Skin necrosis after intradermal injection of lyophilized exosome: A case report and a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Exosomes have gained attention for their potential in skin rejuvenation. Currently, most exosome products are available for topical administration, and the use of subdermal injection as a route of administration has not been approved.

AIMS

The purpose of this case report is to describe a case of skin necrosis that occurred following an intradermal injection of lyophilized exosomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We hereby report a case of a middle-aged man who experienced adverse effects after receiving an intradermal injection of lyophilized exosomes. Multiple injections of an exosome product were administered to treat enlarged facial pores. Shortly after the injection, the patient felt pain and noticed several dark red bumps. Three days after injection, the lesions transformed into palpable, painful, non-blanchable purplish papules and nodules, accompanied by central, tiny crusted erosions. The residual product was injected into the upper arm using an intradermal method. Similar lesions also appeared, and a skin biopsy showed necrotic keratinocytes, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, and eccrine necrosis.

RESULTS

There are few reports available regarding complications, especially those related to intradermal exosomes. These complications include multiple foreign-body granulomatous reactions at the injection sites. In our case, oral prednisolone was administered for a duration of 7 days. After the treatment, the lesions exhibited notable improvement, eventually leaving post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation.

CONCLUSION

Utilizing exosomes through unapproved methods should be avoided due to the possibility of adverse reactions that could cause aesthetic issues.

Safety and Immunogenicity of an Anti-Zika Virus DNA Vaccine

BACKGROUND

Although Zika virus (ZIKV) infection is typically self-limiting, other associated complications such as congenital birth defects and the Guillain-Barré syndrome are well described. There are no approved vaccines against ZIKV infection.

METHODS

In this phase 1, open-label clinical trial, we evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a synthetic, consensus DNA vaccine (GLS-5700) encoding the ZIKV premembrane and envelope proteins in two groups of 20 participants each. The participants received either 1 mg or 2 mg of vaccine intradermally, with each injection followed by electroporation (the use of a pulsed electric field to introduce the DNA sequence into cells) at baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

The median age of the participants was 38 years, and 60% were women; 78% were White and 22% Black; in addition, 30% were Hispanic. At the interim analysis at 14 weeks (i.e., after the third dose of vaccine), no serious adverse events were reported. Local reactions at the vaccination site (e.g., injection-site pain, redness, swelling, and itching) occurred in approximately 50% of the participants. After the third dose of vaccine, binding antibodies (as measured on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) were detected in all the participants, with geometric mean titers of 1642 and 2871 in recipients of 1 mg and 2 mg of vaccine, respectively. Neutralizing antibodies developed in 62% of the samples on Vero-cell assay. On neuronal-cell assay, there was 90% inhibition of ZIKV infection in 70% of the serum samples and 50% inhibition in 95% of the samples. The intraperitoneal injection of postvaccination serum protected 103 of 112 IFNAR knockout mice (bred with deletion of genes encoding interferon-α and interferon-β receptors) (92%) that were challenged with a lethal dose of ZIKV-PR209 strain; none of the mice receiving baseline serum survived the challenge. Survival was independent of the neutralization titer.

CONCLUSIONS

In this phase 1, open-label clinical trial, a DNA vaccine elicited anti-ZIKV immune responses. Further studies are needed to better evaluate the safety and efficacy of the vaccine. (Funded by GeneOne Life Science and others; ZIKA-001 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02809443.).

Delivery of immunoreactive antigen using a controllable needle-free jet injector

Intradermal immunization of mice against hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) using a novel real-time controlled jet injector was assessed by comparison with intradermal and subcutaneous injection of antigen using a 27G needle and syringe. Three doses of aluminium-absorbed HBsAg were delivered at 0, 14, and 28days. Antibodies to HBsAg were detected only in mice injected with antigen with antibody levels increasing with secondary injections. Mice vaccinated by intradermal injection using the jet injector or subcutaneous needle injection exhibited comparable immune responses at day 47. Differences in titer observed between intradermal jet injected and needle injected animals reflect differences in the volume of antigen delivered. With the exception of minor bleeding at the injection site in a few animals injected either by jet injection or needle, no adverse events were observed in any of the mice used in the study.

Differences in efficiency, satisfaction and adverse events between self-administered intradermal and nurse-administered intramuscular influenza vaccines in hospital workers

Vaccinating healthcare workers against influenza takes tens of thousands of hours of work annually. This study was undertaken to determine the acceptability, success rate, and time to vaccinate healthcare workers in nurse-led groups that self-vaccinated with intradermal influenza vaccine compared with nurse-administered intramuscular vaccine.

METHODS

Volunteer hospital workers were randomly assigned to groups that either self-administered intradermal influenza vaccine (Intanza(®)) in a nurse-led group or received nurse-administered intramuscular vaccine (Vaxigrip(®)). Research assistants timed vaccination procedures; pre- and post-injection questionnaires assessed acceptability and reactogenicity.

RESULTS

810 adults, 21-69 years of age, from two study sites were vaccinated: 401 self-administered the intradermal vaccine while 409 received their intramuscular vaccine from a nurse. Of those who self-administered for the first time, 98.5% were successful on their first attempt with an additional 1.5% on their second attempt. Acceptability was high: 96% were very or somewhat certain that they administered the vaccine correctly, 83% would choose intradermal influenza vaccine again and of those, 75% would choose self-administration again, if given the choice. It took 51.3-72.6s per person for the nurses to guide the groups through the self-administration process, which was significantly less time than it took to individually administer the intramuscular vaccines (93.6s).

