Effects of endothelin-1 on capsaicin-induced nociception in mice

Endothelin Receptor Antagonists: Status Quo and Future Perspectives for Targeted Therapy

The endothelin axis, recognized for its vasoconstrictive action, plays a central role in the pathology of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Treatment with approved endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), such as bosentan, ambrisentan, or macitentan, slow down PAH progression and relieves symptoms. Several findings have indicated that endothelin is further involved in the pathogenesis of certain other diseases, making ERAs potentially beneficial in the treatment of various conditions. In addition to PAH, this review summarizes the use and perspectives of ERAs in cancer, renal disease, fibrotic disorders, systemic scleroderma, vasospasm, and pain management. Bosentan has proven to be effective in systemic sclerosis PAH and in decreasing the development of vasospasm-related digital ulcers. The selective ERA clazosentan has been shown to be effective in preventing cerebral vasospasm and delaying ischemic neurological deficits and new infarcts. Furthermore, in the SONAR (Study Of Diabetic Nephropathy With Atrasentan) trial, the selective ERA atrasentan reduced the risk of renal events in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. These data suggest atrasentan as a new therapy in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy and possibly other renal diseases. Preclinical studies regarding heart failure, cancer, and fibrotic diseases have demonstrated promising effects, but clinical trials have not yet produced measurable results. Nevertheless, the potential benefits of ERAs may not be fully realized.

Endothelin: 30 Years From Discovery to Therapy

Discovered in 1987 as a potent endothelial cell-derived vasoconstrictor peptide, endothelin-1 (ET-1), the predominant member of the endothelin peptide family, is now recognized as a multifunctional peptide with cytokine-like activity contributing to almost all aspects of physiology and cell function. More than 30 000 scientific articles on endothelin were published over the past 3 decades, leading to the development and subsequent regulatory approval of a new class of therapeutics-the endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs). This article reviews the history of the discovery of endothelin and its role in genetics, physiology, and disease. Here, we summarize the main clinical trials using ERAs and discuss the role of endothelin in cardiovascular diseases such as arterial hypertension, preecclampsia, coronary atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) caused by spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD), Takotsubo syndrome, and heart failure. We also discuss how endothelins contributes to diabetic kidney disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, pulmonary arterial hypertension, as well as cancer, immune disorders, and allograft rejection (which all involve ET_A autoantibodies), and neurological diseases. The application of ERAs, dual endothelin receptor/angiotensin receptor antagonists (DARAs), selective ET_B agonists, novel biologics such as receptor-targeting antibodies, or immunization against ET_A receptors holds the potential to slow the progression or even reverse chronic noncommunicable diseases. Future clinical studies will show whether targeting endothelin receptors can prevent or reduce disability from disease and improve clinical outcome, quality of life, and survival in patients.

Endothelin-1 Decreases Excitability of the Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons via ETB Receptor

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) has been demonstrated to be a pro-nociceptive as well as an anti-nociceptive agent. However, underlying molecular mechanisms for these pain modulatory actions remain unclear. In the present study, we evaluated the ability of ET-1 to alter the nociceptor excitability using a patch clamp technique in acutely dissociated rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. ET-1 produced an increase in threshold current to evoke an action potential (I _threshold) and hyperpolarization of resting membrane potential (RMP) indicating decreased excitability of DRG neurons. I _threshold increased from 0.25 ± 0.08 to 0.33 ± 0.07 nA and hyperpolarized RMP from -57.51 ± 1.70 to -67.41 ± 2.92 mV by ET-1 (100 nM). The hyperpolarizing effect of ET-1 appears to be orchestrated via modulation of membrane conductances, namely voltage-gated sodium current (I _Na) and outward transient potassium current (I _KT). ET-1, 30 and 100 nM, decreased the peak I _Na by 41.3 ± 6.8 and 74 ± 15.2%, respectively. Additionally, ET-1 (100 nM) significantly potentiated the transient component (I _KT) of the potassium currents. ET-1-induced effects were largely attenuated by BQ-788, a selective ET_BR blocker. However, a selective ET_AR blocker BQ-123 did not alter the effects of ET-1. A selective ET_BR agonist, IRL-1620, mimicked the effect of ET-1 on I _Na in a concentration-dependent manner (IC₅₀ 159.5 ± 92.6 μM). In conclusion, our results demonstrate that ET-1 hyperpolarizes nociceptors by blocking I _Na and potentiating I _KT through selective activation of ET_BR, which may represent one of the underlying mechanisms for reported anti-nociceptive effects of ET-1.

Endothelin

The endothelins comprise three structurally similar 21-amino acid peptides. Endothelin-1 and -2 activate two G-protein coupled receptors, ETA and ETB, with equal affinity, whereas endothelin-3 has a lower affinity for the ETA subtype. Genes encoding the peptides are present only among vertebrates. The ligand-receptor signaling pathway is a vertebrate innovation and may reflect the evolution of endothelin-1 as the most potent vasoconstrictor in the human cardiovascular system with remarkably long lasting action. Highly selective peptide ETA and ETB antagonists and ETB agonists together with radiolabeled analogs have accurately delineated endothelin pharmacology in humans and animal models, although surprisingly no ETA agonist has been discovered. ET antagonists (bosentan, ambrisentan) have revolutionized the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, with the next generation of antagonists exhibiting improved efficacy (macitentan). Clinical trials continue to explore new applications, particularly in renal failure and for reducing proteinuria in diabetic nephropathy. Translational studies suggest a potential benefit of ETB agonists in chemotherapy and neuroprotection. However, demonstrating clinical efficacy of combined inhibitors of the endothelin converting enzyme and neutral endopeptidase has proved elusive. Over 28 genetic modifications have been made to the ET system in mice through global or cell-specific knockouts, knock ins, or alterations in gene expression of endothelin ligands or their target receptors. These studies have identified key roles for the endothelin isoforms and new therapeutic targets in development, fluid-electrolyte homeostasis, and cardiovascular and neuronal function. For the future, novel pharmacological strategies are emerging via small molecule epigenetic modulators, biologicals such as ETB monoclonal antibodies and the potential of signaling pathway biased agonists and antagonists.

Evidence for the endothelin system as an emerging therapeutic target for the treatment of chronic pain

Many people worldwide suffer from pain and a portion of these sufferers are diagnosed with a chronic pain condition. The management of chronic pain continues to be a challenge, and despite taking prescribed medication for pain, patients continue to have pain of moderate severity. Current pain therapies are often inadequate, with side effects that limit medication adherence. There is a need to identify novel therapeutic targets for the management of chronic pain. One potential candidate for the treatment of chronic pain is therapies aimed at modulating the vasoactive peptide endothelin-1. In addition to vasoactive properties, endothelin-1 has been implicated in pain transmission in both humans and animal models of nociception. Endothelin-1 directly activates nociceptors and potentiates the effect of other algogens, including capsaicin, formalin, and arachidonic acid. In addition, endothelin-1 has been shown to be involved in inflammatory pain, cancer pain, neuropathic pain, diabetic neuropathy, and pain associated with sickle cell disease. Therefore, endothelin-1 may prove a novel therapeutic target for the relief of many types of chronic pain.

A Review of Signal Transduction of Endothelin-1 and Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase-related Pain for Nanophysiotherapy

[Purpose] An understanding of pain is very important in the study of nanophysiotherapy. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms of endothelin-1 (ET-1)- and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-related pain, and suggest their applications in pain physiotherapy. [Method] This review focuses on the signal transduction of pain and its mechanisms. [Results] Our reviews show that mechanisms of ET-1- and MAPK-related pain exist. [Conclusions] In this review article, we carefully discuss the signal transduction in ET-1- and MAPK-related pain with reference to pain nanophysiotherapy from the perspective of nanoparticle-associated signal transduction.

