The low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein/alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor binds and mediates catabolism of bovine milk lipoprotein lipase

Novel insights into the multifaceted and tissue-specific roles of the endocytic receptor LRP1

Receptor-mediated endocytosis provides a mechanism for the selective uptake of specific molecules thereby controlling the composition of the extracellular environment and biological processes. The low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1) is a widely expressed endocytic receptor that regulates cellular events by modulating the levels of numerous extracellular molecules via rapid endocytic removal. LRP1 also participates in signalling pathways through this modulation as well as in the interaction with membrane receptors and cytoplasmic adaptor proteins. LRP1 SNPs are associated with several diseases and conditions such as migraines, aortic aneurysms, cardiopulmonary dysfunction, corneal clouding, and bone dysmorphology and mineral density. Studies using Lrp1 KO mice revealed a critical, nonredundant and tissue-specific role of LRP1 in regulating various physiological events. However, exactly how LRP1 functions to regulate so many distinct and specific processes is still not fully clear. Our recent proteomics studies have identified more than 300 secreted proteins that either directly interact with LRP1 or are modulated by LRP1 in various tissues. This review will highlight the remarkable ability of this receptor to regulate secreted molecules in a tissue-specific manner and discuss potential mechanisms underpinning such specificity. Uncovering the depth of these "hidden" specific interactions modulated by LRP1 will provide novel insights into a dynamic and complex extracellular environment that is involved in diverse biological and pathological processes.

Macromolecular Interactions of Lipoprotein Lipase (LPL)

Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is a critical enzyme in humans that provides fuel to peripheral tissues. LPL hydrolyzes triglycerides from the cores of lipoproteins that are circulating in plasma and interacts with receptors to mediate lipoprotein uptake, thus directing lipid distribution via catalytic and non-catalytic functions. Functional losses in LPL or any of its myriad of regulators alter lipid homeostasis and potentially affect the risk of developing cardiovascular disease-either increasing or decreasing the risk depending on the mutated protein. The extensive LPL regulatory network tunes LPL activity to allocate fatty acids according to the energetic needs of the organism and thus is nutritionally responsive and tissue dependent. Multiple pharmaceuticals in development manipulate or mimic these regulators, demonstrating their translational importance. Another facet of LPL biology is that the oligomeric state of the enzyme is also central to its regulation. Recent structural studies have solidified the idea that LPL is regulated not only by interactions with other binding partners but also by self-associations. Here, we review the complexities of the protein-protein and protein-lipid interactions that govern LPL structure and function.

Lipid and Lipoprotein Metabolism in Microglia

Microglia, once viewed as static bystanders with limited homeostatic functions, are now considered key players in the development of neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative diseases. Microglial activation is a salient feature of neuroinflammation involving a dynamic process that generates multitudinous microglial phenotypes that can respond to a variety of situational cues in the central nervous system. Recently, a flurry of single cell RNA-sequencing studies have defined microglial phenotypes in unprecedented detail, and have highlighted robust changes in the expression of genes involved in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. Increased expression of genes such as Apolipoprotein E (ApoE), Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells 2 (TREM2) and Lipoprotein Lipase (LPL) in microglia during development, damage, and disease, suggest that increased lipid metabolism is needed to fuel protective cellular functions such as phagocytosis. This review describes our current understanding of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism in microglia, and highlights microglial lipid metabolism as a modifiable target for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and multiple sclerosis.

Low Density Receptor-Related Protein 1 Interactions With the Extracellular Matrix: More Than Meets the Eye

The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a biological substrate composed of collagens, proteoglycans and glycoproteins that ensures proper cell migration and adhesion and keeps the cell architecture intact. The regulation of the ECM composition is a vital process strictly controlled by, among others, proteases, growth factors and adhesion receptors. As it appears, ECM remodeling is also essential for proper neuronal and glial development and the establishment of adequate synaptic signaling. Hence, disturbances in ECM functioning are often present in neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s disease. Moreover, mutations in ECM molecules are found in some forms of epilepsy and malfunctioning of ECM-related genes and pathways can be seen in, for example, cancer or ischemic injury. Low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (Lrp1) is a member of the low density lipoprotein receptor family. Lrp1 is involved not only in ligand uptake, receptor mediated endocytosis and lipoprotein transport—functions shared by low density lipoprotein receptor family members—but also regulates cell surface protease activity, controls cellular entry and binding of toxins and viruses, protects against atherosclerosis and acts on many cell signaling pathways. Given the plethora of functions, it is not surprising that Lrp1 also impacts the ECM and is involved in its remodeling. This review focuses on the role of Lrp1 and some of its major ligands on ECM function. Specifically, interactions with two Lrp1 ligands, integrins and tissue plasminogen activator are described in more detail.

Angiopoietin-like 4 promotes intracellular degradation of lipoprotein lipase in adipocytes

LPL hydrolyzes triglycerides in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins along the capillaries of heart, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue. The activity of LPL is repressed by angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4) but the underlying mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. Our objective was to study the cellular location and mechanism for LPL inhibition by ANGPTL4. We performed studies in transfected cells, ex vivo studies, and in vivo studies with Angptl4(-/-) mice. Cotransfection of CHO pgsA-745 cells with ANGPTL4 and LPL reduced intracellular LPL protein levels, suggesting that ANGPTL4 promotes LPL degradation. This conclusion was supported by studies of primary adipocytes and adipose tissue explants from wild-type and Angptl4(-/-) mice. Absence of ANGPTL4 resulted in accumulation of the mature-glycosylated form of LPL and increased secretion of LPL. Blocking endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-Golgi transport abolished differences in LPL abundance between wild-type and Angptl4(-/-) adipocytes, suggesting that ANGPTL4 acts upon LPL after LPL processing in the ER. Finally, physiological changes in adipose tissue ANGPTL4 expression during fasting and cold resulted in inverse changes in the amount of mature-glycosylated LPL in wild-type mice, but not Angptl4(-/-) mice. We conclude that ANGPTL4 promotes loss of intracellular LPL by stimulating LPL degradation after LPL processing in the ER.

Low density lipoprotein receptor class A repeats are O-glycosylated in linker regions

The low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) is crucial for cholesterol homeostasis and deficiency in LDLR functions cause hypercholesterolemia. LDLR is a type I transmembrane protein that requires O-glycosylation for stable expression at the cell surface. It has previously been suggested that LDLR O-glycosylation is found N-terminal to the juxtamembrane region. Recently we identified O-glycosylation sites in the linker regions between the characteristic LDLR class A repeats in several LDLR-related receptors using the "SimpleCell" O-glycoproteome shotgun strategy. Herein, we have systematically characterized O-glycosylation sites on recombinant LDLR shed from HEK293 SimpleCells and CHO wild-type cells. We find that the short linker regions between LDLR class A repeats contain an evolutionarily conserved O-glycosylation site at position -1 of the first cysteine residue of most repeats, which in wild-type CHO cells is glycosylated with the typical sialylated core 1 structure. The glycosites in linker regions of LDLR class A repeats are conserved in LDLR from man to Xenopus and found in other homologous receptors. O-Glycosylation is controlled by a large family of polypeptide GalNAc transferases. Probing into which isoform(s) contributed to glycosylation of the linker regions of the LDLR class A repeats by in vitro enzyme assays suggested a major role of GalNAc-T11. This was supported by expression of LDLR in HEK293 cells, where knock-out of the GalNAc-T11 isoform resulted in the loss of glycosylation of three of four linker regions.

