Cotreatment with growth hormone, after pituitary suppression, for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-control trial

Comparative efficacy of different growth hormone supplementation protocols in improving clinical outcomes in women with poor ovarian response undergoing assisted reproductive therapy: a network meta-analysis

Growth hormone (GH) has a long-standing history of use as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of poor ovarian response (POR), but the optimal dosage and timing remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of different GH supplementation protocols through a network meta-analysis (NMA) and determine the optimal treatment protocol. This study was reported based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews for Network Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-NMA) statement. Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched until June 2023. A total of 524 records were retrieved in our search, and 23 clinical studies comprising 4889 cycles were involved. Seven different GH protocols were identified. Results showed that compared to the control group, daily administration of 4-8 IU of GH during the follicular phase of the stimulation cycle had the best comprehensive therapeutic effects on improving the number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes, endometrial thickness, and reducing gonadotropin requirements in POR patients undergoing assisted reproductive therapy, with a relatively brief treatment duration and a moderate total GH dose. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that this protocol could significantly improve the clinical pregnancy rate of POR patients in the randomized controlled trials (RCT) subgroup and the African subgroup. Therefore, its clinical application is suggested. Besides, the potential advantages of long-term GH supplementation protocol (using GH for at least 2 weeks before oocyte retrieval) has merit for further research. Rigorous and well-designed multi-arm RCTs are needed in the future to confirm the conclusions drawn from this study.

Evaluation of growth hormone deficiency in women with unexplained infertility

PURPOSE

Growth hormone (GH) has been recognized to play a regulatory role in female reproduction. It has been reported that infertile GH deficient patients regained fertility after GH replacement. The frequency of GH deficiency is not established in patients diagnosed with unexplained infertility. Here, we aim to present the prevalence of GH deficieny in this patient group.

METHODS

We included patients diagnosed with unexplained infertility throughout 18 months. Insulin tolerance test (ITT) and glucagon stimulation tests (GST) were performed and insufficient response to both tests was required for the diagnosis of GH deficiency.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were included in the study, the mean age was 27.4 ± 4.5 years and the median duration of infertility was 60 months (min:14, max:120). Two patients were GH deficient according to GST and 14 to ITT. Two patients (8%) showed lack of response on both tests and were diagnosed with GH deficiency.

CONCLUSION

The rate of GH deficiency among women with unexplained infertility was 8% in this preliminary study. There is need for further studies with larger patient groups to verify the results.

Effect of growth hormone administration on ameliorating pregnancy outcome in women with advanced maternal age and exploration of its optimized utilization

Background

Age-related fertility decay is a great challenge for clinicians. Growth hormone (GH) supplementation has been studied as an adjuvant since late 1980s. However, it has not come to a consensus on the GH administration due to the ambiguous efficacy among studies with different enrolled population and dosage regime.

Methods

A self-controlled retrospective study was conducted on women with advanced maternal age who underwent at least a previous cycle without GH (GH-) and a subsequent cycle with GH co-treatment (GH+). The ovarian stimulation parameters and outcomes were compared between the two cycles and logistical analysis was applied to further explore the association between GH administration protocol as well as other clinical parameters and cumulative live birth in GH+cycle.

Results

A total of 150 women aged 35-43 were included. The number of oocytes retrieved, MII oocytes, 2PNs, transferrable embryos and good-quality embryos in GH+ significantly increased (p < 0.001). The proportion of cycles with no transferrable embryos was significantly reduced in GH+ cycle compared with previous GH- cycle (3 vs. 32; p < 0.001). GH co-treatment cycles showed significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates (43.75% vs. 6.06%; 38.35% vs. 12.04%, p < 0.001), live birth rates (29.17% vs. 0; 27.07% vs. 0, p < 0.001) in both fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle. Cumulative live birth rate of the GH+ cycle reached 33.33%. Use of GH prior to Gn stimulation and lasting until the hCG day seemed to achieve a higher successful live birth rate (OR 2.312, 95%CI 1.074-5.163, p=0.032).

Conclusion

GH supplementation could ameliorate pregnancy outcome in women with advanced maternal age. Dosage regimen of long-term pretreatment prior to Gn stimulation (4 IU every other day) and 4 IU per day until hCG day may of greater efficacy compared with concurrent administration with Gn. Additionally, it's worthy of exploring whether an individualized dosage regimen based on the IGF or IGFBP level of patient would be more reasonable and effective. More well-designed prospective trials with large sample size and fundamental experiments on the mechanism are required to testify findings above.

Effects of Growth Hormone on Adult Human Gonads: Action on Reproduction and Sexual Function

Growth hormone (GH), which is commonly considered to be a promoter of growth and development, has direct and indirect effects on adult gonads that influence reproduction and sexual function of humans and nonhumans. GH receptors are expressed in adult gonads in some species including humans. For males, GH can improve the sensitivity of gonadotropins, contribute to testicular steroidogenesis, influence spermatogenesis possibly, and regulate erectile function. For females, GH can modulate ovarian steroidogenesis and ovarian angiogenesis, promote the development of ovarian cells, enhance the metabolism and proliferation of endometrial cells, and ameliorate female sexual function. Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) is the main mediator of GH. In vivo, a number of the physiological effects of GH are mediated by GH-induced hepatic IGF-1 and local IGF-1. In this review, we highlight the roles of GH and IGF-1 in adult human gonads, clarify potential mechanisms, and explore the efficacy and the risk of GH supplementation in associated deficiency and assisted reproductive technologies. Besides, the effects of excess GH on adult human gonads are discussed as well.

Administration of growth hormone improves endometrial function in women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The positive effects of growth hormone (GH) on IVF are often attributed to improvements in oocyte and embryo quality. While emerging evidence emphasizes GH-induced improvements in the endometrium, these results are controversial.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether GH administration improved endometrial function and reproductive outcomes during IVF cycles and to thus guide clinical practice.

SEARCH METHODS

A literature search in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed and Embase was performed through to 30 November 2021, without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of GH on IVF outcomes were included. Risk of bias and quality of evidence (QoE) were assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were assessed by random-effects models.

OUTCOMES

A total of 25 trials with 2424 women were included. Seventeen RCTs with poor responders (n = 1723) showed that GH administration significantly increased endometrial thickness (EMT) (MD = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.18-0.59; moderate QoE), which contributed to an improved live birth rate (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.13-2.49; very low QoE) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (OR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.43-2.72; low QoE). Subgroup analyses showed a dose- and time-dependent relationship between GH cotreatment and IVF outcomes; the optimal recommendation for improving CPR was consistent with that for EMT, rather than for oocytes and embryos. Hence, GH might improve fertility via effects on the endometrium. Administration of GH daily from the follicular phase of previous cycle until the hCG trigger with < 5 IU/day led to a thicker endometrium and a greater chance of becoming pregnant, while 5-10 IU/day or administration from the luteal phase of the previous cycle until the hCG trigger resulted in higher oocyte and embryo quality. Poor responders might benefit from cotreatment with the GnRH agonist long protocol more than other stimulation protocols. Pooled data from four trials (n = 354) on women with a thin endometrium indicated that improved endometrial function might be critical for improving reproductive outcomes during GH treatment, as no improvements in embryo quality were found. GH administration not only increased EMT (MD = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.21-1.75; moderate QoE) but also promoted endometrial morphology (OR = 2.67, 95% CI: 1.36-5.23; low QoE) and perfusion (OR = 5.84, 95% CI: 1.30-26.17; low QoE), thereby improving the CPR (OR = 2.71, 95% CI: 1.69-4.34; P < 0.0001; low QoE). There was insufficient evidence to reach a conclusion regarding the effects of GH in normal responders (n = 80). Due to obvious improvements in the CPR, women with a thin endometrium might be the most appropriate population to benefit from GH administration.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Improving endometrial function might be another vital mechanism by which GH improves IVF outcomes. Optimal treatment should be offered to the target population according to their personal conditions and needs. The QoE was moderate to very low, due to limited sample sizes and methodological problems; thus, the results should be interpreted with caution. More rigorous RCTs with large sample sizes are needed to confirm the effects and determine optimal GH protocols.

