Population-based analysis of factors associated with survival in patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy in the targeted therapy era

Beyond the knife: strategic patient selection for cytoreductive nephrectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To evaluate the current role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) within the context of evolving treatment paradigms, focusing on implications for patient selection.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two randomized trials failed to show significant benefits from CN for intermediate and poor-risk patients undergoing targeted therapy. Despite this, subgroup analysis and retrospective data suggest potential benefits for a subset of good and intermediate-risk patients. Although currently used risk stratification tools guide CN eligibility, they have limitations, including, subjectivity, perioperative variability, and missing validation. Deferred CN may benefit patients responding to systemic treatment, whereas other patients may benefit from upfront CN. Emerging data supports the value of CN with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in selected patients, emphasizing the need for ongoing trials in the ICI era.

SUMMARY

The role and timing of CN in mRCC have evolved across therapeutic eras. Although awaiting prospective evidence in the current era of ICI, CN still has a role in the therapeutic approach for a subset of patients. The decision to recommend CN must be personalized and involve multidisciplinary discussions considering both patient- and tumor-related factors.

The Evolving Landscape of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been studied intensively over the past few decades. Interestingly, the opinion with regard to the importance of this procedure has switched from a recommendation as a standard of care to an almost complete refutation. However, no definitive agreement on cytoreductive nephrectomy, including the pros and cons of the procedure, has been reached, and the topic remains highly controversial. With the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors, we have experienced a paradigm shift, with immunotherapy playing a crucial role in the treatment algorithm. Nevertheless, obtaining results from prospective clinical trials on the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy requires time, and once some data have been gathered, the standards of systemic therapy may be different, and we stand again at the beginning. This review summarizes current knowledge on the topic in the light of newly evolving treatment strategies. The crucial point is to recognize who could be an appropriate candidate for immediate cytoreductive surgery that may facilitate the effect of systemic therapy through tumor debulking, or who might benefit from deferred cytoreduction in the setting of an objective response of the tumor. The role of prognostic factors in management decisions as well as the technical details associated with performing the procedure from a urological perspective are discussed. Ongoing clinical trials that may bring new evidence for transforming therapeutic paradigms are listed.

Prognostic significance of albumin-to-globulin ratio in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Background

Whether the albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) predicts the prognosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains controversial. Herein, we performed a meta-analysis to critically evaluate the relationship between the AGR and RCC prognosis, as well as the association between the AGR and the clinicopathological characteristics of RCC.

Methods

The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were thoroughly and comprehensively searched from their inception until 24 June 2023. To determine the predictive significance of the AGR, hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated from the pooled data. The relationship between the AGR and the clinicopathological features of RCC was evaluated by estimating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs in subgroup analyses.

Results

The meta-analysis included nine articles involving 5,671 RCC cases. A low AGR significantly correlated with worse overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.37-2.41, p <0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.61-3.70, p <0.001). Analysis of the pooled data also revealed significant associations between a low AGR and the following: female sex (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.31-1.67, p <0.001), pT stage T3-T4 (OR = 4.12, 95% CI = 2.93-5.79, p <0.001), pN stage N1 (OR = 3.99, 95% CI = 2.40-6.64, p <0.001), tumor necrosis (OR = 3.83, 95% CI = 2.23-6.59, p <0.001), and Fuhrman grade 3-4 (OR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.34-2.42, p <0.001). The AGR was not related to histology (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.60-1.15, p = 0.267).

Conclusion

In patients with RCC, a low AGR strongly predicted poor OS and PFS and significantly correlated with clinicopathological features indicative of disease progression.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy for synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Is there enough evidence?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the role of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for synchronous metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma patients in the Systemic Therapy era and beyond regarding the Overall Survival, the optimal sequence between Systemic Therapy and Cytoreductive Nephrectomy and prognostic factors.

METHODS

The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Bibliographic search was performed in Medline (PubMed), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Studies included were those indexed from 2005 in an attempt to limit those conducted in the cytokine era. Risk of bias assessment was performed by two authors (K.S and T.L) using the Cochrane Collaborative Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials, the Cochrane Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for nonrandomized studies.