Lipoprotein receptors--an evolutionarily ancient multifunctional receptor family

The evolutionarily ancient low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene family represents a class of widely expressed cell surface receptors. Since the dawn of the first primitive multicellular organisms, several structurally and functionally distinct families of lipoprotein receptors have evolved. In accordance with the now obsolete 'one-gene-one-function' hypothesis, these cell surface receptors were originally perceived as mere transporters of lipoproteins, lipids, and nutrients or as scavenger receptors, which remove other kinds of macromolecules, such as proteases and protease inhibitors from the extracellular environment and the cell surface. This picture has since undergone a fundamental change. Experimental evidence has replaced the perception that these receptors serve merely as cargo transporters. Instead it is now clear that the transport of macromolecules is inseparably intertwined with the molecular machinery by which cells communicate with each other. Lipoprotein receptors are essentially sensors of the extracellular environment that participate in a wide range of physiological processes by physically interacting and coevolving with primary signal transducers as co-regulators. Furthermore, lipoprotein receptors modulate cellular trafficking and localization of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) and the β-amyloid peptide (Aβ), suggesting a role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Moreover, compelling evidence shows that LDL receptor family members are involved in tumor development and progression.

LRP1 receptor controls adipogenesis and is up-regulated in human and mouse obese adipose tissue

The cell surface low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1, LRP1, plays a major role in lipid metabolism. The question that remains open concerns the function of LRP1 in adipogenesis. Here, we show that LRP1 is highly expressed in murine preadipocytes as well as in primary culture of human adipocytes. Moreover, LRP1 remains abundantly synthesised during mouse and human adipocyte differentiation. We demonstrate that LRP1 silencing in 3T3F442A murine preadipocytes significantly inhibits the expression of PPARgamma, HSL and aP2 adipocyte differentiation markers after adipogenesis induction, and leads to lipid-depleted cells. We further show that the absence of lipids in LRP1-silenced preadipocytes is not caused by lipolysis induction. In addition, we provide the first evidences that LRP1 is significantly up-regulated in obese C57BI6/J mouse adipocytes and obese human adipose tissues. Interestingly, silencing of LRP1 in fully-differentiated adipocytes also reduces cellular lipid level and is associated with an increase of basal lipolysis. However, the ability of mature adipocytes to induce lipolysis is independent of LRP1 expression. Altogether, our findings highlight the dual role of LRP1 in the control of adipogenesis and lipid homeostasis, and suggest that LRP1 may be an important therapeutic target in obesity.

Binding of alpha2ML1 to the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1) reveals a new role for LRP1 in the human epidermis

BACKGROUND

The multifunctional receptor LRP1 has been shown to bind and internalize a large number of protein ligands with biological importance such as the pan-protease inhibitor alpha2-macroglobulin (alpha2M). We recently identified Alpha2ML1, a new member of the alpha2M gene family, expressed in epidermis. alpha2ML1 might contribute to the regulation of desquamation through its inhibitory activity towards proteases of the chymotrypsin family, notably KLK7. The expression of LRP1 in epidermis as well as its ability to internalize alpha2ML1 was investigated.

METHODS AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

In human epidermis, LRP1 is mainly expressed within the granular layer of the epidermis, which gathers the most differentiated keratinocytes, as shown by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence using two different antibodies. By using various experimental approaches, we show that the receptor binding domain of alpha2ML1 (RBDl) is specifically internalized into the macrophage-like cell line RAW and colocalizes with LRP1 upon internalization. Coimmunoprecipitation assays demonstrate that RBDl binds LRP1 at the cell surface. Addition of RAP, a universal inhibitor of ligand binding to LRP1, prevents RBDl binding at the cell surface as well as internalization into RAW cells. Silencing Lrp1 expression with specific siRNA strongly reduces RBDl internalization.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

Keratinocytes of the upper differentiated layers of epidermis express LRP1 as well as alpha2ML1. Our study also reveals that alpha2ML1 is a new ligand for LRP1. Our findings are consistent with endocytosis by LRP1 of complexes formed between alpha2ML1 and proteases. LRP1 may thus control desquamation by regulating the biodisponibility of extracellular proteases.

Adipocyte LDL receptor-related protein-1 expression modulates postprandial lipid transport and glucose homeostasis in mice

Diet-induced obesity and its serious consequences such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer are rapidly becoming a major global health threat. Therefore, understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which dietary fat causes obesity and diabetes is of paramount importance in order to identify preventive and therapeutic strategies. Increased dietary fat intake results in high plasma levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TGRL). Tissue uptake of TGRL has been shown to promote glucose intolerance. We generated mice with an adipocyte-specific inactivation of the multifunctional receptor LDL receptor-related protein-1 (LRP1) to determine its role in mediating the effects of TGRL on diet-induced obesity and diabetes. Knockout mice displayed delayed postprandial lipid clearance, reduced body weight, smaller fat stores, lipid-depleted brown adipocytes, improved glucose tolerance, and elevated energy expenditure due to enhanced muscle thermogenesis. We further demonstrated that inactivation of adipocyte LRP1 resulted in resistance to dietary fat-induced obesity and glucose intolerance. These findings identify LRP1 as a critical regulator of adipocyte energy homeostasis, where functional disruption leads to reduced lipid transport, increased insulin sensitivity, and muscular energy expenditure.

Quantitative analysis of SR-BI-dependent HDL retroendocytosis in hepatocytes and fibroblasts

Previous studies have suggested that HDL retroendocytosis may play a role in scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI)-dependent selective lipid uptake in a cell-specific manner. To investigate this possibility, we developed methods to quantitatively measure HDL uptake and resecretion in fibroblast (COS-7) and hepatocyte (HepG2) cells expressing exogenous SR-BI. Approximately 17% and 24% of HDL associated in an SR-BI-dependent manner with COS-7 and HepG2 cells, respectively, accumulates intracellularly after a 10 min incubation. To determine whether this intracellular HDL undergoes retroendocytosis, we developed a pulse-chase assay whereby internalized biotinylated (125)I-HDL(3) secreted from cells is quantitatively precipitated from cell supernatants using immobilized streptavidin. Our results show a rapid secretion of a portion of intracellular HDL from both cell types (representing 4-7% of the total cell-associated HDL) that is almost complete within 30 min (half-life approximately 10 min). In COS-7 cells, the calculated rate of HDL secretion ( approximately 0.5 ng HDL/mg/min) was >30-fold slower than the rate of SR-BI-dependent selective cholesteryl ester (CE) uptake ( approximately 17 ng HDL/mg/min), whereas the rate of release of HDL from the cell surface ( approximately 19 ng HDL/mg/min) was similar to the rate of selective CE uptake. Notably, the rate of SR-BI-dependent HDL resecretion in COS-7 and HepG2 cells was similar. BLT1, a compound that inhibits selective CE uptake, does not alter the amount of SR-BI-mediated HDL retroendocytosis in COS-7 cells. From these data, we conclude that HDL retroendocytosis in COS-7 and HepG2 cells is similar and that the vast majority of SR-BI-dependent selective uptake occurs at the cell surface in both cell types.

