An increase in sexually transmitted infections seen in US emergency departments

Sex Disparities in Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Treatment in US Adult Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

In US emergency departments (EDs), empiric antibiotic treatment for gonorrhea (GC) and chlamydia (CT) is common due to the unavailability of immediate test results. Evidence suggests sex-based disparities in treatment practices, with females potentially receiving less empiric treatment than males.

Objective

To investigate sex differences in empiric antibiotic treatment for GC and CT in EDs, comparing practices to subsequent laboratory-confirmed results.

Design Setting and Participants

This systematic review and meta-analysis included studies from US EDs reporting GC/CT testing and empiric antibiotic treatment from January 2010 to February 2021. A total of 1,644 articles were screened, with 17 studies (n = 31,062 patients) meeting inclusion criteria.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcomes were GC/CT test positivity, empiric antibiotic treatment rates, and discordance between treatment and test results, stratified by sex. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model.

Results

Overall GC/CT positivity was 14% (95% CI, 11%-16%): 11% (95% CI, 8%-14%) in females and 25% (95% CI, 23%-26%) in males. Empiric antibiotic treatment was administered in 46% (95% CI, 38%-55%) of cases: 31% (95% CI, 24%-37%) in females and 73% (95% CI, 65%-80%) in males. Among patients without a laboratory-confirmed infection, 38% (95% CI, 30%-47%) received treatment: 27% (95% CI, 20%-34%) of females and 64% (95% CI, 55%-73%) of males. Conversely, 39% (95% CI, 31%-48%) of patients with laboratory-confirmed infections were not treated: 52% (95% CI, 46%-57%) of females and 15% (95% CI, 12%-17%) of males.

Conclusions and Relevance

There is significant discordance between ED empiric antibiotic treatment and laboratory-confirmed results, with notable sex-based disparities. Females were 3.5 times more likely than males to miss treatment despite confirmed infection. These findings highlight the need for improved strategies to reduce sex-based disparities and enhance empiric treatment accuracy for GC/CT in ED settings.

Key Points

Question: Are there sex-based differences in empiric antibiotic treatment for gonorrhea and chlamydia in US emergency departments (EDs), and how do these practices compare to laboratory-confirmed results?Findings: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 studies with 31,062 patients, females were significantly less likely than males to receive empiric antibiotic treatment for gonorrhea and chlamydia. Additionally, 39% of patients with a laboratory-confirmed infection were not empirically treated, with females 3.5 times more likely to miss treatment than males.Meaning: The findings indicate significant sex disparities in ED empiric antibiotic treatment for sexually transmitted infections, underscoring the need for improved strategies to ensure equitable and accurate treatment across sexes.

Testing trends and co-testing patterns for HIV, hepatitis C and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in Emergency departments

Background

Many underserved populations use Emergency Department (EDs) as primary sources of care, representing an important opportunity to provide infectious disease testing and linkage to care. We explored national ED testing trends and co-testing patterns for HIV, hepatitis C, and sexually transmitted infections (STIs).

Methods

We used 2010-2019 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Nationwide Emergency Department Sample data to estimate ED visit testing rates for HIV, hepatitis C, chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis infections, identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Trends and co-testing (visit with tests for > 1 infection) patterns were analyzed by sociodemographic, hospital, and visit characteristics. Trends were evaluated as the average annual percentage change (AAPC) using the Joinpoint Regression.

Results

During 2010-2019, testing events per 1000 visits (AAPCs) increased for HIV from 1.3 to 4.2 (16.3 %), hepatitis C from 0.4 to 2.2 (25.1 %), chlamydia from 9.1 to 16.0 (6.6 %), gonorrhea from 8.4 to 15.7 (7.4 %), and syphilis from 0.7 to 2.0 (12.9 %). Rate increases varied by several characteristics across infections. The largest AAPC increases were among visits by groups with lower base rate testing in 2010, including persons aged ≥ 65 years (HIV: 36.4 %), with Medicaid (HIV: 43.8 %), in the lowest income quintile (hepatitis C: 36.9 %), living in the West (syphilis: 49.4 %) and with non-emergency diagnoses (hepatitis C: 44.1 %). Co-testing increased significantly for all infections except hepatitis C.

Conclusions

HIV, hepatitis C, and STI testing increased in EDs during 2010-2019; however, co-testing patterns were inconsistent. Co-testing may improve diagnosis and linkage to care, especially in areas experiencing higher rates of infection.

Clinical Evaluation of the Alinity m STI Multiplex PCR Assay

BACKGROUND

Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) are routinely tested and reported; however, Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the United States and the prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) infections is likely higher than estimated. We examined the clinical performance of the Alinity m STI assay for detection and surveillance of CT/NG/TV/MG in urine specimens from patients at a large academic medical center.

METHODS

Urine specimen from 198 patients was tested in this evaluation. Alinity m STI and Aptima Combo 2 CT/NG and TV assay (Panther System) results were compared, with discrepant results run on the cobas 6800 CT/NG, TV/MG assays. Analyzer turnaround times, time from loading the specimen on the analyzer to results reporting, were determined for Alinity m and Panther systems.

RESULTS

Overall percent agreements of the Alinity m in comparison with the Aptima and cobas assays for CT, NG, TV, and MG were 99.5% (97.2%, 99.9%), 99.5% (97.2%, 99.9%), 98.4% (95.5%, 99.5%), and 86.4% (66.7%, 95.3), respectively. There were 5 discrepant samples (CT, 1; NG, 1; TV, 3) between the Alinity m and the Aptima assays, and 3 MG discrepant samples between the Alinity m STI and cobas 6800. Two of the 5 Aptima and Alinity m discrepant samples were resolved as they yielded similar results on both Alinity m and cobas 6800. TV and MG infections comprised 54% of the positive samples and were more often asymptomatic than CT and NG infections. Analyzer turnaround time was 3 hours 25 minutes for the Aptima CT/NG, 3 hours 25 minutes for Aptima TV, and 1 hour 55 minutes for Alinity m STI assay.

CONCLUSIONS

The Alinity m STI assay allows for fast and simultaneous detection of the 4 major STI pathogens, which can facilitate surveillance and provide accurate results to help clinicians diagnose for initiation of appropriate treatment.

Sexually Transmitted Infections in the Emergency Department

As the United States faces a worsening epidemic of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), emergency departments (EDs) play a critical role in identifying and treating these infections. The growing health inequities in the distribution and disproportionate impact of STIs add to the urgency of providing high-quality sexual health care through the ED. Changes in population health are reflected in the new Centers for Disease Control recommendations on screening, diagnostic testing, and treatment of STIs. This review covers common, as well as and less common or emerging STIs, and discusses the state-of-the-art guidance on testing paradigms, extragenital sampling, and antimicrobial treatment and prevention of STIs.

Expanding expedited partner therapy and HIV prophylaxis in the emergency department

PURPOSE

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) continue to have a disproportionate impact on individuals belonging to sexual, gender, and racial minorities. Across the nation, many emergency medicine pharmacists (EMPs) possess the skills and knowledge to expand the provision of expedited partner therapy (EPT) for STIs and provide HIV prophylaxis within existing practice frameworks. This report serves as a call to action for expanded provision of EPT and HIV prophylaxis by EMPs and highlights current barriers and solutions to increase pharmacist involvement in these practice areas.

