1
|
Jackson D, Jenkins M, de Nigris E, Purkayastha D, Patel M, Ouwens M. Associations between the EQ-5D-5L and exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the ETHOS trial. Qual Life Res 2024; 33:1029-1039. [PMID: 38206455 PMCID: PMC10973049 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03582-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with deteriorating health and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among people with COPD during and after events. HRQoL data are key to evaluating treatment cost-effectiveness and informing reimbursement decisions in COPD. EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) utility scores, based on various HRQoL measures, are used in economic evaluations of pharmacotherapy. These analyses estimated associations between EQ-5D-5L utility scores and exacerbations (new and previous) in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD. METHODS Longitudinal mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM), adjusted for time and treatment, were conducted using data from the ETHOS study (NCT02465567); models regressed EQ-5D-5L on current and past exacerbations that occurred during the study, adjusting for other patient reported outcomes and clinical factors. RESULTS Based on the simplest covariate adjusted model (adjusted for current exacerbations and number of previous exacerbations during the study), a current moderate exacerbation was associated with an EQ-5D-5L disutility of 0.055 (95% confidence interval: 0.048, 0.062) with an additional disutility of 0.035 (0.014, 0.055) if the exacerbation was severe. After resolving, each prior exacerbation was associated with a disutility that persisted for the remainder of the study (moderate exacerbation, 0.014 [0.011, 0.016]; further disutility for severe exacerbation, 0.011 [0.003, 0.018]). CONCLUSION An EQ-5D-5L disutility of 0.090 was associated with a current severe exacerbation in ETHOS. Our findings suggest incorporating the effects of current, recently resolved, and cumulative exacerbations into economic models when estimating benefits and costs of COPD pharmacotherapy, as exacerbations have both acute and persistent effects.
Collapse
|
2
|
van Geffen WH, Tan DJ, Walters JA, Walters EH. Inhaled corticosteroids with combination inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 12:CD011600. [PMID: 38054551 PMCID: PMC10698842 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011600.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) commonly involves a combination of long-acting bronchodilators including beta2-agonists (LABA) and muscarinic antagonists (LAMA). LABA and LAMA bronchodilators are now available in single-combination inhalers. In individuals with persistent symptoms or frequent exacerbations, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are also used with combination LABA and LAMA inhalers. However, the benefits and risks of adding ICS to combination LABA/LAMA inhalers as a triple therapy remain unclear. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of adding an ICS to combination LABA/LAMA inhalers for the treatment of stable COPD. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Register of Trials, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and Embase up to 30 November 2022. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP up to 30 November 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA We included parallel-group randomised controlled trials of three weeks' duration or longer that compared the treatment of stable COPD with ICS in addition to combination LABA/LAMA inhalers against combination LABA/LAMA inhalers alone. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. The primary outcomes were acute exacerbations of COPD, respiratory health-related quality of life, pneumonia and other serious adverse events. The secondary outcomes were symptom scores, lung function, physical capacity, and mortality. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for studies that contributed data to our prespecified outcomes. MAIN RESULTS Four studies with a total of 15,412 participants met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of study participants ranged from 64.4 to 65.3 years; the proportion of female participants ranged from 28% to 40%. Most participants had symptomatic COPD (COPD Assessment Test Score ≥ 10) with severe to very severe airflow limitation (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) < 50% predicted) and one or more moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbations in the last 12 months. Trial medications differed amongst studies. The duration of follow-up was 52 weeks in three studies and 24 weeks in one study. We assessed the risk of selection, performance, and detection bias to be low in the included studies; one study was at high risk of attrition bias, and one study was at high risk of reporting bias. Triple therapy may reduce rates of moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbations compared to combination LABA/LAMA inhalers (rate ratio (RR) 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67 to 0.81; n = 15,397; low-certainty evidence). Subgroup analysis stratifying by blood eosinophil counts showed there may be a greater reduction in rate of moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbations with triple therapy in participants with high-eosinophils (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.75) compared to low-eosinophils (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.93) (test for subgroup differences: P < 0.01) (high/low cut-offs: 150 eosinophils/µL in three studies; 200 eosinophils/µL in one study). However, moderate-to-substantial heterogeneity was observed in both high- and low-eosinophil subgroups. These subgroup analyses are observational by nature and thus results should be interpreted with caution. Triple therapy may be associated with reduced rates of severe COPD exacerbations (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.84; n = 14,131; low-certainty evidence). Triple therapy improved health-related quality of life assessed using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) by the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold (4-point decrease) (35.3% versus 42.4%, odds ratio (OR) 1.35, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.45; n = 14,070; high-certainty evidence). Triple therapy may result in fewer symptoms measured using the Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.57; n = 3044; moderate-certainty evidence) and improved lung function as measured by change in trough FEV1 (mean difference 38.68 mL, 95% CI 22.58 to 54.77; n = 11,352; low-certainty evidence). However, these benefits fell below MCID thresholds for TDI (1-unit decrease) and trough FEV1 (100 mL), respectively. Triple therapy is probably associated with a higher risk of pneumonia as a serious adverse event compared to combination LABA/LAMA inhalers (3.3% versus 1.9%, OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.39 to 2.18; n = 15,412; moderate-certainty evidence). In contrast, all-cause serious adverse events may be similar between groups (19.7% versus 19.7%, OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.03; n = 15,412; low-certainty evidence). All-cause mortality may be lower with triple therapy (1.4% versus 2.0%, OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.90; n = 15,397; low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The available evidence suggests that triple therapy may reduce rates of COPD exacerbations (low-certainty evidence) and results in an improvement in health-related quality of life (high-certainty evidence) compared to combination LABA/LAMA inhalers, but probably confers an increased pneumonia risk as a serious adverse event (moderate-certainty evidence). Triple therapy probably improves respiratory symptoms and may improve lung function (moderate- and low-certainty evidence, respectively); however, these benefits do not appear to be clinically significant. Triple therapy may reduce the risk of all-cause mortality compared to combination LABA/LAMA inhalers (low-certainty evidence). The certainty of the evidence was downgraded most frequently for inconsistency or indirectness. Across the four included studies, there were important differences in inclusion criteria, trial medications, and duration of follow-up. Investigation of heterogeneity was limited due to the small number of included studies. We found limited data on the effects of triple therapy compared to combination LABA/LAMA inhalers in patients with mild-moderate COPD and those without a recent exacerbation history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter H van Geffen
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
| | - Daniel J Tan
- Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - E Haydn Walters