Importance of IGF-I levels in IVF: potential relevance for growth hormone (GH) supplementation

Purpose

Growth hormone (GH) supplementation in association with in vitro fertilization (IVF) is worldwide again increasing, even though study outcomes have been discrepant. Since GH acts via insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), its utilization in IVF would only seem to make sense with low IGF-1. We, therefore, determined whether IGF-I levels affect IVF outcomes.

Methods

Retrospectively, 302 consecutive first fresh, non-donor IVF cycles were studied, excluding patients on GH supplementation. Patients were divided into 3 subgroups: IGF-1 in lower 25th percentile (group A, < 132 ng/mL, n = 64); 25th–75th percentile (B, 133–202 ng/mL, n = 164), and upper 25th percentile (C, > 202 ng/mL, n = 74). IGF-1 was tested immunochemiluminometric with normal range at 78–270 ng/mL. Because of the study patients’ adverse selection and low pregnancy chances, the main outcome measure for the study was cycle cancellation. Secondary outcomes were oocyte numbers, embryos transferred, pregnancies, and live births.

Results

Group A was significantly older than B and C (P = 0.019). IGF-1 decreased with increasing age per year by 2.2 ± 0.65 ng/mL (P = 0.0007). FSH was best in group B and worst in A (trend, P = 0.085); AMH was best in B and worst in A (N.S.). Cycle cancellations were lowest in C (11.6%) and highest in A (25.0%; P = 0.042). This significance further improved with age adjustment (P = 0.021). Oocytes, embryo numbers, pregnancies, and live birth rates did not differ, though oocyte numbers trended highest in B.

Conclusions

Here presented results support the hypothesis that IGF-1 levels affect IVF outcomes. GH treatments, therefore, may be effective only with low IGF-1.

Growth hormone for in vitro fertilisation (IVF)

BACKGROUND

In an effort to improve outcomes of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles, the use of growth hormone (GH) has been considered as adjuvant treatment in ovarian stimulation. Improving the outcomes of IVF is especially important for women with infertility who are considered 'poor responders'. We have compared the outcomes of IVF with adjuvant GH versus no adjuvant treatment in routine use, and specifically in poor responders.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of growth hormone as an adjunct to IVF compared to standard IVF for women with infertility SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases (to November 2020): Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group specialised register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Epistemonikos database and trial registers together with reference checking and contact with study authors and experts in the field to identify additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adjuvant GH treatment in IVF compared with no adjuvant treatment for women with infertility. We excluded trials where additional adjuvant treatments were used with GH. We also excluded trials comparing different IVF protocols.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. Two review authors independently performed assessment of trial risk of bias and extraction of relevant data. The primary review outcome was live birth rate. The secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate, oocytes retrieved, embryo transfer, units of gonadotropin used and adverse events, i.e. ectopic pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), congenital anomalies, oedema.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 16 RCTs (1352 women). Two RCTs (80 women) studied GH in routine use, and 14 RCTs (1272 women) studied GH in poor responders. The evidence was low to very low certainty, the main limitations being risk of bias, imprecision and heterogeneity. Adjuvant growth hormone compared to no adjuvant: routine use for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of GH on live birth rate per woman randomised for routine use in IVF (odds ratio (OR) 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40 to 4.43; I2 = 0%; 2 trials, 80 participants; very low-certainty evidence). If the chance of live birth without adjuvant GH is assumed to be 15%, the chance of live birth with GH would be between 6% and 43%. There was insufficient evidence to reach a conclusion regarding clinical pregnancy rates per woman randomised, number of women with at least one oocyte retrieved per woman randomised and embryo transfer achieved per woman randomised; reported data were unsuitable for analysis. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of GH on mean number of oocytes retrieved in normal responders (mean difference (MD) -0.02, 95% CI -0.79 to 0.74; I2 = 0%; 2 trials, 80 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of GH on mean units of gonadotropin used in normal responders (MD 13.57, 95% CI -112.88 to 140.01; I2 = 0%; 2 trials, 80 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of GH on adverse events in normal responders. Adjuvant growth hormone compared to no adjuvant: use in poor responders for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of GH on live birth rate per woman randomised for poor responders (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.70; I2 = 0%; 8 trials, 737 participants; very low-certainty evidence). If the chance of live birth without adjuvant GH is assumed to be 11%, the chance of live birth with GH would be between 13% and 25%. Adjuvant GH results in a slight increase in pregnancy rates in poor responders (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.53; I2 = 15%; 11 trials, 1033 participants; low-certainty evidence). The results suggest, if the pregnancy rate without adjuvant GH is assumed to be 15%, with GH the pregnancy rate in poor responders would be between 19% and 31%. The evidence suggests that GH results in little to no difference in number of women with at least one oocyte retrieved (OR 5.67, 95% CI 1.54 to 20.83; I2 = 0%; 2 trials, 148 participants; low-certainty evidence). If the chance of retrieving at least one oocyte in poor responders was 81%, with GH the chance is between 87% and 99%. There is a slight increase in mean number of oocytes retrieved with the use of GH for poor responders (MD 1.40, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.64; I2 = 87%; 12 trials, 1153 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of GH on embryo transfer achieved (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.96; I2 = 25%; 4 trials, 214 participants; very low-certainty evidence). If the chance of achieving embryo transfer is assumed to be 77%, the chance with GH will be 78% to 94%. Use of GH results in reduction of mean units of gonadotropins used for stimulation in poor responders (MD -1088.19, 95% CI -1203.20 to -973.18; I2 = 91%; 8 trials, 685 participants; low-certainty evidence). High heterogeneity in the analyses for mean number of oocytes retrieved and units of GH used suggests quite different effects according to differences including in trial protocols (populations, GH dose and schedule), so these results should be interpreted with caution. We are uncertain of the effect of GH on adverse events in poor responders as six of the 14 included trials failed to report this outcome.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The use of adjuvant GH in IVF treatment protocols has uncertain effect on live birth rates and mean number of oocytes retrieved in normal responders. However, it slightly increases the number of oocytes retrieved and pregnancy rates in poor responders, while there is an uncertain effect on live birth rates in this group. The results however, need to be interpreted with caution, as the included trials were small and few in number, with significant bias and imprecision. Also, the dose and regimen of GH used in trials was variable. Therefore, further research is necessary to fully define the role of GH as adjuvant therapy in IVF.

Human growth hormone use in poor ovarian response - caution and opportunities

Human growth hormone has found favour as a co-gonadotrophin in assisted reproduction particularly in the circumstances of a poor response to stimulation. Its use has been based on animal studies suggesting insulin-like growth factor-1 enhances granulosa and cumulus cell function and possibly oocyte quality. While there is limited ovarian cellular information in women, the use of human growth hormone is alleged to improve egg numbers, embryo quality, clinical pregnancies and live birth in women with a poor ovarian response. A number of cohort studies have claimed these benefits compared with prior nil treatment, but there are a limited number of quality randomised controlled studies. The few good randomised trials indicate an enhanced ovarian response in terms of oestradiol secretion and oocyte maturity with controversial improvement in ongoing pregnancy and live birth. Given the cost of the medication, the lack of convincing data on enhanced clinical outcomes and the theoretical possibility of side effects, we propose it is still too early to determine human growth hormone’s true cost-benefit for widespread use. However, a number of emerging randomised trials may tilt the equation to a positive outlook in the future. Meanwhile, the hormone should only be used after full informed consent from the patient as to its effectiveness and efficacy.

