1
|
Bønløkke S, Blaakær J, Steiniche T, Iachina M. Social factors and age play a significant role in cervical cancer and advanced-stage disease among Danish women. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:259. [PMID: 38395802 PMCID: PMC10893677 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11994-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For cervical cancer (CC), the implementation of preventive strategies has the potential to make cervical cancer occurrence and death largely avoidable. To better understand the factors possibly responsible for cervical cancer, we aimed to examine possible differences in age and social parameters as well as screening status between women with low- or high-stage cervical cancer and matched controls. METHODS Through the Danish Cancer Registry (DCR), women diagnosed with cervical cancer in Denmark between 1987 and 2016 were included. These were age- and residence-matched in a 1:5 ratio with controls from the general female population. The study population was sub grouped into a low-stage subpopulation with women with early-stage cervical cancer and matched controls and a high-stage subpopulation with women with late-stage cervical cancer and matched controls. Age and social parameters were compared within the subpopulations as well as between low- and high-stage cases. For part of the study population, screening attendance was examined to compare differences in adherence. RESULTS Overall, we found that the risk of cervical cancer is significantly increased in socially disadvantaged women and not least non-attenders in screening. Interestingly, the high-stage subpopulation was significantly older than the low-stage subpopulation (p < 0.001), and when examining the impact of age further, we found that for cervical cancer cases, the risk of having low-stage disease decreases significantly with increasing age, whereas the risk of having high-stage disease increases significantly with increasing age. In the screening cohort, significantly less cases than controls were attenders in screening with the most pronounced differences seen in the old subpopulation (women aged 50-64 years) and in the high-stage subpopulation (p-values all < 0.001). Interestingly, when examining the risk of CC for attenders and non-attenders, we demonstrated that many social parameters continue to influence the risk of cervical cancer, even in women attending screening. CONCLUSIONS Older women, socially disadvantaged women, and non-attenders in screening are particularly vulnerable in terms of developing cervical cancer, especially high-stage disease. Therefore, improvements in the participating rate in screening as well as a revision of the current screening guidelines are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Bønløkke
- Department of Clinical Medicine - Department of Pathology, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark.
- Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark.
| | - Jan Blaakær
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Torben Steiniche
- Department of Clinical Medicine - Department of Pathology, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark
| | - Maria Iachina
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hoare S, Thomas GPA, Powell A, Armstrong N, Mant J, Burt J. Why do people choose not to take part in screening? Qualitative interview study of atrial fibrillation screening nonparticipation. Health Expect 2023; 26:2216-2227. [PMID: 37452480 PMCID: PMC10632648 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While screening uptake is variable, many individuals feel they 'ought' to participate in screening programmes to aid the detection of conditions amenable to early treatment. Those not taking part in screening are often presented as either hindered by practical or social barriers or personally at fault. Why some people choose not to participate receives less consideration. METHODS We explored screening nonparticipation by examining the accounts of participants who chose not to participate in screening offered by a national research trial of atrial fibrillation (AF) screening in England (SAFER: Screening for Atrial Fibrillation with ECG to Reduce stroke). AF is a heart arrhythmia that increases in prevalence with age and increases the risk of stroke. Systematic screening for AF is not a nationally adopted programme within the United Kingdom; it provides a unique opportunity to explore screening nonparticipation outside of the norms and values attached to existing population-based screening programmes. We interviewed people aged over 65 (n = 50) who declined an invitation from SAFER and analysed their accounts thematically. RESULTS Beyond practical reasons for nonparticipation, interviewees challenged the utility of identifying and managing AF earlier. Many questioned the benefits of screening at their age. The trial's presentation of the screening as research made it feel voluntary-something they could legitimately decline. CONCLUSION Nonparticipants were not resistant to engaging in health-promoting behaviours, uninformed about screening or unsupportive of its potential benefits. Instead, their consideration of the perceived necessity, legitimacy and utility of this screening shaped their decision not to take part. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION The SAFER programme is guided by four patient and carer representatives. The representatives are embedded within the team (e.g., one is a co-applicant, another sits on the programme steering committee) and by participating in regular meetings advise on all aspects of the design, management and delivery of the programme, including engaging with interpreting and disseminating the findings. For the qualitative workstream, we established a supplementary patient and public involvement group with whom we regularly consult about research design questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Hoare
- The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute (THIS Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Gwilym P. A. Thomas
- The Guildhall and Barrow SurgeryBury St EdmundsUK
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary CareStrangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge School of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Alison Powell
- The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute (THIS Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Natalie Armstrong
- SAPPHIRE Research Group, Department of Population Health SciencesUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
| | - Jonathan Mant
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary CareStrangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge School of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Jenni Burt
- The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute (THIS Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ilic I, Babic G, Dimitrijevic A, Sipetic Grujicic S, Ilic M. Psychological Distress in Women With Abnormal Pap Smear Results Attending Cervical Cancer Screening. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2023; 27:343-350. [PMID: 37535069 DOI: 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Women often experience psychological distress upon receipt of an abnormal Pap test result. This study aimed to evaluate psychological distress and its correlates among women who received an abnormal Pap screening test result. MATERIAL AND METHODS A cross-sectional study was performed in a cohort of 172 consecutive women who had attended screening for cervical cancer and who received abnormal Pap smear results and underwent additional diagnostic procedures (colposcopy/biopsy/endocervical curettage). The participants filled out a questionnaire on sociodemographic variables and the Cervical Dysplasia Distress Questionnaire. Multivariate linear regression was used for the analysis of the data. For multiple comparisons, the Bonferroni correction was applied to adjust the level of significance. RESULTS In women who received an abnormal Pap smear result, the independent correlate of higher psychological distress (by Cervical Dysplasia Distress Questionnaire score) before diagnostic procedures was lower satisfaction with information/support received from other people ( p = .002). Correlates of psychological distress in women older than 40 years with abnormal Pap smear were anxiety ( p = .042) and worry about having cervical cancer, general health and having sex ( p = .044). CONCLUSIONS The authors' findings could enable control of factors predictive of psychological distress in women who received a positive Pap smear screening test before undergoing diagnostic procedures, primarily via active provision of targeted information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irena Ilic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Goran Babic
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Aleksandra Dimitrijevic
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | | | - Milena Ilic
- Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cavers D, Nelson M, Rostron J, Robb KA, Brown LR, Campbell C, Akram AR, Dickie G, Mackean M, van Beek EJR, Sullivan F, Steele RJ, Neilson AR, Weller D. Understanding patient barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung screening using low dose computed tomography: a mixed methods scoping review of the current literature. Respir Res 2022; 23:374. [PMID: 36564817 PMCID: PMC9789658 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-022-02255-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted lung cancer screening is effective in reducing mortality by upwards of twenty percent. However, screening is not universally available and uptake is variable and socially patterned. Understanding screening behaviour is integral to designing a service that serves its population and promotes equitable uptake. We sought to review the literature to identify barriers and facilitators to screening to inform the development of a pilot lung screening study in Scotland. METHODS We used Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology and PRISMA-ScR framework to identify relevant literature to meet the study aims. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies published between January 2000 and May 2021 were identified and reviewed by two reviewers for inclusion, using a list of search terms developed by the study team and adapted for chosen databases. RESULTS Twenty-one articles met the final inclusion criteria. Articles were published between 2003 and 2021 and came from high income countries. Following data extraction and synthesis, findings were organised into four categories: Awareness of lung screening, Enthusiasm for lung screening, Barriers to lung screening, and Facilitators or ways of promoting uptake of lung screening. Awareness of lung screening was low while enthusiasm was high. Barriers to screening included fear of a cancer diagnosis, low perceived risk of lung cancer as well as practical barriers of cost, travel and time off work. Being health conscious, provider endorsement and seeking reassurance were all identified as facilitators of screening participation. CONCLUSIONS Understanding patient reported barriers and facilitators to lung screening can help inform the implementation of future lung screening pilots and national lung screening programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debbie Cavers
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Doorway 1, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG UK
| | - Mia Nelson
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Doorway 1, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG UK
| | - Jasmin Rostron
- The National Institute of Economic and Social Research, 2 Dean Trench Street, London, NW1P 3HE UK
| | - Kathryn A. Robb
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ UK
| | - Lynsey R. Brown
- School of Medicine, University of St. Andrews, North Haugh, St. Andrews, KY16 9TF UK
| | - Christine Campbell
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Doorway 1, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG UK
| | - Ahsan R. Akram
- MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Graeme Dickie
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Doorway 1, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG UK
| | - Melanie Mackean
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU UK
| | - Edwin J. R. van Beek
- Edinburgh Imaging, Queen’s Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ UK
| | - Frank Sullivan
- School of Medicine, University of St. Andrews, North Haugh, St. Andrews, KY16 9TF UK
| | - Robert J. Steele
- School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, DD1 9SY UK
| | - Aileen R. Neilson
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Doorway 1, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG UK
| | - David Weller
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Doorway 1, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Winer RL, Lin J, Tiro JA, Miglioretti DL, Beatty T, Gao H, Kimbel K, Thayer C, Buist DSM. Effect of Patient Characteristics on Uptake of Screening Using a Mailed Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling Kit: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2244343. [PMID: 36449291 PMCID: PMC9713609 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Mailing human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling kits increases cervical cancer screening participation, but effects may differ across subpopulations. Subpopulation data can inform US health care system implementation. OBJECTIVE To identify patient characteristics that modify effectiveness of a mailed kit intervention at increasing screening. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a secondary analysis of data from the Home-Based Options to Make Cervical Cancer Screening Easy (HOME) randomized clinical trial conducted from 2014 to 2018 at Kaiser Permanente Washington. Data analysis was performed from March 2018 to May 2022. Individuals aged 30 to 64 years with female sex, health plan enrollment longer than 3 years and 5 months, a current primary care clinician, and no Papanicolaou test within the prior 3 years and 5 months were identified through electronic medical records and randomized (1:1) to the control or intervention group. INTERVENTIONS The control group received usual care Papanicolaou screening reminders and outreach. The intervention group received usual care plus an unsolicited mailed HPV self-sampling kit. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Screening uptake was captured within 6 months after randomization. Baseline patient characteristics (age, race, ethnicity, travel time to clinic, income, body mass index, tobacco use, health plan enrollment duration, time since last Papanicolaou test, mammography, comorbidities, and colorectal cancer screening adherence) were extracted from the electronic medical record. RESULTS Of 19 734 individuals (mean [SD] age, 50.1 [9.5] years; 14 129 [71.6%] White), 9843 were randomized to the intervention group, and 9891 were randomized to the control group. Screening uptake was 26.3% (2592 of 9843 individuals) in the intervention group vs 17.4% (1719 of 9891 individuals) in the control group (relative risk [RR], 1.51; 95% CI, 1.43-1.60). Although absolute differences in uptake by group varied little by screening history, relative effects were greater with longer vs shorter time since last Papanicolaou test (no prior Papanicolaou test: RRs, 1.85-3.25; ≥10 years: RR, 2.78; 5-10 years: RRs, 1.69-1.86; <5 years: RRs 1.29-1.37). Relative effects were greater in participants overdue (RR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.73-2.38) vs up-to-date with mammography (RR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.41-1.67), although absolute difference was greater in the up-to-date group. Differences by age were not significant, with RRs of 1.33 to 1.48 across 5-year age groups in participants 30 to 54, vs 1.60 (95% CI, 1.40-1.82) in participants 55 to 59 and 1.77 (95% CI, 1.56-2.01) in participants 60 to 64 years. Among those mailed kits, there were differences in kit use vs in-clinic screening by age, race, plan enrollment duration, underscreening duration, and colorectal cancer screening adherence. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, clinically important improvements in screening uptake were observed for all subgroups. Differences in magnitude of intervention effect and kit use highlighted opportunities to optimize HPV self-sampling for priority groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02005510.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel L. Winer
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle
| | - John Lin
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Jasmin A. Tiro
- Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Diana L. Miglioretti
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis
| | - Tara Beatty
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle
| | - Hongyuan Gao
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle
| | - Kilian Kimbel
