1
|
Huiskes M, Kong W, Oud M, Crama K, Rasch C, Breedveld S, Heijmen B, Astreinidou E. Validation of Fully Automated Robust Multicriterial Treatment Planning for Head and Neck Cancer IMPT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:968-977. [PMID: 38284961 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our purpose was to compare robust intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans, automatically generated with wish-list-based multicriterial optimization as implemented in Erasmus-iCycle, with manually created robust clinical IMPT plans for patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Thirty-three patients with head and neck cancer were retrospectively included. All patients were previously treated with a manually created IMPT plan with 7000 cGy dose prescription to the primary tumor (clinical target volume [CTV]7000) and 5425 cGy dose prescription to the bilateral elective volumes (CTV5425). Plans had a 4-beam field configuration and were generated with scenario-based robust optimization (21 scenarios, 3-mm setup error, and ±3% density uncertainty for the CTVs). Three clinical plans were used to configure the Erasmus-iCycle wish-list for automated generation of robust IMPT plans for the other 30 included patients, in line with clinical planning requirements. Automatically and manually generated IMPT plans were compared for (robust) target coverage, organ-at-risk (OAR) doses, and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP). No manual fine-tuning of automatically generated plans was performed. RESULTS For all automatically generated plans, voxel-wise minimum D98% values for the CTVs were within clinical constraints and similar to manual plans. All investigated OAR parameters were favorable in the automatically generated plans (all P < .001). Median reductions in mean dose to OARs went up to 667 cGy for the inferior pharyngeal constrictor muscle, and median reductions in D0.03cm3 in serial OARs ranged up to 1795 cGy for the spinal cord surface. The observed lower mean dose in parallel OARs resulted in statistically significant lower NTCP for xerostomia (grade ≥2: 34.4% vs 38.0%; grade ≥3: 9.0% vs 10.2%) and dysphagia (grade ≥2: 11.8% vs 15.0%; grade ≥3: 1.8% vs 2.8%). CONCLUSIONS Erasmus-iCycle was able to produce IMPT dose distributions fully automatically with similar (robust) target coverage and improved OAR doses and NTCPs compared with clinical manual planning, with negligible hands-on planning workload.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merle Huiskes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Wens Kong
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michelle Oud
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Koen Crama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Coen Rasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Breedveld
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ben Heijmen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eleftheria Astreinidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rykkelid AM, Sinha PM, Folefac CA, Horsman MR, Sørensen BS, Søland TM, Schreurs OJF, Malinen E, Edin NFJ. Combination of proton- or X-irradiation with anti-PDL1 immunotherapy in two murine oral cancers. Sci Rep 2024; 14:11569. [PMID: 38773258 PMCID: PMC11109162 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62272-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Combining radiation therapy with immunotherapy is a strategy to improve both treatments. The purpose of this study was to compare responses for two syngeneic head and neck cancer (HNC) tumor models in mice following X-ray or proton irradiation with or without immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). MOC1 (immunogenic) and MOC2 (less immunogenic) tumors were inoculated in the right hind leg of each mouse (C57BL/6J, n = 398). Mice were injected with anti-PDL1 (10 mg/kg, twice weekly for 2 weeks), and tumors were treated with single-dose irradiation (5-30 Gy) with X-rays or protons. MOC2 tumors grew faster and were more radioresistant than MOC1 tumors, and all mice with MOC2 tumors developed metastases. Irradiation reduced the tumor volume in a dose-dependent manner. ICI alone reduced the tumor volume for MOC1 with 20% compared to controls, while no reduction was seen for MOC2. For MOC1, there was a clear treatment synergy when combining irradiation with ICI for radiation doses above 5 Gy and there was a tendency for X-rays being slightly more biologically effective compared to protons. For MOC2, there was a tendency of protons being more effective than X-rays, but both radiation types showed a small synergy when combined with ICI. Although the responses and magnitudes of the therapeutic effect varied, the optimal radiation dose for maximal synergy appeared to be in the order of 10-15 Gy, regardless of tumor model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Marit Rykkelid
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1048, 0316, Blindern, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Michael R Horsman
- Experimental Clinical Oncology - Dept. Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Brita Singers Sørensen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Tine Merete Søland
- Institute of Oral Biology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1052, 0316, Blindern, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1048, 0316, Blindern, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Radiation Biology, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950, 0424, Nydalen, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nina Frederike J Edin
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1048, 0316, Blindern, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chow JCH, Ho JCS, Cheung KM, Johnson D, Ip BYM, Beitler JJ, Strojan P, Mäkitie AA, Eisbruch A, Ng SP, Nuyts S, Mendenhall WM, Babighian S, Ferlito A. Neurological complications of modern radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2024; 194:110200. [PMID: 38438018 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is one of the mainstay treatment modalities for the management of non-metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC). Notable improvements in treatment outcomes have been observed in the recent decades. Modern radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy and charged particle therapy, have significantly improved tumor target conformity and enabled better preservation of normal structures. However, because of the intricate anatomy of the head and neck region, multiple critical neurological structures such as the brain, brainstem, spinal cord, cranial nerves, nerve plexuses, autonomic pathways, brain vasculature, and neurosensory organs, are variably irradiated during treatment, particularly when tumor targets are in close proximity. Consequently, a diverse spectrum of late neurological sequelae may manifest in HNC survivors. These neurological complications commonly result in irreversible symptoms, impair patients' quality of life, and contribute to a substantial proportion of non-cancer deaths. Although the relationship between radiation dose and toxicity has not been fully elucidated for all complications, appropriate application of dosimetric constraints during radiotherapy planning may reduce their incidence. Vigilant surveillance during the course of survivorship also enables early detection and intervention. This article endeavors to provide a comprehensive review of the various neurological complications of modern radiotherapy for HNC, summarize the current incidence data, discuss methods to minimize their risks during radiotherapy planning, and highlight potential strategies for managing these debilitating toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James C H Chow
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
| | - Jason C S Ho
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Ka Man Cheung
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - David Johnson
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Bonaventure Y M Ip
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Jonathan J Beitler
- Harold Alfond Center for Cancer Care, Maine General Hospital, Augusta, ME, USA
| | - Primož Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Antti A Mäkitie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Avraham Eisbruch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sandra Nuyts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Silvia Babighian
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ospedale Sant'Antonio, Azienda Ospedaliera, Padova, Italy
| | - Alfio Ferlito
- Coordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kraan AC, Moglioni M, Battistoni G, Bersani D, Berti A, Carra P, Cerello P, Ciocca M, Ferrero V, Fiorina E, Mazzoni E, Morrocchi M, Muraro S, Orlandi E, Pennazio F, Retico A, Rosso V, Sportelli G, Vischioni B, Vitolo V, Bisogni MG. Using the gamma-index analysis for inter-fractional comparison of in-beam PET images for head-and-neck treatment monitoring in proton therapy: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Phys Med 2024; 120:103329. [PMID: 38492331 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
GOAL In-beam Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a technique for in-vivo non-invasive treatment monitoring for proton therapy. To detect anatomical changes in patients with PET, various analysis methods exist, but their clinical interpretation is problematic. The goal of this work is to investigate whether the gamma-index analysis, widely used for dose comparisons, is an appropriate tool for comparing in-beam PET distributions. Focusing on a head-and-neck patient, we investigate whether the gamma-index map and the passing rate are sensitive to progressive anatomical changes. METHODS/MATERIALS We simulated a treatment course of a proton therapy patient using FLUKA Monte Carlo simulations. Gradual emptying of the sinonasal cavity was modeled through a series of artificially modified CT scans. The in-beam PET activity distributions from three fields were evaluated, simulating a planar dual head geometry. We applied the 3D-gamma evaluation method to compare the PET images with a reference image without changes. Various tolerance criteria and parameters were tested, and results were compared to the CT-scans. RESULTS Based on 210 MC simulations we identified appropriate parameters for the gamma-index analysis. Tolerance values of 3 mm/3% and 2 mm/2% were suited for comparison of simulated in-beam PET distributions. The gamma passing rate decreased with increasing volume change for all fields. CONCLUSION The gamma-index analysis was found to be a useful tool for comparing simulated in-beam PET images, sensitive to sinonasal cavity emptying. Monitoring the gamma passing rate behavior over the treatment course is useful to detect anatomical changes occurring during the treatment course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aafke Christine Kraan
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, Pisa, 56127, Italy
| | - Martina Moglioni
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, Pisa, 56127, Italy; Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, Pisa, 56127, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Battistoni
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Milano, Via Giovanni Celoria 16, Milano, 20133, Italy
| | - Davide Bersani
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Torino, Via Pietro Giuria 1, Torino, 10125, Italy
| | - Andrea Berti
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, Pisa, 56127, Italy; Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, Pisa, 56127, Italy
| | - Pietro Carra
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, Pisa, 56127, Italy; Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, Pisa, 56127, Italy
| | - Piergiorgio Cerello
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Torino, Via Pietro Giuria 1, Torino, 10125, Italy
| | - Mario Ciocca
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Strada Privata Campeggi 53, Pavia, 27100, Italy
| | - Veronica Ferrero
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Torino, Via Pietro Giuria 1, Torino, 10125, Italy
| | - Elisa Fiorina
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Torino, Via Pietro Giuria 1, Torino, 10125, Italy
| | - Enrico Mazzoni
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, Pisa, 56127, Italy
| | - Matteo Morrocchi
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, Pisa, 56127, Italy; Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, Pisa, 56127, Italy
| | - Silvia Muraro
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Milano, Via Giovanni Celoria 16, Milano, 20133, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Strada Privata Campeggi 53, Pavia, 27100, Italy
| | - Francesco Pennazio
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Torino, Via Pietro Giuria 1, Torino, 10125, Italy
| | - Alessandra Retico
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, Pisa, 56127, Italy
| | - Valeria Rosso
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, Pisa, 56127, Italy; Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, Pisa, 56127, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Sportelli
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, Pisa, 56127, Italy; Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, Pisa, 56127, Italy
| | - Barbara Vischioni
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Strada Privata Campeggi 53, Pavia, 27100, Italy
| | - Viviana Vitolo
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Strada Privata Campeggi 53, Pavia, 27100, Italy
| | - Maria Giuseppina Bisogni
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, Pisa, 56127, Italy; Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, Pisa, 56127, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Amstutz F, Krcek R, Bachtiary B, Weber DC, Lomax AJ, Unkelbach J, Zhang Y. Treatment planning comparison for head and neck cancer between photon, proton, and combined proton-photon therapy - From a fixed beam line to an arc. Radiother Oncol 2024; 190:109973. [PMID: 37913953 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This study investigates whether combined proton-photon therapy (CPPT) improves treatment plan quality compared to single-modality intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Different proton beam arrangements for CPPT and IMPT are compared, which could be of specific interest concerning potential future upright-positioned treatments. Furthermore, it is evaluated if CPPT benefits remain under inter-fractional anatomical changes for HNC treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS Five HNC patients with a planning CT and multiple (4-7) repeated CTs were studied. CPPT with simultaneously optimized photon and proton fluence, single-modality IMPT, and IMRT treatment plans were optimized on the planning CT and then recalculated and reoptimized on each repeated CT. For CPPT and IMPT, plans with different degrees of freedom for the proton beams were optimized. Fixed horizontal proton beam line (FHB), gantry-like, and arc-like plans were compared. RESULTS The target coverage for CPPT without adaptation is insufficient (average V95%=88.4 %), while adapted plans can recover the initial treatment plan quality for target (average V95%=95.5 %) and organs-at-risk. CPPT with increased proton beam flexibility increases plan quality and reduces normal tissue complication probability of Xerostomia and Dysphagia. On average, Xerostomia NTCP reductions compared to IMRT are -2.7 %/-3.4 %/-5.0 % for CPPT FHB/CPPT Gantry/CPPT Arc. The differences for IMPT FHB/IMPT Gantry/IMPT Arc are + 0.8 %/-0.9 %/-4.3 %. CONCLUSION CPPT for HNC needs adaptive treatments. Increasing proton beam flexibility in CPPT, either by using a gantry or an upright-positioned patient, improves treatment plan quality. However, the photon component is substantially reduced, therefore, the balance between improved plan quality and costs must be further determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Amstutz
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland; Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Reinhardt Krcek
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Antony J Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland; Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jan Unkelbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ye Zhang