CONCLUSION

Self-administration of intradermal influenza vaccine by people working in healthcare settings is a possible alternative to nurse administered vaccinations, with nurse-led group sessions a good way of teaching the technique while being available to respond to unanticipated problems (NCT01665807).

Efficacy, safety and acceptability of the new pen needle 33G × 4 mm. AGO 01 study

OBJECTIVES

Adherence to insulin therapy can be threatened by pain and needle fear. This cross-over randomized non-inferiority trial evaluated a new Pic Insupen 33G × 4 mm needle vs. a 32G × 4 mm needle in terms of metabolic control, safety and acceptability in patients with diabetes treated with insulin.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We used a centralized, permuted block randomization, stratified by center and maximum insulin dose per single injection. Subjects used the two needles in two 3 week treatment periods. The primary endpoint was the absolute percentage variation of the blood fructosamine between the two treatments (% |ΔFru|). Additional endpoints were: glycemic variability, total insulin doses, body weight, severe hypoglycemic episodes, leakage at injection sites and pain measured by visual analogue scale. Equivalent glycemic control was defined a priori as % |ΔFru| (including 95% CI) within 20%.

RESULTS

Of 87 subjects randomized, 77 completed the study (median age 53.1 [IR 42.3-61.2], median BMI 24.3 Kg/m(2) [IR 21.3-28.5], median duration of insulin therapy [in months] 141.4 (IR 56.3-256.9), median baseline HbA1c 7.9% [IR 7.2-8.8]). The % |ΔFru| was 7.93% (95% CI 6.23-9.63), meeting the non-inferiority criterion. The fasting blood glucose standard deviation was 46.2 (mean 154.6) with the 33G needle and 42.8 (mean 157.3) with the 32G needle (p=0.42). Insulin daily dose and patients' weight did not show any statistically significant variation. We observed 95 episodes of symptomatic hypoglycemia with the 33G needle and 96 with the 32G needle. One episode of severe hypoglycemia was documented in the latter group. As for insulin leakage we observed 37.55 episodes per 100 patient-days with the 33G needle and 32.21 episodes per 100 patient-days with the 32G needle (p=0.31). Patients reported less pain with the 33G × 4 mm needle (p=0.05).

STUDY LIMITATIONS

Study sample was mainly composed of adults with type 1 diabetes and study was not blinded.

CONCLUSIONS

The 33G needle is not inferior to the 32G needle in terms of efficacy and safety, with reduced pain and no difference in insulin leakage.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01745549.

Avoiding the "danger zones" when injecting dermal fillers and volume enhancers

Aesthetic providers need to be aware of the serious potential complications that can result from occlusion of specific facial arterial and venous structures. This article focuses on the anatomical "danger zones" to avoid during dermal filler and volume enhancer injection procedures. Clinical pearls are provided on how to avoid these "danger zones" and what to do if a rare complication (e.g., skin necrosis or vision loss) does occur.

Insulin pen injection technique survey in patients with type 2 diabetes in mainland China in 2010

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of injection therapy in diabetes depends on correct injection technique. To provide patients with guidance in this area and help patients inject themselves correctly, we must understand how they currently inject; therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the current situation of insulin injection technique in patients with diabetes in mainland China.

DESIGN AND METHODS

From October 2010 to November 2010, a cross-sectional survey of 380 diabetes patients from 20 centers in mainland China was conducted regarding their daily insulin pen injection practice.

RESULTS

Overall, 35.26% of patients had lipohypertrophy; 58.68% of patients had bleeding and bruising, and abdominal lipohypertrophy at injection sites. Bleeding and bruising were more frequent. We found a significant relationship between the frequency of a single needle reuse and lipohypertrophy (r = 0.426, P = 0.000). In addition, there was a significant relationship between the frequency of daily insulin injection and lipohypertrophy (r = 0.146, P = 0.004), between rolling the pen while pulling out the needle after injection and lipohypertrophy (χ(2 )= 7.355, P = 0.007). Bleeding and bruising at injection sites were found to be related to HbA1c levels (r = 0.151, P = 0.003).

LIMITATIONS

A few limitations linked with this survey should be noted. Because of the limited budget, the ultrasound was not used to evaluate lipodystrophy and the photographs of lipodystrophy were not taken. On the other hand, specific size of lipodystrophy and the cost of insulin wastage were not evaluated. Furthermore, the population of this survey is limited, and it was only done in general hospitals and not in community hospitals, therefore, a larger study sample is advisable.

CONCLUSIONS

The insulin injection skill of patients with diabetes in mainland China was poor, and the incidence of lipohypertrophy, bleeding, and needle reuse was high. Frequency of daily insulin injection and needle reuse may relate to the incidence of lipohypertrophy and bleeding. The bleeding and bruising at the injection sites may be associated with suboptimal absorption of injected insulin. Improved education in optimal insulin injection technique, including reducing needle reuse and correct rotation of injection sites should be emphasized.

Giving a good needle: resident guide to decreasing injection pain

Residency is a time when we set a foundation for how we will practice dermatology in the future. Perfecting good injection technique early in one's career can boost patient perception of the provider and help keep a schedule running smoothly. This resident guide focuses on ways we can give better injections by highlighting useful pearls to master this commonplace procedure.

Fundus artery occlusion caused by cosmetic facial injections

BACKGROUND

With the increasing popularity of cosmetic facial filler injections in recent years, more and more associated complications have been reported. However, the causative surgical procedures and preventative measures have not been studied well up to now. The aim of this stady was to investigate the clinical characteristics and visual prognosis of fundus artery occlusion resulting from cosmetic facial filler injections.

