Meta-analysis of clinical outcome after first and second liver resection for colorectal metastases

Consideration of Metastasis-Directed Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Expert Survey and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

A survey of medical oncologists (MOs), radiation oncologists (ROs), and surgical oncologists (SOs) who are experts in the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was conducted to identify factors used to consider metastasis-directed therapy (MDT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online survey to assess clinical factors when weighing MDT in patients with mCRC was developed based on systematic review of the literature and integrated with clinical vignettes. Supporting evidence from the systematic review was included to aid in answering questions.

RESULTS

Among 75 experts on mCRC invited, 47 (response rate 62.7%) chose to participate including 16 MOs, 16 ROs, and 15 SOs. Most experts would not consider MDT in patients with 3 lesions in both the liver and lung regardless of distribution or timing of metastatic disease diagnosis (6 vs. 36 months after definitive treatment). Similarly, for patients with retroperitoneal lymph node and lung and liver involvement, most experts would not offer MDT regardless of timing of metastatic disease diagnosis. In general, SOs were willing to consider MDT in patients with more advanced disease, ROs were more willing to offer treatment regardless of metastatic site location, and MOs were the least likely to consider MDT.

CONCLUSIONS

Among experts caring for patients with mCRC, significant variation was noted among MOs, ROs, and SOs in the distribution and volume of metastatic disease for which MDT would be considered. This variability highlights differing opinions on management of these patients and underscores the need for well-designed prospective randomized trials to characterize the risks and potential benefits of MDT.

Long-term survival after hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a single-center study in Iran

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) has been associated with improved survival in these patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of liver metastasectomy, also finding independent factors related to survival after liver metastasectomy.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, all patients with CRLM who underwent resection of liver metastases between 2012 and 2022 at Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex in Tehran, Iran, were enrolled. All patients were actively followed based on clinicopathologic and operative data.

RESULTS

A total of 248 patients with a median follow-up time of 46 months (Range, 12 to 122) were studied. Eighty-six patients (35.0%) underwent major hepatectomy, whereas 160 (65.0%) underwent minor hepatectomy. The median overall survival was 43 months (Range, 0 to 122 months), with estimated 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates of 91%, 56%, and 42%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a metastasis size > 6 cm, major hepatectomy, rectum as the primary tumor site, and involved margin (< 1 mm) were independent factors associated with decreased overall survival (OS).

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection is an effective treatment for patients with CRLM that is associated with relatively favorable survival. A negative margin of 1 mm seems to be sufficient for oncological resection.

Investigation of anti-adhesion ability of 8-arm PEGNHS-modified porcine pericardium

In post-adhesion surgery, there is a clinical need for anti-adhesion membranes specifically designed for the liver, given the limited efficacy of current commercial products. To address this demand, we present a membrane suitable for liver surgery applications, fabricated through the modification of decellularized porcine pericardium with 20 KDa hexaglycerol octa (succinimidyloxyglutaryl) polyoxyethylene (8-arm PEGNHS). We also developed an optimized modification procedure to produce a high-performance anti-adhesion barrier. The modified membrane significantly inhibited fibroblast cell adherence while maintaining minimal levels of inflammation. By optimizing the modification ratio, we successfully controlled post-adhesion formation. Notably, the 8-arm PEG-modified pericardium with a molar ratio of 5 exhibited the ability to effectively prevent post-adhesion formation on the liver compared to both the control and Seprafilm®, with a low adhesion score of 0.5 out of 3.0. Histological analysis further confirmed its potential for easy separation. Furthermore, the membrane demonstrated regenerative capabilities, as evidenced by the proliferation of mesothelial cells on its surface, endowing anti-adhesion properties between the abdominal wall and liver. These findings highlight the membrane's potential as a reliable barrier for repeated liver resection procedures that require the removal of the membrane multiple times.

Effect of multi arm-PEG-NHS (polyethylene glycol n-hydroxysuccinimide) branching on cell adhesion to modified decellularized bovine and porcine pericardium

Implanting physical barrier materials to separate wounds from their surroundings is a promising strategy for preventing postoperative adhesions. Herein, we develop a material that switches from an anti-adhesive surface to an adhesive surface, preventing adhesion in the early stage of transplantation and then promoting recellularization. In this study, 2-arm, 4-arm, and 8-arm poly(ethylene glycol) succinimidyl glutarate (2-, 4-, 8-arm PEG-NHS) were used to modify the surface of decellularized porcine and bovine pericardium. The number of free amines on the surface of each material significantly decreased following modification regardless of the reaction molar ratio of NH2 and NHS, the number of PEG molecule branches, and the animal species of the decellularized tissue. The structure and mechanical properties of the pericardium were maintained after modification with PEG molecules. The time taken for the PEG molecules to detach through hydrolysis of the ester bonds differed between the samples, which resulted in different cell repulsion periods. By adjusting the reaction molar ratio, the number of PEG molecule branches, and the animal species of the decellularized pericardium, the duration of cell repulsion can be controlled and is expected to provide an anti-adhesion material for a variety of surgical procedures.

Outcomes after repeat hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases from the colorectal liver operative metastasis international collaborative (COLOMIC)

BACKGROUND

Resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) is beneficial when feasible. However, the benefit of second hepatectomy for hepatic recurrence in CLM remains unclear.

METHODS

The Colorectal Liver Operative Metastasis International Collaborative retrospectively examined 1004 CLM cases from 2000 to 2018 from a total of 953 patients. Hepatic recurrence after initial hepatectomy was identified in 218 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to offset selection bias. Cox proportional-hazards regression was performed to identify risk factors associated with OS.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients underwent second hepatectomy. Unadjusted median OS was 60.1 months in repeat-hepatectomy versus 38.3 months in the single-hepatectomy group (p = 0.015). In the PSM population, median OS remained significantly better in the repeat-hepatectomy group (60.1 vs. 33.1 months; p = 0.0023); median RFS was 12.4 months for the repeat-hepatectomy group, versus 9.8 months in the single-hepatectomy group (p = 0.0050). Repeat hepatectomy was associated with lower risk of death (hazard ratio: 0.283; p = 0.000012). Obesity, tobacco use, and high intraoperative blood loss were associated with significant risk of death (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In CLM with hepatic recurrence, second hepatectomy was beneficial for OS. With PSM, the OS benefit of performing a second hepatectomy remained significant.

Predicting morbidity in liver resection surgery: external validation of the revised frailty index and development of a novel predictive model

BACKGROUND

Perioperative complications of liver resection surgery are common but individual patient-level prediction is difficult. Most risk models are unvalidated and may not be clinically useful. We aimed to validate a risk prediction model for complications of liver resection, the Revised Frailty Index (rFI), at a high volume centre. We also aimed to derive a predictive model for complications in our cohort.

METHODS

Records were reviewed for 300 patients undergoing liver resection. The rFI's discrimination of 90-day major complications was assessed by receiver operating curve analysis. Logistic regression analysis was then used to fit rFI covariates to our dataset. A further analysis produced a model with optimal discrimination of 90-day major complications.

RESULTS

The rFI was a poor discriminator of 90-day major complications (AUROC 0.562) among patients at our centre. The rFI optimised fit model demonstrated improved discrimination of 90-day major complications (AUROC 0.685). We developed a novel model with improved fit and similar discrimination (AUROC 0.710).

