Risk and impact of radiation related lymphopenia in lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Recent developments in the field of radiotherapy for the management of lung cancer

Lung cancer has a poor prognosis, and further improvements in outcomes are needed. Radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of unresectable lung cancer, and there have been recent developments in the field of radiotherapy for the management of lung cancer. However, to date, there have been few reviews on the improvement in treatment outcomes associated with high precision radiotherapy for lung cancer. Thus, this review aimed to summarize the recent developments in radiotherapy techniques and indicate the future directions in the use of radiotherapy for lung cancer. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for unresectable stage I lung cancer has been reported to improve local control rates without severe adverse events, such as radiation pneumonitis. For locally advanced lung cancer, a combination of chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors dramatically improves treatment outcomes, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) enables safer radiation therapy with less frequent pneumonitis. Particle beam therapy, such as carbon-ion radiotherapy and proton beam therapy, has been administered as advanced medical care for patients with lung cancer. Since 2024, it has been covered under insurance for early stage lung cancer with tumors ≤ 5 cm in size in Japan. In addition to chemotherapy, local ablative radiotherapy improves treatment outcomes in patients with oligometastatic stage IV lung cancer. A particular problem with radiotherapy for lung cancer is that the target location changes with respiratory motion, and various physical methods have been used to control respiratory motion. Recently, coronavirus disease has had a major impact on lung cancer treatment, and cancer treatment during situations, such as the coronavirus pandemic, must be performed carefully. To improve treatment outcomes for lung cancer, it is necessary to fully utilize evolving radiotherapy modalities, and the role of radiotherapy in lung cancer treatment is expected to increase.

Lymphopenia associated with whole-brain radiotherapy and its effects on clinical outcomes of patients with brain metastases

There is increasing awareness of radiotherapy's potential side effects, such as lymphopenia. Therefore, this study aimed to establish the association between WBRT and the development of lymphopenia in patients with brain metastases undergoing brain radiotherapy (RT), along with evaluating the corresponding clinical outcomes. Including 116 patients with brain metastases undergoing brain radiotherapy, the study collected the absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) within 2 weeks before brain radiotherapy (pre-radiotherapy, pre-RT), as well as ones at 1 and 2 months after completing RT (post-RT). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify associations between radiation modality and post-RT ALC. The relationships between post-RT ALC and overall survival were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and a multivariate Cox regression model. The median ALC definitely decreased at 1 month post-RT, but at 2 months post-RT, gradually rose but not to the pre-RT ALC. The multivariate analysis identified WBRT and lower pre-RT ALC as independent risk factors associated with the decrease in post-RT ALC at 1 month. It also revealed more than 4 brain metastases, G3-4 lymphopenia at 1 month and lower post-RT ALC at 2 months exhibited significantly worse prognosis regardless of the radiation modality. However, there was indeed an independent correlation between radiation modality and the outcome of intracranial progression-free survival (PFS). To approach the feasibility and reasonableness of treatment, clinicians should carefully consider various factors to achieve long-term survival of patients.

Palliative Thoracic Radiotherapy in the Era of Modern Cancer Care for NSCLC

Palliative thoracic radiotherapy provides rapid and effective symptom relief in approximately two-thirds of NSCLC patients treated. In patients with poor performance status, the degree of palliation appears unrelated to the radiation dose or fractionation schedule. Conversely, in patients with good performance status, higher radiation doses administered over longer periods have shown modest survival benefits. These findings stem from studies conducted before the advent of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in clinical practice. Currently, there are no large prospective studies specifically dedicated to palliative radiotherapy conducted in this new treatment era. Modern radiotherapy technologies are now widely available and are increasingly used for palliative purposes in selected patients, reflecting the expanded array of therapeutic options for disseminated NSCLC and improved prognosis. Some traditional tenets of palliative thoracic radiotherapy, such as the improvement of overall survival with a protracted radiation schedule and the use of simple, cost-effective radiation techniques for palliative purposes, may no longer hold true for patients receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy. The application of IMRT or SBRT in the context of palliative radiotherapy for NSCLC is not yet sufficiently explored, and this is addressed in this review. Moreover, new risks associated with combining palliative radiotherapy with these systemic treatments are being explored and are discussed within the context of palliative care. The optimal timing, doses, fractionation schedules, and treatment volumes for radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy or targeted therapy are currently subjects of investigation. In emergencies, radiotherapy should be used as a life-saving measure without delay. However, for other indications of palliative thoracic radiotherapy, decisions regarding doses, timing relative to systemic treatments, and treatment volumes should be made in a multidisciplinary context, considering the patient's prognosis, anticipated outcomes, and access to potentially effective treatments. We still lack robust data from prospective studies on this matter. This review examines and discusses available evidence on the use of palliative thoracic radiotherapy within the framework of modern treatment strategies for NSCLC.

Early lymphocyte levels and low doses radiation exposure of lung predict lymphopenia in radiotherapy for lung cancer

Introduction

Radiation induced lymphopenia (RIL) deteriorate survival and diminishes the benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combined treatment of lung cancer. Given the inconsistent data across various studies on the predictors of RIL, we aim to methodically elucidate these predictors and formulate a practical guide for clinicians.

Methods

We conducted observational cohort study in four tertiary cancer centers. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer, without lymphopenia grade >1, who underwent standalone radiotherapy (RT) in minimum 15 fractions were eligible. Dose-volume parameters of structures and clinical factors were comprehensively analyzed using various predictors selection methods and statistical models (Linear Regressors, Elastic Net, Bayesian Regressors, Huber Regression, regression based on k-nearest neighbors, Gaussian Process Regressor, Decision Tree Regressor, Random Forest Regressor, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, Automated Machine Learning) and were ranked to predict lymphocytes count nadir (alc_nadir).

Results

Two hundred thirty eight patients (stage I-3.4%, II-17.6%, III-75.2%, IV-3.8%) who underwent RT to median dose of 60 Gy were analyzed. Median alc_nadir was 0.68K/mm3. The 60 feature sets were evaluated in 600 models (RMSE 0.27-0.41K/mm³). The most important features were baseline lymphocyte count (alc_1), mean lung_dose, lung v05, lung v10, heart v05 and effective dose to immune cells (edic). In patients with alc_1 ≤ 2.005K/mm3, median alc_nadir predictions were 0.54K/mm3 for lung_v05p > 51.8% and 0.76K/mm3 for lung_v05p ≤ 51.8%. Lymphopenia was rare in patients with alc_1 > 2.005K/mm3.

Discussion

RIL was most severe in patients with low early lymphocyte counts, primarily triggered by low RT doses in the heart and lungs.

Lymphopenia after palliative radiotherapy for vertebral metastases

Lymphopenia is a well-known side effect of radiotherapy and has been shown to have a negative impact on patient outcomes. However, the extent of lymphopenia caused by palliative radiotherapy and its effect on patient prognosis has not been clarified. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and severity of lymphopenia after palliative radiotherapy for vertebral metastases and to determine their effects on patients' survival outcomes. We conducted a retrospective analysis for patients who underwent palliative radiotherapy for vertebral metastases and could be followed up for 12 weeks. Lymphocyte counts were documented at baseline and throughout the 12-week period following the start of radiotherapy and their medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) were recorded. Exploratory analyses were performed to identify predictive factors for lymphopenia and its impact on overall survival (OS). A total of 282 cases that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The median baseline lymphocyte count was 1.26 × 103/μl (IQR: 0.89-1.72 × 103/μl). Peak lymphopenia occurred at a median of 26 days (IQR: 15-45 days) with a median nadir of 0.52 × 103/μl (IQR: 0.31-0.81 × 103/μl). Long-term analysis of patients surviving for 1 year showed that lymphopenia persisted at 1 year after radiotherapy. The main irradiation site, radiation field length and pretreatment lymphocyte count were significantly related to grade 3 or higher lymphopenia. Lymphopenia was identified as a significant predictor of OS by multivariate Cox regression analysis. This study demonstrated the incidence of lymphopenia after palliative radiotherapy for vertebral metastases and its effect on patients' OS.