Effects of Growth Hormone Supplementation on Poor Ovarian Responders in Assisted Reproductive Technology: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

To investigate whether additional growth hormone (GH) treatment can improve pregnancy outcomes in poor ovarian responders (POR), this systematic review and meta-analysis is prospectively designed and has been registered in PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42019137866). Literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from January 2010 to June 2019, and studies before 2010 were included based on a Cochrane review published in 2010. Only English articles and randomized clinical trial studies were included. A total of 12 studies were included for analysis. GH treatment in poor ovarian responders significantly increased the clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio (OR) = 1.75 (1.23, 2.50)), and the live birth rate also tended to increase after GH treatment (OR = 1.51 (0.97, 2.35)). Other outcomes including the gonadotropin requirement, oocyte retrieval number, endometrium thickness, and the number of patients with available embryos for transfer were also improved by growth hormone treatment (weighted mean differences (WMD) = - 0.78 (- 1.23, - 0.33), 1.41 (0.72, 2.09), 0.36 (0.18, 0.53), OR = 2.67 (1.47, 4.68), respectively). Based on the current study, GH treatment in POR can increase clinical pregnancy rate and show a higher but not statistically significant likelihood of live birth rate. The effect is likely to be mediated by improving ovarian response and endometrium thickness. The effect of GH treatment on live birth rate should be tested by further studies with a larger sample size.

Growth hormone cotreatment for poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of growth hormone (GH) supplementation in improving the in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes of poor responders.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S)

Poor ovarian responders undergoing conventional IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

INTERVENTION(S)

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of poor ovarian responders undergoing a single IVF/ICSI cycle with GH supplementation versus conventional controlled ovarian stimulation. This review was registered in the PROSPERO database before starting data extraction (CRD42020151681).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Primary outcome was live birth rate. Clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, number of oocytes, number of mature (metaphase II [MII]) oocytes and the number of embryos available to transfer were considered as secondary outcomes.

RESULT(S)

Twelve RCTs were included; 586 women were assigned to the intervention group and 553 to the control group. The analysis revealed that patients receiving GH supplementation did not show an increased live birth rate, miscarriage rate, or ongoing pregnancy rate. However, GH supplementation in poor responders increased clinical pregnancy rate, number of oocytes retrieved (mean difference 1.62), number of MII oocytes (mean difference 2.06), and number of embryos available to transfer (mean difference 0.76). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses did not provide statistical changes to pooled results.

CONCLUSION(S)

The present meta-analysis provides evidence that GH supplementation may improve some reproductive outcomes in poor responders, but not live birth rates.

The Role of Growth Hormone on Ovarian Functioning and Ovarian Angiogenesis

Although not yet well-understood, today it is clear that Growth Hormone (GH) exerts a relevant role in the regulation of ovulation and fertility; in fact, fertility is lower in women with GH deficiency (GHD), and GH receptors (GHR) and GH mRNA have been found in the ovary since the onset of follicular development in humans. However, despite the strong evidence of GH in the regulation of fertility, many aspects of GH actions at this level are still not well-established, and it is likely that some controversial data depend on the species analyzed, the dose of the hormone and the duration of use of GH. Folliculogenesis, ovulation, and corpus luteum formation and maintenance are processes that are critically dependent on angiogenesis. In the ovary, new blood vessel formation facilitates oxygen, nutrients, and hormone substrate delivery, and also secures transfer of different hormones to targeted cells. Some growth factors and hormones overlap their actions in order to control the angiogenic process for fertility. However, we still know very little about the factors that play a critical role in the vascular changes that occur during folliculogenesis or luteal regression. To promote and maintain the production of VEGF-A in granulosa cells, the effects of local factors such as IGF-I and steroids are needed; that VEGF-A-inducing effect cannot be induced by luteinizing hormone (LH) or chorionic gonadotropin (CG) alone. As a result of the influences that GH exerts on the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, facilitating the release of gonadotropins, and given the relationship between GH and local ovarian factors such as VEGF-A, FGF-2, IGF-1, or production of sex steroids, we assume that GH has to be a necessary factor in ovarian angiogenesis, as it happens in other vascular beds. In this review we will discuss the actions of GH in the ovary, most of them likely due to the local production of the hormone and its mediators.

Growth Hormone and Endometrial Receptivity

Administration of growth hormone (GH) during ovarian stimulation has shown beneficial effects on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. It is generally believed that this improvement is due to the stimulating effect of GH on oocyte quality. However, studies are emerging that show possible positive effect of GH administration on endometrial receptivity, thus suggesting an additional potential benefit at the level of the uterus, especially among women with recurrent implantation failure, thin endometrium, and older normal responders. This review summarizes recent data on GH co-treatment effects on endometrium and endometrial receptivity among infertile women undergoing IVF, and proposes possible mechanisms of GH actions in the endometrium.

Use of Growth Hormone in the IVF Treatment of Women With Poor Ovarian Reserve

Growth hormone (GH) has been used as an adjunct in the field of female infertility treatment for more than 25 years, although, apart from treating women with GH deficiency its role has not yet been clarified. Contributing to this lack of clarity is that several underpowered studies have been performed on women undergoing IVF treatment, with a previous "poor response" to ovarian stimulation, which have suggested a favorable outcome. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials has demonstrated a benefit for the use of the adjunct growth hormone, in comparison to placebo; with reductions in the duration of ovarian stimulation required prior to oocyte retrieval, with a greater number of oocytes collected, and improvements in many of the early clinical parameters with the use of GH. However, no benefit of an increased chance of a live birth with the use of growth hormone for the "poor responding" patient has been determined. Consequently the role of GH to treat a woman with a poor response to ovarian stimulation cannot be supported on the basis of the available evidence. However, the place for GH in the treatment of women undergoing IVF may yet still be determined, as it is also used, without firm evidence of benefit; for women with poor embryonic development, poor endometrial development and for women who do not conceive despite multiple embryo transfers (recurrent implantation failure).

Outcomes of poor responders following growth hormone co-treatment with IVF/ICSI mild stimulation protocol: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

No research has studied the effect of GH co-treatment in mild stimulation protocol for poor responders. We therefore conducted this retrospective analysis to assess the outcome of IVF/ICSI cycles after the adjunct GH use to the mild stimulation protocol in poor responders.

METHODS

132 poor responders who received mild stimulation protocol at Reproductive Medicine Center of Changzheng Hospital from January 2014 to December 2016 were included in this study. Good-quality embryo rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate were compared between the GH group (n = 61) and control group (n = 71).

RESULTS

IVF good-quality embryo rate (68.1 versus 51.5%; P = 0.008*) and ICSI good-quality embryo rate (53.9 versus 36.7%; P = 0.045*) was significantly higher in the GH group. Though the clinical outcomes did not reach a statistically significant difference between the two groups due to the limited sample size, there was a trend of higher rate in GH group in the aspect of clinical pregnancy rate (52.4 versus 47.1%; P = 0.609) and live birth rate (35.7 versus 27.5%; P = 0.392).

CONCLUSION

The results suggested that the adjuvant GH treatment in mild stimulation protocol for poor responders could significantly improve good-quality embryo rate, and might therefore improve the clinical outcomes.

Growth hormone in IVF cycles: any hope?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Growth hormone (GH) has been used as an adjunct in ovulation induction and IVF for 25 years, particularly as an adjunct to ovarian stimulation for women who had a previous poor response to stimulation in an IVF cycle. It does not have US Food and Drug Administration approval for this use. Unfortunately, due to the problems inherent with recruiting women who have undergone unsuccessful IVF treatment cycles and their inevitable low live birth rate per initiated cycle, many studies performed to date have been underpowered.

