Attenuation of Fos-like immunoreactivity in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis following trigeminovascular activation in the anaesthetised guinea-pig

A novel large animal model of recurrent migraine established by repeated administration of inflammatory soup into the dura mater of the rhesus monkey

Several animal models of migraine have been established, and those based on trigeminovascular system activation are widely accepted. However, most of these models have been established on lower animals, such as rodents, and involve only a single administration of a noxious stimulus. In this study, an inflammatory soup (10 μL), consisting of prostaglandin E2 (0.2 mM), serotonin (2 mM), bradykinin (2 mM) and histamine (2 mM), was injected into the dura mater of conscious rhesus monkeys through an indwelling catheter. The infusion started on day 8 and was repeated every 3 days, for a total of six administrations, to induce neurogenic inflammation. We performed behavioral assessments and measured the expression of the oncogene c-fos, neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) and calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) in the trigeminal system and in multiple brain regions involved in pain processing by immunohistochemical staining. Compared with monkeys in the control group, three of the four animals in the inflammatory soup group displayed decreased motor behaviors, and two showed increased ipsilateral nose and mouth secretions during the stimulus period. Higher expression levels of c-fos, nNOS and CGRP were found in various brain areas of experimental animals compared with controls, including the trigeminal nucleus caudalis, thalamus, hypothalamus, midbrain, pons and other areas involved in pain perception. These results suggest that repeated inflammatory soup stimulation of the dura activates the trigeminovascular system and produces migraine-like pathological changes and abnormal behaviors in conscious rhesus monkeys.

Spontaneous and Bite-Evoked Muscle Pain Are Mediated by a Common Nociceptive Pathway With Differential Contribution by TRPV1

Spontaneous pain and function-associated pain are prevalent symptoms of multiple acute and chronic muscle pathologies. We established mouse models for evaluating spontaneous pain and bite-evoked pain from masseter muscle, and determined the roles of transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1 (TRPV1) and the contribution of TRPV1- or neurokinin 1 (NK1)-dependent nociceptive pathways. Masseter muscle inflammation increased Mouse Grimace Scale scores and face-wiping behavior, which were attenuated by pharmacological or genetic inhibition of TRPV1. Masseter inflammation led to a significant reduction in bite force. Inhibition of TRPV1 only marginally relieved the inflammation-induced reduction of bite force. These results suggest a differential extent of contribution of TRPV1 to the 2 types of muscle pain. However, chemical ablation of TRPV1-expressing nociceptors or chemogenetic silencing of TRPV1-lineage nerve terminals in masseter muscle attenuated inflammation-induced changes in Mouse Grimace Scale scores as well as bite force. Furthermore, ablation of neurons expressing NK1 receptor in trigeminal subnucleus caudalis also prevented both types of muscle pain. Our results suggest that TRPV1 differentially contributes to spontaneous pain and bite-evoked muscle pain, but TRPV1-expressing afferents and NK1-expressing second-order neurons commonly mediate both types of muscle pain. Therefore, manipulation of the nociceptive circuit may provide a novel approach for management of acute or chronic craniofacial muscle pain.

PERSPECTIVE

We report the profound contribution of TRPV1 to spontaneous muscle pain but not to bite-evoked muscle pain. These 2 types of muscle pain are transmitted through a common nociceptive pathway. These results may help to develop new strategies to manage multiple modes of muscle pain simultaneously by manipulating pain circuits.

Modelling headache and migraine and its pharmacological manipulation

Similarities between laboratory animals and humans in anatomy and physiology of the cephalic nociceptive pathways have allowed scientists to create successful models that have significantly contributed to our understanding of headache. They have also been instrumental in the development of novel anti-migraine drugs different from classical pain killers. Nevertheless, modelling the mechanisms underlying primary headache disorders like migraine has been challenging due to limitations in testing the postulated hypotheses in humans. Recent developments in imaging techniques have begun to fill this translational gap. The unambiguous demonstration of cortical spreading depolarization (CSD) during migraine aura in patients has reawakened interest in studying CSD in animals as a noxious brain event that can activate the trigeminovascular system. CSD-based models, including transgenics and optogenetics, may more realistically simulate pain generation in migraine, which is thought to originate within the brain. The realization that behavioural correlates of headache and migrainous symptoms like photophobia can be assessed quantitatively in laboratory animals, has created an opportunity to directly study the headache in intact animals without the confounding effects of anaesthetics. Headache and migraine-like episodes induced by administration of glyceryltrinitrate and CGRP to humans and parallel behavioural and biological changes observed in rodents create interesting possibilities for translational research. Not unexpectedly, species differences and model-specific observations have also led to controversies as well as disappointments in clinical trials, which, in return, has helped us improve the models and advance our understanding of headache. Here, we review commonly used headache and migraine models with an emphasis on recent developments.

