1
|
Sardar S, McNair CM, Ravindranath L, Chand SN, Yuan W, Bogdan D, Welti J, Sharp A, Ryan NK, Schiewer MJ, DeArment EG, Janas T, Su XA, Butler LM, de Bono JS, Frese K, Brooks N, Pegg N, Knudsen KE, Shafi AA. AR coactivators, CBP/p300, are critical mediators of DNA repair in prostate cancer. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.05.07.592966. [PMID: 38766099 PMCID: PMC11100730 DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.07.592966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
Castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains an incurable disease stage with ineffective treatments options. Here, the androgen receptor (AR) coactivators CBP/p300, which are histone acetyltransferases, were identified as critical mediators of DNA damage repair (DDR) to potentially enhance therapeutic targeting of CRPC. Key findings demonstrate that CBP/p300 expression increases with disease progression and selects for poor prognosis in metastatic disease. CBP/p300 bromodomain inhibition enhances response to standard of care therapeutics. Functional studies, CBP/p300 cistrome mapping, and transcriptome in CRPC revealed that CBP/p300 regulates DDR. Further mechanistic investigation showed that CBP/p300 attenuation via therapeutic targeting and genomic knockdown decreases homologous recombination (HR) factors in vitro, in vivo, and in human prostate cancer (PCa) tumors ex vivo. Similarly, CBP/p300 expression in human prostate tissue correlates with HR factors. Lastly, targeting CBP/p300 impacts HR-mediate repair and patient outcome. Collectively, these studies identify CBP/p300 as drivers of PCa tumorigenesis and lay the groundwork to optimize therapeutic strategies for advanced PCa via CBP/p300 inhibition, potentially in combination with AR-directed and DDR therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumaira Sardar
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, 20817, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, 20817 USA
| | - Christopher M. McNair
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, USA
| | - Lakshmi Ravindranath
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, 20817, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, 20817 USA
| | - Saswati N. Chand
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, USA
| | - Wei Yuan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Denisa Bogdan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jon Welti
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Sharp
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Natalie K. Ryan
- South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, The University of Adelaide, Australia
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Matthew J. Schiewer
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, USA
| | - Elise G. DeArment
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, 20817, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, 20817 USA
| | - Thomas Janas
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, 20817, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, 20817 USA
| | - Xiaofeng A. Su
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, 20817, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, 20817 USA
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Lisa M. Butler
- South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, The University of Adelaide, Australia
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Johann S. de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kris Frese
- CellCentric Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Neil Pegg
- CellCentric Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Karen E. Knudsen
- The American Cancer Society, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103, USA
| | - Ayesha A. Shafi
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, 20817, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, 20817 USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen Y, Zhen Z, Chen L, Wang H, Wang X, Sun X, Song Z, Wang H, Lin Y, Zhang W, Wu G, Jiang Y, Mao Z. Androgen signaling stabilizes genomes to counteract senescence by promoting XRCC4 transcription. EMBO Rep 2023; 24:e56984. [PMID: 37955230 PMCID: PMC10702805 DOI: 10.15252/embr.202356984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Aging is accompanied by a decreased DNA repair capacity, which might contribute to age-associated functional decline in multiple tissues. Disruption in hormone signaling, associated with reproductive organ dysfunction, is an early event of age-related tissue degeneration, but whether it impacts DNA repair in nonreproductive organs remains elusive. Using skin fibroblasts derived from healthy donors with a broad age range, we show here that the downregulation of expression of XRCC4, a factor involved in nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair, which is the dominant pathway to repair somatic double-strand breaks, is mediated through transcriptional mechanisms. We show that the androgen receptor (AR), whose expression is also reduced during aging, directly binds to and enhances the activity of the XRCC4 promoter, facilitating XRCC4 transcription and thus stabilizing the genome. We also demonstrate that dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a powerful AR agonist, restores XRCC4 expression and stabilizes the genome in different models of cellular aging. Moreover, DHT treatment reverses senescence-associated phenotypes, opening a potential avenue to aging interventions in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Chen
- Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, School of Life Sciences and TechnologyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Clinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and TechnologyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Zhengyi Zhen
- Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, School of Life Sciences and TechnologyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Clinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and TechnologyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Lingjiang Chen
- Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, School of Life Sciences and TechnologyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Clinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and TechnologyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Hao Wang
- Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, School of Life Sciences and TechnologyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Clinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and TechnologyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Xuhui Wang
- Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, School of Life Sciences and TechnologyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Clinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and TechnologyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Xiaoxiang Sun
- Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, School of Life Sciences and TechnologyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Clinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and TechnologyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Zhiwei Song
- Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, School of Life Sciences and TechnologyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Clinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and TechnologyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Haiyan Wang
- Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, School of Life Sciences and TechnologyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Clinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and TechnologyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Yizi Lin
- Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, School of Life Sciences and TechnologyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Wenjun Zhang
- Department of Plastic SurgeryChangzheng HospitalShanghaiChina
| | - Guizhu Wu
- Department of Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant HospitalShanghai Tongji University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Ying Jiang
- Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, School of Life Sciences and TechnologyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Zhiyong Mao
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Clinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and TechnologyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Borsky P, Holmannova D, Andrys C, Kremlacek J, Fiala Z, Parova H, Rehacek V, Svadlakova T, Byma S, Kucera O, Borska L. Evaluation of potential aging biomarkers in healthy individuals: telomerase, AGEs, GDF11/15, sirtuin 1, NAD+, NLRP3, DNA/RNA damage, and klotho. Biogerontology 2023; 24:937-955. [PMID: 37523061 PMCID: PMC10615959 DOI: 10.1007/s10522-023-10054-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
Aging is a natural process of gradual decrease in physical and mental capacity. Biological age (accumulation of changes and damage) and chronological age (years lived) may differ. Biological age reflects the risk of various types of disease and death from any cause. We selected potential biomarkers of aging - telomerase, AGEs, GDF11 and 15 (growth differentiation factor 11/15), sirtuin 1, NAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide), inflammasome NLRP3, DNA/RNA damage, and klotho to investigate changes in their levels depending on age and sex. We included 169 healthy volunteers and divided them into groups according to age (under 35; 35-50; over 50) and sex (male, female; male and female under 35; 35-50, over 50). Markers were analyzed using commercial ELISA kits. We found differences in values depending on age and gender. GDF15 increased with age (under 30 and 35-50 p < 0.002; 35-50 and over 50; p < 0.001; under 35 and over 50; p < 0.001) as well as GDF11 (35-50 and over 50; p < 0.03; under 35 and over 50; p < 0.02), AGEs (under 30 and 35-50; p < 0.005), NLRP3 (under 35 over 50; p < 0.03), sirtuin 1 (35-50 and over 50; p < 0.0001; under 35 and over 50; p < 0.004). AGEs and GDF11 differed between males and females. Correlations were identified between individual markers, markers and age, and markers and sex. Markers that reflect the progression of biological aging vary with age (GDF15, GDF11, AGEs, NLRP3, sirtuin) and sex (AGEs, GDF11). Their levels could be used in clinical practice, determining biological age, risk of age-related diseases and death of all-causes, and initiating or contraindicating a therapy in the elderly based on the patient's health status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavel Borsky
- Institute of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, 50003, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Drahomira Holmannova
- Institute of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, 50003, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
| | - Ctirad Andrys
- Institute of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, 50003, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Kremlacek
- Institute of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, 50003, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Zdenek Fiala
- Institute of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, 50003, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Helena Parova
- Institute of Clinical Biochemistry and Diagnostics, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, 50003, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Vit Rehacek
- Transfusion Center, University Hospital, 50003, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Tereza Svadlakova
- Institute of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, 50003, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Svatopluk Byma
- Institute of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, 50003, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Otto Kucera
- Institute of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, 50003, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Lenka Borska
- Institute of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, 50003, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Apaydin T, Zonis S, Zhou C, Valencia CW, Barrett R, Strous GJ, Mol JA, Chesnokova V, Melmed S. WIP1 is a novel specific target for growth hormone action. iScience 2023; 26:108117. [PMID: 37876819 PMCID: PMC10590974 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
