Toward personalized immunotherapy in sepsis: The PROVIDE randomized clinical trial

Innate immune response in acute critical illness: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

Activation of innate immunity is a first line of host defense during acute critical illness (ACI) that aims to contain injury and avoid tissue damages. Aberrant activation of innate immunity may also participate in the occurrence of organ failures during critical illness. This review aims to provide a narrative overview of recent advances in the field of innate immunity in critical illness, and to consider future potential therapeutic strategies.

MAIN TEXT

Understanding the underlying biological concepts supporting therapeutic strategies modulating immune response is essential in decision-making. We will develop the multiple facets of innate immune response, especially its cellular aspects, and its interaction with other defense mechanisms. We will first describe the pathophysiological mechanisms of initiation of innate immune response and its implication during ACI. We will then develop the amplification of innate immunity mediated by multiple effectors. Our review will mainly focus on myeloid and lymphoid cellular effectors, the major actors involved in innate immune-mediated organ failure. We will third discuss the interaction and integration of innate immune response in a global view of host defense, thus considering interaction with non-immune cells through immunothrombosis, immunometabolism and long-term reprogramming via trained immunity. The last part of this review will focus on the specificities of the immune response in children and the older population.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent understanding of the innate immune response integrates immunity in a highly dynamic global vision of host response. A better knowledge of the implicated mechanisms and their tissue-compartmentalization allows to characterize the individual immune profile, and one day eventually, to develop individualized bench-to-bedside immunomodulation approaches as an adjuvant resuscitation strategy.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling in Critically Ill Children Receiving Anakinra While on Extracorporeal Life Support

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Because of the pathophysiological changes associated with critical illness and the use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) such as continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), the pharmacokinetics of drugs are often altered. The objective of this study was to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for anakinra in children that accounts for the physiological changes associated with critical illness and ECLS technology to guide appropriate pharmacotherapy.

METHODS

A PBPK model for anakinra was first developed in healthy individuals prior to extrapolating to critically ill children receiving ECLS. To account for the impact of anakinra clearance by the dialysis circuit, a CRRT compartment was added to the pediatric PBPK model and parameterized using data from a previously published ex-vivo study. Additionally, an ECMO compartment was added to the whole-body structure to create the final anakinra ECLS-PBPK model. The final model structure was validated by comparing predicted concentrations with observed patient data. Due to limited information in guiding anakinra dosing in this population, in-silico dose simulations were conducted to provide baseline recommendations.

RESULTS

By accounting for changes in physiology and the addition of ECLS compartments, the final ECLS-PBPK model predicted the observed plasma concentrations in an adolescent receiving subcutaneous anakinra. Furthermore, dosing simulations suggest that anakinra exposure in adolescents receiving ECLS is similar to that in healthy counterparts.

CONCLUSION

The anakinra ECLS-PBPK model developed in this study is the first to predict plasma concentrations in a population receiving simultaneous CRRT and ECMO. Dosing simulations provided may be used to inform anakinra use in critically ill children and guide future clinical trial planning.

Modulation of Metabolomic Profile in Sepsis According to the State of Immune Activation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the metabolomic profiles associated with different immune activation states in sepsis patients.

DESIGN

Subgroup analysis of the PROVIDE (a Personalized Randomized trial of Validation and restoration of Immune Dysfunction in severe infections and Sepsis) prospective clinical study.

SETTING

Results of the PROVIDE study showed that patients with sepsis may be classified into three states of immune activation: 1) macrophage-activation-like syndrome (MALS) characterized by hyperinflammation, sepsis-induced immunoparalysis, and 3) unclassified or intermediate patients without severe immune dysregulation.

PATIENTS OR SUBJECTS

Two hundred ten patients from 14 clinical sites in Greece meeting the Sepsis-3 definitions with lung infection, acute cholangitis, or primary bacteremia.

INTERVENTIONS

During our comparison, we did not perform any intervention.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Untargeted metabolomics analysis was performed on plasma samples from 210 patients (a total of 1394 products). Differential abundance analysis identified 221 significantly different metabolites across the immune states. Metabolites were enriched in pathways related to ubiquinone biosynthesis, tyrosine metabolism, and tryptophan metabolism when comparing MALS to immunoparalysis and unclassified patients. When comparing MALS to unclassified, 312 significantly different metabolites were found, and pathway analysis indicated enrichment in multiple pathways. Comparing immunoparalysis to unclassified patients revealed only two differentially regulated metabolites.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest distinct metabolic dysregulation patterns associated with different immune dysfunctions in sepsis: the strongest metabolic dysregulation is associated with MALS.

Current perspectives in the management of sepsis and septic shock

Within patients with sepsis, there exists significant heterogeneity, and while all patients should receive conventional therapy, there are subgroups of patients who may benefit from specific therapies, often referred to as rescue therapies. Therefore, the identification of these specific patient subgroups is crucial and lays the groundwork for the application of precision medicine based on the development of targeted interventions. Over the years, efforts have been made to categorize sepsis into different subtypes based on clinical characteristics, biomarkers, or underlying mechanisms. For example, sepsis can be stratified into different phenotypes based on the predominant dysregulated host response. These phenotypes can range from hyperinflammatory states to immunosuppressive states and even mixed phenotypes. Each phenotype may require different therapeutic approaches to improve patient outcomes. Rescue strategies for septic shock may encompass various interventions, such as immunomodulatory therapies, extracorporeal support (e.g., ECMO), or therapies targeted at specific molecular or cellular pathways involved in the pathophysiology of sepsis. In recent years, there has been growing interest in precision medicine approaches to sepsis and phenotype identification. Precision medicine aims to tailor treatments to each individual patient based on their unique characteristics and disease mechanisms.

