1
|
Shankar M, Hazfiarini A, Zahroh RI, Vogel JP, McDougall ARA, Condron P, Goudar SS, Pujar YV, Somannavar MS, Charantimath U, Ammerdorffer A, Rushwan S, Gülmezoglu AM, Bohren MA. Factors influencing the participation of pregnant and lactating women in clinical trials: A mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Med 2024; 21:e1004405. [PMID: 38814991 PMCID: PMC11139290 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor representation of pregnant and lactating women and people in clinical trials has marginalised their health concerns and denied the maternal-fetal/infant dyad benefits of innovation in therapeutic research and development. This mixed-methods systematic review synthesised factors affecting the participation of pregnant and lactating women in clinical trials, across all levels of the research ecosystem. METHODS AND FINDINGS We searched 8 databases from inception to 14 February 2024 to identify qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies that described factors affecting participation of pregnant and lactating women in vaccine and therapeutic clinical trials in any setting. We used thematic synthesis to analyse the qualitative literature and assessed confidence in each qualitative review finding using the GRADE-CERQual approach. We compared quantitative data against the thematic synthesis findings to assess areas of convergence or divergence. We mapped review findings to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B) to inform future development of behaviour change strategies. We included 60 papers from 27 countries. We grouped 24 review findings under 5 overarching themes: (a) interplay between perceived risks and benefits of participation in women's decision-making; (b) engagement between women and the medical and research ecosystems; (c) gender norms and decision-making autonomy; (d) factors affecting clinical trial recruitment; and (e) upstream factors in the research ecosystem. Women's willingness to participate in trials was affected by: perceived risk of the health condition weighed against an intervention's risks and benefits, therapeutic optimism, intervention acceptability, expectations of receiving higher quality care in a trial, altruistic motivations, intimate relationship dynamics, and power and trust in medicine and research. Health workers supported women's participation in trials when they perceived clinical equipoise, had hope for novel therapeutic applications, and were convinced an intervention was safe. For research staff, developing reciprocal relationships with health workers, having access to resources for trial implementation, ensuring the trial was visible to potential participants and health workers, implementing a woman-centred approach when communicating with potential participants, and emotional orientations towards the trial were factors perceived to affect recruitment. For study investigators and ethics committees, the complexities and subjectivities in risk assessments and trial design, and limited funding of such trials contributed to their reluctance in leading and approving such trials. All included studies focused on factors affecting participation of cisgender pregnant women in clinical trials; future research should consider other pregnancy-capable populations, including transgender and nonbinary people. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review highlights diverse factors across multiple levels and stakeholders affecting the participation of pregnant and lactating women in clinical trials. By linking identified factors to frameworks of behaviour change, we have developed theoretically informed strategies that can help optimise pregnant and lactating women's engagement, participation, and trust in such trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mridula Shankar
- Gender and Women’s Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alya Hazfiarini
- Gender and Women’s Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rana Islamiah Zahroh
- Gender and Women’s Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joshua P. Vogel
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Annie R. A. McDougall
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Patrick Condron
- University Library, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shivaprasad S. Goudar
- Women’s and Children’s Health Research Unit, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
| | - Yeshita V. Pujar
- Women’s and Children’s Health Research Unit, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
| | - Manjunath S. Somannavar
- Women’s and Children’s Health Research Unit, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
| | - Umesh Charantimath
- Women’s and Children’s Health Research Unit, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
| | | | - Sara Rushwan
- Concept Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland/Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Meghan A. Bohren
- Gender and Women’s Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Skelton E, Cromb D, Smith A, Harrison G, Rutherford M, Malamateniou C, Ayers S. The influence of antenatal imaging on prenatal bonding in uncomplicated pregnancies: a mixed methods analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024; 24:265. [PMID: 38605314 PMCID: PMC11007968 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06469-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prenatal bonding describes the emotional connection expectant parents form to their unborn child. Research acknowledges the association between antenatal imaging and enhanced bonding, but the influencing factors are not well understood, particularly for fathers or when using advanced techniques like fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study aimed to identify variables which may predict increased bonding after imaging. METHODS First-time expectant parents (mothers = 58, fathers = 18) completed a two-part questionnaire (QualtricsXM™) about their expectations and experiences of ultrasound (n = 64) or fetal MRI (n = 12) scans in uncomplicated pregnancies. A modified version of the Prenatal Attachment Inventory (PAI) was used to measure bonding. Qualitative data were collected through open-ended questions. Multivariate linear regression models were used to identify significant parent and imaging predictors for bonding. Qualitative content analysis of free-text responses was conducted to further understand the predictors' influences. RESULTS Bonding scores were significantly increased after imaging for mothers and fathers (p < 0.05). MRI-parents reported significantly higher bonding than ultrasound-parents (p = 0.02). In the first regression model of parent factors (adjusted R2 = 0.17, F = 2.88, p < 0.01), employment status (β = -0.38, p < 0.05) was a significant predictor for bonding post-imaging. The second model of imaging factors (adjusted R2 = 0.19, F = 3.85, p < 0.01) showed imaging modality (β = -0.53), imaging experience (β = 0.42) and parental excitement after the scan (β = 0.29) were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with increased bonding. Seventeen coded themes were generated from the qualitative content analysis, describing how scans offered reassurance about fetal wellbeing and the opportunity to connect with the baby through quality interactions with imaging professionals. A positive scan experience helped parents to feel excited about parenthood. Fetal MRI was considered a superior modality to ultrasound. CONCLUSIONS Antenatal imaging provides reassurance of fetal development which affirms parents' emotional investment in the pregnancy and supports the growing connection. Imaging professionals are uniquely positioned to provide parent-centred experiences which may enhance parental excitement and facilitate bonding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Skelton
- Division of Radiography and Midwifery, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.
| | - Daniel Cromb
- Perinatal Imaging and Health, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Alison Smith
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Gill Harrison
- Society and College of Radiographers, London, SE1 2EW, UK
| | - Mary Rutherford
- Perinatal Imaging and Health, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Christina Malamateniou
- Division of Radiography and Midwifery, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, UK
| | - Susan Ayers
- Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Davis S, Pandor A, Sampson FC, Hamilton J, Nelson-Piercy C, Hunt BJ, Daru J, Goodacre S, Carser R, Rooney G, Clowes M. Thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy and the puerperium: a systematic review and economic evaluation to estimate the value of future research. Health Technol Assess 2024; 28:1-176. [PMID: 38476084 PMCID: PMC11017156 DOI: 10.3310/dfwt3873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Pharmacological prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism is currently recommended for women assessed as being at high risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or in the 6 weeks after delivery (the puerperium). The decision to provide thromboprophylaxis involves weighing the benefits, harms and costs, which vary according to the individual's venous thromboembolism risk. It is unclear whether the United Kingdom's current risk stratification approach could be improved by further research. Objectives To quantify the current decision uncertainty associated with selecting women who are pregnant or in the puerperium for thromboprophylaxis and to estimate the value of one or more potential future studies that would reduce that uncertainty, while being feasible and acceptable to patients and clinicians. Methods A decision-analytic model was developed which was informed by a systematic review of risk assessment models to predict venous thromboembolism in women who are pregnant or in the puerperium. Expected value of perfect information analysis was used to determine which factors are associated with high decision uncertainty and should be the target of future research. To find out whether future studies would be acceptable and feasible, we held workshops with women who have experienced a blood clot or have been offered blood-thinning drugs and surveyed healthcare professionals. Expected value of sample information analysis was used to estimate the value of potential future research studies. Results The systematic review included 17 studies, comprising 19 unique externally validated risk assessment models and 1 internally validated model. Estimates of sensitivity and specificity were highly variable ranging from 0% to 100% and 5% to 100%, respectively. Most studies had unclear or high risk of bias and applicability concerns. The decision analysis found that there is substantial decision uncertainty regarding the use of risk assessment models to select high-risk women for antepartum prophylaxis and obese postpartum women for postpartum prophylaxis. The main source of decision uncertainty was uncertainty around the effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis for preventing venous thromboembolism in women who are pregnant or in the puerperium. We found that a randomised controlled trial of thromboprophylaxis in obese postpartum women is likely to have substantial value and is more likely to be acceptable and feasible than a trial recruiting women who have had a previous venous thromboembolism. In unselected postpartum women and women following caesarean section, the poor performance of risk assessment models meant that offering prophylaxis based on these models had less favourable cost effectiveness with lower decision uncertainty. Limitations The performance of the risk assessment model for obese postpartum women has not been externally validated. Conclusions Future research should focus on estimating the efficacy of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in pregnancy and the puerperium, and clinical trials would be more acceptable in women who have not had a previous venous thromboembolism. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020221094. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR131021) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 9. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Davis
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Abdullah Pandor
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Fiona C Sampson
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jean Hamilton
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Beverley J Hunt
- Haematology and Pathology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jahnavi Daru
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Steve Goodacre
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Rosie Carser
- Patient and Public Involvement, Thrombosis UK, Llanwrda, UK
| | - Gill Rooney
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mark Clowes