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hansen CR, Jensen K, Smulders B, Holm AIS, Samsøe E, Nielsen MS, Sibolt P, Skyt P, Elstrøm UV, Nielsen CP, Johansen J, Zukauskaite R, Eriksen JG, Farhadi M, Andersen M, Andersen E, Overgaard J, Grau C, Friborg J. Evaluation of decentralised model-based selection of head and neck cancer patients for a proton treatment study. DAHANCA 35. Radiother Oncol 2024; 190:109812. [PMID: 37479061 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Proton treatment can potentially spare patients with H&N cancer for substantial treatment-related toxicities. The current study investigated the reproducibility of a decentralised model-based selection of patients for a proton treatment study when the selection plans were compared to the clinical treatment plans performed at the proton centre. METHODS Sixty-three patients were selected for proton treatment in the six Danish Head and Neck Cancer (DAHANCA) centres. The patients were selected based on normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) estimated from local photon and proton treatment plans, which showed a ΔNTCP greater than 5%-point for either grade 2 + dysphagia or grade 2 + xerostomia at six months. The selection plans were compared to the clinical treatment plans performed at the proton centre. RESULTS Of the 63 patients, 49 and 25 were selected based on an estimated benefit in risk of dysphagia and xerostomia, respectively. Eleven patients had a potential gain in both toxicities. The mean ΔNTCP changed from the local selection plan comparison to the clinical comparison from 6.9 to 5.3 %-points (p = 0.01) and 7.3 to 4.9 %-points (p = 0.03) for dysphagia and xerostomia, respectively. Volume differences in both CTV and OAR could add to the loss in ΔNTCP. 61 of the 63 clinical plans had a positive ΔNTCP, and 38 had a ΔNTCP of 5%-points for at least one of the two endpoints. CONCLUSION A local treatment plan comparison can be used to select candidates for proton treatment. The local comparative proton plan overestimates the potential benefit of the clinical proton plan. Continuous quality assurance of the delineation procedures and planning is crucial in the subsequent randomised clinical trial setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Rønn Hansen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Danish Center of Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
| | - Kenneth Jensen
- Danish Center of Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Bob Smulders
- Danish Center of Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | | | - Eva Samsøe
- Danish Center of Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark
| | | | - Patrik Sibolt
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev & Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Peter Skyt
- Danish Center of Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | | | - Camilla Panduro Nielsen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | | | - Ruta Zukauskaite
- Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Jesper Grau Eriksen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Mohamma Farhadi
- Department of Oncology, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark
| | - Maria Andersen
- Department of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Elo Andersen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev & Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Cai Grau
- Danish Center of Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Jeppe Friborg
- Danish Center of Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ahmed SK, Keole SR. Proton Therapy in the Adolescent and Young Adult Population. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4269. [PMID: 37686545 PMCID: PMC10487250 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adolescent and young adult cancer patients are at high risk of developing radiation-associated side effects after treatment. Proton beam radiation therapy might reduce the risk of these side effects for this population without compromising treatment efficacy. METHODS We review the current literature describing the utility of proton beam radiation therapy in the treatment of central nervous system tumors, sarcomas, breast cancer and Hodgkin lymphoma for the adolescent and young adult cancer population. RESULTS Proton beam radiation therapy has utility for the treatment of certain cancers in the young adult population. Preliminary data suggest reduced radiation dose to normal tissues, which might reduce radiation-associated toxicities. Research is ongoing to further establish the role of proton therapy in this population. CONCLUSION This report highlights the potential utility of proton beam radiation for certain adolescent young adult cancers, especially with reducing radiation doses to organs at risk and thereby potentially lowering risks of certain treatment-associated toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Safia K. Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA;
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mahé M, Beddok A, Goudjil F, Ala Eddine C, Bolle S, Champion L, Feuvret L, Herman P, Zefkili S, Choussy O, Le Tourneau C, Dendale R, Buvat I, Sauvaget E, Créhange G, Calugaru V. Curative high-dose reirradiation for patients with recurrent head and neck adenoid cystic carcinomas: outcomes and analysis of patterns of failure. Int J Radiat Biol 2023; 100:79-86. [PMID: 37526368 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2023.2242934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent curative reirradiation (reRT), with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or proton therapy (PT) for unresectable recurrent or second primary head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (HNACC). METHODS Ten patients, mostly KPS 90%, were reirradiated (3/10 with IMRT and 7/10 with PT) at a median maximum dose to the CTV of 64.2 Gy from July 2011 to November 2021. Locations at the time of reRT were mainly the sinus (4/10) and the salivary glands (including the parotid and submandibular gland, 3/10). CTCAEv5 was used to assess acute and late toxicities. Follow-up was the time between the end of reRT and the date of last news. RESULTS The median time between the two irradiations was 53.5 months (IQR: 18-84). After a median follow-up of 26 months (range, 12.5-51.8 months), six patients had developed a locoregional recurrence (LR), of which four occurred within the previously irradiated volume. Two and three-year locoregional failure-free survival (LFFS) and overall survival (OS) were 55.6% [95%CI: 31-99.7%], and 41% [18.5-94%] and 66.7% [42-100%] and 44.4% [21.4-92.3%], respectively. LFFS and OS were significantly better in the subgroup of sinus tumors (p = .013) and the subgroup of patients re-irradiated more than two years after the first course of irradiation (p = .01). Seven patients had impairments before the start of reRT, including hearing impairment (3/10) and facial nerve impairment (3/10). The most severe late toxicities were brain necrosis (2/10), osteoradionecrosis (1/10) and vision decreased (1/10). CONCLUSION Curative reRT for HNACC is possible for selected cases, but the LR rate in the irradiated field and the risk of severe toxicity remain high. Improved selection criteria and more carefully defined target volumes may improve outcome in these patients. A further study including larger cohort of patients would be useful to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilde Mahé
- Radiation Oncology Department. Paris/Saint-Cloud/Orsay, Institut Curie. PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Arnaud Beddok
- Radiation Oncology Department. Paris/Saint-Cloud/Orsay, Institut Curie. PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie. PSL Research University. University Paris Saclay. Inserm LITO U1288 Orsay, Paris, France
| | - Farid Goudjil
- Radiation Oncology Department. Paris/Saint-Cloud/Orsay, Institut Curie. PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | | | - Stéphanie Bolle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Campus, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Loïc Feuvret
- Department of Radiation Therapy, East Group Hospital. Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Philippe Herman
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Lariboisière Hospital. APHP. Nord. Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Sofia Zefkili
- Radiation Oncology Department. Paris/Saint-Cloud/Orsay, Institut Curie. PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Choussy
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery. Institut Curie, Paris/Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Christophe Le Tourneau
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), INSERM U900 Research unit. Paris-Saclay University. Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Remi Dendale
- Radiation Oncology Department. Paris/Saint-Cloud/Orsay, Institut Curie. PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Irene Buvat
- Institut Curie. PSL Research University. University Paris Saclay. Inserm LITO U1288 Orsay, Paris, France
| | - Elisabeth Sauvaget
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Saint-Joseph Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Radiation Oncology Department. Paris/Saint-Cloud/Orsay, Institut Curie. PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Valentin Calugaru
- Radiation Oncology Department. Paris/Saint-Cloud/Orsay, Institut Curie. PSL Research University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Reiners K, Dagan R, Holtzman A, Bryant C, Andersson S, Nilsson R, Hong L, Johnson P, Zhang Y. CBCT-Based Dose Monitoring and Adaptive Planning Triggers in Head and Neck PBS Proton Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3881. [PMID: 37568697 PMCID: PMC10417147 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the feasibility of using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-derived synthetic CTs to monitor the daily dose and trigger a plan review for adaptive proton therapy (APT) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. METHODS For 84 HNC patients treated with proton pencil-beam scanning (PBS), same-day CBCT and verification CT (vfCT) pairs were retrospectively collected. The ground truth CT (gtCT) was created by deforming the vfCT to the same-day CBCT, and it was then used as a dosimetric baseline and for establishing plan review trigger recommendations. Two different synthetic CT algorithms were tested; the corrected CBCT (corrCBCT) was created using an iterative image correction method and the virtual CT (virtCT) was created by deforming the planning CT to the CBCT, followed by a low-density masking process. Clinical treatment plans were recalculated on the image sets for evaluation. RESULTS Plan review trigger criteria for adaptive therapy were established after closely reviewing the cohort data. Compared to the vfCT, the corrCBCT and virtCT reliably produced dosimetric data more similar to the gtCT. The average discrepancy in D99 for high-risk clinical target volumes (CTV) was 1.1%, 0.7%, and 0.4% and for standard-risk CTVs was 1.8%, 0.5%, and 0.5% for the vfCT, corrCBCT, and virtCT, respectively. CONCLUSION Streamlined APT has been achieved with the proposed plan review criteria and CBCT-based synthetic CT workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keaton Reiners
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL 32206, USA; (K.R.); (R.D.); (C.B.); (P.J.)
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Roi Dagan
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL 32206, USA; (K.R.); (R.D.); (C.B.); (P.J.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Adam Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA;
| | - Curtis Bryant
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL 32206, USA; (K.R.); (R.D.); (C.B.); (P.J.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | | | - Rasmus Nilsson
- RaySearch Laboratories, SE-103 65 Stockholm, Sweden; (S.A.); (R.N.)
| | - Liu Hong
- Ion Beam Applications S.A., 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium;
| | - Perry Johnson
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL 32206, USA; (K.R.); (R.D.); (C.B.); (P.J.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Yawei Zhang
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL 32206, USA; (K.R.); (R.D.); (C.B.); (P.J.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Alberga JM, Meijer J, Raghoebar GM, Langendijk JA, Korfage A, Steenbakkers RJHM, Meijer TWH, Reintsema H, Vissink A, Witjes MJH. Planned dose of intensity modulated proton beam therapy versus volumetric modulated arch therapy to tooth-bearing regions. Oral Oncol 2023; 140:106392. [PMID: 37084567 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intensity modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT) for head and neck cancer offers dosimetric benefits for the organs at risk when compared to photon-based volumetric modulated arch therapy (VMAT). However, limited data exists about the potential benefits of IMPT for tooth-bearing regions. The aim of this study was to compare the IMPT and VMAT radiation dosimetrics of the tooth-bearing regions in head and neck cancer patients. Also, we aimed to identify prognostic factors for a cumulative radiation dose of ≥40 Gy on the tooth-bearing areas, which is considered the threshold dose for prophylactic dental extractions. METHODS A total of 121 head and neck cancer patients were included in this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. We compared the average Dmean values of IMPT versus VMAT of multiple tooth-bearing regions in the same patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed for receiving a cumulative radiation dose of ≥40 Gy to the tooth-bearing regions (primary endpoint) in both VMAT and IMPT. RESULTS A lower Dmean was seen after applying IMPT to the tooth-bearing tumour regions (p < 0.001). Regarding VMAT, oral cavity tumours, T3-T4 tumours, molar regions in the mandible, and regions ipsilateral to the tumour were risk factors for receiving a cumulative radiation dose of ≥40 Gy. CONCLUSIONS IMPT significantly reduces the radiation dose to the tooth-bearing regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Alberga
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - J Meijer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - G M Raghoebar
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - J A Langendijk
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - A Korfage
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - R J H M Steenbakkers
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - T W H Meijer
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - H Reintsema
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - A Vissink
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - M J H Witjes
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dionisi F, Di Rito A, Errico A, Iaccarino G, Farneti A, D'Urso P, Nardangeli A, Bambace S, D'Onofrio I, D'Angelo E, De Felice F, Fanetti G, Belgioia L, Alterio D, Orlandi E, Merlotti A, Musio D, Sanguineti G. Nasopharyngeal cancer: the impact of guidelines and teaching on radiation target volume delineation. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2023; 128:362-371. [PMID: 36877421 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01612-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
Target volume delineation in the radiation treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer is challenging due to several reasons such as the complex anatomy of the site, the need for the elective coverage of definite anatomical regions, the curative intent of treatment and the rarity of the disease, especially in non-endemic areas. We aimed to analyze the impact of educational interactive teaching courses on target volume delineation accuracy between Italian radiation oncology centers. Only one contour dataset per center was admitted. The educational course consisted in three parts: (1) The completely anonymized image dataset of a T4N1 nasopharyngeal cancer patient was shared between centers before the course with the request of target volume and organs at risk delineation; (2) the course was held online with dedicated multidisciplinary sessions on nasopharyngeal anatomy, nasopharyngeal cancer pattern of diffusion and on the description and explanation of international contouring guidelines. At the end of the course, the participating centers were asked to resubmit the contours with appropriate corrections; (3) the pre- and post-course contours were analyzed and quantitatively and qualitatively compared with the benchmark contours delineated by the panel of experts. The analysis of the 19 pre- and post-contours submitted by the participating centers revealed a significant improvement in the Dice similarity index in all the clinical target volumes (CTV1, CTV2 and CTV3) passing from 0.67, 0.51 and 0.48 to 0.69, 0.65 and 0.52, respectively. The organs at risk delineation was also improved. The qualitative analysis consisted in the evaluation of the inclusion of the proper anatomical regions in the target volumes; it was conducted following internationally validated guidelines of contouring for nasopharyngeal radiation treatment. All the sites were properly included in target volume delineation by >50% of the centers after correction. A significant improvement was registered for the skull base, the sphenoid sinus and the nodal levels. These results demonstrated the important role that educational courses with interactive sessions could have in such a challenging task as target volume delineation in modern radiation oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Dionisi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
| | - Alessia Di Rito
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Hospital "Mons. A.R. Dimiccoli", Barletta, Italy
| | - Angelo Errico
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Hospital "Mons. A.R. Dimiccoli", Barletta, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Iaccarino
