Patient demographics, insurance status, race, and ethnicity as predictors of morbidity and mortality after spine trauma: a study using the National Trauma Data Bank

Trends and epidemiology of lower trunk fractures in the super elderly population in the United States from 2011 to 2020

INTRODUCTION

Fractures of the lower trunk are among the most common fractures occurring in the elderly. Super elderly individuals (i.e., those 80 years of age and older) represent a growing segment of the population and are especially prone to these fractures. The contemporary epidemiology of lower trunk fractures in the super elderly population is incompletely described in the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This descriptive epidemiology study used the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) to examine the incidence and recent trends of lower trunk fractures (i.e., fractures of the hip, pelvis, and lumbar spine) occurring among super elderly individuals in the United States (US) from 2011 to 2020. Annual, overall, and age-/sex-specific incidence rates (IRs) were analyzed. Average annual percent change (AAPC) estimates were calculated to indicate the magnitude/direction of trends in annual injury rates.

RESULTS

An estimated N=1,226,160 super elderly patients sustained lower trunk fractures over the 10-year study period for an overall IR of 100.2 per 10,000 person-years at-risk (PYR). Hip fractures accounted for the largest percentage of cases (IR=71.7 PYR), followed by lumbar spine fractures (IR=14.7), and pelvic fractures (IR=14.3). The incidence of lower trunk fractures among super elderly females (IR=121.5 PYR) was significantly greater than that of males (IR=65.7 PYR). The incidence of lower trunk fractures among nonagenarians and centenarians was significantly higher than that of octogenarians. Accounting for population growth yielded a significantly increasing annual incidence of lower trunk fractures in super elderly patients over the study period from 86.7 PYR in 2011 to 107.2 PYR in 2020 (AAPC=2.7, p<0.001). The annual incidence of both pelvic (AAPC=5.8) and lumbar spine (AAPC=6.9) fractures increased at a significantly higher rate than that of hip fractures (AAPC=1.4).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the annual incidence of lower trunk fractures in the oldest cohort of patients in the US (80+ years of age) increased significantly during the recent decade from 2011 to 2020, with pelvic and lumbar fractures in particular becoming increasingly common. Increased incidence rates highlight the need for future research aimed at optimizing outcomes and quality of life in this frail and ever-growing segment of the population.

Disparities in Access, Management and Outcomes of Critically Ill Adult Patients with Trauma

Despite legal protections guaranteeing care for patients with trauma, disparities exist in patient outcomes. We review disparities in patient management and outcomes related to insurance status, race and ethnicity, and gender for patients with trauma in the preadmission, in-hospital, and postdischarge settings. We highlight groups understudied and either underrepresented or unrepresented in national trauma databases-including American Indians/Alaska Natives, non-English preferred patients, and patients with disabilities. We call for more study of these groups and of upstream factors affecting the reviewed demographics to measure and improve outcomes for these vulnerable populations.

Trends and epidemiology of spine fractures in the super-elderly population in the United States

Introduction

Spine fractures occur commonly in the geriatric population. Super-elderly individuals (i.e., those 80 years of age and older) represent a growing segment of the population and are especially prone to these fractures. The contemporary epidemiology of spine fractures in the super-elderly population is incompletely described in the literature.

Materials and Methods

This descriptive epidemiology study used the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System to examine the incidence and recent trends of spine fractures occurring among super-elderly individuals in the United States (US) from 2011 to 2020. Annual, overall, and age-/sex-specific incidence rates (IRs) were analyzed. Average annual percent change (AAPC) estimates were calculated to indicate the magnitude/direction of trends in annual injury rates.

Results

An estimated n = 385,375 super-elderly patients sustained spine fractures over the 10-year study period for an overall IR of 31.5 per 10,000 person-years at-risk. Lumbar fractures (IR = 16.3) were the most common, followed by thoracic (IR = 9.4) and cervical (IR = 6.9) fractures. Incidence was significantly higher in super-elderly females (IR = 35.6) than in males (IR = 24.8). Incidence was significantly higher in nonagenarians (IR = 50.7) and centenarians (IR = 42.6) than in octogenarians (IR = 26.8). Accounting for population growth yielded a significantly increasing incidence over the study period from 20.8 in 2011 to 40.3 in 2020 (AAPC = 8, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

This study suggests that the annual incidence of spine fractures in the oldest cohort of patients in the US (80 + years of age) increased significantly during the recent decade from 2011 to 2020. Increased IRs highlight the need for future research aimed at optimizing outcomes and quality of life in this frail and ever-growing segment of the population.

Opioid Risk Tool, in-hospital opioid exposure, and opioid demand predict pain outcomes following traumatic injury

Prescribed opioids are a mainstay pain treatment after traumatic injury, but a subgroup of patients may be at risk for continued opioid use. We evaluated the predictive utility of a traditional screening tool, the Opioid Risk Tool (ORT), and two other measures: average in-hospital milligram morphine equivalents (MME) per day and an assessment of opioid demand in predicting pain outcomes. Assessments of pain-related outcomes (pain intensity, interference, injury-related stress, and need for additional pain treatment) were administered at 2 weeks and 12 months post-discharge in a sample of 34 patients hospitalized for traumatic injury. Bayesian linear models were used to evaluate changes in responses over time as a function of predictors. High-risk ORT, higher MME per day, and greater opioid demand predicted less change in outcomes over time. This report provides first evidence that malleable factors of opioid and opioid demand have utility in predicting pain outcomes following traumatic injury.

Addressing the Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Musculoskeletal Spine Care in the United States

➤ Despite being a social construct, race has an impact on outcomes in musculoskeletal spine care.➤ Race is associated with other social determinants of health that may predispose patients to worse outcomes.➤ The musculoskeletal spine literature is limited in its understanding of the causes of race-related outcome trends.➤ Efforts to mitigate race-related disparities in spine care require individual, institutional, and national initiatives.

Healthcare segregation in orthopedic surgery: A statewide analysis of American Indian and Alaska Native patients

Significant health disparities have been described for American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) patients undergoing various surgical procedures, however, research into healthcare segregation within orthopedic surgery has been limited. In this study, our purpose was to assess if AIAN patients were more likely to be treated by lower-volume surgeons and at lower-volume hospitals. AIAN and White patients who underwent one of four common orthopedic procedures (knee or hip arthroplasty, femur or tibia repair) were identified from a Washington state inpatient database. Demographic, socioeconomic, geographic, and procedure data were surveyed, and volumetric thresholds were established for lower versus higher volume surgeons and hospitals. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated for AIAN patients receiving care from a lower volume surgeon or hospital, including covariates for patient demographics, geographic, and socioeconomic status. AIAN patients were more likely to receive care from a lower-volume surgeon for all procedures except tibial repair. Adjusted odds ratios of 1.53 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22, 1.92) and 1.68 (95% CI: 1.26, 2.21) were found for AIAN patients receiving knee or hip arthroplasty from a lower volume surgeon, respectively. There was no strong evidence of AIAN patients being more likely to receive care at a lower-volume hospital. Finally, AIAN patients having knee arthroplasty at a higher volume hospital were more likely to have their surgery performed by a lower volume surgeon. These data suggest that there may be significant healthcare segregation among AIAN patients across common orthopedic surgical procedures.

In-hospital mortality trends after surgery for traumatic thoracolumbar injury: A national inpatient sample database study

Introduction

Given the increasing incidence of traumatic thoracolumbar injuries in recent years, studies have sought to investigate potential risk factors for outcomes in these patients.

Research question

The aim of this study was to investigate trends and risk factors for in-hospital mortality after fusion for traumatic thoracolumbar injury.

Materials and methods

Patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion after traumatic injury were queried from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2012 to 2017. Analysis was performed to identify risk factors for inpatient mortality after surgery.

Results

Patients in 2017 were on average older (51.0 vs. 48.5, P = 0.004), had more admitting diagnoses (15.5 vs. 10.7, p < 0.001), were less likely to be White (75.8% vs. 81.2%, p = 0.006), were from a ZIP code with a higher median income quartile (Quartile 1: 31.4% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.011), and were more likely to have Medicare as a primary payer (22.9% vs. 30.1%, p < 0.001). Bivariate analysis of demographics and surgical characteristics demonstrated that patients in the in-hospital mortality group (n = 90) were older (70.2 vs. 49.6, p < 0.001), more likely to be male (74.4% vs. 62.8%, p = 0.031), had a great number of admitted diagnoses (21.3 vs. 12.7, p < 0.001), and were more likely to be insured by Medicare (70.0% vs. 27.0%, p < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis found age (OR 1.06, p < 0.001) and Black race (OR 3.71, p = 0.007) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion

Our study of nationwide, traumatic thoracolumbar fusion procedures from 2012 to 2017 in the NIS database found older, black patients were at increased risk for in-hospital mortality after surgery.