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Caljé E, Oyston C, Wang Z, Bloomfield F, Marriott J, Dixon L, Groom K. The fatigue after infusion or transfusion pilot trial and feasibility study: A three-armed randomized pilot trial of intravenous iron and blood transfusion for the treatment of postpartum anemia. Transfusion 2024; 64:301-314. [PMID: 38149691 DOI: 10.1111/trf.17621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence for the management of moderate-to-severe postpartum anemia is limited. A randomized trial is needed; recruitment may be challenging. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Randomized pilot trial with feasibility surveys. INCLUSION hemoglobin 65-79 g/L, ≤7 days of birth, hemodynamically stable. EXCLUSION ongoing heavy bleeding; already received, or contraindication to intravenous (IV)-iron or red blood cell transfusion (RBC-T). Intervention/control: IV-iron; RBC-T; or IV-iron and RBC-T. PRIMARY OUTCOME number of recruits; proportion of those approached; proportion considered potentially eligible. SECONDARY OUTCOMES fatigue, depression, baby-feeding, and hemoglobin at 1, 6 and 12 weeks; ferritin at 6 and 12 weeks. Surveys explored attitudes to trial participation. RESULTS Over 16 weeks and three sites, 26/34 (76%) women approached consented to trial participation, including eight (31%) Māori women. Of those potentially eligible, 26/167 (15.6%) consented to participate. Key participation enablers were altruism and study relevance. For clinicians and stakeholders the availability of research assistance was the key barrier/enabler. Between-group rates of fatigue and depression were similar. Although underpowered to address secondary outcomes, IV-iron and RBC-T compared with RBC-T were associated with higher hemoglobin concentrations at 6 (mean difference [MD] 11.7 g/L, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7-20.7) and 12 (MD 12.8 g/L, 95% CI 1.5-24.2) weeks, and higher ferritin concentrations at 6 weeks (MD 136.8 mcg/L, 95% CI 76.6-196.9). DISCUSSION Willingness to participate supports feasibility for a future trial assessing the effectiveness of IV-iron and RBC-T for postpartum anemia. Dedicated research assistance will be critical to the success of an appropriately powered trial including women-centered outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Caljé
- Liggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Charlotte Oyston
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Zeke Wang
- Liggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Frank Bloomfield
- Liggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Joy Marriott
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Lesley Dixon
- New Zealand College of Midwives, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Katie Groom
- Liggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- National Women's Health, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tesson S, Swinsburg D, Nielson-Jones C, Costa DSJ, Winlaw DS, Badawi N, Sholler GF, Butow PN, Kasparian NA. Mother-Infant Dyadic Synchrony and Interaction Patterns After Infant Cardiac Surgery. J Pediatr Psychol 2024; 49:13-26. [PMID: 37873696 DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsad069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Parents and their infants with complex congenital heart disease (CHD) face relational challenges, including marked distress, early separations, and infant hospitalizations and medical procedures, yet the prevalence of parent-infant interaction difficulties remains unclear. Using a standardized observational paradigm, this study investigated mother-infant dyadic synchrony, interactional patterns, and associated predictors in mother-infant pairs affected by CHD, compared with typically-developing pairs. METHODS In this prospective, longitudinal cohort study, mothers and their infants requiring cardiac surgery before age 6-months (n=110 pairs) and an age- and sex-matched Australian community sample (n=85 pairs) participated in a filmed, free-play interaction at 6.9±1.0 months. Mother-infant dyadic synchrony, maternal and infant interactional patterns, and relational risk were assessed using the Child-Adult Relationship Experimental (CARE) Index. Maternal and infant predictors were assessed at 32 weeks gestation, 3- and 6-months postpartum. RESULTS Most mother-infant interactions were classified as "high risk" or "inept" (cardiac: 94%, control: 81%; p=.007). Dyadic synchrony (p<.001), maternal sensitivity (p=.001), and infant cooperativeness (p=.001) were lower for cardiac than control pairs. Higher maternal traumatic stress at 6-months postpartum predicted lower dyadic synchrony for mother-infant pairs affected by CHD (B=-.04, p=.03). Dyadic synchrony was higher among older infants in the total (B=.40, p=.003) but not cardiac sample (B=.24, p=.06). CONCLUSIONS Relational difficulties were almost universal among mother-infant pairs affected by CHD and were also high in the Australian community sample. Widespread education initiatives are recommended to increase awareness of heightened mother-infant relational risk in congenital heart care and well-child settings, alongside relationally-focused prevention and early intervention programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Tesson
- Heart Centre for Children, The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Australia
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dianne Swinsburg
- Heart Centre for Children, The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of New South Wales, Australia
| | - Claudia Nielson-Jones
- Heart Centre for Children, The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel S J Costa
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Australia
- Pain Management Research Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, Australia
| | - David S Winlaw
- Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, USA
| | - Nadia Badawi
- Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Australia
- Grace Centre for Newborn Care, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Australia
| | - Gary F Sholler
- Heart Centre for Children, The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Australia
- Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Phyllis N Butow
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Australia
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Nadine A Kasparian
- Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, USA
- Heart and Mind Wellbeing Center, Heart Institute and Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mahapatro M, Roy S, Nayar P, Panchkaran S, Jadhav A. Adherence to behavioural intervention in RCT study by the women experiencing domestic violence and attending ANC in a public hospital in India-an analysis. DIALOGUES IN HEALTH 2023; 2:100126. [PMID: 38515486 PMCID: PMC10953984 DOI: 10.1016/j.dialog.2023.100126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
Background The paper aims to identify the factors for effective implementation and adherence to the behavioural intervention package by women experiencing domestic violence (DV) and attending ANC in a public hospital. Methods A qualitative study was undertaken with 211 pregnant women experiencing DV and attending antenatal care (ANC) at the LN Hospital, New Delhi. The intervention was given to women recruited under the RCT study. The narratives were analysed under two broad themes, impeding and facilitating factors, with nine sub-themes. Findings Impeding factors are external factors generated by the structural interaction of the participants, whereas facilitating factors are supplied internally in the trial to eliminate the influence of impeding factors and singulate the factors under study. Our results show that despite the plethora of impeding factors (nine), the overall sum impact of impeding factors falls short of the positive impact of facilitating factors (nine), which were minor adjustments but reinforce participation in the trial and adherence with 97% follow-up rates. Interpretation Our study findings are expected to reset the treatment protocol, which entails converting impeding factors into facilitating factors for appropriate adherence and compliance and adequate access and utilization of public services. The sensitization of healthcare providers to the impact of the quality of human interaction on the patient and its impact on the uptake of healthcare services and adherence is needed, particularly in the public hospitals of India. Funding Funds received for the research are from the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, Government of India.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sudeshna Roy
- National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi 110067, India
| | - Poonam Nayar
- National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi 110067, India
| | - Suruchi Panchkaran
- National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi 110067, India
| | - Ashwini Jadhav
- National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi 110067, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Salloum M, Paviotti A, Bastiaens H, Van Geertruyden JP. The inclusion of pregnant women in vaccine clinical trials: An overview of late-stage clinical trials' records between 2018 and 2023. Vaccine 2023; 41:7076-7083. [PMID: 37903681 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.10.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
Pregnant women are generally excluded from clinical research over safety concerns. However, demands to include them in clinical vaccine development have intensified after recent COVID-19, Ebola, and Lassa fever outbreaks given the disproportionate effect of these diseases on pregnant women and/or their foetuses. Numerous studies highlighted the scarcity of safety data for therapeutic interventions in pregnant women. Nevertheless, only a small number have assessed the number of vaccine trials including this population. Therefore, we searched for phase 3 and 4 vaccine clinical trials in healthy populations registered between 2018 and 2023 in clinicaltrials.gov and the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform. Out of 400 registered vaccine trials matching our inclusion criteria, 217 (54 %) were industry-sponsored, and 222 (56 %) had COVID-19 as a target. We found 22 studies (6 %) that either were designed for pregnant women or included them as part of a larger population. Out of these 22 trials, 13 were designed specifically for pregnant women; seven of these were maternal vaccines aiming at protecting the foetus, namely pertussis (3), Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) (3), and meningitis plus tetanus (1) vaccines, and six others targeted either flu (3), COVID-19 (2) or Ebola (1). Only the RSV and Ebola vaccine trials were industry-sponsored. We also found that nine studies targeting the general population included pregnant women. These focused on COVID-19 (3), flu (2), COVID-19 + flu (2), Ebola (1), and Hepatitis B (1). None of these studies was industry-sponsored. Our findings show that a gap still exists in terms of pregnant women's inclusion in vaccine trials. Such a gap needs to be tackled urgently to minimise the devastating effects that a future infectious disease outbreak could have on this population. This study can inform future demands for increased inclusion, especially in industry-sponsored trials, as it provides an overview of the current vaccine trials scene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maha Salloum
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Drie Eikenstraat 663, 2650 Antwerp, Belgium; Global Health Institute, Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Doornstraat 331, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Antea Paviotti
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Drie Eikenstraat 663, 2650 Antwerp, Belgium; Global Health Institute, Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Doornstraat 331, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Hilde Bastiaens
- Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Doornstraat 331, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Jean-Pierre Van Geertruyden
- Global Health Institute, Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Doornstraat 331, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Edwards TL, Greene CA, Piekos JA, Hellwege JN, Hampton G, Jasper EA, Velez Edwards DR. Challenges and Opportunities for Data Science in Women's Health. Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci 2023; 6:23-45. [PMID: 37040736 PMCID: PMC10877578 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-020722-105958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
