Trends in resource utilization and prescription of anticonvulsants for patients with active epilepsy in Germany

Epilepsy Impacts Families and Communities: Persistent Gaps and Inequities

EFFECT OF EPILEPSY ON FAMILIES, COMMUNITIES, AND SOCIETY

Adam P. Ostendorf , Satyanarayana Gedela Seminars in Pediatric Neurology Volume 24, Issue 4, November 2017, Pages 340-347 The effect of epilepsy extends beyond those with the diagnosis and impacts families, communities and society. Caregiver and sibling quality of life is often negatively affected by frequent seizures, comorbid behavioral and sleep disorders and stigma surrounding the diagnosis. Furthermore, the negative effects can be magnified by individual coping styles and resources available to families of those with epilepsy. Beyond the family and immediate caregivers, epilepsy affects local communities by drawing additional resources from education systems. The direct costs of caring for an individual with epilepsy and the indirect costs associated with decreased productivity place financial strain on individuals and health care systems throughout the world. This review details factors affecting family and caregiver quality of life and provides several approaches through which health care providers may address these concerns. Furthermore, we examine the financial effect of epilepsy on society and review emerging strategies to lessen health care use for individuals with epilepsy.

Adverse Event Profiles of Antiseizure Medications and the Impact of Coadministration on Drug Tolerability in Adults with Epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Antiseizure medication (ASM) as monotherapy or in combination is the treatment of choice for most patients with epilepsy. Therefore, knowledge about the typical adverse events (AEs) for ASMs and other coadministered drugs (CDs) is essential for practitioners and patients. Due to frequent polypharmacy, it is often difficult to clinically assess the AE profiles of ASMs and differentiate the influence of CDs.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective analysis aimed to determine typical AE profiles for ASMs and assess the impact of CDs on AEs in clinical practice.

METHODS

The Liverpool AE Profile (LAEP) and its domains were used to identify the AE profiles of ASMs based on data from a large German multicenter study (Epi2020). Following established classifications, drugs were grouped according to their mode of action (ASMs) or clinical indication (CDs). Bivariate correlation, multivariate ordinal regression (MORA), and artificial neural network (ANNA) analyses were performed. Bivariate correlation with Fisher's z-transformation was used to compare the correlation strength of LAEP with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) to avoid LAEP bias in the context of antidepressant therapy.

RESULTS

Data from 486 patients were analyzed. The AE profiles of ASM categories and single ASMs matched those reported in the literature. Synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) and voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC) modulators had favorable AE profiles, while brivaracetam was superior to levetiracetam regarding psychobehavioral AEs. MORA revealed that, in addition to seizure frequency, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) modulators and antidepressants were the only independent predictors of high LAEP values. After Fisher's z-transformation, correlations were significantly lower between LAEP and antidepressants than between LAEP and HADS or NDDI-E. Therefore, a bias in the results toward over interpreting the impact of antidepressants on LAEP was presumed. In the ANNA, perampanel, zonisamide, topiramate, and valproic acid were important nodes in the network, while VGSC and SV2A modulators had low relevance for predicting relevant AEs. Similarly, cardiovascular agents, analgesics, and antipsychotics were important CDs in the ANNA model.

CONCLUSION

ASMs have characteristic AE profiles that are highly reproducible and must be considered in therapeutic decision-making. Therapy using perampanel as an AMPA modulator should be considered cautiously due to its relatively high AE profile. Drugs acting via VGSCs and SV2A receptors are significantly better tolerated than other ASM categories or substances (e.g., topiramate, zonisamide, and valproate). Switching to brivaracetam is advisable in patients with psychobehavioral AEs who take levetiracetam. Because CDs frequently pharmacokinetically interact with ASMs, the cumulative AE profile must be considered.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS00022024, U1111-1252-5331.

Unemployment and early retirement among patients with epilepsy - A study on predictors, resilience factors and occupational reintegration measures

The primary aim of this study was to identify predictors and resilience factors for unemployment and early retirement in patients with epilepsy of working age based on data from a multicenter German cohort study performed in 2020 (n = 456) by using multivariate binary logistic regression analysis. A second aim was to assess the assumed working ability of patients as well as the use of occupational reintegration measures. The unemployment rate was 8.3%, and 18% of patients had retired early due to epilepsy. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis identified the presence of a relevant disability and frequent seizures as significant predictors of unemployment and early retirement, while seizures in remission were the only resilience factor associated with job retention. Regarding occupational incapacity, at the time of the survey, most of the patients in early retirement or unemployment were fit for work in their original or extended occupational setting. The proportion of patients with recent epilepsy-related occupational retraining (0.4%) or job changes (0.9%) was low, and only 2.4% reported an epilepsy-related reduction in work time. These findings underline the persistent disadvantage of patients with epilepsy in the professional field and the urgent need for effective, comprehensive work reintegration measures that must be made accessible for all patients.

Trends in resource utilization and cost of illness in patients with active epilepsy in Germany from 2003 to 2020

OBJECTIVE

To calculate epilepsy-related direct, indirect, and total costs in adult patients with active epilepsy (ongoing unprovoked seizures) in Germany and to analyze cost components and dynamics compared to previous studies from 2003, 2008 and 2013. This analysis was part of the Epi2020 study.

METHODS

Direct and indirect costs related to epilepsy were calculated with a multicenter survey using an established and validated questionnaire with a bottom-up design and human capital approach over a 3-month period in late 2020. Epilepsy-specific costs in the German health care sector from 2003, 2008 and 2013 were corrected for inflation to allow for a valid comparison.

RESULTS

Data on the disease-specific costs for 253 patients in 2020 were analyzed. The mean total costs were calculated at € 5,551 (± € 5,805; median: € 2,611; range: € 274 to € 21,667) per three months, comprising mean direct costs of € 1,861 (± € 1,905; median: € 1,276; range: € 327 to € 13,158) and mean indirect costs of € 3,690 (± € 5,298; median: € 0; range: € 0 to € 11,925). The main direct costs components were hospitalization (42.4%), anti-seizure medication (42.2%) and outpatient care (6.2%). Productivity losses due to early retirement (53.6%), part-time work or unemployment (30.8%) and seizure-related off-days (15.6%) were the main reasons for indirect costs. However, compared to 2013, there was no significant increase of direct costs (-10.0%), and indirect costs significantly increased (p<0.028, +35.1%), resulting in a significant increase in total epilepsy-related costs (p<0.047, +20.2%). Compared to the 2013 study population, a significant increase of cost of illness could be observed (p=0.047).

SIGNIFICANCE

The present study shows that disease-related costs in adult patients with active epilepsy increased from 2013 to 2020. As direct costs have remained constant, this increase is attributable to an increase in indirect costs. These findings highlight the impact of productivity loss caused by early retirement, unemployment, working time reduction and seizure-related days off.