Medicaid Insurance is a Predictor of Prolonged Hospital Length of Stay After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Stratified National Trauma Data Bank Cohort Analysis of 552 949 Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hospital length of stay (HLOS) is a metric of injury severity, resource utilization, and healthcare access. Recent evidence has shown an association between Medicaid insurance and increased HLOS after traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aims to validate the association between Medicaid and prolonged HLOS after TBI using the National Trauma Data Bank.

METHODS

National Trauma Data Bank Trauma Quality Programs Participant Use Files (2003-2021) were queried for adult patients with TBI using traumatic intracranial injury ICD-9/ICD-10 codes. Patients with complete HLOS, age, sex, race, insurance payor, Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, and discharge disposition data were included (N = 552 949). Analyses were stratified by TBI severity using Glasgow Coma Scale. HLOS was coded into Tiers according to percentiles within TBI severity categories (Tier 1: 1-74th; 2: 75-84th; 3: 85-94th; 4: 95-99th). Multivariable logistic regressions evaluated associations between insurance payor and prolonged (Tier 4) HLOS, controlling for sociodemographic, Injury Severity Score, cranial surgery, and discharge disposition variables. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% CI were reported.

RESULTS

HLOS Tiers consisted of 0-19, 20-27, 28-46, and ≥47 days (Tiers 1-4, respectively) in severe TBI (N = 103 081); 0-15, 16-21, 22-37, and ≥38 days in moderate TBI (N = 39 904); and 0-7, 8-10, 11-19, and ≥20 days in mild TBI (N = 409 964). Proportion of Medicaid patients increased with Tier ([Tier 1 vs Tier 4] severe: 16.0% vs 36.1%; moderate: 14.1% vs 31.6%; mild TBI: 10.2% vs 17.4%; all P < .001). On multivariable analyses, Medicaid was associated with prolonged HLOS (severe TBI: aOR = 2.35 [2.19-2.52]; moderate TBI: aOR = 2.30 [2.04-2.61]; mild TBI: aOR = 1.75 [1.67-1.83]; reference category: private/commercial).

CONCLUSION

This study supports Medicaid as an independent predictor of prolonged HLOS across TBI severity strata. Reasons may include different efficacies in care delivery and reimbursement, which require further investigation. Our findings support the development of discharge coordination pathways and policies for Medicaid patients with TBI.

Advance in hyperbaric oxygen therapy in spinal cord injury

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a severe lesion comporting various motor, sensory and sphincter dysfunctions, abnormal muscle tone and pathological reflex, resulting in a severe and permanent lifetime disability. The primary injury is the immediate effect of trauma and includes compression, contusion, and shear injury to the spinal cord. A secondary and progressive injury usually follows, beginning within minutes and evolving over several hours after the first ones. Because ischemia is one of the most important mechanisms involved in secondary injury, a treatment to increase the oxygen tension of the injured site, such as hyperbaric oxygen therapy, should theoretically help recovery. Although a meta-analysis concluded that hyperbaric oxygen therapy might be helpful for clinical treatment as a safe, promising and effective choice to limit secondary injury when appropriately started, useful and well-defined protocols/guidelines still need to be created, and its application is influenced by local/national practice. The topic is not a secondary issue because a well-designed randomized controlled trial requires a proper sample size to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of a treatment, and the absence of a common practice guideline represents a limit for results generalization. This narrative review aims to reassemble the evidence on hyperbaric oxygen therapy to treat SCI, focusing on adopted protocols in the studies and underlining the critical issues. Furthermore, we tried to elaborate on a protocol with a flowchart for an evidence-based hyperbaric oxygen therapy treatment. In conclusion, a rationale and shared protocol to standardize as much as possible is needed for the population to be studied, the treatment to be adopted, and the outcomes to be evaluated. Further studies, above all, well-designed randomized controlled trials, are needed to clarify the role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as a strategic tool to prevent/reduce secondary injury in SCI and evaluate its effectiveness based on an evidence-based treatment protocol. We hope that adopting the proposed protocol can reduce the risk of bias and drive future studies.

Closed Collaborative Surgical Intensive Care Unit Modeling and Its Association With Trauma Patient Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The optimization of intensive care unit (ICU) care impacts clinical outcomes and resource utilization. In 2017, our surgical ICU (SICU) adopted a "closed-collaborative" model. The aim of this study is to compare patient outcomes in the closed-collaborative model versus the previous open model in a cohort of trauma surgical patients admitted to our adult level 1 trauma center.

METHODS

A retrospective review of trauma patients in the SICU from August 1, 2015 to July 31, 2019 was performed. Patients were divided into those admitted prior to August 1, 2017 (the "open" cohort) and those admitted after August 1, 2017 (the "closed-collaborative" cohort). Demographic variables and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Trauma severity was assessed using injury severity score (ISS).

RESULTS

We identified 1669 patients (O: 895; C: 774). While no differences in demographics were observed, the closed-collaborative cohort had a higher overall ISS (O: 21.5 ± 12.14; C: 25.10 ± 2.72; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the two cohorts in the incidence of strokes (O: 1.90%; C: 2.58%, P = 0.3435), pulmonary embolism (O: 0.78%; C: 0.65%; P = 0.7427), sepsis (O: 5.25%; C: 7.49%; P = 0.0599), median ICU charges (O: $7784.50; C: $8986.53; P = 0.5286), mortality (O: 11.40%; C: 13.18%; P = 0.2678), or ICU length of stay (LOS) (O: 4.85 ± 6.23; C: 4.37 ± 4.94; P = 0.0795).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in the closed-collaborative cohort had similar clinical outcomes despite having a sicker cohort of patients. We hypothesize that the closed-collaborative ICU model was able to maintain equivalent outcomes due to the dedicated multidisciplinary critical care team caring for these patients. Further research is warranted to determine the optimal model of ICU care for trauma patients.

Impact of the Social Determinants of Health on Adult Trauma Outcomes

Social determinants of health (SDOHs) have been well studied within the literature in the United States but the effects of these determinants of health on patients with trauma have garnered less attention. The interaction between patients with SDOHs and patients with trauma requires clinicians caring for this population to view patients with trauma through a multifaceted lens. The purpose of this article will be to illuminate the drivers of trauma in the adult population and how the SDOHs and the health-care system come together to contribute to disparities in trauma outcomes.

Few Randomized Controlled Trials in Spine Surgery in the United States Include Sociodemographic Patient Data: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

The importance of sociodemographic factors such as race, education, and income on spine surgery outcomes has been well established, yet the representation of sociodemographic data within randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in spine literature remains undefined in the United States (U.S).

METHODS

Medical literature was reviewed within PubMed for RCTs with "spine" in the title or abstract published within the last 8 years (2014 to 2021) in seven major spine journals. This yielded 128 results, and after application of inclusion criteria (RCTs concerning adult spine pathologies conducted in the U.S), 54 RCTs remained for analysis. Each article's journal of publication, year of publication, and spinal pathology was recorded. Pathologies included cervical degeneration, thoracolumbar degeneration, adult deformity, cervical trauma, and thoracolumbar trauma. Sociodemographic variables collected were race, ethnicity, insurance status, income, work status, and education. The Fisher's exact test was used to compare inclusion of sociodemographic data by journal, year, and spinal pathology.

RESULTS

Sociodemographic data were included in the results and in any section of 57.4% (31/54) of RCTs. RCTs reported work status in 25.9% (14/54) of results and 38.9% (21/54) of RCTs included work status in any section. Income was included in the results and mentioned in any section in 13.0% (7/54) of RCTs. Insurance status was in the results or any section of 9.3% (5/54) and 18.5% (10/54) of RCTs, respectively. There was no association with inclusion of sociodemographic data within the results of RCTs as a factor of journal (P = 0.337), year of publication (P = 0.286), or spinal pathology (P = 0.199).

DISCUSSION

Despite evidence of the importance of sociodemographic factors on the natural history and treatment outcomes of myriad spine pathologies, this study identifies a surprising absence of sociodemographic data within contemporary RCTs in spine surgery. Failure to include sociodemographic factors in RCTs potentially bias the generalizability of outcome data.

Thoracic trauma: Clinical and paleopathological perspectives

OBJECTIVES

Although trauma is one of the most significant areas of study in paleopathology, most studies focus on fractures of single anatomical elements. Paleopathological research on regional trauma, such as of the thorax, is rare. This paper explores the causes, complications, and consequences of adult thoracic trauma using clinical data in order to inform paleopathological research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Trends in paleopathological thoracic trauma literature were assessed by evaluating publications from Bioarchaeology International, International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, International Journal of Paleopathology, and American Journal of Biological Anthropology. Clinical publications on thoracic trauma throughout time were also assessed through a PubMed search, and modern prevalence data was found through trauma databases such as the National Trauma Databank.

