1
|
Mellado S, Chirban AM, Shapera E, Rivera B, Panettieri E, Vivanco M, Conrad C, Sucandy I, Vega EA. Innovations in surgery for gallbladder cancer: A review of robotic surgery as a feasible and safe option. Am J Surg 2024; 233:37-44. [PMID: 38443272 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted surgical techniques in the treatment of gallbladder cancer, comparing it with traditional open and laparoscopic methods. METHODS A systematic review of the literature searched for comparative analyses of patient outcomes following robotic, open, and laparoscopic surgeries, focusing on oncological results and perioperative benefits. RESULTS Five total studies published between 2019 and 2023 were identified. Findings indicate that robotic-assisted surgery for gallbladder cancer is as effective as traditional methods in terms of oncological outcomes, with potential advantages in precision and perioperative recovery. CONCLUSIONS Robotic surgery offers a viable and potentially advantageous alternative for gallbladder cancer treatment, warranting further research to confirm its benefits and establish comprehensive surgical guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Mellado
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ariana M Chirban
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Emanuel Shapera
- Digestive Health Institute, Advent Health Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Belen Rivera
- Department of Surgery, Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago, Chile
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcelo Vivanco
- Department of Surgery, Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago, Chile
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- Digestive Health Institute, Advent Health Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cheng J, Liu J, Dou CW, Xie ZC, Fan BF, Jin LM, Liang L, Zhang CW. Standardized lymph node dissection for gallbladder cancer under laparoscopy: en-bloc resection technique. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:183. [PMID: 37154945 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02924-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Positive lymph node (LN) is a key prognostic factor in radically resected gallbladder cancer (GBCA). However, only a few underwent an adequate lymphadenectomy, and the number and extent of lymph node dissection (LND) have not been standardized. This study aims to develop an en bloc and standardized surgical procedure of LND for GBCA under laparoscopy. METHODS Data of patients with GBCA underwent laparoscopic radical resection using a standardized and en bloc technique for LND were collected. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS A total of 39 patients underwent laparoscopic radical resection using standardized and en bloc technique for LND except one case (open conversion rate: 2.6%). Patients with stage T1b had significantly lower LNs involved rate than patients with stage T3 (P = 0.04), whereas median LN count in stage T1b was significantly higher than that in stage T2 (P = 0.04), which was significantly higher than that in stage T3 (P = 0.02). Lymphadenectomy with ≥ 6 LNs accounted for 87.5% in stage T1b, up to 93.3% in T2 and 81.3% in T3, respectively. All the patients in stage T1b were alive without recurrence at this writing. The 2-year recurrence-free survival rate was 80% for T2 and 25% for T3, and the 3-year overall survival rate was 73.3% for T2 and 37.5% for T3. CONCLUSION The standardized and en bloc LND permits complete and radical removal of lymph stations for patients with GBCA. This technique is safe and feasible with low complication rates and good prognosis. Further studies are required to explore its value and long-term outcomes compared to conventional approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Cheng
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jie Liu
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
| | - Chang-Wei Dou
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhong-Chun Xie
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
| | - Bing-Fu Fan
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
| | - Li-Ming Jin
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lei Liang
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
| | - Cheng-Wu Zhang
