1
|
McCarthy R, Mooney T, Fitzpatrick P, Kennedy RA, Coffey H, Sheedy M, MacMathúna P. The impact of delayed screening colonoscopies during the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical outcomes. Cancer Epidemiol 2024; 92:102629. [PMID: 39088893 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening services in Ireland were cancelled or postponed for periods during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of screening colonoscopy delays after a positive FIT on clinical and histopathological outcomes due to these restrictions. METHODS Participants in the Irish National Bowel Screening Programme with a positive Immunochemical Faecal Test (FIT) during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020-December 2021) were included. Patients were categorised into attended for a colonoscopy <3 months and attended for colonoscopy ≥3-17 months post positive FIT. Chi-Square Test of independence was performed using WinPepi. RESULTS 3227 individuals had a complete index colonoscopy <3 months and 262 attended colonoscopy from ≥3 to 17 months post positive FIT. Of the clients whose colonoscopy was between ≥3-17 months from positive FIT, the median wait time was 3 months. There was no significant difference found between the two groups for CRC (5.8 % vs 5.0 %, p=0.544) or for the proportion of cancer stage I, stage II and unknown (33.7 %, 40.6 %, 25.7 %, p=0.411). There was no difference in the proportions of adenomas (57.8 % vs 58.4 %, p=0.849) and the proportion of advanced adenomas (7.7 % vs 10.7 %, p=0.077) detected between the two groups. A similar proportion of polyps were detected in individuals whose index colonoscopies were postponed <3 months from positive FIT (66.9 % vs 66 %, p=0.786). CONCLUSION A median delay of 3 months in screening colonoscopies after a positive FIT does not adversely impact clinical or histopathological outcomes. There was no significant difference in cancer staging, advanced adenomas or polyps detected between those who attended colonoscopies <3 months and ≥3-17 months post positive FIT. COVID-19 related disruptions to the normal functioning of the Irish bowel screening programme did not compromise our key objectives of advanced adenoma and cancer detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Róisín McCarthy
- National Screening Service, King's Inns House, 200 Parnell Street, Dublin 1 D01 A3Y8, Ireland
| | - Thérèse Mooney
- National Screening Service, King's Inns House, 200 Parnell Street, Dublin 1 D01 A3Y8, Ireland
| | - Patricia Fitzpatrick
- National Screening Service, King's Inns House, 200 Parnell Street, Dublin 1 D01 A3Y8, Ireland; University College Dublin, School of Public Health Physiotherapy and Sports Science, Woodview House, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
| | - Rachel A Kennedy
- National Screening Service, King's Inns House, 200 Parnell Street, Dublin 1 D01 A3Y8, Ireland
| | - Hilary Coffey
- National Screening Service, King's Inns House, 200 Parnell Street, Dublin 1 D01 A3Y8, Ireland
| | - Mary Sheedy
- National Screening Service, King's Inns House, 200 Parnell Street, Dublin 1 D01 A3Y8, Ireland
| | - Padraic MacMathúna
- National Screening Service, King's Inns House, 200 Parnell Street, Dublin 1 D01 A3Y8, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shah R, Loo CE, Hanna NM, Hughes S, Mafra A, Fink H, McFerran E, Garcia M, Acharya S, Langselius O, Frick C, Niyigaba J, Lasebikan N, Steinberg J, Sullivan R, Bray F, Ilbawi AM, Ginsburg O, Chiam K, Cylus J, Caruana M, David M, Hui H, Canfell K, Soerjomataram I. Global review of COVID-19 mitigation strategies and their impact on cancer service disruptions. J Cancer Policy 2024; 41:100486. [PMID: 38830535 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, countries adopted mitigation strategies to reduce disruptions to cancer services. We reviewed their implementation across health system functions and their impact on cancer diagnosis and care during the pandemic. A systematic search was performed using terms related to cancer and COVID-19. Included studies reported on individuals with cancer or cancer care services, focusing on strategies/programs aimed to reduce delays and disruptions. Extracted data were grouped into four functions (governance, financing, service delivery, and resource generation) and sub-functions of the health system performance assessment framework. We included 30 studies from 16 countries involving 192,233 patients with cancer. Multiple mitigation approaches were implemented, predominantly affecting sub-functions of service delivery to control COVID-19 infection via the suspension of non-urgent cancer care, modified treatment guidelines, and increased telemedicine use in routine cancer care delivery. Resource generation was mainly ensured through adequate workforce supply. However, less emphasis on monitoring or assessing the effectiveness and financing of these strategies was observed. Seventeen studies suggested improved service uptake after mitigation implementation, yet the resulting impact on cancer diagnosis and care has not been established. This review emphasizes the importance of developing effective mitigation strategies across all health system (sub)functions to minimize cancer care service disruptions during crises. Deficiencies were observed in health service delivery (to ensure equity), governance (to monitor and evaluate the implementation of mitigation strategies), and financing. In the wake of future emergencies, implementation research studies that include pre-prepared protocols will be essential to assess mitigation impact across cancer care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richa Shah
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
