Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin in patients with AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma

Population pharmacokinetics of TLD-1, a novel liposomal doxorubicin, in a phase I trial

STUDY OBJECTIVES

TLD-1 is a novel pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) formulation aiming to optimise the PLD efficacy-toxicity ratio. We aimed to characterise TLD-1's population pharmacokinetics using non-compartmental analysis and nonlinear mixed-effects modelling.

METHODS

The PK of TLD-1 was analysed by performing a non-compartmental analysis of longitudinal doxorubicin plasma concentration measurements obtained from a clinical trial in 30 patients with advanced solid tumours across a 4.5-fold dose range. Furthermore, a joint parent-metabolite PK model of doxorubicinentrapped, doxorubicinfree, and metabolite doxorubicinol was developed. Interindividual and interoccasion variability around the typical PK parameters and potential covariates to explain parts of this variability were explored.

RESULTS

Medians  ± standard deviations of dose-normalised doxorubicinentrapped+free Cmax and AUC0-∞ were 0.342 ± 0.134 mg/L and 40.1 ± 18.9 mg·h/L, respectively. The median half-life (95 h) was 23.5 h longer than the half-life of currently marketed PLD. The novel joint parent-metabolite model comprised a one-compartment model with linear release (doxorubicinentrapped), a two-compartment model with linear elimination (doxorubicinfree), and a one-compartment model with linear elimination for doxorubicinol. Body surface area on the volumes of distribution for free doxorubicin was the only significant covariate.

CONCLUSION

The population PK of TLD-1, including its release and main metabolite, were successfully characterised using non-compartmental and compartmental analyses. Based on its long half-life, TLD-1 presents a promising candidate for further clinical development. The PK characteristics form the basis to investigate TLD-1 exposure-response (i.e., clinical efficacy) and exposure-toxicity relationships in the future. Once such relationships have been established, the developed population PK model can be further used in model-informed precision dosing strategies.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT03387917-January 2, 2018.

TLD-1, a novel liposomal doxorubicin, in patients with advanced solid tumors: Dose escalation and expansion part of a multicenter open-label phase I trial (SAKK 65/16)

BACKGROUND

TLD-1 is a novel liposomal doxorubicin that compared favorably to conventional doxorubicin liposomal formulations in preclinical models. This phase I first-in-human study aimed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety and preliminary activity of TLD-1 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We recruited patients with advanced solid tumors who failed standard therapy and received up to 3 prior lines of palliative systemic chemotherapy. TLD-1 was administered intravenously every 3 weeks up to a maximum of 9 cycles (6 for patients with prior anthracyclines) from a starting dose of 10 mg/m2, according to an accelerated titration design followed by a modified continual reassessment method.

RESULTS

30 patients were enrolled between November 2018 and May 2021. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed. Maximum administered dose of TLD-1 was 45 mg/m2, RP2D was defined at 40 mg/m2. Most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) of any grade included palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) (50% of patients), oral mucositis (50%), fatigue (30%) and skin rash (26.7%). Most common G3 TRAE included PPE in 4 patients (13.3%) and oral mucositis in 2 (6.7%). Overall objective response rate was 10% in the whole population and 23.1% among 13 patients with breast cancer; median time-to-treatment failure was 2.7 months. TLD-1 exhibit linear pharmacokinetics, with a median terminal half-life of 95 h.

CONCLUSIONS

The new liposomal doxorubicin formulation TLD-1 showed a favourable safety profile and antitumor activity, particularly in breast cancer. RP2D was defined at 40 mg/m2 administered every 3 weeks. (NCT03387917).

An exploratory first-in-man study to investigate the pharmacokinetics and safety of liposomal dexamethasone at a 2- and 1-week interval in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer

Dexamethasone has antitumor activity in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We aimed to investigate intravenous liposome-encapsulated dexamethasone disodium phosphate (liposomal dexamethasone) administration in mCRPC patients. In this exploratory first-in-man study, patients in part A received a starting dose of 10 mg followed by five doses of 20 mg liposomal dexamethasone at 2-week intervals. Upon review of part A safety, patients in part B received 10 weekly doses of 18.5 mg. Primary outcomes were safety and pharmacokinetic profile, secondary outcome was antitumor efficacy. Nine mCRPC patients (5 part A, 4 part B) were enrolled. All patients experienced grade 1-2 toxicity, one (part B) patient experienced grade 3 toxicity (permanent bladder catheter-related urosepsis). No infusion-related adverse events occurred. One patient had upsloping glucose levels ≤9.1 mmol/L. Trough plasma concentrations of liposomal- and free dexamethasone were below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) in part A, and above LLOQ in three patients in part B (t1/2 ~50 h for liposomal dexamethasone), trough concentrations of liposomal- and free dexamethasone increased toward the end of the study. In seven of nine patients (78%) patients, stable disease was observed in bone and/or CT scans at follow-up, and in one (part B) of these seven patients a >50% PSA biochemical response was observed. Bi- and once weekly administrations of IV liposomal dexamethasone were well-tolerated. Weekly dosing enabled trough concentrations of liposomal- and free dexamethasone >LLOQ. The data presented support further clinical investigation in well-powered studies. Clinical trial registration: ISRCTN 10011715.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of nanoparticle-bound and free camptothecin after administration of NLG207 in adults with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

NLG207 (formerly CRLX101) is a nanoparticle-drug conjugate (NDC) of the potent topoisomerase I inhibitor, camptothecin (CPT). The present study sought to characterize the complex pharmacokinetics (PK) of NLG207 and better describe CPT release from nanoparticles using a population PK (popPK) model.

METHODS

From 27 patients enrolled on two phase II clinical trials (NCT02769962 and NCT03531827), dense sampling was performed up to 48 h post-administration of NLG207 during cycle one and six of treatment; samples were also collected at ~ 360 h post-dose. Conjugated and free CPT concentrations were quantified from each sample, resulting in 477 observations to build a popPK model using non-linear mixed-effects modeling.

RESULTS

The PK of NLG207 was characterized by combining two linear two-compartment models with first-order kinetics each to describe nanoparticle-bound (conjugated) and free CPT. Allometric scaling based on body weight provided the best body-size descriptor for all PK parameters. The typical volumes of distribution of the conjugated CPT central and free CPT central compartments were 3.16 L (BSV CV%; 18.1%) and 21.1 L (CV%; 79.8%), respectively. CPT release from the nanoparticle formulation was characterized via an initial rapid clearance of 5.71 L/h (CV%; 62.6%), which decreased via first-order decay (estimated half-life of 0.307 h) to the steady-state value of 0.0988 L/h (CV%; 33.5%) by ~ 4 h after end of infusion. Renal clearance of free CPT was 0.874 L/h (CV%; 42.2%).

CONCLUSION

The popPK model confirmed nanoparticle behavior of conjugated CPT and mechanistically characterized CPT release from NLG207. The current analysis provides a strong foundation for future study as a potential predictive tool in ongoing NLG207 clinical trials.