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sun J, Xie TG, Ma ZY, Wu X, Li BL. Current status and progress in laparoscopic surgery for gallbladder carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:2369-2379. [PMID: 37179580 PMCID: PMC10167897 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i16.2369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is the most common biliary tract malignancy associated with a concealed onset, high invasiveness and poor prognosis. Radical surgery remains the only curative treatment for GBC, and the optimal extent of surgery depends on the tumor stage. Radical resection can be achieved by simple cholecystectomy for Tis and T1a GBC. However, whether simple cholecystectomy or extended cholecystectomy, including regional lymph node dissection and hepatectomy, is the standard surgical extent for T1b GBC remains controversial. Extended cholecystectomy should be performed for T2 and some T3 GBC without distant metastasis. Secondary radical surgery is essential for incidental gall-bladder cancer diagnosed after cholecystectomy. For locally advanced GBC, hepatopancreatoduodenectomy may achieve R0 resection and improve long-term survival outcomes, but the extremely high risk of the surgery limits its implementation. Laparoscopic surgery has been widely used in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies. GBC was once regarded as a contraindication of laparoscopic surgery. However, with improvements in surgical instruments and skills, studies have shown that laparoscopic surgery will not result in a poorer prognosis for selected patients with GBC compared with open surgery. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery is associated with enhanced recovery after surgery since it is minimally invasive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Sun
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Tian-Ge Xie
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Zu-Yi Ma
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Xin Wu
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Bing-Lu Li
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Balakrishnan A, Jah A, Lesurtel M, Andersson B, Gibbs P, Harper SJF, Huguet EL, Kosmoliaptsis V, Liau SS, Praseedom RK, Ramia JM, Branes A, Lendoire J, Maithel S, Serrablo A, Achalandabaso M, Adham M, Ahmet A, Al-Sarireh B, Albiol Quer M, Alconchel F, Alejandro R, Alsammani M, Alseidi A, Anand A, Anselmo A, Antonakis P, Arabadzhieva E, de Aretxabala X, Aroori S, Ashley S, Ausania F, Banerjee A, Barabino M, Bartlett A, Bartsch F, Belli A, Beristain-Hernandez J, Berrevoet F, Bhatti A, Bhojwani R, Bjornsson B, Blaz T, Byrne M, Calvo M, Castellanos J, Castro M, Cavallucci D, Chang D, Christodoulis G, Ciacio O, Clavien P, Coker A, Conde-Rodriguez M, D'Amico F, D'Hondt M, Daams F, Dasari B, De Beillis M, de Meijer V, Dede K, Deiro G, Delgado F, Desai G, Di Gioia A, Di Martino M, Dixon M, Dorovinis P, Dumitrascu T, Ebata T, Eilard M, Erdmann J, Erkan M, Famularo S, Felli E, Fergadi M, Fernandez G, Fox A, Galodha S, Galun D, Ganandha S, Garcia R, Gemenetzis G, Giannone F, Gil L, Giorgakis E, Giovinazzo F, Giuffrida M, Giuliani T, Giuliante F, Gkekas I, Goel M, Goh B, Gomes A, Gruenberger T, Guevara O, Gulla A, Gupta A, Gupta R, Hakeem A, Hamid H, Heinrich S, Helton S, Heumann A, Higuchi R, Hughes D, Inarejos B, Ivanecz A, Iwao Y, Iype S, Jaen I, Jie M, Jones R, Kacirek K, Kalayarasan R, Kaldarov A, Kaman L, Kanhere H, Kapoor V, Karanicolas P, Karayiannakis A, Kausar A, Khan Z, Kim DS, Klose J, Knowles B, Koh P, Kolodziejczyk P, Komorowski A, Koong J, Kozyrin I, Krishna A, Kron P, Kumar N, van Laarhoven S, Lakhey P, Lanari J, Laurenzi A, Leow V, Limbu Y, Liu YB, Lob S, Lolis E, Lopez-Lopez V, Lozano R, Lundgren L, Machairas M, Magouliotis D, Mahamid A, Malde D, Malek A, Malik H, Malleo G, Marino M, Mayo S, Mazzola M, Memeo R, Menon K, Menzulin R, Mohan R, Morgul H, Moris D, Mulita F, Muttillo E, Nahm C, Nandasena M, Nashidengo P, Nickkholgh A, Nikov A, Noel C, O'Reilly D, O'Rourke T, Ohtsuka M, Omoshoro-Jones J, Pandanaboyana S, Pararas N, Patel R, Patkar S, Peng J, Perfecto A, Perinel J, Perivoliotis K, Perra T, Phan M, Piccolo G, Porcu A, Primavesi F, Primrose J, Pueyo-Periz E, Radenkovic D, Rammohan A, Rowcroft A, Sakata J, Saladino E, Schena C, Scholer A, Schwarz C, Serrano P, Silva M, Soreide K, Sparrelid E, Stattner S, Sturesson C, Sugiura T, Sumo M, Sutcliffe R, Teh C, Teo J, Tepetes K, Thapa P, Thepbunchonchai A, Torres J, Torres O, Torzili G, Tovikkai C, Troncoso A, Tsoulfas G, Tuzuher A, Tzimas G, Umar G, Urbani L, Vanagas T, Varga, Velayutham V, Vigano L, Wakai T, Yang Z, Yip V, Zacharoulis D, Zakharov E, Zimmitti G. Heterogeneity of management practices surrounding operable gallbladder cancer - results of the OMEGA-S international HPB surgical survey. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:2006-2012. [PMID: 35922277 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is an aggressive, uncommon malignancy, with variation in operative approaches adopted across centres and few large-scale studies to guide practice. We aimed to identify the extent of heterogeneity in GBC internationally to better inform the need for future multicentre studies. METHODS A 34-question online survey was disseminated to members of the European-African Hepatopancreatobiliary Association (EAHPBA), American Hepatopancreatobiliary Association (AHPBA) and Asia-Pacific Hepatopancreatobiliary Association (A-PHPBA) regarding practices around diagnostic workup, operative approach, utilization of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies and surveillance strategies. RESULTS Two hundred and three surgeons responded from 51 countries. High liver resection volume units (>50 resections/year) organised HPB multidisciplinary team discussion of GBCs more commonly than those with low volumes (p < 0.0001). Management practices exhibited areas of heterogeneity, particularly around operative extent. Contrary to consensus guidelines, anatomical liver resections were favoured over non-anatomical resections for T3 tumours and above, lymphadenectomy extent was lower than recommended, and a minority of respondents still routinely excised the common bile duct or port sites. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest some similarities in the management of GBC internationally, but also specific areas of practice which differed from published guidelines. Transcontinental collaborative studies on GBC are necessary to establish evidence-based practice to minimise variation and optimise outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Balakrishnan
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
| | - Asif Jah
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Mickael Lesurtel
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, 100 Bd du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France
| | - Bodil Andersson
- Department of Surgery, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Paul Gibbs
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Simon J F Harper
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Emmanuel L Huguet
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Vasilis Kosmoliaptsis
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Siong S Liau
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Raaj K Praseedom
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Jose M Ramia
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Avenida Pintor Baeza, 12 03010 Alicante, Spain
| | - Alejandro Branes
- Department of HPB Surgery, Hospital Sotero del Rio, Av. Concha y Toro 3459, Puente Alto, Región Metropolitana, Chile
| | - Javier Lendoire
- Department of Surgery, University of Buenos Aires, Hospital Dr Cosme Argerich, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Shishir Maithel
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322 USA
| | - Alejandro Serrablo
- Department of HPB Surgery, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Perioperative psychological issues and nursing care among patients undergoing minimally invasive surgeries. LAPAROSCOPIC, ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lers.2022.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
|
6
|
Vega EA, Mellado S, Salehi O, Freeman R, Conrad C. Treatment of Resectable Gallbladder Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1413. [PMID: 35326566 PMCID: PMC8945892 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common biliary tract cancer worldwide and its incidence has significant geographic variation. A unique combination of predisposing factors includes genetic predisposition, geographic distribution, female gender, chronic inflammation, and congenital developmental abnormalities. Today, incidental GBC is the most common presentation of resectable gallbladder cancer, and surgery (minimally invasive or open) remains the only curative treatment available. Encouragingly, there is an important emerging role for systemic treatment for patients who have R1 resection or present with stage III-IV. In this article, we describe the pathogenesis, surgical and systemic treatment, and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo A. Vega
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA; (E.A.V.); (O.S.); (R.F.)
| | | | - Omid Salehi
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA; (E.A.V.); (O.S.); (R.F.)
| | - Richard Freeman
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA; (E.A.V.); (O.S.); (R.F.)