T-cell immunosuppression in sepsis is augmented by sciatic denervation-induced skeletal muscle atrophy

Skeletal muscle atrophy is a known risk factor for immunosuppressive conditions and for a poor prognosis in sepsis. However, its immunopathology has not been experimentally elucidated. This study investigated the effects of skeletal muscle atrophy on the immunopathology of sepsis. Male C57BL/6J mice were subjected to sciatic denervation (DN) and caecal ligation and puncture (CLP) to induce muscle atrophy or sepsis. The macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), and T-cells in peritoneal and spleen were analysed using flow cytometry. DN-induced muscle atrophy did not affect macrophage and MDSC populations. In contrast, the percentage of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen (CTLA)-4+ CD4+ T-cells, programmed death (PD)-1+ CD8+ T-cells, regulatory T-cells, and the CTLA-4+ regulatory T-cells was statistically significantly higher in DN-CLP mice than in sham-CLP mice. Skeletal muscle atrophy before sepsis triggers excessive T cell immunosuppression, which may contribute to the exacerbation of sepsis under skeletal muscle atrophy.

Immunomodulatory drugs in sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Dysregulation of the host immune response has a central role in the pathophysiology of sepsis. There has been much interest in immunomodulatory drugs as potential therapeutic adjuncts in sepsis. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials evaluating the safety and clinical effectiveness of immunomodulatory drugs as adjuncts to standard care in the treatment of adults with sepsis. Our primary outcomes were serious adverse events and all-cause mortality. Fifty-six unique, eligible randomised controlled trials were identified, assessing a range of interventions including cytokine inhibitors; anti-inflammatories; immune cell stimulators; platelet pathway inhibitors; and complement inhibitors. At 1-month follow-up, the use of cytokine inhibitors was associated with a decreased risk of serious adverse events, based on 11 studies involving 7138 patients (RR (95%CI) 0.95 (0.90-1.00), I2 = 0%). The only immunomodulatory drugs associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events were toll-like receptor 4 antagonists (RR (95%CI) 1.18 (1.04-1.34), I2 = 0% (two trials, 567 patients)). Based on 18 randomised controlled trials, involving 11,075 patients, cytokine inhibitors reduced 1-month mortality (RR (95%CI) 0.88 (0.78-0.98), I2 = 57%). Mortality reduction was also shown in the subgroup of 13 randomised controlled trials that evaluated anti-tumour necrosis factor α interventions (RR (95%CI) 0.93 (0.87-0.99), I2 = 0%). Anti-inflammatory drugs had the largest apparent effect on mortality at 2 months at any dose (two trials, 228 patients, RR (95%CI) 0.64 (0.51-0.80), I2 = 0%) and at 3 months at any dose (three trials involving 277 patients, RR (95%CI) 0.67 (0.55-0.81), I2 = 0%). These data indicate that, except for toll-like receptor 4 antagonists, there is no evidence of safety concerns for the use of immunomodulatory drugs in sepsis, and they may show some short-term mortality benefit for selected drugs.

Acute Management of Sepsis beyond 24 Hours

Sepsis manifests as a dysregulated immune response to an infection, leading to tissue damage, organ failure, and potentially death or long-term health issues. Sepsis remains a major health challenge globally, causing approximately 50 million cases and 11 million deaths annually. Early management of sepsis focuses on source control, antimicrobial treatment, and supporting vital organ function. Subsequent care includes metabolic, nutritional, and immune therapies to address the complex needs of septic patients. Metabolic management is based on obtaining moderate glucose targets. Nutritional support aims to mitigate hypercatabolism and muscle wasting, but aggressive early nutrition does not improve outcomes and could even be harmful. Immune modulation is crucial due to the dual nature of sepsis-induced immune responses. Corticosteroids have shown benefits in shock and organ dysfunction reversal and in mortality reduction with current guidelines recommending them in vasopressor therapy-dependent patients. In conclusion, sepsis management beyond the initial hours requires a multifaceted approach, focusing on metabolic, nutritional, and immune system support tailored to individual patient needs to enhance survival and recovery.

Informative Subtyping of Patients with Sepsis

Sepsis pathobiology is complex. Heterogeneity refers to the clinical and biological variation within sepsis cohorts. Sepsis subtypes refer to subpopulations within sepsis cohorts derived based on these observable variations and latent features. The overarching goal of such endeavors is to enable precision immunomodulation. However, we are yet to identify immune endotypes of sepsis to achieve this goal. The sepsis subtyping field is just starting to take shape. The current subtypes in the literature do not have a core set of shared features between studies. Thus, in this narrative review, we reason that there is a need to a priori state the purpose of sepsis subtyping and minimum set of features that would be required to achieve the goal of precision immunomodulation for future sepsis.

