography), the most limiting factors to produce high-quality and repeatable data remain closely tied to the manual skills of the researcher conducting experiments and the availability of suitable tissue.

Perspectives on Ensifentrine and Its Therapeutic Potential in the Treatment of COPD: Evidence to Date

Ensifentrine is a novel inhalational phosphodiesterase (PDE)3 and PDE4 inhibitor which improves bronchodilation and decreases inflammatory markers by acting locally on the bronchial tissue, with minimal systemic effects. Both preclinical and clinical trials have demonstrated benefits of this therapy, including improvement in lung function and reduction in exacerbations. This therapy is currently under review by the US Food and Drug Administration with a decision expected in 2024.

What role will ensifentrine play in the future treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients? Implications from recent clinical trials

Data from the phase III ENHANCE clinical trials provide compelling evidence that ensifentrine, an inhaled 'bifunctional' dual phosphodiesterase 3/4 inhibitor, can provide additional benefit to existing treatments in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and represents a 'first-in-class' drug having bifunctional bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory activity in a single molecule. Ensifentrine, generally well tolerated, can provide additional bronchodilation when added to muscarinic receptor antagonists or β2-agonists and reduce the exacerbation risk. This information allows us to consider better the possible inclusion of ensifentrine in the future treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, there is less information on whether it provides additional benefit when added to inhaled corticosteroid or 'triple therapy' and, therefore, when this drug is best utilized in clinical practice.

Ensifentrine, a Novel Phosphodiesterase 3 and 4 Inhibitor for the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Phase III Trials (the ENHANCE Trials)

Rationale: Ensifentrine is a novel, selective, dual phosphodiesterase (PDE)3 and PDE4 inhibitor with bronchodilator and antiinflammatory effects. Replicate phase III trials of nebulized ensifentrine were conducted (ENHANCE-1 and ENHANCE-2) to assess these effects in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of ensifentrine compared with placebo for lung function, symptoms, quality of life, and exacerbations in patients with COPD. Methods: These phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trials were conducted between September 2020 and December 2022 at 250 research centers and pulmonology practices in 17 countries. Patients aged 40-80 years with moderate to severe symptomatic COPD were enrolled. Measurements and Main Results: Totals of 760 (ENHANCE-1) and 789 (ENHANCE-2) patients were randomized and treated, with 69% and 55% receiving concomitant long-acting muscarinic antagonists or long-acting β2-agonists, respectively. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 percentage predicted values were 52% and 51% of predicted normal. Ensifentrine treatment significantly improved average FEV1 area under the curve at 0-12 hours versus placebo (ENHANCE-1, 87 ml [95% confidence interval, 55, 119]; ENHANCE-2, 94 ml [65, 124]; both P < 0.001). Ensifentrine treatment significantly improved symptoms (Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms) and quality of life (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire) versus placebo at Week 24 in ENHANCE-1 but not in ENHANCE-2. Ensifentrine treatment reduced the rate of moderate or severe exacerbations versus placebo over 24 weeks (ENHANCE-1, rate ratio, 0.64 [0.40, 1.00]; P = 0.050; ENHANCE-2, rate ratio, 0.57 [0.38, 0.87]; P = 0.009) and increased time to first exacerbation (ENHANCE-1, hazard ratio, 0.62 [0.39, 0.97]; P = 0.038; ENHANCE-2, hazard ratio, 0.58 [0.38, 0.87]; P = 0.009). Adverse event rates were similar to those for placebo. Conclusions: Ensifentrine significantly improved lung function in both trials, with results supporting exacerbation rate and risk reduction in a broad COPD population and in addition to other classes of maintenance therapies. Clinical trial registered with www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov and EudraCT (ENHANCE-1, www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov identifier NCT04535986, EudraCT identifier 2020-002086-34; ENHANCE-2, www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov identifier NCT04542057, EudraCT identifier 2020-002069-32).

Ensifentrine as a Novel, Inhaled Treatment for Patients with COPD

Ensifentrine is a novel, potent, and selective dual inhibitor of phosphodiesterase (PDE)3 and PDE4 designed for delivery by inhalation that combines effects on airway inflammation, bronchodilation and ciliary function in bronchial epithelia. In Phase 2 studies in subjects with COPD, ensifentrine demonstrated clinically meaningful bronchodilation and improvements in symptoms and health-related quality of life when administered alone or in combination with current standard of care therapies. Ensifentrine is currently in late-stage clinical development for the maintenance treatment of patients with COPD. This review summarizes non-clinical data as well as Phase 1 and Phase 2 efficacy and safety results of nebulized ensifentrine relevant to the maintenance treatment of patients with COPD.

Experimental drugs in clinical trials for COPD: Artificial Intelligence via Machine Learning approach to predict the successful advance from early-stage development to approval

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic advances in drug therapy of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) really effective in suppressing the pathological processes underlying the disease deterioration are still needed. Artificial Intelligence (AI) via Machine Learning (ML) may represent an effective tool to predict clinical development of investigational agents.

AREAL COVERED

Experimental drugs in Phase I and II development for COPD from early 2014 to late 2022 were identified in the ClinicalTrials.gov database. Different ML models, trained from prior knowledge on clinical trial success, were used to predict the probability that experimental drugs will successfully advance toward approval in COPD, according to Bayesian inference as follows: ≤25% low probability, >25% and ≤ 50% moderate probability, >50% and ≤ 75% high probability, and > 75% very high probability.

EXPERT OPINION

The Artificial Neural Network and Random Forest ML models indicated that, among the current experimental drugs in clinical trials for COPD, only the bifunctional muscarinic antagonist - β₂-adrenoceptor agonists (MABA) navafenterol and batefenterol, the inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/MABA fluticasone furoate/batefenterol, and the bifunctional phosphodiesterase (PDE) 3/4 inhibitor ensifentrine resulted to have a moderate to very high probability of being approved in the next future, however not before 2025.

Inflammatory and contractile profile in LPS-challenged equine isolated bronchi: Evidence for IL-6 as a potential target against AHR in equine asthma

BACKGROUND

Airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) are pivotal characteristics of equine asthma. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) may have a central role in modulating airway inflammation and dysfunction. Therefore, the aim of this study was to match the inflammatory and contractile profile in LPS-challenged equine isolated bronchi to identify molecular targets potentially suitable to counteract AHR in asthmatic horses.