| | - Ching Ee Loo
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Institute for Clinical Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
| | | | - Suzanne Hughes
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Allini Mafra
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Team, Public Health Expertise, Department of Precision Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg
| | - Hanna Fink
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | | | - Montse Garcia
- Cancer Screening Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Early Detection of Cancer Group, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | | | - Oliver Langselius
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Clara Frick
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Jean Niyigaba
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | | | - Julia Steinberg
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Richard Sullivan
- King's College London, Institute of Cancer Policy, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Freddie Bray
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - André Michel Ilbawi
- Department of Non-communicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Karen Chiam
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jonathan Cylus
- WHO Barcelona Office for Health Systems Financing, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Barcelona, Spain; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Public Health, London, UK
| | - Michael Caruana
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael David
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia; School of Medicine & Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Harriet Hui
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Karen Canfell
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Robles C, Monfil L, Ibáñez R, Roura E, Font R, Peremiquel-Trillas P, Brotons M, Martínez-Bueno C, de Sanjosé S, Espinàs JA, Bruni L. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cervical cancer screening participation, abnormal cytology prevalence and screening interval in Catalonia. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1338859. [PMID: 38873256 PMCID: PMC11171128 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1338859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic led to a national lockdown and the interruption of all cancer preventive services, including cervical cancer screening. We aimed to assess the COVID-19 pandemic impact on opportunistic screening participation, abnormal cytology (ASCUS+) prevalence and screening interval in 2020 and 2021 within the Public Health System of Catalonia, Spain. Methods Individual data on cytology and HPV testing of women aged 25-65 from 2014 to 2021 were retrieved from the Information System for Primary Care Services (SISAP). Time-series regression models were used to estimate expected screening participation and abnormal cytology prevalence in 2020 and 2021. The impact was determined by comparing observed and expected values (ratios). Additionally, changes in screening interval trends between 2014 and 2021 were assessed by fitting a Piecewise linear regression model. Results Cervical cancer screening participation decreased by 38.8% and 2.2% in 2020 and 2021, respectively, with the most significant impact on participation (-96.1%) occurring in April 2020. Among older women, participation was lower, and it took longer to recover. Abnormal cytology prevalence was 1.4 times higher than expected in 2020 and 2021, with variations by age (range=1.1-1.5). From June 2020 onwards, the screening interval trend significantly changed from an increase of 0.59 to 3.57 months per year, resulting in a median time of 48 months by December 2021. Conclusions During the pandemic, fewer women have participated in cervical cancer screening, abnormal cytology prevalence has increased, and the screening interval is more prolonged than before. The potential cervical cancer lifetime risk implications highlight the need for organized HPV-based screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Robles
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Monfil
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Raquel Ibáñez
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP - CB06/02/0073), Madrid, Spain
| | - Esther Roura
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP - CB06/02/0073), Madrid, Spain
| | - Rebeca Font
- Catalan Cancer Strategy, Department of Health, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Paula Peremiquel-Trillas
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP - CB06/02/0073), Madrid, Spain
- University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Brotons
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP - CB06/02/0073), Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Martínez-Bueno
- University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Atenció a la Salut Sexual i Reproductiva (ASSIR) Catalunya, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain
- Grup de Recerca en Salut Sexual i Reproductiva (GRASSIR), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia de Sanjosé
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, United States
- Institut de Salut Global (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Laia Bruni