Guidelines for the experimental design of pharmacokinetic studies with nanomaterials in preclinical animal models

A shared feature in the value proposition of every nanomaterial-based drug delivery systems is the desirable improvement in the disposition (or ADME) and pharmacokinetic profiles of the encapsulated drug being delivered. Remarkable progress has been made towards understanding the complex and multifactorial relationships between pharmacokinetic profiles and nanomaterial physicochemical properties, biological interactions, species physiology, etc. These advances have fuelled the rational design of numerous nanomaterials with long-circulation times and improved tissue accumulation (e.g., in tumours). Unfortunately, a central weakness in many of these research efforts has been the inconsistent and insufficient characterisation of the pharmacokinetic profiles of nanomaterials in scientific reporting-a problem affecting the majoirty of of contemporary nanomaterials literature and innovative nanomaterials in early stages of preclinical development especially. Given the significant role of pharmacokinetic assessments to serve as guideposts for deciding whether to continue with the preclinical development and clinical translation of drug delivery systems, the prevalence of poor pharmacokinetic characterisations in nanomaterials research is particularly alarming. A conspicuous problem in many reports is the inappropriate selection of experimental designs and methodologies for studying nanomaterial pharmacokinetics, the consequences of which are increased uncertainty over the accurate interpretation of reported pharmacokinetic data and diminished experimental reproducibility throughout the field. Thus, there is renewed interest in the establishment of consistent and comprehensive strategies for designing preclinical experiments to assess the pharmacokinetics of nanomaterials with diverse physicochemical properties. Towards this end, herein are proposed simple guidelines for the experimental design of pharmacokinetic studies with nanomaterials drawn from the best research practices, principle strategies, and important considerations used in industry for collecting pharmacokinetic data in preclinical animal models. Specifically, key experimental design factors in these studies are identified and examined in the context of nanomaterials for optimality, including blood sampling strategy and technique, sample allocation and sampling time window, test species selection, experimental sources of pharmacokinetic variability, etc. Methods for noninvasive imaging-derived pharmacokinetic assessments of theranostic nanomaterials are also explored with particular focus on emission tomography imaging modalities. Taken together, this review will provide nanomaterial researchers with practical knowledge and pragmatic recommendations for selecting the best designs and methodologies for assessing the pharmacokinetic profiles of their nanomaterials, and hopefully maximise the chances of translational success of these innovative products into humans.

In Vitro and in Vivo Behavior of Liposomes Decorated with PEGs with Different Chemical Features

The colloidal stability, in vitro toxicity, cell association, and in vivo pharmacokinetic behavior of liposomes decorated with monomethoxy-poly(ethylene glycol)-lipids (mPEG-lipids) with different chemical features were comparatively investigated. Structural differences of the mPEG-lipids used in the study included: (a) surface-anchoring moiety [1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DSPE), cholesterol (Chol), and cholane (Chln)]; (b) mPEG molecular weight (2 kDa mPEG₄₅ and 5 kDa mPEG₁₁₄); and (c) mPEG shape (linear and branched PEG). In vitro results demonstrated that branched (mPEG₁₁₄)₂-DSPE confers the highest stealth properties to liposomes (∼31-fold lower cell association than naked liposomes) with respect to all PEGylating agents tested. However, the pharmacokinetic studies showed that the use of cholesterol as anchoring group yields PEGylated liposomes with longer permeance in the circulation and higher systemic bioavailability among the tested formulations. Liposomes decorated with mPEG₁₁₄-Chol had 3.2- and ∼2.1-fold higher area under curve (AUC) than naked liposomes and branched (mPEG₁₁₄)₂-DSPE-coated liposomes, respectively, which reflects the high stability of this coating agent. By comparing the PEGylating agents with same size, namely, linear 5 kDa PEG derivatives, linear mPEG₁₁₄-DSPE yielded coated liposomes with the best in vitro stealth performance. Nevertheless, the in vivo AUC of liposomes decorated with linear mPEG₁₁₄-DSPE was lower than that obtained with liposomes decorated with linear mPEG₁₁₄-Chol. Computational molecular dynamics modeling provided additional insights that complement the experimental results.

Translational considerations in nanomedicine: The oncology perspective

Nanoparticles can provide effective control of the release rate and tissue distribution of their drug payload, leading to major pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes vis-à-vis the conventional administration of free drugs. In the last two decades, we have witnessed major progress in the synthesis and characterization of engineered nanoparticles for imaging and treatment of cancers, resulting in the approval for clinical use of several products and in new and promising approaches. Despite these advances, clinical applications of nanoparticle-based therapeutic and imaging agents remain limited due to biological, immunological, and translational barriers. There is a need to make high impact advances toward translation. In this review, we address biological, toxicological, immunological, and translational aspects of nanomedicine and discuss approaches to move the field forward productively. Overcoming these barriers may dramatically improve the development potential and role of nanomedicines in the oncology field and help meet the high expectations.

Plasmafiltration as an effective method in the removal of circulating pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and the reduction of mucocutaneous toxicity during the treatment of advanced platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

The present study evaluates the safety and efficacy of double-plasma filtration (PF) to remove the exceeding pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in circulation, thus reducing mucocutaneous toxicity.

METHODS

A total of 16 patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer were treated with 50 mg/m² PLD applied in 1-h IV infusion every 28 days. PF was scheduled at 44-46 h post-infusion. The concentration of plasma PLD and non-liposomal doxorubicin (NLD) was monitored with high-performance liquid chromatography at 116 h post-infusion. A non-linear method for mixed-effects was used in the population pharmacokinetic model. The dose fraction of PLD eliminated by the patient prior to PF was compared with the fraction removed by PF. PLD-related toxicity was recorded according to CTCAE v4.0 criteria and compared to historical data. Anticancer effects were evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 criteria.

RESULTS

The patients received a median of 3 (2-6) chemotherapy cycles. A total of 53 cycles with PF were evaluated, which removed 31% (10) of the dose; on the other hand, the fraction eliminated prior to PF was of 34% (7). Exposure to NLD reached only 10% of exposure to the parent PLD. PLD-related toxicity was low, finding only one case of grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (6.7%) and grade 1 mucositis (6.7%). Other adverse effects were also mild (grade 1-2). PF-related adverse effects were low (7%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was of 3.6 (1.5-8.1) and 7.5 (1.7-26.7) months, respectively. Furthermore, 33% of the patients achieved stable disease (SD), whereas that 67% progressed.

CONCLUSION

PF can be considered as safe and effective for the extracorporeal removal of PLD, resulting in a lower incidence of mucocutaneous toxicity.

Clinical developments of antitumor polymer therapeutics

Polymer therapeutics encompasses polymer-drug conjugates that are nano-sized, multicomponent constructs already in the clinic as antitumor compounds, either as single agents or in combination with other organic drug scaffolds. Nanoparticle-based polymer-conjugated therapeutics are poised to become a leading delivery strategy for cancer treatments as they exhibit prolonged half-life, higher stability and selectivity, water solubility, longer clearance time, lower immunogenicity and antigenicity and often also specific targeting to tissues or cells. Compared to free drugs, polymer-tethered drugs preferentially accumulate in the tumor sites unlike conventional chemotherapy which does not discriminate between the cancer cells and healthy cells, thereby causing severe side-effects. It is also desirable that the drug reaches its site of action at a particular concentration and the therapeutic dose remains constant over a sufficiently long period of time. This can be achieved by opting for new formulations possessing polymeric systems of drug carriers. However, many challenges still remain unanswered in polymeric drug conjugates which need to be readdressed and therefore, can broaden the scope of this field. This review highlights some of the antitumor polymer therapeutics including polymer-drug conjugates, polymeric micelles, polymeric liposomes and other polymeric nanoparticles that are currently under investigation.