Baseline Blood CD8+ T Cell Activation Potency Discriminates Responders from Non-Responders to Immune Checkpoint Inhibition Combined with Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Tumor-infiltrating immune cells have been correlated with prognosis for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment of various cancers. However, no robust biomarker has been described to predict treatment response yet. We hypothesized that the activation potency of circulating T cells may predict response to ICI treatment.

METHODS

An exploratory analysis was conducted to investigate the association between the response to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) combined with stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) and the potency of circulating T cells to be activated. Blood-derived lymphocytes from 14 patients were stimulated ex vivo with, among others, Staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) and compared to healthy controls (HCs). Patients were grouped into responders (>median progression free survival (PFS)) and non-responders (

RESULTS

At baseline, a higher percentage of activated CD8+ T cells (15.8% vs. 3.5% (p = <0.01)) and IL-2+CD69+CD8+ T cells (8.8% vs. 2.9% (p = 0.02)) was observed in responders compared to non-responders upon ex vivo stimulation with SEB. The concurrently measured serum cytokine levels were not different between responders and non-responders.

CONCLUSION

Baseline blood CD8+ T cell activation potency, measured by intracellular cytokine production after ex vivo stimulation, is a potential biomarker to discriminate responders from non-responders to SBRT combined with ICI.

Collapse

Key Words

• NSCLC
• T cell function assay
• biomarker
• cytokines
• immune checkpoint inhibition
• immunotherapy
• liquid biopsy

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants

• ESR 16-12461 / D4191C00075 AstraZeneca (Netherlands)

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Hanneke Kievit Department of Pulmonology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands (H.A.M.K.)
M. Benthe Muntinghe-Wagenaar Department of Pulmonology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands (H.A.M.K.)
Wayel H. Abdulahad Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
Abraham Rutgers Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
Lucie B. M. Hijmering-Kappelle Department of Pulmonology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands (H.A.M.K.)
Birgitta I. Hiddinga Department of Pulmonology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands (H.A.M.K.)
J. Fred Ubbels Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
Robin Wijsman Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
Marcel J. van der Leij Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical Immunology Laboratory, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
Johan Bijzet Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
Harry J. M. Groen Department of Pulmonology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands (H.A.M.K.)
Huib A. M. Kerstjens Department of Pulmonology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands (H.A.M.K.)
Anthonie J. van der Wekken Department of Pulmonology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands (H.A.M.K.)
Bart-Jan Kroesen Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical Immunology Laboratory, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
T. Jeroen N. Hiltermann Department of Pulmonology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands (H.A.M.K.)

Collapse

Nomogram for radiation-induced lymphopenia in patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy based-chemoradiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A multi-institutional study

Purpose

Severe lymphopenia (SLP) has emerged as a significant prognostic factor in glioblastoma. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)-based radiation therapy (RT) is suggested to minimize the risk of SLP. This study aimed to evaluate SLP incidence based on multi-institutional database in patients with GBM treated with IMRT and develop a predictive nomogram.

Patients and methods

This retrospective study reviewed data from 348 patients treated with IMRT-based concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) at two major hospitals from 2016 to 2021. After multivariate regression analysis, a nomogram was developed and internally validated to predict SLP risk.

Results

During treatment course, 21.0% of patients developed SLP and SLP was associated with poor overall survival outcomes in patients with GBM. A newly developed nomogram, incorporating gender, pre-CCRT absolute lymphocyte count, and brain mean dose, demonstrated fair predictive accuracy (AUC 0.723).

Conclusions

This study provides the first nomogram for predicting SLP in patients with GBM treated with IMRT-based CCRT, with acceptable predictive accuracy. The findings underscore the need for dose optimization and radiation planning to minimize SLP risk. Further external validation is crucial for adopting this nomogram in clinical practice.

Late-onset lymphopenia during radiation is associated with an increased risk of tumor recurrence in newly diagnosed pediatric medulloblastoma

BACKGROUND

Recent data found a correlation between lymphopenia occurring early during craniospinal radiation therapy (RT) and risk of disease recurrence in newly diagnosed childhood medulloblastoma. However, the population included patients who received chemotherapy prior to or during RT. Here, we investigate the effect of lymphopenia during RT in patients with newly diagnosed pediatric medulloblastoma who were chemotherapy-naïve.

PROCEDURE

We analyzed 79 patients with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma (ages 2-21 years) treated between 1997 and 2013 with craniospinal RT. Log-rank tests were used to determine survival differences, and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess associations between patient characteristics and lymphopenia with disease recurrence risk.

RESULTS

Eighty-three percent of patients (62/75) had grade ≥3 lymphopenia by RT Week 3, with 95% developing grade ≥3 lymphopenia at some point during therapy. There was no difference in incidence of lymphopenia between those who received proton beam RT (93%) versus photon (97%). Twenty-four of 79 (30%) patients developed disease recurrence at an average 27.0 months after diagnosis. There was higher risk of disease recurrence in patients with grade ≥3 lymphopenia during RT Week 4 (log-rank p = .016; Cox p = .03) and Week 5 (log-rank p = .024; Cox p = .032); after adjusting for clinical risk group, only grade ≥3 lymphopenia at Week 4 remained prognostic (Cox p = .04). No correlation was found between risk of tumor recurrence and early lymphopenia (RT Weeks 0-3) or absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) below the median at any time during RT.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphopenia during RT Weeks 4 and 5 correlates with increased risk of tumor recurrence in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma.

Immune System Dose With Proton Versus Photon Radiotherapy for Treatment of Locally Advanced NSCLC

Purpose

Emerging data have illuminated the impact of effective radiation dose to immune cells (EDIC) on outcomes in patients with locally advanced, unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Hypothesizing that intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) may reduce EDIC versus IMRT, we conducted a dosimetric analysis of patients treated at our institution.

Materials and Methods

Data were retrospectively collected for 12 patients with locally advanced, unresectable NSCLC diagnosed between 2019 and 2021 who had physician-approved IMRT and IMPT plans. Data to calculate EDIC from both Jin et al (PMID: 34944813) and Ladbury et al's (PMID: 31175902) models were abstracted. Paired t tests were utilized to compare the difference in mean EDIC between IMPT and IMRT plans.

Results

IMPT decreased EDIC for 11 of 12 patients (91.7%). The mean EDIC per the Jin model was significantly lower with IMPT than IMRT (3.04 GyE vs 4.99 Gy, P < .001). Similarly, the mean EDIC per the Ladbury model was significantly lower with IMPT than IMRT (4.50 GyE vs 7.60 Gy, P < .002). Modeled 2-year overall survival was significantly longer with IMPT than IMRT (median 71% vs 63%; P = .03).