RESULTS

Cytoreductive nephrectomy was associated with improved overall survival in all but one of the observational studies. While in all of these studies the unvariable analysis showed improved overall survival in favor of the cytoreductive nephrectomy group in some studies the subgroup analysis showed no benefit. Regarding the optimal sequence, deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy demonstrated better results in more studies than upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy but a advantage was not clearly certain. In the analysis of possible prognostic factors for overall survival with cytoreductive nephrectomy, most common prognostic factors found were age (in 8 studies), tumor histology (in 7 studies), number of metastasis (in 6 studies), and T stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytoreductive nephrectomy can still play an important role in wisely selected patients, although the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the new immunotherapy era needs to be defined.

Prognostic model of upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and/or targeted agents

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate prognostic factors and to establish a prognostic model using them for upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and/or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred eleven patients who were diagnosed as mRCC at initial diagnosis and were treated with TKI and/or ICI were classified into 2 groups: those undergoing CN (upfront CN group, 117 cases) and those who initially underwent systemic therapy (non-upfront CN group, 94 cases). In the upfront CN group, the patients' background and overall survival (OS) were compared with those in the other two groups, and prognostic factors were analyzed. A prognostic model of the upfront CN group was established.

RESULTS

The median of the observation period for the upfront CN group was 25 months. The rates of patients with clear cell histology, with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of ≥ 80%, with a single metastatic organ, with a normal pretreated C-reactive protein level, and with an intermediate risk according to the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) model were significantly higher than those in the non-upfront CN group (87.2% and 30.9%, p < 0.0001; 92.3% and 77.7%, p = 0.0025; 41.9% and 24.5%, p = 0.0080; 47.9% and 13.8%, p < 0.0001; 66.7% and 45.7%, p = 0.0023, respectively). The 50% OS in the upfront CN group was 33.1 months, significantly better than that in the non-upfront CN group (11.1 months, p < 0.0001), and these results were consistent regardless of their prognostic risk level. Multivariate analysis showed that multiple metastatic organs and a KPS of < 80% were independent predictive factors for OS (hazard ratio: 1.653 and 2.995, p = 0.0339 and 0.0054, respectively). Using these two parameters to stratify the upfront CN group, the 50% OSs in cases with no risk factors, in those with one factor, and in those with two factors were 43.4 months, 29.1 months, and 7.7 months, respectively (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The upfront CN group was able to be stratified by our prognostic model into three subgroups with different prognoses. This model can provide useful information for making decisions in consideration of upfront CN in patients with mRCC.

Prognostic Significance of Prognostic Nutritional Index in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

The prognostic nutrition index (PNI), based on the serum lymphocyte counts and albumin levels, has been introduced as a prognostic factor in various cancer. In the present study, we explore the prognostic significance of PNI in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A literature search of all publications was conducted using the Cochrane library, PubMed and Embase databases from inception to April 2020. A total of 12 studies consisting of 7,391 patients were enrolled in the present study. We found that low pretreatment PNI is significantly correlated to poor survival, including overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (P = 0.002), progression-free survival/recurrence-free survival/disease-free survival (PFS/RFS/DFS) (P < 0.001). The age (P < 0.001), clear cell histology (P = 0.044), T3-T4 (P = 0.049), and Fuhrman grade 3-4 (P = 0.024) were significantly differed in the low and high pretreatment PNI group. In summary, low pretreatment PNI was associated with adverse clinicopathological features in patients with RCC. Besides, low pretreatment PNI was also an unfavorable factor of OS, CSS, and PFS/RFS/DFS in RCC patients, which could serve as an unfavorable factor. More studies with large participants are required to verify our results.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2021.1931702.

Contemporary Cytoreductive Nephrectomy Provides Survival Benefit in Clear-cell Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

A recent randomized trial questioned the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (ccmRCC). We reassessed the effect of cytoreductive nephrectomy on survival in a contemporary population-based ccmRCC cohort.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010-2015), we focused on patients with ccmRCC. The primary endpoint consisted of overall mortality. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were applied in the overall cohort and in patients who underwent targeted therapy. Sensitivity analyses included 1:1 propensity score matching, 3- and 6-month landmark analyses, incremental survival benefit analyses, and metastases number and location-based stratifications.