METHODS

Thirteen consecutive patients with fundus artery occlusion caused by facial filler injections were included. Main outcome measures were filler materials, injection sites, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fundus fluorescein angiography, and associated ocular and systemic manifestations.

RESULTS

Eleven patients had ophthalmic artery occlusion (OAO) and one patient each had central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) and anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION). Injected materials included autologous fat (seven cases), hyaluronic acid (five cases), and bone collagen (one case). Injection sites were the frontal area (five cases), periocular area (two cases), temple area (two cases), and nose area and nasal area (4 cases). Injected autologous fat was associated with worse final BCVA than hyaluronic acid. The BCVA of seven patients with autologous fat injection in frontal area and temple area was no light perception. Most of the patients with OAO had ocular pain, headache, ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, and no improvement in final BCVA.

CONCLUSIONS

Cosmetic facial injections can cause fundus artery occlusion. Autologous fat injection tends to be associated with painful blindness, ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, and poor visual outcomes. The prognosis is much worse with autologous fat injection than hyaluronic acid injection.

Preference for a new prefilled insulin pen compared with the original pen

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of diabetes is increasing in the United States and worldwide. Insulin injection pens are preferred over vial/syringe methods, and are designed to facilitate use, improve adherence, and provide accurate insulin delivery.

OBJECTIVE

This study compares the efficacy, safety profile, and patient preference of the new prefilled insulin pen FT* versus the original insulin pen FP.

METHODS

This randomized, multicenter, open-label, crossover study was conducted in insulin-treated pen-naïve patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (n = 242, mean age 58 years, mean body mass index (BMI) 31.4 kg/m(2), baseline glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)] 7.3%). Patients were randomized 1:1 to either FT or FP for 12 weeks and then switched to the alternate insulin device for 12 weeks, while the insulin regimen was kept the same. All subjects were on either insulin detemir alone or in combination with insulin aspart treatment during the trial. HbA(1c) was assessed at screening, randomization, cross-over period, and end of trial. The safety profile was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs), adverse device effects (ADEs), and hypoglycemic episodes. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires assessed at randomization, crossover period, and end of trial were used to investigate the subjects' preference of the two prefilled devices.

RESULTS

A total of 400 subjects were screened, 242 subjects were randomized and exposed to the prefilled pen devices, and 222 subjects completed the trial. Twenty subjects discontinued the study. Four subjects discontinued due to adverse events. Subject default (withdrawal of consent and loss to follow up) was the most common reason for discontinuation (10 subjects), Glycemic control achieved with FT was comparable to that with FP (FT-FP: difference -0.047 [95% CI -0.127; 0.032%]). The majority of subjects (68%) indicated a preference for the FT device over FP. In addition, the majority of subjects found FT easier to use (64% [144/226]), easier to inject the insulin dose (65% [148/227]) and easier to push for injection (69% [155/226]). The Treatment Related Impact Measure-Diabetes (TRIM-D) ratings of FT were significantly higher for diabetes management facilitation (P < 0.001), and treatment burden (P < 0.001). The safety profiles were comparable for FT and FP.

CONCLUSIONS

FT was found to be comparable to FP with respect to the efficacy and safety profile. Significantly more subjects favored the FT device in terms of ease of use, insulin injection, diabetes management, and overall preference. A limitation of the present study was its open-label design because the pen devices used to administer the insulin were distinctively different and the use of a double-dummy design was precluded by the absence of placebo pen devices. The questionnaires about treatment were related to the use of the device and therefore a blinded study was not possible.

Infusion pressure and pain during microneedle injection into skin of human subjects

Infusion into skin using hollow microneedles offers an attractive alternative to hypodermic needle injections. However, the fluid mechanics and pain associated with injection into skin using a microneedle have not been studied in detail before. Here, we report on the effect of microneedle insertion depth into skin, partial needle retraction, fluid infusion flow rate and the co-administration of hyaluronidase on infusion pressure during microneedle-based saline infusion, as well as on associated pain in human subjects. Infusion of up to a few hundred microliters of fluid required pressures of a few hundred mmHg, caused little to no pain, and showed weak dependence on infusion parameters. Infusion of larger volumes up to 1 mL required pressures up to a few thousand mmHg, but still usually caused little pain. In general, injection of larger volumes of fluid required larger pressures and application of larger pressures caused more pain, although other experimental parameters also played a significant role. Among the intradermal microneedle groups, microneedle length had little effect; microneedle retraction lowered infusion pressure but increased pain; lower flow rate reduced infusion pressure and kept pain low; and use of hyaluronidase also lowered infusion pressure and kept pain low. We conclude that microneedles offer a simple method to infuse fluid into the skin that can be carried out with little to no pain.

Stabilization of influenza vaccine enhances protection by microneedle delivery in the mouse skin

Background

Simple and effective vaccine administration is particularly important for annually recommended influenza vaccination. We hypothesized that vaccine delivery to the skin using a patch containing vaccine-coated microneedles could be an attractive approach to improve influenza vaccination compliance and efficacy.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Solid microneedle arrays coated with inactivated influenza vaccine were prepared for simple vaccine delivery to the skin. However, the stability of the influenza vaccine, as measured by hemagglutination activity, was found to be significantly damaged during microneedle coating. The addition of trehalose to the microneedle coating formulation retained hemagglutination activity, indicating stabilization of the coated influenza vaccine. For both intramuscular and microneedle skin immunization, delivery of un-stabilized vaccine yielded weaker protective immune responses including viral neutralizing antibodies, protective efficacies, and recall immune responses to influenza virus. Immunization using un-stabilized vaccine also shifted the pattern of antibody isotypes compared to the stabilized vaccine. Importantly, a single microneedle-based vaccination using stabilized influenza vaccine was found to be superior to intramuscular immunization in controlling virus replication as well as in inducing rapid recall immune responses post challenge.