SUMMARY

Emergency medicine pharmacy practice continues to expand to allow for limited prescribing authority through collaborative practice agreements (CPAs). In recent years, CPA restrictions have been changed to facilitate treatment of more patients with less bureaucracy. This report addresses the unique challenges and opportunities for expanding EPT and HIV pre- and postexposure prophylaxis provision by pharmacists in emergency departments (EDs). Furthermore, current strategies and treatments for EPT, such as patient-delivered partner therapy and HIV prophylaxis, are discussed. Pharmacist involvement in STI treatment and HIV prevention is a key strategy to increase access to high-risk populations with high ED utilization and help close current gaps in care.

CONCLUSION

Expanding EMP provision of EPT and HIV prophylaxis may be beneficial to reducing the incidence of STIs and HIV infection in the community. CPAs offer a feasible solution to increase pharmacist involvement in the provision of these treatments. Legislative efforts to expand pharmacist scope of practice can also contribute to increasing access to EPT and HIV prophylaxis. With these efforts, EMPs can play an essential role in the fight against STIs and HIV.

Comparison of two testing strategies for Mycoplasma genitalium in emergency department patients across a statewide health system

PURPOSE

Mycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in women and 1.1% in men aged 21-23 years. (Hilbert and Reno, 2018) A cross-sectional study conducted in a community emergency department (ED) determined that the prevalence of Mgen was 14.8% in asymptomatic female patients. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines recommend testing for Mgen in select circumstances. This study aims to determine what testing strategy in ED patients results in the most appropriate treatment of Mgen based on CDC recommendations.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective, pre- and post-intervention cohort study assessed adherence to CDC recommendations for appropriate management of Mgen in ED patients. Inclusion criteria were patients at least 18 years of age discharged from one of the 15 ED sites within the health system studied who were tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis), and Mgen. Subjects were excluded if they were pregnant, sexually assaulted, or had indeterminate STI results. For cohort 1, which included patients evaluated from May 2022 through July 2022, Mgen was incorporated into the standard STI testing panel. Cohort 2 consisted of patients evaluated from September 2022 through November 2022; testing for Mgen in cohort 2 was optional, and a testing algorithm based on CDC recommendations was disseminated to ED sites. The primary endpoint was the number of subjects treated appropriately for Mgen in accordance with CDC recommendations. Cohort 1 secondary endpoints included overall prevalence of Mgen in patients who presented to ED sites for STI testing and prevalence in ICD-10 code diagnosed PID. Secondary endpoints for both cohorts included baseline characteristics of patients who tested positive for Mgen.

RESULTS

Percent appropriate treatment did not differ significantly between cohort 1 (21%) and cohort 2 (20%), (p > 0.9). However, greater than three times as many subjects were inappropriately treated for Mgen in cohort 1 when the health system studied did not adhere to current CDC Mgen testing recommendations. The overall prevalence of Mgen in ED patients who were tested for STIs was 13.1%. The prevalence of PID ICD-10 diagnosis code in patients positive for Mgen was 2.9%. Based on results of a risk factor analysis to determine if certain baseline characteristics are indicators for a positive infection with Mgen, a positive Mgen result was significantly associated with a positive result for T. vaginalis (p = 0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence regarding the preferred testing strategy for Mgen is currently limited. This study demonstrates that testing all STI presenting patients for Mgen results in antibiotic overuse, so adhering to CDC testing recommendations is important. Prevalence of positive Mgen result in ED patients tested for STIs was similar to results of previously published literature. Risk factor analysis results could be used as a screening method to determine what patients should be considered for Mgen testing. Based on the results of this study, we recommend against including Mgen on the standard ED STI testing panel at this time.

Identifying the Need for and Availability of Evidence-Based Care for Sexually Transmitted Infections in Rural Primary Care Clinics

BACKGROUND

Increasing rates of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) may lead to increased HIV rates, as the STI and HIV epidemics are syndemic. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines recommend including extragenital (i.e., rectal and/or pharyngeal) STI screenings for certain populations at increased risk of STIs and concurrent infections with HIV.

METHODS

A descriptive study was conducted by interviewing staff members from 4 rural primary care clinics in areas of high need for STI and HIV services in South Carolina. Qualitative data about their clinical practices in 2021 were obtained. The primary outcome was to determine the awareness and availability of health care services associated with STI and HIV care in these locations.

RESULTS

Clinics in target counties provided limited STI and HIV testing and treatment services, especially for populations at risk of infection, indicating the need for additional clinical training and professional development for all clinic staff. Specifically, only 1 of 4 clinics provided extragenital STI testing, and no clinics reported prescribing preexposure prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

Rural primary care clinics can fill important gaps in the availability of STI and HIV services with appropriate support and incentives. Findings from this study may aid in facilitating policy (state Medicaid agency) and program (state health department) decisions related to STI and HIV testing and treatment.

Analysis of Patient Adherence to Filling Emergency Department Discharge Prescriptions for Empiric Treatment of Chlamydia

PURPOSE

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) represent an enormous public health burden in the United States. Emergency departments (EDs) are a significant source of medical care, particularly for vulnerable patient populations. Guidelines for the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis have evolved and now recommend doxycycline 100 mg orally twice daily for 7 days as the primary regimen for adults. However, the single-dose azithromycin regimen can be given during the ED visit, while the new regimen has nonadherence hurdles. The purpose of this study will be determining the rate of ED discharge prescription pick ups of doxycycline for Chlamydia trachomatis infection at two discharge pharmacies.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review of information contained in the electronic medical record (EMR) from August 1st, 2021 - July 31st, 2022. Adult patients who present to the two EDs in the healthcare system and those who received empiric antibiotic treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis infection prior to, or at, ED discharge will be included. Patients who are pregnant, less than 18 years old, those without a Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acid amplification test during their ED visit, or patients whose antibiotic treatment prescription was sent to a pharmacy other than the two primary discharge pharmacies at the respective medical centers will be excluded. The primary outcome of this study will be determining the rate of emergency department (ED) discharge prescription pick ups of doxycycline for empiric treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infection at two discharge pharmacies. The secondary outcomes will include the incidence of repeat positive tests between four weeks and 90 days, risk of repeat positive tests in those who do not fill doxycycline, number of positive and negative test results, rate of prescribing adherence to 2021 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines regimens for empiric treatment, and insurance status at the time of discharge fill.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and thirty patients were pulled from the EMR. One hundred of the patients were excluded from the study as they did not receive empiric antibiotic treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis infection prior to, or at, ED discharge leaving 630 participants. Among this group, 369 patients were excluded as their discharge prescription was not sent to the discharge pharmacies within the medical system, leaving 261 individuals in the study. Per chart review, 215 of the patients picked up their doxycycline prescription (82.4%) and 46 (17.6%) patients failed to pick up their prescription. Additionally, 43 (16.5) of the patients who were prescribed empiric therapy had a positive chlamydia trachomatis test, while 209 (83.5%) of those had a negative test. This study also showed 188 (72%) patients received treatment according to the current CDC recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Majority of patients who received prescriptions from the in-hospital discharge pharmacy picked up their prescriptions.

A National Study of Expedited Partner Therapy Use in Emergency Departments: A Survey of Medical Director Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices

BACKGROUND

Emergency departments (EDs) are the primary source of health care for many patients diagnosed with sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Expedited partner therapy (EPT), treating the partner of patients with STIs, is an evidence-based practice for patients who might not otherwise seek care. Little is known about the use of EPT in the ED. In a national survey, we describe ED medical directors' knowledge, attitudes, and practices of EPT.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of medical directors from academic EDs was conducted from July to September 2020 using the Academy of Academic Administrators of Emergency Medicine Benchmarking Group. Primary outcomes were EPT awareness, support, and use. The survey also examined barriers and facilitators.