METHODS

Equine isolated bronchi were incubated overnight with LPS (0.1-100 ng/ml). The contractile response to electrical field stimulation (EFS) and the levels of cytokines, chemokines, and neurokinin A (NKA) were quantified. The role of capsaicin sensitive-sensory nerves, neurokinin-2 (NK₂) receptor, transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 receptors (TRPV1), and epithelium were also investigated.

RESULTS

LPS 1 ng/ml elicited AHR to EFS (+238.17 ± 25.20% P < 0.001 vs. control). LPS significantly (P < 0.05 vs. control) increased the levels of IL-4 (+36.08 ± 1.62%), IL-5 (+38.60 ± 3.58%), IL-6 (+33.79 ± 2.59%), IL-13 (+40.91 ± 1.93%), IL-1β (+1650.16 ± 71.16%), IL-33 (+88.14 ± 8.93%), TGF-β (22.29 ± 1.03%), TNF-α (+56.13 ± 4.61%), CXCL-8 (+98.49 ± 17.70%), EOTAXIN (+32.26 ± 2.27%), MCP-1 (+49.63 ± 4.59%), RANTES (+36.38 ± 2.24%), and NKA (+112.81 ± 6.42%). Capsaicin sensitive-sensory nerves, NK₂ receptor, and TRPV1 were generally involved in the LPS-mediated inflammation. Epithelium removal modulated the release of IL-1β, IL-33, and TGF-β. Only the levels of IL-6 fitted with AHR to a wide range of EFS frequencies, an effect significantly (P < 0.05) inhibited by anti-IL-6 antibody; exogenous IL-6 induced significant (P < 0.05) AHR to EFS similar to that elicited by LPS.

CONCLUSION

Targeting IL-6 with specific antibody may represent an effective strategy to treat equine asthma, especially in those animals suffering from severe forms of this disease.

Drug interaction and chronic obstructive respiratory disorders

Chronic obstructive respiratory disorders uncontrolled by monotherapy should be given combinations of drugs that act by distinct mechanisms of action. The rationale for combining different classes of drugs should be to elicit a synergistic interaction, lower the dose of the single components in the combinations and, thus, reduce the risk of adverse events.

The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the combined effect of drugs acting on human airways, by including studies that used a validated method for assessing the nature of drug interaction.

Current evidence indicates that drug combinations modulating the bronchial contractility induce a synergistic relaxant effect when the individual components are combined at isoeffective concentrations. There are several mechanisms of action underlying drug interactions. Pharmacological research has been directed to elucidate what causes the synergism between long-acting β₂-adrenoceptor (β₂-AR) agonists (LABAs), long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMAs), and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) administered as dual or triple combination. Conversely, the mechanisms behind the additive interaction between phosphodiesterase 3 and 4 inhibitors and LAMAs, and the synergistic interaction between proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligands and β₂ agonists have been only hypothesized. Overall, the synergism elicited by combined drugs for the treatment of chronic respiratory disorders is an effect of class, rather than specific for drug combinations. Optimal synergy can be achieved only when the single agents are combined at isoeffective concentrations, and when monocomponents are given concurrently to reach together the same levels of the bronchial tree.

•

Drug interaction should be identified with validated pharmacological models.

•

Synergistic efficacy is the rationale for combining drugs for respiratory diseases.

•

Synergy is favored when combined agents act by distinct mechanisms of action.

•

Optimal synergy is achieved when drugs are combined at isoeffective concentrations.

•

Synergy is a class effect and is not specific for single drug combinations.

Rationale and Clinical Use of Bronchodilators in Adults with Bronchiectasis

Currently, there is much controversy surrounding the therapeutic approach to pulmonary function abnormalities in patients with bronchiectasis and, consequently, whether and when to use bronchodilators in these patients. National and international guidelines on the treatment of bronchiectasis in adults do not recommend the routine use of bronchodilators because there is no evidence that a significant response to a bronchodilator or the presence or hyperresponsiveness of the airway are good predictors of future effective clinical response. However, some guidelines recommend them in the presence of airway obstruction and/or special conditions, which vary according to the guideline in question, although there are no recommendations on optimal dosing and bronchodilator treatment combined with or without inhaled corticosteroids. Nonetheless, in contrast with guideline recommendations, bronchodilators are overused in real-world patients with bronchiectasis even in the absence of airway obstruction, as demonstrated by analysis of national and international registries. This overuse can be explained by the awareness of the existence of a solid pharmacological rationale that supports the use of bronchodilators in the presence of chronic airway obstruction independent of its aetiology. We performed a systematic review of the literature and were able to verify that there are no randomised controlled trials (apart from a small study with methodological limitations and a very recent trial involving a not-very-large number of patients), or any long-term observational studies on the short- or long-term effect of bronchodilators in patients with bronchiectasis. Therefore, we believe that it is essential and even urgent to evaluate the effects of bronchodilators in these patients with appropriately designed studies.

Impact of long-acting muscarinic antagonists on small airways in asthma and COPD: A systematic review

Small airway disease is recognized as a cardinal pathological process of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and recently small airways have been recognized as a major site of airflow obstruction also in asthmatic patients. The transversal involvement of small airways in COPD and asthma has warranted research efforts to identify therapeutic strategies able to unlock the small airway compartment. The mainstay of COPD treatment is represented by long-acting β₂-adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs). In asthma, the efficacy of LAMAs administered add-on to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) or ICS/LABA combinations has been investigated only in recent years. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the current literature concerning the impact of LAMAs on small airways and their lung deposition in both COPD and asthma. LAMAs administered either alone or in combination induced an effective bronchorelaxant effect of small airways, however the effectiveness of respiratory medications not only relies on the selected drug, but also on the employed inhalation device and patient's adherence. Tiotropium delivered via Respimat® SMI achieved a superior drug deposition in the peripheral lung compared to HandiHaler® dry powder inhaler and metered-dose inhalers (MDIs). The use of co-suspension™ delivery technology for MDIs and the introduction of the eFlow® nebulizer to deliver glycopyrronium improved aerosol drug delivery to the peripheral lung, by achieving uniform distribution of drug particles. This systematic review provides a synthesis of current literature concerning the impact of LAMAs on small airways and an insight on LAMAs distribution within the lung.

