Up-regulation of A 2B adenosine receptor in A 2A adenosine receptor knockout mouse coronary artery

Transient Adenosine Modulates Serotonin Release Indirectly in the Dorsal Raphe Nuclei

Rapid adenosine transiently regulates dopamine and glutamate via A1 receptors, but other neurotransmitters, such as serotonin, have not been studied. In this study, we examined the rapid modulatory effect of adenosine on serotonin release in the dorsal raphe nuclei (DRN) of mouse brain slices by using fast-scan cyclic voltammetry. To mimic adenosine release during damage, a rapid microinjection of adenosine at 50 pmol was applied before electrical stimulation of serotonin release. Transient adenosine significantly reduced electrically evoked serotonin release in the first 20 s after application, but serotonin release recovered to baseline as adenosine was cleared from the slice. The continuous perfusion of adenosine did not change the evoked serotonin release. Surprisingly, the modulatory effects of adenosine were not regulated by A1 receptors as adenosine still inhibited serotonin release in A1KO mice and also after perfusion of an A1 antagonist (8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropyl xanthine). The inhibition was also not regulated by A3 receptors as perfusion of the A3 antagonist (MRS 1220) in A1KO brain slices did not eliminate the inhibitory effects of transient adenosine. In addition, adenosine also inhibited serotonin release in A2AKO mice, showing that A2A did not modulate serotonin. However, perfusion of a selective 5HT1A autoreceptor antagonist drug [(S)-WAY 100135 dihydrochloride] abolished the inhibitory effect of transient adenosine on serotonin release. Thus, the transient neuromodulatory effect of adenosine on DRN serotonin release is regulated by serotonin autoreceptors and not by adenosine receptors. Rapid, transient adenosine modulation of neurotransmitters such as serotonin may have important implications for diseases such as depression and brain injury.

Congenital Coronary Blood Vessel Anomalies: Animal Models and the Integration of Developmental Mechanisms

Coronary blood vessels are in charge of sustaining cardiac homeostasis. It is thus logical that coronary congenital anomalies (CCA) directly or indirectly associate with multiple cardiac conditions, including sudden death. The coronary vascular system is a sophisticated, highly patterned anatomical entity, and therefore a wide range of congenital malformations of the coronary vasculature have been described. Despite the clinical interest of CCA, very few attempts have been made to relate specific embryonic developmental mechanisms to the congenital anomalies of these blood vessels. This is so because developmental data on the morphogenesis of the coronary vascular system derive from complex studies carried out in animals (mostly transgenic mice), and are not often accessible to the clinician, who, in turn, possesses essential information on the significance of CCA. During the last decade, advances in our understanding of normal embryonic development of coronary blood vessels have provided insight into the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying coronary arteries anomalies. These findings are the base for our attempt to offer plausible embryological explanations to a variety of CCA as based on the analysis of multiple animal models for the study of cardiac embryogenesis, and present them in an organized manner, offering to the reader developmental mechanistic explanations for the pathogenesis of these anomalies.

The Importance of Integrated Regulation Mechanism of Coronary Microvascular Function for Maintaining the Stability of Coronary Microcirculation: An Easily Overlooked Perspective

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) refers to a group of disorders affecting the structure and function of coronary microcirculation and is associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. At present, great progress has been made in the diagnosis of CMD, but there is no specific treatment for it because of the complexity of CMD pathogenesis. Vascular dysfunction is one of the important causes of CMD, but previous reviews mostly considered microvascular dysfunction as a whole abnormality so the obtained conclusions are skewed. The coronary microvascular function is co-regulated by multiple mechanisms, and the mechanisms by which microvessels of different luminal diameters are regulated vary. The main purpose of this review is to revisit the mechanisms by which coronary microvessels at different diameters regulate coronary microcirculation through integrated sequential activation and briefly discuss the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment progress of CMD from this perspective.

Crosstalk between adenosine receptors and CYP450-derived oxylipins in the modulation of cardiovascular, including coronary reactive hyperemic response

Adenosine is a ubiquitous endogenous nucleoside or autacoid that affects the cardiovascular system through the activation of four G-protein coupled receptors: adenosine A₁ receptor (A₁AR), adenosine A_2A receptor (A_2AAR), adenosine A_2B receptor (A_2BAR), and adenosine A₃ receptor (A₃AR). With the rapid generation of this nucleoside from cellular metabolism and the widespread distribution of its four G-protein coupled receptors in almost all organs and tissues of the body, this autacoid induces multiple physiological as well as pathological effects, not only regulating the cardiovascular system but also the central nervous system, peripheral vascular system, and immune system. Mounting evidence shows the role of CYP450-enzymes in cardiovascular physiology and pathology, and the genetic polymorphisms in CYP450s can increase susceptibility to cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). One of the most important physiological roles of CYP450-epoxygenases (CYP450-2C & CYP2J2) is the metabolism of arachidonic acid (AA) and linoleic acid (LA) into epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) and epoxyoctadecaenoic acid (EpOMEs) which generally involve in vasodilation. Like an increase in coronary reactive hyperemia (CRH), an increase in anti-inflammation, and cardioprotective effects. Moreover, the genetic polymorphisms in CYP450-epoxygenases will change the beneficial cardiovascular effects of metabolites or oxylipins into detrimental effects. The soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) is another crucial enzyme ubiquitously expressed in all living organisms and almost all organs and tissues. However, in contrast to CYP450-epoxygenases, sEH converts EETs into dihydroxyeicosatrienoic acid (DHETs), EpOMEs into dihydroxyoctadecaenoic acid (DiHOMEs), and others and reverses the beneficial effects of epoxy-fatty acids leading to vasoconstriction, reducing CRH, increase in pro-inflammation, increase in pro-thrombotic and become less cardioprotective. Therefore, polymorphisms in the sEH gene (Ephx2) cause the enzyme to become overactive, making it more vulnerable to CVDs, including hypertension. Besides the sEH, ω-hydroxylases (CYP450-4A11 & CYP450-4F2) derived metabolites from AA, ω terminal-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids (19-, 20-HETE), lipoxygenase-derived mid-chain hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids (5-, 11-, 12-, 15-HETEs), and the cyclooxygenase-derived prostanoids (prostaglandins: PGD₂, PGF_2α; thromboxane: Txs, oxylipins) are involved in vasoconstriction, hypertension, reduction in CRH, pro-inflammation and cardiac toxicity. Interestingly, the interactions of adenosine receptors (A_2AAR, A₁AR) with CYP450-epoxygenases, ω-hydroxylases, sEH, and their derived metabolites or oxygenated polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs or oxylipins) is shown in the regulation of the cardiovascular functions. In addition, much evidence demonstrates polymorphisms in CYP450-epoxygenases, ω-hydroxylases, and sEH genes (Ephx2) and adenosine receptor genes (ADORA1 & ADORA2) in the human population with the susceptibility to CVDs, including hypertension. CVDs are the number one cause of death globally, coronary artery disease (CAD) was the leading cause of death in the US in 2019, and hypertension is one of the most potent causes of CVDs. This review summarizes the articles related to the crosstalk between adenosine receptors and CYP450-derived oxylipins in vascular, including the CRH response in regular salt-diet fed and high salt-diet fed mice with the correlation of heart perfusate/plasma oxylipins. By using A_2AAR^-/-, A₁AR^-/-, eNOS^-/-, sEH^-/- or Ephx2^-/-, vascular sEH-overexpressed (Tie2-sEH Tr), vascular CYP2J2-overexpressed (Tie2-CYP2J2 Tr), and wild-type (WT) mice. This review article also summarizes the role of pro-and anti-inflammatory oxylipins in cardiovascular function/dysfunction in mice and humans. Therefore, more studies are needed better to understand the crosstalk between the adenosine receptors and eicosanoids to develop diagnostic and therapeutic tools by using plasma oxylipins profiles in CVDs, including hypertensive cases in the future.

Spontaneous Adenosine and Dopamine Cotransmission in the Caudate-Putamen Is Regulated by Adenosine Receptors

Transient changes in adenosine and dopamine have been measured in vivo, but no studies have examined if these transient changes occur simultaneously. In this study, we characterized spontaneous adenosine and dopamine transients in anesthetized mice, examining coincident release in the caudate-putamen for the first time. We found that in C57B mice, most of the dopamine transients (77%) were coincident with adenosine, but fewer adenosine transients (12%) were coincident with a dopamine transient. On average, the dopamine transient started 200 ms before its coincident adenosine transient, so they occurred concurrently. There was a positive correlation (r = 0.7292) of adenosine and dopamine concentrations during coincident release. ATP is quickly broken down to adenosine in the extracellular space, and the coincident events may be due to corelease, where dopaminergic vesicles are packaged with ATP, or cotransmission, where ATP is packaged in different vesicles released simultaneously with dopamine. The high frequency of adenosine transients compared to that of dopamine transients suggests that adenosine is also released from nondopaminergic vesicles. We investigated how A₁ and A_2A adenosine receptors regulate adenosine and dopamine transients using A₁ and A_2AKO mice. In A₁KO mice, the frequency of adenosine and dopamine transients increased, while in A_2AKO mice, the frequency of adenosine alone increased. Adenosine receptors modulate coincident transients and could be drug targets to modulate both dopamine and adenosine release. Many spontaneous dopamine transients have coincident adenosine release, and regulating adenosine and dopamine cotransmission could be important for designing treatments for dopamine diseases, such as Parkinson's or addiction.

