1
|
Kawam O, Zhu X, Eton DT, Martin-Lillie C, Finney Rutten LJ, Shapiro S, Tilburt JC, Master Z. Designing persuasive health education for patients seeking unproven stem cell interventions. Stem Cell Reports 2023; 18:1549-1554. [PMID: 37557072 PMCID: PMC10444566 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2023.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Misinformation among clinics advertising unproven stem cell interventions (SCIs) is pervasive and has resulted in patient and societal harms. Most bioethics commentaries have centered on advancing regulatory approaches to curtail the supply side of the market, but insufficient attention has been paid to considering strategies influencing patient demand. In this article, we offer an ethical justification for the design and deployment of persuasive patient education on unproven SCIs and distinguish it from didactic and manipulative education frames. Persuasive education should aim to correct and inoculate against misinformation about unproven SCIs and instill a sense of caution among patients considering experimental interventions outside of a clinical trial. We outline various communication strategies to effectively correct or inoculate against SCI misinformation. The stem cell community needs to invest in understanding patients' informational sources, attitudes, and beliefs about SCIs to develop and implement evidence-based persuasive education to promote informed decision-making about these therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Kawam
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Xuan Zhu
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David T Eton
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Shane Shapiro
- Center for Regenerative Biotherapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Jon C Tilburt
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Zubin Master
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Center for Regenerative Biotherapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pang PCI, Munsie M, Chang S, Tanner C, Walker C. Participatory Design and Evaluation of the "Stem Cells Australia" Website for Delivering Complex Health Knowledge: Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e44733. [PMID: 37471121 PMCID: PMC10401697 DOI: 10.2196/44733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The internet has become a commonly used information source for people seeking to understand their health care options. However, inconsistent representation about what stem cell treatments are available and from whom, coupled with the lack of transparency about what has been shown to work or is even safe, can distract and mislead users. Given these challenges, there is a need to develop effective evidence-based tools for delivering information about health care options involving stem cells. OBJECTIVE A need to redesign an existing website in Australia was identified to provide trustworthy information about stem cell research and to counter misinformation. Using a participatory design approach to generate an understanding of what information users need for stem cell treatments, the Stem Cells Australia website serves as a case study for the development and evaluation of websites delivering complex messages about science and health. METHODS This study comprised 3 steps. First, a focus group and several one-on-one interviews with a purposive sample of users (n=12) were conducted to identify their needs and requirements. Second, we designed a new version of the website based on findings from the focus group and interviews. Finally, for evaluating the participatory design process, we collected 180 days of Google Analytics data for both the original and redesigned versions (90 days for each) and compared their differences using 2-sample z tests. RESULTS The feedback from participants was grouped into 3 themes-needed and unwanted information, how and where to obtain information, and their information preferences. These were translated into requirements for rebuilding the website. The redesigned version reached users in other continents, despite the daily numbers of users (-61.2%; P<.001) and sessions (-61.7%; P<.001) decreasing. The redesigned version also showed substantial decrease in daily bounce rate (-97.2%; P<.001), significant increase in the daily average of page reads per session (+110.8%; P<.001), and long daily average for session duration (+22.9%; P=.045). Navigation flow analysis showed more traffic toward web pages related to health conditions in the redesigned version. CONCLUSIONS Websites about stem cell research need to provide content for vulnerable global audiences. Participatory design that addresses knowledge gaps and information needs can produce better performance and engagement, which can be evaluated using Google Analytics, a common web analytics tool used by many websites. Learnings for improving the metrics regarding website identity, research updates, and clinical trials are concluded, which can inform the future design of websites seeking to engage users and provide reliable and accessible science and health information including but not limited to stem cell research and therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Megan Munsie
- Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Stem Cell Ethics and Policy Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Shanton Chang
- School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Claire Tanner
- School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Christine Walker
- Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Peruzzotti-Jametti L, Pluchino S. Therapy with mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis ready for prime time: Commentary. Mult Scler 2022; 28:1328-1329. [PMID: 35786043 DOI: 10.1177/13524585221097958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Peruzzotti-Jametti
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stefano Pluchino
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lyons S, Salgaonkar S, Flaherty GT. International stem cell tourism: a critical literature review and evidence-based recommendations. Int Health 2021; 14:132-141. [PMID: 34415026 PMCID: PMC8890798 DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihab050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Stem cell tourism is an emerging area of medical tourism activity. Frustrated by the slow translation of stem cell research into clinical practice, patients with debilitating conditions often seek therapeutic options that are not appropriately regulated. This review summarises recent developments in the field of stem cell tourism and provides clinicians with the information necessary to provide basic pretravel health advice to stem cell tourists. PubMed and Scopus databases were consulted for relevant publications, using combinations of the terms 'stem cell', 'tourism', 'regenerative medicine', 'international', 'travel medicine' and 'environmental health'. The leading countries in the international stem cell tourism market are the USA, China, India, Thailand and Mexico. As the majority of clinics offering stem cell therapies are based in low- and-middle-income countries, stem cell tourists place themselves at risk of receiving an unproven treatment, coupled with the risk of travel-related illnesses. These clinics do not generally provide even basic travel health information on their websites. In addition to often being ineffective, stem cell therapies are associated with complications such as infection, rejection and tumorigenesis. Physicians, researchers, regulatory bodies, advocacy groups and medical educators are encouraged to work together to improve patient and physician education and address current legislative deficiencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Lyons