Conclusion

IMPT offers a statistically significant reduction in EDIC compared to IMRT. Given the emergence of EDIC as a modifiable prognostic factor in treatment planning, our dosimetric study highlights a potential role for IMPT to address an unmet need in improving oncologic outcomes in patients with locoregionally advanced NSCLC.

Pelvic bone marrow dose-volume predictors of late lymphopenia following pelvic lymph node radiation therapy for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Given the substantial lack of knowledge, we aimed to assess clinical/dosimetry predictors of late hematological toxicity on patients undergoing pelvic-nodes irradiation (PNI) for prostate cancer (PCa) within a prospective multi-institute study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical/dosimetry/blood test data were prospectively collected including lymphocytes count (ALC) at baseline, mid/end-PNI, 3/6 months and every 6 months up to 5-year after PNI. DVHs of the Body, ileum (BMILEUM), lumbosacral spine (BMLS), lower pelvis (BMPELVIS), and whole pelvis (BMTOT) were extracted. Current analysis focused on 2-year CTCAEv4.03 Grade ≥ 2 (G2+) lymphopenia (ALC < 800/μL). DVH parameters that better discriminate patients with/without toxicity were first identified. After data pre-processing to limit overfitting, a multi-variable logistic regression model combining DVH and clinical information was identified and internally validated by bootstrap.

RESULTS

Complete data of 499 patients were available: 46 patients (9.2 %) experienced late G2+ lymphopenia. DVH parameters of BMLS/BMPELVIS/BMTOT and Body were associated to increased G2+ lymphopenia. The variables retained in the resulting model were ALC at baseline [HR = 0.997, 95 %CI 0.996-0.998, p < 0.0001], smoke (yes/no) [HR = 2.9, 95 %CI 1.25-6.76, p = 0.013] and BMLS-V ≥ 24 Gy (cc) [HR = 1.006, 95 %CI 1.002-1.011, p = 0.003]. When acute G3+ lymphopenia (yes/no) was considered, it was retained in the model [HR = 4.517, 95 %CI 1.954-10.441, p = 0.0004]. Performances of the models were relatively high (AUC = 0.87/0.88) and confirmed by validation.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-year lymphopenia after PNI for PCa is largely modulated by baseline ALC, with an independent role of acute G3+ lymphopenia. BMLS-V24 was the best dosimetry predictor: constraints for BMTOT (V10Gy < 1520 cc, V20Gy < 1250 cc, V30Gy < 850 cc), and BMLS (V24y < 307 cc) were suggested to potentially reduce the risk.

Dose-volume metric-based prediction of radiotherapy-induced lymphocyte loss in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with modern radiotherapy techniques

Background and Purpose

Radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) is a common side effect of radiotherapy (RT) that may negatively impact survival. We aimed to identify RIL predictors in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analysed data of 306 patients who underwent radical RT for NSCLC. Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) loss was evaluated for each patient by fitting an exponential decay curve to data from first 45 days since treatment start, and percentage ALC loss relative to baseline was calculated based on area under the decay curve and baseline ALC. We compared IMRT and VMAT treatment plans and used linear regression to predict ALC loss.

Results

ALC decreased during RT in the whole patient group, while neutrophil counts remained stable and decreased only in those treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Percentage ALC loss ranged between 11 and 78 % and was more strongly than lymphocyte nadir correlated with dose-volume metrics for relevant normal structures. We found evidence for the association of high radiation dose to the lungs, heart and body with percentage ALC loss, with lung volume exposed to 20-30 Gy being most important predictors in patients treated with IMRT. A multivariable model based on CRT use, baseline ALC and first principal component (PC1) of the dose-volume predictors showed good predictive performance (bias-corrected R2 of 0.40).

Conclusion

Percentage lymphocyte loss is a robust measure of RIL that is predicted by baseline ALC, CRT use and dose-volume parameters to the lungs, heart and body.

The prognostic value of absolute lymphocyte count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for patients with metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is considered a potential prognostic marker in early breast cancer. However, the prognosis of absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and NLR in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has been reported in a few studies, and conclusions are still conflicting. This present manuscript aims to provide further solid evidence regarding the prognostic values of ALC and NLR in MBC patients.

Method

Eligible studies that reported the associations between ALC or NLR and MBC were included by searching relative electronic databases. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were used as outcome measures. The hazard ratio (HR) values and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the outcome measures were collected as effect sizes, and further analysis and discussion were conducted according to the pooled HR, subgroup analysis, publication bias, and interstudy heterogeneity.

Results

Twenty-nine studies comprising 3,973 patients with MBC were included. According to our findings, lower ALC was significantly associated with poorer prognosis of OS (HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.68) and PFS (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.79), and greater NLR was associated with poorer OS (HR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.67) and PFS (HR = 1.82, 95% CI 1.42 to 2.35). Furthermore, the prognostic values of ALC and NLR in MBC were also observed in the subgroup analyses regarding cutoff values and ethnicities.

Conclusion

Low ALC and elevated NLR were observed to be significantly associated with adverse OS and PFS in MBC, indicating that ALC and NLR may act as potential prognostic biomarkers of MBC patients. Meanwhile, our results will also provide some novel evidence and research clues for the selection and development of clinical treatment strategies for MBC patients.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42021224114.

The need for paradigm shift: prognostic significance and implications of standard therapy-related systemic immunosuppression in glioblastoma for immunotherapy and oncolytic virotherapy

Despite significant advances in our knowledge regarding the genetics and molecular biology of gliomas over the past two decades and hundreds of clinical trials, no effective therapeutic approach has been identified for adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, and overall survival remains dismal. Great hopes are now placed on combination immunotherapy. In clinical trials, immunotherapeutics are generally tested after standard therapy (radiation, temozolomide, and steroid dexamethasone) or concurrently with temozolomide and/or steroids. Only a minor subset of patients with progressive/recurrent glioblastoma have benefited from immunotherapies. In this review, we comprehensively discuss standard therapy-related systemic immunosuppression and lymphopenia, their prognostic significance, and the implications for immunotherapy/oncolytic virotherapy. The effectiveness of immunotherapy and oncolytic virotherapy (viro-immunotherapy) critically depends on the activity of the host immune cells. The absolute counts, ratios, and functional states of different circulating and tumor-infiltrating immune cell subsets determine the net immune fitness of patients with cancer and may have various effects on tumor progression, therapeutic response, and survival outcomes. Although different immunosuppressive mechanisms operate in patients with glioblastoma/gliomas at presentation, the immunological competence of patients may be significantly compromised by standard therapy, exacerbating tumor-related systemic immunosuppression. Standard therapy affects diverse immune cell subsets, including dendritic, CD4+, CD8+, natural killer (NK), NKT, macrophage, neutrophil, and myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC). Systemic immunosuppression and lymphopenia limit the immune system's ability to target glioblastoma. Changes in the standard therapy are required to increase the success of immunotherapies. Steroid use, high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and low post-treatment total lymphocyte count (TLC) are significant prognostic factors for shorter survival in patients with glioblastoma in retrospective studies; however, these clinically relevant variables are rarely reported and correlated with response and survival in immunotherapy studies (e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, and oncolytic viruses). Our analysis should help in the development of a more rational clinical trial design and decision-making regarding the treatment to potentially improve the efficacy of immunotherapy or oncolytic virotherapy.