Hypoxia Inducible Factors as Central Players in the Pathogenesis and Pathophysiology of Cardiovascular Diseases

Cardiovascular (CV) diseases are the major cause of death in industrialized countries. The main function of the CV system is to deliver nutrients and oxygen to all tissues. During most CV pathologies, oxygen and nutrient delivery is decreased or completely halted. Several mechanisms, including increased oxygen transport and delivery, as well as increased blood flow are triggered to compensate for the hypoxic state. If the compensatory mechanisms fail to sufficiently correct the hypoxia, irreversible damage can occur. Thus, hypoxia plays a central role in the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of CV diseases. Hypoxia inducible factors (HIFs) orchestrate the gene transcription for hundreds of proteins involved in erythropoiesis, glucose transport, angiogenesis, glycolytic metabolism, reactive oxygen species (ROS) handling, cell proliferation and survival, among others. The overall regulation of the expression of HIF-dependent genes depends on the severity, duration, and location of hypoxia. In the present review, common CV diseases were selected to illustrate that HIFs, and proteins derived directly or indirectly from their stabilization and activation, are related to the development and perpetuation of hypoxia in these pathologies. We further classify CV diseases into acute and chronic hypoxic states to better understand the temporal relevance of HIFs in the pathogenesis, disease progression and clinical outcomes of these diseases. We conclude that HIFs and their derived factors are fundamental in the genesis and progression of CV diseases. Understanding these mechanisms will lead to more effective treatment strategies leading to reduced morbidity and mortality.

Adenosine and adenosine receptor-mediated action in coronary microcirculation

Adenosine is an ubiquitous extracellular signaling molecule and plays a fundamental role in the regulation of coronary microcirculation through activation of adenosine receptors (ARs). Adenosine is regulated by various enzymes and nucleoside transporters for its balance between intra- and extracellular compartments. Adenosine-mediated coronary microvascular tone and reactive hyperemia are through receptors mainly involving A_2AR activation on both endothelial and smooth muscle cells, but also involving interaction among other ARs. Activation of ARs further stimulates downstream targets of H₂O₂, K_ATP, K_V and K_Ca2+ channels leading to coronary vasodilation. An altered adenosine-ARs signaling in coronary microcirculation has been observed in several cardiovascular diseases including hypertension, diabetes, atherosclerosis and ischemic heart disease. Adenosine as a metabolite and its receptors have been studied for its both therapeutic and diagnostic abilities. The present review summarizes important aspects of adenosine metabolism and AR-mediated actions in the coronary microcirculation.

Role of Cardiac A2A Receptors Under Normal and Pathophysiological Conditions

This review presents an overview of cardiac A2A-adenosine receptors The localization of A2A-AR in the various cell types that encompass the heart and the role they play in force regulation in various mammalian species are depicted. The putative signal transduction systems of A2A-AR in cells in the living heart, as well as the known interactions of A2A-AR with membrane-bound receptors, will be addressed. The possible role that the receptors play in some relevant cardiac pathologies, such as persistent or transient ischemia, hypoxia, sepsis, hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy, and arrhythmias, will be reviewed. Moreover, the cardiac utility of A2A-AR as therapeutic targets for agonistic and antagonistic drugs will be discussed. Gaps in our knowledge about the cardiac function of A2A-AR and future research needs will be identified and formulated.

A1 and A2A Receptors Modulate Spontaneous Adenosine but Not Mechanically Stimulated Adenosine in the Caudate

Adenosine is a neuromodulator, and rapid increases in adenosine in the brain occur spontaneously or after mechanical stimulation. However, the regulation of rapid adenosine by adenosine receptors is unclear, and understanding it would allow better manipulation of neuromodulation. The two main adenosine receptors in the brain are A₁ receptors, which are inhibitory, and A_2A receptors, which are excitatory. Here, we investigated the regulation of spontaneous adenosine and mechanically stimulated adenosine by adenosine receptors, using global A₁ or A_2A knockout mice. Results were compared in vivo and in brain slices' models. A₁ KO mice have increased frequency of spontaneous adenosine events, but no change in the average concentration of an event, while A_2A KO mice had no change in frequency but increased average event concentration. Thus, both A₁ and A_2A self-regulate spontaneous adenosine release; however, A₁ acts on the frequency of events, while A_2A receptors regulate concentration. The trends are similar both in vivo and slices, so brain slices are a good model system to study spontaneous adenosine release. For mechanically stimulated adenosine, there was no effect of A₁ or A_2A KO in vivo, but in brain slices, there was a significant increase in concentration evoked in A₁KO mice. Mechanically stimulated release was largely unregulated by A₁ and A_2A receptors, likely because of a different release mechanism than spontaneous adenosine. Thus, A₁ receptors affect the frequency of spontaneous adenosine transients, and A_2A receptors affect the concentration. Therefore, future studies could probe drug treatments targeting A₁ and A_2A receptors to increase rapid adenosine neuromodulation.

Insulin requires A2B adenosine receptors to modulate the L-arginine/nitric oxide signalling in the human fetoplacental vascular endothelium from late-onset preeclampsia

Late-onset preeclampsia (LOPE) associates with reduced umbilical vein reactivity and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity but increased human cationic amino acid (hCAT-1)-mediated L-arginine transport involving A_2A adenosine receptor in the fetoplacental unit. This study addresses the A_2B adenosine receptor (A_2BAR)-mediated response to insulin in the fetoplacental vasculature from LOPE. Umbilical veins and HUVECs were obtained from women with normal (n = 37) or LOPE (n = 35) pregnancies. Umbilical vein rings reactivity to insulin was assayed in the absence or presence of adenosine and MRS-1754 (A_2BAR antagonist) in a wire myograph. HUVECs were exposed to insulin, MRS-1754, BAY60-6583 (A_2BAR agonist), NECA (general adenosine receptors agonist) or N^G-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (NOS inhibitor). A_2BAR, hCAT-1, total and phosphorylated eNOS, Akt and p44/42^mapk protein abundance were determined by Western blotting. Insulin receptors A (IR-A) and B (IR-B), eNOS and hCAT-1 mRNA were determined by qPCR. Firefly/Renilla luciferase assay was used to determine -1606 bp SLC7A1 (hCAT-1) promoter activity. L-Citrulline content was measured by HPLC, L-[³H]citrulline formation from L-[³H]arginine by the Citrulline assay, and intracellular cGMP by radioimmunoassay. LOPE-reduced dilation of vein rings to insulin was restored by MRS-1754. HUVECs from LOPE showed higher A_2BAR, hCAT-1, and IR-A expression, Akt and p44/42^mapk activation, and lower NOS activity. MRS-1754 reversed the LOPE effect on A_2BAR, hCAT-1, Akt, and eNOS inhibitory phosphorylation. Insulin reversed the LOPE effect on A_2BAR, IR-A and eNOS, but increased hCAT-1-mediated transport. Thus, LOPE alters endothelial function, causing an imbalance in the L-arginine/NO signalling pathway to reduce the umbilical vein dilation to insulin requiring A_2BAR activation in HUVECs.

Purinergic Dysfunction in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a life‐threatening disease characterized by increased pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance, which result in an increase in afterload imposed onto the right ventricle, leading to right heart failure. Current therapies are incapable of reversing the disease progression. Thus, the identification of novel and potential therapeutic targets is urgently needed. An alteration of nucleotide‐ and nucleoside‐activated purinergic signaling has been proposed as a potential contributor in the pathogenesis of PAH. Adenosine‐mediated purinergic 1 receptor activation, particularly A_2AR activation, reduces pulmonary vascular resistance and attenuates pulmonary vascular remodeling and right ventricle hypertrophy, thereby exerting a protective effect. Conversely, A_2BR activation induces pulmonary vascular remodeling, and is therefore deleterious. ATP‐mediated P2X₇R activation and ADP‐mediated activation of P2Y₁R and P2Y₁₂R play a role in pulmonary vascular tone, vascular remodeling, and inflammation in PAH. Recent studies have revealed a role of ectonucleotidase nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase, that degrades ATP/ADP, in regulation of pulmonary vascular remodeling. Interestingly, existing evidence that adenosine activates erythrocyte A_2BR signaling, counteracting hypoxia‐induced pulmonary injury, and that ATP release is impaired in erythrocyte in PAH implies erythrocyte dysfunction as an important trigger to affect purinergic signaling for pathogenesis of PAH. The present review focuses on current knowledge on alteration of nucleot(s)ide‐mediated purinergic signaling as a potential disease mechanism underlying the development of PAH.

Keep an eye on adenosine: Its role in retinal inflammation

Adenosine is an endogenous purine nucleoside ubiquitously distributed throughout the body that interacts with G protein-coupled receptors, classified in four subtypes: A₁R, A_2AR, A_2BR and A₃R. Among the plethora of functions of adenosine, it has been increasingly recognized as a key mediator of the immune response. Neuroinflammation is a feature of chronic neurodegenerative diseases and contributes to the pathophysiology of several retinal degenerative diseases. Animal models of retinal diseases are helping to elucidate the regulatory roles of adenosine receptors in the development and progression of those diseases. Mounting evidence demonstrates that the adenosinergic system is altered in the retina during pathological conditions, compromising retinal physiology. This review focuses on the roles played by adenosine and the elements of the adenosinergic system (receptors, enzymes, transporters) in the neuroinflammatory processes occurring in the retina. An improved understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of the signalling pathways mediated by adenosine underlying the onset and progression of retinal diseases will pave the way towards the identification of new therapeutic approaches.