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA; (E.A.V.); (O.S.); (R.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Prieto-Ortiz RG, Borráez-Segura BA, Prieto-Ortiz JE, Guevara-Cruz ÓA. Cáncer de vesícula biliar, una visión actual. REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE CIRUGÍA 2022. [DOI: 10.30944/20117582.891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Introducción. El diagnóstico de cáncer de vesícula biliar se realiza generalmente de forma incidental durante el estudio de las piezas quirúrgicas o cuando la enfermedad está avanzada y se expresa por su diseminación. Muy pocas veces se diagnostica de forma preoperatoria. Corresponde a la neoplasia más común de las vías biliares y su incidencia varía de acuerdo a la región geográfica. La región andina en Latinoamérica presenta una de las mayores incidencias a nivel mundial.
Métodos. Se realizó una revisión narrativa de la literatura, para presentar una información actualizada en lo referente a los factores de riesgo (incluyendo las alteraciones genéticas y moleculares), al diagnóstico y al tratamiento de esta patología. Basados en los datos actuales, presentamos algunas recomendaciones dirigidas al diagnóstico temprano, que permita un manejo más adecuado de nuestros pacientes.
Resultados. Se han implicado nuevos factores de riesgo relacionados con la etiología del cáncer de vesícula biliar, como la obesidad, factores genéticos y moleculares. A pesar de la disponibilidad de los métodos diagnósticos imagenológicos, no ha ocurrido una importante variación porcentual en cuanto al estadio al momento del diagnóstico.
Conclusiones. El manejo quirúrgico del cáncer de vesícula biliar está indicado en los estadios más tempranos de la enfermedad y es importante evaluar las opciones terapéuticas en pacientes con enfermedad avanzada. Se considera de suma importancia el estudio anatomopatológico de la pieza quirúrgica y la revisión del informe por parte del cirujano
Collapse
|
8
|
Sui Z, Sui X. Long non-coding RNA TMPO-AS1 promotes cell proliferation, migration, invasion and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in gallbladder carcinoma by regulating the microRNA-1179/E2F2 axis. Oncol Lett 2021; 22:855. [PMID: 34777589 PMCID: PMC8581476 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2021.13116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC), which is a common tumor of the biliary system, poses a serious threat to human life and health. The present study aimed to investigate the molecular mechanism of the long non-coding (lnc)RNA thymopoietin antisense transcript 1 (TMPO-AS1)/microRNA (miRNA/miR)-1179/E2F transcription factor 2 (E2F2) axis in GBC. The viability, proliferation, migration, invasion and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of GBC cell lines were assessed via the Cell Counting Kit-8, colony formation, Transwell migration and invasion, immunofluorescence and western blot assays. In the present study, lncRNA TMPO-AS1 was significantly upregulated in clinical GBC tissues and cell lines, and was highly expressed in stage III+IV patients with GBC compared with stage I+II patients with GBC. In addition, the overall survival rate of patients with low TMPO-AS1 expression levels was higher than those with high TMPO-AS1 expression levels. Furthermore, TMPO-AS1 knockdown inhibited the viability, proliferation, migration, invasion and EMT of GBC cell lines. In addition, miR-1179 expression was downregulated in clinical GBC tissues and cell lines, and negatively correlated with TMPO-AS1 expression. The results revealed that miR-1179 is a target of TMPO-AS1, which was confirmed via the dual-luciferase reporter assay and RNA pull-down analysis. Overexpression of miR-1179 inhibited the viability, proliferation, migration, invasion and EMT of GBC cell lines. Furthermore, E2F2 was verified as a direct target of miR-1179 by binding to its 3'-untranslated region. E2F2 expression was significantly upregulated in clinical GBC tissues and cell lines, and negatively correlated with miR-1179 expression. Notably, E2F2 knockdown partially hindered the effects of TMPO-AS1/miR-1179 on the proliferation and metastasis of GBC cell lines. Taken together, the results of the present study suggest that TMPO-AS1 potentially plays a tumor-promoting role in the occurrence and development of GBC, which may be achieved by regulating the miR-1179/E2F2 axis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenghui Sui
- Department of General Surgery, The People's Hospital of Danyang and Affiliated Danyang Hospital of Nantong University, Danyang, Jiangsu 212300, P.R. China
| | - Xin Sui