Severe Lymphopenia During Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Comprehensive Analysis of Randomized Phase 2B Trial of Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Lymphocytes play an important role in antitumor immunity; however, they are also especially vulnerable to depletion during chemoradiation therapy (CRT). The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of grade 4 lymphopenia (G4L) between proton beam therapy (PBT) and intensity modulated photon radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with esophageal cancer treated with CRT in a completed randomized trial and to ascertain patient heterogeneity to G4L risk based on treatment and established prognostic factors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between April 2012 and March 2019, a single-institution, open-label, nonblinded, phase 2 randomized trial (NCT01512589) was conducted at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Patients were randomly assigned to IMRT or PBT, either definitively or preoperatively. This secondary analysis of the randomized trial was G4L during concurrent CRT according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

RESULTS

Among 105 patients evaluable for analysis, 44 patients (42%) experienced G4L at a median of 28 days after the start date of concurrent CRT. Induction chemotherapy (P = .003), baseline absolute lymphocyte count (P < .001), radiation therapy modality (P = .002), and planning treatment volume (P = .033) were found to be significantly associated with G4L. Multivariate classification analysis partitioned patients into 5 subgroups for whom the incidence of G4L was observed in 0%, 14%, 35%, 70%, and 100% of patients. The benefit of PBT over IMRT was most pronounced in patients with an intermediate baseline absolute lymphocyte count and large planning treatment volume (P = .011).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first prospective evidence that limiting dose scatter by PBT significantly reduced the incidence of G4L, especially in the intermediate-risk patients. The implication of this immune-sparing effect of PBT, especially in the context of standard adjuvant immunotherapy, needs further examination in the current phase 3 randomized trials.

FLASH radiotherapy sparing effect on the circulating lymphocytes in pencil beam scanning proton therapy: impact of hypofractionation and dose rate

Purpose. The sparing effect of ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy has been reported, but its potential to mitigate depletion of circulating blood and lymphocytes (CL) has not been investigated in pencil-beam scanning-based (PBS) proton therapy, which could potentially reduce the risk of radiation-induced lymphopenia.Material and methods. A time-dependent framework was used to score the dose to the CL during the course of radiotherapy. For brain patients, cerebral vasculatures were semi-automatic segmented from 3T MR-angiography data. A dynamic beam delivery system was developed capable of simulating spatially varying instantaneous dose rates of PBS treatment plans, and which is based on realistic beam delivery parameters that are available clinically. We simulated single and different hypofractionated PBS intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) FLASH schemes using 600 nA beam current along with conventionally fractionated IMPT treatment plan at 2 nA beam current. The dosimetric impact of treatment schemes on CL was quantified, and we also evaluated the depletion in subsets of CL based on their radiosensitivity.Results. The proton FLASH sparing effect on CL was observed. In single-fraction PBS FLASH, just 1.5% of peripheral blood was irradiated, whereas hypofractionated FLASH irradiated 7.3% of peripheral blood. In contrast, conventional fractionated IMPT exposed 42.4% of peripheral blood to radiation. PBS FLASH reduced the depletion rate of CL by 69.2% when compared to conventional fractionated IMPT.Conclusion. Our dosimetric blood flow model provides quantitative measures of the PBS FLASH sparing effect on the CL in radiotherapy for brain cancer. FLASH Single treatment fraction offers superior CL sparing when compared to hypofractionated FLASH and conventional IMPT, supporting assumptions about reducing risks of lymphopenia compared to proton therapy at conventional dose rates. The results also indicate that faster conformal FLASH delivery, such as passive patient-specific energy modulation, may further enhance the sparing of the immune system.

Influence of treatment-related lymphopenia on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

Treatment-related lymphopenia (TRL) is common in patients with lung cancer, particularly in those with radiotherapy. However, the influence of TRL on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for patients with lung cancer remains poorly understood. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the influence of TRL on survival of lung cancer patients on ICIs.

Methods

In order to accomplish the aim of the meta-analysis, a comprehensive search was conducted on databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science to identify observational studies with longitudinal follow-up. The Cochrane Q test was employed to evaluate heterogeneity among the included studies, while the I2 statistic was estimated. Random-effects models were utilized to merge the results, considering the potential impact of heterogeneity.

Results

Ten cohort studies with 1130 lung cancer patients who were treated with ICIs were included. Among them, 427 (37.8%) had TRL. Pooled results showed that compared to patients without TRL, patients with TRL were associated with poor progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.62 to 2.60, p < 0.001; I2 = 22%) and overall survival (HR: 2.69, 95% CI: 2.10 to 3.43, p < 0.001; I2 = 0%). Sensitivity analysis limited to patients with non-small cell lung cancer showed similar results (HR: 2.66 and 2.62, both p < 0.05). Moreover, subgroup analyses according to the diagnostic criteria of TRL, regression analysis model (univariate or multivariate), and indications of ICIs (for locally advanced or advanced lung cancer) showed consistent results (p for subgroup difference all > 0.05).

Conclusion

TRL was associated with poor survival of lung cancer patients who were treated with ICIs.

The need of radiotherapy optimization for glioblastomas considering immune responses

Glioblastoma is the most common of malignant primary brain tumors and one of the tumors with the poorest prognosis for which the overall survival rate has not significantly improved despite recent advances in treatment techniques and therapeutic drugs. Since the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors, the immune response to tumors has attracted increasing attention. Treatments affecting the immune system have been attempted for various tumors, including glioblastomas, but little has been shown to be effective. It has been found that the reason for this is that glioblastomas have a high ability to evade attacks from the immune system, and that the lymphocyte depletion associated with treatment can reduce its immune function. Currently, research to elucidate the resistance of glioblastomas to the immune system and development of new immunotherapies are being vigorously carried out. Targeting of radiation therapy for glioblastomas varies among guidelines and clinical trials. Based on early reports, target definitions with wide margins are common, but there are also reports that narrowing the margins does not make a significant difference in treatment outcome. It has also been suggested that a large number of lymphocytes in the blood are irradiated by the irradiation treatment to a wide area in a large number of fractionations, which may reduce the immune function, and the blood is being recognized as an organ at risk. Recently, a randomized phase II trial comparing two types of target definition in radiotherapy for glioblastomas was conducted, and it was reported that the overall survival and progression-free survival were significantly better in a small irradiation field group. We review recent findings on the immune response and the immunotherapy to glioblastomas and the novel role of radiotherapy and propose the need to develop an optimal radiotherapy that takes radiation effects on the immune function into account.

Prognostic impact of radiotherapy-induced-lymphopenia in patients treated with breast-conservative surgery

We investigated a prognostic impact of radiotherapy-induced lymphopenia (RIL) in breast cancer patients treated with breast-conservative surgery (BCS). We included 531 breast cancer patients who were treated with BCS and adjuvant radiotherapy. None of these received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Pre- and post- absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) were reviewed before and after radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was to evaluate recurrence-free survival (RFS) according to the pre-to-post ALC ratio. Binary logistic regression model was used to identify risk factors for RIL. Either continuous or categorical (> 2.4) pre-to-post ALC ratio was associated with RFS. In 531 patients receiving whole breast irradiation (WBI) and regional nodal irradiation (RNI), RFS was significantly reduced in the patients with high pre-to-post ALC ration (> 2.4). In multivariable analysis, low pre-to-post post ALC ratio was significantly related to decreased RFS in the multivariable analysis (HR 2.293, 95% CIs 1.110-4.735, P = 0.025). In 452 patients treated with WBI alone, high pre-to-post ALC ratio was still significantly associated with decreased RFS in the multivariable analysis (HR 2.708, 95% CIs 1.016-7.218, P = 0.046). In binary logistic regression analysis, RNI was only significant risk factor for clinically meaningful RIL. Our findings show that a markedly decrease in ALC during radiotherapy has a negative prognostic impact.