Chylomicron remnant uptake in the livers of mice expressing human apolipoproteins E3, E2 (Arg158→Cys), and E3-Leiden

Apolipoprotein E2 (apoE2) and apoE3-Leiden cause chylomicron remnant accumulation (type III hyperlipidemia). However, the degree of dyslipidemia and its penetrance are different in humans and mice. Remnant uptake by isolated liver from apoE-/- mice transgenic for human apoE2, apoE3-Leiden, or apoE3 was measured. In the presence of both LDL receptor (LDLR) and LDL receptor-related protein (LRP), remnant uptake was apoE3>E3-Leiden>E2 mice. Absence of LDLR reduced uptake in apoE3 and apoE3-Leiden-secreting livers but not in apoE2-secreting livers. LRP inhibition with receptor-associated protein reduced uptake in apoE3- and apoE2-secreting livers, but not in apoE3-Leiden-secreting livers, regardless of the presence of LDLR. Fluorescently labeled remnants clustered with LRP in apoE3-secreting livers only in the absence of LDLR, but clustered in livers that expressed apoE2 even in the presence of LDLR, and did not cluster with LRP in livers of apoE3-Leiden even in the absence of LDLR. Remnants were reconstituted with the three human apoE isoforms. Removal by liver of mApoe-/-/mldlr-/- mice expressing the human LDLR was slightly greater than removal in the previous experiments with apoE3>E2> E3-Leiden. Thus, in vivo, human apoE2 is cleared primarily by LRP, apoE3-Leiden is cleared only by the LDLR, and apoE3 is cleared by both.

Endocytosis of hepatic lipase and lipoprotein lipase into rat liver hepatocytes in vivo is mediated by the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein

In isolated cell studies, the internalization and degradation of hepatic lipase (HL) has been linked to its binding to the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP). We have utilized the receptor-associated protein (RAP), a universal inhibitor of high affinity ligand binding to LRP, to evaluate the participation of LRP in the endocytosis of HL and lipoprotein lipase (LPL). We isolated a total endosome fraction from rat livers after a 30-min infusion of recombinant RAP, administered as a glutathione S-transferase conjugate (GST-RAP). GST-RAP infusion had no effect on the concentration of HL in liver homogenates, but its concentration in blood plasma increased progressively by 20%, and enrichment over homogenate of HL in endosomes was reduced by 50% as compared with infusion of GST alone. The concentrations of LPL in liver and plasma were 1.4 and 0.5%, respectively, those of HL, but endosomal enrichment of the two enzymes was similar ( approximately 10-fold). GST-RAP infusion had no effect on the concentration of LPL in liver but increased its concentration in blood plasma by 250% and reduced its endosomal enrichment by 95% or greater. GST-RAP infusion also reduced endosomal enrichment of LRP by 40%, but enrichment of several other endocytic receptors was unaffected. Endosomal enrichment of several membrane trafficking proteins associated with the endocytic pathway in hepatocytes was unaffected by GST-RAP with the exception of early endosome endosome antigen 1, which was reduced by 85%. We conclude that HL is partially and LPL almost exclusively taken up into rat hepatocytes after binding to the endocytic receptor LRP.

The low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein complexes with cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans to regulate proteoglycan-mediated lipoprotein catabolism

It has been proposed that clearance of cholesterol-enriched very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles occurs through a multistep process beginning with their initial binding to cell-surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG), followed by their uptake into cells by a receptor-mediated process that utilizes members of the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) family, including the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP). We have further explored the relationship between HSPG binding of VLDL and its subsequent internalization by focusing on the LRP pathway using a cell line deficient in LDLR. In this study, we show that LRP and HSPG are part of a co-immunoprecipitable complex at the cell surface demonstrating a novel association for these two cell surface receptors. Cell surface binding assays show that this complex can be disrupted by an LRP-specific ligand binding antagonist, which in turn leads to increased VLDL binding and degradation. The increase in VLDL binding results from an increase in the availability of HSPG sites as treatment with heparinase or competitors of glycosaminoglycan chain addition eliminated the augmented binding. From these results we propose a model whereby LRP regulates the availability of VLDL binding sites at the cell surface by complexing with HSPG. Once HSPG dissociates from LRP, it is then able to bind and internalize VLDL independent of LRP endocytic activity. We conclude that HSPG and LRP together participate in VLDL clearance by means of a synergistic relationship.

Antisense down-regulation of lipocalin-interacting membrane receptor expression inhibits cellular internalization of lipocalin-1 in human NT2 cells

There is increasing experimental evidence demonstrating that many lipocalins bind to specific cell surface receptors. However, whereas the binding of lipocalins to their lipophilic ligands has now been characterized in much detail, there is a lack of knowledge about the nature of lipocalin receptors, the physiological role of receptor binding, and the molecular mechanism of ligand delivery. We previously identified a novel human membrane protein (lipocalin-1-interacting membrane receptor (LIMR)), which interacts with lipocalin-1 (Wojnar, P., Lechner, M., Merschak, P., and Redl, B. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 20206-20212). In the present study, we investigated the physiological role of LIMR and found this protein to be essential for mediating internalization of lipocalin-1 (Lcn-1) in NT2 cells, leading to its degradation. Whereas control NT2 cells rapidly internalized (125)I-Lcn-1 or fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled Lcn-1, NT2 cells that were made LIMR deficient by cDNA antisense expression greatly accumulated Lcn-1 in the culture medium but did not internalize it. Because sequence and structure analysis indicated that proteins similar to LIMR are present in several organisms and at least two closely related orthologues are found in human and mouse, we suggest LIMR to be the prototype of a new family of endocytic receptors, which are topographically characterized by nine putative transmembrane domains and a characteristic large central cytoplasmic loop.

Influence of exonic polymorphisms in the gene for LDL receptor-related protein (LRP) on risk of coronary artery disease

The low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-related protein (LRP) is a multifunctional receptor involved in numerous biological processes relevant to vascular biology including lipoprotein metabolism. Several polymorphisms in the LRP gene have been described and in this study we examined their influence on coronary artery disease (CAD). We compared the frequencies of the exon 3 (C766T), exon 6 (C663T), exon 22 (C200T), and four rarer and more recently described polymorphisms in approximately 600 Caucasian subjects aged <50 years with angiographic CAD and approximately 700 similarly aged subjects without symptomatic CAD randomly selected from the community. We found the distribution of exon 22 C200T genotypes to differ significantly between the CAD (CC: 52%, CT: 39%, TT: 9%) and control subjects (CC: 43%, CT: 46%, TT: 11%, P=0.005), with the CC genotype conferring an odds ratio (OR) for CAD of 1.5 (95% CI: 1.2-1.8, P=0.001) despite a lack of significant influence on plasma cholesterol or triglyceride. The other LRP polymorphisms were less common. Two showed an association with CAD; for the exon 3 C766T polymorphism the TT genotype was significantly lower (1.0 vs. 2.7%; OR: 0.36; P=0.04) and, for the exon 6 C663T polymorphism, the heterozygote frequency was higher (6.2 vs. 3.4%; OR: 1.9; P=0.03) in CAD subjects. In conclusion, LRP gene polymorphisms, particularly the relatively common exon 22 C200T polymorphism, are a significant risk factor for premature CAD in Caucasians.