Multicenter, cross-sectional study of the costs of illness and cost-driving factors in adult patients with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to quantify epilepsy-related costs of illness (COI) in Germany and identify cost-driving factors.

METHODS

COI were calculated among adults with epilepsy of different etiologies and severities. Multiple regression analysis was applied to determine any epilepsy-related and sociodemographic factors that serve as cost-driving factors.

RESULTS

In total, 486 patients were included, with a mean age of 40.5 ± 15.5 years (range = 18-83 years, 58.2% women). Mean 3-month COI were estimated at €4911, €2782, and €2598 for focal, genetic generalized, and unclassified epilepsy, respectively. The mean COI for patients with drug-refractory epilepsy (DRE; €7850) were higher than those for patients with non-DRE (€4720), patients with occasional seizures (€3596), or patients with seizures in remission for >1 year (€2409). Identified cost-driving factors for total COI included relevant disability (unstandardized regression coefficient b = €2218), poorer education (b = €2114), living alone (b = €2612), DRE (b = €1831), and frequent seizures (b = €2385). Younger age groups of 18-24 years (b = -€2945) and 25-34 years (b = -€1418) were found to have lower overall expenditures. A relevant disability (b = €441), DRE (b = €1253), frequent seizures (b = €735), and the need for specialized daycare (b = €749) were associated with higher direct COI, and poorer education (b = €1969), living alone (b = €2612), the presence of a relevant disability (b = €1809), DRE (b = €1831), and frequent seizures (b = €2385) were associated with higher indirect COI.

SIGNIFICANCE

This analysis provides up-to-date COI data for use in further health economics analyses, highlighting the high economic impacts associated with disease severity, disability, and disease-related loss of productivity among adult patients with epilepsy. The identified cost drivers could be used as therapeutic and socioeconomic targets for future cost-containment strategies.

[Admission diagnosis contusion: etiology, epidemiology and cost-causing factors]

BACKGROUND

The admission of patients with minor injuries, such as contusions is a regular practice in acute care hospitals. The pathophysiological changes resulting from the accident are seldom the primary reason for hospitalization. The aim of this retrospective monocentric study was therefore to examine the etiology as well as the cost-causing factors and refinancing on admission.

METHODS

Patients were identified due to a retrospective query in the hospital information system (HIS) according to the ICD-10 German modification codes at discharge. A total of 117 patients were enrolled over a period of 2 years. The classification was carried out according to the accident mechanism and the division into age groups. In addition, the cost calculation was based on department and clinic-specific daily rates.

RESULTS

In terms of etiology low impact falls in the domestic environment were the most common cause (48.7%), followed by high-energy trauma (22.8%). Within the group with domestic falls, the mean age was 77.8 years. This group also showed the longest length of stay (LOS) with 5.2 days. As part of the calculated costs, the group of domestic falls showed the highest costs of 2596.24 € with an average DRG cost revenue of 1464.51 €.

DISCUSSION

The evaluation of the clinic internal data confirmed the subjective perception that the majority of patients admitted with the diagnosis of contusions came from the age group >65 years. Admission is primarily based on the increasing comorbidities and to avert secondary diseases and the consequences of immobilization. It could also be shown that the resulting costs are relevant to health economics and that the treatment does not appear to cover the costs.

[Inpatient treatment costs, cost-driving factors and potential reimbursement problems due to epileptic seizure-related injuries and fractures]

BACKGROUND

The systematic analysis of disease-specific costs is becoming increasingly more relevant in an economically oriented healthcare system. Chronic diseases are of particular interest due to the long duration as well as frequent hospitalization and physician visits. Epilepsy is a frequent neurological disorder affecting all age groups with the clinical hallmark of paroxysmal epileptic seizures, which are often associated with injuries.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to process the inpatient treatment costs due to seizure-related injuries and fractures. Moreover, relevant cost-causing factors were addressed. Using an alternative calculation of the costs of care, the question of potential reimbursement problems in the current German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) system was additionally assessed.

METHODS

For this monocentric retrospective analysis the actual proceeds of 62 inpatients who were treated at the University Hospital Frankfurt between January 2010 and January 2018 for injuries and fractures due to epileptic seizures were used. The analysis of potential cost-causing factors was carried out with respect to relevant sociodemographic and clinical aspects. The alternative calculation of the costs of treatment was carried out using established health economic methods.

RESULTS

The average DRG revenue was 7408€ (±8993€, median 5086€, range 563-44,519€), the average calculated costs were 9423€ (±11,113€, 5626€, range 587-49,830€). A length of stay ≥7 days (p = 0.014) was identified as a significant cost-driving factor. Due to the significant difference (p < 0.001) between revenue and calculated costs, an analysis was made according to factors for potential reimbursement problems, which remained significant for a length of stay of ≥7 days (p = 0.014) and for treatment in the intensive care unit (p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

The inpatient treatment costs for patients with injuries and fractures due to epileptic seizures are high and therefore relevant from a health economic perspective. In general, reimbursement according to the G‑DRG appears to cover the actual costs, but there may be reimbursement problems for patients with a long period of hospitalization or a stay in an intensive care ward.

Socioeconomic associations of poorly controlled epilepsy in the Republic of Guinea: cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the socioeconomic factors associated with epilepsy in the Republic of Guinea.

METHODS

People living with epilepsy (PLWE) were prospectively recruited at Ignace Deen Hospital, Conakry, in 2018. An instrument exploring household assets as a measure of wealth was designed and administered. Multivariate logistic regression models with fixed effects were fitted to assess the associations of sociodemographic and microeconomic factors with self-reported frequency of seizures in the prior month and regular intake of antiseizure medications (ASMs). Participants were stratified by age group: children (<13 years), adolescents (13-21) and adults (>21).

RESULTS

A total of 285 participants (mean age 19.5 years; 129 females; 106 children, 72 adolescents, 107 adults, median household size 8) had an average of 4.2 seizures in the prior month. 64% were regularly taking ASMs. Direct costs of epilepsy were similar across income strata, averaging 60 USD/month in the lowest and 75 USD/month in the highest wealth quintiles (P = 0.42). The poorest PLWE were more likely to spend their money on traditional treatments (average 35USD/month) than on medical consultations (average 11 USD/month) (P = 0.01), whereas the wealthiest participants were not. Higher seizure frequency was associated with a lower household education level in adolescents and children (P = 0.028; P = 0.026) and with being male (P = 0.009) in children. Adolescents in higher-educated households were more likely to take ASMs (P = 0.004). Boys were more likely to regularly take ASMs than girls (P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted programming for children and adolescents in the households with the lowest education and for girls would help improve epilepsy care in Guinea.