RECENT FINDINGS

Previous meta-analyses of studies performed in populations of women with a poor response to ovarian stimulation, demonstrated an increase in the live birth rate for the use of GH. With the recent publication of three studies and the presentation of the Australian LIGHT study, we undertook an updated meta-analysis.

SUMMARY

Meta-analysis demonstrated a benefit for the use of the adjunct GH, with a reduction in the duration of ovarian stimulation required for oocyte retrieval, the collection of a greater number of oocytes than placebo, and an improvement in many of the early clinical parameters; however, there was no evidence of an increased chance of a live birth for the use of GH.

The influence of different growth hormone addition protocols to poor ovarian responders on clinical outcomes in controlled ovary stimulation cycles: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Growth hormone (GH) is used as an adjuvant therapy in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) for poor ovarian responders, but findings for its effects on outcomes of IVF have been conflicting. The aim of the study was to compare IVF-ET outcomes among women with poor ovarian responders, and find which subgroup can benefit from the GH addition.

METHODS

We searched the databases, using the terms "growth hormone," "GH," "IVF," "in vitro fertilization." Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were included if they assessed pregnancy rate, live birth rate, collected oocytes, fertilization rate, and implantation rate. Extracted the data from the corresponding articles, Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model, or fixed-effects model was used. Eleven studies were included.

RESULTS

Clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.23-2.22), live birth rate (RR1.73, 1.25-2.40), collected oocytes number (SMD 1.09, 95% CI 0.54-1.64), MII oocytes number (SMD 1.48, 0.84-2.13), and E2 on human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) day (SMD 1.03, 0.18-1.89) were significantly increased in the GH group. The cancelled cycles rate (RR 0.65, 0.45-0.94) and the dose of gonadotropin (Gn) (SMD -0.83, -1.47, -0.19) were significantly lower in patients who received GH. Subgroup analysis indicated that the GH addition with Gn significantly increased the clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.76, 1.25-2.48) and the live birth rate (RR 1.91, 1.29-2.83).

CONCLUSION

The GH addition can significantly improve the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate. Furthermore, the GH addition time and collocation of medications may affect the pregnancy outcome.

The value of growth hormone supplements in ART for poor ovarian responders

Recently, three meta-analyses have concluded that cotreatment with GH improves assisted reproduction outcome in poor controlled ovarian stimulation responders. Although generally GH supplements did not increase controlled ovarian stimulation response or number of oocytes, the supplements improved pregnancy and live-birth rates-thus speaking for an effect on oocyte quality.

Evidence-based management of poor ovarian response

Poor ovarian response is not infrequent and represents one of the major therapeutic challenges in in vitro fertilization. Although several tests have been proposed, which aim at predicting poor response to ovarian stimulation, available data are conflicting regarding their accuracy and clinical usefulness. Even though several therapeutic approaches have been explored, a single effective strategy has not yet been established. One of the major limitations of interpreting the relevant literature is the wide variability in the definitions used for poor ovarian response. Regarding the interventions that have been proposed to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders, limited evidence from relevant randomized controlled trials suggests that addition of growth hormone during ovarian stimulation, as well as performing embryo transfer on day 2 instead of day 3, might be beneficial. Further randomized control trials are warranted to reliably determine which would be the best approach for treating poor ovarian response.

Growth hormone supplementation improves implantation and pregnancy productivity rates for poor-prognosis patients undertaking IVF

In a sequential crossover study of IVF conducted from 2002 to 2006, growth hormone (GH) supplementation was assessed in poor-prognosis patients, categorized on the basis of past failure to conceive (mean 3.05 cycles) due to low response to high-dose stimulation (<3 metaphase II oocytes) or poor-quality embryos. Pregnancy rates in both fresh and frozen transfer cycles and the total productivity rates (fresh and frozen pregnancies per egg collection) were compared. In all, 159 patients had 488 treatment cycles: 221 with GH and 241 without GH. These cycles were also compared with 1572 uncategorized cycles from the same period. GH co-treatment significantly improved the clinical pregnancy rate per fresh transfer (P<0.001) as well as per frozen-thawed embryo derived from GH cycles (P<0.05) creating a highly significant productivity rate (P<0.001). The effect was significant across all age groups, especially in younger patients, and was independent of stimulation modality or number of transfers. GH cycles resulted in significantly more babies delivered per transfer than non-GH cycles (20% versus 7%; P<0.001) although less than the uncategorized cycles (53%). The data uniquely show that the effect of GH is directed at oocyte and subsequent embryo quality.

Growth hormone for in vitro fertilization

BACKGROUND

In an effort to improve outcomes of in-vitro fertilisation cycles the use of growth hormone has been considered. Improving the outcomes of in-vitro fertilisation is especially important for subfertile women who are considered 'poor responders'.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of adjuvant growth hormone in in-vitro fertilisation protocols.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Groups trials register (June 2009), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2009), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2009), EMBASE (1988 to June 2009) and Biological Abstracts (1969 to June 2009).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials were included if they addressed the research question and provided outcome data for intervention and control participants.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Assessment of trial risk of bias and extraction of relevant data was performed independently by two reviewers.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten studies (440 subfertile couples) were included. Results of the meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in outcome measures and adverse events in the routine use of adjuvant growth hormone in in-vitro fertilisation protocols. However, meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in both live birth rates and pregnancy rates favouring the use of adjuvant growth hormone in in-vitro fertilisation protocols in women who are considered poor responders without increasing adverse events, OR 5.39, 95% CI 1.89 to 15.35 and OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.74 to 6.20 respectively.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although the use of growth hormone in poor responders has been found to show a significant improvement in live birth rates, we were unable to identify which sub-group of poor responders would benefit the most from adjuvant growth hormone. The result needs to be interpreted with caution, the included trials were few in number and small sample size. Therefore, before recommending growth hormone adjuvant in in-vitro fertilisation further research is necessary to fully define its role.

Growth hormone for in vitro fertilization

BACKGROUND

In an effort to improve outcomes of in-vitro fertilisation cycles the use of growth hormone has been considered. Improving the outcomes of in-vitro fertilisation is especially important for subfertile women who are considered 'poor responders'.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of adjuvant growth hormone in in-vitro fertilisation protocols.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Groups trials register (June 2009), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2009), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2009), EMBASE (1988 to June 2009) and Biological Abstracts (1969 to June 2009).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials were included if they addressed the research question and provided outcome data for intervention and control participants.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Assessment of trial risk of bias and extraction of relevant data was performed independently by two reviewers.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten studies (440 subfertile couples) were included. Results of the meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in outcome measures and adverse events in the routine use of adjuvant growth hormone in in-vitro fertilisation protocols. However, meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in both live birth rates and pregnancy rates favouring the use of adjuvant growth hormone in in-vitro fertilisation protocols in women who are considered poor responders without increasing adverse events, OR 5.39, 95% CI 1.89 to 15.35 and OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.74 to 6.20 respectively.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although the use of growth hormone in poor responders has been found to show a significant improvement in live birth rates, we were unable to identify which sub-group of poor responders would benefit the most from adjuvant growth hormone. The result needs to be interpreted with caution, the included trials were few in number and small sample size. Therefore, before recommending growth hormone adjuvant in in-vitro fertilisation further research is necessary to fully define its role.

Biological versus chronological ovarian age: implications for assisted reproductive technology

BACKGROUND

Women have been able to delay childbearing since effective contraception became available in the 1960s. However, fertility decreases with increasing maternal age. A slow but steady decrease in fertility is observed in women aged between 30 and 35 years, which is followed by an accelerated decline among women aged over 35 years. A combination of delayed childbearing and reduced fecundity with increasing age has resulted in an increased number and proportion of women of greater than or equal to 35 years of age seeking assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment.