- Department of General Surgery, The People's Hospital of Danyang and Affiliated Danyang Hospital of Nantong University, Danyang, Jiangsu 212300, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee W, Kim KM, Kwak BJ, Park Y, Jun E, Song KB, Hwang DW, Kim SC, Lee JH. Clinical Outcomes Between a Minimally Invasive and Open Extended Cholecystectomy for T2 Gallbladder Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2021; 32:538-544. [PMID: 34382818 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2021.0417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Although a minimally invasive extended cholecystectomy (MIEC) for T2 gallbladder cancer (T2 GBC) has been performed in many experienced centers, no oncologic comparison with open extended cholecystectomy (OEC) has yet been reported. Methods: T2 GBC patients who underwent MIEC (n = 60) or OEC (n = 135) were enrolled. We used propensity score matching (PSM) using pre- and intraoperative variables. Short- and long-term outcomes were then compared before and after PSM. Results: Before PSM, OEC patients more frequently showed completion of surgery after a simple cholecystectomy (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.551), and lymph node enlargement on preoperative computed tomography (SMD = -0.471). PSM was used to select 56 patients from each of the 2 patient groups. MIEC patients showed comparable complication rate (7.1% versus 12.5%, P = .365) and shorter hospital stay (5.7 days versus 9.8 days, P < .001). The median follow-up period was 26.2 months, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (96.8% versus 91.1%, P = .464) and 5-year recurrence free survival (RFS) (54.7% versus 44.4%, P = .580) outcomes were still comparable between MIEC and OEC groups. Conclusion: MIEC have advantages such as early recovery and comparable short-term outcomes compared with OEC. MIEC showed comparable OS and RFS outcomes compared with OEC. MIEC is a safe option without oncological compromise for T2 GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woohyung Lee
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyu Min Kim
- University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Bong Jun Kwak
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yejong Park
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eunsung Jun
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki Byung Song
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae Wook Hwang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Song Cheol Kim
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kwon W, Kim H, Han Y, Hwang YJ, Kim SG, Kwon HJ, Vinuela E, Járufe N, Roa JC, Han IW, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW, Ahn KS, Kang KJ, Lee W, Jeong CY, Hong SC, Troncoso AT, Losada HM, Han SS, Park SJ, Kim SW, Yanagimoto H, Endo I, Kubota K, Wakai T, Ajiki T, Adsay NV, Jang JY. Role of tumour location and surgical extent on prognosis in T2 gallbladder cancer: an international multicentre study. Br J Surg 2020; 107:1334-1343. [PMID: 32452559 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2019] [Revised: 02/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In gallbladder cancer, stage T2 is subdivided by tumour location into lesions on the peritoneal side (T2a) or hepatic side (T2b). For tumours on the peritoneal side (T2a), it has been suggested that liver resection may be omitted without compromising the prognosis. However, data to validate this argument are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of tumour location in T2 gallbladder cancer, and to clarify the adequate extent of surgical resection. METHODS Clinical data from patients who underwent surgery for gallbladder cancer were collected from 14 hospitals in Korea, Japan, Chile and the USA. Survival and risk factor analyses were conducted. RESULTS Data from 937 patients were available for evaluation. The overall 5-year disease-free survival rate was 70·6 per cent, 74·5 per cent for those with T2a and 65·5 per cent among those with T2b tumours (P = 0·028). Regarding liver resection, extended cholecystectomy was associated with a better 5-year disease-free survival rate than simple cholecystectomy (73·0 versus 61·5 per cent; P = 0·012). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was marginally better for extended than simple cholecystectomy in both T2a (76·5 versus 66·1 per cent; P = 0·094) and T2b (68·2 versus 56·2 per cent; P = 0·084) disease. Five-year disease-free survival rates were similar for extended cholecystectomies including liver wedge resection versus segment IVb/V segmentectomy (74·1 versus 71·5 per cent; P = 0·720). In multivariable analysis, independent risk factors for recurrence were presence of symptoms (hazard ratio (HR) 1·52; P = 0·002), R1 resection (HR 1·96; P = 0·004) and N1/N2 status (N1: HR 3·40, P < 0·001; N2: HR 9·56, P < 0·001). Among recurrences, 70·8 per cent were metastatic. CONCLUSION Tumour location was not an independent prognostic factor in T2 gallbladder cancer. Extended cholecystectomy was marginally superior to simple cholecystectomy. A radical operation should include liver resection and adequate node dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Kwon