- Laboratory of Medical Physics and Expert Systems, IRCSS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessia Farneti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Pasqualina D'Urso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessia Nardangeli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Santa Bambace
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Hospital "Mons. A.R. Dimiccoli", Barletta, Italy
| | - Ida D'Onofrio
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy
| | - Elisa D'Angelo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fanetti
- Division of Radiotherapy, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Liliana Belgioia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Health Science (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Daniela Alterio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Anna Merlotti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, S. Croce and Carle Teaching Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Daniela Musio
- Department of Radiotherapy, Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Huiskes M, Astreinidou E, Kong W, Breedveld S, Heijmen B, Rasch C. Dosimetric impact of adaptive proton therapy in head and neck cancer - A review. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 39:100598. [PMID: 36860581 PMCID: PMC9969246 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) in head and neck cancer (HNC) is susceptible to anatomical changes and patient set-up inaccuracies during the radiotherapy course, which can cause discrepancies between planned and delivered dose. The discrepancies can be counteracted by adaptive replanning strategies. This article reviews the observed dosimetric impact of adaptive proton therapy (APT) and the timing to perform a plan adaptation in IMPT in HNC. Methods A literature search of articles published in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science from January 2010 to March 2022 was performed. Among a total of 59 records assessed for possible eligibility, ten articles were included in this review. Results Included studies reported on target coverage deterioration in IMPT plans during the RT course, which was recovered with the application of an APT approach. All APT plans showed an average improved target coverage for the high- and low-dose targets as compared to the accumulated dose on the planned plans. Dose improvements up to 2.5 Gy (3.5 %) and up to 4.0 Gy (7.1 %) in the D98 of the high- and low dose targets were observed with APT. Doses to the organs at risk (OARs) remained equal or decreased slightly after APT was applied. In the included studies, APT was largely performed once, which resulted in the largest target coverage improvement, but eventual additional APT improved the target coverage further. There is no data showing what is the most appropriate timing for APT. Conclusion APT during IMPT for HNC patients improves target coverage. The largest improvement in target coverage was found with a single adaptive intervention, and an eventual second or more frequent APT application improved the target coverage further. Doses to the OARs remained equal or decreased slightly after applying APT. The most optimal timing for APT is yet to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merle Huiskes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands,Corresponding author at: Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, Postal zone K1-P, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Eleftheria Astreinidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Wens Kong
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Breedveld
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ben Heijmen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Coen Rasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands,HollandPTC, Delft, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Singh A, Kitpanit S, Neal B, Yorke E, White C, Yom SK, Randazzo JD, Wong RJ, Huryn JM, Tsai CJ, Zakeri K, Lee NY, Estilo CL. Osteoradionecrosis of the Jaw Following Proton Radiation Therapy for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 149:151-159. [PMID: 36547968 PMCID: PMC9912132 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.4165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Importance Proton radiation therapy (PRT) has reduced radiation-induced toxic effects, such as mucositis and xerostomia, over conventional photon radiation therapy, leading to significantly improved quality of life in patients with head and neck cancers. However, the prevalence of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the jaw following PRT in these patients is less clear. Objective To report the prevalence and clinical characteristics of ORN in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer (OOPC) treated with PRT. Design, Setting, and Participants This case series reports a single-institution experience (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York) between November 2013 and September 2019 and included 122 radiation therapy-naive patients with OOPC treated with PRT. Data were analyzed from 2013 to 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures Clinical parameters, including sex, age, comorbidities, tumor histology, concurrent chemotherapy, smoking, comorbidities, and preradiation dental evaluation, were obtained from the medical record. Patients with clinical or radiographic signs of ORN were identified and graded using the adopted modified Glanzmann and Grätz grading system. Characteristics of ORN, such as location, clinical presentation, initial stage at diagnosis, etiology, time to diagnosis, management, and clinical outcome at the last follow-up, were also collected. Results Of the 122 patients (mean [SD] age, 63 [13] years; 45 [36.9%] women and 77 [63.1%] men) included in this study, 13 (10.6%) developed ORN following PRT during a median (range) follow-up time of 40.6 (<1-101) months. All patients had spontaneous development of ORN. At the time of initial diagnosis, grade 0, grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 ORN were seen in 2, 1, 9, and 1 patient, respectively. The posterior ipsilateral mandible within the radiation field that received the full planned PRT dose was the most involved ORN site. At a median (range) follow-up of 13.5 (0.2-58.0) months from the time of ORN diagnosis, complete resolution, stable condition, and progression of ORN were seen in 3, 6, and 4 patients, respectively. The 3-year rates of ORN and death in the total cohort were 5.2% and 21.5%, while the 5-year rates of ORN and death were 11.5% and 34.4%, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance In this case series, the prevalence of ORN following PRT was found to be 10.6%, indicating that ORN remains a clinical challenge even in the era of highly conformal PRT. Clinicians treating patients with OOPC with PRT should be mindful of this complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annu Singh
- Dental Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sarin Kitpanit
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Pathumwan, Bangkok
| | - Brian Neal
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, New Jersey
| | - Ellen Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Charlie White
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - SaeHee K. Yom
- Dental Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Joseph D. Randazzo
- Dental Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Richard J. Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Joseph M. Huryn
- Dental Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Dental Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chiaojung Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Cherry L. Estilo
- Dental Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Avril D, Foy JP, Bouaoud J, Grégoire V, Saintigny P. Biomarkers of radioresistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Int J Radiat Biol 2023; 99:583-593. [PMID: 35930497 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2022.2110301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Although HNSCC is mainly caused by tobacco and alcohol consumption, infection by Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) has been also associated with the increasing incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) during the past decades. HPV-positive HNSCC is characterized by a higher radiosensitivity compared to HPV-negative tumor. While several clinical trials are evaluating de-escaladed radiation doses strategies in HPV-positive HNSCC, molecular mechanisms associated with relative radioresistance in HPV-negative HNSCC are still broadly unknown. Our goal was to review recently proposed biomarkers of radioresistance in this setting, which may be useful for stratifying tumor's patient according to predicted level of radioresistance. CONCLUSIONS most of biomarkers of radioresistance in HPV-negative HNSCC are identified using a hypothesis-driven approach, based on molecular mechanisms known to play a key role during carcinogenesis, compared to an unsupervised data-driven approach regardless the biological rational. DNA repair and hypoxia are the two most widely investigated biological and targetable pathways related to radioresistance in HNSCC. The better understanding of molecular mechanisms and biomarkers of radioresistance in HPV-negative HNSCC could help for the development of radiosensitization strategies, based on targetable biomarkers, in radioresistant tumors as well as de-escalation radiation dose strategies, based on biological level of radioresistance, in radiosensitive tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delphine Avril
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Centre Léon Bérard, Centre de recherche en cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Foy
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Centre Léon Bérard, Centre de recherche en cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Jebrane Bouaoud
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Centre Léon Bérard, Centre de recherche en cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Vincent Grégoire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Pierre Saintigny
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Centre Léon Bérard, Centre de recherche en cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kato R, Kato T, Narita Y, Sasaki S, Takayama K, Murakami M. Identification of Induced Radionuclides Produced from Dental Metals in Proton Beam Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 8:101153. [PMID: 36798730 PMCID: PMC9926195 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To identify the induced radionuclides produced from dental metals in proton beam therapy and investigate the accuracy of the Monte Carlo (MC) simulation by comparing the measured radioactivity. Methods and Materials Two dental metals of pure titanium and gold-silver-palladium alloy, commonly used in Japan, were used in this study. The dental metal placed at the center of Spread-out Bragg Peak was irradiated by 150-MeV passive scattering proton beam. The gamma rays emitted from the activated dental metals were measured using a high purity germanium (HPGe) detector. The induced radionuclides were identified from the measured gamma-ray energies. Furthermore, the Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System v.3.24 and DCHAIN were used for the MC simulation. The measured radionuclides and their radioactivity were compared with the simulation results. Results In the MC simulation for the activated titanium, vanadium-47, with a half-life of 32.6 minutes had the strongest radioactivity among the induced radionuclides. The energy peaks of gamma rays emitted from titanium-51, scandium-43, scandium-44, and annihilation gamma rays were observed for the activated titanium in the HPGe detector. In the MC simulation for the activated gold-silver-palladium alloy, silver-108, with a half-life of 2.4 minutes had the strongest radioactivity. The energy peaks of gamma rays emitted from silver-104, silver-104 m, silver-108, and annihilation gamma rays were observed for the activated gold-silver-palladium alloy in the HPGe detector. Furthermore, the induced radionuclides and their radioactivity in the MC simulation were consistent with the measurement results for both dental metals, except for a few radionuclides. Conclusions We identify the induced radionuclides produced from 2 dental metals and compared their radioactivity between the measurements and the MC simulation. Although the identification of the induced radionuclides using the MC simulation remains uncertain, the MC simulation can be clinically effective for pre-estimating the induced radionuclides in proton beam therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryohei Kato
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan,Corresponding author: Ryohei Kato, MS
| | - Takahiro Kato
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan,Department of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Yuki Narita
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Sho Sasaki
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Kanako Takayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Masao Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Photon- and Proton-Mediated Biological Effects: What Has Been Learned? LIFE (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 13:life13010030. [PMID: 36675979 PMCID: PMC9866122 DOI: 10.3390/life13010030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The current understanding of the effects of radiation is gradually becoming broader. However, it still remains unclear why some patients respond to radiation with a pronounced positive response, while in some cases the disease progresses. This is the motivation for studying the effects of radiation therapy not only on tumor cells, but also on the tumor microenvironment, as well as studying the systemic effects of radiation. In this framework, we review the biological effects of two types of radiotherapy: photon and proton irradiations. Photon therapy is a commonly used type of radiation therapy due to its wide availability and long-term history, with understandable and predictable outcomes. Proton therapy is an emerging technology, already regarded as the method of choice for many cancers in adults and children, both dosimetrically and biologically. This review, written after the analysis of more than 100 relevant literary sources, describes the local effects of photon and proton therapy and shows the mechanisms of tumor cell damage, interaction with tumor microenvironment cells and effects on angiogenesis. After systematic analysis of the literature, we can conclude that proton therapy has potentially favorable toxicological profiles compared to photon irradiation, explained mainly by physical but also biological properties of protons. Despite the fact that radiobiological effects of protons and photons are generally similar, protons inflict reduced damage to healthy tissues surrounding the tumor and hence promote fewer adverse events, not only local, but also systemic.
Collapse
|
17
|
Rozanova OM, Smirnova EN, Belyakova TA, Strelnikova NS, Shemyakov AE, Smirnov AV. The Effect of Irradiation with a Sequence of Neutrons and Protons on the Tumor Response of Solid Ehrlich Carcinoma and Skin Reactions in Mice in the Early and Long Terms. Biophysics (Nagoya-shi) 2022. [DOI: 10.1134/s0006350922050153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
|
18
|
Biological Mechanisms to Reduce Radioresistance and Increase the Efficacy of Radiotherapy: State of the Art. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms231810211. [PMID: 36142122 PMCID: PMC9499172 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231810211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer treatment with ionizing radiation (IR) is a well-established and effective clinical method to fight different types of tumors and is a palliative treatment to cure metastatic stages. Approximately half of all cancer patients undergo radiotherapy (RT) according to clinical protocols that employ two types of ionizing radiation: sparsely IR (i.e., X-rays) and densely IR (i.e., protons). Most cancer cells irradiated with therapeutic doses exhibit radio-induced cytotoxicity in terms of cell proliferation arrest and cell death by apoptosis. Nevertheless, despite the more tailored advances in RT protocols in the last few years, several tumors show a relatively high percentage of RT failure and tumor relapse due to their radioresistance. To counteract this extremely complex phenomenon and improve clinical protocols, several factors associated with radioresistance, of both a molecular and cellular nature, must be considered. Tumor genetics/epigenetics, tumor microenvironment, tumor metabolism, and the presence of non-malignant cells (i.e., fibroblast-associated cancer cells, macrophage-associated cancer cells, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, endothelial cells, cancer stem cells) are the main factors important in determining the tumor response to IR. Here, we attempt to provide an overview of how such factors can be taken advantage of in clinical strategies targeting radioresistant tumors.