General Trends in Prices and Prescription Patterns of Anticonvulsants in Germany between 2000 and 2017: Analysis of National and Cohort-Based Data

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to explore trends in price evolution and prescription volumes of anticonvulsants (AEDs, antiepileptic drugs) in Germany between 2000 and 2017.

METHOD

This study used data from annual reports on mean prescription frequency and prices of defined daily doses (DDD) of AEDs in Germany to analyze nationwide trends. Interrupted time series (ITS) analysis was employed to test for significant effects of several statutory healthcare reforms in Germany on AED price evolution. These data were compared to cohort-based prescription patterns of four German cohort studies from 2003, 2008, 2013, and 2016 that included a total of 1368 patients with focal and generalized epilepsies.

RESULTS

Analysis of national prescription data between 2000 and 2017 showed that mean prices per DDD of third-generation AEDs decreased by 65% and mean prices of second-generation AEDs decreased by 36%, whereas mean prices of first-generation AEDs increased by 133%. Simultaneously, mean prescription frequency of third- generation AEDs increased by 2494%, while there was a substantial decrease in the use of first- (- 55%) and second- (- 16%) generation AEDs. ITS analysis revealed that in particular the introduction of mandatory rebates on drugs in 2003 affected prices of frequently used newer AEDs. These findings are consistent with data from cohort studies of epilepsy patients showing a general decrease of prices for frequently used AEDs in monotherapy by 62% and in combination therapies by 68%. The analysis suggests that overall expenses for AEDs remained stable despite an increase in the prescription of "newer" and "non-enzyme-inducing" AEDs for epilepsy patients.

CONCLUSION

Between 2000 and 2017, a distinct decline in AED prices can be observed that seems predominately caused by a governmentally obtained price decline of third- and second-generation drugs. These observations seem to be the result of a German statutory cost containment policy applied across all health-care sectors. The increasing use of third-generation AEDs to the disadvantage of "old" and "enzyme-inducing" AEDs reflects the preferences of physicians and patients with epilepsy and follows national treatment guidelines.

Counseling and social work for people with epilepsy in Germany: A cross-sectional multicenter study on demand, frequent content, patient satisfaction, and burden-of-disease

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of epilepsy is accompanied by relevant personal, interpersonal, and professional restrictions for patients and their caregivers. Specialized epilepsy counseling services (ECS) have been introduced to inform, advise, and support patients with disease-related problems.

AIM AND SCOPE

The objective of this cross-sectional, multicenter study was to determine the demand, typical content, and outcomes of ECS in children, adolescents, and adults in two adjacent German regions of Hessen and Lower Franconia. All ECS sites in these regions participated in 2014 and 2015, offering a total population of 7.5 million inhabitants.

RESULTS

A total number of 435 patients [323 adults (74.3%), 51.7% female, mean age: 40.3 ± 14.7 years and 112 children/adolescents (25.7%), 52.7% female, mean age: 9.4 ± 4.6 years] were enrolled at six ECS sites. The most common reasons for counseling were general information needs (n = 304; 69.9%), administrative help (n = 208; 47.8%), problems with education or work (n = 176; 40.5%), and recreational activities (n = 119; 27.3%). In addition, 6.2% reported epilepsy-related questions on family planning as a specific reason for desiring counseling. Recommendation by the treating physicians was the most frequent reason for receiving counseling through ECS (62.5%), and most patients preferred to receive a personal consultation (73.1%). Patient satisfaction as measured by the ZUF-8 client satisfaction score was high with a mean of 29.7 points (standard deviation: ±2.7 points, median: 29.9 points), and 83.9% of patients said they would recommend ECS. Disease-related job loss or change in school was avoided in 72% of 82 patients. Suggestions for improvement of ECS included an extension of service hours (58.6%) and a better availability of more sites located nearby (32.8%).

CONCLUSION

Epilepsy counseling services are necessary, valued, and effective institutions for people with epilepsy complementing outpatient and inpatient care. To improve the care for people with epilepsy, access to and availability of ECS should be improved.

Incidence, Risk Factors and Consequences of Epilepsy-Related Injuries and Accidents: A Retrospective, Single Center Study

Introduction: This study was designed to evaluate risk factors and incidence of epilepsy-related injuries and accidents (ERIA) at an outpatient clinic of a German epilepsy center providing healthcare to a mixed urban and rural population of over one million inhabitants. Methods: Data acquisition was performed between 10/2013 and 09/2014 using a validated patient questionnaire on socioeconomic status, course of epilepsy, quality of life (QoL), depression, injuries and accidents associated with seizures or inadequate periictal patterns of behavior concerning a period of 3 months. Univariate analysis, multiple testing and regression analysis were performed to identify possible variables associated with ERIA. Results: A total of 292 patients (mean age 40.8 years, range 18-86; 55% female) were enrolled and analyzed. Focal epilepsy was diagnosed in 75% of the patients. The majority was on an antiepileptic drug (AEDs) polytherapy (mean number of AEDs: 1.65). Overall, 41 patients (14.0%) suffered from epilepsy-related injuries and accidents in a 3-month period. Besides lacerations (n = 18, 6.2%), abrasions and bruises (n = 9, 3.1%), fractures (n = 6, 2.2%) and burns (n = 3, 1.0%), 17 mild injuries (5.8%) were reported. In 20 (6.8% of the total cohort) cases, urgent medical treatment with hospitalization was necessary. Epilepsy-related injuries and accidents were related to active epilepsy, occurrence of generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) and drug-refractory course as well as reported ictal falls, ictal loss of consciousness and abnormal peri-ictal behavior in the medical history. In addition, patients with ERIA had significantly higher depression rates and lower QoL. Conclusion: ERIA and their consequences should be given more attention and standardized assessment for ERIA should be performed in every outpatient visit.

Trends in resource utilization and prescription of anticonvulsants for patients with active epilepsy in Germany from 2003 to 2013 - A ten-year overview

This study evaluated trends in resource use and prescription patterns in patients with active epilepsy over a 10-year period at the same outpatient clinic of a German epilepsy center. We analyzed a cross-sectional patient sample of consecutive adults with active epilepsy over a 3-month period in 2013 and compared them with equally acquired data from the years 2003 and 2008. Using validated patient questionnaires, data on socioeconomic status, course of epilepsy, as well as direct and indirect costs were recorded. A total of 198 patients (mean age: 39.6±15.0years, 49.5% male) were enrolled and compared with our previous assessments in 2003 (n=101) and 2008 (n=151). In the 2013 cohort, 75.8% of the patients had focal epilepsy, and the majority were taking antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (39.9% monotherapy, 59.1% polytherapy). We calculated epilepsy-specific costs of €3674 per three months per patient. Direct medical costs were mainly due to anticonvulsants (20.9% of total direct costs) and to hospitalization (20.8% of total direct costs). The proportion of enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants and 'old' AEDs decreased between 2003 and 2013. Indirect costs of €1795 in 2013 were mainly due to early retirement (55.0% of total indirect costs), unemployment (26.5%), and days off due to seizures (18.2%). In contrast to our previous findings from 2003 and 2008, our data show a stagnating cost increase with slightly reduced total costs and balanced direct and indirect costs in patients with active epilepsy. These findings are accompanied by an ongoing cost-neutral increase in the prescription of 'newer' and non-enzyme-inducing AEDs. However, the number and distribution of indirect cost components remained unchanged.