Targeting Purinergic Signaling and Cell Therapy in Cardiovascular and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Extracellular purines exert several functions in physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms. ATP acts through P2 receptors as a neurotransmitter and neuromodulator and modulates heart contractility, while adenosine participates in neurotransmission, blood pressure, and many other mechanisms. Because of their capability to differentiate into mature cell types, they provide a unique therapeutic strategy for regenerating damaged tissue, such as in cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. Purinergic signaling is pivotal for controlling stem cell differentiation and phenotype determination. Proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of stem cells of various origins are regulated by purinergic receptors. In this chapter, we selected neurodegenerative and cardiovascular diseases with clinical trials using cell therapy and purinergic receptor targeting. We discuss these approaches as therapeutic alternatives to neurodegenerative and cardiovascular diseases. For instance, promising results were demonstrated in the utilization of mesenchymal stem cells and bone marrow mononuclear cells in vascular regeneration. Regarding neurodegenerative diseases, in general, P2X7 and A_2A receptors mostly worsen the degenerative state. Stem cell-based therapy, mainly through mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cells, showed promising results in improving symptoms caused by neurodegeneration. We propose that purinergic receptor activity regulation combined with stem cells could enhance proliferative and differentiation rates as well as cell engraftment.

Extracellular adenosine: a critical signal in liver fibrosis

Extracellular adenosine nucleoside is a potent, endogenous mediator that signals through specific G protein-coupled receptors, and exerts pleiotropic effects on liver physiology, in health and disease. Particularly, adenosinergic or adenosine-mediated signaling pathways impact the progression of hepatic fibrosis, a common feature of chronic liver diseases, through regulation of matrix deposition by liver myofibroblasts. This review examines the current lines of evidence on adenosinergic regulation of liver fibrosis and myofibroblasts, identifies unanswered research questions, and proposes important future areas of investigation.

Divergent coronary flow responses to uridine adenosine tetraphosphate in atherosclerotic ApoE knockout mice

Uridine adenosine tetraphosphate (Up4A) exerts potent relaxation in porcine coronary arteries that is reduced following myocardial infarction, suggesting a crucial role for Up4A in the regulation of coronary flow (CF) in cardiovascular disorders. We evaluated the vasoactive effects of Up4A on CF in atherosclerosis using ApoE knockout (KO) mice ex vivo and in vivo. Functional studies were conducted in isolated mouse hearts using the Langendorff technique. Immunofluorescence was performed to assess purinergic P2X1 receptor (P2X1R) expression in isolated mouse coronary arteries. In vivo effects of Up4A on coronary blood flow (CBF) were assessed using ultrasound. Infusion of Up4A (10-9-10-5 M) into isolated mouse hearts resulted in a concentration-dependent reduction in CF in WT and ApoE KO mice to a similar extent; this effect was exacerbated in ApoE KO mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD). The P2X1R antagonist MRS2159 restored Up4A-mediated decreases in CF more so in ApoE KO + HFD than ApoE KO mice. The smooth muscle to endothelial cell ratio of coronary P2X1R expression was greater in ApoE KO + HFD than ApoE KO or WT mice, suggesting a net vasoconstrictor potential of P2X1R in ApoE KO + HFD mice. In contrast, Up4A (1.6 mg/kg) increased CBF to a similar extent among the three groups. In conclusion, Up4A decreases CF more in ApoE KO + HFD mice, likely through a net upregulation of vasoconstrictor P2X1R. In contrast, Up4A increases CBF in vivo regardless of the atherosclerotic model.

The Adenosinergic System as a Therapeutic Target in the Vasculature: New Ligands and Challenges

Adenosine is an adenine base purine with actions as a modulator of neurotransmission, smooth muscle contraction, and immune response in several systems of the human body, including the cardiovascular system. In the vasculature, four P1-receptors or adenosine receptors—A₁, A_2A, A_2B and A₃—have been identified. Adenosine receptors are membrane G-protein receptors that trigger their actions through several signaling pathways and present differential affinity requirements. Adenosine is an endogenous ligand whose extracellular levels can reach concentrations high enough to activate the adenosine receptors. This nucleoside is a product of enzymatic breakdown of extra and intracellular adenine nucleotides and also of S-adenosylhomocysteine. Adenosine availability is also dependent on the activity of nucleoside transporters (NTs). The interplay between NTs and adenosine receptors’ activities are debated and a particular attention is given to the paramount importance of the disruption of this interplay in vascular pathophysiology, namely in hypertension., The integration of important functional aspects of individual adenosine receptor pharmacology (such as in vasoconstriction/vasodilation) and morphological features (within the three vascular layers) in vessels will be discussed, hopefully clarifying the importance of adenosine receptors/NTs for modulating peripheral mesenteric vascular resistance. In recent years, an increase interest in purine physiology/pharmacology has led to the development of new ligands for adenosine receptors. Some of them have been patented as having promising therapeutic activities and some have been chosen to undergo on clinical trials. Increased levels of endogenous adenosine near a specific subtype can lead to its activation, constituting an indirect receptor targeting approach either by inhibition of NT or, alternatively, by increasing the activity of enzymes responsible for ATP breakdown. These findings highlight the putative role of adenosinergic players as attractive therapeutic targets for cardiovascular pathologies, namely hypertension, heart failure or stroke. Nevertheless, several aspects are still to be explored, creating new challenges to be addressed in future studies, particularly the development of strategies able to circumvent the predicted side effects of these therapies.

Adenosine contribution to normal renal physiology and chronic kidney disease

Adenosine is a nucleoside that is particularly interesting to many scientific and clinical communities as it has important physiological and pathophysiological roles in the kidney. The distribution of adenosine receptors has only recently been elucidated; therefore it is likely that more biological roles of this nucleoside will be unveiled in the near future. Since the discovery of the involvement of adenosine in renal vasoconstriction and regulation of local renin production, further evidence has shown that adenosine signaling is also involved in the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism, sodium reabsorption and the adaptive response to acute insults, such as ischemia. However, the most interesting finding was the increased adenosine levels in chronic kidney diseases such as diabetic nephropathy and also in non-diabetic animal models of renal fibrosis. When adenosine is chronically increased its signaling via the adenosine receptors may change, switching to a state that induces renal damage and produces phenotypic changes in resident cells. This review discusses the physiological and pathophysiological roles of adenosine and pays special attention to the mechanisms associated with switching homeostatic nucleoside levels to increased adenosine production in kidneys affected by CKD.

In vivo assessment of coronary flow and cardiac function after bolus adenosine injection in adenosine receptor knockout mice

Bolus injections of adenosine and the A2A adenosine receptor (AR) selective agonist (regadenoson) are used clinically as a substitute for a stress test in people who cannot exercise. Using isolated tissue preparations, our lab has shown that coronary flow and cardiac effects of adenosine are mostly regulated by the AR subtypes A1, A2A, and A2B In this study, we used ultrasound imaging to measure the in vivo effects of adenosine on coronary blood flow (left coronary artery) and cardiac function in anesthetized wild-type, A1 knockout (KO), A2AKO, A2BKO, A3KO, A1, and A3 double KO (A1/3 DKO) and A2A and A2B double KO (A2A/2B DKO) mice in real time. Echocardiographic and Doppler studies were performed using a Visualsonic Vevo 2100 ultrasound system. Coronary blood flow (CBF) baseline data were obtained when animals were anesthetized with 1% isoflourane. Diameter (D) and velocity time integral (VTI) were measured on the left coronary arteries (CBF = ((π/4) × D(2) × VTI × HR)/1000). CBF changes were the highest within 2 min of injection (about 10 mg/kg). Heart rate, cardiac output, and stroke volume were measured by tracing the left ventricle long axis. Our data support a role for the A2 AR in CBF and further support our conclusions of previous studies from isolated tissues. Adenosine-mediated decreases in cardiac output and stroke volume may be A2B and/or A3 AR-mediated; however, the A1 and A2 ARs also play roles in overall cardiac function. These data further provide a powerful translational tool in studying the cardiovascular effects of adenosine in disease states.

