French organization for the pharmacovigilance of COVID-19 vaccines: A major challenge

Impact of Covid-19 Vaccination on Spontaneous Pharmacovigilance Reporting in France

INTRODUCTION

In 2021, the massive Covid-19 vaccination campaign in France was accompanied by an intensified pharmacovigilance monitoring of their potential adverse drug reactions. The importance of this reporting might have led to an important selective reporting and overloading of Pharmacovigilance Centres, delaying the recording of some reports in the national pharmacovigilance database. In this context, we aimed to evaluate the impact of the Covid-19 vaccination campaign in France and related reports on spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions that were not related to the Covid-19 vaccine.

METHODS

We performed time-series analyses considering the monthly number of adverse drug reactions reported between January 1, 2018 and April 30, 2022 using the French Pharmacovigilance database. The impact of the Covid-19 vaccination campaign on the monthly reporting not Covid-19 vaccine related was estimated using interrupted time-series. January 2021, marking the start of the campaign, was the intervention date in the models. Analyses were run globally first considering all adverse drug reaction reports, and second according to notifier type and to case seriousness.

RESULTS

We included 170,294 reports registered in the French Pharmacovigilance database between January 1, 2018 and April 30, 2022 that were not Covid-19 vaccine-related. Among these, 77,067 (45.3%) were serious and 146,683 (86.1%) had been reported by health care professionals. The campaign start was associated with a nearly 35.0% decrease in average monthly reporting that was not Covid-19 vaccine-related, with a significant level decrease in the monthly number of reports of -658.0 (p < 10-3) immediately after the vaccination campaign start and a subsequent slope decrease of -50.0 (p < 10-3). This decrease was mainly due to a significant level and slope decrease (level: -739.2 p < 10-3; slope: -39 [p < 10-2]) for health care professional reports. A similar level decrease was found for the monthly number of both serious and non-serious reports (-402.3, p < 10-3; and -311.9, p = 10-2, respectively). According to the ATC 1 level, the decrease in the monthly number of reports showed similar patterns for all drugs. However, a potential increase in the number of serious reports suspecting antineoplastic and immunomodulating drugs (ATC L) or drugs targeting blood was observed (ATC B).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a significant impact of the Covid-19 campaign vaccination in the reporting of adverse drug reactions that were not Covid-19 vaccine-related, of roughly 35%. This leads to a loss of information regarding the monitoring of drug safety that could have impacted the system capacity to detect safety signals for drugs other than Covid-19 vaccines.

Role of spontaneous reporting in investigating the relationship between mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and myocarditis: The French perspective

AIM OF THE STUDY

Post-mRNA coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines myocarditis emerged as a rare adverse effect, particularly in adolescents and young adults, and was labeled as such for both vaccines in the summer of 2021. This study aims to summarize the timeline and process of signal detection, substantiation, and quantification of myocarditis cases related to mRNA vaccines in France.

METHODS

The intensive monitoring plan for COVID-19 vaccine safety was based on case-by-case analysis of all cases collected in the French spontaneous reporting database (Base nationale de pharmacovigilance, BNPV). Cases were evaluated by drug safety medical professionals and discussed at a national level for signal detection purposes. Reported cases were compared to the number of vaccine-exposed persons up to September 30th, 2021. Reporting rates (Rr) of myocarditis per 100,000 injections were calculated and stratified according to age, gender, and injection rank of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines. Poisson distribution was used to compute Rrs 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI).

RESULTS

The case-by-case analysis detected a possible cluster of myocarditis in April 2021 (5 cases, 4 after the 2nd injection). In June 2021, the signal was substantiated with 12 cases (9 related to BNT162b2, and 3 to mRNA-1273). As of September 2021, almost 73 million BNT162b2 and 10 million mRNA-1273 doses had been injected. The Rr per 100,000 injections was 0.5 (0.5-0.6) for BNT162b2 and 1.1 (95% CI 0.9-1.3) for mRNA-1273. The difference among vaccines was more pronounced after the second injection, particularly in men aged 18-24 years (4.3 [3.4-5.5] for BNT162b2 vs. 13.9 [9.2-20.1] for mRNA-1273) and aged 25-29 years (1.9 [1.2-2.9] vs. 7.0 [3.4-12.9]).