RESULTS

Forty-eight of 70 medical directors (69%) responded. Seventy-three percent were aware of EPT, but fewer knew how to prescribe it (38%), and only 19% of EDs had implemented EPT. Seventy-nine percent supported EPT and were more likely to if they were aware of EPT (89% vs. 54%; P = 0.01). Of nonimplementers, 41% thought EPT was feasible, and 56% thought departmental support would be likely. Emergency department directors were most concerned about legal liability, but a large proportion (44%) viewed preventing sequelae of untreated STIs as "extremely important."

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency department medical directors expressed strong support for EPT and reasonable levels of feasibility for implementation but low utilization. Our findings highlight the need to identify mechanisms for EPT implementation in EDs.

The role of primary care providers in testing for sexually transmitted infections in the MassHealth Medicaid program

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and predictors of testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) under an accountable care model of health care delivery. Data sources were claims and encounter records from the Massachusetts Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (MassHealth) for enrollees aged 13 to 64 years in 2019. This cross-sectional study examines the one-year prevalence of STI testing and evaluates social determinants of health and other patient characteristics as predictors of such testing in both primary care and other settings. We identified visits with STI testing using procedure codes and primary care settings from provider code types. Among 740,417 members, 55% were female, 11% were homeless or unstably housed, and 15% had some level of disability. While the prevalence of testing in any setting was 20% (N = 151,428), only 57,215 members had testing performed in a primary care setting, resulting in an 8% prevalence of testing by primary care clinicians (PCCs). Members enrolled in a managed care organization (MCO) were significantly less likely to be tested by a primary care provider than those enrolled in accountable care organization (ACO) plans that have specific incentives for primary care practices to coordinate care. Enrollees in a Primary Care ACO had the highest rates of STI testing, both overall and by primary care providers. Massachusetts' ACO delivery systems may be able to help practices increase STI screening with explicit incentives for STI testing in primary care settings.

Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Testing Patterns Among Women with and Without Serious Mental Illness

Rates of the sexually transmitted infections (STIs) Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) have risen in women by 13% and 40%, respectively, since 2015. Women with Serious Mental Illness (SMI) are at disproportionate risk for STIs. A retrospective chart review was performed at a safety-net healthcare system in the Southeastern United States (US) from 2014 to 2017. CT/GC positivity rates did not differ between the general and SMI populations (6.6% vs. 6.5% for CT and 1.8% vs. 2.2% for GC, respectively). Emergency Medicine accounted for more positive STI test results in SMI patients than the general population (25.2% vs. 19.1% for CT, 47.8% vs. 35.5% for GC, respectively). SMI patients received large portions of STI care in emergency settings, where follow-up is poor. Point of Care (POC) testing could improve care in this setting, and mental healthcare providers must address sexual health with patients who otherwise may not receive this care.

Emergency department claims among Medicare beneficiaries with HIV, STDs, viral hepatitis or tuberculosis before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

Changes in emergency department (ED) usage among US Medicare beneficiaries (MB) with fee-for-service claims for HIV, viral hepatitis, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) or tuberculosis (TB) (HHST) services have not been assessed since the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

During 2006-20, we assessed the annual number of MB with each HHST per 1000 persons with ED claims for all conditions, and changes in demographic and geographic distribution of ED claimants for each HHST condition.

RESULTS

Of all persons who attended an ED for any condition, 10.5 million (27.5%) were MB with ≥1 ED claim in 2006; that number (percentage) increased to 11.0 million (26.7%) in 2019 and decreased to 9.2 million (22.7%) in 2020; < 5 MB per 1000 ED population had HHST ED claims in 2020. The percentage increase in ED claims was higher for MB with STDs than for those with other HHST conditions, including a 10% decrease for MB with TB in 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

Trends in ED usage for HHST conditions were associated with changes in demographic and geographic distribution among MB during 2006-20. Updated ED reimbursement policies and primary care practices among MB might improve prevention, diagnosis and treatment of HHST conditions in the future.

Trends in STI testing and diagnosis rates during the COVID-19 pandemic at a large urban tertiary care center, and the role of the emergency department in STI care

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has had profound effects on access to care, including outpatient sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing and treatment. Many vulnerable populations already relied on the emergency department (ED) for much of their care prior to the pandemic. This study examines trends in STI testing and positivity before and during the pandemic at a large urban medical center and evaluates the role of the ED in providing STI care.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of all gonorrhea, chlamydia, and trichomonas tests from November 1, 2018, through July 31, 2021. Demographic information and location and results of STI testing were extracted from the electronic medical record. Trends in STI testing and positivity were examined for 16 month periods before and after the COVID-19 pandemic started (March 15, 2020), with the latter divided into the early pandemic period (EPP: March 15 -July 31, 2020) and late pandemic period (LPP: August 1, 2020 - July 31, 2021).

Results

Tests per month decreased by 42.4% during the EPP, but rebounded by July 2020. During the EPP, the proportion of all STI testing originating in the ED increased from 21.4% pre-pandemic to 29.3%, and among pregnant women from 45.2% to 51.5%. Overall STI positivity rate increased from 4.4% pre-pandemic to 6.2% in the EPP. Parallel trends were observed for gonorrhea and chlamydia individually. The ED represented 50.5% of overall positive tests, and as much as 63.1% of positive testing during the EPP. The ED was the source of 73.4% of positive tests among pregnant women, which increased to 82.1% during the EPP.

Conclusions

STI trends from this large urban medical center paralleled national trends, with an early decrease in positive cases followed by a rebound by the end of May 2020. The ED represented an important source of testing for all patients, and especially for pregnant patients, throughout the study period, but even more so early in the pandemic. This suggests that more resources should be directed towards STI testing, education, and prevention in the ED, as well as to support linkage to outpatient primary and obstetric care during the ED visit.

Multidisciplinary Approach to Improve Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Syphilis Testing Rates in Emergency Departments

BACKGROUND

Best practice guidelines recommend that patients at risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), such as gonorrhea (GC) and chlamydia, should also be tested for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and syphilis. This prospective quality assurance study aimed to increase HIV and syphilis testing rates in emergency departments (EDs) across the Cleveland Clinic Health System from January 1, 2020 through January 1, 2022.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team of emergency medicine, infectious diseases, pharmacy, and microbiology personnel convened to identify barriers to HIV and syphilis testing during ED encounters at which GC/chlamydia were tested. The following interventions were implemented in response: rapid HIV testing with new a workflow for results follow-up, a standardized STI-screening order panel, and feedback to clinicians about ordering patterns.

RESULTS

There were 57 797 ED visits with GC/chlamydia testing completed during the study period. Human immunodeficiency virus testing was ordered at 5% of these encounters before the interventions were implemented and increased to 8%, 23%, and 36% after each successive intervention. Syphilis testing increased from 9% before the interventions to 12%, 28%, and 39% after each successive intervention. In multivariable analyses adjusted for age, gender, and location, the odds ratio for HIV and syphilis testing after all interventions was 11.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.82-12.71; P ≤.001) and 6.79 (95% CI, 6.34-7.27; P ≤.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The multidisciplinary intervention resulted in improved testing rates for HIV and syphilis.