Immunogenicity after two and three doses of mRNA vaccine in patients with cancer treated with exclusive radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Data on immunoresponse after SARS-CoV-2 vaccines for patients treated with exclusive radiotherapy (RT) are scarce. Since RT may affect the immune system, we conducted the MORA trial (Antibody response and cell-mediated immunity of MOderna mRNA-1273 vaccine in patients treated with RAdiotherapy).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data regarding humoral and cellular immune response of patients treated with RT were prospectively collected after the second and third dose of mRNA vaccines.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients were enrolled. With a median of 147 days after the second dose, the median SARS-CoV-2 IgG titer was 300 BAU/mL: six patients were seronegative (Spike IgG titer ≤ 40 BAU/mL), whereas 24, 46 and 16 were poor responders (Spike IgG titer:41-200 BAU/mL), responders (Spike IgG titer:201-800 BAU/mL) and ultraresponders (Spike IgG titer > 800 BAU/mL), respectively. Among seronegative patients, two patients were negative also for cell mediated response, as tested with IFN-γ release Assay (IGRA) test. With a median of 85 days after the third dose, the median SARS-CoV-2 IgG titer was 1632 BAU/mL in 81 patients: only two patients were seronegative, whereas 16 and 63 patients were responders and ultraresponders, respectively. Among the 2 persistently seronegative patients, IGRA test was negative in one who had previously received anti-CD20 therapy. Documented paucisymptomatic (n = 3) or asymptomatic (n = 4) infection occurred after the third dose, during the Omicron wave.

CONCLUSION

In patients treated with exclusive RT, even during the Omicron breakthrough, robust humoral response and clinical protection from severe SARS-CoV-2 disease were achievable with three doses of mRNA vaccine.

Impact of Lymphopenia Recovery After Chemoradiotherapy on Durvalumab Consolidation Therapy in Stage III NSCLC

Introduction

Durvalumab maintenance therapy after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment modality for stage III NSCLC. Although severe treatment-related lymphopenia (TRL) during CRT may impair the efficacy of subsequent durvalumab therapy, data on the effect of TRL recovery on consolidation durvalumab therapy are lacking.

Methods

This retrospective study evaluated patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with durvalumab after concurrent CRT. The patients were enrolled across nine institutes throughout Japan between August 2018 and March 2020. The effect of TRL recovery on survival was evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups on the basis of their lymphocyte recovery status: the recovery group involved patients who did not experience severe TRL or experienced TRL but exhibited lymphocyte count recovery at durvalumab initiation, and the nonrecovery group involved patients who experienced severe TRL and did not exhibit lymphocyte count recovery on durvalumab initiation.

Results

Among the 151 patients evaluated, 41 (27%) and 110 (73%) patients were classified into the recovery and the nonrecovery groups, respectively. The nonrecovery group had significantly worse progression-free survival than the recovery group (21.9 mo versus not reached, p = 0.018). Recovery from TRL (p = 0.027) and high pre-CRT lymphocyte count (p = 0.028) independently influenced progression-free survival.

Conclusions

Baseline lymphocyte count and recovery from TRL at the start of durvalumab therapy were predictive factors for survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC treated with durvalumab consolidation after concurrent CRT.

Prognostic Significance of the Post-Treatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Pharyngeal Cancers Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Even though the pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are well-established prognosticators in various cancers including head and neck cancers, there have been relatively few studies on the clinical significance of the post-treatment values. This study aimed to investigate the changes in NLR and PLR after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and to evaluate their prognostic significance in pharyngeal cancers.

METHODS

This study was retrospectively conducted on 461 consecutive patients with primary pharyngeal cancer who had received definitive CCRT. Blood test results before and after CCRT were obtained, and the pre- and post-treatment NLR and PLR were calculated. Patient prognosis was evaluated based on overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

After CCRT, the NLR increased from 2.01 (interquartile range (IQR), 1.53-2.62) to 2.69 (IQR, 1.93-3.81), and the PLR increased from 118.84 (IQR, 92.61-151.63) to 193.19 (IQR, 146.28-262.46). Along with high pre-treatment NLR and high pre-treatment PLR, high post-treatment NLR was also significantly associated with worse OS and RFS (p = 0.013 and p = 0.026). In addition, patients with a high ΔNLR (i.e., the difference between pre- and post-treatment NLRs) had significantly worse OS and RFS (p = 0.013 and p = 0.026). However, only a high pre-treatment NLR (hazard ratio (HR), 2.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17-4.08; p = 0.014), age (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.14-4.08; p = 0.018), and stage IV (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.15-3.89; p = 0.017) were independent prognostic factors for OS in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with pharyngeal cancers, following CCRT, the NLR and PLR increased significantly from pre-treatment values. Like the pre-treatment NLR and PLR, a high post-treatment NLR and a significant increase in NLR were also associated with poor prognosis. Further prospective studies are required to prove the independent significance of the post-treatment NLR and PLR.

Reduced radiation exposure to circulating blood cells in proton therapy compared with X-ray therapy in locally advanced lung cancer: Computational simulation based on circulating blood cells

Background

We estimated the dose of circulating blood cells (CBCs) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer for predicting severe radiation-induced lymphopenia (SRIL) and compared pencil-beam scanning proton therapy (PBSPT) and intensity-modulated (photon) radiotherapy (IMRT).

Materials and methods

After reviewing 325 patients who received definitive chemoradiotherapy with PBSPT (n = 37) or IMRT (n = 164). SRIL was diagnosed when two or more events of an absolute lymphocyte count < 200 µL occurred during the treatment course. Dose information for the heart and lungs was utilized for the time-dependent computational dose calculation of CBCs.

Results

The dose distribution of CBCs was significantly lesser in the PBSPT group than that in the IMRT group. Overall, 75 (37.3%) patients experienced SRIL during the treatment course; 72 and 3 patients were treated with IMRT and PBSPT, respectively. SRIL was associated with poor progression-free and overall survival outcomes. Upon incorporating the dose information of CBCs for predicting SRIL, CBC D90% > 2.6 GyE was associated with the development of SRIL with the baseline lymphocyte count and target volume. Furthermore, PBSPT significantly reduced the dose of CBC D90% (odds ratio = 0.11; p = 0.004) compared with IMRT.

Conclusion

The results of this study demonstrate the significance of the dose distribution of CBCs in predicting SRIL. Furthermore, reducing the dose of CBCs after PBSPT minimized the risk of SRIL. Lymphocyte-sparing radiotherapy in PBSPT could improve outcomes, particularly in the setting of maintenance immunotherapy.

Lymphocyte sparing normal tissue effects in the clinic (LymphoTEC): A systematic review of dose constraint considerations to mitigate radiation-related lymphopenia in the era of immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Radiation-related lymphopenia has been associated with suboptimal tumor control rates leading to inferior survival outcomes. To date, no standardized dose constraints are available to limit radiation dose to resident and circulating lymphocyte populations. We undertook this systemic review of the literature to provide a synopsis of the dosimetric predictors of radiation-related lymphopenia in solid malignancies.

METHODOLOGY

A systematic literature review of PubMed (National Institutes of Health), Cochrane Central (Cochrane collaboration), and Google Scholar was conducted with the following keywords: "radiation", "lymphopenia", "cancer", "dosimetric predictors" with an inclusion deadline of May 31, 2022. Studies that met prespecified inclusion criteria were designated either Good, Fair, or Poor Quality based on the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment. The dosimetric parameters derived from Good Quality studies were tabulated as LymphoTEC dose constraints. Dosimetric parameters derived from Fair and Poor-quality studies were grouped as optional.