Purinergic transmission in blood vessels

There are nineteen different receptor proteins for adenosine, adenine and uridine nucleotides, and nucleotide sugars, belonging to three families of G protein-coupled adenosine and P2Y receptors, and ionotropic P2X receptors. The majority are functionally expressed in blood vessels, as purinergic receptors in perivascular nerves, smooth muscle and endothelial cells, and roles in regulation of vascular contractility, immune function and growth have been identified. The endogenous ligands for purine receptors, ATP, ADP, UTP, UDP and adenosine, can be released from different cell types within the vasculature, as well as from circulating blood cells, including erythrocytes and platelets. Many purine receptors can be activated by two or more of the endogenous ligands. Further complexity arises because of interconversion between ligands, notably adenosine formation from the metabolism of ATP, leading to complex integrated responses through activation of different subtypes of purine receptors. The enzymes responsible for this conversion, ectonucleotidases, are present on the surface of smooth muscle and endothelial cells, and may be coreleased with neurotransmitters from nerves. What selectivity there is for the actions of purines/pyrimidines comes from differential expression of their receptors within the vasculature. P2X1 receptors mediate the vasocontractile actions of ATP released as a neurotransmitter with noradrenaline (NA) from sympathetic perivascular nerves, and are located on the vascular smooth muscle adjacent to the nerve varicosities, the sites of neurotransmitter release. The relative contribution of ATP and NA as functional cotransmitters varies with species, type and size of blood vessel, neuronal firing pattern, the tone/pressure of the blood vessel, and in ageing and disease. ATP is also a neurotransmitter in non-adrenergic non-cholinergic perivascular nerves and mediates vasorelaxation via smooth muscle P2Y-like receptors. ATP and adenosine can act as neuromodulators, with the most robust evidence being for prejunctional inhibition of neurotransmission via A1 adenosine receptors, but also prejunctional excitation and inhibition of neurotransmission via P2X and P2Y receptors, respectively. P2Y2, P2Y4 and P2Y6 receptors expressed on the vascular smooth muscle are coupled to vasocontraction, and may have a role in pathophysiological conditions, when purines are released from damaged cells, or when there is damage to the protective barrier that is the endothelium. Adenosine is released during hypoxia to increase blood flow via vasodilator A2A and A2B receptors expressed on the endothelium and smooth muscle. ATP is released from endothelial cells during hypoxia and shear stress and can act at P2Y and P2X4 receptors expressed on the endothelium to increase local blood flow. Activation of endothelial purine receptors leads to the release of nitric oxide, hyperpolarising factors and prostacyclin, which inhibits platelet aggregation and thus ensures patent blood flow. Vascular purine receptors also regulate endothelial and smooth muscle growth, and inflammation, and thus are involved in the underlying processes of a number of cardiovascular diseases.

Cardiac purinergic signalling in health and disease

This review is a historical account about purinergic signalling in the heart, for readers to see how ideas and understanding have changed as new experimental results were published. Initially, the focus is on the nervous control of the heart by ATP as a cotransmitter in sympathetic, parasympathetic, and sensory nerves, as well as in intracardiac neurons. Control of the heart by centers in the brain and vagal cardiovascular reflexes involving purines are also discussed. The actions of adenine nucleotides and nucleosides on cardiomyocytes, atrioventricular and sinoatrial nodes, cardiac fibroblasts, and coronary blood vessels are described. Cardiac release and degradation of ATP are also described. Finally, the involvement of purinergic signalling and its therapeutic potential in cardiac pathophysiology is reviewed, including acute and chronic heart failure, ischemia, infarction, arrhythmias, cardiomyopathy, syncope, hypertrophy, coronary artery disease, angina, diabetic cardiomyopathy, as well as heart transplantation and coronary bypass grafts.

Metabolic hyperemia requires ATP-sensitive K+ channels and H2O2 but not adenosine in isolated mouse hearts

We have previously demonstrated that adenosine-mediated H2O2 production and opening of ATP-sensitive K(+) (KATP) channels contributes to coronary reactive hyperemia. The present study aimed to investigate the roles of adenosine, H2O2, and KATP channels in coronary metabolic hyperemia (MH). Experiments were conducted on isolated Langendorff-perfused mouse hearts using combined pharmacological approaches with adenosine receptor (AR) knockout mice. MH was induced by electrical pacing at graded frequencies. Coronary flow increased linearly from 14.4 ± 1.2 to 20.6 ± 1.2 ml·min(-1)·g(-1) with an increase in heart rate from 400 to 650 beats/min in wild-type mice. Neither non-selective blockade of ARs by 8-(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline (8-SPT; 50 μM) nor selective A2AAR blockade by SCH-58261 (1 μM) or deletion affected MH, although resting flow and left ventricular developed pressure were reduced. Combined A2AAR and A2BAR blockade or deletion showed similar effects as 8-SPT. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis by N-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (100 μM) or combined 8-SPT administration failed to reduce MH, although resting flows were reduced (by ∼20%). However, glibenclamide (KATP channel blocker, 5 μM) decreased not only resting flow (by ∼45%) and left ventricular developed pressure (by ∼36%) but also markedly reduced MH by ∼94%, resulting in cardiac contractile dysfunction. Scavenging of H2O2 by catalase (2,500 U/min) also decreased resting flow (by ∼16%) and MH (by ∼24%) but to a lesser extent than glibenclamide. Our results suggest that while adenosine modulates coronary flow under both resting and ischemic conditions, it is not required for MH. However, H2O2 and KATP channels are important local control mechanisms responsible for both coronary ischemic and metabolic vasodilation.

Potential for developing purinergic drugs for gastrointestinal diseases

Treatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), functional dyspepsia, or motility disorders are not adequate, and purinergic drugs offer exciting new possibilities. Gastrointestinal symptoms that could be targeted for therapy include visceral pain, inflammatory pain, dysmotility, constipation, and diarrhea. The focus of this review is on the potential for developing purinergic drugs for clinical trials to treat gastrointestinal symptoms. Purinergic receptors are divided into adenosine P1 (A(1), A(2A), A(2B), A(3)), ionotropic ATP-gated P2X ion channel (P2X(1-7)), or metabotropic P2Y(1,2,4,6,11-14) receptors. There is good experimental evidence for targeting A(2A), A(2B), A(3), P2X(7), and P2X(3) receptors or increasing endogenous adenosine levels to treat IBD, inflammatory pain, IBS/visceral pain, inflammatory diarrhea, and motility disorders. Purine genes are also potential biomarkers of disease. Advances in medicinal chemistry have an accelerated pace toward clinical trials: Methotrexate and sulfasalazine, used to treat IBD, act by stimulating CD73-dependent adenosine production. ATP protects against NSAID-induced enteropathy and has pain-relieving properties in humans. A P2X(7)R antagonist AZD9056 is in clinical trials for Crohn's disease. A(3) adenosine receptor drugs target inflammatory diseases (e.g., CF101, CF102). Dipyridamole, a nucleoside uptake inhibitor, is in trials for endotoxemia. Drugs for pain in clinical trials include P2X(3)/P2X(2/3) (AF-219) and P2X(7) (GSK1482160) antagonists and A(1) (GW493838) or A(2A) (BVT.115959) agonists. Iberogast is a phytopharmacon targeting purine mechanisms with efficacy in IBS and functional dyspepsia. Purinergic drugs have excellent safety/efficacy profile for prospective clinical trials in IBD, IBS, functional dyspepsia, and inflammatory diarrhea. Genetic polymorphisms and caffeine consumption may affect susceptibility to treatment. Further studies in animals can clarify mechanisms and test new generation drugs. Finally, there is still a huge gap in our knowledge of human pathophysiology of purinergic signaling.

Purinergic signaling and blood vessels in health and disease

Purinergic signaling plays important roles in control of vascular tone and remodeling. There is dual control of vascular tone by ATP released as a cotransmitter with noradrenaline from perivascular sympathetic nerves to cause vasoconstriction via P2X1 receptors, whereas ATP released from endothelial cells in response to changes in blood flow (producing shear stress) or hypoxia acts on P2X and P2Y receptors on endothelial cells to produce nitric oxide and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor, which dilates vessels. ATP is also released from sensory-motor nerves during antidromic reflex activity to produce relaxation of some blood vessels. In this review, we stress the differences in neural and endothelial factors in purinergic control of different blood vessels. The long-term (trophic) actions of purine and pyrimidine nucleosides and nucleotides in promoting migration and proliferation of both vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells via P1 and P2Y receptors during angiogenesis and vessel remodeling during restenosis after angioplasty are described. The pathophysiology of blood vessels and therapeutic potential of purinergic agents in diseases, including hypertension, atherosclerosis, ischemia, thrombosis and stroke, diabetes, and migraine, is discussed.

Mechanisms involved in increased sensitivity to adenosine A(2A) receptor activation and hypoxia-induced vasodilatation in porcine coronary arteries

Hypoxia-induced coronary vasorelaxation is a compensatory mechanism increasing blood flow. We hypothesized that hypoxia shares pathways with adenosine and causes vasorelaxation through the adenosine A(2A) receptor and force suppression by increasing cAMP and phosphorylated heat shock protein (HSP)20. Adenosine receptors in porcine left anterior descending coronary arteries (LAD) were examined by RT-PCR and isometric tension recording in myographs. Vasorelaxation was induced by adenosine, 1% oxygen, or both in the absence or presence of ZM241385, an adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist. cAMP was determined by ELISA and p-HSP20/HSP20 and p-MLC/MLC were determined by immunoblotting and densitometric analyses. In coronary arteries exposed to 1% oxygen, there was increased sensitivity to adenosine, the adenosine A2 selective agonist NECA, and the adenosine A(2A) selective receptor agonist CGS21680. ZM241385 shifted concentration-response curves for CGS21680 to the right, whereas the adenosine A1 antagonist DPCPX, the adenosine A2B receptor antagonist MRS1754 and the adenosine A3 receptor antagonist MRS1523 failed to reduce vasodilatation induced by CGS21680. 1% oxygen or adenosine increased cAMP accumulation and HSP20 phosphorylation without changing T850-MYPT1 and MLC phosphorylation. ZM241385 failed to change 1% oxygen-induced vasodilation, cAMP accumulation, HSP20 phosphorylation and MLC phosphorylation. The PKA inhibitor Rp-8-CPT-cAMPS significantly reduced vasorelaxation induced by 1% oxygen or CGS21680. Our findings suggest that the increased sensitivity to adenosine, NECA, and CGS21680 at 1% oxygen involves adenosine A(2A) receptors. Adenosine and 1% oxygen induce vasorelaxation in PGF2α-contracted porcine coronary arteries partly by force suppression caused by increased cAMP and phosphorylation of HSP20.