Chemical mediators of migraine: preclinical and clinical observations

Migraine is a neurovascular disorder, and although the pathophysiology of migraine has not been fully delineated, much has been learned in the past 50 years. This knowledge has been accompanied by significant advancements in the way migraine is viewed as a disease process and in the development therapeutic options. In this review, we will focus on 4 mediators (nitric oxide, histamine, serotonin, and calcitonin gene-related peptide) which have significantly advanced our understanding of migraine as a disease entity. For each mediator we begin by reviewing the preclinical data linking it to migraine pathophysiology, first focusing on the vascular mechanisms, then the neuronal mechanisms. The preclinical data are then followed by a review of the clinical data which support each mediator's role in migraine and highlights the pharmacological agents which target these mediators for migraine therapy.

Triptans attenuate capsaicin-induced CREB phosphorylation within the trigeminal nucleus caudalis: a mechanism to prevent central sensitization?

The c-AMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB) and its phosphorylated product (P-CREB) are nuclear proteins expressed after stimulation of pain-producing areas of the spinal cord. There is evidence indicating that central sensitization within dorsal horn neurons is dependent on P-CREB transcriptional regulation. The objectives of the study were to investigate the expression of P-CREB in cells in rat trigeminal nucleus caudalis after noxious stimulation and to determine whether pre-treatment with specific anti-migraine agents modulate this expression. CREB and P-CREB labelling was investigated within the trigeminal caudalis by immunohistochemistry after capsaicin stimulation. Subsequently, the effect of i.v. pre-treatment with either sumatriptan (n = 5), or naratriptan (n = 7) on P-CREB expression was studied. Five animals pre-treated with i.v. normal saline were served as controls. CREB and P-CREB labelling was robust in all animal groups within Sp5C. Both naratriptan and sumatriptan decreased P-CREB expression (p = 0.0003 and 0.0013) within the Sp5C. Triptans attenuate activation of CREB within the central parts of the trigeminal system, thereby leading to potential inhibition of central sensitization. P-CREB may serve as a new marker for post-synaptic neuronal activation within Sp5C in animal models relevant to migraine.

Fos expression induced by activation of NMDA and neurokinin-1 receptors in the trigeminal subnucleus caudalis in vitro: role of protein kinases

Activity-induced neuronal plasticity is partly facilitated by the expression of the immediate-early gene c-fos and the resulting transcription factor Fos. Expression of Fos is associated with nociceptive afferent activation, but a detailed stimulation-transcription pathway for Fos expression has not yet been determined in the trigeminal system. This study utilized a novel in vitro model to determine whether Fos expression can be induced in trigeminal subnucleus caudalis by NMDA or neurokinin-1 receptor activation, and whether inhibition of intracellular kinases has any effect on Fos expression induced by activation of these receptors. Brainstems of male Wistar rats were excised and maintained in artificial cerebrospinal fluid at 37°C. NMDA or the specific neurokinin-1 receptor agonist [Sar(9),Met(O(2))(11)]-SP was applied. These agonists were subsequently tested in the presence of the protein kinase A inhibitor Rp-cAMP or protein kinase C inhibitor chelerythrine chloride. In all experiments the sodium channel blocker tetrodotoxin was used to prevent indirect neuronal activation. Brainstems were processed immunocytochemically for Fos expression, and positive cells were counted in the trigeminal subnucleus caudalis. NMDA and [Sar(9),Met(O(2))(11)]-SP significantly increased Fos expression, but these increases could be prevented by chelerythrine chloride. Rp-cAMP had no effect on Fos induced by NMDA but caused a significant reduction in Fos induced by [Sar(9),Met(O(2))(11)]-SP. These data demonstrate that in trigeminal subnucleus caudalis activation of either NK1 or NMDA receptors alone induces Fos expression; protein kinases A and C are involved in NK1R-induced Fos while protein kinase A is not required for NMDA receptor-induced Fos.