- School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway H91 TK33, Ireland.,Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shival Salgaonkar
- School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway H91 TK33, Ireland
| | - Gerard T Flaherty
- School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway H91 TK33, Ireland.,School of Medicine, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chavez J, Shah NA, Ruoss S, Cuomo RE, Ward SR, Mackey TK. Online marketing practices of regenerative medicine clinics in US-Mexico border region: a web surveillance study. Stem Cell Res Ther 2021; 12:189. [PMID: 33736697 PMCID: PMC7977255 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-021-02254-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The potential of regenerative medicine to improve human health has led to the rapid expansion of stem cell clinics throughout the world with varying levels of regulation and oversight. This has led to a market ripe for stem cell tourism, with Tijuana, Mexico, as a major destination. In this study, we characterize the online marketing, intervention details, pricing of services, and assess potential safety risks through web surveillance of regenerative medicine clinics marketing services in Tijuana. Methods We conducted structured online search queries from March to April 2019 using 296 search terms in English and Spanish on two search engines (Google and Bing) to identify websites engaged in direct-to-consumer advertising of regenerative medicine services. We performed content analysis to characterize three categories of interest: online presence, tokens of scientific legitimacy, and intervention details. Results Our structured online searches resulted in 110 unique websites located in Tijuana corresponding to 76 confirmed locations. These clinics’ online presence consisted of direct-to-consumer advertising mainly through a dedicated website (94.5%) or Facebook page (65.5%). The vast majority of these websites (99.1%) did not mention any affiliation to an academic institutions or other overt tokens of scientific legitimacy. Most clinics claimed autologous tissue was the source of treatments (67.3%) and generally did not specify route of administration. Additionally, of the Tijuana clinics identified, 13 claimed licensing, though only 1 matched with available licensing information. Conclusions Regenerative medicine clinics in Tijuana have a significant online presence using direct-to-consumer advertising to attract stem-cell tourism clientele in a bustling border region between Mexico and the USA. This study adds to existing literature evidencing the unregulated nature of online stem cell offerings and provides further evidence of the need for regulatory harmonization, particularly to address stem cell services being offered online across borders. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13287-021-02254-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Chavez
- Masters Program in Clinical Research, UC San Diego - School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Neal A Shah
- Department of Healthcare Research and Policy, UC San Diego - Extension, 8950 Villa La Jolla Drive Suite A124, San Diego, CA, 92037, USA.,Global Health Policy and Data Institute, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Severin Ruoss
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC San Diego - School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Raphael E Cuomo
- Global Health Policy and Data Institute, San Diego, CA, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology and Division of Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Samuel R Ward
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Department of Radiology, UC San Diego - School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Tim K Mackey
- Department of Healthcare Research and Policy, UC San Diego - Extension, 8950 Villa La Jolla Drive Suite A124, San Diego, CA, 92037, USA. .,Global Health Policy and Data Institute, San Diego, CA, USA. .,Department of Anesthesiology and Division of Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA. .,S-3 Research, LLC, San Diego, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aiyegbusi OL, Macpherson K, Elston L, Myles S, Washington J, Sungum N, Briggs M, Newsome PN, Calvert MJ. Patient and public perspectives on cell and gene therapies: a systematic review. Nat Commun 2020; 11:6265. [PMID: 33293538 PMCID: PMC7722871 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20096-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Cell and gene therapies offer opportunities for treating disease with potential to restore function, and cure disease. However, they are not without risk and pose complex logistical, economic, ethical and social challenges for health systems. Here we report our systematic review of the current evidence on patient and public knowledge and perspectives of cell and gene therapies, to inform future research, education and awareness raising activities. We screened 10,735 titles and abstracts, and evaluated the full texts of 151 publications. The final selection was 35 publications. Four themes were generated from the narrative synthesis of the study findings namely: (1) Knowledge and understanding of cell and gene therapies, (2) Acceptance of cell and gene therapies (3) Understanding of risk and benefits of therapy, and (4) Information needs and current sources of information. As potential funders or future recipients, it is important that the public and patients are aware of these therapies, understand the issues involved, and can contribute to the debate. This review highlights the need for appropriate patient and public education on the various aspects of cell and gene therapies. High quality studies exploring patient and public opinions and experiences of cell and gene therapy are required. Patient and public perceptions of these therapies, alongside evidence of clinical and cost-effectiveness, will be central to their uptake and use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Centre West Midlands, and National Institute for Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, Birmingham, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | - Nisha Sungum
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, Birmingham, UK
- Midlands-Wales Advanced Therapy Treatment Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mark Briggs