RESULTS

An initial systematic search of the literature yielded 1,632 articles. After screening, a total of 48 studies met inclusion criteria and were divided into the following categories: central nervous system (CNS, 6), thoracic (11), gastrointestinal (26), gynecologic (2), head and neck, breast, and genitourinary (one each) cancers. Lung mean dose, heart mean dose, brain V25, spleen mean dose, estimated dose to immune cells, and bone marrow V10 were among the strongest predictors for severe lymphopenia related to radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Optimizing the delivery of radiation therapy to limit dose to lymphocyte-rich structures may curb the negative oncologic impact of lymphocyte depletion. The dose constraints described herein may be considered for prospective validation and future use in clinical trials to limit risk of radiation-related lymphopenia and possibly improve cancer-associated outcomes.

Hypofractionated concurrent chemoradiotherapy related lymphopenia and its association with survival in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

Background

To evaluate longitudinal changes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) related lymphopenia and its association with survival in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) patients.

Methods

Total lymphocyte count (TLC) at baseline, weekly intervals during CCRT and monthly intervals up to 12 months after CCRT were documented. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 was used to grade the severity of lymphopenia. Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between overall survival (OS) and CCRT related lymphopenia at different timepoints. Logistic regression model was used to determine the clinical factors associated with TLC level.

Results

381 LA-NSCLC patients treated with definitive CCRT without consolidation therapy (NCT02573506/NCT02577341) between 2011 to 2020 were analyzed. With a median follow-up of 45.8 months, the median OS was 41.0 months for all patients. Univariable analysis demonstrated that the 3 weeks during CCRT Grade (G) 4 lymphopenia (P=0.018), 2 months after CCRT G1-4 lymphopenia (P=0.004), 6 months after CCRT (6m-post-CCRT) G1-4 lymphopenia (P=0.001), and TLC nadir (P=0.020) were significantly associated with poorer OS. Multivariable analysis suggested that 6m-post-CCRT G1-4 lymphopenia (HR 2.614; P=0.041) were one of the independent predictors of OS. Further analysis inferred that radiation dose (OR: 1.328; P=0.005), GTV volume (OR: 1.004; P=0.036), and baseline TLC (OR: 0.288; P=0.001) were associated with 6m-post-CCRT lymphopenia.

Conclusion

The persistent lymphopenia at 6 months after CCRT was an independent prognostic factor of OS in LA-NSCLC patients. Higher radiation dose, larger gross tumor volume and lower baseline TLC were significantly related to 6m-post-CCRT lymphopenia.

Radiation-induced eosinophil increase ratio predicts patient outcomes in non-small celllung cancer

Background and purpose

Radiotherapy (RT) is a double-edged sword in regulating immune responses. This study aimed to investigate the impact of thoracic RT on circulating eosinophils and its association with patient outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included 240 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with definitive thoracic RT from January 2012 to January 2020. Statistics included Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), multivariate Cox analyses to identify significant variables, and Spearman’s correlation to qualify the relationship between dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters and EIR.

Results

Absolute eosinophil counts (AECs) showed an increasing trend during RT and an obvious peak in the 1^st month after RT. Thresholds of eosinophil increase ratio (EIR) at the 1^st month after RT for both OS and PFS were 1.43. Patients with high EIR above 1.43 experienced particularly favorable clinical outcomes (five-year OS: 21% versus 10%, P<0.0001; five-year PFS: 10% versus 8%, P=0.014), but may not derive PFS benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to RT. The higher a patient’s EIR, the larger the potential benefit in the absence of chemotherapy. DVH parameters including heart mean dose and heart V10 were negatively associated with EIR. None of these DVH parameters was correlated with the clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

EIR may serve as a potential biomarker to predict OS and PFS in NSCLC patients treated with RT. These findings require prospective studies to evaluate the role of such prognostic marker to identify patients at risk to tailor interventions.

Severe radiation-induced lymphopenia during postoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy has poor prognosis in patients with stage IIB-III after radical esophagectomy: A post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Objective

To investigate whether radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) affects survival and identify the predictors of RIL in postoperative esophageal cancer.

Materials and methods

Post hoc analysis was conducted on data from 116 patients with esophageal cancer from a randomized controlled trial comparing adjuvant therapy with surgery alone. Doses of 54 Gy in 27 fractions was delivered in the postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) group and 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions combined with chemotherapy was delivered in postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) group. Blood counts were obtained before, during, and at first follow-up after treatment. Lymphopenia was graded per version 4.03 of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Receiver operating characteristic curves identified thresholds for preventing grade 4 (G4) lymphopenia.

Results

Median follow-up duration was 56.0 months. During treatment, 16 patients (13.8%) had G4 lymphopenia. All cases of G4 lymphopenia occurred in group PORT (30.2% vs 0.0%, p<0.001). Baseline absolute lymphocyte count was comparable between G1-3 and G4 patients (2.0 ± 0.8 *10⁹/L vs 1.7 ± 0.5 *10⁹/L; p=0.101). The 3-year DFS was significantly lower in group G4 lymphopenia than that in group G1-3 (31.3% vs 57.6%, p=0.036). The 3-year OS was comparable between both groups (50.0% vs 66.5%, p=0.095). Logistic regression analysis revealed that exposed more thoracic marrow (TM V20 ≥75%; TVB V20 ≥71%), heart (V15 ≥40%) and PTV (volume ≥507 ml) were associated with G4 lymphopenia (p<0.05).

Conclusions

G4 RIL had poor disease-free survival, which may be related to more dose exposure of thoracic marrow and heart due to larger PTV. Reasonably reducing the radiation field combined with concurrent chemotherapy, or radiation dose constraints for these normal tissues may be sufficient to decrease the incidence of G4 lymphopenia, but further prospective trials are needed to verify the results.

Clinical Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02279134

Efficacy and Optimal Pressure of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer

We aimed to determine the optimal pressure of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for radiotherapy (RT) through changes in the dosimetric parameters and lung volume according to pressure. Patients with locally advanced lung cancer, who underwent CPAP during computed tomography (CT) simulation, were included. The air pressure was raised in five steps of 4, 7, 10, 14, and 17 cmH2O and a CT scan was performed at the baseline and at each pressure step, accompanied by contouring and RT planning. Paired t- and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare the volumetric and dosimetric parameters according to pressure and interpressure. A total of 29 patients were selected, and 158 CT datasets were obtained. The lung volume increased significantly at all pressures (p < 0.01). The Dmean of the lung decreased significantly from 7 cmH2O (p < 0.01), the V5, V10, V15, and V20 of the lung decreased significantly from 7 cmH2O with increasing pressure, and the Dmean and V5 of the heart decreased significantly from 14 cmH2O with increasing pressure. The V50 showed no significant differences at any pressure. We recommend the use of at least 7 cmH2O with 14 cmH2O as the optimal pressure to achieve the effect of heart preservation.

