Differential expression of renal adenosine A(1) receptors induced by acute renal failure

Purinergic signalling in the kidney in health and disease

The involvement of purinergic signalling in kidney physiology and pathophysiology is rapidly gaining recognition and this is a comprehensive review of early and recent publications in the field. Purinergic signalling involvement is described in several important intrarenal regulatory mechanisms, including tuboglomerular feedback, the autoregulatory response of the glomerular and extraglomerular microcirculation and the control of renin release. Furthermore, purinergic signalling influences water and electrolyte transport in all segments of the renal tubule. Reports about purine- and pyrimidine-mediated actions in diseases of the kidney, including polycystic kidney disease, nephritis, diabetes, hypertension and nephrotoxicant injury are covered and possible purinergic therapeutic strategies discussed.

Purinergic signaling and blood vessels in health and disease

Purinergic signaling plays important roles in control of vascular tone and remodeling. There is dual control of vascular tone by ATP released as a cotransmitter with noradrenaline from perivascular sympathetic nerves to cause vasoconstriction via P2X1 receptors, whereas ATP released from endothelial cells in response to changes in blood flow (producing shear stress) or hypoxia acts on P2X and P2Y receptors on endothelial cells to produce nitric oxide and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor, which dilates vessels. ATP is also released from sensory-motor nerves during antidromic reflex activity to produce relaxation of some blood vessels. In this review, we stress the differences in neural and endothelial factors in purinergic control of different blood vessels. The long-term (trophic) actions of purine and pyrimidine nucleosides and nucleotides in promoting migration and proliferation of both vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells via P1 and P2Y receptors during angiogenesis and vessel remodeling during restenosis after angioplasty are described. The pathophysiology of blood vessels and therapeutic potential of purinergic agents in diseases, including hypertension, atherosclerosis, ischemia, thrombosis and stroke, diabetes, and migraine, is discussed.

Adenosine receptors and the kidney

The autacoid, adenosine, is present in the normoxic kidney and generated in the cytosol as well as at extracellular sites. The rate of adenosine formation is enhanced when the rate of ATP hydrolysis prevails over the rate of ATP synthesis during increased tubular transport work or during oxygen deficiency. Extracellular adenosine acts on adenosine receptor subtypes (A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3)) in the cell membranes to affect vascular and tubular functions. Adenosine lowers glomerular filtration rate by constricting afferent arterioles, especially in superficial nephrons, and thus lowers the salt load and transport work of the kidney consistent with the concept of metabolic control of organ function. In contrast, it leads to vasodilation in the deep cortex and the semihypoxic medulla, and exerts differential effects on NaCl transport along the tubular and collecting duct system. These vascular and tubular effects point to a prominent role of adenosine and its receptors in the intrarenal metabolic regulation of kidney function, and, together with its role in inflammatory processes, form the basis for potential therapeutic approaches in radiocontrast media-induced acute renal failure, ischemia reperfusion injury, and in patients with cardiorenal failure.

Adenosine and Kidney Function

In this review we outline the unique effects of the autacoid adenosine in the kidney. Adenosine is present in the cytosol of renal cells and in the extracellular space of normoxic kidneys. Extracellular adenosine can derive from cellular adenosine release or extracellular breakdown of ATP, AMP, or cAMP. It is generated at enhanced rates when tubular NaCl reabsorption and thus transport work increase or when hypoxia is induced. Extracellular adenosine acts on adenosine receptor subtypes in the cell membranes to affect vascular and tubular functions. Adenosine lowers glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by constricting afferent arterioles, especially in superficial nephrons, and acts as a mediator of the tubuloglomerular feedback, i.e., a mechanism that coordinates GFR and tubular transport. In contrast, it leads to vasodilation in deep cortex and medulla. Moreover, adenosine tonically inhibits the renal release of renin and stimulates NaCl transport in the cortical proximal tubule but inhibits it in medullary segments including the medullary thick ascending limb. These differential effects of adenosine are subsequently analyzed in a more integrative way in the context of intrarenal metabolic regulation of kidney function, and potential pathophysiological consequences are outlined.