METHODS

Literature searches supplemented with the authors' knowledge.

RESULTS

Despite major advances in medical technology, there is currently no ART treatment strategy that can fully compensate for the natural decline in fertility with increasing female age. Although chronological age is the most important predictor of ovarian response to follicle-stimulating hormone, the rate of reproductive ageing and ovarian sensitivity to gonadotrophins varies considerably among individuals. Both environmental and genetic factors contribute to depletion of the ovarian oocyte pool and reduction in oocyte quality. Thus, biological and chronological ovarian age are not always equivalent. Furthermore, biological age is more important than chronological age in predicting the outcome of ART. As older patients present increasingly for ART treatment, it will become more important to critically assess prognosis, counsel appropriately and optimize treatment strategies. Several genetic markers and biomarkers (such as anti-Müllerian hormone and the antral follicle count) are emerging that can identify women with accelerated biological ovarian ageing. Potential strategies for improving ovarian response include the use of luteinizing hormone (LH) and growth hormone (GH). When endogenous LH levels are heavily suppressed by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues, LH supplementation may help to optimize treatment outcomes for women with biologically older ovaries. Exogenous GH may improve oocyte development and counteract the age-related decline of oocyte quality. The effects of GH may be mediated by insulin-like growth factor-I, which works synergistically with follicle-stimulating hormone on granulosa and theca cells.

CONCLUSION

Patients with biologically older ovaries may benefit from a tailored approach based on individual patient characteristics. Among the most promising adjuvant therapies for improving ART outcomes in women of advanced reproductive age are the administration of exogenous LH or GH.

The effects of somatostatin in the polycystic ovary syndrome

Eighteen obese women (body mass index 30 +/- 6.1 kg/m2) with hyperinsulinaemia and with the polycystic ovary syndrome took octreotide at the dose of 100 mug s.c. The effect of the drug was assessed on plasma levels of gonadotropins luteinising hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), of insulin, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), androstenedione, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3). Octreotide significantly reduced LH (31.8%), insulin (52%), IGF-1 (14%), androstenedione (22.6%) and testosterone (20%) and increased IGFBP-3 (25%).

Addition of growth hormone to gonadotrophins in ovarian stimulation of poor responders treated by in-vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether the addition of growth hormone (GH) can improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) has been examined to date by several underpowered studies, which have not provided solid conclusions.

METHODS

A computerized literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and randomized controlled trial (RCT) registries was performed independently by two reviewers, aiming to identify RCTs that evaluated the following research question: does GH addition increase the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues and gonadotrophins for IVF?

RESULTS

Six relevant RCTs were identified, including a total of 169 patients. GH addition significantly increased clinical pregnancy (rate difference: +16%, 95% CI: +4 to +28; fixed effects model) (number-needed-to-treat (NNT) = 6, 95% CI: 4-25) and live birth rates (rate difference: +17%, 95% CI: +5 to +30; fixed effects model) (NNT = 6; 95% CI: 3-20). Furthermore, GH addition was associated with a significantly higher proportion of patients reaching embryo transfer (rate difference: +22%, 95% CI: +7 to +36; fixed effects model).

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis provides evidence that GH addition increases the probability of clinical pregnancy and live birth in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation with GnRH analogues and gonadotrophins for IVF. However, the total number of patients analyzed is small and thus further RCTs are warranted to prove or disprove this finding.

How to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature to identify randomized controlled trials, which evaluate interventions aiming to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

University-based hospital.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Pregnancy rate.

RESULT(S)

Twenty-two eligible randomized controlled trials were identified that evaluated in total 15 interventions to increase pregnancy rates in poor responders. Based on limited evidence, the only interventions that appear to increase the probability of pregnancy were the addition of GH to ovarian stimulation (odds ratio for live birth: 5.22, confidence interval: 95% 1.09-24.99) and the performance of embryo transfer on day 2 compared with day 3 (ongoing pregnancy rate: 27.7% vs. 16.3%, respectively; difference: +11.4, 95% confidence interval: +1.6 to +21.0).

CONCLUSION(S)

Insufficient evidence exists to recommend most of the treatments proposed to improve pregnancy rates in poor responders. Currently, there is some evidence to suggest that addition of GH, as well as performing embryo transfer on day 2 versus day 3, appear to improve the probability of pregnancy.

Use of oral contraceptives in infertile patients: A descriptive review

In the past and currently, there are several applications of oral contraceptives (OCs) in the field of infertility. The aim of the present descriptive review is to analyze the old and new uses of OCs in infertile patients undergoing simple or multiple ovulation-induction programs. Available data seem to indicate that OCs given before treatment could be effective in patients who are resistant to clomiphene citrate and in poor responders. In addition, the use of OCs is useful for scheduling in vitro fertilization programs downregulated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone-antagonists.

Insulin-like growth factors-I and -II and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-2 in dominant equine follicles during spring transition and the ovulatory season

The period between seasonal anoestrus and cyclicity is characterized in many mares by cyclical growth and regression of large dominant follicles. The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system plays a key role in follicular growth and regression; therefore, we hypothesized that changes in the IGF system and its binding proteins would modulate onset of cyclicity in mares. Ovaries were obtained from pony mares on the day after detection of an actively growing 30 mm transitional anovulatory follicle, and also at the second or third oestrus of the breeding season on the day after the preovulatory follicle reached 30 mm in diameter. Size of dominant follicles at the time of removal was similar in transition (32 ± 0.8 mm) and at oestrus (34 ± 0.6 mm). IGF-I mRNA was present in granulosa cells, with low thecal expression, whereas IGF-II mRNA was confined to the theca layer. Expression of IGF-I and -II mRNAs, and intrafollicular concentrations of oestradiol, were lower (P < 0.01; paired t test) in transitional anovulatory follicles than in preovulatory follicles. Messenger RNA encoding IGFBP-2 was present in both theca and granulosa layers. Steady-state concentrations of mRNA encoding IGFBP-2 mRNA increased (P < 0.001) in theca in preovulatory follicles. Intrafollicular concentrations of IGFBP-2 were higher (P < 0.001) in transitional than in preovulatory follicles. The similarity in circulating concentrations of IGF-I in transitional and cyclic mares, suggested that the somatotrophic axis is not involved in transition from anovulatory to ovulatory cycles. The results suggest that the increased expression of IGF-I and -II mRNAs in preovulatory follicles, along with the decrease in IGFBP-2 concentrations, could increase the bioavailability of intrafollicular IGF in large follicles during the breeding season, and support our hypothesis that intrafollicular IGF bioavailability must exceed a threshold level before ovulation can occur.

Estimation of the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) threshold for initiating the final stages of follicular development in women with elevated FSH levels in the early follicular phase

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) threshold in patients with elevated FSH levels in the early follicular phase (EFP) is higher than in controls.

DESIGN

Pilot study.

SETTING

Academic hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Six patients with elevated EFP FSH (>10 IU/L) and 13 controls.

INTERVENTION(S)

Treatment with a GnRH agonist in the midluteal phase before IV administration of recombinant FSH was started in an ultra-low-dose step-up protocol. The FSH threshold was determined by the mean of FSH levels of the above threshold value and the below threshold value.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Follicle-stimulating hormone threshold, FSH screening value, E(2), number of follicles.