Enhancing acute inflammatory and sepsis treatment: superiority of membrane receptor blockade

Conditions such as acute pancreatitis, ulcerative colitis, delayed graft function and infections caused by a variety of microorganisms, including gram-positive and gram-negative organisms, increase the risk of sepsis and therefore mortality. Immune dysfunction is a characterization of sepsis, so timely and effective treatment strategies are needed. The conventional approaches, such as antibiotic-based treatments, face challenges such as antibiotic resistance, and cytokine-based treatments have shown limited efficacy. To address these limitations, a novel approach focusing on membrane receptors, the initiators of the inflammatory cascade, is proposed. Membrane receptors such as Toll-like receptors, interleukin-1 receptor, endothelial protein C receptor, μ-opioid receptor, triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1, and G-protein coupled receptors play pivotal roles in the inflammatory response, offering opportunities for rapid regulation. Various membrane receptor blockade strategies have demonstrated efficacy in both preclinical and clinical studies. These membrane receptor blockades act as early stage inflammation modulators, providing faster responses compared to conventional therapies. Importantly, these blockers exhibit immunomodulatory capabilities without inducing complete immunosuppression. Finally, this review underscores the critical need for early intervention in acute inflammatory and infectious diseases, particularly those posing a risk of progressing to sepsis. And, exploring membrane receptor blockade as an adjunctive treatment for acute inflammatory and infectious diseases presents a promising avenue. These novel approaches, when combined with antibiotics, have the potential to enhance patient outcomes, particularly in conditions prone to sepsis, while minimizing risks associated with antibiotic resistance and immune suppression.

From ICU Syndromes to ICU Subphenotypes: Consensus Report and Recommendations for Developing Precision Medicine in the ICU

Critical care uses syndromic definitions to describe patient groups for clinical practice and research. There is growing recognition that a "precision medicine" approach is required and that integrated biologic and physiologic data identify reproducible subpopulations that may respond differently to treatment. This article reviews the current state of the field and considers how to successfully transition to a precision medicine approach. To impact clinical care, identification of subpopulations must do more than differentiate prognosis. It must differentiate response to treatment, ideally by defining subgroups with distinct functional or pathobiological mechanisms (endotypes). There are now multiple examples of reproducible subpopulations of sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and acute kidney or brain injury described using clinical, physiological, and/or biological data. Many of these subpopulations have demonstrated the potential to define differential treatment response, largely in retrospective studies, and that the same treatment-responsive subpopulations may cross multiple clinical syndromes (treatable traits). To bring about a change in clinical practice, a precision medicine approach must be evaluated in prospective clinical studies requiring novel adaptive trial designs. Several such studies are underway, but there are multiple challenges to be tackled. Such subpopulations must be readily identifiable and be applicable to all critically ill populations around the world. Subdividing clinical syndromes into subpopulations will require large patient numbers. Global collaboration of investigators, clinicians, industry, and patients over many years will therefore be required to transition to a precision medicine approach and ultimately realize treatment advances seen in other medical fields.

Evolving Paradigms in Sepsis Management: A Narrative Review

Sepsis, a condition characterized by life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response to infection, significantly impacts global health, with mortality rates varying widely across regions. Traditional therapeutic strategies that target hyperinflammation and immunosuppression have largely failed to improve outcomes, underscoring the need for innovative approaches. This review examines the development of therapeutic agents for sepsis, with a focus on clinical trials addressing hyperinflammation and immunosuppression. It highlights the frequent failures of these trials, explores the underlying reasons, and outlines current research efforts aimed at bridging the gap between theoretical advancements and clinical applications. Although personalized medicine and phenotypic categorization present promising directions, this review emphasizes the importance of understanding the complex pathogenesis of sepsis and developing targeted, effective therapies to enhance patient outcomes. By addressing the multifaceted nature of sepsis, future research can pave the way for more precise and individualized treatment strategies, ultimately improving the management and prognosis of sepsis patients.

Navigating the Modern Landscape of Sepsis: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment

Sepsis poses a significant threat to human health due to its high morbidity and mortality rates worldwide. Traditional diagnostic methods for identifying sepsis or its causative organisms are time-consuming and contribute to a high mortality rate. Biomarkers have been developed to overcome these limitations and are currently used for sepsis diagnosis, prognosis prediction, and treatment response assessment. Over the past few decades, more than 250 biomarkers have been identified, a few of which have been used in clinical decision-making. Consistent with the limitations of diagnosing sepsis, there is currently no specific treatment for sepsis. Currently, the general treatment for sepsis is conservative and includes timely antibiotic use and hemodynamic support. When planning sepsis-specific treatment, it is important to select the most suitable patient, considering the heterogeneous nature of sepsis. This comprehensive review summarizes current and evolving biomarkers and therapeutic approaches for sepsis.