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence for Chronic Respiratory Disease, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stolz D, Hermansson E, Ouwens M, Singh B, Sharma A, Jackson D, Darken P, Marshall J, Bowen K, Müllerová H, Alcázar Navarrete B, Russell R, Han MK, Tansey-Dwyer D. Mortality risk reduction with budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate versus fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol in COPD: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison based on ETHOS and IMPACT. Curr Med Res Opin 2023; 39:1395-1405. [PMID: 37583267 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2247969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of death worldwide. While two approved fixed-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) triple therapies reduce all-cause mortality (ACM) versus dual LAMA/LABA therapy in patients with COPD, head-to-head studies have not compared the effects of these therapies on ACM. We compared ACM in adults with moderate-to-very severe COPD receiving budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF) in ETHOS versus fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) in IMPACT using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). METHODS A systematic literature review identified two studies (ETHOS [NCT02465567]; IMPACT [NCT02164513]) of ≥52 weeks reporting ACM as an efficacy endpoint in patients receiving triple therapy. As ETHOS and IMPACT lack a common comparator, an unanchored MAIC compared ACM between licensed doses of BGF (320/18/9.6 μg) from ETHOS and FF/UMEC/VI (100/62.5/25 μg) from IMPACT in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD. Using on- and off-treatment data from the final retrieved datasets of the intention-to-treat populations, BGF data were adjusted according to aggregate FF/UMEC/VI data using 11 baseline covariates; a supplementary unadjusted indirect treatment comparison was also conducted. P-values for these post-hoc analyses are not adjusted for Type I error. RESULTS ACM over 52 weeks was statistically significantly reduced by 39% for BGF versus FF/UMEC/VI in the MAIC (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI]: 0.61 [0.38, 0.95], p = 0.030) and unadjusted analysis (HR [95% CI]: 0.61 [0.41, 0.92], p = 0.019). CONCLUSION In this MAIC, which adjusted for population heterogeneity between ETHOS and IMPACT, ACM was significantly reduced with BGF versus FF/UMEC/VI in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daiana Stolz
- Clinic of Respiratory Medicine, Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Bernardino Alcázar Navarrete
- Respiratory Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
- Instituto Biosanitario de Granada, IBS-Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Richard Russell
- King's Centre for Lung Health, Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - MeiLan K Han
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu D, Song Q, Zeng Y, Yi R, Liu Y, Li X, Chen Y, Cai S, Chen P. The Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Non-Frequent Exacerbation Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Chinese Population. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2023; 18:1741-1751. [PMID: 37599897 PMCID: PMC10439774 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s417566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We analyzed the clinical characteristics and outcomes in non-frequent exacerbation patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled patients with stable COPD from 12 hospitals. Non-frequent exacerbation was defined as less than two times of exacerbations in the past year. The non-frequent exacerbation patients were classified into less and more symptomatic groups based on the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC). Finally, the non-frequent exacerbation patients with less and more symptomatic were classified into the long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), long-acting β2-agonist (LABA)+inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), LABA+LAMA, and LABA+LAMA+ICS groups. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was defined as a CAT score decrease of ≥ 2 during six months of follow-up. We recorded the number of exacerbations and mortality during one year of follow-up. Results A total of 834 (67.5%) non-frequent exacerbation patients with COPD were included in this study. The non-frequent exacerbation patients had a higher education level and body mass index (BMI), and lower CAT and mMRC scores (P<0.05). In addition, the non-frequent exacerbation patients had lower mortality and risk of future exacerbation, and were more likely to attain MCID (P<0.05). Furthermore, the non-frequent exacerbation patients with more symptomatic COPD treated with LABA+LAMA or LABA+LAMA+ICS were more likely to attain MCID and had a lower risk of future exacerbation (P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences among the different inhalation therapies in non-frequent exacerbation patients with less symptomatic COPD. Conclusion The non-frequent exacerbation patients with COPD had a higher education level and BMI, a lower symptom burden, and better outcomes. In addition, LABA+LAMA should be recommended to non-frequent exacerbation patients with more symptomatic COPD, while mono-LAMA should be recommended to non-frequent exacerbation patients with less symptomatic COPD as the initial inhalation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Liu
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changsha Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Changsha Eighth Hospital), Changsha, Hunan, 410000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qing Song
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yuqin Zeng
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
| | - Rong Yi
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, Zhuzhou, Hunan, 412000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yi Liu
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, Zhuzhou, Hunan, 412000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xin Li
- Division 4 of Occupational Diseases, Hunan Prevention and Treatment Institute for Occupational Diseases, Changsha, Hunan, 412000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shan Cai
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ping Chen
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Celli B, Vestbo J. Simplifying pharmacotherapy for patients with COPD: a viewpoint. Eur Respir J 2023; 62:2300115. [PMID: 37591551 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00115-2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bartolome Celli
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jørgen Vestbo
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, and the North West Lung Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bafadhel M, Rabe KF, Martinez FJ, Singh D, Darken P, Jenkins M, Aurivillius M, Patel M, Dorinsky P. Benefits of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Dihydrate on COPD Exacerbations, Lung Function, Symptoms, and Quality of Life Across Blood Eosinophil Ranges: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Data from ETHOS. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2022; 17:3061-3073. [PMID: 36510486 PMCID: PMC9738173 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s374670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Blood eosinophil (EOS) count can guide treatment decisions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In the 52-week ETHOS study (NCT02465567), budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) triple therapy at two inhaled corticosteroid doses reduced moderate/severe exacerbation rates and improved lung function, symptoms, and disease-related quality of life (QoL) versus dual therapy with glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (GFF) or budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BFF) in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD. This subgroup analysis evaluated treatment benefits in ETHOS by baseline EOS count. Methods Patients (40-80 years) with a COPD history were randomly assigned 1:1:1:1 to receive BGF 320/14.4/10 µg, BGF 160/14.4/10 µg, GFF 14.4/10 µg, or BFF 320/10 µg via a metered-dose inhaler. This post-hoc analysis assessed endpoints by baseline EOS count using Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease thresholds (<100, ≥100, ≥100-<300, ≥300 cells/mm3), and investigated continuous relationships between treatment effects and EOS count on exacerbations, symptoms, disease-related QoL, lung function, and safety. Results In the modified intention-to-treat population (n=8509), 82.6% had EOS counts ≥100 cells/mm3. BGF 320 reduced moderate/severe exacerbation rates versus GFF in the ≥100, ≥100-<300, and ≥300 subgroups; treatment differences increased with EOS count. BGF 320 improved rescue medication use and lung-function outcomes across all subgroups, and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score, Transition Dyspnea Index focal score, and Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool total score in all except the <100 subgroup versus GFF. Benefits of BGF 320 versus BFF were generally consistent across subgroups. Safety data were comparable across subgroups. Conclusion Benefits of BGF versus GFF were observed across EOS counts, particularly at ≥100 cells/mm³; versus BFF, benefits were largely independent of EOS. These findings confirm that benefits of ICS-containing triple therapy are not restricted to EOS counts ≥300 cells/mm³, supporting recommendations to consider triple therapy in patients with an exacerbation history and EOS counts ≥100 cells/mm³.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Bafadhel
- Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK,Correspondence: Mona Bafadhel, Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, 5th floor, Tower Wing, Guy’s Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK, Tel +44 0207 188 8717, Email
| | - Klaus F Rabe
- LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Airway Research Center North, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany
| | - Fernando J Martinez
- Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dave Singh
- Medicines Evaluation Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Hospitals Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
de Nigris E, Treharne C, Brighton N, Holmgren U, Walker A, Haughney J. Cost-Effectiveness of Triple Therapy with Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Dihydrate versus Dual Therapies in Moderate-to-Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: United Kingdom Analysis Using the ETHOS Study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2022; 17:2987-3000. [PMID: 36444374 PMCID: PMC9700475 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s381138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the 52-week ETHOS study (NCT02465567), fixed-dose triple therapy with budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) reduced moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations versus fixed-dose long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) or inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/LABA dual therapies. Here, ETHOS data were used to estimate the long-term cost-effectiveness of BGF versus LAMA/LABA and ICS/LABA dual therapies in the United Kingdom. Methods Costs, exacerbations, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and LYs were extrapolated using a Markov model that considered disease severity progression, risk of moderate and severe exacerbations, adverse events, and treatment discontinuation in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD receiving BGF 320/14.4/10 µg, the LAMA/LABA glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate 14.4/10 µg (GFF), or the ICS/LABA budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate 320/10 µg (BFF). Utilities for COPD severity states were estimated using EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level data from ETHOS. Exacerbation disutilities were sourced from published literature. Healthcare resource utilization was based on ETHOS data, published literature, key external experts’ input, and informed assumptions. Unit costs came from the UK National Health Service Schedule of Reference Costs, Unit Costs of Health and Social Care from the Personal Social Services Research Unit, and published literature. A lifetime horizon was considered, with costs, QALYs, and LYs discounted at 3.5% per annum. Results The incremental cost–utility ratio (ICUR; per QALY gained) was £9901 for BGF versus GFF and £2164 for BGF versus BFF. The probability of treatments being cost-effective at the conventional UK-adopted willingness-to-pay threshold of ICUR <£20,000 was 85.1% for BGF, 14.3% for GFF, and 0.6% for BFF. Conclusion Based on ETHOS data, BGF was demonstrated to be cost-effective versus LAMA/LABA and ICS/LABA dual therapies at the conventional UK-adopted willingness-to-pay threshold (ICUR <£20,000). The main cost-effectiveness driver for BGF versus LAMA/LABA and ICS/LABA therapies was reduction in rate of exacerbations, which reduced costs and preserved quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico de Nigris
- Formerly of Global Product and Portfolio Strategy, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Catrin Treharne
- Formerly of Health Economic Modelling, Regulatory and Access, Parexel International, London, UK
| | - Nick Brighton
- Formerly of Health Economic Modelling, Regulatory and Access, Parexel International, London, UK
| | - Ulf Holmgren
- Real World Science and Digital, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Correspondence: Ulf Holmgren, AstraZeneca, Pepparedsleden 1, Gothenburg, SE-431 83, Sweden, Tel +46 0 317 761 424, Email
| | | | - John Haughney
- Clinical Research Facility, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brattsand R, Selroos O. May a different kinetic mode explain the high efficacy/safety profile of inhaled budesonide? Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2022; 77:102167. [PMID: 36180011 DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2022.102167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The claimed functional basis for ICSs in asthma and COPD is airway selectivity, attained by inhaling a potent, lipophilic compound with long local dissolution/absorption time. The development has been empirically based, resulting in five widely used ICSs. Among them, budesonide (BUD) deviates by being less lipophilic, leading to a more rapid systemic uptake with plasma peaks with some systemic anti-inflammatory activity. By this, BUD fits less well into the current pharmacological dogma of optimal ICS profile. In this review we compared the physicochemical, pharmacological and clinical properties of BUD, fluticasone propionate (FP) and fluticasone furoate (FF), representing different levels of lipophilicity, airway and systemic kinetics, focusing on their long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) combinations, in line with current GINA and GOLD recommendations. We are aware of the differences between formoterol (FORM) and the not rapid acting LABAs such as e.g. salmeterol and vilanterol but our comparisons are based on currently available combination products. A beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP)/FORM combination is also commented upon. Based on clinical comparisons in asthma and COPD, we conclude that the BUD/formoterol (BUD/FORM) combination is as effective and safe as the FP and FF combinations, and is in some cases even better as it can be used as "maintenance plus reliever therapy" (MART) in asthma and as maintenance in COPD. This is difficult to explain by current views of required ICS's/LABAs pharmacokinetic profiles. We propose that BUD achieves its efficacy by a combination of airway and systemic activity. The airway activity is dominating. The systemic activity contributes by plasma peaks, which are high enough for supportive anti-inflammatory actions at the blood and bone marrow levels but not sufficiently long to trigger a similar level of systemic adverse effects. This may be due to BUD's capacity to exploit a systemic differentiation mechanism as programmed for cortisol's various actions. This differentiation prospect can be reached only for an ICS with short plasma half-life. Here we present an alternative mode for an ICS to reach combined efficacy and safety, based on a poorly investigated and exploited physiological mechanism. A preference of this mode is broader versatility, due to that its straighter dose-response should allow a better adaptation to disease fluctuations, and that its rapid activity enables use as "anti-inflammatory reliever".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralph Brattsand
- Experimental Pharmacology, Budera Company, Kristinehamn, Sweden.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
The Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol in the Treatment of COPD in the Elderly. CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING 2022; 2022:8382295. [PMID: 36072633 PMCID: PMC9402387 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8382295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major and difficult disease of the chronic respiratory system that is common and frequent, with a huge disease burden. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of budesonide/glyburide/formoterol fumarate (BGF) in the treatment of COPD. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The basic features of the seven pieces of literature were identified using the search strategy. The sample size range was 130∼1264. Results The effects of BGF increased FEV1 in patients with COPD (mean difference = 2.86, 95%CI: 2.71–3.01, p < 0.00001). The effects of BGF improved in patients with ≥1 TEAE in patients with COPD, and was not statistically significant after treatment (Odds rate = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.85–1.17, p=0.97). The effects of BGF increased in patients with TEAEs related a to study treatment in patients with COPD (odds rate = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.03–1.57, p=0.02). The effects of BGF in decreased patients with serious TEAEs in patients with COPD (odds rate = −0.02, 95% CI: −0.03–−0.00, p=0.04). The effects of BGF decreased the death rate in patients with COPD, and were not statistically significant after treatment (odds rate = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.31–1.97, p=0.59). The effects of BGF decreased the hypertension rate in patients with COPD (odds rate = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.44–1.89, p=0.81), and was not statistically significant after treatment. The effects of BGF increased pneumonia in patients with COPD (odds rate = 1.55, 95% CI: 0.81–2.97, p=0.19), and were not statistically significant after treatment. The effects of BGF increased FEV1, increased patients with TEAEs related a to study treatment, and decreased patients with serious TEAEs in patients with COPD. Conclusion This study elucidates the efficacy and safety of BGF in the treatment of COPD with a view to providing a clinical reference.