Hepatic lipase mediates an increase in selective uptake of HDL-associated cholesteryl esters by cells in culture independent from SR-BI

Scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI) mediates the selective uptake of HDL cholesteryl esters (CEs) by the liver. Hepatic lipase (HL) promotes this lipid uptake independent from lipolysis. The role of SR-BI in this HL-mediated increase in selective CE uptake was explored. Baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells were transfected with the SR-BI cDNA yielding cells with SR-BI expression, whereas no SR-BI was detected in control cells. These cells were incubated in medium containing 125I [3H]cholesteryl oleyl ether-labeled HDL3 (d = 1.125-1.21 g/ml) and HL was absent or present. Tetrahydrolipstatin (THL) blocked lipolysis. In control BHK cells and in BHK cells with SR-BI, HDL3 selective CE uptake (3H-125I) was detectable and SR-BI promoted this uptake. In both cell types, HL mediated an increase in selective CE uptake from HDL3. Quantitatively, this HL effect was similar in control BHK cells and in BHK cells with SR-BI. These results suggest that HL promotes selective uptake independent from SR-BI. To investigate the role of cell surface proteoglycans on the HL-mediated HDL3 uptake, proteoglycan deficiency was induced by heparinase digestion. Proteoglycan deficiency decreased the HL-mediated promotion of selective CE uptake. In summary, the stimulating HL effect on HDL selective CE uptake is independent from SR-BI and lipolysis. Proteoglycans are a requisite for the HL action on selective uptake. Results suggest that (a) pathway(s) distinct from SR-BI mediate(s) selective CE uptake from HDL.

Adipocyte low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein gene expression and function is regulated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma

The alpha(2)-macroglobulin receptor/low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) is a large multifunctional receptor that interacts with a variety of molecules. It is implicated in biologically important processes such as lipoprotein metabolism, neurological function, tissue remodeling, protease complex clearance, and cell signal transduction. However, the regulation of LRP gene expression remains largely unknown. In this study, we have analyzed 2 kb of the 5'-flanking region of the LRP gene and identified a predicted peroxisome proliferator response element (PPRE) from -1185 to -1173. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) ligands such as fatty acids and rosiglitazone increased functional cell surface LRP by 1.5-2.0-fold in primary human adipocytes and in the SW872 human liposarcoma cell line as assessed by activated alpha(2)-macroglobulin binding and degradation. These agents were found to increase LRP transcription. Gel shift analysis of the putative PPRE demonstrated direct binding of PPARgamma/retinoid X receptor alpha heterodimers to the PPRE in the LRP gene. Furthermore, these heterodimers could no longer interact with a mutated PPRE probe. The isolated promoter was functional in SW872 cells, and its activity was increased by 1.5-fold with the addition of rosiglitazone. Furthermore, the isolated response element was similarly responsive to rosiglitazone when placed upstream of an ideal promoter. Mutagenesis of the predicted PPRE abolished the ability of this construct to respond to rosiglitazone. These data demonstrate that fatty acids and rosiglitazone directly stimulate transcription of the LRP gene through activation of PPARgamma and increase functional LRP expression.

Human coronary smooth muscle cells internalize versican-modified LDL through LDL receptor-related protein and LDL receptors

Versican-like proteoglycans are the main component of the intimal extracellular matrix interacting with low density lipoprotein (LDL). The aim of this study has been to investigate the receptors involved in versican-modified LDL uptake by human vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). We have found that versican-LDL interaction leads to the following: (1) monomeric LDL particles that are similar in size and electrophoretic mobility to native LDL but that have a higher capacity to induce intracellular cholesteryl ester (CE) accumulation and (2) fused LDL particles similar in size to those obtained by vortexing. The precipitable fraction of versican-LDL, composed of 50% monomeric and 50% fused LDL particles, induced a dose-response increase in the CE content of VSMCs. Anti-LDL receptor antibody decreased the CE accumulation derived from monomeric LDL particles by 88 +/- 3% and that derived from the total precipitable fraction by 45 +/- 3%. Inhibition of LDL receptor-related protein expression by antisense oligodeoxynucleotides reduced the CE accumulation derived from the precipitable fraction by 65 +/- 2.8%, whereas it did not produce any effect on the CE accumulation derived from monomeric LDL. These results suggest that versican-LDL induces CE accumulation in human VSMCs by the LDL receptor (monomeric particles) and LDL receptor-related protein (fused LDL).

The low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein contributes to selective uptake of high density lipoprotein cholesteryl esters by SW872 liposarcoma cells and primary human adipocytes

The concept that selective transfer of high density lipoprotein (HDL)-derived cholesteryl esters (CE) does not require lipoprotein internalization has been challenged recently by evidence that implicates HDL recycling during the selective uptake process. This has prompted us to examine the role of the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) in selective uptake. LRP is an endocytic receptor for lipoprotein lipase (LpL) and apolipoprotein E (apoE) ligands that are able to mediate selective uptake. We report that molecules that interfere with ligand binding to LRP, such as the receptor-associated protein (RAP), suramin, alpha(2)-macroglobulin, or lactoferrin, inhibit HDL-CE selective uptake by human primary adipocytes and SW872 liposarcoma cells by 35-50%. This partial inhibition of selective uptake from total HDL was not due to preferential inhibition of the HDL(2) or HDL(3) subfractions. Selective uptake by the scavenger receptor BI was not inhibited by RAP, excluding its involvement. Furthermore, in SW872 cells in which LRP was reduced to 14% of control levels by stable antisense expression, selective uptake was attenuated by at least 33%, confirming a role for LRP in this process. RAP, alpha(2)-macroglobulin, lactoferrin, and suramin (individually or in paired combinations) also attenuated selective uptake of HDL-CE by primary human adipocytes by about 40%. On the other hand, human skin fibroblasts express LRP abundantly but lack the capacity for selective uptake, demonstrating that other molecules are required. In SW872 cells, exogenous apoE or LpL can facilitate selective uptake but only the apoE-enhanced uptake can be inhibited by RAP, implicating apoE as a likely co-mediator. We discuss the possible mechanisms by which the endocytic receptor, LRP, can mediate selective uptake.

Cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans participate in factor VIII catabolism mediated by low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein

We have demonstrated previously that catabolism of a coagulation factor VIII (fVIII) from its complex with von Willebrand factor (vWf) is mediated by low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) (Saenko, E. L., Yakhyaev, A. V., Mikhailenko, I., Strickland, D. K., and Sarafanov, A. G. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 37685-37692). In the present study, we found that this process is facilitated by cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs). This was demonstrated by simultaneous blocking of LRP and HSPGs in model cells, which completely prevented fVIII internalization and degradation from its complex with vWf. In contrast, the selective blocking of either receptor had a lesser effect. In vivo studies of clearance of (125)I-fVIII-vWf complex in mice also demonstrated that the simultaneous blocking of HSPGs and LRP led to a more significant prolongation of fVIII half-life (5.5-fold) than blocking of LRP alone (3.5-fold). The cell culture and in vivo experiments revealed that HSPGs are also involved in another, LRP-independent pathway of fVIII catabolism. In both pathways, HSPGs act as receptors providing the initial binding of fVIII-vWf complex to cells. We demonstrated that this binding occurs via the A2 domain of fVIII, since A2, but not other portions of fVIII or isolated vWf, strongly inhibited cell surface binding of fVIII-vWf complex, and the affinities of A2 and fVIII-vWf complex for the cells were similar. The A2 site involved in binding to heparin was localized to the region 558-565, based on the ability of the corresponding synthetic peptide to inhibit A2 binding to heparin, used as a model for HSPGs.

LDL receptor-related protein mediates uptake of aggregated LDL in human vascular smooth muscle cells

Foam cell formation is a key event in the onset and progression of atherosclerotic lesions. We have previously reported that internalization of aggregated low density lipoproteins (agLDLs) by vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) produces cholesteryl ester (CE) accumulation in these cells. The aim of this study was to analyze whether the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) mediates the uptake of agLDL by VSMCs. First, immunocytochemistry and fluorescence microscopic analysis with the use of anti-LRP antibodies indicated that there was a high expression of LRP in VSMCs. Confocal microscopic analysis with the use of agLDLs labeled with fluorochrome 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3', 3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine and anti-LRP antibodies showed the colocalization of agLDL and LRP. The second approach was to analyze the effect of LRP ligands on agLDL internalization; lactoferrin strongly inhibited CE accumulation from agLDLs (85.0+/-5.7% at 25 microg/mL) by impairing agLDL binding. Coincubation of agLDL with anti-LRP antibodies decreased in a dose-dependent manner agLDL-derived CE accumulation (from 20% at 12.5 microg/mL to 80% at 50 microg/mL). The third approach was to evaluate whether antisense LRP oligodeoxynucleotides were able to block agLDL internalization. Treatment of VSMCs with 5 micromol/L antisense LRP oligodeoxynucleotides reduced agLDL-derived CE accumulation by 84+/-2%. In conclusion, these results from immunologic, biochemical, and molecular interventions demonstrate that LRP mediates the binding and internalization of agLDL in human VSMCs. Because LRP is highly expressed in VSMCs and the uptake of 1 LDL aggregate amounts to the deposition of several hundreds of LDL particles, the uptake of agLDL through LRP could have a crucial role for lipid deposition in VSMCs.

Expression of alpha(2)-macroglobulin receptor/low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) in rat microglial cells

Low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) participates in the uptake and degradation of several ligands implicated in neuronal pathophysiology including apolipoprotein E (apoE), activated alpha(2) -macroglobulin (alpha(2)M*) and beta-amyloid precursor protein (APP). The receptor is expressed in a variety of tissues. In the brain LRP is present in pyramidal-type neurons in cortical and hippocampal regions and in astrocytes that are activated as a result of injury or neoplasmic transformation. As LRP is expressed in the monocyte/macrophage cell system, we were interested in examining whether LRP is expressed in microglia. We isolated glial cells from the brain of neonatal rats and LRP was immunodetected both in microglial cells and in astrocytes expressing glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP). Microglial cells were able to bind and internalize LRP-specific ligand, alpha(2)M*. The internalization was inhibitable by RAP, with a Kd of 1.7 nM. The expression of LRP was up-regulated by dexamethasone, and down-regulated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) or a combination of both. LRP was less sensitive to dexamethasone in activated astrocytes than in microglia. We provided the first analysis of LRP expression and regulation in microglia. Our results open the possibility that microglial cells could be related to the participation of LRP and its ligands in different pathophysiological states in brain.

Endogenously produced glycosaminoglycans affecting the release of lipoprotein lipase from macrophages and the interaction with lipoproteins

Macrophages are intimately involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic diseases. A key feature of this process is their uptake of various lipoproteins and subsequent transformation to foam cells. Since lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is believed to play a role in foam cell formation, we investigated if endogenously produced proteoglycans (PGs) affect the release of this enzyme from macrophages. The human leukaemic cell line THP-1 which differentiates into macrophages by treatment with phorbol ester (phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate) served as a model. The differentiation of THP-1 macrophages promoted the release of PGs into the cell medium which caused the detachment of LPL activity from the cell surface, and prevented LPL re-uptake and inactivation. These PGs were mainly composed of chondroitin sulfate type and exerted a heparin-like effect on LPL release. LPL is known to increase the cell association of lipoproteins by the well known bridging function. Exogenous bovine LPL at a concentration of 1 microg/ml enhanced low density lipoprotein (LDL)-binding 10-fold. Endogenously produced PGs reduced LPL-mediated binding of LDL. It is proposed that the differentiation-dependent increase in the release of PGs interferes with binding of LPL and reduces lipoprotein-binding to macrophages.

The heparin-binding proteins apolipoprotein E and lipoprotein lipase enhance cellular proteoglycan production

Apolipoprotein E (apoE) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL), key proteins in the regulation of lipoprotein metabolism, bind with high affinity to heparin and cell-surface heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG). In the present study, we tested whether the expression of apoE or LPL would modulate proteoglycan (PG) metabolism in cells. Two apoE-expressing cells, macrophages and fibroblasts, and LPL-expressing Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were used to study the effect of apoE and LPL on PG production. Cellular PGs were metabolically labeled with (35)[S]sulfate for 20 hours, and medium, pericellular PGs, and intracellular PGs were assessed. In all transfected cells, PG levels in the 3 pools increased 1.6- to 3-fold when compared with control cells. Initial PG production was assessed from the time of addition of radiolabeled sulfate; at 1 hour, there was no difference in PG synthesis by apoE-expressing cells when compared with control cells. After 1 hour, apoE-expressing cells had significantly greater production of PGs. Total production assessed with [(3)H]glucosamine was also increased. This was due to an increase in the length of the glycosaminoglycan chains. To assess whether the increase in PGs was due to a decrease in PG degradation, a pulse-chase experiment was performed. Loss of sulfate-labeled pericellular PGs was similar in apoE and control cells, but more labeled PGs appeared in the medium of the apoE-expressing cells. Addition of exogenous apoE and anti-human apoE antibody to both non-apoE-expressing and apoE-expressing cells did not alter PG production. Moreover, LPL addition did not alter cell-surface PG metabolism. These results show that enhanced gene expression of apoE and LPL increases cellular PG production. We postulate that such changes in vascular PGs can affect the atherogenic potential of arteries.