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP - CB06/02/0073), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang H, Yang M, Xiong W, Wang Q, Zheng B, Bai Y, Zou K, Li J, Ren J, Chen W, Zhai J, Li J. Noteworthy impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on cancer screening: A systematic review. FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH 2024; 4:484-494. [PMID: 38933198 PMCID: PMC11197616 DOI: 10.1016/j.fmre.2023.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The sudden onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in January 2020 has affected essential global health services. Cancer-screening services that can reduce cancer mortality are strongly affected. However, the specific role of COVID-19 in cancer screening is not fully understood. This study aimed to assess the efficiency of global cancer screening programs before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and to promote potential cancer-screening strategies for the next pandemic. Electronic searches in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, and manual searches were performed between January 1, 2020 and March 1, 2023. Cohort studies that reported the number of participants who underwent cancer screening before and during the COVID-19 pandemic were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Differences in cancer-screening rates were estimated using the incidence rate ratio (IRR). Fifty-five cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis. The screening rates of colorectal cancer using invasive screening methods (Pooled IRR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.65, p < 0.01), cervical cancer (Pooled IRR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.67, p < 0.01), breast cancer (Pooled IRR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.66, p < 0.01) and prostate cancer (Pooled IRR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56 to 0.90, p < 0.01) during the COVID-19 pandemic were significantly lower than those before the COVID-19 pandemic. The screening rates of lung cancer (Pooled IRR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.58 to 1.03, p = 0.08) and colorectal cancer using noninvasive screening methods (Pooled IRR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.50 to 1.09, p = 0.13) were reduced with no statistical differences. The subgroup analyses revealed that the reduction in cancer-screening rates varied across economies. Our results suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a noteworthy impact on colorectal, cervical, breast, and prostate cancer screening. Developing innovative cancer-screening technologies is important to promote the efficiency of cancer-screening services in the post-COVID-19 era and prepare for the next pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huilin Wang
- Office for Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Min Yang
- Department of Comprehensive Intervention, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Wei Xiong
- Department of Gynecology Endocrine & Reproductive Center, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College/Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Quan Wang
- Ambulatory Surgery Center of Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710068, China
| | - Bobo Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People’ s Hospital, Xi'an 710068, China
| | - Yang Bai
- College of Clinical Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
| | - Kaiyong Zou
- Office for Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Jibin Li
- Office for Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Jiansong Ren
- Office for Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Wanqing Chen
- Office for Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Jingbo Zhai
- School of Public Health, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China
| | - Jiang Li
- Office for Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pereyra L, Steinberg L, Lasa J, Marconi A, Calderwood AH, Pellisé M. Management of colorectal cancer screening backlog due to the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective analysis of the use of a colorectal cancer screening clinical-decision support tool in Argentina. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2024; 47:140-148. [PMID: 36934841 PMCID: PMC10022173 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic created a backlog in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and surveillance colonoscopies. The real impact in Argentina is not fully known. GOAL To estimate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CRC prevention by comparing the number of CRC screening and surveillance consults in a clinical decision support-tool used in Argentina before, during and after pandemic lockdown. METHODS We analyzed data from May 2019 to December 2021 from CaPtyVa, a clinical decision support tool for CRC screening and surveillance. Queries were divided in pre-pandemic (May 2019 to March 2020), lockdown (April 2020 to December 2020), and post-lockdown (January 2021 to December 2021). The number of CRC monthly screening and surveillance visits were compared among the three periods and stratified according to CRC risk. RESULTS Overall, 27,563 consults were analyzed of which 9035 were screening and 18,528 were surveillance. Pre-pandemic, the median number of screening consults was 346 per month (IQR25-75 280-410). There was a decrease to 156 (80-210)/month (p<0.005) during lockdown that partially recovered during post-lockdown to 230 (170-290)/month (p=0.05). Pre-pandemic, the median number of surveillance consults was 716 (560-880)/month. They decreased to 354 (190-470)/month during lockdown (p<.05) and unlike screening, completely recovered during post-lockdown to 581 (450-790)/month. CONCLUSIONS There was a >50% decrease in the number of CRC screening and surveillance consults registered in CaPtyVa during lockdown in Argentina. Post-lockdown, surveillance consults recovered to pre-pandemic levels, but screening consults remained at 66% of pre-pandemic levels. This has implications for delays in CRC diagnoses and patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisandro Pereyra