The intersection of women's health and data science is a field of research that has historically trailed other fields, but more recently it has gained momentum. This growth is being driven not only by new investigators who are moving into this area but also by the significant opportunities that have emerged in new methodologies, resources, and technologies in data science. Here, we describe some of the resources and methods being used by women's health researchers today to meet challenges in biomedical data science. We also describe the opportunities and limitations of applying these approaches to advance women's health outcomes and the future of the field, with emphasis on repurposing existing methodologies for women's health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd L Edwards
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA;
| | - Catherine A Greene
- Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA;
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jacqueline A Piekos
- Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA;
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jacklyn N Hellwege
- Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA;
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Gabrielle Hampton
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA;
| | - Elizabeth A Jasper
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Center for Precision Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Digna R Velez Edwards
- Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA;
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jacobson LT, Wolfe M, Zackula R, Okut H, Hampton FE, Grainger DA, Griebel-Thompson AK, Ling Kong K, Befort C. Electronic Monitoring Of Mom's Schedule (eMOMS TM): Recruitment of pregnant populations with elevated BMI in a feasibility randomized controlled trial. Prev Med Rep 2023; 34:102254. [PMID: 37292426 PMCID: PMC10244679 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Underrepresentation of pregnant populations in randomized controlled trials of lifestyle change interventions is concerning due to high attrition and providers' limited clinical time. The purpose of this evaluative study was to assess intervention uptake of pregnant individuals enrolled in a three-arm feasibility randomized controlled trial, electronic Monitoring Of Mom's Schedule (eMOMSTM), examining lifestyle changes and lactation support alone, and in combination. Measures included: (1) participation and completion rates, and characteristics of intervention completers versus other eligible participants; and (2) provider experiences with screening and enrolling pregnant participants. Pregnant people with a pre-pregnancy body mass index ≥ 25 and < 35 kg/m2 were enrolled into the eMOMSTM trial between September 2019 - December 2020. Of the 44 consented participants, 35 were randomized, at a participation rate of 35%, and 26 completed the intervention, resulting in a completion rate of 74%. Intervention completers were slightly older and entered the study earlier in pregnancy compared to non-completers. Completers were more likely to be first-time mothers, resided in urban areas, had higher educational attainment, and were slightly more racially and ethnically diverse. A majority of providers reported willingness to participate, believed the study aligned with their organization's mission, and were satisfied with using iPads for screening. Lessons learned to guide recruitment success include use of: (1) designated research staff in combination with physician support; and (2) user-friendly technology to help mitigate time burden on physicians and their staff. Future work should focus on successful strategies to recruit/retain pregnant populations in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisette T. Jacobson
- University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Department of Population Health, 1010 North Kansas, Wichita, KS 67214, USA
- University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1010 North Kansas, Wichita, KS 67214, USA
| | - Michael Wolfe
- Ascension Via Christi Hospitals Wichita, Inc., Ascension Via Christi Maternal Fetal Medicine Clinic, 1515 South Clifton Avenue, Suite 130, Wichita, KS 67218, USA
| | - Rosey Zackula
- University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Office of Research, 1010 North Kansas, Wichita, KS 67214, USA
| | - Hayrettin Okut
- University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Department of Population Health, 1010 North Kansas, Wichita, KS 67214, USA
- University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Office of Research, 1010 North Kansas, Wichita, KS 67214, USA
| | - Faith E. Hampton
- University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Department of Population Health, 1010 North Kansas, Wichita, KS 67214, USA
| | - David A. Grainger
- University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1010 North Kansas, Wichita, KS 67214, USA
| | - Adrianne K. Griebel-Thompson
- Baby Health Behavior Lab, Division of Health Services and Outcomes Research, Children’s Mercy Research Institute, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA
| | - Kai Ling Kong
- Baby Health Behavior Lab, Division of Health Services and Outcomes Research, Children’s Mercy Research Institute, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA
| | - Christie Befort
- University of Kansas School of Medicine-Kansas City, Department of Population Health, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Mailstop 1003, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lovell H, Silverio SA, Story L, Skelton E, Matthew J. Factors which influence ethnic minority women's participation in maternity research: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0282088. [PMID: 36827386 PMCID: PMC9956875 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women from Black, Asian and mixed ethnicity backgrounds in the UK experience higher rates of maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity, and report poorer experiences of maternity care. Research is required to understand how to reduce these disparities, however, it is acknowledged these groups of women are under-represented in clinical research. AIM To investigate factors which influence participation in maternity research for women from an ethnic minority background. METHODS A systematic review was conducted to examine influencing factors for research participation. MEDLINE/CINHAL/PsycInfo/EMBASE databases were systematically searched in March 2021 and updated in March 2022. Papers were eligible if they explored maternal research participation and identified a woman's ethnicity in the results. No restrictions were placed on methodology. A convergent integrated approach was used to synthesise findings. FINDINGS A total of 14 papers met the inclusion criteria. Results were divided into eight overarching themes. A personalised approach to recruitment and incorporating culturally sensitive communication and considerations enhanced research participation. Distrust around sharing data, a perception of risk to research participation, and research lacking in personal relevance adversely affected the decision to participate. Large variation existed in the quality of the studies reviewed. CONCLUSIONS Consideration of a woman's culture and background in the design and the delivery of a maternity research study may facilitate participation, particularly when sampling from a specific population. Further research, informed by women from ethnic minority backgrounds is warranted to develop women-centred recommendations for conducting inclusive maternity research. Prospero registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42021261686.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Lovell
- Maternity Services, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sergio A. Silverio
- Department of Women & Children’s Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa Story
- Maternity Services, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Women & Children’s Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emily Skelton
- Division of Radiography and Midwifery, City University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jacqueline Matthew
- Maternity Services, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Peripartum women's perspectives on research study participation in the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium during COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 7:e24. [PMID: 36755549 PMCID: PMC9879925 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2022.476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic created an unprecedented need for population-level clinical trials focused on the discovery of life-saving therapies and treatments. However, there is limited information on perception of research participation among perinatal populations, a population of particular interest during the pandemic. Methods Eligible respondents were 18 years or older, were currently pregnant or had an infant (≤12 months old), and lived in Florida within 50 miles of sites participating in the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium. Respondents were recruited via Qualtrics panels between April and September 2020. Respondents completed survey items about barriers and facilitators to participation and answered sociodemographic questions. Results Of 533 respondents, most were between 25 and 34 years of age (n = 259, 49%) and identified as White (n = 303, 47%) and non-Hispanic (n = 344, 65%). Facebook was the most popular social media platform among our respondents. The most common barriers to research participation included poor explanation of study goals, discomforts to the infant, and time commitment. Recruitment through healthcare providers was perceived as the best way to learn about clinical research studies. When considering research participation, "myself" had the greatest influence, followed by familial ties. Noninvasive biological samples were highly acceptable. Hispanics had higher positive perspectives on willingness to participate in a randomized study (p = 0.009). Education (p = 0.007) had significant effects on willingness to release personal health information. Conclusion When recruiting women during the pregnancy and postpartum periods for perinatal studies, investigators should consider protocols that account for common barriers and preferred study information sources. Social media-based recruitment is worthy of adoption.
Collapse
|
12
|
Hanrahan V, Lawrie L, Duncan E, Biesty L, Gillies K. Development of a co-designed behaviour change intervention aimed at healthcare professionals recruiting to clinical trials in maternity care. Trials 2022; 23:870. [PMID: 36224619 PMCID: PMC9556136 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06816-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The evidence on what strategies can improve recruitment to clinical trials in maternity care is lacking. As trial recruiters, maternity healthcare professionals (MHCPs) perform behaviours (e.g. talking about trials with potential participants, distributing trial information) they may not ordinarily do outside of the trial. Most trial recruitment interventions do not provide any theoretical basis for the potential effect (on behaviour) or describe if stakeholders were involved during development. The study aim was to use behavioural theory in a co-design process to develop an intervention for MHCPs tasked with approaching all eligible potential participants and inviting them to join a maternity trial and to assess the acceptability and feasibility of such an intervention. Methods This study applied a step-wise sequential mixed-methods approach. Key stages were informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Techniques (BCT) Taxonomy to map the accounts of MHCPs, with regard to challenges to trial recruitment, to theoretically informed behaviour change strategies. Our recruitment intervention was co-designed during workshops with MHCPs and maternity service users. Acceptability and feasibility of our intervention was assessed using an online questionnaire based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) and involved a range of trial stakeholders. Results Two co-design workshops, with a total of nine participants (n = 7 MHCP, n = 2 maternity service users), discussed thirteen BCTs as potential solutions. Ten BCTs, broadly covering Consequences and Reframing, progressed to intervention development. Forty-five trial stakeholders (clinical midwives, research midwives/nurses, doctors, allied health professionals and trial team members) participated in the online TFA questionnaire. The intervention was perceived effective, coherent, and not burdensome to engage with. Core areas for future refinement included Anticipated opportunity and Self-efficacy. Conclusion We developed a behaviour change recruitment intervention which is based on the accounts of MHCP trial recruiters and developed in a co-design process. Overall, the intervention was deemed acceptable. Future evaluation of the intervention will establish its effectiveness in enabling MHCPs to invite all eligible people to participate in a maternity care trial, and determine whether this translates into an increase in maternity trial recruitment rates. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06816-6.