Monogamy as protection against COVID-19?: Non-monogamy stigma and risk (Mis)perception

COVID-19 public health messages largely communicated that Americans were "safer at home." Implicit in this advice are messages about protections ostensibly also offered by monogamy-that having more relationships is always more dangerous than having fewer relationships and that closer relationships are always safer-from a disease transmission perspective-than unfamiliar relationships. These heuristics may have led people to discount other COVID-19 dangers (such as spending more time with others of unknown infection status) and to ignore COVID-specific safety measures (such as mask-wearing, and ventilation). We conducted three studies in which we used experimental vignettes to assess people's perceptions of COVID-risky targets in monogamous relationships with a close, committed partner versus targets who were described as non-monogamous with casual partners but relatively COVID-safe. Participants perceived monogamous-but-COVID-riskier targets as more responsible and safer from COVID-19. Non-monogamy stigma seems to extend analogously to COVID-19 risk. Public health messages that fail to attend to the specifics and nuances of close relationships risk contributing to this stigma and ultimately undermining the goals of reducing the spread of infectious disease.

Trends in Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Testing and Positivity Rates in a Safety Net Hospital in Georgia: 2014 to 2017

BACKGROUND

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the United States continue to increase at an alarming rate. Since 2015, reported cases of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC), the 2 most prevalent reportable STIs, have increased by 19% and 56%, respectively. Characterizing testing patterns could elucidate how CT/GC care and positivity have evolved over time in a high-risk urban setting and illustrate how patients use the health care system for their STI needs.

METHODS

Using electronic medical record data from a large safety net hospital in Georgia, patient demographics and clinical characteristics were extracted for all nucleic acid amplification tests ordered from 2014 to 2017 (n = 124,793). Descriptive statistics were performed to understand testing patterns and assess positivity rates.

RESULTS

Annual nucleic acid amplification test volume grew by 12.0% from 2014 to 2017. Obstetrics/gynecology consistently accounted for half of all tests ordered; volume in emergency medicine grew by 45.2% (n = 4108 in 2014 to n = 5963 in 2017), whereas primary care volume fell by -4.3% (n = 4186 in 2014 to n = 4005 in 2017). The largest number of positive results was detected among 15- to 24-year-olds. The positivity of CT was higher among females, and GC among males. The percent positivity of CT remained stable (range, 6.4%-7.0%). The percent positivity of GC increased from 2.7% to 4.3% over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Testing volume in emergency medicine has increased at a faster rate than other specialties; point-of-care testing could ensure more accurate treatment and improve antibiotic stewardship. The rates of CT/GC were high among adolescents and young adults. Tailored approaches are needed to lower barriers to care for this vulnerable population.

A Collaborative Intervention Between Emergency Medicine and Infectious Diseases to Increase Syphilis and HIV Screening in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a common reason for evaluation in the emergency department (ED). Given the overlapping risk factors for STIs, patients screened for gonorrhea and chlamydia should be tested for syphilis and HIV. Syphilis and HIV testing rates in the ED have been reported to be low. The study objective was to examine whether collaboration between emergency medicine (EM) and infectious disease (ID) providers improved syphilis and HIV testing in the ED.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team of EM and ID providers was formed to identify and address barriers to syphilis and HIV testing in the ED. Syphilis, HIV, chlamydia, and gonorrhea testing and infection rates were calculated and compared during 2 time periods: preintervention (January 1, 2012-December 30, 2017) and postintervention (November 1, 2018-November 30, 2019). We also extracted clinical and laboratory data from patients with positive syphilis and HIV results during the study period.

RESULTS

The most commonly cited barrier to syphilis and HIV testing was concern about follow-up of positive results. Compared with the preintervention period, syphilis and HIV testing rates increased significantly in the postintervention period (incidence rate ratios, 30.70 [P < 0.0001] and 28.99 [P < 0.0001] for syphilis and HIV, respectively). The postintervention period was also associated with a significant increase in the identification of patients with positive syphilis and HIV results (incidence rate ratios, 7.02 [P < 0.0001] and 2.34 [P = 0.03], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Collaboration between EM and ID providers resulted in a significant increase in syphilis and HIV testing and diagnosis in the ED.

Capturing missed HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis opportunities-sexually transmitted infection diagnoses in the emergency department

The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) be considered for all patients diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection (STI). Emergency departments (EDs) are an important site for diagnosis and treatment of STIs for under-served populations. Consequently, we identified 377 patients diagnosed with a bacterial sexually transmitted infection (gonorrhea, chlamydia, and/or syphilis) at a major New York City emergency department between 1/1/2014 and 7/30/2017 to examine associations between key sociodemographic characteristics and missed opportunities for PrEP provision. In this sample, 299 (79%) emergency department patients missed their medical follow-up 90 days after STI diagnosis, as recommended. Results from adjusted generalized estimating equation regression models indicate that patients >45 yo (aOR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-3.9) and those with a primary care provider in the hospital system (aOR = 6.8, 95% CI 3.8-12.0) were more likely to return for follow-up visits, whereas Black patients (aOR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.25-0.77) were less likely to return for follow-up visits. These findings indicate that lack of STI treatment follow-up visits are significantly missed opportunities for PrEP provision and comprehensive human immunodeficiency virus prevention care.

The Implementation of Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea in the Emergency Department Setting: Successes and Lessons Learned in 2 Jurisdictions

BACKGROUND

Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) continues to develop antimicrobial resistance (AR), and treatment options are limited. ARNG surveillance aids in identifying threats and guiding treatment recommendations but has traditionally been limited to sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics. Large portions of STI care is delivered outside of STI clinics, such as emergency departments (EDs). These facilities might provide additional venues to expand surveillance and outbreak preparedness.

METHODS

Through the Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea program, Greensboro, NC, and Indianapolis, IN, identified 4 EDs in high-morbidity areas to expand culture collection. Patient demographics, culture recovery rates, and antimicrobial susceptibility results between EDs and local STI clinics were compared along with lessons learned from reviewing programmatic policies and discussions with key personnel.

RESULTS

During the period 2018-2019, non-Hispanic Black patients were the most represented group at all 6 sites (73.6%). Age was also similar across sites (median range, 23-27 years). Greensboro isolated 1039 cultures (STI clinic [women, 141; men, 612; transwomen, 3]; EDs, 283 [women, 164; men, 119]). Indianapolis isolated 1278 cultures (STI clinic, 1265 [women, 125; men, 1139; transwomen, 1]; ED, 13 all male). Reduced azithromycin susceptibility was found at the Indianapolis (n = 86) and Greensboro (n = 25) STI clinics, and one Greensboro ED (n = 8).Implementation successes included identifying an on-site "champion," integrating with electronic medical records, and creating an online training hub. Barriers included cumbersome data collection tools, time constraints, and hesitancy from clinical staff.

CONCLUSIONS

Partnering with EDs for ARNG surveillance poses both challenges and opportunities. Program success can be improved by engaging a local champion to help lead efforts.

Finding the Gaps in Retesting for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea: Differences Across High-Volume Testing Departments in an Urban Health Care Setting

BACKGROUND

The Centers of Disease Control and Prevention guidelines recommend that all patients be retested 3 months after a positive chlamydia (CT) or gonorrhea (GC) result. However, retest rates are generally low, and only a quarter of patients return to clinic for retesting. This analysis explored retesting patterns in a high sexually transmitted infection (STI)/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-risk setting to illuminate gaps in adherence to guideline recommendations.