RESULTS

Consideration of thoracic trauma involving concomitant injuries is a recent trend in clinical literature and patient care, but paleopathological research on thoracic trauma has been limited. Since thoracic fractures tend to occur in conjunction with other injuries, assessing them together is critical to the interpretation of trauma in the past.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical research into thoracic fractures and concomitant injuries provides valuable data for paleopathological research. Evaluating the likelihood and consequences of concomitant injury in skeletal remains provides a more robust understanding of trauma in the past and its impact on past lifeways.

SIGNIFICANCE

This paper provides a review of current clinical and paleopathological literature on thoracic trauma and demonstrates the importance of moving beyond the analysis of fractures or trauma of single anatomical elements.

LIMITATIONS

Thoracic bones are often taphonomically altered and differentially preserved leading to difficulty in identifying and interpreting fractures.

SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

Practical application of the data presented here to archaeological samples will help to advance paleopathological understandings of thoracic trauma.

Evaluation of Health Care Disparities in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Does Race and Insurance Matter?

Background:

It is unknown whether race- or insurance-based disparities in health care exist regarding baseline knee pain, knee function, complete meniscal tear, or articular cartilage damage in patients who undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Hypothesis:

Black patients and patients with Medicaid evaluated for ACLR would have worse baseline knee pain, worse knee function, and greater odds of having a complete meniscal tear.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A cohort of patients (N = 1463; 81% White, 14% Black, 5% Other race; median age, 22 years) who underwent ACLR between February 2015 and December 2018 was selected from an institutional database. Patients who underwent concomitant procedures and patients of undisclosed race or self-pay status were excluded. The associations of race with preoperative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain subscale, KOOS Function subscale, and intraoperatively assessed complete meniscal tear (tear that extended through both the superior and the inferior meniscal surfaces) were determined via multivariate modeling with adjustment for age, sex, insurance status, years of education, smoking status, body mass index (BMI), meniscal tear location, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Mental Component Score (VR-12 MCS).

Results:

The 3 factors most strongly associated with worse KOOS Pain and KOOS Function were lower VR-12 MCS score, increased BMI, and increased age. Except for age, the other two factors had an unequal distribution between Black and White patients. Univariate analysis demonstrated equal baseline median KOOS Pain scores (Black, 72.2; White, 72.2) and KOOS Function scores (Black, 68.2; White, 68.2). After adjusting for confounding variables, there was no significant difference between Black and White patients in KOOS Pain, KOOS Function, or complete meniscal tears. Insurance status was not a significant predictor of KOOS Pain, KOOS Function, or complete meniscal tear.

Conclusion:

There were clinically significant differences between Black and White patients evaluated for ACLR. After accounting for confounding factors, no difference was observed between Black and White patients in knee pain, knee function, or complete meniscal tear. Insurance was not a clinically significant predictor of knee pain, knee function, or complete meniscal tear.

Spinal level and cord involvement in the prediction of sepsis development after vertebral fracture repair for traumatic spinal injury

OBJECTIVE

Despite understanding the associated adverse outcomes, identifying hospitalized patients at risk for sepsis is challenging. The authors aimed to characterize the epidemiology and clinical risk of sepsis in patients who underwent vertebral fracture repair for traumatic spinal injury (TSI).

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of adults undergoing vertebral fracture repair during initial hospitalization after TSI who were registered in the National Trauma Data Bank from 2011 to 2014.

RESULTS

Of the 29,050 eligible patients undergoing vertebral fracture repair, 317 developed sepsis during initial hospitalization. Of these patients, most presented after a motor vehicle accident (63%) or fall (28%). Patients in whom sepsis developed had greater odds of being male (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-1.9), having diabetes mellitus (aOR 1.5, 95% CI 1.11-2.1), and being obese (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.4-2.5). Additionally, they had greater odds of presenting with moderate (aOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.8-4.2) or severe (aOR 3.9, 95% CI 2.9-5.2) Glasgow Coma Scale scores and of having concomitant abdominal injuries (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.5-2.5) but not cranial, thoracic, or lower-extremity injuries. Interestingly, cervical spine injury was significantly associated with developing sepsis (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8), but thoracic and lumbar spine injuries were not. Spinal cord injury (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.5-2.5) was also associated with sepsis regardless of level. Patients with sepsis were hospitalized approximately 16 days longer. They had greater odds of being discharged to rehabilitative care or home with rehabilitative care (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.8-3.2) and greater odds of death or discharge to hospice (OR 6.0, 95% CI 4.4-8.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing vertebral fracture repair, those with cervical spine fractures, spinal cord injuries, preexisting comorbidities, and severe concomitant injuries are at highest risk for developing postoperative sepsis and experiencing adverse hospital disposition.

The Unmet Need for Orthopaedic Services Among American Indian and Alaska Native Communities in the United States

ABSTRACT

Historic and present-day marginalization has resulted in a high burden of disease and worse health outcomes for American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities in the United States. Musculoskeletal disease is the leading cause of disability for the general population in the U.S. today. However, few have examined musculoskeletal disease burden and access to orthopaedic surgical care in the AI/AN communities. A high prevalence of hip dysplasia, arthritis, back pain, and diabetes, and a high incidence of trauma and road traffic-related mortality, suggest a disproportionately high burden of musculoskeletal pathology among the AI/AN communities and a substantial need for orthopaedic surgical services. Unfortunately, AI/AN patients face many barriers to receiving specialty care, including long travel distances and limited transportation to health facilities, inadequate staff and resources at Indian Health Service (IHS)-funded facilities, insufficient funding for referral to specialists outside of the IHS network, and sociocultural barriers that complicate health-system navigation and erode trust between patients and providers. For those who manage to access orthopaedic surgery, AI/AN patients face worse outcomes and more complications than White patients. There is an urgent need for orthopaedic surgeons to participate in improving the availability of quality orthopaedic services for AI/AN patients through training and support of local providers, volunteerism, advocating for a greater investment in the IHS Purchased/Referred Care program, expanding telemedicine capabilities, and supporting community-based participatory research activities.

Demographic Predictors of Treatment and Complications for Spinal Disorders: Part 2, Lumbar Spine Trauma

Objective

To study the impact of demographic factors on management of traumatic injury to the lumbar spine and postoperative complication rates.

Methods

Data was obtained from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 2010–2014. International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification codes identified patients diagnosed with lumbar fractures or dislocations due to trauma. A series of multivariate regression models determined whether demographic variables predicted rates of complication and revision surgery.

Results

A total of 38,249 patients were identified. Female patients were less likely to receive surgery and to receive a fusion when undergoing surgery, had higher complication rates, and more likely to undergo revision surgery. Medicare and Medicaid patients were less likely to receive surgical management for lumbar spine trauma and less likely to receive a fusion when operated on. Additionally, we found significant differences in surgical management and postoperative complication rates based on race, insurance type, hospital teaching status, and geography.

Conclusion

Substantial differences in the surgical management of traumatic injury to the lumbar spine, including postoperative complications, among individuals of demographic factors such as age, sex, race, primary insurance, hospital teaching status, and geographic region suggest the need for further studies to understand how patient demographics influence management and complications for traumatic injury to the lumbar spine.

Insurance status as a mediator of clinical presentation, type of intervention, and short-term outcomes for patients with metastatic spine disease

BACKGROUND

It is well established that insurance status is a mediator of disease management, treatment course, and clinical outcomes in cancer patients. Our study assessed differences in clinical presentation, treatment course, mortality rates, and in-hospital complications for patients admitted to the hospital with late-stage cancer - specifically, metastatic spine disease (MSD), by insurance status.

METHODS

The United States National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2012-2014) was queried to identify patients with visceral metastases, metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) or pathological fracture of the spine in the setting of cancer. Clinical presentation, type of intervention, mortality rates, and in-hospital complications were compared amongst patients by insurance coverage (Medicare, Medicaid, commercial or unknown). Multivariable logistical regression and age sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 48,560 MSD patients were identified. Patients with Medicaid coverage presented with significantly higher rates of MSCC (p < 0.001), paralysis (0.008), and visceral metastases (p < 0.001). Patients with commercial insurance were more likely to receive surgical intervention (OR 1.43; p < 0.001). Patients with Medicaid < 65 had higher rates of prolonged length of stay (PLOS) (OR 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.55; p = 0.040) while both Medicare and Medicaid patients < 65 were more likely to have non-routine discharges. In-hospital mortality rates were significantly higher for patients with Medicaid (OR 2.66; 95% CI 1.20-5.89; p = 0.016) and commercial insurance (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.09-2.27;p = 0.013) older than 65.