A1 adenosine receptor negatively modulates coronary reactive hyperemia via counteracting A2A-mediated H2O2 production and KATP opening in isolated mouse hearts

We previously demonstrated that A2A, but not A2B, adenosine receptors (ARs) mediate coronary reactive hyperemia (RH), possibly by producing H2O2 and, subsequently, opening ATP-dependent K(+) (KATP) channels in coronary smooth muscle cells. In this study, A1 AR knockout (KO), A3 AR KO, and A1 and A3 AR double-KO (A1/A3 DKO) mice were used to investigate the roles and mechanisms of A1 and A3 ARs in modulation of coronary RH. Coronary flow of isolated hearts was measured using the Langendorff system. A1 KO and A1/A3 DKO, but not A3 KO, mice showed a higher flow debt repayment [~30% more than wild-type (WT) mice, P < 0.05] following a 15-s occlusion. SCH-58261 (a selective A2A AR antagonist, 1 μM) eliminated the augmented RH, suggesting the involvement of enhanced A2A AR-mediated signaling in A1 KO mice. In isolated coronary arteries, immunohistochemistry showed an upregulation of A2A AR (1.6 ± 0.2 times that of WT mice, P < 0.05) and a higher magnitude of adenosine-induced H2O2 production in A1 KO mice (1.8 ± 0.3 times that of WT mice, P < 0.05), which was blocked by SCH-58261. Catalase (2,500 U/ml) and glibenclamide (a KATP channel blocker, 5 μM), but not N(G)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester, also abolished the enhanced RH in A1 KO mice. Our data suggest that A1, but not A3, AR counteracts the A2A AR-mediated CF increase and that deletion of A1 AR results in upregulation of A2A AR and/or removal of the negative modulatory effect of A1 AR, thus leading to an enhanced A2A AR-mediated H2O2 production, KATP channel opening, and coronary vasodilation during RH. This is the first report implying that A1 AR has a role in coronary RH.

Evidence for the involvement of NADPH oxidase in adenosine receptors-mediated control of coronary flow using A1 and A3 knockout mice

The NADPH oxidase (Nox) subunits 1, 2 (gp91 phox) and 4 are the major sources for reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cardiovascular system. In conditions such as ischemia-reperfusion injury and hypoxia, both ROS and adenosine are released suggesting a possible interaction. We hypothesized that ROS generated through Nox is involved in adenosine-induced coronary flow (CF) responses. Adenosine (10^-8-10^-5.5 M) increased CF in isolated hearts from wild type (WT; C57/BL6), A₁ adenosine receptor (AR) knockout (A₁KO), A₃AR KO (A₃KO) and A₁ and A₃AR double KO (A₁/A₃DKO) mice. The Nox inhibitors apocynin (10^-5 M) and gp91 ds-tat (10^-6 M) or the SOD and catalase-mimicking agent EUK134 (50 μM) decreased the adenosine-enhanced CF in the WT and all the KOs. Additionally, adenosine increased phosphorylation of p47-phox subunit and ERK 1/2 without changing protein expression of Nox isoforms in WT. Moreover, intracellular superoxide production was increased by adenosine and CGS-21680 (a selective A_2A agonist), but not BAY 60-6583 (a selective A_2B agonist), in mouse coronary artery smooth muscle cells (CASMCs) and endothelial cells (CAECs). This superoxide increase was inhibited by the gp91 ds-tat and ERK 1/2 inhibitor (PD98059). In conclusion, adenosine-induced increase in CF in isolated heart involves Nox2-generated superoxide, possibly through ERK 1/2 phosphorylation with subsequent p47-phox subunit phosphorylation. This adenosine/Nox/ROS interaction occurs in both CASMCs and CAECs, and involves neither A₁ nor A₃ ARs, but possibly A_2A ARs in mouse.

Exacerbation of DSS-induced colitis in mice lacking kinin B(1) receptors through compensatory up-regulation of kinin B(2) receptors: the role of tight junctions and intestinal homeostasis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Kinins are pro-inflammatory peptides that are released during tissue injury, including that caused by inflammatory bowel disease. Herein, we assessed the role and underlying mechanisms through which the absence of kinin B(1) receptors exacerbates the development of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

B(1) and B(2) receptor antagonists and B(1) receptor knockout mice (B1(-/-) ) were used to assess the involvement of B(1) and B(2) receptor signalling in a DSS-colitis. B(1) receptor, B(2) receptor, occludin and claudin-4 expression, cytokine levels and cell permeability were evaluated in colon from wild-type (WT) and B1(-/-) mice.

KEY RESULTS

DSS-induced colitis was significantly exacerbated in B1(-/-) compared with WT mice. IL-1β, IFN-γ, keratinocyte-derived chemokine and macrophage inflammatory protein-2 were markedly increased in the colon from DSS-treated B1(-/-) compared with DSS-treated WT mice. Treatment of WT mice with a selective B(1) receptor antagonist, DALBK or SSR240612, had no effect on DSS-induced colitis. Of note, B(2) receptor mRNA expression was significantly up-regulated in colonic tissue from the B1(-/-) mice after DSS administration. Moreover, treatment with a selective B(2) receptor antagonist prevented the exacerbation of colitis in B1(-/-) mice following DSS administration. The water- or DSS-treated B1(-/-) mice showed a decrease in occludin gene expression, which was partially prevented by the B(2) receptor antagonist.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

A loss of B(1) receptors markedly exacerbates the severity of DSS-induced colitis in mice. The increased susceptibility of B1(-/-) may be associated with compensatory overexpression of B(2) receptors, which, in turn, modulates tight junction expression.

Functional and RNA expression profile of adenosine receptor subtypes in mouse mesenteric arteries

Concentration-response curves (CRCs) of adenosine receptor (AR) agonists, NECA (nonspecific), CCPA (A1 specific), CGS-216870 (A2A specific), BAY 60-6583 (A2B specific), and Cl-IB-MECA (A3 specific) for mesenteric arteries (MAs) from 4 AR knockout (KO) mice (A1, A2A, A2B, and A3) and their wild type (WT) were constructed. The messenger RNA expression of MAs from KO mice and WT were also studied. Adenosine (10 to 10 M) and NECA (10 to 10 M) induced relaxation in all mice except A2B KO mice, which only showed constriction by adenosine at 10 to 10 and NECA at 10 to 10 M. The CCPA induced a significant constriction at 10 and 10 M in all mice, except A1KO. BAY 60-6583 induced relaxation (10 to 10 M) in WT and no response in A2BKO except at 10 M. The CRCs for BAY 60-6583 in A1, A2A, and A3 KO mice shifted to the left when compared with WT mice, suggesting an upregulation of A2B AR. No responses were noted to CGS-21680 in all mice. Cl-IB-MECA only induced relaxation at concentration greater than 10 M, and no differences were found between different KO mice. The CRC for Bay 60-6583 was not significantly changed in the presence of 10 M of L-NAME, 10 M of indomethacin, or both. Our data suggest that A2B AR is the predominant AR subtype and the effect may be endothelial independent, whereas A1 AR plays a significant modulatory role in mouse MAs.

Interactions between A(2A) adenosine receptors, hydrogen peroxide, and KATP channels in coronary reactive hyperemia

Myocardial metabolites such as adenosine mediate reactive hyperemia, in part, by activating ATP-dependent K(+) (K(ATP)) channels in coronary smooth muscle. In this study, we investigated the role of adenosine A(2A) and A(2B) receptors and their signaling mechanisms in reactive hyperemia. We hypothesized that coronary reactive hyperemia involves A(2A) receptors, hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)), and KATP channels. We used A(2A) and A(2B) knockout (KO) and A(2A/2B) double KO (DKO) mouse hearts for Langendorff experiments. Flow debt for a 15-s occlusion was repaid 128 ± 8% in hearts from wild-type (WT) mice; this was reduced in hearts from A(2A) KO and A(2A)/(2B) DKO mice (98 ± 9 and 105 ± 6%; P < 0.05), but not A(2B) KO mice (123 ± 13%). Patch-clamp experiments demonstrated that adenosine activated glibenclamide-sensitive KATP current in smooth muscle cells from WT and A(2B) KO mice (90 ± 23% of WT) but not A(2A) KO or A(2A)/A(2B) DKO mice (30 ± 4 and 35 ± 8% of WT; P < 0.05). Additionally, H(2)O(2) activated KATP current in smooth muscle cells (358 ± 99%; P < 0.05). Catalase, an enzyme that breaks down H(2)O(2), attenuated adenosine-induced coronary vasodilation, reducing the percent increase in flow from 284 ± 53 to 89 ± 13% (P < 0.05). Catalase reduced the repayment of flow debt in hearts from WT mice (84 ± 9%; P < 0.05) but had no effect on the already diminished repayment in hearts from A(2A) KO mice (98 ± 7%). Our findings suggest that adenosine A(2A) receptors are coupled to smooth muscle KATP channels in reactive hyperemia via the production of H(2)O(2) as a signaling intermediate.