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Alemán, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Leandro Steinberg
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Durand, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Juan Lasa
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigación Clínica, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Audrey H Calderwood
- Section of Gastroenterology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - María Pellisé
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hijos-Mallada G, Alfaro E, Navarro M, Cañamares P, Ariño I, Charro M, Bruno C, Solano M, Pardillos A, Jimeno C, Carrera-Lasfuentes P, Lanas A, Domper-Arnal MJ. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in colorectal cancer diagnosis and presentation. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2023; 46:702-709. [PMID: 36716926 PMCID: PMC9882881 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with a decrease in the colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence, due to the disruption of screening programmes and a downscaling of endoscopic activity. The endpoint of this study is to evaluate if the pandemic has led to a change in CRC diagnostic rate and presentation in our population. METHODS Multicenter retrospective study of all public hospitals of the Aragon region, attending a population of 1,329,391 inhabitants. We have analyzed all CRC cases detected and endoscopic units workload the year before the pandemic onset (1 March 2019-14 March 2020) and the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (15 March 2020-28 February 2021). RESULTS The diagnosis of CRC cases dropped a 38.9% (888 pre-pandemic vs 542 pandemic cases). Also, there were 30.3% less colonoscopies performed (24,860 vs 17,337). During the pandemic, CRC cases were diagnosed in older patients (72.4±12.2 vs 71.2±12.1 years, p=0.021), and had more frequently severe complications at diagnosis (14.6% vs 10.4%, p=0.019). Moreover, most CRC cases were diagnosed in symptomatic patients (81.4%). No significant difference was found in CRC stage at diagnosis, although stage IV was more frequent (20.1% vs 16.1%). Most hospitals reported a lower workload of endoscopic activity. CONCLUSION CRC diagnostic rate was lower after the onset of the pandemic. CRC was diagnosed in older patients and was more frequently associated with complications. After the onset of the pandemic, the endoscopic units did not reach the workload performed previously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gonzalo Hijos-Mallada
- Lozano Blesa University Clinic Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain; Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain.
| | - Enrique Alfaro
- Lozano Blesa University Clinic Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain; Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Patricia Carrera-Lasfuentes
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Center in Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Spain; Universidad San Jorge, Villanueva de Gállego, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Angel Lanas
- Lozano Blesa University Clinic Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain; Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Center in Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Spain; University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Maria Jose Domper-Arnal
- Lozano Blesa University Clinic Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain; Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain; University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Worthington J, van Wifferen F, Sun Z, de Jonge L, Lew JB, Greuter MJ, van den Puttelaar R, Feletto E, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Coupé VM, Ein Yong JH, Canfell K. Potential global loss of life expected due to COVID-19 disruptions to organised colorectal cancer screening. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 62:102081. [PMID: 37538541 PMCID: PMC10393619 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) decreases cancer burden through removal of precancerous lesions and early detection of cancer. The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted organised CRC screening programs worldwide, with some programs completely suspending screening and others experiencing significant decreases in participation and diagnostic follow-up. This study estimated the global impact of screening disruptions on CRC outcomes, and potential effects of catch-up screening. Methods Organised screening programs were identified in 29 countries, and data on participation rates and COVID-related changes to screening in 2020 were extracted where available. Four independent microsimulation models (ASCCA, MISCAN-Colon, OncoSim, and Policy1-Bowel) were used to estimate the long-term impact on CRC cases and deaths, based on decreases to screening participation in 2020. For countries where 2020 participation data were not available, changes to screening were approximated based on excess mortality rates. Catch-up strategies involving additional screening in 2021 were also simulated. Findings In countries for which direct data were available, organised CRC screening volumes at a country level decreased by an estimated 1.3-40.5% in 2020. Globally, it is estimated that COVID-related screening decreases led to a deficit of 7.4 million fewer faecal screens performed in 2020. In the absence of any organised catch-up screening, this would lead to an estimated 13,000 additional CRC cases and 7,900 deaths globally from 2020 to 2050; 79% of the additional cases and 85% of additional deaths could have been prevented with catch-up screening, respectively. Interpretation COVID-19-related disruptions to screening will cause excess CRC cases and deaths, but appropriately implemented catch-up screening could have reduced the burden by over 80%. Careful management of any disruption is key to improving the resilience of colorectal cancer screening programs. Funding The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by Cancer Council New South Wales, Health Canada, and Dutch National Institute for Public Health and Environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joachim Worthington