CONCLUSION

The study highlighted the role of the spontaneous reporting system in the detection, assessment, and quantification of myocarditis related to m-RNA vaccines. It suggested from September 2021 that mRNA-1273 was reasonably related to a higher risk of myocarditis than BNT162b2 in people under 30, particularly after the second injection.

Monitoring the safety of drugs and COVID-19 vaccines by the French Pharmacovigilance Centers during the pandemic: A win-win bet with Health Authorities!

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) pandemic virus was a "health crisis" and a significant burden also for the French pharmacovigilance system. It took its toll in 2 phases, the first being in early 2020 when very little was known, and during which the missions of the 31 Regional Pharmacovigilance Centers (RPVCs) from university hospitals were to detect adverse reactions of drugs used in the context of the disease. Whether as a possible aggravating role on COVID-19, or displaying a different safety profile during its course, or to assess safety of curative treatment, this phase preceded that of the arrival of dedicated vaccines. Then the RPVCs' missions were to detect, as early as possible, any new serious adverse effect leading to a potential signal that would modify the benefit/risk ratio of a vaccine and require the implementation of health safety measures. During these two distinct periods, signal detection remained the core business of the RPVCs. Each RPVC had to organize itself to handle an unprecedented surge of declarations and requests for advice, from health care professionals and patients alike. "Leading" RPVCs, who were in charge of monitoring vaccines, had to deal with an extraordinary workload (still going on to this date), to generate in real-time and on a weekly basis, a summary of all the adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports as well as an extended analysis of the different safety signals. The organization put in place at the beginning of the health crisis, adapted to the context of the vaccines, allowed to meet the challenge of real-time pharmacovigilance monitoring, and to identify many safety signals. Efficient "short-circuits exchanges" with the French Regional Pharmacovigilance Centers Network (RPVCN) were paramount to the National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM) to develop an optimal collaborative partnership. The French RPVCN has shown at this occasion both agility and flexibility, swiftly adapting to vaccine- and media-related unrest, and demonstrated its effectiveness in the early detection of safety signals. This crisis also confirmed the superiority of manual/human signal detection over automated ones, as the most effective and powerful tool to date to rapidly detect and validate a new ADR and enable to elaborate rapid risk reduction measures. To maintain the performance of French RPVCN in signal detection and to monitor all drugs as they should, and as expected by our fellow citizens, a new funding model should be considered.

Pharmacovigilance follow-up of patients in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

INTRODUCTION

In the context of COVID-19 pandemic, a national pharmacovigilance survey was set up in March 2020. The purpose of this survey was to ensure continuous monitoring of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients with COVID-19, not only related to the drugs used in this indication but also related to all drugs administered to these patients or suspected of having promoted the infection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This descriptive study was based on data extracted from the French Pharmacovigilance Database from 1 January 2020 to 30 September 2021. Misuse was also analysed through the MESANGE project. The ADRs were classified according to three groups: "drugs used to treat COVID-19", "other drugs administered to COVID-19 positive patients" and "drugs suspected of having promoted COVID-19". The data were also presented according to 2 periods (period one was from January to June 2020 and period two from July 2020 onwards).

RESULTS

Among 2189 included cases, 67.1% were serious. Cases were mainly related to "other drugs administrated to COVID-19 positive patients" (58.5%) followed by "drugs used to treat COVID-19" (33.7%) and "drugs suspected of having promoted COVID-19" (7.8%). Drugs used to treat COVID-19 and their main safety profile were different depending on the period: mostly hydroxychloroquine (51%) with heart injury and lopinavir/ritonavir (42%) with liver injury for the first period, and dexamethasone (46%) with hyperglycemia and tocilizumab (28%) with liver injury for the second period. The drugs suspected of worsening COVID-19 differed in both periods especially for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs mainly reported in period 1 (41.5% versus 8.2% in period 2). Other immunosuppressive drugs were in the majority in the second period (85.7%), with mainly methotrexate (15.3%), anti-CD20 (15.3%) and anti-TNF alpha (10.5%). No confirmed safety signal was identified among other drugs administered to patients with COVID-19. The profile of ADRs and suspected drugs was similar between the 2 periods. The study of misuse in outpatient settings identified in both periods mainly hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, ivermectin and zinc±vitamin C.