Adora2b signaling on bone marrow derived cells dampens myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury

BACKGROUND

Cardiac ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) injury represents a major cause of cardiac tissue injury. Adenosine signaling dampens inflammation during cardiac I-R. The authors investigated the role of the adenosine A2b-receptor (Adora2b) on inflammatory cells during cardiac I-R.

METHODS

To study Adora2b signaling on inflammatory cells, the authors transplanted wild-type (WT) bone marrow (BM) into Adora2b(-/-) mice or Adora2b(-/-) BM into WT mice. To study the role of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs), neutrophil-depleted WT mice were treated with an Adora2b agonist. After treatments, mice were exposed to 60 min of myocardial ischemia and 120 min of reperfusion. Infarct sizes and troponin I concentrations were determined by triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively.

RESULTS

Transplantation of WT BM into Adora2b(-/-) mice decreased infarct sizes by 19 ± 4% and troponin I by 87.5 ± 25.3 ng/ml (mean ± SD, n = 6). Transplantation of Adora2b(-/-) BM into WT mice increased infarct sizes by 20 ± 3% and troponin I concentrations by 69.7 ± 17.9 ng/ml (mean ± SD, n = 6). Studies on the reperfused myocardium revealed PMNs as the dominant cell type. PMN depletion or Adora2b agonist treatment reduced infarct sizes by 30 ± 11% or 26 ± 13% (mean ± SD, n = 4); however, the combination of both did not produce additional cardioprotection. Cytokine profiling showed significantly higher cardiac tumor necrosis factor α concentrations in Adora2b(-/-) compared with WT mice (39.3 ± 5.3 vs. 7.5 ± 1.0 pg/mg protein, mean ± SD, n = 4). Pharmacologic studies on human-activated PMNs revealed an Adora2b-dependent tumor necrosis factor α release.

CONCLUSION

Adora2b signaling on BM-derived cells such as PMNs represents an endogenous cardioprotective mechanism during cardiac I-R. The authors' findings suggest that Adora2b agonist treatment during cardiac I-R reduces tumor necrosis factor α release of PMNs, thereby dampening tissue injury.

Regulation of foam cells by adenosine

Macrophages rely on reverse cholesterol transport mechanisms to rid themselves of excess cholesterol. By reducing accumulation of cholesterol in the artery wall, reverse cholesterol transport slows or prevents development of atherosclerosis. In stable macrophages, efflux mechanisms balance influx mechanisms, and accumulating lipids do not overwhelm the cell. Under atherogenic conditions, inflow of cholesterol exceeds outflow, and the cell is ultimately transformed into a foam cell, the prototypical cell in the atherosclerotic plaque. Adenosine is an endogenous purine nucleoside released from metabolically active cells by facilitated diffusion and generated extracellularly from adenine nucleotides. Under stress conditions, such as hypoxia, a depressed cellular energy state leads to an acute increase in the extracellular concentration of adenosine. Extracellular adenosine interacts with 1 or more of a family of G protein-coupled receptors (A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3)) to modulate the function of nearly all cells and tissues. Modulation of adenosine signaling participates in regulation of reverse cholesterol transport. Of particular note for the development of atherosclerosis, activation of A(2A) receptors dramatically inhibits inflammation and protects against tissue injury. Potent antiatherosclerotic effects of A(2A) receptor stimulation include inhibition of macrophage foam cell transformation and upregulation of the reverse cholesterol transport proteins cholesterol 27-hydroxylase and ATP binding cassette transporter A1. Thus, A(2A) receptor agonists may correct or prevent the adverse effects of inflammatory processes on cellular cholesterol homeostasis. This review focuses on the importance of extracellular adenosine acting at specific receptors as a regulatory mechanism to control the formation of foam cells under conditions of lipid loading.

Contributions of A2A and A2B adenosine receptors in coronary flow responses in relation to the KATP channel using A2B and A2A/2B double-knockout mice

Adenosine plays a role in physiological and pathological conditions, and A(2) adenosine receptor (AR) expression is modified in many cardiovascular disorders. In this study, we elucidated the role of the A(2B)AR and its relationship to the A(2A)AR in coronary flow (CF) changes using A(2B) single-knockout (KO) and A(2A/2B) double-KO (DKO) mice in a Langendorff setup. We used two approaches: 1) selective and nonselective AR agonists and antagonists and 2) A(2A)KO and A(2B)KO and A(2A/2B)DKO mice. BAY 60-6583 (a selective A(2B) agonist) had no effect on CF in A(2B)KO mice, whereas it significantly increased CF in wild-type (WT) mice (maximum of 23.3 ± 9 ml·min(-1)·g(-1)). 5'-N-ethylcarboxamido adenosine (NECA; a nonselective AR agonist) increased CF in A(2B)KO mice (maximum of 34.6 ± 4.7 ml·min(-1)·g(-1)) to a significantly higher degree compared with WT mice (maximum of 23.1 ± 2.1 ml·min(-1)·g(-1)). Also, CGS-21680 (a selective A(2A) agonist) increased CF in A(2B)KO mice (maximum of 29 ± 1.9 ml·min(-1)·g(-1)) to a significantly higher degree compared with WT mice (maximum of 25.1 ± 2.3 ml·min(-1)·g(-1)). SCH-58261 (an A(2A)-selective antagonist) inhibited the NECA-induced increase in CF to a significantly higher degree in A(2B)KO mice (19.3 ± 1.6 vs. 0.5 ± 0.4 ml·min(-1)·g(-1)) compared with WT mice (19 ± 3.5 vs. 3.6 ± 0.5 ml·min(-1)·g(-1)). NECA did not induce any increase in CF in A(2A/2B)DKO mice, whereas a significant increase was observed in WT mice (maximum of 23.1 ± 2.1 ml·min(-1)·g(-1)). Furthermore, the mitochondrial ATP-sensitive K(+) (K(ATP)) channel blocker 5-hydroxydecanoate had no effect on the NECA-induced increase in CF in WT mice, whereas the NECA-induced increase in CF in WT (17.6 ± 2 ml·min(-1)·g(-1)), A(2A)KO (12.5 ± 2.3 ml·min(-1)·g(-1)), and A(2B)KO (16.2 ± 0.8 ml·min(-1)·g(-1)) mice was significantly blunted by the K(ATP) channel blocker glibenclamide (to 0.7 ± 0.7, 2.3 ± 1.1, and 0.9 ± 0.4 ml·min(-1)·g(-1), respectively). Also, the CGS-21680-induced (22 ± 2.3 ml·min(-1)·g(-1)) and BAY 60-6583-induced (16.4 ± 1.60 ml·min(-1)·g(-1)) increase in CF in WT mice was significantly blunted by glibenclamide (to 1.2 ± 0.4 and 1.8 ± 1.2 ml·min(-1)·g(-1), respectively). In conclusion, this is the first evidence supporting the compensatory upregulation of A(2A)ARs in A(2B)KO mice and demonstrates that both A(2A)ARs and A(2B)ARs induce CF changes through K(ATP) channels. These results identify AR-mediated CF responses that may lead to better therapeutic approaches for the treatment of cardiovascular disorders.

Adenosine A₂A and A₂B receptors are both required for adenosine A₁ receptor-mediated cardioprotection

All four adenosine receptor subtypes have been shown to play a role in cardioprotection, and there is evidence that all four subtypes may be expressed in cardiomyocytes. There is also increasing evidence that optimal adenosine cardioprotection requires the activation of more than one receptor subtype. The purpose of this study was to determine whether adenosine A(2A) and/or A(2B) receptors modulate adenosine A(1) receptor-mediated cardioprotection. Isolated perfused hearts of wild-type (WT), A(2A) knockout (KO), and A(2B)KO mice, perfused at constant pressure and constant heart rate, underwent 30 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion. The adenosine A(1) receptor agonist N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA; 200 nM) was administrated 10 min before ischemia and for the first 10 min of reperfusion. Treatment with CHA significantly improved postischemic left ventricular developed pressure (74 ± 4% vs. 44 ± 4% of preischemic left ventricular developed pressure at 60 min of reperfusion) and reduced infarct size (30 ± 2% with CHA vs. 52 ± 5% in control) in WT hearts, effects that were blocked by the A(1) antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (100 nM). Treatments with the A(2A) receptor agonist CGS-21680 (200 nM) and the A(2B) agonist BAY 60-6583 (200 nM) did not exert any beneficial effects. Deletion of adenosine A(2A) or A(2B) receptor subtypes did not alter ischemia-reperfusion injury, but CHA failed to exert a cardioprotective effect in hearts of mice from either KO group. These findings indicate that both adenosine A(2A) and A(2B) receptors are required for adenosine A(1) receptor-mediated cardioprotection, implicating a role for interactions among receptor subtypes.