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - H Kim
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Y Han
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Y J Hwang
- School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.,Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, South Korea
| | - S G Kim
- School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.,Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, South Korea
| | - H J Kwon
- School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.,Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, South Korea
| | - E Vinuela
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Santiago, Chile
| | - N Járufe
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Santiago, Chile
| | - J C Roa
- Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - I W Han
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - J S Heo
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - S-H Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - D W Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - K S Ahn
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Centre, Daegu, South Korea
| | - K J Kang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Centre, Daegu, South Korea
| | - W Lee
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, South Korea
| | - C-Y Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, South Korea
| | - S-C Hong
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, South Korea
| | - A T Troncoso
- Department of Surgery, Universidad de la Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | - H M Losada
- Department of Surgery, Universidad de la Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | - S-S Han
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Centre, Goyang, South Korea
| | - S-J Park
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Centre, Goyang, South Korea
| | - S-W Kim
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Centre, Goyang, South Korea
| | - H Yanagimoto
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan
| | - I Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
| | - K Kubota
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - T Wakai
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - T Ajiki
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - N V Adsay
- Department of Pathology, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey.,Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - J-Y Jang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Comparison of lymph node evaluation and yield among patients undergoing open and minimally invasive surgery for gallbladder adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:2223-2228. [PMID: 32430521 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07635-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Assessment of regional lymph nodes (LN) is essential for determining prognosis among patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC). The impact of surgical technique on LN yield has not been well explored. We investigated the impact of minimally invasive surgery (MIS; robotic or laparoscopic) on the evaluation and retrieval of regional LN for patients with GBC. METHODS We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to identify patients with GBC who underwent curative-intent surgery between 2010 and 2015. Patients with metastatic disease or those with missing data on surgical resection or LN evaluation were excluded. RESULTS We identified 2014 patients who underwent an open (n = 1141, 56.6%) or MIS approach (n = 873, 43.4%) for GBC and met the inclusion criteria. Patients who underwent MIS were older (open: 68 years, IQR: 60, 75 vs. MIS: 70 years, IQR (61, 77); P = 0.02), and were more commonly treated at a comprehensive community cancer program (P < 0.001). Approximately 3 out of 4 patients (n = 1468, 72.9%) underwent an evaluation of regional LN, with nearly half of these patients (n = 607, 41.7%) having LN metastasis. Among patients who underwent a regional lymphadenectomy, average lymph node yield was 3 (IQR: 1, 6) and was similar between the two groups (P = 0.04). After controlling for all factors, operative approach was not associated with likelihood of receiving a lymphadenectomy during curative-intent resection (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.63-1.04; P = 0.11). CONCLUSION In conclusion, patients undergoing curative-intent resection for GBC had similar rates of lymph node evaluation and yield regardless of operative approach. Over one-quarter of patients did not undergo a lymphadenectomy at the time of surgery. Further studies are needed to identify barriers to lymph node evaluation and yield among patients undergoing surgery for gallbladder cancer. Presented at the 2019 2nd World Congress of the International Laparoscopic Liver Society, Tokyo, Japan.