Conclusions/Significance

The functional integrity of hemagglutinin is associated with inducing improved protective immunity against influenza. Simple microneedle influenza vaccination in the skin produced superior protection compared to conventional intramuscular immunization. This approach is likely to be applicable to other vaccines too.

Low dose intradermal vaccination is superior to high dose intramuscular vaccination for hepatitis B in unresponsive hemodialysis patients

After two intramuscular (IM) vaccination protocols (40 microg at 0, 1, 2, and 6 months), patients who were unresponsive to hepatitis B vaccination were collected from three HD centers. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of intradermal (ID) and repeated IM vaccination protocols. Thirty-three of 639 HD patients were found to be unresponsive. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups: one to receive 80 microg ID and the other 160 microg IM vaccination protocol. Both ID (p = 0.000) and IM (p = 0.03) groups disclosed statistically significant seroconversion rates six months after the last vaccination dose. The seroconversion rate was 94.1% in the ID and 50% in the IM groups - showing a significant improvement in the ID group (p = 0.011). A low-dose ID is superior to standard IM vaccination protocol and also more cost-effective in unresponsive HD patients.

Comparative immunogenicity of trivalent influenza vaccine administered by intradermal or intramuscular route in healthy adults

The present study was undertaken with controls using equal doses ID and IM plus the standard full dose IM to assess the role of route of vaccine in immunogenicity of inactivated influenza vaccine. The study was a prospective, randomized, active-controlled, open label clinical trial conducted in healthy young adult outpatients to compare the effect of route (IM versus ID) on antibody responses to influenza vaccine. Volunteers received 3, 6 or 9 microg of vaccine by ID or IM route; 15 microg IM was also studied. Low doses of vaccine given by either route were almost as immunogenic as the standard 15 microg IM dose of influenza vaccine. ID route was not superior to IM vaccine at inducing antibodies. ID vaccine induced significantly more local inflammatory response than IM vaccine.

Treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis with botulinum toxin type A reconstituted in lidocaine or in normal saline: a randomized, side-by-side, double-blind study

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin type A represents a safe and effective treatment for primary axillary hyperhidrosis. One of the most troublesome disadvantages associated with this therapy is pain at the injection sites. Reconstitution of botulinum toxin A in a solution of lidocaine could be an easy alternative procedure to reduce the discomfort associated with those injections. However, the current recommendations are that botulinum toxin A should be reconstituted in normal saline.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and tolerance profile of saline-diluted botulinum toxin A and lidocaine-diluted botulinum toxin A in patients with axillary hyperhidrosis.

METHODS

In a double-blind, side-by-side, controlled, randomized clinical trial, 29 patients were injected with 100 mouse units of botulinum toxin A (Botox); Allergan Pharmaceuticals Ireland, Westport, Ireland) reconstituted in lidocaine into one axilla and with the same dosage of the toxin, reconstituted in an equal volume of saline, into the other axilla. The patients were followed up for 8 months. Quantification of sweat production was performed by iodine-starch tests and by the patients' own rating of sweating. The intensity of pain associated with the botulinum toxin intracutaneous injections was self-assessed by the patients and was evaluated using a 100-mm visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

Botulinum toxin A diluted in normal saline and botulinum toxin A diluted in lidocaine were similarly effective in terms of control of onset of sweat production, duration of effect and subjective percentage of mean decrease in sweating. Both treatments were well tolerated, and there were no lasting or severe adverse effects. However, the mean +/- SD pain score during the procedure was significantly lower in the axillae treated with lidocaine-reconstituted botulinum toxin than in the axillae treated with saline-reconstituted botulinum toxin (29.3 +/- 20.1 vs. 47.5 +/- 24.0; P = 0.0027).

CONCLUSIONS

Short- and long-term results show the equal effectiveness of botulinum toxin A reconstituted in saline or in lidocaine. However, because injections of botulinum toxin A reconstituted in lidocaine are associated with significantly reduced pain, lidocaine-reconstituted botulinum toxin A may be preferable for treating axillary hyperhidrosis.

Neurosensory changes in a human model of endothelin-1 induced pain: a behavioral study

Although pain is a frequent feature in patients with cancer, its etiology is still poorly understood. In recent years, endothelin-1 (ET-1) has become a major target molecule in the etiology of cancer pain. In this randomised, double-blind study the effects of intradermal injection of ET-1 on spontaneous pain, temperature perception and sensation of punctate stimulation were evaluated. Thirty-five subjects were randomised to receive either placebo or one of four concentrations of ET-1 (ranging from 10(-10) to 10(-6)M). Besides assessment of spontaneous pain, three neurosensory testings were performed: (1) cold and warm sensation, (2) cold and heat pain, and (3) punctate stimulation using a von Frey monofilament. ET-1 produced a dose-dependent flare zone that was absent after placebo injection. Subjects reported a short-lasting spontaneous pain upon administration of the highest concentrations of ET-1. Injection of ET-1 induced a long-lasting and dose-dependent punctate hyperalgesia in an area around the injection site (secondary hyperalgesia). Thermal testing revealed a short period of hypoesthesia to non-noxious warm and cold stimuli after some doses of ET-1. In addition to the mechanical hyperalgesia, intradermal injection of ET-1 almost instantaneously induced a state of cold hyperalgesia outlasting the study period (120 min). No development of heat hyperalgesia was observed. The observed psychophysical characteristics of this new model of ET-1 induced nociception indicate its potential as a human experimental model for cancer pain.