Inhaled Dual Phosphodiesterase 3/4 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Patients with COPD: A Short Review

Current pharmacological treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are mostly limited to inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids. Azithromycin can contribute to exacerbation prevention. Roflumilast, a phosphodiesterase (PDE) 4 inhibitor administered orally, also prevents exacerbations in selected patients with chronic bronchitis, recurrent exacerbations, severe airflow limitation and concomitant therapy with long-acting inhaled bronchodilators. This outcome likely results from anti-inflammatory effects since PDE4 is expressed by all inflammatory cell types involved in COPD. The use of this agent is, however, limited by side-effects, particularly nausea and diarrhea. To address remaining unmet needs and enrich therapeutic options for patients with COPD, inhaled dual PDE3/4 inhibitors have been developed, with the aim of enhancing bronchodilation through PDE3 inhibition and modulating inflammation and mucus production though PDE4 inhibition, thus producing a potentially synergistic effect on airway calibre. Experimental preclinical data confirmed these effects in vitro and in animal models. At present, RPL554/ensifentrine is the only agent of this family in clinical development. It decreases sputum markers of both neutrophilic and eosinophilic inflammation in patients with COPD. Clinical Phase II trials confirmed its bronchodilator effect and demonstrated clinically meaningful symptom relief and quality of life improvements in these patients. The safety profile appears satisfactory, with less effects on heart rate and blood pressure than salbutamol and no other side effect. Altogether, these data suggest that ensifentrine could have a role in COPD management, especially in addition to inhaled long-acting bronchodilators with or without corticosteroids since experimental studies suggest potentiation of ensifentrine effects by these agents. However, results from ongoing and future Phase III studies are needed to confirm both beneficial effects and favourable safety profile on a larger scale and assess other outcomes including exacerbations, lung function decline, comorbidities and mortality.

New Avenues for Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors in Asthma

Introduction

Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are isoenzymes ubiquitously expressed in the lungs where they catalyse cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (GMP), which are fundamental second messengers in asthma, thereby regulating the intracellular concentrations of these cyclic nucleotides, their signaling pathways and, consequently, myriad biological responses. The superfamily of PDEs is composed of 11 families with a distinct substrate specificity, molecular structure and subcellular localization. Experimental studies indicate a possible role in asthma mainly for PDE3, PDE4, PDE5 and PDE7. Consequently, drugs that inhibit PDEs may offer novel therapeutic options for the treatment of this disease.

Areas Covered

In this article, we describe the progress made in recent years regarding the possibility of using PDE inhibitors in the treatment of asthma.

Expert Opinion

Many data indicate the potential benefits of PDE inhibitors as an add-on treatment especially in severe asthma due to their bronchodilator and/or anti-inflammatory activity, but no compound has yet reached the market as asthma treatment mainly because of their limited tolerability. Therefore, there is a growing interest in developing new PDE inhibitors with an improved safety profile. In particular, the research is focused on the development of drugs capable of interacting simultaneously with different PDEs, or to be administered by inhalation. CHF 6001 and RPL554 are the only molecules that currently are under clinical development but there are several new agents with interesting pharmacological profiles. It will be stimulating to assess the impact of such agents on individual treatable traits in specially designed studies.

Investigational treatments in phase I and II clinical trials: a systematic review in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

Introduction. The current pharmacological treatments for the management of stable COPD permit the reduction of symptoms and frequency and severity of exacerbations, and the improvement of exercise tolerance and health status. However, they do not modify the long-term decline in lung function and patient health. Consequently, there is the strong need for 'highly innovative' medications that are focused on new targets and/or mechanisms for the treatment of COPD. Areas covered. This systematic review assesses investigational agents in Phase I and II clinical trials over the last six years. It offers insights on whether drugs and/or formulations in clinical development offer future effective treatments of COPD. Expert opinion. There is no evidence to suggest that current investigational agents can reduce lung function decline and cure COPD. However, looking forward, investigational, innovative treatments in combination with the therapies already recommended by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) may provide future suitable tools to counteract the progression of COPD.

The future of bronchodilation: looking for new classes of bronchodilators

Available bronchodilators can satisfy many of the needs of patients suffering from airway disorders, but they often do not relieve symptoms and their long-term use raises safety concerns. Therefore, there is interest in developing new classes that could help to overcome the limits that characterise the existing classes.At least nine potential new classes of bronchodilators have been identified: 1) selective phosphodiesterase inhibitors; 2) bitter-taste receptor agonists; 3) E-prostanoid receptor 4 agonists; 4) Rho kinase inhibitors; 5) calcilytics; 6) agonists of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ; 7) agonists of relaxin receptor 1; 8) soluble guanylyl cyclase activators; and 9) pepducins. They are under consideration, but they are mostly in a preclinical phase and, consequently, we still do not know which classes will actually be developed for clinical use and whether it will be proven that a possible clinical benefit outweighs the impact of any adverse effect.It is likely that if developed, these new classes may be a useful addition to, rather than a substitution of, the bronchodilator therapy currently used, in order to achieve further optimisation of bronchodilation.

Optimizing the Development Strategy of Combination Therapy in Respiratory Medicine: From Isolated Airways to Patients

The current recommendations for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are pushing towards triple combination therapy based on the combination of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) associated with two bronchodilator agents. However, dual bronchodilation remains the cornerstone for the treatment of most COPD patients. Combining a long-acting β₂ adrenoceptor agonist (LABA) with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) induces appreciable synergistic bronchorelaxant effect in human airways, especially when the medications are combined at isoeffective concentrations. Thus, each LABA/LAMA combination is characterized by a specific range of concentration-ratio at which the drug mixture may induce sustained synergistic interaction. Results of a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT, NCT00696020) and evidences from pre-clinical studies in human isolated airways poses the question whether combining tiotropium 5 μg with olodaterol 5 μg is the best combination option: tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 μg has the same efficacy profile of tiotropium/olodaterol 5/2 μg, and it is less effective than tiotropium/olodaterol 5/10 μg. Furthermore, tiotropium/olodaterol 5/2 μg, 5/5 μg, and 5/10 μg combinations are generally characterized by the same safety profile. Indeed tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 μg is effective and safe in COPD, but a different development strategy based on solid data obtained from human isolated airways would have driven towards a better-balanced FDC to be tested in Phase III RCTs. Accurate bench-to-bedside plans are needed also in the development of triple combination therapies for asthma and COPD, in which the presence of an ICS in the formulation may further modulate the beneficial interaction between the LABA and the LAMA.