Collapse
|
10
|
Relationship between prior inhaled corticosteroid use and benefits of budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate on exacerbations, symptoms, health-related quality of life, and lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Analyses from the ETHOS study. Respir Med 2022; 197:106857. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
11
|
Saeed MI, Sivapalan P, Eklöf J, Ulrik CS, Browatzki A, Weinreich UM, Jensen TT, Biering-Sørensen T, Jensen JUS. Social Distancing in Relation to Severe Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Nationwide Semi-Experimental Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Am J Epidemiol 2022; 191:874-885. [PMID: 34999742 PMCID: PMC9383148 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwab292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Social distancing measures introduced on March 12, 2020, in Denmark during the COVID-19 pandemic may affect non–COVID-19 admissions for severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (s-AECOPD). We compared rates of s-AECOPD in a nationwide, observational, semi-experimental cohort study using data from all Danish inhabitants between calendar week 1 through 25 in 2019 and 2020. In a sub-cohort of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, we examined incidence of s-AECOPD, admissions to an intensive care unit, and all-cause mortality. A total of 3.0 million inhabitants aged ≥40 years, corresponding to 3.0 million person-years, were followed for s-AECOPD. In the social distancing period in 2020, there were 6,212 incidents of s-AECOPD, compared with 11,260 incidents in 2019, resulting in a 45% relative risk reduction. In the cohort with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 16,675), we observed a lower risk of s-AECOPD in the social distancing period (subdistribution hazard ratio (HR) = 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33, 0.36; absolute risk: 25.4% in 2020 and 42.8% in 2019). The risk of admissions to an intensive care unit was reduced (subdistribution HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.87), as was all-cause mortality (HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.90). Overall, the social distancing period was associated with a significant risk reduction for hospital admittance with s-AECOPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad Isam Saeed
- Correspondence to Mohamad Isam Saeed, Section of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Gentofte Hospitalssvej 7, Ground Floor, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark (e-mail: )
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mao Y, Fu T, Wang L, Wang C. The efficacy and safety of antibiotics and glucocorticoids in the treatment of elderly patients with chronic obstructive emphysema: systematic review and meta-analysis. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2022; 10:287. [PMID: 35433939 PMCID: PMC9011238 DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with antibiotics in the treatment of elderly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, and to provide some reference for the optimization of clinical treatment regimen for elderly COPD patients. Methods Combination of perfect search and keywords from the Chinese and foreign language databases, and the Cochrane Collaboration Center provided Review Manger 5.2 software [Cochrane Information Management System (IMS)] for statistical analysis, and the risk ratio (RR) of dichotic variables was adopted. RR and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used as efficacy and side effects analysis statistics in metaanalysis. Results After independent screening by two researchers, 18 studies were included into the meta-analysis. After data analysis and statistics, the results of meta-analysis showed that the observation group (glucocorticoid combined with antibiotic treatment) and the control group (glucocorticoid therapy) first second forced expiratory volume (FEV1%) expected value (OR =1.21; 95% CI: 0.11–2.32; P=0.03), and 6-min walking distances (6-MWDs) (OR =12.92; 95% CI: 4.61–21.22; P=0.002), the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score (OR =3.08; 95% CI: 2.58−3.57; P<0.00001) the improvement was statistically significant; incidence of adverse reactions (OR =1.24; 95% CI: 0.58–2.67; P=0.58), the incidence of acute exacerbation (OR =0.65; 95% CI: 0.39–1.08; P=0.10), FEV1 (OR =0.07; 95% CI: 0.01–0.15; P=0.09). There was no statistical difference. Discussion The combination of glucocorticoids and antibiotics in elderly patients with stable COPD can significantly improve their lung function and exercise ability with minimal adverse reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanqing Mao
- Department of General Practice, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.,Department of General Practice, Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Ting Fu
- Department of General Practice, Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Ling Wang
- Department of General Practice, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Chunjie Wang
- Department of General Practice, Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Benefits of budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF) on symptoms and quality of life in patients with COPD in the ETHOS trial. Respir Med 2021; 185:106509. [PMID: 34171789 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We report the long-term effects of triple therapy with budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF) vs glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (GFF) and budesonide/formoterol fumarate (BFF) on symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over 52 weeks in the Phase III ETHOS study of patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD. METHODS ETHOS was a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, parallel-group study in symptomatic patients with COPD who experienced ≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the previous year. Patients received twice-daily BGF 320/18/9.6 μg, BGF 160/18/9.6 μg, GFF 18/9.6 μg, or BFF 320/9.6 μg, administered via a single Aerosphere inhaler, for 52 weeks. RESULTS The modified intent-to-treat population included 8509 patients (mean age 64.7 years; 59.7% male; mean COPD Assessment Test score, 19.6). BGF significantly reduced rescue medication use vs GFF and BFF (-0.53 puffs/day [p < 0.0001] and -0.35 puffs/day [p = 0.0002], respectively, with BGF 320 over 52 weeks). BGF 320 also significantly improved St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score over 24 and 52 weeks vs dual therapies, resulting in the greatest proportion of SGRQ responders vs dual therapies over 24 weeks (52.5% vs 42.5% [GFF] and 45.2% [BFF]) and 52 weeks (47.0% vs 37.8% [GFF] and 41.0% [BFF]). Similar results were observed with BGF 160. Benefits were also observed vs dual therapies in symptomatic endpoints including Transition Dyspnea Index focal score, EXAcerbations of Chronic pulmonary disease Tool total scores and Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD total scores over 24 and 52 weeks. CONCLUSIONS BGF triple therapy improved symptoms and HRQoL vs dual therapies over 24 and 52 weeks in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD.
Collapse
|
14
|
Zysman M, Ribeiro Baptista B, Soumagne T, Marques da Silva V, Martin C, Thibault de Menonville C, Boyer L, Degano B, Morelot Panzini C, Burgel PR, Perez T, Bourdin A, Raherison C, Pégliasco H, Piperno D, Zanetti C, Morel H, Delclaux B, Delafosse C, Lorenzo A, Housset B, Chabot F, Devillier P, Deslée G, Roche N. [Pharmacological treatment optimisation in patients with stale COPD. Position of the French-language Respiratory Society. 2021 Update]. Rev Mal Respir 2021; 38:539-561. [PMID: 33985869 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmr.2021.02.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- M Zysman
- Université Bordeaux, centre de recherche cardiothoracique de Bordeaux, U1045, CIC 1401, 33604 Pessac, France; Service des maladies respiratoires, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
| | - B Ribeiro Baptista
- Université Paris-Est, UMR S955, UPEC, 94000 Créteil, France; Département de pneumologie, CHRU Nancy, université de Lorraine, Inserm, U1116, université de Lorraine, Nancy/Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - T Soumagne
- Service de pneumologie, oncologie thoracique et allergologie respiratoire, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France
| | | | - C Martin
- Department of Respir Med, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Université de Paris, Paris, France; INSERM U1016, Institut Cochin, Paris, France
| | | | - L Boyer
- Université Paris-Est, UMR S955, UPEC, 94000 Créteil, France; Département de physiologie-explorations fonctionnelles, AP-HP, hôpital Henri-Mondor, Paris, France
| | - B Degano
- Service hospitalier universitaire pneumologie physiologie, pôle thorax et vaisseaux, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France; Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - C Morelot Panzini
- Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine Intensive et Réanimation, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - P R Burgel
- Department of Respir Med, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Université de Paris, Paris, France; INSERM U1016, Institut Cochin, Paris, France
| | - T Perez
- Service de pneumologie, CHU Lille, institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019, UMR9017, centre d'infection et d'immunité de Lille (CIIL), Lille, France
| | - A Bourdin
- PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, Montpellier, France; Department of Respiratory Diseases, University of Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - C Raherison
- Service des maladies respiratoires, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, université Bordeaux, INSERM, Team EPICENE, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, France
| | - H Pégliasco
- Service de pneumologie, hôpital européen, Marseille, France
| | | | - C Zanetti
- Cabinet de pneumologie, 62300 Lens, France
| | - H Morel
- Service de pneumologie d'allergologie et d'oncologie thoracique, CHR d'Orléans, 45067 Orléans, France
| | - B Delclaux
- Service de pneumologie, centre hospitalier de Troyes, 10003 Troyes, France
| | - C Delafosse
- Centre hospitaliser Simone-Veil, 95602 Eaubonne, France
| | - A Lorenzo
