Missed opportunities to intervene with caregivers of young children highly exposed to secondhand tobacco smoke

Barriers to implementation of pediatric emergency department interventions for parental tobacco use and dependence: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework

Background

Pediatric emergency department (PED) and urgent care (UC) professionals can play a key role in delivering evidence-based guidelines to address parental tobacco use and child tobacco smoke exposure (TSE). Understanding PED/UC professionals’ perceptions regarding these guidelines is the first step in developing and implementing a TSE screening and counseling intervention in these settings. This study aimed to use the theoretical domains framework (TDF) to identify current screening and counseling behaviors of PED/UC professionals related to parental tobacco use and child TSE, and determine barriers and enablers that influence these behaviors.

Methods

Semi-structured, focused interviews were conducted with 29 actively practicing PED/UC clinical staff who worked at one large, Midwestern children’s hospital. The interview guide was informed by the TDF and included open-ended questions. Content analysis of interview transcripts was guided by the TDF. Nurses, physicians, and healthcare administrators were assessed overall and by group membership to ensure each group was represented based on their varying PED/UC roles.

Results

Fifty-one percent were nurses, 38% were physicians, and 11% were healthcare administrators. Most PED/UC professionals did not currently follow the guidelines, but perceived addressing parental tobacco use as part of their role. All 14 TDF domains were identified by nurses, physicians, and administrators in relation to counseling for parental tobacco use and child TSE. Domains with the most sub-themes were (1) knowledge: lack of knowledge about tobacco counseling, including implementing counseling, cessation resources/referrals, and thirdhand smoke; (2) beliefs about capabilities: not comfortable counseling parents, easier to discuss with parents who are receptive and to ask and advise when patients have a TSE-related complaint, and more likely to discuss if there were resources/referrals; and (3) environmental context and resources: barriers include lack of time, training, and resources and referral information to give to parents, and an enabler is using TSE-related complaints as a context to offer counseling.

Conclusions

Study findings provide a strong foundation for developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines regarding parental tobacco use and child TSE in the PED/UC setting. Future intervention development will address all TDF domains and test the implementation of the intervention in the PED/UC setting.

Utilization of a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Reduce Child Tobacco Smoke Exposure in the Urgent Care Setting

BACKGROUND

Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) may facilitate caregiver tobacco screening and counseling by pediatric urgent care (UC) nurses.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of a CDSS to address caregivers' tobacco use and child tobacco smoke exposure (TSE).

METHODS

We conducted a 3-month prospective study on caregivers screened using a CDSS. Nurses used the CDSS to advise, assess, and assist caregivers to quit. We assessed caregiver sociodemographics, smoking habits, and child TSE.

RESULTS

We screened 185 caregivers whose children were exposed to TSE for study inclusion; 155 (84%) met the eligibility criteria, and 149 (80.5%) were included in the study. Study nurses advised 35.2% of the caregivers to quit, assessed 35.9% for readiness to quit, and assisted 32.4%. Of the 149 participants, 83.1% were female; 47.0% were white and 45.6% African American; 84.6% had public insurance or were self-pay; 71.1% were highly nicotine dependent; 50.0% and 50.7% allowed smoking in the home and car, respectively; and 81.3% of children were biochemically confirmed to be exposed to tobacco smoke. At follow-up (86.6% retention), 58.9% reported quit attempts at 3 months. There was a significant decrease in nicotine dependence and a significant increase in motivation to quit. Self-reported quit rate was 7.8% at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

An electronic health record-embedded CDSS was feasible to incorporate into busy UC nurses' workloads and was associated with encouraging changes in the smoking behavior of caregivers. More research on the use of CDSS to screen and counsel caregivers who smoke in the UC and other acute care settings is warranted.

Electronic Health Record Classification of Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Cotinine Levels in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients

OBJECTIVES

Documentation of children's tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) in the electronic health record (EHR) can have important implications for clinical care. However, it may not be accurate if it is not based on biochemical assessment, the most reliable method of verifying TSE. Our objectives were to compare the accuracy of EHR classification of TSE with cotinine verification and to explore parent and child variables associated with biochemically verified TSE.

