Inhibition of tacrine oral clearance by cimetidine

Alzheimer Disease and Its Management

Alzheimer disease is a progressive degenerative disorder of the brain characterized by a slow, progressive decline in cognitive function and behavior. As the disease advances, persons with Alzheimer disease have tough time with daily usage of things like using the phone, cooking, handling money, or driving the car. The disease is more common in elder population. It is estimated that Alzheimer disease affects 15 million people worldwide and approximately 4 million Americans. The clinical features of Alzheimer disease overlaps with common signs of aging, and other types of dementia, hence the diagnosis remains difficult. The neuropathologic hallmarks of the disorder are amyloid-rich senile plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, and neuronal degeneration. Drugs approved for treating Alzheimer disease include acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist. Caregivers not getting adequate information about Alzheimer disease may believe that nothing can be done to manage its symptoms. Understanding the extent of Alzheimer disease related knowledge can assist disease management that result in improved disease management and reduced care costs. This article attempts to focus on some of the important recent developments in understanding and management of Alzheimer disease.

Clinically significant drug interactions with cholinesterase inhibitors: a guide for neurologists

Cholinesterase inhibitors are the only pharmacological class indicated for the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. These drugs are also being used off label to treat severe cases of Alzheimer's disease or vascular dementia and other disorders. The widespread use of cholinesterase inhibitors raises the possibility of their use in combination regimens, with the subsequent risk of deleterious drug-drug interactions in high-risk populations. The purpose of this review is to present the possible sources of pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions involving cholinesterase inhibitors. The four cholinesterase inhibitors (tacrine, donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine) that are currently available have different pharmacological properties that expose patients to the risk of several types of drug interactions of nonequivalent clinical relevance. The principal proven clinically relevant drug interactions involve tacrine and drugs metabolised by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 enzyme, as well as tacrine or donepezil and antipsychotics (which results in the appearance of parkinsonian symptoms). The bioavailability of galantamine is increased by coadministration with paroxetine, ketoconazole and erythromycin. It is of interest to note that because rivastigmine is metabolised by esterases rather than CYP enzymes, unlike the other cholinesterase inhibitors, it is unlikely to be involved in pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. Care must be taken to reduce the risk of inducing central (excitation, agitation) or peripheral (e.g. bradycardia, loss of consciousness, digestive disorders) hypercholinergic effects via drug interactions with cholinesterase inhibitors. A review of the literature does not reveal any alarming data but does highlight the need for prudent prescription, particularly when cholinesterase inhibitors are given in combination with psychotropics or antiarrhythmics. Possible interactions involving other often coprescribed antidementia agents (e.g. memantine, antioxidants, cognitive enhancers) remain an open area requiring particularly prudent use.

Drug interactions with cholinesterase inhibitors

Cholinesterase inhibitors are used for the symptomatic treatment of patients with Alzheimer's disease. This population often has numerous comorbidities and receives treatment with multiple medications. The astute clinician should remain mindful of possible drug interactions, both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic, that may occur with concomitant treatment. Although pharmacokinetic interactions have been reported, pharmacodynamic interactions play a far greater role in the significance of drug interactions, with anticholinergic medications being most concerning. Commonly prescribed medications, such as antihistamines and tricyclic antidepressants, often have anticholinergic properties that alone or in combination with one another can antagonise the effects of cholinesterase inhibitors. Other medication classes such as antipsychotics and cholinergic agents may also result in pharmacodynamic interactions. However, for the most part, cholinesterase inhibitors can be used safely in combination with other medications.

A review of the common properties of drugs with idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity and the "multiple determinant hypothesis" for the manifestation of idiosyncratic drug toxicity

Idiosyncratic drug toxicity is generally believed to be a phenomenon that cannot be readily evaluated experimentally. Reasons for this difficulty include the following: 1. It is a rare event (<1/5,000) and therefore impossible to be studied in clinical trials; 2. It is a human-specific event not detectable in experimental animals. To aid the understanding of idiosyncratic toxicity and to develop an experimental strategy for this phenomenon, a hypothesis is proposed. The hypothesis states that the low frequency of idiosyncratic drug toxicity is due to the requirements for the occurrence of multiple critical and discrete events, with the probability for the occurrence of idiosyncratic drug toxicity as a product of the probabilities of each event. The key determinants of these critical events are proposed to be: 1. Chemical properties; 2. exposure; 3. environmental factors; and 4. genetic factors. Based on this hypothesis, idiosyncratic drug toxicity can be evaluated experimentally via studying these key determinants. The chemical properties critical to idiosyncratic drug toxicity are identified via a review of the common properties of drugs that cause idiosyncratic liver toxicity. These properties include: 1. Formation of reactive metabolites. 2. Metabolism by P450 isoforms. 3. Preponderance of P450 inducers, and 4. Occurrence of clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with co-administered drugs. Based on this review, it is proposed that these common properties may be useful experimental endpoints for the prediction and therefore avoidance of the selection of drug candidates with idiosyncratic drug toxicity for further development.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cholinesterase inhibitors