RESULTS

Of 4062 patients with ccmRCC, 2241 (55.1%) received targeted therapy; cytoreductive nephrectomy was performed in 2226 (54.8%) patients and 1168 (52.1%) patients in the overall and targeted therapy cohorts, respectively. Cytoreductive nephrectomy was associated with lower overall mortality in the overall cohort (median survival, 30 vs. 9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; P < .001), as well as in the targeted therapy cohort (median survival, 28 vs. 12 months; HR, 0.49; P < .001). In sensitivity analyses, cytoreductive nephrectomy was associated with lower overall mortality after 1:1 propensity score-matching (HR, 0.49; P < .001), in 3- and 6-month landmark analyses (HR, 0.49; P < .001 and HR, 0.51; P < .001, respectively), in metastases number and location-based stratifications, except for exclusive liver metastases, as well as in all incremental benefit analyses.

CONCLUSION

Cytoreductive nephrectomy is associated with better survival in patients with ccmRCC, including those exposed to targeted therapy, after adjustment for multiple potential confounders.

The Role of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma: A 29-Year Institutional Experience

OBJECTIVE

To assess which patients respond best following cytoreductive nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation (sRCC) and whether outcomes are improving over time.

METHODS

We identified 562 patients with metastatic RCC treated between 1989 and 2018 with cytoreductive nephrectomy. We reviewed baseline clinical and pathologic characteristics, including the presence of sRCC, and metastatic sites at time of nephrectomy. The primary study endpoint was overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate Cox-regression analyses were used to identify significant predictors of OS.

RESULTS

The study cohort had 192 sRCC patients, with a median age of 59 years. Frequently involved metastatic locations were lung (n = 115), retroperitoneal nodes (n = 63), and axial skeleton (n = 43). Lung metastasis were more prevalent in clear cell histology (P = .0017) whereas nodal involvement was associated with nonclear cell subtypes (P = .0064). Median follow-up was 14 months. Estimated 2- and 5-year OS were 34.1% and 14.8%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, metastases to the liver (HR = 1.64; 95% CI 1.02-2.63; P = .04), lung (HR = 1.50; 95% CI 1.05-2.14; P = .03), retroperitoneal nodes (HR = 1.52; 95% CI 1.03-2.25; P = 0.04) and nonclear cell histology (HR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.10-2.35; P = .01) were associated with worse OS in the sRCC cohort.

CONCLUSION

OS after cytoreductive nephrectomy for sRCC and non-sRCC is improving over time. In patients with sRCC, presentations with unifocal metastasis not involving the liver or lung, clear cell histology and node negative disease have better outcomes following cytoreductive nephrectomy and may yield greater benefit from the procedure.

Valuation of lymph node dissection in localized high-risk renal cell cancer using X-tile software

PURPOSE

Attempt to group the number of lymph nodes in a more ideal way to assess the value of lymph node dissection (LND) in the treatment of localized high-risk renal cell cancer (LH-RCC).

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result database (SEER) was used to analyze LH-RCC patients who undergoing radical nephrectomy (RN) from 2011 to 2015. The X-tile software was performed to calculate the optimal grouping cut-off points for the number of removed lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes. The Nomogram model was constructed by R language to visually present survival rates of patients.

RESULTS

Among 4917 cases of LH-RCC patients undergoing RN, there were 1835 patients treated with LND (37.32%) with the average survival time (AST) of 43.10 months (95% CI 41.91-44.29), which was superior than 40.52 months of patients who did not have LND (95% CI 39.26-41.78) (P < 0.01). The mortality risk of patients with ≥ 3 removed nodes was 0.75 times that of patients with 1-2 removed nodes (95% CI 0.62-0.99, P < 0.01). For overall survival (OS), the hazard ratio of ≥ 5 positive nodes, 1-4 positive nodes, and 0 positive node was 3.04, 2.37, and 1.00, respectively. The Nomogram model can evaluate the 1 year, 2 year, and 3 year survival rates of LH-RCC patients undergoing RN with the internal validation C-index of 0.73.