Observational multicentre study into the use of antiepileptic drugs in Spanish neurology consultations

INTRODUCTION

The study aims to quantify the types of antiepileptic drugs (AED) prescribed in neurology consultations.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This descriptive, observational study included a sample of 559 patients older than 14 years, diagnosed with epilepsy, and receiving pharmacological treatment. Data were collected at outpatient consultations by 47 Spanish neurologists in May 2016. Epilepsy was defined based on the International League Against Epilepsy classification. According to the year of marketing, AEDs were categorised as classic (before 1990) or new (after 1990). We performed a descriptive analysis of qualitative and quantitative variables.

RESULTS

Female patients accounted for 54.6% of the sample. Mean age was 42.7 years; mean age of onset was 22.4. Regarding epilepsy type, 75.7% of patients experienced partial seizures, 51.5% were symptomatic,32.4% had refractory epilepsy, 35.6% had been seizure-free for the previous year, and 59.2% had associated comorbidities.A total of 1103 AED prescriptions were made; 64.6% of prescriptions were for new AEDs; 85.4% of patients received new AEDs. Patients received a mean of 2 AEDs (range, 1-5). A total of 59.6% of patients received polytherapy.The most frequently prescribed AEDs were levetiracetam (42.6%), valproic acid (25.4%), lamotrigine (19.5%), carbamazepine (17.9%), and lacosamide (17.5%). No AED was employed exclusively as monotherapy. The most frequently prescribed AEDs for generalised and partial seizures were valproic acid (48.2%) and levetiracetam (43.2%), respectively. Valproic acid was less frequently prescribed to female patients. Patients with refractory epilepsy or with associated comorbidities were more frequently prescribed a combination of new and classic AEDs (48.7% and 45.6%, respectively) than only one type of AED.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients received new AEDs. The combination of classic and new AEDs was more frequently prescribed to patients with refractory epilepsy or with associated comorbidities.

The Burden of Severely Drug-Refractory Epilepsy: A Comparative Longitudinal Evaluation of Mortality, Morbidity, Resource Use, and Cost Using German Health Insurance Data

Purpose

To evaluate long-term outcome of three years and treatment patterns of patients suffering from severely drug-refractory epilepsy (SDRE).

Methods

This analysis was population-based and retrospective, with data collected from four million individuals insured by statutory German health insurance. ICD-10 codes for epilepsy (G40*) and intake of anticonvulsants were used to identify prevalent cases, which were then compared with a matched cohort drawn from the population at large. Insurance data were available from 2008 to 2013. Any patient who had been prescribed with at least four different antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in an 18-month period was defined as an SDRE case.

Results

A total of 769 patients with SDRE were identified. Of these, 19% were children and adolescents; the overall mean age was 42.3 years, 45.4% were female and 54.6% male. An average of 2.7 AEDs per patient was prescribed during the first follow-up year. The AEDs most commonly prescribed were: levetiracetam (53.5%), lamotrigine (41.4%), valproate (41.3%), lacosamide (20.4%), and topiramate (17.8%). During 3-year follow-up, there was an annual rate of hospitalization in the range 42.7 to 55%, which was significantly higher than the 11.6–12.8% (p < 0.001) for the matched controls. Admissions to hospital because of epilepsy ranged between 1.7 and 1.9 per year, with an average duration for each epilepsy-caused hospitalization of 10–11.1 days. The number of comorbidities for SDRE patients was significantly increased compared with the matched controls: depression (28% against 10%), vascular disorders (22% against 5%), and injury rates were also higher (head 16% against 3%, trunk and limbs 16% against 8%). The 3-year mortality rate for SDRE patients was 14% against 2.1% in the matched cohort.

Conclusion

SDRE patients are treated with AED polytherapy for all of the 3-year follow-up period. They are hospitalized more frequently than the general population and show increased morbidity levels and a sevenfold increase in mortality rate over 3 years. Further examination is required of ways in which new approaches to treatment could lead to better outcomes in severely affected patients.

Nationwide trends in medical expenditures among adults with epilepsy: 2003-2014

OBJECTIVE

Healthcare expenditure among adults with epilepsy is high. There is a paucity of published data on trends in the nationwide economic impact of epilepsy. This study examines trends in healthcare expenditures and components in U.S. adults with epilepsy between 2003 and 2014.

METHODS

We analyzed 12years of data representing a weighted sample of 1,942,413U.S. adults aged ≥18years with epilepsy using Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component (MEPS-HC), 2003-2014 data. We used a novel two-part model (adjusting for demographic, comorbidity, and time) to estimate the incremental healthcare expenditures by epilepsy status. Pre and post Affordable Care Act era costs were compared.

RESULTS

Overall unadjusted annual mean medical expenditures for patients with epilepsy was $15,324. Individuals with epilepsy had nearly three times higher overall unadjusted mean expenditure than those without epilepsy ($15,324, 95%CI: 2778-17,871 vs. $5824, 95%CI: 5722-5926). The unadjusted annual mean medical expenditure decreased over time from $17,994 (95% CI $10,754-$25,234) in 2003/2006 to $13,848 (95% CI: $11,371-$16,324) in 2011/2014; a trend driven primarily by a decrease in inpatient expenditures from $5613 to $4113. Having a diagnosis of epilepsy increased health expenditure by $8598 which was 2.5 to 6 times greater than the equivalent incremental health expenditures for other selected comorbidities. Healthcare expenditure among adults with epilepsy was $4083 lower in the post- Affordable Care Act.

CONCLUSION

Over the last decade, individuals with epilepsy incurred significantly higher medical expenditures than those without epilepsy, but overall healthcare expenditure decreased over time due to a decrease in inpatient expenditures.