Collapse
|
13
|
Al-Shami KM, Ahmed WS, Alzoubi KH. Motivators and barriers towards clinical research participation: A population-based survey from an Arab MENA country. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0270300. [PMID: 35749422 PMCID: PMC9231817 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Jordan was the first Arab country to enact clinical research regulations. The country has a well-flourished pharmaceutical industry that leans heavily on clinical research (CR) for drug development and post-marketing surveillance. In this cross-sectional study, we sought to assess the public's awareness and attitude towards CR as well as their perceived motivators and barriers to CR participation. A population-based, self-administered questionnaire was distributed to the general public in Jordan. Among the 1061 participants in this survey, 74% reported being aware of CR. The majority (70%) agreed to the role of CR in health promotion. Online information and healthcare staff were the two main sources of CR information for the participants. About 25% of the participants received prior invitations to participate in CR with 21% agreeing to participate. However, most participants of the current study (63%) were willing to participate in future CR. Contributing to science, benefiting others, and promoting one's own health were the top motivating factors for participating in CR; while time constraints, fear of research procedure, and lack of interest were the most cited reasons for rejecting participation. Filling out questionnaire surveys, donating blood samples, and participating in physical examinations were the main CR contributions of the participants. Nearly 31% of the participants believed that CR is conducted in a responsible and ethical manner, while 57% did not have an opinion regarding the same matter. In addition, 49% and 44% were neutral with regards to the degree of harm and confidentiality posed by CR. While only 27% disagreed that CR exposes participants to some form of harm, 48% either strongly agreed (15%) or agreed (33%) that it maintains high level of confidentiality for participants. The current study provides insight into the public's perception of CR in Jordan as well as its motivating factors and perceived barriers towards participating in CR. We envisage to utilize this insight as an aid in the design of vigilant future awareness campaigns and recruitment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamal M. Al-Shami
- Division of Tumor Metabolism and Microenvironment, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Biosciences, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Drug Discovery and Development, Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America
| | - Wesam S. Ahmed
- College of Health and Life Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Karem H. Alzoubi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sweeney L, Lanz D, Daru J, Rasijeff AMP, Khanom F, Thomas A, Harden A, Green L. Deferred consent in emergency obstetric research: findings from qualitative interviews with women and recruiters in the ACROBAT pilot trial for severe postpartum haemorrhage. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e054787. [PMID: 35508349 PMCID: PMC9073399 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The ACROBAT pilot trial of early cryoprecipitate for severe postpartum haemorrhage used deferred consent procedures. Pretrial discussions with a patient and public involvement group found mixed views towards deferred consent. This study aimed to build an understanding of how the deferred consent procedures worked in practice, to inform plans for a full-scale trial. SETTING Qualitative interview study within a cluster-randomised pilot trial, involving four London maternity services. PARTICIPANTS Individual interviews were conducted postnatally with 10 women who had received blood transfusion for severe postpartum haemorrhage and had consented to the trial. We also interviewed four 'recruiters'-two research midwives and two clinical trials practitioners who conducted trial recruitment. RESULTS Consent procedures in the ACROBAT pilot trial were generally acceptable and the intervention was viewed as low risk, but most women did not remember much about the consent conversation. As per trial protocol, recruiters sought to consent women before hospital discharge, but this time pressure had to be balanced against the need to ensure women were not approached when distressed or very unwell. Extra efforts had to be made to communicate trial information to women due to the exhaustion of their recovery and competing demands for their attention. Participant information was further complicated by explanations about the cluster design and change in transfusion process, even though the consent sought was for access to medical data. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate that deferred consent procedures raise similar concerns as taking consent when emergency obstetric research is occurring-that is, the risk that participants may conflate research with clinical care, and that their ability to process trial information may be impacted by the stressful nature of recovery and newborn care. A future trial may support more meaningful informed consent by extending the window of consent discussion and ensuring trial information is minimal and easy to understand. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN12146519.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Doris Lanz
- Barts Research Centre for Women's Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Jahnavi Daru
- Barts Research Centre for Women's Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Annika M P Rasijeff
- Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Katie's Team Patient and Public Advisory Group, Barts Research Centre for Women's Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Farzana Khanom
- Katie's Team Patient and Public Advisory Group, Barts Research Centre for Women's Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Angela Harden
- School of Health Sciences, City University of London, London, UK
| | - Laura Green
- Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- NHS Blood and Transplant, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Allison K, Patel D, Kaur R. Assessing Multiple Factors Affecting Minority Participation in Clinical Trials: Development of the Clinical Trials Participation Barriers Survey. Cureus 2022; 14:e24424. [PMID: 35637812 PMCID: PMC9127181 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to analyze factors that influence individuals' decisions to participate in clinical trials focusing on racial and ethnic disparities that exist in clinical trials. These factors are then used to develop a survey that may be used in a clinical setting to further understand specific factors affecting participation. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was carried out for publications from 2010 to 2021 using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. After reviewing the data, the predominant factors that were encountered in the search were then commented upon and reviewed to create an evidence-based questionnaire. Using the comprehensive search, factors that affect clinical trial participation were identified. These factors were then used to create a comprehensive, evidence-based questionnaire to be implemented in a clinical setting to conduct and analyze the factors impacting participation in clinical trials. Understanding the factors that primarily impact an individual's decisions to participate or not participate in a clinical trial allow researchers to implement changes to decrease the hesitancy regarding participation.
Collapse
|
16
|
Hollestelle MJ, van der Graaf R, Hartman SD, Sturkenboom MCJM, van Delden JJM. A Learning Healthcare System for pregnant and breastfeeding women: what do women during preconception, pregnancy, and nursing think? - A qualitative study : A contribution from the ConcePTION project. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:334. [PMID: 35436951 PMCID: PMC9014975 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04675-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most medications lack evidence-based information about its safety and efficacy during pregnancy and breastfeeding, because pregnant women are often not included in clinical research. Another way to generate evidence is by using a Learning Healthcare System (LHS) approach. In an LHS, care and research are aligned in such a way that it can accelerate evidence generation and outcomes for patients, based on real-life medication use. For the development of an ethically responsible and sustainable LHS, it is of crucial importance to understand what women think of such an alternative approach to knowledge generation. Therefore, this paper explores their views on an LHS for pregnant and breastfeeding women. METHOD For this qualitative study, we interviewed 20 women during preconception, pregnancy, or nursing to explore their views on an ethically responsible LHS for pregnant and breastfeeding women. The pseudonymized transcripts were analyzed thematically. RESULTS We identified four main themes describing women's views on LHSs. The first theme describes that respondents were positive about learning healthcare systems, and considered them to function as a central point for information about their medication, which they felt is currently lacking. The second theme shows that respondents want to contribute to and engage in generating new information because they want to help others and contribute to scientific research. Respondents also mentioned that, currently, not every woman is aware of the risks of the lack of evidence for medication used in pregnancy. The third theme shows that respondents regard their healthcare professional as essential for the translation and interpretation of information, regardless of a learning healthcare system. The last theme describes that respondents will trust a learning healthcare system more if the medical community supports it, and when data collection and processing is transparent. CONCLUSION Women during preconception, pregnancy and nursing agree that an LHS could be a viable alternative to help close the knowledge gap on the safety of medication used during pregnancy and breastfeeding. The obtained insights from our interviews provide valuable stepping-stones for the development of an ethically responsible and sustainable LHS, as well as for the engagement of women in an LHS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke J Hollestelle
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Rieke van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sarah Dewi Hartman
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Miriam C J M Sturkenboom
- Department Data science & Biostatistics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes J M van Delden
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sherrell HC, Dunn LTB, Horey D, Flenady V, Kumar S. Women's and clinician's acceptability of participation in a hypothetical obstetric randomized controlled trial: a qualitative survey. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021; 35:9163-9169. [PMID: 34965816 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.2020236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Involving patients and consumers in research design helps ensure relevance for those affected by the problem being investigated and can optimize recruitment to clinical trials. This is particularly important when conducting research involving pregnant women. AIMS We investigated women's motivations to participate in a hypothetical randomized control trial (RCT) of a third-trimester screening test for intrapartum fetal compromise (IFC) and adverse perinatal outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Women attending for routine antenatal care at a tertiary center were invited to complete a short, anonymized patient acceptability survey. The survey was developed with the assistance of the Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand's Consumer Advisory Panel and consisted of Likert scales and open-ended questions. It was designed to ascertain women's responses to research issues, particularly the acceptability of being randomized to a non-revealed arm of a screening test RCT. RESULTS 100 pregnant women took part; 40% indicated that they would agree/strongly agree to participate in a hypothetical RCT regardless of whether they were given the result of a screening test and 31% were unsure. Randomization to either an intervention or control group was acceptable to 47%, 30% were unsure and 23% were not willing to be randomized. Reasons to participate included the desire to contribute to research and to improve pregnancy care. CONCLUSIONS Participation in an RCT of a screening test for IFC involving non-disclosure of the test result was acceptable to a large minority of pregnant women. This finding supports the feasibility of conducting a large-scale study of this design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen C Sherrell
- Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Liam T B Dunn
- Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Dell Horey
- NHMRC Stillbirth Centre for Research Excellence, Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Psychology & Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Vicki Flenady
- Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Mater Mothers' Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,NHMRC Stillbirth Centre for Research Excellence, Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sailesh Kumar
- Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Mater Mothers' Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,NHMRC Stillbirth Centre for Research Excellence, Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Skoogh A, Hall-Lord ML, Bååth C, Bojö AKS. Adverse events in women giving birth in a labor ward: a retrospective record review study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1093. [PMID: 34649538 PMCID: PMC8518258 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07109-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Childbirth could negatively affect the woman’s health through adverse events. To prevent adverse events and increase patient safety it is important to detect and learn from them. The aim of the study was to describe adverse events, including the preventability and severity of harm during planned vaginal births, in women giving birth in the labor ward. Methods The study had a descriptive design with a retrospective birth record review to assess the preventability of adverse events using the Swedish version of the Global Trigger Tool. The setting was a labor ward in Sweden with low-risk and risk childbirths. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s Chi-square test and Student’s t-test were used. Results A total of 38 adverse events (12.2%) were identified in 311 reviewed birth records. Of these, 28 (73.7%) were assessed as preventable. Third- or fourth-degree lacerations and distended urinary bladder were most prevalent together with anesthesia-related adverse events. The majority of the adverse events were classified into the harm categories of ‘prolonged hospital care’ (63.2%) and ‘temporary harm’ (31.6%). No permanent harm were identified, but over two-thirds of the adverse events were assessed as preventable. Conclusions This first study using Global Trigger Tool in a labor ward in Sweden identified a higher incidence of adverse events than previous studies in obstetric care. No permanent patient harm was found, but over two-thirds of the adverse events were assessed as preventable. The results draw particular attention to 3rd-or 4th-degree lacerations, distended urinary bladder and anesthesia-related adverse events. The feedback on identified adverse events should be used for systematic quality improvement and clinical recommendations how to prevent adverse events must be implemented. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07109-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Skoogh
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Karlstad University, S-651 88, Karlstad, Sweden.