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council New South Wales, Australia
| | - Francine van Wifferen
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Zhuolu Sun
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lucie de Jonge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jie-Bin Lew
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marjolein J.E. Greuter
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eleonora Feletto
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council New South Wales, Australia
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Veerle M.H. Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Karen Canfell
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council New South Wales, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sadeghi A, Asadzadeh Aghdaei H, Khalafi MA, Nazemalhosseini-Mojarad E, Ketabi Moghadam P, Sohrabi MR. The impact of COVID-19 on national program of colorectal cancer screening in Tehran, Iran: a multicenter study. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:627. [PMID: 37407931 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11111-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has affected all aspects of the healthcare system, including prevention, treatment, rehabilitation of diseases and health education; access to essential therapies; allocation of finance & facilities to health issues, and governance of diseases, including COVID-19 and other diseases. Consequently, the burden of COVID-19 was not only attributable to the multiorgan involvement and detailed presentation of the disease but also to the inadequate management of other diseases resulting from the exclusive allocation of resources and medical personnel to the pandemic crisis. Over the mentioned period, one observed deficiency was the lack of public and official favor for conventional screening protocols. To this end, this study aims to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening protocols at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran, Iran, in an effort to identify individuals at risk for CRC and provide them with intensive screening and therapy. METHODS This is an observational study comparing the number of candidates for CRC screening referred to primary, secondary, and tertiary health-care centers under supervision of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (SBMU), Tehran, Iran in a 2-year interval before and after COVID-19 pandemics. Patients with intermediate- and high-risk criteria for colorectal cancer were included in the study and were screened by fecal immunochemical test. Patients with positive or indeterminate fecal test results were further evaluated with colonoscopy in research institute for gastroenterology and liver diseases where is a tertiary referral center for CRC screening. Finally, the decrease percentage of screening tests and endoscopic findings during the pandemic period compared to pre-pandemic period was calculated and interpreted. RESULTS A significant decrease in the number of performed fecal immunochemical tests (FITs), referred positive FITs, and referred patients with positive alarm signs to the Research Institute of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases (RIGLD) center inevitably led to a considerable decrease in the number of endoscopic findings, including high-risk adenomas, sessile serrated polyps, and even early-stage colorectal cancers (CRCs). CONCLUSION The disruption of screening protocols caused by the COVID-19 pandemic appears to increase the number of patients with high-grade and end-stage CRCs referred in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Sadeghi
- Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases (RIGLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (SBMU), Taleghani Hospital, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei
- Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases (RIGLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (SBMU), Taleghani Hospital, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Amin Khalafi
- Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases (RIGLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (SBMU), Taleghani Hospital, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ehsan Nazemalhosseini-Mojarad
- Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases (RIGLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (SBMU), Taleghani Hospital, Tehran, Iran
| | - Pardis Ketabi Moghadam
- Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases (RIGLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (SBMU), Taleghani Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Mohammad-Reza Sohrabi