DNA damage repair (DDR) is mediated by phosphorylating effectors ATM kinase, CHK2, p53, and γH2AX. We showed earlier that GH suppresses DDR by suppressing pATM, resulting in DNA damage accumulation. Here, we show GH acting through GH receptor (GHR) inducing wild-type p53-inducible phosphatase 1 (WIP1), which dephosphorylated ATM and its effectors in normal human colon cells and three-dimensional human intestinal organoids. Mice bearing GH-secreting xenografts exhibited induced colon WIP1 with suppressed pATM and γH2AX. WIP1 was also induced in buffy coats derived from patients with elevated GH from somatotroph adenomas. In contrast, decreased colon WIP1 was observed in GHR-/- mice. WIP1 inhibition restored ATM phosphorylation and reversed GH-induced DNA damage. We elucidated a novel GH signaling pathway activating Src/AMPK to trigger HIPK2 nuclear-cytoplasmic relocation and suppressing WIP1 ubiquitination. Concordantly, blocking either AMPK or Src abolished GH-induced WIP1. We identify WIP1 as a specific target for GH-mediated epithelial DNA damage accumulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tugce Apaydin
- Department of Medicine, Pituitary Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Svetlana Zonis
- Department of Medicine, Pituitary Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Cuiqi Zhou
- Department of Medicine, Pituitary Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christian Wong Valencia
- Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Robert Barrett
- Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ger J. Strous
- Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Institute of Biomembranes, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jan A. Mol
- Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Vera Chesnokova
- Department of Medicine, Pituitary Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Shlomo Melmed
- Department of Medicine, Pituitary Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang Q, Ali M, Treviño LS, Mas A, Al-Hendy A. Developmental reprogramming of myometrial stem cells by endocrine disruptor linking to risk of uterine fibroids. Cell Mol Life Sci 2023; 80:274. [PMID: 37650943 PMCID: PMC10471700 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-023-04919-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The stage, when tissues and organs are growing, is very vulnerable to environmental influences, but it's not clear how exposure during this time causes changes to the epigenome and increases the risk of hormone-related illnesses like uterine fibroids (UFs). METHODS Developmental reprogramming of myometrial stem cells (MMSCs), the putative origin from which UFs originate, was investigated in vitro and in the Eker rat model by RNA-seq, ChIP-seq, RRBS, gain/loss of function analysis, and luciferase activity assays. RESULTS When exposed to the endocrine-disrupting chemical (EDC) diethylstilbestrol during Eker rat development, MMSCs undergo a reprogramming of their estrogen-responsive transcriptome. The reprogrammed genes in MMSCs are known as estrogen-responsive genes (ERGs) and are activated by mixed lineage leukemia protein-1 (MLL1) and DNA hypo-methylation mechanisms. Additionally, we observed a notable elevation in the expression of ERGs in MMSCs from Eker rats exposed to natural steroids after developmental exposure to EDC, thereby augmenting estrogen activity. CONCLUSION Our studies identify epigenetic mechanisms of MLL1/DNA hypo-methylation-mediated MMSC reprogramming. EDC exposure epigenetically targets MMSCs and leads to persistent changes in the expression of a subset of ERGs, imparting a hormonal imprint on the ERGs, resulting in a "hyper-estrogenic" phenotype, and increasing the hormone-dependent risk of UFs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiwei Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL 60637 USA
| | - Mohamed Ali
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL 60637 USA
| | - Lindsey S. Treviño
- Division of Health Equities, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
- Center for Precision Environmental Health and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Aymara Mas
- Carlos Simon Foundation, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avda. Menéndez Pelayo 4, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Ayman Al-Hendy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL 60637 USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dias A, Brook MN, Bancroft EK, Page EC, Chamberlain A, Saya S, Amin J, Mikropoulos C, Taylor N, Myhill K, Thomas S, Saunders E, Dadaev T, Leongamornlert D, Dyrsø Jensen T, Evans DG, Cybulski C, Liljegren A, Teo SH, Side L, Kote‐Jarai Z, Eeles RA. Serum testosterone and prostate cancer in men with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. BJUI COMPASS 2023; 4:361-373. [PMID: 37025481 PMCID: PMC10071088 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives The relation of serum androgens and the development of prostate cancer (PCa) is subject of debate. Lower total testosterone (TT) levels have been associated with increased PCa detection and worse pathological features after treatment. However, data from the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) and Prostate Cancer Prevention (PCPT) trial groups indicate no association. The aim of this study is to investigate the association of serum androgen levels and PCa detection in a prospective screening study of men at higher genetic risk of aggressive PCa due to BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs), the IMPACT study. Methods Men enrolled in the IMPACT study provided serum samples during regular visits. Hormonal levels were calculated using immunoassays. Free testosterone (FT) was calculated from TT and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) using the Sodergard mass equation. Age, body mass index (BMI), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and hormonal concentrations were compared between genetic cohorts. We also explored associations between age and TT, SHBG, FT and PCa, in the whole subset and stratified by BRCA1/2 PVs status. Results A total of 777 participants in the IMPACT study had TT and SHBG measurements in serum samples at annual visits, giving 3940 prospective androgen levels, from 266 BRCA1 PVs carriers, 313 BRCA2 PVs carriers and 198 non-carriers. The median number of visits per patient was 5. There was no difference in TT, SHBG and FT between carriers and non-carriers. In a univariate analysis, androgen levels were not associated with PCa. In the analysis stratified by carrier status, no significant association was found between hormonal levels and PCa in non-carriers, BRCA1 or BRCA2 PVs carriers. Conclusions Male BRCA1/2 PVs carriers have a similar androgen profile to non-carriers. Hormonal levels were not associated with PCa in men with and without BRCA1/2 PVs. Mechanisms related to the particularly aggressive phenotype of PCa in BRCA2 PVs carriers may therefore not be linked with circulating hormonal levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Dias
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Instituto Nacional de Cancer Jose de Alencar Gomes da Silva INCARio de JaneiroBrazil
| | - Mark N. Brook
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Elizabeth K. Bancroft
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Academic Urology UnitRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | | | | | - Sibel Saya
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Jan Amin
- Clinical Biochemistry SectionRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Christos Mikropoulos
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Academic Urology UnitRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Natalie Taylor
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Academic Urology UnitRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Kathryn Myhill
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Academic Urology UnitRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Sarah Thomas
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | | | - Tokhir Dadaev
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | | | | | - D. Gareth Evans
- Genetic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences CentreCentral Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and PathologyPomeranian Medical University in SzczecinSzczecinPoland
| | - Annelie Liljegren
- Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Soo H. Teo
- Cancer Research Initiatives FoundationSubang Jaya Medical CentreSelangorDarul EhsanMalaysia
| | - Lucy Side
- Wessex Clinical Genetics ServicePrincess Anne HospitalSouthamptonUK
| | | | | | - Rosalind A. Eeles
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Academic Urology UnitRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rangsrikitphoti P, Marquez-Garban DC, Pietras RJ, McGowan E, Boonyaratanakornkit V. Sex steroid hormones and DNA repair regulation: Implications on cancer treatment responses. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2023; 227:106230. [PMID: 36450315 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2022.106230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The role of sex steroid hormones (SSHs) has been shown to modulate cancer cytotoxic treatment sensitivity. Dysregulation of DNA repair associated with genomic instability, abnormal cell survival and not only promotes cancer progression but also resistance to cancer treatment. The three major SSHs, androgen, estrogen, and progesterone, have been shown to interact with several essential DNA repair components. The presence of androgens directly regulates key molecules in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. Estrogen can promote cell proliferation and DNA repair, allowing cancer cells to tolerate chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Information on the role of progesterone in DNA repair is limited: progesterone interaction with some DNA repair components has been identified, but the biological significance is still unknown. Here, we review the roles of how each SSH affects DNA repair regulation and modulates response to genotoxic therapies and discuss future research that can be beneficial when combining SSHs with cancer therapy. We also provide preliminary analysis from publicly available databases defining the link between progesterone/PR and DDRs & DNA repair regulation that plausibly contribute to chemotherapy response and breast cancer patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pattarasiri Rangsrikitphoti
- Graduate Program in Clinical Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine and Department of Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Diana C Marquez-Garban
- UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer and Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Richard J Pietras
- UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer and Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Eileen McGowan
- School of Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Viroj Boonyaratanakornkit
- Graduate Program in Clinical Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine and Department of Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; Age-related Inflammation and Degeneration Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Li Z, Spoelstra NS, Sikora MJ, Sams SB, Elias A, Richer JK, Lee AV, Oesterreich S. Mutual exclusivity of ESR1 and TP53 mutations in endocrine resistant metastatic breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2022; 8:62. [PMID: 35538119 PMCID: PMC9090919 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-022-00426-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Both TP53 and ESR1 mutations occur frequently in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancers (MBC) and their distinct roles in breast cancer tumorigenesis and progression are well appreciated. Recent clinical studies discovered mutual exclusivity between TP53 and ESR1 mutations in metastatic breast cancers; however, mechanisms underlying this intriguing clinical observation remain largely understudied and unknown. Here, we explored the interplay between TP53 and ESR1 mutations using publicly available clinical and experimental data sets. We first confirmed the robust mutational exclusivity using six independent cohorts with 1,056 ER+ MBC samples and found that the exclusivity broadly applies to all ER+ breast tumors regardless of their clinical and distinct mutational features. ESR1 mutant tumors do not exhibit differential p53 pathway activity, whereas we identified attenuated ER activity and expression in TP53 mutant tumors, driven by a p53-associated E2 response gene signature. Further, 81% of these p53-associated E2 response genes are either direct targets of wild-type (WT) p53-regulated transactivation or are mutant p53-associated microRNAs, representing bimodal mechanisms of ER suppression. Lastly, we analyzed the very rare cases with co-occurrences of TP53 and ESR1 mutations and found that their simultaneous presence was also associated with reduced ER activity. In addition, tumors with dual mutations showed higher levels of total and PD-L1 positive macrophages. In summary, our study utilized multiple publicly available sources to explore the mechanism underlying the mutual exclusivity between ESR1 and TP53 mutations, providing further insights and testable hypotheses of the molecular interplay between these two pivotal genes in ER+ MBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheqi Li
- Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Women's Cancer Research Center, Magee Women's Research Institute, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nicole S Spoelstra
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Matthew J Sikora
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sharon B Sams
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Anthony Elias
- School of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jennifer K Richer
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Adrian V Lee
- Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Women's Cancer Research Center, Magee Women's Research Institute, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Steffi Oesterreich
- Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
- Women's Cancer Research Center, Magee Women's Research Institute, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rall-Scharpf M, Friedl TWP, Biechonski S, Denkinger M, Milyavsky M, Wiesmüller L. Sex-specific differences in DNA double-strand break repair of cycling human lymphocytes during aging. Aging (Albany NY) 2021; 13:21066-21089. [PMID: 34506302 PMCID: PMC8457596 DOI: 10.18632/aging.203519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The gender gap in life expectancy and cancer incidence suggests differences in the aging process between the sexes. Genomic instability has been recognized as a key factor in aging, but little is known about sex-specific differences. Therefore, we analyzed DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in cycling human peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) from male and female donors of different age. Reporter-based DSB repair analyses revealed differential regulation of pathway usage in PBL from male and female donors with age: Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) was inversely regulated in men and women; the activity of pathways requiring end processing and strand annealing steps such as microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) declined with age in women but not in men. Screening candidate proteins identified the NHEJ protein KU70 as well as the end resection regulatory factors ATM and BLM showing reduced expression during aging in women. Consistently, the regulatory factor BLM contributed to the MMEJ proficiency in young but not in old women as demonstrated by knockdown analysis. In conclusion, we show that DSB repair is subject to changes upon aging and age-related changes in DSB repair are distinct in men and women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas W P Friedl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Shahar Biechonski
- Department of Pathology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Michael Denkinger
- Institute for Geriatric Research Unit, Agaplesion Bethesda Hospital, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Michael Milyavsky
- Department of Pathology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Lisa Wiesmüller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sagaram S, Rao A. Rapidly evolving treatment paradigm and considerations for sequencing therapies in metastatic prostate cancer-a narrative review. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:3188-3198. [PMID: 34430421 PMCID: PMC8350255 DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-1383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The treatment landscape of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) has evolved considerably over the past 15 years with approvals of targeted therapies such as poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in castration-resistant [metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)] setting and novel antiandrogens and docetaxel in hormone-sensitive [metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC)] setting. A number of promising clinical trials are now evaluating therapeutic combinations rooted in an improving understanding of tumor biology. Despite a plethora of effective treatment options, decisions regarding choice of therapy remain challenging due to the lack of head-to-head trials and a substantial overlap in selection criteria used in these trials. We summarize the data from key trials that led to approval of commonly used mPCa therapies and provides an easy-to-use clinical decision-making framework that incorporates patient-specific and disease-specific factors to aid selection of the optimal therapy. We outline the evolving use-cases for biomarker-guided treatment selection and our approach to incorporating these therapies in clinical practice. Finally, we highlight the rapidly growing pipeline of therapies that are in advanced stages of clinical development, such as combinations of novel antiandrogen and PARPi, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor and immunotherapy, as well as prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted therapies, many of which are poised to transform the landscape in the coming decade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smitha Sagaram
- University of Minnesota, Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Arpit Rao
- University of Minnesota, Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sottnik JL, Bordeaux EK, Mehrotra S, Ferrara SE, Goodspeed AE, Costello JC, Sikora MJ. Mediator of DNA Damage Checkpoint 1 (MDC1) Is a Novel Estrogen Receptor Coregulator in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast. Mol Cancer Res 2021; 19:1270-1282. [PMID: 33947745 PMCID: PMC8349796 DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-21-0025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the most common special histologic subtype of breast cancer, and nearly all ILC tumors express estrogen receptor alpha (ER). However, clinical and laboratory data suggest ILC are strongly estrogen-driven but not equally antiestrogen-sensitive. We hypothesized ILC-specific ER coregulators mediate ER functions and antiestrogen resistance in ILC, and profiled ER-associated proteins by mass spectrometry. Three ER+ ILC cell lines (MDA MB 134VI, SUM44PE, and BCK4) were compared with ER+ invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) line data, and we examined whether siRNA of identified proteins suppressed ER-driven proliferation in ILC cells. This identified mediator of DNA damage checkpoint 1 (MDC1), a tumor suppressor in DNA damage response (DDR), as a novel ER coregulator in ILC. We confirmed ER:MDC1 interaction was specific to ILC versus IDC cells, and found MDC1 knockdown suppressed ILC cell proliferation and tamoxifen resistance. Using RNA-sequencing, we found in ILC cells MDC1 knockdown broadly dysregulates the ER transcriptome, with ER:MDC1 target genes enriched for promoter hormone response elements. Importantly, our data are inconsistent with MDC1 tumor suppressor functions in DDR, but suggest a novel oncogenic role for MDC1 as an ER coregulator. Supporting this, in breast tumor tissue microarrays, MDC1 protein was frequently low or absent in IDC, but MDC1 loss was rare in ER+ ILC. ER:MDC1 interaction and MDC1 coregulator functions may underlie ER function in ILC and serve as targets to overcome antiestrogen resistance in ILC. IMPLICATIONS: MDC1 has novel ER coregulator activity in ILC, which may underlie ILC-specific ER functions, estrogen response, and antiestrogen resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph L Sottnik
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Evelyn K Bordeaux
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Sanjana Mehrotra
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Sarah E Ferrara
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Andrew E Goodspeed
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - James C Costello
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Matthew J Sikora
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
McFarland TR, Kessel A, Swami U, Agarwal N. Development of PARP inhibitor combinations for castration resistant prostate cancer unselected for homologous recombination repair mutations. Am J Transl Res 2021; 13:7427-7439. [PMID: 34377227 PMCID: PMC8340210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Genetic instability is a hallmark of cancer and, with the introduction of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, is a targetable feature of many tumors. Currently, two PARP inhibitors, olaparib and rucaparib, have received approval as monotherapy by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of men with castration resistant prostate cancer with selected mutations involving the homologous recombination (HR) pathway. However, it is currently debated whether an HR mutation is a prerequisite for response or if patients with HR-proficient mCRPC may also benefit from their use when combined with other targeted or immunotherapeutic agents. Several large phase III trials of PARP inhibitors with novel androgen axis inhibitors in groups of unselected patients are underway. Additionally, there are several early phase trials combining PARP inhibitors with radioligands or immunecheckpoint inhibitors. Here we discuss the currently ongoing or recently concluded trials of PARP inhibitor based combinatorial therapies in unselected patients with mCRPC, the rationale behind these trials, and how these may impact the treatment paradigm in men with mCRPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor Ryan McFarland
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Salt Lake, UT, USA
| | - Adam Kessel
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Salt Lake, UT, USA
| | - Umang Swami
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Salt Lake, UT, USA
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Salt Lake, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schiewer MJ, Knudsen KE. Basic Science and Molecular Genetics of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness. Urol Clin North Am 2021; 48:339-347. [PMID: 34210489 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2021.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Androgen receptor function, tumor cell plasticity, loss of tumor suppressors, and defects in DNA repair genes affect aggressive features of prostate cancer. Prostate cancer development, progression, and aggressive behavior are often attributable to function of the androgen receptor. Tumor cell plasticity, neuroendocrine features, and loss of tumor suppressors lend aggressive behavior to prostate cancer cells. DNA repair defects have ramifications for prostate cancer cell behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Schiewer
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Laboratory, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, 233 South 10th Street BLSB 804, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, Urology Research Laboratory, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, 233 South 10th Street BLSB 804, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 South 10th Street BLSB 1050, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 South 10th Street BLSB 1050, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 South 10th Street BLSB 1050, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 South 10th Street BLSB 1050, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. https://twitter.com/SKCCDirector
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Age-related activity of Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) in men with localized prostate cancer. Mech Ageing Dev 2021; 196:111494. [PMID: 33887280 DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2021.111494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Mutations in DNA repair genes have been connected with familial prostate cancer and sensitivity to targeted drugs like PARP-inhibitors. Clinical use of this information is limited by the small fraction of prostate cancer risk gene carriers, variants of unknown pathogenicity and the focus on monogenic disease mechanisms. Functional assays capturing mono- and polygenic defects were shown to detect breast and ovarian cancer risk in blood-derived cells. Here, we comparatively analyzed lymphocytes from prostate cancer patients and controls applying a sensitive DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair assay and a flow cytometrybased assay measuring the activity of Poly(ADP-Ribose)-Polymerase, a target in treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Contrary to breast and ovarian cancer patients, error-prone DNA double-strand break repair was not activated in prostate cancer patients. Yet, the activity of PARP discriminated between prostate cancer cases and controls. PARylation also correlated with the age of male probands, suggesting male-specific links between mutation-based and aging-associated DNA damage accumulation and PARP. Our work identifies prostate cancer-specific DNA repair phenotypes characterized by increased PARP activities and carboplatin-sensitivities, detected by functional testing of lymphocytes. This provides new insights for further investigation of PARP and carboplatin sensitivity as biomarkers in peripheral cells of men and prostate cancer patients.