- Médecine Sorbonne université, département de médecine générale, Paris, France
| | - B Housset
- Département de pneumologie, CHI de Créteil, University Paris Est Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - F Chabot
- Département de pneumologie, CHRU Nancy, université de Lorraine, Inserm, U1116, université de Lorraine, Nancy/Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - P Devillier
- Department of Airway Diseases, VIM-Suresnes, UMR0892, Foch Hospital, Paris-Saclay University, Suresnes, France
| | - G Deslée
- Service de pneumologie, Inserm U1250, CHU Reims, université Reims Champagne Ardenne, Reims, France
| | - N Roche
- Department of Respir Med, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Université de Paris, Paris, France; INSERM U1016, Institut Cochin, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Martinez FJ, Rabe KF, Ferguson GT, Wedzicha JA, Singh D, Wang C, Rossman K, St Rose E, Trivedi R, Ballal S, Darken P, Aurivillius M, Reisner C, Dorinsky P. Reduced All-Cause Mortality in the ETHOS Trial of Budesonide/Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Parallel-Group Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 203:553-564. [PMID: 33252985 PMCID: PMC7924571 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202006-2618oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale: In the phase III, 52-week ETHOS (Efficacy and Safety of Triple Therapy in Obstructive Lung Disease) trial in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (NCT02465567), triple therapy with budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF) significantly reduced all-cause mortality compared with glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (GFF). However, 384 of 8,509 patients were missing vital status at Week 52 in the original analyses.Objectives: To assess the robustness of the ETHOS mortality findings after additional data retrieval for patients missing Week 52 vital status in the original analyses.Methods: Patients with moderate to very severe COPD and prior history of exacerbation received twice-daily dosing with 320/18/9.6 μg of BGF (BGF 320), 160/18/9.6 μg of BGF (BGF 160), 18/9.6 μg of GFF, or 320/9.6 μg of budesonide/formoterol fumarate (BFF) (all delivered via a single metered-dose Aerosphere inhaler). Time to death (all-cause) was a prespecified secondary endpoint.Measurements and Main Results: In the final retrieved dataset, which included Week 52 vital status for 99.6% of the intent-to-treat population, risk of death with BGF 320 was significantly lower than GFF (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.80; unadjusted P = 0.0035). There were no significant differences in mortality when comparing BGF 320 with BFF (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-1.16; P = 0.1721), nor were significant differences observed when comparing BGF 160 against either dual comparator. Results were similar when the first 30, 60, or 90 days of treatment were excluded from the analysis. Deaths from cardiovascular causes occurred in 0.5%, 0.8%, 1.4%, and 0.5% of patients in the BGF 320, BGF 160, GFF, and BFF groups, respectively.Conclusions: Using final retrieved vital status data, triple therapy with BGF 320 reduced the risk of death compared with GFF, but was not shown to significantly reduce the risk of death compared with BFF, in patients with COPD. Triple therapy containing a lower dose of inhaled corticosteroid (BGF 160) was not shown to significantly reduce the risk of death compared with the dual therapy comparators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando J Martinez
- Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Klaus F Rabe
- LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Airway Research Center North, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany
| | - Gary T Ferguson
- Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills, Michigan
| | | | - Dave Singh
- Medicines Evaluation Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Hospitals Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Chen Wang
- National Clinical Research Centre for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bourbeau J, Bafadhel M, Barnes NC, Compton C, Di Boscio V, Lipson DA, Jones PW, Martin N, Weiss G, Halpin DMG. Benefit/Risk Profile of Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy in COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2021; 16:499-517. [PMID: 33688176 PMCID: PMC7935340 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s291967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with major healthcare and socioeconomic burdens. International consortia recommend a personalized approach to treatment and management that aims to reduce both symptom burden and the risk of exacerbations. Recent clinical trials have investigated single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), long-acting β2-agonist (LABA), and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for patients with symptomatic COPD. Here, we review evidence from randomized controlled trials showing the benefits of SITT and weigh these against the reported risk of pneumonia with ICS use. We highlight the challenges associated with cross-trial comparisons of benefit/risk, discuss blood eosinophils as a marker of ICS responsiveness, and summarize current treatment recommendations and the position of SITT in the management of COPD, including potential advantages in terms of improving patient adherence. Evidence from trials of SITT versus dual therapies in symptomatic patients with moderate to very severe airflow limitation and increased risk of exacerbations shows benefits in lung function and patient-reported outcomes. Moreover, the key benefits reported with SITT are significant reductions in exacerbations and hospitalizations, with data also suggesting reduced all-cause mortality. These benefits outweigh the ICS-class effect of higher incidence of study-reported pneumonia compared with LAMA/LABA. Important differences in trial design, baseline population characteristics, such as exacerbation history, and assessment of outcomes, have significant implications for interpreting data from cross-trial comparisons. Current understanding interprets the blood eosinophil count as a continuum that can help predict response to ICS and has utility alongside other clinical factors to aid treatment decision-making. We conclude that treatment decisions in COPD should be guided by an approach that considers benefit versus risk, with early optimization of treatment essential for maximizing long-term benefits and patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Bourbeau
- Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Department of Medicine, McGill University and Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Mona Bafadhel
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Neil C Barnes
- Respiratory Therapy Area, GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
- William Harvey Institute, Bart’s and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Chris Compton
- Respiratory Therapy Area, GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
| | | | - David A Lipson
- Clinical Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA
- Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Division, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Paul W Jones
- Respiratory Therapy Area, GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
- Institute of Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
| | - Neil Martin
- Respiratory Therapy Area, GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
- University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Gudrun Weiss
- Respiratory Therapy Area, GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
| | - David M G Halpin
- University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rabe KF, Martinez FJ, Singh D, Trivedi R, Jenkins M, Darken P, Aurivillius M, Dorinsky P. Improvements in lung function with budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler versus dual therapies in patients with COPD: a sub-study of the ETHOS trial. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2021; 15:17534666211034329. [PMID: 34428980 PMCID: PMC8392797 DOI: 10.1177/17534666211034329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the phase III, 52-week ETHOS study in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), triple therapy with budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF), at two inhaled corticosteroid dose levels, resulted in significantly lower moderate/severe exacerbation rates versus glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (GFF) and budesonide/formoterol fumarate (BFF). Here, we report results from the ETHOS pulmonary function test (PFT) sub-study, which assessed lung function in a subset of ETHOS patients. METHODS ETHOS (NCT02465567) was a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, parallel-group study in patients with moderate to very severe COPD who had experienced ⩾1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the previous year. Patients received BGF 320/18/9.6 µg, BGF 160/18/9.6 μg, GFF 18/9.6 µg, or BFF 320/9.6 µg twice daily via a single metered dose Aerosphere inhaler for 52 weeks. A subset of patients participated in the 4-hour PFT sub-study; primary endpoints were change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) versus GFF and FEV1 area under the curve from 0 to 4 hours (AUC0-4) versus BFF at week 24. RESULTS The PFT modified intent-to-treat population included 3088 patients (mean age 64.4 years; mean reversibility post-albuterol 16.7%; mean post-albuterol FEV1% predicted 42.8). BGF 320/18/9.6 µg and 160/18/9.6 µg significantly improved morning pre-dose trough FEV1 at week 24 versus GFF (p ⩽ 0.0035 for both). Improvements in trough FEV1 were also observed at week 52 for BGF 320/18/9.6 µg and 160/18/9.6 µg versus GFF (p ⩽ 0.0005 for both). For FEV1 AUC0-4 at week 24, BGF 320/18/9.6 µg and 160/18/9.6 µg showed significant improvements versus BFF (p < 0.0001 for both). Improvements were maintained at week 52 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS BGF 320/18/9.6 µg and 160/18/9.6 µg significantly improved trough FEV1versus GFF and FEV1 AUC0-4versus BFF at week 24. The lung function benefits with both doses of BGF were maintained following 52 weeks of treatment.The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus F. Rabe
- LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and
Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Airway Research Center North, Member of
the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf 22927,
Germany
| | - Fernando J. Martinez
- Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of
Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dave Singh
- Medicines Evaluation Unit, University of
Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tashkin DP. Formoterol for the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2020; 15:3105-3122. [PMID: 33273813 PMCID: PMC7708267 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s273497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Bronchodilators, including long-acting β2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists, are the mainstay for treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to prevent exacerbations or reduce symptoms. Formoterol is a highly selective and potent β2-agonist that relaxes airway smooth muscle to significantly improve lung function. Inhaled formoterol works within 5 minutes of administration and provides improvements in spirometry measurements over 12 hours. The lipophilicity of formoterol allows it to form a depot within the smooth muscle to provide a prolonged duration of action. Following therapeutic doses, plasma concentrations are very low or undetectable. Determination of the pharmacokinetics of formoterol following high-dose administration to healthy volunteers revealed that the drug was rapidly absorbed and excreted unchanged in the urine with a half-life of 10 hours. Inhaled formoterol, as monotherapy or in combination with other agents, is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with moderate to severe COPD. Clinical studies have demonstrated improvements in lung function and COPD symptoms, particularly dyspnea; reductions in the risk of exacerbations; and improvement in patients' health status. The adverse event profile of inhaled formoterol is similar to that of placebo, with few adverse cardiovascular events. Formoterol is a valuable bronchodilator used in the maintenance treatment of COPD. This review describes the mechanism of action, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of inhaled formoterol. It also reviews the results of large, randomized, controlled clinical trials that evaluated the use of formoterol as monotherapy and in combination with inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting muscarinic antagonists, and triple therapy regimens in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald P Tashkin
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Grillet PE, Le Souder C, Rohou J, Cazorla O, Charriot J, Bourdin A. Glycopyrrolate and formoterol fumarate for the treatment of COPD. Expert Rev Respir Med 2020; 15:13-25. [PMID: 32772582 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2020.1807946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Long acting bronchodilators are nowadays the central treatment for management of stable COPD. Several combinations exist within the market with different formulation devices. This article reviews a recent dual combination of glycopyrronium and formoterol fumarate in an innovative pMDI-fixed dual combination, Bevespi® Aerosphere. AREAS COVERED This article explored the literature to understand the place of this novel combination and unique delivery drug device in today's therapeutic arsenal. Clinical efficacy and safety have been evaluated through the different clinical trials published in public databases. EXPERT OPINION Within the fixed-dose combinations, Glycopyrrolate and formoterol fumarate offer a credible unique pMDI option to be given twice a day. LABA-LAMA offers an ICS-free alternative in COPD pharmacology which represents an important treatment option given the current debate over whether or not, maintenance triple therapy combined with ICS are benefic in the long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Edouard Grillet
- PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR , Montpellier, France.,Department of Respiratory Diseases, CHU Montpellier, University of Montpellier , Montpellier, France
| | - Cosette Le Souder
- Pharmacovigilance Regional Center, Medical Pharmacology and Toxicology Department, CHU Montpellier , Montpellier, France
| | - Juliette Rohou
- PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR , Montpellier, France.,Department of Respiratory Diseases, CHU Montpellier, University of Montpellier , Montpellier, France
| | | | - Jérémy Charriot
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, CHU Montpellier, University of Montpellier , Montpellier, France
| | - Arnaud Bourdin
- PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR , Montpellier, France.,Department of Respiratory Diseases, CHU Montpellier, University of Montpellier , Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Axson EL, Lewis A, Potts J, Pang M, Dickinson S, Vioix H, Quint JK. Inhaled therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036455. [PMID: 32994234 PMCID: PMC7526304 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To integrate evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on the efficacy of inhaled treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using network meta-analyses. METHODS Systematic searches MEDLINE and Embase based on predetermined criteria. Network meta-analyses of RCTs investigated efficacy on exacerbations (long-term: ≥20 weeks of treatment; short-term: <20 weeks), lung function (≥12 weeks), health-related quality of life, mortality and adverse events. Qualitative comparisons of efficacies between RCTs and observational studies. RESULTS 212 RCTs and 19 observational studies were included. Compared with combined long-acting beta-adrenoceptor agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LABA+LAMA), triple therapy (LABA+LAMA+inhaled corticosteroid) was significantly more effective at reducing exacerbations (long-term 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78 to 0.94; short-term 0.67 (95% CI: 0.49 to 0.92)) and mortality (0.72 (95% CI: 0.59 to 0.89)) but was also associated with increased pneumonia (1.35 (95% CI: 1.10 to 1.67)). No differences in lung function (0.02 (95% CI: -0.10 to 0.14)), health-related quality of life (-1.12 (95% CI: -3.83 to 1.59)) or other adverse events (1.02 (95% CI: 0.96 to 1.08)) were found. Most of the observational evidence trended in the same direction as pooled RCT data. CONCLUSION Further evidence, especially pragmatic trials, are needed to fully understand the characteristics of patient subgroups who may benefit from triple therapy and for those whom the extra risk of adverse events, such as pneumonia, may outweigh any benefits. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018088013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor L Axson
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Adam Lewis
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - James Potts
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Jennifer K Quint
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lipson DA, Dransfield MT. Reply to Suissa: Mortality in IMPACT: Confounded by Asthma? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 202:773-774. [PMID: 32396736 PMCID: PMC7462388 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202004-1399le] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- David A. Lipson
- GlaxoSmithKlineCollegeville, Pennsylvania
- University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - on behalf of all the authors
- GlaxoSmithKlineCollegeville, Pennsylvania
- University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania
- University of Alabama at BirminghamBirmingham, Alabamaand
- University of MichiganAnn Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
More than one-third of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) continue to smoke cigarettes despite knowing they have the disease. This behavior has a negative impact on prognosis and progression, as repeated injury enhances the pathobiological mechanisms responsible for the disease. A combination of counseling plus pharmacotherapy is the most effective cessation treatment of smokers with COPD, and varenicline seems to be the most effective pharmacologic intervention. Preventing exacerbations in patients with COPD is a major goal of treatment, and vaccination against influenza and pneumococcus is an effective preventive strategy to achieve this goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Montes de Oca
- Servicio de Neumonología, Hospital Universitario de Caracas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Centro Médico de Caracas, Av. Los Erasos, Edf. Anexo B, Piso 4, Consultorio 4B, San Bernardino, Caracas, Venezuela.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rabe KF, Martinez FJ, Ferguson GT, Wang C, Singh D, Wedzicha JA, Trivedi R, St Rose E, Ballal S, McLaren J, Darken P, Aurivillius M, Reisner C, Dorinsky P. Triple Inhaled Therapy at Two Glucocorticoid Doses in Moderate-to-Very-Severe COPD. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:35-48. [PMID: 32579807 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1916046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 291] [Impact Index Per Article: 72.