Enhanced surveillance for adverse events following immunization: Two years of dTap catch-up among high school students in Yukon, Canada (2004, 2005)

BACKGROUND

To address the increasing age of pertussis cases, Yukon replaced the Grade 9 tetanus/diphtheria/inactivated polio booster with diphtheria/tetanus/acellular pertussis (dTap) and implemented a dTap catch-up program for Grade 12 students. The program began in June 2004, making Yukon one of the first Canadian jurisdictions to introduce dTap within five years of a tetanus booster. We implemented enhanced surveillance to monitor adverse events following immunization (AEFI) to determine whether students receiving dTap > or =3 to <5 years after their last tetanus booster were at increased risk of severe AEFI.

METHODS

Students completed a self-administered AEFI questionnaire one week post-dTap vaccination. Public health professionals contacted students reporting severe AEFI. Health care providers were requested to report AEFI. Symptom rate, severity and duration were compared between students receiving dTap > or =3 to <5 years after their last tetanus booster and those receiving it >5 years later.

RESULTS

The > or =3 to <5 years group was more likely than the > or =5 years group to report pain at the injection site (70.6% vs. 61.5%, p=0.038) and less likely to report injection site redness (10.0% vs. 17.3%, p=0.022), injection site swelling (8.9% vs. 16.4%, p=0.013), decreased energy (10.0% vs. 17.1%, p=0.023), body aches (2.2% vs. 7.2%, p=0.014) and sore joints (3.3% vs. 10.1%, p=0.004). Severe AEFI did not differ between the groups (3.3% vs. 5.6%, p=0.232). Health care professionals reported no AEFI.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest no increased risk of severe AEFI among students receiving dTap > or =3 to <5 years after their last tetanus booster.

Adverse Effects When Injecting Facial Fillers

Facial soft-tissue augmentation has become ubiquitous in cosmetic dermatology. In the appropriate patient and with appropriate training, fillers can temporarily eliminate rhytides, creases, and defects, thereby producing a rejuvenated appearance. Yet, even in the most experienced injectors, there can be complications. These adverse effects can be divided into early and late and range from bruising to necrosis. Understanding the anatomy, limitations of the filler and proper technique can reduce the risk of adverse effects. When a complication occurs, the practitioner should understand how to manage them from observation to surgical intervention.

Ice Minimizes Discomfort Associated with Injection of Botulinum Toxin Type A for the Treatment of Palmar and Plantar Hyperhidrosis

BACKGROUND

The value of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) for treatment of palmar and plantar hyperhidrosis (HH) has been limited by injection pain, which in the past has generally required administration of a nerve block. We describe the successful use of ice applied to the intended injection point followed immediately by application of either ice or vibration to skin adjacent to the injection point to reduce discomfort associated with injection of BTX-A for the treatment of palmar and plantar HH.

RESULTS

During needle insertion and injection of BTX-A, both the application of ice to the intended injection point followed by application of ice adjacent to the injection point (ice+ice) and the application of ice to the intended injection point followed by application of vibration adjacent to the injection point have been preferred by our patients to nerve block. These two techniques allow efficient treatment of both hands and/or both feet in a single session.

CONCLUSION

By eliminating the need for nerve blocks, the techniques described here will enlarge the pool of physicians who can administer BTX-A for palmar and plantar HH, and will enlarge the pool of patients who are willing to have this treatment.

Effects of local anaesthesia on subdermal needle insertion pain and subsequent tests of microvascular function in human

Post-occlusive and local thermal hyperemia are currently used as integrated tests to study microvascular function in microvascular diseases. However, further pathophysiological insight would require its association with microdialysis. The major limitation remains the microinvasive approach as local anaesthesia prior to fiber insertion could lead to confounding effects. The objective of our study was to determine whether EMLA cream treatment, applied for 20 min, 40 or 60 min, significantly decreases the pain related to intradermal needle insertions, while not decreasing the microvascular response to post-occlusive and thermal hyperemia 2 h after cream removal. EMLA cream, when applied during 40 min, induces a significant 75% decrease in the pain following intradermal needle insertion, while not modifying skin post-occlusive and thermal hyperemia 2 h after cream removal. Therefore, we recommend its use in such conditions before performing microdialysis coupled with laser Doppler flowmetry in cohort studies aimed at studying microvascular dysfunction in patients with microvascular diseases.

Cosmetic injectable devices: a review of the injection techniques

An ever increasing number of devices and procedures designed to rejuvenate the aging face are available to dermatologists and plastic surgeons. These devices include products consisting of autologous materials, natural polymers, and synthetic compounds. The diversity of these materials is reflected by the wide variety of techniques used to administer them. Differences in terms of injection technique and the equipment used for each device are usually a consequence of the nature of the material. The depth at which a substance is deposited is also very important as device-related adverse events are often a result of improper placement. The techniques used to inject the commonly encountered soft tissue fillers and volume enhancers are compared here, with special reference to the degree with which injection technique causes device-related adverse events.