CONCLUSION

LH-RCC patients with ≥ 3 removed lymph nodes and fewer positive lymph nodes are expected to have better long-term survival. LND is not only helpful for tumor staging of LH-RCC, but also valuable for long-term survival.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy in the current treatment algorithm

The two recent prospective randomized trials CARMENA and SURTIME have changed the therapy paradigm of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The CARMENA trial was conducted to investigate whether cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) is required in the targeted therapy area, whereas SURTIME studied whether deferred CN in combination with sunitinib can be used to identify patients with inherent targeted therapy resistance. In the current review, we provide a comprehensive discussion of two randomized studies and the current evidence with up-do-date algorithms for treating primary metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapy and immune-checkpoint inhibition.

Clinicopathologic features associated with survival after cytoreductive nephrectomy for nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To report the overall survival (OS) outcomes of patients with nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) treated at our institution with a cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and better understand the clinical and pathological characteristics of the patients that respond best.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We queried our prospectively maintained database for patients who underwent CN for nccRCC between 1989 and 2018. Histology was reviewed by an expert genitourinary pathologist, and nccRCC tumors were subdivided into papillary, unclassified, chromophobe, and other histology. Baseline clinicopathology, treatments, and survival outcomes were recorded. Preoperative hematological parameters including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were analyzed. Significant univariate predictors of OS were tested in a multivariate model.

RESULTS

There were 100 nccRCC patients treated with CN. Median age was 61 years (IQR: 48-69) and 65% were male. There were 79 patient deaths with a median OS of 13.7 months (10.8-27.2). Estimated 2- and 5-year survival was 40.1% and 12.2%, respectively. Median follow-up of survivors was 13 months (IQR: 3-30). On multivariate analysis, increasing NLR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-1.40, P < 0.001) and sarcomatoid features (HR 2.18; 95% CI 1.19-3.97, P = 0.014) conferred worse OS and the presence of papillary features were a favorable prognostic feature (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.21-0.65, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

OS outcomes in patients with nccRCC who underwent a CN are consistently modest throughout the study period. Patients with papillary features and a lower preoperative NLR may be better candidates for a CN.

Do renal cell carcinoma patients with brain metastases still need nephrectomy?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the value of nephrectomy for survival prognosis in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with brain metastases (BM).

METHODS

There were 933 RCC patients diagnosed with BM in SEER database from 2010 to 2014. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model were used to analyze the survival prognosis. The effect of nephrectomy on overall survival (OS) was analyzed by propensity score matching. The competitive risk model was performed to explore the relationship between surgery and cancer-specific survival (CSS), and the nomogram visualization model was established by R language to predict survival rate.

RESULTS

BM accounted for 1.5% of newly diagnosed RCC patients and 11.1% of M1 stage patients with the median survival time of 5 months (95% CI 4.5-5.5). Age 45-65 years, tumor diameter > 10 cm and histologic type of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) were high risk factors for BM in RCC patients. Age, N stage, lung metastasis and nephrectomy were independent prognostic factors. Nephrectomy was beneficial for both OS and CSS for the analysis of 216 patients successfully matched. The nomogram model has a certain value in predicting the survival rate with the internal verification c-index of 0.727.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with high risk of BM (age 45-65 years, tumor diameter > 10 cm, histologic type of ccRCC) should emphasize brain imaging screening during follow-up. Nephrectomy may bring survival advantages for RCC patients with BM. Nomogram model based on nephrectomy can helps predicting the 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates.

Reassessing the Role of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in 2019

Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CRN) has long been considered a standard of care in the management of mRCC. This is largely based on randomized trials in the era of interferon (IFN) that demonstrate an improvement in overall survival (OS). With the advent of targeted therapies, the role of CRN has been questioned and multiple retrospective analyses have shown a potential benefit, particularly in intermediate-risk disease. Two long-awaited prospective trials have been published in the past year that explore the role of CRN. The CARMENA trial randomly assigned patients to therapy with sunitinib with or without CRN, showing noninferiority of sunitinib alone versus sunitinib plus CRN with a median OS of 18.4 months versus 13.9 months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] for mortality, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.71-1.1). The SURTIME trial randomly assigned patients to immediate CRN followed by sunitinib versus a deferred CRN after three cycles of sunitinib. Analysis is limited by early termination as a result of low accrual. Although there was no difference in progression-free survival (PFS), median OS was significantly improved among patients in the deferred CRN arm (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.95; p = .032). Early systemic therapy is paramount, but there are patients who may derive benefit by incorporating the removal of the primary tumor in their multimodal therapy, perhaps in a deferred setting. As systemic treatment paradigms shift and immunotherapy again moves to the frontline setting with the potential for novel therapeutic approaches, the role of CRN will continue to evolve with the potential to offer surgical interventions with minimal, if any, delay in systemic treatment.

Risk prediction models for cancer-specific survival following cytoreductive nephrectomy in the contemporary era

INTRODUCTION

To develop a risk-stratification model for cancer-specific survival (CSS) following cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in the contemporary era.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 313 patients who underwent CN for M1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from 1990 to 2010. To account for the introduction of targeted therapies, timing of surgery was classified as immunotherapy era (1990-2004) or contemporary era (2005-2010). Risk scores were developed to predict CSS using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 215 (69%) and 98 (31%) patients were treated in the immunotherapy and contemporary eras, respectively. Median follow-up among survivors was 9.6 years, during which time 291 patients died, including 279 from RCC. On multivariable analysis limited to preoperative features, age ≥ 75, (hazard ratio [HR] 1.9), female sex (HR 1.9), constitutional symptoms (HR 1.61), radiographic lymphadenopathy (HR 1.59), and IVC tumor thrombus (HR 1.65) were significantly associated with CSS. On multivariable analysis including pathologic features, the features above as well as coagulative necrosis (HR 1.51) and sarcomatoid differentiation (HR 1.44) were significantly associated with CSS (all P < 0.05). Risk scores were developed for each model and used to predict CSS according to era. Decision curve analysis revealed that the preoperative risk score conferred a net benefit over a treat-all or treat-none approach beyond a 1-year cancer-specific mortality threshold of 25%.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed risk scores to predict CSS for patients treated with CN in the contemporary era. Patients with poor predicted survival may consider avoiding CN as initial management.

Hospital volume and short-term outcomes after cytoreductive nephrectomy

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of hospital volume on short-term outcomes after cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

METHODS

We identified mRCC patients who underwent CN from 2006 to 2013 in the National Cancer Database. Annual hospital CN volume was categorized as high (top 20th percentile) and low. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, prolonged length of stay (PLOS, ≥7 days), and 30-day readmission rates. Sensitivity analyses were performed with hospital volume considered as a continuous variable.

RESULTS

A total of 9789 patients were included with high-volume (n = 1916) defined as ≥8 cases and low-volume (n = 7873) as 1-7 cases annually. Multivariable logistic regression showed that high-volume was associated with lower odds of 30-day mortality (OR = 0.69, P = 0.013), 90-day mortality (OR = 0.65, P < 0.001), PLOS (OR = 0.82, P = 0.002), and 30-day readmission (OR = 0.78, P = 0.028). Sensitivity analyses showed that increasing hospital volume (per case) was associated with lower odds of 30-day mortality (OR = 0.965, P = 0.008), 90-day mortality (OR = 0.966, P < 0.001), PLOS (OR = 0.982, P = 0.001), and 30-day readmission (OR = 0.975, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Higher hospital volume was associated with better short-term outcomes after CN. Future studies are needed to validate our findings and explore the potential components leading to better outcomes in the higher volume hospitals.

Management of advanced kidney cancer: Canadian Kidney Cancer Forum (CKCF) consensus update 2017

N/A

Pretreatment Prognostic Nutritional Index Is an Independent Predictor of Survival in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Targeted Therapy

BACKGROUND

In the present study we examined the effect of the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) on the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with targeted therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 125 patients with metastatic RCC. Pretreatment PNI was calculated as 10 × serum albumin (g/dL) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count (per mm³). Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the correlation between pretreatment PNI and OS and PFS. Harrell concordance index was used to measure discrimination.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 45.3 months (interquartile range, 23.7-77.3 months). Decreased PNI was significantly associated with older female patients, poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, types of initial drug, and increased Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and Heng risk score (P < .05). An increase in the PNI of 1 unit was associated with a 10% decrease in the risk of death from RCC (hazard ratio, 0.90; P < .001). In the multivariable analysis, the PNI was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P < .001). In intermediate-risk patients according to MSKCC and Heng risk criteria, OS was better in the high PNI group than in the low PNI group (P = .0136 and P = .0009, respectively).

