ZIP kinase phosphorylated and activated by Rho kinase/ROCK contributes to cytokinesis in mammalian cultured cells

Leucine zipper protein 1 (LUZP1) regulates the constriction velocity of the contractile ring during cytokinesis

There has been a great deal of research on cell division and its mechanisms; however, its processes still have many unknowns. To find novel proteins that regulate cell division, we performed the screening using siRNAs and/or the expression plasmid of the target genes and identified leucine zipper protein 1 (LUZP1). Recent studies have shown that LUZP1 interacts with various proteins and stabilizes the actin cytoskeleton; however, the function of LUZP1 in mitosis is not known. In this study, we found that LUZP1 colocalized with the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) at the centromere in metaphase and at the central spindle in anaphase and that these LUZP1 localizations were regulated by CPC activity and kinesin family member 20A (KIF20A). Mass spectrometry analysis identified that LUZP1 interacted with death-associated protein kinase 3 (DAPK3), one regulator of the cleavage furrow ingression in cytokinesis. In addition, we found that LUZP1 also interacted with myosin light chain 9 (MYL9), a substrate of DAPK3, and comprehensively inhibited MYL9 phosphorylation by DAPK3. In line with a known role for MYL9 in the actin-myosin contraction, LUZP1 suppression accelerated the constriction velocity at the division plane in our time-lapse analysis. Our study indicates that LUZP1 is a novel regulator for cytokinesis that regulates the constriction velocity of the contractile ring.

Canonical and noncanonical Wnt signaling: Multilayered mediators, signaling mechanisms and major signaling crosstalk

Wnt signaling plays a major role in regulating cell proliferation and differentiation. The Wnt ligands are a family of 19 secreted glycoproteins that mediate their signaling effects via binding to Frizzled receptors and LRP5/6 coreceptors and transducing the signal either through β-catenin in the canonical pathway or through a series of other proteins in the noncanonical pathway. Many of the individual components of both canonical and noncanonical Wnt signaling have additional functions throughout the body, establishing the complex interplay between Wnt signaling and other signaling pathways. This crosstalk between Wnt signaling and other pathways gives Wnt signaling a vital role in many cellular and organ processes. Dysregulation of this system has been implicated in many diseases affecting a wide array of organ systems, including cancer and embryological defects, and can even cause embryonic lethality. The complexity of this system and its interacting proteins have made Wnt signaling a target for many therapeutic treatments. However, both stimulatory and inhibitory treatments come with potential risks that need to be addressed. This review synthesized much of the current knowledge on the Wnt signaling pathway, beginning with the history of Wnt signaling. It thoroughly described the different variants of Wnt signaling, including canonical, noncanonical Wnt/PCP, and the noncanonical Wnt/Ca2+ pathway. Further description involved each of its components and their involvement in other cellular processes. Finally, this review explained the various other pathways and processes that crosstalk with Wnt signaling.

Inhibition of Rho kinase (ROCK) impairs cytoskeletal contractility in human Müller glial cells without effects on cell viability, migration, and extracellular matrix production