Collapse
|
19
|
Kim KN, Harton J, Mitra N, Lukens JN, Lin A, Amaniera I, Doucette A, Gabriel P, Baumann B, Metz J, Wojcieszynski A. Acute toxicity in patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with proton versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for nonmetastatic head and neck cancers. Head Neck 2022; 44:2386-2394. [PMID: 35822438 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated if proton therapy is associated with decreased acute toxicities compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancers. METHODS We analyzed 580 patients with nonmetastatic head and neck cancers. Primary endpoint was any 90-day grade ≥3 toxicity, prospectively collected and graded per CTCAEv4. Modified Poisson regression models were used. RESULTS Ninety-five patients received proton and 485 IMRT. The proton group had more HPV-positive tumors (65.6 vs. 58.0%, p = 0.049), postoperative treatment (76.8 vs. 62.1%, p = 0.008), unilateral neck treatment (18.9 vs. 6.6%, p < 0.001) and significantly lower doses to organs-at-risk compared to IMRT group. Adjusted for patient and treatment characteristics, the proton group had decreased grade 2 dysgeusia (RR0.67, 95%CI 0.53-0.84, p = 0.004) and a trend toward lower grade ≥3 toxicities (RR0.60, 95%CI 0.41-0.88, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS Proton therapy was associated with significantly reduced grade 2 dysgeusia and nonstatistically significant decrease in acute grade ≥3 toxicities compared to IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine N Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joanna Harton
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nandita Mitra
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - John N Lukens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alexander Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Isabella Amaniera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Abigail Doucette
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Peter Gabriel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Brian Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - James Metz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrzej Wojcieszynski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Argota-Perez R, Sharma MB, Elstrøm UV, Møller DS, Grau C, Jensen K, Holm AIS, Korreman SS. Dose and robustness comparison of nominal, daily and accumulated doses for photon and proton treatment of sinonasal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2022; 173:102-108. [PMID: 35667574 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim was to evaluate and compare the dosimetric effect and robustness towards day-to-day anatomical and setup variations in the delivered dose for photon and proton treatments of sinonasal cancer (SNC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Photon (VMAT) and proton (IMPT) plans were optimized retrospectively for 24 SNC patients. Synthetic CTs (synCT) were obtained by deforming the planning CT (pCT) to the anatomy of every daily cone-beam CT. Both VMAT and IMPT plans were recalculated on the synCTs. The recalculated daily dose was accumulated over the whole treatment on the pCT. Target coverage and dose to organs and risk (OARs) were evaluated for all patients for the nominal, daily and accumulated dose distribution. RESULTS In general, dose to OARs farther away from the target, including brain, chiasm and contralateral optic nerve, was lower for proton plans than photon plans. Whereas, OARs in proximity of the target received a lower dose for photon plans. For proton plans, the target coverage (volume of CTV receiving 95% of prescribed dose), V95%, fell below 99% for 9/24 patients in one or more fractions. For photon plans, 4/24 patients had one or more fractions where V95% fell below 99%. For accumulated doses, V95% was below 99% only in two cases, but above 98% for all patients. CONCLUSION Photon and proton treatment have different strengths regarding OAR sparing. The robustness was high for both treatment modalities. Patient selection for either proton or photon radiation therapy of SNC patients should be based on a case-by-case comparison.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Argota-Perez
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - M B Sharma
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - U V Elstrøm
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - D S Møller
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - C Grau
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - K Jensen
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - A I S Holm
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
| | - S S Korreman
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kaderka R, Liu KC, Liu L, VanderStraeten R, Liu TL, Lee KM, Tu YCE, MacEwan I, Simpson D, Urbanic J, Chang C. Toward automatic beam angle selection for pencil-beam scanning proton liver Treatments: A deep learning-based approach. Med Phys 2022; 49:4293-4304. [PMID: 35488864 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dose deposition characteristics of proton radiation can be advantageous over photons. Proton treatment planning however poses additional challenges for the planners. Proton therapy is usually delivered with only a small number of beam angles, and the quality of a proton treatment plan is largely determined by the beam angles employed. Finding the optimal beam angles for a proton treatment plan requires time and experience, motivating the investigation of automatic beam angle selection methods. PURPOSE A deep learning-based approach to automatic beam angle selection is proposed for proton pencil-beam scanning treatment planning of liver lesions. METHODS We cast beam-angle selection as a multi-label classification problem. To account for angular boundary discontinuity, the underlying convolution neural network is trained with the proposed Circular Earth Mover's Distance based regularization and multi-label circular-smooth label technique. Furthermore, an analytical algorithm emulating proton treatment planners' clinical practice is employed in post-processing to improve the output of the model. Forty-nine patients that received proton liver treatments between 2017 and 2020 were randomly divided into training (n = 31), validation (n = 7), and test sets (n = 11). AI-selected beam angles were compared with those angles selected by human planners, and the dosimetric outcome was investigated by creating plans using knowledge-based treatment planning. RESULTS For 7 of the 11 cases in the test set, AI-selected beam angles agreed with those chosen by human planners to within 20 degrees (median angle difference = 10°; mean = 18.6°). Moreover, out of the total 22 beam angles predicted by the model, 15 (68%) were within 10 degrees of the human-selected angles. The high correlation in beam angles resulted in comparable dosimetric statistics between proton treatment plans generated using AI- and human-selected angles. For the cases with beam angle differences exceeding 20°, the dosimetric analysis showed similar plan quality although with different emphases on organ-at-risk sparing. CONCLUSIONS This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of a novel deep learning-based beam angle selection technique. Testing on liver cancer patients showed that the resulting plans were clinically viable with comparable dosimetric quality to those using human-selected beam angles. In tandem with auto-contouring and knowledge-based treatment planning tools, the proposed model could represent a pathway for nearly fully automated treatment planning in proton therapy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Kaderka
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92121.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, 33136
| | | | - Lawrence Liu
- California Protons Cancer Therapy Center, San Diego, CA, 92121
| | | | | | | | | | - Iain MacEwan
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92121.,California Protons Cancer Therapy Center, San Diego, CA, 92121
| | - Daniel Simpson
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92121
| | - James Urbanic
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92121.,California Protons Cancer Therapy Center, San Diego, CA, 92121
| | - Chang Chang
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92121.,California Protons Cancer Therapy Center, San Diego, CA, 92121
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
España S, Sánchez-Parcerisa D, Bragado P, Gutiérrez-Uzquiza Á, Porras A, Gutiérrez-Neira C, Espinosa A, Onecha VV, Ibáñez P, Sánchez-Tembleque V, Udías JM, Fraile LM. In vivo production of fluorine-18 in a chicken egg tumor model of breast cancer for proton therapy range verification. Sci Rep 2022; 12:7075. [PMID: 35490180 PMCID: PMC9056503 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11037-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Range verification of clinical protontherapy systems via positron-emission tomography (PET) is not a mature technology, suffering from two major issues: insufficient signal from low-energy protons in the Bragg peak area and biological washout of PET emitters. The use of contrast agents including 18O, 68Zn or 63Cu, isotopes with a high cross section for low-energy protons in nuclear reactions producing PET emitters, has been proposed to enhance the PET signal in the last millimeters of the proton path. However, it remains a challenge to achieve sufficient concentrations of these isotopes in the target volume. Here we investigate the possibilities of 18O-enriched water (18-W), a potential contrast agent that could be incorporated in large proportions in live tissues by replacing regular water. We hypothesize that 18-W could also mitigate the problem of biological washout, as PET (18F) isotopes created inside live cells would remain trapped in the form of fluoride anions (F-), allowing its signal to be detected even hours after irradiation. To test our hypothesis, we designed an experiment with two main goals: first, prove that 18-W can incorporate enough 18O into a living organism to produce a detectable signal from 18F after proton irradiation, and second, determine the amount of activity that remains trapped inside the cells. The experiment was performed on a chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane tumor model of head and neck cancer. Seven eggs with visible tumors were infused with 18-W and irradiated with 8-MeV protons (range in water: 0.74 mm), equivalent to clinical protons at the end of particle range. The activity produced after irradiation was detected and quantified in a small-animal PET-CT scanner, and further studied by placing ex-vivo tumours in a gamma radiation detector. In the acquired images, specific activity of 18F (originating from 18-W) could be detected in the tumour area of the alive chicken embryo up to 9 h after irradiation, which confirms that low-energy protons can indeed produce a detectable PET signal if a suitable contrast agent is employed. Moreover, dynamic PET studies in two of the eggs evidenced a minimal effect of biological washout, with 68% retained specific 18F activity at 8 h after irradiation. Furthermore, ex-vivo analysis of 4 irradiated tumours showed that up to 3% of oxygen atoms in the targets were replaced by 18O from infused 18-W, and evidenced an entrapment of 59% for specific activity of 18F after washing, supporting our hypothesis that F- ions remain trapped within the cells. An infusion of 18-W can incorporate 18O in animal tissues by replacing regular water inside cells, producing a PET signal when irradiated with low-energy protons that could be used for range verification in protontherapy. 18F produced inside cells remains entrapped and suffers from minimal biological washout, allowing for a sharper localization with longer PET acquisitions. Further studies must evaluate the feasibility of this technique in dosimetric conditions closer to clinical practice, in order to define potential protocols for its use in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel España
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, Facultad de CC. Físicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, CEI Moncloa, 28040, Madrid, Spain. .,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Ciudad Universitaria, Madrid, Spain. .,Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Daniel Sánchez-Parcerisa
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, Facultad de CC. Físicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, CEI Moncloa, 28040, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Ciudad Universitaria, Madrid, Spain.,Sedecal Molecular Imaging, Algete, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paloma Bragado
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Ciudad Universitaria, Madrid, Spain.,Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Álvaro Gutiérrez-Uzquiza
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Ciudad Universitaria, Madrid, Spain.,Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Almudena Porras
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Ciudad Universitaria, Madrid, Spain.,Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carolina Gutiérrez-Neira
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, Facultad de CC. Físicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, CEI Moncloa, 28040, Madrid, Spain.,Centro de Microanálisis de Materiales, CMAM-UAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrea Espinosa
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, Facultad de CC. Físicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, CEI Moncloa, 28040, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Ciudad Universitaria, Madrid, Spain
| | - Víctor V Onecha
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, Facultad de CC. Físicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, CEI Moncloa, 28040, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Ciudad Universitaria, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paula Ibáñez
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, Facultad de CC. Físicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, CEI Moncloa, 28040, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Ciudad Universitaria, Madrid, Spain
| | - Víctor Sánchez-Tembleque
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, Facultad de CC. Físicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, CEI Moncloa, 28040, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Ciudad Universitaria, Madrid, Spain
| | - José M Udías
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, Facultad de CC. Físicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, CEI Moncloa, 28040, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Ciudad Universitaria, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis M Fraile
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, Facultad de CC. Físicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, CEI Moncloa, 28040, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Ciudad Universitaria, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Beddok A, Calugaru V, de Marzi L, Graff P, Dumas JL, Goudjil F, Dendale R, Minsat M, Verrelle P, Buvat I, Créhange G. Clinical and technical challenges of cancer reirradiation: Words of wisdom. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 174:103655. [PMID: 35398521 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the development of new radiotherapy techniques that have improved healthy tissue sparing, reirradiation (reRT) has become possible. The selection of patients eligible for reRT is complex given that it can induce severe or even fatal side effects. The first step should therefore be to assess, in the context of multidisciplinary staff meeting, the patient's physical status, the presence of sequelae resulting from the first irradiation and the best treatment option available. ReRT can be performed either curatively or palliatively to treat a cancer-related symptom that is detrimental to the patient's quality of life. The selected techniques for reRT should provide the best protection of healthy tissue. The construction of target volumes and the evaluation of constraints regarding the doses that can be used in this context have not yet been fully codified. These points raised in the literature suggest that randomized studies should be undertaken to answer pending questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Beddok
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France.
| | - Valentin Calugaru
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Pierre Graff
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Jean-Luc Dumas
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Farid Goudjil
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Rémi Dendale
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Mathieu Minsat
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Pierre Verrelle
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Irène Buvat
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Vai A, Molinelli S, Rossi E, Iacovelli NA, Magro G, Cavallo A, Pignoli E, Rancati T, Mirandola A, Russo S, Ingargiola R, Vischioni B, Bonora M, Ronchi S, Ciocca M, Orlandi E. Proton Radiation Therapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients: Dosimetric and NTCP Evaluation Supporting Clinical Decision. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051109. [PMID: 35267415 PMCID: PMC8909055 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: we proposed an integrated strategy to support clinical allocation of nasopharyngeal patients between proton and photon radiotherapy. (2) Methods: intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans were optimized for 50 consecutive nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and differences in dose and normal tissue complication probability (ΔNTCPx-p) for 16 models were calculated. Patient eligibility for IMPT was assessed using a model-based selection (MBS) strategy following the results for 7/16 models describing the most clinically relevant endpoints, applying a model-specific ΔNTCPx-p threshold (15% to 5% depending on the severity of the complication) and a composite threshold (35%). In addition, a comprehensive toxicity score (CTS) was defined as the weighted sum of all 16 ΔNTCPx-p, where weights follow a clinical rationale. (3) Results: Dose deviations were in favor of IMPT (ΔDmean ≥ 14% for cord, esophagus, brainstem, and glottic larynx). The risk of toxicity significantly decreased for xerostomia (-12.5%), brain necrosis (-2.3%), mucositis (-3.2%), tinnitus (-8.6%), hypothyroidism (-9.3%), and trismus (-5.4%). There were 40% of the patients that resulted as eligible for IMPT, with a greater advantage for T3-T4 staging. Significantly different CTS were observed in patients qualifying for IMPT. (4) Conclusions: The MBS strategy successfully drives the clinical identification of NPC patients, who are most likely to benefit from IMPT. CTS summarizes well the expected global gain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Vai
- Radiotherapy Department, Center for National Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.M.); (E.R.); (G.M.); (S.R.); (R.I.); (B.V.); (M.B.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (E.O.)