DISCUSSION

This survey, based on real-time pharmacological and medical assessment of ADRs and weekly meetings in a specific national committee, made it possible to identify relevant safety signals which contribute to patient care with no delay. The main safety signal highlighted was serious cardiac damage under hydroxychloroquine, alone or combined with azithromycin and also with lopinavir/ritonavir. This signal has contributed to the evolution of the recommendations for these 2 drugs. The methodology of this survey has been taken over and is still going on for the pharmacovigilance monitoring of vaccines against COVID-19, for monoclonal antibodies used against COVID-19 and also for Paxlovid® (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) which benefit from dedicated surveys.

[Monitoring the safety of drugs and COVID-19 vaccines by the French Pharmacovigilance Centers during the pandemic: a win-win bet with Health Authorities!]

The pandemic subsequent to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus resulted, for the French institutional pharmacovigilance, in a "health crisis" in 2 phases: the coronavirus disease 2019 - "COVID-19" phase during which the missions of the Regional Pharmacovigilance Centres (RPVC) were to detect a possible impact of drugs on this disease, as whether existed a possible aggravating role of certain drugs, or the safety profile of drugs used for the management of COVID-19 could evolve. The second phase followed the availability of COVID-19 vaccines, during which the RPVCs' missions were to detect as early as possible any new serious adverse effect, source of a potential signal that would modify the benefit/risk ratio of a vaccine and require the implementation of health safety measures. During these two periods, signal detection remained the core business of the RPVCs. The RPVCs had to organize themselves to handle an historical surge of declarations and requests for advice, whereas the RPVCs in charge of monitoring vaccines had to deal with an extraordinary dense activity over a long period of time, in order to produce in real time and on a weekly basis, a summary of all the declarations and an analysis of safety signals. The national organization put in place made it possible to meet the challenge of real-time pharmacovigilance monitoring of 4 vaccines with conditional marketing authorizations. Short-circuit efficient exchanges with the French Regional Pharmacovigilance Centres Network was paramount for the French National Agency for medicines and health products (Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé) to develop an optimal collaborative partnership. The RPVC network has shown agility and flexibility, has been able to adapt swiftly and demonstrated its effectiveness in the early detection of safety signals. This crisis confirmed the superiority of manual/human signal detection as the most effective and powerful tool to date, to rapidly detect a new adverse drug reaction and enable to elaborate rapid measures of risk reduction. In order to maintain the performance of French RPVCs in signal detection and to monitor all drugs as they should and as expected by our fellow citizens, a new funding model correcting the inadequacy of RPVCs' expertise resources in relation to the volume of reports should be considered.

Health system, surveillance and the COVID-19 pandemic response in France

France was the first European country to confirm cases of COVID-19, being one of the most affected by the pandemic in the first wave. This case study analyzed the measures adopted by the country in the fight against COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021, correlating it to the characteristics of its health and surveillance system. As a welfare state, it relied on compensatory policies and protection of the economy, as well as increased investments in health. There were weaknesses in the preparation and delay in the implementation of the coping plan. The response was coordinated by the national executive power, adopting strict lockdowns in the first two waves, mitigating restrictive measures in the other waves, after the increase in vaccination coverage and in the face of population resistance. The country faced problems with testing, case and contact surveillance and patient care, especially in the first wave. It was necessary to modify the health insurance rules to expand coverage, access and better articulation of surveillance actions. It indicates lessons learned about the limits of its social security system, but also the potential of a government with a strong response capacity in the financing of public policies and regulation of other sectors to face the crisis.

What place for intelligent automation and artificial intelligence to preserve and strengthen vigilance expertise in the face of increasing declarations?