Activation of mu opioid receptors sensitizes transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) via β-arrestin-2-mediated cross-talk

The transient receptor potential family V1 channel (TRPV1) is activated by multiple stimuli, including capsaicin, acid, endovanilloids, and heat (>42C). Post-translational modifications to TRPV1 result in dynamic changes to the sensitivity of receptor activation. We have previously demonstrated that β-arrestin2 actively participates in a scaffolding mechanism to inhibit TRPV1 phosphorylation, thereby reducing TRPV1 sensitivity. In this study, we evaluated the effect of β-arrestin2 sequestration by G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) on thermal and chemical activation of TRPV1. Here we report that activation of mu opioid receptor by either morphine or DAMGO results in β-arrestin2 recruitment to mu opioid receptor in sensory neurons, while activation by herkinorin does not. Furthermore, treatment of sensory neurons with morphine or DAMGO stimulates β-arrestin2 dissociation from TRPV1 and increased sensitivity of the receptor. Conversely, herkinorin treatment has no effect on TRPV1 sensitivity. Additional behavioral studies indicate that GPCR-driven β-arrestin2 sequestration plays an important peripheral role in the development of thermal sensitivity. Taken together, the reported data identify a novel cross-talk mechanism between GPCRs and TRPV1 that may contribute to multiple clinical conditions.

Mechanism of cancer pain

Ongoing and breakthrough pain is a primary concern for the cancer patient. Although the etiology of cancer pain remains unclear, animal models of cancer pain have allowed investigators to unravel some of the cancer-induced neuropathologic processes that occur in the region of tumor growth and in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. Within the cancer microenvironment, cancer and immune cells produce and secrete mediators that activate and sensitize primary afferent nociceptors. Pursuant to these peripheral changes, nociceptive secondary neurons in spinal cord exhibit increased spontaneous activity and enhanced responsiveness to three modes of noxious stimulation: heat, cold, and mechanical stimuli. As our understanding of the peripheral and central mechanisms that underlie cancer pain improves, targeted analgesics for the cancer patient will likely follow.

Role of peripheral endothelin receptors in an animal model of complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS-I)

Chronic post-ischemic pain (CPIP) is an animal model of CRPS-I developed using a 3-h ischemia-reperfusion injury of the rodent hind paw. The contribution of local endothelin to nociception has been evaluated in CPIP mice by measuring sustained nociceptive behaviors (SNBs) following intraplantar injection of endothelin-1 or -2 (ET-1, ET-2). The effects of local BQ-123 (ETA-R antagonist), BQ-788 (ETB-R antagonist), IRL-1620 (ETB-R agonist) and naloxone (opioid antagonist) were assessed on ET-induced SNBs and/or mechanical and cold allodynia in CPIP mice. ETA-R and ETB-R expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis. Compared to shams, CPIP mice exhibited hypersensitivity to local ET-1 and ET-2. BQ-123 reduced ET-1- and ET-2-induced SNBs in both sham and CPIP animals, but not mechanical or cold allodynia. BQ-788 enhanced ET-1- and ET-2-induced SNBs in both sham and CPIP mice, and cold allodynia in CPIP mice. IRL-1620 displayed a non-opioid anti-nociceptive effect on ET-1- and ET-2-induced SNBs and mechanical allodynia in CPIP mice. The distribution of ETA-R and ETB-R was similar in plantar skin of sham and CPIP mice, but both receptors were over-expressed in plantar muscles of CPIP mice. This study shows that ETA-R and ETB-R have differing roles in nociception for sham and CPIP mice. CPIP mice exhibit more local endothelin-induced SNBs, develop a novel local ETB-R agonist-induced (non-opioid) analgesia, and exhibit over-expression of both receptors in plantar muscles, but not skin. The effectiveness of local ETB-R agonists as anti-allodynic treatments in CPIP mice holds promise for novel therapies in CRPS-I patients.

Endogenous endothelin stimulates cardiac sympathetic afferents during ischaemia

Myocardial ischaemia activates cardiac sympathetic afferents leading to chest pain and reflex cardiovascular responses. Previous studies have shown that a brief period of myocardial ischaemia increases endothelin in cardiac venous plasma draining ischaemic myocardium and that exogenous endothelin excites cutaneous group III and IV sensory nerve fibres. The present study tested the hypothesis that endogenous endothelin stimulates cardiac afferents during ischaemia through direct activation of endothelin A receptors (ET(A)Rs). Nerve activity of single unit cardiac sympathetic afferents was recorded from the left sympathetic chain or rami communicates (T(2)-T(5)) in anaesthetized cats. Single fields of 38 afferents (CV = 0.25-3.86 m s(-1)) were identified in the left or right ventricle with a stimulating electrode. Five minutes of myocardial ischaemia stimulated all 38 cardiac afferents (8 Adelta, 30 C-fibres) and the responses of these 38 afferents to chemical stimuli were further studied in the following protocols. In the first protocol, injection of endothelin 1 (ET-1, 1, 2 and 4 microg) into the left atrium (LA) stimulated seven ischaemically sensitive cardiac afferents in a dose-dependent manner. Second, BQ-123, a selective ET(A)R antagonist, abolished the responses of nine afferents to 2 microg of ET-1 injected into the left atrium and attenuated the ischaemia-related increase in activity of eight other afferents by 51%. In contrast, blockade of ET(B) receptors caused inconsistent responses to exogenous ET-1 as well as to ischaemia. Furthermore, in the absence of ET(A)R blockade, cardiac afferents responded consistently to repeated administration of ET-1 (n = 7) and to recurrent myocardial ischaemia (n = 7). Finally, using an immunocytochemical staining approach, we observed that ET(A) receptors were expressed in cardiac sensory neurons in thoracic dorsal root ganglia. Taken together, these data indicate that endogenous endothelin contributes to activation of cardiac afferents during myocardial ischaemia through direct stimulation of ET(A) receptors likely to be located in the cardiac sensory nervous system.

Involvement of imidazoline and opioid receptors in the enhancement of clonidine-induced analgesia by sulfisoxazole

Clonidine, an α2-adrenergic agonist, has been demonstrated to produce significant analgesia and potentiate morphine analgesia. Endothelin (ETA) receptor antagonists have also been found to potentiate the antinociceptive response to morphine. Clonidine and ET have been reported to have cardiovascular interactions involving the sympathetic nervous system, but it is not known whether ETA receptor antagonist affects clonidine analgesia. This study examined the influence of sulfisoxazole (ETA receptor antagonist) on clonidine analgesia. Male Swiss Webster mice were used to determine antinociceptive response of drugs by measuring tail-flick latency. The effect of clonidine (0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 mg/kg, i.p.) alone or in combination with sulfisoxazole (25, 75, and 225 mg/kg, p.o.) on analgesia and body temperature was determined. Clonidine produced a dose-dependent analgesia and hypothermia. Sulfisoxazole (25, 75, and 225 mg/kg), when administered with clonidine (0.3 mg/kg), significantly potentiated (31% increase in area under the curve (AUC)) the analgesic effect of clonidine. Yohimbine (α2-adrenergic receptor antagonist) did not affect analgesic effect of clonidine plus sulfisoxazole. Idazoxan (I1-imidazoline and α2-adrenergic receptor antagonist) reduced (47% decrease in AUC) the analgesic effect of clonidine plus sulfisoxazole. Treatment with naloxone reduced (46% decrease in AUC) the analgesic effect of clonidine plus sulfisoxazole. The effect of another ETA receptor antagonist, BMS-182874 (2, 10, and 50 µg, i.c.v.) was studied, and it was found that the dose of 10 µg significantly potentiated (26% increase in AUC) the analgesic effect of clonidine. These results indicate that sulfisoxazole, an ETA receptor antagonist, potentiates the analgesic effect of clonidine, which could be mediated through I1-imidazoline receptors and opioid receptors.