- Welsh Blood Service, Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - Philip N Newsome
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Centre West Midlands, and National Institute for Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Melanie J Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Centre West Midlands, and National Institute for Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Crowdfunding, stem cell interventions and autism spectrum disorder: comparing campaigns related to an international "stem cell clinic" and US academic medical center. Cytotherapy 2020; 23:198-202. [PMID: 33082092 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2020.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 08/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AIMS Studies examining crowdfunding campaigns for stem cell interventions have typically focused on campaigns seeking funds to send individuals to businesses marketing unlicensed and unproven stem cell products. However, some crowdfunding campaigns identify academic medical centers as destinations for individuals seeking access to stem cell products provided either in clinical studies or on an expanded access basis. This study examines crowdfunding campaigns seeking funds to enable children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder access to stem cell interventions. METHODS This study compares and contrasts crowdfunding campaigns, identifying an international stem cell clinic marketing a purported umbilical cord blood-derived stem cell treatment for autism spectrum disorder, with campaigns soliciting donations intended to help children with autism spectrum disorder either participate in clinical studies or obtain expanded access to stem cell products provided at an academic medical center in the US. RESULTS Campaigns connected to both sites contained inaccurate claims. However, campaigns identifying the international clinic as the intended destination site made stronger claims about efficacy and were more reliant upon testimonials than campaigns listing the US-based academic medical center as the planned clinical site. Acknowledging these important distinctions, clinical studies and press releases associated with the academic medical center played an important role in lending the perception of credibility to the putative stem cell treatments marketed by the international clinic. CONCLUSIONS The study's findings emphasize how important it is for researchers at academic medical centers and comparable research facilities to avoid engaging in stem cell hyperbole; highlight the preliminary nature of early clinical studies; ensure that any claims about safety and efficacy are based upon robust and reliable evidence; and promote responsible science communication by exercising restraint when crafting press releases, conducting media interviews and otherwise publicizing clinical research findings.
Collapse
|
8
|
Julian K, Yuhasz N, Rai W, Salerno JA, Imitola J. Complications from “Stem Cell Tourism” in Neurology. Ann Neurol 2020; 88:661-668. [DOI: 10.1002/ana.25842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Julian
- Department of Neurology The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio USA
- Laboratory for Neural Stem Cells and Functional Neurogenetics, Division of Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology, Department of Neurology UConn School of Medicine Farmington CT USA
| | - Nicholas Yuhasz
- Department of Neurology The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio USA
| | - Widjan Rai
- Department of Neurology The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio USA
| | - Jose A. Salerno
- Department of Neurology The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio USA
- National Laboratory of Embryonic Stem Cells Universidad Federal Rio de Janeiro Brazil
| | - Jaime Imitola
- Department of Neurology The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio USA
- Laboratory for Neural Stem Cells and Functional Neurogenetics, Division of Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology, Department of Neurology UConn School of Medicine Farmington CT USA
- UConn Health Comprehensive Multiple Sclerosis Center, Division of Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology, Department of Neurology UConn School of Medicine Farmington CT USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Translating Basic Research into Safe and Effective Cell-based Treatments for Respiratory Diseases. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2020; 16:657-668. [PMID: 30917290 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201812-890cme] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Respiratory diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pulmonary fibrosis, result in severely impaired quality of life and impose significant burdens on healthcare systems worldwide. Current disease management involves pharmacologic interventions, oxygen administration, reduction of infections, and lung transplantation in advanced disease stages. An increasing understanding of mechanisms of respiratory epithelial and pulmonary vascular endothelial maintenance and repair and the underlying stem/progenitor cell populations, including but not limited to airway basal cells and type II alveolar epithelial cells, has opened the possibility of cell replacement-based regenerative approaches for treatment of lung diseases. Further potential for personalized therapies, including in vitro drug screening, has been underscored by the recent derivation of various lung epithelial, endothelial, and immune cell types from human induced pluripotent stem cells. In parallel, immunomodulatory treatments using allogeneic or autologous mesenchymal stromal cells have shown a good safety profile in clinical investigations for acute inflammatory conditions, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome and septic shock. However, as yet, no cell-based therapy has been shown to be both safe and effective for any lung disease. Despite the investigational status of cell-based interventions for lung diseases, businesses that market unproven, unlicensed and potentially harmful cell-based interventions for respiratory diseases have proliferated in the United States and worldwide. The current status of various cell-based regenerative approaches for lung disease as well as the effect of the regulatory environment on clinical translation of such approaches are presented and critically discussed in this review.
Collapse
|
10
|
How to Peddle Hope: An Analysis of YouTube Patient Testimonials of Unproven Stem Cell Treatments. Stem Cell Reports 2020; 12:1186-1189. [PMID: 31189092 PMCID: PMC6565870 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Revised: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Providers capitalize on patient testimonials to market unproven stem cell treatments (SCTs). We evaluated 159 YouTube videos and found patients discussed health improvements (91.2%), praised providers (53.5%), and recommended SCTs (28.9%). In over a third of the videos, providers posed questions to patients, thereby directing narratives and making them a powerful marketing tool.