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Triple fixed-dose regimens of an inhaled glucocorticoid, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), and a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been studied at single dose levels of inhaled glucocorticoid, but studies at two dose levels are lacking. METHODS In a 52-week, phase 3, randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple therapy at two dose levels of inhaled glucocorticoid in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD and at least one exacerbation in the past year, we assigned patients in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive twice-daily inhaled doses of triple therapy (inhaled glucocorticoid [320 μg or 160 μg of budesonide], a LAMA [18 μg of glycopyrrolate], and a LABA [9.6 μg of formoterol]) or one of two dual therapies (18 μg of glycopyrrolate plus 9.6 μg of formoterol or 320 μg of budesonide plus 9.6 μg of formoterol). The primary end point was the annual rate (the estimated mean number per patient per year) of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations, as analyzed in the modified intention-to-treat population with the use of on-treatment data only. RESULTS The modified intention-to-treat population comprised 8509 patients. The annual rates of moderate or severe exacerbations were 1.08 in the 320-μg-budesonide triple-therapy group (2137 patients), 1.07 in the 160-μg-budesonide triple-therapy group (2121 patients), 1.42 in the glycopyrrolate-formoterol group (2120 patients), and 1.24 in the budesonide-formoterol group (2131 patients). The rate was significantly lower with 320-μg-budesonide triple therapy than with glycopyrrolate-formoterol (24% lower: rate ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 0.83; P<0.001) or budesonide-formoterol (13% lower: rate ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.95; P = 0.003). Similarly, the rate was significantly lower with 160-μg-budesonide triple therapy than with glycopyrrolate-formoterol (25% lower: rate ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.83; P<0.001) or budesonide-formoterol (14% lower: rate ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.95; P = 0.002). The incidence of any adverse event was similar across the treatment groups (range, 61.7 to 64.5%); the incidence of confirmed pneumonia ranged from 3.5 to 4.5% in the groups that included inhaled glucocorticoid use and was 2.3% in the glycopyrrolate-formoterol group. CONCLUSIONS Triple therapy with twice-daily budesonide (at either the 160-μg or 320-μg dose), glycopyrrolate, and formoterol resulted in a lower rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations than glycopyrrolate-formoterol or budesonide-formoterol. (Funded by AstraZeneca, ETHOS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02465567.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus F Rabe
- From LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany (K.F.R.); the Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York (F.J.M.); the Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills (G.T.F.); the National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing (C.W.); the Medicines Evaluation Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Hospitals Trust, Manchester (D.S.), and the National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London (J.A.W.) - both in the United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Durham, NC (R.T., P. Dorinsky); AstraZeneca, Morristown, NJ (E.S.R., S.B., P. Darken, C.R.); AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD (J.M.); and AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (M.A.)
| | - Fernando J Martinez
- From LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany (K.F.R.); the Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York (F.J.M.); the Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills (G.T.F.); the National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing (C.W.); the Medicines Evaluation Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Hospitals Trust, Manchester (D.S.), and the National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London (J.A.W.) - both in the United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Durham, NC (R.T., P. Dorinsky); AstraZeneca, Morristown, NJ (E.S.R., S.B., P. Darken, C.R.); AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD (J.M.); and AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (M.A.)
| | - Gary T Ferguson
- From LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany (K.F.R.); the Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York (F.J.M.); the Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills (G.T.F.); the National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing (C.W.); the Medicines Evaluation Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Hospitals Trust, Manchester (D.S.), and the National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London (J.A.W.) - both in the United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Durham, NC (R.T., P. Dorinsky); AstraZeneca, Morristown, NJ (E.S.R., S.B., P. Darken, C.R.); AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD (J.M.); and AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (M.A.)
| | - Chen Wang
- From LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany (K.F.R.); the Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York (F.J.M.); the Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills (G.T.F.); the National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing (C.W.); the Medicines Evaluation Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Hospitals Trust, Manchester (D.S.), and the National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London (J.A.W.) - both in the United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Durham, NC (R.T., P. Dorinsky); AstraZeneca, Morristown, NJ (E.S.R., S.B., P. Darken, C.R.); AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD (J.M.); and AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (M.A.)
| | - Dave Singh
- From LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany (K.F.R.); the Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York (F.J.M.); the Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills (G.T.F.); the National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing (C.W.); the Medicines Evaluation Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Hospitals Trust, Manchester (D.S.), and the National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London (J.A.W.) - both in the United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Durham, NC (R.T., P. Dorinsky); AstraZeneca, Morristown, NJ (E.S.R., S.B., P. Darken, C.R.); AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD (J.M.); and AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (M.A.)
| | - Jadwiga A Wedzicha
- From LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany (K.F.R.); the Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York (F.J.M.); the Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills (G.T.F.); the National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing (C.W.); the Medicines Evaluation Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Hospitals Trust, Manchester (D.S.), and the National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London (J.A.W.) - both in the United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Durham, NC (R.T., P. Dorinsky); AstraZeneca, Morristown, NJ (E.S.R., S.B., P. Darken, C.R.); AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD (J.M.); and AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (M.A.)
| | - Roopa Trivedi
- From LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany (K.F.R.); the Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York (F.J.M.); the Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills (G.T.F.); the National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing (C.W.); the Medicines Evaluation Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Hospitals Trust, Manchester (D.S.), and the National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London (J.A.W.) - both in the United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Durham, NC (R.T., P. Dorinsky); AstraZeneca, Morristown, NJ (E.S.R., S.B., P. Darken, C.R.); AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD (J.M.); and AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (M.A.)
| | - Earl St Rose
- From LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany (K.F.R.); the Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York (F.J.M.); the Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills (G.T.F.); the National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing (C.W.); the Medicines Evaluation Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Hospitals Trust, Manchester (D.S.), and the National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London (J.A.W.) - both in the United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Durham, NC (R.T., P. Dorinsky); AstraZeneca, Morristown, NJ (E.S.R., S.B., P. Darken, C.R.); AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD (J.M.); and AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (M.A.)
| | - Shaila Ballal
- From LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany (K.F.R.); the Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York (F.J.M.); the Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills (G.T.F.); the National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing (C.W.); the Medicines Evaluation Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Hospitals Trust, Manchester (D.S.), and the National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London (J.A.W.) - both in the United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Durham, NC (R.T., P. Dorinsky); AstraZeneca, Morristown, NJ (E.S.R., S.B., P. Darken, C.R.); AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD (J.M.); and AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (M.A.)
| | - Julie McLaren
- From LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany (K.F.R.); the Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York (F.J.M.); the Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills (G.T.F.); the National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing (C.W.); the Medicines Evaluation Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Hospitals Trust, Manchester (D.S.), and the National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London (J.A.W.) - both in the United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Durham, NC (R.T., P. Dorinsky); AstraZeneca, Morristown, NJ (E.S.R., S.B., P. Darken, C.R.); AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD (J.M.); and AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (M.A.)
| | - Patrick Darken
- From LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany (K.F.R.); the Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York (F.J.M.); the Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills (G.T.F.); the National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing (C.W.); the Medicines Evaluation Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Hospitals Trust, Manchester (D.S.), and the National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London (J.A.W.) - both in the United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Durham, NC (R.T., P. Dorinsky); AstraZeneca, Morristown, NJ (E.S.R., S.B., P. Darken, C.R.); AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD (J.M.); and AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (M.A.)