| | - Marie Louise Hall-Lord
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Karlstad University, S-651 88, Karlstad, Sweden.,Department of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Teknologivn. 22, 2815, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Carina Bååth
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Karlstad University, S-651 88, Karlstad, Sweden.,Faculty of Health, Welfare and Organisation, Østfold University College, P.O. Box 700, 1757, Halden, Fredrikstad, Norway
| | - Ann-Kristin Sandin Bojö
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Karlstad University, S-651 88, Karlstad, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Paddock K, Woolfall K, Frith L, Watkins M, Gamble C, Welters I, Young B. Strategies to enhance recruitment and consent to intensive care studies: a qualitative study with researchers and patient-public involvement contributors. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e048193. [PMID: 34551943 PMCID: PMC8461270 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Clinical trials and studies in intensive care units (ICUs) have complex consent processes and often encounter problems in recruiting patients. By interviewing research team members about the challenges in critical care research, we aimed to identify strategies to enhance recruitment and consent to ICU studies. METHODS Semistructured interviews with UK-based researchers (N=17) and patient-public involvement (PPI) contributors (N=8) with experience of ICU studies. Analysis of transcripts of audio-recorded interviews drew on thematic approaches. RESULTS Seven themes were identified. Participants emphasised the need for substitute decision-making processes in critical care studies, yet some researchers reported that research ethics committees (RECs) were reluctant to approve such processes. Researchers spoke about the potential benefits of research without prior consent (RWPC) for studies with narrow recruitment windows but believed RECs would not approve them. Participants indicated that the activity of PPI contributors was limited in critical care studies, though researchers who had involved PPI contributors more extensively were clear that their input when designing consent processes was important. Researchers and PPI contributors pointed to resource and staffing limitations as barriers to patient recruitment. Researchers varied in whether and how they used professional consultees as substitute decision-makers, in whether they approached families by telephone to discuss research and in whether they disclosed details of research participation to bereaved relatives. CONCLUSION Critical care research could benefit from RECs having expertise in consent processes that are suited to this setting, better staffing at research sites, more extensive PPI and an evidence base on stakeholder perspectives on critical care research processes. Guidance on professional consultee processes, telephoning relatives to discuss research, RWPC and disclosure of research participation to bereaved relatives could help to harmonise practice in these areas and enhance recruitment and consent to critical care studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Paddock
- Faculty of Health and Education, School of Childhood, Youth and Education Studies, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
- Institute of Population Health, Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Kerry Woolfall
- Institute of Population Health, Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Lucy Frith
- Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Law and Philosophy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Megan Watkins
- Institute of Population Health, Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Carrol Gamble
- Institute of Population Health, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ingeborg Welters
- Institute of Life Course and Medical Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Critical Care, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Bridget Young
- Institute of Population Health, Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Experience and lessons learned from multi-modal internet-based recruitment of U.S. Vietnamese into research. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0256074. [PMID: 34388178 PMCID: PMC8363004 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Asian-Americans are one of the most understudied racial/ethnic minority populations. To increase representation of Asian subgroups, researchers have traditionally relied on data collection at community venues and events. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has created serious challenges for in-person data collection. In this case study, we describe multi-modal strategies for online recruitment of U.S. Vietnamese parents, compare response rates and participant characteristics among strategies, and discuss lessons learned. Methods We recruited 408 participants from community-based organizations (CBOs) (n = 68), Facebook groups (n = 97), listservs (n = 4), personal network (n = 42), and snowball sampling (n = 197). Using chi-square tests and one-way analyses of variance, we compared participants recruited through different strategies regarding sociodemographic characteristics, acculturation-related characteristics, and mobile health usage. Results The overall response rate was 71.8% (range: 51.5% for Vietnamese CBOs to 86.6% for Facebook groups). Significant differences exist for all sociodemographic and almost all acculturation-related characteristics among recruitment strategies. Notably, CBO-recruited participants were the oldest, had lived in the U.S. for the longest duration, and had the lowest Vietnamese language ability. We found some similarities between Facebook-recruited participants and those referred by Facebook-recruited participants. Mobile health usage was high and did not vary based on recruitment strategies. Challenges included encountering fraudulent responses (e.g., non-Vietnamese). Perceived benefits and trust appeared to facilitate recruitment. Conclusions Facebook and snowball sampling may be feasible strategies to recruit U.S. Vietnamese. Findings suggest the potential for mobile-based research implementation. Perceived benefits and trust could encourage participation and may be related to cultural ties. Attention should be paid to recruitment with CBOs and handling fraudulent responses.
Collapse
|
21
|
Kaye DK. Motivation to participate and experiences of the informed consent process for randomized clinical trials in emergency obstetric care in Uganda. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:104. [PMID: 34320963 PMCID: PMC8317416 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00672-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Informed consent, whose goal is to assure that participants enter research voluntarily after disclosure of potential risks and benefits, may be impossible or impractical in emergency research. In low resource settings, there is limited information on the experiences of the informed consent process for randomized clinical trials in the emergency care context. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of the informed consent process and factors that motivated participation in two obstetrics and newborn care randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Methods This was a qualitative study conducted among former participants of RCTs in the emergency obstetric care context, conducted at Kawempe National Referral Hospital, Uganda. It employed 30 in-depth interviews conducted from June 1, 2019 to August 30, 2019. Issues explored included attitudes about research, the purpose of the research in which they participated, motivations to take part in the study, factors that influenced enrolment decisions, and experiences of the informed consent process. Results Respondents felt that research was necessary to investigate the cause, prevention or complications of illness. The decisions to participate were influenced by hope for material or therapeutic benefit, trust in the healthcare system and influence of friends and family members. Many were satisfied with the informed consent process, though they did not understand some aspects of the research. Conclusion Respondents valued participation in RCTs in emergency obstetric and newborn care. Hope for benefit, altruism, desire to further scientific knowledge and trust in the investigators featured prominently in the motivation to participate. Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors were motivators for RCT participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Kabonge Kaye
- College of Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. .,Johns Hopkins University, Berman Institute of Bioethics, Deering Hall, 1809 Ashland Avenue, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Terry N, Lipsky LM, Siega-Riz AM, Liu A, Nansel TR. The effect of remuneration schedule on data completion and retention in the pregnancy eating attributes study (PEAS). PLoS One 2021; 16:e0251533. [PMID: 33984020 PMCID: PMC8118263 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Maximizing data completion and study retention is essential in population research. This study examined the effect of remuneration schedule and data collection modality on data completion and retention in the Pregnancy Eating Attributes Study cohort. Participants (n = 458) completed online surveys and attended six in-person study visits. Initially, remuneration was a prespecified amount per visit, then was changed mid-study to be prorated based on the number of forms completed. Additionally, survey data collection modality was changed to in-person at the sixth study visit. In this secondary data analysis, there was no effect of remuneration schedule on withdrawal rates or time-to-withdrawal. Survey completion was significantly lower under prorated remuneration at the first visit but did not significantly differ at subsequent visits. The lump sum group had significantly greater odds of completely the first and second trimester dietary record (OR = 4.1, OR = 2.6, respectively) then the prorated group but were almost half as likely to complete the dietary record at the 6-month postpartum visit (OR = 0.5). Survey completion at sixth visit was significantly higher for in-person versus online completion (68.6% vs. 93.1%). Findings suggest that remuneration schedule and data collection modality can impact completion of self- reported assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ndeah Terry
- Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Social and Behavioral Sciences Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Leah M. Lipsky
- Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Social and Behavioral Sciences Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Anna Maria Siega-Riz
- Department of Nutrition and Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Aiyi Liu
- Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Social and Behavioral Sciences Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Tonja R. Nansel
- Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Social and Behavioral Sciences Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Goldstein E, Bakhireva LN, Nervik K, Hagen S, Turnquist A, Zgierska AE, Marquez LE, McDonald R, Lo J, Chambers C. Recruitment and retention of pregnant women in prospective birth cohort studies: A scoping review and content analysis of the literature. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2021; 85:106974. [PMID: 33766723 PMCID: PMC8137666 DOI: 10.1016/j.ntt.2021.106974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Longitudinal cohort studies present unique methodological challenges, especially when they focus on vulnerable populations, such as pregnant women. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the existing knowledge on recruitment and retention (RR) of pregnant women in birth cohort studies and to make recommendations for researchers to improve research engagement of this population. A scoping review and content analysis were conducted to identify facilitators and barriers to the RR of pregnant women in cohort studies. The search retrieved 574 articles, with 38 meeting eligibility criteria and focused on RR among English-speaking, adult women, who are pregnant or in early postpartum period, enrolled in birth cohort studies. Selected studies were birth cohort (including longitudinal) (n = 20), feasibility (n = 14), and other (n = 4) non-interventional study designs. The majority were from low-risk populations. Abstracted data were coded according to emergent theme clusters. The majority of abstracted data (79%) focused on recruitment practices, with only 21% addressing retention strategies. Overall, facilitators were reported more often (75%) than barriers (25%). Building trusting relationships and employing diverse recruitment methods emerged as major recruitment facilitators; major barriers included heterogeneous participant reasons for refusal and cultural factors. Key retention facilitators included flexibility with scheduling, frequent communication, and culturally sensitive practices, whereas participant factors such as loss of interest, pregnancy loss, relocation, multiple caregiver shifts, and substance use/psychiatric problems were cited as major barriers. Better understanding of facilitators and barriers of RR can help enhance the internal and external validity of future birth/pre-birth cohorts. Strategies presented in this review can help inform investigators and funding agencies of best practices for RR of pregnant women in longitudinal studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Goldstein
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, 1100 Delaplaine Ct, Madison, WI 53715, United States of America.
| | - Ludmila N Bakhireva
- College of Pharmacy Substance Use Research and Education (SURE) Center, United States of America; Department of Family and Community Medicine, United States of America; Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Preventive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, 1 University of New Mexico, MSC 09 5360, Albuquerque, NM 87131, United States of America.
| | - Kendra Nervik
- Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin, 8128 William H. Sewell Social Sciences Building, 1180 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI 53706-1393, United States of America.
| | - Shelbey Hagen
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, 1100 Delaplaine Ct, Madison, WI 53715, United States of America.
| | - Alyssa Turnquist
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, 1100 Delaplaine Ct, Madison, WI 53715, United States of America.
| | - Aleksandra E Zgierska
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, United States of America.
| | - Lidia Enriquez Marquez
- College of Pharmacy Substance Use Research and Education (SURE) Center, United States of America.
| | - Ryan McDonald
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health McConnell Hall, 1010 Mound Street, Madison, WI 53715, United States of America.
| | - Jamie Lo
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, L466, Portland, OR 97239, United States of America.
| | - Christina Chambers
- Departments of Pediatrics and Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC0828, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Placek CD, Place JM, Wies J. Reflections and Challenges of Pregnant and Postpartum Participant Recruitment in the Context of the Opioid Epidemic. Matern Child Health J 2021; 25:1031-1035. [PMID: 33904023 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-021-03143-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Opioid use disorder among women of childbearing age has reached epidemic proportions. In rural regions of the United States, recruiting perinatal women who use nonmedical opioids to participate in research is wrought with challenges, including barriers such as community stigma, lack of transportation, and time constraints. The current study describes our process and challenges of recruiting pregnant and postpartum women in rural Indiana consisting of women who misuse opioids and those who do not. DESCRIPTION We employed multiple strategies to recruit participants. Methods included (1) sampling from healthcare facilities based on referrals from front-desk staff and frontline healthcare workers; (2) dissemination of flyers and brochures within healthcare facilities and the community, supported with onsite research assistant presence; (3) digital methods coupled with snowball sampling; and (4) local community talks that provided information about the study. ASSESSMENT Our multiple recruitment efforts revealed that building relationships with community stakeholders was key in recruiting women who use nonmedical opioids, but that digital methods were more effective in recruiting a larger sample of pregnant and postpartum women in a short amount of time. CONCLUSION We conclude by making several recommendations to enhance academic-community partnerships in order to bolster sample sizes for prolonged research studies. Furthermore, we highlight the need to destigmatize addiction in order to better serve hard-to-reach populations through research and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlyn D Placek
- Department of Anthropology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, 47306, USA.