Personalized translational epilepsy research - Novel approaches and future perspectives: Part I: Clinical and network analysis approaches

Despite the availability of more than 15 new "antiepileptic drugs", the proportion of patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy has remained constant at about 20-30%. Furthermore, no disease-modifying treatments shown to prevent the development of epilepsy following an initial precipitating brain injury or to reverse established epilepsy have been identified to date. This is likely in part due to the polyetiologic nature of epilepsy, which in turn requires personalized medicine approaches. Recent advances in imaging, pathology, genetics and epigenetics have led to new pathophysiological concepts and the identification of monogenic causes of epilepsy. In the context of these advances, the First International Symposium on Personalized Translational Epilepsy Research (1st ISymPTER) was held in Frankfurt on September 8, 2016, to discuss novel approaches and future perspectives for personalized translational research. These included new developments and ideas in a range of experimental and clinical areas such as deep phenotyping, quantitative brain imaging, EEG/MEG-based analysis of network dysfunction, tissue-based translational studies, innate immunity mechanisms, microRNA as treatment targets, functional characterization of genetic variants in human cell models and rodent organotypic slice cultures, personalized treatment approaches for monogenic epilepsies, blood-brain barrier dysfunction, therapeutic focal tissue modification, computational modeling for target and biomarker identification, and cost analysis in (monogenic) disease and its treatment. This report on the meeting proceedings is aimed at stimulating much needed investments of time and resources in personalized translational epilepsy research. Part I includes the clinical phenotyping and diagnostic methods, EEG network-analysis, biomarkers, and personalized treatment approaches. In Part II, experimental and translational approaches will be discussed (Bauer et al., 2017) [1].

Risk factors of early adverse drug reactions with phenytoin: A prospective inpatient cohort

INTRODUCTION

Phenytoin (PHT) is an effective and inexpensive antiepileptic drug (AED). However, its use has been limited for fear of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and is being replaced by newer AED, increasing the costs and causing major budget problems, particularly for developing countries.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine ADR frequency, explore, and establish related risk factors.

METHODS

Prospective data were collected from a cohort of inpatients using PHT for the first time. Pharmacovigilance was performed during hospitalization and after one month from the discharge. Clinical variables, plasma levels, and concomitant medications were collected and their association with the occurrence of different ADRs was explored.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were included: 59 were women, and mean age was 59±21years. Thirty-three patients presented ADR, all moderate and idiosyncratic. The most frequent were rash (17%), fever (10%), and elevated transaminases (10%). Female gender (85% vs 52%, p=0.029), younger age (mean age: 49 vs 62years, p=0.032), and higher PHT plasmatic levels after IV-PO load (mean plasmatic levels: 18.6 vs 13.9μg/mL, p=0.040) were found to be associated with rash. A higher number of concomitant medications were also found to be associated with the risk for developing any ADR. The multivariate analysis revealed an association between rash and younger age (cut-off: 35years old; relative risk (RR)=11.7; p=0.026), and higher PHT plasmatic levels (cut-off: 16μg/mL; RR=12.5; p=0.021); and increased risk of elevated transaminases with use of PHT inductors (RR=18; p=0.006). A longer hospital stay was found in patients who developed fever (mean: 43days, p<0.0001) and elevated transaminases (mean: 26days, p=0.041) compared with patients without ADR (mean: 17days).

CONCLUSIONS

Phenytoin is a widely used AED associated with easily detectable ADR through structured pharmacovigilance. The development of ADR is associated with longer hospital stays. Recognition of local risk factors may lead to ADR prevention in a near future. Larger studies are needed to better define PHT-related ADR risk profile and to individualize treatment regimens.

Effect of Epilepsy on Families, Communities, and Society

The effect of epilepsy extends beyond those with the diagnosis and impacts families, communities and society. Caregiver and sibling quality of life is often negatively affected by frequent seizures, comorbid behavioral and sleep disorders and stigma surrounding the diagnosis. Furthermore, the negative effects can be magnified by individual coping styles and resources available to families of those with epilepsy. Beyond the family and immediate caregivers, epilepsy affects local communities by drawing additional resources from education systems. The direct costs of caring for an individual with epilepsy and the indirect costs associated with decreased productivity place financial strain on individuals and health care systems throughout the world. This review details factors affecting family and caregiver quality of life and provides several approaches through which health care providers may address these concerns. Furthermore, we examine the financial effect of epilepsy on society and review emerging strategies to lessen health care use for individuals with epilepsy.

Trends in Antiepileptic Drug Use in Children and Adolescents With Epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

We describe the trends in antiepileptic drug (AED) use in children and adolescents with epilepsy in the United States.

METHODS

We undertook a cross-sectional study based on Medicaid Analytic eXtract data set from 26 US states. Children and adolescents aged three to 18 years with at least one year continuous Medicaid fee-for-service coverage after the second outpatient or the first inpatient diagnosis of epilepsy in each calendar year during 1999 to 2009 were included in the study; therefore, 11 cohorts were established. A patient was defined as being exposed to a specific AED if he or she had at least one-day supply of the AED during the 1-year follow-up period. The annual prevalence of AEDs was reported, stratified by gender and age. The trends in AED use were evaluated through linear regression.

RESULTS

The sample sizes of the 11 cohorts ranged between 17,304 and 22,672. The annual prevalence of valproic acid use declined from 42.4% in 1999 to 26.5% in 2009, and the prevalence of carbamazepine use declined from 37.1% to 10.2%. Meanwhile, the prevalence of levetiracetam use increased from 5.1% to about 32.0% in 2009, and the prevalence of oxcarbazepine use increased from 1.3% to 19.1%. Since 2008, levetiracetam (29.6%) has replaced valproic acid (27.8%) as the most commonly used AED in children and adolescents with epilepsy. The prevalence of diazepam use increased from 11.6% to 28.1%.

SIGNIFICANCE

Compared with first- and second-generation antiepileptic drugs, third-generation AEDs have fewer adverse side effects, resulting in increased patient treatment adherence. Equally important is the economic impact of these newer AEDs. This first-of-its-kind study underscores the need for large database studies that objectively assess the cost-effectiveness of third-generation AEDs versus first- and second-generation AEDs in the treatment of childhood epilepsy.

Drug-Level Monitoring on Admission for Presurgical Epilepsy Evaluation

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation for surgical treatment is offered to patients who do not respond to antiepileptic drugs. Pseudo-pharmacoresistance (PPR) has been described in the context of impaired compliance, incorrect diagnosis of epilepsy or pharmacological interference resulting in too low blood levels. We were interested to determine the frequency and causes of PPR in patients admitted for presurgical evaluation.

METHODS

We reviewed 553 drug levels in 199 patients and analyzed the relative frequency of drugs below reference range (10 and 20% below the range).

RESULTS

Patients who had at least one serum level below the 10% cut-off amounted to 33% and 9% of patients had at least one serum level below the 20% cut-off. Only in 2 patients (1%), this was due to poor compliance. Low levels were equally frequent in mono- or polytherapy. Drugs that were most frequently found out of range were phenytoin, valproate, and topiramate. In monotherapy, lamotrigine was often prescribed in too low dosages.

CONCLUSION

Low drug levels are frequently observed in surgical candidates due to pharmacological interference or insufficient dosing. Poor compliance or incorrect diagnosis does not appear to be a significant concern in this patient group. Our data strengthen the need for regular drug monitoring even in advanced chronic epilepsy to avoid unnecessary health costs by too low and ineffective dosages.