The epiretinal membrane is a fibrocontractile tissue that forms on the inner surface of the retina, causing visual impairment ranging from mild to severe, and even retinal detachment. Müller glial cells actively participate in the formation of this membrane. Current research is constantly seeking for new therapeutic approaches that aim to prevent or treat cellular dysfunctions involved in the progression of this common fibrosis condition. The Rho GTPases signaling pathway regulates several processes associated with the epiretinal membrane, such as cell proliferation, migration, and contraction. Rho kinase (ROCK), an effector of the RhoA GTPase, is an interesting potential therapeutic target. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a ROCK inhibitor (Y27632) on human Müller cells viability, growth, cytoskeletal organization, expression of extracellular matrix components, myofibroblast differentiation, migration, and contractility. Müller cells of the MIO-M1 lineage were cultured and treated for different periods with the inhibitor. Viability was evaluated by MTT assay and trypan blue exclusion method, and growth was evaluated by growth curve and BrdU incorporation assay. The actin cytoskeleton was stained with fluorescent phalloidin, intermediate filaments and microtubules were analyzed with immunofluorescence for vimentin and α-tubulin. Gene and protein expression of collagens I and V, laminin and fibronectin were evaluated by rt-PCR and immunofluorescence. Chemotactic and spontaneous cell migration were studied by transwell assay and time-lapse observation of live cells, respectively. Cell contractility was assessed by collagen gel contraction assay. The results showed that ROCK inhibition by Y27632 did not affect cell viability, but decreased cell growth and proliferation after 72 h. There was a change in cell morphology and organization of F-actin, with a reduction in the cell body, disappearance of stress fibers and formation of long, branched cell extensions. Microtubules and vimentin filaments were also affected, possibly because of F-actin alterations. The inhibitor also reduced gene expression and immunoreactivity of smooth muscle α-actin, a marker of myofibroblasts. The expression of extracellular matrix components was not affected by the inhibitor. Chemotactic cell migration showed no significant changes, while cell contractility was substantially reduced. No spontaneous migration of MIO-M1 cells was observed. In conclusion, pharmacological inhibition of ROCK in Müller cells could be a potentially promising approach to treat epiretinal membranes by preventing cell proliferation, contractility and transdifferentiation, without affecting cell viability.

Nonmuscle Myosin II Regulation Directs Its Multiple Roles in Cell Migration and Division

Nonmuscle myosin II (NMII) is a multimeric protein complex that generates most mechanical force in eukaryotic cells. NMII function is controlled at three main levels. The first level includes events that trigger conformational changes that extend the complex to enable its assembly into filaments. The second level controls the ATPase activity of the complex and its binding to microfilaments in extended NMII filaments. The third level includes events that modulate the stability and contractility of the filaments. They all work in concert to finely control force generation inside cells. NMII is a common endpoint of mechanochemical signaling pathways that control cellular responses to physical and chemical extracellular cues. Specific phosphorylations modulate NMII activation in a context-dependent manner. A few kinases control these phosphorylations in a spatially, temporally, and lineage-restricted fashion, enabling functional adaptability to the cellular microenvironment. Here, we review mechanisms that control NMII activity in the context of cell migration and division. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, Volume 37 is October 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

The Crossroads between RAS and RHO Signaling Pathways in Cellular Transformation, Motility and Contraction

Ras and Rho proteins are GTP-regulated molecular switches that control multiple signaling pathways in eukaryotic cells. Ras was among the first identified oncogenes, and it appears mutated in many forms of human cancer. It mainly promotes proliferation and survival through the MAPK pathway and the PI3K/AKT pathways, respectively. However, the myriad proteins close to the plasma membrane that activate or inhibit Ras make it a major regulator of many apparently unrelated pathways. On the other hand, Rho is weakly oncogenic by itself, but it critically regulates microfilament dynamics; that is, actin polymerization, disassembly and contraction. Polymerization is driven mainly by the Arp2/3 complex and formins, whereas contraction depends on myosin mini-filament assembly and activity. These two pathways intersect at numerous points: from Ras-dependent triggering of Rho activators, some of which act through PI3K, to mechanical feedback driven by actomyosin action. Here, we describe the main points of connection between the Ras and Rho pathways as they coordinately drive oncogenic transformation. We emphasize the biochemical crosstalk that drives actomyosin contraction driven by Ras in a Rho-dependent manner. We also describe possible routes of mechanical feedback through which myosin II activation may control Ras/Rho activation.