Mathematical modeling of the heterogeneous distributions of nanomedicines in solid tumors

The distribution of nanomedicines inside solid tumors is often restricted to perivascular areas, leaving most distal tumor cells out of reach. This partly explains modest patient benefit of many nanomedicines compared to their free-form counterparts. The objective for this study is to develop a mathematical model to quantitatively analyze this phenomenon and the influencing factors to such perivascular distribution and seek for effective strategies to alleviate this. A spatial tumor distribution model was firstly constructed to mimic the geometrical structure of tumor vessels and the surrounding tumor cells. This tumor model was further integrated with a systemic pharmacokinetics model for nanoparticles. A variety of factors on the tumor spatial distributions of nanomedicines were considered in the model. With the model, we quantified the effect of these influencing factors on tumor delivery efficacy (ID %), the magnitude of heterogeneous distribution (H index), and the effect of enhanced permeability and retention (EPR). In particularly, we compared the spatial distributions of the nanoparticles and the free payloads insides tumors. The model predicted high degrees of distributional heterogeneity for both nanoparticles and free payloads. The degree of heterogeneity and the influencing factors for free payloads were markedly different from those for nanoparticles. We found that nanoparticle diffusion coefficient was the most effective factor in reducing the nanoparticle H index but exerted moderate influence on the free payloads H index. The most effective factor in reducing the H index of free payload was payload diffusion coefficient. The factors that improved free payload distribution were closely associated with higher drug efficacy. In contrast, the factors that improved nanoparticle spatial distributions did not always confer improved anti-tumor efficacy of the delivered drug. These findings highlight the importance of assessing the heterogeneous free payload distribution in tumors for the development of effective nanomedicines.

Preclinical evaluation of thermosensitive poly(N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide mono/dilactate)-grafted liposomes for cancer thermochemotherapy

Thermosensitive liposomes grafted with cholesterol-conjugated poly(N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide mono/dilactate) (chol-pHPMAlac) have been developed for heat-induced release of doxorubicin (DOX). These liposomes release DOX completely during mild hyperthermia, but their interaction with blood cells and cancer cells has not been studied. Following intravenous administration, liposomes may interact with plasma proteins and various types of cells (e.g., endothelial cells, platelets, and macrophages), which would reduce their disposition in the tumor stroma. Interaction between liposomes and platelets may further cause platelet activation and thrombosis, which could lead to vascular occlusion and thromboembolic complications. The aim was to investigate DOX release kinetics in the presence of serum, stability, in vitro uptake by and toxicity to cancer cells and somatic cells, and platelet activating potential of the chol-pHPMAlac liposomes. DOX release was determined spectrofluorometrically. Liposome stability was determined in buffer and serum by dynamic light scattering and nanoparticle tracking analysis. Association with/uptake by and toxicity of empty liposomes to AML-12, HepG2 (both hepatocyte-derived cancer cells), RAW 264.7 (macrophages), and HUVEC (endothelial) cells was assayed in vitro. Platelet activation was determined by analysis of P-selectin expression and fibrinogen binding. DOPE:EPC liposomes (diameter = 135 nm) grafted with 5% chol-pHPMAlac (cloud point (CP) = 16 °C; M_n = 8.5 kDa) released less than 10% DOX at 37 °C in 30 min, whereas complete release took place at 47 °C or higher within 10 min. The size of these liposomes remained stable in buffer and serum during 24 h at 37 °C. Fluorescently labeled but DOX-lacking chol-pHPMAlac-liposomes exhibited poor association with/uptake by all cells under investigation, were not cytotoxic, and did not activate platelets in both buffered solution and whole blood. In conclusion, thermosensitive chol-pHPMAlac-grafted liposomes rapidly release DOX during mild hyperthermia. The liposomes are stable in a physiological milieu, are not taken up by cells that are encountered in an in vivo setting, and are non-antagonistic towards platelets. Chol-pHPMAlac-grafted liposomes are therefore good candidates for DOX delivery to tumors and temperature-triggered release in tumor stroma.

Investigation of the Discriminatory Ability of Pharmacokinetic Metrics for the Bioequivalence Assessment of PEGylated Liposomal Doxorubicin

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to construct a population pharmacokinetic model for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and use the final model to investigate the discrimination performance of pharmacokinetic metrics (e.g., C_max, AUC and partial AUC) of various analytes (e.g., liposome encapsulated doxorubicin, free doxorubicin and total doxorubicin) for the identification of formulation differences by means of Monte Carlo simulations.

METHODS

A model was simultaneously built to characterize the concentration time profiles of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin and free doxorubicin using NONMEM. The different scenarios associated with changes in release rate (Rel) were simulated based on the final parameters. 500 simulated virtual bioequivalence (BE) studies were performed for each scenario, and power curves for the probability of declaring BE were also computed.

RESULTS

The concentration time profiles of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin and free doxorubicin were well described by a one- and two-compartment model, respectively. pAUC_0-24 h and pAUC_0-48 h of free doxorubicin was most responsive to changes in the Rel when the Rel (test)/Rel (reference) ratios decreased. In contrast, when the Rel (test) increased, AUC_0-t of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin was the most responsive metric.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to the traditional metrics, partial AUC should be included for the BE assessment of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin.

Nanocarriers in cancer clinical practice: a pharmacokinetic issue

The advent of nanocarriers for drug delivery has given rise to new intriguing scenarios in the cancer field. Nanocarriers indeed partly overcome the limits of traditional cytotoxic drugs principally changing the pharmacokinetic behavior of the parental drug. The peculiar characteristics of these systems strongly minimize the adverse reactions and ensure a more precise release of the compound to the tumor site. Several nanocarriers have been developed for the delivery of cytotoxic drugs such as paclitaxel and doxorubicin in order to improve both the outcome and the patients' quality of life. The aims of this review are to describe in detail the pharmacokinetics of nanocarriers, already marketed or in advanced clinical phases, for paclitaxel and doxorubicin, to highlight the main differences with the parental drugs, and to underline, in a critical manner, benefits and disadvantages related to the use of these new drug delivery systems.

Cytotoxicity of folic acid conjugated hollow silica nanoparticles toward Caco2 and 3T3 cells, with and without encapsulated DOX

Hollow silica nanoparticles of two sizes with and without a folic acid targeting ligand were synthesized. Fickian diffusion of the antitumor drug doxorubicin hydrochloride (DOX) was demonstrated by the produced nanoparticles, achieving a cumulative release of 73% and 45% for 215 nm and 430 nm particles respectively over a period of 500 h. The hollow silica nanoparticles presented a time and dose dependent toxicity, selective to human epithelial colorectal adenocarcinoma (Caco2) cells, over mouse embryonic fibroblast (3T3) cells. At 24h Caco2 cell viability was reduced to 66% using pure hollow silica at a concentration of 50 μg mL(-1), while that of 3T3 cells remained at 94% under the same conditions. The selective cytotoxicity of hollow silica nanoparticles was further enhanced by conjugation of folic acid and incorporation of DOX: at 24h and an equivalent DOX concentration of 0.5 μg mL(-1), viable Caco2 cells were reduced to 45% while 3T3 cells were reduced to 83%. Interestingly the equivalent dose of free DOX was more toxic to 3T3 than to Caco2 cells, reducing the 3T3 viability to 72% and the Caco2 viability to 80%, which is likely due to the presence of the p-glycoprotein pumps in Caco2 cells. Folic acid conjugation served to enhance the viability of both cell lines in this work. Careful optimization of the folate content should further improve the cell specificity of the hollow silica nanoparticles, thus providing a viable targeting platform for cancer therapy.