Neurologist adherence to clinical practice guidelines and costs in patients with newly diagnosed and chronic epilepsy in Germany

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate physician adherence to the German Neurological Society guidelines of 2008 regarding initial monotherapy and to determine the cost-of-illness in epilepsy.

METHODS

This was an observational cohort study using health data routinely collected at 55 outpatient neurology practices throughout Germany (NeuroTransData network). Data on socioeconomic status, course of epilepsy, anticonvulsive treatment, and direct and indirect costs were recorded using practice software-based questionnaires.

RESULTS

One thousand five hundred eighty-four patients with epilepsy (785 male (49.6%); mean age: 51.3±18.1years) were enrolled, of whom 507 were newly diagnosed. Initial monotherapy was started according to authorization status in 85.9%, with nonenzyme-inducing drugs in 94.3% of all AEDs. Drugs of first choice by guideline recommendations were used in 66.5%. Total annual direct costs in the first year amounted to €2194 (SD: €4273; range: €55-43,896) per patient, with hospitalization (59% of total direct costs) and anticonvulsants (30%) as the main cost factors. Annual total direct costs decreased by 29% to €1572 in the second year, mainly because of a 59% decrease in hospitalization costs. The use of first choice AEDs did not influence costs. Chronic epilepsy was present in 1077 patients, and total annual direct costs amounted to €1847 per patient, with anticonvulsants (51.0%) and hospitalization (41.0%) as the main cost factors. Potential cost-driving factors in these patients were active epilepsy and focal epilepsy syndrome.

CONCLUSION

This study shows excellent physician adherence to guidelines regarding initial monotherapy in adults with epilepsy. Newly diagnosed patients show higher total direct and hospital costs in the first year upon diagnosis, but these are not influenced by adherence to treatment guidelines.

[Impact of early benefit assessment on patients with epilepsy in Germany: Current healthcare provision and therapeutic needs]

Epilepsy is one of the most common chronic neurological diseases and represents a significant burden for patients, their families and society. In more than 75 % of patients anticonvulsant therapy consists of valproate, carbamazepine, lamotrigine or levetiracetam. There is a need for polytherapy in drug-refractory patients and they suffer from negative effects on quality of life and employment that is associated with high indirect costs. To allow a comprehensive treatment in this patient group, access to new anticonvulsants with novel modes of action is needed; however, all applications for new antiepileptic drugs failed to prove added benefits during the Pharmaceutical Market Restructuring Act (AMNOG) in Germany. One of the main reasons is the mandatory definition of a standard comparative therapy. It remains unclear whether there will be studies in the future which will fulfill the requirements of the current version of AMNOG. Observational studies after approval and marketing of new antiepileptic drugs could be better alternatives to prove added benefits for individual patients in the current German healthcare system.

Trends in Antiepileptic Drug Prescriptions for Childhood Epilepsy at a Tertiary Children's Hospital in Korea, 2001-2012

OBJECTIVES

Longitudinal prescription patterns of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have not been described to date in Korea. Here we aimed to describe AED prescribing trends over a 12-year period and assess age differences in AED prescribing patterns in a pediatric epilepsy population.

METHODS

We retrieved and analyzed all AED prescribing and dispensing data in 2001-2012 in patients aged 0-18 years with an established diagnosis of epilepsy at the largest tertiary children's hospital in Korea. AEDs included for analysis were classified as older (i.e., carbamazepine, ethosuximide, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and valproic acid) and newer (i.e., gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, topiramate, vigabatrin, zonisamide, lacosamide, and rufinamide) on the basis of market availability before versus after 1991.

RESULTS

A total of 5593 patients with epilepsy were prescribed an AED during the 12-year period. The proportion of newer AED prescriptions was 52.6 % in 2001 and continuously increased to 74.3 % in 2012. Oxcarbazepine was most widely used, followed by valproic acid. While carbamazepine and vigabatrin use progressively decreased over the 12-year period, those of lamotrigine and topiramate rapidly increased. Age differences in prescribing patterns were observed. Polytherapy was observed in 49.7 % of the total population, while 83.9 % of new users were prescribed monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

This study provided updated information on AED prescription trends for childhood epilepsy. We found a progressive increase in the use of newer AEDs. However, valproic acid, the only prevalent older AED, continued to be widely prescribed. A high rate of polytherapy among the prescriptions overall raises some safety concerns.

The economic impact of epilepsy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

In this review we aimed to determine the economic impact of epilepsy and factors associated with costs to individuals and health systems.

METHODS

A narrative systematic review of incidence and case series studies with prospective consecutive patient recruitment and economic outcomes published before July 2014 were retrieved from Medline, Embase and PsycInfo.

RESULTS

Of 322 studies reviewed, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria and 14 were from high income country settings. The total costs associated with epilepsy varied significantly in relation to the duration and severity of the condition, response to treatment, and health care setting. Where assessed, 'out of pocket' costs and productivity losses were found to create substantial burden on households which may be offset by health insurance. However, populations covered ostensibly for the upfront costs of care can still bear a significant economic burden.

CONCLUSIONS

Epilepsy poses a substantial economic burden for health systems and individuals and their families. There is uncertainty over the degree to which private health insurance or social health insurance coverage provides adequate protection from the costs of epilepsy. Future research is required to examine the role of different models of care and insurance programs in protecting against economic hardship for this condition, particularly in low and middle income settings.

Drug utilisation study in patients receiving antiepileptic drugs in Colombia

INTRODUCTION

This study examines the indications according to which antiepileptic drugs are prescribed and used in a population of patients enrolled in the Colombian national health system (SGSSS).

METHODS

Retrospective cross-sectional study. From the pool of individuals in 34 Colombian cities who used antiepileptic drugs between 18 July, 2013 and 31 August, 2014 during a period of no less than 12 months, we obtained a random sample stratified by city. Socio-demographic, pharmacological and comorbidity variables were analysed. Continuous and categorical variables were compared, and logistic regression models were used.

RESULTS

Our patient total was 373 patients, with 197 women (52.1%) and a mean age of 41.9 ± 21.7 years; 65.4% of the patients were treated with monotherapy. The most frequently used drugs were valproic acid (53.1%) and carbamazepine (33.2%). Epilepsy was the most frequent indication (n=178; 47.7%); however, 52.3% of the patients were prescribed antiepileptics for different indications, especially neuropathic pain (26.8%), affective disorders (14.2%) and migraine prophylaxis (12.3%). A total of 81 patients with epilepsy (46.6%) displayed good seizure control while another 25 (14.4%) had drug-resistant epilepsy. In the multivariate analysis, medication adherence was associated with a lower risk of treatment failure in patients with epilepsy (OR: 0.27; 95%CI, 0.11-0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

In Colombia, antiepileptic drugs are being used for indications other than those originally intended. Monotherapy is the most commonly used treatment approach, together with the use of classic antiepileptic drugs.