METHODS

Participants were 171 hospitalized pediatric patients (ages 0-17 years; mean age 5.1 [SD 3.7] years) who had EHR documentation of TSE and measured salivary cotinine. Children with cotinine levels >1 ng/mL were classified as having biochemical verification of TSE. Parents reported sociodemographic characteristics, and children's EHRs were abstracted for TSE status, past medical history, and diagnoses. We conducted χ² tests to assess the agreement between EHR classification of TSE status and cotinine levels. Then, we assessed the relationship between sociodemographic and clinical variables and cotinine using crude and adjusted logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Overall, 71% (121 of 171) of EHR classifications were correct on the basis of cotinine levels. Specificity analyses showed that 77% (53 of 69) were correctly identified as exposed to tobacco smoke. Sensitivity analyses showed that 67% (68 of 102) were correctly identified as unexposed. The negative predictive value was 0.61 (53 of 87); 39% (34 of 87) were misclassified as unexposed. The positive predictive value was 0.81 (68 of 84); 19% (16 of 84) were misclassified as exposed.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost 40% of children were misclassified in the EHR as unexposed to tobacco smoke. Biochemical verification should be used as part of universal TSE screening during pediatric hospitalizations.

The Association of Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Inflammatory Markers in Hospitalized Children

Background: Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure is associated with altered cytokine levels in children. We sought to examine ETS exposure prevalence and the relationship between ETS exposure and cytokine levels in a sample of hospitalized children. (2) Methods: Inflammatory markers (IL-8, IL-1β, IL-10, and TNF-α) and cotinine were measured in saliva of hospitalized, nonsmoking children (N = 112). To assess the association between ETS exposure and immune system response, we built a multivariate regression model including the four inflammatory markers as the response variables and cotinine, age, sex, and discharge diagnosis as explanatory variables while assessing possible interaction effects. (3) Results: Mean age (SD) was 5.8(5.0) years; Geometric Mean (GeoM) cotinine = 1.8 [95% CI = 1.4–2.2]. Children with non-inflammatory other diagnoses had lower IL-10 (p = 0.003) and TNF-α (p = 0.009) levels than children with inflammatory other diagnoses. Children with asthma (p = 0.01) and bacterial illnesses and/or pneumonia (p = 0.002) had higher IL-8 levels. Independent of diagnosis, there was a significant curvilinear association between cotinine and IL-1β (p = 0.002) reflecting no association for cotinine levels <5 ng/mL and a positive association for >5 ng/mL. (4) Conclusions: Children with higher ETS exposure levels have higher IL-1β levels regardless of age, sex, and diagnosis. ETS exposure may increase pro-inflammatory immune responses in children and may interfere with native immune responses and the ability to heal and fight infection.

Tobacco Use Behaviors and Perceptions of Parental Smokers in the Emergency Department Setting

BACKGROUND

More information is needed about modifiable child tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) patterns in racially diverse parental smokers to tailor interventions designed to help parents quit smoking and reduce their child's TSE. Our objectives were to determine whether there were differences in smoking and TSE patterns based on parental race and child age and whether these patterns differed based on child age within black and white parental smokers. Secondary objectives were to assess the relationship between parental perceptions about the effects of smoking and the benefits of quitting on their child based on child age, race, and reported TSE patterns and to examine biochemically verified TSE levels by child age, race, and parent-reported TSE patterns.

METHODS

Participants (N = 415) were non-Hispanic black and non-Hispanic white parental smokers, mean age (standard deviation [SD]) = 31.2 (7.2) years, who visited the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) or Urgent Care (UC) with their child, mean age (SD) = 4.7 (4.6) years. Parents reported sociodemographics, smoking, and child TSE patterns. We conducted chi-square tests, independent t-tests, and general linear regression models to answer our primary objectives and linear regression models to answer our secondary objectives.