- Correspondence: (A.V.); (N.A.I.); Tel.: +39-0382-078-505 (A.V.)
| | - Silvia Molinelli
- Radiotherapy Department, Center for National Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.M.); (E.R.); (G.M.); (S.R.); (R.I.); (B.V.); (M.B.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (E.O.)
| | - Eleonora Rossi
- Radiotherapy Department, Center for National Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.M.); (E.R.); (G.M.); (S.R.); (R.I.); (B.V.); (M.B.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (E.O.)
| | - Nicola Alessandro Iacovelli
- Radiotherapy Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano (INT), 20133 Milan, Italy; (A.C.); (E.P.); (T.R.); (A.M.)
- Correspondence: (A.V.); (N.A.I.); Tel.: +39-0382-078-505 (A.V.)
| | - Giuseppe Magro
- Radiotherapy Department, Center for National Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.M.); (E.R.); (G.M.); (S.R.); (R.I.); (B.V.); (M.B.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (E.O.)
| | - Anna Cavallo
- Radiotherapy Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano (INT), 20133 Milan, Italy; (A.C.); (E.P.); (T.R.); (A.M.)
| | - Emanuele Pignoli
- Radiotherapy Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano (INT), 20133 Milan, Italy; (A.C.); (E.P.); (T.R.); (A.M.)
| | - Tiziana Rancati
- Radiotherapy Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano (INT), 20133 Milan, Italy; (A.C.); (E.P.); (T.R.); (A.M.)
| | - Alfredo Mirandola
- Radiotherapy Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano (INT), 20133 Milan, Italy; (A.C.); (E.P.); (T.R.); (A.M.)
| | - Stefania Russo
- Radiotherapy Department, Center for National Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.M.); (E.R.); (G.M.); (S.R.); (R.I.); (B.V.); (M.B.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (E.O.)
| | - Rossana Ingargiola
- Radiotherapy Department, Center for National Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.M.); (E.R.); (G.M.); (S.R.); (R.I.); (B.V.); (M.B.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (E.O.)
| | - Barbara Vischioni
- Radiotherapy Department, Center for National Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.M.); (E.R.); (G.M.); (S.R.); (R.I.); (B.V.); (M.B.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (E.O.)
| | - Maria Bonora
- Radiotherapy Department, Center for National Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.M.); (E.R.); (G.M.); (S.R.); (R.I.); (B.V.); (M.B.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (E.O.)
| | - Sara Ronchi
- Radiotherapy Department, Center for National Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.M.); (E.R.); (G.M.); (S.R.); (R.I.); (B.V.); (M.B.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (E.O.)
| | - Mario Ciocca
- Radiotherapy Department, Center for National Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.M.); (E.R.); (G.M.); (S.R.); (R.I.); (B.V.); (M.B.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (E.O.)
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiotherapy Department, Center for National Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.M.); (E.R.); (G.M.); (S.R.); (R.I.); (B.V.); (M.B.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (E.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Woods KE, Ma TM, Cook KA, Morris ED, Gao Y, Sheng K, Kishan AU, Hegde JV, Felix C, Basehart V, Narahara K, Shen Z, Tenn S, Steinberg ML, Chin RK, Cao M. A Prospective Phase II Study of Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer: Initial Report of Feasibility, Safety, and Patient-Reported Outcomes. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14040939. [PMID: 35205686 PMCID: PMC8870161 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14040939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The delivery of higher radiation doses has been shown to increase local control, and ultimately survival, for head and neck cancer patients, but highly conformal dose distributions are necessary to minimize normal tissue toxicity. Varian’s HyperArc non-coplanar automated treatment planning and delivery technique has been shown to improve dose conformity for intracranial treatment, but its safety and efficacy for head and neck cancer treatment has yet to be verified. This study evaluates the initial results of a prospective clinical trial using HyperArc for recurrent head and neck cancer patients. We demonstrated that HyperArc can enable significant tumor dose escalation compared to conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning while minimizing the dose to organs at risk. Treatment delivery was feasible and safe, with minimal treatment-related toxicities and positive patient-reported quality of life measures. Abstract This study reports the initial results for the first 15 patients on a prospective phase II clinical trial exploring the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of the HyperArc technique for recurrent head and neck cancer treatment. Eligible patients were simulated and planned with both conventional VMAT and HyperArc techniques and the plan with superior dosimetry was selected for treatment. Dosimetry, delivery feasibility and safety, treatment-related toxicity, and patient-reported quality of life (QOL) were all evaluated. HyperArc was chosen over conventional VMAT for all 15 patients and enabled statistically significant increases in dose conformity (R50% reduced by 1.2 ± 2.1, p < 0.05) and mean PTV and GTV doses (by 15.7 ± 4.9 Gy, p < 0.01 and 17.1 ± 6.0 Gy, p < 0.01, respectively). The average HyperArc delivery was 2.8 min longer than conventional VMAT (p < 0.01), and the mean intrafraction motion was ≤ 0.5 ± 0.4 mm and ≤0.3 ± 0.1°. With a median follow-up of 12 months, treatment-related toxicity was minimal (only one grade 3 acute toxicity above baseline) and patient-reported QOL metrics were favorable. HyperArc enabled superior dosimetry and significant target dose escalation compared to conventional VMAT planning, and treatment delivery was feasible, safe, and well-tolerated by patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaley E. Woods
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Kiri A. Cook
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA;
| | - Eric D. Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Yu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Ke Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Amar U. Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - John V. Hegde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Carol Felix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Vincent Basehart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Kelsey Narahara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Zhouhuizi Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Stephen Tenn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Michael L. Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Robert K. Chin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
- Correspondence: (R.K.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
- Correspondence: (R.K.C.); (M.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Belotti A, Carpenito L, Bulfamante AM, Maccari A, Bulfamante G. Sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma treated with surgery and proton beam therapy: clinical, histological aspects and differential diagnosis of a new case. Pathologica 2022; 113:469-474. [PMID: 34974554 PMCID: PMC8720401 DOI: 10.32074/1591-951x-215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma is a rare aggressive malignant tumor with a primary setting involving the nasal cavity followed by the ethmoid sinus and maxillary sinus. It accounts for approximately 3% of all head and neck cancers and less than 1% of all tumors. Nasal obstruction, recurrent epistaxis and headache represent the typical clinical presentation. Imaging shows the presence of a mass in the nasal cavity. The treatment usually consists of surgery and adjuvant intensity modulated radiotherapy. The rarity and the variability of the histological features make its diagnosis particularly difficult. In this paper, we report a case of sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma in a 62-year-old male treated with a multidisciplinary approach. As an alternative to intensity modulated radiotherapy, we proposed proton beam therapy for the first time. The patient benefited from the new and personalized protocol that provided excellent results and few adverse effects. At 45 months follow-up there is no evidence of relapse and the patient is in good health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Belotti
- Human Pathology and Medical Genetic Unit, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Carpenito
- Human Pathology and Medical Genetic Unit, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Mario Bulfamante
- Otolaryngology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Maccari
- Otolaryngology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gaetano Bulfamante
- Human Pathology and Medical Genetic Unit, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gordon K, Gulidov I, Koryakin S, Smyk D, Makeenkova T, Gogolin D, Lepilina O, Golovanova O, Semenov A, Dujenko S, Medvedeva K, Mardynsky Y. Proton therapy with a fixed beamline for skull-base chordomas and chondrosarcomas: outcomes and toxicity. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:238. [PMID: 34930352 PMCID: PMC8686536 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01961-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim This study presents an analysis (efficacy and toxicity) of outcomes in patients with skull-base chordomas or chondrosarcomas treated with a fixed horizontal pencil proton beam. Background Chordomas (CAs) and chondrosarcomas (CSAs) are rare tumours that are usually located near the base of the skull and very close to the brain's most critical structures. Proton therapy (PT) is often considered the best radiation treatment for these diseases, but it is still a limited resource. Active scanning PT delivered via a fixed pencil beamline might be a promising option. Methods This is a single-centre experience describing the results of proton therapy for 31 patients with CA (n = 23) or CSA (n = 8) located near the base of the skull. Proton therapy was utilized by a fixed pencil beamline with a chair to position the patient between May 2016 and November 2020. Ten patients underwent resection (32.2%), 15 patients (48.4%) underwent R2 resection, and 6 patients had unresectable tumours (19.4%). In 4 cases, the tumours had been previously irradiated. The median PT dose was 70 GyRBE (relative biological efficacy, 1.1) [range, 60 to 74] with 2.0 GyRBE per fraction. The mean GTV volume was 25.6 cm3 [range, 4.2–115.6]. Patient demographics, pathology, treatment parameters, and toxicity were collected and analysed. Radiation-induced reactions were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 4.0. Results The median follow-up time was 21 months [range, 4 to 52]. The median overall survival (OS) was 40 months. The 1- and 2-year OS was 100%, and the 3-year OS was 66.3%. Four patients died due to non-cancer-related reasons, 1 patient died due to tumour progression, and 1 patient died due to treatment-related injuries. The 1-year local control (LC) rate was 100%, the 2-year LC rate was 93.7%, and the 3-year LC rate was 85.3%. Two patients with CSA exhibited progression in the neck lymph nodes and lungs. All patients tolerated PT well without any treatment interruptions. We observed 2 cases of ≥ grade 3 toxicity, with 1 case of grade 3 myelitis and 1 case of grade 5 brainstem injury. Conclusion Treatment with a fixed proton beam shows promising disease control and an acceptable toxicity rate, even the difficult-to-treat subpopulation of patients with skull-base chordomas or chondrosarcomas requiring dose escalation.
Collapse
|
28
|
Reirradiation for Nasal Cavity or Paranasal Sinus Tumor-A Multi-Institutional Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13246315. [PMID: 34944935 PMCID: PMC8699758 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of reirradiation of nasal cavity or paranasal sinus tumors. We collected and analyzed multi-institutional data of reirradiation cases. Seventy-eight patients with nasal or paranasal sinus tumors underwent reirradiation. The median survival time was 20 months with a medial follow-up of 10.7 months. The 2-year local control and overall survival rates were 43% and 44%, respectively. Tumor volume (≤25 cm3), duration between previous radiotherapy and reirradiation (≤12 months), histology (squamous cell carcinoma), male sex, and lymph node involvement were predisposing factors for poor survival. Distant metastasis was observed in 20 patients (25.6%). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were observed in 22% of the patients, including five grade 4 (8.6%) cases and one grade 5 (1.2%) case. Tumor location adjacent to the optic pathway was a significant predisposing factor for grade ≥3 visual toxicity. Reirradiation of nasal and paranasal sinus tumors is feasible and effective. However, adverse events, including disease-related toxicities, were significant. Prognostic factors emerge from this study to guide multidisciplinary approaches and clinical trial designs.