Impairment of cytokinesis by cancer-associated DAPK3 mutations

Death-associated protein kinase 3 (DAPK3), a member of the DAPK family, contributes to cytokinesis by phosphorylating myosin II regulatory light chain (MRLC). Missense mutations in DAPK3, T112M, D161N, and P216S, were observed in the lung, colon, and cervical cancers, respectively, but the effects of these mutations on cytokinesis remain unclear. Here, we show that cells expressing EGFP-DAPK3-T112M, -D161N, or -P216S exhibited reduced rates of cytokinesis, with an increased ratio of multinucleated cells. In addition, these cells exhibited reduced levels of phosphorylated MRLC at the contractile ring. Collectively, our data demonstrates that cancer-associated DAPK3 mutations impair cytokinesis by reducing phosphorylated MRLC.

Rho-associated kinase and zipper-interacting protein kinase, but not myosin light chain kinase, are involved in the regulation of myosin phosphorylation in serum-stimulated human arterial smooth muscle cells

Myosin regulatory light chain (LC₂₀) phosphorylation plays an important role in vascular smooth muscle contraction and cell migration. Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) phosphorylates LC₂₀ (its only known substrate) exclusively at S19. Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) and zipper-interacting protein kinase (ZIPK) have been implicated in the regulation of LC₂₀ phosphorylation via direct phosphorylation of LC₂₀ at T18 and S19 and indirectly via phosphorylation of MYPT1 (the myosin targeting subunit of myosin light chain phosphatase, MLCP) and Par-4 (prostate-apoptosis response-4). Phosphorylation of MYPT1 at T696 and T853 inhibits MLCP activity whereas phosphorylation of Par-4 at T163 disrupts its interaction with MYPT1, exposing the sites of phosphorylation in MYPT1 and leading to MLCP inhibition. To evaluate the roles of MLCK, ROCK and ZIPK in these phosphorylation events, we investigated the time courses of phosphorylation of LC₂₀, MYPT1 and Par-4 in serum-stimulated human vascular smooth muscle cells (from coronary and umbilical arteries), and examined the effects of siRNA-mediated MLCK, ROCK and ZIPK knockdown and pharmacological inhibition on these phosphorylation events. Serum stimulation induced rapid phosphorylation of LC₂₀ at T18 and S19, MYPT1 at T696 and T853, and Par-4 at T163, peaking within 30–120 s. MLCK knockdown or inhibition, or Ca²⁺ chelation with EGTA, had no effect on serum-induced LC₂₀ phosphorylation. ROCK knockdown decreased the levels of phosphorylation of LC₂₀ at T18 and S19, of MYPT1 at T696 and T853, and of Par-4 at T163, whereas ZIPK knockdown decreased LC₂₀ diphosphorylation, but increased phosphorylation of MYPT1 at T696 and T853 and of Par-4 at T163. ROCK inhibition with GSK429286A reduced serum-induced phosphorylation of LC₂₀ at T18 and S19, MYPT1 at T853 and Par-4 at T163, while ZIPK inhibition by HS38 reduced only LC₂₀ diphosphorylation. We also demonstrated that serum stimulation induced phosphorylation (activation) of ZIPK, which was inhibited by ROCK and ZIPK down-regulation and inhibition. Finally, basal phosphorylation of LC₂₀ in the absence of serum stimulation was unaffected by MLCK, ROCK or ZIPK knockdown or inhibition. We conclude that: (i) serum stimulation of cultured human arterial smooth muscle cells results in rapid phosphorylation of LC₂₀, MYPT1, Par-4 and ZIPK, in contrast to the slower phosphorylation of kinases and other proteins involved in other signaling pathways (Akt, ERK1/2, p38 MAPK and HSP27), (ii) ROCK and ZIPK, but not MLCK, are involved in serum-induced phosphorylation of LC₂₀, (iii) ROCK, but not ZIPK, directly phosphorylates MYPT1 at T853 and Par-4 at T163 in response to serum stimulation, (iv) ZIPK phosphorylation is enhanced by serum stimulation and involves phosphorylation by ROCK and autophosphorylation, and (v) basal phosphorylation of LC₂₀ under serum-free conditions is not attributable to MLCK, ROCK or ZIPK.