A(2A) adenosine receptor-mediated increase in coronary flow in hyperlipidemic APOE-knockout mice

Adenosine-induced coronary vasodilation is predominantly A_2A adenosine receptor (AR)-mediated, whereas A₁ AR is known to negatively modulate the coronary flow (CF). However, the coronary responses to adenosine in hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis are not well understood. Using hyperlipidemic/atherosclerotic apolipoprotein E (APOE)–knockout mice, CF responses to nonspecific adenosine agonist (5′-N-ethylcarboxamide adenosine, NECA) and specific adenosine agonists (2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyl-adenosine [CCPA, A₁ AR-specific] and CGS-21680, A_2A AR-specific) were assessed using isolated Langendorff hearts. Western blot analysis was performed in the aorta from APOE and their wild-type (WT) control (C57BL/6J). Baseline CF (expressed as mL/min/g heart weight) was not different among WT (13.23 ± 3.58), APOE (13.22 ± 2.78), and APOE on high-fat diet (HFD) for 12 weeks (APOE-HFD, 12.37 ± 4.76). Concentration response curves induced by CGS-21680 were significantly shifted to the left in APOE and APOE-HFD when compared with WT. CCPA induced an increase in CF only at 10⁻⁶ M in all groups and the effect was reversed by the addition of a selective A_2A AR antagonist, SCH-58261 (10⁻⁶ M), and a significant decrease in CF from baseline was observed. Western blot analysis showed a significant upregulation of A_2A AR in the aorta from APOE and APOE-HFD. This study provides the first evidence that CF responses to A_2A AR stimulation were upregulated in hyperlipidemic/atherosclerotic animals. The speculation is that the use of A_2A AR-specific agonist for myocardial perfusion imaging (such as regadenoson) could overestimate the coronary reserve in coronary artery disease patients.

Mechanisms involved in the adenosine-induced vasorelaxation to the pig prostatic small arteries

Benign prostatic hypertrophy has been related with glandular ischemia processes and adenosine is a potent vasodilator agent. This study investigates the mechanisms underlying the adenosine-induced vasorelaxation in pig prostatic small arteries. Adenosine receptors expression was determined by Western blot and immunohistochemistry, and rings were mounted in myographs for isometric force recording. A(2A) and A(3) receptor expression was observed in the arterial wall and A(2A)-immunoreactivity was identified in the adventitia-media junction and endothelium. A(1) and A(2B) receptor expression was not obtained. On noradrenaline-precontracted rings, P1 receptor agonists produced concentration-dependent relaxations with the following order of potency: 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) = CGS21680 > 2-Cl-IB-MECA = 2-Cl-cyclopentyladenosine = adenosine. Adenosine reuptake inhibition potentiated both NECA and adenosine relaxations. Endothelium removal and ZM241385, an A(2A) antagonist, reduced NECA relaxations that were not modified by A(1), A(2B), and A(3) receptor antagonists. Neuronal voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels and nitric oxide (NO) synthase blockade, and adenylyl cyclase activation enhanced these responses, which were reduced by protein kinase A inhibition and by blockade of the intermediate (IK(Ca))- and small (SK(Ca))-conductance Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channels. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX), large-conductance Ca(2+)-activated-, ATP-dependent-, and voltage-gated-K(+) channel failed to modify these responses. These results suggest that adenosine induces endothelium-dependent relaxations in the pig prostatic arteries via A(2A) purinoceptors. The adenosine vasorelaxation, which is prejunctionally modulated, is produced via NO- and COX-independent mechanisms that involve activation of IK(Ca) and SK(Ca) channels and stimulation of adenylyl cyclase. Endothelium-derived NO playing a regulatory role under conditions in which EDHF is non-functional is also suggested. Adenosine-induced vasodilatation could be useful to prevent prostatic ischemia.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXI. Nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors--an update

In the 10 years since our previous International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology report on the nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors, no developments have led to major changes in the recommendations. However, there have been so many other developments that an update is needed. The fact that the structure of one of the adenosine receptors has recently been solved has already led to new ways of in silico screening of ligands. The evidence that adenosine receptors can form homo- and heteromultimers has accumulated, but the functional significance of such complexes remains unclear. The availability of mice with genetic modification of all the adenosine receptors has led to a clarification of the functional roles of adenosine, and to excellent means to study the specificity of drugs. There are also interesting associations between disease and structural variants in one or more of the adenosine receptors. Several new selective agonists and antagonists have become available. They provide improved possibilities for receptor classification. There are also developments hinting at the usefulness of allosteric modulators. Many drugs targeting adenosine receptors are in clinical trials, but the established therapeutic use is still very limited.

Adenosine receptor subtypes and the heart failure phenotype: translating lessons from mice to man

Adenosine plays an important role in the pathophysiology of heart failure and in myocardial protection during ischemia and reperfusion. The action of adenosine in the heart is mediated by four G-protein-coupled receptors: A(1)-AR and A(3)-AR, which act via Gα(1), and A(2A)-AR and A(2B)-AR, which act via Gα(s). Understanding of cellular signaling pathways triggered by adenosine has been complicated by the availability of only partially specific adenosine agonists/antagonists. Adenosine signaling appears to be at times redundant in receptor function, and cellular signaling pathways for adenosine are multiple, parallel, and interrelated. Data obtained about the specific role of individual adenosine receptors, through the genetic modulation of receptors in murine hearts have provided important information about the role of adenosine receptors in the heart. Here we review existing data and present new results that clarify the function of individual adenosine receptors in the heart and their role in the development of left ventricular dysfunction, and about the downstream signaling systems that are modified by adenosine receptor activation.

Adenosine A2A receptor activation attenuates tubuloglomerular feedback responses by stimulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase

Adenosine A(2) receptors have been suggested to modulate tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) responses by counteracting adenosine A(1) receptor-mediated vasoconstriction, but the mechanisms are unclear. We tested the hypothesis that A(2A) receptor activation blunts TGF by release of nitric oxide in the juxtaglomerular apparatus (JGA). Maximal TGF responses were measured in male Sprague-Dawley rats as changes in proximal stop-flow pressure (ΔP(SF)) in response to increased perfusion of the loop of Henle (0 to 40 nl/min) with artificial tubular fluid (ATF). The maximal TGF response was studied after 5 min intratubular perfusion (10 nl/min) with ATF or ATF + A(2A) receptor agonist (CGS-21680; 10(-7) mol/l). The interaction with nitric oxide synthase (NOS) isoforms was tested by perfusion with a nonselective NOS inhibitor [N(ω)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (L-NAME); 10(-3) mol/l] or a selective neuronal NOS (nNOS) inhibitor [N(ω)-propyl-L-arginine (L-NPA); 10(-6) mol/l] alone, and with the A(2A) agonist. Blood pressure, urine flow, and P(SF) at 0 nl/min were similar among the groups. The maximal TGF response (ΔP(SF)) with ATF alone (12.3 ± 0.6 mmHg) was attenuated by selective A(2A) stimulation (9.5 ± 0.4 mmHg). L-NAME enhanced maximal TGF responses (18.9 ± 0.4 mmHg) significantly more than L-NPA (15.2 ± 0.7 mmHg). Stimulation of A(2A) receptors did not influence maximal TGF response during nonselective NOS inhibition (19.0 ± 0.4) but attenuated responses during nNOS inhibition (10.3 ± 0.4 mmHg). In conclusion, adenosine A(2A) receptor activation attenuated TGF responses by stimulation of endothelial NOS (eNOS), presumably in the afferent arteriole. Moreover, NO derived from both eNOS and nNOS in the JGA may blunt TGF responses.

Adenosine and its receptors in the heart: regulation, retaliation and adaptation

The purine nucleoside adenosine is an important regulator within the cardiovascular system, and throughout the body. Released in response to perturbations in energy state, among other stimuli, local adenosine interacts with 4 adenosine receptor sub-types on constituent cardiac and vascular cells: A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3)ARs. These G-protein coupled receptors mediate varied responses, from modulation of coronary flow, heart rate and contraction, to cardioprotection, inflammatory regulation, and control of cell growth and tissue remodeling. Research also unveils an increasingly complex interplay between members of the adenosine receptor family, and with other receptor groups. Given generally favorable effects of adenosine receptor activity (e.g. improving the balance between myocardial energy utilization and supply, limiting injury and adverse remodeling, suppressing inflammation), the adenosine receptor system is an attractive target for therapeutic manipulation. Cardiovascular adenosine receptor-based therapies are already in place, and trials of new treatments underway. Although the complex interplay between adenosine receptors and other receptors, and their wide distribution and functions, pose challenges to implementation of site/target specific cardiovascular therapy, the potential of adenosinergic pharmacotherapy can be more fully realized with greater understanding of the roles of adenosine receptors under physiological and pathological conditions. This review addresses some of the major known and proposed actions of adenosine and adenosine receptors in the heart and vessels, focusing on the ability of the adenosine receptor system to regulate cell function, retaliate against injurious stressors, and mediate longer-term adaptive responses.