Costs of epilepsy and cost-driving factors in children, adolescents, and their caregivers in Germany

OBJECTIVE

To provide first data on the cost of epilepsy and cost-driving factors in children, adolescents, and their caregivers in Germany.

METHODS

A population-based, cross-sectional sample of consecutive children and adolescents with epilepsy was evaluated in the states of Hessen and Schleswig-Holstein (total of 8.796 million inhabitants) in all health care sectors in 2011. Data on socioeconomic status, course of epilepsy, and direct and indirect costs were recorded using patient questionnaires.

RESULTS

We collected data from 489 children and adolescents (mean age ± SD 10.4 ± 4.2 years, range 0.5-17.8 years; 264 [54.0%] male) who were treated by neuropediatricians (n = 253; 51.7%), at centers for social pediatrics ("Sozialpaediatrische Zentren," n = 110, 22.5%) and epilepsy centers (n = 126; 25.8%). Total direct costs summed up to €1,619 ± €4,375 per participant and 3-month period. Direct medical costs were due mainly to hospitalization (47.8%, €774 ± €3,595 per 3 months), anticonvulsants (13.2%, €213 ± €363), and ancillary treatment (9.1%, €147 ± €344). The total indirect costs amounted to €1,231 ± €2,830 in mothers and to €83 ± €593 in fathers; 17.4% (n = 85) of mothers and 0.6% (n = 3) of fathers reduced their working hours or quit work because of their child's epilepsy. Independent cost-driving factors were younger age, symptomatic cause, and polytherapy with anticonvulsants. Older age, active epilepsy, symptomatic cause, and polytherapy were independent predictors of higher antiepileptic drug (AED) costs, whereas younger age, longer epilepsy duration, symptomatic cause, disability, and parental depression were independent predictors for higher indirect costs.

SIGNIFICANCE

Treatment of children and adolescents with epilepsy is associated with high direct costs due to frequent inpatient admissions and high indirect costs due to productivity losses in mothers. Direct costs are age-dependent and higher in patients with symptomatic epilepsy and polytherapy. Indirect costs are higher in the presence of a child's disability and parental depression.

Regional variation in prevalence and healthcare utilization due to epilepsy in Sweden

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the regional differences in the prevalence of epilepsy and the associated costs due to inpatient and outpatient care and anti-epileptic drug (AED) utilization for the years 2005 and 2011 in Sweden.

METHODS

Region-specific estimates of the prevalence of epilepsy were obtained using a method based on a linkage of the healthcare and pharmaceutical registries and the cause of death registry. Regional cost components were estimated using registry data by region on inpatient and outpatient care utilization, AED sales, and mortality. Per-patient utilization and monetary costs were calculated.

RESULTS

Estimated prevalence of epilepsy varied substantially across the regions in 2011, from 0.76% in Jämtland to 1.08% in Gotland. The national prevalence was 0.88%. The average number of hospitalizations per patient and year decreased at the national level between 2005 and 2011. At the national level, the per-patient specialized care (outpatient) utilization also decreased between 2005 and 2011. However, at the regional level, the decrease was not uniform, and in some counties, the per-patient utilization increased during the period studied. The per-patient utilization of AEDs increased in all counties, except Kronoberg, between 2005 and 2011. Moreover, between-region differences in healthcare and AED utilization, and significant differences between regions and national averages were revealed. Similarly, regional per-patient costs were shown to deviate from the national average in 13 of 21 regions.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant variation in the prevalence of epilepsy and the provision of health care for patients with epilepsy across the different regions of Sweden.

Sociodemographic disparities in administration of antiepileptic drugs to adults with epilepsy in Germany: a retrospective, database study of drug prescriptions

BACKGROUND

Large epidemiological databases facilitate the study of medical care in different subgroups of the population and how such care compares with standard treatment guidelines. This study aimed for such analyses regarding utilization of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for epilepsy in Germany.

METHOD

The data source was the Disease Analyzer(®) database that is representative for the German population and assembles anonymous demographic and medical (diagnoses, prescriptions) data obtained from the practice computer system of general practitioners and specialists throughout Germany. A total of 43,712 adult patients with an epilepsy diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition [ICD10] code: G40.X) seen in 2010-2012 by 346 neurologists were retrospectively analysed according to sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidity, and AED treatment. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

As compared with women, men were less likely to receive lamotrigine (OR 0.68; 95 % CI 0.65-0.72; p < 0.001) and were treated preferably with carbamazepine (OR 1.29; 95 % CI 1.23-1.35; p < 0.001). As compared with patients covered by private health insurance (PHI), patients with statutory health insurance (SHI) were treated more often with valproate (OR 1.19; 95 % CI 1.07-1.31; p < 0.001) and showed a higher rate of obesity (SHI: 3.1 %; PHI: 1.6 %; p < 0.001), while PHI was associated with administration of levetiracetam (OR 1.27; 95 % CI 1.16-1.4; p < 0.001). Carbamazepine (OR 1.25; 95 % CI 1.17-1.31; p < 0.001) and primidone (OR 1.23; 95 % CI 1.08-1.38; p < 0.001) were administered to a larger extent in rural versus urban areas. Lamotrigine (OR 1.31; 95 % CI 1.23-1.39; p < 0.001) was used more often in West than in East Germany. Living in an urban community raised the likelihood of being treated with levetiracetam (OR 1.23; 95 % CI 1.17-1.28; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of common guidelines, AED treatment differed significantly among adults with epilepsy in Germany. Besides gender, type of health insurance and place of residence strongly influenced AED administration.

Evaluation of health-care utilization in patients with Dravet syndrome and on adjunctive treatment with stiripentol and clobazam

Dravet syndrome (DS) is a rare, severe childhood epilepsy syndrome that imposes a substantial burden on patients and their caregivers. This study evaluated health-care utilization over a 2-year period in patients with DS at an outpatient clinic of a German epilepsy center. Data on the course of epilepsy, anticonvulsant treatment, and direct costs were recorded using the electronic seizure diary Epivista and patients' files. We enrolled 13 patients with DS (6 females, mean age: 12.3±7.5 years) between 2007 and 2010 and evaluated them during a 1-year baseline. All patients had drug-resistant epilepsy and their seizures failed to improve with a mean number of 6.7±3.4 anticonvulsants. They had an overall mean seizure frequency of 102.1 seizures per year (median: 31, range: 3-538) with 43.2 GTCSs per year (median: 14, range: 0-228). We estimated the annual total direct costs at €6506±3974 (range: €1174-11,783) per patient with hospitalization (68.9% of total direct costs) as the major cost factor ahead of costs for anticonvulsants (24.0%). For the 1-year follow-up period, less severely affected patients were continued on conventional anticonvulsants (n=4) or switched to adjunctive treatment with stiripentol and clobazam (n=9). In the latter group, six patients (67%) were long-term responders, with between 25% and 100% seizure reduction with respect to either GTCSs or the overall seizure frequency. This reduction in seizure frequency was associated with a shift in the distribution of cost components towards higher medication costs and decreased hospitalization costs. The total direct costs increased by 42.7%, mainly due to the newly introduced stiripentol, with an annual cost of €6610. This study showed that direct costs of patients with DS were above the average European costs of drug-resistant epilepsy in children. Treatment with new anticonvulsants resulted in reduction of seizures and inpatient admissions.