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Landy R, Hollingworth T, Waller J, Marlow LA, Rigney J, Round T, Sasieni PD, Lim AW. Non-speculum clinician-taken samples for human papillomavirus testing: a cross-sectional study in older women. Br J Gen Pract 2022; 72:e538-e545. [PMID: 35667684 PMCID: PMC9183459 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer incidence and mortality are high in women aged ≥65 years, despite the disease being preventable by screening. Speculum-based screening can become more uncomfortable after the menopause. AIM To examine test performance and acceptability of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on clinician-collected vaginal samples without a speculum (non-speculum). DESIGN AND SETTING Cross-sectional study in 11 GP practices and four colposcopy clinics in London, UK, between August 2017 and January 2019. METHOD Non-speculum and conventional (speculum) samples were collected from women aged ≥50 years attending for a colposcopy (following a speculum HPV-positive screening result) or women aged ≥35 years (with confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+), and women aged 50-64 years attending routine screening. Sensitivity to CIN2+ was assessed among women with confirmed CIN2+ (colposcopy). Specificity to HPV relative to speculum sampling and overall concordance was assessed among women with negative cytology (routine screening). RESULTS The sensitivity of non-speculum sampling for detecting CIN2+ was 83.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 60.8 to 94.2) (n = 15/18). There was complete concordance among women with positive CIN2+ who had a speculum sample ≤91 days prior to the non-speculum sample (n = 12). Among 204 women with negative cytology, the specificity to HPV was 96.4% (95% CI = 92.7 to 98.5), with 96.6% concordant results (κ 72.4%). Seventy-one percent (n = 120/170) of women preferred a non-speculum sample for their next screen. CONCLUSION HPV testing on non-speculum clinician-taken samples is a viable approach that warrants further exploration in larger studies. Overall test performance was broadly comparable with that of self-sampling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Landy
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, US
| | | | - Jo Waller
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Laura Av Marlow
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jane Rigney
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas Round
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Peter D Sasieni
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Anita Ww Lim
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bravington A, Chen H, Dyson J, Jones L, Dalgliesh C, Bryan A, Patnick J, Macleod U. Translating qualitative data into intervention content using the Theoretical Domains Framework and stakeholder co-design: a worked example from a study of cervical screening attendance in older women. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:610. [PMID: 35524217 PMCID: PMC9074234 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07926-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous screening interventions have demonstrated a series of features related to social determinants which have increased uptake in targeted populations, including the assessment of health beliefs and barriers to screening attendance as part of intervention development. Many studies cite the use of theory to identify methods of behaviour change, but fail to describe in detail how theoretical constructs are transformed into intervention content. The aim of this study was to use data from a qualitative exploration of cervical screening in women over 50 in the UK as the basis of intervention co-design with stakeholders using behavioural change frameworks. We describe the identification of behavioural mechanisms from qualitative data, and how these were used to develop content for a service-user leaflet and a video animation for practitioner training. The interventions aimed to encourage sustained commitment to cervical screening among women over 50, and to increase sensitivity to age-related problems in screening among primary care practitioners. METHODS Secondary coding of a qualitative data set to extract barriers and facilitators of cervical screening attendance. Barrier and facilitator statements were categorised using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify relevant behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Key TDF domains and associated BCTs were presented in stakeholder focus groups to guide the design of intervention content and mode of delivery. RESULTS Behavioural determinants relating to attendance clustered under three domains: beliefs about consequences, emotion and social influences, which mapped to three BCTs respectively: (1) persuasive communication/information provision; (2) stress management; (3) role modelling and encouragement. Service-user stakeholders translated these into three pragmatic intervention components: (i) addressing unanswered questions, (ii) problem-solving practitioner challenges and (iii) peer group communication. Based on (ii), practitioner stakeholders developed a call to action in three areas - clinical networking, history-taking, and flexibility in screening processes. APEASE informed modes of delivery (a service-user leaflet and a cartoon animation for practitioners). CONCLUSION The application of the TDF to qualitative data can provide an auditable protocol for the translation of qualitative data into intervention content.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Bravington
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston-Upon-Hull, UK.
| | - Hong Chen
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Judith Dyson
- Centre for Social Care, Health and Related Research, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lesley Jones
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston-Upon-Hull, UK
| | | | | | - Julietta Patnick
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Una Macleod
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston-Upon-Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Marlow LAV, Nemec M, Vlaev I, Waller J. Testing the content for a targeted age-relevant intervention to promote cervical screening uptake in women aged 50-64 years. Br J Health Psychol 2022; 27:623-644. [PMID: 34339562 DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Low uptake of cervical screening in women in their 50s and 60s leaves them at elevated risk of cancer in older age. An age-targeted intervention could be an effective way to motivate older women to attend cervical screening. Our primary objective was to test the impact of different candidate messages on cervical screening intention strength. DESIGN A cross-sectional online survey with randomized exposure to different candidate messages. METHODS Women aged 50-64 years who were not intending to be screened when next invited were recruited through an online panel. Those meeting the inclusion criteria (n = 825) were randomized to one of three groups: (1) control group, (2) intervention group 1, (3) intervention group 2. Each intervention group saw three candidate messages. These included a descriptive social norms message, a diagram illustrating the likelihood of each possible screening outcome, a response efficacy message, a risk reduction message and an acknowledgement of the potential for screening discomfort. We tested age-targeted versions (vs. generic) of some messages. The primary outcome was screening intention strength. RESULTS After adjusting for baseline intention, social norms (p = .425), outcome expectancy (p = .367), risk reduction (p = .090), response efficacy (p = .136) and discomfort acknowledgement messages (p = .181) had no effect on intention strength. Age-targeted messages did not result in greater intention than generic ones. CONCLUSIONS There was no evidence that a single message used to convey social norms, outcome expectancy, risk reduction or response efficacy had an impact on intention strength for older women who did not plan to be screened in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A V Marlow
- Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, UK
| | - Martin Nemec
- Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, UK
| | - Ivo Vlaev
- Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Jo Waller
- Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hoare S, Powell A, Modi RN, Armstrong N, Griffin SJ, Mant J, Burt J. Why do people take part in atrial fibrillation screening? Qualitative interview study in English primary care. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e051703. [PMID: 35296474 PMCID: PMC8928318 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is insufficient evidence to support national screening programmes for atrial fibrillation (AF). Nevertheless, some practitioners, policy-makers and special interest groups have encouraged introduction of opportunistic screening in primary care in order to reduce the incidence of stroke through earlier detection and treatment of AF. The attitudes of the public towards AF screening are unknown. We aimed to explore why AF screening participants took part in the screening. DESIGN Semistructured longitudinal interview study of participant engagement in the SAFER study (Screening for Atrial Fibrillation with ECG to Reduce stroke). We undertook initial interviews face to face, with up to two follow-up telephone interviews during the screening process. We thematically analysed and synthesised these data to understand shared views of screening participation. SETTING 5 primary care practices in the East of England, UK. PARTICIPANTS 23 people taking part in the SAFER study first feasibility phase. RESULTS Participants were supportive of screening for AF, explaining their participation in screening as a 'good thing to do'. Participants suggested screening could facilitate earlier diagnosis, more effective treatment, and a better future outcome, despite most being unfamiliar with AF. Participating in AF screening helped attenuate participants' concerns about stroke and demonstrated their commitment to self-care and being a 'good patient'. Participants felt that the screening test was non-invasive, and they were unlikely to have AF; they therefore considered engaging in AF screening was low risk, with few perceived harms. CONCLUSIONS Participants assessed the SAFER AF screening programme to be a legitimate, relevant and safe screening opportunity, and complied obediently with what they perceived to be a recommendation to take part. Their unreserved acceptance of screening benefit and lack of awareness of potential harms suggests that uptake would be high but reinforces the importance of ensuring participants receive balanced information about AF screening initiatives. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN16939438; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Hoare