Role of non-selective adenosine receptor blockade and phosphodiesterase inhibition in cisplatin-induced nephrogonadal toxicity in rats

1. It is well documented that cisplatin (CDDP) treatment increases the expression of adenosine A(1) receptors in both kidney and testes. However, the effect of adenosine at these receptors is controversial. Adenosine A(1) receptors have been documented to be involved in either cytoprotection or aggravation of nephrotoxicity. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of the non-selective adenosine receptor inhibitor theophylline and the phosphodiesterase inhibitor pentoxifylline on CDDP-induced renal and testicular toxicity. 2. Male Wister rats were divided into six groups. Two control groups received plain drinking water and a third control group received theophylline 0.8 mg/mL in the drinking water for 2 weeks. One group of animals drinking plain water was injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with pentoxifylline 50 mg/kg per day for 2 weeks. The remaining groups were treated in the same manner and received single dose of CDDP 7 mg/kg, i.p., 1 week after starting theophylline and pentoxifylline treatment and all animals were killed 1 week after CDDP treatment. 3. Rats treated with CDDP developed nephrotoxicity, as demonstrated by increased kidney and testes weight as a percentage of total bodyweight, blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels and decreased serum calcium and albumin levels. In addition, CDDP treatment resulted in an increase in the production of malondialdehyde (MDA) and decreases in total nitrate/nitrite levels, as well as depletion of reduced glutathione (GSH) content and glutathione peroxidase (GPX) activity in both the kidney and testes. Administration of theophylline in the drinking water to CDDP-treated rats resulted in exacerbation of the indices of nephrotoxicity, depletion of GSH content and GPX activity levels, with increased MDA production and platinum accumulation in both the kidney and testes. However, pentoxifylline administration reduced CDDP-induced biochemical changes and reduced platinum accumulation in both organs. Histopathological examination of the kidney revealed that CDDP treatment produced multifocal tubular atrophy, atypical reparative changes of the tubular epithelium and marked tubular necrosis. Animals treated with the theophylline/CDDP combination showed extensive widespread damage with intratubular calcification. However, pentoxifylline treatment ameliorated the overt changes induced by CDDP treatment. 4. Theophylline exacerbates the deleterious effects of CDDP on rat kidney and testes. However, pentoxifylline alleviates CDDP-induced renal and testicular toxicity.

Experimental hypothyroidism modifies specific binding of A1 and A2A analogues to adenosine receptors in the rat kidney

1 Binding kinetic studies with the adenosine analogues [3H]CPA (0.250-50 nm) and [3H]CGS21680 (0.1-100 nm) were performed in renal tissue from control (NL) and thyroidectomised (HTX) rats. We propose that the low renal adenosine content reported in hypothyroid rats may induce changes in the density and/or affinity of adenosine receptor, distributed in the cortex (C), outer medulla (OM), and inner medulla (IM) of the kidney. 2 [3H]CPA and [3H]CGS21680 binding saturation isotherms were fitted by nonlinear regression analysis and evaluated by Furchgott's method. These results revealed high (KH) and low (KL) affinity (KD) sites for both compounds. As expected, a heterogeneous pattern was observed for Bmax and KD values. 3 Bound [3H]CPA and [3H]CGS21680 were displaced by increasing concentrations of nonlabelled DPCPX and NECA, respectively, indicating the presence of A1 and A2A adenosine receptors distributed in the renal segments studied. 4 The relative intrinsic efficacy (epsilon) for [3H]CPA and [3H]CGS21680 showed extreme values (far from 1.0), 0.5 in IM NL and 2.70 in IM HTX for [3H]CGS21680. 5 Our results indicate that A2A adenosine receptor is predominant in IM from HTX, but A1 receptors are expressed preferentially in C in NL. 6 We conclude that the changes observed in number, affinity, and epsilon for the A2A receptor in IM from HTX might be responsible from alterations in medullary function, that is, incapacity for urine concentration as observed in the hypothyroid kidney.

Chronic hypoxia up-regulates expression of adenosine A1 receptors in DDT1-MF2 cells