CONCLUSION

Given the differing severity in MSD presentation, mortality rates, and rates of PLOS by insurance status, our results identify disparities based on insurance coverage.

Influence of psychosocial and sociodemographic factors in the surgical management of traumatic cervicothoracic spinal cord injury at level I and II trauma centers in the United States

Background

Socioeconomic factors can bias clinician decision-making in many areas of medicine. Psychosocial characteristics such as diagnosis of alcoholism, substance abuse, and major psychiatric disorder are emerging as potential sources of conscious and unconscious bias. We hypothesized that these psychosocial factors, in addition to socioeconomic factors, may impact the decision to operate on patients with a traumatic cervicothoracic fracture and associated spinal cord injury (SCI).

Methods

We performed a cohort analysis using clinical data from 2012-2016 in the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Trauma Data Bank at academic level I and II trauma centers. Patients were eligible if they had a diagnosis of cervicothoracic fracture with SCI. Using ICD codes, we evaluated baseline characteristics including race; insurance status; diagnosis of alcoholism, substance abuse, or major psychiatric disorder; admission drug screen and blood alcohol level; injury characteristics and severity; and hospital characteristics including geographic region, non-profit status, university affiliation, and trauma level. Factors significantly associated with surgical intervention in univariate analysis were eligible for inclusion in multivariate logistic regression.

Results

We identified 6,655 eligible patients, of whom 62% underwent surgical treatment (n=4,137). Patients treated non-operatively were more likely to be older; be female; be Black or Hispanic; have Medicare, Medicaid, or no insurance; have been assaulted; have been injured by a firearm; have thoracic fracture; have less severe injuries; have severe TBI; be treated at non-profit hospitals; and be in the Northeast or Western U.S. (all P<0.01). After adjusting for confounders in multivariate analysis, only insurance status remained associated with operative treatment. Medicaid patients (OR=0.81; P=0.021) and uninsured patients (OR=0.63; P<0.001) had lower odds of surgery relative to patients with private insurance. Injury severity and facility characteristics also remained significantly associated with surgical management following multivariate regression.

Conclusions

Psychosocial characteristics such as diagnosis of alcoholism, substance abuse, or psychiatric illness do not appear to bias the decision to operate after traumatic cervicothoracic fracture with SCI. Baseline sociodemographic imbalances were explained largely by insurance status, injury, and facility characteristics in multivariate analysis.

Disparities in the Surgical Treatment of Adult Spine Diseases: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Our goal was to systematically review the literature on racial/ethnic, insurance, and socioeconomic disparities in adult spine surgery in the United States and analyze potential areas for improvement.

METHODS

We conducted a database search of literature published between January 1990 and July 2020 using PRISMA guidelines for all studies investigating a disparity in any aspect of adult spine surgery care analyzed based on race/ethnicity, insurance status/payer, or socioeconomic status (SES).

RESULTS

Of 2679 articles identified through database searching, 775 were identified for full-text independent review by 3 authors, from which a final list of 60 studies were analyzed. Forty-three studies analyzed disparities based on patient race/ethnicity, 32 based on insurance status, and 8 based on SES. Five studies assessed disparities in access to care, 15 examined surgical treatment, 35 investigated in-hospital outcomes, and 25 explored after-discharge outcomes. Minority patients were less likely to undergo surgery but more likely to receive surgery from a low-volume provider and experience postoperative complications. White and privately insured patients generally had shorter hospital length of stay, were more likely to undergo favorable/routine discharge, and had lower rates of in-hospital mortality. After discharge, white patients reported better outcomes than did black patients. Thirty-three studies (55%) reported no disparities within at least 1 examined metric.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive systematic review underscores ongoing potential for health care disparities among adult patients in spinal surgery. We show a need for continued efforts to promote equity and cultural competency within neurologic surgery.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Bone Health and Outcomes in the United States

Osteoporosis is a bone disease classified by deterioration of bone microarchitecture and decreased bone strength, thereby increasing subsequent risk of fracture. In the United States, approximately 54 million adults aged 50 years and older have osteoporosis or are at risk due to low bone mass. Osteoporosis has long been viewed as a chronic health condition affecting primarily non-Hispanic white (NHW) women; however, emerging evidence indicates racial and ethnic disparities in bone outcomes and osteoporosis management. The primary objective of this review is to describe disparities in bone mineral density (BMD), prevalence of osteoporosis and fracture, as well as in screening and treatment of osteoporosis among non-Hispanic black (NHB), Hispanic, and Asian adults compared with NHW adults living on the US mainland. The following areas were reviewed: BMD, osteoporosis prevalence, fracture prevalence and incidence, postfracture outcomes, DXA screening, and osteoporosis treatments. Although there are limited studies on bone and fracture outcomes within Asian and Hispanic populations, findings suggest that there are differences in bone outcomes across NHW, NHB, Asian, and Hispanic populations. Further, NHB, Asian, and Hispanic populations may experience suboptimal osteoporosis management and postfracture care, although additional population-based studies are needed. There is also evidence that variation in BMD and osteoporosis exists within major racial and ethnic groups, highlighting the need for research in individual groups by origin or background. Although there is a clear need to prioritize future quantitative and qualitative research in these populations, initial strategies for addressing bone health disparities are discussed. © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Association of Medicare and Medicaid Insurance Status with Increased Spine Surgery Utilization Rates

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective single-institution study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between patients' insurance status and the likelihood for them to be recommended various spine interventions upon evaluation in our neurosurgical clinics.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Socioeconomically disadvantaged populations have worse outcomes after spine surgery. No studies have looked at the differential rates of recommendation for surgery for patients presenting to spine surgeons based on socioeconomic status.

METHODS

We studied patients initially seeking spine care from spine-fellowship trained neurosurgeons at our institution from July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between insurance status and the recommended patient treatment.

RESULTS

Overall, 663 consecutive outpatients met inclusion criteria. Univariate analysis revealed a statistically significant association between insurance status and treatment recommendations for surgery (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that compared with private insurance, Medicare (odds ratio [OR] 3.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-7.53, P = 0.001) and Medicaid patients (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.21-5.17, P = 0.014) were more likely to be recommended for surgery. Uninsured patients did not receive recommendations for surgery at significantly different rates than patients with private insurance.

CONCLUSION

Medicare and Medicaid patients are more likely to be recommended for spine surgery when initially seeking spine care from a neurosurgeon. These findings may stem from a number of factors, including differential severity of the patient's condition at presentation, disparities in access to care, and differences in shared decision making between surgeons and patients.Level of Evidence: 3.

Increased Mortality in Underinsured Penetrating Trauma Patients

INTRODUCTION

It remains unclear whether an increased mortality risk in uninsured patients exists across Injury Severity Score (ISS) classifications. We hypothesized that penetrating trauma self-pay patients would have a similarly increased mortality risk across all ISS categories.

METHODS

The National Trauma Data Bank (2013-2015) was queried for patients presenting with penetrating firearm, explosive, or stab wound injuries. 115 651 patients were identified and a stratified multivariable logistic regression model was used.

RESULTS

In the >15 ISS group, self-pay patients had a lower median total hospital Length of Stay (LOS) (3 vs 8, P < .001), lower median Intensive Care Unit LOS (1 vs 3, P < .001), and lower median ventilator days (0 vs 1, P < .001). Self-pay patients had an increased risk for mortality compared to patients with private insurance in both the ≤15 ISS group (OR 2.68, P < .001) and >15 ISS group (OR 1.56, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Uninsured patients have an increased mortality risk in both low and high ISS groups. A higher mortality risk among uninsured patients in the high ISS group can be explained by decreased resource availability and lower ICU days and ventilator time. However, more studies are needed to determine why there is an even greater mortality risk among uninsured patients with mild ISS.

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on health insurance coverage among trauma patients: a study of six level I trauma centers

Background

Increased unemployment during the COVID-19 pandemic has likely led to widespread loss of employer-provided health insurance. This study examined trends in health insurance coverage among trauma patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, including differences in demographics and clinical characteristics by insurance type.

Methods

This was a retrospective study on adult patients admitted to six level 1 trauma centers between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2020. The primary exposure was hospital admission date: January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (Period 1), January 1, 2019 to March 15, 2020 (Period 2), and March 16, 2020 to June 30, 2020 (Period 3). Covariates included demographic and clinical variables. χ² tests examined whether the rates of patients covered by each insurance type differed between the pandemic and earlier periods. Mann-Whiney U and χ² tests investigated whether patient demographics or clinical characteristics differed within each insurance type across the study periods.