- The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alison Powell
- The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rakesh Narendra Modi
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Natalie Armstrong
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Simon J Griffin
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan Mant
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jenni Burt
- The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang M, Yang HL, Liu XL, Mo BR, Kynoch K, Ramis MA. Evaluating behavioral economic interventions for promoting cancer screening uptake and adherence in targeted populations: a systematic review protocol. JBI Evid Synth 2022; 20:1113-1119. [PMID: 35013041 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-21-00265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this review is to determine the effectiveness of behavioral economic interventions for promoting uptake of and adherence to cancer screening recommended by guidelines. INTRODUCTION Cancer screening has been found to help reduce incidence of and mortality from advanced cancer. However, adherence to recommended cancer screening services is low in asymptomatic adults with average risk possibly due to systematic decision biases. The findings of this review will demonstrate whether interventions informed by behavioral economic insights can help improve uptake of and adherence to cancer screening. INCLUSION CRITERIA This review will consider studies that meet the following inclusion criteria: experimental, quasi-experimental, and analytical observational studies that i) evaluate the effects of behavioral economic interventions in adults eligible for guideline-recommended cancer screening, and that ii) report the number/percentage of individuals who used screening services; number/percentage of individuals who completed screening recommended by guidelines; participant self-reported intentions, choice, and satisfaction regarding the use of screening services; detection rates of early-stage cancers; use of early intervention for cancers; and cancer-related mortality. METHODS A systematic literature search will be performed by one reviewer. After removing duplicates, two reviewers will independently screen and appraise eligible studies according to the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. Five databases will be searched: CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science. Sources of gray literature and registered clinical trials will also be searched for potential studies. There will be no limits to publication date or language. Data synthesis will be conducted using meta-analysis and narrative synthesis where appropriate. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO CRD42021258370.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mian Wang
- Department of Nursing, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China Nanshan Evidence Based Nursing Centre: A JBI Affiliated Group, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China College of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia Mater Health, Evidence in Practice Unit, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia The Queensland Centre for Evidence Based Nursing and Midwifery: A JBI Institute Centre of Excellence, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Landy R, Hollingworth T, Waller J, Marlow LA, Rigney J, Round T, Sasieni PD, Lim AW. Non-speculum sampling approaches for cervical screening in older women: randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract 2022; 72:e26-e33. [PMID: 34972808 PMCID: PMC8714504 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer disproportionately affects women ≥65 years, especially those not screened regularly. Speculum use is a key barrier. AIM To assess if offering non-speculum clinician-taken sampling and self-sampling increases uptake for lapsed attenders aged 50-64 years. DESIGN AND SETTING Pragmatic randomised control trial conducted at 10 general practices in East London, UK. METHOD Participants were 784 women aged 50-64 years, last screened 6-15 years before randomisation. Intervention participants received a letter offering the choice of non-speculum clinician- or self-sampling. Control participants received usual care. The main outcome measure was uptake within 4 months. RESULTS Screening uptake 4 months after randomisation was significantly higher in the intervention arm: 20.4% (n = 80/393) versus 4.9% in the control arm (n = 19/391, absolute difference 15.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 11.0% to 20.0%, P<0.001). This was maintained at 12 months: intervention 30.5% (n = 120/393) versus control 13.6% (n = 53/391) (absolute difference 17.0%, 95% CI = 11.3% to 22.7%, P<0.001). Conventional screening attendance within 12 months was very similar for both intervention 12.7% (n = 50/393) and control 13.6% (n = 53/391) arms. Ethnic differences were seen in screening modality preference. More White women opted for self-sampling (50.7%, n = 38/75), whereas most Asian and Black women and those from other ethnic backgrounds opted for conventional screening. CONCLUSION Offering non-speculum clinician-taken sampling and self-sampling substantially increases uptake in older lapsed attendee women. Non-speculum clinician sampling appeals to women who dislike the speculum but still prefer a clinician to take their sample. Providing a choice of screening modality may be important for optimising cervical screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Landy
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland, US
| | | | - Jo Waller
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London
| | - Laura Av Marlow
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London
| | - Jane Rigney
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London
| | - Thomas Round
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London and National Cancer Analysis and Registration Service, Public Health England
| | - Peter D Sasieni
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London
| | - Anita Ww Lim
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
O'Donovan B, Mooney T, Rimmer B, Fitzpatrick P, Flannelly G, Doherty L, Martin C, O'Leary J, O'Connor M, Sharp L. Advancing understanding of influences on cervical screening (non)-participation among younger and older women: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the COM-B model. Health Expect 2021; 24:2023-2035. [PMID: 34476875 PMCID: PMC8628586 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective screening can prevent cervical cancer, but many women choose not to attend their screening tests. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate behavioural influences on cervical screening participation using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and COM-B models of behaviour change. DESIGN A qualitative study and semistructured phone interviews were conducted with women invited for routine screening tests within the national cervical screening programme in Ireland. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Forty-eight women aged 25-65 years were recruited from the national screening register. RESULTS Seven core themes were identified that mapped to three COM-B components and 11 TDF domains: (1) knowledge of cervical cancer and screening, (2) coping with smear tests, (3) competing motivational processes-automatic and reflective, (4) cognitive resources, (5) role of social support, (6) environmental influences and (7) perceputal and practical influences. A range of knowledge about screening, perceived risk of cervical cancer and human papillomavirus infection was evident. Factors that influenced screening behaviours may be hierarchical-some were assigned greater importance than others. Positive screening behaviours were linked to autonomous motivation. Deficits in physical and psychological capability (inadequate coping skills) were barriers to screening, while physical and social opportunity (e.g. healthcare professional 'champions') could facilitate participation. Older women raised age-related issues (e.g. screening no longer necessary) and had more negative attitudes to screening, while younger women identified practical barriers. CONCLUSIONS This study provides insight into screening participation and will aid development of theoretically informed interventions to increase uptake. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Women invited for screening tests through the national screening programme were interviewed. A Public & Patient Involvement (PPI) Panel, established to provide input into all CERVIVA research projects, advised the research team on recruitment materials and were given the opportunity to review and comment on the interview topic guide. This panel is made up of six women with various cervical screening histories and experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Therese Mooney