RESULT(S)

The FSH threshold in the elevated EFP FSH group was 6.75 IU/L and was significantly higher than the FSH threshold of the controls (4.65 IU/L). The FSH screening value on day 3 was 12.0 IU/L in the patient group and 5.0 IU/L in the controls. Estradiol was significantly lower on the day that the largest follicle was 18 mm in the elevated EFP FSH group compared with controls (277 vs. 491 pmol/L, respectively). On the day of hCG administration, the number of smaller (10-13 mm) follicles was equal but the number of larger (>14 mm) follicles was higher in the control group compared with the elevated FSH group. In the control group, the basal FSH levels correlated highly with the FSH threshold levels (r = 0.8), but in the patients with elevated EFP FSH this correlation was absent.

CONCLUSION(S)

In normal women, basal FSH day 3 values represent the ovarian threshold for FSH. In women with elevated day 3 FSH, the FSH threshold is higher but not as high as basal FSH values. We postulate that the FSH threshold in patients with elevated EFP FSH is higher because of intraovarian factors. Basal FSH overshoots the threshold, probably because of the limited feedback by the ovary.

Alternative Approaches in the Management of Poor Response in Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation (COH)

Improving pregnancy rates in patients with many failed attempts remains a challenge during IVF-ET or ICSI-ET programs. The availability of good-quality oocytes is a prerequisite for good results in such programs. The use of a personalized protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) that gives the best possible results for the specific patient is a main factor for the success in IVF or ICSI. The response of many patients to the ovarian stimulation used is very poor, giving fewer oocytes than expected, resulting in much lower, if any, pregnancy rates. The definition of a poor responder is not clear and differs among researchers. A variety of strategies have been used to improve response in these patients, regardless of the definition used. These include various ovulation induction protocols that we believe might assist these patients achieve a pregnancy. The difficulty is greater due to the fact that poor responders are not a homogeneous group and each patient may have a different cause. More studies with large numbers of patients are needed in order to find those protocols that could provide these couples with an acceptable pregnancy rate.

IVF outcome in anovulatory infertility (WHO group 2)--including polycystic ovary syndrome--following previous unsuccessful ovulation induction

This follow-up study represents IVF treatment characteristics and outcomes in women with World Health Organization (WHO) group 2 anovulatory infertility after previous unsuccessful ovulation induction compared with controls. Furthermore, the possibility of initial screening parameters of these anovulatory women to predict IVF outcome was examined. Twenty-six patients with WHO 2 anovulatory infertility who failed to achieve a live birth following previous induction of ovulation (using clomiphene citrate as first line and exogenous FSH as second line) were compared with 26 IVF patients with tubal infertility matched for age, treatment period and treatment regimen. The WHO 2 patients underwent 49 IVF cycles, whereas the normo-ovulatory controls underwent 46 cycles. In WHO 2 patients 15 cycles were cancelled compared with six cycles in controls (P = 0.04). Cycles were predominantly cancelled due to insufficient response (P = 0.04). In cases in whom the cycle was cancelled, body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in WHO 2 women compared with controls. Overall live birth rates were comparable (P = 0.9). Obese women suffering from WHO 2 anovulatory infertility are at an increased risk of having their IVF cycle cancelled due to insufficient response. Once oocyte retrieval is achieved, live birth rates are comparable with controls.

Growth hormone for in vitro fertilization

BACKGROUND

In an effort to improve outcomes of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles the use of growth hormone (GH) has been considered. Most studies investigate the role of GH in normally ovulating infertile women but there is also an interest in the effect of GH on women who respond poorly to ovulation induction and IVF.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of GH or growth hormone releasing (GRF) adjuvant therapy, primarily in terms of improving livebirth rate, for women undergoing ovulation induction prior to IVF in (a) patients with no previous history of poor response and (b) patients with a history of poor response.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's trials register (24 March 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to Feb 2003), EMBASE (1988 to Feb 2003) and Biological Abstracts (1969 to Feb 2003). Reference lists of articles were also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials were included if they addressed the research question and provided outcome data for intervention and control subjects.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Assessment of trial quality and extraction of relevant data was performed independently by two reviewers. Validity was assessed in terms of method of randomisation, completeness of follow-up and co-intervention.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine studies (401 couples) were included. Three trials concerned patients with no history of poor response to IVF (91 women) and six investigated previous poor responders (302 women). There was no evidence that routine use of GH affected the outcome of livebirth (3 RCTs; OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.38 to 3.59). In women who had previously responded poorly to IVF there was no significant differences in livebirth when combining trials of GH and GRF (4 RCTs; OR 2.42, 95% CI 0.94 to 6.23). However when trials using GH were analysed separately there was an increase in livebirths (3 RCTs; OR 4.37, 95% CI 1.06 to 18.01). There was no significant differences in any adverse events, but these were poorly and inconsistently reported.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Although the use of GH in previous poor responders has been found to show a significant improvement in livebirth rate, this result was only just significant. Also, this data is from just three small trials. Therefore, before recommending GH in IVF further research is necessary to fully define its role. Meanwhile GH should only be considered in the context of a clinical trial.

IGF-1 in gynaecology and obstetrics: update 2002

Recent discoveries on endocrine, paracrine and autocrine involvement of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in the proliferation of many tissues raised the attention of its role in reproduction and in the growth of various cancers as well as of benign proliferations. The intention of this article is to focus on IGF-1 in the field of gynaecology. Perimenopausal women who exhibit high IGF-1 and low IGF binding protein (IGFBP) levels, like IGFBG-3, have an increased risk of developing breast cancer. A higher risk for cervical, ovarian and endometrial cancer is related to high IGF-1 levels in post- and premenopausal women. It has been shown that myomas, by far the most common benign uterine tumor in women, grow in the presence of IGF-1, in vitro as well as in vivo. Studies show that IGF-1 is involved in the differentiation of various reproductive tissues, like endometrium and ovarian tissues. Patients suffering from polycystic ovary syndrome (PCO) frequently show insulin resistance accompanied by an increase of IGF-1 in plasma. Plasma IGF-1 levels are higher in cases of severe endometriosis, however, in endometriosis and in PCO IGF levels locally in the endometrium are reduced, what might explain infertility. Recently, it was shown that IGF facilitates the implantation of the human embryo in the endometrium during IVF. Implantation is a paradox where different immune systems have to collaborate to make implantation and survival of the pregnancy possible. IGF seems to be the starter molecule so that the two epithelia can fuse. A disturbance can result in complications during pregnancy i.e. spontaneous miscarriage, preeclampsia as well as defects of the embryo. Therefore, IGF is a useful marker in successful pregnancy as well. A better mechanistic understanding of IGF-1 action on the cellular level not only provides more elegant mechanistic explanations for the scientist, but the practitioner might find it interesting to utilize its diagnostic potential as a marker for various diseases. The relation between systemic IGF levels and local tissue IGF-1 levels has not yet been determined for all conditions.

Poor ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation the role of adjuvant treatments

Poor ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation represents a clinical problem in in vitro fertilization practice. Women showing poor ovarian response are a heterogeneous group, many of whom have a reduced ovarian reserve and consequently a lower pregnancy potential. Various management strategies have been proposed to improve ovarian response to gonadotrophins, but these have met with limited success. Adjuvant treatments aim to potentiate the effect of exogenous follicle-stimulating hormone. In separate, randomized, placebo-controlled trials low-dose dexamethasone and aspirin have been shown to reduce the incidence of poor response in an initial stimulation cycle. Preliminary studies using pyridostigmine and L-arginine in established poor responders are encouraging but require confirmation in adequately powered studies. Evidence from randomized controlled trials does not support the use of adjuvant growth hormone or growth hormone-releasing hormone in poor responders without overt growth hormone deficiency. The mechanisms of action of adjuvant treatments require further investigation.

Transvaginal ovarian drilling: a new surgical treatment for improving the clinical outcome of assisted reproductive technologies in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of transvaginal ovarian drilling (TVOD) in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who were undergoing IVF treatment.