| | - Jean Marie Place
- Department of Nutrition and Health Science, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, USA
| | - Jennifer Wies
- Department of Anthropology, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY, 40475, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nilvér H, Wessberg A, Dencker A, Hagberg H, Wennerholm UB, Fadl H, Wesström J, Sengpiel V, Lundgren I, Bergh C, Wikström AK, Saltvedt S, Elden H. Women's childbirth experiences in the Swedish Post-term Induction Study (SWEPIS): a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e042340. [PMID: 33827832 PMCID: PMC8031013 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare childbirth experiences in women randomly assigned to either induction of labour at 41 weeks or to expectant management until 42 weeks, in the Swedish Post-term Induction Study. DESIGN A register-based, multicentre, randomised, controlled, superiority trial. SETTING Women were recruited at 14 hospitals in Sweden, 2016-2018. PARTICIPANTS Women with an uncomplicated singleton pregnancy were recruited at 41 gestational weeks. INTERVENTIONS The women were randomly assigned to induction of labour at 41 weeks (induction group, n=1381) or expectant management until 42 weeks (expectant management group, n=1379). OUTCOME MEASURES As main outcome, women's childbirth experiences were measured using the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2 (CEQ2), in 656 women, 3 months after the birth at three hospitals. As exploratory outcome, overall childbirth experience was measured in 1457 women using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 1-10) within 3 days after delivery at the remaining eleven hospitals. RESULTS The total response rate was 77% (2113/2760). There were no significant differences in childbirth experience measured with CEQ2 between the groups (induction group, n=354; expectant management group, n=302) in the subscales: own capacity (2.8 vs 2.7, p=0.09), perceived safety (3.3 vs 3.2, p=0.06) and professional support (3.6 vs 3.5, p=0.38) or in the total CEQ2 score (3.3 vs 3.2, p=0.07), respectively. Women in the induction group scored higher in the subscale participation (3.6 vs 3.4, p=0.02), although with a small effect size (0.19). No significant difference was observed in overall childbirth experience according to VAS (8.0 (n=735) vs 8.1 (n=735), p=0.22). CONCLUSIONS There were no differences in childbirth experience, according to CEQ2 or overall childbirth experience assessed with VAS, between women randomly assigned to induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks. Overall, women rated their childbirth experiences high. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN26113652.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Nilvér
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Akademy, University of Gothenbourg, Gothenbourg, Sweden
| | - Anna Wessberg
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Akademy, University of Gothenbourg, Gothenbourg, Sweden
- Department of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenbourg, Sweden
| | - Anna Dencker
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Akademy, University of Gothenbourg, Gothenbourg, Sweden
| | - Henrik Hagberg
- Department of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenbourg, Sweden
- Centre of Perinatal Medicine & Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Salgrenska Akademy, Göteborgs Universitet, Gothenbourg, Sweden
| | - Ulla-Britt Wennerholm
- Department of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenbourg, Sweden
- Centre of Perinatal Medicine & Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Salgrenska Akademy, Göteborgs Universitet, Gothenbourg, Sweden
| | - Helena Fadl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Jan Wesström
- Centre for Clinical Research, Department of Women's Health, Dalarna County Council, Falun, Sweden
| | - Verena Sengpiel
- Department of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenbourg, Sweden
- Centre of Perinatal Medicine & Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Salgrenska Akademy, Göteborgs Universitet, Gothenbourg, Sweden
| | - Ingela Lundgren
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Akademy, University of Gothenbourg, Gothenbourg, Sweden
- Department of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenbourg, Sweden
| | - Christina Bergh
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenbourg, Sweden
| | - Anna-Karin Wikström
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sissel Saltvedt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Helen Elden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Akademy, University of Gothenbourg, Gothenbourg, Sweden
- Department of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenbourg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Probiotics as a treatment for prenatal maternal anxiety and depression: a double-blind randomized pilot trial. Sci Rep 2021; 11:3051. [PMID: 33542275 PMCID: PMC7862351 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81204-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Probiotic use may be an efficacious treatment option to effectively manage symptoms of prenatal maternal anxiety and depression. Our primary aim was to test feasibility and acceptability for a probiotic randomized controlled trial (RCT) in pregnant women with pre-existing symptoms. This double-blind pilot RCT included 40 pregnant women with low-risk pregnancies and elevated depressive symptoms and/or anxiety. Once daily, participants orally consumed a probiotic (Ecologic Barrier) or a placebo, from 26 to 30 weeks gestation until delivery. A priori key progression criteria for primary outcomes were determined to decide whether or not a full RCT was feasible and acceptable. Secondary outcomes included depressive symptoms, anxiety, stress, and maternal bonding to offspring. In 19 months, 1573 women were screened; following screening, 155 women (10%) were invited for participation, of whom 135 (87%) received study information, and 40 women (30%) were included. Four out of six a priori determined criteria for success on feasibility and acceptability were met. After 8 weeks of intervention, there was no significant difference between the probiotic and placebo groups for secondary outcomes. The pilot trial was feasible and acceptable, but hampered by recruitment method and study design. Secondary endpoints did not reveal differences between the groups for improving maternal mood.
Collapse
|
27
|
Dumas AA, Lemieux S, Lapointe A, Provencher V, Robitaille J, Desroches S. Recruitment and retention of mothers of preschoolers and school-aged children in a social media-delivered healthy eating intervention: lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2020; 21:706. [PMID: 32778159 PMCID: PMC7418391 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04628-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social media represent cost-effective platforms to advance the dissemination and uptake of health research to improve population health. However, there is limited evidence available to support researchers overcome methodological challenges related to recruitment and retention of participants in studies using social media for delivering behavior change interventions. This study aims to describe the recruitment and the retention strategies used in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that evaluated a blog-delivered healthy eating intervention among mothers of preschoolers and school-aged children. METHODS Eighty-four adult mothers of children aged between two and 12 years old living in Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, were recruited between October 2015 and February 2017 using traditional methods (e.g. institutional email lists, flyers, newspapers, and word of mouth) and Facebook advertisements. Retention rates were calculated at the end of the 6-month intervention and at a 12-month follow-up assessment. Sociodemographic characteristics, Internet use behaviors and retention rates of mothers recruited through traditional methods and Facebook were compared using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS Of the 196 mothers who responded to the recruitment call, 87 (44.4%) were eligible and 84 (42.9%) were randomized to the trial, representing a recruitment success of 76.4% (84/110) from the planned sample size target. Among those, a minority (3.6%) were recruited using Facebook. Those mothers presented similar sociodemographic characteristics to those recruited using traditional methods. Retention rates were 73.8% and 66.7% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, with similar rates between mothers recruited using Facebook and traditional methods. Various challenges associated with population retention were highlighted with lack of time being mothers' main reason for withdrawing from the study. CONCLUSIONS The methodological challenges experienced during the conduct of the blog-delivered healthy eating intervention allowed to draw upon several lessons regarding the recruitment process and the retention of mothers of preschoolers and school-aged children to inform future social media-delivered research. Recommendations for future research include exploring mothers' perceptions and preferences to tailor social media recruitment, ensure that interventions are delivered to them using social media platforms that are already integrated into their routine, and are providing remote outcome assessments to increase participant retention. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trial Protocol NCT03156803 . Registered on 17 May 2017, retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrée-Anne Dumas
- Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, School of Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Université Laval, Pavillon des services, office 2729-P, 2440 Hochelaga Boulevard, Quebec City, Quebec G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Simone Lemieux
- Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, School of Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Université Laval, Pavillon des services, office 2729-P, 2440 Hochelaga Boulevard, Quebec City, Quebec G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Annie Lapointe
- Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, School of Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Université Laval, Pavillon des services, office 2729-P, 2440 Hochelaga Boulevard, Quebec City, Quebec G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Véronique Provencher
- Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, School of Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Université Laval, Pavillon des services, office 2729-P, 2440 Hochelaga Boulevard, Quebec City, Quebec G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Julie Robitaille
- Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, School of Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Université Laval, Pavillon des services, office 2729-P, 2440 Hochelaga Boulevard, Quebec City, Quebec G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Sophie Desroches
- Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, School of Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Université Laval, Pavillon des services, office 2729-P, 2440 Hochelaga Boulevard, Quebec City, Quebec G1V 0A6 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Meagher BT, Campos MR, Thornton P, Klima C, Peters TA, Hallberg J, Ulfhager E, O'Brien WD, McFarlin BL. Reasons Why Pregnant Women Participate in Ultrasound Research Involving Transvaginal Scans. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2020; 39:1581-1587. [PMID: 32073680 PMCID: PMC8059443 DOI: 10.1002/jum.15248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Revised: 01/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to explore the motivations of pregnant women in participating in an ultrasound study and the acceptability of vaginal ultrasound examinations. METHODS A prospective sample of 270 women were asked one question: "Can you tell me what motivated you to participate in the study?" The data were then analyzed through a qualitative thematic analysis with an inductive approach. In addition to the thematic analysis, quantification of the data was performed to enhance the qualitative result. RESULTS Through the thematic analysis, 5 themes emerged from the responses of the participants: altruism, research, personal experience, personal benefit, and finding out. All responses were relatively short, and some responses included more than one theme. CONCLUSIONS Vaginal ultrasound examinations were acceptable to the participants, and pregnant women had many motivations to participate. Regardless of race, ethnicity, or insurance status, the women in our study were altruistic and curious about our research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara T Meagher
- Department of Women, Children, and Family Health Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Marissa R Campos
- Department of Women, Children, and Family Health Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Patrick Thornton
- Department of Women, Children, and Family Health Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Carrie Klima
- Department of Women, Children, and Family Health Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Tara A Peters
- Department of Women, Children, and Family Health Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Josefin Hallberg
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Reproductive Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Emma Ulfhager
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Reproductive Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - William D O'Brien
- Department of Computer and Electrical Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - Barbara L McFarlin