- Programme Evaluation Unit, National Screening Service, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ben Rimmer
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Patricia Fitzpatrick
- Programme Evaluation Unit, National Screening Service, Dublin, Ireland.,School of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Cara Martin
- Department of Histopathology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,Department of Pathology, Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John O'Leary
- Department of Histopathology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,Department of Pathology, Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Linda Sharp
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hellsten C, Ernstson A, Bodelsson G, Forslund O, Borgfeldt C. Equal prevalence of severe cervical dysplasia by HPV self-sampling and by midwife-collected samples for primary HPV screening: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer Prev 2021; 30:334-340. [PMID: 34010238 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES HPV self-sampling is an option for cervical screening. The aim of this randomised study was to investigate the compliance, prevalence of HPV, and prevalence of severe dysplasia in a vaginal self-sampling group in comparison to cervical samples collected by midwives (control arm). The hypothesis was that there would be no difference between vaginal self-sampling and cervical sampling to find high-grade cervical dysplasia or cancer. METHODS Vaginal HPV self-sampling kits were sent by regular mail to 14 765 randomly selected women aged 30-64 years old in the screening programme. HPV-positive women were invited for a follow-up examination by their midwife in which they provided a cervical sample for cytological and HPV co-testing. The control arm consisted of 14 839 women who met the same inclusion criteria and were invited to have cervical sampling by midwives for primary HPV screening. All HPV samples were analysed by the Aptima HPV assay (Hologic Inc.). MAIN RESULTS The participation rate was 33.5% in the self-sampling arm and 47.5% in the cervical sampling arm, (P < 0.0001). HPV was detected in 17.1% (95% confidence interval (CI), 16.1-18.23%) in the self-sampling arm and 4.5% (95% CI, 4.0-5.0%) in the cervical sampling arm. Histological, severe dysplasia was observed among 0.48% (95% CI, 0.3-0.72%) and 0.47% (95% CI, 0.3-0.66%) of the self-sampling and the cervical sampling groups, respectively. CONCLUSION The self-sampling approach detects a similar proportion of severe dysplasia as regular screening. Thus, our study indicates that self-sampling could replace primary HPV screening of cervical samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Hellsten
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund
| | - Avalon Ernstson
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund
| | - Gunilla Bodelsson
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, Office for Medical Services, Region Skåne
| | - Ola Forslund
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Laboratory Medicine Region Skåne, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Christer Borgfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Malone C, Buist DSM, Tiro J, Barlow W, Gao H, Lin J, Winer RL. Out of reach? Correlates of cervical cancer underscreening in women with varying levels of healthcare interactions in a United States integrated delivery system. Prev Med 2021; 145:106410. [PMID: 33388329 PMCID: PMC7956225 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
One in five U.S. women with health insurance are underscreened for cervical cancer. We sought to identify whether underscreening correlates differed among women with different levels of health care interaction. Among women age 30-64 years who were members of an integrated U.S. health system, we used 2014-2015 electronic health record data to identify underscreened cases (≥3.4 years since last Papanicolaou (Pap) test, n=3352) and screening-adherent controls (<3.4 years since last Pap test, n=45,359) and extracted data on potential underscreening correlates (demographics, health history, and healthcare utilization). We calculated the odds of underscreening in the total population and by subgroups defined by healthcare visits and online health portal usage in the prior 12 months. Underscreening was associated with older age (50-64 vs. 30-39; odds ratio (OR)=1.6; 95%CI=1.4-1.8), current tobacco use (vs. never use; OR=2.1; 95%CI=1.8-2.2), higher BMI (≥35 kg/m2 vs <25 kg/m2, OR=2.0; 95%CI=1.8-2.3), screening non-adherence for colorectal cancer (OR=5.1; 95%CI=4.6-5.7) and breast cancer (OR=8.1, 95%CI=7.2-9.0), and having no recent visit with their primary care provider (PCP) nor recent health portal use (vs. recent PCP visit and portal use; OR=8.4, 95%CI=7.6-9.4). Underscreening correlates were similar between the total study population and within all healthcare interaction groups. Interaction with the healthcare system is associated with lower odds of underscreening, but sociodemographic and health status correlates are similar regardless of primary care visits or online portal use. These data support the need for additional interventions to reach insured women who remain underscreened for cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin Malone
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Diana S M Buist
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jasmin Tiro
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - William Barlow
- SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Hongyuan Gao
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - John Lin
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rachel L Winer
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fuzzell LN, Perkins RB, Christy SM, Lake PW, Vadaparampil ST. Cervical cancer screening in the United States: Challenges and potential solutions for underscreened groups. Prev Med 2021; 144:106400. [PMID: 33388330 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Cervical cancer screening rates in the United States are generally high, yet certain groups demonstrate disparities in screening and surveillance. Individuals at greatest risk for cervical cancer are often from marginalized or underserved groups who do not participate in regular screening for a variety of reasons. Using the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process (PROSPR) Trans-Organ Conceptual Model, including concepts of individual-, provider-, facility-, system-, or policy-level factors, we provide a commentary to highlight reasons for low screening participation among subgroups in the U.S. These include racial and ethnic minorities, rural residents, sexual and gender minorities, those with limited English proficiency, those with particular religious beliefs, and various health conditions. We describe barriers and offer potential solutions for each group. In addition, we discuss cross-cutting barriers to screening including difficulty interacting with the healthcare system (limited knowledge and health literacy, lack of provider recommendation/contact), financial (cost, lack of insurance), and logistical barriers (e.g., lack of usual source of care, competing demands, scheduling issues). Solutions to address these barriers are needed to improve screening rates across all underscreened groups. Changes at state and national policy levels are needed to address health insurance coverage. Mobile screening, ensuring that interpreters are available for all visits, and targeted in reach at non-gynecological visits can further overcome barriers. Employing community outreach workers can increase community demand for screening, and patient navigators can improve adherence to both screening and follow-up diagnostic evaluation. HPV self-sampling can address multiple barriers to cervical cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay N Fuzzell
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, 12902 Magnolia Dr. Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America.