Ensifentrine (RPL554): an investigational PDE3/4 inhibitor for the treatment of COPD

Introduction: A compound that simultaneously inhibits PDE3 and PDE4 should increase airway caliber by relaxing the smooth muscle and, simultaneously, suppress airway inflammatory responses. Ensifentrine (RPL554) is considered a PDE3/4 inhibitor, although its affinity for PDE3 is 3,440 times higher than that for PDE4, that is under clinical development for the treatment of asthma and COPD and, potentially, cystic fibrosis. Areas covered: We analyze the development of this molecule from its basic pharmacology to the present clinical Phase II studies. Expert opinion: Ensifentrine is an interesting drug but there is a lack of solid studies that still does not allow us to correctly allocate this molecule in the current COPD and even asthma therapeutic armamentarium. Furthermore, apparently ensifentrine has not yet entered Phase III clinical development and, in any case, there is no reliable evidence of its ability to elicit an anti-inflammatory activity in patients with COPD or asthma. Therefore, the real anti-inflammatory profile of ensifentrine must be clarified with new studies of basic pharmacology and adequate clinical studies specifically designed. However, at present the most intriguing perspective is linked to its possible use in the treatment of cystic fibrosis, also considering the lack of valid therapeutic options for this disease.

Long-term observational study on the impact of GLP-1R agonists on lung function in diabetic patients

INTRODUCTION

Preclinical research suggests a role of Glucagon Like Peptide-1 Receptors (GLP-1R) on the regulation of human bronchial tone. We investigated the effect of GLP-1R agonists on lung function of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) population without co-existing chronic obstructive respiratory disorders.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study that examined change in lung function measurements over two years of T2DM patients (n = 32) treated with metformin monotherapy (control cohort), metformin plus GLP-1R agonists (GLP-1R agonists cohort), or metformin plus insulin (insulin cohort).

RESULTS

After 24 months of treatment, the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) significantly (p < 0.05) increased from baseline in the GLP-1R agonists cohort (218 ml [95%CI 88-246]), but not in the control and insulin cohorts (94 ml [95%CI -28 - 216] and 26 ml [95%CI -174 - 226], respectively; p > 0.05 vs. baseline). The average increase in FEV₁ in the GLP-1R agonists cohort was significantly greater than that in the control and insulin cohorts (delta: 110 ml [95%CI 18-202] and 177 ml [95%CI 85-270], respectively, p < 0.05). The forced vital capacity (FVC) also increased significantly more in the GLP-1R agonists cohort than in the control and insulin cohorts (overall delta FVC: 183 ml [95%CI 72-295], p < 0.05). The maximal expiratory flow at 50-75% significantly (p < 0.05) improved from baseline in the GLP-1R agonists cohort, but not in the control and insulin cohorts (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary results suggest a potential new therapeutic perspective to treat airway disorders with GLP-1R agonists.

Phosphodiesterases as therapeutic targets for respiratory diseases

Chronic respiratory diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, affect millions of people all over the world. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) which is one of the most important second messengers, plays a vital role in relaxing airway smooth muscles and suppressing inflammation. Given its vast role in regulating intracellular responses, cAMP provides an attractive pharmaceutical target in the treatment of chronic respiratory diseases. Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are enzymes that hydrolyze cyclic nucleotides and help control cyclic nucleotide signals in a compartmentalized manner. Currently, the selective PDE4 inhibitor, roflumilast, is used as an add-on treatment for patients with severe COPD associated with bronchitis and a history of frequent exacerbations. In addition, other novel PDE inhibitors are in different phases of clinical trials. The current review provides an overview of the regulation of various PDEs and the potential application of selective PDE inhibitors in the treatment of COPD and asthma. The possibility to combine various PDE inhibitors as a way to increase their therapeutic effectiveness is also emphasized.

An evaluation of roflumilast and PDE4 inhibitors with a focus on the treatment of asthma

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is a common chronic airway inflammatory disease characterized by diverse inflammatory events leading to airway hyperresponsiveness and reversible airflow obstruction. Corticosteroids have been the mainstay for asthma treatment due to their broad anti-inflammatory actions; however, other medications such as phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors also demonstrate anti-inflammatory activity in the airways.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes tissue expression of phosphodiesterase 4 in the airways, the different phosphodiesterase 4 isoenzymes identified, and the anti-inflammatory activities of phosphodiesterase 4 inhibition in asthma and related findings in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The authors further review clinical trials demonstrating that drugs such as roflumilast have an excellent safety profile and efficacy in patients with asthma and COPD.

EXPERT OPINION

Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors suppress the activity of immune cells, an effect similar to corticosteroids although by acting through different anti-inflammatory pathways and uniquely blocking neutrophilic inflammation. Roflumilast and other phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors have been shown to provide additive protection in asthma when added to corticosteroid and anti-leukotriene treatment. Developmental drugs with dual phosphodiesterase 3 and 4 inhibition are thought to be able to provide bronchodilation and anti-inflammatory activities and will consequently be pushed forward in their clinical development for the treatment of asthma and COPD.

Ensifentrine (RPL554): an inhaled 'bifunctional' dual PDE3/4 inhibitor for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Ensifentrine (RPL554), an inhaled 'bifunctional' dual phosphodiesterase 3/4 inhibitor that exhibits both bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory activities, provides a new option in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and other inflammatory airway diseases that are under clinical development. Ensifentrine appears to be initially under development for the treatment of COPD although it is not yet clear whether it should be understood as an add-on therapy in patients for the treatment of acute exacerbations of COPD or for the regular maintenance treatment of patients either alone, or on top of existing drug classes.

The short-term bronchodilator effects of the dual phosphodiesterase 3 and 4 inhibitor RPL554 in COPD

We investigated the short-term bronchodilator effects of RPL554 (an inhaled dual phosphodiesterase 3 and 4 inhibitor) combined with other bronchodilators in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with reversibility (>150 mL to short-acting bronchodilators).

Study 1 was a six-way, placebo-controlled crossover study (n=36) with single doses of RPL554 (6 mg), salbutamol (200 µg), ipratropium (40 µg), RPL554 (6 mg)+salbutamol (200 µg), RPL554 (6 mg)+ipratropium (40 µg) or placebo. Study 2 was a three-way crossover study (n=30) of tiotropium (18 µg) combined with RPL554 (1.5 or 6 mg) or placebo for 3 days. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁), lung volumes and specific airway conductance (sG_aw) were measured.

In study 1, peak FEV₁ change compared with placebo was similar with RPL554, ipratropium and salbutamol (mean 223, 199 and 187 mL, respectively). The peak FEV₁ was higher for RPL554+ipratropium versus ipratropium (mean difference 94 mL; p<0.0001) and RPL554+salbutamol versus salbutamol (mean difference 108 mL; p<0.0001). In study 2 (day 3), both RPL554 doses caused greater peak FEV₁ effects than placebo. The average FEV_{1(0–12 h)} increase was greater with RPL554 6 mg only versus placebo (mean difference 65 mL; p=0.0009). In both studies, lung volumes and sG_aw showed greater RPL554 combination treatment effects versus monotherapy.