Collapse
|
29
|
Huang H, Yuan G, Xu Y, Gao Y, Mao Q, Zhang Y, Bai L, Li W, Wu A, Hu W, Pan Y, Zhou G. Photoacoustic and magnetic resonance imaging-based gene and photothermal therapy using mesoporous nanoagents. Bioact Mater 2021; 9:157-167. [PMID: 34820563 PMCID: PMC8586268 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The integration of photothermal therapy (PTT) with gene therapy (GT) in a single nanoscale platform demonstrates great potential in cancer therapy. Porous iron oxide nanoagents (PIONs) are widely used as magnetic nanoagents in the drug delivery field and also serve as a photothermal nanoagent for photothermal therapy. However, the therapeutic efficacy of PIONs-mediated GT has not been studied. The long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) CRYBG3 (LNC CRYBG3), a lncRNA induced by heavy ion irradiation in lung cancer cells, has been reported to directly bind to globular actin (G-actin) and cause degradation of cytoskeleton and blocking of cytokinesis, thus indicating its potential for use in GT by simulating the effect of heavy ion irradiation and functioning as an antitumor drug. In the present study, we investigated the possibility of combining PIONs-mediated PTT and LNC CRYBG3-mediated GT to destroy non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells both in vitro and in vivo. The combination therapy showed a high cancer cell killing efficacy, and the cure rate was better than that achieved using PTT or GT alone. Moreover, as a type of magnetic nanoagent, PIONs can be used for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and photoacoustic imaging (PAI) both in vitro and in vivo. These findings indicate that the new combination therapy has high potential for cancer treatment. LNC CRYBG3 induced by heavy ion irradiation can cause cytoskeleton degradation and function as an antitumor drug. pcDNA3.1-LNC CRYBG3 delivered by PIONs can escape from lysosomes to facilitate plasmid release when exposed to NIR. The combination of PIONs-mediated PTT and LNC CRYBG3-mediated GT presents both diagnosis and treatment potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory for RNA Medicine, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, PR China
| | - Guotao Yuan
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory for RNA Medicine, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, PR China
| | - Ying Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, China
| | - Yuan Gao
- Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Soochow University of Public Health, Suzhou, 215123, China
| | - Qiulian Mao
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, China
| | - Yin Zhang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory for RNA Medicine, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, PR China
| | - Lu Bai
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory for RNA Medicine, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, PR China
| | - Weijie Li
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory for RNA Medicine, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, PR China
| | - Anqing Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, China
| | - Wentao Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, China
| | - Yue Pan
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory for RNA Medicine, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, PR China
| | - Guangming Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Roy A, Andruska N, Brenneman R, Hogan J, Orlowski HLP, Pipkorn P, Daly MD. A Case of Gorham-Stout Disease of the Skull Base Treated With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 7:100809. [PMID: 34729445 PMCID: PMC8543380 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Roy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Neal Andruska
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Randall Brenneman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jacob Hogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Hilary L P Orlowski
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Patrik Pipkorn
- Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Mackenzie D Daly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Williams VM, Parvathaneni U, Laramore GE, Aljabab S, Wong TP, Liao JJ. Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Nasopharynx Cancer: 2-year Outcomes from a Single Institution. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:28-40. [PMID: 34722809 PMCID: PMC8489486 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00057.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Advances in radiotherapy have improved tumor control and reduced toxicity in the management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Local failure remains a problem for some patients with advanced primary tumors, and toxicities are significant given the large treatment volume and tumor proximity to critical structures, even with modern photon-based radiotherapy. Proton therapy has unique dosimetric advantages, and recent technological advances now allow delivery of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), which can potentially improve the therapeutic ratio in NPC. We report our 2-year clinical outcomes with IMPT for NPC. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed treatment records of patients with NPC treated with IMPT at our center. Demographics, dosimetry, tumor response, local regional control (LRC), distant metastasis, overall survival, and acute and late toxicity outcomes were reviewed. Analyses were performed with descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicity was graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). Results Twenty-six patients were treated from 2015 to 2020. Median age was 48 years (range, 19–73 years), 62% (n = 16) had T3-T4 disease, 92% (n = 24) were node positive, 92% (n = 24) had stage III-IV disease, and 69% (n = 18) had positive results for Epstein-Barr virus. Dose-painted pencil-beam IMPT was used. Most patients (85%; 22 of 26) were treated with 70 Gy(RBE) in 33 fractions once daily; 4 (15%) underwent hyperfractionated accelerated treatment twice daily. All received concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy; 7 (27%) also received induction chemotherapy. All patients (100%) completed the planned radiotherapy, and no acute or late grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed. At median follow-up of 25 months (range, 4-60), there were 2 local regional failures (8%) and 3 distant metastases (12%). The Kaplan-Meier 2-year LRC, freedom from distant metastasis, and overall survival were 92%, 87%, and 85% respectively. Conclusion IMPT is feasible in locally advanced NPC with early outcomes demonstrating excellent LRC and favorable toxicity profile. Our data add to the growing body of evidence supporting the clinical use of IMPT for NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vonetta M Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - George E Laramore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Saif Aljabab
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Tony P Wong
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jay J Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rupasinghe T, Silva DC, Balawardena J, Perera K, Gunasekera D, Weerasinghe S, Jeyakumaran N, Abeysinghe P, Skandarajah T, Choudhury A, Joseph N. Curative-Intent Radiotherapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck in Sri Lanka: The Impact of Radiotherapy Technique on Survival. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:765-772. [PMID: 34642066 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
AIMS We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) treated with curative-intent radiotherapy at the National Cancer Institute of Sri Lanka to determine the impact of the treatment technique on disease-free survival (DFS). MATERIALS AND METHODS SCCHN patients treated with radical radiotherapy or adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy from 2016 to 2017 were included in the study. Data on the following variables were collected by reviewing clinical and radiotherapy treatment records: age, gender, tumour site, stage, time to delivery of radiotherapy, use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, use of concurrent radiosensitising chemotherapy and treatment technique. DFS, defined as the time to death, tumour recurrence or loss to follow-up, was the primary end point and outcomes were compared between patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in linear accelerators and those treated with conventional radiotherapy in cobalt teletherapy units. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out on known prognostic variables. RESULTS In total, 408 patients were included in the study, with 138 (34%) being treated with IMRT in the linear accelerator. More than 75% of patients were of stage III or IV at diagnosis. The 2-year DFS of the whole cohort was 25% (95% confidence interval 21-30%). Patients treated with IMRT in the linear accelerator had a superior DFS in comparison with those treated with conventional radiotherapy in the cobalt teletherapy units (P < 0.001, hazard ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.5-0.82). Higher stage, cobalt treatment and use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were adversely associated with DFS on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION A large proportion of patients with SCCHN treated with curative-intent radiotherapy in Sri Lanka had locally advanced disease and DFS was superior in patients treated with IMRT in the linear accelerator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Rupasinghe
- National Cancer Institute, Maharagama, Sri Lanka; Sri Lanka Cancer Research Group, Sri Lanka College of Oncologists, Mahargama, Sri Lanka
| | - D C Silva
- Sri Lanka Cancer Research Group, Sri Lanka College of Oncologists, Mahargama, Sri Lanka
| | - J Balawardena
- Sri Lanka Cancer Research Group, Sri Lanka College of Oncologists, Mahargama, Sri Lanka; General Sir John Kotalawela Defence University, Kandawala, Sri Lanka
| | - K Perera
- National Cancer Institute, Maharagama, Sri Lanka; Sri Lanka Cancer Research Group, Sri Lanka College of Oncologists, Mahargama, Sri Lanka
| | - D Gunasekera
- National Cancer Institute, Maharagama, Sri Lanka; Sri Lanka Cancer Research Group, Sri Lanka College of Oncologists, Mahargama, Sri Lanka
| | - S Weerasinghe
- National Cancer Institute, Maharagama, Sri Lanka; Sri Lanka Cancer Research Group, Sri Lanka College of Oncologists, Mahargama, Sri Lanka
| | - N Jeyakumaran
- National Cancer Institute, Maharagama, Sri Lanka; Sri Lanka Cancer Research Group, Sri Lanka College of Oncologists, Mahargama, Sri Lanka
| | - P Abeysinghe
- National Cancer Institute, Maharagama, Sri Lanka; Sri Lanka Cancer Research Group, Sri Lanka College of Oncologists, Mahargama, Sri Lanka
| | - T Skandarajah
- National Cancer Institute, Maharagama, Sri Lanka; Sri Lanka Cancer Research Group, Sri Lanka College of Oncologists, Mahargama, Sri Lanka
| | - A Choudhury
- The Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - N Joseph
- Sri Lanka Cancer Research Group, Sri Lanka College of Oncologists, Mahargama, Sri Lanka; Teaching Hospital, Batticaloa, Sri Lanka.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Balakin VE, Rozanova OM, Smirnova EN, Belyakova TA, Shemyakov AE, Strelnikova NS. Combined Effect of Neutron and Proton Radiations on the Growth of Solid Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma and Remote Effects in Mice. DOKL BIOCHEM BIOPHYS 2021; 498:159-164. [PMID: 34189642 DOI: 10.1134/s1607672921030017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
The combined effect of the irradiation with a proton pencil scanning beam (PBS) at a total dose of 80 Gy and neutron radiation at a dose of 5 Gy on the growth of solid Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) and the remote effects in tumor-bearing mice was studied. Combined irradiation of mice with neutrons before and after irradiation with PBS, as well as irradiation only with PBS, effectively suppressed the growth of solid EAC within 1 month. In terms of the frequency and severity of radiation-induced skin reactions of mice observed 15-40 days after therapy, neutron irradiation after the irradiation with PBS showed better values of these parameters as compared to only PBS; however, exposure to neutrons before PBS was more damaging as compared to the other two options. It was also shown that the tumor relapse rate in the groups of animals with combined irradiation was higher, and the total lifespan was lower than the group of mice irradiated with PBS alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V E Balakin
- Physical Technical Center, Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Protvino, Russia.
| | - O M Rozanova
- Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Russia
| | - E N Smirnova
- Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Russia
| | - T A Belyakova
- Physical Technical Center, Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Protvino, Russia
| | - A E Shemyakov
- Physical Technical Center, Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Protvino, Russia.,Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Russia
| | - N S Strelnikova
- Physical Technical Center, Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Protvino, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Leach K, Tang S, Sturgeon J, Lee AK, Grover R, Sanghvi P, Urbanic J, Chang C. Beam-Specific Spot Guidance and Optimization for PBS Proton Treatment of Bilateral Head and Neck Cancers. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:50-61. [PMID: 34285935 PMCID: PMC8270101 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00060.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose A multi-field optimization (MFO) technique that uses beam-specific spot placement volumes (SPVs) and spot avoidance volumes (SAVs) is introduced for bilateral head and neck (H&N) cancers. These beam-specific volumes are used to guide the optimizer to consistently achieve optimal organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing with target coverage and plan robustness. Materials and Methods Implementation of this technique using a 4-beam, 5-beam, and variant 5-beam arrangement is discussed. The generation of beam-specific SPVs and SAVs derived from target and OARs are shown. The SPVs for select fields are further partitioned into optimization volumes for uniform dose distributions that resemble those of single-field optimization (SFO). A conventional MFO plan that does not use beam-specific spot placement guidance (MFOcon) and an MFO plan that uses only beam-specific SPV (MFOspv) are compared with current technique (MFOspv/sav), using both simulated scenarios and forward-calculated plans on weekly verification computed tomography (VFCT) scans. Results Dose distribution characteristics of the 4-beam, 5-beam, and variant 5-beam technique are demonstrated with discussion on OAR sparing. When comparing the MFOcon, MFOspv, and MFOspv/sav, the MFOspv/sav is shown to have superior OAR sparing in 9 of the 14 OARs examined. It also shows clinical plan robustness when evaluated by using both simulated uncertainty scenarios and forward-calculated weekly VFCTs throughout the 7-week treatment course. Conclusion The MFOspv/sav technique is a systematic approach using SPVs and SAVs to guide the optimizer to consistently reach desired OAR dose values and plan robustness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karla Leach
- California Protons Cancer Therapy Center, San Diego, CA, USA.,Texas Center for Proton Therapy, Irving, TX, USA
| | - Shikui Tang
- Texas Center for Proton Therapy, Irving, TX, USA
| | | | - Andrew K Lee
- Texas Center for Proton Therapy, Irving, TX, USA
| | - Ryan Grover
- California Protons Cancer Therapy Center, San Diego, CA, USA.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Parag Sanghvi
- California Protons Cancer Therapy Center, San Diego, CA, USA.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - James Urbanic
- California Protons Cancer Therapy Center, San Diego, CA, USA.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Chang Chang
- California Protons Cancer Therapy Center, San Diego, CA, USA.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sherry AD, Pasalic D, Gunn GB, Fuller CD, Phan J, Rosenthal DI, Morrison WH, Sturgis EM, Gross ND, Gillison ML, Ferrarotto R, El-Naggar AK, Garden AS, Frank SJ. Proton Beam Therapy for Head and Neck Carcinoma of Unknown Primary: Toxicity and Quality of Life. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:234-247. [PMID: 34285950 PMCID: PMC8270080 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00034.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Proton radiation therapy (PRT) may offer dosimetric and clinical benefit in the treatment of head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary (HNCUP). We sought to describe toxicity and quality of life (QOL) in patients with HNCUP treated with PRT. Patients and Methods Toxicity and QOL were prospectively tracked in patients with HNCUP from 2011 to 2019 after institutional review board approval. Patients received PRT to the mucosa of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and bilateral cervical lymph nodes with sparing of the larynx and hypopharynx. Patient-reported outcomes were tracked with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory–Head and Neck Module, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Head and Neck, the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory, and the Xerostomia-Related QOL Scale. Primary study endpoints were the incidence of grade ≥ 3 (G3) toxicity and QOL patterns. Results Fourteen patients (median follow-up, 2 years) were evaluated. Most patients presented with human papillomavirus–positive disease (n = 12, 86%). Rates of G3 oral mucositis, xerostomia, and dermatitis were 7% (n = 1), 21% (n = 3), and 36% (n = 5), respectively. None required a gastrostomy. During PRT, QOL was reduced relative to baseline and recovered shortly after PRT. At 2 years after PRT, the local regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 100% (among 7 patients at risk), 79% (among 6 patients at risk), and 90% (among 7 patients at risk), respectively. Conclusion Therefore, PRT for HNCUP was associated with highly favorable dosimetric and clinical outcomes, including minimal oral mucositis, xerostomia, and dysphagia. Toxicity and QOL may be superior with PRT compared with conventional radiation therapy and PRT maintains equivalent oncologic control. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate late effects and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dario Pasalic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - C David Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William H Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Erich M Sturgis
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Neil D Gross
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maura L Gillison
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adel K El-Naggar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Zakeri K, Wang H, Kang JJ, Lee A, Romesser P, Mohamed N, Gelblum D, Sherman E, Dunn L, Boyle J, Wong R, Chen L, Yu Y, Tsai CJ, McBride SM, Riaz N, Lee N. Outcomes and prognostic factors of major salivary gland tumors treated with proton beam radiation therapy. Head Neck 2021; 43:1056-1062. [PMID: 33606323 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton beam radiation therapy (PBRT) has dosimetric advantages compared to photon radiation therapy for the treatment of major salivary gland tumors (MSGTs). METHODS Patients with non-metastatic MSGTs treated at a single proton therapy center from October 2013 to October 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS Sixty-eight patients with MSGTs were included and the most common site and histology were the parotid gland (75.0%) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (22.1%), respectively. The 3-year rates of locoregional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 95.1% (95% CI: 89.9%-100.0%), 80.7% (70.2%-92.7%), and 96.1% (95% CI: 90.9%-100.0%), respectively. CONCLUSION In a large cohort of MSGTs treated with PBRT, the rates of locoregional control were high in short-term follow-up and treatment was well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York City, USA