Collapse
|
15
|
Jiang M, Jia K, Wang L, Li W, Chen B, Liu Y, Wang H, Zhao S, He Y, Zhou C. Alterations of DNA damage repair in cancer: from mechanisms to applications. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:1685. [PMID: 33490197 PMCID: PMC7812211 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-2920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways are essential to ensure the accurate transmission of genetic material. However, different endogenous and exogenous factors challenge genomic integrity. Mechanisms involved in the alterations of DDR pathways mainly include genetic inactivation and epigenetic mechanisms. The development and progression of carcinomas are closely associated with DDR pathway aberrations, including the epigenetic silencing of gene O6-alkylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT); deficiencies of mismatch repair (MMR) genes, including MutL homolog 1 (MLH1), MutS protein homologue (MSH)-2 (MSH2), MSH6, and PMS1 homolog 2; the mismatch repair system component (PMS2); and mutations of homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, such as the breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 (BRCA1/2). Understanding the underlying mechanisms and the correlations between alterations to DDR pathways and cancer could improve the efficacy of antitumor therapies. Emerging evidence suggests that survival is higher in patients with DDR-deficient tumors than in those with DDR-proficient tumors. Thus, DDR alterations play a predictive and prognostic role in anticancer therapies. Theoretical studies on the co-administration of DDR inhibitors and other anticancer therapies, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, endocrine therapy, and epigenetic drugs, hold promise for cancer treatments. In this review, we focus on the basic mechanisms, characteristics, current applications, and combination strategies of DDR pathways in the anticancer field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minlin Jiang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University Medical School Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Keyi Jia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University Medical School Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University Medical School Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University Medical School Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Bin Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University Medical School Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University Medical School Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hao Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University Medical School Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sha Zhao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University Medical School Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yayi He
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University Medical School Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Caicun Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University Medical School Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wengner AM, Scholz A, Haendler B. Targeting DNA Damage Response in Prostate and Breast Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E8273. [PMID: 33158305 PMCID: PMC7663807 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21218273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Steroid hormone signaling induces vast gene expression programs which necessitate the local formation of transcription factories at regulatory regions and large-scale alterations of the genome architecture to allow communication among distantly related cis-acting regions. This involves major stress at the genomic DNA level. Transcriptionally active regions are generally instable and prone to breakage due to the torsional stress and local depletion of nucleosomes that make DNA more accessible to damaging agents. A dedicated DNA damage response (DDR) is therefore essential to maintain genome integrity at these exposed regions. The DDR is a complex network involving DNA damage sensor proteins, such as the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1), the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs), the ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) kinase and the ATM and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase, as central regulators. The tight interplay between the DDR and steroid hormone receptors has been unraveled recently. Several DNA repair factors interact with the androgen and estrogen receptors and support their transcriptional functions. Conversely, both receptors directly control the expression of agents involved in the DDR. Impaired DDR is also exploited by tumors to acquire advantageous mutations. Cancer cells often harbor germline or somatic alterations in DDR genes, and their association with disease outcome and treatment response led to intensive efforts towards identifying selective inhibitors targeting the major players in this process. The PARP-1 inhibitors are now approved for ovarian, breast, and prostate cancer with specific genomic alterations. Additional DDR-targeting agents are being evaluated in clinical studies either as single agents or in combination with treatments eliciting DNA damage (e.g., radiation therapy, including targeted radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) or addressing targets involved in maintenance of genome integrity. Recent preclinical and clinical findings made in addressing DNA repair dysfunction in hormone-dependent and -independent prostate and breast tumors are presented. Importantly, the combination of anti-hormonal therapy with DDR inhibition or with radiation has the potential to enhance efficacy but still needs further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bernard Haendler
- Preclinical Research, Research & Development, Pharmaceuticals, Bayer AG, Müllerstr. 178, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (A.M.W.); (A.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sjöström M, Veenstra C, Holmberg E, Karlsson P, Killander F, Malmström P, Niméus E, Fernö M, Stål O. Expression of HGF, pMet, and pAkt is related to benefit of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a long-term follow-up of the SweBCG91-RT randomised trial. Mol Oncol 2020; 14:2713-2726. [PMID: 32946618 PMCID: PMC7607179 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Experimental studies suggest that hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and its transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor, Met, in part also relying on Akt kinase activity, mediate radioresistance. We investigated the importance of these biomarkers for the risk of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) after adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in primary breast cancer. HGF, phosphorylated Met (pMet) and phosphorylated Akt (pAkt) were evaluated immunohistochemically on tissue microarrays from 1004 patients in the SweBCG91‐RT trial, which randomly assigned patients to breast‐conserving therapy, with or without adjuvant RT. HGF was evaluated in the stroma (HGFstr); pMet in the membrane (pMetmem); HGF, pMet and pAkt in the cytoplasm (HGFcyt, pMetcyt, pAktcyt); and pAkt in the nucleus (pAktnuc). The prognostic and treatment predictive effects were evaluated to primary endpoint IBTR as first event during the first 5 years. Patients with tumours expressing low levels of HGFcyt and pMetcyt and high levels of pAktnuc derived a larger benefit from RT [hazard ratio (HR): 0.11 (0.037–0.30), 0.066 (0.016–0.28) and 0.094 (0.028–0.31), respectively] compared to patients with high expression of HGFcyt and pMetcyt, and low pAktnuc [HR: 0.36 (0.19–0.67), 0.35 (0.20–0.64) and 0.47 (0.32–0.71), respectively; interaction analyses: P = 0.052, 0.035 and 0.013, respectively]. These differences remained in multivariable analysis when adjusting for patient age, tumour size, histological grade, St Gallen subtype and systemic treatment (interaction analysis, P‐values: 0.085, 0.027, and 0.023, respectively). This study suggests that patients with immunohistochemically low HGFcyt, low pMetcyt and high pAktnuc may derive an increased benefit from RT after breast‐conserving surgery concerning the risk of developing IBTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Sjöström
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Cynthia Veenstra
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Erik Holmberg
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Per Karlsson
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Fredrika Killander
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Per Malmström
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Emma Niméus
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Mårten Fernö
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Olle Stål
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gormally BMG, Estrada R, McVey M, Romero LM. Beyond corticosterone: The acute stress response increases DNA damage in house sparrows. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY PART 2020; 333:595-606. [PMID: 32798291 DOI: 10.1002/jez.2405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Although corticosterone (Cort) has been the predominant metric used to assess acute stress in birds, it does not always accurately reflect how an animal copes with a stressor. Downstream measurements may be more reliable. In the current study, we tested the hypothesis that acute increases in DNA damage could be used to assess stressor exposure. Studies have shown DNA damage increases in response to stress-related hormones in vitro; however, this has not yet been thoroughly applied in wild animals. We exposed house sparrows (Passer domesticus) to a 30- or 120-min restraint stressor and took blood samples at 0, 30, 60, and 120 min to measure Cort, DNA damage, and uric acid. Both treatments increased DNA damage and Cort, and decreased uric acid. It thus appears that DNA damage can reflect acute stressor exposure. To improve the usability of DNA damage as a metric for stress, we also tested the impacts of sample storage on DNA damage. Leaving red blood cells on ice for up to 24 hr, only slightly influenced DNA damage. Freezing blood samples for 1-4 weeks substantially increased DNA damage. These findings emphasize the importance of reducing variation between samples by assaying them together whenever possible. Overall, these results indicate that assessing DNA damage is a valid method of assessing acute stressor exposure that is suitable for both laboratory- and field-based studies; however, additional research is needed on the molecular dynamics of nucleated red blood cells, including whether and how their DNA is repaired.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rodolfo Estrada
- Department of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts
| | - Mitch McVey
- Department of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ruff SE, Logan SK, Garabedian MJ, Huang TT. Roles for MDC1 in cancer development and treatment. DNA Repair (Amst) 2020; 95:102948. [PMID: 32866776 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The DNA damage response (DDR) is necessary to maintain genome integrity and prevent the accumulation of oncogenic mutations. Consequently, proteins involved in the DDR often serve as tumor suppressors, carrying out the crucial task of keeping DNA fidelity intact. Mediator of DNA damage checkpoint 1 (MDC1) is a scaffold protein involved in the early steps of the DDR. MDC1 interacts directly with γ-H2AX, the phosphorylated form of H2AX, a commonly used marker for DNA damage. It then propagates the phosphorylation of H2AX by recruiting ATM kinase. While the function of MDC1 in the DDR has been reviewed previously, its role in cancer has not been reviewed, and numerous studies have recently identified a link between MDC1 and carcinogenesis. This includes MDC1 functioning as a tumor suppressor, with its loss serving as a biomarker for cancer and contributor to drug sensitivity. Studies also indicate that MDC1 operates outside of its traditional role in DDR, and functions as a co-regulator of nuclear receptor transcriptional activity, and that mutations in MDC1 are present in tumors and can also cause germline predisposition to cancer. This review will discuss reports that link MDC1 to cancer and identify MDC1 as an important player in tumor formation, progression, and treatment. We also discuss mechanisms by which MDC1 levels are regulated and how this contributes to tumor formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie E Ruff
- Department of Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Susan K Logan
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA; Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Michael J Garabedian
- Department of Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA; Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| | - Tony T Huang
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Oster S, Aqeilan RI. Programmed DNA Damage and Physiological DSBs: Mapping, Biological Significance and Perturbations in Disease States. Cells 2020; 9:cells9081870. [PMID: 32785139 PMCID: PMC7463922 DOI: 10.3390/cells9081870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are known to be the most toxic and threatening of the various types of breaks that may occur to the DNA. However, growing evidence continuously sheds light on the regulatory roles of programmed DSBs. Emerging studies demonstrate the roles of DSBs in processes such as T and B cell development, meiosis, transcription and replication. A significant recent progress in the last few years has contributed to our advanced knowledge regarding the functions of DSBs is the development of many next generation sequencing (NGS) methods, which have considerably advanced our capabilities. Other studies have focused on the implications of programmed DSBs on chromosomal aberrations and tumorigenesis. This review aims to summarize what is known about DNA damage in its physiological context. In addition, we will examine the advancements of the past several years, which have made an impact on the study of genome landscape and its organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Oster
- The Concern Foundation Laboratories, The Lautenberg Center for Immunology and Cancer Research, Department of Immunology and Cancer Research-IMRIC, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel;
| | - Rami I. Aqeilan
- The Concern Foundation Laboratories, The Lautenberg Center for Immunology and Cancer Research, Department of Immunology and Cancer Research-IMRIC, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel;
- Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chesnokova V, Melmed S. Peptide Hormone Regulation of DNA Damage Responses. Endocr Rev 2020; 41:5818084. [PMID: 32270196 PMCID: PMC7279704 DOI: 10.1210/endrev/bnaa009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
DNA damage response (DDR) and DNA repair pathways determine neoplastic cell transformation and therapeutic responses, as well as the aging process. Altered DDR functioning results in accumulation of unrepaired DNA damage, increased frequency of tumorigenic mutations, and premature aging. Recent evidence suggests that polypeptide hormones play a role in modulating DDR and DNA damage repair, while DNA damage accumulation may also affect hormonal status. We review the available reports elucidating involvement of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), growth hormone (GH), α-melanocyte stimulating hormone (αMSH), and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)/gonadotropins in DDR and DNA repair as well as the current understanding of pathways enabling these actions. We discuss effects of DNA damage pathway mutations, including Fanconi anemia, on endocrine function and consider mechanisms underlying these phenotypes. (Endocrine Reviews 41: 1 - 19, 2020).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Chesnokova
- Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Shlomo Melmed
- Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Venkadakrishnan VB, Ben-Salem S, Heemers HV. AR-dependent phosphorylation and phospho-proteome targets in prostate cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 2020; 27:R193-R210. [PMID: 32276264 PMCID: PMC7583603 DOI: 10.1530/erc-20-0048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (CaP) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Western men. Because androgens drive CaP by activating the androgen receptor (AR), blocking AR's ligand activation, known as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), is the default treatment for metastatic CaP. Despite an initial remission, CaP eventually develops resistance to ADT and progresses to castration-recurrent CaP (CRPC). CRPC continues to rely on aberrantly activated AR that is no longer inhibited effectively by available therapeutics. Interference with signaling pathways downstream of activated AR that mediate aggressive CRPC behavior may lead to alternative CaP treatments. Developing such therapeutic strategies requires a thorough mechanistic understanding of the most clinically relevant and druggable AR-dependent signaling events. Recent proteomics analyses of CRPC clinical specimens indicate a shift in the phosphoproteome during CaP progression. Kinases and phosphatases represent druggable entities, for which clinically tested inhibitors are available, some of which are incorporated already in treatment plans for other human malignancies. Here, we reviewed the AR-associated transcriptome and translational regulon, and AR interactome involved in CaP phosphorylation events. Novel and for the most part mutually exclusive AR-dependent transcriptional and post-transcriptional control over kinase and phosphatase expression was found, with yet other phospho-regulators interacting with AR. The multiple mechanisms by which AR can shape and fine-tune the CaP phosphoproteome were reflected in diverse aspects of CaP biology such as cell cycle progression and cell migration. Furthermore, we examined the potential, limitations and challenges of interfering with AR-mediated phosphorylation events as alternative strategy to block AR function during CaP progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varadha Balaji Venkadakrishnan
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Salma Ben-Salem
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kodandaraman G, Bankoglu EE, Stopper H. Overlapping mechanism of the induction of genomic damage by insulin and adrenaline in human promyelocytic HL-60 cells. Toxicol In Vitro 2020; 66:104867. [PMID: 32305330 DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Endogenous hormones systemically regulate the growth and metabolism and some prior studies have shown that their imbalance can have a potential to induce genomic damage in in vitro and animal models. Some conditions that are associated with elevated levels of endogenous hormones are hyperinsulinemia and intense exercise-induced stress causing increased adrenaline. In this study we test whether these two hormones, could cause an additive increase in genomic damage and whether they have an overlapping mechanism of action. For this, we use the human promyelocytic HL60 cells, as they express the receptors for both hormones. At doses taken from the saturation level of the individual dose response curves, no additivity in genomic damage was detected through micronucleus induction. This hints towards a common step in the pathway, which is under these conditions fully activated by each of the individual hormone. To investigate this further, individual and common parts in insulin and adrenaline signalling such as their respective hormone receptors, the downstream protein AKT and the involvement of mitochondria and NADPH oxidase (NOX) enzymes were studied. The results indicate no additive effect of high hormone concentrations in genomic damage in the in vitro model, which may be due to exhaustion of the NOX 2-mediated reactive oxygen production. It remains to be determined whether a similar situation may occur in in vivo situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geema Kodandaraman
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Ezgi Eyluel Bankoglu
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Helga Stopper
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Prolonged use of finasteride-induced gonadal sex steroids alterations, DNA damage and menstrual bleeding in women. Biosci Rep 2020; 40:221928. [PMID: 31967291 PMCID: PMC7007407 DOI: 10.1042/bsr20191434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of prolonged use of finasteride on serum levels of dihydrotestosterone (DHT), estradiol (E2), progesterone, testosterone and androstenedione in women during the menstrual period. Further, to screen and compare the 5α-reductase activities through the expression of SRD5A1, SRD5A2 and AR gene and to determine the level of VEGF, VKOR and SAA gene expression and DNA damage. A total of 30 Saudi women aged between 25 and 35 years were enrolled in the study. The selected women were divided into two groups. The first group (n = 15) received 5 mg finasteride/day for prolonged period of one year and second group (n = 15) was taken as a healthy control. ELISA technique was used for measuring the serum levels of the targeted hormones, and Comet assay was used for checking the DNA integrity. Our findings revealed significant decrement of DHT, E2, progesterone and androstenedione levels and elevated levels of testosterone in group treated with daily oral doses of 5 mg finasteride/day compared with the control subjects. mRNA expression suggested that finasteride has concrete effects on the gene expression of the selected genes from the treated group in comparison with the control group. In addition, finasteride induced DNA damage, and heavy menstrual bleeding was noted in women treated with finasteride. In conclusion, the present findings revealed that finasteride has adverse health effects in women associated with gonadal sex steroids alterations, DNA damage and heavy menstrual bleeding with no consensus in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in women.
Collapse
|
25
|
Li Y, Yang R, Henzler CM, Ho Y, Passow C, Auch B, Carreira S, Nava Rodrigues D, Bertan C, Hwang TH, Quigley DA, Dang HX, Morrissey C, Fraser M, Plymate SR, Maher CA, Feng FY, de Bono JS, Dehm SM. Diverse AR Gene Rearrangements Mediate Resistance to Androgen Receptor Inhibitors in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:1965-1976. [PMID: 31932493 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-3023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2019] [Revised: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of male cancer deaths. Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is a lethal stage of the disease that emerges when endocrine therapies are no longer effective at suppressing activity of the androgen receptor (AR) transcription factor. The purpose of this study was to identify genomic mechanisms that contribute to the development and progression of CRPC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We used whole-genome and targeted DNA-sequencing approaches to identify mechanisms underlying CRPC in an aggregate cohort of 272 prostate cancer patients. We analyzed structural rearrangements at the genome-wide level and carried out a detailed structural rearrangement analysis of the AR locus. We used genome engineering to perform experimental modeling of AR gene rearrangements and long-read RNA sequencing to analyze effects on expression of AR and truncated AR variants (AR-V). RESULTS AR was among the most frequently rearranged genes in CRPC tumors. AR gene rearrangements promoted expression of diverse AR-V species. AR gene rearrangements occurring in the context of AR amplification correlated with AR overexpression. Cell lines with experimentally derived AR gene rearrangements displayed high expression of tumor-specific AR-Vs and were resistant to endocrine therapies, including the AR antagonist enzalutamide. CONCLUSIONS AR gene rearrangements are an important mechanism of resistance to endocrine therapies in CRPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingming Li
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Rendong Yang
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.,The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, Minnesota
| | - Christine M Henzler
- Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Yeung Ho
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Courtney Passow
- University of Minnesota Genomics Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Benjamin Auch
- University of Minnesota Genomics Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Claudia Bertan
- The Institute for Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tae Hyun Hwang
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - David A Quigley
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Ha X Dang
- McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.,Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Colm Morrissey
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Michael Fraser
- Computational Biology Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Stephen R Plymate
- Division of Gerontology, Geriatric Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Centers, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Christopher A Maher
- McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.,Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Johann S de Bono
- The Institute for Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.,The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Scott M Dehm
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. .,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.,Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Clinical implications of genetic aberrations in metastatic prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2019; 29:319-325. [DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
27
|
Jin G, Mao X, Qiao Z, Chen B, Jin F. RAP80 expression in breast cancer and its relationship with apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Onco Targets Ther 2019; 12:625-634. [PMID: 30705591 PMCID: PMC6343510 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s186981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background RAP80 is a member of BRCA1-A complex, which plays an important role in regulating the cell cycle checkpoint and DNA damage repair in the nucleus. Method We investigated RAP80 expression in breast cancer and its paired normal breast tissues to further analyze its role in the biological behavior of breast cancer cells. Results RAP80 expression in breast cancer (62.3%, 101/162) was significantly lower than that in adjacent normal breast tissues (P<0.05). RAP80 expression was related to tumor size, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage, and molecular subtype (P<0.05). RAP80 mRNA expression was significantly lower in triple-negative breast cancer than other types. The mRNA and protein of RAP80 were obvious in MCF-7 and very weak in ZR-75 or MDA-MB-231, so we picked MCF-7 to be transfected with RAP80 siRNA. The survival rate of both cells decreased in a dose-dependent manner and the IC50 value for cisplatin in MCF-7 RAP80 siRNA cells was 0.83 µg/mL, and 1.69 µg/mL in wild-type MCF-7 according to MTT. RAP80 siRNA transfection upregulated the apoptosis and downregulated invasive or migrating ability of MCF-7. RAP80 siRNA also upregulated the protein expression of Caspase-3, cleaved Caspase-3, Apaf-1, Cytochrome C, Bax, and Fas, and downregulated the protein expression of Bcl-2. Conclusion RAP80 expression was related to ER or PR activity. Inhibition of RAP80 expression can induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells and improve chemosensitivity to cisplatin. Tumor cells can activate protective responses to inhibit cell cycle progression, which may be related to RAP80, and repair cisplatin-induced DNA damage. RAP80 is related to BRCA1's effect, which can be used as an interesting target for pharmacological modulation that can increase the efficiency of cisplatin chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guanghua Jin
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, People's Republic of China,
| | - Xiaoyun Mao
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, People's Republic of China,
| | - Zhen Qiao
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, People's Republic of China,
| | - Bo Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, People's Republic of China,
| | - Feng Jin
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, People's Republic of China,
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bessa MJ, Brandão F, Querido MM, Costa C, Pereira CC, Valdiglesias V, Laffon B, Carriere M, Teixeira JP, Fraga S. Optimization of the harvesting and freezing conditions of human cell lines for DNA damage analysis by the alkaline comet assay. Mutat Res 2018; 845:402994. [PMID: 31561887 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2018.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Revised: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/09/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
The comet assay is a commonly used method for in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity assessment. This versatile assay can be performed in a wide range of tissues and cell types. Although most of the studies use samples immediately processed after collection, frozen biological samples can also be used. The present study aimed to optimize a collection and freezing protocol to minimize the DNA damage associated with these procedures in human cell line samples for comet assay analysis. This study was conducted in glial A172 and lung alveolar epithelial A549 cells. Two cell detachment methods (mechanical vs enzymatic) and two cryoprotective media [FBS + 10% DMSO vs Cell Culture Media (CCM) + 10% DMSO] were tested, and DNA damage assessed at four time points following storage at -80 °C (one, two, four and eight weeks). In both cell lines, no differences in % tail intensity were detected between fresh and frozen cells up to eight weeks, irrespective of the harvesting method and freezing medium used. However, freshly isolated A172 cells exhibited a significant lower DNA damage when resuspended in CCM + 10% DMSO, while for A549 fresh cells the preferable harvesting method was the enzymatic one since it induced less DNA damage. Although both harvesting methods and cryoprotective media tested were found suitable, our data indicate that enzymatic harvesting and cryopreservation in CCM + 10% DMSO is a preferable method for DNA integrity preservation of human cell line samples for comet assay analysis. Our data also suggest that CCM is a preferable and cost-effective alternative to FBS in cryopreservation media. This optimized protocol allows the analysis of in vitro cell samples collected and frozen at different locations, with minimal interference on the basal DNA strand break levels in samples kept frozen up to eight weeks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria João Bessa
- EPIUnit-Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal; Instituto Nacional de Saúde Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Departamento de Saúde Ambiental, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Fátima Brandão
- EPIUnit-Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal; Instituto Nacional de Saúde Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Departamento de Saúde Ambiental, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Micaela Machado Querido
- EPIUnit-Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal; Instituto Nacional de Saúde Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Departamento de Saúde Ambiental, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Carla Costa
- EPIUnit-Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal; Instituto Nacional de Saúde Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Departamento de Saúde Ambiental, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Cristiana Costa Pereira
- EPIUnit-Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal; Instituto Nacional de Saúde Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Departamento de Saúde Ambiental, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Vanessa Valdiglesias
- EPIUnit-Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal; Universidade da Coruña, DICOMOSA Group, Department of Psychology, Area of Psychobiology, Coruña, Spain.