Extracorporeal Elimination of Circulating Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) to Enhance the Benefit of Cytostatic Therapy in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer Patients

Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common malignancy in the world's female population and with the highest lethality index among gynecological tumors. The prognosis of metastatic disease is usually poor, especially in platinum-resistant cases. There are several options for the treatment of metastatic disease resistant to platinum derivates (e.g. paclitaxel, topotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin), all of which are considered equipotent. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is a liposomal form of the anthracycline antibiotic doxorubicin. It is characterized by more convenient pharmacokinetics and a different toxicity profile. Cardiotoxicity, the major adverse effect of conventional doxorubicin, is reduced in PLD as well as hematotoxicity, alopecia, nausea and vomiting. Skin toxicity and mucositis, however, emerge as serious issues since they represent dose and schedule-limiting toxicities. The pharmacokinetics of PLD (prolonged biological half-life and preferential distribution into tumor tissue) provide new possibilities to address these toxicity issues. The extracorporeal elimination of circulating liposomes after PLD saturation in the tumor tissue represents a novel and potent strategy to diminish drug toxicity. This article intends to review PLD characteristics and the importance of extracorporeal elimination to enhance treatment tolerance and benefits.

Translational studies of phenotypic probes for the mononuclear phagocyte system and liposomal pharmacology

As nanoparticles (NPs) are cleared via phagocytes of the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS), we hypothesized that the function of circulating monocytes and dendritic cells (MO/DC) in blood can predict NP clearance (CL). We measured MO/DC phagocytosis and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in mice, rats, dogs, and patients with refractory solid tumors. Pharmacokinetic studies of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-encapsulated liposomal doxorubicin (PEGylated liposomal doxirubicin [PLD]), CKD-602 (S-CKD602), and cisplatin (SPI-077) were performed at the maximum tolerated dose. MO/DC function was also evaluated in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) administered PLD. Across species, a positive association was observed between cell function and CL of PEGylated liposomes. In patients with EOC, associations were observed between PLD CL and phagocytosis (R(2) = 0.43, P = 0.04) and ROS production (R(2) = 0.61, P = 0.008) in blood MO/DC. These findings suggest that probes of MPS function may help predict PEGylated liposome CL across species and PLD CL in patients with EOC.

Clinical trials with pegylated liposomal Doxorubicin in the treatment of ovarian cancer

Among the pharmaceutical options available for treatment of ovarian cancer, increasing attention has been progressively focused on pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), whose unique formulation prolongs the persistence of the drug in the circulation and potentiates intratumor accumulation. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has become a major component in the routine management of epithelial ovarian cancer. In 1999 it was first approved for platinum-refractory ovarian cancer and then received full approval for platinum-sensitive recurrent disease in 2005. PLD remains an important therapeutic tool in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer in 2012. Recent interest in PLD/carboplatin combination therapy has been the object of phase III trials in platinum-sensitive and chemonaïve ovarian cancer patients reporting response rates, progressive-free survival, and overall survival similar to other platinum-based combinations, but with a more favorable toxicity profile and convenient dosing schedule. This paper summarizes data clarifying the role of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in ovarian cancer, as well as researches focusing on adding novel targeted drugs to this cytotoxic agent.

Pharmacokinetics and Urinary Excretion of Vincristine Sulfate Liposomes Injection in Metastatic Melanoma Patients

Vincristine sulfate liposomes injection (VSLI) is a liposomal formulation of vincristine encapsulated in sphingosomes composed of sphinogomyelin and cholesterol (58/42; mol/mol). The pharmacokinetics and urinary excretion of VSLI were evaluated in 12 patients with metastatic melanoma after single-dose (2.0 mg/m2 every 2 weeks = 1 cycle) and multiple-dose (cycle 3, pharmacokinetics only) administrations (intravenous infusion over 1 hour). After VSLI infusion, total (released and encapsulated) vincristine concentrations in plasma remained relatively constant for 3 to 12 hours and thereafter declined, with interpatient variability seen in the rate of decline resulting in monoexponential or biexponential profiles. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity of total vincristine in plasma ranged from 4933 to 40495 h.ng/mL and total clearance ranged from 131 to 445 mL/h. The volume of distribution at steady state was 2650 +/- 731 mL, indicating VSLI was mainly confined within the plasma. The released vincristine concentrations in plasma were below the level of quantitation in 95% of samples. The pharmacokinetic parameters were similar between cycles 1 and 3, and trough plasma levels of total vincristine were below the level of quantitation of 1 ng/mL. Approximately 8% of the injected dose was excreted in the urine as unchanged vincristine (7%) or N-desformylvincristine (0.8%). Overall, VSLI exhibited a longer circulation half-life and higher area under the plasma concentration-time curve compared to conventional vincristine, whereas its route of elimination remained unchanged.

Factors affecting the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of liposomal drugs

Various attempts to increase the therapeutic index of the drug while minimizing side effects have been made in drug delivery systems. Among several promising strategies, liposomes represent an advanced technology to target active molecules to the site of action. Rapid clearance of circulating liposomal drugs administered intravenously has been a critical issue because circulation time in the blood affects drug exposure at the target site. The clinical use of liposomal drugs is complicated by large intra- and interindividual variability in their pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). Thus, it is important to understand the factors affecting the PK/PD of the liposomal formulation of drugs and to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the variability in the PK/PD of liposomal drugs. In this review article, we describe the characteristics of liposome formulations and discuss the effects of various factors, including liposome-associated factors, host-associated factors, and treatment on the PK/PD of liposomal agents.

Kinetic targeting of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: a new approach to reduce toxicity during chemotherapy (CARL-trial)

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic success of chemotherapeutic agents is often limited by severe adverse effects. To reduce toxicity of these drugs, nanoscale particle-based drug delivery systems (DDS) are used. DDS accumulate to some extent in tumor tissues, but only a very small portion of a given dose reaches this target. Accumulation of DDS in tumor tissues is supposed to be much faster than in certain other tissues in which side effects occur ("Kinetic Targeting"). Once saturation in tumor tissue is achieved, most of the administered DDS still circulate in the plasma. The extracorporeal elimination of these circulating nanoparticles would probably reduce toxicity.

METHODS

For the CARL-trial (Controlled Application and Removal of Liposomal chemotherapeutics), pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) was used as chemotherapeutic agent and double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) was performed for extracorporeal elimination of liposomes. PLD was given as 40 mg/m2 every 3 weeks in combination with vinorelbine 2 × 25 mg/m2 (neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer, 12 patients), or as 40 mg/m2 every 4 weeks (recurrent ovarian cancer, 3 patients). Primary endpoints were the efficiency and safety profile of DFPP, and secondary endpoints were side effects and tumor response.

RESULTS

DFPP eliminated ~62% of circulating PLD, corresponding to ~45% of the total dose (n = 57 cycles). AUC of doxorubicin was reduced by 50%. No leakage of doxorubicin was detected during elimination, and no relevant DFPP-related side effects occurred. Reduction in tumor size > 30% occurred in 10/12 (neoadjuvant) and in 1/3 patients (recurrent). Only five grade 2 events and one grade 3 event (mucositis, neutropenia or leucopenia) and a single palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia grade 2 were reported.

CONCLUSION

Extracorporeal elimination of PLD by DFPP is safe and efficient. CARL can diminish the main dose-limiting side effects of PLD, and probably many different DDS alike.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS00000163.