RPL554 combined with standard bronchodilators caused additional bronchodilation and hyperinflation reduction.

The dual PDE3 and PDE4 inhibitor RPL554 causes additional bronchodilation when combined with commonly used short- or long-acting bronchodilatorshttp://ow.ly/CUYi30lDcYW

Beclomethasone dipropionate and formoterol fumarate synergistically interact in hyperresponsive medium bronchi and small airways

Background

Corticosteroids increase the expression of β₂-adrenoceptors (β₂-ARs) and protect them against down-regulation. Conversely, β₂-AR agonists improve the anti-inflammatory action of corticosteroids. Nevertheless, it is still uncertain whether adding a long-acting β₂-AR agonist (LABA) to an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) results in an additive effect, or there is true synergy.

Therefore, the aim of this study was to pharmacologically characterize the interaction between the ICS beclomethasone diproprionate (BDP) and the LABA formoterol fumarate (FF) in a validated human ex vivo model of bronchial asthma.

Methods

Human medium and small airways were stimulated by histamine and treated with different concentrations of BDP and FF, administered alone and in combination at concentration-ratio reproducing ex vivo that of the currently available fixed-dose combination (FDC; BDP/FF 100:6 combination-ratio). Experiments were performed in non-sensitized (NS) and passively sensitized (PS) airways. The pharmacological interaction was assessed by using Bliss Independence and Unified Theory equations.

Results

BDP/FF synergistically increased the overall bronchorelaxation in NS and PS airways (+ 15.15% ± 4.02%; P < 0.05 vs. additive effect). At low-to-medium concentrations the synergistic interaction was greater in PS than in NS bronchioles (+ 16.68% ± 3.02% and + 7.27% ± 3.05%, respectively). In PS small airways a very strong synergistic interaction (Combination Index: 0.08; + 20.04% ± 2.18% vs. additive effect) was detected for the total concentrations of BDP/FF combination corresponding to 10.6 ng/ml.

Conclusion

BDP/FF combination synergistically relaxed human bronchi; the extent of such an interaction was very strong at low-to-medium concentrations in PS small airways.

Trial registration

Not applicable.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-018-0770-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Combining long-acting bronchodilators with different mechanisms of action: A pharmacological approach to optimize bronchodilation of equine airways

The ultra long-acting β₂ -adrenoceptor agonist olodaterol plus the ultra long-acting muscarinic antagonist tiotropium bromide are known to relax equine airways. In human bronchi combining these drugs elicits a positive interaction, thus we aimed to characterize this information further in equine isolated airways stimulated by electrical field stimulation (EFS) and using the Concentration-Reduction Index (CRI) and Combination Index (CI) equations. The drugs were administered alone and together by reproducing ex vivo the concentration-ratio delivered by the currently available fixed-dose combination (1:1). The single agents elicited a significant (p < .05) concentration-dependent reduction in the EFS-induced contractility, that was synergistically improved (CI 0.18) when administered in combination (0.9 logarithms more potent, 24% more effective than the monocomponents). The drugs mixture allowed a reduction in the concentration of olodaterol from ≃1 to ≃2.3 logarithms. A favorable CRI was detected also for tiotropium bromide, whose concentration can be reduced ≃1 logarithm at medium effect levels, remaining positive up to submaximal relaxant effect in the presence of olodaterol. The combination of tiotropium bromide/olodaterol allows the reduction in the concentration of the monocomponents to achieve airway smooth muscle relaxation, thus potentially decreases the risk of adverse events when these drugs are used to treat severe asthmatic horses.

Effect of lipopolysaccharide on the responsiveness of equine bronchial tissue

Recurrent airway obstruction (RAO) is a main characteristic of horses with severe equine asthma syndrome. The presence of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the airways of horses is thought to play a crucial role in the clinical expression of this disorder. This study pharmacologically characterized the effect of LPS on the responsiveness of equine bronchial tissue. Equine isolated bronchi were incubated overnight with LPS (0.1-100 ng/ml) and then stimulated by electrical field stimulation (EFS). The role of capsaicin sensitive-sensory nerves (capsaicin desensitization treatment), neurokinin-2 (NK₂) receptors (blocked by GR159897), transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 receptors (TRPV1; blocked by SB366791), and neurokinin A (NKA) were investigated. Untreated bronchi were used as control tissues. LPS (1 ng/ml) significantly increased the EFS-evoked contractility of equine bronchi compared with control tissues (+742 ± 123 mg; P < 0.001). At higher concentrations LPS induced desensitization to airways hyperresponsiveness (AHR; EC₅₀: 5.9 ± 2.6 ng/ml). Capsaicin desensitization and GR159897 significantly prevented AHR induced by LPS at EFS_1-50Hz (-197 ± 25%; P < 0.01). SB366791 inhibited AHR at very low EFS frequency (EFS_1Hz -193 ± 29%; P < 0.01 vs. LPS-treated bronchi). LPS (1 ng/ml) significantly (P < 0.01) increased 3.7 ± 0.7 fold the release of NKA compared with control bronchi. LPS induces biphasic dysfunctional bronchial contractility due to the stimulation of capsaicin sensitive-sensory nerves, increased release of NKA, and activation of NK₂ receptors, whereas TRPV1 receptors appear to play a marginal role in this response. The overnight challenge with low concentrations of LPS represents a suitable model to investigate pharmacological options that may be of value in the treatment of equine RAO.

Bifunctional Drugs for the Treatment of Respiratory Diseases

Over the last decade, there has been a steady increase in the use of fixed dose combinations for the treatment of a range of diseases, including cancer, AIDS, tuberculosis and other infectious diseases. It is now evident that patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can also benefit from the use of fixed dose combinations, including combinations of a long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA) and an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), and combinations of LABAs and long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonists (LAMAs). There are now also "triple inhaler" fixed dose combinations (containing a LABA, LAMA and ICS) under development and already being made available in clinical practice, with the first such triple combination having been approved in India. The use of combinations containing drugs with complementary pharmacological actions in the treatment of patients with asthma or COPD has led to the discovery and development of drugs having two different primary pharmacological actions in the same molecule that we have called "bifunctional drugs". In this review we have discussed the state of the art of bifunctional drugs that can be categorized as bifunctional bronchodilators, bifunctional bronchodilator/anti-inflammatory drugs, bifunctional anti-inflammatory drugs and bifunctional mucolytic and anti-inflammatory drugs.