| | - Rebecca B Perkins
- Boston University School of Medicine, 85 E. Concord St., Boston, MA 02118, United States of America
| | - Shannon M Christy
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, 12902 Magnolia Dr. Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America; Center for Immunization and Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Dr. Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America; University of South Florida, College of Medicine, 12901 Bruce B Downs Blvd., Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America
| | - Paige W Lake
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, 12902 Magnolia Dr. Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America
| | - Susan T Vadaparampil
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, 12902 Magnolia Dr. Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America; Center for Immunization and Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Dr. Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America; University of South Florida, College of Medicine, 12901 Bruce B Downs Blvd., Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wong JLJ, Thu WPP, Lim CW, Wang YL, Yong EL, Logan SJS. Health information needs of 1000 midlife Singaporean women. Climacteric 2020; 23:511-518. [DOI: 10.1080/13697137.2020.1767570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J. L. J. Wong
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, National University Hospital, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
| | - W. P. P. Thu
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, National University Hospital, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
| | - C. W. Lim
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, National University Hospital, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
| | - Y. L. Wang
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, National University Hospital, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
| | - E. L. Yong
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, National University Hospital, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
| | - S. J. S. Logan
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, National University Hospital, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wilding S, Wighton S, Halligan D, West R, Conner M, O'Connor DB. What factors are most influential in increasing cervical cancer screening attendance? An online study of UK-based women. Health Psychol Behav Med 2020; 8:314-328. [PMID: 34040874 PMCID: PMC8114340 DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2020.1798239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Cervical cancer is the fourth most commonly occurring cancer in women worldwide. The UK has one of the highest cervical screening rates in Europe, yet attendance has been decreasing. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to screening attendance and assess the perceived importance of these factors. Methods: 194 women living in the UK were recruited via an online research recruitment website to an online survey. Most participants (N = 128, 66.0%) were currently up-to-date with cervical screening, 66 participants (34.0%) had never been screened, or were overdue for screening. Participants identified barriers and facilitators to cervical screening attendance via free-text responses and were also asked to rate a list of factors as most to least influential over decision making. Results were analysed using thematic content analysis and ratings analysed using multivariable analyses. Results: The most commonly reported barriers were: Pain/discomfort; Embarrassment; and Time. These were also rated as most influential for decision making. The most commonly reported facilitators were: Ease of making appointments; Peace of mind; and Fear of cancer/preventing serious illness. While importance rating of barriers did not differ by previous screening behaviour, ratings of some facilitators significantly differed. Up-to-date women rated believing screening is potentially life-saving and part of personal responsibility as significantly more important than overdue/never screened women. Conclusion: This study confirmed that factors which encourage screening are key to the decision of whether to attend screening. Women suggested several improvements that might make attending easier and improve uptake, including flexibility of screening locations to fit around work hours and childcare arrangements. Psychological facilitators included the peace of mind that screening brings and the belief that cervical cancer screening is potentially life-saving. Public health interventions should target factors which facilitate screening and how these interplay with barriers in order to improve uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Wilding
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sarah Wighton
- NHS England and NHS Improvement (North East & Yorkshire), Leeds, UK
| | | | - Robert West
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Mark Conner
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Marlow LAV, Ryan M, Waller J. Increasing the perceived relevance of cervical screening in older women who do not plan to attend screening. Sex Transm Infect 2020; 96:20-25. [PMID: 31395750 PMCID: PMC7029243 DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2019-054120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Revised: 07/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Uptake of cervical screening among women aged 50-64 years is declining. Not feeling at risk because of current sexual behaviour is a reason some older women give for not being screened. We hypothesised that explaining the long interval between acquiring human papillomavirus (HPV) and developing cervical cancer would increase the relevance of screening in older women. METHODS Women aged 50-64 years (n=597) who did not intend to go for screening were recruited through an online panel and randomised to one of three information conditions: cause only (basic information about HPV and cervical cancer), cause with basic timeline (also read a sentence describing the long interval between acquiring HPV and developing cervical cancer) and cause with explicit timeline (read the same as the timeline group alongside an explanation of what this means for older women). Perceived risk of cervical cancer, screening intention strength and understanding of HPV were assessed preinformation and postinformation exposure. RESULTS Information condition was significantly associated with risk perceptions and intention strength postintervention (F(2,593)=6.26, p=0.002 and F(2,593)=4.98, p=0.007 respectively). Women in the cause with explicit timeline condition were more likely to increase their risk perceptions and intention strength compared with cause only (24% vs 9% and 25% vs 13% for risk perceptions and intention, respectively). In the cause with explicit timeline group, women with 4-10 lifetime partners had higher odds of increasing their perceived risk and intention strength postintervention compared with those with 0-1 partners (OR=2.27, 95% CI 1.01 to 5.12 and OR=3.20, 95% CI 1.34 to 7.67, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Providing a clear explanation that decouples women's perceived cervical cancer risk from their current sexual behaviour has the potential to increase perceived risk of cervical cancer and intentions to be screened among older women. Providing women with a clear cognitive representation of the aetiology of cervical cancer may be one approach to increasing screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A V Marlow
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mairead Ryan
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jo Waller
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Feriyawati L, Anggraini DR, Nasution TA. Co-Infection of Human Papillomavirus with Mycoplasma Hominis/Ureaplasma Urealyticum Among Female Sex Workers in Medan, Indonesia. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2019; 7:3425-3428. [PMID: 32002066 PMCID: PMC6980820 DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Revised: 09/15/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is one of the most prevalent sexually transmitted diseases among women aged < 35 years worldwide. Recent studies have suggested that the vaginal microenvironment influenced by bacterial infection poses for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection and cervical carcinogenesis. Female sex workers (FSWs) are a population susceptible to acquire Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), as well as transmitting the virus to others. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between Mycoplasma/Ureaplasma infections and HPV infection among female sex workers. A total of 70 female sex workers of reproductive age were recruited from various location in Medan, Indonesia in 2018. Detection of Mycoplasma/Ureaplasma infections and HPV infection were obtained from PCR assessment. The results of this study showed that no correlation significant between Mycoplasma hominis/Ureaplasma urealyticum infection and HPV infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lita Feriyawati
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
| | - Dwi Rita Anggraini
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
| | - Tetty Aman Nasution
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Aasbø G, Solbrække KN, Waller J, Tropé A, Nygård M, Hansen BT. Perspectives of non-attenders for cervical cancer screening in Norway: a qualitative focus group study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e029505. [PMID: 31471438 PMCID: PMC6719771 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The attendance rate for cervical cancer screening in Norway is currently suboptimal at 69%, and an in-depth understanding of postponement of cervical cancer screening from the perspective of non-attenders is lacking. This study aims to generate knowledge about how non-attenders for cervical cancer screening reflect on booking a screening appointment. METHODS Using the Norwegian cervical cancer screening registry, we identified and recruited women who were non-attenders to screening. Nine focus group interviews were carried out, with 41 women participating in the interviews. RESULTS Four main themes were generated, which provide a comprehensive understanding of how women who are overdue for screening reflect on their hesitancy to book a screening appointment: 'It's easy to forget about it', 'Women have to arrange their own appointment', 'It has to be a 'must'' and 'It's a humiliating situation'. CONCLUSION The degree to which women regard screening as important is affected by the nudging strategies employed in the screening programme and the facilitation of attendance provided by healthcare services. Dependence on one's personal initiative to schedule a screening appointment and perception of a lack of responsibility on the part of healthcare services to attend screening may undermine informed and shared decision-making about screening attendance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunvor Aasbø