Contralateral paw sensitization following injection of endothelin-1: effects of local anesthetics differentiate peripheral and central processes

Subcutaneous injection of the peptide endothelin-1 (ET-1) into the rat's footpad is known to cause rapid, transient ipsilateral mechanical and thermal sensitization and nocifensive hind paw flinching. Here we report that local injection of ET-1 (2 nmoles) into one hind paw slowly sensitizes the contralateral paw to chemical and mechanical stimulation. There was a 1.5-2-fold increase in the hind paw flinching response, over that from the first injection, to a second injection of the same dose of ET-1 delivered 24 h later into the contralateral paw. A similar increase in the number of flinches during the second phase of the response to formalin also occurred in the contralateral paw 24 h after ET-1. The contralateral paw withdrawal threshold to von Frey hairs was lowered by approximately 55% at 24 h after ipsilateral ET-1 injection. ET-1 injected s.c. at a segmentally unrelated location, the nuchal midline, caused no sensitization of the paws, obviating a systemic route of action. Local anesthetic block of the ipsilateral sciatic nerve during the period of initial response to ipsilateral ET-1 prevented contralateral sensitization, indicating the importance of local afferent transmission, although ipsilateral desensitization was not changed. These findings suggest that peripheral ET-1 actions lead to central sensitization that alters responses to selected stimuli.

Dual Roles for Endothelin-B Receptors in Modulating Adjuvant-Induced Inflammatory Hyperalgesia in Rats

Injection of endothelin-1 (ET-1) into the plantar rat hindpaw causes acute pain at high concentrations and tactile sensitization at low concentrations. The pro-nociceptive actions are driven through ET(A) receptors for both levels of [ET-1], but the ET(B) receptors are only pro-nociceptive for allodynia from low [ET-1] and anti-nociceptive for pain from high [ET-1]. The goal of the present work was to discriminate the roles of the ET receptors in the acute hyperalgesia from inflammation by complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA, 20 mg/paw) into the rat hindpaw. Selective antagonists were injected l0 min before and then together with CFA. An ET(A) receptor antagonist, BQ-123, reduced CFA-induced thermal hyperalgesia (by up to 50%), as did an ET(B) receptor antagonist, BQ-788 (by up to 66%). BQ-123 and BQ-788 also delayed the onset (by 1.5 - 2 h) but insignificantly reduced the maximum degree of CFA-induced allodynia (~10%). Surprisingly, an ET(B) receptor agonist, IRL-1620, also reduced maximum thermal hyperalgesia induced by CFA, suppressed peak allodynia and delayed its occurrence by ~ 3 h. The latter actions of IRL-1620 were reversed by co-administration of BQ-788, naloxone hydrochloride and the peripherally restricted opiate receptor antagonist naloxone methiodide, and by antiserum against β-endorphin. These findings demonstrate an important role for endogenous ET-1 in acute inflammatory pain and a dual action of ET(B) receptors, including a pro-algesic action along with the important activation of a local analgesic pathway, implying that at least two different ET(B) receptors contribute to modulation of inflammatory pain.

Role of ET(A) and ET(B) endothelin receptors on endothelin-1-induced potentiation of nociceptive and thermal hyperalgesic responses evoked by capsaicin in rats

Increasing evidence indicates that endothelin-1 (ET-1) activates nociceptive neurons and sensitizes them to different noxious stimuli, but involvement of TRPV1-dependent mechanisms in mediation of such effects is not yet fully understood. Here we report that intraplantar (i.pl.) injection of ET-1 (10 pmol) into the hind paw of rats induced overt nociceptive behavior over the first hour, followed by a slowly developing thermal hyperalgesia, lasting from 3 to 8h after injection. Both effects were also induced by similar injections of capsaicin (10-1000 pmol), but these responses were shorter lasting than those caused by ET-1. Local pre-treatment with the TRPV1 antagonist capsazepine (30 nmol, i.pl.) reduced only the thermal hyperalgesia induced by ET-1, but fully suppressed both responses to capsaicin (1000 pmol). Injection of a sub-threshold dose of ET-1 (0.1 pmol, i.pl.) prior to capsaicin (1 pmol, i.pl.) markedly sensitized the hind paw to the overt nociceptive and thermal hyperalgesic effects of the later. The potentiation of capsaicin-induced nociception by ET-1 was abolished by prior i.pl. injection of BQ-123 (ET(A) receptor antagonist, 10 nmol), but unaffected by BQ-788 (ET(B) receptors antagonist, 10 nmol), whereas the enhancement of capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia by ET-1 was attenuated by both antagonists. Therefore, differently to what has been reported in mice, in rats TRPV1 receptors contribute selectively to thermal hyperalgesia, but not overt nociception, induced by ET-1. Importantly, although ET-1 augments capsaicin-induced overt nociception and thermal hyperalgesia, potentiation of the former relies solely on ET(A) receptor-mediated signaling mechanisms, whereas both receptors contribute to the latter.

Endothelin receptors and pain

The endogenous endothelin (ET) peptides participate in a remarkable variety of pain-relatedprocesses. Pain that is elevated by inflammation, by skin incision, by cancer, during a Sickle Cell Disease crisis and by treatments that mimic neuropathic and inflammatory pain and are all reduced by local administration of antagonists of endothelin receptors. Many effects of endogenously released endothelin are simulated by acute, local subcutaneous administration of endothelin, which at very high concentrations causes pain and at lower concentrations sensitizes the nocifensive reactions to mechanical, thermal and chemical stimuli.

PERSPECTIVE

In this paper we review the biochemistry, second messenger pathways and hetero-receptor coupling that are activated by ET receptors, the cellular physiological responses to ET receptor activation, and the contribution to pain of such mechanisms occurring in the periphery and the CNS. Our goal is to frame the subject of endothelin and pain for a broad readership, and to present the generally accepted as well as the disputed concepts, including important unanswered questions.

Targeting endothelin ETA and ETB receptors inhibits antigen-induced neutrophil migration and mechanical hypernociception in mice

Endothelin may contribute to the development of inflammatory events such as leukocyte recruitment and nociception. Herein, we investigated whether endothelin-mediated mechanical hypernociception (decreased nociceptive threshold, evaluated by electronic pressure-meter) and neutrophil migration (myeloperoxidase activity) are inter-dependent in antigen challenge-induced Th1-driven hind-paw inflammation. In antigen challenge-induced inflammation, endothelin (ET) ET(A) and ET(B) receptor antagonism inhibited both hypernociception and neutrophil migration. Interestingly, ET-1 peptide-induced hypernociception was not altered by inhibiting neutrophil migration or endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonism, but rather by endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonism. Furthermore, endothelin ET(A), but not ET(B), receptor antagonism inhibited antigen-induced PGE(2) production, whereas either selective or combined blockade of endothelin ET(A) and/or ET(B) receptors reduced hypernociception and neutrophil recruitment caused by antigen challenge. Concluding, this study advances knowledge into the role for endothelin in inflammatory mechanisms and further supports the potential of endothelin receptor antagonists in controlling inflammation.