Collapse
|
11
|
Smith C, Martin-Lillie C, Higano JD, Turner L, Phu S, Arthurs J, Nelson TJ, Shapiro S, Master Z. Challenging misinformation and engaging patients: characterizing a regenerative medicine consult service. Regen Med 2020; 15:1427-1440. [PMID: 32319855 PMCID: PMC7466910 DOI: 10.2217/rme-2020-0018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: To address the unmet needs of patients interested in regenerative medicine, Mayo Clinic created a Regenerative Medicine Consult Service (RMCS). We describe the service and patient satisfaction. Materials & methods: We analyzed RMCS databases through retrospective chart analysis and performed qualitative interviews with patients. Results: The average patient was older to elderly and seeking information about regenerative options for their condition. Patients reported various conditions with osteoarthritis being most common. Over a third of consults included discussions about unproven interventions. About a third of patients received a clinical or research referral. Patients reported the RMCS as useful and the consultant as knowledgeable. Conclusion: An institutional RMCS can meet patients' informational needs and support the responsible translation of regenerative medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cambray Smith
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Charlene Martin-Lillie
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Jennifer Dens Higano
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Leigh Turner
- Center for Bioethics, School of Public Health & College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, N520 Boynton, 410 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Sydney Phu
- School of History, Philosophy & Religion, Oregon State University, 322 Milam Hall, 2520 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
| | - Jennifer Arthurs
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Timothy J Nelson
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Shane Shapiro
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Zubin Master
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chisholm J, Ruff C, Viswanathan S. Current state of Health Canada regulation for cellular and gene therapy products: potential cures on the horizon. Cytotherapy 2019; 21:686-698. [PMID: 31196821 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2019.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2018] [Revised: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
We provide an overview of the regulatory framework, pathways and underlying regulatory authority for cell, gene and tissue-engineered therapies in Canada. Canada's regulatory approach uses three sets of regulations, namely, the Cells, Tissues and Organs Regulations, the Food and Drug Regulations and the Medical Devices Regulations. We provide an overview of each these sets of regulations as they apply to clinical investigation to post-market product lifecycle stages. Information is provided on the current sources of relevant Health Canada guidance documents. We highlight several regional success stories including Prochymal, a cell therapy product that achieved Canadian regulatory approval using the conditional marketing approval system. We also examine the perceived gaps in the Canadian regulations and how those gaps are being addressed by interactions between the government, stakeholders and international bodies. We conclude that the risk-benefit approach used by Health Canada for regulatory approval processes is sufficiently flexible to enable to development of novel cell and gene therapy products in Canada, yet stringent enough to protect patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jolene Chisholm
- Cell Therapy Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Arthritis Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Crystal Ruff
- International Society for Cellular Therapy North American Legal and Regulatory Affairs Committee (NA LRA), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Illumina Cambridge Ltd., Cambridge, UK; DRI Biotechnologies, London, UK
| | - Sowmya Viswanathan
- Cell Therapy Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Arthritis Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; International Society for Cellular Therapy North American Legal and Regulatory Affairs Committee (NA LRA), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Institute of Biomaterials & Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sola M, Sanchez-Quevedo C, Martin-Piedra MA, Carriel V, Garzon I, Chato-Astrain J, Garcia-Garcia OD, Alaminos M, Campos F. Evaluation of the awareness of novel advanced therapies among family medicine residents in Spain. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0214950. [PMID: 30943248 PMCID: PMC6447282 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Advanced therapies are increasingly demanded by patients with the intent of treating some incurable conditions. Because family medicine professionals play an important role as health educators, their residency programs should incorporate new knowledge related to advanced therapies. To successfully implement these programs, how family medicine residents perceive these therapies should be investigated. The main components of perception, i.e. conceptual, procedural and attitudinal, refer to knowledge, skills and feelings, respectively. Methods and findings We designed a specific questionnaire to assess the components of perceptions of advanced therapies in 300 medical residents enrolled in the Spanish National Family Medicine Residency Program. Each component consisted of 4 or 5 topics and each topic contained 6 items. Respondents scored highest in the procedural component (average 4.12±1.00), followed by the attitudinal (3.94±1.07) and conceptual component (3.04±1.43). Differences among the three components were statistically significant (p<0.00017). Family medicine residents perceived that procedures to implement advanced therapies are well established, especially their application. However, they felt their cognitive background was insufficient to respond efficiently to the expectations generated by these new therapeutic tools, especially in the regulatory framework. High awareness of the risks and limitations of these treatments was reflected by residents’ preference for clinically tested therapies. Although they appropriately situated treatment with these therapies within hospital care, they associated the biofabrication of novel products with research centers, although these therapeutic tools can be produced in different facilities. Conclusions These results are potentially useful for designing future training programs and health policies for family medicine residents, and suggest the need to implement specific training programs in advanced therapies at the conceptual, procedural and attitudinal level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Sola
- Family Medicine Unit, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Carmen Sanchez-Quevedo
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
- Department of Histology (Tissue Engineering Group), School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Miguel A. Martin-Piedra
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
- Department of Histology (Tissue Engineering Group), School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Victor Carriel
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
- Department of Histology (Tissue Engineering Group), School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Ingrid Garzon