Results

A total of 31 225 trauma patients admitted between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2019 were included. Forty-one per cent (n=12 651) were admitted in Period 1, 49% (n=15 258) were from Period 2, and 11% (n=3288) were from Period 3. Percentages of uninsured patients increased significantly across the three periods (Periods 1 to 3: 15%, 16%, 21%) (p_trend=0.02); however, there was no accompanying decrease in the percentages of commercial/privately insured patients (Periods 1 to 3: 40%, 39%, 39%) (p_trend=0.27). There was a significant decrease in the percentage of patients on Medicare during the pandemic period (Periods 1 to 3: 39%, 39%, 34%) (p<0.01).

Discussion

This study found that job loss during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in increases of uninsured trauma patients. However, there was not a corresponding decrease in commercial/privately insured patients, as may have been expected; rather, a decrease in Medicare patients was observed. These findings may be attributable to a growing workforce during the study period, in combination with a younger overall patient population during the pandemic.

Level of evidence

Retrospective, level III study.

Injury and Mortality Profiles in Level II and III Trauma Centers

BACKGROUND

While the benefit of admission to trauma centers compared to non-trauma centers is well-documented and differences in outcomes between Level-I and Level-II trauma centers are well-studied, data on the differences in outcomes between Level-II trauma centers (L2TCs) and Level-III trauma centers (L3TCs) are scarce.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare mortality risk between patients admitted to L2TCs and L3TCs, hypothesizing no difference in mortality risk for patients treated at L3TCs compared to L2TCs.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the 2016 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database was performed. Patients aged 18+ years were divided into 2 groups, those treated at American College of Surgeons (ACS) verified L2TCs and L3TCs.

RESULTS

From 74,486 patients included in this study, 74,187 (99.6%) were treated at L2TCs and 299 (.4%) at L3TCs. Both groups had similar median injury severity scores (ISSs) (10 vs 10, P < .001); however, L2TCs had a higher mean ISS (14.6 vs 11.9). There was a higher mortality rate for L2TC patients (6.0% vs 1.7%, P = .002) but no difference in associated risk of mortality between the 2 groups (OR .46, CI .14-1.50, P = .199) after adjusting predictors of mortality. L2TC patients had a longer median length of stay (5.0 vs 3.5 days, P < .001). There was no difference in other outcomes including myocardial infarction (MI) and cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (P > .05).

DISCUSSION

Patients treated at L2TCs had a longer LOS compared to L3TCs. However, after controlling for covariates, there was no difference in associated mortality risk between L2TC and L3TC patients.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Frail Geriatric Trauma Patients

Background

Frailty in geriatric trauma patients is commonly associated with adverse outcomes. Racial disparities in geriatric trauma patients are previously described in the literature. We aimed to assess whether race and ethnicity influence outcomes in frail geriatric trauma patients.

Methods

We performed a 1-year (2017) analysis of TQIP including all geriatric (age ≥ 65 years) trauma patients. The frailty index was calculated using 11-variables and a cutoff limit of 0.27 was defined for frail status. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to control for demographics, insurance status, injury parameters, vital signs, and ICU and hospital length of stay.

Results

We included 41,111 frail geriatric trauma patients. In terms of race, among frail geriatric trauma patients, 35,376 were Whites and 2916 were African Americans; in terms of ethnicity, 37,122 were Non-Hispanics and 2184 were Hispanics. On regression analysis, the White race was associated with higher odds of mortality (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2–2.0; p < 0.01) and in-hospital complications (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1–1.9; p < 0.01). White patients were more likely to be discharged to SNF (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1–1.4; p = 0.03) and less likely to be discharged home (p = 0.04) compared to African Americans. Non-Hispanics were more likely to be discharged to SNF (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1–1.5; p < 0.01) and less likely to be discharged home (p < 0.01) as compared to Hispanics. No significant difference in in-hospital mortality was seen between Hispanics and Non-Hispanics.

Conclusion

Race and ethnicity influence outcomes in frail geriatric trauma patients. These disparities exist regardless of age, gender, injury severity, and insurance status. Further studies are needed to highlight disparities by race and ethnicity and to identify potentially modifiable risk factors in the geriatric trauma population.

Linking Individual Data From the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Center and Local Trauma Registry: Development and Validation of Probabilistic Matching Algorithm

BACKGROUND

Linking records from the National Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems (SCIMS) database to the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) provides a unique opportunity to study early variables in predicting long-term outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). The public use data sets of SCIMS and NTDB are stripped of protected health information, including dates and zip code.

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a probabilistic algorithm linking data from an SCIMS center and its affiliated trauma registry.

METHOD

Data on SCI admissions 2011-2018 were retrieved from an SCIMS center (n = 302) and trauma registry (n = 723), of which 202 records had the same medical record number. The SCIMS records were divided equally into two data sets for algorithm development and validation, respectively. We used a two-step approach: blocking and weight generation for linking variables (race, insurance, height, and weight).

RESULTS

In the development set, 257 SCIMS-trauma pairs shared the same sex, age, and injury year across 129 clusters, of which 91 records were true-match. The probabilistic algorithm identified 65 of the 91 true-match records (sensitivity, 71.4%) with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 80.2%. The algorithm was validated over 282 SCIMS-trauma pairs across 127 clusters and had a sensitivity of 73.7% and PPV of 81.1%. Post hoc analysis shows the addition of injury date and zip code improved the specificity from 57.9% to 94.7%.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate the feasibility of probabilistic linkage between SCIMS and trauma records, which needs further refinement and validation. Gaining access to injury date and zip code would improve record linkage significantly.

Gender Disparities in Surgical Treatment of Axis Fractures in Older Adults

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

Gender appears to play in important role in surgical outcomes following acute cervical spine trauma, with current literature suggesting males have a significantly higher mortality following spine surgery. However, no well-adjusted population-based studies of gender disparities in incidence and outcomes of spine surgery following acute traumatic axis injuries exist to our knowledge. We hypothesized that females would receive surgery less often than males, but males would have a higher 1-year mortality following isolated traumatic axis fractures.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using Medicare claims data that identified US citizens aged 65 and older with ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision) code diagnosis corresponding to isolated acute traumatic axis fracture between 2007 and 2014. Our primary outcome was defined as cumulative incidence of surgical treatment, and our secondary outcome was 1-year mortality. Propensity weighted analysis was performed to balance covariates between genders. Our institutional review board approved the study (IRB #16-0533).

RESULTS

There was no difference in incidence of surgery between males and females following acute isolated traumatic axis fractures (7.4 and 7.5 per 100 fractures, respectively). Males had significantly higher 1-year weighted mortality overall (41.7 and 28.9 per 100 fractures, respectively, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Our well-adjusted data suggest there was no significant gender disparity in incidence of surgical treatment over the study period. The data also support previous observations that males have worse outcomes in comparison to females in the setting of axis fractures and spinal trauma regardless of surgical intervention.

Low Socioeconomic Status Is Associated With Increased Complication Rates: Are Risk Adjustment Models Necessary in Cervical Spine Surgery?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine whether lower socioeconomic status was associated with increased resource utilization following anterior discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for patients who underwent a primary, 1- to 2-level ACDF between 2005 and 2014. Trauma, malignancy, infection, and revision surgery were excluded. The top and bottom income quartiles were compared. Demographics, medical comorbidities, length of stay, complications, and hospital cost were compared between patients of top and bottom income quartiles.

RESULTS

A total of 69 844 cases were included. The bottom income quartile had a similar mean hospital stay (2.04 vs 1.77 days, P = .412), more complications (2.45% vs 1.77%, P < .001), and a higher mortality rate (0.18% vs 0.11%, P = .016). Multivariate analysis revealed bottom income quartile was an independent risk factor for complications (odds ratio = 1.135, confidence interval = 1.02-1.26). Interestingly, the bottom income quartile experienced lower mean hospital costs ($17 041 vs $17 958, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patients in the lowest income group experienced more complications even after adjusting for comorbidities. Therefore, risk adjustment models, including socioeconomic status, may be necessary to avoid potential problems with access to orthopedic spine care for this patient population.

1-Year Mortality and Surgery Incidence in Older US Adults with Cervical Spine Fracture

BACKGROUND

Traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries (SCIs) can be lethal and are especially dangerous for older adults. Falls from standing and risk factors for a cervical fracture and spinal cord injury increase with age. This study estimates the 1-year mortality for patients with a cervical fracture and resultant SCI and compares the mortality rate with that from an isolated cervical fracture.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of U.S. Medicare patients older than 65 years of age. International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 codes were used to identify patients with a cervical fracture without SCI and patients with a cervical fracture with SCI between 2007 and 2014. Our primary outcome was 1-year mortality cumulative incidence rate; our secondary outcome was the cumulative incidence rate of surgical intervention. Propensity weighted analysis was performed to balance covariates between the groups.