| | - Blanca Laffon
- Universidade da Coruña, DICOMOSA Group, Department of Psychology, Area of Psychobiology, Coruña, Spain.
| | - Marie Carriere
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, CEA, CNRS, INAC-SyMMES, Chimie Interface Biologie pour l'Environnement, la Santé et la Toxicologie (CIBEST), France.
| | - João Paulo Teixeira
- EPIUnit-Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal; Instituto Nacional de Saúde Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Departamento de Saúde Ambiental, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Sónia Fraga
- EPIUnit-Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal; Instituto Nacional de Saúde Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Departamento de Saúde Ambiental, Porto, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Isaacsson Velho P, Carducci MA. Investigational therapies targeting the androgen signaling axis and the androgen receptor and in prostate cancer – recent developments and future directions. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2018; 27:811-822. [DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2018.1513490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael A. Carducci
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zheng D, Wang X, Antonson P, Gustafsson JÅ, Li Z. Genomics of sex hormone receptor signaling in hepatic sexual dimorphism. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2018; 471:33-41. [PMID: 28554805 PMCID: PMC5702598 DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2016] [Revised: 05/17/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The liver plays a crucial role in a variety of physiological processes. Sexual dimorphism is markedly defined in liver disorders, such as fatty liver diseases and liver cancer, but barely addressed in the normal liver. Distinct sex hormone signaling between male and female livers is the major driving factor for hepatic sexual dimorphism. Over 6000 genes are differently expressed between male and female livers in mice. Here we address how sex hormone receptors, estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and androgen receptor (AR), mediate sexually dimorphic gene expression in mouse livers. We identified 5192 ERα target genes and 4154 AR target genes using ChIP-Seq. Using liver-specific ERα or AR knockout mice, we further identified direct and functional target genes of ERα (123 genes) and AR (151 genes) that contribute to hepatic sexual dimorphism. We also found that the most significant sexually dimorphic gene expression was initiated at birth by comparing hepatic gene expression data from the embryonic stage E10.5 to the postnatal stage P60 during liver development. Overall, our study indicates that sex hormone receptor signaling drives sexual dimorphism of hepatic gene expression throughout liver development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daoshan Zheng
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Xiao Wang
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Per Antonson
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge 14183, Sweden
| | - Jan-Åke Gustafsson
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge 14183, Sweden; Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA
| | - Zhaoyu Li
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Eryilmaz IE, Guney Eskiler G, Egeli U, Yurdacan B, Cecener G, Tunca B. In vitro cytotoxic and antiproliferative effects of usnic acid on hormone-dependent breast and prostate cancer cells. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 2018; 32:e22208. [PMID: 30101414 DOI: 10.1002/jbt.22208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2018] [Revised: 06/25/2018] [Accepted: 07/06/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
The aim of the current study was first to investigate cytotoxic activity of usnic acid (UA) on hormone-dependent breast and prostate cancer, and normal cells. Cells were treated with increasing concentrations (25 to 150 µM) of UA for 48 hours and cell viability, quantitative and morphological analysis of cell death, and cell cycle analysis were performed. UA was shown to have selective cytotoxicity on hormone-dependent cancer cells with the IC50 levels of 71.4 and 77.5 µM for MCF7 and LNCaP cells, respectively. UA induced apoptotic cell death and G0/G1 cell cycle arrest without damaging normal cells. MCF7 cells were more sensitive to UA than LNCaP cells. Our results first revealed that UA is a promising candidate as an alternative agent for hormone-dependent breast and prostate cancers. However, molecular mechanism underlying the UA-mediated cell death in cancer cells should be investigated further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isil Ezgi Eryilmaz
- Medical Biology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Gamze Guney Eskiler
- Medical Biology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - Unal Egeli
- Medical Biology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Beste Yurdacan
- Medical Biology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Gulsah Cecener
- Medical Biology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Berrin Tunca
- Medical Biology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Setayesh T, Nersesyan A, Mišík M, Ferk F, Langie S, Andrade VM, Haslberger A, Knasmüller S. Impact of obesity and overweight on DNA stability: Few facts and many hypotheses. MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH 2018; 777:64-91. [PMID: 30115431 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2018.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2017] [Revised: 05/03/2018] [Accepted: 07/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Health authorities are alarmed worldwide about the increase of obesity and overweight in the last decades which lead to adverse health effects including inflammation, cancer, accelerated aging and infertility. We evaluated the state of knowledge concerning the impact of elevated body mass on genomic instability. Results of investigations with humans (39 studies) in which DNA damage was monitored in lymphocytes and sperm cells, are conflicting and probably as a consequence of heterogeneous study designs and confounding factors (e.g. uncontrolled intake of vitamins and minerals and consumption of different food types). Results of animal studies with defined diets (23 studies) are more consistent and show that excess body fat causes DNA damage in multiple organs including brain, liver, colon and testes. Different molecular mechanisms may cause genetic instability in overweight/obese individuals. ROS formation and lipid peroxidation were found in several investigations and may be caused by increased insulin, fatty acid and glucose levels or indirectly via inflammation. Also reduced DNA repair and formation of advanced glycation end products may play a role but more data are required to draw firm conclusions. Reduction of telomere lengths and hormonal imbalances are characteristic for overweight/obesity but the former effects are delayed and moderate and hormonal effects were not investigated in regard to genomic instability in obese individuals. Increased BMI values affect also the activities of drug metabolizing enzymes which activate/detoxify genotoxic carcinogens, but no studies concerning the impact of these alterations of DNA damage in obese individuals are available. Overall, the knowledge concerning the impact of increased body weight and DNA damage is poor and further research is warranted to shed light on this important issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tahereh Setayesh
- Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Armen Nersesyan
- Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Miroslav Mišík
- Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Franziska Ferk
- Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sabine Langie
- Environmental Risk and Health Unit, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium
| | - Vanessa M Andrade
- Laboratório de Biologia Celulare Molecular, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Unidade Acadêmica de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense (UNESC), Brazil
| | | | - Siegfried Knasmüller
- Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kornberg Z, Chou J, Feng FY, Ryan CJ. Prostate cancer in the era of "Omic" medicine: recognizing the importance of DNA damage repair pathways. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2018; 6:161. [PMID: 29911109 PMCID: PMC5985268 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2018.05.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Data from recent high-throughput studies analyzing local and advanced prostate cancer have revealed an incredible amount of biological diversity, which has led to the classification of distinct molecular tumor subtypes. While integrating prostate cancer genomics with clinical medicine is still at its infancy, new approaches to treat prostate cancer are well underway and being studied. With the recognition that DNA damage repair (DDR) mutations play an important role in the pathogenesis of this disease, clinicians can begin to utilize genomic information in complex treatment decisions for prostate cancer patients. In this Review, we discuss the role of DDR mutations in prostate cancer, including deficiencies in homologous repair and mismatch repair (MMR), and how this information is revolutionizing the treatment landscape. In addition, we highlight the potential resistance mechanisms that may result as we begin to target these pathways in isolation and discuss potential combinatorial approaches that may delay or overcome resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Kornberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Chou
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Felix Y. Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Charles J. Ryan
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Awad D, Pulliam TL, Lin C, Wilkenfeld SR, Frigo DE. Delineation of the androgen-regulated signaling pathways in prostate cancer facilitates the development of novel therapeutic approaches. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2018; 41:1-11. [PMID: 29609138 DOI: 10.1016/j.coph.2018.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2018] [Accepted: 03/08/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Although androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is initially effective for the treatment of progressive prostate cancer, it inevitably fails due to the onset of diverse resistance mechanisms that restore androgen receptor (AR) signaling. Thus, AR remains a desired therapeutic target even in the relapsed stages of the disease. Given the difficulties in stopping all AR reactivation mechanisms, we propose that the identification of the driver signaling events downstream of the receptor offer viable, alternative therapeutic targets. Here, we summarize recently described, AR-regulated processes that have been demonstrated to promote prostate cancer. By highlighting these signaling events and describing some of the ongoing efforts to pharmacologically modulate these pathways, our goal is to advocate potential new therapeutic targets that would represent an alternative approach for blocking AR actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Awad
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thomas L Pulliam
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Center for Nuclear Receptors and Cell Signaling, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chenchu Lin
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sandi R Wilkenfeld
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel E Frigo
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Center for Nuclear Receptors and Cell Signaling, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Molecular Medicine Program, The Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Rong C, Meinert ÉFRC, Hess J. Estrogen Receptor Signaling in Radiotherapy: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Studies. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:ijms19030713. [PMID: 29498642 PMCID: PMC5877574 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19030713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2017] [Revised: 02/02/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Numerous studies have established a proof of concept that abnormal expression and function of estrogen receptors (ER) are crucial processes in initiation and development of hormone-related cancers and also affect the efficacy of anti-cancer therapy. Radiotherapy has been applied as one of the most common and potent therapeutic strategies, which is synergistic with surgical excision, chemotherapy and targeted therapy for treating malignant tumors. However, the impact of ionizing radiation on ER expression and ER-related signaling in cancer tissue, as well as the interaction between endocrine and irradiation therapy remains largely elusive. This review will discuss recent findings on ER and ER-related signaling, which are relevant for cancer radiotherapy. In addition, we will summarize pre-clinical and clinical studies that evaluate the consequences of anti-estrogen and irradiation therapy in cancer, including emerging studies on head and neck cancer, which might improve the understanding and development of novel therapeutic strategies for estrogen-related cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Rong
- Section Experimental and Translational Head and Neck Oncology, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Étienne Fasolt Richard Corvin Meinert
- Section Experimental and Translational Head and Neck Oncology, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Research Group Molecular Mechanisms of Head and Neck Tumors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Jochen Hess
- Section Experimental and Translational Head and Neck Oncology, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Research Group Molecular Mechanisms of Head and Neck Tumors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Antitumor Mechanisms of Curcumae Rhizoma Based on Network Pharmacology. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2018; 2018:4509892. [PMID: 29636777 PMCID: PMC5832109 DOI: 10.1155/2018/4509892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Curcumae Rhizoma, a traditional Chinese medication, is commonly used in both traditional treatment and modern clinical care. Its anticancer effects have attracted a great deal of attention, but the mechanisms of action remain obscure. In this study, we screened for the active compounds of Curcumae Rhizoma using a drug-likeness approach. Candidate protein targets with functions related to cancer were predicted by reverse docking and then checked by manual search of the PubMed database. Potential target genes were uploaded to the GeneMANIA server and DAVID 6.8 database for analysis. Finally, compound-target, target-pathway, and compound-target-pathway networks were constructed using Cytoscape 3.3. The results revealed that the anticancer activity of Curcumae Rhizoma potentially involves 13 active compounds, 33 potential targets, and 31 signaling pathways, thus constituting a “multiple compounds, multiple targets, and multiple pathways” network corresponding to the concept of systematic actions in TCM. These findings provide an overview of the anticancer action of Curcumae Rhizoma from a network perspective, as well as setting an example for future studies of other materials used in TCM.