Collapse
|
12
|
Vega EA, Conrad C. Author response to: Comment on: Comparison of oncological outcomes after open and laparoscopic re-resection of incidental gallbladder cancer. Br J Surg 2020; 107:772. [PMID: 32339285 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- E A Vega
- Department of Surgery, Saint Elizabeth Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - C Conrad
- Department of Surgery, Saint Elizabeth Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vega EA, Conrad C. Author response to: Is laparoscopic re-resection of incidental gallbladder cancer really non-inferior to the open approach? Br J Surg 2020; 107:767-768. [PMID: 32339286 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- E A Vega
- Department of Surgery, Saint Elizabeth Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - C Conrad
- Department of Surgery, Saint Elizabeth Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vega EA, De Aretxabala X, Qiao W, Newhook TE, Okuno M, Castillo F, Sanhueza M, Diaz C, Cavada G, Jarufe N, Munoz C, Rencoret G, Vivanco M, Joechle K, Tzeng CWD, Vauthey JN, Vinuela E, Conrad C. Comparison of oncological outcomes after open and laparoscopic re-resection of incidental gallbladder cancer. Br J Surg 2020; 107:289-300. [PMID: 31873948 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Revised: 03/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safety and oncological efficacy of laparoscopic re-resection of incidental gallbladder cancer have not been studied. This study aimed to compare laparoscopic with open re-resection of incidentally discovered gallbladder cancer while minimizing selection bias. METHODS This was a multicentre retrospective observational cohort study of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer who underwent re-resection with curative intent at four centres between 2000 and 2017. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analysed by intention to treat. Inverse probability of surgery treatment weighting using propensity scoring was undertaken. RESULTS A total of 255 patients underwent re-resection (190 open, 65 laparoscopic). Nineteen laparoscopic procedures were converted to open operation. Surgery before 2011 was the only factor associated with conversion. Duration of hospital stay was shorter after laparoscopic re-resection (median 4 versus 6 days; P < 0·001). Three-year OS rates for laparoscopic and open re-resection were 87 and 62 per cent respectively (P = 0·502). Independent predictors of worse OS were residual cancer found at re-resection (hazard ratio (HR) 1·91, 95 per cent c.i. 1·17 to 3·11), blood loss of at least 500 ml (HR 1·83, 1·23 to 2·74) and at least four positive nodes (HR 3·11, 1·46 to 6·65). In competing-risks analysis, the RFS incidence was higher for laparoscopic re-resection (P = 0·038), but OS did not differ between groups. Independent predictors of worse RFS were one to three positive nodes (HR 2·16, 1·29 to 3·60), at least four positive nodes (HR 4·39, 1·96 to 9·82) and residual cancer (HR 2·42, 1·46 to 4·00). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic re-resection for selected patients with incidental gallbladder cancer is oncologically non-inferior to an open approach. Dissemination of advanced laparoscopic skills and timely referral of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer to specialized centres may allow more patients to benefit from this operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E A Vega
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - X De Aretxabala
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Clinica Alemana, Santiago, Chile
| | - W Qiao
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - T E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - M Okuno
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - F Castillo
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Clinica Alemana, Santiago, Chile
| | - M Sanhueza
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Hospital Sotero Del Rio, Santiago, Chile.,Department of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - C Diaz
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Hospital Sotero Del Rio, Santiago, Chile.,Department of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - G Cavada
- Department of Biostatistics, Clínica Alemana-Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
| | - N Jarufe
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - C Munoz
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - G Rencoret
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Clinica Alemana, Santiago, Chile
| | - M Vivanco
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Clinica Alemana, Santiago, Chile
| | - K Joechle
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - C-W D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - J-N Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - E Vinuela
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Hospital Sotero Del Rio, Santiago, Chile.,Department of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - C Conrad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|