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
- Department of Histology (Tissue Engineering Group), School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Jesus Chato-Astrain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
- Department of Histology (Tissue Engineering Group), School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Oscar-Dario Garcia-Garcia
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
- Department of Histology (Tissue Engineering Group), School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Miguel Alaminos
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
- Department of Histology (Tissue Engineering Group), School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- * E-mail:
| | - Fernando Campos
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
- Department of Histology (Tissue Engineering Group), School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
CORR® International - Asia-Pacific: Stem Cell-based Treatments in Orthopaedic Clinical Practice-Is it Ready For Primetime in the Asia-Pacific Region? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477:695-697. [PMID: 30829690 PMCID: PMC6437390 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000000697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
15
|
Tanner C, Munsie M, Sipp D, Turner L, Wheatland C. The politics of evidence in online illness narratives: An analysis of crowdfunding for purported stem cell treatments. Health (London) 2019; 23:436-457. [DOI: 10.1177/1363459319829194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Doug Sipp
- RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shapiro SA, Smith CG, Arthurs JR, Master Z. Preparing regenerative therapies for clinical application: proposals for responsible translation. Regen Med 2019; 14:77-84. [DOI: 10.2217/rme-2018-0163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shane A Shapiro
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
- Mayo Clinic Center for Regenerative Medicine, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Cambray G Smith
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Jennifer R Arthurs
- Mayo Clinic Center for Regenerative Medicine, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Zubin Master
- Mayo Clinic Center for Regenerative Medicine, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Datta S. An endogenous explanation of growth: direct-to-consumer stem cell therapies in PR China, India and the USA. Regen Med 2018; 13:559-579. [PMID: 30129871 DOI: 10.2217/rme-2017-0144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The recent expansion of direct-to-consumer stem cell therapies (DSCTs) across nations where medical malpractice laws are the strongest globally challenges the causal assumption that low regulatory standards in developing countries bolster DSCTs. Drawing on firm-level data of existing biopharmaceuticals, approved stem cell therapies (SCTs) and DSCT clinics across the USA, PR China and India, this paper provides an innovation studies perspective of the ways in which the paradigmatic shift in fundamental knowledge production - from in vitro to in vivo stem cells - is transforming SCT discovery and delivery. It argues that the endogenous and inherent disruptive attributes of SCTs, rather than exogenous conditions like regulations, provide a substantive explanation for the recent expansion of DSCTs and urges regulatory adaptation to endogenous imperatives for effective governance of SCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saheli Datta
- King's College London, Global Health & Social Medicine Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Horner C, Tenenbaum E, Sipp D, Master Z. Can civil lawsuits stem the tide of direct-to-consumer marketing of unproven stem cell interventions. NPJ Regen Med 2018; 3:5. [PMID: 29479481 PMCID: PMC5818472 DOI: 10.1038/s41536-018-0043-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2017] [Revised: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The sale of unproven stem cell interventions (SCIs) by commercial entities has proliferated in highly developed countries, most notably in the USA. Yet, there have been few criminal prosecutions and regulatory enforcement actions against providers who have violated laws and best practice standards due to the lack of resources and legal ambiguity. While the stem cell research community has invested much in protecting patients and preventing the growth of this industry, some patients are seeking remedies under civil law to hold stem cell clinics responsible for fraudulent practices. Several patients have filed lawsuits against providers demanding compensation for physical injuries caused by unproven treatments and financial losses due to fraud and false advertising. Lawsuits can be used as a tool not only to compensate plaintiffs but also to achieve positive public health and policy outcomes. In this paper, we explore the value of a public health litigation strategy as a countermeasure against the exploitative practices of the unproven SCI industry by analyzing stem cell lawsuits and comparing them with other major public health litigation efforts. We argue that stem cell lawsuits complement other approaches to reining in unsafe practices. In particular, stem cell lawsuits could intensify publicity and raise awareness of the harms of unproven treatments, set legal precedent, reshape the media narrative from one focused on the right to try or practice to one highlighting the need for adequate safety and efficacy standards, and encourage authorities to turn their attention to policy reform and enforcement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Horner
- 1Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Suite 310D, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Evelyn Tenenbaum
- 2Albany Law School, 80 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, NY 12208-3494 USA.,3Alden March Bioethics Institute, Albany Medical College, 47 New Scotland Avenue, MC 153, Albany, NY 12208-3478 USA
| | - Douglas Sipp
- 4RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, 2-2-3 Minatojima, Minamimachi Chuo-ku, Kobe, Japan.,5Department of Physiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582 Japan.,Keio University Global Research Institute, 2-15-45, Mita, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8345 Japan.,RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, Nihonbashi 1-chome Mitsui Building, 15th floor, 1-4-1 Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0027 Japan
| | - Zubin Master
- 8Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, NY 55905 USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
There are widespread concerns with the ways in which 'unproven' stem cell therapies are advertised to patients. This article explores the potential and limits of using laws that regulate advertising and promotion as a tool to address these concerns. It examines general consumer protection laws and laws and policies on advertising medical products and services, focusing on the USA, Canada and Australia. The content of existing laws and policies covers most of the marketing practices that cause concern, but several systemic factors are likely to limit enforcement efforts. Potential reforms in Australia that would prevent direct-to-consumer advertising of autologous cell therapies are justified in principle and should be considered by other jurisdictions, but again face important practical limits to their effectiveness.