CONCLUSION

We were unable to validate the rFI as a predictor of complications. We developed a novel model with discrimination at least equal to other published risk models. However, there is an unmet need for well-validated, clinically useful risk tools in this area.

Hepatectomy and liver regeneration in the results of treatment of colorectal liver metastasis

Introduction

Hepatectomy is currently the most reliable treatment modality for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This paper describes and discusses the outcomes of initial versus repeat hepatic resection for CRLM.

Material and methods

Between January 2008 and December 2018, we retrospectively analyzed the data of 385 patients who underwent initial and repeat hepatic resection for CRLM at a single institution with respect to surgical outcomes and remnant liver regeneration. The remnant liver volume was postoperatively measured via computed tomography on postoperative day 7 and at 1, 2, 5, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

Results

The liver regeneration rate peaked at 1 week postoperatively, and gradually decreased thereafter. Remnant liver volume plateaued around 1–2 months postoperatively, when regeneration was almost complete. There was no difference in the rate of liver volume regeneration during the entire postoperative period between initial and repeat hepatic resection (p = 0.708, 0.511, 0.055, 0.053, 0.102, and 0.110, respectively). After 2 months postoperatively, the laboratory data showed recovery toward near normal levels, and none of the data exhibited significant differences. There were also no significant differences in morbidity rate, mortality rate, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival after hepatic resection (p = 0.488, 0.124, 0.071 and 0.387, respectively).

Conclusions

Initial and repeat hepatectomy showed similar outcomes of remnant liver regeneration and short- and long-term prognoses.

Evaluation of adhesion barrier types in a rat hepatectomy-induced adhesion model

Background

Adhesion formation after hepatectomy creates problems for repeat hepatectomy. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a spray (AdSpray) and sheet adhesion barrier (Seprafilm) in a rat hepatectomy-induced adhesion model.

Methods

Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent partial resection of the left lateral liver lobe. They were randomly assigned to control (n = 10), AdSpray (n = 10), and Seprafilm groups. Seven days after surgery, the animals were sacrificed, and adhesions at the hepatic resection surface were blindly evaluated.

Results

In the control group, adhesions were formed in all 10 animals (100%), with a 69% adhesion extent (mean). In the AdSpray group, the incidence of adhesions (40%) and the adhesion extent (mean, 10%) were significantly lower than in the control group (incidence; p = 0.0147, adhesion extent; p = 0.0007). In the Seprafilm group, the incidence of adhesions was 70%. The adhesion extent of Seprafilm (mean, 30%) was significantly lower than in the control group (p = 0.0492). No significant differences were observed between the AdSpray and Seprafilm groups. As for histopathological examination, animals in the AdSpray group showed a similar healing profile to that of the control group without delayed healing and regeneration of mesothelial cells. In contrast, the Seprafilm group showed ongoing foreign body reaction to Seprafilm, and regeneration of mesothelial cells was immature at 7 days.

Conclusions

Both the spray-type gel and sheet adhesion barriers significantly reduced adhesion formation after hepatectomy. The spray-type adhesion barrier caused no adverse events and induced favorable healing. These adhesion barriers may be effective in hepatectomy. Further animal studies and clinical trials are required to determine their benefits in clinical use.

MRI Findings of Liver Parenchyma Peripheral to Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A Potential Predictor of Long-term Prognosis

Background Gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI is superior to CT in the detection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) smaller than 10 mm. However, few studies have used MRI findings to predict patients' long-term prognosis. Purpose To investigate the relationship between Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI findings in the liver parenchyma peripheral to CRLM and both pathologic vessel invasion and long-term prognosis. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI before curative surgery for CRLM, without neoadjuvant chemotherapy, between July 2008 and June 2015. Early enhancement, reduced Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake, and bile duct dilatation peripheral to the CRLM at MRI were evaluated by three abdominal radiologists. All tumor specimens were reevaluated for the presence or absence of portal vein, hepatic vein, and bile duct invasion. Predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after surgery were identified with Cox proportional hazard model with the Bayesian information criterion. Previously reported prognosticators were selected for multivariable analyses. The median follow-up period was 60 months (range, 9-127 months). Results Overall, 106 patients (mean age, 65 years ± 12 [standard deviation]; 68 men) with 148 CRLMs were evaluated. Bile duct dilatation peripheral to the tumor was associated with pathologic portal vein invasion (sensitivity, 12 of 50 [24%]; specificity, 89 of 98 [91%]; P = .02), bile duct invasion (sensitivity, eight of 19 [42%]; specificity, 116 of 129 [90%]; P = .001), poor RFS (P = .03; hazard ratio [HR] = 2.4 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.3, 4.2]), and poor OS (P = .01; HR = 2.4 [95% CI: 1.2, 4.9]). For RFS and OS, early enhancement and reduced Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake peripheral to the CRLM were eliminated by means of variable selection in the multivariable analysis, but the combination of these findings with bile duct dilatation provided a predictor of poor OS (P = .001; HR = 3.3 [95% CI: 1.6, 6.8]). Conclusion MRI signal intensity changes peripheral to the colorectal liver metastasis were predictors of long-term prognosis after curative surgery without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Bashir in this issue.

Shanghai international consensus on diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of colorectal liver metastases (version 2019)

The liver is the most common anatomical site for hematogenous metastases from colorectal cancer. Therefore effective treatment of liver metastases is one of the most challenging elements in the management of colorectal cancer. However, there is rare available clinical consensus or guideline only focusing on colorectal liver metastases. After six rounds of discussion by 195 clinical experts of the Shanghai International Consensus Expert Group on Colorectal Liver Metastases (SINCE) from 29 countries or regions, the Shanghai Consensus has been finally completed, based on current research and expert experience. The consensus emphasized the principle of multidisciplinary team, provided detailed diagnosis approaches, and guided precise local and systemic treatments. This Shanghai Consensus might be of great significance to standardized diagnosis and treatment of colorectal liver metastases all over the world.

Repeat hepatectomy for recurred colorectal liver metastasis: is it justified?

Purpose

Liver resection is considered the only curative treatment modality for colorectal liver metastasis. The recurrence rate after hepatectomy is >50%. Two or more hepatectomies are applied to treat recurred metastases. We assessed the efficiency and feasibility of repeat hepatectomy and analyzed the prognostic factors after a repeat hepatectomy.

Methods

In total, 248 patients were diagnosed with recurred liver metastasis between January 2003 and May 2016. Second and third hepatectomies were performed in 70 and 7 patients, respectively. The other 171 patients did not undergo a repeat hepatectomy. Clinical features were collected from the medical records. We analyzed survival rates of the repeat hepatectomy group and the nonrepeat hepatectomy group. We also investigated factors affecting overall and disease-free survival of patients who received a repeat hepatectomy using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Median overall survival was significantly higher in the repeat hepatectomy group than in the nonrepeat group (83.0 months vs. 25.0 months, P < 0.001). The morbidity and mortality rates of repeat hepatectomy were 9.1% and 0%, respectively. Median overall and disease-free survival of the repeat hepatectomy group were 62.0 and 51.0 months, respectively. The number of recurred tumors was the only significant factor for disease-free survival (P = 0.029). None of the factors affected overall survival.