DIMINISHED EXPRESSION OF GLS IN CD4 + T CELLS SERVES AS A PROGNOSTIC INDICATOR ASSOCIATED WITH CUPROPTOSIS IN SEPTIC PATIENTS

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening disease associated with a dysfunctional host immune response. Stratified identification of critically ill patients might significantly improve the survival rate. The present study sought to probe molecular markers associated with cuproptosis in septic patients to aid in stratification and improve prognosis. Methods: We studied expression of cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs) using peripheral blood samples from septic patients. Further classification was made by examining levels of expression of these potential CRGs in patients. Coexpression networks were constructed using the Weighted Gene Coexpression Network Analysis (WGCNA) method to identify crucial prognostic CRGs. Additionally, we utilized immune cell infiltration analysis to further examine the immune status of septic patients with different subtypes and its association with the CRGs. scRNA-seq data were also analyzed to verify expression of key CRGs among specific immune cells. Finally, immunoblotting, flow cytometry, immunofluorescence, and CFSE analysis were used to investigate possible regulatory mechanisms. Results: We classified septic patients based on CRG expression levels and found significant differences in prognosis and gene expression patterns. Three key CRGs that may influence the prognosis of septic patients were identified. A decrease in GLS expression was subsequently verified in Jurkat cells, accompanied by a reduction in O-GlcNAc levels, and chelation of copper by tetrathiomolybdate could not rescue the reduction in GLS and O-GLcNAc levels. Moreover, immoderate chelation of copper was detrimental to mitochondrial function, cell viability, and cell proliferation, as well as the immune status of the host. Conclusion: We have identified novel molecular markers associated with cuproptosis, which could potentially function as diagnostic indicators for septic patients. The reversible nature of the observed alterations in FDX1 and LIAS was demonstrated through copper chelation, whereas the correlation between copper and the observed changes in GLS requires further investigation.

Unleashing the Cytokine Storm: A Case of Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), synonymous with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), is a rare and critical complication of rheumatologic disease stemming from the unregulated activation and rapid multiplication of macrophages and T lymphocytes. While it primarily manifests in children diagnosed with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), it can arise less frequently in other rheumatologic conditions. Here, we outline the clinical course, treatment, and outcome of MAS diagnosed in an 18-year-old female previously diagnosed with SLE who exhibited a unique clinical presentation.

Immunotherapy in the context of sepsis-induced immunological dysregulation

Sepsis is a clinical syndrome caused by uncontrollable immune dysregulation triggered by pathogen infection, characterized by high incidence, mortality rates, and disease burden. Current treatments primarily focus on symptomatic relief, lacking specific therapeutic interventions. The core mechanism of sepsis is believed to be an imbalance in the host's immune response, characterized by early excessive inflammation followed by late immune suppression, triggered by pathogen invasion. This suggests that we can develop immunotherapeutic treatment strategies by targeting and modulating the components and immunological functions of the host's innate and adaptive immune systems. Therefore, this paper reviews the mechanisms of immune dysregulation in sepsis and, based on this foundation, discusses the current state of immunotherapy applications in sepsis animal models and clinical trials.

CLINICAL UTILITY OF INTERLEUKIN-1 INHIBITORS IN PEDIATRIC SEPSIS

ABSTRACT

The pathophysiology of pediatric sepsis is characterized by increased innate immune activation earlier in life. Interleukin-1 is a proinflammatory cytokine implicated in the pathophysiology of sepsis, and ferritin is a stable surrogate biomarker for elevated IL-1 levels. Data in adult sepsis have shown that use of anakinra, an anti-IL-1 receptor antagonist, led to improved clinical outcomes in patients with features of macrophage activation and hyperferritinemia. However, data in pediatric sepsis are lacking. Our narrative review sought to highlight the current understanding of using IL-1 inhibitors in pediatric sepsis. We identified five studies including one case report and four retrospective case series that described clinical outcomes in relation to use of anakinra for secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). A few patients in this pooled heterogenous cohort of 72 patients had concomitant infection meeting the criteria for sepsis. All studies measured ferritin levels and reported a decrease in ferritin after initiating anakinra. Twelve patients died after treatment initiation. There was no clear comparison in clinical outcomes between infected and noninfected patients. The pathophysiology of pediatric sepsis suggests that there is a need for blinded clinical trials using targeted immunomodulation such as IL-1 inhibitors in pediatric sepsis cohort with an immunophenotype suggesting increased innate immune activation.

[The Immune System of the Critically Ill Patient]

Critically ill patients often experience a dysregulated immune response, leading to immune dysfunction. Sepsis, trauma, severe infections, and certain medical conditions can trigger a state of systemic inflammation, known as the cytokine storm. This hyperactive immune response can cause collateral damage to healthy tissues and organs, exacerbating the patient's condition. On the other hand, some critically ill patients may suffer from immune paralysis which can increase the risk of nosocomial infections.Fever is an evolutionary adaptation that evolved as an effective defense mechanism to fight invading pathogens. By raising body temperature, fever enhances the immune response, inhibits pathogen growth, promotes recovery, and aids in the formation of immune memory. Understanding the role of fever in the context of immune defense is crucial for optimizing medical interventions and supporting the body's natural ability to combat infections.Future Directions: Advancements in immunology research and technology hold promise for better understanding the immune system's complexities in critically ill patients. Personalized medicine approaches may be developed to tailor therapies to individual patients based on their immune profile, optimizing treatment outcomes. Based on recent studies prognostic parameters such as lymphocyte count, IL-10 concentration and mHLA-DR expression can be used to stratify the immunological response pattern in septic patients.Conclusion: The immune system's response in critically ill patients is a multifaceted process, involving intricate interactions between various immune cells, cytokines, and organs. Striking the delicate balance between immune activation and suppression remains a significant challenge in clinical practice. Continued research and therapeutic innovations are vital to improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden of critical illness on healthcare systems.