Differential effects of adenosine A2a and A2b receptors on cardiac contractility

The mammalian myocardium expresses four adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes: A(1)AR, A(2a)AR, A(2b)AR, and A(3)AR. The A(1)AR is well known for its profound antiadrenergic effects, but the roles of other AR subtypes in modulating contractility remain inconclusive. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine the direct and indirect effects of A(2a)AR and A(2b)AR on cardiac contractility. Experiments were conducted in paced, constant pressure-perfused isolated hearts from wild-type (WT), A(2a)AR knockout (KO), and A(2b)AR KO mice. The A(2a)AR agonist CGS-21680 did not alter basal contractility or β-adrenergic receptor agonist isoproterenol (Iso)-mediated positive inotropic responses, and Iso-induced effects were unaltered in A(2a)AR KO hearts. However, A(2a)AR gene ablation resulted in a potentiation of the antiadrenergic effects mediated by the A(1)AR agonist 2-chloro-N-cyclopentyladenosine. The nonselective AR agonist 5'-N-ethylcarboxamido adenosine and the selective A(2b)AR agonist BAY 60-6583 induced coronary flow-independent increases in contractility, but BAY 60-6583 did not alter Iso-induced contractile responses. The A(1)AR antiadrenergic effect was not potentiated in A(2b)AR KO hearts. The expression of all four AR subtypes in the heart and ventricular myocytes was confirmed using real-time quantitative PCR. Taken together, these results indicate that A(2a)AR does not increase cardiac contractility directly but indirectly alters contractility by modulating the A(1)AR antiadrenergic effect, whereas A(2b)AR exerts direct contractile effects but does not alter β-adrenergic or A(1)AR antiadrenergic effects. These results indicate that multiple ARs differentially modulate cardiac function.

Adenosine A(2) receptors modulate tubuloglomerular feedback

Adenosine can mediate the tubuloglomerular (TGF) response via activation of A(1) receptors on the afferent arteriole, but both adenosine A(1) and A(2) receptors can regulate preglomerular resistance. We tested the hypothesis that adenosine A(2) receptors offset the effect of A(1) receptors and modulate the TGF. Maximal TGF responses were measured in male Sprague-Dawley rats as changes in proximal stop-flow pressure (DeltaP(SF)) in response to increased perfusion of the loop of Henle (0 to 40 nl/min) with artificial tubular fluid (ATF). The maximal TGF response was studied after 5 min of intratubular perfusion (10 nl/min) with ATF alone, or with ATF plus the A(2A) receptor antagonist (ZM-241385; 10(-7) or 10(-5) mol/l), A(1) receptor antagonist (PSB-36; 10(-8) mol/l), or with a combination of A(1) (PSB-36; 10(-8) mol/l) and A(2A) (ZM-241385; 10(-7) mol/l) antagonists. The maximal TGF response (DeltaP(SF)) with ATF alone was 11.7 +/- 1.0 mmHg. Specific A(2) inhibition (low dose) enhanced the maximal TGF response (15.7 +/- 0.8 mmHg; P < 0.01), whereas a high dose (unspecific inhibition) attenuated the response (5.0 +/- 0.4 mmHg; P < 0.001). A(1) inhibition alone led to a paradoxical TGF response, with an increase in P(SF) of 3.1 +/- 0.5 mmHg (P < 0.05). Simultaneous application of A(1) and A(2) antagonists abolished the TGF response (DeltaP(SF): 0.4 +/- 0.3 mmHg). In conclusion, adenosine A(2) receptors modulate the TGF response by counteracting the effects of adenosine A(1) receptors.

Involvement of A1 adenosine receptors in altered vascular responses and inflammation in an allergic mouse model of asthma

Poor lung function and respiratory disorders like asthma have a positive correlation with the development of adverse cardiovascular events. Increased adenosine levels are associated with lung inflammation that could lead to altered vascular responses and systemic inflammation. We hypothesized that asthmatic lung inflammation has systemic effects through A(1) adenosine receptors (A(1)AR) and investigated the effects of aerosolized adenosine on vascular reactivity and inflammation, using A(1)AR knockout (A(1)KO) and corresponding wild-type (A(1)WT) mice that were divided into three experimental groups each: control (CON), allergen sensitized and challenged (SEN), and SEN + aerosolized adenosine (SEN + AD). Animals were sensitized with ragweed (200 microg ip; days 1 and 6), followed by 1% ragweed aerosol challenges (days 11 to 13). On day 14, the SEN + AD groups received one adenosine aerosol challenge (6 mg/ml) for 2 min, and aortae were collected on day 15. 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA; nonselective adenosine analog) induced concentration-dependent aortic relaxation in the A(1)WT CON group, which was impaired in the A(1)WT SEN and SEN + AD groups. All groups of A(1)KO mice showed similar (no significant difference) concentration-dependent relaxation to NECA. The A(1)WT SEN and SEN + AD groups had a significantly higher contraction to selective A(1) agonist 2-chloro-N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA) compared with the CON group. Western blot data showed that aortic A(1)AR expression was significantly increased in WT SEN and SEN + AD mice compared with CON mice. Gene expression of ICAM-1 and IL-5 was significantly increased in allergic A(1)WT aorta and were undetected in the A(1)KO groups. A(1)WT allergic mice had significantly higher airway hyperresponsiveness (enhanced pause) to NECA, with adenosine aerosol further enhancing it. In conclusion, allergic A(1)WT mice showed altered vascular reactivity, increased airway hyperresponsiveness, and systemic inflammation. These data suggest that A(1)AR is proinflammatory systemically in this model of allergic asthma.

A new role for the A2b adenosine receptor in regulating platelet function

BACKGROUND

Activation of platelets is a critical component of atherothrombosis and plays a central role in the progression of unstable cardiovascular syndromes. Adenosine, acting through adenosine receptors, increases intracellular cAMP levels and inhibits platelet aggregation. The A2a adenosine receptor has already been recognized as a mediator of adenosine-dependent effects on platelet aggregation, and here we present a new role for the A2b adenosine receptor (A2bAR) in this process.

METHODS AND RESULTS

As compared with platelets from wild-type controls, platelets derived from A2bAR knockout mice have significantly greater ADP receptor activation-induced aggregation. Although mouse megakaryocytes and platelets express low levels of the A2bAR transcript, this gene is highly upregulated following injury and systemic inflammation in vivo. Under these conditions, A2bAR-mediated inhibition of platelet aggregation significantly increases. Our studies also identify a novel mechanism by which the A2bAR could regulate platelet aggregation; namely, ablation of the A2bAR leads to upregulated expression of the P2Y1 ADP receptor, whereas A2bAR-mediated or direct elevation of cAMP has the opposite effect. Thus, the A2bAR regulates platelet function beyond mediating the immediate effect of adenosine on aggregation.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, these investigations show for the first time that the platelet A2bAR is upregulated under stress in vivo, plays a significant role in regulating ADP receptor expression, and inhibits agonist-induced platelet aggregation.

The exercising heart at altitude

Maximal cardiac output is reduced in severe acute hypoxia but also in chronic hypoxia by mechanisms that remain poorly understood. In theory, the reduction of maximal cardiac output could result from: (1) a regulatory response from the central nervous system, (2) reduction of maximal pumping capacity of the heart due to insufficient coronary oxygen delivery prior to the achievement of the normoxic maximal cardiac output, or (3) reduced central command. In this review, we focus on the effects that acute and chronic hypoxia have on the pumping capacity of the heart, particularly on myocardial contractility and the molecular responses elicited by acute and chronic hypoxia in the cardiac myocytes. Special emphasis is put on the cardioprotective effects of chronic hypoxia.

Absence of adenosine-mediated aortic relaxation in A(2A) adenosine receptor knockout mice

Adenosine mediates vascular responses through four receptor subtypes: A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3). The role of A(2A) receptors in aortic vascular tone was investigated using A(2A) adenosine receptor (AR) knockout (A(2A)KO) and corresponding wild-type (A(2A)WT) mice. Isolated aortic rings from A(2A)WT and A(2A)KO mice were precontracted with phenylephrine (10(-7) M), and concentration responses for adenosine analogs and selective agonists/antagonists were obtained. Nonselective adenosine analog (NECA; EC(50) = 6.78 microM) and CGS-21680 (A(2A)AR selective agonist; EC(50) = 0.013 microM) produced concentration-dependent relaxation (maximum of 25% and 28% relaxation at 10(-5) M NECA and CGS-21680, respectively) in A(2A)WT aorta. In A(2A)KO aorta, NECA (EC(50) = 0.075 microM) induced concentration-dependent contraction (maximum contraction of 47% at 10(-6) M; P < 0.05 compared with A(2A)WT), whereas CGS-21680 produced no response. SCH-58261 (10(-6) M; A(2A)AR selective antagonist) abolished both NECA- and CGS-21680-mediated vasorelaxation in A(2A)WT (P < 0.05), whereas no change was observed in A(2A)KO. When DPCPX (10(-5) M; A(1) selective antagonist) was used in NECA concentration response, greater vasorelaxation was observed in A(2A)WT (50% vs. 25% in controls at 10(-5) M; P < 0.05), whereas lower contraction was seen in A(2A)KO tissues (5% vs. 47% in controls at 10(-6) M; P < 0.05). Aortic endothelial function, determined by response to acetylcholine, was significantly higher in WT compared with KO (66% vs. 51%; P < 0.05). BAY 60-6583 (A(2B) selective agonist) produced similar relaxation in both KO and WT tissues. In conclusion, A(2A)AR KO mice had significantly lower aortic relaxation and endothelial function, suggesting that the A(2A)AR plays an important role in vasorelaxation, probably through an endothelium-dependent mechanism.