- Department of Women, Children, and Family Health Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sullivan K, Mtande T, Jaffe E, Rosenberg N, Zimba C, Hoffman I, Little M, Faden R, Lyerly AD. Views among Malawian women about joining HIV prevention clinical trials when pregnant. AIDS Res Ther 2020; 17:27. [PMID: 32460804 PMCID: PMC7251879 DOI: 10.1186/s12981-020-00271-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pressing need to expand the biomedical HIV prevention evidence base during pregnancy is now increasingly recognized. Women's views regarding participation in such trials and initiating PrEP while pregnant are critical to inform evolving policy and best practices aimed at responsibly expanding evidence-based access for this population. METHODS We conducted 35 semi-structured interviews with reproductive-aged women in Malawi in the local language, Chichewa. Participants were HIV-negative and purposively sampled to capture a range of experience with research during pregnancy. Women's perspectives on enrolling in three hypothetical HIV prevention trial vignettes while pregnant were explored, testing: (1) oral PrEP (Truvada) (2) a vaginal ring (dapivirine), and (3) a randomized trial comparing the two. The vignettes were read aloud to participants and a simple visual was provided. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, translated, and coded using NVivo 11. Thematic analysis informed the analytic approach. RESULTS A majority of women accepted participation in all trials. Women's views on research participation varied largely based on their assessment of whether participation or nonparticipation would best protect their own health and that of their offspring. Women interested in participating described power dynamics with their partner as fueling their HIV exposure concerns and highlighted health benefits of participation-principally, HIV protection and access to testing/treatment and ancillary care, and perceived potential risks of the vignettes as low. Women who were uninterested in participating highlighted potential maternal and fetal health risks of the trial, challenges of justifying prevention use to their partner, and raised some modality-specific concerns. Women also described ways their social networks, sense of altruism and adherence requirements would influence participation decisions. CONCLUSIONS The majority of participants conveyed strong interest in participating in biomedical HIV prevention research during pregnancy, largely motivated by a desire to protect themselves and their offspring. Our results are consistent with other studies that found high acceptance of HIV prevention products during pregnancy, and support the current direction of HIV research policies and practices that are increasingly aimed at protecting the health of pregnant women and their offspring through responsible research, rather than defaulting to their exclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Sullivan
- Center for Bioethics and Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 333 S. Columbia Street, Campus Box 7240, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| | - Tiwonge Mtande
- UNC Project Malawi, Tidziwe Centre, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Elana Jaffe
- Center for Bioethics and Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 333 S. Columbia Street, Campus Box 7240, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Nora Rosenberg
- Department of Health Behavior, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Rosenau Hall, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Chifundo Zimba
- UNC Project Malawi, Tidziwe Centre, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Irving Hoffman
- Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Bioinformatics Building, 130 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Maggie Little
- The Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, 3700 O Street Northwest, Washington, DC, 20057, USA
| | - Ruth Faden
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, 1809 Ashland Avenue, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Anne Drapkin Lyerly
- Center for Bioethics and Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 333 S. Columbia Street, Campus Box 7240, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sheridan R, Martin-Kerry J, Hudson J, Parker A, Bower P, Knapp P. Why do patients take part in research? An overview of systematic reviews of psychosocial barriers and facilitators. Trials 2020; 21:259. [PMID: 32164790 PMCID: PMC7069042 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-4197-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding why people take part in health research is critical to improve research efficiency and generalisability. The aim of this overview of systematic reviews was to identify psychosocial determinants of research participation and map them to psychological theory and empirical recruitment research, to identify effective strategies to increase research participation. METHODS Qualitative and quantitative systematic reviews were systematically identified. No date or language limits were applied. Two reviewers independently selected reviews. Methodological quality was rated using AMSTAR, and poor-quality reviews (scoring 0-3) were excluded. Barriers and facilitators were coded to psychological theory (Theoretical Domains Framework) and empirical recruitment research (recruitment interventions that had been subjected to randomised controlled trial evaluation). RESULTS We included 26 systematic reviews (429 unique primary studies), covering a wide range of patient populations and health settings. We identified five groups of facilitators, of which three were dominant (potential for personal benefit, altruism, trust) and appear to be relevant across research setting and design. We identified nine groups of barriers, which were more dependent on the particular study (context, population, design). Two determinants (participant information, social influences) were found to be both barriers and facilitators. Barriers and facilitators could be coded to the Motivation and Opportunity components of the Theoretical Domains Framework; only one was coded to a Capability component. There was some overlap between psychosocial determinants and empirical recruitment research, but some barriers and facilitators had not been tested at all. CONCLUSIONS Identifying effective recruitment strategies could increase the efficiency and generalisability of primary research. We identified a number of barriers and facilitators that could be addressed by researchers. There is a need for more research to identify effective recruitment strategies that draw on the psychosocial facilitators and barriers identified in this overview.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Peter Knapp
- University of York and the Hull York Medical School, York, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Greer O, Shah NM, Sriskandan S, Johnson MR. Sepsis: Precision-Based Medicine for Pregnancy and the Puerperium. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20215388. [PMID: 31671794 PMCID: PMC6861904 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20215388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Sepsis contributes significantly to global morbidity and mortality, particularly in vulnerable populations. Pregnant and recently pregnant women are particularly prone to rapid progression to sepsis and septic shock, with 11% of maternal deaths worldwide being attributed to sepsis. The impact on the neonate is considerable, with 1 million neonatal deaths annually attributed to maternal infection or sepsis. Pregnancy specific physiological and immunological adaptations are likely to contribute to a greater impact of infection, but current approaches to the management of sepsis are based on those developed for the non-pregnant population. Pregnancy-specific strategies are required to optimise recognition and management of these patients. We review current knowledge of the physiology and immunology of pregnancy and propose areas of research, which may advance the development of pregnancy-specific diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to optimise the care of pregnant women and their babies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orene Greer
- Imperial College London, Academic Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Level 3, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK.
- Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK.
| | - Nishel Mohan Shah
- Imperial College London, Academic Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Level 3, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK.
- Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK.
| | - Shiranee Sriskandan
- Imperial College London, NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.
| | - Mark R Johnson
- Imperial College London, Academic Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Level 3, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK.
- Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hayes-Ryan D, Meaney S, Nolan C, O'Donoghue K. An exploration of women's experience of taking part in a randomized controlled trial of a diagnostic test during pregnancy: A qualitative study. Health Expect 2019; 23:75-83. [PMID: 31578808 PMCID: PMC6978861 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Revised: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore pregnant women's views of participation in a clinical research trial while pregnant. DESIGN Prospective nested qualitative cohort study embedded within a national, multi-site randomized controlled trial of a diagnostic test for preeclampsia: Placental Growth Factor. One-to-one in-depth semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 19 women who had recently participated in the trial at a single recruiting site. The interviews were conducted in private, recorded digitally and transcribed verbatim. SETTING Single tertiary maternity hospital currently recruiting eligible women onto an on-going randomized controlled trial (NCT02881073). PARTICIPANTS Women who had participated in the PARROT Ireland randomized controlled trial during their recent pregnancy. METHODS Thematic analysis was utilized. Each line of the transcribed interviews was coded into a category by two researchers. The resultant categories were reviewed, and those with similarities were pooled allowing the development of themes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Women's opinions and experience of participation in a randomized controlled trial of an interventional diagnostic test during their pregnancy. RESULTS Four major themes were identified as follows: (a) Understanding of preeclampsia, (b) Motivators for clinical trial participation, (c) Barriers to decision making and (d) Influence of PARROT Ireland on pregnancy experience. CONCLUSIONS Women are generally interested and positively inclined to participate in research during pregnancy. The potential of risk is an important consideration for eligible pregnant woman. Information and support by both researchers and clinicians are paramount in aiding women's understanding of a research trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deirdre Hayes-Ryan
- The Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.,Cork University Maternity Hospital (CUMH), Cork, Ireland
| | - Sarah Meaney
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Centre, University College Cork, Ireland
| | - Caroline Nolan
- The Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Keelin O'Donoghue
- The Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.,Cork University Maternity Hospital (CUMH), Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
A systemic review of maternal wellbeing and its relationship with maternal fetal attachment and early postpartum bonding. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0220032. [PMID: 31344070 PMCID: PMC6657859 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background An emerging body of literature suggests there is a relationship between a pregnant woman’s psychological wellbeing and the development of maternal-fetal attachment (MFA) and early postpartum bonding. The nature of this relationship is not well understood because of the limited theoretical framework surrounding the construct of MFA and variations in study methods and data collection points. In this systematic review, we synthesize the published literature to determine the nature of the relationship from the antenatal to early postnatal period and to provide recommendations for future research and clinical practice. Method Using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) approach, four electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed empirical studies, published in English. Articles were considered for inclusion if data was collected on at least one domain of maternal wellbeing/mental health and MFA during pregnancy or MFA during pregnancy and the mother-infant relationship during the early postpartum period (up to 12 weeks). No date parameters were applied to the search strategy. The review was registered with PROPSERO (registration number: CRD42018096174). Results 25 studies examining maternal mental health and MFA/postpartum bonding were selected for inclusion in this review. Key findings identified from the review were: a need to validate existing mental health measures or develop new measures specific for use in antenatal populations; inconsistencies in data collection points throughout pregnancy and postpartum; a lack of consensus about the construct of MFA and the way it is assessed; and a continued focus on postpartum outcomes. Conclusion Scientific gaps remain in our understanding of the relationship between maternal mental health and both MFA and postpartum bonding which limit our theoretical understanding of the MFA construct. Recommendations for future research are to employ prospective longitudinal designs that span the full pregnancy and postpartum period, and for consistency in the terminology and methodology used when considering MFA. A re-focus of research attention on the theory behind MFA will allow a richer and more holistic account of the emerging relationship between mother and baby.