Avoiding and treating dermal filler complications

All fillers are associated with the risk of both early and late complications. Early side effects such as swelling, redness, and bruising occur after intradermal or subdermal injections. The patient has to be aware of and accept these risks. Adverse events that last longer than 2 weeks can be attributable to technical shortcomings (e.g., too superficial an implantation of a long-lasting filler substance). Such adverse events can be treated with intradermal 5-fluorouracil, steroid injections, vascular lasers, or intense pulsed light, and later with dermabrasion or shaving. Late adverse events also include immunologic phenomena such as late-onset allergy and nonallergic foreign body granuloma. Both react well to intralesional steroid injections, which often have to be repeated to establish the right dose. Surgical excisions shall remain the last option and are indicated for hard lumps in the lips and visible hard nodules or hard granuloma in the subcutaneous fat.

Killed Mycobacterium vaccae suspension in children with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The hygiene hypothesis is often proposed to explain the high prevalence of atopy in the western world. Dysregulation of the immune system may result from inadequate exposure to micro-organisms such as mycobacteria. A small trial suggested that a killed extract of Mycobacterium vaccae ameliorates atopic dermatitis (AD).

OBJECTIVES

To confirm in a large clinical trial whether killed M. vaccae ameliorates AD in 5-16-year-old children.

METHODS

This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multi-centre study of the effect of intradermal injection of killed M. vaccae (0.1 or 1 mg) on patients, aged 5-16, with moderate-to-severe AD. Patients were followed up for 24 weeks. The primary end point was the change in severity of AD at 12 weeks, assessed using the six area, six-sign, atopic dermatitis (SASSAD) score. Secondary end points included changes in disease extent, patient's global assessment and children's dermatology life quality index.

RESULTS

There were 166 patients randomized. The mean SASSAD score fell to a similar degree at week 12 in all treatment arms: from 33 to 24, (26%) in the high-dose group, from 30 to 23 (25%) in the low-dose group and from 36 to 27 (24%) in the placebo group (P>0.05). Secondary end points followed the same trend. Adverse events were generally those expected to occur in this population. Injection site reactions occurred in 32 patients at week 4.

CONCLUSIONS

M. vaccae was no more effective than the placebo in ameliorating the severity of AD.

Usability of a microtapered needle (TN3305) for insulin treatment in japanese patients with diabetes mellitus: a comparative clinical study with a standard thin wall needle

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the clinical usability of a microtapered needle (TN3305, "Needle T," Terumo Corp., Tokyo, Japan) by comparing it with a standard needle (Micro-Fine +, 31 gauge, 5 mm, thin wall, "Needle B," Nippon Becton Dickinson Co., Ltd., Tokyo) in a multicenter study.

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients with diabetes mellitus being treated in 11 Japanese hospitals were enrolled in the study. Written consent was obtained from all patients. They were allocated randomly to two groups by an envelope (crossover) method. Injections were performed using one needle first, followed by the other needle 4 or 5 days later. Pain caused by injection was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS).

RESULTS

In the overall evaluation, Needle T was chosen by 40 patients (44.4%) and Needle B by 17 (18.8%); 33 patients (36.7%) expressed no preference. VAS scores for Needles T and B were 1.48 +/- 0.18 and 2.47 +/- 0.24 cm, respectively (P < 0.001). In this study, lower VAS indicated less pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The preferences and VAS scores suggested that Needle T caused less pain than Needle B. The incidence of adverse events and safety were equivalent for both needles. We believe that usability of Needle T by patients for self-injection is better.

Single-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of 4% Lidocaine Cream versus Vehicle Cream During Botulinum Toxin Type A Treatments

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injections are overwhelmingly safe and effective treatment in cosmetic treatment, but some patients are apprehensive about pain associated with injection.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether preprocedural application of lidocaine 4% topical anesthetic cream to the injection site will reduce pain on injection of BTX-A for the treatment of crow's feet.

METHODS

Twenty-four participants receiving bilateral injections for crow's feet were enrolled. Subjects were randomized to one of four study groups. Prior to BTX-A injection, group 1 (n = 6) received lidocaine 4% cream on the right side of the face and vehicle cream on the left side of the face; group 2 (n = 6) received vehicle cream on the right side and lidocaine 4% on the left side; group 3 (n = 6) received lidocaine 4% on both sides; and group 4 (n = 6) received vehicle cream on both sides.

RESULTS

We observed a statistically significant reduction in subject-reported procedural pain in participants pretreated with lidocaine 4% on both sides of the face compared with controls.

CONCLUSION

Lidocaine 4% cream is effective in reducing the pain associated with BTX-A injection for crow's feet. We encourage further study to clarify the optimal use of topical anesthetics in the practice of cosmetic dermatology.

[Comparison of the systems used for providing local anesthesia in dentistry--the Wand (Milestone Scientific) and Injex (Rosch)]

Local anesthesia is one of the basic and the most often executed interventions in dentistry. This procedure is very stressful for the patients because it is combined with pain. The new systems for delivering local anesthesia in dentistry have revolutionized the technique considerably by its simplify as well as reduction in pain.

THE AIM

this study presents the comparison between the local anesthesia delivery systems used in dentistry--The Wand and Injex, taking into consideration pain intensity during performing anesthesia and the intensification of fear before executed anesthesia with the given system.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), verbal scale and questionnaires were used to evaluate pain and fear.

RESULTS

On the basis of our investigations it can be concluded that there were statistically important differences between men and women in fear intensity combined with the anesthesia procedure--men were less afraid than women. The patients who were anaesthetized with system The WAND declared less fear before similar anesthesia in future. The average value of intensity of pain analyzed with both verbal and visual scales during anaesthetizing with the system Injex (independently from sex) was statistically significantly higher than for system The WAND--respectively 0.57 and 8.55 for The WAND, 2.02 and 32.18 for Injex (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

on the basis of the results of this study it can be concluded that the less stressful and painful local anesthesia delivery system is the WAND.