Conclusion

Repeat hepatectomy is necessary, effective, and safe for treating recurred colorectal liver metastasis. Repeat hepatectomy can be considered in patients with fewer than three recurred metastatic tumors.

Repeat procedures for recurrent colorectal liver metastases: analysis of long-term liver regeneration and outcome

Background and aim: Repeat hepatectomy is increasingly performed for the management of recurrent colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term functional liver volume (FLV) after a second hepatic procedure and to measure survival outcome. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients treated for recurrent CRLM in the years 2005-2015 at two liver centers were included. Total FLV was calculated before the first procedure and before and after the second procedure. Overall survival was calculated. Results: Eighty-two patients were identified. The median follow-up was 53 (40-71) months from the first procedure. The median interval between first and second procedure was 13 (8-22) months. The initial FLV was 1584 (1313-1927) mL. The FLV was 1438 (1204-1896) mL after the first procedure and 1470 (1172-1699) mL after the second procedure (P<0.001). After the second procedure, a total of ten patients (12%) had a residual liver volume of less than 75% of the initial liver volume. The 5-year overall survival was 37 (26-54)% after the second procedure. Conclusion: Small changes in FLV were found after two hepatic procedures but with considerable inter-individual variation. Patients selected for a repeated hepatic procedure for recurrent CRLM had an acceptable survival.

Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of colorectal liver metastases (version 2018)

The liver is the most common anatomical site for hematogenous metastases of colorectal cancer, and colorectal liver metastases is one of the most difficult and challenging points in the treatment of colorectal cancer. To improve the diagnosis and comprehensive treatment in China, the Guidelines have been edited and revised several times since 2008, including the overall evaluation, personalized treatment goals and comprehensive treatments, to prevent the occurrence of liver metastases, improve the resection rate of liver metastases and survival. The revised Guideline includes the diagnosis and follow-up, prevention, MDT effect, surgery and local ablative treatment, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, and comprehensive treatment, and with advanced experience, latest results, detailed content, and strong operability.

Graft reduction using a powered stapler in pediatric living donor liver transplantation

Large-for-size syndrome is defined by inadequate tissue oxygenation, which results in vascular complications and graft compression after abdominal closure in living donor liver transplantation recipients. An accurate graft reduction that matches the optimal liver volume for the recipient is essential. We herein initially present the feasibility and safety of graft reduction using a powered stapler to obtain an optimal graft size. From October 1996 to October 2015, a total of eight graft reductions were performed using a powered stapler (group A; n=4) or by the conventional method using a cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator and portal triad suturing (group B; n=4). The background, intraoperative findings and the post-operative outcomes of these eight patients were retrospectively investigated. There were no statistically significant differences in the background of the patients in the two groups. Graft reduction was successfully achieved without any intraoperative complications in group A, whereas intraoperative complications, such as bleeding and bile leakage, occurred in two patients of group B. No post-operative surgical complications were detected on computed tomography; moreover, the serum aspartate aminotransferase level normalized significantly earlier in group A (P<.05). In summary, graft reduction using a powered stapler was feasible and safe in comparison with the conventional method.

Trans-arterial chemoperfusion for the treatment of liver metastases of breast cancer and colorectal cancer: Clinical results in palliative care patients

AIM

To evaluate the clinical value and efficiency of trans-arterial chemoperfusion (TACP) in patients with liver metastases from breast cancer (BC) and colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

We treated 36 patients with liver metastases of BC (n = 19, 19 females) and CRC (n = 17; 8 females, 9 males) with repeated TACP. The treatment interval was 4 wk. TACP was performed with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m²) and mitomycin (10 mg/m²), administered within 1 h after positioning the catheter tip in the hepatic artery. Before treatment, the size, location, tumour volume, vascularization and number of liver tumours were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Tumour response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines.

RESULTS

TACP using gemcitabine and mitomycin for metastases from CRC and BC was performed without any serious side effects. The follow-up MRI showed a therapeutic response in 84.2% of the BC patients - stable disease 47.4% and partial response 36.8%. A progression was seen in 15.8%. CRC patients showed a therapeutic response in 52.9% of cases. A progression of the disease was documented in 47.1% of the patients with CRC. These data show that TACP in patients with liver metastases of BC leads to a significantly better therapeutic response compared with CRC patients (P = 0.042). The median survival time was 13.2 mo for the BC patients, which is significantly longer than for CRC patients at 9.3 mo (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

TACP for liver metastases of BC appears to be a safe and effective palliative treatment with improved outcomes in comparison to patients with CRC.

Surgical salvage of recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases: incidence and outcomes

Surgical resection remains the primary curative treatment option for patients with colorectal liver metastases. While the majority of patients will develop tumor relapse within or outside of the liver after hepatic metastasectomy, a subset of these patients may be amenable to salvage surgical resection. However, outcomes for this approach are not well defined. In this article, we summarize the current evidence for the incidence, feasibility and outcomes of salvage resection for recurrence after initial resection of colorectal liver metastases.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the utility of repeated versus single hepatic resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Recurrence of colorectal liver metastases after a first hepatectomy is common (4-48% of patients). This review investigates the utility of repeated hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was performed in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and trial registers. All studies comparing repeated hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases with patients who underwent only one hepatectomy were eligible. Outcome criteria were safety parameters and survival rates. Data were analyzed using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

In eight observational clinical studies, 450 patients with repeated hepatic resection were compared with 2669 single hepatic resections. Morbidity such as hepatic insufficiency (OR [95% CI] 1.46 [0.69; 3.08], p = 0.32) and biliary leakage and fistula (OR [95% CI] 1.22 [0.80; 1.85], p = 0.35) was comparable between the two groups. Mortality (OR [95% CI] 1.13 [0.46; 2.74], p = 0.79) and overall survival (HR [95% CI] 1.00 [0.63; 1.60], p = 0.99) were not significantly different between the two groups.

DISCUSSION

Repeated hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases is safe in selected patients. A prospective, multicenter high-quality trial or register study of repeated hepatic resection will be required to clarify patient-oriented outcomes such as overall survival and quality of life.

Benefit of an implanted solid barrier for the feasibility of a sequence of three different hepato-biliary operations in a small animal model

BACKGROUND

Current liver surgery includes complex multi-stage procedures such as portal vein ligation (PVL) followed by extended liver resection, especially in patients with Klatskin tumours. The risk for severe adhesions increases with every procedure. Finally, this complex sequence could fail because of malignant adhesions. Therefore, we proved the hypothesis of reducing malignant adhesions and increasing feasibility of a sequence with three hepato-biliary operations by implantation of a solid barrier.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We operated in male rats (n=40). Our sequence included as 1st operation bile duct ligation mimicking Klatskin III° or IV°, the 2nd operation was a selective portal vein ligation (sPVL) and 3rd procedure was a 70% liver resection. The mechanical barrier (part of a sterile glove) was implanted at the end of the first operation between the upper (median lobe+left lateral lobe [ML+LLL]) and lower (right lobe+caudate lobe [RL+CL]) rat liver lobes. We assessed the degree of adhesions and the feasibility of the 2nd and 3rd operation by using an established adhesion score (Zühlke) and a feasibility score. The severity of the adhesions and the pro-inflammatory cellular response were further evaluated by morphometry of thickness (HE) of the adhesion layer and quantification of infiltrating neutrophils (ASDCL) in the adhesion layer on the liver surface.