Tumor-evoked sensitization of C nociceptors: a role for endothelin

Primary and metastatic cancers that effect bone are frequently associated with pain. Sensitization of primary afferent C nociceptors innervating tissue near the tumor likely contributes to the chronic pain and hyperalgesia accompanying this condition. This study focused on the role of the endogenous peptide endothelin-1 (ET-1) as a potential peripheral algogen implicated in the process of cancer pain. Electrophysiological response properties, including ongoing activity and responses evoked by heat stimuli, of C nociceptors were recorded in vivo from the tibial nerve in anesthetized control mice and mice exhibiting mechanical hyperalgesia following implantation of fibrosarcoma cells into and around the calcaneus bone. ET-1 (100 microM) injected into the receptive fields of C nociceptors innervating the plantar surface of the hind paw evoked an increase in ongoing activity in both control and tumor-bearing mice. Moreover, the selective ETA receptor antagonist, BQ-123 (3 mM), attenuated tumor-evoked ongoing activity in tumor-bearing mice. Whereas ET-1 produced sensitization of C nociceptors to heat stimuli in control mice, C nociceptors in tumor-bearing mice were sensitized to heat, and their responses were not further increased by ET-1. Importantly, administration of BQ-123 attenuated tumor-evoked sensitization of C nociceptors to heat. We conclude that ET-1 at the tumor site contributes to tumor-evoked excitation and sensitization of C nociceptors through an ETA receptor mediated mechanism.

Endothelin1 activates and sensitizes human C-nociceptors

Microneurography was used to record action potentials from afferent C-fibers in cutaneous fascicles of the peroneal nerve in healthy volunteers. Afferent fibers were classified according to their mechanical responsiveness to von Frey stimulation (75g) into mechano-responsive and mechano-insensitive nociceptors. Various concentrations of Endothelin1 (ET1) and Histamine were injected into the receptive fields of C-fibers. Activation and heat sensitization were monitored. Axon reflex flare and psychophysical ratings were assessed after injection of ET1 and codeine into the forearms after pre-treatment with an H1 blocker or sodium chloride. 65% of mechanosensitive nociceptors were activated by ET1. One-third showed long lasting responses (>15min). In contrast, none of thirteen mechano-insensitive fibers were activated. Sensitization to heat was observed in 62% of mechanosensitive and in 46% of mechano-insensitive fibers. Injection of ET1 produced a widespread axon reflex flare, which was suppressed by pre-treatment with an H1 receptor blocker. In addition, pain sensations were induced more often than itching by ET1 in contrast to codeine. No wheal was observed after injection of ET1. Both itching and pain were decreased after H1 blocker treatment. In summary: (1) In humans ET1 activates mechanosensitive, but not mechano-insensitive, nociceptors. (2) Histamine released from mast cells is not responsible for all effects of ET1 on C-nociceptors. (3) ET1 could have a differential role in pain compared to other chemical algogens which activate additionally or even predominantly mechano-insensitive fibers.

Endothelin-1-induced pain and hyperalgesia: a review of pathophysiology, clinical manifestations and future therapeutic options

Pain in patients with metastatic cancer contributes to increased suffering in those already burdened by their advancing illness. The causes of this pain are unknown, but are likely to involve the action of tumour-associated mediators and their receptors. In recent years, several chemical mediators have increasingly come to the forefront in the pathophysiology of cancer pain. One such mediator, endothelin-1 (ET-1), is a peptide of 21 amino acids that was initially shown to be a potent vasoconstrictor. Extensive research has revealed that members of the ET family are indeed produced by several epithelial cancerous tumours, in which they act as autocrine and/or paracrine growth factors. Several preclinical and clinical studies of various malignancies have suggested that the ET axis may represent an interesting contributor to tumour progression. In addition, evidence is accumulating to suggest that ET-1 may contribute to pain states both in humans and in other animals. ET-1 both stimulates nociceptors and sensitises them to painful stimuli. Selective stimulation of ET receptors has been implicated as a cause of inflammatory, neuropathic and tumoural pain. ET-1-induced pain-related behaviour seems to be mediated either solely by one receptor type or via both endothelin-A receptors (ETAR) and endothelin-B receptors (ETBR). Whereas stimulation of ETAR on nociceptors always elicits a pain response, stimulation of ETBR may cause analgesia or elicit a pain response, depending on the conditions. The administration of ETAR antagonists in the receptive fields of these nociceptors has been shown to ameliorate pain-related behaviours in animals, as well as in some patients with advanced metastatic prostate cancer. The identification of tumour-associated mediators that might directly or indirectly cause pain in patients with metastatic disease, such as ET-1, should lead to improved, targeted analgesia for patients with advanced cancer. In this review, we will describe the current status of the role of ET-1 in different types of painful syndromes, with special emphasis on its role in the pathophysiology of cancer pain. Finally, potential new treatment options that are based on the role of the ET axis in the pathophysiology of cancer are elaborated.

Neurosensory changes in a human model of endothelin-1 induced pain: a behavioral study

Although pain is a frequent feature in patients with cancer, its etiology is still poorly understood. In recent years, endothelin-1 (ET-1) has become a major target molecule in the etiology of cancer pain. In this randomised, double-blind study the effects of intradermal injection of ET-1 on spontaneous pain, temperature perception and sensation of punctate stimulation were evaluated. Thirty-five subjects were randomised to receive either placebo or one of four concentrations of ET-1 (ranging from 10(-10) to 10(-6)M). Besides assessment of spontaneous pain, three neurosensory testings were performed: (1) cold and warm sensation, (2) cold and heat pain, and (3) punctate stimulation using a von Frey monofilament. ET-1 produced a dose-dependent flare zone that was absent after placebo injection. Subjects reported a short-lasting spontaneous pain upon administration of the highest concentrations of ET-1. Injection of ET-1 induced a long-lasting and dose-dependent punctate hyperalgesia in an area around the injection site (secondary hyperalgesia). Thermal testing revealed a short period of hypoesthesia to non-noxious warm and cold stimuli after some doses of ET-1. In addition to the mechanical hyperalgesia, intradermal injection of ET-1 almost instantaneously induced a state of cold hyperalgesia outlasting the study period (120 min). No development of heat hyperalgesia was observed. The observed psychophysical characteristics of this new model of ET-1 induced nociception indicate its potential as a human experimental model for cancer pain.

Orofacial cold hyperalgesia due to infraorbital nerve constriction injury in rats: reversal by endothelin receptor antagonists but not non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

The susceptibility of changes in responsiveness to noxious cold stimulation of rats submitted to chronic constriction of the infraorbital nerve (CION) or carrageenan to drug inhibition was compared. Nocifensive responses were measured as total time rats engaged in bilateral facial grooming with both forepaws over the first 2 min following tetrafluoroethane spray application to the snout. Carrageenan (50 microg, s.c. into upper lip) caused short-lived ipsilateral cold hyperalgesia (peak at 3 h: vehicle 8.4+/-1.3, carrageenan 21.2+/-3.0 s) which was markedly suppressed by i.p. indomethacin (4 mg/kg), celecoxib (10mg/kg) or s.c. dexamethasone (0.5 mg/kg), endothelin ET(A) or ET(B) receptor antagonists (BQ-123 and BQ-788, respectively; 10 nmol/lip). CION caused ipsilateral cold hyperalgesia between Days 2 and 12, which peaked on Days 4 (sham 15.3+/-1.8, CION 32.4+/-5.3s) to 6. Established peak CION-induced cold hyperalgesia was unaffected by indomethacin and celecoxib, whereas dexamethasone, BQ-123, BQ-788, and i.v. injections of selective antagonists of ET(A) (atrasentan, 3-10 mg/kg) or ET(B) (A-192621, 5-20 mg/kg) receptors caused significant inhibitions lasting 1-2.5h (peaks approximately 65-90%). Bosentan (dual ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonist, 10 mg/kg, i.v.) abolished CION-induced cold hyperalgesia for up to 6h. Thus, once established, CION-induced orofacial hyperalgesia to cold stimuli appears to lack an inflammatory component, but is alleviated by endothelin ET(A) and/or ET(B) receptor antagonists. If this CION injury model bears predictive value to trigeminal neuralgia (i.e., paroxysmal orofacial pain triggered by various stimuli), endothelin receptors might constitute new targets for treatment of this disorder.