A users guide for reducing the pain of local anaesthetic administration

Local anaesthetics (LAs) are used by medical practitioners in a number of clinical settings. The choice of agent and mode of administration is influenced by their experience, speciality and knowledge of the evidence base. Patients often express concern about the discomfort experienced during injection. Although short lived, the pain of LA administration in some patients is severe enough for them to decline future surgery. Methods to minimise the pain of LA administration relate to (1) the patient, (2) the LA, and (3) the injection technique (table 1). This article aims to provide a practical guide to doctors of all specialities who use LAs.

Treatment of plantar hyperhidrosis with botulinum toxin type A

BACKGROUND

Hyperhidrosis (excessive, uncontrollable sweating) can be embarrassing and disabling, significantly impacting social and professional performance and quality of life. Treatments aim to reduce sweating, but few are effective, often carrying the risk of significant side-effects. The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) for plantar hyperhidrosis and to investigate the role of the Dermojet as a potential injection technique.

METHODS

Ten adult patients (five men, five women), aged 19-51 years, with severe, previously unresponsive, plantar hyperhidrosis, were recruited to this single-center, open-label, noncomparative study. The hyperhidrotic area of each foot was injected over 15-20 sites without analgesia with 50 U BTX-A + 5 mL sterile saline using a Dermojet. Patients were followed up for 8 months with monthly sweat reduction assessments using Minor's iodine-starch test. Patients provided a treatment self-assessment after completion of follow-up.

RESULTS

Within 7 days post-treatment, eight patients reported significantly decreased sweating, and seven patients were symptom free for up to 5 months. Patient self-assessment showed that seven of the 10 patients were satisfied with their treatment. One minor adverse event was reported comprising a temporary localized hematoma (one patient).

CONCLUSIONS

Intracutaneous BTX-A injection using the Dermojet offers a simple, safe, and effective alternative for treatment of plantar hyperhidrosis.

Intradermal injections: traditional bevel up versus bevel down

This study used qualitative and quantitative methods to examine differences regarding correct placement of injectate, leaking or bleeding, time to administer injection, and comfort of person administering, and receiving an intradermal injection. Each (N = 98) administered and received two injections. Subjects evaluated their comfort on a Likert scale. After second injection, each reported which was better. Most of the time (82%), a wheal was produced. Leaking or bleeding occurred a fourth of the time. Subjects rated the first injection better (p < 0.05) with no preference regarding technique. Subjects administering injections reported bevel up more comfortable (p < 0.01). Bevel up was significantly faster.

A randomised placebo controlled trial of delipidated, deglycolipidated Mycobacterium vaccae as immunotherapy for psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To test the hypothesis that PVAC, delipidated, deglycolipidated heat killed Mycobacterium vaccae, is an effective and safe treatment for psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This treatment has shown promising results in psoriasis.

METHODS

36 patients with PsA in two centres were studied in this double blind, placebo controlled, randomised trial. Patients were randomised to receive two intradermal injections of 50 micro g PVAC or placebo and were followed up for 24 weeks. The primary end point was the Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC), a composite measure based on changes in joint tenderness and swelling scores and physician and patient global assessments.

RESULTS

The PsARC response at either 12 or 24 weeks was achieved by 9/18 (50%) placebo and 9/18 (50%) PVAC patients (p = 1.0). No significant differences in the Psoriasis Activity and Severity Index (PASI), patient or physician global assessments, CRP, or Health Assessment Questionnaire score over time were found between the two groups. However, changes in the pain visual analogue scale over time did differ between the two groups (p = 0.006): at 24 weeks the mean score in the PVAC group had declined by 19.2 mm and in the placebo group had increased by 4.8 mm. PVAC was well tolerated with no increased incidence of adverse events compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

PVAC was not shown to be as effective as immunotherapy for PsA. The striking response to placebo in this study reinforces the importance of adequately controlling therapeutic trials in PsA.

Evaluation of the safety of a non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid (NASHA - Q-Medical, Sweden) in European countries: a retrospective study from 1997 to 2001

BACKGROUND

In Europe, several filler devices are currently on the market for use in aesthetic dermatology and some of them cause severe, permanent, adverse reactions. Since 1996 a non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid (NASHA) from Q-Medical, Sweden, has been introduced and is becoming a leading product in aesthetic dermatology. Hyaluronic acid has no species specificity and skin testing is not recommended before treatment.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to evaluate the incidence of adverse reactions from 1997 to 2001 and the safety of NASHA after injections into the skin for aesthetic reasons.

METHOD

Surveys were sent to physicians in European countries that agreed to participate. This is a retrospective study. A total of 12 344 syringes were sold by the Q-Medical to these physicians and we evaluated the total number of patients treated to 35% of this number (4320). We separated immediate hypersensitivity reactions from delayed reactions and analysed infectious and other types of reactions.

RESULTS

From 1997 until 2001, 34 cases of hypersensitivity were reported: 16 cases of immediate hypersensitivity and 18 cases of delayed. The global risk of sensitivity is 0.8%. Since 2000, the amount of protein in the raw product has decreased and the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions is around 0.6%. As 50% of these reactions are immediate and resolved within less than 3 weeks, the risk of strong but transient, delayed reaction is around 0.3%. Four cases of abscess were reported. They were all sterile. No bacterial infection was found. Herpetic recurrence is possible after lip augmentation according to the technique of injection. No systemic reactions were reported.

CONCLUSION

NASHA is a very useful and safe filler product. Skin testing does not seem to be necessary.