RESULTS

The planned liver resection as the third procedure was only feasible when a mechanical barrier was placed. Extent of cholestasis or time interval between the operations had no significant impact on adhesions score or feasibility of the whole sequence.

CONCLUSION

A sequence of three hepato-biliary operations in a small animal model (rat) is feasible. It should be considered to implant a mechanical barrier in a sequence of more than two surgical interventions in an experimental model in order to assure the feasibility of the final operation.

Identification of liver metastases with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy at two excitation wavelengths

BACKGROUND

Metastasis of colorectal cancer to the liver is the most common indication for hepatic resection in a western population. Incomplete excision of malignancy due to residual microscopic disease normally results in worse patient outcome. Therefore, a method aiding in the real time discrimination of normal and malignant tissue on a microscopic level would be of benefit.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The ability of fluorescent probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) to identify normal and malignant liver tissue was evaluated in an orthotopic murine model of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM). To maximise information yield, two clinical fluorophores, fluorescein and indocyanine green (ICG) were injected and imaged in a dual wavelength approach (488 and 660 nm, respectively). Visual tissue characteristics on pCLE examination were compared with histological features. Fluorescence intensity in both tissues was statistically analysed to elucidate if this can be used to differentiate between normal and malignant tissue.

RESULTS

Fluorescein (488 nm) enabled good visualisation of normal and CRLM tissue, whereas ICG (660 nm) visualisation was limited to normal liver tissue only. Fluorescence intensity in areas of CRLM was typically 53-100% lower than normal hepatic parenchyma. Using general linear mixed modelling and receiver operating characteristic analysis, high fluorescence intensity was found to be statistically more likely in normal hepatic tissue.

CONCLUSION

Real time discrimination between normal liver parenchyma and metastatic tissue with pCLE examination of fluorescein and ICG is feasible. Employing two (rather than a single) fluorophores allows a combination of qualitative and quantitative characteristics to be used to distinguish between hepatic parenchyma and CRLM. Lasers Surg. Med. 49:280-292, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Local Ablation for Solid Tumor Liver Metastases: Techniques and Treatment Efficacy

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for liver metastases from solid tumors, such as colon cancer, breast cancer, neuroendocrine tumors, and sarcomas, have expanded in recent years and now include nonresection methods.

METHODS

The literature focused on the treatment of liver metastases was reviewed for technique, perioperative, and long-term outcomes specifically related to local ablation techniques for liver metastases.

RESULTS

Ablation modalities have become popular as therapies for patients who are not appropriate candidates for surgical resection. Use of these techniques, alone or in combination with other liver-directed therapies (and often systemic therapy), has extended the rate of survival for patients with liver metastases and, at times, offers nearly equivalent disease-free survival rates to surgical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Although surgical resection remains the optimal treatment for liver metastasis, local options, including microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation, can offer similar long-term local control in appropriately selected patients.

Efficacy of repeat hepatectomy for recurrence following curative hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 128 patients

BACKGROUND

Despite improvements in surgery and chemotherapy, most patients develop recurrence after initial hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Following initial hepatectomy for CRLM, patterns and surgical management of recurrence have not been widely reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 128 patients who underwent hepatic resection for CRLM between January 2000 and December 2012. Demographics, operative data, site of recurrence, and long-term survival data were collected and analyzed. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on their site of recurrence as intrahepatic, intra- and extrahepatic, and extrahepatic. In addition, the influence of potential factors on overall survival (OS) in patients with only liver relapse was analyzed through univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

After curative initial hepatectomy, 87 (68.0%) patients had a recurrence: 33 in the intrahepatic group, 11 in the intra- and extrahepatic group, and 43 in the extrahepatic group. The OS for the intra- and extrahepatic group was significantly lower than that for the intrahepatic group. In the intrahepatic group, disease-free interval (DFI) < 12 months and non-repeat hepatectomy were independent poor prognostic factors. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) at the time of hepatectomy was significantly higher in DFI < 12 group than in the DFI ≥ 12 group.

CONCLUSION

Patterns of recurrence following initial hepatectomy for CRLM have important implications for OS. In the intrahepatic recurrence group, short DFI was correlated with high CEA at hepatectomy, and was a poor prognostic factor.

Mortality-related risk factors and long-term survival after 4460 liver resections in Sweden-a population-based study

Purpose

The objectives of this study were to analyze the outcome after hepatectomy and to identify contributing factors to mortality and long-term survival in a population-based setting.

Method

A retrospective, nationwide register study was performed. All patients who underwent hepatectomy in Sweden between 2002 and 2011 were identified in the Swedish Hospital Discharge Registry using their unique personal identification numbers. This cohort was linked to the National Cancer Registry (cancer diagnosis), the National Registry of Causes of Death, and the Migration Registry. Survival analysis by Kaplan-Meier method was performed to assess long-term outcome. A Cox regression model was used to analyze risk factors affecting long-term survival.

Results

Overall, 4460 hepatectomies were performed. The 30- and 90-day mortalities were 1.8 and 3.1 %, respectively. The overall 5- and 10-year survival rates for all diagnoses were 45 and 38 %, respectively. Independent risk factors for 5-year mortality were as follows: patient age, comorbidity, male gender, intrahepatic/extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, extent of hepatectomy, and hepatectomies performed at non-university hospitals. Re-resection (78.1 % with diagnosis “metastasis”) was performed on 374 patients. In these patients, mortality risk decreased by >50 % (HR 0.42; 95 %, CI 0.33–0.53).

Conclusion

In a population-based analysis, liver resections are done with a low mortality risk and good long-term outcome. Patients who underwent resection at a University Hospital showed a significant better outcome compared to patients resected at non-University Hospitals. These results support further centralization of liver surgery. Re-resection should be performed if feasible.

Liver resection for metastases from colorectal cancer in very elderly patients: New surgical horizons

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) may develop liver metastases. Surgical resection remains the best treatment of choice for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) according to resectability criteria, with a long-term survival of 25% up to 41% after 5 years. Advanced age is associated with a higher incidence and co-morbidity, particularly cardiovascular disease, as well as deteriorating physiological reserves. The aim of this study was to analyse the overall and disease-free survival for patients with CRLM according to their chronological age.

METHODS

Patients with CRLM were enrolled in the study. Data on gender, age, co-morbidity, metastasis characteristics (number, size and total metastatic volume (TMV)), use of perioperative chemotherapy and operative and post-operative complications were collected. Then, according to recent World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, the patients were grouped by age. Statistical analysis was performed using the software R (ver. 2.14.1).