Morphine tolerance does not develop in mice treated with endothelin-A receptor antagonists

Long-term use of morphine leads to development of antinociceptive tolerance. We provide evidence that central endothelin (ET) mechanisms are involved in development of morphine tolerance. In the present study, we investigated the effect of ET(A) receptor antagonists, BQ123 and BMS182874, on morphine antinociception and tolerance in mice. Mechanism of interaction of ET(A) receptor antagonists with morphine was investigated. BQ123 (3 microg, i.c.v.) and BMS182874 (50 microg, i.c.v.) significantly enhanced antinociceptive effect of morphine (P < 0.05), through an opioid-mediated effect. Treatment with a single dose of BQ123 (3 microg, i.c.v.) reversed tolerance to morphine antinociception in morphine-tolerant mice. BQ123 or BMS182874 did not affect naloxone binding in the brain. Therefore, ET(A) receptor antagonists did not bind directly to opioid receptors. [35S]GTPgammaS binding was stimulated by morphine and ET-1 in non-tolerant mice. Morphine- and ET-1-induced GTP stimulation was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in morphine-tolerant group (33% and 42%, respectively) compared to control group. BQ123 and BMS182874 did not activate binding in non-tolerant mice. BQ123 and BMS182874 significantly increased G protein activation in morphine-tolerant mice (96% and 86%, respectively; P < 0.05). These results provide evidence that uncoupling of G protein occurs in morphine-tolerant mice, and ET(A) antagonists promote coupling of G protein to its receptors, thereby restoring antinociceptive effect. These findings indicate that ET(A) receptor antagonists potentiate morphine antinociception and reverse antinociceptive tolerance in mice, through their ability to couple G proteins to opioid receptors.

Nociceptive Effect of Subcutaneously Injected Interleukin-12 Is Mediated by Endothelin (ET) Acting on ETB Receptors in Rats

Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is an inflammatory Th1-driving cytokine that has been clinically used as immune therapy and vaccine adjuvant. Recently, it was reported that patients receiving IL-12 presented hyperalgesia. In the present study, we investigated the mechanical hyperalgesic effect of IL-12 in rats using two tests: 1) paw constant pressure and 2) electronic pressure-meter. In both tests, intraplantar administration of IL-12 (3-30 ng paw(-1)) caused a dose- and time-dependent mechanical hyperalgesia, which peaked between 3 to 5 h, remaining significantly different from control levels until 7 h and resolved 24 h postinjection. However, the same doses of IL-12 did not induce thermal hyperalgesia, determined using the Hargreaves test. Pretreatments with effective doses of indomethacin (2.5 mg kg(-1)), atenolol (1 mg kg(-1)), 3-[1-(p-chlorobenzyl)-5-(isopropyl)-3-t-butylthioindol-2-yl]-2,2-dimethylpropanoic acid, sodium (MK886) (5-lipoxygenase activating protein inhibitor; 1 mg kg(-1)), or cyclo[(D)Trp-(D)Asp-Pro-(D)Val-Leu] (BQ123) [endothelin (ET)(A) receptor antagonist; 30 nmol paw(-1)] did not inhibit IL-12-evoked mechanical hyperalgesia (10 ng paw(-1)). However, dexamethasone (2 mg kg(-1)), morphine (3-12 microg paw(-1)), and N-cys-2,6 dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-L-gamma-methylleucyl-D-1-methoxycarboyl-d-norleucine (BQ788) (ET(B) receptor antagonist; 3-30 nmol paw(-1)) did inhibit IL-12 hyperalgesia. Furthermore, neither pretreatment with effective doses of antiserum against rat-TNF-alpha (50 microl paw(-1)) nor against IL-18 (10 microg paw(-1)) inhibited the IL-12-induced hyperalgesia. Likewise, antiserum against IL-12 (10 ng paw(-1)) did not alter IL-18-induced hyperalgesia. In conclusion, we demonstrated for the first time that IL-12 is a prohyperalgesic cytokine that induces mechanical hyperalgesia mediated by endothelin action on the ET(B) receptor. Therefore, endothelin receptor antagonism could be beneficial in controlling IL-12 therapy-induced pain or hyperalgesia.

Effects of selective endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonists on endothelin-1-induced potentiation of cancer pain

In some diseases in which endothelin-1 production increases, e.g. prostate cancer, endothelin-1 is considered to be involved in the generation of pain. In the present study, we investigated the effects of a selective endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist, (E)-N-[6-methoxy-5-(2-methoxyphenoxy)[2,2'-bipyrimidin]-4-yl]-2-phenylethenesulfonamide monopotassium salt (YM598), on the nociception potentiated by endothelin-1 in a cancer inoculation-induced pain model in mice, induced by inoculation of the androgen-independent human prostate cancer cell line PPC-1 into the hind paws of severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice. No pain responses were observed in the sham-operated mice, whereas monophasic pain responses were observed in the PPC-1-inoculated mice. Endothelin-1 (1 to 10 pmol/paw) but not sarafotoxin S6c potentiated the pain response in prostate cancer-inoculated mice. Both YM598 and atrasentan (0.3 to 3 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly inhibited the endothelin-1 (10 pmol/paw)-induced potentiation of nociception in a dose-dependent manner. These results suggest that selective endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonists might relieve pain in patients with various diseases in which endothelin-1 production is increased, e.g. prostate cancer.

Endothelins induce ETB receptor-mediated mechanical hypernociception in rat hindpaw: roles of cAMP and protein kinase C

The present study assesses the capacity of endothelins to induce mechanical hypernociception, and characterises the receptors involved and the contribution of cAMP and protein kinases A (PKA) and C (PKC) to this effect. Intraplantar administration of endothelin-1, endothelin-2 or endothelin-3 (3-30 pmol) induced dose- and time-dependent mechanical hypernociception, which was inhibited by BQ-788 (N-cys-2,6-dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-l-gamma-methylleucyl-d-1-methoxycarboyl-d-norleucine; endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist), but not BQ-123 (cyclo[d-Trp-d-Asp-Pro-d-Val-Leu]; endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist; each at 30 pmol). The selective endothelin ET(B) receptor agonist BQ-3020 (N-Ac-Ala(11,15)-endothelin-1 (6-21)) fully mimicked the hypernociceptive effects of the natural endothelins. Treatments with indomethacin, atenolol or dexamethasone did not inhibit endothelin-1-evoked mechanical hypernociception. However, endothelin-1-induced mechanical hypernociception was potentiated by the cAMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor rolipram (4-[3-(cyclopentyloxy)-4-methoxyphenyl]-2-pyrrolidinone) and inhibited by the PKC inhibitors staurosporine and calphostin C, but was unaffected by the PKA inhibitor H89 (N-[2-((p-bromocinnamyl)amino)ethyl]-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide). Thus, endothelins, acting through endothelin ET(B) receptors, induce mechanical hypernociception in the rat hindpaw via cAMP formation and activation of the PKC-dependent phosphorylation cascade.