Clinical management of treatment-experienced, HIV-infected patients with the fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide: consensus recommendations

The introduction of enfuvirtide (FUZEON) represents an important advance in the treatment of therapy-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection. However, parenteral self-administration, and the advanced disease and antiretroviral experience of patients currently most needing enfuvirtide introduce unique usage considerations. Enfuvirtide has been shown to provide clinically relevant improvements in CD4 cell counts and reductions in HIV viraemia across all subgroups of treatment-experienced patients studied, including those taking few or no other active drugs. However, optimal outcome results from initiation when the CD4 cell count is above 100 x 10(6) cells/l and viraemia below 1 x 10(5) copies/ml, as part of a newly constructed third or fourth antiretroviral regimen in combination with one or two other antiretrovirals to which the virus remains sensitive. Resistance testing should be used where available to guide background drug selection. Where insufficient options for an effective background exist, enfuvirtide should still be considered and treatment undertaken with the aim of achieving an immunological or clinical response, despite the unlikelihood of a sustained virological outcome. Similarly, where there is no viable alternative treatment, enfuvirtide should be continued following virological failure wherever ongoing immunological or clinical benefit is discerned. Injection site reactions (ISRs) are common on enfuvirtide and will affect almost all patients. ISRs are manageable and seldom activity- or treatment-limiting. Bacterial pneumonia and systemic hypersensitivity reactions have also been reported uncommonly. A structured series of patient visits with a healthcare professional provides an atmosphere of ongoing training and support that may prevent 'injection fatigue', maintain adherence and minimise the incidence of ISRs. An initial investment in establishing such procedures can be expected to yield significant returns in patient confidence and benefit on enfuvirtide.

[Local complications in the skin related to the administration of insulin]

Insulin administration is one of the important aspects in diabetes education. This study focuses on skin site complications related to insulin application. Fifty-one people with diabetes mellitus were interviewed at a private institution in São Paulo State. Results showed that hematomas were the most frequent complication and that they mainly resulted from the use of incorrect application techniques. It was concluded that health professionals must design effective strategies in order to provide safety to subjects and prevent skin complications.

Chloroprocaine is less painful than lidocaine for skin infiltration anesthesia

Skin infiltration of local anesthetics causes pain. In a double-blinded protocol, 22 volunteers received random intradermal injections to the volar surface of the forearm with each of the following solutions: normal saline solution 0.9% (NSS), lidocaine 1% (L), lidocaine 1% and sodium bicarbonate 8.4% (L+BIC), 2-chloroprocaine 2% (CP), 2-chloroprocaine 2% and sodium bicarbonate 8.4% (CP+BIC), and NaCHO(3) 8.4% (BIC). Initially, each volunteer received an open-labeled injection of NSS. A 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS, 1-100) was used to assess pain with each injection. The pH of each solution was stable for the length of the study. Repeated measures of variance were used for analysis. The VAS scores (mean +/- SD) for open-label and blinded NSS injections were 15.5 +/- 15.9 and 14.0 +/- 18.1, respectively. The scores for the studied solutions were as follows: BIC, 47.2 +/- 25.5; L, 25.8 +/- 27.6; L+BIC, 16.0 +/- 14.2; CP, 8.6 +/- 7.4; and CP+BIC, 6.8 +/- 6.7. No significant difference was found between CP and alkalinized CP, but the injection of both solutions was significantly less painful than that of all other solutions (P < 0.05). The pH of the solutions was not related to the pain score. We found that chloroprocaine caused less pain at injection than the more commonly used lidocaine.

IMPLICATIONS

Using 2-chloroprocaine can diminish pain caused by the intradermal injection of lidocaine. pH variations of the solution did not relate to the pain profile of the local anesthetic.

Safety of modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) in immune-suppressed macaques

Modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA)-based recombinant viruses have been shown to be potent vaccine candidates for several infectious and neoplastic diseases. Since a major application of these live, replication-deficient vectors would be their use in immunocompromised or potentially immunocompromised individuals, a preclinical safety study was carried out. Macaques were inoculated with high doses of MVA (10(9)) via various routes, after immune-suppression by total-body irradiation, anti-thymocyte globulin treatment, or measles virus (MV) infection. No clinical, haematological or pathological abnormalities related to MVA inoculation were observed during a 13-day follow-up period. The presence of MVA genomes was demonstrated by nested PCR during the course of the experiment in all macaques, but from none of these animals replication competent MVA could be reisolated. These data suggest that MVA can safely be used as a basis for recombinant human vaccines, and that it is also safe for use in immunocompromised individuals.

Subcutaneous versus intracutaneous injections of sterile water for labour analgesia: a comparison of perceived pain during administration

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether, during injections of sterile water, there is any difference in perceived pain between intracutaneous and subcutaneous injections.

DESIGN

Blind controlled trial with cross-over design.

SETTING

Göteborg and Skövde, Sweden.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred healthy female volunteers.

METHODS

The women were randomised into two groups and subjected to two trials, within one week of each other. During the first trial one group (n = 50) received the intracutaneous injection first, followed by the subcutaneous injection. The second group (n = 50) was given the subcutaneous injection first, followed by intracutaneous injection. In both groups all the injections were given in reverse order during the second trial.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Experienced pain during the administration of sterile water injections, measured by visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

The analysis showed intracutaneous injections to be significantly more painful than subcutaneous injections, even after adjusting for injection day and for left/right site of injection (mean 60.8 vs 41.3, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that the less painful subcutaneous injection technique should be used.