Highly secreted tryptophanyl tRNA synthetase 1 as a potential theranostic target for hypercytokinemic severe sepsis

Despite intensive clinical and scientific efforts, the mortality rate of sepsis remains high due to the lack of precise biomarkers for patient stratification and therapeutic guidance. Secreted human tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase 1 (WARS1), an endogenous ligand for Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 and TLR4 against infection, activates the genes that signify the hyperinflammatory sepsis phenotype. High plasma WARS1 levels stratified the early death of critically ill patients with sepsis, along with elevated levels of cytokines, chemokines, and lactate, as well as increased numbers of absolute neutrophils and monocytes, and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. These symptoms were recapitulated in severely ill septic mice with hypercytokinemia. Further, injection of WARS1 into mildly septic mice worsened morbidity and mortality. We created an anti-human WARS1-neutralizing antibody that suppresses proinflammatory cytokine expression in marmosets with endotoxemia. Administration of this antibody into severe septic mice attenuated cytokine storm, organ failure, and early mortality. With antibiotics, the antibody almost completely prevented fatalities. These data imply that blood-circulating WARS1-guided anti-WARS1 therapy may provide a novel theranostic strategy for life-threatening systemic hyperinflammatory sepsis.

The pathophysiology of sepsis and precision-medicine-based immunotherapy

Sepsis remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in both low- and high-income countries. Antibiotic therapy and supportive care have significantly improved survival following sepsis in the twentieth century, but further progress has been challenging. Immunotherapy trials for sepsis, mainly aimed at suppressing the immune response, from the 1990s and 2000s, have largely failed, in part owing to unresolved patient heterogeneity in the underlying immune disbalance. The past decade has brought the promise to break this blockade through technological developments based on omics-based technologies and systems medicine that can provide a much larger data space to describe in greater detail the immune endotypes in sepsis. Patient stratification opens new avenues towards precision medicine approaches that aim to apply immunotherapies to sepsis, on the basis of precise biomarkers and molecular mechanisms defining specific immune endotypes. This approach has the potential to lead to the establishment of immunotherapy as a successful pillar in the treatment of sepsis for future generations.

Immune dysregulation in sepsis: experiences, lessons and perspectives

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction syndrome caused by dysregulated host responses to infection. Not only does sepsis pose a serious hazard to human health, but it also imposes a substantial economic burden on the healthcare system. The cornerstones of current treatment for sepsis remain source control, fluid resuscitation, and rapid administration of antibiotics, etc. To date, no drugs have been approved for treating sepsis, and most clinical trials of potential therapies have failed to reduce mortality. The immune response caused by the pathogen is complex, resulting in a dysregulated innate and adaptive immune response that, if not promptly controlled, can lead to excessive inflammation, immunosuppression, and failure to re-establish immune homeostasis. The impaired immune response in patients with sepsis and the potential immunotherapy to modulate the immune response causing excessive inflammation or enhancing immunity suggest the importance of demonstrating individualized therapy. Here, we review the immune dysfunction caused by sepsis, where immune cell production, effector cell function, and survival are directly affected during sepsis. In addition, we discuss potential immunotherapy in septic patients and highlight the need for precise treatment according to clinical and immune stratification.

Targeting the host response in sepsis: current approaches and future evidence

Sepsis, a dysregulated host response to infection characterized by organ failure, is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Disbalances of the immune response play an important role in its pathophysiology. Patients may develop simultaneously or concomitantly states of systemic or local hyperinflammation and immunosuppression. Although a variety of effective immunomodulatory treatments are generally available, attempts to inhibit or stimulate the immune system in sepsis have failed so far to improve patients' outcome. The underlying reason is likely multifaceted including failure to identify responders to a specific immune intervention and the complex pathophysiology of organ dysfunction that is not exclusively caused by immunopathology but also includes dysfunction of the coagulation system, parenchymal organs, and the endothelium. Increasing evidence suggests that stratification of the heterogeneous population of septic patients with consideration of their host response might led to treatments that are more effective. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of current studies aimed at optimizing the many facets of host response and to discuss future perspectives for precision medicine approaches in sepsis.

Adjunctive treatment in COVID-19 and sepsis-What did we learn?

The introduction of anakinra, baricitinib and tocilizumab into the treatment armamentarium of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) reinforced the concept of immunotherapy for bacterial sepsis. The current review investigates how the example of COVID-19 may be extrapolated to sepsis using a three-step approach. In the first step, the clinical evidence on how the immunotherapy of COVID-19 assisted viral clearance is presented. In a second step, the indications acquired from human and animal studies on the need to employ strategies with primary effective phagocytosis in sepsis are presented. In a final step, lessons learnt from COVID-19 immunotherapy are applied for sepsis. The end result is that sepsis immunotherapy should rely on the use of biomarkers which provide information on the activation of a specific prevailing mechanism in order to enable the selection of the appropriate drug.