Factors affecting the pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients

PURPOSE

There is significant inter-patient variability in the pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). Identification of factors affecting the pharmacokinetics of PLD would enable personalization of therapy. We previously reported that age, gender, body composition, and monocytes affect the clearance of other liposomal agents. Therefore, we evaluated how these factors affect the pharmacokinetics of PLD.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic studies of PLD were performed as part of phase I and II studies in 70 patients with solid tumors or Kaposi's sarcoma. The effects of monocyte count, age, gender, and body composition on PLD clearance were examined.

RESULTS

There was a 15.3-fold variability in PLD clearance. Body surface area-based dosing did not significantly reduce the variability in PLD clearance. The mean ± SD clearance for patients <60 years old and ≥60 years old were 54.6 ± 28.5 and 23.3 ± 10.8 mL/h/m(2), respectively (P < 0.0001), and for female and male patients were 23.7 ± 18.8 and 55.6 ± 26.8 mL/h/m(2), respectively (P < 0.0001). A reduction in pre-cycle monocyte count was associated with a greater reduction in PLD clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Age, gender, and monocyte counts appear to correlate with PLD clearance. Further investigation of the association between these factors, PLD pharmacokinetics, and clinical outcomes (efficacy and toxicity) is warranted. These effects on the pharmacokinetics of PLD may be an approach for personalizing PLD therapy and may affect other pegylated liposomes and nanoparticle agents.

Pharmacokinetic and toxicity considerations for the use of anthracyclines in ovarian cancer treatment

INTRODUCTION

Safe and effective treatments are needed for ovarian cancer. While there are many drugs currently available, there has recently been a renewed novel interest in the use of anthracyclines.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the available evidence on pharmacokinetic (PK) and toxicology implications of anthracyclines and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in the clinical management of women with epithelial ovarian cancer. This article consists of material obtained via Medline, PubMed and EMBASE literature searches, up to September 2010.

EXPERT OPINION

PLD is a liposomal formulation of doxorubicin (DXR), with a distinct pharmacokinetic profile, characterized by extended circulation time and a reduced clearance and volume of distribution with respect to the free drug. PLD is effective and well tolerated in relapsed ovarian cancer. The toxicity profile of PLD is characterized by dose-limiting mucosal and cutaneous toxicities, mild myelosuppression and decreased cardiotoxicity compared to free DXR. The good response rate, toxicity profile and pharmacokinetic profile of PLD suggest that PLD could be an option in first-line and second-line treatment in ovarian cancer; especially in those who had experienced taxane-induced toxicity or had a poor performance status.

Phase II trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus docetaxel with and without trastuzumab in metastatic breast cancer: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial E3198

The purpose of this trial was to determine cardiac toxicity and overall efficacy of the pegylated liposome doxorubicin (PLD)-docetaxel couplet alone if HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (internal control) or with trastuzumab if HER2-positive disease. Upon central HER2 confirmation, 84 eligible patients received induction with PLD (30 mg/m(2)) and docetaxel (60 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks (maximum eight cycles), alone if HER2-negative (arm A; N = 38) or plus trastuzumab (4 mg/kg once, then 2 mg/kg weekly) if HER2-positive disease (arm B; N = 46) as first-line therapy. Maintenance therapy (without PLD) allowed. Primary objectives were to determine whether congestive heart failure (CHF) rate >3% and the efficacy/toxicity of each arm. CHF rate was <3% in each arm. Response rate, median progression-free-, and overall survival in arms A and B were 47.4 and 45.7%, 11 and 10.6 months, and 24.6 and 31.8 months, respectively. Trastuzumab arm was associated with higher rates of hand foot syndrome (grade 3: 22 vs. 38%; P = 0.16; overall 51 vs. 75%, P = 0.03) and treatment discontinuation due to toxicity/patient withdrawal (13 vs. 28%; P = 0.11). Febrile neutropenia occurred in approximately 10% of patients. In conclusion, concurrent administration of trastuzumab with PLD-docetaxel was not associated with higher risk of cardiac toxicity compared with PLD-docetaxel alone, but led to excessive hand-foot syndrome.

Phase I/II trial of intravenous Doxil® and whole abdomen hyperthermia in patients with refractory ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

A phase I/II study of Doxil combined with whole abdomen hyperthermia was conducted in patients with refractory ovarian cancer. Liposomal doxorubicin combined with hyperthermia has been shown to increase both liposomal delivery and drug extravasation into tumour xenografts resulting in enhanced cytotoxic effects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with either recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian cancer were enrolled. All patients had either measurable or assessable disease. Patients received intravenous (IV) Doxil at a dose of 40 mg m-2 as a 1-h infusion followed by whole abdomen hyperthermia. The phase I portion of the study was performed to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of hyperthermia. Quality of life (QoL) was performed at baseline, prior to each cycle and every 3 months. Plasma pharmacokinetic studies were performed with the first cycle.

RESULTS

Ten patients participated in the phase I portion of the study which demonstrated that the MTD of hyperthermia was 60 min after either average vaginal and rectal temperatures of 40 degrees C had been achieved or after 30 min of power application, whichever was shorter. All 30 patients were either paclitaxel and/or platinum resistant initially or developed resistant disease. The median number of prior chemotherapeutic regimens was three (range 2-8) and six patients had been previously treated with Doxil. There were three partial responses for a response rate of 10% (95% CI: [2%, 27%]) and eight patients (27%; 95% CI: [12%, 46%]) had disease stabilization. The median time to progression or death was 3.4 months (95% CI: [2.6, 5.2]) and the median survival was 10.8 months (95% CI: [8.8, 17.4]). Twelve patients (40%) experienced palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE), but only four (13%) experienced grade 3-4 PPE toxicity. Doxil systemic exposure was higher in those with grade 3-4 PPE compared to those with no PPE. None of the patients had grade 3-4 thermal toxicity due to hyperthermia. QoL was not decreased in patients responding to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapy with intravenous Doxil and whole abdomen hyperthermia for patients with platinum/paclitaxel resistant ovarian cancer is feasible and does not negatively impact quality of life.

A phase I study of the safety and pharmacokinetics of trabectedin in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced malignancies

BACKGROUND

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, potential pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions, and effect on liver histology of trabectedin in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) for advanced malignancies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Entry criteria for the 36 patients included normal liver function, prior doxorubicin exposure <250 mg/m(2), and normal cardiac function. A 1-h PLD (30 mg/m(2)) infusion was followed immediately by one of six trabectedin doses (0.4, 0.6, 0.75, 0.9, 1.1, and 1.3 mg/m(2)) infused over 3 h, repeated every 21 days until evidence of complete response (CR), disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. Plasma samples were obtained to assess PK profiles.

RESULTS

The MTD of trabectedin was 1.1 mg/m(2). Drug-related grade 3 and 4 toxic effects were neutropenia (31%) and elevated transaminases (31%). Six patients responded (one CR, five partial responses), with an overall response rate of 16.7%, and 14 had stable disease (less than a 50% reduction and less than a 25% increase in the sum of the products of two perpendicular diameters of all measured lesions and the appearance of no new lesions) >4 months (39%). Neither drug had its PK affected significantly by concomitant administration compared with trabectedin and PLD each given as a single agent.

CONCLUSION

Trabectedin combined with PLD is generally well tolerated at therapeutic doses of both drugs in pretreated patients with diverse tumor types and appears to provide clinical benefit. These results support the need for additional studies of this combination in appropriate cancer types.