Collapse
|
20
|
Tanner C, Petersen A, Munsie M. ‘No one here's helping me, what do you do?’: addressing patient need for support and advice about stem cell treatments. Regen Med 2017; 12:791-801. [DOI: 10.2217/rme-2017-0056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: This article examines how those who contemplate purported stem cell treatments (SCTs) negotiate available information sources and the adequacy of current approaches to guidance and support. Materials & methods: Qualitative interviews undertaken with people who had contemplated or undergone purported SCTs for a range of conditions (n = 24 and n = 27, respectively), as well as professionals who are frequently asked about SCTs (n = 20) were analyzed. Results: Our findings reveal the difficulties for individuals in discriminating between different sources of information on SCTs and the limitations of current responses. Conclusion: In the context of contending information about SCTs informal (‘accidental’) advisors potentially play a crucial role in supporting patients. Additional approaches are also required to better address patients’ needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Tanner
- Department of Anatomy & Neuroscience, Center for Stem Cell Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alan Petersen
- Sociology, School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Megan Munsie
- Department of Anatomy & Neuroscience, Center for Stem Cell Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation: A Roadmap about Good Clinical Practice and Patient Care. Stem Cells Int 2017; 2017:5080259. [PMID: 29090010 PMCID: PMC5635281 DOI: 10.1155/2017/5080259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2017] [Revised: 07/27/2017] [Accepted: 09/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The latest research achievements in the field of stem cells led in 2016 to the publication of “Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation” by the International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR). Updating the topics covered in previous publications, the new recommendations offer interesting ethical and scientific insights. Under the common principles of research integrity, protection of patient's welfare, respect for the research subjects, transparency and social justice, the centrality of good clinical practice, and informed consent in research and translational medicine is supported. The guidelines implement the abovementioned publications, requiring rigor in all areas of research, promoting the validity of the scientific activity results and emphasizing the need for an accurate and efficient public communication. This paper aims to analyze the aforementioned guidelines in order to provide a valid interpretive tool for experts. In particular, a research activity focused on the bioethical, scientific, and social implications of the new recommendations is carried out in order to provide food for thought. Finally, as an emerging issue of potential impact of current guidelines, an overview on implications of compensation for egg donation is offered.
Collapse
|
22
|
Matthews KRW, Iltis AS. Unproven Stem Cell-Based Interventions: Advancing Policy through Stakeholder Collaboration. Tex Heart Inst J 2017; 44:171-173. [PMID: 28761396 DOI: 10.14503/thij-17-6244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
23
|
Fung M, Yuan Y, Atkins H, Shi Q, Bubela T. Responsible Translation of Stem Cell Research: An Assessment of Clinical Trial Registration and Publications. Stem Cell Reports 2017; 8:1190-1201. [PMID: 28416287 PMCID: PMC5425617 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2016] [Revised: 03/11/2017] [Accepted: 03/12/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
We assessed the extent to which the publication of clinical trial results of innovative cell-based interventions reflects International Society for Stem Cell Research best practice guidelines. We assessed: (1) characteristics and time to publication of completed trials; (2) quality of reported trials; and (3) results of published trials. We identified and analyzed publications from 1,052 novel stem cell clinical trials: 179 (45.4%) of 393 completed trials had published results; 48 trials were registered by known stem cell tourism clinics, none of which reported results. Completed non-industry-sponsored trials initially published more rapidly, but differences with industry-sponsored trials decreased over time. Most publications reported safety, and 67.3% (mainly early-stage trials) reported positive outcomes. A higher proportion of industry trials reported positive efficacy. Heightened patient expectations for stem cell therapies give rise to ethical obligations for the transparent conduct of clinical trials. Reporting guidelines need to be developed that are specific to early-phase clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moses Fung
- School of Public Health, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada; Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R7, Canada
| | - Yan Yuan
- School of Public Health, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Harold Atkins
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Qian Shi
- School of Public Health, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Tania Bubela
- School of Public Health, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Liska MG, Crowley MG, Borlongan CV. Regulated and Unregulated Clinical Trials of Stem Cell Therapies for Stroke. Transl Stroke Res 2017; 8:93-103. [PMID: 28127687 DOI: 10.1007/s12975-017-0522-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2017] [Accepted: 01/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael G Liska
- Center of Excellence for Aging and Brain Repair, Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Marci G Crowley
- Center of Excellence for Aging and Brain Repair, Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Cesar V Borlongan
- Center of Excellence for Aging and Brain Repair, Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
The path to successful commercialization of cell and gene therapies: empowering patient advocates. Cytotherapy 2016; 19:293-298. [PMID: 27956199 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2016.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2016] [Revised: 10/28/2016] [Accepted: 10/31/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Often, novel gene and cell therapies provide hope for many people living with incurable diseases. To facilitate and accelerate a successful regulatory approval and commercialization path for effective, safe and affordable cell and gene therapies, the involvement of patient advocacy groups (PAGs) should be considered early in the development process. This report provides a thorough overview of the various roles PAGs play in the clinical translation of cell and gene therapies and how they can bring about positive changes in the regulatory process, infrastructure improvements and market stability.