Healthcare utilization and costs in children with stable and uncontrolled epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Epilepsy adversely affects childhood development, possibly leading to increased economic burden in pediatric populations. We compared annual healthcare utilization and costs between children (<12 years old) with stable and uncontrolled epilepsy treated with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).

METHODS

Children (<12 years old) with epilepsy (ICD-9-CM 345.xx or 780.39) in 2008 were identified in the MarketScan claims database from 2007 to 2009. Patients with "stable" epilepsy used the same AED for ≥12 months, and patients with "uncontrolled" epilepsy were prescribed additional AED(s) during that period. For patients with uncontrolled epilepsy, the study index date was the start of additional AED(s); for patients with stable epilepsy, the study index date was a random AED fill date. Epilepsy-related utilization included medical services with 345.xx or 780.39 in any diagnosis field and AED fills. Epilepsy-related costs included AEDs, medical claims with epilepsy in any diagnosis field, and certain tests. We adjusted for baseline cohort differences (demographics, region, usual-care physician specialty, and comorbidities) using logistic regression and analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

Two thousand one hundred seventy patients were identified (mean: 7.5 years; 45.3% were female; Charlson comorbidity index: 0.3; 422 (19.4%) patients with uncontrolled epilepsy). Patients with uncontrolled epilepsy faced more hospitalizations (30.1% vs. 12.0%) and greater overall ($30,343 vs. $18,206) and epilepsy-related costs ($16,894 vs. $7979) (all p<.001). Adjusting for baseline measures, patients with uncontrolled epilepsy had greater odds of hospitalization (OR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.9-3.3) and costs (overall: $3908, p=.087; epilepsy-related: $5744, p<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with uncontrolled epilepsy use significantly more healthcare resources and have a greater economic burden than children with stable epilepsy. However, epilepsy accounted for only half of overall costs, indicating that comorbid conditions may add substantially to the disease burden.

Which drug-induced side effects would be tolerated in the prospect of seizure control?

There is ample evidence that side effects of antiepileptic pharmacotherapy negatively affect quality of life, adherence, and long-term retention. The study was set up to evaluate the anticipated tolerance of common side effects provided that a 50% or 100% reduction of seizure frequency would be achieved. An anonymous inquiry in 79 consecutive patients with epilepsy comprised questions regarding the severity of epilepsy/seizures and the perceived impact of seizures and drug treatment on daily functioning and a 10-tiered rating which assesses 11 common behavioral/psychiatric, cognitive, physiological, or physical side effects according to the degree to which they would be tolerated. Least acceptance was evident for psychiatric side effects followed by cognitive, physiological, and physical side effects. Weight gain and tiredness were the most tolerated side effects. The overall low acceptance of negative side effects was slightly higher in the case of a 100% vs. 50% seizure frequency reduction (28% vs. 21% of the maximum toleration score regarding all side effects). Surely, there is a trade-off between the severity of epilepsy, seizure control, and the acceptance of adverse treatment effects. However, the data disclose that psychiatric and cognitive side effects are least accepted. Thus, consideration of individual tolerance and monitoring of side effects in addition to seizures may increase adherence and therapy success.

Counseling and social work for persons with epilepsy: observational study on demand and issues in Hessen, Germany

The goal of the social management of epilepsy is to decrease the physical, psychological, and social consequences for persons with epilepsy (PWEs). The objective of this observational study was to determine the needs and issues of PWEs in the utilization of epilepsy counseling services between 2008 and 2012 in the German state of Hessen. Sociodemographic data, employment status, counseling issues, and characteristics were collected at first and follow-up visits. An average of 492 (272 males, 55.3%) PWEs presented at counseling services per year. These were mainly children or adolescents below the age of 20years (22.4%) and PWEs in working age between 20 and 65years (73.6%). The majority of PWEs seeking counseling were employed (44.4%, annual average: 219 PWEs, SD: 39). However, a substantial part (114/219, 52.1%) of these employed PWEs reported problems or difficulties at their workplace associated with the diagnosis of epilepsy. We could identify four major issues addressed by the PWEs as 1) diagnosis of epilepsy, 2) employment, 3) family-related matters, and 4) social or medical aids linked with public authorities. This study demonstrated the continuous demand for epilepsy counseling with at least one out of twenty (5.8%) PWEs in need of counseling per year. Further studies are warranted to answer questions on outcome and long-term course. Epilepsy counseling should be available to all PWEs on a national level and may be helpful in preventing long-term unemployment and early retirement while maintaining quality of care for PWEs.

Inpatient treatment costs of status epilepticus in adults in Germany

PURPOSE

Status epilepticus (SE) is an important neurological emergency and a significant source of direct costs related to hospitalization; however, no cost-of-illness (COI) studies have been performed in Europe. The objective of this study was to determine and characterize hospital costs related to the acute inpatient treatment of SE and to provide national estimates of SE hospitalization costs.

METHODS

Adult inpatient treatment costs related to SE and costs attributable to epilepsy-related hospital admissions were derived from billing data of participating hospitals.

RESULTS

During the 4-month study period a total of 96 patients (59.5 ± 21.6 years; 52 male) received inpatient treatment for epilepsy-related reasons, 10 of these (10.4%) were treated for SE. Epilepsy was newly diagnosed in 30/96 patients (31.3%), of whom five presented with SE. The admission costs related to SE (€8347 ± 10,773 per patient per admission) were significantly higher than those related to admissions of patients with newly diagnosed (€1998 ± 1089; p = 0.014) or established epilepsy (€3475 ± 4413; p = 0.026). Of the total inpatient costs (€346,319) 24.4% were attributable to SE, 14.4% to newly diagnosed epilepsy without SE (n = 25) and 61.2% to complications of established epilepsy (n = 61). Extrapolation to the whole of Germany (population 82 million) indicates that SE causes hospital costs of more than €83 million per year while the total of epilepsy-related inpatient treatment costs amounts to €342 million.

CONCLUSION

Acute treatment of SE is responsible for a high proportion of hospital costs associated with epilepsy. With a high incidence of SE in the elderly population, the health care systems will face an increasing number of presentations with SE and its associated costs, underlining the necessity to further evaluate the burden and optimize the treatment of SE.