Pharmacological characterization of the interaction between tiotropium and olodaterol administered at 5:5 concentration-ratio in equine bronchi

Equine airways represent a suitable ex vivo model to study the functional impact of pharmacological treatments on human chronic obstructive pulmonary disorders, such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We aimed to characterize the pharmacological interaction between the long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) tiotropium and the long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA) olodaterol in equine airways. The effect of tiotropium and olodaterol, administered alone and in combination at the ratio of concentrations reproducing ex vivo the concentration-ratio delivered by the currently available fixed-dose combination (FDC) (5:5), was investigated on the cholinergic contractile tone induced by the parasympathetic activation of equine isolated airways. The drug interaction was analysed by using the Bliss Independence and Unified Theory models. Both tiotropium and olodaterol induced a sub-maximal concentration-dependent inhibition of bronchial contractility (E_max: tiotropium 83.6 ± 14.8%, olodaterol 76.9 ± 17.9%; pEC₅₀: tiotropium 8.2 ± 0.5; olodaterol 8.3 ± 0.6). When administered at 5:5 concentration-ratio, tiotropium plus olodaterol completely inhibited the bronchial contractility (E_max 102.7 ± 8.4%; pEC₅₀ 9.0 ± 0.7). Strong synergistic interaction was detected for tiotropium/olodaterol combination (combination index 0.011). When administered at low concentrations, the drug mixture elicited up to 94.6 ± 9.5% effect that was 36.0 ± 8.1% greater than the expected additive effect. The results of this study demonstrate that the co-administration of tiotropium plus olodaterol at 5:5 concentration-ratio leads to synergistic inhibition of equine bronchial contractility when compared with either drug administered alone. These findings suggest that the currently available LABA/LABA FDC may be effective in delivering tiotropium/olodaterol combination at equipotency concentrations of each monocomponent into the lung and, thus, inducing synergistic effect in the airways.

Pharmacological characterization of the interaction between umeclidinium and vilanterol in human bronchi

The long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA) / long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) fixed dose combination (FDC) therapy represents the cornerstone for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Nevertheless, conflicting clinical findings still exist on the real benefit of the LABA/LAMA FDCs. Therefore, we investigated whether combining the LABA vilanterol with the LAMA umeclidinium may induce synergistic bronchorelaxant effect in isolated airways. The effect of umeclidinium and vilanterol, administered alone, in combination at the ratio of concentrations reproducing the doses delivered by Anoro^® Ellipta^® (55:22), or at isoeffective low concentrations, was investigated on the cholinergic contractile tone induced by the parasympathetic activation of human isolated airways. The interaction was analyzed by using the Bliss Independence and Unified Theory models. Umeclidinium and vilanterol induced a concentration-dependent relaxation of isolated bronchi, with umeclidinium significantly (P < 0.05) more potent than vilanterol (E_max at 10Hz: umeclidium 102.6 ± 6.8%, vilanterol 75.1 ± 13.8%; pEC₅₀ at 10Hz: umeclidinium 8.6 ± 0.4, vilanterol 6.9 ± 0.6). When administered at 55:22 concentration-ratio, umeclidinium plus vilanterol completely relaxed the isolated airways (E_max at 10Hz: 99.6 ± 8.0%; pEC₅₀ at 10Hz: 8.2 ± 0.4). No synergistic interaction was detected for umeclidinium/vilanterol combined at 55:22 ratio, whereas strong synergism was elicited when the drugs were administered at low isoeffective concentrations (+ 41.4 ± 5.8% vs. monocomponents), leading to submaximal relaxant effect (81.4 ± 5.8%). Umeclidinium and vilanterol are imbalanced when combined at 55:22 ratio, with umeclidinium over-dosed, or vice versa vilanterol under-dosed. Specific studies are needed to identify the dose ratio of umeclidinium/vilanterol combination to guarantee equipotency concentrations of each component into the lung, and induce synergistic bronchodilation.

Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor: A Novel Pharmacological Target for Treating Human Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness

Asthma is associated with several comorbidities, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, which may lead to bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Because glucagon-like peptide (GLP) 1 regulates glucose homeostasis, we pharmacologically investigated the influence of the GLP1 receptor (GLP1-R) agonist, exendin-4, on BHR induced in human isolated airways. The effect of exendin-4 was assessed in human isolated airways undergoing overnight passive sensitization and high-glucose stimulation, two conditions mimicking ex vivo the BHR typical of patients with asthma and diabetes, respectively. GLP1-R activation modulated the bronchial contractile tone induced by transmural stimulation (maximum effect -56.7 ± 3.6%; onset of action, 28.2 ± 4.4 min). Exendin-4 prevented BHR induced by both high-glucose stimulation and passive sensitization (-37.8 ± 7.5% and -74.9 ± 3.9%, P < 0.05 versus control, respectively) through selective activation of GLP1-R and in an epithelium-independent manner. The cAMP-dependent protein kinase A inhibitor, KT5720, reduced the protective role of exendin-4 (P > 0.05 versus passively sensitized tissues). The GLP1-R stimulation by overnight incubation with exendin-4 induced the overexpression of adenylyl cyclase isoform V (+48.4 ± 1.3%, P < 0.05 versus passively sensitized tissues) and restored the cAMP levels depleted by this procedure (+330.8 ± 63.3%, P < 0.05 versus passively sensitized tissues). In conclusion, GLP1-R may represent a novel target for treating BHR by activating the cAMP-dependent protein kinase A pathway in human airways, and GLP1-R agonists could be used as a "new" class to treat patients with asthma and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with BHR.

Xanthines and Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors

Theophylline is an orally acting xanthine that has been used since 1937 for the treatment of respiratory diseases including asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, in most treatment guidelines, xanthines have now been consigned to third-line therapy because of their narrow therapeutic window and propensity for drug-drug interactions. However, lower than conventional doses of theophylline considered to be bronchodilator are now known to have anti-inflammatory actions of relevance to the treatment of respiratory disease. The molecular mechanism(s) of action of theophylline are not well understood, but several potential targets have been suggested including non-selective inhibition of phosphodiesterases (PDE), inhibition of phosphoinositide 3-kinase, adenosine receptor antagonism and increased activity of certain histone deacetylases. Although theophylline has a narrow therapeutic window, other xanthines are in clinical use that are claimed to have a better tolerability such as doxofylline and bamifylline. Nonetheless, xanthines still play an important role in the treatment of asthma and COPD as they can show clinical benefit in patients who are refractory to glucocorticosteroid therapy, and withdrawal of xanthines from patients causes worsening of disease, even in patients taking concomitant glucocorticosteroids.More recently the orally active selective PDE4 inhibitor, roflumilast, has been introduced into clinical practice for the treatment of severe COPD on top of gold standard treatment. This drug has been shown to improve lung function in patients with severe COPD and to reduce exacerbations, but is dose limited by a range side effect, particularly gastrointestinal side effects.