Collapse
|
26
|
Master Z, McDonald M, Paciulli D, Longstaff H. A Primer on Ethics Education for Stem Cell and Biomedical Scientists. CURRENT STEM CELL REPORTS 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s40778-016-0064-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
27
|
Sharpe K, Di Pietro N, Jacob KJ, Illes J. A Dichotomy of Information-Seeking and Information-Trusting: Stem Cell Interventions and Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2016; 12:438-47. [DOI: 10.1007/s12015-016-9667-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
28
|
Du L, Rachul C, Guo Z, Caulfield T. Gordie Howe's "Miraculous Treatment": Case Study of Twitter Users' Reactions to a Sport Celebrity's Stem Cell Treatment. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2016; 2:e8. [PMID: 27227162 PMCID: PMC4869214 DOI: 10.2196/publichealth.5264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2015] [Revised: 12/20/2015] [Accepted: 01/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Former Detroit Red Wing Gordie Howe received stem cell (SC) treatment in Mexico in December 2014 for a stroke he suffered in October 2014. The news about his positive response to the SC treatment prompted discussion on social networks like Twitter. Objective This study aims to provide information about discussions that took place on Twitter regarding Howe’s SC treatment and SC treatment in general. In particular, this study examines whether tweets portrayed a positive or negative attitude towards Howe’s SC treatment, whether or not tweets mention that the treatment is unproven, and whether the tweets mention risks associated with the SC treatment. Methods This is an infodemiology study, harnessing big data published on the Internet for public health research and analysis of public engagement. A corpus of 2783 tweets about Howe’s SC treatment was compiled using a program that collected English-language tweets from December 19, 2014 at 00:00 to February 7, 2015 at 00:00. A content analysis of the corpus was conducted using a coding framework developed through a two-stage process. Results 78.87% (2195/2783) of tweets mentioned improvements to Howe’s health. Only one tweet explicitly mentioned that Howe’s SC treatment was unproven, and 3 tweets warned that direct-to-consumer SC treatments lacked scientific evidence. In addition, 10.31% (287/2783) of tweets mentioned challenges with SC treatment that have been raised by scientists and researchers, and 3.70% (103/2783) of tweets either defined Howe as a “stem cell tourist” or claimed that his treatment was part of “stem cell tourism”. In general, 71.79% (1998/2783) of tweets portrayed a positive attitude towards Howe’s SC treatment. Conclusions Our study found the responses to Howe’s treatment on Twitter to be overwhelmingly positive. There was far less attention paid to the lack of scientific evidence regarding the efficacy of the treatment. Unbalanced and uncritical discussion on Twitter regarding SC treatments is another example of inaccurate representations of SC treatments that may create unrealistic expectations that will facilitate the market for unproven stem cell therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Du
- Health Law Institute Faculty of Law University of Alberta Edmonton, AB Canada
| | - Christen Rachul
- School of Linguistics and Language Studies Carleton University Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Zhaochen Guo
- Department of Computing Science University of Alberta Edmonton, AB Canada
| | - Timothy Caulfield
- Health Law Institute, Law Centre, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Matthews KRW, Iltis AS. Unproven stem cell-based interventions and achieving a compromise policy among the multiple stakeholders. BMC Med Ethics 2015; 16:75. [PMID: 26537611 PMCID: PMC4634187 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-015-0069-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2015] [Accepted: 10/25/2015] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2004, patient advocate groups were major players in helping pass and implement significant public policy and funding initiatives in stem cells and regenerative medicine. In the following years, advocates were also actively engaged in Washington DC, encouraging policy makers to broaden embryonic stem cell research funding, which was ultimately passed after President Barack Obama came into office. Many advocates did this because they were told stem cell research would lead to cures. After waiting more than 10 years, many of these same patients are now approaching clinics around the world offering experimental stem cell-based interventions instead of waiting for scientists in the US to complete clinical trials. How did the same groups who were once (and often still are) the strongest supporters of stem cell research become stem cell tourists? And how can scientists, clinicians, and regulators work to bring stem cell patients back home to the US and into the clinical trial process? DISCUSSION In this paper, we argue that the continued marketing and use of experimental stem cell-based interventions is problematic and unsustainable. Central problems include the lack of patient protection, US liability standards, regulation of clinical sites, and clinician licensing. These interventions have insufficient evidence of safety and efficacy; patients may be wasting money and time, and they may be forgoing other opportunities for an intervention that has not been shown to be safe and effective. Current practices do not contribute to scientific progress because the data from the procedures are unsuitable for follow-up research to measure outcomes. In addition, there is no assurance for patients that they are receiving the interventions promised or of what dosage they are receiving. Furthermore, there is inconsistent or non-existent follow-up care. Public policy should be developed to correct the current situation. CONCLUSION The current landscape of stem cell tourism should prompt a re-evaluation of current approaches to study cell-based interventions with respect to the design, initiation, and conduct of US clinical trials. Stakeholders, including scientists, clinicians, regulators and patient advocates, need to work together to find a compromise to keep patients in the US and within the clinical trial process. Using HIV/AIDS and breast cancer advocate cases as examples, we identify key priorities and goals for this policy effort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirstin R W Matthews
- Center for Health and Biosciences at the Baker Institute for Public Policy, 6100 Main Street MS40, Houston, TX, 77005, USA.