RESULTS

Hepatic resection was performed in 149 patients (21 patients in the very elderly group, 79 in the elderly group and 49 in the younger group). The three groups were comparable in terms of operative duration, transfusion rate, length of high-dependency unit (HDU) stay and post-operative hospital stay. The very elderly group showed a non-significant increase in post-operative morbidity. The 30-day and 60-day/inpatient mortality rates increased with age without any significant statistically difference between the three groups (very elderly group 4.8% and 4.8%; elderly group: 2.5% and 3.8%; and younger group 0% and 2%). At 5 years, the overall survival was 28.6% for very elderly patients (≥75 years), 33.3% for elderly patients (≥65 to <75 years) and 43.5% for younger patients (≤65 years). The 1-, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival was similar across the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver resection for CRLM in carefully selected patients above the age of 75 can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates, similar to those in younger patients. Moreover, the severity of CRLM in elderly patients is proven to be lesser than in younger patients. Thus, we can conclude that advanced chronological age cannot be considered a contraindication to hepatic resection for CRLM.

Laparoscopic Parenchymal-Sparing Resections for Nonperipheral Liver Lesions, the Diamond Technique: Technical Aspects, Clinical Outcomes, and Oncologic Efficiency

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of liver lesions has moved toward "parenchymal-sparing" strategies. Although open parenchymal-sparing liver resections are supported by encouraging results, the applicability of the laparoscopic approach for nonperipheral tumors is still questionable. Our aim was to assess the feasibility, safety, and oncologic adequacy of laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing liver resection for nonperipheral lesions with a description of the technique adopted in this setting.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospectively collected single-center database of 517 laparoscopic liver resections was reviewed. Laparoscopic nonperipheral parenchymal-sparing liver resections (LapPSLRs), that is, entirely intraparenchymal limited resections performed on nonperipheral lesions, were selected. Intra- and perioperative outcomes were analyzed along with 3-year actuarial survival for patients with colorectal liver metastases.

RESULTS

The group comprised 49 LapPSLRs. Colorectal liver metastases were the most frequent diagnosis (n = 24 patients). Lesions were located in segments 8, 7, 4a, and 3 in 51%, 8.2%, 36.7%, and 4.1% of cases, respectively. Conversion occurred in 4 patients (8%). Intra- and postoperative short-term outcomes were calculated for the 24 isolated LapPSLR (not associated with any concurrent liver resection). Median operative time and blood loss were 215 minutes and 225 mL, respectively. Pringle maneuver was used in 75% of cases. Postoperative 90-day mortality was nil and morbidity rate was 12.5%. Median postoperative stay was 3 days. Median tumor-free margin was 4 mm and 100% R0 rate was achieved for all LapPSLRs with curative intent. Three-year overall, recurrence-free, and disease-free survival rates were 100%, 65.2%, and 69.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing liver resections for nonperipheral liver lesions are feasible and can be performed safely without compromising perioperative and oncological outcomes.

Recurrence After Partial Hepatectomy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Potentially Curative Role of Salvage Repeat Resection

PURPOSE

Patients with recurrence after complete resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) are considered for repeat resection as a potential salvage therapy (PST). However, outcomes for this approach are not well defined. We sought to analyze the natural history of recurrence and PST in a large cohort of patients with long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Recurrence patterns, treatments, and outcomes in consecutive patients undergoing resection for colorectal liver metastases were analyzed retrospectively. PST was defined as repeat resection of all recurrent disease and effective salvage therapy (EST) as free of disease for 36 months after last PST. Factors associated with PST, EST, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 952 patients who underwent resection, 594 (62 %) experienced recurrence (median interval = 13 months). Initial recurrences involved liver (n = 157,26 %), lung (n = 167,28 %), multiple sites (n = 171,29 %), and other single sites (n = 99,17 %). PST was performed in 160 (27 %) of 594, most commonly with a single site of recurrence (n = 149). Young age (p = 0.01), negative initial resection margin (p = 0.003), initial tumor size <5 cm (p = 0.006), and recurrence pattern (p < 0.001) were independently associated with PST. Thirty-six patients experienced EST (25 % of PSTs). Overall median survival was 61 and 43 months in those with recurrence. Median survival of patients undergoing PST was 87 months compared to 34 months for those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence is common after CLM resection, but 27 % of patients were able to undergo PST. Approximately one-quarter of these experienced EST and may be cured. PST is associated with long-term survival and possible cure, and therefore active surveillance after CLM resection is justified.

Selecting patients for a second hepatectomy for colorectal metastases: an systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Opinions on the suitability of repeat hepatectomy for patients with recurrent colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) vary among studies. We conducted a meta-analysis to establish the criteria for selecting the best candidates for a second hepatectomy.

METHODS

Database and manual searches were performed to identify comparative or prognostic studies published up to October 2013. Outcomes of interest included disease characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and long-term survival after initial and second hepatectomies for patients with CRLM. Study quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and a modified Hayden's score.

RESULTS

A total of 7226 patients from 27 studies were included. Recurrent CRLMs after initial hepatectomy were more likely to be solitary (RR = 0.86, P = 0.045), unilobar (RR = 0.60, P < 0.001), and smaller (WMD = -0.66, P < 0.001). Postoperative morbidity and mortality were comparable between initial and second hepatectomies (RR = 1.10, P = 0.191; RR = 0.78, P = 0.678, respectively). In high-quality studies, patients showed better survival after a second hepatectomy than those after a single hepatectomy (HR = 0.68, P = 0.022). Patients meeting the following six predictors survived longer after second hepatectomy: disease-free survival after initial hepatectomy >1 y (P = 0.034); solitary CRLM at second hepatectomy (P < 0.001); unilobar CRLM at second hepatectomy (P = 0.009); maximal size of CRLM at second hepatectomy ≤ 5 cm (P = 0.035); lack of extrahepatic metastases at second hepatectomy (P < 0.001); and R0 resection at second hepatectomy (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Second hepatectomy is a safe and feasible procedure for patients with recurrent CRLM. In fact, in well-selected patients it improves overall survival. The established criteria can help clinicians to select the best candidates for second hepatectomy and to achieve better long-term outcomes after resection.

Improved long-term survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases following staging with FDG positron emission tomography

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Actual long-term survival of patients with colorectal liver metastases staged by PET CT has not been reported. Objectives were to investigate whether PET CT staging results in actual improved long-term survival, to examine outcome in patients with 'equivocal' PET CT scans, and those excluded from hepatectomy by PET CT.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases between March 1998 and September 2008.

RESULTS

Overall 5- and 10-year survival was 44.8% and 23.9%. PET CT staging resulted in management changes in 23% of patients. PET CT staged patients showed significantly better survival than those staged by CT alone at 3 years (79.8% vs. 54.1%) and at 5 years (54.1% vs. 37.3%) with median survivals of 6.4 years versus 3.9 years (log rank P = 0.018). Patients with equivocal PET CT scans showed worse median survival than those with favourable PET CT (log rank P = 0.002), but may include a subpopulation whose prognosis trends towards a more favourable outcome than those excluded from liver resection by PET CT, whose median survival remains limited to 21 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Staging of patients with colorectal liver metastases by PET CT is associated with significantly improved actual long-term survival, and provides valuable prognostic information which guides surgical and oncological treatments.

Interferon γ and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 regulate adhesion formation after partial hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

The pathophysiology of intra-abdominal adhesions has not been studied extensively. The aim of this study was to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying adhesion formation in a murine model and in patients undergoing hepatectomy.