In 2018, the "Ateliers de Giens" (Giens Workshops) devoted a workshop to artificial intelligence (AI) and led its experts to confirm the potential contribution and theoretical benefit of AI in clinical research, pharmacovigilance, and in improving the efficiency of care. The 2022 workshop is a continuation of this reflection on AI and intelligent automation (IA) by focusing on its contribution to pharmacovigilance and the applications and tasks could be optimized to preserve and strengthen medical and pharmacological expertise in pharmacovigilance. The evolution of pharmacovigilance work is characterized by many tasks with low added value, a growing volume of pharmacovigilance reporting of suspected side effects, and a scarcity of medical staff with expertise in clinical pharmacology and pharmacovigilance and human resources to support this growing need. Together, these parameters contribute to an embolization of the pharmacovigilance system at risk of missing its primary mission: to identify and characterize a risk or even a health alert on a drug. The participants of the workshop (representatives of the Regional Pharmacovigilance Centres (CRPV), the French National Agency for Safety of Medicinal Products (ANSM), patients, the pharmaceutical industry, or start-ups working in the development of AI in the field of medicine) shared their experiences, their pilot projects and their expectations on the expected potential, theoretical or proven, AI and IA. This work has made it possible to identify the needs and challenges that AI or IA represent, in the current or future modes of organization of pharmacovigilance activities. This approach led to the development of a SWOT matrix (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats), a basis for reflection to identify critical points and consider four main recommendations: (1) preserve and develop business expertise in pharmacovigilance (including research and development in methods) with the integration of new technologies; (2) improve the quality of pharmacovigilance reports; (3) adapt technical and regulatory means; (4) implement a development strategy for AI and IA tools at the service of expertise.

Comprehensive description of adult-onset Still's disease after COVID-19 vaccination

Cases of adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) have been reported after COVID-19 vaccination. Here we provide a comprehensive description and analysis of all cases of AOSD reported in the literature and in pharmacovigilance databases through April 2022. Disproportionality analyses of pharmacovigilance data were performed in order to further explore the association between vaccination and AOSD. We included 159 patients, 144 from the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database and 15 from the literature. Detailed clinical characteristics were described for the cases from the literature and from the French pharmacovigilance database (n = 9). The cases of AOSD after COVID-19 vaccination concerned women in 52.2% of cases. The median age was 43.4 years. More than 80% of AOSD reports occurred during the first three weeks and concerned mostly the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. We identified 14.5% of disease flare with a median time-to-onset of AOSD flare-up significantly shorter than for the new onset form. More than 90% patients received steroids. Although all cases were considered serious and required hospitalization, most cases presented a favorable outcome (67.1%) with a good response to corticosteroid therapy with a mean time to recovery of 7.2 days. Disproportionality analyses suggested that AOSD was associated with COVID-19 vaccines as well as other vaccines. AOSD was nearly five times more frequently reported with COVID-19 vaccines than with all other drugs. Clinicians should be informed about the potential risk of AOSD onset or flare following COVID vaccines and the importance of its early detection to optimize its management.

Cognitive deficits and memory impairments after COVID-19 (Covishield) vaccination

Vaccination is an essential public health strategy to control the 2019 Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. While the benefits of the COVID-19 vaccines far outweigh the risks, side effects continue to be reported in the literature. We report a 65-year-old man who developed cognitive deficits and memory impairments following his first dose of Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine (Covishield). The onset of acute cognitive deficits and memory impairments could be another complication to COVID-19 vaccination that physicians and neurologists need to be warned to. Monitoring the safety of COVID-19 vaccines and describing side effects associated with them is essential to improve safety profiles and enhance public trust.

Hyper inflammatory syndrome following COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in children: A national post-authorization pharmacovigilance study

Background

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is the most severe clinical entity associated with pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection with a putative role of the spike protein into the immune system activation. Whether COVID-19 mRNA vaccine can induce this complication in children is unknown. We aimed to assess the risk of hyper-inflammatory syndrome following COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in children.