RESULTS

Parents were 56.1% non-Hispanic black; 87.5% women; mean (SD) number of cigarettes smoked/day was 10.5(6.8). A higher proportion of parents with younger children <3 years old reported smoking bans compared with parents with older children ⩾3 to <18 years old (41.3% vs 19.7%, P < .0001). Subsequent analyses revealed this pattern for both black and white parents. A total of 212 (51%) of children had biochemical assessment of TSE; 89.6% had detectable TSE. Younger children had significantly higher cotinine levels than older children independent of their race (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Children of parental smokers who visit the PED/UC were highly tobacco smoke exposed. Both black and white parental smokers with younger children were more likely to enforce smoking bans, but younger children had higher TSE levels than older children. Interventions that target this group of parental smokers with younger children may be more effective than interventions geared to all parental smokers.

Association of secondhand smoke exposure with asthma symptoms, medication use, and healthcare utilization among asthmatic adolescents

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe) and asthma symptoms, medication use, and emergency department (ED)/urgent care (UC) utilization among adolescents.

METHODS

We performed a secondary cross-sectional analysis of Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Wave 2 (2014-2015) including asthmatic adolescents (N = 2198). Logistic regression models and Poisson regression models were built.

RESULTS

Participants with SHSe ≥1 hour in the past 7 days were at increased risk of reporting shortness of breath and harder to exercise aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.04-1.43), wheezing (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.56), wheezing disturbing sleep (aOR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.35-2.63), wheezing during/after exercise (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.19-1.66), wheezing limiting speech (aOR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.55-2.86), dry cough at night (aOR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.54-2.24), and asthma symptoms disturbing sleep (aOR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.81-2.79). Participants with SHSe ≥1 hour were more likely to take asthma medications (aOR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.03-1.52), including steroids (aOR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.19-2.91), oxygen therapy (aOR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.82-4.54), and controlling medications (aOR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.24-1.82). Symptoms and medications varied by living with a smoker and home SHSe. Participants with SHSe were at increased risk of having a higher number of asthma attacks that required steroid use. Participants who lived with a smoker and had home SHSe were at increased risk of having higher ED/UC visits for asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

SHSe reduction efforts are needed for asthmatic adolescents, and EDs/UCs are promising venues.

Adolescent Tobacco Smoke Exposure, Respiratory Symptoms, and Emergency Department Use

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to examine the relationship between distinct tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) measures and TSE-related symptoms and emergency department (ED) and/or urgent care (UC) use among nonsmoking adolescents without asthma diagnoses.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of 7389 adolescents who completed the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study wave 2. Logistic regression and Poisson regression models were built.

RESULTS

Adolescents with TSE were at increased risk of reporting: shortness of breath, finding it hard to exercise, wheezing during or after exercise, and dry cough at night. Adolescents who lived with a smoker and had home TSE were at increased odds of reporting wheezing or whistling in the chest, and only adolescents with home TSE were at increased risk of reporting wheezing that disturbed sleep. Adolescents with TSE were less likely to report very good or excellent overall health and physical health but were more likely to report they sometimes, often, or very often missed school because of illness. Participants who lived with a smoker and had TSE ≥1 hour were more likely to have had an ED and/or UC visit. Participants with any TSE were at increased risk of having a higher number of ED and/or UC visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Different TSE measures uniquely increased the risk of TSE-related symptoms, but any TSE increased the risk of having a higher number of ED and/or UC visits. The providers at these high-volume settings should offer interventions to adolescents who are exposed to tobacco smoke and their families to decrease these symptoms and related morbidity.

Secondhand smoke exposure, illness severity, and resource utilization in pediatric emergency department patients with respiratory illnesses

OBJECTIVE

Hospital-based data reveal that children who have secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe) experience severe respiratory illnesses and greater resource utilization. Our objective was to assess the relationship between SHSe and illness severity/resource utilization among children presenting to the pediatric emergency department (PED) with three common respiratory conditions-asthma, bronchiolitis, and pneumonia.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a yearlong consecutive sample of PED patients with SHSe status documentation and asthma, bronchiolitis, or pneumonia diagnoses was performed. PED illness severity/resource utilization variables included triage categorization, initial oxygen saturation, evaluation/testing (influenza A & B, respiratory syncytial virus, chest X-ray), procedures/interventions performed (supplemental oxygen, suctioning, intubation), medications administered, and disposition. Logistic and linear regression models were conducted to determine differences in each diagnosis group while controlling for sociodemographics, medical history, seasonality, and insurance type.