As the first step to understand how chronic hypoxia might regulate smooth muscle function in health and disease, we have employed an established immortalised cell model of smooth muscle, DDT1-MF2 cells, to address the hypothesis that adenosine A1 receptor density is modulated by O2 availability. Maximal specific binding (Bmax) of the selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist, [3H]-DPCPX, to cell membranes increased 3.5-fold from 0.48 +/- 0.02 pmol/mg to 1.7 +/- 0.5 pmol/mg protein after 16 hr of hypoxia and this effect was not accompanied by any statistically significant changes in either binding affinity (0.84 +/- 0.2 nM vs. 1.2 +/- 0.3 nM) or Hill coefficient (1.1 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.99 +/- 0.03). Hypoxia-evoked increases in membrane receptor density were paralleled in intact DDT1-MF2 cells. In addition, the increase in [3H]-DPCPX binding to intact cells was inhibited by co-incubation during hypoxia with the translational inhibitor cycloheximide, the transcriptional blocker actinomycin D and the NFkappaB inhibitor sulphasalazine. Together, these data show that adenosine A1 receptor density is modulated, at least in part, by O2-dependent activation of the transcription factor NFkappaB and adds to the list of processes dynamically regulated by ambient oxygen availability. Since hypoxia is an initiating factor in acute renal failure, similar changes in transcription may account for up-regulation of adenosine A1 receptors noted previously in the renal vasculature of rats with acute renal failure.

Expression of adenosine receptors in the preglomerular microcirculation

The purpose of this study was to systematically investigate the abundance of each of the adenosine receptor subtypes in the preglomerular microcirculation vs. other vascular segments and vs. the renal cortex and medulla. Rat preglomerular microvessels (PGMVs) were isolated by iron oxide loading followed by magnetic separation. For comparison, mesenteric microvessels, segments of the aorta (thoracic, middle abdominal, and lower abdominal), renal cortex, and renal medulla were obtained by dissection. Adenosine receptor protein and mRNA expression were examined by Western blotting, Northern blotting, and RT-PCR. Our results indicate that compared with other vascular segments and renal tissues, A1 and A2B receptor protein and mRNA are abundantly expressed in the preglomerular microcirculation, whereas A2A and A3 receptor protein and mRNA are barely detectable or undetectable in PGMVs. We conclude that, relative to other vascular and renal tissues, A1 and A2B receptors are well expressed in PGMVs, whereas A2A and A3 receptors are notably deficient. Thus A1 and A2B receptors, but not A2A or A3 receptors, may importantly regulate the preglomerular microcirculation.

Molecular aspects of acute inhibition of Na(+)-H(+) exchanger NHE3 by A(2)-adenosine receptor agonists

Adenosine regulates Na(+) homeostasis by its acute effects on renal Na(+) transport. We have shown in heterologously transfected A6/C1 cells (renal cell line from Xenopus laevis) that adenosine-induced natriuresis may be effected partly via A(2) adenosine receptor-mediated inactivation of the renal brush border membrane Na(+)-H(+) exchanger NHE3. In this study we utilized A6/C1 cells stably expressing wild-type as well as mutated forms of NHE3 to assess the molecular mechanism underlying A(2)-dependent control of NHE3 function. Cell surface biotinylation combined with immunoprecipitation revealed that NHE3 is targeted exclusively to the apical domain and that the endogenous Xenopus NHE is located entirely on the basolateral side of A6/C1 transfectants. Stimulation of A(2)-adenosine receptors located on the basolateral side for 15 min with CPA (N6-cyclopentyladenosine) acutely decreased NHE3 activity (microspectrofluorimety). This effect was mimicked by 8-bromo-cAMP and entirely blocked by pharmacological inhibition of PKA (with H89) or singular substitution of two PKA target sites (serine 552 and serine 605) on NHE3. Downregulation of NHE3 activity by CPA was attributable to a reduction of NHE3 intrinsic transport activity without change in surface NHE3 protein at 15 min. At 30 min, the decrease in transport activity was associated with a decrease in apical membrane NHE3 antigen. In conclusion, two highly conserved target serine sites on NHE3 determine NHE3 modulation upon A(2)-receptor activation and NHE3 inactivation by adenosine proceeds via two phases with distinct mechanisms.

Immunolocalisation of adenosine A(1) receptors in the rat kidney

The location of adenosine A(1) receptors in the rat kidney was investigated using immunolabelling with antibodies raised to a 15-amino-acid sequence near the C-terminus of the receptor (antibody I) and to a 14-amino-acid sequence in the second extracellular loop (antibody II). In the cortex, antibody I bound to adenosine A(1) receptors in mesangial cells and afferent arterioles, whilst antibody II bound to receptors in proximal convoluted tubules. In the medulla, both antibodies bound to receptors in collecting ducts and the papillary surface epithelium. These observations provide support for the diverse functional roles previously proposed for the adenosine A(1) receptor in the kidney. The labelling of distinct but different structures in the cortex by antibodies raised to different amino acid sequences on the A(1) receptor protein suggests that differing forms of the receptor are present in this region of the kidney.