The relevance of preclinical research models for the development of antimigraine drugs: focus on 5-HT(1B/1D) and CGRP receptors

Migraine is a complex neurovascular syndrome, causing a unilateral pulsating headache with accompanying symptoms. The past four decades have contributed immensely to our present understanding of migraine pathophysiology and have led to the introduction of specific antimigraine therapies, much to the relief of migraineurs. Pathophysiological factors culminating into migraine headaches have not yet been completely deciphered and, thus, pose an additional challenge for preclinical research in the absence of any direct experimental marker. Migraine provocation experiments in humans use a head-score to evaluate migraine, as articulated by the volunteer, which cannot be applied to laboratory animals. Therefore, basic research focuses on different symptoms and putative mechanisms, one at a time or in combination, to validate the hypotheses. Studies in several species, utilizing different preclinical approaches, have significantly contributed to the two antimigraine principles in therapeutics, namely: 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists (known as triptans) and CGRP receptor antagonists (known as gepants). This review will analyze the preclinical experimental models currently known for the development of these therapeutic principles, which are mainly based on the vascular and/or neurogenic theories of migraine pathogenesis. These include models based on the involvement of cranial vasodilatation and/or the trigeminovascular system in migraine. Clearly, the preclinical strategies should involve both approaches, while incorporating the newer ideas/techniques in order to get better insights into migraine pathophysiology.

Animal models of migraine headache and aura

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the past 30 years, animal models of migraine have led to the identification of novel drug targets and drug treatments as well as helped to clarify a mechanism for abortive and prophylactic drugs. Animal models have also provided translational knowledge and a framework to think about the impact of hormones, genes, and environmental factors on migraine pathophysiology. Although most acknowledge that these animal models have significant shortcomings, promising new drugs are now being developed and brought to the clinic using these preclinical models. Hence, it is timely to provide a short overview examining the ways in which animal models inform us about underlying migraine mechanisms.

RECENT FINDINGS

First generation migraine models mainly focused on events within pain-generating intracranial tissues, for example, the dura mater and large vessels, as well as their downstream consequences within brain. Upstream events such as cortical spreading depression have also been modeled recently and provide insight into mechanisms of migraine prophylaxis. Mouse mutants expressing human migraine mutations have been genetically engineered to provide an understanding of familial hemiplegic migraine and possibly, by extrapolation, may reflect on the pathophysiology of more common migraine subtypes.

SUMMARY

Animal models of migraine reflect distinct facets of this clinically heterogeneous disorder and contribute to a better understanding of its pathophysiology and pharmacology.

Effects of parecoxib on plasma protein extravasation and c-fos expression in the rat

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the effects of the cyclooxygenases-2 (COX-2) inhibitor parecoxib on meningeal plasma protein extravasation (PPE) and on c-fos expression in the nucleus trigeminalis caudalis in an animal model of trigeminovascular activation. Background.-Recent reports about the efficacy of COX-2 inhibitors in migraine treatment suggest the involvement of COX-2 in migraine pathophysiology. So far, studies on the role of COX-2 in animal models of migraine are lacking.

METHODS

Unilateral electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion was performed in anesthetized male Sprague Dawley rats. We assessed PPE in the ipsilateral dura mater and expression of c-fos within the ipsilateral trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC) under control conditions and after pretreatment with parecoxib.

RESULTS

Parecoxib significantly attenuated PPE in the rat dura mater. The PPE ratio under control conditions (1.73 +/- 0.19 (mean +/- SD)) was reduced by 58.9 +/- 30% after pretreatment with 10 mg/kg parecoxib and by 78.1 +/- 23% after pretreatment with 50 mg/kg. c-fos experiments: Compared with vehicle, all doses of parecoxib (1 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, 50 mg/kg) significantly reduced the number of c-fos positive cells in the ipsilateral TNC (P < .05). The number of c-fos positive cells in the ipsilateral TNC was 50 +/- 2.7 (mean +/- SEM) under control conditions and 9.1 +/- 0.6 after pretreatment with 50 mg/kg parecoxib.