Role of the low density lipoprotein-related protein receptor in mediation of factor VIII catabolism

In the present study, we found that catabolism of coagulation factor VIII (fVIII) is mediated by the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LPR), a liver multiligand endocytic receptor. In a solid phase assay, fVIII was shown to bind to LRP (K(d) 116 nM). The specificity was confirmed by a complete inhibition of fVIII/LRP binding by 39-kDa receptor-associated protein (RAP), an antagonist of all LRP ligands. The region of fVIII involved in its binding to LRP was localized within the A2 domain residues 484-509, based on the ability of the isolated A2 domain and the synthetic A2 domain peptide 484-509 to prevent fVIII interaction with LRP. Since vWf did not inhibit fVIII binding to LRP, we proposed that LRP receptor may internalize fVIII from its complex with vWf. Consistent with this hypothesis, mouse embryonic fibroblasts that express LRP, but not fibroblasts genetically deficient in LRP, were able to catabolize (125)I-fVIII complexed with vWf, which was not internalized by the cells. These processes could be inhibited by RAP and A2 subunit of fVIII, indicating that cellular internalization and degradation were mediated by interaction of the A2 domain of fVIII with LRP. In vivo studies of (125)I-fVIII.vWf complex clearance in mice demonstrated that RAP completely inhibited the fast phase of the biphasic (125)I-fVIII clearance that is responsible for removal of 60% of fVIII from circulation. Inhibition of the RAP-sensitive phase prolonged the half-life of (125)I-fVIII in circulation by 3.3-fold, indicating that LRP receptor plays an important role in fVIII clearance.

An extrahepatic receptor-associated protein-sensitive mechanism is involved in the metabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins

We have used adenovirus-mediated gene transfer in mice to investigate low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) and LDLR-related protein (LRP)-independent mechanisms that control the metabolism of chylomicron and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) remnants in vivo. Overexpression of receptor-associated protein (RAP) in mice that lack both LRP and LDLR (MX1cre(+)LRP(flox/flox)LDLR(-/-)) in their livers elicited a marked hypertriglyceridemia in addition to the pre-existing hypercholesterolemia in these animals, resulting in a shift in the distribution of plasma lipids from LDL-sized lipoproteins to large VLDL-sized particles. This dramatic increase in plasma lipids was not due to a RAP-mediated inhibition of a unknown hepatic high affinity binding site involved in lipoprotein metabolism, because no RAP binding could be detected in livers of MX1cre(+)LRP(flox/flox)LDLR(-/-) mice using both membrane binding studies and ligand blotting experiments. Remarkably, RAP overexpression also resulted in a 7-fold increase (from 13.6 to 95.6 ng/ml) of circulating, but largely inactive, lipoprotein lipase (LPL). In contrast, plasma hepatic lipase levels and activity were unaffected. In vitro studies showed that RAP binds to LPL with high affinity (K(d) = 5 nM) but does not affect its catalytic activity, in vitro or in vivo. Our findings suggest that an extrahepatic RAP-sensitive process that is independent of the LDLR or LRP is involved in metabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. There, RAP may affect the functional maturation of LPL, thus causing the accumulation of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in the circulation.

The second and fourth cluster of class A cysteine-rich repeats of the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein share ligand-binding properties

The low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) is a multifunctional endocytic cell-surface receptor that binds and internalizes a diverse array of ligands. The receptor contains four putative ligand-binding domains, generally referred to as clusters I, II, III, and IV. In this study, soluble recombinant receptor fragments, representing each of the four individual clusters, were used to map the binding sites of a set of structurally and functionally distinct ligands. Using surface plasmon resonance, we studied the binding of these fragments to methylamine-activated alpha(2)-macroglobulin, pro-urokinase-type plasminogen activator, tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, t-PA.plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 complexes, lipoprotein lipase, apolipoprotein E, tissue factor pathway inhibitor, lactoferrin, the light chain of blood coagulation factor VIII, and the intracellular chaperone receptor-associated protein (RAP). No binding of the cluster I fragment to any of the tested ligands was observed. The cluster III fragment only bound to the anti-LRP monoclonal antibody alpha(2)MRalpha3 and weakly to RAP. Except for t-PA, we found that each of the ligands tested binds both to cluster II and to cluster IV. The affinity rate constants of ligand binding to clusters II and IV and to LRP were measured, showing that clusters II and IV display only minor differences in ligand-binding kinetics. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the subdomains C3-C7 of cluster II are essential for binding of ligands and that this segment partially overlaps with a RAP-binding site on cluster II. Finally, we show that one RAP molecule can bind to different clusters simultaneously, supporting a model in which RAP binding to LRP induces a conformational change in the receptor that is incompatible with ligand binding.

Low density lipoprotein uptake: holoparticle and cholesteryl ester selective uptake

Low density lipoproteins (LDL) contain apolipoprotein B-100 and are cholesteryl ester-rich, triglyceride-poor macromolecules, arising from the lipolysis of very low density lipoproteins. This review will describe the receptors responsible for uptake of whole LDL particles (holoparticle uptake), and the selective uptake of LDL cholesteryl ester. The LDL-receptor mediates the internalization of whole LDL through an endosomal-lysosomal pathway, leading to complete degradation of LDL. Increasing LDL-receptor expression by pharmacological intervention efficiently reduces blood LDL concentrations. The lipolysis stimulated receptor and LDL-receptor related protein may also lead to complete degradation of LDL in presence of free fatty acids and apolipoprotein E- or lipase-LDL complexes, respectively. Selective uptake of LDL cholesteryl ester has been demonstrated in the liver, especially in rodents and humans. This activity brings five times more LDL cholesteryl ester than the LDL-receptor to human hepatoma cells, suggesting that it is a physiologically significant pathway. The lipoprotein binding site of HepG2 cells mediates this process and recognizes all lipoprotein classes. Scavenger receptor class B type I and CD36, which mediate the selective uptake of high density lipoprotein cholesteryl ester, are potentially involved in LDL cholesteryl ester selective uptake, since they both bind LDL with high affinity. It is not known whether they are identical to the uncloned lipoprotein binding site and if the selective uptake of LDL cholesteryl ester produces a less atherogenic particle. If this is verified, pharmacological up-regulation of LDL cholesteryl ester selective uptake may become another therapeutic approach for reducing blood LDL-cholesterol levels and the risk of atherosclerosis.