Cholinesterase inhibitors are the 'first-line' agents in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. This article presents the latest information on their pharmacokinetic properties and pharmacodynamic activity. Tacrine was the first cholinesterase inhibitor approved by regulatory agencies, followed by donepezil, rivastigmine and recently galantamine. With the exception of low doses of tacrine, the cholinesterase inhibitors exhibit a linear relationship between dose and area under the plasma concentration-time curve. Cholinesterase inhibitors are rapidly absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract, with time to peak concentration usually less than 2 hours; donepezil has the longest absorption time of 3 to 5 hours. Donepezil and tacrine are highly protein bound, whereas protein binding of rivastigmine and galantamine is less than 40%. Tacrine is metabolised by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2, and donepezil and galantamine are metabolised by CYP3A4 and CYP2D6. Rivastigmine is metabolised by sulfate conjugation. Two cholinesterase enzymes are present in the body, acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE). Tacrine and rivastigmine inhibit both enzymes, whereas donepezil and galantamine specifically inhibit AChE. Galantamine also modulates nicotine receptors, thereby enhancing acetylcholinergic activity at the synapse. These different pharmacological profiles provide distinctions between these agents. Cholinesterase inhibitors show a nonlinear relationship between dose and cholinesterase inhibition, where a plateau effect occurs. Cholinesterase inhibitors display a different profile as each agent achieves its plateau at different doses. In clinical trials, cholinesterase inhibitors demonstrate a dose-dependent effect on cognition and functional activities. Improvement in behavioural symptoms also occurs, but without a dose-response relationship. Gastrointestinal adverse events are dose-related. Clinical improvement occurs with between 40 and 70% inhibition of cholinesterase. A conceptual model for cholinesterase inhibitors has been proposed, linking enzyme inhibition, clinical efficacy and adverse effects. Currently, measurement of enzyme inhibition is used as the biomarker for cholinesterase inhibitors. New approaches to determining the efficacy of cholinesterase inhibitors in the brain could involve the use of various imaging techniques. The knowledge base for the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cholinesterase inhibitors continues to expand. The increased information available to clinicians can optimise the use of these agents in the management of patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Concurrent administration of donepezil HCl and cimetidine: assessment of pharmacokinetic changes following single and multiple doses

AIM

The aim of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetics of donepezil HCl and cimetidine separately, and in combination, following administration of multiple oral doses.

METHODS

This was an open-label, randomized, three-period crossover study in healthy male volunteers (n=19). During each treatment period, subjects received single daily doses of either donepezil HCl (5 mg), cimetidine (800 mg), or a combination of both drugs for 7 consecutive days. Pharmacokinetic comparisons were made between groups for the day 1 and day 7 profiles. Each treatment period was followed by a 3-week, drug-free washout period.

RESULTS

On both day 1 and day 7, a statistically significant difference was observed between the donepezil and the donepezil + cimetidine groups in terms of the Cmax and AUC(0-24) values for donepezil. The combination group had an 11-13% greater Cmax and a 10% greater AUC(0-24) than the donepezil-only group. No significant difference was observed between the tmax of the two treatment groups on day 1, and no significant differences in tmax, t1/2 or the rate of drug accumulation (RA) were observed between the groups on day 7. Cimetidine pharmacokinetics were essentially unchanged by co-administration of the two drugs. The donepezil + cimetidine treatment group had a 20% greater maximum cimetidine concentration (Cmax) than the cimetidine-only group (P= 0.001) on day 1, but not on day 7, and no difference was observed in any of the other pharmacokinetic parameters examined.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-administration of donepezil HCl (5 mg) and cimetidine (800 mg) did not produce clinically significant changes in the pharmacokinetic profiles of either drug.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of donepezil HCl following evening administration

AIMS

The primary objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single daily doses of donepezil (5 and 10 mg) each evening for 28 consecutive days. A secondary objective was to measure the plasma protein binding of donepezil at steady state.

METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized, multiple-dose study in healthy male (n=13) and female (n=3) volunteers. Subjects were randomized to receive, once daily, either oral doses of 5 mg donepezil for 28 days or doses of 5 mg donepezil for 7 days followed by 10 mg donepezil for 21 days. All doses were administered in the evening. Donepezil concentrations and protein binding in plasma were determined by HPLC with UV detection and equilibrium dialysis, respectively. Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity in red blood cell (rbc) membranes was assessed using a specific radioenzyme assay.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of donepezil were linear, dose proportional and stationary over the course of the study. Mean Cmax, tmax, AUC(0-24), t1/2 and Vlambda(z)/F at steady state were 34.1 ng ml(-1), 3.0 h, 634.8 ng h ml(-1), 72.7 h, and 11.81 kg(-1), respectively, for the 5 mg group and 60.5 ng ml(-1), 3.9 h, 1127.8 ng h ml(-1), 73.5 h and 11.61 kg(-1), respectively, for the 10 mg group. Accumulation of the drug was observed for 14-21 days, until steady state was achieved. A direct consistent relationship was observed between donepezil plasma concentration and percentage rbc-AChE inhibition during each 24 h evaluation period, indicating no hysteresis in donepezil pharmacodynamics. The pharmacodynamic parameters, Emin, Emax and Ess, were 62.2%, 71.8% and 65.3%, respectively, for the 5 mg donepezil dose, and 74.7%, 83.6% and 77.8%, respectively, for the 10 mg donepezil dose. Donepezil was 95.6% bound to plasma protein at steady state. The binding was high capacity and low affinity, and neither concentration nor time dependent. Both dosage regimens were well tolerated; no clinically significant changes in laboratory or vital sign parameters were observed in any subject.

CONCLUSIONS

The measured pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters for both 5 and 10 mg day(-1) donepezil administered in the evening are in good agreement with previous results obtained with morning administration, indicating no time of dosing effect.

Caffeine based measures of CYP1A2 activity correlate with oral clearance of tacrine in patients with Alzheimer's disease

AIMS

To study the potential utility of caffeine based probes of CYP1A2 enzyme activity in predicting the pharmokinetics of tacrine in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

METHODS

The pharmokinetics of a single 40 mg oral dose of tacrine were measured in 19 patients with Alzheimer's disease. Each patient also received 2 mg kg(-1) [13C-3-methyl] caffeine orally and had breath and urine samples collected.

RESULTS

Tacrine oral clearance (CL F(-1) kg(-1)), which varied 15-fold among the patients, correlated significantly with the 2 h total production of 13CO2 in breath (r=0.56, P=0.01), and with each of two commonly used urinary caffeine metabolite ratios: the 'paraxanthine/caffeine ratio' (1,7X + 1, 7U)/1,3,7X) (r=0.76, P=0.0002) and the 'caffeine metabolic ratio' (AFMU + 1X + 1U)/1, 7U)(r=0.76, P=0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

These observations support a central role for CYP1A2 in the in vivo disposition of tacrine and the potential for drug interactions when tacrine treated patients receive known inducers or inhibitors of this enzyme. The magnitude of the correlations we observed, however, are probably not sufficient to be clinically useful in individualizing tacrine therapy.

High-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet and fluorimetric detection for the simultaneous determination of tacrine, nimodipine, and their respective metabolites in the plasma of patients with Alzheimer disease

A new high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay was developed for the simultaneous determination of tacrine (THA), nimodipine, and their three metabolites (MI, MII, and MIII) using a 1-ml plasma sample volume. A liquid-liquid extraction procedure was coupled with a reverse-phase HPLC separation. Quantification was performed by fluorometric detection for THA and metabolites and by ultraviolet detection for nimodipine and metabolites. Peak-height ratios were linear across the ranges 0.5 to 100 micro/l for THA and its three metabolites; 2 to 500 microg/l for nimodipine, MII, and MIII; and 4 to 500 microg/l for MI. Correlation coefficients were better than 0.998 for all compounds. Accuracy and precision were less than 12% for the entire concentration range for each substance. This method is sensitive and selective. Analysis of plasma samples collected from patients with Alzheimer disease demonstrated that the assay is suitable for clinical and pharmacokinetic trials including drug-drug interactions studies.