CONCLUSION

Our study results suggest that COX-2 is involved in neurogenic inflammation of the rat dura mater. Moreover, the study points to a role of COX-2 inhibitors in trigeminal nociception at the second-order level.

Animal models of migraine: looking at the component parts of a complex disorder

Animal models of human disease have been extremely helpful both in advancing the understanding of brain disorders and in developing new therapeutic approaches. Models for studying headache mechanisms, particularly those directed at migraine, have been developed and exploited efficiently in the last decade, leading to better understanding of the potential mechanisms of the disorder and of the action for antimigraine treatments. Model systems employed have focused on the pain-producing cranial structures, the large vessels and dura mater, in order to provide reproducible physiological measures that could be subject to pharmacological exploration. A wide range of methods using both in vivo and in vitro approaches are now employed; these range from manipulation of the mouse genome in order to produce animals with human disease-producing mutations, through sensitive immunohistochemical methods to vascular, neurovascular and electrophysiological studies. No one model system in experimental animals can explain all the features of migraine; however, the systems available have begun to offer ways to dissect migraine's component parts to allow a better understanding of the problem and the development of new treatment strategies.

Experimental migraine models and their relevance in migraine therapy

Although the understanding of migraine pathophysiology is incomplete, it is now well accepted that this neurovascular syndrome is mainly due to a cranial vasodilation with activation of the trigeminal system. Several experimental migraine models, based on vascular and neuronal involvement, have been developed. Obviously, the migraine models do not entail all facets of this clinically heterogeneous disorder, but their contribution at several levels (molecular, in vitro, in vivo) has been crucial in the development of novel antimigraine drugs and in the understanding of migraine pathophysiology. One important vascular in vivo model, based on an assumption that migraine headache involves cranial vasodilation, determines porcine arteriovenous anastomotic blood flow. Other models utilize electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion/nerve to study neurogenic dural inflammation, while the superior sagittal sinus stimulation model takes into account the transmission of trigeminal nociceptive input in the brainstem. More recently, the introduction of integrated models, namely electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion or systemic administration of capsaicin, allows studying the activation of the trigeminal system and its effect on the cranial vasculature. Studies using in vitro models have contributed enormously during the preclinical stage to characterizing the receptors in cranial blood vessels and to studying the effects of several putative antimigraine agents. The aforementioned migraine models have advantages as well as some limitations. The present review is devoted to discussing various migraine models and their relevance to antimigraine therapy.

Molecular Mechanisms of Migraine

Migraine is a common complex disorder that affects a large portion of the population and thus incurs a substantial economic burden on society. The disorder is characterized by recurrent headaches that are unilateral and usually accompanied by nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia. The range of clinical characteristics is broad and there is evidence of comorbidity with other neurological diseases, complicating both the diagnosis and management of the disorder. Although the class of drugs known as the triptans (serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) agonists) has been shown to be effective in treating a significant number of patients with migraine, treatment may in the future be further enhanced by identifying drugs that selectively target molecular mechanisms causing susceptibility to the disease.Genetically, migraine is a complex familial disorder in which the severity and susceptibility of individuals is most likely governed by several genes that may be different among families. Identification of the genomic variants involved in genetic predisposition to migraine should facilitate the development of more effective diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Genetic profiling, combined with our knowledge of therapeutic response to drugs, should enable the development of specific, individually-tailored treatment.

The NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 reduces Fos-like immunoreactivity within the trigeminocervical complex following superior sagittal sinus stimulation in the cat

Expression of Fos protein is an indicator of neuronal perturbation and is readily observed in the caudal medulla and the spinal cord following trigeminovascular nociceptive activation by electrical stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) in the cat. It has been shown in the rat that N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor blockade causes a reduction in Fos protein expression after generalised meningeal irritation. We wished to examine if the same relationship was true in the cat, using the same non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801, and a trigeminovascular-specific stimulus. A group of experimental animals underwent stimulation following blinded administration of MK-801 (4 mg/kg i.v.); control animals underwent stimulation minus MK-801, and a non-stimulated control animal underwent surgery alone. The regions examined for Fos-like immunoreactivity were the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC) and its caudal extension into the C(1) and C(2) levels of the upper cervical spinal cord. The Fos-positive cell counts for the three regions (TNC, C(1) and C(2)) were grouped together for analysis. In the control stimulated group a median of 78 (56-99, quartile range, n=4) cells were Fos-positive. In the group treated with MK-801 the median number of Fos-positive cells was reduced to 40 (30-48; P<0.03, n=7). The large reduction that was observed in SSS stimulation-evoked Fos protein expression following the administration of MK-801, taken together with electrophysiological data, indicates a role for glutamate in neurotransmission within the trigeminocervical complex. Understanding glutamatergic mechanisms in the trigeminocervical complex offers mechanistic insight and therapeutic possibilities for primary neurovascular headaches, such as migraine.