METHODS

Retrospective chart data from a large urban safety-net institution were analyzed descriptively. Patients who received a positive CT/GC test from January to February 2017 were followed up for at least 4 months to assess if retesting occurred within approximately 3 months.

RESULTS

Our sample of 207 patients was primarily non-Hispanic Black (92.8%), younger than 25 years (63.3%) and women (60.4%). Over half had been initially diagnosed with CT, one-third with GC, and one-tenth with both CT and GC. Eighty-nine (43.0%) patients were retested during the observed period; mean time between tests was 2.7 months. Retesting was most common in infectious diseases/HIV primary care (73.6%) and obstetrics/gynecology (44.9%). Patients who were first diagnosed in emergency medicine were significantly less likely to be retested. Retested patients included a large number of HIV-positive men (31 of 89 total) and pregnant women (23 of 54 women).

CONCLUSIONS

Forty-three percent of patients were retested within approximately 3 months of their initial positive CT/GC diagnosis, exceeding previously published rates. Nonetheless, in light of the growing STI epidemic, health care systems should prioritize retesting across high-volume testing specialties, rethink retesting models, and facilitate referrals to ensure that patients receive guideline-recommended, comprehensive STI care.

Screening and Treatment of Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Medicaid Populations-A 2-State Analysis

BACKGROUND

Chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis are common, treatable sexually transmitted infections (STIs) that are highly prevalent in the general US population. Costs associated with diagnosing and treating these conditions for individual states' Medicaid participants are unknown. The purpose of this study was to estimate the cost of screening and treatment for 3 common STIs for state Medicaid program budgets in Maryland and South Carolina.

METHODS

A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted using Medicaid administrative claims data over a 2-year period. Claims were included based on the presence of one of the 3 study conditions in either diagnosis or procedure codes. Descriptive analyses were used to characterize the participant population and expenditures for services provided.

RESULTS

Total Medicaid expenditures for STI care in state fiscal years 2016 and 2017 averaged $43.5 million and $22.3 million for each year in Maryland and South Carolina, respectively. Maryland had a greater proportion of costs associated with outpatient hospital and laboratory settings. Costs for care provided in the emergency department were highest in South Carolina.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis and treatment of commonly reported STIs may have a considerable financial impact on individual state Medicaid programs. Public health activities directed at STI prevention are important tools for reducing these costs to states.

Characteristics of HIV Seroconverters Identified in an Emergency Department HIV Screening Program

The emergency department (ED) may represent a missed opportunity to proactively intervene upon patients at "high risk" for HIV. We sought to describe characteristics of ED HIV seroconverters (individuals who screened positive in the ED for HIV who had either (1) a previous prior negative HIV test in the electronic health record (EHR) or who (2) self-reported a prior negative HIV test) to identify a "high-risk" phenotype for pre-infection engagement. A retrospective chart-review was performed of HIV seroconverters at an academic, urban ED. General demographics, mental health illness comorbidities, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-identified "high risk" factors, including intravenous drug use (IVDU) and history of sexually transmitted infection (STI) were noted. One hundred thirty total patients were identified, 48 (36.9%) with prior HER-negative test and 82 (63.1%) with self-reported previous negative test. Of total seroconverters: 100 (76.9%) were male and 77 (59.2%) were between the ages of 13-34, comparable to national rates of new HIV diagnoses. Ninety-two patients (70.8%) were Black and 16 (12.3%) had a history of IVDU, significantly increased compared with regional and national new HIV rates (p < 0.05). Fifty-two patients (40%) had an STI within 1 year before HIV-positive screen, 67 (51.5%) had a history of mental health illness, and 77 (59.2%) were uninsured. This review revealed an HIV seroconversion population disproportionately affected by race, IVDU, mental health comorbidities, and additional social factors. The ED may represent a unique opportunity for at-risk, pre-HIV exposure intervention, particularly for vulnerable populations.

Antibiotic Selection for Suspected Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infection Among Penicillin-Allergic Patients in the Emergency Department

Objectives

While penicillin allergies are commonly reported, their cross-reactivity with beta-lactam antibiotics is minimal. First-line treatment of gonorrheal infections includes a cephalosporin. In emergency department (ED) environments, physicians must consider these potential allergies when selecting antibiotics for a patient with symptoms concerning for sexually transmitted infection (STI).

Methods

A retrospective chart review of adult patients with symptoms concerning for STI presenting to an urban ED from January 2014 through June 2019 was performed. Chart discovery used search terms of “STI”, “STD”, “urethritis”, “vaginitis”, and “gonorrhea”. Information abstracted included patient symptoms, type of care provider, antibiotics prescribed or administered in the ED.

Results

A total of 603 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 31 reported allergies to penicillin antibiotics, and another three reported allergies to cephalosporins. Patients reporting penicillin allergy were less likely to receive a cephalosporin antibiotic (p=0.0081). Patients reporting a non-anaphylactic allergy to penicillin received a cephalosporin at a rate of 92.3%. Patients reporting a penicillin allergy under the care of only an attending physician were less likely to receive a cephalosporin antibiotic compared with those whose care teams included either a resident physician or physician assistant (p=0.00019). Patients reporting a penicillin allergy were more likely to receive alternative antibiotics beyond cephalosporins or azithromycin (p=0.048); the most frequently given additional antibiotics were metronidazole, doxycycline, and levofloxacin.

Conclusions 

Patients with penicillin allergies represent a recurring challenge for ED physicians when faced with antibiotic selection for STI symptoms concerning for gonorrheal infection. Those with penicillin allergies are significantly less likely to receive a cephalosporin antibiotic, though these remain the only universally accepted treatment for gonorrheal infections. These findings highlight the significant need for further physician and public education on allergies and antibiotic selection.

Association between Chlamydia and routine place for healthcare in the United States: NHANES 1999-2016

BACKGROUND

The United States is experiencing a surge in Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infections representing a critical need to improve sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening and treatment programs. To understand where patients with STIs seek healthcare, we evaluated the relationship between CT infections and the place where individuals report usually receiving healthcare.

METHODS

Our study used a nationally representative sample from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2016. The study population is adult patients, aged 18 to 39 years in whom a urine CT screen was obtained. Logistic regression models were used to determine if location of usual healthcare was predictive of a positive urine CT screen result. Models were adjusted for known confounders including age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, and insurance status.

RESULTS

In this nationally representative sample (n = 19,275; weighted n = 85.8 million), 1.9% of individuals had a positive urine CT result. Participants reported usually going to the doctor's office (70.3%), "no place" (24.8%), Emergency Department (ED) (3.3%), or "other" place (1.7%) for healthcare. In adjusted models, the predicted probability of having a positive urine CT result is higher (4.9% vs 3.2%, p = 0.022; OR = 1.58) among those that reported the ED as their usual place for healthcare compared to those that reported going to a doctor's office or clinic.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals having a positive urine CT screen are associated with using the ED as a usual source for healthcare. Understanding this association has the potential to improve STI clinical and policy interventions as the ED may be a critical site in combatting the record high rates of STIs.

Frequency of Sexually Transmitted Infection/HIV Testing Among Commercially Insured Patients With International Classification of Disease Tenth Revision Specified Sex Partners

BACKGROUND

High-risk sexual behaviors (HRSB) are associated with sexually transmitted infections (STIs). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and US Preventive Services Task Force recommend routine testing for patients with HRSB. Providers can classify patients with HRSB based on the sex of their sex partners using the International Classification of Disease Tenth Revision. We analyzed STI/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing frequencies among patients with HRSB.