METHODS

Partial hepatectomy was performed using bipolar forceps in mice. Wild-type mice, antibodies to CD4 and interferon (IFN) γ, IFN-γ, natural killer T (NKT) cells and plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI) 1 knockout (KO) mice were used. Recombinant hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) was tested for its ability to prevent adhesions. Liver specimens were obtained during surgery from patients undergoing hepatectomy. Adhesion formation was evaluated using a scoring system that ranged from 0 (no adhesions) to 5 (severe adhesions). Levels of IFN-γ and PAI-1 mRNA, and protein concentration of PAI-I were measured, and fluorescence immunostaining was performed.

RESULTS

Adhesion formation depended on IFN-γ produced by NKT cells, and NKT KO mice developed few adhesions (mean(s.d.) 1·7(0·3) versus 4·6(0·4) in wild-type mice; P = 0·037). In wild-type mice, the level of PAI-1 mRNA increased after hepatectomy, followed by a decrease in the tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) mRNA level. Adhesion formation was inhibited completely in PAI-1 KO mice (0(0) versus 4·1(0·8) in wild-type mice; P = 0·002). HGF inhibited formation of abdominal adhesions after hepatectomy by reducing IFN-γ and PAI-1 levels, and increasing tPA levels compared with those in mice treated with phosphate-buffered saline (P < 0·001, P = 0·002 and P = 0·035 respectively). In human liver specimens, NKT cells accumulated in the liver after hepatectomy, and PAI-1 expression was increased 5·25-fold (P = 0·030).

CONCLUSION

IFN-γ is a key molecule for abdominal adhesion formation after hepatectomy, acting via the reciprocal balance of PAI-1 and tPA. This molecular mechanism may also regulate adhesion formation in patients following hepatectomy. HGF inhibited formation of adhesions by regulating IFN-γ and PAI-1, suggesting that it may be an important target for prevention of adhesions after hepatectomy. SURGICAL RELEVANCE: Postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions can be asymptomatic or cause significant morbidity and mortality. Adhesion formation after hepatectomy has not been studied extensively. In the present study, the molecular mechanisms underlying intra-abdominal adhesions after hepatectomy were investigated in a murine model and in patients. Interferon (IFN) γ produced by natural killer T cells is a key molecule for adhesion formation after hepatectomy in mice, acting via the reciprocal balance between plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI) 1 and tissue plasminogen activator, the pivotal factors in fibrinolytic activity. This mechanism was also involved in the regulation of adhesions in human tissue samples. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) strongly inhibited adhesion formation by regulating IFN-γ and PAI-1. These results indicate that IFN-γ and PAI-1 are possible therapeutic targets, and HGF could prevent postoperative adhesion formation after hepatectomy.

Colorectal cancer: prevention and management of metastatic disease

This paper compared the similarities and differences of the two most common types of colorectal cancer metastases. The treatment of liver metastases by surgery combined with systemic chemotherapy was explained. The different natural history of liver metastases as compared to peritoneal metastases and the possibility for prevention of peritoneal metastases were emphasized. Perioperative cancer chemotherapy or second-look surgery must be considered as individualized treatments of selected patients who have small volume peritoneal metastases or who are known to be at risk for subsequent disease progression on peritoneal surfaces. However, the fact that peritoneal metastases, when diagnosed in the follow-up of colorectal cancer patients, can be cured with a combination of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic perioperative chemotherapy cannot be ignored. Careful follow-up and timely intervention in colorectal cancer patients with progressive disease are a necessary part of the management strategies recommended by the multidisciplinary team. After a critical evaluation of the data currently available, these strategies for prevention and management of colorectal metastases are presented as the author's recommendations for a high standard of care. As more information becomes available, modifications may be necessary.

Surgical management of colorectal liver metastases: a European perspective

The treatment of colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver is increasingly complex as a result of changes in the patient population, advances in preoperative staging, changing definitions of resectability, advances in surgical technique and the expanding chemotherapeutic armamentarium. Management of these patients within a multidisciplinary team is increasingly important and associated with better outcomes. In patients with irresectable hepatic metastases, high secondary resection rates can be achieved with multiagent chemotherapy when managed in conjunction with a liver specialist. Perioperative mortality rates are reducing but morbidity remains high, and enhanced recovery could help reduce morbidity. Despite the advancing age and comorbidity of the patient population, multimodal management is likely to lead to further improvements in perioperative and long-term outcomes.

Laparoscopic liver resection as a safe and efficacious alternative to open resection for colorectal liver metastasis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) remain to be established. A meta-analysis was undertaken to compare LLR and open liver resection (OLR) for CLM with respect to surgical and oncologic outcomes.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed to retrieve all relevant articles published in the English language by the end of March 2013. Data were analyzed using Review Manager version 5.0.

RESULTS

A total of 8 nonrandomized controlled studies with 695 subjects were analyzsed. Intra-operative blood loss, the proportion of patients requiring blood transfusion, morbidity and the length of hospital stay were all significantly reduced after LLR. Postoperative recurrence, 5-year overall and disease-free survivals were comparable between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LLR for CLM is safe and efficacious. It improves surgical outcomes and uncompromises oncologic outcomes as compared with OLR.

Outcome after repeat resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Although advances in multimodal treatment have led to prolongation of survival in patients after resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CRC-LM), most patients develop recurrence, which is often confined to the liver. Repeat hepatic resection (RHR) may prolong survival or even provide cure in selected patients. We evaluated the perioperative and long-term outcomes after RHR for CRC-LM in a single institution series.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Since 1999, 92 repeat hepatic resections (63% wedge/segmental, 37% hemihepatectomy or greater) for recurrent CRC-LM were performed in 80 patients. Median interval from initial liver resection to first RHR was 1.25 years. Any kind of chemotherapy (CTx) had been given in 88% before RHR. Neoadjuvant CTx was given in 38%.

RESULTS

Hepatic margin-negative resection was achieved in 79%. Mortality was 3.8%. Overall complication rates were 53%, including infection (17%), operative re-intervention (12%), and hepatic failure (5.4%). Overall 5-year survival after first RHR was 50.3%. Univariately, primary tumor stage, the extent of liver resection, postoperative complications, and the overall resection margin correlated with survival. By multivariate analysis, primary T stage, size of metastasis, and overall R0 resection influenced survival. Survival was not independently influenced by hepatic resection margins or (neoadjuvant) CTx.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat hepatic resection for recurrent CRC-LM can be performed with low mortality and acceptable morbidity. Survival after repeat hepatic resection in this selected group of patients is encouraging and comparable to results after first liver resections.

Electronic beam steering used with a toroidal HIFU transducer substantially increases the coagulated volume

Treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound is well established but requires extended treatment time. A device composed of 256 elements arranged on a toroidal transducer was developed to increase the coagulated volume. When all the elements are working in phase for 40 s, a volume of 6-8 cm(3) can be ablated. However, the mechanical juxtaposition of single lesions is still necessary for treating one tumor with a diameter of 2 cm. The objective of this study was to combine this toroidal transducer geometry with electronic beam steering to ablate tumors with adequate normal tissue margins and without any mechanical displacement of the high-intensity focused ultrasound device. In vitro tests demonstrated that the coagulated volume obtained from 130 s of total exposure has an average diameter of 41.4 ± 4.0 mm and an average length of 53.3 ± 6.1 mm. This single lesion can be used to treat various size of metastasis, located at depths in the liver ranging 5-45 mm.