RESULTS

The SCI cohort had a 1-year mortality of 36.5%, compared with 31.1% in patients with an isolated cervical fracture (risk difference 5.4% (2.9%-7.9%)). Patients with an SCI were also more likely to undergo surgical intervention compared with those without a SCI (23.1% and 10.3%, respectively; risk difference 12.8% (10.8%-14.9%)).

CONCLUSIONS

Using well-adjusted population-level data in older adults, this study estimates the 1-year mortality after SCI in older adults to be 36.5%. The mortality after a cervical fracture with SCI was 5 percentage points higher than in patients without SCI, and this difference is smaller than one might expect, likely representing the frailty of this population and unmeasured covariates.

Racial inequality in the trauma of women: A disproportionate decade

BACKGROUND

Historically, women have been largely underrepresented in the body of medical research. Given the paucity of data regarding race and trauma in women, we aimed to evaluate the most common types of traumas incurred by women and analyze temporal racial differences.

METHODS

A 10-year review (2007-2016) of the National Trauma Data Bank was conducted to identify common mechanisms of injuries among women. Trends of race, intent of injury, and firearm-related assaults were assessed using the Cochran-Armitage Trend test. Multivariable multinomial logistic regressions were utilized to examine the association between race and trauma subtypes.

RESULTS

Of the 2,082,768 women identified as a trauma during this study period, the majority presented due to an unintentional intent (94.5%), whereas fewer presented secondary to an assault (4.4%) or self-inflicted injury (1.1%). While racioethnic minority women encompassed a small percentage of total traumas (19%), they accounted for roughly three fifths of assault-related traumas (p < 0.001). Though total assaults decreased by 20.8% during the study period, black and Hispanic women saw a disproportionately smaller decrease of 15.1% and 15.8%, respectively. On regression analysis, compared with white women, black women had more than four times the odds of being an assault-related trauma compared with unintentional trauma (odds ratio, 4.48; 95% confidence interval, 4.41-4.55). On subset analysis, firearm-related assault was 17.3 times more prevalent among black women (white, 0.3% vs. black: 5.2%; p < 0.001). In fact, history of alcohol abuse was found to be an effect modifier of the association of race/ethnicity and firearm-related trauma.

CONCLUSION

Compelling data highlight a disproportionate trend in the assault-related trauma of minority women. Specifically, minority women, especially those with a history of alcohol abuse, were at increased risk of being involved in a firearm assault. Further studies are essential to help mitigate disparities and subsequently develop preventative services for this diverse population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Epidemiological, Level III.

Pediatric trauma mortality: an ecological analysis evaluating correlation between injury-related mortality and geographic access to trauma care in the United States in 2010

Background

Trauma is the leading cause of mortality in the pediatric population &gt;1 year. Analyzing relationships between pediatric trauma-related mortality and geographic access to trauma centers (among other social covariates) elucidates the importance of cost and care effective regionalization of designated trauma facilities.

Methods

Pediatric crude injury mortality in 49 United States served as a dependent variable and state population within 45 minutes of trauma centers acted as the independent variable in four linear regression models. Multivariate analyses were performed using previously identified demographics as covariates.

Results

There is a favorable inverse relation between pediatric access to trauma centers and pediatric trauma-related mortality. Though research shows care is best at pediatric trauma centers, access to Adult Level 1 or 2 trauma centers held the most predictive power over mortality. A 4-year college degree attainment proved to be the most influential covariate, with predictive powers greater than the proximity variable.

Conclusions

Increased access to adult or pediatric trauma facilities yields improved outcomes in pediatric trauma mortality. Implementation of qualified, designated trauma centers, with respect to regionalization, has the potential to further lower pediatric mortality. Additionally, the percentage of state populations holding 4-year degrees is a stronger predictor of mortality than proximity and warrants further investigation.

Associations between clinical characteristics and the development of multiple organ failure after severe burns in adult patients

To determine the association between potential risk factors and multiple organ failure (MOF) in severe burn adult patients, we performed a secondary analysis of data from the "Inflammation and the Host Response to Injury" database, which included patients from six burn centers in the United States between 2003 and 2009. Three hundred twenty-two adult patients (aged ≥16 years) with severe burns (≥20.0% total body surface area [TBSA]) were included. MOF was defined according to the Denver score. Potential risk factors were analyzed for their association with MOF. Models were built using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Eighty-eight patients (27.3%) developed MOF during the study period. We found that TBSA, age, and inhalation injury were significant risk factors for MOF. This predictive model showed good performance, with the total area under the receiver operating characteristic curve being 0.823. Moreover, among patients who developed MOF, inhalation injury was significantly associated with the development of MOF in the acute phase (within three days of injury) (adjusted odds ratio 3.1; 95% confidence interval 1.1-8.3). TBSA, age, lactate, and Denver score within 24h were associated with the late phase development of MOF. Thus, we have identified key risk factors for the onset of MOF after severe burn injury. Our findings contribute to the understanding of individualized treatment and will potentially allow for efficient allocation of resources and a lower threshold for admission to an intensive care unit, which can prevent the development of MOF and eventually reduce mortality.

Pediatric firearm-related traumatic brain injury in United States trauma centers

OBJECTIVE

Pediatric firearm injury is a leading cause of death and disability in the youth of the United States. The epidemiology of and outcomes following gunshot wounds to the head (GSWHs) are in need of systematic characterization. Here, the authors analyzed pediatric GSWHs from a population-based sample to identify predictors of prolonged hospitalization, morbidity, and death.

METHODS

All patients younger than 18 years of age and diagnosed with a GSWH in the National Sample Program (NSP) of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) in 2003-2012 were eligible for inclusion in this study. Variables of interest included injury intent, firearm type, site of incident, age, sex, race, health insurance, geographic region, trauma center level, isolated traumatic brain injury (TBI), hypotension in the emergency department, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and Injury Severity Score (ISS). Risk predictors for a prolonged hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality were identified. Odds ratios, mean increases or decreases (B), and 95% confidence intervals were reported. Statistical significance was assessed at α < 0.001 accounting for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

In a weighted sample of 2847 pediatric patients with GSWHs, the mean age was 14.8 ± 3.3 years, 79.2% were male, and 59.0% had severe TBI (GCS score 3-8). The mechanism of assault (63.0%), the handgun as firearm (45.6%), and an injury incurred in a residential area (40.6%) were most common. The mean hospital length of stay was 11.6 ± 14.4 days for the survivors, for whom suicide injuries involved longer hospitalizations (B = 5.9-day increase, 95% CI 3.3-8.6, p < 0.001) relative to those for accidental injuries. Mortality was 45.1% overall but was greater with injury due to suicidal intent (mortality 71.5%, p < 0.001) or caused by a shotgun (mortality 56.5%, p < 0.001). Lower GCS scores, higher ISSs, and emergency room hypotension predicted poorer outcomes. Patients with private insurance had lower mortality odds than those with Medicare/Medicaid (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.7-3.4, p < 0.001) or government insurance (OR 3.6, 95% CI 2.2-5.8, p < 0.001). Management at level II centers, compared to level I, was associated with lower odds of returning home (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.5, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

From 2003 to 2012, with regard to pediatric TBI hospitalizations due to GSWHs, their proportion remained stable, those caused by accidental injuries decreased, and those attributable to suicide increased. Overall mortality was 45%. Hypotension, cranial and overall injury severity, and suicidal intent were associated with poor prognoses. Patients treated at level II trauma centers had lower odds of being discharged home. Given the spectrum of risk factors that predispose children to GSWHs, emphasis on screening, parental education, and standardization of critical care management is needed to improve outcomes.

Do Medicare Accountable Care Organizations Reduce Disparities After Spinal Fracture?

BACKGROUND

National changes in health care disparities within the setting of trauma care have not been examined within Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) or non-ACOs. We sought to examine the impact of ACOs on post-treatment outcomes (in-hospital mortality, 90-day complications, and readmissions), as well as surgical intervention among whites and nonwhites treated for spinal fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified all beneficiaries treated for spinal fractures between 2009 and 2014 using national Medicare fee for service claims data. Claims were used to identify sociodemographic and clinical criteria, receipt of surgery and in-hospital mortality, 90-day complications, and readmissions. Multivariable logistic regression analysis accounting for all confounders was used to determine the effect of race/ethnicity on outcomes. Nonwhites were compared with whites treated in non-ACOs between 2009 and 2011 as the referent.