Endothelin ETB receptors inhibit articular nociception and priming induced by carrageenan in the rat knee-joint

The participation of the endothelin system on nociception and priming induced by carrageenan in the knee-joint was investigated. Intra-articular (i.a.) carrageenan (300 microg) caused long-lasting nociceptive effects (i.e., increases in paw elevation time [PET]), which were potentiated by endothelin-1 (dual endothelin ETA/ETB receptor agonist) and inhibited by sarafotoxin S6c (endothelin ETB receptor agonist; both at 30 pmol, i.a., 24 h beforehand). Priming the naive joint with carrageenan augmented nociceptive responses to a second carrageenan challenge, 72 h later. Carrageenan-induced priming, but not nociception, was potentiated by local BQ-788 (10 nmol, i.a., 15 min before priming; endothelin ETB receptor antagonist; N-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-L-gamma-methylleucyl-D-1-methoxycarbonyl-tryptophanil-D-norleucine), but BQ-123 (endothelin ETA receptor antagonist; cyclo [D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu]) was ineffective. Sarafotoxin S6c markedly suppressed carrageenan-induced priming to nociception triggered by carrageenan, endothelin-1 or sarafotoxin S6c, and BQ-788 prevented this action. Thus, selective endothelin ETB receptor agonists inhibit carrageenan-induced nociception and priming in the naive joint. This priming effect of carrageenan to nociception evoked by subsequent inflammatory insults is limited by an endothelin ETB receptor-operated mechanism.

Plasma endothelin-1 levels in patients with complex regional pain syndrome

The clinical characteristics of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)--spontaneous and stimulus-evoked pain, autonomic abnormalities, motor dysfunction, and trophic changes in the affected limb--are well known. However, its pathogenesis is unclear, and the diagnosis is often delayed, in part due to lack of objective laboratory tests. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a potent vasoconstrictor that has recently been shown to produce pain, allodynia, edema, and muscle weakness, as well as to exert a direct excitatory effect on nociceptive afferents. Furthermore, new evidence indicates that ET-1 is involved in various cancer- and non-cancer-related painful conditions. The aim of the present explorative study was to determine the ET-1 plasma levels in patients with CRPS in an attempt to identify a 'laboratory marker' for CRPS and to search for evidence suggesting that ET-1 may be involved in the pathogenesis of CRPS. ET-1 plasma levels were determined in 20 severely affected CRPS patients, in eight patients with non-CRPS chronic painful conditions, and in 10 healthy volunteers. The results showed that there were no significant differences in ET-1 plasma levels between the three groups. We conclude that the plasma level of ET-1 cannot be regarded as a 'marker' for CRPS. Yet, the possibility that ET-1 is involved in the pathophysiology of CRPS has not been excluded and deserves further investigation.

Central endothelin-B receptor stimulation does not affect morphine analgesia in rats

Several neurotransmitter mechanisms have been proposed to play a role in the actions of morphine. We reported that centrally administered endothelin A (ETA) receptor antagonists potentiate morphine analgesia in rats. It has also been reported that ETB agonist, IRL1620, has antinociceptive action mediated through opiate receptors in the periphery. The present study was conducted to determine if central ETB receptors are involved in analgesic actions of morphine. The effect of intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of ETB receptor agonist, IRL1620, on morphine-induced analgesia and hyperthermia was determined in the rat. Morphine (4 mg/kg, s.c.) produced a significant increase (84%) in tail-flick latency compared to the control group and the analgesic response lasted for 4 h. IRL1620 (30 microg, i.c.v.) did not produce any increase (16%) in tail-flick latency over the 5-hour observation period in vehicle-treated rats. Pretreatment with IRL1620 (3, 10, and 30 microg, i.c.v.) did not have any significant effect on the intensity and duration of morphine (4 mg/kg, s.c.)-induced analgesia. Morphine (4 mg/kg, s.c.) administration produced an increase in body temperature compared to the control group. In vehicle-pretreated rats, IRL1620 (30 microg, i.c.v.) did not produce any change in body temperature. The morphine-induced hyperthermic effect was not altered in IRL1620-pretreated rats. These studies demonstrate that IRL1620, a specific ETB receptor agonist, did not affect the morphine-induced analgesic and hyperthermic effect in rats. It can be concluded that central ETB receptors are not involved in modulation of pharmacological actions of morphine.

ET – phone the pain clinic

Recent findings by Khodorova et al. demonstrate that the vasoconstrictor endothelin-1 plays an important role in certain nociceptive behaviors in an animal model of pain, through activation of sensory neurons. Endothelin-1 might also have the unexpected capacity to release an opioid from surrounding keratinocytes and thereby inhibit the pain response. Such results suggest that, in the periphery, there are important interactions between sensory nerve terminals and surrounding cells, and that glia and keratinocytes could modulate the perception of environmental stimuli to a greater extent than previously considered.

Endothelins contribute towards nociception induced by antigen in ovalbumin-sensitised mice

1. The contribution of endogenous endothelins to nociceptive responses elicited by ovalbumin (OVA) in the hind-paw of mice sensitised to this antigen (50 microg OVA+5 mg Al(OH)(3), s.c., 14 days beforehand) was investigated. 2. Sensitised mice exhibited greater nocifensive responsiveness to intraplantar (i.pl.) OVA (total licking time over first 30 min: 85.2+/-14.6 s at 0.3 microg; 152.6+/-35.6 s at 1 microg) than nonsensitised animals (29.3+/-7.4 s at 1 microg). Nocifensive responses of sensitised mice to 0.3 microg OVA were inhibited by morphine (3 mg kg(-1), s.c.) or local depletion of mast cells (four daily i.pl. injections of compound 48/80). 3. Pretreatment with i.v. bosentan (mixed ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonist; 52 micromol kg(-1)) or A-122722.5 (selective ET(A) receptor antagonist; 6 micromol kg(-1)) reduced OVA-induced licking from 124.8+/-20.6 s to 45.7+/-13.0 s and 64.2+/-12.1 s, respectively, whereas A-192621.1 (selective ET(B) receptor antagonist; 25 micromol kg(-1)) enhanced them to 259.2+/-39.6 s. 4. Local i.pl. pretreatment with BQ-123 or BQ-788 (selective ET(A) or ET(B) receptor antagonists, respectively, each at 3 nmol) reduced OVA-induced licking (from 106.2+/-15.2 to 57.0+/-9.4 s and from 118.6+/-10.5 to 76.8+/-14.7 s, respectively). Sarafotoxin S6c (selective ETB receptor agonist, 30 pmol, i.pl., 30 min after OVA) induced nocifensive responses in OVA-sensitised, but not in nonsensitised, animals. 5. Compound 48/80 (0.3 microg, i.pl.) induced nocifensive responses per se and potentiated those induced by i.pl. capsaicin (0.1 microg). Treatment with BQ-123 (3 nmol, i.pl.) reduced only the hyperalgesic effect of compound 48/80, whereas BQ-788 (3 nmol) was ineffective. 6. Thus, immune-mediated Type I hypersensitivity reactions elicit mast cell- and endothelin-dependent nociception in the mouse hind-paw, which are mediated locally by both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors. The nocifensive response to antigen is amenable to blockade by systemic treatment with dual ET(A)/ET(B) or selective ET(A) receptor antagonists, but is sharply potentiated by systemic selective ET(B) receptor antagonist treatment. The apparently distinct roles played by ET(B) receptors in this phenomenon at local and other sites remain to be characterised.