Novel relaxant effects of RPL554 on guinea pig tracheal smooth muscle contractility

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We investigated the effectiveness of RPL554, a dual PDE3 and 4 enzyme inhibitor, on airway smooth muscle relaxation and compared it with that induced by salbutamol, ipratropium bromide, glycopyrrolate or their combination on bronchomotor tone induced by different spasmogenic agents.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Guinea pig tracheal preparations were suspended under 1 g tension in Krebs-Henseleit solution maintained at 37°C and aerated with 95% O2 /5% CO2 and incubated in the presence of indomethacin (5 μM). Relaxation induced by cumulative concentrations of muscarinic receptor antagonists (ipratropium bromide or glycopyrrolate), β2 -adrenoceptor agonists (salbutamol or formoterol), PDE3 inhibitors (cilostamide, cilostazol or siguazodan) or a PDE4 inhibitor (roflumilast) was evaluated in comparison with RPL554. Maximal relaxation was calculated (% Emax papaverine) and expressed as mean ± SEM.

KEY RESULTS

Bronchomotor tone induced by the various spasmogens was reduced by the different bronchodilators to varying degrees. RPL554 (10-300 μM) caused near maximum relaxation irrespective of the spasmogen examined, whereas the efficacy of the other relaxant agents varied according to the contractile stimulus used. During the evaluation of potential synergistic interactions between bronchodilators, RPL554 proved superior to salbutamol when either was combined with muscarinic receptor antagonists.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

RPL554 produced near maximal relaxation of highly contracted respiratory smooth muscle and provided additional relaxation compared with that produced by other clinically used bronchodilator drugs. This suggests that RPL554 has the potential to produce additional beneficial bronchodilation over and above that of maximal clinical doses of standard bronchodilators in highly constricted airways of patients.

Pirfenidone, nintedanib and N-acetylcysteine for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is increasing every year. Pirfenidone and nintedanib were approved for treatment of IPF in 2014, but they received only a conditional recommendation for use and, thus, to date no drugs are strongly recommended for IPF. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of the currently approved drugs for IPF and N-acetylcysteine (NAC), the most debated drug in the last update of guidelines for IPF treatment.

METHODS

RCTs in IPF were identified searching from databases of published and unpublished studies. The influence of pirfenidone, nintedanib and NAC on clinical outcomes, safety, and mortality was assessed via pair-wise meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Ten papers (3847 IPF patients; 2254 treated; 1593 placebo) were included in this study. Our results showed that both pirfenidone and nintedanib, but not NAC, were significantly effective in reducing FVC decline and the risk of FVC ≥10% decline in percent predicted over 12 months. Nintenadib significantly protected against the risk of acute exacerbation and mortality. Pirfenidone and nintedanib showed a similar and good safety profile, whereas NAC provided a signal for increased adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The rank of effectiveness emerging from this meta-analysis represents an indirect indicator of potential differences between currently approved doses of pirfenidone and nintedanib. Direct comparisons are necessary to assess this matter, and well designed bench-to-bedside studies would permit to understand the potential of combined, sequential, or adjunctive treatment regimens in which perhaps NAC may have a role for specific clusters of IPF patients.

Brain natriuretic peptide: Much more than a biomarker

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) modulates several biological processes by activating the natriuretic peptide receptor A (NPR-A). Atria and ventricles secrete BNP. BNP increases natriuresis, diuresis and vasodilatation, thus resulting in a decreased cardiac workload. BNP and NT-proBNP, which is the biologically inactive N-terminal portion of its pro-hormone, are fast and sensitive biomarkers for diagnosing heart failure. The plasma concentrations of both BNP and NT-proBNP also correlate with left ventricular function in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD, even without history of heart failure. Several studies have been conducted in vitro and in vivo, both in animals and in humans, in order to assess the potential role of the NPR-A activation as a novel therapeutic approach for treating obstructive pulmonary disorders. Unfortunately, these studies have yielded conflicting results. Nevertheless, further recent specific studies, performed in ex vivo models of asthma and COPD, have confirmed the bronchorelaxant effect of BNP and its protective role against bronchial hyperresponsiveness in human airways. These studies have also clarified the intimate mechanism of action of BNP, represented by an autocrine loop elicited by the activation of NPR-A, localized on bronchial epithelium, and the relaxant response of the surrounding ASM, which does not expresses NPR-A. This review explores the teleological activities and paradoxical effects of BNP with regard to chronic obstructive respiratory disorders, and provides an excursus on the main scientific findings that explain why BNP should be considered much more than a biomarker.

Onset of action of budesonide/formoterol Spiromax(®) compared with budesonide/formoterol Turbuhaler(®) in patients with COPD

Budesonide/formoterol (BF) is available in two delivery systems, the dry powder inhaler (DPI) Turbuhaler and a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) for use in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Spiromax DPI was recently developed as an alternative to Turbuhaler DPI. In the present study, we examined whether there is a difference in the onset of bronchodilatation between BF 320/9 μg delivered by Spiromax and BF 320/9 μg delivered by Turbuhaler in 16 outpatients with stable moderate-to-severe COPD. Our results confirm the rapid onset of action of formoterol when combined with budesonide in patients with COPD and indicate that the onset of bronchodilation induced by BF Spiromax is faster than that elicited by BF Turbuhaler. Furthermore, they show that BF fixed-dose combination does not induce a decrease in SpO2 or an increase in heart rate in patients with COPD, irrespective of the DPI used to deliver this combination. Given the evidence that both inhalers have an equal safety profile, BF Spiromax offers to prescribers and COPD patients an effective alternative to BF Turbuhaler depending also on their preference, availability and cost.

Pharmacological characterisation of the interaction between glycopyrronium bromide and indacaterol fumarate in human isolated bronchi, small airways and bronchial epithelial cells

BACKGROUND

Nowadays, there is a considerable gap in knowledge concerning the mechanism(s) by which long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) interact to induce bronchodilation. This study aimed to characterise the pharmacological interaction between glycopyrronium bromide and indacaterol fumarate and to identify the mechanism(s) leading to the bronchorelaxant effect of this interaction.