Pharmacological opportunities and pitfalls in the therapy of migraine

The mild vasoconstrictor effects of modern antimigraine drugs, such as serotonin (5-HT; 5-hydroxytryptamine)1B/D agonists, have led to a search for nonvasoconstrictor approaches to therapy. Such approaches have included substance P (neurokinin I) antagonists, endothelin antagonists and highly specific 5HT1D agonists. All of these substances are effective in animal models and have no significant vasoconstrictive effects. However, all of them failed to demonstrate any antimigraine effects. Current clinical and experimental evidence therefore supports the view that isolated peripheral trigeminal nerve inhibition is insufficient to relieve acute migraine.

Substance P receptor antagonists in the therapy of migraine

Clinical observations, the vascular component of migraine pain, its pulsating or throbbing pain character, have focused attention on the trigeminal innervation of pain-sensitive intracranial structures, such as the dura mater and large vessels. These intracranial structures are innervated by the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve, which is marked by the presence of vasoactive peptides, such as substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide. Substance P is a mediator of the sterile inflammation of the dura mater, which has been considered to be the source of migraine pain. Modern antimigraine drugs, such as 5-HT(1B/D) agonists (triptans), block this dural neurogenic inflammation dose-dependently in an animal model but their vasoconstrictor effects have led to a search for non-vasoconstrictor approaches. One such approach has been substance P (neurokinin-1) antagonists. These are highly effective in animal models of dural inflammation and have no significant vasoconstrictive effect. However, several NK(1) antagonists failed to demonstrate any effect in acute migraine. Current clinical and experimental evidence therefore supports the view that NK(1) receptor antagonists may have no significant antimigraine properties.

Depletion of substance P, neurokinin A and calcitonin gene-related peptide from the contralateral and ipsilateral caudal trigeminal nucleus following unilateral electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion; a possible neurophysiological and neuroanatomical link to generalized head pain

Primary trigeminal neurons of the trigeminal ganglion (TG) innervate major parts of the face and head, including the dura. Electrical stimulation of the TG at specific parameters, can activate its nociceptive neurons and may serve as an experimental pain model. Markowitz [J. Neurosci. 7 (1987) 4129] reported that electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion (TG) causes extravasation of plasma proteins from venules of the trigeminally innervated domain possibly due to the release of vasoactive substances. Neurogenic inflammation (vasodilatation, plasma protein extravasation, release of vasoactive peptides) in dura may serve as one of the possible pathomechanisms underlying vascular head pain [Moskowitz, Ann. Neurol. 16 (1984) 157]. We performed a unilateral electrical stimulation (7.5 Hz, 5 ms, 0.8-1.4 mA for 5 min) of the TG in rat, to induce a neurogenic inflammation in the peripheral trigeminal domain including the dura, looking for calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP), substance P (SP) and neurokinin A (NKA) immunoreactivity (IR) in the caudal trigeminal nucleus (CTN) into which massive central trigeminal processes terminate. Here, we show patchy depletion(s) of CGRP-, SP- and NKA-IRs in the contralateral CTN of the rat in addition to their ipsilateral depletion. Such depletion is due to the release of these neuropeptides in the CTN leading to the activation of bilateral trigeminal nociceptive pathway. These data afford the possibility that under specific frequencies (which may roughly correlate to the intensity of the painful stimulus) and/or specific intensities (may correlate to specific areas of the peripheral trigeminal domain) of stimulation, activation of one side of the TG may activate bilateral trigeminal nociceptive pathway leading to the perception of an ill localized/generalized pain or headache rather than a unilateral one.