An open-label study to evaluate dose and cycle dependence of the pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin

PURPOSE

There are no definitive data in humans on the dose dependence and/or cycle dependence of the pharmacokinetics (PK) of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). This study examined the PK of PLD across a twofold dose variation and along 3 cycles.

METHODS

Fifteen patients received PLD in successive doses of 60, 30, and 45 mg/m(2) (Arm A) and 30, 60, and 45 mg/m(2) (Arm B), every 4 weeks. Twelve patients, six on each arm, completed all three cycles and were fully evaluable. Plasma levels of doxorubicin were analyzed by HPLC and fluorimetry. PK analysis was done by non-compartmental method. Repeated measures ANOVA and paired tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the PK parameters examined when the dose was increased from 30 to 60 mg/m(2). However, when we analyzed the effect of cycle number on the PK, we found a gradual and significant inhibition of clearance (P < 0.0001) from the 1st through the 3rd cycle of PLD, with a geometric mean increase of 43% in dose-normalized AUC (P = 0.0003). Dose-normalized C(max) and T(1/2) mean values increased by 17 and 18%, respectively between the 1st and 3rd cycles, but only the increase in T(1/2) was statistically significant (P = 0.0017).

CONCLUSIONS

While the PK of PLD is not dose-dependent within the dose range of 30-60 mg/m(2), there is evidence of a cycle-dependent effect that results in inhibition of clearance when patients receive successive cycles of PLD. These results suggest the need for dose adjustments of PLD upon retreatment to minimize the risk of toxicity.

Plasma protein distribution and its impact on pharmacokinetics of liposomal amphotericin B in paediatric patients with malignant diseases

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the association of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) with plasma proteins and its impact on the pharmacokinetics of L-AmB in paediatric patients with malignant diseases.

METHODS

Paediatric oncology patients (n = 39) who received multiple-doses of L-AmB were recruited into this study. The association of the drug with plasma lipoprotein was investigated using single vertical spin density gradient ultracentrifugation and quantitated with a validated HPLC assay. The unbound amphotericin B (AmB) in the plasma was separated by ultrafiltration and determined with a validated LC/MS/MS assay.

RESULTS

The ex vivo lipoprotein distribution of L-AmB found that 68.3 +/- 11.8% of the drug was associated with the high density lipoprotein (HDL) fraction, which demonstrated a significant inverse correlation with posterior Bayesian estimates of L-AmB clearance (r = -0.690, p < 0.01). The average of unbound fraction of AmB in plasma of patients administered with L-AmB was 0.005, but its relationship with L-AmB clearance did not reach a statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

L-AmB displays different lipoprotein distribution profile from that of the conventional AmB formulation, with L-AmB preferentially associated with HDL in plasma. The inverse correlation of L-AmB clearance to its HDL distribution contributes to the difference in the pharmacokinetic profile of L-AmB.

Reduced Incidence of Severe Palmar-Plantar Erythrodysesthesia and Mucositis in a Prospective Multicenter Phase II Trial with Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin at 40 mg/m2 Every 4 Weeks in Previously Treated Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess whether the reduction in the total dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) per cycle from 50 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks to 40 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks can effectively lower the incidence of treatment-related palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) and mucositis.

METHODS

Patients received PLD 40 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks, and were evaluated for toxicity prior to each treatment and for response every 8 weeks.

RESULTS

All patients were previously treated with at least one chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease, and 72% of the patients had a prior exposure to an anthracycline. Forty-six evaluable patients received a median of four PLD cycles, with a median dose intensity of 10 mg/m(2)/week and a median cumulative dose of 160 mg/m(2). No National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) grade 3 or 4 PPE was observed in these patients. NCI-CTC grade 3 or 4 mucositis occurred in 4.3% of patients, only. Response rates and survival results observed here were comparable to those observed with PLD 50 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks in a matched patient population. However, patients treated with PLD 40 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks experienced less PPE and mucositis and required clearly less dose reductions and treatment delays.

CONCLUSION

The favorable safety profile observed in this study leads us to recommend the use of PLD 40 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks for patients with advanced breast cancer.

Phase I study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and the multidrug-resistance modulator, valspodar

Valspodar, a P-glycoprotein modulator, affects pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin when administered in combination, resulting in doxorubicin dose reduction. In animal models, valspodar has minimal interaction with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PEG-LD). To determine any pharmacokinetic interaction in humans, we designed a study to determine maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of total doxorubicin, in PEG-LD and valspodar combination therapy in patients with advanced malignancies. Patients received PEG-LD 20–25 mg m⁻² intravenously over 1 h for cycle one. In subsequent 2-week cycles, valspodar was administered as 72 h continuous intravenous infusion with PEG-LD beginning at 8 mg m⁻² and escalated in an accelerated titration design to 25 mg m⁻². Pharmacokinetic data were collected with and without valspodar. A total of 14 patients completed at least two cycles of therapy. No DLTs were observed in six patients treated at the highest level of PEG-LD 25 mg m⁻². The most common toxicities were fatigue, nausea, vomiting, mucositis, palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia, diarrhoea, and ataxia. Partial responses were observed in patients with breast and ovarian carcinoma. The mean (range) total doxorubicin clearance decreased from 27 (10–73) ml h⁻¹ m⁻² in cycle 1 to 18 (3–37) ml h⁻¹ m⁻² with the addition of valspodar in cycle 2 (P=0.009). Treatment with PEG-LD 25 mg m⁻² in combination with valspodar results in a moderate prolongation of total doxorubicin clearance and half-life but did not increase the toxicity of this agent.

Interactions Between Antiretrovirals and Antineoplastic Drug Therapy

Despite the established impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in reducing HIV-related morbidity and mortality, malignancy remains an important cause of death. Patients who receive the combination of cancer chemotherapy and HAART may achieve better response rates and higher rates of survival than patients who receive antineoplastic therapy alone. However, the likelihood of drug interactions with combined therapy is high, since protease inhibitors (PIs) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are substrates and potent inhibitors or inducers of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system. Since many antineoplastic drugs are also metabolised by the CYP system, coadministration with HAART could result in either drug accumulation and possible toxicity, or decreased efficacy of one or both classes of drugs. Although formal, prospective pharmacokinetic interaction studies are not available in most instances, it is possible to infer the nature of drug interactions based on the metabolic fates of these agents. Paclitaxel and docetaxel are both metabolised by the CYP system, although differences exist in the nature of the isoenzymes involved. Case reports describing adverse consequences of concomitant taxane-antiretroviral therapy exist. Although other confounding factors may have been present, these cases serve as reminders of the vigilant monitoring necessary when taxanes and HAART are coadministered. Similarly, vinca alkaloids are substrates of CYP3A4 and are, thus, vulnerable to PI- or NNRTI-mediated changes in their pharmacokinetics. Interactions with the alkylating agents cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide are complicated as a result of the involvement of the CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 isoenzymes in both the metabolic activation of these drugs and the generation of potentially neurotoxic metabolites. Existing data regarding the metabolic fate of the anthracyclines doxorubicin and daunorubicin suggest that clinically detrimental interactions would not be expected with coadministered HAART. Commonly used endocrine therapies are largely substrates of the CYP system and may, therefore, be amenable to modulation by concomitant HAART. In addition, tamoxifen itself has been associated with reduced concentrations of both anastrozole and letrozole, raising the concern that similar inducing properties may adversely affect the outcome of PI- or NNRTI-based therapy. Similarly, dexamethasone is both a substrate and concentration-dependent inducer of CYP3A4; enhanced corticosteroid pharmacodynamics may result with CYP3A4 inhibitors, while the efficacy of concomitant HAART may be compromised with prolonged dexamethasone coadministration. Since PIs and NNRTIs may also induce or inhibit the expression of P-glycoprotein, the potential for additional interactions to arise via modulation of this transporter also exists. Further research delineating the combined safety and pharmacokinetics of antiretrovirals and antineoplastic therapy is necessary.