- Community Medicine Department, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti Medical University, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Giorgi Rossi P, Carrozzi G, Falini P, Sampaolo L, Gorini G, Zorzi M, Armaroli P, Senore C, Sassoli de Bianchi P, Masocco M, Zappa M, Battisti F, Mantellini P. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Italian population-based cancer screening activities and test coverage: Results from national cross-sectional repeated surveys in 2020. eLife 2023; 12:81804. [PMID: 36734526 PMCID: PMC9934859 DOI: 10.7554/elife.81804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In Italy, regions have the mandate to implement population-based screening programs for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer. From March to May 2020, a severe lockdown was imposed due to the COVID-19 pandemic by the Italian Ministry of Health, with the suspension of screening programs. This paper describes the impact of the pandemic on Italian screening activities and test coverage in 2020 overall and by socioeconomic characteristics. Methods The regional number of subjects invited and of screening tests performed in 2020 were compared with those in 2019. Invitation and examination coverage were also calculated. PASSI surveillance system, through telephone interviews, collects information about screening test uptake by test provider (public screening and private opportunistic). Test coverage and test uptake in the last year were computed by educational attainment, perceived economic difficulties, and citizenship. Results A reduction of subjects invited and tests performed, with differences between periods and geographical macro areas, was observed in 2020 vs. 2019. The reduction in examination coverage was larger than that in invitation coverage for all screening programs. From the second half of 2020, the trend for test coverage showed a decrease in all the macro areas for all the screening programs. Compared with the pre-pandemic period, there was a greater difference according to the level of education in the odds of having had a test last year vs. never having been screened or not being up to date with screening tests. Conclusions The lockdown and the ongoing COVID-19 emergency caused an important delay in screening activities. This increased the preexisting individual and geographical inequalities in access. The opportunistic screening did not mitigate the impact of the pandemic. Funding This study was partially supported by Italian Ministry of Health - Ricerca Corrente Annual Program 2023 and by the Emilian Region DGR 839/22.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio EmiliaReggio EmiliaItaly
| | | | - Patrizia Falini
- Istituto per lo Studio, la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica (ISPRO)FlorenceItaly
| | | | - Giuseppe Gorini
- Istituto per lo Studio, la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica (ISPRO)FlorenceItaly
| | - Manuel Zorzi
- Registro Tumori del Veneto, Azienda ZeroPaduaItaly
| | - Paola Armaroli
- Centro di Prevenzione Oncologica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di TorinoTurinItaly
| | - Carlo Senore
- Centro di Prevenzione Oncologica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di TorinoTurinItaly
| | - Priscilla Sassoli de Bianchi
- Servizio Prevenzione Collettiva e Sanità Pubblica, Direzione Generale Cura della Persona, Salute e Welfare, Regione Emilia-RomagnaBolognaItaly
| | | | - Marco Zappa
- Osservatorio Nazionale ScreeningFlorenceItaly
| | - Francesca Battisti
- Istituto per lo Studio, la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica (ISPRO)FlorenceItaly
| | - Paola Mantellini
- Istituto per lo Studio, la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica (ISPRO)FlorenceItaly,Osservatorio Nazionale ScreeningFlorenceItaly
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Wifferen F, Greuter MJE, Lissenberg-Witte BI, Carvalho B, Meijer GA, Dekker E, Campari C, Garcia M, Rabeneck L, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Senore C, Coupé VMH, Segnan N, McCarthy S, Puricelli-Perin DM, Portillo I, Jahn B. Guidance for setting international standards on reporting longitudinal adherence to stool-based colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med 2022; 164:107187. [PMID: 35963311 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Longitudinal adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is reported using different summarizing measures, which hampers international comparison. We provide evidence to guide recommendations on which longitudinal adherence measure to report. Using adherence data over four stool-based CRC screening rounds in three countries, we calculated six summarizing adherence measures; adherence over all rounds, adherence per round, rescreening, full programme adherence (yes/no), regularity (never/inconsistent/consistent screenees) and number of times participated. For each measure, we calculated the accuracy in capturing the observed adherence patterns. Using the ASCCA model, we predicted screening effectiveness when using summarizing measures as model input versus the observed adherence patterns. Adherence over all rounds in the Italian, Spanish and Dutch cohorts was 64.9%, 42.8% and 61.5%, respectively, and the proportion of consistent screenees was 50.9%, 26.3% and 45.7%. Number of times participated and regularity were most accurate and resulted in similar model-predicted screening effectiveness as simulating the observed adherence patterns of Italy, Spain and the Netherlands (mortality reductions: 24.4%, 16.9% and 23.5%). Adherence over all rounds and adherence per round were least accurate. Screening effectiveness was overestimated when using adherence over all rounds (mortality reductions: 26.8%, 19.4% and 25.7%) and adherence per round (mortality reductions: 26.8%, 19.5% and 25.9%). To conclude, number of times participated and regularity were most accurate and resulted in similar model-predicted screening effectiveness as using the observed adherence patterns. However they require longitudinal data. To facilitate international comparison of CRC screening programme performance, consensus on an accurate adherence measure to report should be reached.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francine van Wifferen