DESIGN

Pilot study.

SETTING

Reproductive medicine unit.

PATIENT(S)

Eleven patients with PCOS undergoing treatment with assisted reproductive technology (ART).

INTERVENTION(S)

Selection criterion for TVOD was repeated poor performance in > or =2 previous IVF cycles.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation parameters, number of eggs collected, fertilization rate, embryo cleavage rate, implantation rate, pregnancy rate compared with the cycles before TVOD.

RESULT(S)

In the cycle after TVOD, a significantly higher dosage of FSH was used (33.5 +/- 12 IU vs. 52.2 +/- 15 IU) to collect a higher number of oocytes in the presence of similar E2 values at the day of hCG administration. This resulted in significantly higher fertilization and cleavage rates (27% vs. 66% and 54% vs. 72%, respectively). The pregnancy and the implantation rates after TVOD were similar to those for normovulatory patients undergoing IVF for tubal factor infertility during the study period.

CONCLUSION(S)

Our data suggest that the TVOD is effective in improving IVF results in difficult to treat patients with PCOS, and it is less invasive and less expensive when compared with laparoscopic ovarian diathermy.

Growth hormone does not increase the expression of insulin-like growth factors and their receptor genes in the pre-menopausal human ovary

A growing body of information now supports the existence of a complete intraovarian insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) system. Although the precise role of IGF-I in the context of ovarian physiology remains to be determined, it is likely that IGF-I may engage in the amplification of gonadotrophin hormonal action. These facts and experiments with animals establishing the ovaries of multiple species as a site of growth hormone (GH) reception and action have led to the use of recombinant GH (rGH) as an adjunctive agent to potentiate ovulation induction by exogenous gonadotrophins. Whether intraovarian IGF-I plays an intermediary role in GH hormonal action at the ovarian level remains uncertain at present. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether rGH administration to pre-menopausal women could modify the expression of the IGF-I gene in the ovary. The expression of the IGF-I gene was examined in a time-dependent manner in normal pre-menopausal ovaries obtained from nine women treated with rGH and nine control women treated with placebo, using solution hybridization/RNase protection assays. Ovarian tissue samples were obtained 24 h (six women) and 7 days (12 women) following rGH/placebo injection. Total RNA (20 microg) from whole pre-menopausal ovaries (with or without rGH treatment) as well as from human granulosa cells was hybridized with a human IGF-I antisense RNA. IGF-I peptide, but not oestradiol, serum concentrations increased significantly 24 h after rGH injection. IGF-I gene, however, was not expressed in the luteinized granulosa cells and whole pre-menopausal ovaries irrespectively of rGH treatment in ovarian samples analysed both 1 and 7 days following rGH injection. On the contrary, IGF-II mRNA transcribed from the fetal or fetal-neonatal IGF-II promoter and IGF-I receptor mRNA (both used as hybridization control) were both found in whole pre-menopausal ovary and luteinized granulosa cells. Nevertheless, no changes in the hybridization patterns were seen in the absence or presence of rGH. These studies demonstrate that rGH administration to normal premenopausal women does not change the expression of insulin-like growth factors and their receptor genes in the pre-menopausal human ovary. Furthermore, these results provide further evidence against locally produced IGF-I as responsible for any ovarian effects seen in systemic rGH administration.

Does pretreatment with progestogen or oral contraceptive pills in low responders followed by the GnRHa flare protocol improve the outcome of IVF-ET?

PURPOSE

Women undergoing in vitro fertilization with low ovarian reserve and poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) present a management dilemma. In a retrospective observational study, we compared the pretreatment use of the gestogen medroxyprogesterone acetate (10 mg twice daily from day 15 of the cycle for a minimum of 2 weeks) with an oral contraceptive pill (one tablet daily from day 4 of the cycle for a minimum of 3 weeks).

METHODS

The criteria for inclusion in the study included one or more of the following: abandoned cycles due to poor response, fewer than four oocytes retrieved following a standard COH protocol, age > 39 years, and elevated basal serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Thirty-eight women received pretreatment with gestogen, and a similar number of women received pretreatment with the pill. The flare protocol was used in all treatment cycles combined with an individualized dose of human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) (4-8 ampoules/day of 75 units FSH/ampoule) depending on previous response, age, and early follicular serum FSH level. Both groups were similar in mean age, duration of infertility, early follicular FSH levels, and the distribution of various aetiologies.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine cycles were abandoned before oocyte retrieval, 15 (39.5%) in the pill group and 14 (36.8%) in the gestogen group, because of an inadequate ovarian response. The mean (+/- SD) number of ampoules (75 IU FSH/ampoule) of hMG used per cycle was similar in the pill and gestogen groups (59.7 +/- 19.3 vs. 70.2 +/- 29.4, respectively). There also was no difference seen in the numbers of oocytes retrieved (4.4 +/- 2.3 vs. 4.2 +/- 2.5), total number of embryos (2.5 +/- 2.4 vs. 2.2 +/- 1.1), or the number of embryos transferred (1.8 +/- 1.2 vs. 2.1 +/- 1.0) in the pill and gestogen groups, respectively. One pregnancy in each group resulted following embryo transfer in 22 women in the pill group and in 24 women in the gestogen group.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that pre-IVF treatment with oral contraceptive pill or gestogen combined with the flare protocol in women at high risk of or with a history of poor ovarian response, as defined in this study, did not appear to result in an improvement in outcome of IVF-embryo transfer.

The effects of equine somatotropin (eST) on follicular development and circulating plasma hormone profiles in cyclic mares treated during different stages of the estrous cycle

The effects of exogenous equine somatotropin (eST) administration on ovarian activity and plasma hormone levels were evaluated on horse and pony mares. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of eST on follicular development and circulating concentrations of leutinizing hormone (LH), estradiol, progesterone, and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) in cyclic horse and pony mares. Sixteen mares received daily injections (i.m.) of eST at a concentration of 25 micrograms/kg body weight on either Days 6 through 12 (Treatment A) or 13 through 19 (Treatment B) postovulation. In addition, contemporary mares were similarly given the carrier vehicle and served as controls (Treatments C and D). Blood samples were collected at 24-hr intervals and ultrasonographic evaluations were performed on the ovaries of each mare at 48-hr intervals beginning on the first day of treatment and ending either on the day of ovulation or 5 d postovulation. Circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) were increased in treated mares by Day 3 post-treatment (P < 0.05). Also, mares in Treatment B exhibited a decrease in plasma estradiol concentrations (P < 0.05) when compared with control mares on Days 1 through 5 postovulation of the post-treated estrous cycle. In addition, circulating leutinizing hormone levels were different for mares in Treatment A compared with controls on Days--8 through--1 pre-ovulation (P < 0.05). All follicles present on the ovaries of each mare were measured and placed into one of five categories based on their diameter. Neither the mean number of follicles per size category > or = 8 mm in diameter nor the mean follicular diameter within each size category differed among treatment and control mares. However, eST treatment significantly increased the number of follicles < or = 7 mm on the ovaries of mares treated early in the estrous cycle when compared with control mares on Days 3 and 7 post-treatment and at the onset of standing estrus.

Follicular fluid insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 and -3 vary as a function of ovarian reserve and ovarian stimulation

PURPOSE

Follicular fluid concentrations of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF-II, IGF-binding protein (BP)-1, and IGFBP-3 in 57 women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer were examined to determine whether levels reflected differences in patients' exposure to gonadotropin stimulation and a diminished ovarian reserve.

METHODS

Preovulatory follicular fluid was obtained from both gonadotropin-stimulated and unstimulated cycles. Subjects were grouped according to normal or decreased ovarian reserve and whether or not they received gonadotropin stimulation.