Acute treatments: some blind alleys

The introduction of sumatriptan, a selective 5-HT(1B/1D) agonist, for the treatment of migraine sparked a new era of drug research in this field. Many novel targets have since been developed, and tested in the clinic. The promise of these approaches is to deliver an anti-migraine compound with the optimal efficacy and safety profile. In this chapter, blind alleys in anti-migraine development are discussed. The failing soldiers have included the NK-1 antagonists, some second-generation 5-HT(1B/1D) agonists, CP-122,288, 4991W93, the neurosteroid ganaxolone, selective 5-HT(1F) (LY334370) and 5-HT(1D) agonists (PNU-142,633), and the endothelin-1 antagonist bosentan. Some of these promising targets failed to demonstrate clinical efficacy, while others were stopped for preclinical toxicity.

Intracisternal octreotide does not ameliorate orthodromic trigeminovascular nociception

Octreotide is a long-acting somatostatin analogue that has been effectively used to treat migraine. Octreotide poorly penetrates the blood-brain barrier, but has potential central target sites in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis, which is the primary central relay station for trigeminal nociceptive information in the brain. We studied the effect of intracisternally applied octreotide in a model of trigeminovascular stimulation in the unrestrained rat using intracisternal capsaicin infusion to stimulate intracranial trigeminal nerves. Fos expression in the outer layers of the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC I-II) and behavioural analysis were used to measure the effects of octreotide on capsaicin-induced trigeminovascular activation. Increases of head grooming and scratching behaviour are an indication of octreotide-induced trigeminal activation. However, octreotide did not alter the average capsaicin-induced Fos expression in the TNC I-II and capsaicin sensitive behaviours were not modified by octreotide pretreatment. This argues against a role for central (TNC I-II) somatostatin receptors in the processing of the nociceptive trigeminovascular signals.

The induction of pain: an integrative review

The highly disagreeable sensation of pain results from an extraordinarily complex and interactive series of mechanisms integrated at all levels of the neuroaxis, from the periphery, via the dorsal horn to higher cerebral structures. Pain is usually elicited by the activation of specific nociceptors ('nociceptive pain'). However, it may also result from injury to sensory fibres, or from damage to the CNS itself ('neuropathic pain'). Although acute and subchronic, nociceptive pain fulfils a warning role, chronic and/or severe nociceptive and neuropathic pain is maladaptive. Recent years have seen a progressive unravelling of the neuroanatomical circuits and cellular mechanisms underlying the induction of pain. In addition to familiar inflammatory mediators, such as prostaglandins and bradykinin, potentially-important, pronociceptive roles have been proposed for a variety of 'exotic' species, including protons, ATP, cytokines, neurotrophins (growth factors) and nitric oxide. Further, both in the periphery and in the CNS, non-neuronal glial and immunecompetent cells have been shown to play a modulatory role in the response to inflammation and injury, and in processes modifying nociception. In the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, wherein the primary processing of nociceptive information occurs, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors are activated by glutamate released from nocisponsive afferent fibres. Their activation plays a key role in the induction of neuronal sensitization, a process underlying prolonged painful states. In addition, upon peripheral nerve injury, a reduction of inhibitory interneurone tone in the dorsal horn exacerbates sensitized states and further enhance nociception. As concerns the transfer of nociceptive information to the brain, several pathways other than the classical spinothalamic tract are of importance: for example, the postsynaptic dorsal column pathway. In discussing the roles of supraspinal structures in pain sensation, differences between its 'discriminative-sensory' and 'affective-cognitive' dimensions should be emphasized. The purpose of the present article is to provide a global account of mechanisms involved in the induction of pain. Particular attention is focused on cellular aspects and on the consequences of peripheral nerve injury. In the first part of the review, neuronal pathways for the transmission of nociceptive information from peripheral nerve terminals to the dorsal horn, and therefrom to higher centres, are outlined. This neuronal framework is then exploited for a consideration of peripheral, spinal and supraspinal mechanisms involved in the induction of pain by stimulation of peripheral nociceptors, by peripheral nerve injury and by damage to the CNS itself. Finally, a hypothesis is forwarded that neurotrophins may play an important role in central, adaptive mechanisms modulating nociception. An improved understanding of the origins of pain should facilitate the development of novel strategies for its more effective treatment.