| | - Huili Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York City, USA
| | - Jung Julie Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York City, USA
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York City, USA
| | - Paul Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York City, USA
| | - Nader Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York City, USA
| | - Daphna Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York City, USA
| | - Eric Sherman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York City, USA
| | - Lara Dunn
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York City, USA
| | - Jay Boyle
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York City, USA
| | - Richard Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York City, USA
| | - Linda Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York City, USA
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York City, USA
| | - C Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York City, USA
| | - Sean M McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York City, USA
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York City, USA
| | - Nancy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York City, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Margalit DN, Sacco AG, Cooper JS, Ridge JA, Bakst RL, Beadle BM, Beitler JJ, Chang SS, Chen AM, Galloway TJ, Koyfman SA, Mita C, Robbins JR, Tsai CJ, Truong MT, Yom SS, Siddiqui F. Systematic review of postoperative therapy for resected squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Executive summary of the American Radium Society appropriate use criteria. Head Neck 2021; 43:367-391. [PMID: 33098180 PMCID: PMC7756212 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aims of this systematic review are to (a) evaluate the current literature on the impact of postoperative therapy for resected squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) on oncologic and non-oncologic outcomes and (b) identify the optimal evidence-based postoperative therapy recommendations for commonly encountered clinical scenarios. METHODS An analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Prospective studies and methodology-based systematic reviews and meta-analyses of postoperative therapy for SCCHN were identified by searching Medline (OVID) and EMBASE (Elsevier) using controlled vocabulary terms (ie, National Library of Medicine Medical Subject Headings [MeSH], EMTREE). Study screening and selection was performed with Covidence software and full-text review. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was used by the expert panel to rate the appropriate use of postoperative therapy, and the modified Delphi method was used to come to consensus. RESULTS A total of 5660 studies were identified and screened using the title and abstract, leading to 201 studies assessed for relevance using full-text review. After limitation to the eligibility criteria, 101 studies from 1977 to 2020 were identified, including 77 with oncologic endpoints and 24 with function and quality of life endpoints. All studies reported staging prior to the implementation of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC-8). CONCLUSIONS Prospective clinical studies and systematic reviews identified through the PRISMA systematic review provided good evidence for consensus statements regarding the appropriate use of postoperative therapy for resected SCCHN. Further research is needed in domains where consensus by the expert panel could not be achieved for the appropriateness of specific postoperative therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle N. Margalit
- Dana‐Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | | | | | | | | - Beth M. Beadle
- Stanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Carol Mita
- Countway Library, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | | | | - Minh T. Truong
- Boston University School of MedicineBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Sue S. Yom
- University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Crary MA. Dysphagia and Head and Neck Cancer. Dysphagia 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-63648-3.00005-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
39
|
Agarwal J, Gupta T. Progress in head-and-neck cancer: Promise versus reality. JOURNAL OF HEAD & NECK PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS 2021. [DOI: 10.4103/jhnps.jhnps_21_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
|
40
|
Comparative evaluation of treatment plan quality for a prototype biology-guided radiotherapy system in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Med Dosim 2020; 46:171-178. [PMID: 33272744 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2020.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to compare prototype treatment plans for a new biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT) machine in its intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) mode with those using existing IMRT delivery techniques in treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We retrospectively selected ten previous NPC patients treated in 33 fractions according to the NRG-HN001 treatment protocol. Three treatment plans were generated for each patient: a helical tomotherapy (HT) plan with a 2.5-cm jaw, a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan using 2 to 4 6-MV arc fields, and a prototype IMRT plan for a new BgRT system which uses a 6-MV photon beam on a ring gantry that rotates at 60 rotations per minute with a couch that moves in small incremental steps. Treatment plans were compared using dosimetric parameters to planning target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risk (OARs) as specified by the NRG-HN001 protocol. Plans for the three modalities had comparable dose coverage, mean dose, and dose heterogeneity to the primary PTV, while the prototype IMRT plans had greater dose heterogeneity to the non-primary PTVs, with the average homogeneity index ranging from 1.28 to 1.50 in the prototype plans. Six of all the 7 OAR mean dose parameters were lower with statistical significance in the prototype plans compared to the HT and VMAT plans with the other mean dose parameter being comparable, and all the 18 OAR maximum dose parameters were comparable or lower with statistical significance in the prototype plans. The average left and right parotid mean doses in the prototype plans were 10.5 Gy and 10.4 Gy lower than those in the HT plans, respectively, and were 5.1 Gy and 5.2 Gy lower than those in the VMAT plans, respectively. Compared to that with the HT and VMAT plans, the treatment time was longer with statistical significance with the prototype IMRT plans. Based on dosimetric comparison of ten NPC cases, the prototype IMRT plans achieved comparable or better critical organ sparing compared to the HT and VMAT plans for definitive NPC radiotherapy. However, there was higher dose heterogeneity to non-primary targets and longer estimated treatment time with the prototype plans.
Collapse
|
41
|
Mendenhall WM, Holtzman AL, Dagan R, Bryant CM, Hitchcock KE, Amdur RJ, Fernandes RP. Current Role of Radiotherapy in the Management of Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2020; 14:79-83. [PMID: 33613841 DOI: 10.1177/1943387520971418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Study Design Literature review. Objective To review the current role of radiotherapy (RT) in the management of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Methods Review of selected literature. Results T1-T2N0 SCCs may be treated with either RT alone or surgery with a high likelihood of cure. The pendulum swung toward surgery with postoperative RT (PORT) added depending on the pathological findings in the mid 1980s. Patients with positive margins, extranodal extension (ENE), and/or 4 or more positive nodes receive concomitant chemotherapy (POCRT). Patients with T3-T4 and/or positive regional nodes are treated with surgery and PORT alone or POCRT. The likelihood of cure is moderate to low depending on extent of disease. The likelihood of major complications ranges from 10% to 30% depending on the method of reconstruction and the aggressiveness of postoperative PORT/POCRT. Patients with very advanced disease are treated with palliative RT, chemotherapy, or supportive care. Conclusions The role of RT in the management of oral cavity SCC is primarily in the postoperative setting with palliative RT being reserved for those with very advanced disease where the likelihood of cure is remote.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Curtis M Bryant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Kathryn E Hitchcock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Robert J Amdur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Rui P Fernandes
- Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Florida Health, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Alterio D, Turturici I, Volpe S, Ferrari A, Russell-Edu SW, Vischioni B, Mardighian D, Preda L, Gandini S, Marvaso G, Augugliaro M, Durante S, Arculeo S, Patti F, Boccuzzi D, Casbarra A, Starzynska A, Santoni R, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Carotid blowout syndrome after reirradiation for head and neck malignancies: a comprehensive systematic review for a pragmatic multidisciplinary approach. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 155:103088. [PMID: 32956946 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To provide a literature review on risk factors and strategies to prevent acute carotid blowout (CBO) syndrome in patients who underwent reirradiation (reRT) for recurrent head and neck (HN) malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Inclusion criteria were: 1) CBO following reRT in the HN region, 2) description on patient-, tumor- or treatment-related risk factors, 3) clinical or radiological signs of threatened or impending CBO, and 4) CBO prevention strategies. RESULTS Thirty-five studies were selected for the analysis from five hundred seventy-seven records. Results provided indications on clinical, radiological and dosimetric parameters possibly associated with higher risk of CBO. Endovascular procedures (artery occlusion and stenting) to prevent acute massive hemorrhage in high risk patients were discussed. CONCLUSION Literature data are still scarce with a low level of evidence. Nevertheless, the present work provides a comprehensive review useful for clinicians as a multidisciplinary pragmatic tool in their clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Alterio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Irene Turturici
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - Annamaria Ferrari
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Barbara Vischioni
- National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy (Fondazione CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Preda
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCSS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Augugliaro
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Durante
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Simona Arculeo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Patti
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Boccuzzi
- Diagnostic Radiology Residency School, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alessia Casbarra
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Starzynska
- Department of Oral Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| | - Riccardo Santoni
- Radiation Oncology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ning MS, Palmer MB, Shah AK, Chambers LC, Garlock LB, Melson BB, Frank SJ. Three-Year Results of a Prospective Statewide Insurance Coverage Pilot for Proton Therapy: Stakeholder Collaboration Improves Patient Access to Care. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 16:e966-e976. [PMID: 32302271 PMCID: PMC8462618 DOI: 10.1200/jop.19.00437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton therapy is increasingly prescribed, given its potential to improve outcomes; however, prior authorization remains a barrier to access and is associated with frequent denials and treatment delays. We sought to determine whether appropriate access to proton therapy could ensure timely care without overuse or increased costs. METHODS Our large academic cancer center collaborated with a statewide self-funded employer (n = 186,000 enrollees) on an insurance coverage pilot, incorporating a value-based analysis and ensuring preauthorization for appropriate indications. Coverage was ensured for prospective trials and five evidence-supported anatomic sites. Enrollment initiated in 2016 and continued for 3 years. Primary end points were use, authorization time, and cost of care, with case-matched comparison of total charges at 1 month pretreatment through 6 months posttreatment. RESULTS Thirty-two patients were approved over 3 years, with only 22 actually receiving proton therapy, versus a predicted use by 120 patients (P < .01). Median follow-up was 20.1 months, and average authorization time decreased from 17 days to < 1 day (P < .01), significantly enhancing patient access. During this time, 25 patients who met pilot eligibility were instead treated with photons; and 17 patients with > 6 months of follow-up were case matched by treatment site to 17 patients receiving proton therapy, with no significant differences in sex, age, performance status, stage, histology, indication, prescribed fractions, or chemotherapy. Total medical costs (including radiation therapy [RT] and non-RT charges) for patients treated with PBT were lower than expected (a cost increase initially was expected), with no significant difference in total average charges (P = .82), in the context of overall ancillary care use. CONCLUSION This coverage pilot demonstrated that appropriate access to proton therapy does not necessitate overuse or significantly increase comprehensive medical costs. Objective evidence-based coverage polices ensure appropriate patient selection. Stakeholder collaboration can streamline patient access while reducing administrative burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew S. Ning
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Laura C. Chambers
- Office of Employee Benefits, The University of Texas System, Austin, TX
| | - Laura B. Garlock
- Office of Employee Benefits, The University of Texas System, Austin, TX
| | - Benjamin B. Melson
- Department of Financial Planning and Analysis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Steven J. Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Proton Therapy Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lin YL. Proton beam therapy of periorbital sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma: Two case reports and review of literature. World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11:655-672. [PMID: 32879851 PMCID: PMC7443830 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i8.655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinonasal malignancies are rare but demanding due to complex anatomy, usually late diagnosis, and inconsistent therapy strategy based on multimodality approaches. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most common histology, with poorer prognosis. In the setting of orbital invasion, an orbital exenteration may be required. However, in case of primary rejection of disfiguring surgery or unresectable disease, proton beam therapy (PBT) should be largely considered, allowing for better sparing of neighboring critical structures and improved outcomes by dose escalation. CASE SUMMARY A 62-year-old male presented with a recurrent SCC in the nasal septum abutting frontal skull base and bilateral orbits at 7 mo after primary partial nasal amputation. Because of refusal of face-deforming surgery and considerable adverse effects of conventional radiotherapy, the patient underwent a PBT by hyperfractionated accelerated scheme, resulting in complete response and moderate toxicities. After 2 years, a nasal reconstruction was implemented with satisfactory appearance and recurrence-freedom to date. Another patient with an initially extended sinonasal SCC, invading right orbit and facial soft tissue, declined an orbital exenteration and was treated with a normofractionated PBT to the gross tumor and elective cervical lymphatics. The follow-up showed a continuous tumor remission with reasonable late toxicities, such as cataract and telangiectasia on the right. Despite T4a stage and disapproval of concurrent chemotherapy owing to individual choice, both patients still achieved outstanding treatment outcomes with PBT alone. CONCLUSION PBT enabled orbit preservation and excellent tumor control without severe adverse effects on both presented patients with locally advanced sinonasal SCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Lan Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rinecker Proton Therapy Center, Munich 81371, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Evaluation of a VERT-based module for proton radiotherapy education and training. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2020. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396920000473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractIntroduction:In many countries, there is a skills gap in proton therapy with many staff unprepared to work with the new technology. The new Virtual Environment for Radiotherapy Training (VERT) proton module provides learners with a simulated proton machine 3D environment. This project aimed to evaluate the role of VERT in training the radiotherapy workforce for the future use of protons.Methods:A practical teaching session using VERT was deployed after a traditional teaching session had provided basic knowledge. A questionnaire deployed before and after VERT enabled comparison of knowledge while a combination of Likert and open questions gathered participant feedback concerning the initiative.Results:A total of 38 students provided evaluation of the session. Overall, there were high levels of satisfaction and enjoyment with 35 participants reporting enjoyment and 36 indicating that the event be repeated.Discussion:Participants felt that they had learned from the experience, although quantitative data lacked statistical significance to demonstrate this. All participants agreed that VERT had provided improved understanding of proton dose deposition arising from visualisation of beams and dose deposition. Most participants agreed that the simulation was realistic and that it had improved their understanding. Feedback in relation to future sessions concerned smaller group sizes, more patient cases, more time and additional clinical datasets.Conclusion:A proton simulation module has been shown to be an enjoyable teaching tool that improves students’ confidence in their knowledge of the underpinning theory and clinical usage of the modality. Learners felt better prepared to encounter protons in clinical practice. Future work will build on these findings using smaller group work and a more robust assessment tool to identify long-term impact of the training.