A systematic review of repeat hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Selected patients with recurrent colorectal liver metastases (CLM) may be resectable by repeat hepatectomy approach. In this review, we aim to collate and evaluate the published evidence for repeat hepatectomy in patients with recurrent CLM.

METHODS

Searches of the Medline and Embase databases were undertaken to identify studies of repeat hepatectomy in patients with recurrent CLM focusing on the perioperative treatment regimen, operative strategy, morbidity, technical success and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-two observational studies were reviewed. A total of 1,610 patients underwent second hepatectomy for recurrent CLM. The median percentage of extra-hepatic disease was 15 % (range, 0-39 %). Preoperative chemotherapy was reported in 5/22 studies. Major liver resection was undertaken in 25 % (range, 9-59 %) of patients and the R0 resection rate was 90 % (range, 77-96 %). Postoperative morbidity and mortality after the second hepatectomy were 23 % and 1.2 %, respectively. Recurrence rate after second hepatectomy was 63.9 % (range, 42-91 %) with a median follow-up period of 32 months (range, 19-59 months). Median overall survival was 35 months (range, 19-56 months). The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 55 % (range, 11-82 %) and 42 % (range, 31-73 %), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Second hepatectomy is safe and feasible in selected patients with recurrent CLM and is associated with acceptable perioperative and survival outcomes. Future prospective studies are required to further define the patient selection criteria for repeat hepatectomy and the exact role of perioperative chemotherapy.

Repeat liver resection for colorectal metastases

BACKGROUND

Following resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) up to 75 per cent of patients develop recurrent liver metastases. Although repeat resection remains the only curative therapy, data evaluating the outcome are deficient. This study analysed postoperative morbidity, mortality and independent predictors of survival following repeat resection of CLMs.

METHODS

Data on surgical treatment of primary and recurrent CLMs between 1994 and 2010 were collected retrospectively, and compared with those for single hepatic resections carried out during the same period. Independent predictors of survival were evaluated by means of univariable and multivariable Cox regression models.

RESULTS

In this interval 1026 primary resections of CLMs were performed and 94 patients underwent repeat CLM excision. Overall postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were low (15·8 and 1·3 per cent respectively), with no statistical difference in patients undergoing repeat surgery (P = 0·072). Compared with single liver resections, overall survival was improved in repeat resections (P = 0·003). Multivariable analysis revealed that size of primary CLM over 50 mm was an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio (HR) 2·61; P = 0·008). Only major hepatic resection was associated with poorer outcome following repeat surgery (HR 2·62; P = 0·009). International Union Against Cancer stage, number of CLMs, age at surgery and need for intraoperative transfusion had no impact on survival after repeat resection.

CONCLUSION

Recurrent CLM surgery is feasible with similar morbidity and mortality rates to those of initial or single CLM resections.

Colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: does global management at the same centre improve results?

BACKGROUND

Synchronous liver metastases (SLM) occur in 20% of colorectal cancers (CRC). Resection of SLM and CLC can be undertaken at different centres (separate management, SM) or at the same centre (global management, GM).

METHODS

Retrospective study of SLM and CRC resections carried out during 01/2000 - 12/2006 by SM or GM, using a combined or delayed strategy.

RESULTS

Morphologic characteristics and type of CRC and SLM resection were similar for the GM (n = 45) or SM (n = 66) groups. In patients with delayed liver resection (62 SM, 17 GM), chemotherapy prior to liver surgery was used in 92% and 38% of SM and GM patients (P < 0.0001) and the median delay between procedures was 212 and 182 days, respectively (P = 0.04). First step of liver resection was more often performed during colorectal surgery in the GM group (62 vs. 6% for SM, P < 0.0001) and the mean number of procedures (CRC+SLM) was lower (1.6 vs. 2.3, P = 0.003). Three-month mortality was 3% for GM and 0% for SM (n.s.). Overall survival rates were 67% and 51% for SM and GM at 3 years (n.s.), and 35 and 31% at 5 years (n.s.). Disease-free survival to 5 years was higher in SM patients (14% vs. 11%, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

GM of CRC and SLM was associated with fewer procedures but did not influence overall survival. SM was associated with a longer delay and increased use of chemotherapy between procedures, suggesting that more rigorous selection of SM patients for surgery may explain the higher disease-free survival after SLM resection.

Repeat hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Some 75-80 per cent of patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastases develop intrahepatic recurrence. A significant number of these can be considered for repeat liver surgery. This study examined the outcomes of repeat liver resection for the treatment of recurrent colorectal metastases confined to the liver.

METHODS

Patients who underwent repeat liver resection in a single tertiary referral hepatobiliary centre were identified from a database. Clinicopathological variables were analysed to assess factors predictive of survival.

RESULTS

A total of 195 patients underwent repeat resection between 1993 and 2010. Median age was 63 years, and the median interval between first and repeat resection was 13·8 months. Thirty-three patients (16·9 per cent) underwent completion hemihepatectomy or extended hemihepatectomy and the remainder had non-anatomical or segmental resection. The 30-day mortality rate was 1·5 per cent, and the overall 30-day morbidity rate was 20·0 per cent. Overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 91·2, 44·3 and 29·4 per cent respectively. Tumour size 5 cm or greater was the only independent predictor of overall survival (relative risk 1·71, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·08 to 2·70; P = 0·021). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before resection, perioperative blood transfusion, bilobar disease, R1 resection margin and multiple metastases were among factors that did not significantly influence survival.

CONCLUSION

Repeat hepatic resection remains the only curative option for patients presenting with recurrent colorectal liver metastases.

Therapeutic strategies for synchronous and multiple liver metastases from colorectal cancer

Metastasis in the liver is one of the most critical factors in the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer. The incidence of synchronous liver metastasis has been found to be approximately 20–25%, but the optimal timing of surgical resection remains controversial. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has also been found to be beneficial not only for initially unresectable but also resectable synchronous metastases and traditional surgical strategies of hepatic resection with past chemotherapeutic regimens have been used less and less over the past several years. This review will discuss treatments in association with the recently developed chemotherapeutic regimens.

More than 7-year survival of a patient following repeat hepatectomy for total 20 colon cancer liver metastases

A 54-year-old man was transferred with sigmoid colon cancer combined with multiple bilobar liver metastases. Nine metastases were in the left lobe and 5 metastases were in the right lobe. After low anterior resection, all 9 lesions in the left lobe were completely removed by wedge resections. Because the remnant liver volume after multiple wedge resection of the left lobe was not sufficient to perform a right hepatectomy simultaneously, we planned a two-stage hepatectomy. Right portal vein embolization was performed one week after the first liver operation. A right hepatectomy was safely performed 22 days after the first hepatectomy. A recurrent mass developed in the segment III 18 months after the right hepatectomy. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was performed to remove that lesion. Five other metastases developed 18 months after RFA whereby multiple wedge resections were performed. The patient has survived for more than 7 years after the first liver operation.