Anakinra Removal by Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: An Ex Vivo Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Patients with sepsis are at significant risk for multiple organ dysfunction, including the lungs and kidneys. To manage the morbidity associated with kidney impairment, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may be required. The extent of anakinra pharmacokinetics in CRRT remains unknown. The objectives of this study were to investigate the anakinra-circuit interaction and quantify the rate of removal from plasma.

DESIGN

The anakinra-circuit interaction was evaluated using a closed-loop ex vivo CRRT circuit. CRRT was performed in three phases based on the method of solute removal: 1) hemofiltration, 2) hemodialysis, and 3) hemodiafiltration. Standard control samples of anakinra were included to assess drug degradation.

SETTING

University research laboratory.

PATIENTS

None.

INTERVENTIONS

Anakinra was administered to the CRRT circuit and serial prefilter blood samples were collected along with time-matched control and hemofiltrate samples. Each circuit was run in triplicate to assess inter-run variability. Concentrations of anakinra in each reference fluid were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Transmembrane filter clearance was estimated by the product of the sieving coefficient/dialysate saturation constant and circuit flow rates.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Removal of anakinra from plasma occurred within minutes for each CRRT modality. Average drug remaining (%) in plasma following anakinra administration was lowest with hemodiafiltration (34.9%). The average sieving coefficient was 0.34, 0.37, and 0.41 for hemodiafiltration, hemofiltration, and hemodialysis, respectively. Transmembrane clearance was fairly consistent across each modality with the highest during hemodialysis (5.53 mL/min), followed by hemodiafiltration (4.99 mL/min), and hemofiltration (3.94 mL/min). Percent drug remaining within the control samples (93.1%) remained consistent across each experiment, indicating negligible degradation within the blood.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this analysis are the first to demonstrate that large molecule therapeutic proteins such as anakinra, are removed from plasma with modern CRRT technology. Current dosing recommendations for patients with severe renal impairment may result in subtherapeutic anakinra concentrations in those receiving CRRT.

Severe acute malnutrition promotes bacterial binding over proinflammatory cytokine secretion by circulating innate immune cells

Children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) have high infectious mortality and morbidity, implicating defects in their immune defenses. We hypothesized that circulating innate immune cells from children (0 to 59 months) hospitalized with SAM in Zambia and Zimbabwe (n = 141) have distinct capacity to respond to bacteria relative to adequately nourished healthy controls (n = 92). SAM inpatients had higher neutrophil and monocyte Escherichia coli binding capacity but lower monocyte activation and proinflammatory mediator secretion in response to lipopolysaccharide or heat-killed Salmonella typhimurium than controls. Among SAM cases, wasting severity was negatively associated with cytokine secretion, children with HIV had lower monocyte activation, and the youngest children released the least myeloperoxidase upon stimulation. Inpatient bacterial binding capacity and monocyte activation were associated with higher odds of persistent SAM at discharge, a risk factor for subsequent mortality. Thus, SAM shifts innate immune cell function, favoring bacterial containment over proinflammatory activation, which may contribute to health deficits after discharge.

Immune response mechanisms in acute and chronic pancreatitis: strategies for therapeutic intervention

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is one of the most common inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract and a steady rising diagnosis for inpatient hospitalization. About one in four patients, who experience an episode of AP, will develop chronic pancreatitis (CP) over time. While the initiating causes of pancreatitis can be complex, they consistently elicit an immune response that significantly determines the severity and course of the disease. Overall, AP is associated with a significant mortality rate of 1-5%, which is caused by either an excessive pro-inflammation, or a strong compensatory inhibition of bacterial defense mechanisms which lead to a severe necrotizing form of pancreatitis. At the time-point of hospitalization the already initiated immune response is the only promising common therapeutic target to treat or prevent a severe disease course. However, the complexity of the immune response requires fine-balanced therapeutic intervention which in addition is limited by the fact that a significant proportion of patients is in danger of development or progress to recurrent and chronic disease. Based on the recent literature we survey the disease-relevant immune mechanisms and evaluate appropriate and promising therapeutic targets for the treatment of acute and chronic pancreatitis.

Biomarkers to guide immunomodulatory treatment: where do we stand?

INTRODUCTION

This review summarizes current progress in the development of biomarkers to guide immunotherapy in oncology, rheumatology, and critical illness.

AREAS COVERED

An extensive literature search was performed about biomarkers classifying patients' immune responses to guide immunotherapy in oncology, rheumatology, and critical illness. Surface markers, such as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), genetic biomarkers, such as tumor mutation load, and circulating tumor DNA are biomarkers associated with the effectiveness of immunotherapy in oncology. Genomics, metabolomics, and proteomics play a crucial role in selecting the most suitable therapeutic options for rheumatologic patients. Phenotypes and endotypes are a promising approach to detect critically ill patients with hyper- or hypo-inflammation. Sepsis trials using biomarkers such as ferritin, lymphopenia, HLA-DR expression on monocytes and PD-L1 to guide immunotherapy have been already conducted or are currently ongoing. Immunotherapy in COVID-19 pneumonia, guided by C-reactive protein and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) has improved patient outcomes globally. More research is needed into immunotherapy in other critical conditions.