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Marjolein J E Greuter
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cinzia Campari
- Screening Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Montse Garcia
- Cancer Screening Unit, Prevention and Control Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Linda Rabeneck
- Prevention & Cancer Control, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carlo Senore
- SSD Epidemiology, screening unit - CPO, University Hospital "Città della Salute e della Scienza", Turin, Italy
| | - Veerle M H Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Nereo Segnan
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, CPO, Piedmonte, Turin, Italy
| | - Sharon McCarthy
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Isabel Portillo
- Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Basque Country Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme, 48011 Bilbao, Spain; Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cancer Biomarker Area, 48903 Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Beate Jahn
- Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT-University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard-Wallnoefer Zentrum 1, A-6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Domper-Arnal MJ, Hijos-Mallada G, Lanas Á. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer patients. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2022; 15:17562848221117636. [PMID: 36035306 PMCID: PMC9403473 DOI: 10.1177/17562848221117636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed an unprecedented challenge to healthcare systems worldwide, causing downscaling of almost all other activities, especially in its early stages. Currently, the availability of vaccines along with the spread of new viral variants has modified the epidemiology of the disease, and the previous activity is being gradually resumed in most healthcare facilities. In this review, we have summarized the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Population-based screening with either colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests has proven to reduce CRC incidence and mortality, so screening programs have been implemented in most western countries. However, during the first COVID-19 wave, most of these programs had to be disrupted temporarily. In this review, we have thoroughly analyzed the consequences of these disruptions of screening programs as well as of the forced delays in diagnostic and therapeutic services on CRC prognosis, although its exact impact cannot be exactly measured yet. In any way, strategies to minimize its effect, such as catch-up strategies expanding the colonoscopy capacity or using fecal occult blood concentration and other risk factors to prioritize patients, are urgently needed. The COVID-19 pandemic has also led to a change in CRC patient presentation, with an overall temporary decreased incidence due to postponed diagnoses, but with more patients presenting in need of an emergency admission or with symptoms. Finally, changes in treatment approaches in CRC patients have been reported during the pandemic, namely a drop in the proportion of laparoscopic surgeries or a rise in short-term radiotherapy courses. We have therefore aimed to summarize the available evidence to guide the healthcare professionals treating CRC patients to choose the best treatment options in the current pandemic situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ángel Lanas
- Service of Digestive Diseases, University
Clinic Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain,Aragón Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón),
Zaragoza, Spain,CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain,University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Self-Reported and Objective Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Planning, Compliance and Timeliness of a Diagnostic Colonoscopy after a Positive FIT Screening Result in the Flemish Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/gidisord4030013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Flemish colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program (by fecal immunochemical test, FIT) was suspended and non-urgent medical procedures were discommended. This study estimates how this impacted diagnostic colonoscopy (DC) scheduling after a positive FIT and the interval between both in 2020. Methods: An online survey was sent to participants in the Flemish CRC screening program with a positive FIT but without a DC to explore the possible impact of COVID-19 on the scheduling of a DC. Self-reported survey results were complemented with objective data on DC compliance and the interval between FIT and DC. Results: In 2020, DC compliance was 4–5% lower than expected (for 3780 positive FITs no DC was performed). In February–March 2020, the median time between a positive FIT and DC significantly increased. Survey participants reported fear of COVID-19 contamination, perception to create hospital overload, delay in non-urgent medical procedures (on government advice) and not being sure a DC could be performed as contributing reasons. Conclusions: On top of a 3% lower participation, the COVID-19 pandemic further increased existing DC non-compliance and the positive FIT–DC interval. The survey confirmed the crucial role of COVID-19 in the decision not to plan a DC.