METHODS

The effects of glycopyrronium plus indacaterol on the contractile tone of medium and small human isolated bronchi were evaluated, and acetylcholine and cAMP concentrations were quantified. The interaction was assessed by Bliss Independence approach.

RESULTS

Glycopyrronium plus indacaterol synergistically inhibited the bronchial tone (medium bronchi, +32.51 % ± 7.86 %; small bronchi, +28.46 % ± 5.35 %; P < 0.05 vs. additive effect). The maximal effect was reached 140 min post-administration. A significant (P < 0.05) synergistic effect was observed during 9 h post-administration on the cholinergic tone, but not on the histaminergic contractility. Co-administration of glycopyrronium and indacaterol reduced the release of acetylcholine from the epithelium but not from bronchi, and enhanced cAMP levels in bronchi and epithelial cells (P < 0.05 vs. control), an effect that was inhibited by the selective KCa(++) channel blocker iberiotoxin. The role of cAMP-dependent pathway was confirmed by the synergistic effect elicited by the adenylate cyclase activator forskolin on glycopyrronium (P < 0.05 vs. additive effect), but not on indacaterol (P > 0.05 vs. additive effect), with regard of the bronchial relaxant response and cAMP increase.

CONCLUSIONS

Glycopyrronium/indacaterol co-administration leads to a synergistic improvement of bronchodilation by increasing cAMP concentrations in both airway smooth muscle and bronchial epithelium, and by decreasing acetylcholine release from the epithelium.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of GSK961081 (Batefenterol), a Muscarinic Antagonist and β2-Agonist, in Moderate-to-Severe COPD Patients: Substudy of a Randomized Trial

GSK961081 (batefenterol) is a novel bifunctional molecule composed of a muscarinic antagonist and a β₂‐agonist. The aims of this substudy were (1) to characterize the population pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of GSK961081 in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); and (2) to investigate the relationship between systemic exposure to GSK961081 and key cardiac-related safety parameters. Three once-daily doses (100, 400, and 800 μg) and three twice-daily doses (100, 200, and 400 μg) of GSK961081 DISKUS were investigated. A two-compartment disposition PK model with first-order absorption adequately described the plasma GSK961081 concentration–time data. An empirical maximum-effects PD model adequately described the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) response relationship with the covariate baseline FEV₁ on day 1. No clear relationships between GSK961081 plasma drug levels and cardiac-related safety parameters were apparent. The PK and PD models will be used to guide the dose selection and development of GSK961081 in patients with COPD.

Interaction between corticosteroids and muscarinic antagonists in human airways

BACKGROUND

To date there is emerging clinical evidence to add long-acting anti-muscarinic agents (LAMAs) with inhaled corticosteroid (ICSs) in asthma, but the pharmacological rationale that supports the use of such a combination has not yet been explained. The aim of this study was to pharmacologically investigate the interaction between the ICS beclomethasone and the LAMA glycopyrronium on the human airway smooth muscle (ASM) tone.

METHODS

We investigated the rapid non-genomic bronchorelaxant effect of beclomethasone and glycopyrronium, administered alone and in combination, in human isolated bronchi and bronchioles. Experiments were carried out also in passively sensitized airways and the pharmacological analysis of drug interaction was performed by Bliss Independence method.

RESULTS

The acute administration of beclomethasone and glycopyrronium induced a significant relaxation of passively sensitized ASM pre-contracted with histamine, by causing submaximal/maximal inhibition of the contractile tone in both medium bronchi and bronchioles. Beclomethasone was characterized by a rapid non-genomic and epithelium independent bronchorelaxant effect. In passively sensitized airways, this effect seemed to be dependent by the activation of a Gsα--cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)--protein kinase A cascade. While no synergistic interaction was detected in non-sensitized bronchi, the beclomethasone/glycopyrronium combination synergistically enhanced the relaxation of passively sensitized medium and small bronchi. The synergistic interaction between beclomethasone and glycopyrronium was associated with an increase of cAMP concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides for the first time the pharmacological rationale for combining low doses of an ICS plus a LAMA.

The dual phosphodiesterase 3 and 4 inhibitor RPL554 stimulates CFTR and ciliary beating in primary cultures of bronchial epithelia

Cystic fibrosis (CF), a genetic disease caused by mutations in the CFTR gene, is a life-limiting disease characterized by chronic bacterial airway infection and severe inflammation. Some CFTR mutants have reduced responsiveness to cAMP/PKA signaling; hence, pharmacological agents that elevate intracellular cAMP are potentially useful for the treatment of CF. By inhibiting cAMP breakdown, phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors stimulate CFTR in vitro and in vivo. Here, we demonstrate that PDE inhibition by RPL554, a drug that has been shown to cause bronchodilation in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, stimulates CFTR-dependent ion secretion across bronchial epithelial cells isolated from patients carrying the R117H/F508del CF genotype. RPL554-induced CFTR activity was further increased by the potentiator VX-770, suggesting an additional benefit by the drug combination. RPL554 also increased cilia beat frequency in primary human bronchial epithelial cells. The results indicate RPL554 may increase mucociliary clearance through stimulation of CFTR and increasing ciliary beat frequency and thus could provide a novel therapeutic option for CF.

Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a review of current and developing drugs

INTRODUCTION

Phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors modulate lung inflammation and cause bronchodilation by increasing intracellular cyclic adenosine 3', 5'-monophosphate in airway smooth muscle and inflammatory cells. Roflumilast is the only approved PDE-4 inhibitor (PDE4I) for use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Its beneficial clinical effects occur preferentially in patients with chronic bronchitis and frequent COPD exacerbations. Use of roflumilast as adjunctive or alternate therapy to other COPD medications reduces exacerbations and modestly improves lung function.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the current role of PDE4I in COPD treatment emphasizing roflumilast's clinical efficacy and adverse effects. This article also reviews developing PDE4Is in early clinical trials and in preclinical studies.

EXPERT OPINION

After decades of research in drug development, PDE4Is are a welcomed addition to the COPD therapeutic armamentarium. In its current clinical role, the salubrious clinical effects of PDE4I in reducing exacerbations and stabilizing the frequent exacerbator phenotype have to be cautiously balanced with numerous adverse effects. Developing drugs may provide similar or better clinical benefits while minimizing adverse effects by changing the mode of drug delivery to inhaled formulations, combining dual PDE isoenzyme inhibitors (PDE1/4I and PDE3/4I) and by forming hybrid molecules with other bronchodilators (muscarinic receptor antagonist/PDE4I and β2-agonist/PDE4I).