CONCLUSION

PNI is an independent prognostic factor in patients with metastatic RCC treated with targeted therapy. When used as an adjunct, it increases the prognostic accuracy of established factors and could be a valuable tool for tailoring surveillance, patient counseling, and clinical trial design.

The role of cytoreductive surgery in the era of targeted agents

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Two randomized trials were initiated to define the role and sequence of cytoreductive nephrectomy in combination with VEGF-targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell cancer. While these trials will not report before the end of 2016, recent retrospective population-based studies published real-world data on incidence, treatment, prognosis and outcome that may help to better define the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy for this heterogeneous patient population in the targeted therapy era.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since the introduction of targeted agents, utilization of cytoreductive nephrectomy has declined. Potentially more patients are being treated with their primary tumours in place. Some countries also observed an additional decline in the incidence of primary metastatic disease. Although large population-based studies consistently demonstrate a survival benefit after cytoreductive nephrectomy, confounding factors preclude definite conclusions. However, patients with a life expectancy of less than 1 year or at least four IMDS risk factors may not benefit from cytoreductive nephrectomy.

SUMMARY

Recent retrospective data suggest a more refined use of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the targeted therapy era. With the exception of patients in whom cytoreductive nephrectomy and resection of solitary or oligometastasis may result in cure or delay of systemic therapy, performance, prognostic models and life expectancy estimates help to define the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the individual patient.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy and its role in the present-day period of targeted therapy

The beneficial effect of cytoreductive nephrectomy on survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the immunotherapy era was based on two prospective randomized trials. Unfortunately, such evidence does not yet exist in the present-day period of targeted therapy. Despite this, cytoreductive nephrectomy remains integral in the multimodal management of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Multiple retrospective studies as well as data from prospective studies examining targeted therapy support the continued use of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the properly selected patient. Ongoing studies will hopefully fine-tune the role and timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the context of targeted therapy.

Percentage of sarcomatoid component as a prognostic indicator for survival in renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation

OBJECTIVE

Renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation (sRCC) is associated with higher stage of presentation and worse survival. The objective of this study was to examine the clinicopathologic characteristics associated with overall survival (OS), specifically examining the percentage of sarcomatoid component (PSC).

METHODS

We reviewed clinicopathologic data for all nephrectomized patients with confirmed sRCC. Histologic slides were rereviewed by dedicated genitourinary pathologists to ascertain PSC. Patient characteristics were tabulated overall and by disease stage. Cutpoints in the PSC providing a meaningful difference in OS were identified by recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). Factors selected included age group, gender, race, clinical stage, tumor histology, presurgical systemic therapy, lymphovascular invasion, and tumor size. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to assess differences in OS.

RESULTS

Among 186 patients with sRCC, 64 (34%) had localized, and 122 (66%) had metastatic disease at presentation. Patients had primarily clear cell histology (73%). Median follow-up was 12.1 months (range: 0.1-242.2mo). Median OS was 12.6 months (95% CI: 10.7-14.9mo). Univariate RPA identified a PSC cutpoint of 10% as prognostically significant. Patients with PSC>10% were at higher risk of death when compared with patients with PSC≤10% (45% vs. 61% 1-y OS; P = 0.04). Multivariate RPA revealed that tumor size, presence of metastatic disease, and PSC were significantly associated with OS. Among 4 identified groups, patients with localized disease and tumor size≤10cm were most likely to be alive at 1 year (89%), and patients with metastatic disease and PSC>40% were least likely to be alive at 1 year (28%; P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

PSC appears to be a prognostic factor in patients with sRCC, with larger percentage of involvement portending a worse survival, especially in patients with metastatic disease.