| | - Ana S Iltis
- Department of Philosophy and Center for Bioethics, Health and Society, Wake Forest University, 1834 Wake Forest Road, Winston-Salem, NC, 27106, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Perspectives on strategies and challenges in the conversation about stem cells for spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2015; 53:811-5. [PMID: 26032752 DOI: 10.1038/sc.2015.96] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2015] [Revised: 04/20/2015] [Accepted: 05/01/2015] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Qualitative study. OBJECTIVE To examine how trusted communication between individuals with spinal cord injury (ISCIs) and physicians who care for ISCIs is affected by the discussion of advances in stem cell research and interventions locally and abroad. SETTING Canada and the United States (US). METHODS Semi-structured interviews with ISCIs and physicians. A thematic analysis approach was applied to more than 12 h of data to derive prominent themes and describe relationships between them. RESULTS A convergence of factors involving transparency impact trusted communication between ISCIs and physicians about stem cells and spinal cord injury (SCI). ISCIs expressed that trusted communication is strengthened when physicians exhibit caring, attentive and positive attitudes that are underpinned by domain-specific knowledge and scholarship. Perceived reluctance to communicate or lack of knowledge poses significant challenges. Physicians also emphasised the importance of transparency for trusted communication but expressed that the still limited clinical reality of treatment choices for SCI and the pressures imposed by external resources are significant stressors that complicate the communication landscape. Both groups cited the range and variable quality of information sources, and the difficulty associated with navigating them, as priorities for action that would remediate these tensions. CONCLUSIONS (1) Epistemic transparency should be privileged over silence. (2) A new generation of innovations in research and clinical trial dissemination about stem cells for SCI is needed to remedy the perceived inadequacies of existing information content and accessibility.
Collapse
|
31
|
Knoepfler PS. From bench to FDA to bedside: US regulatory trends for new stem cell therapies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2015; 82-83:192-6. [PMID: 25489841 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2014] [Revised: 12/01/2014] [Accepted: 12/01/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The phrase "bench-to-bedside" is commonly used to describe the translation of basic discoveries such as those on stem cells to the clinic for therapeutic use in human patients. However, there is a key intermediate step in between the bench and the bedside involving governmental regulatory oversight such as by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States (US). Thus, it might be more accurate in most cases to describe the stem cell biological drug development process in this way: from bench to FDA to bedside. The intermediate development and regulatory stage for stem cell-based biological drugs is a multifactorial, continually evolving part of the process of developing a biological drug such as a stem cell-based regenerative medicine product. In some situations, stem cell-related products may not be classified as biological drugs in which case the FDA plays a relatively minor role. However, this middle stage is generally a major element of the process and is often colloquially referred to in an ominous way as "The Valley of Death". This moniker seems appropriate because it is at this point, and in particular in the work that ensues after Phase 1, clinical trials that most drug product development is terminated, often due to lack of funding, diseases being refractory to treatment, or regulatory issues. Not surprisingly, workarounds to deal with or entirely avoid this difficult stage of the process are evolving both inside and outside the domains of official regulatory authorities. In some cases these efforts involve the FDA invoking new mechanisms of accelerating the bench to beside process, but in other cases these new pathways bypass the FDA in part or entirely. Together these rapidly changing stem cell product development and regulatory pathways raise many scientific, ethical, and medical questions. These emerging trends and their potential consequences are reviewed here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul S Knoepfler
- Department of Cell Biology and Human Anatomy, University of California Davis School of Medicine, 4303 Tupper Hall, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Genome Center, University of California Davis School of Medicine, 451 Health Sciences Drive, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Institute of Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Shriners Hospital For Children Northern California, 2425 Stockton Blvd., Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Scott CT. The case for stem cell counselors. Stem Cell Reports 2014; 4:1-6. [PMID: 25483110 PMCID: PMC4297874 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2014] [Revised: 10/30/2014] [Accepted: 10/31/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
In this article, Scott describes how a new counseling profession could support clinical sites and patients enrolling in stem cell clinical trials. A possible model is proposed, along with a curriculum that would provide counselors with the tools to address challenges facing the clinical stem cell field. Finally, a candidate recruitment and clinical site interface scheme is offered.
Collapse
|