METHODS

This study used a large US administrative outpatient medical claims data set from 2015 to 2017. Patients aged 15 to 64 years were identified with HRSB using International Classification of Disease Tenth Revision codes. An initial HRSB diagnosis in 2016 served as the index date. We assessed chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and HIV testing by HRSB at the index date, and 4 time intervals of 1 to 6 months, and 7 to 12 months before and after the index date.

RESULTS

We identified 52,160 patients with HRSB: 90.3% were patients with opposite-sex partners, 7.7% patients with same-sex partners, and 2.1% patients with same- and opposite-sex partners. There were 77.5% and 82.1% of the patients insured 6 months before and after the index, respectively. On the index date, patients with opposite-sex partners tested most for chlamydia (65.3%) and gonorrhea (65.2%), patients with same-sex partners tested most for syphilis (51.5%) and HIV (57.8%). Among insured patients, follow-up STI/HIV testing was 89.5% during 1 to 6 months and 33.1% during 7 to 12 months after the index date. Patients tested on the index date were more likely to have an STI/HIV test within 1 to 6 months after the index date.

CONCLUSIONS

The STI/HIV testing among patients with HRSB could improve. It is important for patients identified as HRSB to get tested and continue testing patients based on recommendations.

Geospatial and Temporal Associations between Increases in Opioid Deaths, Socioeconomics, and Rates of Sexually Transmitted Infections in the Northeast United States 2012-2017

With the introduction of fentanyl to illegal markets in 2013 and an overall rise in rates of synthetic opioid use, opioid-related deaths have increased significantly. A similar trend has been observed for sexually transmitted infections, homicides, and poor mental health outcomes. In this paper, we explore the spatiotemporal relationship between opioid death rates and sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates in counties from the Northeast region of the United States between the years 2012–2017. We hypothesized that rates for gonorrhea, chlamydia, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) would all be positively associated with opioid death rates and that there would be a similar association between the STI rates and later time periods relative to earlier time periods. A negative binomial mixed-effects regression model was employed to assess these associations. Contrary to the study hypothesis, opioid death rates were not found to be significantly associated with the STI rates after accounting for other demographic and socioeconomic variables, with the exception of opioid deaths and gonorrhea in urban counties. Additionally, the regression demonstrated a significant association between infection rate and time period beyond the included socioeconomic variables and opioid deaths. Overall, this study indicates that declining sexual health outcomes may parallel rising opioid death, though both trends may be explained by similar underlying factors related to time period.

Single and Repeated Use of the Emergency Department for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Care

OBJECTIVE

Chlamydia and gonorrhea infection rates are rising in the United States, and the emergency department (ED) is increasingly a site where individuals seek care for these infections, sometimes more than once. This article investigates how individuals who use the ED more than once and receive chlamydia and gonorrhea care differ from individuals who are single users of the ED, as well as characteristics associated with being a repeat user of the ED.

METHODS

We analyzed 46,964 visits made by individuals who attended 1 of 4 EDs from January 1, 2010, to May 31, 2016, and received a test for chlamydia and gonorrhea infection. We used negative binomial regression to test the ability of age, sex, race, infection status, and insurance status to predict number of visits.

RESULTS

Individuals who used the ED more than once and received chlamydia and gonorrhea care were at their first visit more likely to be younger (incident rate ratio [IRR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-0.98 per year) nonpregnant female (IRR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.06-1.42), black (IRR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.04-1.57), and have no or public insurance compared with single users of the ED.

DISCUSSIONS

Individuals likely to make multiple visits to the ED and receive chlamydia and gonorrhea care may be identifiable on their first visit and potentially directed elsewhere during subsequent visits for more comprehensive and potentially less expensive sexually transmitted disease care.

A Model for Syphilis Screening in the Emergency Department

The incidence of syphilis infections is on the rise, particularly among African American men and men who have sex with men, and it is reaching epidemic levels in these communities throughout the United States. Although syphilis is relatively inexpensive to treat and cure and is a predictor for HIV incidence among men and transgender women who have sex with men, rates of co-screening for syphilis are low in the emergency department setting, with a dearth of literature on this topic since the 1990s and early 2000s. In this case study, we describe an operational model for routine syphilis screening implemented in June 2017 at the University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center in Cleveland, Ohio. We describe the advantages of screening using a reverse testing algorithm rather than the traditional method and the necessity of partnering with the Cleveland Department of Public Health for both diagnostic and follow-up logistics.

Descriptive Evaluation of Male Emergency Department Patients in the United States With Gonorrhea and Chlamydia

Introduction

Sexually transmitted infections are commonly tested for in the emergency department (ED), but diagnostic test results are often unavailable during the clinical encounter.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed health records of 3,132 men ≥18 years that had an emergency department visit in northeast Ohio between April 18, 2014 and March 7, 2017. All subjects underwent testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis. Independent t-tests and chi-square analyses were performed as well as multivariable regression analysis.

Results

On univariable analysis, men with N gonorrhoeae and/or C trachomatis, compared with uninfected men, were younger (25.9 vs 32.4 years), more likely to be of Black race (91.7% vs 85.6%), less likely to be married (3.7% vs 10.2%), less likely to arrive to the ED by ambulance or police (1.7% vs 4.1%), and more likely to be diagnosed with a urinary tract infection (8.3% vs 3.7%), to be treated for gonorrhea and chlamydia in the ED (84.6% vs 54.9%), and to have higher emergency severity index (ESI) scores (3.8 vs 3.6) (P ≤ .03 for all). On urinalysis, men infected with N gonorrhoeae and/or C trachomatis had significantly more white blood cells (55.1 vs 20.9); more mucus (1.3 vs 1.2); higher leukocyte esterase (1.5 vs .4); fewer squamous epithelial cells (.6 vs 1.4); higher urobilinogen (1.1 vs .8); higher bilirubin (.09 vs .05); and more protein (.4 vs .3) (P ≤ .04).

Conclusions

Demographic and urinalysis findings can be associated with an increased odds of men being infected with N gonorrhoeae and/or C trachomatis.

Gonorrhea testing, morbidity, and reporting using an integrated sexually transmitted disease registry in Indiana: 2004-2016

Surveillance of gonorrhea (GC), the second most common notifiable disease in the United States, depends on case reports. Population-level data that contain the number of individuals tested in addition to morbidity are lacking. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of data obtained from individuals tested for GC recorded in a sexually transmitted disease (STD) registry in the state of Indiana. Descriptive statistics were performed, and a Poisson generalized linear model was used to evaluate the number of individuals tested for GC and the positivity rate. GC cases from a subset of the registry were compared to CDC counts to determine the completeness of the registry. A total of 1,870,811 GC tests were linked to 627,870 unique individuals. Individuals tested for GC increased from 54,334 in 2004 to 269,701 in 2016; likewise, GC cases increased from 2,039 to 5,997. However, positivity rate decreased from 3.75% in 2004 to 2.22% in 2016. The difference in the number of GC cases captured by the registry and those reported to the CDC was not statistically significant (P = 0.0665). Population-level data from an STD registry combining electronic medical records and public health case data may inform STD control efforts. In Indiana, increased testing rates appeared to correlate with increased GC morbidity.

Management of gonorrhoea in a hospital network: are we following best practice?