Radiation-induced lymphopenia does not impact treatment efficacy in a mouse tumor model

Radiation-induced lymphopenia is a common occurrence in radiation oncology and an established negative prognostic factor, however the mechanisms underlying the relationship between lymphopenia and inferior survival remain elusive. The relevance of lymphocyte co-irradiation as critical normal tissue component at risk is an emerging topic of high clinical relevance, even more so in the context of potentially synergistic radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations. The impact of the radiotherapy treatment volume on the lymphocytes of healthy and tumor-bearing mice was investigated in a novel mouse model of radiation-induced lymphopenia. Using an image-guided small-animal radiotherapy treatment platform, translationally relevant tumor-oriented volumes of irradiation with an anatomically defined increasing amount of normal tissue were irradiated, with a focus on the circulating blood and lymph nodes. In healthy mice, the influence of irradiation with increasing radiotherapy treatment volumes was quantified on the level of circulating blood cells and in the spleen. A significant decrease in the lymphocytes was observed in response to irradiation, including the minimally irradiated putative tumor area. The extent of lymphopenia correlated with the increasing volumes of irradiation. In tumor-bearing mice, differential radiotherapy treatment volumes did not influence the overall therapeutic response to radiotherapy alone. Intriguingly, an improved treatment efficacy in mice treated with draining-lymph node co-irradiation was observed in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Taken together, our study reveals compelling data on the importance of radiotherapy treatment volume in the context of lymphocytes as critical components of normal tissue co-irradiation and highlights emerging challenges at the interface of radiotherapy and immunotherapy.

Severe Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia Attenuates the Benefit of Durvalumab After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for NSCLC

Introduction

Durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) for NSCLC improves survival, but only in a subset of patients. We investigated the effect of severe radiation-induced lymphopenia (sRIL) on survival in these patients.

Methods

Outcomes after CCRT (2010–2019) or CCRT followed by durvalumab (2018–2019) were reviewed. RIL was defined by absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) nadir in samples collected at end of CCRT; sRIL was defined as nadir ALC less than 0.23 × 10⁹/L (the lowest tertile). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard modeling evaluated associations between clinical variables and survival.

Results

Of 309 patients, 192 (62%) received CCRT only and 117 (38%) CCRT plus durvalumab. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that sRIL was associated with planning target volume (OR = 1.002, p = 0.001), stage IIIB disease (OR = 2.77, p = 0.04), and baseline ALC (OR = 0.36, p < 0.01). Durvalumab extended median PFS (23.3 versus 14.1 mo, p = 0.003) and OS (not reached versus 30.8 mo, p < 0.01). sRIL predicted poorer PFS and OS in both treatment groups. Among patients with sRIL, durvalumab did not improve survival (median = 24.6 mo versus 18.1 mo CCRT only, p = 0.079). On multivariable analyses, sRIL (OR = 1.81, p < 0.01) independently predicted poor survival.

Conclusions

Severe RIL compromises survival benefits from durvalumab after CCRT for NSCLC. Measures to mitigate RIL after CCRT may be warranted to enhance the benefit of consolidation durvalumab.

Prediction and clinical impact of delayed lymphopenia after chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction

The dosimetric factors of radiotherapy have an acute impact on the host immune system during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, even after CRT, a substantial number of patients remain immunosuppressed with delayed lymphopenia. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate clinical and dose-volumetric predictors of delayed lymphopenia after CRT in locally advanced NSCLC.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed 272 patients with locally advanced NSCLC who received definitive CRT from January 2012 to August 2020. Differential blood count data, including serum albumin values, were obtained at baseline, during and at first follow up after CRT. Acute and delayed lymphopenia events were defined as grade III/IV lymphopenia developed during or 4-12 weeks after CRT completion, which accounted for 84% and 10% of cases, respectively. Dose-volume histogram parameters for planned target volume, whole body, heart, lung, great vessels, spleen, esophagus and thoracic vertebral bodies were evaluated.

Results

Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with delayed lymphopenia were associated with inferior overall survival (HR 2.53, P = 0.001) and progression-free survival (HR 1.98, P = 0.006). However, there was no significant survival difference between groups stratified by acute lymphopenia. On multivariable logistic regression models, lung V5, baseline ALC, during-CRT ALC, and albumin nadir were significant predictors for delayed lymphopenia. Furthermore, the nomogram for delayed lymphopenia based on these variables had good discrimination (area under the curve, 0.905).

Conclusions

In this study, we investigated the prognostic significance of delayed lymphopenia and identified clinico-dosimetric parameters to predict delayed lymphopenia.

Efficacy of thymosin α1 in management of radiation pneumonitis in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial (GASTO-1043)

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of thymosin α1 in management of radiation pneumonitis (RP) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LANSCLC) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This phase II, single-arm trial enrolled patients with unresectable LANSCLC of 18 to 75 years' old and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Eligible patients received definitive CCRT and weekly thymosin α1 from the start of CCRT till 2 months after CCRT. Patients were administered 51 Gy in 17 daily fractions or 40 Gy in 10 daily fractions in the first course followed by a re-evaluation and those patients without disease progression had an adaptive plan of 15 Gy in 5 daily fractions or 24 Gy in 6 daily fractions as a boost. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of weekly docetaxel (25 mg/m²) and nedaplatin (25 mg/m²) during radiation therapy. The primary endpoint was the incidence of Grade (G) ≥2 RP. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of late pulmonary fibrosis, total lymphocyte count (TLC), serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and the composition of gut microbiota. TLC and CRP data were collected at baseline, 2-3 weeks during CCRT, the end of CCRT, 2 and 6 months after CCRT. Fecal samples were collected at baseline and the end of CCRT. Patients treated with CCRT but without thymosin α1 intervention during the same period were selected as the control group by the propensity score matching method.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were enrolled in the study, and another 69 patients were selected as the control group. The incidence of G≥2 RP was lower in the study group compared with control cases (36.2% vs 53.6%, P=0.040). G1 late pulmonary fibrosis occurred in 2 (3.7%) patients of the control group compared with no event in the study group (P=0.243). Compared with the control group, the incidence of G3-4 lymphopenia (19.1% vs. 62.1%, P<0.001) was lower, and the median TLC nadir (0.51 k/µL vs. 0.30 k/µL, P<0.001) was higher in the study group. The proportion of patients with maximum CRP≥100 mg/L was lower in the study group (13.8% vs. 29.7% P=0.029). The diversity and community composition of the gut microbiota were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of thymosin α1 during and after CCRT was associated with significant reductions in G≥2 RP and G3-4 lymphopenia in patients with LANSCLC compared to historic controls.

Severe Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia Affects the Outcomes of Esophageal Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Radiotherapy is as an important part of esophageal cancer (EC) treatment. However, it often causes severe radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL). The aim of the current study was to evaluate the influence of severe RIL on the outcomes of EC. A systematic review and meta-analysis including 17 studies was performed. Our meta-analysis found that severe RIL was associated with a lower pathologic complete response rate and inferior overall survival and progression-free survival of EC patients. The lymphocyte nadir was found during 4–6 weeks after the start of radiotherapy. A series of dosimetric factors and clinical factors associated with RIL were summarized. Our results provide important evidence for the clinical application of radiotherapy. Minimizing the dosimetric risk factors, especially in patients with clinical risk factors, might benefit their outcomes. Our results might also offer clues for the strategy of combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy in EC patients.