RESULTS

We identified 245,704 patients who were treated for spinal fractures. Two percent of the cohort received care in an ACO, whereas 7% were nonwhite. We found that disparities in the use of surgical fixation for spinal fractures were present in non-ACOs over the period 2009-2014 but did not exist in the context of care provided through ACOs (odds ratio [OR] 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44, 1.28). A disparity in the development of complications existed for nonwhites in non-ACOs (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.01, 1.17) that was not encountered among nonwhites receiving care in ACOs (OR 1.32; 95% CI 0.90, 1.95). An existing disparity in readmission rates for nonwhites in ACOs over 2009-2011 (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.01, 1.80) was eliminated in the period 2012-2014 (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.65, 1.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Our work reinforces the idea that ACOs could improve health care disparities among nonwhites. There is also the potential that as ACOs become more familiar with care integration and streamlined delivery of services, further improvements in disparities could be realized.

Changes in healthcare delivery following spinal fracture in Medicare Accountable Care Organizations

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) were designed to reduce healthcare costs while simultaneously improving quality. Given that the success of ACOs is predicated on controlling costs, concerns have been expressed that patients could be adversely affected through restricted access to surgery, including in the context of spine fracture care.

PURPOSE

Evaluate the impact of Medicare ACO formation on the utilization of surgery and outcomes following spinal fractures.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of Medicare claims (2009-2014).

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients treated for spinal fractures in an ACO or non-ACO.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The utilization of surgery as treatment for spinal fractures, in-hospital mortality, 90-day complications, or hospital readmission within 90-days injury.

METHODS

We used a pre-post study design to compare outcomes for patients treated in ACOs versus non-ACOs. Receipt of surgery for treatment of a spinal fracture was the primary outcome, with mortality, complications and readmissions treated secondarily. We used multivariable logistic regression adjusting for confounders to determine the association between environment of care (ACO vs. non-ACO) and the outcomes of interest. In all testing, beneficiaries treated in non-ACOs during 2009 to 2011 were used as the referent.

RESULTS

During 2009 to 2011, 9% (n=10,866) of patients treated in non-ACOs received surgery, whereas a similar percentage (9%; n=210) underwent surgery in ACOs. This figure decreased to 8% (n=9,857) for individuals treated in non-ACOs over 2012 to 2014, although the surgical rate remained unchanged for those receiving care in an ACO (9%; n=227). There was no difference in the use of surgery among patients treated in ACOs (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.79, 1.18) over 2012 to 2014. Similar increases in the odds of mortality were observed for both ACOs and non-ACOs during this period. A marginal, yet significant increase in complications was observed among ACOs, although there was no change in the odds of readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that the formation of ACOs did not result in alterations in the use of surgery for spinal fractures or substantive changes in outcomes. As ACOs continue to evolve, more emphasis should be placed on the incorporation of measures directly related to surgical and trauma care in the determinants of risk-based reimbursements.

The role of sociodemographics in the occurrence of orthopaedic trauma

INTRODUCTION

We sought to determine the effects of sociodemographic factors on the occurrence of orthopaedic injuries in an adult population presenting to a level 1 trauma center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who received orthopaedic trauma care at a level 1 academic trauma center.

RESULTS

20,919 orthopaedic trauma injury cases were treated at an academic level 1 trauma center between 01 January 1993 and 27 August 2017. Following application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, a total of 14,654 patients were retrieved for analysis. Out of 14,654 patients, 4602 (31.4%) belonged to low socioeconomic status (SES), 4961 (32.0%) to middle SES and 5361 (36.6%) to high SES. Following adjustment for age, sex, race, insurance status and injury severity score (ISS), patients belonging to middle SES vs. low SES (OR 0.77 [95% CI 0.63-0.94]; p = 0.009) or high SES vs. low SES (OR 0.77 [95% CI 0.62-0.95]; p = 0.016) had lower odds of receiving a penetrating injury as compared to a blunt injury.

CONCLUSION

The results from this study indicate that a link exists between sociodemographic factors and the occurrence of orthopaedic injuries presenting to a level 1 trauma center. The most common cause of injury varied within age groups, by sex, and within the different socioeconomic groups.

Epidemiological State, Predictors of Early Mortality, and Predictive Models for Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Multicenter Nationwide Cohort Study

STUDY DESIGN

Multi-center, retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the epidemiology, identify predictors of early mortality, and develop predictive models for traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Despite improved initial care and management strategies, traumatic SCI remains a devastating event. Knowledge of the epidemiological state and predictive factors for mortality is important for developing strategies and counseling; however, they have not been adequately investigated, and predictive modeling regarding outcomes remains an underused modality for patients with traumatic SCI.

METHODS

Using a nationwide trauma registry-the Japan Trauma Data Bank-we identified adult (≥18 yrs) patients with SCI between 2004 and 2015. The endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Characteristics of each patient were described. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors significantly associated with in-hospital mortality and develop a predictive model.

RESULTS

In total, 236,698 patients were registered in the database. Of the 215,835 adult patients, 8069 (3.7%) had SCI. The majority had SCI at the cervical level with falls at ground level being the primary etiology. Over the study period, median age, the proportion of cervical SCI, and the etiology of falls at ground level increased. The mortality rate was 5.6%. The following eight factors, age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale on arrival (GCS), hypotension on arrival, bradycardia on arrival, severe head injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and neurological severity of SCI, were independently associated with mortality. A predictive model consisting of these variables predicted mortality with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-0.90).

CONCLUSION

Over the 12-year period, patient characteristics, etiology, and post-SCI outcomes significantly changed. We identified eight prognostic factors of early mortality. A predictive model including these factors showed excellent performance and may improve treatment strategies, healthcare resource allocation, and counseling.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Achieving ethnic equality in the Israel trauma healthcare system: the case of the elderly population

Objective

To determine if ethnic disparities exist with regard to the risk of injury and injury outcomes among elderly hospitalized casualties in Israel.

Methods

A retrospective study based on data from the Israeli National Trauma Registry between 2008 and 2017. Data included demographic, injury and hospitalization characteristics. Descriptive statistics and adjusted logistic regression were used to examine the differences between Jewish and Arab casualties, aged 65 and older.

Result

The study included 96,795 casualties. The proportion of elderly hospitalized casualties was 2.8 times greater than their proportion in the population (3.1 times greater among Jews and 2.1 times among Arabs). In comparison to Arabs, Jews suffered from a greater percentage of head injuries (10.5 and 8.9%, respectively for Jews and Arabs p < .001), but fewer extremity injuries (46.7% vs. 48.0% respectively for Jews and Arabs p < .05). Among severe/critical casualties and among casualties with severe head injuries, Arabs were more likely to be transported to the hospital in a private car (27% vs. 21% respectively for Arabs and Jews p < .001; 30.5% vs. 23.3% respectively for Arabs and Jews p < .001). Logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age, gender, injury severity, type of injury, type of trauma center and year of admission, shows that Jews, relative to Arabs, were more likely to be hospitalized for more than seven days, admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and to be discharged to a rehabilitation center (OR: 1.3, 1.3 and 2.4 respectively). No differences regarding surgery (OR: 0.95) or in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.99) were found.

Conclusions

Ethnic disparities between Jewish and Arab hospitalized casualties were observed with regard to hospital stay, ICU admission and rehabilitation transfer. However, no differences were found with regard to mortality and surgery. While the reported disparities may be due in part by cultural differences and accessibility, health policy decision makers should aim to reduce the gaps by optimizing the accessibility of ambulance and rehabilitation services as well as increasing awareness regarding the availability of these medical services among the Arab population.

Epidemiology of Anterior Tibial Spine Fractures in Young Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 122 Cases

BACKGROUND

Historically, bicycle accidents were described as the most common mechanism for pediatric anterior tibial spine fractures (ATSFs). There is a paucity of current literature examining the demographic factors associated with these injuries. The purpose of this cohort study was to characterize the epidemiology of ATSFs presenting to a single tertiary referral pediatric hospital.

METHODS

A consecutive cohort of 122 pediatric patients with ATSFs between 1996 and 2014 were reviewed. Radiographic variables, classification of fractures (Meyers and McKeever type), age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, and mechanism of injury were retrieved. Categories of mechanism of injury included organized sports (football, soccer, basketball, lacrosse, wrestling, and gymnastics), bicycling, outdoor sports (skiing, skateboarding, and sledding), fall, motor vehicle collision/pedestrian versus motor vehicle, and trampoline.