| | - Magnus Aurivillius
- From LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany (K.F.R.); the Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York (F.J.M.); the Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills (G.T.F.); the National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing (C.W.); the Medicines Evaluation Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Hospitals Trust, Manchester (D.S.), and the National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London (J.A.W.) - both in the United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Durham, NC (R.T., P. Dorinsky); AstraZeneca, Morristown, NJ (E.S.R., S.B., P. Darken, C.R.); AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD (J.M.); and AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (M.A.)
| | - Colin Reisner
- From LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany (K.F.R.); the Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York (F.J.M.); the Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills (G.T.F.); the National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing (C.W.); the Medicines Evaluation Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Hospitals Trust, Manchester (D.S.), and the National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London (J.A.W.) - both in the United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Durham, NC (R.T., P. Dorinsky); AstraZeneca, Morristown, NJ (E.S.R., S.B., P. Darken, C.R.); AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD (J.M.); and AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (M.A.)
| | - Paul Dorinsky
- From LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany (K.F.R.); the Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York (F.J.M.); the Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills (G.T.F.); the National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing (C.W.); the Medicines Evaluation Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Hospitals Trust, Manchester (D.S.), and the National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London (J.A.W.) - both in the United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Durham, NC (R.T., P. Dorinsky); AstraZeneca, Morristown, NJ (E.S.R., S.B., P. Darken, C.R.); AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD (J.M.); and AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (M.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Efficacy of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler (BGF MDI) Versus Other Inhaled Corticosteroid/Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist/Long-Acting β 2-Agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) Triple Combinations in COPD: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis. Adv Ther 2020; 37:2956-2975. [PMID: 32335859 PMCID: PMC7467454 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-020-01311-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Triple inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) combination therapy is recommended for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who experience further exacerbations/symptoms on dual LAMA/LABA or ICS/LABA therapy. The relative efficacy of budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler 320/18/9.6 µg (BGF MDI) in COPD was compared with other ICS/LAMA/LABA fixed-dose and open combination therapies in a network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials of at least 10-week duration, including at least one fixed-dose or open combination triple therapy arm, in patients with moderate to very severe COPD. Studies were assessed for methodological quality and risk of bias. A three-level hierarchical Bayesian NMA model was used to determine the exacerbation rate per patient per year as well as the following outcomes at week 24: changes from baseline in pre-dose trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), post-dose peak FEV1, and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score; proportion of SGRQ responders; and Transition Dyspnea Index focal score. Change from baseline in rescue medication use over weeks 12-24 was also analyzed. Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were used to assess heterogeneity across studies. RESULTS Eighteen studies (n = 29,232 patients) contributed to the NMA. ICS/LABA dual combinations were combined as a single treatment group to create a connected network. Across all outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences between BGF MDI and other triple ICS/LAMA/LABA fixed-dose (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol and beclomethasone dipropionate/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate) and open combinations with data available within the network. Results from sensitivity analyses and meta-regression were consistent with the base-case scenario. CONCLUSION This NMA suggested that BGF MDI has comparable efficacy to other ICS/LAMA/LABA fixed-dose and open triple combination therapies in reducing exacerbations and improving lung function and symptoms in patients with moderate to very severe COPD. Further research is warranted as additional evidence regarding triple therapies, especially fixed-dose combinations, becomes available.
Collapse
|
25
|
Hanania NA, Papi A, Anzueto A, Martinez FJ, Rossman KA, Cappelletti CS, Duncan EA, Nyberg JS, Dorinsky PM. Efficacy and safety of two doses of budesonide/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler in COPD. ERJ Open Res 2020; 6:00187-2019. [PMID: 32363206 PMCID: PMC7184113 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00187-2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist combination therapy is a recommended treatment option for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and increased exacerbation risk, particularly those with elevated blood eosinophil levels. SOPHOS (NCT02727660) evaluated the efficacy and safety of two doses of budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate metered dose inhaler (BFF MDI) versus formoterol fumarate dihydrate (FF) MDI, each delivered using co-suspension delivery technology, in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD and a history of exacerbations. In this phase 3, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, 12–52-week, variable length study, patients received twice-daily BFF MDI 320/10 µg or 160/10 µg, or FF MDI 10 µg. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at week 12. Secondary and other endpoints included assessments of moderate/severe COPD exacerbations and safety. The primary analysis (modified intent-to-treat) population included 1843 patients (BFF MDI 320/10 µg, n=619; BFF MDI 160/10 µg, n=617; and FF MDI, n=607). BFF MDI 320/10 µg and 160/10 µg improved morning pre-dose trough FEV1 at week 12 versus FF MDI (least squares mean differences 34 mL [p=0.0081] and 32 mL [p=0.0134], respectively), increased time to first exacerbation (hazard ratios 0.827 [p=0.0441] and 0.803 [p=0.0198], respectively) and reduced exacerbation rate (rate ratios 0.67 [p=0.0001] and 0.71 [p=0.0010], respectively). Lung function and exacerbation benefits were driven by patients with blood eosinophil counts ≥150 cells·mm−3. The incidence of adverse events was similar, and pneumonia rates were low (≤2.4%) across treatments. SOPHOS demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of BFF MDI 320/10 µg and 160/10 µg in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD at increased risk of exacerbations. Co-suspension delivery technology budesonide/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler improve lung function and reduce exacerbation risk versus LABA monotherapy in patients with moderate to very severe COPD and an exacerbation history in the prior yearhttp://bit.ly/3aDOvru
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola A Hanania
- Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alberto Papi
- Research Centre on Asthma and COPD, Dept of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Antonio Anzueto
- Pulmonary Medicine and Critical Care, University of Texas Health Science Center and South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Fernando J Martinez
- Joan and Sanford I. Weill Dept of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Triple Therapy Versus Dual Bronchodilation and Inhaled Corticosteroids/Long-Acting β-Agonists in COPD: Accumulating Evidence from Network Meta-Analyses. Pulm Ther 2019; 5:117-126. [PMID: 32026413 PMCID: PMC6967256 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-019-00102-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Guidelines are mainly based on evidence of well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but there are limitations to the transferability of conclusions of RCTs to usual care mainly because the patients enrolled in RCTs are selected and not representative of the population encountered in daily practice; moreover, the research environment is substantially different from that of the real world. Because of the scarcity of data generated in large unselected populations in everyday clinical practice, the possibility of using meta-analyses can be considered. Recently, several meta-analyses have attempted to clarify the role of triple therapy containing a long-acting β-agonist (LABA), a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) delivered from a single inhaler in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), also considering that there is a big difference in the use of triple therapy between what is recommended by COPD guidelines or strategies and the prescriptive behaviour of clinicians. Taking into account the results of the most recent meta-analyses, we believe that triple therapy provides modest clinical benefit in the general COPD population, but in patients on LABA/LAMA combination therapy, who still experience acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPDs) and have blood eosinophil counts ≥ 300 cells·μl−1, it is of clinical relevance. On the contrary, adding a LAMA to an ICS/LABA combination elicits relevant clinical benefit in the general COPD population, supporting the role of dual bronchodilation therapy for the treatment of COPD. The quantitative synthesis of the currently available clinical evidence seems to suggest that, in patients with COPD already on ICS/LABA combination, the therapy can be improved without an increase of cardiovascular severe adverse events (SAEs) when a LAMA is added to the combination.
Collapse
|