EXPERT OPINION

Targeted immunotherapy has improved outcomes in oncology and rheumatology, paving the way for precision medicine in the critically ill. Transcriptomics will play a crucial role in detecting the most suitable candidates for immunomodulation.

The relationship between serum ferritin level and clinical outcomes in sepsis based on a large public database

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between serum ferritin level and prognosis in sepsis. It also explored the potential prognostic value of serum ferritin for predicting outcomes in sepsis based on a large public database. Sepsis patients in MIMIC-IV database were included. Different models including crude model (adjusted for none), model I (adjusted for age and gender) and model II (adjusted for all potential confounders) were performed. Smooth fitting curves were constructed for exploring the relationships between serum ferritin and mortalities of 28-day, 90-day, 180-day and 1-year. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was utilized for assessing the predictive value of serum ferritin. 1947 sepsis patients were included. The mortalities of 28-day, 90-day, 180-day and 1-year were 20.18% (n = 393), 28.35% (n = 552), 30.30% (n = 590) and 31.54% (n = 614), respectively. In Model II (adjusted for all potential confounders), for every 1000 ng/ml increment in serum ferritin, the values of OR in mortalities of in 28-day, 90-day, 180-day and 1-year were 1.13 (95% CI 1.07-1.19, P < 0.0001), 1.15 (95% CI 1.09-1.21, P < 0.0001), 1.16 (95% CI 1.10-1.22, P < 0.0001) and 1.17 (95% CI 1.10-1.23, P < 0.0001), respectively. The relationships between serum ferritin level and outcomes were non-linear. The areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of ferritin for predicting mortalities of 28-day, 90-day, 180-day and 1-year were 0.597 (95% CI 0.563-0.629), 0.593 (95% CI 0.564-0.621), 0.595 (95% CI 0.567-0.623) and 0.592 (95% CI 0.564-0.620), respectively. The non-linear relationships between serum ferritin and clinical outcomes in sepsis were found. Serum ferritin had a predictive value for short-term and long-term outcomes in sepsis.

Multi-Omics Endotypes in ICU Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression

It is evident that the admission of some patients with sepsis and septic shock to hospitals is occurring late in their illness, which has contributed to the increase in poor outcomes and high fatalities worldwide across age groups. The current diagnostic and monitoring procedure relies on an inaccurate and often delayed identification by the clinician, who then decides the treatment upon interaction with the patient. Initiation of sepsis is accompanied by immune system paralysis following "cytokine storm". The unique immunological response of each patient is important to define in terms of subtyping for therapy. The immune system becomes activated in sepsis to produce interleukins, and endothelial cells express higher levels of adhesion molecules. The proportions of circulating immune cells change, reducing regulatory cells and increasing memory cells and killer cells, having long-term effects on the phenotype of CD8 T cells, HLA-DR, and dysregulation of microRNA. The current narrative review seeks to highlight the potential application of multi-omics data integration and immunological profiling at the single-cell level to define endotypes in sepsis and septic shock. The review will consider the parallels and immunoregulatory axis between cancer and immunosuppression, sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy, and endothelial damage. Second, the added value of transcriptomic-driven endotypes will be assessed through inferring regulatory interactions in recent clinical trials and studies reporting gene modular features that inform continuous metrics measuring clinical response in ICU, which can support the use of immunomodulating agents.

The Regulation of Neutrophil Migration in Patients with Sepsis: The Complexity of the Molecular Mechanisms and Their Modulation in Sepsis and the Heterogeneity of Sepsis Patients

Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Common causes include gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria as well as fungi. Neutrophils are among the first cells to arrive at an infection site where they function as important effector cells of the innate immune system and as regulators of the host immune response. The regulation of neutrophil migration is therefore important both for the infection-directed host response and for the development of organ dysfunctions in sepsis. Downregulation of CXCR4/CXCL12 stimulates neutrophil migration from the bone marrow. This is followed by transmigration/extravasation across the endothelial cell barrier at the infection site; this process is directed by adhesion molecules and various chemotactic gradients created by chemotactic cytokines, lipid mediators, bacterial peptides, and peptides from damaged cells. These mechanisms of neutrophil migration are modulated by sepsis, leading to reduced neutrophil migration and even reversed migration that contributes to distant organ failure. The sepsis-induced modulation seems to differ between neutrophil subsets. Furthermore, sepsis patients should be regarded as heterogeneous because neutrophil migration will possibly be further modulated by the infecting microorganisms, antimicrobial treatment, patient age/frailty/sex, other diseases (e.g., hematological malignancies and stem cell transplantation), and the metabolic status. The present review describes molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of neutrophil migration; how these mechanisms are altered during sepsis; and how bacteria/fungi, antimicrobial treatment, and aging/frailty/comorbidity influence the regulation of neutrophil migration.