The mammalian low-density lipoprotein receptor family

The low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDL-R) family consists of cell-surface receptors that recognize extracellular ligands and internalize them for degradation by lysosomes. The LDL-R is the prototype of this family, which also contains very-low-density lipoprotein receptors (VLDL-R), apolipoprotein E receptor 2, LRP, and megalin. The family members contain four major structural modules: the cysteine-rich complement-type repeats, epidermal growth factor precursor-like repeats, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic domain. Each structural module serves distinct and important functions. These receptors bind several structurally dissimilar ligands. It is proposed that instead of a primary sequence, positive electrostatic potential in different ligands constitutes a receptor binding domain. This family of receptors plays crucial roles in various physiologic functions. LDL-R plays an important role in cholesterol homeostasis. Mutations cause familial hypercholesterolemia and premature coronary artery disease. LDL-R-related protein plays an important role in the clearance of plasma-activated alpha 2-macroglobulin and apolipoprotein E-enriched lipoproteins. It is essential for fetal development and has been associated with Alzheimer's disease. Megalin is the major receptor in absorptive epithelial cells of the proximal tubules and an antigenic determinant for Heymann nephritis in rats. Mutations in a chicken homolog of VLDL-R cause female sterility and premature atherosclerosis. This receptor is not expressed in liver tissue; however, transgenic expression of VLDL-R in liver corrects hypercholesterolemia in experiment animals, which suggests that it can be a candidate for gene therapy for various hyperlipidemias. The functional importance of individual receptors may lie in their differential tissue expression. The regulation of expression of these receptors occurs at the transcriptional level. Expression of the LDL-R is regulated by intracellular sterol levels involving novel membrane-bound transcription factors. Other members of the family are not regulated by sterols. All the members are, however, regulated by hormones and growth factors, but the mechanisms of regulation by hormones have not been elucidated. Studies of these receptors have provided important insights into receptor structure-function and mechanisms of ligand removal and catabolism. It is anticipated that increased knowledge about the LDL-R family members will open new avenues for the treatment of many disorders.

Sortilin/neurotensin receptor-3 binds and mediates degradation of lipoprotein lipase

Lipoprotein lipase and the receptor-associated protein (RAP) bind to overlapping sites on the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein/alpha2-macroglobulin receptor (LRP). We have investigated if lipoprotein lipase interacts with the RAP binding but structurally distinct receptor sortilin/neurotensin receptor-3. We show, by chemical cross-linking and surface plasmon resonance analysis, that soluble sortilin binds lipoprotein lipase with an affinity similar to that of LRP. The binding was inhibited by heparin and RAP and by the newly discovered sortilin ligand neurotensin. In 35S-labeled 3T3-L1 adipocytes treated with the cross-linker dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate), lipoprotein lipase-containing complexes were isolated by anti-sortilin antibodies. To elucidate function in cells, sortilin-negative Chinese hamster ovary cells were transfected with full-length sortilin and shown to express about 8% of the receptors on the cell surface. These cells degraded 125I-labeled lipoprotein lipase much faster than the wild-type cells. The degradation was inhibited by unlabeled lipoprotein lipase, indicating a saturable pathway, and by RAP and heparin. Moreover, inhibition by the weak base chloroquine suggested that degradation occurs in an acidic vesicle compartment. The results demonstrate that sortilin is a multifunctional receptor that binds lipoprotein lipase and, when expressed on the cell surface, mediates its endocytosis and degradation.

Intracellular processing of endocytosed triglyceride-rich lipoproteins comprises both recycling and degradation

The current study was performed to investigate the intracellular fate of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins are responsible for the delivery of lipids to various tissues, however, their intracellular pathway has not yet been elucidated. Here radiolabeled triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, associated with lipoprotein lipase, were used for the quantitative evaluation of the intracellular metabolism. Pulse chase experiments showed that after 90 minutes approximately 60% of the labeled protein, mainly apoproteins E and C, was released intact into the medium, where it re-associates with lipoproteins. Apoprotein B, in contrast, was degraded, following the same pathway as the apoprotein B from low density lipoproteins. In kinetic experiments uptake and intracellular fate of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins was compared to that of transferrin and low density lipoproteins. These experiments revealed that apoproteins were retained inside the cell much longer than transferrin, and unlike low density lipoproteins were not degraded. Using immunofluorescence it was shown that apoprotein E and lipoprotein lipase follow a distinct route from the sorting compartment to the surface, which is clearly distinguishable from the perinuclear transferrin recycling compartment. In contrast, the fluorescence labeled lipids were delivered to lysosomal compartments. The data presented here show that surface proteins of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, such as apoproteins E and C and lipoprotein lipase follow a recycling pathway, whereas lipids and high molecular mass core proteins are degraded.

Receptor-mediated mechanisms of lipoprotein remnant catabolism

Chylomicron and VLDL are triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particles assembled by the intestine and liver respectively. These particles are not metabolized by the liver in their native form. However, upon entry into the plasma, their triglyceride component is rapidly hydrolyzed by lipoprotein lipase and they are converted to cholesterol-rich remnant particles. The remnant particles are recognized by the liver and rapidly cleared from the plasma. This process is believed to occur in two steps. (i) An initial sequestration of remnant particles on hepatic cell surface proteoglycans, and (ii) receptor-mediated endocytosis of remnants by hepatic parenchymal cells. The initial binding to proteoglycans may be facilitated by lipoprotein lipase and hepatic lipase which possess both lipid- and heparin-binding domains. The subsequent endocytic process may be mediated by LDL receptors and/or LRP. Both receptors have a high affinity for apoE, a major apolipoprotein component of remnant particles. The lipases may also serve as ligands for these receptors. An impairment of any component of this complex process may result in an accumulation of remnant particles in the plasma leading to atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease.

In vivo clearance of ternary complexes of vitronectin-thrombin-antithrombin is mediated by hepatic heparan sulfate proteoglycans

Thrombin is inhibited by its cognate plasma inhibitor antithrombin, through the formation of covalent thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complexes that are found as ternary complexes with vitronectin (VN-TAT). To determine whether the metabolism of VN-TAT ternary complexes is different from that previously reported for binary TAT complexes, plasma clearance studies were done in rabbits using human VN-TAT. 125I-VN-TAT was shown to be cleared rapidly from the circulation (t1/2alpha = 3.8 min) in a biphasic manner mainly by the liver. 125I-TAT had a similar initial clearance (t1/2alpha = 5.3 min) but had a significantly faster beta-phase clearance (t1/2beta = 42.8 min versus 85.4 min for VN-TAT; p = 0.005). Protamine sulfate and heparin abolished the rapid initial alpha-phase of 125I-VN-TAT clearance and reduced its liver-specific association and in vivo degradation. Heparin also reduced the alpha-phase clearance of 125I-TAT and was associated with the appearance of high molecular weight complexes, suggesting enhanced complex formation between VN and TAT. 125I-VN-TAT binding to HepG2 cells was reduced by competition with VN-TAT or heparin but to a much lesser extent in the presence of TAT. The binding of VN-TAT to HepG2 cells was not inhibited by competition with the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein ligand, methylamine-alpha2-macroglobulin. 125I-VN-TAT binding was also inhibited by treating HepG2 cells with heparinase or by growing the cells in the presence of beta-D-xyloside. Finally, both heparin and chloroquine, but not methylamine-alpha2-macroglobulin, reduced the internalization and degradation of VN-TAT by HepG2 cells. Taken together, these data indicate the importance of VN in TAT metabolism and demonstrate that VN-TAT binds to liver-associated heparan sulfate proteoglycans, which mediate its internalization and subsequent intracellular degradation.