Repeat hepatectomy for liver metastases from colorectal primary cancer: a review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

After hepatectomy for metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC), approximately 50% to 70% of patients develop recurrent hepatic metastases. This recurrence is limited to the liver in about one-third of cases. The purpose of this study is to report a comprehensive review of the literature concerning the results of repeat hepatectomy for recurrent liver metastases from CRC.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted to identify all medical articles published concerning repeat hepatectomy for liver metastases of colorectal origin during the period January 1990 to December 2010.

RESULTS

After a second hepatectomy, the mean mortality was 1.4% and the mean morbidity rate was 21.3%. The 5-year survival ranged from 16% to 55%. After a third or fourth hepatectomy, the mean mortality rate was 0% and the mean morbidity rate was 24.5%. After a third hepatectomy, the 5-year survival ranged from 23.8% to 37.9%. After a fourth hepatectomy, the 5-year survival was 9.3% to 36%.

CONCLUSION

Repeat hepatectomy seems justified, since it may result in prolonged survival with acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality, results similar to those seen after initial hepatectomy.

Visualisation of liver tumours using hand-held real-time strain imaging: results of animal experiments

OBJECTIVE

Surgical resection is the only curative option for colorectal hepatic metastases. Intra-operative localisation of these metastases during hepatic resection is performed by intra-operative B-mode imaging and palpation. Because liver metastases are stiffer than normal tissues, elastography may be a useful complement to B-mode imaging. This paper reports quantitative measures of the image quality attained during intra-operative real-time elastographic visualisation of liver metastasis.

METHODS

VX2 tumours were implanted in the liver of eight rabbits and were scanned in vivo. Measurements of the tumour dimensions obtained via elastography were compared with those obtained using B-mode imaging and with gross pathology.

RESULTS

Measurements of tumour diameters were similar when obtained by intra-operative elastography and pathological measurement methods (mean difference±standard deviation, 0.1±0.9 mm). The contrast between tumours and normal tissues was significantly higher (p<0.05) in elastograms (26±10 dB contrast) than in sonograms (1±1 dB contrast). Sensitivity and specificity for detecting tumours using intra-operative elastography were 100% and 88%, respectively, and positive and negative predictive values were 89% and 100%, respectively. In two cases elastograms were able to detect a tumour that was ambiguous in B-mode images.

CONCLUSION

Combined hand-held B-mode/strain imaging may provide additional information that is relevant for detection of liver metastases that may be missed by standard B-mode imaging alone, such as small and/or isoechoic tumours.

Repeat hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer is safe but marginally effective

BACKGROUND

Although hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) offers prolonged survival in up to 40% of people, recurrence rates are high, approaching 70%. Many patients experience recurrent disease in the liver after initial hepatectomy. We examined our experience with repeat hepatectomy for mCRC.

METHODS

After Institutional Review Board approval, we reviewed the records of all patients at a single institution who underwent hepatectomy for mCRC. Repeat hepatectomy was defined as partial liver resection any time after the initial hepatectomy for recurrent mCRC. We estimated time to recurrence and survival by using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared outcomes between groups by using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

From 1998 to 2008, 405 patients underwent hepatectomy for mCRC, and 215 (53%) experienced disease recurrence at a median of 13 months. Of 150 patients with liver-only or liver-predominant recurrence, 52 (35%) underwent repeat hepatectomy. The median time to recurrence after repeat hepatectomy was 10 months, and median overall survival was 19 months. There was one (1.9%) perioperative death, and there were 14 (27%) major complications. The median overall survival in the repeat hepatectomy group from the time of recurrence after initial hepatectomy was 22 months, compared with 15 months in the 98 patients with liver recurrence who were not selected for repeat hepatectomy (P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat hepatectomy for mCRC is feasible in highly selected patients, with acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality. Although repeat hepatectomy should be considered, recurrence rates are high. Although the initial hepatectomy for mCRC is potentially curative, recurrence of metastatic disease in the liver is unlikely to be cured.

Treatment advances in liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer

Over the last several decades advances in the management and treatment of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) has changed a disease with a dismal prognosis to one with a potential for cure in some patients. Advances have been made through coordinated management of patients by surgeons, medical oncologists, radiologists, and other health care professionals coupled with advances in treatment options. Although these advances have clearly impacted patient outcomes, it is clear that the benefit of traditional surgical approaches and the use of cytoxic chemotherapy are reaching a plateau. Continued research to develop new and more active therapies, including targeted or biologic agents, is needed. This review discusses the advances made in management of patients with liver-limited metastatic disease.

Predictors of long-term survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a single center study and review of the literature

PURPOSE

Prognosis after resection of liver metastases of colorectal cancer is influenced by a variety of clinical factors. For more than 20 years, efforts have been made to restructure and simplify prognostic parameters into clinical scores. We evaluated the influence of various clinical and pathological factors on survival and recurrence and developed a simple model for risk stratification.

METHODS

We have analyzed a total of 13 prognostic factors in 382 consecutive and prospectively enrolled R0-resected patients and applied our data set to ten published prognostic scoring systems. Prognostic factors that influenced disease-specific and disease-free survival were included into a model clinical risk score.

RESULTS

The 5- and 10-year observed survival rates were 43% and 28%, respectively, for all 382 patients. The disease-specific 5- and 10-year survival rates were 49% and 37%, respectively; the 5- and 10-year recurrence rates were 68% and 70%, respectively. For patients with synchronous liver metastases, survival was not affected by the timing of liver resection. The prognosis after treatment of any recurrence was best after the accomplishment of a repeated R0 situation, independent of the location of the recurrence. In the multivariate analysis, the disease-specific survival and recurrence rates were statistically significantly influenced by more than three lymph node metastases of the primary tumor, more than two lesions within the liver, and the presence of extrahepatic tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

From these data, we have developed a simple score for the risk stratification which may be useful for future studies on interdisciplinary management of colorectal liver metastases.

Surgical management of colorectal liver metastases

Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer with approximately half of the patients developing liver metastases during the course of their disease. Modern multimodal therapies have improved the overall survival. Liver resection remains the most important modality in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. The evolution of the criteria for resectability has resulted in more patients being offered a hepatectomy. This is further augmented with the utilization of adjuncts to liver resection, including portal vein embolization and local ablative techniques. Two-stage hepatectomy is also being used to increase resectability. Overall survival is improved by the deployment of new chemotherapeutic agents and the use of combination chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a promising development in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Patients with colorectal liver metastases can achieve long-term survival. A multidisciplinary approach is essential in the management of these patients.

Surgical management of colorectal liver metastases

Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer with approximately half of the patients developing liver metastases during the course of their disease. Modern multimodal therapies have improved the overall survival. Liver resection remains the most important modality in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. The evolution of the criteria for resectability has resulted in more patients being offered a hepatectomy. This is further augmented with the utilization of adjuncts to liver resection, including portal vein embolization and local ablative techniques. Two-stage hepatectomy is also being used to increase resectability. Overall survival is improved by the deployment of new chemotherapeutic agents and the use of combination chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a promising development in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Patients with colorectal liver metastases can achieve long-term survival. A multidisciplinary approach is essential in the management of these patients.