Background Gonorrhoea is usually managed in community sexual health or general practice, but a proportion of cases present to hospital settings. In this study, we examined how gonorrhoea was managed through a large hospital network and what the implications may be for public health management.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of the management of patients with Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection diagnosed at a large Australian healthcare network from January 2015 to May 2018. Documentation rates of five parameters of care were assessed: (1) the presence (or absence) of previous sexually transmissible infections (STIs); (2) recent travel; (3) discussion of HIV testing; (4) contact tracing; and (5) public health notification.

RESULTS

In all, 110 cases (48 male, 62 female) were analysed. Most cases were in the 15-39 years age group; 98 cases (89%) were symptomatic, and 12 (11%) were screening tests. The most common presenting syndromes were pelvic inflammatory disease (32%; 31/98 symptomatic cases), urethritis (26%; 25/98) and epididymo-orchitis (13%; 13/98). None of the five parameters assessed were documented in most cases. Documentation was most likely to occur in patients admitted to hospital. When HIV testing was performed, no new cases of HIV were identified.

CONCLUSION

Infections with gonorrhoea present on a regular basis to hospital practice, but overall management is suboptimal. Automated prompts for other recommended tests, including HIV testing when testing for other sexually transmissible diseases is ordered, may improve management. Better awareness of best practice is needed, which can be facilitated with ongoing education. However, the greatest benefit is likely achieved by linking patients back to community-based services, which are best placed to provide ongoing long-term care.

Inferring Sexually Transmitted Infection Risk From Attractiveness in Online Dating Among Adolescents and Young Adults: Exploratory Study

Background

Sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates are on the rise among adolescents and young adults in the United States. With the popularity of online dating, adolescents and young adults must increasingly rely on limited cues to make initial judgments about potential sexual partners, including judgments about STI risk.

Objective

This study aimed to assess whether in the context of online dating, an attractiveness heuristic would be used for STI risk assessment. We hypothesized that consistent with research on halo effects, decision makers would judge more attractive people to be less likely to have STIs.

Methods

In a survey experiment, we asked participants to determine which individual in each of 20 sets of paired photographs was enrolled in a personals website for people with publicly disclosed STIs.

Results

Despite financial incentives for accuracy and high levels of self-confidence in their judgments, participants performed no better than chance at identifying individuals with self-reported STIs. Contrary to our hypothesis, however, more attractive people were judged as being more likely to have an STI. This relationship appears to be mediated by inferences regarding the target individual’s sexual behavior, with more attractive individuals considered to have more partners.

Conclusions

On showing adolescents and young adults photographs offering no diagnostic information about STIs, they appeared to use attractiveness as a cue for sexual risk, which was mediated by the belief that attractive individuals have more sexual opportunities. Health care providers may wish to address this heuristic process among their adolescent patients in discussions about sexual health.

Presenting to the Emergency Department Versus Clinic-Based Sexually Transmitted Disease Care Locations for Testing for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea: A Spatial Exploration

BACKGROUND

Rates of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) including chlamydia and gonorrhea are increasing in the United States while public health funding for STD services is decreasing. Individuals seek care in various locations including the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study is to investigate whether there are more physically proximal clinic-based STD care locations available to individuals who present to the ED in a major metropolitan area.

METHODS

Addresses of EDs, clinics, and patients 13 years or older in St. Louis City or County given a nucleic acid amplification test and assigned an STD diagnosis (n = 6100) were geocoded. R was used to analyze clinics within 5 radii from the patients' home address and assess missed clinic opportunities (open, no charge, with walk-in availability) for those living in an urban versus suburban area.

RESULTS

In urban areas, 99.1% of individuals lived closer to a clinic than the ED where they sought STD services; in suburban areas, 82.2% lived closer to a clinic than the ED where they presented. In the region, 50.6% lived closer to the health department-based STD care location than the hospital where they presented. Up to a third of ED patient visits for STD care could have occurred at a clinic that was closer to the patient's home address, open, no charge, and available for walk-in appointments.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinic availability is present for most of the individuals in our study. Clinics providing STD services can increase advertising efforts to increase public awareness of the services which they provide.

Where Do People Go for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Tests: A Cross-Sectional View of the Central Indiana Population, 2003-2014

BACKGROUND

Despite major efforts to control their spread, reported sexually transmitted infections (STI) are increasing. Using data from a mid-sized Midwest metropolitan area, we examined the settings in which individuals are tested for gonorrhea and chlamydia in relation to demographics and test result to determine where interventions may best be focused.

METHODS

A deidentified and integrated registry, containing records from all patients tested for an STI from 2003 to 2014, was created by combining data from a large health information exchange and the reporting district's STI Program located in Indianapolis, IN. Individual characteristics and visit settings where gonorrhea and chlamydia testing was performed were analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified 298,946 individuals with 1,062,369 visits where testing occurred at least once between the ages of 13 and 44 years. Females were tested significantly more often than males and received testing more often in outpatient clinics whereas males were most often tested in the STI clinic. Individuals who used both STI and non-STI settings were more likely to have a positive test at an STI or emergency department visit (6.4-20.8%) than outpatient or inpatient setting (0.0-11.3%) (P < 0.0001). Test visits increased over the study period particularly in emergency departments, which showed a substantial increase in the number of positive test visits.

CONCLUSIONS

The most frequent testing sites remain STI clinics for men and outpatient clinics for women. Yet, emergency departments (ED) are increasingly a source of testing and morbidity. This makes them a valuable target for public health interventions that could improve care and population health.

History, Physical Examination, and Laboratory Findings Associated with Infection and the Empiric Treatment of Gonorrhea and Chlamydia of Women in the Emergency Department

Background Neisseria gonorrhea (NG), Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) are common sexually transmitted infections (STIs) treated in the emergency department (ED). Objectives To assess the history, physical examination, and laboratory findings associated with NG and CT infection and the decision to administer empiric antibiotic treatment for the diseases in the ED. Methods A retrospective review of 566 clinical encounters of adult female patients tested for STIs between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2014. An analysis of patient- and provider-level variables was assessed to determine the characteristics associated with empiric antibiotic treatment in the ED and post-discharge laboratory confirmed NG or CT. Results Younger age and the presence of TV on vaginal wet prep had a higher association with being infected with NG or CT (p < 0.05). Subjective exam findings, such as vaginal discharge, abdominal pain, urinary urgency, urinary frequency, dysuria, objective vaginal discharge, cervical motion tenderness, adnexal tenderness, vaginal bleeding, as well as positive leukocyte esterase and nitrites on urinalysis were all not associated with NG or CT infection (p > 0.05). ED providers were more likely to treat subjects in the ED for NG and CT when there was subjective and objective vaginal discharge, cervical motion tenderness, adnexal tenderness, and vaginal bleeding, TV on wet prep, and leukocyte esterase on urinalysis (p < 0.05). Conclusions Only younger age women and the presence of TV on vaginal wet prep were associated with NG or CT infection. ED providers empirically over-treated with antibiotics ~20 patients uninfected with NG and CT by laboratory confirmation, for every one patient with a laboratory confirmed infection.