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the influence of severe radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) on the outcomes of esophageal cancer (EC). A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed through the PRISMA guideline. Seventeen studies were included in the current systematic review, with eight included in the meta-analyses. Meta-analyses found that severe RIL was associated with lower pathologic complete response (pCR) rate (odds ratio (OR) = 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.30–0.66, I² = 0%), inferior overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.29–1.75, I² = 6%), and worse progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.39–2.07, I² = 0%) of EC patients. The lymphocyte nadir was found during 4–6 weeks after the start of radiotherapy. The leading dosimetric factors associated with severe RIL included larger PTV, higher dose to heart and body, and higher effective dose to the immune cells (EDIC). Clinical risk factors for RIL mainly comprised lower baseline ALC, higher tumor length and clinical stage, and distal EC. In conclusion, severe RIL might be associated with a lower pCR rate and worse OS and PFS of EC patients. Minimizing the dosimetric risk factors, especially in patients with clinical risk factors, might benefit their outcomes.

The impact of radiation induced lymphopenia in the prognosis of head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Radiotherapy is a key part of head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. Radiation induced lymphopenia (RIL) is a severe complication of radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic role of RIL in HNC patients.

METHOD

We conducted a PRISMA guideline based systemic review and meta-analysis. The studies were identified on the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library from 2007 to October 2021. The quality of each study was assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form for Cohort Studies (NOS).

RESULTS

There were 8 studies with 2,733 samples finally included in current study. The meta-analysis showed that the odds ratio of developing grade 3-4 RIL was 13.49 (95%CI = 7.03-25.89, I² = 94%). The incidence rate of grade 3-4 RIL ranged from 73%-88%. Multivariate meta-analysis found that the RIL significantly decreased the overall survival (HR = 2.94, 95%CI = 1.83-4.74, I² = 0%) and distant metastasis free survival of HNC (HR = 3.79, 95%CI = 2.06-6.97, I² = 0%). After sensitivity analysis and excluding a potential study that caused heterogeneity, the new pooled multivariate meta-analysis showed RIL was a risk factor to the progression free survival of HNC patients (HR = 3.16, 95%CI = 1.77-5.63, I² = 0%).

CONCLUSION

This is the first meta-analysis which showed severe RIL decreased the overall survival and promoted the progression of HNC patients. Future large-scale prospective studies are required to evaluate the association between severe RIL and the prognosis of HNC.

Prognostic Value and Risk Factors of Treatment-Related Lymphopenia in Malignant Glioma Patients Treated With Chemoradiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Immunotherapy has shown promising therapeutic efficacy in various cancers but not gliomas. Circulating lymphocytes play critical roles in cancer control and responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Treatment-related lymphopenia has been associated with poor survival in patients with various tumors. This meta-analysis evaluated the risk and impact of lymphopenia in patients with glioma. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were comprehensively searched. Eligible studies were included if they reported the incidence and risk factors of lymphopenia and the impact of lymphopenia on survival. Stata 16.0 was used for this meta-analysis. Results: A total of 21 studies were included in the final systematic review and 20 were included in the quantitative analysis. The overall incidence of grade III/IV lymphopenia was 31.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), 22.3-40.8%]. Pooled results based on pathology of glioma revealed that the incidence in astrocytoma and astrocytoma oligodendroglioma patients was 20.2% (95% CI:5.9-34.4%), and the incidence in glioblastoma patients was 27.6% (95% CI:16.2-38.9%). Lymphopenia was associated with poor overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.74-2.27; P< 0.001) compared to no lymphopenia. Brain receiving radiation dose of 20 or 25 Gy, female sex, older age, lower baseline lymphocyte count, and dexamethasone dose > 2 mg instead of baseline use were risk factors for lymphopenia. Conclusions: Treatment-related lymphopenia was associated with decreased survival in patients with glioma. Optimization of chemoradiation regimens, particularly in patients with concurrent risk factors, can reduce lymphopenia and potentially improve survival in the era of immunotherapy.

Heterogeneous immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy

The immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy is unknown. This prospective cohort study demonstrates that anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody and neutralization titers are reduced in a subset of thoracic radiotherapy patients, possibly due to immunosuppressive conditions. Antibody testing may be useful to identify candidates for additional vaccine doses.

On the interplay between dosiomics and genomics in radiation-induced lymphopenia of lung cancer patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the interplay between spatial dose patterns and single nucleotide polymorphisms in the development of radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) in 186 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing chemo-radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

This study included NSCLC patients enrolled in a randomized trial of protons vs. photons with available absolute lymphocyte counts at baseline and during RT and XRCC1-rs25487 genotyping data. After masking the GTV, planning CT scans and dose maps were spatially normalized to a common anatomical reference. A Voxel-Based Analysis (VBA) was performed to assess voxel-wise relationships of dosiomic and genomic explanatory variables with RIL. The underlying generalized linear model was designed to include both the explanatory variables (3D dose distributions and the XRCC1-rs25487 genotypes) and possible nuisance variables significantly correlated with RIL. The maps of model coefficients as well as their significance maps were generated.

RESULTS

Measures for RIL definition during RT were characterized, including kinetic parameters for lymphocyte loss. The VBA generated three-dimensional maps of correlation between RIL and dose in lymphoid organs as well as organs with abundant blood pools. The identified voxel-wise relationships account for XRCC1-rs25487 polymorphism and demonstrate the variant AA genotype being detrimental to lymphocyte depletion (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The performed analyses blindly highlighted relevant anatomical regions that contributed most to lymphocyte depletion during RT and the interplay of the variant XRCC1-rs25487 AA genotype with the dose delivered to the primary lymphoid organs. These findings may help to guide the development of dosimetric RIL mitigation strategies for the application of effective individualized RT.

Prognostic impact of lymphopenia and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio for patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Outcomes after definitive chemoradiation for squamous cell carcinoma are generally favorable. However, biomarkers to further yield prognostic information are desired. Treatment-related lymphopenia as well as an elevated baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio have been associated with worse survival in several cancer types. We evaluated absolute lymphocyte count and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio at baseline and at treatment-related nadir in patients with anal cancer for associations with oncologic endpoints.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 428 consecutive patients with non-metastatic anal cancer treated with definitive, intensity-modulated radiation therapy-based chemoradiation. We analyzed absolute neutrophil and lymphocyte counts at several timepoints: pretreatment, weekly during treatment, and in the six weeks following treatment completion. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio was calculated at baseline and treatment-related nadir. We estimated oncologic endpoints using life tables and compared them using the log-rank test. We conducted univariate and multivariable time-to-event analyses using Cox proportional hazards.

Results

Median absolute lymphocyte count at baseline and nadir were 1.80 [interquartile range (IQR), 1.45-2.32] k/µL and 0.26 (IQR, 0.18-0.36) k/µL, respectively, and 31% developed treatment-related grade 4 lymphopenia. Median neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio at baseline and nadir were 2.34 (IQR, 1.68-3.30) and 8.80 (IQR, 5.86-12.68), respectively. Estimates of overall survival, local failure-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and freedom from colostomy at 5 years were 87%, 86%, 82%, and 88%, respectively. Baseline and nadir absolute lymphocyte count were not associated with selected outcomes on univariate analysis. On multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with death included T3-T4 disease, HIV-positive status, treatment break, and baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio >3. Baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio showed a trend toward association with distant progression or death (P=0.07). The 5-year overall survival estimates for patients with baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratios ≤3 and >3 were 92.3% and 80.6%, respectively.

Conclusions

Lymphopenia during and after chemoradiation for anal cancer is common but does not appear to be associated with worse survival, recurrence, or metastases. However, elevated baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio was independently associated with overall survival, local recurrence-free survival, and DMFS. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical utility of baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio to guide treatment and follow-up.