Involvement of endogenous endothelins in thermal and mechanical inflammatory hyperalgesia in mice

Endothelin receptors have been involved in inflammatory, neuropathic and tumoral pain. In the case of inflammatory hyperalgesia, some previous papers have pointed towards the involvement of ETB receptors, although the stimulation of ETA receptors seems to participate in the development of the inflammatory reaction. We have studied the effect of ETA and ETB receptor antagonists in the thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia induced in a model of acute (induced by carrageenan) and chronic (induced by complete Freund's adjuvant, CFA) inflammation in mice. The i.pl. administration of the selective ETA antagonist BQ-123 (1-10 nmol) antagonized the thermal hyperalgesia detected by the unilateral hot plate test, observed in both inflammatory models, whereas the i.pl. administration of the ETB selective antagonist BQ-788 (17.7 nmol) failed to modify this. In contrast, both BQ-123 (3-17.7 nmol) and BQ-788 (3-17.7 nmol) antagonized the mechanical hyperalgesia, as assessed by the Randall-Selitto test in carrageenan- and CFA-treated mice. Both BQ-123 and BQ-788 were able to antagonize the mechanical hyperalgesia induced by ET-1 (200 pmol; i.pl.) in the same dose range. Thus, ETA receptors are involved in both thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia whereas ETB receptors are only involved in mechanical hyperalgesia in these inflammatory models. In conclusion, the role of ETB receptors in inflammatory pain is further supported and new insights into the participation of ETA receptors in inflammatory hyperalgesia are given.

Thrombin inhibits NMDA-mediated nociceptive activity in the mouse: possible mediation by endothelin

The CNS expresses many components of an extracellular protease signalling system, including the protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) whose tethered ligand is generated by thrombin. Activation of PAR-1 potentiates NMDA receptor activity in hippocampal neurons. Because NMDA activity mediates hyperalgesia, we tested the hypothesis that PAR-1 receptors also regulate pain processing. In contrast to the potentiating effect of thrombin in the hippocampus, NMDA-induced behaviours and the transient mechanical hyperalgesia (von Frey fibres) induced by intrathecally injected NMDA in mice were inhibited by thrombin in a dose-related fashion. This anti-hyperalgesic effect was mimicked by SFLLRN, the natural ligand at PAR-1 binding sites, but not SLIGRL-amide, a PAR-2 agonist. The effects of SFLLRN were less potent and shorter in duration than that of thrombin, consistent with its more transient effect on PAR-1 sites. Both thrombin and SFLLRN inhibited acetic acid-induced abdominal stretch (writhing) behaviours, which were also sensitive to NMDA antagonism, but not hot plate or tail flick latencies, which were insensitive to NMDA antagonists. TFLLR-amide, a selective ligand for PAR-1 sites, mimicked the effects of thrombin while RLLFT-amide, an inactive, reverse peptide sequence, did not. In addition, the effect of TFLLR-amide was prevented by RWJ-56110, a PAR-1 antagonist. Thrombin and TFLLR-amide produced no oedema (Evans Blue extravasation) in the spinal cord that would account for these effects. Based on the reported ability of thrombin to mobilize endothelin-1 from astrocytes, we tested the role of this compound in thrombin's activity. BQ123, an endothelin A receptor antagonist, prevented thrombin's inhibition of writhing and NMDA-induced behaviours while BQ788, an endothelin B receptor antagonist, did not. Thus, activation of PAR-1 sites by thrombin in the CNS appears to inhibit NMDA-mediated nociception by a pathway involving endothelin type A receptors.

Local injection of a selective endothelin-B receptor agonist inhibits endothelin-1-induced pain-like behavior and excitation of nociceptors in a naloxone-sensitive manner

We showed previously that subcutaneous injection of the injury-associated peptide mediator endothelin-1 (ET-1) into the rat plantar hindpaw produces pain behavior and selective excitation of nociceptors, both through activation of ET(A) receptors likely on nociceptive terminals. The potential role of ET(B) receptor activation in these actions of ET-1-has not been examined. Therefore, in these experiments, we studied the effect of blocking or activating ET(B) receptors on ET-1-induced hindpaw flinching and excitation of nociceptors in rats. An ET(B) receptor-selective antagonist, BQ-788 (3 mm), coinjected with ET-1 (200 microm) reduced the time-to-peak of flinching and significantly enhanced the average maximal flinch frequency (MFF). In contrast, coinjection of an ET(B) receptor selective agonist, IRL-1620 (100 or 200 microm), with ET-1 reduced the average MFF and the average total number of flinches. Interestingly, this unexpected inhibitory effect of IRL-1620 was prevented by the nonselective opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (2.75 mm). To confirm these inhibitory actions, we studied the effects of IRL-1620 on ET-1-induced spike responses in single, physiologically characterized nociceptive C-fibers. IRL-1620 suppressed spike responses to ET-1 in all (n = 12) C-units, with mean and maximum response frequencies of 0.08 +/- 0.02 and 1.5 +/- 0.4 impulses/sec versus 0.32 +/- 0.07 and 4.17 +/- 0.17 impulses/sec for ET-1 alone. In additional support of the behavioral results, coinjection of naloxone (2.75 mm) completely prevented this inhibitory action of IRL-1620. These results establish that ET(B) receptor activation inhibits ET-1-induced pain behavior and nociception in a naloxone-sensitive manner and point to a previously unrecognized dual modulation of acute nociceptive signaling by ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in cutaneous tissues.

Functional interactions between tumor and peripheral nerve: morphology, algogen identification, and behavioral characterization of a new murine model of cancer pain

This paper describes a model of tumor-induced bone destruction and hyperalgesia produced by implantation of fibrosarcoma cells into the mouse calcaneus bone. Histological examination indicates that tumor cells adhere to the bone edge as early as post-implantation day (PID) 3, but osteolysis does not begin until PID 6, correlating with the development of hyperalgesia. C3H/He mice exhibit a reproducible hyperalgesia to mechanical and cold stimuli between PID 6 and 16. These behaviors are present but significantly reduced with subcutaneous implantation that does not involve bone. Systemic administration of morphine (ED(50) 9.0 mg/kg) dose-dependently attenuated the mechanical hyperalgesia. In contrast, bone destruction and hypersensitivity were not evident in mice implanted with melanoma tumors or a paraffin mass of similar size. A novel microperfusion technique was used to identify elevated levels of the putative algogen endothelin (ET) in perfusates collected from the tumor sites of hyperalgesic mice between PID 7 and 12. Increased ET was evident in microperfusates from fibrosarcoma tumor-implanted mice but not from melanoma tumor-implanted mice, which are not hyperalgesic. Intraplantar injection of ET-1 in naive and, to a greater extent, fibrosarcoma tumor-bearing mice produced spontaneous pain behaviors, suggesting that ET-1 activates primary afferent fibers. Intraplantar but not systemic injection of the ET-A receptor antagonist BQ-123 partially blocked tumor-associated mechanical hyperalgesia, indicating that ET-1 contributes to tumor-induced nociception. This model provides a unique approach for quantifying the behavioral, biochemical, and electrophysiological consequences of tumor-nerve interactions.