Undertreatment of chlamydia and gonorrhea among pregnant women in the emergency department

The objective of this study is to evaluate whether pregnant women receive appropriate treatment, undertreatment, or overtreatment in the emergency department (ED) when they are tested for chlamydia and gonorrhea as compared to non-pregnant women. In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed visits made to an urban ED from 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2014, with testing for chlamydia and gonorrhea (n = 3908). Using multiple logistic regression, we compared undertreatment and overtreatment in women controlling for pregnancy, age, race, and sexually transmitted infection International Statistical Classifications of Diseases (ICD)-9 coded diagnosis. Pregnant women were significantly more likely to be undertreated when positive for infection as compared to non-pregnant women (OR 2.94; 95% CI, 1.47–5.95) and significantly less likely to be overtreated when negative for infection (OR 0.40; 95% CI, 0.31–0.53) as compared to non-pregnant women. Pregnant women may not be receiving appropriate treatment when they present to the ED with chlamydia or gonorrhea. Attention should be paid to this group when administering chlamydia and gonorrhea treatment to ensure appropriate care and follow-up.

Clinical knowledge of human immunodeficiency virus and sexually transmitted infections among emergency medicine providers

Introduction

This study examines the association of the domains of knowledge for HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among emergency medicine providers (EP).

Methods

From February 2018 to March 2018, 75 EP (physicians, residents, and advanced practice providers) completed an anonymous, self-administered survey. The primary outcome of strength of correlation between HIV and STI sections of the survey was analyzed using Spearman’s rank-order coefficient.

Results

Respondents were physicians (54.6%), male (56%), Caucasian (83.7%), with eight years in practice (IQR: 2,16). Spearman’s correlation of HIV and STIs showed a weak positive correlation ( r = 0.35, p = 0.002). There was no association between HIV scores and provider type ( p = 0.67) or provider gender ( p = 0.89) as well as no association between STI scores and provider type ( p = 0.10) or provider gender ( p = 0.79).

Conclusion

The results of our study reveal that when presented with a patient at high risk for undiagnosed HIV or with undiagnosed symptomatic HIV infection, most providers either do not test or do not have HIV in the differential diagnosis. Similarly, knowledge of STIs is only weakly correlated with knowledge of HIV risk factors and symptomatic HIV infection. Further research and screening efforts may benefit by focusing on HIV education among emergency medicine providers.

The influence of race and sex on gonorrhea and chlamydia treatment in the emergency department

BACKGROUND

Emergency Departments (EDs) are a care source for patients with sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). St. Louis, MO reports among the highest rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia infection. We examined STD treatment in a high-volume urban ED, in St. Louis MO, to identify factors that may influence treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review and analysis was conducted on visits to a high volume, academic ED in St. Louis, MO where patients received a gonorrhea/chlamydia nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) with a valid matching test result over two years. Using multiple logistic regression, we examined available predictors for under and overtreatment.

RESULTS

NAATs were performed on 3.3% of all ED patients during the study period. Overall prevalence was 6.9% for gonorrhea (95% CI: 6.2, 7.7) and 11.6% for chlamydia (95% CI: 10.6, 12.5). Race was not a statistically significant predictor for undertreatment but Black patients were significantly more likely to be overtreated compared to White patients. (OR 1.83, 95% CI: 1.5, 2.2). Females were more likely to be undertreated when positive for infection compared to males (OR 7.34, 95% CI: 4.8, 11.2) and less likely to be overtreated when negative for infection (OR 0.27, 95% CI: 0.2, 0.3).

CONCLUSION

The burden of STDs in a high-volume academic ED was significant and treatment varied across groups. Attention should be paid to particular groups, specifically women and patients reporting Black as their race, to ensure appropriate treatment is administered. Patients would benefit from targeted STD management protocols and training in the ED.

Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Emergency Department

The emergency department (ED) is the hub of the US health care system. Acute infectious diseases are frequently encountered in the ED setting, making this a critical setting for antimicrobial stewardship efforts. Systems level and behavioral stewardship interventions have demonstrated success in the ED setting but successful implementation depends on institutional support and the presence of a physician champion. Antimicrobial stewardship efforts in the ED should target high-impact areas: antibiotic prescribing for nonindicated respiratory tract conditions, such as bronchitis and sinusitis; overtreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria; and using two antibiotics (double coverage) for uncomplicated cases of cellulitis or abscess.

Management of Patients with Sexually Transmitted Infections in the Emergency Department

Sexually transmitted infections (STI) are very common infections in the United States. Most patients with STIs are evaluated and treated in primary care settings; however, many also present to the Emergency Department (ED) for initial care. Management of STIs in the ED includes appropriate testing and treatment per CDC Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines. Although most patients with STIs are asymptomatic or may only exhibit mild symptoms, serious complications from untreated infection are possible. Pregnant women with STIs are particularly vulnerable to serious complications; therefore, empiric ED treatment combined with close follow-up care and referral to obstetrics are paramount.

Trends in pelvic inflammatory disease emergency department visits, United States, 2006-2013

BACKGROUND

Pelvic inflammatory disease is a female genital tract disorder with severe reproductive sequelae. Because of the difficulties in diagnosing pelvic inflammatory disease, it is not a reportable condition in many states. Females seeking care in emergency departments are a sentinel population for pelvic inflammatory disease surveillance.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine trends in diagnoses of acute pelvic inflammatory disease in a nationally representative sample of emergency departments.

STUDY DESIGN

All emergency department visits among females aged 15-44 years with an International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code indicating pelvic inflammatory disease during 2006-2013 were assessed from the HealthCare Utilization Project Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. Total and annual percentage changes in the proportion of pelvic inflammatory disease emergency department visits were estimated using trend analyses.

RESULTS

While the number of emergency department visits among females aged 15-44 years during 2006-2013 increased (6.5 million to 7.4 million), the percentage of visits due to pelvic inflammatory disease decreased from 0.57% in 2006 to 0.41% in 2013 (total percentage change, -28.4%; annual percent change, -4.3%; 95% confidence interval, -5.7% to -2.9%). The largest decreases were among those aged 15-19 years (total percent change, -40.6%; annual percentage change, -6.6%; 95% confidence interval, -8.6% to -4.4%) and living in the South (total percentage change, -38.0%; annual percentage change, -6.2%; 95% confidence interval, -7.8% to -4.6%). Females aged 15-19 years who lived in the South had a 47.9% decrease in visits due to pelvic inflammatory disease (annual percentage change, -8.4%, 95% confidence interval, -10.4 to -6.5). Patients living in ZIP codes with the lowest median income (<$38,000) had the highest percent of visits with a pelvic inflammatory disease diagnosis; the smallest declines over time were in patients living in ZIP codes with the highest median income (i.e., >$64,000, total percent change, -24.4%; annual percent change, -3.8%; 95% confidence interval, -5.2% to -2.4%). The percentage of emergency department visits due to pelvic inflammatory disease was highest among patients not charged for their visit, self-paying, or those covered by Medicaid, with total percentage changes in these 3 groups of -27.8%, -30.7%, and -35.1%, respectively. Patients with Medicaid coverage had the largest decrease in visits with a diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease (total percent change, -35.1%; annual percent change, -5.8%; 95% confidence interval, -7.2% to -4.3%).

CONCLUSION

Nationally representative data indicate the percentage of emergency department visits with a pelvic inflammatory disease diagnosis decreased during 2006-2013 among females aged 15-44 years, primarily driven by decreased diagnoses of pelvic inflammatory disease among females aged 15-19 years and among women living in the southern United States. Despite declines, a large number of females of reproductive age are receiving care for pelvic inflammatory disease in emergency departments. Patients with lower median income and no or public health insurance status, which may decrease access to and use of health care services, consistently had the highest percentage of emergency department visits due to pelvic inflammatory disease. Future research should focus on obtaining a better understanding of factors influencing trends in pelvic inflammatory disease diagnoses and ways to address the challenges surrounding surveillance for this condition.