Methods

We conducted a post-authorization national population-based surveillance using the French enhanced pharmacovigilance surveillance system for COVID-19 vaccines. All cases of suspected hyper-inflammatory syndrome following COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in 12–17-year-old children between June 15^th, 2021 and January 1^st, 2022, were reported. Cases were reviewed according to WHO criteria for MIS-C. The reporting rate of this syndrome was compared to the MIS-C rate per 1,000,000 12–17-year-old children infected by SARS-CoV-2.

Findings

Up to January 2022, 8,113,058 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses were administered to 4,079,234 12–17-year-old children. Among them, 12 presented a hyper-inflammatory syndrome with multisystemic involvement. Main clinical features included male predominance (10/12, 83%), cardiac involvement (10/12, 83%), digestive symptoms (10/12, 83%), coagulopathy (7/12, 58%), cytolytic hepatitis (6/12, 50%), and shock (5/12, 42%). 4/12 (33%) required intensive care unit transfer, and 3/12 (25%) hemodynamic support. All cases recovered. In eight cases, no evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection was found. The reporting rate was 1.5 (95%CI [0.8; 2.6]) per 1,000,000 doses injected, i.e. 2.9 (95%CI [1.5; 5.1]) per 1,000,000 12–17-year-old vaccinated children. As a comparison, 113 MIS-C (95%CI [95; 135]) occurred per 1,000,000 12–17-year-old children infected by SARS-CoV-2.

Interpretation

Very few cases of hyper-inflammatory syndrome with multi-organ involvement occurred following COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in 12–17-year-old children. The low reporting rate of this syndrome, compared to the rate of post-SARS-CoV-2 MIS-C in the same age-group, largely supports the vaccination in a context of an important circulation of SARS-CoV-2.

Funding

ESPID Fellowship Award; Grandir–Fonds de Solidarité Pour L'enfance.

Evaluation of Covid-19 vaccines: Pharmacoepidemiological aspects

The marketing authorization granted to SARS-Cov-2 vaccines was accompanied by reinforced safety monitoring plans. These plans' implementation was part of the usual logic of post-marketing surveillance of new and innovative health products. It was especially adapted to the context of post-marketing monitoring of drugs developed according to the usual scientific quality standards but in an accelerated schedule. In Europe, the reinforced surveillance system relies on the complementary strengths of pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiology. If the performances of pharmacovigilance monitoring are incomparable for the detection of safety signals relating to rare events of atypical presentation, it needs to be completed with pharmacoepidemiology activities for more common events, either multifactorial or frequently classified as idiopathic. The pharmacoepidemiological monitoring developed in Europe was elaborated before the first SARS-Cov-2 vaccines where marketed, taking into account the lessons learned from the vaccination campaign against 2009 A (H1N1) influenza. It includes numerous academic studies as well as studies performed within vaccines risk management plans. In terms of safety, those defined a priori mostly concerns a list of pre-established health events of specific interest. Aside of these planned activities, ad-hoc studies will be latter developed on purpose to investigate safety signals or potential signals that could be identified as the result of pharmacovigilance activities. Aside of these regulated activities, as for today, very few studies have been published regarding SARS-Cov-2 vaccines; most of the existing consist in preprints that should be considered with caution. Pharmacoepidemiology of vaccines is thought to allow near-real time monitoring that needs sufficient time to provide with valid results. In the constant urge for information that accompanies COVID-related science, it is important not to make haste the enemy of speed and to let pharmacoepidemiology provides with what it is expected to do: rock-solid scientific information contributing to evidence-based decision-making.

COVID-19 vaccines: A perspective from social pharmacology

Social pharmacology is a branch of clinical pharmacology, which depicts relationships between society and drugs and in particular factors, reasons, social consequences of drug use as well as representations of drugs in the society. Recent development and marketing of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines raises a number of questions of social pharmacology: are vaccines drugs like any other? What is their perception at the individual, population and societal levels? How do individuals perceive the risks and benefits of these vaccines? What is the perception at the societal level? What is the individual and societal acceptability of these vaccines during a pandemic? All these questions are discussed in the light of recent data. A number of proposals, both at the individual and at the collective or population level, are formulated to help solve these problems of social pharmacology.