Collapse
|
46
|
Simone CB, Plastaras JP, Jabbour SK, Lee A, Lee NY, Choi JI, Frank SJ, Chang JY, Bradley J. Proton Reirradiation: Expert Recommendations for Reducing Toxicities and Offering New Chances of Cure in Patients With Challenging Recurrence Malignancies. Semin Radiat Oncol 2020; 30:253-261. [PMID: 32503791 PMCID: PMC10870390 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2020.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Local and regional recurrences are common following an initial course of radiotherapy, yet management of these recurrences remains a challenge. Reirradiation may be an optimal treatment approach for providing durable tumor control and even offering select patients with locoregional recurrences or new primary tumors a chance of cure, but photon reirradiation can be associated with considerable risks of high grade acute and late toxicities. The high conformality and lack of exit dose with proton therapy offer significant advantages for reirradiation. By decreasing dose to adjacent normal tissues, proton therapy can more safely deliver definitive instead of palliative doses of reirradiation, more safely dose escalate reirradiation treatment, and more safely allow for concurrent systemic therapy in the reirradiation setting. In this case-based analysis, renowned experts in the fields of proton therapy and of reirradiation present cases for which they recently employed proton reirradiation. This manuscript focuses on case studies in patients with lung cancer, head and neck malignancies, and pelvic malignancies. Considerations for when to deliver proton therapy in the reirradiation setting and the pros and cons of proton therapy are discussed, and the existing literature supporting the use of proton reirradiation for these disease sites is assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| | - John P Plastaras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - J Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeffrey Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Saini G, Shukla R, Sood KS, Shukla SK, Chandra R. Role of Proton Beam Therapy in Current Day Radiation Oncology Practice. ASIAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractProton beam therapy (PBT), because of its unique physics of no–exit dose deposition in the tissue, is an exciting prospect. The phenomenon of Bragg peak allows protons to deposit their almost entire energy towards the end of the path of the proton and stops any further dose delivery. Braggs peak equips PBT with superior dosimetric advantage over photons or electrons because PBT doesn’t traverse the target/body but is stopped sharply at an energy dependent depth in the target/body. It also has no exit dose. Because of no exit dose and normal tissue sparing, PBT is hailed for its potential to bring superior outcomes. Pediatric malignancies is the most common malignancy where PBT have found utmost application. Nowadays, PBT is also being used in the treatment of other malignancies such as carcinoma prostate, carcinoma breast, head and neck malignancies, and gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Despite advantages of PBT, there is not only a high cost of setting up of PBT centers but also a lack of definitive phase-III data. Therefore, we review the role of PBT in current day practice of oncology to bring out the nuances that must guide the practice to choose suitable patients for PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gagan Saini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAX Super Speciality Hospital Patparganj and Vaishali, New Delhi, India
| | - Rashmi Shukla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAX Super Speciality Hospital Patparganj and Vaishali, New Delhi, India
| | - Kanika S. Sood
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dharamshila Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Sujit K. Shukla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Ritu Chandra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAX Super Speciality Hospital Patparganj and Vaishali, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kitpanit S, Lee A, Pitter KL, Fan D, Chow JC, Neal B, Han Z, Fox P, Sine K, Mah D, Dunn LA, Sherman EJ, Michel L, Ganly I, Wong RJ, Boyle JO, Cohen MA, Singh B, Brennan CW, Gavrilovic IT, Hatzoglou V, O'Malley B, Zakeri K, Yu Y, Chen L, Gelblum DY, Kang JJ, McBride SM, Tsai CJ, Riaz N, Lee NY. Temporal Lobe Necrosis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients after Proton Therapy to the Skull Base. Int J Part Ther 2020; 6:17-28. [PMID: 32582816 PMCID: PMC7302730 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00014.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To demonstrate temporal lobe necrosis (TLN) rate and clinical/dose-volume factors associated with TLN in radiation-naïve patients with head and neck cancer treated with proton therapy where the field of radiation involved the skull base. MATERIALS AND METHODS Medical records and dosimetric data for radiation-naïve patients with head and neck cancer receiving proton therapy to the skull base were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with <3 months of follow-up, receiving <45 GyRBE or nonconventional fractionation, and/or no follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were excluded. TLN was determined using MRI and graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Clinical (gender, age, comorbidities, concurrent chemotherapy, smoking, radiation techniques) and dose-volume parameters were analyzed for TLN correlation. The receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) were performed to determine the cutoff points of significant dose-volume parameters. RESULTS Between 2013 and 2019, 234 patients were included. The median follow-up time was 22.5 months (range = 3.2-69.3). Overall TLN rates of any grade, ≥ grade 2, and ≥ grade 3 were 5.6% (N = 13), 2.1%, and 0.9%, respectively. The estimated 2-year TLN rate was 4.6%, and the 2-year rate of any brain necrosis was 6.8%. The median time to TLN was 20.9 months from proton completion. Absolute volume receiving 40, 50, 60, and 70 GyRBE (absolute volume [aV]); mean and maximum dose received by the temporal lobe; and dose to the 0.5, 1, and 2 cm3 volume receiving the maximum dose (D0.5cm3, D1cm3, and D2cm3, respectively) of the temporal lobe were associated with greater TLN risk while clinical parameters showed no correlation. Among volume parameters, aV50 gave maximum AUC (0.921), and D2cm3 gave the highest AUC (0.935) among dose parameters. The 11-cm3 cutoff value for aV50 and 62 GyRBE for D2cm3 showed maximum specificity and sensitivity. CONCLUSION The estimated 2-year TLN rate was 4.6% with a low rate of toxicities ≥grade 3; aV50 ≤11 cm3, D2cm3 ≤62 GyRBE and other cutoff values are suggested as constraints in proton therapy planning to minimize the risk of any grade TLN. Patients whose temporal lobe(s) unavoidably receive higher doses than these thresholds should be carefully followed with MRI after proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarin Kitpanit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ken L. Pitter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dan Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - James C.H. Chow
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Brian Neal
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, NJ, USA
| | - Zhiqiang Han
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, NJ, USA
| | - Pamela Fox
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, NJ, USA
| | - Kevin Sine
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, NJ, USA
| | - Dennis Mah
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, NJ, USA
| | - Lara A. Dunn
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric J. Sherman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Loren Michel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ian Ganly
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard J. Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jay O. Boyle
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc A. Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bhuvanesh Singh
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cameron W. Brennan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Igor T. Gavrilovic
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vaios Hatzoglou
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bernard O'Malley
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, China
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, NJ, USA
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Linda Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daphna Y. Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jung Julie Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sean M. McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chiaojung J. Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Alterio D, D’Ippolito E, Vischioni B, Fossati P, Gandini S, Bonora M, Ronchi S, Vitolo V, Mastella E, Magro G, Franco P, Ricardi U, Krengli M, Ivaldi G, Ferrari A, Fanetti G, Comi S, Tagliabue M, Verri E, Ricotti R, Ciardo D, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Valvo F, Orecchia R. Mixed-beam approach in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: IMRT followed by proton therapy boost versus IMRT-only. Evaluation of toxicity and efficacy. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:541-548. [PMID: 32090645 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1730001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To compare radiation-induced toxicity and dosimetry parameters in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (LANPC) treated with a mixed-beam (MB) approach (IMRT followed by proton therapy boost) with an historic cohort of patients treated with a full course of IMRT-only.Material and methods: Twenty-seven patients with LANPC treated with the MB approach were compared to a similar cohort of 17 patients treated with IMRT-only. The MB approach consisted in a first phase of IMRT up to 54-60 Gy followed by a second phase delivered with a proton therapy boost up to 70-74 Gy (RBE). The total dose for patients treated with IMRT-only was 69.96 Gy. Induction chemotherapy was administrated to 59 and 88% and concurrent chemoradiotherapy to 88 and 100% of the MB and IMRT-only patients, respectively. The worst toxicity occurring during the entire course of treatment (acute toxicity) and early-late toxicity were registered according to the Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events V4.03.Results: The two cohorts were comparable. Patients treated with MB received a significantly higher median total dose to target volumes (p = .02). Acute grade 3 mucositis was found in 11 and 76% (p = .0002) of patients treated with MB and IMRT-only approach, respectively, while grade 2 xerostomia was found in 7 and 35% (p = .02) of patients treated with MB and IMRT-only, respectively. There was no statistical difference in late toxicity. Local progression-free survival (PFS) and progression-free survival curves were similar between the two cohorts of patients (p = .17 and p = .40, respectively). Local control rate was 96% and 81% for patients treated with MB approach and IMRT-only, respectively.Conclusions: Sequential MB approach for LANPC patients provides a significantly lower acute toxicity profile compared to full course of IMRT. There were no differences in early-late morbidities and disease-related outcomes (censored at two-years) but a longer follow-up is required to achieve conclusive results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Alterio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Emma D’Ippolito
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Barbara Vischioni
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Piero Fossati
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Bonora
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Sara Ronchi
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Viviana Vitolo
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Edoardo Mastella
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Magro
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Krengli
- Department of Translational Medicine, Novara, University of Piemonte Orientale, Vercelli, Italy
| | - Giovanni Ivaldi
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, ICS Maugeri, IRCSS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Annamaria Ferrari
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppi Fanetti
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Comi
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Tagliabue
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Verri
- Department of Medical Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosalinda Ricotti
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Delia Ciardo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Valvo
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Direction, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Scientific Direction, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Van Gestel D, Dragan T, Grégoire V, Evans M, Budach V. Radiotherapy Quality Assurance for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2020; 10:282. [PMID: 32226773 PMCID: PMC7081058 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The impact of radiotherapy (RT) quality assurance (QA) has been demonstrated by numerous studies and is particularly important for head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment due to the complexity of RT target volumes in this region and the multiple adjacent organs at risk. The RT planning process includes many critical steps including interpretation of diagnostic imaging, image fusion, target volume delineation (tumor, lymph nodes, and organs at risk), and planning. Each step has become highly complex, and precise and rigorous QA throughout the planning process is essential. The ultimate aim is to precisely deliver radiation dose to the target, maximizing the tumor dose and minimizing the dose to surrounding organs at risk, in order to improve the therapeutic index. It is imperative that RT QA programs should systematically control all aspects of the RT planning pathway and include regular end-to-end tests and external audits. However, comprehensive QA should not be limited to RT and should, where possible, also be implemented for surgery, systemic therapy, pathology, as well as other aspects involved in the interdisciplinary treatment of HNC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Van Gestel
- Department of Radiation Oncology Head and Neck Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tatiana Dragan
- Department of Radiation Oncology Head and Neck Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Grégoire
- Radiation Oncology Departement, Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - Mererid Evans
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Volker Budach
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|