RESULTS

There were 3,229 children with documentation of SHSe status and an asthma (41%), bronchiolitis (36%), or pneumonia (23%) diagnosis. Across diagnosis groups, approximately 1/4 had positive documentation of SHSe. Asthmatic children with SHSe were more likely to receive corticosteroids (odds ratio (OR) = 1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.19, 2.44) and/or magnesium sulfate (OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.14, 2.40). Children with SHSe and bronchiolitis were more likely to receive racemic epinephrine (OR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.21, 5.08), have a chest X-ray (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.00, 1.85), and/or be admitted (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.09, 1.95). No differences in illness severity/resource utilization were identified for children with pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS

SHS-exposed children with asthma or bronchiolitis have greater illness severity/resource utilization. Our findings highlight the importance of SHSe assessment, cessation, and research efforts in the PED setting.

Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Pediatric Healthcare Visits and Hospitalizations

INTRODUCTION

This study assessed the relationship between secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe) as measured by serum cotinine and healthcare utilization among children.

METHODS

In 2016, the 2009-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data were analyzed including 4,985 children aged 3-19 years. Associations between SHSe and having a routine place for healthcare, type of place, and hospital utilization were examined using logistic regression models. Poisson regression analyses assessed the relationship between SHSe and number of hospital admissions. Relationships between SHSe and acute care visits and hospital utilization were examined among asthmatic children.

RESULTS

SHSe level did not differ by having a routine place for healthcare, although children with high SHSe indicative of active smoking (cotinine ≥3 ng/mL) were 3.49 times (95% CI=1.77, 6.89) more likely to use an emergency department. Children with high SHSe were 2.85 times (95% CI=1.87, 4.34) more likely to have had an overnight hospital stay. Children with high SHSe had 2.05 times (95% CI=1.46, 2.87) the risk of having a higher number of hospital admissions for overnight stays versus children with no SHSe (cotinine <0.05 ng/mL). Among asthmatic children, those with high SHSe and low SHSe (cotinine 0.05-2.99 ng/mL) were more likely to have an acute care visit, overnight hospital stay, and higher number of hospital admissions than asthmatic children with no SHSe.

CONCLUSIONS

High SHSe is associated with increased healthcare utilization. The emergency department and inpatient settings are important venues in which to routinely offer cessation and SHSe reduction interventions.

Healthy families: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of a screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment intervention for caregivers to reduce secondhand smoke exposure among pediatric emergency patients

Background

Involuntary exposure to secondhand smoke (SHSe) is an important cause of morbidity in children who present to the pediatric emergency department (PED) and urgent care (UC). SHSe interventions delivered in the PED and UC would benefit both the smoker and child, but there have been no large trials testing the efficacy of such interventions. The Healthy Families program is the first randomized controlled trial to test whether a screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) intervention delivered in the PED and UC will be effective in decreasing SHSe in children and increasing cessation in smokers.

Methods/design

This trial uses a randomized, two-group design in which caregiver-smokers of children 0–17 years old are recruited from the PED and UC. Eligible caregiver-smokers are randomized to either the: 1) SBIRT Condition with face-to-face, tailored counseling that focuses on the child’s illness, the importance of reducing child SHSe, caregiver smoking cessation, and the option to receive nicotine replacement therapy; or 2) Healthy Habits Control Condition which includes face-to-face, tailored attention control “5–2–1-0” counseling that focuses on improving the child’s health. Dyadic assessments are conducted in-person at baseline, and via email, phone, or in-person at 6-weeks and 6-months. The primary outcomes are biochemically-verified, 7-day point prevalence and prolonged smoking abstinence. Secondary outcomes are cigarettes smoked per week, 24 h quit attempts, and biochemically validated child SHSe at each time point. The costs of this intervention will also be analyzed.