Advantages of liposomal delivery systems for anthracyclines

Liposomes, closed vesicular structures consisting of one or more lipid bilayers, have generated a great deal of interest as drug delivery vehicles. In particular, they have been investigated for their ability to improve the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to tumors, in efforts to increase therapeutic efficacy and decrease toxicity to normal cells. Development of liposomal chemotherapeutic agents has, in the past, been hindered primarily by the rapid uptake of liposomes by the reticuloendothelial system. Numerous strategies that seek to either exploit or avoid this phenomenon have been used. As a result, several liposomal chemotherapeutic agents are now available in the clinic. STEALTH, a novel liposomal system coated with polyethylene glycol, avoids uptake by the reticuloendothelial system, thus improving drug delivery to the tumor while decreasing toxicity. In pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil/Caelyx [PLD]), this delivery system encapsulates doxorubicin within polyethylene glycol-coated liposomes, leading to promising new applications for a well-established drug. Liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin citrate complex (Myocet [NPLD]), another liposomal delivery system for doxorubicin, lacks the polyethylene glycol coating, resulting in much shorter circulation times than those of PLD. Daunorubicin citrate liposome (DaunoXome [DNX]) contains daunorubicin encapsulated in a smaller liposome of a different lipid composition. It has circulation times between those of PLD and NPLD. This article reviews the advantages of liposomal delivery systems in general and the divergent approaches that have been taken in developing these agents.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: Proof of principle using preclinical animal models and pharmacokinetic studies

Encapsulation of doxorubicin in polyethylene glycol-coated liposomes (Doxil/Caelyx [PLD]), was developed to enhance the safety and efficacy of conventional doxorubicin. The liposomes alter pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic parameters of conventional doxorubicin so that drug delivery to the tumor is enhanced while toxicity normally associated with conventional doxorubicin is decreased. In animals and humans, pharmacokinetic advantages of PLD include an increased area under the plasma concentration-time curve, longer distribution half-life, smaller volume of distribution, and reduced clearance. In preclinical models, PLD produced remission and cure against many cancers including tumors of the breast, lung, ovaries, prostate, colon, bladder, and pancreas, as well as lymphoma, sarcoma, and myeloma. It was also found to be effective as adjuvant therapy. In addition, it was found to cross the blood-brain barrier and induce remission in tumors of the central nervous system. Increased potency over conventional doxorubicin was observed and, in contrast to conventional doxorubicin, PLD was equally effective against low- and high-growth fraction tumors. The combination of PLD with vincristine or trastuzumab resulted in additive effects and possible synergy. PLD appeared to overcome multidrug resistance, possibly as the result of increased intracellular concentrations and an interaction between the liposome and P-glycoprotein function. On the basis of pharmacokinetic and preclinical studies, PLD, either alone or as part of combination therapy, has potential applications to treat a variety of cancers.

Pharmacokinetics of liposomal doxorubicin (TLC-D99; Myocet) in patients with solid tumors: an open-label, single-dose study

PURPOSE

Liposomal encapsulation of doxorubicin is designed to increase safety and tolerability by decreasing cardiac and gastrointestinal toxicity through decreased exposure of these tissues to doxorubicin, while effectively delivering drug to the tumor. We conducted an open-label phase I study to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of a single dose of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin (Myocet) in patients with various solid tumors. Safety and tolerability were monitored.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients received a single intravenous infusion of Myocet 75 mg/m2. Plasma samples were analyzed for concentration of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin, total doxorubicin, and doxorubicinol.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients aged 20-73 years (median 60 years) participated; 17 were evaluable for pharmacokinetic analysis. The most common primary tumor was soft tissue sarcoma (22%). Total body clearance for total doxorubicin was 5.6 l/h/m2 while the volume (Vss) was 82 l/m2. The terminal half-life was 52.6 h. Based on the AUC and Cmax values for total doxorubicin and encapsulated doxorubicin, an estimated 85% of circulating doxorubicin was encapsulated. Doxorubicinol was detected in all patients; the mean AUC was 2.03+/-1.10 micromol/l/h. The mean 48-h urinary excretion of doxorubicin was 6.44% of the dose. The most common adverse events were nausea (94%), fatigue (78%) and vomiting (67%). Cardiotoxicity (measured as ten-point fall in LVEF to <50%) was observed in one patient. Pharmacokinetic values did not correlate with hematological, laboratory or demographic variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetic profile of Myocet suggests that the liposomal formulation results in a longer half-life with less free drug available for tissue distribution than conventional doxorubicin, consistent with the enhanced therapeutic index observed in clinical studies.

Safety and Activity of the Combination of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin and Weekly Docetaxel in Advanced Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The present study was designed with the aim of evaluating the tolerability and activity of pegylated liposomial doxorubicin (PLD) in combination with weekly docetaxel as first line treatment of advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-seven patients entered the study. PLD was administered at escalating doses starting from 30 mg/m2, on day 1; docetaxel was administered at the fixed dose of 35 mg/m2 on days 2 and 9. A cycle of therapy consisted of 21 days.

RESULTS

The MTD was achieved at the dose of 40 mg/m2 of PLD, being febrile neutropenia and palmar-plantar-erythrodisesthesia (PPE) the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), so that the fixed dose of PLD for the Phase II study was 35 mg/m2. Forty-two consecutive patients received treatment at the established dose for a total of 194 cycles: among these, three patients were withdrawn for severe allergic reaction at the first administration of PLD. Hematological toxicity was moderate, the most common grade 1-3 non-hematological toxicities were stomatitis and PPE, occurring in 20 (47.5%) and 16 (38%) patients, respectively. No cardiac toxicity was recorded. According to the intent to treat analysis a major objective response was observed in 59.5% of patients (95% CI, 43.3-74.4%), with a median time to progression of 9 months and an estimated overall survival at 18 months of 62%.

CONCLUSION

The combination of PLD and weekly docetaxel is an effective first-line therapy for patients with advanced breast cancer. PPE and mucositis are the most relevant side effects of such a combination.

Pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal Doxorubicin: review of animal and human studies

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (doxorubicin HCl liposome injection; Doxil or Caelyx) is a liposomal formulation of doxorubicin, reducing uptake by the reticulo-endothelial system due to the attachment of polyethylene glycol polymers to a lipid anchor and stably retaining drug as a result of liposomal entrapment via an ammonium sulfate chemical gradient. These features result in a pharmacokinetic profile characterised by an extended circulation time and a reduced volume of distribution, thereby promoting tumour uptake. Preclinical studies demonstrated one- or two-phase plasma concentration-time profiles. Most of the drug is cleared with an elimination half-life of 20-30 hours. The volume of distribution is close to the blood volume, and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) is increased at least 60-fold compared with free doxorubicin. Studies of tissue distribution indicated preferential accumulation into various implanted tumours and human tumour xenografts, with an enhancement of drug concentrations in the tumour when compared with free drug. Clinical studies of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in humans have included patients with AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma (ARKS) and with a variety of solid tumours, including ovarian, breast and prostate carcinomas. The pharmacokinetic profile in humans at doses between 10 and 80 mg/m(2) is similar to that in animals, with one or two distribution phases: an initial phase with a half-life of 1-3 hours and a second phase with a half-life of 30-90 hours. The AUC after a dose of 50 mg/m(2) is approximately 300-fold greater than that with free drug. Clearance and volume of distribution are drastically reduced (at least 250-fold and 60-fold, respectively). Preliminary observations indicate that utilising the distinct pharmacokinetic parameters of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in dose scheduling is an attractive possibility. In agreement with the preclinical findings, the ability of pegylated liposomes to extravasate through the leaky vasculature of tumours, as well as their extended circulation time, results in enhanced delivery of liposomal drug and/or radiotracers to the tumour site in cancer patients. There is evidence of selective tumour uptake in malignant effusions, ARKS skin lesions and a variety of solid tumours. The toxicity profile of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is characterised by dose-limiting mucosal and cutaneous toxicities, mild myelosuppression, decreased cardiotoxicity compared with free doxorubicin and minimal alopecia. The mucocutaneous toxicities are dose-limiting per injection; however, the reduced cardiotoxicity allows a larger cumulative dose than that acceptable for free doxorubicin. Thus, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin represents a new class of chemotherapy delivery system that may significantly improve the therapeutic index of doxorubicin.

Pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin administered i.v. as Myocet (TLC D-99; liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin citrate) compared with conventional doxorubicin when given in combination with cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Myocet (TLC D-99) is a liposomal formulation of the anti-neoplastic drug doxorubicin with an improved therapeutic index compared with conventional doxorubicin. The objective of this study was to assess the plasma disposition of doxorubicin when administered i.v. as TLC D-99 and to compare this to conventional drug. Metabolite (doxorubicinol) plasma levels were also quantitated in both treatment groups. Plasma was collected during the first course of treatment from 10 patients receiving TLC D-99 60 mg/m and 10 receiving conventional doxorubicin 60 mg/m2, each with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. Samples were assayed for total doxorubicin (all doxorubicin regardless of whether it is encapsulated or not), encapsulated doxorubicin (TLC D-99 group only) and doxorubicinol using high-performance liquid chromatography. Plasma concentrations of total doxorubicin were higher in patients receiving TLC D-99 than in patients receiving conventional doxorubicin. The clearance of total doxorubicin after administration of TLC D-99 was lower (approximately 9-fold) and the volume of distribution at steady state was less (25-fold) than that of doxorubicin after conventional drug. Doxorubicinol was detected in the plasma of all patients in both treatment groups. The mean AUC(0-infinity) of doxorubicinol for patients receiving TLC D-99 (1.5+/-0.4 M x h) was not statistically different than that in patients receiving conventional doxorubicin (1.8+/-0.4 M x h), although the appearance of the peak doxorubicinol concentration occurred later and was lower in patients receiving TLC D-99. There was a correlation between the plasma AUC(0-infinity) of total doxorubicin and the degree of myelosuppression in patients receiving conventional doxorubicin, but this correlation was not found in patients receiving TLC D-99.

Polyethylene glycol-liposomal doxorubicin: a review of its use in the management of solid and haematological malignancies and AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma

Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-liposomal doxorubicin is a formulation of the anthracycline doxorubicin in which the drug is encapsulated in PEG-coated liposomes. This alters the pharmacokinetic properties of doxorubicin, prolonging circulation time and enhancing localisation to tumours. In a large randomised trial, intravenous PEG-liposomal doxorubicin was at least as effective as topotecan in patients with ovarian cancer refractory or sensitive to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Overall response rates of patients with ovarian cancer refractory to platinum- and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy who received the drug ranged from 18.3 to 27.6% in noncomparative clinical trials. PEG-liposomal doxorubicin also has antitumour activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer pretreated with other chemotherapeutic agents. Overall response rates were similar in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer who had received PEG-liposomal doxorubicin or two comparator salvage chemotherapy regimens (vinorelbine or mitomycin C plus vinblastine) in an interim analysis of a large randomised study. In patients with advanced AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma, PEG-liposomal doxorubicin monotherapy produced overall response rates ranging from 46 to 77% in randomised trials. The drug was significantly more effective than bleomycin plus vincristine alone or in combination with standard doxorubicin, as measured by tumour response. As a replacement for standard doxorubicin in commonly used combination therapies, PEG-liposomal doxorubicin has shown activity in multiple myeloma and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in small, preliminary trials. The most common adverse events associated with PEG-liposomal doxorubicin are myelosuppression, palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia, stomatitis and nausea. These can be managed by delaying or reducing dosages. Although preliminary trials are promising, the relative cardiotoxicity of PEG-liposomal doxorubicin compared with the standard formulation has not been clearly established.

CONCLUSIONS

Monotherapy with PEG-liposomal doxorubicin is effective as a second-line chemotherapy in patients with platinum-refractory ovarian cancer and in patients with metastatic breast cancer. However, as with all chemotherapeutic agents, the benefits of treatment need to be weighed against the agent's tolerability profile. Strong comparative data have helped to establish PEG-liposomal doxorubicin as the first-line treatment option in patients with advanced Kaposi's sarcoma. Anticancer activity has also been observed in studies conducted in small numbers of patients with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving PEG-liposomal doxorubicin instead of standard doxorubicin in combination regimens, although further data are needed to confirm the clinical relevance of these findings.

Relationship between exposure to zidovudine and decrease of P24 antigenemia in HIV-infected patients in monotherapy

The link between virological response and exposure to zidovudine was studied in 40 HIV-infected patients of the protocol ANRS 01. During this 45-day trial, the patients received only oral zidovudine in six treatment groups. Our objectives were: to analyze and model the pharmacokinetics of zidovudine and the decrease of P24 antigenemia; to study the links between exposure and efficacy. For the pharmacokinetic study, 12 blood samples were collected from 0.16 to 24 h after the first dose and a compartmental model was used. For the pharmacodynamic study of P24 antigenemia, blood samples were collected before treatment and every 3 days until day 45; an exponantial decay model was used. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were estimated for each patient by nonlinear regression. The correlations between efficacy parameters and exposure parameters, were then studied in the 40 patients. The mean (+/- SD) apparent volume of distribution and clearance were 151 L (+/- 94) and 184 L/h (+/- 72), respectively. The mean initial antigen level was 472 pg/mL (+/- 409), the coefficient of reduction of antigenemia was 0.27 (+/- 0.21) and the rate of decrease was 0.27/day (+/- 0.16). The coefficient of P24 reduction was found to be significantly correlated to the daily area under the curve (P < 0.0014). This relationship was adequately described by an Imax model and the daily area under the curve, leading to 50% of antigenemia decrease, was estimated to be 2.32 mg x h/L (+/- 0.33). In conclusion, a significant relationship between exposure to zidovudine at day 1, and decrease of P24 antigenemia was found. It was estimated that the average steady-state concentration, which corresponds to 70% of maximal efficacy, was 0.22 mg/L. Together with the large interpatient variability of zidovudine pharmacokinetics, these findings confirmed that zidovudine should be monitored and a clinical target concentration was defined.