RESULTS

The mean follicular fluid concentrations of IGF-I and IGFBP-1 were significantly lower in the "decreased" ovarian reserve group compared with the "normal" ovarian reserve group, with no change in estradiol or IGF-II levels. This resulted in a decreased molar IGF-I: BP ratio and an increased molar IGF-II:IGFBP-1 ratio. In unstimulated cycles, mean follicular fluid concentrations of IGFs did not differ significantly compared with those in stimulated cycles, whereas concentrations of IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3 were significantly lower, leading to higher molar ratios of the IGFs to the binding proteins.

CONCLUSIONS

Follicular fluid IGF and binding proteins vary as a function of ovarian reserve and gonadotropin stimulation. This may reflect either differences in oocyte quality or a suboptimal follicular fluid environment.

Ovarian follicular dynamics: from basic science to clinical practice

The management of low responders (LR) to ovarian stimulation in cycles of assisted reproduction (AR) is a difficult challenge. Aging of the ovary and LR are coincidental in many situations, but LR is also present in young patients undergoing AR. In fact, today it is a recognized cause of infertility. When the aged ovary is considered, there is evidence that the functioning of the granulosa cells as well as the quality of the oocytes and resulting embryos are affected. Similarly, in young LR, the production of inhibin is affected. However, there is no evidence that the quality of the oocyte and/or the resulting embryo is affected. In this study, we have retrospectively analyzed our files and observed that the quality of the oocytes and embryos was similar between younger and older LR and normal responders (NR). Studies using color Doppler vaginal ultrasound have shown that the pulsatility index (PI) and the resistance index (RI) were increased in LR as compared with NR, suggesting that there was some degree of vascular resistance to flow. Treatment of LR is also a difficult challenge. Ovum donation is a successful treatment for LR, since cumulative birth rates are > 85% with four attempts of embryo transfer. The future may be promising for LR once new technologies are introduced into clinical practice. The use of recombinant gonadotropins and genetically engineered human gonadotropin derivatives may be of considerable help for LR. Similarly, non-gonadotropin hormones, such as cytokines or growth factors, may be shown to play a role in the stimulation of the ovary in the near future, and may therefore open new frontiers for treatment of LR.

Recombinant human growth hormone: old and novel uses

Recent studies of the growth hormone insulinlike growth factor I (IGFI) axis suggest that these hormones are involved in several physiologic processes, in addition to growth. Thus, several lines of evidence indicate an increasingly important role for recombinant human growth hormone as a part of the modern therapeutic armamentarium. In addition to the treatment of children with growth hormone deficiency, administration of growth hormone appears to be of considerable benefit to girls with Turner syndrome, children with chronic renal failure, and adults with growth hormone deficiency or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) wasting syndrome. Moreover, its therapeutic use is being investigated in other conditions, such as children with idiopathic short stature, the healthy elderly, and the critically ill. However, long-term surveillance among growth hormone recipients is needed to fully evaluate its risk-benefit profile.

Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 reduction in follicular fluid in spontaneous and stimulated cycles

OBJECTIVE

To investigate serum and follicular fluid insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) behavior in spontaneous and in superstimulated cycles.

DESIGN

Estradiol, GH, IGF-I, and IGFBP-3 were evaluated in serum and in follicular fluid during spontaneous and stimulated cycles.

SETTING

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Naples, Naples, Italy.

PATIENT(S)

Ninety-two patients with regular menstrual cycles and tubal and/or male factor infertility undergoing treatment with an IVF program.

INTERVENTION(S)

The superstimulated IVF program uses leuprolide acetate suppression followed by hMG in a sequential manner in the subsequent cycle. After sufficient follicular development, hCG was administered, followed 34-36 hours later by oocyte retrieval.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Growth hormone, IGF-I, and IGFBP-3 were assayed by RIA and immunoradiometric assay techniques.

RESULT(S)

Growth hormone levels in serum and in follicular fluid were higher after FSH-stimulated cycles than after physiologic cycles. Serum and follicular fluid IGF-I did not change during physiologic and FSH-stimulated cycles. Serum IGFBP-3 decreased only in FSH-stimulated cycles. Levels of IGFBP-3 in follicular fluid were lower than serum levels in late follicular phase both in physiologic and in FSH-stimulated cycles.

CONCLUSION(S)

Reduction of IGFBP-3 is an important mechanism allowing a larger local availability of free IGFs, which modulate the response of follicles to gonadotropin stimulation. This effect is amplified in stimulated cycles.

Effect of growth hormone suppression on the serum levels of ovarian and adrenal sex steroid hormones in normal women and in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

We investigated the acute effect on the serum levels of ovarian and adrenal sex steroid hormones of the suppression of growth hormone during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). A standard 75 g OGTT was performed in 11 healthy women and eight women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Another five controls were given a sham loading of oral distilled water. Blood samples were obtained immediately before and at 30-minute intervals after glucose or sham loading. Significant progressive declines in testosterone, estradiol, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) and growth hormone levels were observed during OGTT in both groups. In the PCOS and normal groups, respectively, at 120 min, testosterone levels were 75.8% and 64.4% of the baseline (0-time) value, estradiol levels were 83.4% and 83.1%, DHEAS levels were 79.3% and 79.1%, and growth hormone levels were 33.9% and 21.2%. Significant positive correlations were observed between the level of growth hormone and each of the testosterone, estradiol and DHEAS levels in both the groups. The area under the curve for growth hormone was significantly smaller in the PCOS group than in the normal group. Gonadotropins were not changed at any time during OGTT. It appears that growth hormone may modify ovarian and adrenal sex steroidogenic responses to tropic hormones directly or via local insulin-like growth factor-I. Women with PCOS may be relatively deficient in growth hormone, a deficiency which may play a role in the pathophysiology of ovulatory disturbance.

Limited success using the "flare" protocol in poor responders in cycles with low basal follicle-stimulating hormone levels during in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE

To assess an alternate protocol for stimulating poor responders.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

SETTING

University-affiliated infertility clinic.

PATIENT(S)

Eighty poor responders.

INTERVENTION(S)

Stimulation was withheld until patients fulfilled the following criteria: basal FSH < or = 12 mIU/mL (conversion factor to SI unit, 1.00) with concurrent E2 level < or = 100 pg/mL (conversion factor to SI unit, 3.671), and P level < or = 1.0 ng/mL (conversion factor to SI unit, 3.467). They then started leuprolide acetate on cycle day 2 and a high dose of gonadotropins on cycle day 3.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Stimulation response and pregnancy rates (PRs).

RESULT(S)

Nineteen cycles (23.8%) were canceled because of poor ovarian response. The mean E2 level on day of hCG was 2,578 +/- 1,339 pg/mL (9,464 +/- 4,915 pmol/L) (range, 789 to 5934 pg/mL [2,896 to 21,784 pmol/L]). The number of oocytes retrieved was 10 +/- 6.6 (range, 1 to 37). Nine patients did not have ET (failed fertilization [n = 5], no cleavage of preembryos [n = 3], freeze all [n = 1]). The number of pre-embryos transferred was 3.9 +/- 1.6 (range, 1 to 8). The clinical pregnancy rate was 7 of 61 (11.5%) per retrieval, and 7 of 52 (13.4%) per transfer with an implantation rate of 7 of 201 (3.5%). Three patients miscarried with an ongoing PR of 4 of 61 (6.5%) per retrieval and 4 of 52 (7.6%) per transfer.

CONCLUSION(S)

Poor responders undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with the "flare" protocol in cycles with low basal FSH will often show adequate ovarian response and reach oocyte retrieval and ET. The PRs, however, remain low.