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Jo Waller
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ameli Tropé
- Cervical Cancer Screening Programme, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mari Nygård
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ryan M, Waller J, Marlow LA. Could changing invitation and booking processes help women translate their cervical screening intentions into action? A population-based survey of women's preferences in Great Britain. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e028134. [PMID: 31300499 PMCID: PMC6629419 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2018] [Revised: 05/28/2019] [Accepted: 06/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many women who do not attend screening intend to go, but do not get around to booking an appointment. Qualitative work suggests that these 'intenders' face more practical barriers to screening than women who are up-to-date ('maintainers'). This study explored practical barriers to booking a screening appointment and preferences for alternative invitation and booking methods that might overcome these barriers. DESIGN A cross-sectional survey was employed. SETTING Great Britain. PARTICIPANTS Women aged 25-64, living in Great Britain who intended to be screened but were overdue ('intenders', n=255) and women who were up-to-date with screening ('maintainers', n=359). RESULTS 'Intenders' reported slightly more barriers than 'maintainers' overall (mean=1.36 vs 1.06, t=3.03, p<0.01) and were more likely to think they might forget to book an appointment (OR=2.87, 95% CI: 2.01 to 4.09). Over half of women said they would book on a website using a smartphone (62%), a computer (58%) or via an app (52%). Older women and women from lower social grades were less likely to say they would use online booking methods (all ps <0.05). Women who reported two or more barriers were more likely to say they would use online booking than women who reported none (ps <0.01). CONCLUSIONS Women who are overdue for screening face practical barriers to booking appointments. Future interventions may assess the efficacy of changing the architecture of the invitation and booking system. This may help women overcome logistical barriers to participation and increase coverage for cervical screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mairead Ryan
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jo Waller
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Laura Av Marlow
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Predictors of Pap Smear Screening Behavior Among Rural Women in Tabriz, Iran: An Application of Health Belief Model. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT 2019. [DOI: 10.5812/ijcm.87246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
|
23
|
Marlow L, McBride E, Varnes L, Waller J. Barriers to cervical screening among older women from hard-to-reach groups: a qualitative study in England. BMC Womens Health 2019; 19:38. [PMID: 30808349 PMCID: PMC6390581 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-019-0736-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical screening attendance among 50-64 year-olds is suboptimal. Understanding attitudes to screening and reasons for non-attendance in older women will help to identify the content of interventions for this age group. This study aimed to explore barriers to cervical screening among women aged 50-64 years from hard-to-reach groups whose perspectives are often absent from research on cervical screening but are critical to developing appropriate interventions to increase engagement with the screening offer. METHODS Qualitative methodology was used. Six focus groups were carried out with women aged 50-64 years from lower socio-economic and ethnic minority backgrounds (n = 38). Focus group discussions were recorded, transcribed verbatim and translated where necessary. Data were analysed using the Framework Approach, a type of thematic analysis. RESULTS All women had heard of cervical screening, but many felt they had poor knowledge. Women's reasons for non-attendance were wide-ranging and included discomfort and embarrassment, negative perceptions of health professionals, worry and trust in the results, concern about the procedure, idiosyncratic beliefs, and extreme negative experiences. Some women reported not receiving letters or prompts to be screened. CONCLUSIONS Information designed specifically for older women should ensure they understand the purpose of screening and its relevance to them. Emphasising changes to the programme that have made the experience less uncomfortable, and improved sample taker awareness of how women feel, may help to allay concerns related to previous negative experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Marlow
- Cancer Communication & Screening Group, Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
| | - Emily McBride
- Cancer Communication & Screening Group, Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
| | - Laura Varnes
- Cancer Communication & Screening Group, Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
| | - Jo Waller
- Cancer Communication & Screening Group, Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
You H, Gu H, Zhang N, Fan H, Kou Y, Cui N, Liu XY, Li XL, Gu JH. Why hasn't this woman been screened for breast and cervical cancer? - Evidence from a Chinese population-based study. Public Health 2019; 168:83-91. [PMID: 30708199 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2018] [Revised: 12/01/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Less than half of eligible Chinese rural women have been screened for breast and cervical cancer. The objective of this study was to describe individual-level reasons for attending or not attending 'two cancers' screening using Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional study. METHODS The study sample was from the Health Services Survey in 2013 in Jiangsu, China. A total of 6520 rural women aged 36-65 years answered the questions on 'two cancers' screening participation and were included in the final analysis, which consisted of univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS In the results of multivariate logistic regression, factors significantly associated with having 'two cancers' screening included educational level (odds ratio [OR] = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.65-0.92), per capita household income (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.58-0.73), availability of female medical faculty in township facilities (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.28-0.42), quality of life (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.58-0.90), being nulliparous (OR = 3.21, 95% CI = 1.96-5.26), and multiparous (OR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.68-2.16). CONCLUSION To reduce inadequate screening service utilization of breast and cervical cancer in rural areas, efforts should be made not only to target the vulnerable rural women with lower income, lower educational level, and lower health conditions but also to further improve access to female primary-care providers. Strategies are also urgently needed to focus on nulliparous and multiparous women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H You
- Center for Health Policy and Management Studies, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China; Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
| | - H Gu
- Center for Health Policy and Management Studies, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - N Zhang
- Department of Health Policy and Promotion, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, United States.
| | - H Fan
- Center for Health Policy and Management Studies, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China; Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Y Kou
- Center for Health Policy and Management Studies, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - N Cui
- Center for Health Policy and Management Studies, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - X Y Liu
- Center for Health Policy and Management Studies, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - X L Li
- Department of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - J H Gu
- Nanjing Foreign Language School, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
van der Meij AE, Damman OC, Uiters E, Timmermans DRM. What benefits and harms are important for a decision about cervical screening? A study of the perspective of different subgroups of women. Patient Prefer Adherence 2019; 13:1005-1017. [PMID: 31303748 PMCID: PMC6611716 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s193522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 02/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In cervical screening programs, women typically receive information leaflets to support their decision about participation. However, these leaflets are often based on what experts consider important benefits and harms of screening and not what women themselves consider important to know. Objective: To identify which benefits and harms women consider important for making a decision about cervical screening. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting and participants: Women from the Dutch target group of cervical screening (N=248; 30-60 years), recruited through an online access panel. Main variables studied: Perceived importance of different benefits and harms of cervical screening, assessed through two rating items ("How important is the information about [this harm/benefit] for your decision?" and "For me it is a [benefit/harm] that participating in the screening program leads to [the benefit/harm]"), and one ranking item ("Rank the information according to their importance for your own choice"). Results: Women overall considered the benefits of cervical screening more important than the harms or disadvantages. The most important harm according to women was the chance of false positive results (M=4.88; SD=1.75). Differences between those with lower and higher numeracy/health literacy were found regarding several aspects, e.g. for the chance of false positive results, the chance of false negative results, the chance of overtreatment. Discussion and conclusion: The results suggest that leaflets could include more explicit information about false positive results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber E van der Meij