Collapse
|
13
|
de Jonge L, van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer HJ, Breekveldt ECH, Spaander MCW, van Vuuren HJ, van Kemenade FJ, Dekker E, Nagtegaal ID, van Leerdam ME, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Modelling optimal use of temporarily restricted colonoscopy capacity in a FIT-based CRC screening program: Application during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0270223. [PMID: 35749423 PMCID: PMC9231802 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The COVID-19 pandemic forced colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs to downscale their colonoscopy capacity. In this study, we assessed strategies to deal with temporary restricted colonoscopy capacity in a FIT-based CRC screening program while aiming to retain the maximum possible preventive effect of the screening program. Design We simulated the Dutch national CRC screening program inviting individuals between ages 55 and 75 for biennial FIT using the MISCAN-Colon model including the 3-month disruption in the first half of 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. For the second half of 2020 and 2021, we simulated three different strategies for the total target population: 1) increasing the FIT cut-off, 2) skipping one screening for specific screening ages, and 3) extending the screening interval. We estimated the impact on required colonoscopy capacity in 2020–2021 and life years (LYs) lost in the long-term. Results Increasing the FIT cut-off, skipping screening ages and extending the screening interval resulted in a maximum reduction of 25,100 (-17.0%), 16,100(-10.9%) and 19,000 (-12.9%) colonoscopies, respectively. Modelling an increased FIT cut-off, the number of LYs lost ranged between 1,400 and 4,400. Skipping just a single screening age resulted in approximately 2,700 LYs lost and this was doubled in case of skipping two screening ages. Extending the screening interval up to 34 months had the smallest impact on LYs lost (up to 1,100 LYs lost). Conclusion This modelling study shows that to anticipate on restricted colonoscopy capacity, temporarily extending the screening interval retains the maximum possible preventive effect of the CRC screening program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucie de Jonge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | | | - Emilie C. H. Breekveldt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C. W. Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke J. van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D. Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ribes J, Pareja L, Sanz X, Mosteiro S, Escribà JM, Esteban L, Gálvez J, Osca G, Rodenas P, Pérez-Sust P, Borràs JM. Cancer diagnosis in Catalonia (Spain) after two years of COVID-19 pandemic: an incomplete recovery. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100486. [PMID: 35714476 PMCID: PMC9197337 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J Ribes
- Catalan Pathology Registry, Catalan Cancer Plan, Department of Health of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Cancer Registry Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - L Pareja
- Hospital Cancer Registry Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - X Sanz
- Catalan Pathology Registry, Catalan Cancer Plan, Department of Health of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Mosteiro
- Hospital Cancer Registry Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J M Escribà
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Cancer Registry Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Esteban
- Catalan Pathology Registry, Catalan Cancer Plan, Department of Health of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Gálvez
- Hospital Cancer Registry Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - G Osca
- Hospital Cancer Registry Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Rodenas
- Catalan Electronic Health Record, EHealth Office, Health/Catalan Health Service, Department of Health of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Pérez-Sust
- CatSalut Information Systems and Health Department ICT Unit, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J M Borràs
- Catalan Pathology Registry, Catalan Cancer Plan, Department of Health of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|