Collapse
|
37
|
Zárate S, Stevnsner T, Gredilla R. Role of Estrogen and Other Sex Hormones in Brain Aging. Neuroprotection and DNA Repair. Front Aging Neurosci 2018. [PMID: 29311911 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00430/xml/nlm] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Aging is an inevitable biological process characterized by a progressive decline in physiological function and increased susceptibility to disease. The detrimental effects of aging are observed in all tissues, the brain being the most important one due to its main role in the homeostasis of the organism. As our knowledge about the underlying mechanisms of brain aging increases, potential approaches to preserve brain function rise significantly. Accumulating evidence suggests that loss of genomic maintenance may contribute to aging, especially in the central nervous system (CNS) owing to its low DNA repair capacity. Sex hormones, particularly estrogens, possess potent antioxidant properties and play important roles in maintaining normal reproductive and non-reproductive functions. They exert neuroprotective actions and their loss during aging and natural or surgical menopause is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, neuroinflammation, synaptic decline, cognitive impairment and increased risk of age-related disorders. Moreover, loss of sex hormones has been suggested to promote an accelerated aging phenotype eventually leading to the development of brain hypometabolism, a feature often observed in menopausal women and prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD). Although data on the relation between sex hormones and DNA repair mechanisms in the brain is still limited, various investigations have linked sex hormone levels with different DNA repair enzymes. Here, we review estrogen anti-aging and neuroprotective mechanisms, which are currently an area of intense study, together with the effect they may have on the DNA repair capacity in the brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Zárate
- Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas (INBIOMED, UBA-CONICET), Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Departamento de Histología, Embriología, Biología Celular y Genética, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Tinna Stevnsner
- Danish Center for Molecular Gerontology and Danish Aging Research Center, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ricardo Gredilla
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Zárate S, Stevnsner T, Gredilla R. Role of Estrogen and Other Sex Hormones in Brain Aging. Neuroprotection and DNA Repair. Front Aging Neurosci 2017; 9:430. [PMID: 29311911 PMCID: PMC5743731 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 162] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2017] [Accepted: 12/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Aging is an inevitable biological process characterized by a progressive decline in physiological function and increased susceptibility to disease. The detrimental effects of aging are observed in all tissues, the brain being the most important one due to its main role in the homeostasis of the organism. As our knowledge about the underlying mechanisms of brain aging increases, potential approaches to preserve brain function rise significantly. Accumulating evidence suggests that loss of genomic maintenance may contribute to aging, especially in the central nervous system (CNS) owing to its low DNA repair capacity. Sex hormones, particularly estrogens, possess potent antioxidant properties and play important roles in maintaining normal reproductive and non-reproductive functions. They exert neuroprotective actions and their loss during aging and natural or surgical menopause is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, neuroinflammation, synaptic decline, cognitive impairment and increased risk of age-related disorders. Moreover, loss of sex hormones has been suggested to promote an accelerated aging phenotype eventually leading to the development of brain hypometabolism, a feature often observed in menopausal women and prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD). Although data on the relation between sex hormones and DNA repair mechanisms in the brain is still limited, various investigations have linked sex hormone levels with different DNA repair enzymes. Here, we review estrogen anti-aging and neuroprotective mechanisms, which are currently an area of intense study, together with the effect they may have on the DNA repair capacity in the brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Zárate
- Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas (INBIOMED, UBA-CONICET), Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Departamento de Histología, Embriología, Biología Celular y Genética, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Tinna Stevnsner
- Danish Center for Molecular Gerontology and Danish Aging Research Center, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ricardo Gredilla
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hussain M, Daignault-Newton S, Twardowski PW, Albany C, Stein MN, Kunju LP, Siddiqui J, Wu YM, Robinson D, Lonigro RJ, Cao X, Tomlins SA, Mehra R, Cooney KA, Montgomery B, Antonarakis ES, Shevrin DH, Corn PG, Whang YE, Smith DC, Caram MV, Knudsen KE, Stadler WM, Feng FY, Chinnaiyan AM. Targeting Androgen Receptor and DNA Repair in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Results From NCI 9012. J Clin Oncol 2017; 36:991-999. [PMID: 29261439 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.75.7310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 161] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To determine whether cotargeting poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 plus androgen receptor is superior to androgen receptor inhibition in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and whether ETS fusions predict response. Patients and Methods Patients underwent metastatic site biopsy and were stratified by ETS status and randomly assigned to abiraterone plus prednisone without (arm A) or with veliparib (arm B). Primary objectives were: confirmed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR) and whether ETS fusions predicted response. Secondary objectives were: safety, measurable disease RR (mRR), progression-free survival (PFS), and molecular biomarker analysis. A total of 148 patients were randomly assigned to detect a 20% PSA RR improvement. Results A total of 148 patients with mCRPC were randomly assigned: arm A, n = 72; arm B, n = 76. There were no differences in PSA RR (63.9% v 72.4%; P = .27), mRR (45.0% v 52.2%; P = .51), or median PFS (10.1 v 11 months; P = .99). ETS fusions did not predict response. Exploratory analysis of tumor sequencing (80 patients) revealed: 41 patients (51%) were ETS positive, 20 (25%) had DNA-damage repair defect (DRD), 41 (51%) had AR amplification or copy gain, 34 (43%) had PTEN mutation, 33 (41%) had TP53 mutation, 39 (49%) had PIK3CA pathway activation, and 12 (15%) had WNT pathway alteration. Patients with DRD had significantly higher PSA RR (90% v 56.7%; P = .007) and mRR (87.5% v 38.6%; P = .001), PSA decline ≥ 90% (75% v 25%; P = .001), and longer median PFS (14.5 v 8.1 months; P = .025) versus those with wild-type tumors. Median PFS was longer in patients with normal PTEN (13.5 v 6.7 months; P = .02), TP53 (13.5 v 7.7 months; P = .01), and PIK3CA (13.8 v 8.3 months; P = .03) versus those with mutation or activation. In multivariable analysis adjusting for clinical covariates, DRD association with PFS remained significant. Conclusion Veliparib and ETS status did not affect response. Exploratory analysis identified a novel DRD association with mCRPC outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maha Hussain
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Stephanie Daignault-Newton
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Przemyslaw W Twardowski
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Costantine Albany
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark N Stein
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lakshmi P Kunju
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Javed Siddiqui
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Yi-Mi Wu
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Dan Robinson
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Robert J Lonigro
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Xuhong Cao
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Scott A Tomlins
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Rohit Mehra
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kathleen A Cooney
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Bruce Montgomery
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Emmanuel S Antonarakis
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Daniel H Shevrin
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Paul G Corn
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Young E Whang
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - David C Smith
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Megan V Caram
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Walter M Stadler
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Arul M Chinnaiyan
- Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University; Walter M. Stadler, University of Chicago, Chicago; Daniel H. Shevrin, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Javed Siddiqui, Yi-Mi Wu, Dan Robinson, Robert J. Lonigro, Xuhong Cao, Scott A. Tomlins, Rohit Mehra, David C. Smith, Megan V. Caram, and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Przemyslaw W. Twardowski, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte; Felix Y. Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Costantine Albany, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Mark N. Stein, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Bruce Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Paul G. Corn, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Young E. Whang, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Karen E. Knudsen, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Fakouri NB, Durhuus JA, Regnell CE, Angleys M, Desler C, Hasan-Olive MM, Martín-Pardillos A, Tsaalbi-Shtylik A, Thomsen K, Lauritzen M, Bohr VA, de Wind N, Bergersen LH, Rasmussen LJ. Rev1 contributes to proper mitochondrial function via the PARP-NAD +-SIRT1-PGC1α axis. Sci Rep 2017; 7:12480. [PMID: 28970491 PMCID: PMC5624938 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12662-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Nucleic acids, which constitute the genetic material of all organisms, are continuously exposed to endogenous and exogenous damaging agents, representing a significant challenge to genome stability and genome integrity over the life of a cell or organism. Unrepaired DNA lesions, such as single- and double-stranded DNA breaks (SSBs and DSBs), and single-stranded gaps can block progression of the DNA replication fork, causing replicative stress and/or cell cycle arrest. However, translesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerases, such as Rev1, have the ability to bypass some DNA lesions, which can circumvent the process leading to replication fork arrest and minimize replicative stress. Here, we show that Rev1-deficiency in mouse embryo fibroblasts or mouse liver tissue is associated with replicative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. In addition, Rev1-deficiency is associated with high poly(ADP) ribose polymerase 1 (PARP1) activity, low endogenous NAD+, low expression of SIRT1 and PGC1α and low adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated kinase (AMPK) activity. We conclude that replication stress via Rev1-deficiency contributes to metabolic stress caused by compromized mitochondrial function via the PARP-NAD+-SIRT1-PGC1α axis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nima Borhan Fakouri
- Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jon Ambæk Durhuus
- Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christine Elisabeth Regnell
- Department of Oral Biology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria Angleys
- Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Claus Desler
- Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Kirsten Thomsen
- Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Lauritzen
- Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Rigshospitalet, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Vilhelm A Bohr
- Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, USA
| | - Niels de Wind
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Linda Hildegard Bergersen
- Department of Oral Biology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lene Juel Rasmussen
- Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Stelloo S, Nevedomskaya E, Kim Y, Hoekman L, Bleijerveld OB, Mirza T, Wessels LFA, van Weerden WM, Altelaar AFM, Bergman AM, Zwart W. Endogenous androgen receptor proteomic profiling reveals genomic subcomplex involved in prostate tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2017; 37:313-322. [PMID: 28925401 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2017.330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Revised: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 08/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Androgen receptor (AR) is a key player in prostate cancer development and progression. Here we applied immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry of endogenous AR in LNCaP cells to identify components of the AR transcriptional complex. In total, 66 known and novel AR interactors were identified in the presence of synthetic androgen, most of which were critical for AR-driven prostate cancer cell proliferation. A subset of AR interactors required for LNCaP proliferation were profiled using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays followed by sequencing, identifying distinct genomic subcomplexes of AR interaction partners. Interestingly, three major subgroups of genomic subcomplexes were identified, where selective gain of function for AR genomic action in tumorigenesis was found, dictated by FOXA1 and HOXB13. In summary, by combining proteomic and genomic approaches we reveal subclasses of AR transcriptional complexes, differentiating normal AR behavior from the oncogenic state. In this process, the expression of AR interactors has key roles by reprogramming the AR cistrome and interactome in a genomic location-specific manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Stelloo
- Division of Oncogenomics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Nevedomskaya
- Division of Oncogenomics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Y Kim
- Division of Oncogenomics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L Hoekman
- Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Facility, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - O B Bleijerveld
- Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Facility, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T Mirza
- Division of Oncogenomics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L F A Wessels
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Faculty of EEMCS, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - W M van Weerden
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A F M Altelaar
- Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Facility, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Group, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, The Netherlands Proteomics Centre, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A M Bergman
- Division of Oncogenomics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W Zwart
- Division of Oncogenomics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Di Sante G, Di Rocco A, Pupo C, Casimiro MC, Pestell RG. Hormone-induced DNA damage response and repair mediated by cyclin D1 in breast and prostate cancer. Oncotarget 2017; 8:81803-81812. [PMID: 29137223 PMCID: PMC5669849 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2016] [Accepted: 06/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Cell cycle control proteins govern events that leads to the production of two identical daughter cells. Distinct sequential temporal phases, Gap 1 (G1), Gap 0 (G0), Synthesis (S), Gap 2 (G2) and Mitosis (M) are negotiated through a series of check points during which the favorability of the local cellular environment is assessed, prior to replicating DNA [1]. Cyclin D1 has been characterized as a key regulatory subunit of the holoenzyme that promotes the G1/S-phase transition through phosphorylating the pRB protein. Cyclin D1 overexpression is considered a driving force in several types of cancers and cdk inhibitors are being used effectively in the clinic for treatment of ERα+ breast cancer [1, 2]. Genomic DNA is assaulted by damaging ionizing radiation, chemical carcinogens, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) which are generated by cellular metabolism. Furthermore, specific hormones including estrogens [3, 4] and androgens [5] govern pathways that damage DNA. Defects in the DNA Damage Response (DDR) pathway can lead to genomic instability and cancer. Evidence is emerging that cyclin D1 bind proteins involved in DNA repair including BRCA1 [6], RAD51 [7], BRCA2 [8] and is involved in the DNA damage and DNA repair processes [7, 8]. Because the repair of damaged DNA appears to be an important and unexpected role for cyclin D1, and inhibitors of cyclin D1-dependent kinase activity are being used in the clinic, the latest findings on the role of cyclin D1 in mediating the DDR including the DDR induced by the hormones estrogen [9] and androgen [10, 11] is reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Di Sante
- Pennsylvania Cancer and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Baruch S. Blumberg Institute, Pennsylvania Biotechnology Center, PA, USA
| | - Agnese Di Rocco
- Pennsylvania Cancer and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Baruch S. Blumberg Institute, Pennsylvania Biotechnology Center, PA, USA
| | - Claudia Pupo
- Pennsylvania Cancer and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Baruch S. Blumberg Institute, Pennsylvania Biotechnology Center, PA, USA
| | - Mathew C Casimiro
- Pennsylvania Cancer and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Baruch S. Blumberg Institute, Pennsylvania Biotechnology Center, PA, USA
| | - Richard G Pestell
- Pennsylvania Cancer and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Baruch S. Blumberg Institute, Pennsylvania Biotechnology Center, PA, USA.,Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Nyquist MD, Corella A, Burns J, Coleman I, Gao S, Tharakan R, Riggan L, Cai C, Corey E, Nelson PS, Mostaghel EA. Exploiting AR-Regulated Drug Transport to Induce Sensitivity to the Survivin Inhibitor YM155. Mol Cancer Res 2017; 15:521-531. [PMID: 28465296 PMCID: PMC5471626 DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-16-0315-t] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2016] [Revised: 12/03/2016] [Accepted: 12/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Androgen receptor (AR) signaling is fundamental to prostate cancer and is the dominant therapeutic target in metastatic disease. However, stringent androgen deprivation therapy regimens decrease quality of life and have been largely unsuccessful in curtailing mortality. Recent clinical and preclinical studies have taken advantage of the dichotomous ability of AR signaling to elicit growth-suppressive and differentiating effects by administering hyperphysiologic levels of testosterone. In this study, high-throughput drug screening identified a potent synergy between high-androgen therapy and YM155, a transcriptional inhibitor of survivin (BIRC5). This interaction was mediated by the direct transcriptional upregulation of the YM155 transporter SLC35F2 by the AR. Androgen-mediated YM155-induced cell death was completely blocked by the overexpression of multidrug resistance transporter ABCB1. SLC35F2 expression was significantly correlated with intratumor androgen levels in four distinct patient-derived xenograft models, and with AR activity score in a large gene expression dataset of castration-resistant metastases. A subset of tumors had significantly elevated SLC35F2 expression and, therefore, may identify patients who are highly responsive to YM155 treatment. IMPLICATIONS The combination of androgen therapy with YM155 represents a novel drug synergy, and SLC35F2 may serve as a clinical biomarker of response to YM155.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Nyquist
- Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Alexandra Corella
- Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - John Burns
- Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ilsa Coleman
- Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Shuai Gao
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts
- Hematology-Oncology Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robin Tharakan
- Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Luke Riggan
- Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Changmeng Cai
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts
- Hematology-Oncology Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eva Corey
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Peter S Nelson
- Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Elahe A Mostaghel
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Brown JS, O'Carrigan B, Jackson SP, Yap TA. Targeting DNA Repair in Cancer: Beyond PARP Inhibitors. Cancer Discov 2017; 7:20-37. [PMID: 28003236 PMCID: PMC5300099 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-16-0860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 420] [Impact Index Per Article: 60.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2016] [Revised: 11/03/2016] [Accepted: 11/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Germline aberrations in critical DNA-repair and DNA damage-response (DDR) genes cause cancer predisposition, whereas various tumors harbor somatic mutations causing defective DDR/DNA repair. The concept of synthetic lethality can be exploited in such malignancies, as exemplified by approval of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors for treating BRCA1/2-mutated ovarian cancers. Herein, we detail how cellular DDR processes engage various proteins that sense DNA damage, initiate signaling pathways to promote cell-cycle checkpoint activation, trigger apoptosis, and coordinate DNA repair. We focus on novel therapeutic strategies targeting promising DDR targets and discuss challenges of patient selection and the development of rational drug combinations. SIGNIFICANCE Various inhibitors of DDR components are in preclinical and clinical development. A thorough understanding of DDR pathway complexities must now be combined with strategies and lessons learned from the successful registration of PARP inhibitors in order to fully exploit the potential of DDR inhibitors and to ensure their long-term clinical success. Cancer Discov; 7(1); 20-37. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Stephen P Jackson
- The Wellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute and Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy A Yap
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Shiloh Y, Lederman HM. Ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T): An emerging dimension of premature ageing. Ageing Res Rev 2017; 33:76-88. [PMID: 27181190 DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2016.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2016] [Revised: 05/02/2016] [Accepted: 05/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
A-T is a prototype genome instability syndrome and a multifaceted disease. A-T leads to neurodegeneration - primarily cerebellar atrophy, immunodeficiency, oculocutaneous telangiectasia (dilated blood vessels), vestigial thymus and gonads, endocrine abnormalities, cancer predisposition and varying sensitivity to DNA damaging agents, particularly those that induce DNA double-strand breaks. With the recent increase in life expectancy of A-T patients, the premature ageing component of this disease is gaining greater awareness. The complex A-T phenotype reflects the ever growing number of functions assigned to the protein encoded by the responsible gene - the homeostatic protein kinase, ATM. The quest to thoroughly understand the complex A-T phenotype may reveal yet elusive ATM functions.
Collapse
|
46
|
May High MMP-2 and TIMP-2 Expressions Increase or Decrease the Aggressivity of Oral Cancer? Pathol Oncol Res 2016; 23:197-206. [DOI: 10.1007/s12253-016-0149-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2015] [Accepted: 11/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|