Collapse
|
34
|
Truong MBT, Ngo E, Ariansen H, Tsuyuki RT, Nordeng H. Community pharmacist counseling in early pregnancy-Results from the SafeStart feasibility study. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0219424. [PMID: 31323048 PMCID: PMC6641474 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Community pharmacists are available to counsel women in early pregnancy, but no studies have assessed the feasibility of such a service. Objective To test the feasibility of a pharmacist consultation in early pregnancy and to inform the design of a definitive trial. Setting Six community pharmacies in Norway from Oct. to Dec. 2017. Method We evaluated recruitment approaches and an automatic data preprocessing system (ADPS) to enroll, assign participants, and distribute questionnaires. Women (≥18 years) in early pregnancy were eligible for inclusion. Participants were assigned to a pharmacist consultation (intervention group) or standard care (control group). The intervention aimed to address each woman’s concerns and needs regarding medications and ailments in pregnancy, and was documented on a standard form. The women’s acceptability of the intervention was measured by a questionnaire. Main outcome measures Appropriate recruitment approaches, workflow of the ADPS, and women’s acceptability of the intervention. Results Of the 35 participants recruited, 19 were recruited through Facebook. The ADPS worked well. Treatment of nausea and vomiting (NVP) (10/11) and general information about medications (8/11) were frequently discussed during the consultations (n = 11). The women reported high satisfaction with the consultation. Having the option of telephone and follow-up consultations was important to the women. Conclusion It is feasible to provide community pharmacist consultations in early pregnancy. In a definitive study, the consultations should focus on NVP and general medication use and further explore social media as a recruiting tool. Both in-pharmacy and telephone consultations should be offered to deliver the intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elin Ngo
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Ariansen
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- The Norwegian Pharmacy Association, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ross T. Tsuyuki
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Hedvig Nordeng
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Child Health and Development, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Probiotics in pregnancy: protocol of a double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial for pregnant women with depression and anxiety (PIP pilot trial). Trials 2019; 20:440. [PMID: 31315657 PMCID: PMC6637581 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3389-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Maternal prenatal depressive or anxiety symptoms are associated with adverse maternal and infant health outcomes. With prevalence rates of maternal prenatal depression and anxiety ranging between 10 and 20%, attempts to identify effective interventions to reduce symptoms are priority. There are indications that probiotics can reduce symptoms of maternal depression or anxiety. Probiotics ingested by the mother may thus offer a promising and accessible intervention to complement existing treatments. Methods The Probiotics in Pregnancy (PIP) pilot trial is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot trial. While one group orally consumes a probiotic mixture (Ecologic® Barrier; 2,5 × 109 colony forming units/g; 2 g; daily), the other group consumes a placebo, from between 26 and 30 weeks gestation until delivery. Subjects are randomly allocated (1:1) to the intervention or placebo group. Forty healthy pregnant women with symptoms of depression or anxiety and uncomplicated pregnancies at randomization will be included. The primary aim is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a probiotic trial to reduce symptoms of maternal depression or anxiety in pregnancy. The secondary aim is to exploratorily compare the potential effect of probiotics, compared to placebo, on depressive and/or anxiety symptoms, maternal stress (i.e. reported/hair cortisol), maternal vaginal and intestinal microbiota, and by possibly affecting maternal mood and microbiota, maternal bonding to offspring, infant microbiota and infant crying. Discussion Results of this pilot trial will help determine whether or not to proceed with a full trial after the pilot trial, and if so, whether revisions should be made to the study protocol and procedures before conducting a full randomized controlled trial. Additionally, they are expected to provide insights into whether changes in psychological, behavioral and biological parameters can be attributed to the probiotic intervention. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register, NTR6219. Registered on 28 February 2017. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3389-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
36
|
Bradshaw L, Sawyer A, Mitchell E, Armstrong-Buisseret L, Ayers S, Duley L. Women's experiences of participating in a randomised trial comparing alternative policies for timing of cord clamping at very preterm birth: a questionnaire study. Trials 2019; 20:225. [PMID: 30992034 PMCID: PMC6469101 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3325-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Cord Pilot Trial compared two alternative policies for cord-clamping at very preterm birth at eight UK tertiary maternity units: clamping after at least 2 min and immediate neonatal care with cord intact, or clamping within 20 s and neonatal care after clamping. This paper reports views and experiences of the women who participated in the trial (261 randomised), based on data from two self-completed questionnaires. METHODS Women were given or posted the first questionnaire between 4 and 8 weeks after birth, and posted a second similar questionnaire at 1 year. Both questionnaires included three questions about experiences of participating in the trial: (1) If time suddenly went backwards and you had to do it all over again, would you agree to participate in the Cord Pilot Trial?; (2) Please tell us if there was anything about the Cord Pilot Trial that you think could have been done better; and (3) Please tell us if there was anything about the Cord Pilot Trial, or your experiences of joining the trial, that you think were particularly good. RESULTS One hundred and eighty-six women completed the first questionnaire and 133 completed the second. At both time points, 90% responded 'probably' or 'definitely' to participating in the trial again. More women randomised to deferred clamping responded 'definitely yes' than those allocated immediate clamping (78% versus 67% first questionnaire). Women were positive about the level of information and explanations, the friendly and caring staff, and the benefits for their baby and others as a result of participating in the trial. Suggestions for how the trial could be done better included being approached earlier, better staff communication about the trial, more information overall, and better timing of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Women were largely positive about participating in the trial. Nevertheless, they had suggestions for how the study could have been improved. These suggestions have implications for the design of future trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN21456601 . Registered on 28 February 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Bradshaw
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Alexandra Sawyer
- School of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Falmer, BN1 9PH, UK
| | - Eleanor Mitchell
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | | | - Susan Ayers
- Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City University London, London, EC1V 0HB, UK
| | - Lelia Duley
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
van der Zande ISE, van der Graaf R, Oudijk MA, van Vliet-Lachotzki EH, van Delden JJM. A qualitative study on stakeholders' views on the participation of pregnant women in the APOSTEL VI study: a low-risk obstetrical RCT. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19:65. [PMID: 30744577 PMCID: PMC6371564 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2209-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2017] [Accepted: 01/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bioethicists argue that inclusion of pregnant women in clinical research should be more routine to increase the evidence-base for pregnant women and foetuses. Yet, it is unknown whether pregnant women and others directly involved are willing to be routinely included. Therefore, we first need to establish what these stakeholders think about research participation in regular pregnancy-related research. However, studies on their views are scarce. In our study, we piggy-backed on a relatively conventional RCT, the APOSTEL VI study, to identify the views of stakeholders on inclusion of pregnant women in this study. METHODS We conducted a prospective qualitative study using 35 in-depth semi-structured interviews and one focus group. We interviewed pregnant women (n = 14) recruited for the APOSTEL VI study, in addition to healthcare professionals (n = 14), Research Ethics Committee members (RECs) (n = 5) and regulators (n = 7) involved in clinical research in pregnant women. RESULTS Three themes characterise stakeholders' views on inclusion of pregnant women in the APOSTEL VI study. Additionally, one theme characterises stakeholders' interest in inclusion of pregnant women in clinical research in general. First, pregnant women participate in the APOSTEL VI study for potential individual benefit and secondarily for altruistic motives, contrary to hypothetical studies. Second, a gatekeeping tendency hampers recruitment of pregnant women who might be eligible and willing, and questions about pregnant women's decisional capacities surface. Third, healthcare professionals sometimes use the counselling conversation to steer pregnant women in a direction. Fourth, all stakeholders are hesitant about inclusion of pregnant women in clinical research in general due to a protective sentiment. CONCLUSIONS Pregnant women are willing to participate in the APOSTEL VI study for potential individual benefit and altruistic motives. However, an underlying protective sentiment, resulting in gatekeeping and directive counselling, sometimes hampers recruitment in the APOSTEL VI study as well as in clinical research in general. While bioethicists claim that inclusion of pregnant women should be customary, our study indicates that healthcare professionals, regulators, RECs and pregnant women themselves are not necessarily interested in inclusion. Advancing the situation and increasing the evidence-base for pregnant women and foetuses may require additional measures such as investing in the recruitment and feasibility of RCTs and stimulating pregnant women's decisional capacities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indira S. E. van der Zande
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rieke van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn A. Oudijk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Johannes J. M. van Delden
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Browne JL, Rees CO, van Delden JJM, Agyepong I, Grobbee DE, Edwin A, Klipstein-Grobusch K, van der Graaf R. The willingness to participate in biomedical research involving human beings in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Trop Med Int Health 2019; 24:264-279. [PMID: 30565381 PMCID: PMC6850431 DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To systematically review reasons for the willingness to participate in biomedical human subjects research in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). Methods Five databases were systematically searched for articles published between 2000 and 2017 containing the domain of ‘human subjects research’ in ‘LMICs’ and determinant ‘reasons for (non)participation’. Reasons mentioned were extracted, ranked and results narratively described. Results Ninety‐four articles were included, 44 qualitative and 50 mixed‐methods studies. Altruism, personal health benefits, access to health care, monetary benefit, knowledge, social support and trust were the most important reasons for participation. Primary reasons for non‐participation were safety concerns, inconvenience, stigmatisation, lack of social support, confidentiality concerns, physical pain, efficacy concerns and distrust. Stigmatisation was a major concern in relation to HIV research. Reasons were similar across different regions, gender, non‐patient or patient participants and real or hypothetical study designs. Conclusions Addressing factors that affect (non‐)participation in the planning process and during the conduct of research may enhance voluntary consent to participation and reduce barriers for potential participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce L Browne
- Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Connie O Rees
- Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes J M van Delden
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Irene Agyepong
- Ghana Health Service, Research and Development Division, Accra, Ghana.,Public Health Faculty, Ghana College of Physicians and Surgeons, Accra, Ghana
| | - Diederick E Grobbee
- Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ama Edwin
- Department of Psychological Medicine and Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch
- Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Division of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Rieke van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|