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute
, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olga C Damman
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute
, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: Olga C DammanAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Van der Boechorststraat 7, AmsterdamNL-1081 BT, The NetherlandsTel +3 120 444 8414Email
| | - Ellen Uiters
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services
, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle RM Timmermans
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute
, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM)
, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Freeman M, Waller J, Sasieni P, Lim AWW, Marlow LAV. Acceptability of non-speculum clinician sampling for cervical screening in older women: A qualitative study. J Med Screen 2018; 25:205-210. [PMID: 29439604 PMCID: PMC6262594 DOI: 10.1177/0969141318756452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2017] [Accepted: 01/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES One reason that women over age 50 report avoiding cervical screening is increased discomfort postmenopause. This study aimed to explore the acceptability of human papillomavirus testing on clinician-collected vaginal samples without a speculum ('non-speculum') for cervical screening among older women. METHODS Thirty-eight women in England aged 50-64 with a range of cervical screening experience ('up-to-date' n = 17, 'overdue screening' n = 18, 'never screened' n = 3) were identified via a recruitment agency. Women participated in focus groups or interviews about the potential for using clinician-collected samples without a speculum. Discussions were analysed using Framework Analysis. RESULTS The two main themes identified were women's perceptions of the speculum and attitudes towards non-speculum screening. Many women reported negative experiences with the speculum, including increased pain after the menopause. Women generally had positive attitudes towards non-speculum clinician sampling and felt it would be a less intrusive option, but expressed concern that it could be less accurate than screening with a speculum. Women who were 'up-to-date' preferred conventional screening, while overdue and never screened women welcomed the option to be screened without a speculum. CONCLUSIONS Human papillomavirus testing on non-speculum clinician-collected vaginal samples could be an acceptable alternative cervical screening method for older women. Offering this approach could increase screening uptake in older women who find conventional cervical screening to be less acceptable with ageing or the menopause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine Freeman
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health,
University College London, London, UK
| | - Jo Waller
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health,
University College London, London, UK
| | - Peter Sasieni
- Barts & The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen
Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Anita WW Lim
- Barts & The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen
Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Laura AV Marlow
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health,
University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Darquy S, Moutel G, Jullian O, Barré S, Duchange N. Towards equity in organised cancer screening: the case of cervical cancer screening in France. BMC WOMENS HEALTH 2018; 18:192. [PMID: 30477482 PMCID: PMC6258288 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-018-0683-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Accepted: 11/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The French national cancer institute (INCa) conducted a series of studies to assist decision-making in view of the implementation of organised cervical cancer screening that will be launched in 2018. The programme will concern all women aged 25-65 and targeted interventions will be developed for underscreened populations. This is an evolution from an equality-based approach to a step-by-step strategy of equity aiming to tackle health cancer inequalities that are avoidable and represents unfair differences. Here we present the work of the expert-group in ethics drafted by INCa to review the ethical issues prior to the programme implementation. DISCUSSION We discuss the value of such a strategy and presents reflections with regard to issues of stigmatization, respect for individual freedom and autonomy. Indeed, the balance has to be found between the search for beneficence and the potential occurrence of perverse effects, which should be considered with particular attention. CONCLUSION Moving toward an equity-oriented policy under a strategy of proportionate universalism faces a number of challenges, thus an overview of ethics and social sciences must be an integral part of the process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylviane Darquy
- Univ. Bordeaux, Inserm U1219, EPICENE, Cancer et expositions environnementales, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Grégoire Moutel
- Normandie univ, UNICAEN, Inserm U1086, ANTICIPE, 14000, Caen, France.,Espace régional d'éthique, CHU de Caen, Normandie Université, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Odile Jullian
- Institut National du Cancer, 92513, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Stéphanie Barré
- Institut National du Cancer, 92513, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Nathalie Duchange
- Normandie univ, UNICAEN, Inserm U1086, ANTICIPE, 14000, Caen, France.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kellen E, Benoy I, Vanden Broeck D, Martens P, Bogers JP, Haelens A, Van Limbergen E. A randomized, controlled trial of two strategies of offering the home-based HPV self-sampling test to non- participants in the Flemish cervical cancer screening program. Int J Cancer 2018; 143:861-868. [PMID: 29569715 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Revised: 02/15/2018] [Accepted: 02/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
We conducted a randomized, controlled trial to evaluate different strategies of offering an HPV-self sampling program, and compared this with two control groups. All total of 35,354 women who did not participate in the Flemish cancer screening program were included in the study: 9,118 received a HPV self-collection brush (RIATOL qPCR HPV genotyping test (qPCR [E6/E7]); 9,098 were offered the opportunity to order an HPV-selfsampling brush, 8,830 received the recall letter; 8,849 received no intervention. Within 12 months after the mailing, 18.7% of the women who had received the brush, participated by returning a self-sample sample, while 10.6% women allocated to the opt- in group did so. 10.5% women who received the standard recall letter, had a PAP smear taken within a period of 12 months; while 8% women did so without receiving an intervention at all. Participation in postmenopausal women was higher than in women younger than 50 in both self-sampling arms. Screening by means of the self-sample kit increased by age, contradictory when screening is performed by a PAP smear. Of those testing hrHPV positive (9.5%), 88.9% attended for follow up cytology. The mean DNA concentration, found in the self-sampler, decreased by age, causing a higher number of inconclusive results. Our results support the efficacy of a self-sampling strategy to increase participation in the Flemish screening program. Self-sampling seems particularly acceptable to postmenopausal non-responders. Future research should focus on the performance of different self-sampling devices in post-menopausal women as low DNA concentrations exponentially increased over age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliane Kellen
- Centre for Cancer Detection, Flanders, Belgium.,University Hospital Leuven, Campus St. Rafael, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ina Benoy
- AML, Sonic Healthcare, Antwerp, Belgium.,National Reference Centre for HPV, Brussels, Belgium.,AMBIOR, Laboratory for Cell Biology & Histology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Davy Vanden Broeck
- AML, Sonic Healthcare, Antwerp, Belgium.,National Reference Centre for HPV, Brussels, Belgium.,International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Jean-Paul Bogers
- AML, Sonic Healthcare, Antwerp, Belgium.,National Reference Centre for HPV, Brussels, Belgium.,AMBIOR, Laboratory for Cell Biology & Histology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Erik Van Limbergen
- Centre for Cancer Detection, Flanders, Belgium.,University Hospital Leuven, Campus St. Rafael, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Costa S, Barberis N, Larcan R, Cuzzocrea F. The incremental role of trait emotional intelligence on perceived cervical screening barriers. PSYCHOL HEALTH MED 2018; 23:880-890. [PMID: 29436238 DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2018.1437278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Researchers have become increasingly interested in investigating the role of the psychological aspects related to the perception of cervical screening barriers. This study investigates the influence of trait EI on perceived cervical screening barriers. Furthermore, this study investigates the incremental validity of trait EI beyond the Big Five, as well as emotion regulation in the perceived barrier towards the Pap test as revealed in a sample of 206 Italian women that were undergoing cervical screening. Results have shown that trait EI is negatively related to cervical screening barriers. Furthermore, trait EI can be considered as a strong incremental predictor of a woman's perception of screening over and above the Big Five, emotion regulation, age, sexual intercourse experience and past Pap test. Detailed information on the study findings and future research directions are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Costa
- a Department of Psychology , Nottingham Trent University , Nottingham , UK
| | - Nadia Barberis
- b Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , University of Messina , Messina , Italy
| | - Rosalba Larcan
- b Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , University of Messina , Messina , Italy
| | - Francesca Cuzzocrea
- b Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , University of Messina , Messina , Italy
| |
Collapse
|