RESULTS

Organized sports-related injuries represented the most common cause of ATSFs (36%). Other common mechanisms of injury included bicycle accidents (25%), outdoor sports (18%), and falls (11%). There was a higher proportion of males (69%) compared with females (31%). Males (mean age, 11.6 y) were significantly older than females (mean age, 9.8 y) (P=0.004). Younger patients (aged 11.5 y and below) were more likely to have displaced fractures (type III), whereas type I and type II were more common in patients above 11.5 years (P=0.02). Patients with fracture type I were significantly taller than patients with fracture type III. No other variables were found to differ significantly according to fracture severity, including sex, weight, and body mass index.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, our study represents both the largest (n=122) and most up-to-date epidemiological ATSF study in pediatric patients. A higher rate of ATSF occurs due to organized sports rather than bicycling or motor vehicle collision. This 18-year data collection represents a change in the paradigm, and is likely multifactorial, including increased participation in youth sports and early sport specialization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-retrospective, cohort study.

Using cable ties to connect thoracostomy tubes to drainage devices decreases frequency of unplanned disconnection

OBJECTIVES

Thoracostomy tube (TT) connection to drainage device (DD) may be unintentionally disconnected, potentiating complications. Tape may strengthen this connection despite minimal data informing optimal practice. Our goal was to analyze the utility of cable ties for TT to DD connection.

METHODS

On April 1, 2015, our trauma center supplanted use of tape or nothing with cable ties for securing TT to DD connection. We abstracted trauma registry patients with TTs placed from March 1, 2014 to May 31, 2016 and dichotomized as prior ("BEFORE") and subsequent ("AFTER") to the cable tie practice pattern change. We analyzed demographics, TT-specific details and outcomes. Primary outcome was TT to DD disconnection. Secondary outcomes included TT dislodgement from the chest, complications, length of stay (LOS), mortality, number of TTs placed and TT days.

RESULTS

121 (83.4% of abstracted) patients were analyzed. Demographics, indications for TT and operative rate were similar for BEFORE and AFTER cohorts. ISS was lower BEFORE (14.12 ± 2.35 vs 18.21 ± 2.71, p = 0.022); however, RTS and AIS for chest were similar (p = 0.155 and 0.409, respectively). TT to DD disconnections per TT days were significantly higher in the BEFORE cohort [6 (2.8%) vs. 1 (0.19%), p = 0.003], and dislodgements were statistically similar [0 vs 3 (0.57%), p = 0.36]. LOS, initial TTs placed and days per TT were similar, and median and mode of days per TT were the same.

CONCLUSIONS

Cable ties secure connections between TT and DDs with higher fidelity compared to tape or nothing but may increase rates of TT dislodgement from the chest.

Adult Firearm-Related Traumatic Brain Injury in United States Trauma Centers

Civilian firearm injury is an important public health concern in the United States. Gunshot wounds to the head (GSWH) remain in need of update and systematic characterization. We identify predictors of prolonged hospital length of stay (HLOS), intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), medical complications, mortality, and discharge disposition from a population-based sample using the National Sample Program (NSP) of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), years 2003-2012. Statistical significance was assessed at α < 0.001 to correct for multiple comparisons. In total, 8148 adult GSWH patients were included extrapolating to 32,439 national incidents. Age was 36.6 ± 16.4 years and 64.4% were severe traumatic brain injury (TBI; Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score 3-8). Assault (49.2%), handgun (50.3%), and residential injury (43.2%) were of highest incidence. HLOS and ICU LOS were 7.7 ± 14.2 and 5.7 ± 13.4 days, respectively. Overall mortality was 54.6%; suicide/self-injury was associated with the highest mortality rate (71.6%). GCS, Injury Severity Score, and hypotension were significant predictors for outcomes overall. Medicare/Medicaid patients had longer HLOS compared to private/commercial insured (mean increase, 4.4 days; 95% confidence interval [2.6-6.3]). Compared to the Midwest, the South had longer HLOS (mean increase, 3.7 days; [2.0-5.4]) and higher odds of complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.7 [1.4-2.0]); the West had lower odds of complications (OR, 0.6; [0.5-0.7]). Versus handgun, shotgun (OR, 0.3; [0.2-0.4]) and hunting rifle (OR, 0.5; [0.4-0.8]) resulted in lower mortality. Patients with government/other insurance had higher odds of discharging home compared to private/commercially insured (OR, 1.7; [1.3-2.3]). In comparison to level I trauma centers, level II trauma centers had lower odds of discharge to home (OR, 0.7; [0.5-0.8]). Our results support hypotension, injury severity, injury intent, firearm type, and U.S. geographical location as important prognostic variables in firearm-related TBI. Improved understanding of civilian GSWH is critical to promoting increased awareness of firearm injuries as a public health concern and reducing its debilitating injury burden to patients, families, and healthcare systems.

Test characteristics of a drug CAGE questionnaire for the detection of non-alcohol substance use disorders in trauma inpatients

BACKGROUND

Non-alcohol substance use disorders (drug use disorders [DUDs]) are common in trauma patients.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the test characteristics of a 4-item drug CAGE questionnaire to detect DUDs in a cohort of adult trauma inpatients.

METHODS

Observational cross-sectional cohort of 1,115 adult patients admitted directly to a level-one trauma center between September, 1994 and November, 1996. All participants underwent both a 4-item drug CAGE questionnaire and the substance use disorder section of a structured psychiatric diagnostic clinical interview (SCID) (DSM-IIIR criteria), administered by staff unaware of their clinical status. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), positive (LR+) and negative likelihood ratios (LR-), and the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) were calculated for each individual question and the overall questionnaire, using SCID-generated DUD diagnoses as the standard. Performance characteristics of the screen were also compared across selected sociodemographic, injury mechanism, and diagnostic sub-groups.

RESULTS

Subjects with DUDs were common (n = 349, 31.3%), including cannabis (n = 203, 18.2%), cocaine (n = 199, 17.8%), and opioids (n = 156, 14.0%). The screen performed well overall (AUC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.88-0.91) and across subgroups based on age, sex, race, marriage status, income, education, employment status, mechanism of injury, and current/past DUD status (AUCs 0.75-1.00). Answering any one question in the affirmative had a sensitivity = 83.4% (95% CI: 79.1-87.1), specificity = 92.3% (95% CI: 90.2-94.1), PPV = 83.1%, LR+ = 10.8.

CONCLUSIONS

The 4-item drug CAGE and its individual questions had good-to-excellent ability to detect DUDs in this adult trauma inpatient population, suggesting its usefulness as a screening tool.

Predictors of 30-Day Outcomes in Octogenarians with Traumatic C2 Fractures Undergoing Surgery

BACKGROUND

Predictors of surgical outcomes following traumatic axis (C2) fractures in octogenarians remain undercharacterized.

METHODS

Patients age ≥80 years undergoing cervical spine surgery following traumatic C2 fractures were extracted from the National Sample Program of the National Trauma Data Bank (2003-2012). Outcomes include overall inpatient complications, individual complications with an incidence >1%, hospital length of stay (HLOS), discharge disposition, and mortality. Demographics, comorbidities, and injury predictors were analyzed using multivariable regression. Odds ratios (OR), mean differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Statistical significance was assessed at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

The cohort of 442 patients was 48.6% male and had a mean age of 84.3 ± 2.7 years. The distribution of admissions was 42.3% to the hospital floor, 40.3% to the intensive care unit (ICU), 7.7% to telemetry, 2.0% to the operating room, and 7.7% to other/unknown. Mortality was 9.7%, mean HLOS was 13.1 ± 9.2 days, the rate of complications was 38.5%, and 81.5% of survivors were discharged to a nonhome facility. Injury severity was predictive of mortality and overall complications. History of bleeding disorder/coagulopathy predicted mortality (OR, 4.02; 95% CI, 1.07-15.05), overall complications (OR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.09-8.32), cardiac arrest (OR, 8.19; 95% CI, 1.06-63.54), and renal complications (OR, 10.36; 95% CI, 2.13-50.38). History of congestive heart failure predicted mortality (OR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.10-8.69). ICU admission (vs. floor) predicted overall complications (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.23-3.27) and pneumonia (OR, 4.65; 95% CI, 1.91-11.30). Telemetry admission (vs. floor) predicted unplanned intubation (OR, 7.76; 95% CI, 1.24-48.49).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of octogenarians undergoing surgery for traumatic C2 fracture, injury severity and a history of bleeding disorder/coagulopathy were identified as risk factors for inpatient complications and mortality. Heightened surveillance should be considered for ICU and/or telemetry admissions for the development of complications. These findings warrant consideration by the clinician, patient, and family to inform clinical decisions and goals of care.