Local injection of endothelin-1 produces pain-like behavior and excitation of nociceptors in rats

Neurobehavioral and neurophysiological actions of the peptide endothelin-1 (ET-1) were investigated after subcutaneous plantar hindpaw injections in adult male Sprague Dawley rats. Hindpaw flinching developed within minutes after ET-1 (8-16 nmol) injection, peaked at 30 min, lasted for 60 min, and was strongly inhibited by the endothelin-A (ET(A)) receptor antagonist, BQ-123 (3.2 m). In separate experiments, impulse activity of single, physiologically characterized sensory C-, Adelta-, and Abeta-fibers was recorded from the sciatic nerve in anesthetized rats after subcutaneous injections of endothelin-1 (1-20 nmol), alone or together with BQ-123 (3.2 m), into the plantar hindpaw receptive fields of these units. All nociceptive C-fibers (31 of 33 C-fibers studied) were excited by ET-1 (1-20 nmol) in a dose-dependent manner. For doses of 16-20 nmol, the mean latency for afferent activation after injection of ET-1 was 3.16 +/- 0.31 min, and the mean and maximum response frequency were 2.02 +/- 0.48 impulses (imp)/sec and 14.0 +/- 3.2 imp/sec, respectively. All 10 nociceptive Adelta-fibers (of 12 Adelta-fibers studied) also responded to 1-20 nmol of ET-1 in a dose-dependent manner with a mean latency of 3.5 +/- 0.12 min and mean response frequency of 3.3 +/- 2.3 imp/sec. In contrast, most Abeta-fibers (9 of 12) did not respond to ET-1. BQ-123, when coinjected with ET-1, blocked ET-1-induced activation in all C- and Adelta-fibers tested. These data demonstrate that subcutaneous administration of ET-1 to the rat plantar hindpaw produces pain-like behavior and selective excitation of nociceptive fibers through activation of ET(A) receptors.

Functional Interactions Between Tumor and Peripheral Nerve in a Model of Cancer Pain in the Mouse

Cancer is usually accompanied by pain, which tends to increase in relation to metastatic infiltration and destruction. In the United States, 30% to 40% of newly diagnosed cancer patients and 67% to 90% of patients with advanced cancer report moderate to severe pain. Relief for approximately 90% of patients with cancer-related pain may be provided by the World Health Organization's "analgesic ladder," which involves progressing from non-opioid (e.g., acetaminophen, ibuprofen) to weak opioid (e.g., codeine), to strong opioid (e.g., morphine, fentanyl) intervention for pain relief. The severity of cancer pain is affected by diverse factors. In addition to the obvious factors of tumor size and degree of metastatic destruction, the type of tumor and its location are also important factors that contribute to pain severity. Severe cancer pain is especially associated with tumors involving bone destruction and nerve infiltration. Cancer pain seems to involve diverse mechanisms, including characteristics of both nociceptive and neuropathic pain. Unfortunately, even opioid analgesics often produce poor pain relief against neuropathic pain derived from peripheral nerve or root damage common to cancers involving bone metastases and nerve infiltration. In addition, these drugs may induce adverse side effects since they affect various physiological functions, including hormone secretion, neurotransmitter release, feeding, gastrointestinal motility, and respiratory activity. Currently, drug therapies utilizing antidepressants and anticonvulsants are being used to relieve neuropathic pain whereas cancer pain is treated largely with opiods in cancer patients.

Endothelin-1-induced ET(A) receptor-mediated nociception, hyperalgesia and oedema in the mouse hind-paw: modulation by simultaneous ET(B) receptor activation

Endothelin-1 causes ET(A) receptor-mediated enhancement of capsaicin-induced nociception in mice. We have assessed if this hyperalgesic effect of endothelin-1 is also accompanied by other pro-inflammatory effects, namely nociception and oedema, and characterized the endothelin ET receptors involved. Intraplantar (i. pl.) hind-paw injection of endothelin-1 (0.3 - 30 pmol) induced graded nociceptive responses (accumulated licking time: vehicle, 20. 5+/-3.3 s; endothelin-1 at 30 pmol, 78.1+/-9.8 s), largely confined to the first 15 min. Endothelin-1 (1 - 10 pmol) potentiated ipsilateral capsaicin-induced (0.1 microgram, i.pl.; at 30 min) nociception (vehicle, 40.2+/-2.6 s; endothelin-1 at 10 pmol, 98.4+/-5.8 s, but 30 pmol was inactive), and caused oedema (increase in paw weight 5 min after capsaicin: vehicle, 46.3+/-2.3 mg; endothelin-1 at 30 pmol, 100.3+/-6.1 mg). Selective ET(B) receptor agonists sarafotoxin S6c (up to 30 pmol) and IRL 1620 (up to 100 pmol) were inactive, whereas endothelin-3 (up to 30 pmol) induced only modest oedema. ET(A) receptor antagonists BQ-123 (1 nmol, i.pl. ) or A-127722-5 (6 micromol kg(-1), i.v.) prevented all effects of endothelin-1 (10 pmol), but the ET(B) receptor antagonist BQ-788 (1 or 10 nmol, i.pl.) was ineffective. BQ-788 (10 nmol, i.pl.) unveiled hyperalgesic effects of 30 pmol endothelin-1 and endothelin-3. Sarafotoxin S6c (30 pmol, i.pl.) did not modify endothelin-1-induced (10 pmol) nociception or oedema, but abolished hyperalgesia. Thus, endothelin-1 triggers ET(A) receptor-mediated nociception, hyperalgesia and oedema in the mouse hind-paw. Simultaneous activation of ET(B) receptors by endothelin-1 or selective agonists can limit the hyperalgesic, but not the nociceptive or oedematogenic, effects of the peptide.

ABT-627, an endothelin ET(A) receptor-selective antagonist, attenuates tactile allodynia in a diabetic rat model of neuropathic pain

Tactile allodynia, the enhanced perception of pain in response to normally non-painful stimulation, represents a common complication of diabetic neuropathy. The activation of endothelin ET(A) receptors has been implicated in diabetes-induced reductions in peripheral neurovascularization and concomitant endoneurial hypoxia. Endothelin receptor activation has also been shown to alter the peripheral and central processing of nociceptive information. The present study was conducted to evaluate the antinociceptive effects of the novel endothelin ET(A) receptor-selective antagonist, 2R-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4S-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-1-(N, N-di(n-butyl)aminocarbonyl-methyl)-pyrrolidine-3R-carboxylic acid (ABT-627), in the streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat model of neuropathic pain. Rats were injected with 75 mg/kg streptozotocin (i. p.), and drug effects were assessed 8-12 weeks following streptozotocin treatment to allow for stabilization of blood glucose levels (>/=240 mg/dl) and tactile allodynia thresholds (</=8.0 g). Systemic (i.p.) administration of ABT-627 (1 and 10 mg/kg) was found to produce a dose-dependent increase in tactile allodynia thresholds. A significant antinociceptive effect (40-50% increase in tactile allodynia thresholds, P<0.05) was observed at the dose of 10 mg/kg, i.p., within 0.5-2-h post-dosing. The antinociceptive effects of ABT-627 (10 mg kg(-1) day(-1), p.o.) were maintained following chronic administration of the antagonist in drinking water for 7 days. In comparison, morphine administered acutely at a dose of 8 mg/kg, i.p., produced a significant 90% increase in streptozotocin-induced tactile allodynia thresholds. The endothelin ET(B) receptor-selective antagonist, 2R-(4-propoxyphenyl)-4S-(1, 3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-1-(N-(2, 6-diethylphenyl)aminocarbonyl-methyl)-pyrrolidine-3R-carboxy lic acid (A-192621; 20 mg/kg, i.p.), did not significantly alter tactile allodynia thresholds in streptozotocin-treated rats. Although combined i.p. administration of ABT-627 and A-192621 produced a significant, acute increase in tactile allodynia thresholds, this effect was significantly less than that produced by ABT-627 alone. These results indicate that the selective blockade of endothelin ET(A) receptors results in an attenuation of tactile allodynia in the streptozotocin-treated rat.