Parallel Dysregulated Immune Response in Severe Forms of COVID-19 and Bacterial Sepsis via Single-Cell Transcriptome Sequencing

Critically ill COVID-19 patients start developing single respiratory organ failure that often evolves into multiorgan failure. Understanding the immune mechanisms in severe forms of an infectious disease (either critical COVID-19 or bacterial septic shock) would help to achieve a better understanding of the patient’s clinical trajectories and the success of potential therapies. We hypothesized that a dysregulated immune response manifested by the abnormal activation of innate and adaptive immunity might be present depending on the severity of the clinical presentation in both COVID-19 and bacterial sepsis. We found that critically ill COVID-19 patients demonstrated a different clinical endotype that resulted in an inflammatory dysregulation in mild forms of the disease. Mild cases (COVID-19 and bacterial non severe sepsis) showed significant differences in the expression levels of CD8 naïve T cells, CD4 naïve T cells, and CD4 memory T cells. On the other hand, in the severe forms of infection (critical COVID-19 and bacterial septic shock), patients shared immune patterns with upregulated single-cell transcriptome sequencing at the following levels: B cells, monocyte classical, CD4 and CD8 naïve T cells, and natural killers. In conclusion, we identified significant gene expression differences according to the etiology of the infection (COVID-19 or bacterial sepsis) in the mild forms; however, in the severe forms (critical COVID-19 and bacterial septic shock), patients tended to share some of the same immune profiles related to adaptive and innate immune response. Severe forms of the infections were similar independent of the etiology. Our findings might promote the implementation of co-adjuvant therapies and interventions to avoid the development of severe forms of disease that are associated with high mortality rates worldwide.

THE ROLE OF OBESITY AND PLASMA ADIPOCYTOKINES IN IMMUNE DYSREGULATION IN SEPSIS PATIENTS

Introduction: The dysregulated immune response in sepsis is highly variable, ranging from hyperinflammation to immunoparalysis. Obesity is associated with the release of inflammatory mediators from adipose tissue, known as adipocytokines, causing a chronic inflammatory state. Perhaps counterintuitively, obesity is also associated with lower mortality in sepsis patients. We investigated the association between obesity, circulating adipocytokine concentrations, immune dysregulation, and outcome in sepsis patients. Methods In this secondary analysis of a prospective study, plasma concentrations of the adipocytokines leptin, adiponectin, and resistin were assessed in 167 patients at diagnosis of sepsis due to pneumonia, bacteremia, or acute cholangitis. Adipocytokines were compared between patients with normal weight (body mass index [BMI], 18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 ; n = 67), overweight (BMI, 25.0-29.9 kg/m 2 ; n = 56), and obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 ; n = 42), as well as between immunological endotypes: hyperinflammation (n = 40), immunoparalysis (n = 62), and unclassified (n = 55). Results: Higher circulating concentrations of leptin were observed in patients with obesity compared with patients with normal weight ( P = 0.008) and overweight ( P = 0.02), whereas adiponectin and resistin plasma concentrations were not different ( P = 0.08 and P = 0.85, respectively). Resistin concentrations were associated with immunological endotypes, with the highest levels found in hyperinflammatory patients ( P < 0.001). Furthermore, resistin concentrations were predictive for 28-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03 per 10 ng/mL; P = 0.04). These associations were not found for leptin and adiponectin. Conclusion: Obesity and BMI-related adipocytokines are not related to the development of a hyperactive or suppressed immune response as defined by ferritin and mHLA-DR expression in sepsis patients. Although resistin is related to the immune response and an increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes, these associations are similar in patients with normal weight, overweight, and obesity. This implies that the relationship between resistin and clinical outcome is likely driven by the inflammatory response and not by obesity itself. Taken together, although there exists a strong association between inflammation and sepsis mortality, our results do not point toward a role for obesity and BMI-related adipocytokines in immune dysregulation in sepsis patients.

Complement activation in severely ill patients with sepsis: no relationship with inflammation and disease severity

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is characterized by a dysregulated immune response to infection. The complement system plays an important role in the host defence to pathogens. However, exaggerated complement activation might contribute to a hyperinflammatory state. The interplay between complement activation and inflammation in relationship with adverse outcomes in sepsis patients is unclear.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of complement factors in a prospective study in 209 hospitalized sepsis patients, of whom the majority presented with shock. Concentrations of complement factors C3, C3a, C3c, C5, C5a, and soluble terminal complement complex were assessed in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid plasma samples collected within 24 h after sepsis diagnosis using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

RESULTS

The concentration of complement factors in plasma of severely ill sepsis patients indicated profound activation of the complement system (all P < 0.01 compared to healthy controls). Spearman rank correlation tests indicated consistent relationships between the different complement factors measured, but no significant correlations were observed between the complement factors and other inflammatory biomarkers such as leukocyte numbers, C-reactive protein and ferritin concentrations, or HLA-DR expression on monocytes. The concentration of complement factors was not associated with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, the incidence of septic shock, and mortality rates (all P > 0.05) in this cohort of patients with high disease severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Once an infection progresses to severe sepsis or septic shock, the complement pathway is already profoundly activated and is no longer related to a dysregulated inflammatory response, nor to clinical outcome. This implies that in this patient category with severe disease, the complement system is activated to such an extent that it no longer has predictive value for clinical outcome.

Identifying inflammatory phenotypes to target mechanism-specific treatments in sepsis

A clinical trial by Leventogiannis et al.¹ suggests that ferritin and HLA-DR monocyte receptor expression can identify septic patients with macrophage-activation-like syndrome (MALS), or immunoparalysis, and that targeting IL-1ra treatment with this strategy may improve outcomes.