Discussion

This study will test an innovative, multilevel intervention designed to reduce child SHSe and increase smoking cessation in caregivers. If effective and routinely used, this SBIRT model could reach at least one million smokers a year in the U.S., resulting in significant reductions in caregivers’ tobacco use, SHSe-related pediatric illness, and healthcare costs in this population of children.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02531594. Date of registration: August 4, 2015.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4278-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Development of a Tobacco Cessation Clinical Decision Support System for Pediatric Emergency Nurses

Almost 50% of children who visit the pediatric emergency department are exposed to tobacco smoke. However, pediatric emergency nurses do not routinely address this issue. The incorporation of a clinical decision support system into the electronic health record may improve the rates of tobacco exposure screening and interventions. We used a mixed-methods design to develop, refine, and implement an evidence-based clinical decision support system to help nurses screen, educate, and assist caregivers to quit smoking. We included an advisory panel of emergency department experts and leaders and focus and user groups of nurses. The prompts include the following: (1) "Ask" about child smoke exposure and caregiver smoking; (2) "Advise" caregivers to reduce their child's smoke exposure by quitting smoking; (3) "Assess" interest; and (4) "Assist" caregivers to quit. The clinical decision support system was created to reflect nurses' suggestions and was implemented in five busy urgent care settings with 38 nurses. The nurses reported that the system was easy to use and helped them to address caregiver smoking. The use of this innovative tool may create a sustainable and disseminable model for prompting nurses to provide evidence-based tobacco cessation treatment.

Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Health-Care Utilization Among Children in the United States

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess patterns of health-care utilization among children who potentially had tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) compared to those who were not exposed.

DESIGN

A secondary data analysis of the 2011 to 2012 National Survey on Children's Health was performed.

SETTING

Households nationwide were selected.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 95 677 children aged 0 to 17 years.

MEASURES

Sociodemographic characteristics, TSE status, and health-care visits were measured.

ANALYSIS

Multivariable logistic regression models were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 24.1% of children lived with smokers. Approximately 5% had home TSE. Participants who lived with a smoker were significantly more likely to have had a medical care visit (odds ratio [OR] = 1.22, confidence interval [CI] = 1.21-1.22) and were more likely to seek sick care or health advice at an emergency department (OR = 1.23, CI = 1.23-1.24) but were less likely to have had a dental care visit (OR = 0.82, CI = 0.82-0.83) than those who did not live with a smoker. Similar findings were found among participants who had home TSE.

CONCLUSION

TSE is a risk factor for increased use of pediatric medical care. Based on the high number of children who potentially had TSE and received sick care or health advice at an emergency emergency department, this setting may be a venue to deliver health messages to caregivers.

A smoking cessation intervention for low-income smokers in the ED

BACKGROUND

There is a high prevalence of smoking among caregivers who bring their children to the pediatric emergency department (PED) and even higher rates of tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) and related morbidity among their children. The PED visit presents an opportunity to intervene with caregivers, but it is unknown whether they are more likely to quit if their child has a TSE-related illness. We sought to examine a PED-based smoking cessation intervention and compare outcomes based on children's TSE-related illness.

METHODS

A single-arm, prospective trial, with baseline, 3, and 6 month assessments was used in this study. Caregivers whose child had either a TSE-related (n=100) or non-TSE-related illness (n=100) were given a brief intervention consisting of counseling, referral to the Quitline, and free nicotine replacement therapy.

RESULTS

Participants were 91.5% female, 50.5% African American, 100% Medicaid recipients, 30.8 years old, child age mean of 5.5 years, 90% highly nicotine dependent, and 60.3% and 75.8% allowed smoking in the home and car, respectively. At follow-up (65% retention), 80% reported quit attempts at 3 months and 89% between 3 and 6 months. There were significant decreases in number of cigarettes smoked, time to first cigarette, and smoking in the home and car. Quit rates were 12.2% at 3 months, 14.6% at 6 months, and 7.3% at both time points (50% biochemically confirmed). There were no significant differences in outcomes based on children's illness.

CONCLUSIONS

A brief PED-based smoking cessation intervention resulted in quit attempts and successful quits. However, the presence of a TSE-related illness did not result in different cessation outcomes.