Oligomeric structure of hepatic lipase: evidence from a novel epitope tag technique

The subunit structure of purified rHL (rHL) was determined by gel filtration chromatography, density gradient ultracentrifugation studies and a novel approach using epitope-tagged rHL. By gel filtration studies, native rHL had an apparent molecular weight of 179 kDa whereas enzyme treated with 6 M guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl) for 22 h at room temperature gave a protein peak at 76 kDa. Using milder conditions for denaturation of rHL, such as 1 M GuHCl for 2 h, rHL eluted in two distinct peaks, one at 179 kDa and the other at 76 kDa. In addition, both protein peaks produced under mild denaturing conditions possessed detectable catalytic activity. Consistent with studies on lipoprotein lipase, the denatured rHL eluted from heparin-Sepharose at a lower salt concentration of 0.42 M NaCl than the native rHL which eluted at 0.72 M NaCl. By density gradient ultracentrifugation studies, the estimated molecular weight of native rHL was determined to be 113 kDa. Together, the data suggest that native rHL exists as a dimer that can be denatured into monomers by GuHCl and that a fraction of the denatured enzyme has detectable enzyme activity. To confirm these results, we designed two different rHL constructs that were epitope-tagged with either the myc or flag epitope and transfected them into 293 cells. The addition of the tag was shown not to alter enzyme secretion rate or specific activity of the lipase. Partially purified lipase from media of cotransfected cells was used to establish a dimer assay which employed a sandwich ELISA. This assay firmly established the presence of a rHL species which contained both the myc and flag tags, supporting an oligomeric subunit structure for rHL. Furthermore, the data using the epitope-tagged enzyme shows that this method could be a useful tool not only in identifying the region of the lipase responsible for dimer formation but also to study other protein-protein interactions.

Lipase engineering: a window into structure-function relationships

Utilization of genetic engineering techniques to create novel functional lipases has increased knowledge of structure-function relationships in this important class of enzymes. The examples of engineered lipases presented in this chapter addressed the investigation of domain-specific properties, heparin binding, and subunit orientation. Conclusions reached are credible because the designed lipases retained catalytic activity, implying native, or near-native, conformation. This approach has demonstrated vigor by determining the domain location of several important enzyme functions and by providing the first evidence that LPL subunits are arranged in a head-to-tail orientation. In conjunction with physical techniques, such as crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, the engineered lipase approach could reveal new insights into the mechanism by which lipolysis is accomplished. The studies described here represent only the first attempts to explore that subject; more sophisticated lipase engineering will be used in future as a window into structure-function relationships.

Induced mutant mice expressing lipoprotein lipase exclusively in muscle have subnormal triglycerides yet reduced high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in plasma

To determine the contribution of muscle lipoprotein lipase (LPL) to lipoprotein metabolism, induced mutant mice were generated that express human LPL exclusively in muscle. By cross-breeding heterozygous LPL knockout mice with transgenic mice expressing human LPL only in muscle, animals were obtained that express human LPL primarily in skeletal muscle on either the null (L0-MCK) or normal (L2-MCK) LPL backgrounds, and these were compared with control littermates (L2). Fed and fasted post-heparin plasma (PHP) LPL activities were increased 1.4- and 2.3-fold, respectively, in L2-MCK mice and were normal in L0-MCK mice compared with controls. The specific enzyme activities of human LPL in mouse plasma was comparable to human LPL in human PHP. Skeletal muscle LPL activity was increased in both L2-MCK and L0-MCK mice in the fed (6.6-fold) and fasted (4.2-fold in L2-MCK; and 3.4-fold in L0-MCK) states. Adipose tissue LPL mRNA and activity were not detectable in L0-MCK mice. Growth and body mass composition were similar among all groups. In the fasted and fed state, L2-MCK mice had 31% and 53% reductions, respectively, in plasma triglycerides (TG), compatible with increased PHP LPL activity. Unexpectedly, both in the fasted and fed state the L0-MCK mice also had reduced TG (22%), despite normal PHP LPL activities. Very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) turnover studies revealed that the decreased TG were due to increased particle fractional catabolic rate in both L2-MCK and L0-MCK mice. Despite reduced TG, both L2-MCK and L0-MCK mice showed reduced high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels (16% and 19%, respectively). HDL turnover studies indicated increased HDL cholesteryl ester fractional catabolic rate in the L2-MCK and L0-MCK compared with control mice. In summary, these studies suggest that muscle LPL is particularly potent with regard to VLDL metabolism and is sufficient to compensate for the lack of LPL in other tissues with regard to lipolyzing VLDL particles. With regard to HDL, muscle LPL expression does not result in normal levels due to enhanced breakdown either by mediating accelerated HDL clearance or by failing to establish normal HDL particles that are then cleared more quickly than normal. These studies provide new insights on the tissue-specific effects of LPL on lipoprotein metabolism.

Lipoprotein lipase (EC 3.1.1.34) targeting of lipoproteins to receptors

Summarizing all available data on the role of lipases in targeting lipoproteins to their receptors, we propose the following model: TRL after hydrolysis by LPL have apo E exposed on their surface and might contain one or more molecules of LPL. Both 'apolipoproteins' direct the particles to the cell surface by high-affinity binding to cellular proteoglycans. HL, bound to the surface of hepatocytes can further hydrolyse the particles and together with apo E and LPL mediate the binding to cellular receptors. The most important receptors recognizing these remnants are LRP and VLDLR. The LRP seems to be mainly responsible for the hepatic uptake of remnant lipoproteins, while the VLDLR, mainly located in adipose tissue and muscle, might target the lipoproteins to these tissues for fatty acid delivery.

Uptake of chylomicrons by the liver, but not by the bone marrow, is modulated by lipoprotein lipase activity

We have shown that chylomicrons are catabolized by the liver and bone marrow in rabbits and marmosets. In the present investigation, we studied the role of various apolipoproteins and lipoprotein lipase in the clearance of these particles by the liver and bone marrow in rabbits. Incubation of chylomicrons with purified apolipoprotein (apo) E or C-II resulted in more rapid clearance of these particles from the plasma, whereas incubation of chylomicrons with apoA-I, apoC-I, apoC-III1, or apoC-III2, did not affect their clearance rates. Analysis of tissue uptake revealed that the increased plasma clearance rate of chylomicrons enriched with apoE or apoC-II was primarily due to enhanced uptake by the liver. The uptake of chylomicrons by the bone marrow increased after their enrichment with apoA-I but decreased after their enrichment with apoC-II. Because apoC-II is a cofactor for lipoprotein lipase, we hypothesized that the increased clearance rates were due to faster hydrolysis of chylomicrons and rapid generation of chylomicron remnants. To test this hypothesis, lipoprotein lipase activity was inhibited by injection of an antilipoprotein lipase monoclonal antibody. Inhibition of lipoprotein lipase retarded clearance of chylomicrons from the plasma and decreased their uptake by the liver but did not affect their uptake by the bone marrow. These studies suggest that bone marrow can take up chylomicrons in the absence of lipoprotein lipase activity and provide an explanation for the presence of foam cells in the bone marrow of type I hyperlipoproteinemic patients.